1991-10 RESOLUTION NO. 91 -10
l
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF TPM-90-03 AND E-90-09
AND ITS ASSOCIATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION TO THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
WHEREAS, the applicant, L.A. Wainscott and Associates, property owners/James
Harber and Robert Harber Joint Tenants, have applied for approval of a tentative parcel
map, (Exhibit A), dividing 8.7 acres into 5 lots in Phase I, in the Commercial Manufacturing
Zone located on Van Buren Avenue, (APN# 277-091-63,64);
WHEREAS, a properly notice hearing was held by the Planning Commission on May
16, 1991, and for the purpose of hearing on this matter; and
WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project per Article
6 of the California Environmental Quality Act (Exhibit B) and said Negative Declaration
has been considered by the Planning Commission per Section 15074(a) of the California
Environmental Quality Act.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City
of Grand Terrace, State of California, that the following findings have been made:
1. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed type of development.
2. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development.
3. That the design of the subdivision (Phase I) and the proposed improvements
are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and
avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.
4. That the design of the subdivision (Phase I) or type of proposed
improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems or cause
threat to life and property from a wildland conflagration.
5. That the proposed subdivision (Phase I) together with the provisions for its
design and improvements are consistent with the General Plan.
6. That the proposed subdivision (Phase I) its design, density and type of
development and improvements conform to the conditions imposed by the
regulations of the Development Code, and the regulations of the City of
Grand Terrace.
- NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Planning Commission
of the City of Grand Terrace, California, that TPM-90-03 (Exhibit A) and the
aforementioned Negative Declaration (Exhibit B) are hereby recommended to the City
Council for approval subject to the following conditions:
1. An overall design program shall be approved by the Site and Architectural
Review Board prior to issuance of building permits for any parcel within the
Parcel Map. Such program shall include but not be limited to:
* Minimum architectural design guidelines for the construction of
commercial and office structures.
* Location of buildable pads for each individual lot; and
* Minimum landscaping and property maintenance requirements; and
* Parking and access layout; and
* Reciprocal access between individual parcels.
2. The approval of this parcel map is for the proposed subdivision, Phase I,
illustrated on the map. This does not represent current or future approval of
the referenced proposed remainder parcel, Phase II. In accordance with the
Subdivision Map Act, the remainder parcel shall require the filing of a
tenatative parcel map. An additional overall design program shall be
approved by the Site and Architectural Review Board for the development of
the remainder parcel, Phase H.
3. City Engineer/Building and Safety Department in their memorandum to the
City dated April 29, 1991 (Exhibit C);
4. San Bernardino County, Fire Warden's Department, in their memorandum to
the City dated May 8, 1991 (Exhibit D);
5. Riverside Highland Water in their memorandum to the City dated May 7,
1991 (Exhibit E).
6. San Bernardino County, Office of Special Districts, in their memorandum to
the City dated May 6, 1991 (Exhibit F).
7. Riverside-Corona Resource Conservation District in their memorandum to the
City dated November 27, 1990 (Exhibit G).
8. State of California, Department of Transportation, in their memorandum to
the City dated November 27, 1990 (Exhibit H).
9. City of Riverside, Public Utilities Department, in their memorandum to the
J City dated May 13, 1991 (Exhibit I).
10. The Commerce Way dedication shall be made as a condition of the parcel
map as recommended by the City Engineer however the City shall enter into
a deferral agreement with respect to the construction of Commerce Way
improvements until such time as the remainder parcel develops or Commerce
Way is developed, whichever occurs first, as recommended by the City
Engineer.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Grand
Terrace, California, at a meeting held on the.16th day of May, 1991.
