Loading...
04/04/1991GRAND TERRACE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING APRIL 4, 1991 The regular meeting of the Grand Terrace Planning Commission was called to order at the Grand Terrace Civic Center, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California, on April 4, 1991 at 7:00 p.m. by Chairman Jerry Hawkinson. PRESENT: Jerry Hawkinson, Chairman Dan Buchanan, Vice -Chairman Stanley Hargrave, Commissioner Ray Munson, Commissioner Jim Sims, Commissioner Fran Van Gelder, Commissioner Maria Muett, Acting Community Development Director Maggie Barder, Planning Secretary ABSENT: Ron Wright, Commissioner PLEDGE: Ray Munson, Commissioner PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP CONVENED AT 6:30 P.M. Approval of parapet for Potomac West project. May 2, 1991 Planning Commission Meeting canceled. Discussion of adopting a Planning Commission Resolution commending David Sawyer. Information/comments from staff. Information/comments from commissioners. PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP ADJOURNED AT 7:00 P.M. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CONVENED AT 7:00 P.M. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: None. ITEM #1 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES - MARCH 7, 1991 MOTION PCM-91-81 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES - MARCH 7, 1991 MOTION VOTE PCM-91-81 Commissioner Van Gelder made a motion to approve the March 7, 1991 minutes. Vice -Chairman Buchanan second. Motion carries. 5-0-1-1. Commissioner Wright absent. Commissioner Munson abstained. ITEM #2 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES - MARCH 21, 1991 MOTION PCM-91-82 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES - MARCH 21, 1991 MOTION VOTE PCM-91-82 Commissioner Van Gelder made a motion to continue the March 21, 1991 minutes to the April 18, 1991 Planning Commission Meeting. Vice -Chairman Buchanan second. Motion carries. 4-0-1-2. Commissioner Wright absent. Commissioners Munson and Sims abstained. ITEM #3 CUP-91-02 INLAND LUMBER/R.W. MFG. OF SO. CAL. 21850 MAIN STREET G.T. AN APPLICATION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A DUST COLLECTOR FOR AN EXISTING LUMBER COMPANY 2 c The Acting Community Development Director presented the staff report. Chairman Hawkinson called up the applicant. ROBERT WHEELER 15305 MANILLA FONTANA Mr. Wheeler stated that the ownership of Inland Lumber has changed in the last few years, and the new owners are making major changes, including repaving their yard. He said the new system will eliminate the dust problem. He said there was a company in the yard called "Modern Materials" driving trucks in and out, and they are no longer there. Commissioner Sims asked where the noise test was conducted. Mr. Wheeler said it was done at the corner of the 1st residence at the fenceline. Commissioner Hargrave asked if the new dust collector was to be put at the new site or the current site. Mr. Wheeler said it would be located across the railroad tracks. He said they only move about 15' closer to the property. Commissioner Hargrave asked if the restroom was hooked up to the sewer. Mr. Wheeler said the mill area restroom is hooked up to a septic tank and the office is on sewer. Vice -Chairman Buchanan asked if he would have a problem if they made the hours from 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. a condition of the conditional use permit. Mr. Wheeler said he would not have a problem with this. Chairman Hawkinson was in favor of the new system, but asked for justification as to the relocation of the system. Mr. Wheeler said that to shut down for 3 weeks would stifle them and they would probably lose a lot of customers. He said they have to be able to feed the mill. Commissioner Van Gelder asked if it would be a detriment if they asked that the facility was to shut down at 8:00 p.m. or 9:00 p.m. 3 C Mr. Wheeler stated this has been their allowable hours of work, and felt they would want to retain that in case of an emergency. 7:17 P.M. OPENED PUBLIC HEARING CHESTER EASTER 21963 TANAGER STREET G.T. Mr. Easter stated that the City inherited the problem from the County, stating that the residential area was designed and implemented before Inland Timber. He said that when the lumber company was built, there was an advisory board called MAC, and the gentleman who owned the property where this was being built, including the tract that he lived in, was on the committee. He stated that the decibels were read at the corner of Mr. Butterfield's property. He said that they are at the top end of the threshold, and if they allow 60 decibels, they are already 2 decibels over the limit. He said that whether it is 15' closer or 1' closer, it should not be allowed. He said that there is not a cap on the silo on the collector and the pipe that leads into the silo is not shown. He wanted to see the bottom area enclosed to prevent dust from escaping into the