Loading...
05/14/2019CITY OF GRAND TERRACE CITY COUNCIL AND CITY COUNCIL AS THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND HOUSING AUTHORITY AGENDA ● MAY 14, 2019 Council Chambers Regular Meeting 6:00 PM Grand Terrace Civic Center ● 22795 Barton Road City of Grand Terrace Page 1 The City of Grand Terrace complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. If you require special assistance to participate in this meeting, please call the City Clerk’s office at (909) 824-6621 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting. If you desire to address the City Council during the meeting, please complete a Request to Speak Form available at the entrance and present it to the City Clerk. Speakers will be ca lled upon by the Mayor at the appropriate time. Any documents provided to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s office at City Hall located at 22795 Barton Road d uring normal business hours. In addition, such documents will be posted on the Ci ty’s website at www.grandterrace-ca.gov. CALL TO ORDER Convene City Council Invocation Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Attendee Name Present Absent Late Arrived Mayor Darcy McNaboe    Mayor Pro Tem Doug Wilson    Council Member Sylvia Robles    Council Member Bill Hussey    Council Member Jeff Allen    A. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS - NONE Agenda Grand Terrace City Council May 14, 2019 City of Grand Terrace Page 2 B. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted upon by the City Council at one time without discussion. Any Council Member, Staff Member, or Citizen may request removal of an item from the Consent calendar for discussion. 1. Waive Full Reading of Ordinances on Agenda DEPARTMENT: CITY CLERK 2. Approval of Minutes – Regular Meeting – 04/23/2019 DEPARTMENT: CITY CLERK 3. Attachment to Minutes - 04/23/2019 DEPARTMENT: CITY CLERK 4. Planning Commission, Historical & Cultural Activities Committee, and Parks & Recreation Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. DEPARTMENT: CITY CLERK C. PUBLIC COMMENT This is the opportunity for members of the public to comment on any items not appearing on the regular agenda. Because of re strictions contained in California Law, the City Council may not discuss or act on any item not on the agenda but may briefly respond to statements made or ask a question for clarification. The Mayor may also request a brief response from staff to questio ns raised during public comment or may request a matter be agendized for a future meeting. 5. Colton Joint Unified School District Communication D. CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS Council Member Jeff Allen Council Member Bill Hussey Council Member Sylvia Robles Mayor Pro Tem Doug Wilson Mayor Darcy McNaboe Agenda Grand Terrace City Council May 14, 2019 City of Grand Terrace Page 3 E. PUBLIC HEARINGS To speak on Public Hearing Items, please fill out a Request to Speak Form and give it to the City Clerk. Each person will be allowed 3 minutes to address the City Council. If you challenge in court any action taken concerning a Public Hearing item, you may be limited to raising only those issues you, or someone else, raised at t he Public Hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the Public Hearing. All Public Hearings will be conducted following this format: a) Public Hearing opened b) Written communication c) City Council questions/staff comments d) Applicant's comments (applicant not limited to 3 minutes) e) Oral - favor and opposition (speakers limited to 3 minutes) f) Applicant’s rebuttal (applicant not limited to 3 minutes) g) Public Hearing closed h) City Council deliberation 6. General Plan Amendment 18-01 and Zoning Code Amendment 18-01 to Delete the Requirement of a Specific Plan for Development in the Hillside Residential Areas When the Property is One-Acre or Less in Size and Served by Public Infrastructure a nd Fire Service RECOMMENDATION: 1) Adopt A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ADOPTING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 18-01 AMENDING POLICY 2.2.1, TABLE 2.3, AND TABLE 2.6 OF THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT ELIMINATING THE SPECIFIC PLAN REQUIREMENT FOR CERTAIN DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN THE HILLSIDE LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LAND USE DESIGNATION; and 2) Read by Title Only, Waive Further Reading and Introduce AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, FINDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT