10/09/1986CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
COUNCIL MINUTES
f
REGULAR MEETING - OCTOBER 9, 1986
A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace was called to
order in the Council Chambers, Grand Terrace Civic Center, 22795 Barton Road,
Grand Terrace, California, on October 25, 1986, at 5:34 p.m.
PRESENT: Hugh J. Grant, Mayor
Byron Matteson, Mayor Pro Tempore
Tony Petta, Councilman
Barbara Pfennighausen, Councilwoman
Dennis L. Evans, Councilman
Seth Armstead, City Manager
Ivan Hopkins, City Attorney
Joe Kicak, Planning Director/City Engineer
Ilene Dughman, City Clerk
ABSENT: NONE
The meeting was opened with invocation by Steve Wyrick, Professor of Full
Testament, California Baptist College, Riverside, followed by the Pledge of
Allegiance, led by Councilman Petta.
SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
Certificate of Service - Sanford L. Collins
Mayor Grant read and presented a Certificate of Service to Sanford L.
Collins for his outstanding service and contributions to the City
while serving as Planning Commissioner.
Resolution of Support - Fourth Annual Wildlife West Festival
November 22-23, 1987
Mayor Grant read above Resolution supporting the Fourth Annual
Wildlife West Festival, November 22-23, 1986, to be held at the San
Bernardino County Museum in Redlands. Will be forwarded to Dr. Allan
D. Griesemer, Director of the Museum.
Proclamation - Crime Prevention Month, October 1986
Mayor Grant read the Crime Prevention Proclamation and presented it to
Sharon Korgan, Community Service Officer. Ms. Korgan thanked Council
and distributed pins and red bows to members to signify "Red Ribbon
Week," October 27 - November 3, 1986, initiated by the Governor to
stamp out drugs in conjunction with Crime Prevention Month.
Council Minutes - 10/9/86
Page 2
Resolution of Appreciation to City of Grand Terrace on the Occasion of
Southern California ison s Centennial
Sue Noreen, SCE Area Manager, read and presented a Resolution of
Appreciation to the Council commemorating 100 years of service.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Item 3D, Approval of the 9/13/86 Minutes, was removed for discussion.
CC-86-245 Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Matteson, Second by Councilwoman
Pfennighausen, to approve the following Consent Calendar items:
A. Approve Check Register No. 100986;
B. Ratify 10/9/86 CRA Action;
C. Waive Full Reading of Ordinances on Agenda;
E. Approve 9/25/86 Minutes;
F. Accept and Authorize Recordation of the following Grant Deeds for
Barton Road Rights -of -Way: Robert Zandbergen, AP #275-242-09;
Dennis Stafford and Darry L. Grable, et al, AP #275-242-10;
G. Accept and Authorize Recordation of Grant Deed for Right -of -Way -
Barton Road Business Park, (Goode), AP #275-223-16.
APPROVAL OF 9/13/86 MINUTES
CC-86-246 Motion by Councilman Petta, Second by Mayor Pro Tem Matteson, ALL
AYES, to approve the Minutes of September 13, 1986, as amended,
adding, prior to Motion No. CC-86-236, additional workshop discussion
referencing necessity to explore alternatives to alleviate the
existing Barton Road on and off ramp congestion anticipated to
escalate with future development.
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
Louis S. Contreras, 12652 Mirada, voiced concern and requested that
Council not adopt a proposed Resolution appearing on the Agenda
opposing reconfirmation of California Supreme Court Justices (See Page
10). Noted a Press Enterprise news article which caused ridiculing
remarks by citizens who objected to Council attempting to dictate or
mandate position of the entire City. Realized that was not Council's
intent; however, felt the City faces a serious situation, not only
with respect to its reputation, but more importantly the setting of
precedent. Concerned ramifications of such action far outweigh any
benefits derived. (�
Mary Robinson, 22631 Minona Drive: (1) Requested status of the water
rate issue; (2) Voiced support of proposed Resolution opposing
reconfirmation of California Supreme Court Justices (See Page 10).
Council Minutes - 10/9/86
Page 3
Riverside Highland Water Rate Increase
Finance Director Schwab advised, subsequent to Council's prior
direction that Staff continue to work with Riverside Highland Water
Company in a cooperative effort to reduce rates, that the Company is
preparing an application for Clean Water Bond Act funding for
submission in January, which, if approved, could only be a long term
solution.