AYES: 6 - CHAIRMAN HAWKINSON, VICE-CHAIRMAN BUCHANAN, COMMISSIONERS
MUNSON, SIMS, VAN GELDER. AND WRIGHT
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 1 - COMMISSIONER HARGRAVE
ABSTAIN: 0
awkinson, Chairman
App�pqing Commission
ATTEST:
- Deputy City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ohn HarpUer, ity ttorn y�
s" SHEL='T 1 OF 1
TEN TA T/ VE
277-091-45 277-09J-23 I 27 7-o9J-2:4 PARCEL MAP /3664
IOC 2
Jm IN Tw a rY cp GnANv mFv�, cE
", I A RESLsa wsyON OF PARCEL MAP 9666 AS RECORDED/N BOCK 106
J PAGES 49 6 49 CF PARCEL MAPS, OF f?ECOROS OF ThE COUNTY OF
— - \ ♦ \!r{9.OI,'I \ \ ?� \ \....._I —_— SAN SERNARO/ND, STATE OF CAL/FORMA
L.A. WA/NSCOTT 6 ASSOC/ATES INC. M4Y/99/
ONAAC w OMAAei"LAI c OL114 (»aee44rra '
ee) e �\ F z1a -091-Oa
\ {I \� ZL►'V/N4 OWNEH I s[I9D/V/QEA
\ \f b \I�# I I lf�Y\r.7 7t12' H Zip\ �� o n A�a\. ` \_`\.�S\\\ /.�AC;.";"•YY.°;\ \ 1I (L� eGMX[geaL7vOTlK,uzs✓W4 ert .
r�eae.
ars
cpt-Iv �CLIF.66n . s vµ
Ow1\lJ
err-xne
RIVIWAFEtr
L.A.WMAMW T B AG:LVAT 1M.
PKMO
\ —i r i-.\�-� awwNo rs�Av.uuF.ae.�
� J r J Ow
.�' rpOrE3i'0
J A.
NK c 973 Q f RALM Q r fAr�f� iw°roiaa�.eo.anre
i
\ • ♦ rcm.a'e WAONC MLL re.e'ro�•
26
VAN/ilY^.C.WP.Yll®
fnu!II!-F211
GAUP.ory"
rsss w
awT wawa
rE CALIF.YP921
WA
� 2_._ Sv' 1 � frM/eWdPN
m ' ' 1. 1 , ` / T ! � 'r i THI f E W�A00l.AfW WArEA GD.
/`^` 11/ I Curwr ewuF.aeaew
r: / ea/ vl tse
1 `�li'ram c M1/
\\\ \� \ Z: I Q i Tlncry s�/ayseoe.e7D.w.gra./m
\ \\ 1 j -1
dEQ-
VAN BUA&M a7-
r
_ + _ --�+s.--=T7'r/dL SenpJ/gC s.O.tn.s/Ac►K•rb./R� aarrJ7 I
o �- LEGE,UD V/C/MTY MAP
/\ l u•� I t.V Li 11W/
TI�� - ` J�1 Lw N .rvoicwrsa frwer r.....
rf J�iJ F� ;�'�
�f .• � A�Aretrr 1= -
277�J0J�J4 277�10J�EOI 277-JOJ�BJ 277-JO1-63 � ��` . A.«, IV ,m ,.
G,K/?f7N9 COMMgwwi mM�/C M/P,C1b"Al.1G A7t4ov,NA'�"A¢7A7V.
. ..:. �maacrwgvr�srsco ar�prxy
C`T), )
Air 7)
Planning
M tiny�ttzHc Department
NOTICE OF FILING NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, a Negative Declaration is hereby
filed on the below referenced project, on the basis that said project will not have a
significant effect on the environment.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT:
TPM-90-03,a Tentative Tract Map 13664,and E-90-09(Environmental Review)subdividing
8.7 acres into 6 commercial lots for commercial and light industrial uses. This project is
within the General Plan's Commercial/Light Industrial Zone.
i
APPLICANT:
L.A. Wainscott and Associates, Inc.
Owner - Harber Companies/Brian Harber
LOCATION:
Van Buren Avenue
APN# 277-091-63/64
Copies of the Negative Declaration and Initial Study for this project are available for review
at the City of Grand Terrace Planning Department, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace
(714-824-6621). Anyone wishing to comment on this project may do so prior to May 28,
1991. All comments should be directed to the Planning Departmewnt.
a.
Maria C. Muett, ` Date
Acting Community Development Director
r�
City of Grand Terrace
E.X H I B*1 T. B.
22795 Barton Road • Grand Terrace, California 92324-5295 (714) 824-6621
° .� Planning
Re.KE)TERRfiC
Department
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, a Negative Declaration is hereby
filed on the below referenced project, on the basis that said project will not have a
significant effect on the environment.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT:
TPM-90-03,a Tentative Tract Map 13664,and E-90-09(Environmental Review)subdividing
8.7 acres into 6 commercial lots for commercial and light industrial uses. This project is
within the General Plan's Commercial/Light Industrial Zone.