air. He said that the company did not pave immediately south of the residential walls to the south of the railroad tracks. He said that where they are proposing to put the bin is a complete dirt area. He said that there are no operations on the extreme south end other than an electrical receptacle, and above that are some power poles with transformers. He said that to the east of that, they could put the blower and collector system and would be more centralized. fie said they could also put it to the west of there, and all they would have to do is move a stack of timbers. He said that on Saturday morning, a gentleman cleans the asphalt with a blower, which blows the dirt to the north onto their houses. He questioned why they do not use a vacuum. DAN BUTTERFIELD 12796 ROYAL AVENUE G.T. Mr. Butterfield said he is the nearest residence to the mill. He agreed with Mr. Easter and was against the system being moved closer to their homes. He said he would like to see them close operations at 8:00 p.m. as he is in bed by then, and he cannot sleep. Mr. Wheeler said that the lower portion where the truck backs in will be enclosed and they have a floor sweep in case anything is spilled off the truck. He said the decibel level on the blower system is way under 60, and there is 4 c a lot of cloth material and filter bags which suppress the noise from the blower system. Chairman Hawkinson asked about an alternative location. Mr. Wheeler stated that the end of the mill the citizens talked about is where all the main power comes into the plant, and no equipment can be put there. He said that they service the mill on the sides, so they couldn't put it there. Vice -Chairman Buchanan asked for comments regarding the paving of the area. Mr. Wheeler stated that it is paved where the truck backs in to where the new location of where the bin will be as well as the traffic circulation routes to and from the location. Vice -Chairman Buchanan asked how the truck loading area would be enclosed. Mr. Wheeler said it is a sheet -metal housing. 7:35 P.M. CLOSED PUBLIC HEARING Commissioner Hargrave asked Mr. Wheeler to address the bin being next to the cleaner. Mr. Wheeler said the bin is where the cyclone separator sits on top, and there is a cap that goes on the top of the cyclone separator so there is no emittance. He said the air will be piped over to the filter collector, which will take out the dust and let the air out. Commissioner Hargrave asked the heights of the two structures. Mr. Wheeler said one is 60' and the other is 45'. Commissioner Hargrave asked if there was just one structure there now. Mr. Wheeler said there is one structure where there is a bin and they are unloading with a screw -conveyer and are picking that up with a blower and going over to another separator and loading a truck. He said that they will not have that extra blower noise with the proposed system. Commissioner Hargrave asked if the noise reading was based on the current system. 5 c Mr. Wheeler said that it was, and they were also running the mill. Chairman Hawkinson brought this item back to the commission. Vice -Chairman Buchanan stated that the neighbors have had a long history of concerns, but if they do not approve this item, the applicant's alternative is to leave it the way it is, which doesn't benefit anyone. He said they should clarify the recommendations include it being capped and enclosed as well as including the hours of operation. He said he would like to see a condition that all traffic areas be paved within the facility. He felt the relocation was not a significant move, and if they say no to the proposed location, the applicant may not put in the new system. He said the noisy part of the operation, the mill, is not being moved any closer. Commissioner Hargrave asked Mr. Butterfield if he had worked in this area before. Mr. Butterfield said he was the mill superintendent at Inland Lumber and is now running a mill in Orange County. Commissioner Hargrave asked if there was a way to mute the sounds from the saws. Mr. Butterfield said there are many ways. He questioned the decibel test as far as how much of the mill was in operation. He said that South Bay Lumber Co. in Orange County has a planer just like one of the planers at Inland Lumber, which is completely enclosed in a little building. He said that when Inland Lumber owned it, they built a wall between the timber sizer and the resaw. He said they could put up more walls or baffles up above the machines. Commissioner Hargrave asked if encasing the machines was expensive. Mr. Butterfield said they could build a cheap building around them. Commissioner Hargrave felt this was an opportunity to mitigate the noise from the saws. Chairman Hawkinson felt the noise from the mill may be outside of the scope of what is being proposed. Vice -Chairman Buchanan stated he was not comfortable with expanding the scope of their inquiry that far, not that he didn't feel it was unlawful, but