Mayor Pro Tem Matteson, referencing his and the Mayor's discussion
with members of the Grand Jury at the last meeting and their
suggestion that LAFCO be contacted for assistance, was advised LAFCO
has no jurisdiction over mutual water companies; pursuant to their
suggestion to create a Special District, found that was not feasible
since many of the stockholders live outside the City limits. City
Attorney Hopkins advised the City could literally be the governing
body of a Subsidiary District; however, financing the purchase of the
water company could be cost prohibitive.
City Manager Armstead, referencing contact by the Special District,
related an alternative suggested of placing the question of purchasing
the water company (for which citizens would be taxed) on the ballot;
also noted recent doubling of water and sewer rates in the City of
Redlands. City Attorney Hopkins, relative to placing the matter on
the ballot and presuming Council's willingness to exercise eminent
domain powers, noted potential financial constraints involved due to
the requirement of depositing a considerable sum with the Court.
Responding to Councilman Petta's concerns, City Engineer Kicak
clarified that pressure test failures have caused the need for the
Water Company to re -excavate the streets after waterline
installations.
Sanford Collins, 22697 Brentwood, relative to acquiring financing,
understands several owners of undevelopable land within the City have
returned their shares to the Water Company and, therefore, have not
paid any water bills for some time; recommended investigation to
ascertain how much has not been paid. Mayor Pro Tem Matteson,
indicating he assumed Mr. Collins was suggesting the City purchase
those shares, noted it would be an expensive proposition, in view
of the increased cost per share.
Donald R. Ihrig, 11872 Eaton Drive, noted traffic hazard at I-215
freeway off -ramp entering Barton Road eastbound; suggested requesting
CALTRANS to install a sign at the approach indicating entrance to a
new line of traffic. Voiced concern with condition of portions of
Barton Road and lack of centerline marking creating a traffic hazard.
ORAL REPORTS
PLANNING COMMMISSION REPORT - Minutes of the September 8 and 15, 1986
meetings were provided.
Council Minutes - 10/9/86
Page 4
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMITTEE REPORT - Minutes of the September 8,
9 meeting were provided.
Councilman Evans noted difficulty in soliciting volunteers to
construct the Terrace Hills Junior High School snack bar and the
upcoming rainy season; also understood a letter had been received from
Colton Joint Unified School District addressing a potential hazard;
therefore, suggested the City circulate requests for bids to expedite
completion. Community Services Director Anstine related contact with
a State Licensed Contractor who will submit a proposal; however, noted
the San Bernardino County Environmental Health Department has ordered
work ceased until plans are reviewed in relation to compliance with
the State Health and Restaurant Act regulations.
EMERGENCY OPERATIONS COMMITTEE REPORT - Minutes of the August 21, 1986
meeting were provided.
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE REPORT - Dave TerBest, President, thanked
participants in errace ays" and reported the following:
(1) Regarding Council's previous request for justification of economic
development expenditures, related over 48 1/2% of their budget has
been expended in the last six months for that purpose; noted $48,500
expended for the newsletter, promotional brochures and booth, joint
venture with the Inland Empire Magazine, the City Map, educational
materials for the schools, and "Terrace Days." Voiced appreciation
for grant funding already received, but concerned there will not be
sufficient funds by early spring to continue operation; requested
Council seriously consider granting additional funds.
Mayor Pro Tem Matteson requested Chamber submit a current budget
containing expenditures and a proposed budget for the remaining fiscal
year including proposed utilization of additional funding. Councilman
Evans also requested the Chamber's Budget and expenditures for the
past two years.
Councilman Petta, noting a great portion of the Chamber's funds are
expended for economic development, suggested hiring an expert in that
field to work in conjunction with the Chamber; recommended staff
investigate and report to the Council and Chamber on feasibility of a
cooperative effort. Mayor Pro Tem Matteson, with Mr. TerBest
indicating concurrence, felt the feasibility of paying a commission
for each business brought into the community should be investigated.
Mr. Terbest felt the Chamber could operate effectively without the
burden of economic development, feeling that to be a professional
task.
POLICE CHIEF REPORT - Mayor Grant introduced Detective Floyd Gilbreth,
representing San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department, who reported
crime statistics from September 22 - October 6 including a robbery at
the Ontario Savings Bank.