APPLICANT:
L.A. Wainscott and Associates, Inc.
Owner - Harber Companies/Brian Harber
LOCATION:
Van Buren Avenue
APN# 277-091-63/64
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT.-
Based upon the attached Initial Study, there is no substantial evidence that the project will
have a significant effect on the environment.
Maria C. Muett ` Date
Acting Community Development Director
City of Grand Terrace
22795 Barton Road • Grand Terrace, California 92324-5295 (714) 824-6621
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY
I Background
1 . Name of Proponent: City of Grand Terrace
2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: City of Grand Terrace
22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, CA 92324-5295
Attention: David Sawyer, Planning Director
3. Date of Environmental Assessment:
4. Agency Requiring Assessment City .of Grand Terrace
.A.tVAA)5dtfTTSNC.-
5. Name of Proposal, if applicable 11A9BEq co gPANIEs
-rpm-- `i 0--6 3/E--,7v-d 9
6. Location of Proposal: VAGAW Lm' oN VAN BUREN
II Environmental Impacts
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are provided on
attached sheets.)
Yes Maybe No
1 . Earth. Will the proposal result in:
a. Unstable earth conditions- or in
changes in geologic -substructures?
b. Disruptions, displacements, compac-
tion or overcovering of the soil? �(
c. Substantial change in topography or
ground surface relief features?
d. The destruction, covering or modi-
fication of any unique geologic or
physical features? J(
' e. Any substantial increase in. wind or
t water erosion of soils, either on or
or off site? YV-
Yes Maybe No
- f. Changes in deposition or erosion of
beach sands, or changes in siltation,
deposition or erosion which may modify
the channel of a river or stream or
the bed of the ocean or any bay,
inlet or lake?
g. Exposure of people or property
to geologic hazards such as earth
quakes, landslides, mudslides, ground Y
failure, or similar hazards?
2. Air. Will the proposal result in:
a. Substantial air emissions or deterior-
ation of ambient air quality?
b. The creation of objectionable odors?
c. Alteration of air movement, moisture;
or temperature, or any change in
climate, whether locally or regionally?
3. Water. Will the proposal result in:
a. Substantial changes -in currents, or the
course or direction of water movements,
in either marine or fresh waters?
b. Substantial changes in absorption rates,
drainage .patterns, or the rate and
amount of surface runoff? X
c. Alterations to the course or flow
• of flood waters? X
d. Change in the amount of -surface water
in any water body?
e. Discharge into surface waters, or in
any alteration of surface water qual-
ity, including, but not limited to,
temperature, dissolved oxygen or
turbidity?
f. Alteration of the direction or rate
of flow of ground waters?
Yes Maybe No
g. Change in the quantity of .ground
waters, either through direct addi-
tions or withdrawals, -or through inter-
ception of.an aquifer by cuts or
excavations? x
h. Substantial reduction in the amount
of water otherwise available for
public water supplies?
i. Exposure of people or .property to
water related hazards such as flood-
ing or -tidal waves?
4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of species,
or number of any native species of plants
(including trees, shrubs, grass,
crops, and aquatic plants)? )(
b. Reduction of the numbers, of any
unique, rare, or endangered -species
of plants?
c. Introduction of new species -of plants
into an area of native vegetation, or
in a barrier to the normal replenish-
ment of existing species? T
d. Substantial reduction in acreage of
any agricultural crop?
5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of species, or
numbers of any species of animals
(birds, land animals including rep-
tiles, fish and shellfish, benthic
organisms or insects)?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique,
rare or endangered species of animals?
c. Deterioration to existing fish or
Wildlife habitat?
.r -'3 ..I L :I{�}" t3: d-s�'�'- .(L'fi>s1L'113-��-Ia .uatnj.elly..1_a IaF�•Ff�'a" .��I '� Jfa tll YI.f4k ! 4..L.��aM�
I�ViFn �i[.
Yes Maybe No
r 6. Noise. Will the proposal result in:
a. Increases in existing noise levels?
b. Exposure of people to severe noise
levels? X
7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce
substantial new light or glare?
8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a
substantial alteration of the present or
planned land use of an area?
9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal
result in:
a. Substantial increase in the rate of use
of any natural resources? �(
b. Substantial depletion of any non-
renewable natural resource?