historically, the City has been careful about this scope of inquiry. I G Commissioner Sims stated that his original concern was the decibel level, and one of the conditions was to take readings, and there is no way to take readings of the proposed system until it is up. He asked if the test was done by the applicant. The Acting Community Development Director stated that it was ordered by the applicant. Vice -Chairman Buchanan said that staff's conditions stated that prior to the issuance of building permits for the new dust bin/filter collector, evidence must be submitted to the Planning Department reflecting acceptable noise levels for this district. He said that his concern was that the dust bin/filter collector was not going to generate excessive noise. He felt this would be done through the presentation of literature from the manufacturer of the collector showing the decibel ratings. He said there was no discussion about particular existing equipment being modified or removed or tested at that point in time. Commissioner Sims stated that there is no gauge. He said they are bringing the facility closer to the homes and it is not fair to increase the decibel level. Vice -Chairman Buchanan said they were looking for evidence that this new construction would not increase the noise level. He stated that if they deny the project, they will have the same sound problem as well as the same dust problem. He felt they should allow them to construct the new dust collector, and perhaps they do not change the noise level, but at least the dust problem is reduced. He said the biggest concern is that the new system should not generate any more noise than is already there, and he felt it would be quieter. Commissioner Sims said he hasn't heard anything from the applicant that he can't move it. Vice -Chairman Buchanan said that the farther it is from the mill, the more overhead pipe they need to have. The Acting Community Development Director suggested making a condition that the new dust bin filter facility does not emit any higher decibel levels either than the existing one, or put a range that is presented in the study itself. Chairman Hawkinson felt this issue is the dust collector, not the rest of the mill operation. He said that they needed to take a reading to have a benchmark for comparing the new one. 7 Commissioner Van Gelder said that now is the time to do something about the mill, so she would like to continue this item until the city attorney can be present to advise them as to their scope. Commissioner Hargrave stated that he would go along with a continuance, but they do have a broad scope, and they need to either take the initiative or not. He asked if at Site and Architectural Review, if the Chairman would be willing to consider some mitigation measures. Chairman Hawkinson stated that at Site and Architectural, they would be talking about the specific location and the design. He said that based on testimony, it sounds like the proposed system is of far superior design than the existing system. Vice -Chairman Buchanan said that the physical location of the unit is as much a part of the conditional use permit as the site and architectural portion, and for the most part, things are overlapping, and they normally treat them as co- extensive issues, so that the conditional use permit has the same set of conditions as the site and architectural approval does. The Acting Community Development Director clarified from the code what the conditional use permit and site and architectural review cover. 0 Commissioner Sims suggested going out to the site. Vice -Chairman Buchanan said he was comfortable going forward. Chairman Hawkinson wasn't sure an on -site inspection would give them more insight, but he felt they should make sure the facility is adequately paved. He said he was not convinced that it was justified to relocate the facility. Commissioner Hargrave stated that irrespective of where the filter is placed, the mill, which is the noisy part of the operation, isn't moving. Chairman Hawkinson said that if this item were continued for an on -site inspection, it would give enough time for staff to contact the City Attorney. Vice -Chairman Buchanan stated that regarding the location of the dust collector, they haven't heard justification for the proposed location, however, he wasn't sure their explanation isn't sufficient. He didn't feel the dust collector itself is significant enough to warrant an on -site inspection. Commissioner Hargrave stated the conditional use permit is one of the few methods they have to mitigate this problem. Q Commissioner Van Gelder questioned whether they had the authority to l request that the decibel level be changed. MOTION L PCM-91-83 CUP-91-02 Commissioner Munson said he was under the impression that the City has a noise ordinance, and if obligations are not fulfilled, they would be fined or closed down. He felt the proposed dust collector is better than