PURSUANT TO SECTION 15061(b)(3) AND AMENDING TITLE 18 (ZONING) OF THE GRAND TERRACE MUNICIPAL CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 18.10.040 OF CHAPTER 18.10 (RESIDENTIAL ZONES) ELIMINATING THE SPECIFIC PLAN REQUIREMENT FOR CERTAIN DEVELOPMENTS IN THE HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL ZONE DISTRICT DEPARTMENT: PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7. Annexation #5 of Tract No. 18604 (Generally Located in the Area of Van Buren Street, Tesoro Court, and Gage Canal) into Landscape & Lighting Assessment District 89 -1 RECOMMENDATION: 1) Conduct the Public Hearing; and Agenda Grand Terrace City Council May 14, 2019 City of Grand Terrace Page 4 2) Adopt A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA APPROVING THE ENGINEER’S REPORT AND CONFIRMING A DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT DESCRIBED THEREIN, APPROVING THE ANNEXATION OF TRACT 18604 INTO THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 89-1 AND ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION THEREWITH, AND LEVYING THE ASSESSMENT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2019-2020 DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS F. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 8. Animal Control Community Workshop Results on Proposed Ordinances Amending Regulations Relating to Animal Control RECOMMENDATION: 1. Receive and Accept the Summary Report; and 2. Provide Staff Direction on Items 1, 2, and 11 DEPARTMENT: PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES G. NEW BUSINESS 9. Priorities Work Program RECOMMENDATION: Provide staff with direction to set Priority Work Program Workshop(s) as City Council desires. DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER 10. Public Convenience and Necessity Finding for Proposed Grocery Outlet to be Located at 22441 Barton Road for Type 20 Off -Sale Beer and Wine License RECOMMENDATION: 1. Make a positive finding of Public Convenience or Necessity for a Type 20 Off -Sale Beer and Wine License For the Proposed Grocery Outlet Market Located at 22411 Barton Road; and 2. Direct Staff to Issue the Proposed Public Convenience or Necessity Letter to the California Department of Alcohol Beverage Control in Support of Grocery Outlet's Type 20 Off-Sale Beer and Wine License. DEPARTMENT: PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Agenda Grand Terrace City Council May 14, 2019 City of Grand Terrace Page 5 11. Professional Services Agreement Between the City of Grand Terrace and UltraSystems Environmental, Inc. for Environmental Services Related to Conditional Use Permit 19 -01 (Proposed Trailer Storage Use at APN 0275-191-06 and 30) RECOMMENDATION: 1) Approve an Agreement with UltraSystems Environmental, Inc. in the amount of $40,560.00; and 2) Authorize the City Manager to Execute the Contract, subject to City Attorney approval as to form. DEPARTMENT: PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 12. Professional Service Agreements for on Call Planning and Environmental Services Between the City of Grand Terrace and Moore, Iacofano, Goltsman, Inc., and Mike Baker International RECOMMENDATION: 1. Approve Professional Services Agreements Between the City of Grand Terrace and Moore Iacofano Goltsman, Inc., and Michael Baker International (each with 3 year terms), subject to the City Manager’s approval/negotiation and the City Attorney’s approval as to form; and 2. Authorize the City Manager to Execute the Agreements, subject to the City Manager’s approval/negotiation and the City Attorney’s approval as to form . DEPARTMENT: PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 13. Notice of Completion for the Dog Park and Settlement Agreement with Clean Cut Landscaping RECOMMENDATION: 1. Authorize the appropriation of $66,493 from the following a. $54,254 from the General Fund bond proceeds; and b. $12,239 from Measure I funds to fund the final payments to Clean Cut Landscaping; 2. Direct Staff to file a Notice of Completion for the Dog Park work completed by Clean Cut Landscaping; and 3. Approve the settlement agreement and authorize the Mayor to execute the settlement agreement, subject to City Attorney approval as to form, that authorizes the final payment to Clean Cut Landscaping in the amount of $102,645.67 (representing all final outstanding payments due to Clean Cut Landscaping) as provided in the settlement agreement. DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS 