Loading...
02/16/1988GRAND TERRACE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 16, 1988 The regular meeting of the Grand Terrace Planning Commission was called to order at the Grand Terrace Civic Center., 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California, on February 16, 1988, at 7:10 p.m. by Chairman Norman Caouette. PRESENT: Norman Caouette, Chairman Fran Van Gelder, Vice -Chairwoman Gerald Cole, Commissioner Stanley Hargrave, Commissioner Jim Sims, Commissioner ABSENT: Jerry Hawkinson, Commissioner Ray Munson, Commissioner (ARRIVED LATE) PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Stanley Hargrave, Commissioner ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- WORKSHOP CONVENED AT 6:30 P.M. Discussion on TPM 12966, Phase lI (Palazolla Construction) Site and Architectural and final landscaping. Discussion and corrections noted on the December 7, 1987 minutes. WORKSHOP ADJOURNED AT 7:10 P.M. ----------------------------------------------------------------- PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CONVENED AT 7:10 P.M. ITEM #1 MINUTES 12/7/87 MOTION PCM-88-5 Chairman Caouette opened discussion on Item #1, the minutes of December 7, 1987 Planning Commission. VICE -CHAIRWOMAN VAN GELDER MADE THE MOT1ON TO APPROVE MINUTES OF DECEMBER 7, 1987, AS CORRECTED IN THE WORKSHOP. COMMISSIONER SIMS SECONDED. MOTION CARRIED. 5-0-0-2. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ADJOURNED AT 7:11 P.M. 1 0 SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD CONVENED AT 7:11 P.M. Chairman Caouette opened discussion on Item #2, SA-88-1, Redemption Center. ITEM #2 SA-88-1 20/20/RECYCLE CENTER 22441 BARTON ROAD MOTION PCM-88-6 The Planning Director presented the staff report to the Planning Commission and recommended approval according to the conditions recommended by staff, reviewing agencies and the City Engineer. Discussion by the Planning Commission regarding noise levels associated with this type of facility and parking spaces necessary for Recycling Center. COMMISSIONER COLE MADE THE MOTION TO APPROVE SA- 88-1 WITH CONDITIONS AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF. VICE -CHAIRWOMAN VAN GELDER SECONDED. MOTION CARRIED. 5-0-0-2. Discussion as to the responsibility for maintenance and upkeep on the igloos. It was pointed out that the applicant would be responsible. Chairman Caouette opened discussion on Item #3, TPM 12966, Palazolla Construction. ITEM #3 TPM-12966 PALAZOLLA CONSTRUCTION PASCAL AVENUE/VAN BUREN The Planning Director presented the staff report with recommendations and conditions from staff, reviewing agencies and the City Engineer. The Planning Department requested that the Planning Commission direct staff to continue working with the applicant and authorize the Planning Director to approve the landscaping plans on a staff level. 0 z 0 0 MOTION PCM-88-7 Commissioner Sims asked if the landscaping would have continuity from Phase I through Phase II. Planning Director stated it would. COMMISSIONER SIMS MADE THE MOTION TO ENDORSE THE PLANNING DIRECTOR'S RECOMMENDATION FOR LANDSCAPING PLANS ON THE STAFF REPORT TPM 12966 PHASE II AS STATED IN THE STAFF REPORT. COMMISSIONER COLE SECONDED. MOTION CARRIED. COMMISSIONER MUNSON ABSTAIN AND COMMISSIONER HAWKINSON ABSENT. 5-0-1- 1. ADJOURN SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MEETING AT 7:25 P.M. Commissioner Hargrave brought up discussion on the Chaparral Pines (Britton Development) and the CC&R's on the development. The City Attorney mentioned that the CC&R's were regular ones and not specially designed for that project. The Planning Director stated that the CC&R's had never been forwarded to the Planning Department or back to the City Attorney or Council in a formal state. The applicant had taken them down and they are now recorded documents. The City Attorney pointed out that they should be reviewed and approved; that was one of the conditions of approval. The Planning Director pointed out the documents were recorded. They did not have any signatures or approval from the City and asked about their validity. The City Attorney mentioned they were valid as binding one property owner with another. The City Attorney and Planning Director stated they will research the situation before the Planning Department gives approval for final occcupancy of the buildings. 3 r�� S.B. County Hazardous Waste Management Plan Commissioner Hargrave pointed out the importance of the CC&R's being approved according to the conditions of approval or else the City cannot be involved. San Bernardino County Hazardous Wastes Management Plan included in Planning Commissioner's Packets. Planning Director reminded the Commissioners of the San Bernardino County's Public Hearing dealing with the plan. P.C. Commissioners Budget Discussion on remaining balance in the Planning Commissioner's Budget. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ADJOURNED AT 7:30 P.M. Approved By, Norman Caouette, Criairman Planning Commission 4 Respectfully Submitted, David-R. Sawyer Planning Director.