CITY ENGINEER REPORT - Relative to obtaining the remainder of
right-of-way dedications for Barton Road widening project, City
Engineer Kicak anticipated submitting an updated status report at the
Council Minutes - 10/9/86
Page 5
next meeting. Visualized completion of project by the end of the
fiscal year.
CITY MANAGER REPORT - City Manager Armstead related forthcoming
meeting etween staff and the Colton Joint Unified School District
scheduled for October 13 regarding school impaction fees; will meet
with the City of Colton's new City Manager on October 15.
COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilman Petta reported the following: (1) The poor condition of
Barton Road. City Engineer Kicak related he will request the Manager
of the Riverside Highland Water Company to alleviate problem by
completing repairs within the next few days; (2) Requested status of
the Community/Senior Center carpeting; Mr. Kicak advised an updated
report will be submitted at the next meeting; (3) Citizen complaint
regarding noise at the Terrace Hills Community Park generated from the
playground during the day and from the park itself after hours.
Motion by Councilman Petta, Second by Mayor Grant, to approve $500.00
to purchase and plant trees adjacent to the Terrace Hills Community
Park.
Councilwoman Pfennighausen indicated she could support the Motion if
` proven effective; however, felt professional advice necessary prior to
taking any action.
Based upon that, Councilman Petta, with the Second in concurrence,
withdrew his Motion and recommended Staff to investigate the situation
and return to Council with a recommendation. Community Services
Director Anstine related the County Environmental Health Department
conducted a sound test four years ago, and their recommendations were
that no amount of trees would be effective. It was also determined
that planting trees would impair the Sheriff's Deputies and adjacent
residents' view of children at play, thereby jeopardizing their
safety. Related, if Council desires more trees planted, and the
proper amount of canopy of foliage is sufficient to somewhat buffer
the noise, 26" box trees, spaced not to interfere with existing sewer
and irrigation lines, would be required, at an approximate cost of
$500 per tree.
Following Mr. Anstine's response, no further direction was given to
pursue investigating the planting of trees. Relative to the after -
hour noise, Councilman Petta requested the Sheriff's Deputies patrol
the park after closing.
Councilwoman Pfenni hausen could not understand why noise created by
happy children bothers people; felt a clear vision of those children
must be maintained for a protected environment. Reported the
following: (1) Observed youngsters removing political signs;
cautioned them to the private nature of the property; requested
citizens observing such vandalism to advise parties to refrain from
such activity and replace any signs removed; (2) Wants street striping
Council Minutes - 10/9/86
Page 6
and crosswalks maintained, regardless of cost efficiency, feeling it
the City's responsibility to eliminate traffic hazards.
Mayor Pro Tem Matteson reported the following: (1) Attended a
Waste -to -Energy meeting with the County Board of Supervisors, which
revealed that those type of waste disposal facilities are inevitable
for the future; (2) Requested the City Manager apprise Staff to
refrain from making sarcastic remarks to the news media about the
Council or the City, since such comments could be detrimental to the
City.
Mayor Grant reported the following: (1) Concurred with importance of
maintaining street striping; felt parties responsible for excavating
the streets should be required to restore them to original condition;
(2) Voiced concern about litter in the community; commended the
Finance Director, while acting as City Manager, for recommending
utilizing students at a nominal wage to pick up litter in the City;
noted Mayor Pro Tem Matteson's suggestion of involving the Girl and
Boy Scouts in that program; (3) Concurred with Councilwoman
Pfennighausen relative to vandalism of political signs; (4) Concurs
with suggestion for a monetary incentive for Chamber members to bring
business into the community; also enthused about retaining a
professional economic development consultant, feeling that individual
should be paid for what he produces; (5) Felt the Sheriff's Overtime
Report should periodically specify the purpose of additional hours
worked; (6) Responding to Councilwoman Pfennighausen's Report, felt no
one was attempting to curtail noise from happy children; felt the
biggest complaint was due to noise from the park after closing.
Recessed at 7:04 p.m.; reconvened at 7:19 p.m., with all members
present.
GAGE CANAL RIGHT-OF-WAY REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT - McMILLIN DEVELOPMENT
City Manager Armstead related his meeting, along with City Attorney
Hopkins and Planning Director Kicak, with Mr. John Hocking, President
of Gage Canal Company, 7452 Dufferin Avenue, Riverside.