14. Approval of Contract with the Boys & Girls Clubs of Greater Redlands-Riverside to Provide the City of Grand Terrace’s 2019 Summer Swim Pr ogram in the Amount Not to Exceed $25,198.00 Agenda Grand Terrace City Council May 14, 2019 City of Grand Terrace Page 6 RECOMMENDATION: 1. Waive the Competitive Bidding Requirement for the 2019 City of Grand Terrace Summer Swim Program; and 2. Approve Contract with The Boys & Girls Clubs of Greater Redlands-Riverside to Provide the City of Grand Terrace’s 2019 Summer Swim Program in the Amount Not to Exceed $25,198.00, subject to City Attorney approval as to form; and 3. Authorize the City Manager to Execute the Agreement Between the City of Grand Terrace and the Boys & Girls Club of Greater Redlands-Riverside for the 2019 Summer Swim Program, subject to City Attorney approval as to form. DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER 15. Adoption of a Resolution Setting a Public Hearing Relating to Refuse Rate Increases RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. 2019-__ setting forth a public hearing date of July 9, 2019, to hear matters pertaining to proposed waste and recycle rate increases. DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC W ORKS 16. Rescind Authorization to Enter into Lease Agreement with EVGO and Approve Lease Agreement with Carbon Solutions to Provide Electric Vehicle Equipment and Related Services for Electric Vehicle Charging Stations (EVCS) on City Property RECOMMENDATION: 1. Rescind authorization to enter into Lease Agreement previously awarded to EVGO for Electric Vehicle Service Equipment and Related Services for an Electric Vehicle Charging Station Project (EVCS) on City property; 2. Approve a Lease Agreement between the City and Carbon Solutions for Electric Vehicle Service Equipment and Related Services for an EV Charging Station Project on City property, subject to City Attorney approval as to form; 3. Authorize the City Manager to Execute the Agreement, subject to City Attorney approval as to form; 4. Acknowledge, by executing the lease agreement, the City agrees to use or sign over the California Energy Commission's Southern California Incentive Program (SCIP) grant for up to $140,000 for the project. DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS Agenda Grand Terrace City Council May 14, 2019 City of Grand Terrace Page 7 17. Update and Implementation of Parking Restrictions on De Berry RECOMMENDATION: 1. Review findings from staff. 2. Direct staff with respect to implementation of parking restrictions on De Berry, including conducting any related studies. DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS H. REQUESTS FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS BY CITY COUNCIL Pursuant to City Council policy set forth in the 2030 Vision and 2014 ‐2020 Strategic Plan, if a City Council Member is interested in a task or project that will require more than one hour of staff time to complete, the item will be agendized to ask the City Council if time should be spent on preparing a report on the proposed item. In accordance with this policy, this is the opportunity for City Council Members to request that an item be placed on a future agenda and authorize staff to prepare an agenda report. To ensure compliance with the Brown Act, the request shall be su bmitted to the City Manager at least one week in advance of the meeting so that the topic can be included on the agenda under this section. In order for any listed item to be placed on a future agenda, the City Council must act by formal motion (i.e., requ ires a motion and a second) to direct the City Manager to place the item on a future agenda. Pursuant to the requirements of the Brown Act, no other items may be considered other than those listed below. 1. Create Master Plan for Long Term Underground Utilities Requested By: Mayor McNaboe 2. Request Survey and Cost Estimate for Installation of Street Lights on Existing Power Poles Requested By: Council Member Hussey I. CITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS Agenda Grand Terrace City Council May 14, 2019 City of Grand Terrace Page 8 J. RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION CLOSED SESSION 1. