06/14/1990CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - JUNE 14, 1990
A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace was called
to order in the Council Chambers, Grand Terrace Civic Center, 22795 Barton
Road, Grand Terrace, California, on June 14, 1990, at 6:00 p.m.
PRESENT: Byron Matteson, Mayor
Hugh J. Grant, Mayor Pro Tem
Barbara Pfennighausen, Councilmember
Jim Singley, Councilmember
Gene Carlstrom, Councilmember
Thomas J. Schwab, City Manager/Finance Director
Randall Anstine, Assistant City Manager
Juanita Brown, City Clerk
David Sawyer, Community Development Director
Joe Kicak, City Engineer
Alan Burns, Deputy City Attorney
ABSENT: John Harper, City Attorney
The meeting was opened with invocation by Pastor Tom Comstock, Assembly of God,
followed by the Pledge of Allegiance led by Mayor Pro Tem Grant.
Mayor Matteson convened City Council meeting at 6:00 p.m.
Mayor Matteson reconvened City Council meeting at 6:05 p.m.
ITEMS TO DELETE
Item 8A - Appropriation for FY 89/90 SCJPIA General Liability
Retroactive Payment.
SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
2A. Lisa Coburn 22997 Orangewood; introduced Christy Fitzgerald,
Miss Grand Terrace 1990, and first runner-up, Jennifer Carter.
She presented Council with a portrait of Miss Grand Terrace for
display.
2B. Mayor Matteson read a Proclamation for the Preservation of
United States Route 66 as an Historic Highway.
CONSENT CALENDAR
CC-90-51 MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM GRANT, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER
PFENNIGHAUSEN, CARRIED 5-0, to approve the remainder of the Consent
Calendar with the removal of Items A and D.
Council Minutes - 6/14/90
Page 2
B. RATIFY 6/14/90 CRA ACTION
C. WAIVE FULL READING OF ORDINANCES ON AGENDA
E. COUNCILMEMBER'S REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION OF APPEAL OF
PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION SA-90-03 (OUTDOOR DESIGNS/
GENEL)
F. BID SPECIFICATIONS FOR SENIOR CENTER
ITEM FOR DISCUSSION
3A. APPROVE CHECK REGISTER NO. 061490
Mayor Pro Tem Grant, asked City Engineer Kicak if Check No.
P672 , progress payment to Matich Corp., is based on his
determination that the job has been done in accordance with
specifications and that he is satisfied with the job.
City Engineer Kicak, stated that that is correct and indicated
that a request is made each month for a progress payment and
the request is reviewed to make sure that the work is
completed.
CC-90-52 MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM GRANT, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER SINGLEY,
CARRIED 5-0, to approve Check Register no. 061490.
3D. APPROVE 5/24/90 MINUTES
Councilmember Pfenni hausen, pointed out an error on page 6
stating that it Should read, "requested a list of the people
who have submitted plans for all the vacant property. . ."
CC-90-53 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER PFENNIGHAUSEN, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER
SINGLEY, CARRIED 4-0-0-1 (MAYOR MATTESON ABSTAINED), to approve May
24, 1990 Minutes with stated correction.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Ed O'Neal, 22608 Minona Dr., Grand Terrace; indicated that he is
pleased with the handrails that were recently put in at the
Community Center and requested that handrails also be put at the
main entrance of the Civic Center and suggested that faucet knobs
for the handicapped be put in the restrooms. He reported that the
Safety Fair was successful and indicated that they are planning a
parade for next year.
Tony Petta, 11875 Eton Dr., Grand Terrace; indicated that he has
eat many positive comments about the improvements on Barton
Road. He indicated that he has heard from many residents that they
would like to see the large dumpsters for trash pick-up throughout
the City on a monthly basis and asked Council to give it
consideration. He gave a report on Chamber activities.
11
Council Minutes - 6/14/90
Page 3
ORAL REPORTS
5A. Committee Reports
1. Parks & Recreation Committee
(a) Upgrade of Pico Parksite
City Manager Schwab, reported that on April 4th Mr.
U7-55-5-M came before Council requesting that the Pico
Parksite be upgraded so that Little League games could be
played. The Committee recommends that permanent bases,
pitching mound rubbers, a home -run fence, bleachers,
portable restrooms and trash cans be installed. Southern
California Edison, who is the property owner, has indicated
that these types of non -permanent additions could be
installed. The Committee recommends that Council direct
staff to ascertain what costs would be incurred to make the
improvements and return to Council with a report. He
indicated that this project would be funded out of the park
fund.
CC-90-54 MOTION BY MAYOR MATTESON, SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM GRANT, CARRIED
5-0, to direct staff to ascertain a cost estimate for the
improvements and report back to Council.