10. Risk -of Upset. .Will the proposal involve:
,—, a. A risk of an explosion or the release
of hazardous substances (including,
but not limited to, oil, pesticides,
chemicals or radiation) in the event
of an accident or upset conditions? x
b. Possible interference with an emerg-
ency response plan or an emergency
evacuation plan?
11 . Population. Will the .proposal alter the
location, distribution, density, or growth
rate of the human population of an area?
12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing
housing or create a demand for additional
housing?
! 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the pro-
proposal result in:
a. Generation of substantial additional
vehicular movement?
f
_77-
Yes Maybe No
_ b. Effects on existing parking facili-
ties, or demand for new parking? X
c. Substantial impact upon existing
transportation systems?
d. Alterations to present patterns of
circulation or movement of people
and/or goods?
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or
air traffic?
f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor
vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians?
14. Public Services. Will the proposal have
substantial effect upon, .or result in a need
for new or altered governmental services in
any of the following areas:
a. Fire protection?
b. Police protection?
c. Schools?
d. Parks or other recreational faci-
lities?
e. Maintenance of public facilities,
including roads? X
f. Other governmental services?
15. Energy. Will the proposal result -in:
a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel
or energy?
b. Substantial increase in demand upon
existing sources of energy, or re-
quire the development of new sources
' of energy?
16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a
need for new systems, or substantial
alterations to the following utilities:
a. Power or natural gas?
Yes .Maybe No
b. Communications systems?
c. Water?
d. Sewer or septic tanks? Y
e. Storm water drainage? X
f. Solid waste and disposal?
17. Human Health. Will the proposal result
in:
a. Creation of any health hazard or
potential health hazard (excluding
mental health)?
b. Exposure of people to potential
health hazards? ]�
18. Aesthetics. Will the .proposal result
in the obstruction of any scenic vista
or view open to the public, or will the
proposal result in the creation of an
aesthetically offensive site open to
public view? }�
19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in
an impact upon the quality or quantity
of existing recreational opportunities?
20. Cultural Resources.
a. Will the proposal result in the
alteration of or the destruction of
a prehistoric or historic archaeo-
logical site? �(
b. Will the proposal result in adverse
physical or aesthetic effects to a
prehistoric or historic building,
structure, or object?
' c. Does the proposal have the potential
to cause a physical change which
would affect unique ethnic cultural
values?
r
= Yes Maybe No .
d. Will the proposal restrict existing
religious or sacred uses within the
- potential impact area?
21 . Mandatory Findings of Significance.
a. Does the project have the potential
to degrade the quality of the environ-
ment, substantially reduce the habitat
of a fish or wildlife species, cause
a' fish or wildlife population to drop
below self sustaining levels, threaten
'to eliminate a plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of the
major periods of California history
or prehistory?
b. Does the project have the potential
to achieve short-term, to the dis-
advantage of long-term, environ-
mental goals? (A short-term impact
on the environment is one which oc-
curs in a relatively brief, definitive
period of time while long-term impacts
will endure well into the future.)
c. Does the project have impacts which
are individually limited, but cumu-
latively considerable? (A project's
impact on two or more separate
resources may be relatively small, but
where the effect of the total of
those impacts •on the environment
is significant.)
d. Does the project have environmental
effects which will cause substan-
tial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant
effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be
prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a signi-
ficant effect on the environment, there will not be a signi-
ficant. effect in this case because the mitigation measures
described on attached sheets have been added to the
project. A -NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED.
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on"
the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is
required.
Planning Director
Date SignatvTAJ
-� For .City of Grand Terrace
III. DISCUSSION OF THE
ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
Lb, c
3.b The development of this currently vacant site will result in the overcovering
of a certain percentage of the soil. This impact will be mitigated by utilizing
proper drainage methods which will be reviewed and approved by the
Building and Engineering Department.
6. a The existing noise levels may increase as a result of the development of
commercial/light industrial uses in an.area that is currently vacant. This
impact will be within the allowable levels as set in the Master Environmental
Analysis for the General Plan.
7. The proposed project may produce new light or glare however this will be
mitigated by directing the lighting away from any surrounding residential areas
and compliance with the Grand Terrace Municipal Code Off-Street Parldng
Ordinance.
13.a,b,f The future development of this site into a commercial/light industrial u;se will
result in the increase of additional vehicular movement and may result in the
demand for new parking. There may also be an increase in traffic hazards to
motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians. These hazards will be mitigated
within the conditions adopted for this project. Also, these impacts will be
within the Traffic Circulation Element of the Master Environmental Analysis
for the General Plan.