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS, pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 Properties: 22317 Barton Road, APN 1167-231-01 22273 Barton Road, APN 1167-231-02 22293 Barton Road, APN 1167-311-01 City Negotiators: G. Harold Duffey, City Manager Adrian Guerra, City Attorney Negotiating Parties: Greens Group, Inc. Under Negotiation: Price and terms of payment RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION REPORT OUT OF CLOSED SESSION K. ADJOURN The Next Regular City Council Meeting will be held on Tuesday, May 28, 2019 at 6:00 p.m. Any request to have an item placed on a future agenda must be made in writing and submitted to the City Clerk’s office and the request will be processed in accordance with Council Procedures. CITY OF GRAND TERRACE CITY COUNCIL AND THE CITY COUNCIL AS THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND HOUSING AUTHORITY MINUTES ● APRIL 23, 2019 Council Chambers Regular Meeting 6:00 PM Grand Terrace Civic Center ● 22795 Barton Road City of Grand Terrace Page 1 CALL TO ORDER Mayor Darcy McNaboe convened the Regular Meeting of the City Council and City Council as the Housing Authority at 6:00 p.m. INVOCATION The Invocation was given by Council Member Bill Hussey. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by The REC Center Stars cheerleading squad. Attendee Name Title Status Arrived Darcy McNaboe Mayor Present Doug Wilson Mayor Pro Tem Present Sylvia Robles Council Member Present Bill Hussey Council Member Present Jeff Allen Council Member Present G. Harold Duffey City Manager Present Adrian Guerra City Attorney Present Debra Thomas City Clerk Present Alan French Public Works Director Present Sandra Molina Planning & Development Services Director Present Cynthia A. Fortune Assistant City Manager Absent A. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS - NONE B.2 Packet Pg. 9 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Apr 23, 2019 6:00 PM (Consent Calendar) Minutes Grand Terrace City Council and Housing Authority April 23, 2019 City of Grand Terrace Page 2 B. CONSENT CALENDAR RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER: Jeff Allen, Council Member SECONDER: Bill Hussey, Council Member AYES: McNaboe, Wilson, Robles, Hussey, Allen 1. Waive Full Reading of Ordinances on Agenda 2. Approval of Minutes – Regular Meeting – 04/09/2019 3. Attachment to Minutes - Regular Meeting - 04/09/2019 4. City Department Monthly Activity Report - March 2019 RECEIVE AND FILE. 5. February-2019 Monthly Financial Report RECEIVE AND FILE THE FEBRUARY-2019 MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT. 6. Second Reading and Adoption of an Ordinance Adding Chapter 12.56 to the Municipal Code to Regulate Wireless Telecommunication Facilities in the Public Right of Way 1. READ BY TITLE ONLY, WAIVE FURTHER READING AND ADOPT AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 12 OF THE GRAND TERRACE MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING CHAPTER 12.56, WHICH ESTABLISHES REGULATIONS FOR ALL WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES LOCATED IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY IN THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE 7. Quarterly Business License Report Ending March 31, 2019 RECEIVE AND FILE THE QUARTERLY BUSINESS LICENSE REPORT ENDING MARCH 31, 2019. 8. Resolution Adopting List of Projects Proposed to be Funded by SB 1 2019-2020 RECOMMENDATION: ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2019-20 APPROVING THE LIST OF PROJECTS TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (CTC) FOR ROAD MAINTENANCE AND REHABILITATION ACCOUNT (RMRA) FUNDING C. PUBLIC COMMENT Jennifer Araiza, The REC Center brought in The REC Center Stars cheerleading squad who performed their routine for the City Council. B.2 Packet Pg. 10 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Apr 23, 2019 6:00 PM (Consent Calendar) Minutes Grand Terrace City Council and Housing Authority April 23, 2019 City of Grand Terrace Page 3 Valerie Holmes, Chairman Veteran’s Wall of Freedom Committee invited the City Council to the Committee’s Memorial Day event. The speaker is Dr. Colonel Conrad Salinas, and the names of the fallen will be read. D. CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS Council Member Jeff Allen Council Member Jeff Allen attended the meeting of the San Bernardino County Solid Waste Task Force on April 17, 2019 and discussed the following: · CalRecycle - Proposed Regulatory Text for Short Lived Climate Pollutants o Enforcement of Recycling Laws o Reduction of Food Waste o Locations for Digester Systems o Legislative Updates Council Member Allen also attended the City/County Conference on April 18-19, 2019 and commented on the annual housing goals of the Governor and reforming CEQA. Council Member