5B. Council Reports
Councilmember Pfenni hausen, indicated that at the last Council
meeting a resident made reference to forming our own school
district. She indicated that it is not likely that we will have a
high school within our jurisdiction, so the passage of a bond issue
would be critical to the students in Grand Terrace who will be
attending Colton High School. She felt that the cost of forming
our own school district could be detrimental to many residents in
Grand Terrace and we need to make the school district that we have
accountable and function for us. She indicated that the General
Plan Consultant recommended upgrading our park facilities by at
least the acquisition and development of a 10-acre parksite that
would give the kind of recreational opportunities that a community
of this quality and size deserves. She indicated that we need
something other than what we can put at the Pico Park site. We
need to start looking forward to the recreational needs of all the
ages within our City and start looking for 10 acres of land that we
can start to develop.
Councilmember Carlstrom, indicated that he is pleased with the
improvements ma a to Barton Road. He felt that it has improved the
entrance to our City and indicated that he is looking forward to
improving the intersection of Mt. Vernon and Barton Road as well as
the continuity of the block walls along Barton Road.
Council Minutes - 6/14/90
Page 4
Mayor Pro Tem Grant, reported that he attended the San Bernardino
Associated overnments meeting on June 6th where the State
Transportation Improvement program was discussed. He indicated
that the I-215 improvements between the county line and the
interchange was approved but because of the time it is going to
take to resolve problems of making it compatible with the part of
the freeway being reconstructed in Riverside, it was placed at a
low priority. He indicated that several years ago the Council made
the decision to paint the curb green at 11959 Arliss Dr. on behalf
of a man who suffered a lot from others. He reported that that man
is no longer with us and suggested that the green paint be
removed. He indicated that he is opposed to efforts by other
cities to get a third city member designated to the Local Agency
Formation Commission and requested that this be put on the next
agenda for discussion. He indicated that he is looking forward to
the franchise on refuse collection particularly in view of the rate
increase. He requested that a resolution opposing the desecration
of the American flag be put on the next agenda.
Mayor Matteson, reported that while he was home he had an attempted
teak -in an encouraged everyone to be cautious. He indicated that
Colton -Terrace Little League will be having a tournament July 9-26
at the Colton Municipal Park. He reported that the trash fees will
be going up. He indicated that off -ramps are key areas for
beautification and felt that Council should look at this in the
coming year.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
6C. SP-90-01, TTM-90-01, E-90-01 (PORTER DEVELOPMENT/HANSEN)
Community Development Director Sawyer, reported that this is an
application tor a Specific Plan, Tentative Tract Map 14816 and
Negative Declaration for a 19-unit residential planned unit
development on the east side of Grand Terrace Road. The subject
property contains approximately 2.53 acres of land in an R2 Zone
(Low Medium Density Residential District) and is presently vacant.
The development will consist entirely of 3-bedroom single-family
detached units, each with 1,556 to 1,572 square feet of living area
and attached two -car garages. The project is designed as a planned
unit development with the individual units being sold independently
and the remainder of the property to be held in ownership by the
Homeowner's Association, the majority of which is to be common
ground available to all of the homeowners. He recommended that
Council adopt a Resolution approving TTM-90-01, SP-90-01 and
E-90-01 and the associated Negative Declaration subject to the
conditions of approval contained therein.
Roger Porter, Developer; stated that he has tried to bring a
qualityevelopment to Grand Terrace and has taken a very
professional approach. He indicated that he would be happy to
answer any questions.
-11
Council Minutes - 6/14/90
Page 5
Mayor Matteson opened discussion to the public, there being none he
returned discussion to Council.
Mayor Pro Tem Grant, indicated that the plans show a decorative
block wall and askeir if it will be slumpstone. He felt that other
types of block walls invite vandalism.
City Engineer Kicak, indicated that the words "decorative block
wa would ouT a precision block wall.
Community Development Director Sawyer, indicated that the type of
wa asnbeen defined. The front wall which will be facing onto
Grand Terrace Road, the applicant had indicated that they were
going to put in a brick wall and I would anticipate that the wall
that would be along the parameter of the project could also be a
block wall with stucco and capped in order to tie into the stucco
portions of the wall. He indicated that that would be acceptable
to staff.
Mayor Pro Tem Grant, expressed concern that the wall would be a
target for graffiti.
Community Development Director Sawyer, indicated that this
particular wall would only be the portion that would be adjacent to
other private properties and not adjacent to a public right-of-way
or street so there wouldn't be as much of a chance for graffiti.
He indicated that if Council would prefer slumpstone block walls,
that would also be acceptable to staff.