CITY
UPS �� W.O. 12-2.1074
GRAND TERR CE
M E M O R A N D U M
22795 Barton Road
Grand Terrace TO: Maria Muett, Acting Community Development Director
California 92324-5295
FROM: Joseph Kicak, City Engineer
Civic Center
(714)824-6621 DATE: April 29, 1991
SUBJECT: Tentative Parcel Map 13664
Following recommendations should be considered as conditions of approval
of the proposed Tentative Parcel Map.
Byron R.Matteson 1 . Commerce Way
Mayor
(a) Dedicate to provide for 44 foot half street plus 10 feet.
Hugh J.Grant
Mayor Pro Tempore (b) Install curb and gutter 32 feet from street centerline on east
side.
Gene Carlstrom
ca�aaJ M.Christianson (c) Construct standard berm 10 feet west of centerline.
Herman Hilkey
Council Members (d) Construct standard roadway between new curb and the berm.
Thomas J. Schwab 2. Van Buren Street
City Manager
(a) Install curb and gutter 20 feet from street centerline.
(b) Construct standard roadway between new curb and street
centerline.
3. Street "A"
(a) Dedicate to provide for 64 feet of right-of-way along with
standard cul-de-sac at north end.
(b) Install curb and gutter at 20 feet from street centerline and
standard location along the cul-de-sac.
(c) Construct standard roadway between new curbs.
4. Structural sections of all streets shall be designed to TI=8.
5. Construct standard sidewalk.
6. Install ornamental street lights.
EXHIBIT C
Memorandum to Maria Muett
April 29, 1991
Page 2
7. Provide hydrology study.
8. Construct adequate drainage facilities.
9. Install sanitary sewer to serve all lots.
10. Show proof of paying off the sewer assessment or reapportion any
outstanding bond amounts.
11 . Provide will serve letter from Riverside Highland Water Company.
12. Provide Preliminary Soils and Geology Reports.
13. Grading shall be completed on all phases, in conjunction with Phase
I, in accordance with Chapter 70 of the U.B.C.
14. Obtain storm run-off acceptance letter from property owners affected
by development of this parcel .
15. Pay all permit, inspection fees and capital improvement fund fees in
effect at the time of recording.
16. Coordinate with City of Riverside regarding the existing 42"
diameter water line. Each sheet of plans having impact on this
facility shall have provisions for approval by the City of Riverside
as to protection of the 42" diameter line.
17. All improvements shall -be designed by owner's Civil Engineer to the
specifications of the City.
JK/ct
SAN BEVNARDIHO COUNTY
E!rVjRQjrr TAL mu .G.. l GROUP
PALS ESSA�oE - COVER SHEE
(F"- i (714)
pAT
DZPAMMM
R o
�1 N=ber of Pages (including this page)
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: Ne ,
CrYN sib, •
If you experience any problems in receiving this information
as contact the operator whose name is noted below:
ns=t n CFe wear Phone
WPCTR:APPLICATIONS :FAX, COVER.SHEET E X H I B I T. D
' 0AN FIRE WARDEN COUNTY 4F rSAN SERNAFtDINC
Firs pV0tV.0 vn Planning ��roc v voca�7w ('10-K—f$i Or" Canna OFFICE C� PUBLIC SAFETY
i;� A&TOWhsnd Avenue. F`•n's Floor a ��s: rnardir.o. CA 924IS•0186 FLOYD TIDWFU, 71rectw
1141 U7.4.212. 387-421 t�ytll�1/i/l�
EMERGENCY SERd/iCES
Date- Ca
-
.
-he following circled conditions apply to your project.
Fire Department Reference Number: /"a "' .- ` a `Q
F�1 The above referenced project is protected by the San
Bernardino County Forestry and Fire Warden Department.
Prior to any construction occurring on any parcel, the
applicant shall contact the Fire Department for
verification of current Fire Protection requirements.
�°- All now construction shall comply with the existing
Unisf®rm Fire Code Requirements and all applicable
statues, codes; ordinances, or standards of the Fire
Department,
F-3 The street address shall be posted with a minimum of
four (4) inch nwribers, visible from the street and
during the hours of darkneas the numbers shell be
?ow voltage in'.ernally electrically illuminated.
posted numbers shall contrast with their background
and be legible from the street in accordance with the
Uniform Fire Code. where building set backs exceed
104 feet from the roadway, additional contrasting four
( 4) inch numbers shall be displayed at the property
access entrance.