the existing one, and stated that he sees no reason for an on -site inspection. Commissioner Van Gelder stated that the City inherited the situation from the County and according to David Sawyer, the decibel level had never been checked. Chairman Hawkinson stated that he wasn't sure of the date, but he knows they took readings there because of the noise ordinance. He felt the scope needs to be limited to the dust collector, stating he felt uncomfortable broadening the scope without the City Attorney's opinion. He said he would be receptive to a motion to continue this item to the next meeting and perhaps continue it to a workshop session at the facility if the applicant did not have a problem with this. The Acting Community Development Director stated that staff would make contact with the City Attorney and make arrangements with the applicant. Commissioner Hargrave made a motion to continue CUP-91-02 to the next Planning Commission Meeting with a workshop session to take place at the facility. Commissioner Sims second. Vice -Chairman Buchanan stated that if any of the commissioners feel they could act on this favorably tonight, they should vote no on the continuance, and they could move forward on specific conditions and vote. Chairman Hawkinson stated that the collector is a good thing, but he has not been convinced of the proposed location. Commissioner Van Gelder felt they should look at the site. Chairman Hawkinson called for the question. 9 MOTION VOTE PCM-91-83 Motion fails. Commissioners Hargrave, Sims and Van Gelder voted yes. Chairman Hawkinson, Vice -Chairman Buchanan and Commissioner Munson voted no. Commissioner Wright absent. 8:29 P.M. TO 8:39 P.M. - RECESS Chairman Hawkinson called up the applicant. He asked for justification of why the dust collector can not be in the same location as the existing one and asked what the merits are for the proposed location. Mr. Wheeler stated that he did not think they would shut the mill down to put the dust collector in that location. Commissioner Sims asked if it could go adjacent to it. Mr. Wheeler said there is a restroom to the right of the mill and there is a septic tank to the left side, so they would have to go out to the edges of the mill, which would interfere with the forklift traffic. He said that he has been around mills since he was 14 years old, and he believes this is the right location. Commissioner Sims asked if the additional piping comes into the picture. Mr. Wheeler said that it does take more horsepower and they would have to put in a bigger blower, and this would make more noise, however, the blower system is not the real noisemaker in this situation. Chairman Hawkinson asked if it was feasible to hook up the restroom to the sewer system. Mr. Wheeler said it is pretty far from the main line. Commissioner Sims asked for the restroom and septic tank to be pointed out on the plans. Mr. Wheeler indicated this on the plans. He said that the blower is the powered unit and has the fan, and it is at the mill and will remain there. He said this is where the noise is created. Commissioner Sims asked if it was correct that on the sides of the mill there 10 MOTION PCM-91-84 CUP-91-02 MOTION VOTE PCM-91-84 MOTION PCM-91-85 CUP-91-02 MOTION VOTE PCM-91-85 are other facilities that are not depicted on the plans that prevent it from being placed on either side of the mill, to which Mr. Wheeler agreed. Chairman Hawkinson asked how much of the facility was unpaved. Mr. Wheeler indicated this on the drawings. Chairman Hawkinson asked if the proposed location is approved, would all the area from the mill to the truck area be paved. Mr. Wheeler said it is paved now. Chairman Hawkinson brought the item back to the commission. Vice -Chairman Buchanan made a motion to add as a condition that the bin is capped and the truck -loading area is enclosed with sheet metal to minimize dust escapage. Commissioner Sims second. Motion carries. 6-0-1-0. Commissioner Wright absent. Vice -Chairman Buchanan made a motion that all traffic areas involved in access to or servicing of the proposed dust collection facility be paved, including the actual site and flooring of the location. Commissioner Sims second. Motion carries. 6-0-1-0. Commissioner Wright absent. 11 MOTION PCM-91-86 CUP-91-02 MOTION VOTE PCM-91-86 Commissioner include, "And second. Hargrave made a motion that Condition 4 be amended to any future amendments to that act". Commissioner Sims Motion carries. 