City Attorney Hopkins related Council's previous approval of two
developments requiring access across the Gage Canal. (Ref: Condition
of Approval #4 (McMillin Development) that acceptable access across
the Gage Canal be provided.) Further related the City's previous
authorization for staff to negotiate and, if necessary, institute
whatever legal proceedings necessary to acquire acquisition across the
Gage Canal. Noted various conditions were required by the Gage Canal
Company, Canal owner, and the City of Riverside, owner of the
underlying right-of-way in which the canal is located; subsequent to
lengthy negotiations, an agreement was reached with those two entities
as to everything but one issue - the City wanted to enlarge and widen
Canal Street, which is located on the westerly side of the canal,
requiring acquisition of an additional right-of-way from the Gage
Canal Company or from the City of Riverside who, by agreement, must
receive approval from the Gage Canal Company prior to any such action.
Council Minutes - 10/9/86
Page 7
As a requirement for approval, the Gage Canal Company conditioned that
the right-of-way be purchased at a price of $30,000 (non-negotiable);
the City felt the figure unreasonable and in excess of actual property
value, therefore, recommended, on that basis, not to proceed. In
order to expedite the process, McMillin Development, initiator of
project (property has subsequently been placed in escrow for sale to
Forest City Dillon), offered to provide payment of $30,000 to the Gage
Canal Company and, in return, the City would reimburse them the
determined appraised value of the property. An agreement to that
effect was made and a cashier's check for $30,000 has been received
from McMillin Development, authorizing release under certain
circumstances for deposit in the City Treasury. Relative to the
previously mentioned meeting with the Gage Canal Company, indicated
their willingness to accept the $30,000, the other conditions, and
proceed to grant the rights -of -way in three locations across the Gage
Canal, contingent upon escrow being opened with a $30,000 City
cashier's check on Wednesday, October 15th.
City Attorney outlined the following series of actions required if
Council desires to proceed: (1) Approve a Resolution specifying that
Condition #4 of the Conditions of Approval will have occurred;
(2) Approve the revised Contract with McMillin Development; Noted
problems with the release of the $30,000 and the time frame in
relation to reimbursement to McMillin; also, a five and three day time
period provision which is unsatisfactory due to it being too short of
a time frame. Related an appraisal of the property could be
accomplished by the Title Company who did the Title Report for a
figure not to exceed $2,000; however, if another appraiser is
utilized, a great deal more money and time would be involved. Advised
both the attorney for McMillin Development and client have related
concurrence with suggested Contract amendments. Therefore, if Council
desires to proceed, staff would recommend the approval of the revised
Contract. (3) Approve a 3-party agreement between the City of Grand
Terrace, the Gage Canal Company, and the City of Riverside, with the
following conditions: 1. The easterly side of the Canal be protected
with fencing along the right-of-way; (They have agreed that the
fencing required by the Planning Commission's Conditions of Approval
would suffice; therefore, no additional fencing would be required.)
2. That the crossings themselves be protected with fencing as they
cross the canal; 3. That the City provide 16-foot openings to the
canal for access by the Gage Canal Company to enable maintenance of
facility; 4. That the streets leading to the storm drains be
protected inasmuch as possible; 5. That the City protect the Canal
right-of-way from low spots on the adjoining property; 6. That the
water pipe to the canal itself be protected by reinforced concrete or
a minimum of 36 inches of dirt cover and paving, and that the plans
and structural protections provided on the crossing themselves be
{ approved by the Gage Canal Company and the City of Riverside;
1
Council Minutes - 10/9/86
Page 8
7. That the street easements, to be recorded with conditions, be
acceptable to the Gage Canal Company and the City of Riverside;
8. That the City obtain three public crossings; the Gage Canal
Company and the City of Riverside are to approve the utility crossings
wherever they cross on those three structures; 9. That to the extent
possible, the City provide the alternate ingress and egress to all
property fronting along the easterly side; (Noted the developers have
made that provision to the extent possible) 10. That the City of
Riverside grant an additional 7 1/2 feet of right-of-way to widen
Canal Street; 11. That the City may landscape the canal right-of-way
in accordance with the Gage Canal Company specifications and subject
to their approval, if desired; 12. That, if it is landscaped, the
City of Grand Terrace will be responsible for the perpetual
maintenance (watering, landscaping, etc.). City Attorney Hopkins
advised that all of the above conditions have reached concurrence with
City Engineer Kicak. If Council desires to proceed, staff would
recommend approval of entering into such an agreement. (4) Authorize
entering escrow at the Safeco Title Company in Riverside for the Canal
Street property north of Victoria at a purchase price of $30,000 and
authorize acceptance of the Grant Deeds, Grants of Easements, licenses
and conveyances relative thereto, including all three of the
crossings. (5) Approve increasing General Fund Revenues in the amount
of $30,000 and General Fund Expenditures in the amount of $45,000,
pursuant to Finance Director Schwab's memo of this date.