F_a prior to final inspection or occupancy each chimney
used in conjunction with any fireplace or any heating
appliance in which solid or liquid fuel is used shall
be maintained with- an approved spark arrester as
identified in the Uniform Fite Code.
F-5 Pri®r to any oonetr'uction occurring, all flam.able
vegetation shall be r4Wovad from each building site a
minimum distance of thirty (30) feet from any
flarw.able building material, including a finished
structure.
F-a Prior to final inspection or occupancy
the development
and each phase thereof shall have two (2) points of
,,
a' o was fo fire and other emergency
�G't�lj��[T1E'I»v anC"q' For rcutez of escapQ which will S-afely
handle evac.iations as rtqujred. in the development
code.
F-7 Prior to final inspection or occupancy, private
roads iays which exceed one-hundred and fifty ( 150)
feet a.n length shall be approved by the Fire
Department having jurisdiction, and shall be extended
`o within one hunc2rod and fifty ( 150) feaat, of, and
shall give reasonable access to all portions of the
a tea for walls of the first story of any building. An
accaas road shall be provided within fifty ( 50) feat
of all buildings if the natural grade between the
accese road and the building is in excess of thirty
percent (10) . Where the access roadway cannot be
provided, an approved fire protection system or
systems shall be provided, as required and approved by
the Fire Department.
F--8 Prior to finial inspection or occupancy a turn-around
shall be provided at the end of .each roadway, one-
hundred and fifty (150) feet or more in longth and
ehall be approved by the Fir® Department. Cul-de-sac
r length shall not exceed six-hundred (600) feet except
as identified In the development code and approved by
the chiaf.
F-9 Private road maintenance, including but not limited to
grading and snow removAl, shall he provided for prior
to recordatior. or approval. Written doo=ontation
shall be submitted to the Fire Department having
jurisdiction. Private fire access roads shall provide .•
an all weather surface with minintun. paving width of
twenty (20) feet.
F--IQ Water systems deSiaa�ed► to fleet the required fire flow
F-010
of this development shall be app.-ove4 by the Fire
Department having jurisdiction. The developer shall
furnish the Fire Department with two eopie@ of the
water systom improvement plan for approval and a
letter from the Water Purveyor stating the
availability of the required 'fire flow pri.ox to
recordation. Water systems shall be operational and
approved by thv Fire Department prior to any
construction occurring. The required fire flow shall
be deter wined by appropriate calculations, using the
Required Fire Flow•" in areas without water-serving
of
San Bernardino County Quids f De
water-serving
uti,litid he re protection water systerl shall be
based on NFPA pamphlet num]"r 1231 and Uniform fir*
Code reTai,rements
(�'i6-.0 't�, A, 600 �
F_i 0 MS-IL3 THROUGH IL5
riater Systems designed to me®t the seguired fire flogs
Shall be c;,yezational and apprgivead by the Fire
Departmer t prior to any cons`ru,tlon occurring. The
req',,{red f y re `.glow *hall deete�rmineed^ by appropriate
Cal, ide
ula-ions, 4 s-jiiq the ► an Bernardino Coun4Y li/�,
F� The Detel-mina►t.ion of Recruired F,�ire Flow" . vIn
aaeas witrIout water-s-rvtng utilities, or fire
protect..on water serving utilities, the firo
protection water system shall be based on N.F.P.A.
Pearphlet Nur'ber 1231 and the San Bernardino County
Uniform Fire Code.
Cr- orto Duildin.g permits being issued approved fire
Cr-11)
hydrants and fire hydrant pavement markers shall be
bnatajled- Fire hydrants shall be 61' diameter with a
rn1niT►1um Qne 411 and one 2 1/2j1 connection. The hydrant
and Sire hydrant markers shall be approved by Fire
Department. All fire hydrant spacing shall be 300
bee: with the exception of single family residential
which ri1ay be increased to 600 feet maximum,
F-.12 Frio- to final jnspectlon or occupancy thin
development shall comply with Fire Safety overlay
conditlQrs az adopted in County Ordinance Number 33*1.