6-0-1-0. Commissioner Wright absent. Commissioner Van Gelder asked about deleting Condition 6. Vice -Chairman Buchanan stated that they could delete it, or, as Commissioner Hargrave and Sims were discussing, they could make a condition requiring a limitation on the sound to ensure there is no added noise situation. Commissioner Hargrave asked why they originally wanted to pull Condition 6. The Acting Community Development Director stated it was basically to show evidence that those levels were acceptable to the Planning Department, and being that they were presented to the commission, they were making that determination. She said if they need to keep it in or rephrase it that would be fine, but she was considering it as being redundant. Commissioner Hargrave asked to leave it in as a safety measure. Commissioner Sims stated that the intent was to establish the noise as a baseline, and then after they put up the facility, they will need to see what the noise level is to make sure it is not creating more noise. He felt it was wise to leave it in. Vice -Chairman Buchanan said the condition needs to be reworded if they want to see that the proposed dust collector does not exceed the appropriate levels for this district. The Acting Community Development Director asked if they wished to include the testing locations. Vice -Chairman Buchanan stated that he was not that concerned with the noise 12 MOTION PCM-91-87 CUP-91-02 NIOTION VOTE PCM-91-87 MOTION PCM-91-88 CUP-91-02 and he wasn't making a motion at this point. Commissioner Hargrave made a motion to amend Condition 6 to read that the new dust collector shall have a decibel level no greater than what the applicant showed with the present dust collector, and if the Planning Department of Commission doesn't feel this is so, or if the neighbors complain, they can ask for a test based on the same premise, location and situation as the previous test submitted to the Planning Commission in their decision. Commissioner Sims second. Commissioner Van Gelder stated that when the test is taken, it depends if everything is running. Commissioner Hargrave stated they are only testing the dust collector. Vice -Chairman Buchanan stated they can assume that if the dust collector operating by itself exceeds 62 decibels, the applicant has a problem, so he didn't feel it matters what is running on the subsequent test. Motion carries. 6-0-1-0. Commissioner Wright absent. Vice -Chairman Buchanan made a motion that the hours of operation for the facility be limited to commencing at 7:00 a.m. and concluding at 9:00 p.m. Commissioner Van Gelder second. Chairman Hawkinson asked what the present permitted hours of operation are. The Acting Community Development Director said that the applicant had stated 7:00 a.m, to 10:00 p.m., but it wasn't clarified as to what was running. Commissioner Munson said the hours of a milling operation are dependent 13 MOTION VOTE PCM-91-88 MOTION PCM-91-89 CUP-91-02 MOTION VOTE PCM-91-89 upon the building going on at the time, and historically, summer hours are probably the busiest hours, and this is when they will want to go to 10:00 p.m. He said they are looking at pocketbooks, and an extra hours and a half of overtime is a good chunk of change for the workers. The Acting Community Development Director referred the commission to the letter submitted by the applicant regarding the milling operation hours being from 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Chairman Hawkinson asked if this would be 7 days a week. Mr. Wheeler did not know. Commissioner Munson stated that the yards that they ship to probably are not open on Sundays, so they can't really work on Sunday. Mr. Easter said that it operates 7 days a week about 90% of the time. Motion carries. 5-1-1-0. Commissioner Munson voted no. Commissioner Wright absent. Vice -Chairman Buchanan made a motion to approve CUP-91-02 pursuant to the conditions and amendments. Commissioner Van Gelder second. Motion carries. 4-2-1-0. Chairman Hawkinson and Commissioner I largrave voted no. Commissioner Wright absent. 14 ITEM #4 } V-90-02; CUP-85-09R1 CDS ENGINEERING/BARTON 88 INVESTMENT ASSOCIATES 22325 BARTON ROAD G.T. c AN APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE OF THE PARKING REQUIREMENT FOR AN EXISTING RETIREMENT HOTEL IN A C-2 ZONE; AN APPLICATION TO REVISE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 85-09 FOR AN EXISTING RETIREMENT HOTEL IN A C-2 ZONE The Acting Community Development Director presented the staff report, recommending that this item be continued for 60 days, providing the original applicant sufficient time to provide the updated title report. Commissioner Hargrave stated this shouldn't require more than one working week. The Acting Community Development Director stated that the City Attorney requested sufficient time to review it. Commissioner Hargrave felt 60 days was way too long. Commissioner Sims said the purpose of getting the title report was to verify ownership of the property. Chairman Hawkinson said that they never got a separate, recorded map, and there were some title changes in the meantime. The Acting Community Development Director stated that about one month ago there was a bankruptcy, and what came about was a new owner of Parcel 2. Commissioner Sims asked why the City can't obtain the title report themselves. Vice -Chairman Buchanan said the burden belongs to the applicant. He said they are telling him they are setting a fixed date for a hearing, and the applicant must be here with evidence that they have an easement, and if the applicant is not here, they will deny everything. Commissioner Sims asked what would happen if they deny it. Chairman Hawkinson said they could potentially have to cease all operations. He suggested they have the information by the May 16, 1991 meeting. 