Sanford Collins, 22697 Brentwood, requested clarification of proposed
agreement, not seeing the benefit to the City.
City Attorney Hopkins clarified the proposal would enable the City to
widen Canal Street to accommodate traffic flow and would, therefore,
benefit the entire community. Since the Gage Canal Company would not
agree to the City having the property appraised and paying them the
appraised value, McMillin Development Company agreed to pay the
requested $30,000 to the Gage Canal Company, with the stipulation that
the City reimburse them for the amount of the appraised value; this
allows the City to do what they initially proposed.
J. Brian Urtnowski, McMillin's Attorney, Law Firm of Sheppard, Mullin,
Richter, further clarified that McMillin Development is virtually
giving the City an interest -free loan as well as subsidizing them if
the appraisal is less than $30,000. Therefore, if the land is
appraised at zero value, the Gage Canal Company will be paid $30,000
without the City having to expend any funds including legal fees
involved if land had to be obtained through condemnation proceedings.
Responding to Mayor Pro Tem Matteson relative to condemnation,
related, if the property was in fact condemned, the City would be
required to pay the fair market value as well as legal costs.
Council Minutes - 10/9/86
Page 9
Responding to Councilwoman Pfennighausen relative to consequences if
escrow is not executed by the date specified, City Attorney Hopkins
indicated eminent domain proceedings could be initiated to acquire the
crossings. Advised that Mr. Hocking, President of Gage Canal Company,
will not bend with conditions as set forth.
Councilwoman Pfennighausen, tired of being threatened by the Gage
Canal Company, noted Council was previously prepared to initiate
eminent domain condemnation proceedings. If eminent domain is decided
upon, suggested acquiring the entire top of the Canal to alleviate
future problems securing crossings. Does not feel Council should back
peddle; however, felt they should be reasonable. Noting some of the
proposals were not submitted until late this afternoon, advised she is
not prepared to make any approvals until able to thoroughly review all
pertinent material. Mayor Grant voiced concurrence, feeling all
Councilmembers should have sufficient review time to enable clear
understanding of matter; advised he would also not be pushed into
making a decision.
Mayor Pro Tem Matteson related that Councilmembers have repeatedly
reiterated their disdain toward red tape, feeling it hinders
development. Noting the acquisition of Gage Canal crossings has been
a problem for over a year, felt that Council should proceed tonight;
believed the City Attorney made a good agreement with McMillin
Development which he reviewed thoroughly. If action not taken
tonight, felt a special meeting should be called tomorrow night. In
light of resolving matter, Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Matteson, to follow
staff recommendations and execute the proposed reimbursement agreement
between the City and McMillin Development and approve appropriation of
$15,000 for the Gage Canal property appraisal and acquisition of the
right-of-way. Motion died for lack of Second.
Councilman Evans felt proposed agreement to be extremely complicated
and could, therefore, have serious ramifications; noted it may entail
expenditure of City funds. Desired sufficient time for complete
review of agreement in its entirety and, if matter is continued,
requested the City Clerk prepare this portion of the minutes
immediately for availability to Council; Mayor Pro Tem Matteson
requested they be verbatim. (Subsequent to the meeting, it was
clarified that minutes could be consolidated into sensible format.)
Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Matteson, Second by Councilman Petta, to call
a special meeting Monday, October 13, 1986, at 6:00 p.m. (Motion was
withdrawn later in the meeting.)
Mayor Grant noted that Monday is a state holiday (Columbus Day) and
Councilman Evans, due to inablility to attend that day, requested
continuing item until the next Council meeting to enable everyone to
get full input.