The development is located in Fire Review Area,
F-13 Prior t6 .Issuance of a building permit a fuel
modification zone in compliance with county standards
��+ reruir wd i 4
P-14 Prior to r"Inal inapecti.on or occupancy, an approved
Fire Department key box is recuired. If autam&tie
Olgcbric Sgogrjty gates are used art approved lock
switch is required on each gate in lieu of the box.
gueat.ions and/.or cor ents may be directed to the Fire
p4otection planning Section; County Government Center, 385
14orth Arrowhead,. 1st Floor, San Bernardino, California,
92415-0186; car 0411 (714) 381-4225. Thank you to; your
cooperation.
sin eraly,
DA.viD fJ. DRISCOLL, Chief
county Fire wa}'ddanBy
tea y
Fire Pr ctiG Officer
i
n ' n _
h qb
1450 Washington Street • Colton, California 92324 (714) 825-4128
�HSERYIJry.O�• -...
May 7, 1991
MARIA C. MUETT
Acting Community Development Director
City of Grand Terrace
22795 Barton Road
Grand Terrace, cA 92324-5295
RE: Negative Declaration TPM-90-03, TTM 13664
Harbor Companies/Brian Harbor
Dear Ms. Muett,
Riverside Highland Water Company is concerned about section #16-
Utilities Subsection C - Water. Until . such time that the San
Bernardino Fire Marshall 's office can review the specific
building designs and useages and makes a determination of
required fire flows,-. Section #16 C should be marked MAYBE.
The water requirements can certainly be mitigated by water main
design and reservoir capacity. However, until the Fire Marshall
has responded with required flows a water system cannot be
designed and therefore, no street improvements should be
considered.
Thank You.
Since
gene P. Mc eans
General Manager
EPM/kb RAY. 9 1991
EXHIBI
T E.
S41J`
1450 V�%sjl izagtOn St
T R A N S M I T A L
TIME
I w GX :iJI�ER:(714 f
DATE: � "
TO:
FROM, g--
F INCL*JA?Nr, THIS FORI4:�_
TOTAL NUrTBER OF PAG.-S, b � � r' - CIO
`T P m
DOCUMEI;T/LETTER TRANSMITTED:
L'GSCR QN OF
�., ; rz� a : -► .� - a 0 4
n.1 C s .
r
IF ALL PAGES ArE NOT REGEIVE!� OR TU^'k"
PLEASE CALL (714) 82 -4120. THANK YOU.
TC!TwL
t E ' '.i0U--Y si SA F; i�f?i�li
1�
_�SJaa {{�}6 tom++�y'y� LS q° yg yty �ti 1 y�l;j� %
a3T V 1(63;Lam. O F @ E S�d� IFS" 2 E I Z, �\ a
..pNY•�A_ _ .';�'..-l.,+ay.9s" �>-� r-.f�.-s�-.7��.-_"_ ' �'r' rr,�r
VERNON G. l;?dOURCK
Dt Flfth 8treat Sacs 5w:nd:dino, CA 92415-0450 1714) 307.5240 �
✓%�l;�l`\� ��s:,c �+t ��tlf ifiattae3Ya ^tic�'
'Cat ca er • :71 3 387.596E i 1 l 4 6w Spe.-N! Did16016
May 6, 1991
David R. sawyer
Community Development Director
city of Grand Terrace
22795 Barton Road
Grand Terrace, CA 92324-5295
REs YG13R PILE NO. TPN-90 -09t B-90 -b9P
COON—Ly SERVICE 2UREA 70,t XX2R0V-2MEij' ZONE Nr xL8sEsst1ENT
DISTRICT NO. 1* ASSESSOP.sa PARCEL N08o 277- 091-63 A14D
277-091-64 t A0S2S81-MN1° NOS, 21-060
Dear fir. Sawyer:
Our records indicate the above referenced project, as identified
by Assessor's Parcel Nays. 277-091-63 and 277-091-641 lies *within
county service Area 70_, Improvement Zone H, Assessment DistrAct
No. 1.