Councilmember Sin ley, asked the developer if he objects to
s umpstone instead of what has been proposed.
Roger Porter, Developer; indicated that from his experience he has
found t a graffiti on a smooth surface can be easily painted over
and on a rough surface such as slumpstone that has a natural color
in it you have to try to match that color and then you would get a
patchy look. This is one of the reasons why we had the stucco. It
is easier to paint over and it would tie in with our mediteranean
architecture better. He felt that it is surrounded by private
property owners and the chance of graffiti is minimal.
Mayor Pro Tem Grant, indicated that the private property in
question is an RV Park and will have a transient population so
there may not be people who care to keep the park nice. He felt
that the block wall should be slumpstone.
Councilmember Pfenni hausen, felt that this project does not have
enough recreational common area. She felt that a tot lot and one
F spa are not adequate and indicated that she would like to see the
three units that occupy part of the center space removed and the
whole center area dedicated to recreation. She made reference to a
letter from the Colton School District regarding the impact this
Council Minutes - 6/14/90
Page 6
project would have on the schools. She indicated that she could
not, in good conscience, vote yes on the Negative Declaration where
there has been obvious and valid concern raised in the area of
school impact. She felt that the project would also create a need
for additional recreational facilities. She stated that she will
have to vote "NO" on the project unless more common area can be
opened. She indicated that if the project is approved she would
like to have this Council make it a condition that the CC&R's
attached to the project be reviewed and approved by the City prior
to the permits being issued or occupancy permits being issued.
City Manager Schwab, indicated that staff would recommend the
TCET's—Fe reviewed prior to certificate of occupancy.
Councilmember Carlstrom, indicated that he would also like to see
more open space in t e center of the project.
Roger Porter, Developer; felt that the recreation area proposed is
adequate.
Councilmember Sin ley, indicated that he would be in favor of
supporting the project with Unit #5 removed to allow more open area
in the center.
Roger Porter, indicated that he would be willing to remove Unit #5.
Mayor Matteson, indicated that if Unit #5 was removed there would
e room or a swimming pool and felt that it would be a better
project.
Councilmember Pfenni hausen, indicated that she could make a
compromise by taking #5 out, although, she felt that this project
does not have the amenities that make the PUD a viable project.
Roger Porter, indicated that he is willing to remove one unit and
expand the recreation area to include more open area and a swimming
pool.
CC-90-55 MOTION BY MAYOR MATTESON, SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM GRANT, to approve
SP-90-01, TTM-90-01 and E-90-01 with the removal of Unit #5 and
include a swimming pool and a slumpstone wall; the CC&R's are to be
reviewed and approved by Council prior to Certificate of Occupancy.
Councilmember Pfenni hausen, asked what the Cities position would
e if Councilapproves the Negative Declaration knowing that there
is potential impact.
Community Development Director Sawyer, indicated that this
particular project would produce approximately 21 students. That's
six students over what the general plan had indicated this piece of
property would generate. Staff felt that the comments were valid
in the Specific Plan, which indicated that they anticipate that the
Council Minutes - 6/14/90
Page 7
future purchasers of these units will be of the area and you can
anticipate that there will be students moving into this project
that are already in the school district. Overall, staff did not
feel that six students is enough to generate a substantial impact
on the school district. He indicated that if you don't agree with
that, the Negative Declaration could be marked "Maybe or "Yes."
Then you would have to come back with mitigation measures and an
analysis that says how you will prevent this from being a problem.
Deputy City Attorney Burns, indicated that there is a 30-day
statute of limitations on challenging a Negative Declaration once
the filing has been made.
MOTION CC-90-55 CARRIED 5-0.
6B. Appeal of Planning Commission's Decision SA-90-09 (Cather/O'Connor)
City Manager Schwab, gave a slide presentation of various types of
over ea ec-Ts 'invarious communities showing examples of the types
of decks that will hopefully be prevented. He indicated that the
Planning Commission has come up with some guidelines that they are
recommending to Council.
Community Development Director Sawyer, indicated that on May 15th
t e anning commission set gui a ines for overhead decks and voted
for approval. The purpose of the guidelines is to provide property
owners the ability to have some parameters that they could work
with when designing their overhead decks. The guidelines reflect
the Planning Commission's general attitude towards overhead decks,
they are not strict rules that cannot be broken. He indicated that
these guidelines were adopted prior to the consideration of Mr.
Cather's deck and were taken into consideration in Planning
Commission's decision. He recommended that Council consider
approval of Mr. Cather's deck at no greater than 150 square feet.
He indicated that there is only interior access to the deck,
stating that with interior access the deck would most likely be
limited to family and close friends and would not likely be used as
a party area.