15 MOTION PCM-91-90 V-90-02, CUP-85-09R1 MOTION VOTE PCM-91-90 Vice -Chairman Buchanan made a motion to continue V-90-02 and CUP-85- 09R1 to the May 16, 1991 Planning Commission Meeting, and asked that staff communicate to the applicant that this will be the time at which the applicant is expected to be present with justification for all of the changes and variances they are requesting, including documentation that they have a lawful easement as has been previously required and requested, and that proof of that easement shall be submitted well in advance of the meeting for the City Attorney's review. The Acting Community Development Director asked if he wished to add that if not, there will be a denial. Vice -Chairman Buchanan stated he didn't feel they should go so far as to say they would deny it, but the implication should be that if he doesn't appear with the evidence, he will not get a favorable consideration. Ile said they will act on it that night. Commissioner Sims second. Commissioner Munson asked if it would be possible to put in the motion that he have the title report in the hands of the Acting Planning Director no later than April 30 so the City Attorney would have two weeks to review it. Vice -Chairman Buchanan didn't think they could make it a request, but made it as a direction to staff to communicate this as a request of the Planning Commission. Motion carries. 6-0-1-0. Commissioner Wright absent. Chairman Hawkinson felt it would be appropriate for a discussion with the City Attorney as to what the alternatives are in the event that the applicant is unable to produce these items. 16 RESOLUTION FOR DAVID SAWYER Chairman Hawkinson added an item, that this body propose a resolution for David Sawyer. MOTION PCM-91-91 RESOLUTION FOR DAVID SAWYER MOTION VOTE PCM-91-91 Commissioner Van Gelder made a motion that this body prepare and send to David Sawyer a resolution of thanks for his commitment and energies expended in their direction and this be prepared by staff and the Chairman or Vice -Chairman, to be sent as soon as possible. Vice -Chairman Buchanan second. Motion carries. 5-0-2-0. Commissioners Sims and Wright absent. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ADJOURNED AT 9:24 P.M. SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD CONVENED AT 9:24 P.M. ITEM #5 SA-91-04 INLAND LUMBER/R.W. MFG. OF SO. CAL. 21850 MAIN STREET G.T. AN APPLICATION FOR SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF A DUST COLLECTOR FOR AN EXISTING LUMBER COMPANY 9:25 P.M. OPENED PUBLIC HEARING 9:25 P.M. CLOSED PUBLIC HEARING Chairman Hawkinson brought the item back the Site and Architectural Review Board. `` 17 MOTION PCM-91-92 SA-91-04 MOTION VOTE PCM-91-92 Vice -Chairman Buchanan made a motion to approve SA-91-04 as conditioned and amended. Commissioner Munson second. Motion carries. 5-1-1-0. Commissioner Hargrave voted no. Commissioner Wright absent. ITEM #6 SA-85-09R1; SA-87-08R1 CDS ENGINEERING/BARTON 88 INVESTMENT ASSOCIATES 22325 BARTON ROAD G.T. AN APPLICATION TO REVISE SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEWS 85-09 AND 87- 08 FOR AN EXISTING RETIREMENT HOTEL IN A C-2 ZONE OChairman Hawkinson recommended this item be continued to May 16, 1991. MOTION PCM-91-93 SA-85-09R1, SA-87-08R1 MOTION VOTE PCM-91-93 c Commissioner Sims made a motion to continue SA-85-09R1 and SA-87-08R1 to the May 16, 1991 Planning Commission Meeting. Commissioner Hargrave second. Motion carries. 6-0-1-0. Commissioner Wright absent. Vice -Chairman Buchanan requested a complete package of all the items relevant to this item. ITEM #7 SA-91-01 BRUCE W. HALSTEAD, M.D. 23000 GRAND TERRACE ROAD G.T. AN APPLICATION FOR SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF A NEW STORAGE FACILITY TO BE LOCATED IN THE R1-20 DISTRICT MOTION PCM-91-94 SA-91-01 MOTION VOTE PCM-91-94 The Acting Community Development Director presented the staff report. She requested their be a time limit placed on the continuance. Vice -Chairman Buchanan asked if 60 days would be long enough. The Acting Community Development Director stated this would be sufficient. Vice -Chairman Buchanan made a motion that SA-91-01 be continued to the June 6, 1991 Planning Commission Meeting. Commissioner Hargrave second. Motion carries. 6-0-1-0. Commissioner Wright absent. SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD ADJOURNED AT 9:33 P.M. NEXT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TO BE HELD APRIL 18, 1991. Respectfully submitted, Approved by, Maria C. Muett *eraActing Community Development Directorlanning Commission 04-11-91 19