The assessment lien pursuant to the .improtiement bond Act of 1915
has been paid in gull during the 30-day cash collection period for
these parcels. Therefore, no assessment apportiQnment Or
assessment payoff will be required, pursuant to this act, for the
proposed project. For more information please contact Mark Von
Wald at (714) 387-5829..
very t - 1 ours,
MARK VON W'ALD
Staff Analyst
Development ServiQes Division
Office of Special Districts
a:grntrrce.nk2/5
s
EXHIBIT- F
°E o,
_10 Riverside-Corona
Resource Conservation District
� r
m _ U
~cam CO2023CHICAGO AVENUE,B14 • RIVERSIDE,CALIFORNIA 92507 • PHONE(714)683-7691
9
C0AfEFN
November 27, 1990
Dear David R Sawyer
We acknowledge receipt or the Preparation of an Environmental Impact
Report for TPN1-90-03, E-90-09
in- Riverside County, California that was addressed to the USDA-Soil
Conservation Service and the Riverside-Corona Resource Conservation
District on November 27, 1990for review and comment.
We have reviewed the above Notice of Preparation of an Environmental
Impact Report and find that:
1 . There are no controversial items in the report within the realm of
the Soil Conservation Service's expertise and responsibilities.
a. We do not find any serious potential problems with soil erosion
and/or flooding within the project area.
b. There is no Prime, State, Unique or Locally Important Farmland
involved in the project area.
c. We find no conflict with any SCS on-going or planned programs
or projects.
We find that the items listed below should be reviewed by your
committee:
We do have a concern with the an amt and type of foreign
tPr;al deposited on'-.site. For ccxnpaction much of
this material should be excavated. We -see rio proposed
drainage system for runoff and wmM recamend a system
be desiqned.
We appreciate the opportunity to review and comment on this proposed
project..
Sincerely,
STANIEY 000LEY
Vie-President E X H I B1 T G
STATE OF CALIFORNIA—BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN, Governor
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
4D_ "
DISTRICT 8, P.O. BOX 231 SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA 92402
TDD (714) 383-4609
November 27, 1990
08-SBd-215-1.312
Mr. David R. Sawyer
Community Development Director
City of Grand Terrace
22795 Barton Road
Grand Terrace, CA 92324
RE: Tentative Parcel Map 90-03, E-90-09
Dear Mr. Sawyer:
We have reviewed the above-referenced document and request
consideration of the following comments:
o It is recognized that there is considerable public concern
about noise levels adjacent to heavily traveled highways.
Land development, in order to be compatible with this
concern, may require special noise attenuation measures.
Development of this property should include any necessary
noise attenuation.
o Cumulative impacts on the Iowa Avenue and Barton Road
Interchanges should be investigated further and mitigation
measures must be considered to reduce peak and off peak
vehicle trips.
If you have any questions, please contact Tony Calvillo at (714)
383-6285 or FAX (714) 383-4936.
Very truly yours,
HARVEY J. SAWYER
Chief, Transportation Planning
Branch B
E.XHIBIT. . H
CITY OF PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT 3900 Main Street . Riverside. California . 92522
May 13, 1991
BILL 0.CARNAHAN
Public Utilities Director
City of Grand Terrace, Planning Dept.
22795 Barton Road
Grand Terrace, CA 92324-5295
Attn: Mr. David R. Sawyer,
Community Development Director
Subject: Tentative Parcel Map 13664 - Subdivision of Two Parcels
on Van Buren Street(APN-277-091-63 & 64)
Refer: Your File No. TPN-90-03,- E-90-09
Dear Mr. Sawyer:
We have reviewed the Tentative Parcel Map and Conceptual Grading
Plan for the subject property. The City of Riverside has an
existing .42-inch water transmission main located within a 30-foot
wide easement running North-South along the West property line of
this development. We have the following comments/requirements:
1 . ) The exact horizontal and vertical location/alignment of
the 42-inch waterline shall be verified by the developer.
Coordinate potholing with Mr. Adrian Saint at 782-5428.
2. ) Submit grading, street improvement, storm drain, and any
other utility plans for new Commerce Way for our review
and approval to ensure adequate cover and clearances are
maintained.
3. ) Adequate drainage protection facilities are required
where the proposed 20-foot wide drainage easement crosses
our 30-foot easement.
4. ) The Remainder Parcel should be a numbered parcel(s) for
the development shown on the Conceptual Grading Plan.
5. ) Since the City of Riverside does not issue non-
interference letters, an Easement Certificate for
signature by the Director of Public Utilities of the City
of Riverside is required on the Record Map.
EXHIBIT I
Should you have any questions or need additional information,
please contact me at 782-5304.
Sincerely,
Richard S. Dro
Senior Engineer
cc: Brian Simpson
grdterr.ltr