Mayor Matteson, felt that it would be a good guideline to require
that the ecc stay below the roofline.
Community Development Director Sawyer, agreed with Mayor Matteson
an 571 tnata snoula be included in future guidelines.
Mayor Matteson opened discussion to the public.
Robert Cather, 22725 Raven Way, Grand Terrace; indicated that the
the o servation deck he has proposed is approximately 17 feet 2-
inches wide by 9 feet. He stated that the deck would be off the
master bedroom and the only entrance to the deck would be from
inside.
Council Minutes - 6/14/90
Page 8
Ms. Huss, 22735 Raven Way, Grand Terrace; indicated that she lives
next or to the applicant and she has no objection to the deck.
Mayor Matteson returned discussion to Council.
Mayor Matteson, asked what the Planning Commission's opinion is of
e app scan s request for 153 sq. ft.
Community Development Director Sawyer, indicated that 150 sq. ft.
proBZTy-woula nave been approve ut the Planning Commission's
motion for denial was based on a complaint from an adjoining
property owner. He indicated that he would feel comfortable with
150 sq. ft. on this deck and felt that it would not be in
opposition to what the Planning Commission would have approved.
CC-90-56 MOTION BY MAYOR MATTESON, SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM GRANT, CARRIED
5-0, to approve SA-90-09, a 150 sq. ft. overhead deck, in
accordance with the guidelines of the Planning Commission.
6A. Appeal of Planning Commission's Decision SA-90-03 (Outdoor Designs/
Genel)
City Manager Schwab, indicated this deck is slightly larger and it
ocTes inc u e a spiral staircase to the ground.
Councilmember Sin ley, indicated that he has spoken to Mr. Genel
and-Fe'indicated tat he would be willing to go along with the
Planning Departments recommendation of 150 sq. ft., but he did want
the outside spiral staircase. Mr. Genel also indicated that he
would be willing to verify in writing that it would not be used for
parties.
Councilmember Pfenni hausen, felt that the deck should be denied
unless the applicant is willing to eliminate the outside staircase.
Mayor Matteson opened discussion to the public.
Stan Hargrave, 12048 Canary Ct., Grand Terrace; felt that it is not
appropriate to ask the applicant to change his plans at this point
without referring it back to the Planning Commission.
Community Develo ment Director Sawyer, indicated that this is an
AppeaT—oT a decision of the Panning Commission and it is up to
Council whether or not they want to place additional conditions on
the approval. Since the outside access was addressed in the
Planning Commission meeting, it does not have to go back to the
Planning Commission.
Ms. Huss, 22735 Raven Way, Grand Terrace; indicated that she is a
nei� of the applicant and he has indicated to her that if they
did not get approval based on the staircase, they would eliminate
that item.
11
1
Council Minutes - 6/14/90
Page 9
CC-90-57 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER PFENNIGHAUSEN, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER
CARLSTROM, CARRIED 5-0, to approve SA-90-03 with the condition that
the size of the deck not exceed 150 sq. ft., no access from the
ground be made and that no portion of the deck be extended further
than 10 feet away from the main structure.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
7A. Policy Regarding Proclamations
City Manager Schwab, indicated that the City currently has no
po io cy regarding issuance of Proclamations by the Mayor on behalf
of himself and the City Council. Discussion regarding implementing
a policy arose over a Proclamation endorsing a political candidate
for office. The Mayor issues Proclamations on many varied issues.
The only controversy appears to be that regarding endorsement of
political candidates or propositions. He recommended that the
Mayor continue to have the authorization to issue proclamations on
behalf of the City Council, however, any proclamations endorsing
political candidates or propositions must come before Council on
the consent calendar for potential discussion and action.
Mayor Pro Tem Grant, stated that he would like it to read that any
proclamation endorsing political candidates or propositions and
candidates for appointment to regional or local boards,
organizations, commissions, etc. He felt that it is essential that
we remember that the issue of endorsing political candidates is not
restricted to those people who are formal candidates on the ballot.
CC-90-58 MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM GRANT, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER
PFENNIGHAUSEN, CARRIED 5-0, to adopt a policy authorizing the Mayor
to issue proclamations on behalf of the City Council, however, any
proclamations endorsing political candidates or propositions and
candidates for appointment to regional or local boards,
organizations, commissions, etc. must come before Council on the
Consent Calendar for potential discussion and action.
ORDER OF ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Matteson adjourned the City Council meeting at 8:30 p.m.,
until the adjourned regular City Council/CRA budget session, which
is scheduled to be held Thursday, June 21, 1990 at 6:00 p.m.
Ter
a t ity o Granrace .
0 e 7 y o ran Terrace.