Mayor Pro Tem Matteson felt Council should take action tonight, noting
if opportunity is jeopardized and matter ends up in court (eminent
domain proceedings), project could be prolonged for another year.
Council Minutes - 10/9/86
Page 10
Suggested the City Attorney contact the Gage Canal Company for an
extension. City Attorney Hopkins related he could attempt to get
the deadline extended.
Councilwoman Pfennighausen noted absolutes are not being dealt with at
this time since it is unknown whether the Gage Canal Company's Board
of Directors will even accept the proposed agreement.
In light of above discussion, Mayor Pro Tem Matteson withdrew his
Motion, with its Second (Councilman Petta) in concurrence.
CC-86-247 Motion by Councilman Evans, Second by Councilwoman Pfennighausen, that
item be continued to the meeting of October 23, 1986, carried, 4-1,
with Mayor Pro Tem Matteson voting NOE.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE,
CALIFORNIA, OPPOSING THE RECONFIRMATION OF CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE BIRD AND
ASSOCIATE JUSTICES CRUZ REYNOSO AND JOSEPH GRODIN TO THE CALIFORNIA
SUPREME COURT.
Relative to above Resolution, Mayor Grant noted a clear distinction
between a legislative body taking a position on a ballot measure and a
candidate; felt the Resolution implies Council is acting on behalf of
the citizens, urging people to oppose the Justices at the polls.
Wanted it clear he is not committing his position on the three
Justices, feeling that to be his own business. Felt individual
Councilmembers have the prerogative to advise of their position;
encouraged reconsideration of this matter.
Mayor Pro Tem Matteson felt it a city official `s duty to look out for
the health, benefit, and safety of constituents. Cited case of
Theodore Frank wherein Rose Bird overturned the death penalty as well
as the conviction based on a technicality of inadmissible evidence.
Felt the Resolution is addressing a strong law and order issue, not a
candidate.
Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Matteson to adopt the newly submitted version
of a Resolution opposing reconfirmation of Justices Bird, Reynoso, and
Grodin, died for lack of a Second.
Councilwoman Pfennighausen advised of her reconsideration of matter
due to it becoming a publicized issue and realizing its potential
impact upon her candidacy for re-election. At this point, does not
feel adopting the Resolution as important since people are aware of
where the Council stands; however, felt it important that elected
individuals have enough backbone to make a stand. Personally has been
a victim of a violent crime and supports victim's rights; therefore,
hopes all three are removed and replaced with responsible judges that
will back law enforcement and the criminal justice system.
Councilman Petta respected Mayor Pro Tem Matteson's views, feeling he
had valid reasons for his action; however, agreed with Mayor Grant.
Council Minutes - 10/9/86
Page 11
Related that citizens have advised him of their objection to the
Council telling them how to vote. For that reason did not support the
Resolution, not because of taking a position one way or another.
Councilman Evans stated his initial suggestion for the Resolution was
not made in the vein of being arrogant, but based upon the recognition
that crime impacts everyone's lives and is everyone's concern; felt
that the justice system appears to be weakened by judicial decisions
that favor the criminal. Encouraged all elected officials who truly
believe in a strong criminal justice system to take a stand; did not
view any difference between this issue and a ballot measure.
Mayor Pro Tem Matteson felt the proposed Resolution does not tell
people how to vote; noted that two members feel Council should take a
stand; however, did not support the Motion.
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS - ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE
SCE PICO PARK -SITE DESIGN F86-16)
Community Services Director Anstine related, effective January 1987,
the existing tenant (Marygold Farms) will vacate the SCE Pico park -
site property. Since specific requirements must be adhered to,
related staff recommendation that Council consider authorizing
"Requests for Proposals" to retain the services of a qualified
landscape architect to finalize the design for submission to Southern
California Edison for approval.
Following clarification that schematics are not concrete and no funds
CC-86-248 will be expended at this time, Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Matteson,
Second by Councilman Evans, ALL AYES, to authorize Requests for
Proposals for Architectural/Engineering services for the design of the
SCE Pico park site (RFP 86-16).
Adjourned at 8:18 p.m. The next regular meeting will be held
Thursday, October 23, 1986, at 5:30 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
APPROVED:
ayo r