Bill Hussey Council Member Bill Hussey attended the San Bernardino County Gang & Drug Task Force on April 10, 2019, and discussed the following: · Grants and Scholarships · Mission Statement: The San Bernardino Countywide Gangs and Drugs Task Force is committed to a leadership role in advocating the prevention and suppression of gang membership and drug use throughout San Bernardino County through coordination, collaboration, and communication between education, law enforcement, the criminal justice system, elected officials, private enterprise, and community at-large. Council Member Hussey attended Community Clean Up day on April 13, 2019 and wanted to thank all of the volunteers and City staff who participated. Council Member Hussey also attended the City/County Conference on April 18 -19, 2019 and commented on the housing market and the economist who spoke regarding the possible economic downturn. Council Member Hussey, Johan Gallo, Lieutenant Doug Wolfe and G. Harold Duffey City Manager met with Assemblymember Eloise Reyes to discuss ways to enhance the City’s sheriff service. The State cannot provide funding for sheriff man hours however can receive funding for things like infrastructure, cameras, signage, and neighborhood watch. B.2 Packet Pg. 11 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Apr 23, 2019 6:00 PM (Consent Calendar) Minutes Grand Terrace City Council and Housing Authority April 23, 2019 City of Grand Terrace Page 4 Council Member Sylvia Robles Nothing to report. Mayor Pro Tem Doug Wilson Mayor Pro Tem Doug Wilson attended the San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District Board Meeting and discussed the following: · Senate Bills · Assembly Bills · Water Availability (Clean Water Act) · Water Retention and Conservation · State Drought Conditions Mayor Darcy McNaboe Mayor Darcy McNaboe attended the San Bernardino County Transportation General Policy Committee and Metro Study Session meetings and discussed the following: · Received reports on Measure I receipts for the year · Reviewed Estimated Insurance Premiums for the Fiscal Year · Recommended Approval of Amendment for the San Bernardino Regional Energy Partnership Contract with Southern California Gas Company · Reviewed State and Federal Legislative Updates · Received Major Project Status Report · Preview of Hearings to Consider Resolutions of Necessity for the Interests in Interstate 10 Corridor Contract Project · Received a Presentation on Landscaping Scenarios and Costs · Recommended Release of a Final Request for Proposal for Design Build Contract for the Mt. Vernon Viaduct · Recommended Approval to a Cooperative Agreement with Caltrans for the Construction of State Route 210 Lane Addition. · Received a Report to Provide Comments on the Plan Update for the 10 Year Delivery Plan for the Valley Freeway Projects Mayor McNaboe also attended the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority Annual Workshop and discussed the following: · Forming of a Captive Insurance Entity, wholly owned by the Joint Powers Insurance Authority serving to lower the rates for member agencies Mayor McNaboe attended the City/County Conference on April 18-19, 2019 and was very interested in hearing from the San Bernardino County Museum speaker on ideas to bring the museum into the 21st Century. She also attended the following sessions: · GenerationGO! A Work-based Learning Initiative Workshop B.2 Packet Pg. 12 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Apr 23, 2019 6:00 PM (Consent Calendar) Minutes Grand Terrace City Council and Housing Authority April 23, 2019 City of Grand Terrace Page 5 · Autonomous Vehicle - Second Coming of the Car · Dinner Speaker - Nathan Masters, host of KCET’s “Lost L.A.” · Authentically Engaging Your Community · Christopher Thornberg - What’s Ahead for Our Economy **All of the speakers have their presentation notes on the SBCTA’s website for those who may want to have access. Mayor McNaboe wished congratulations to Adrian Guerra, City Attorney and his wife on the birth of their new child. E. PUBLIC HEARINGS - NONE F. UNFINISHED BUSINESS - NONE G. NEW BUSINESS 9. Professional Services Agreement with KTUA to Prepare the Michigan Street Walkability/Complete Street Plan and Appropriation of Bond Funds Thereof in the Amount of $74,509.00 Sandra Molina, Planning and Development Services Director gave the Power Point presentation for this item. PUBLIC COMMENT Steve Kendall, Grand Terrace has concerns regarding the design for M ichigan Street; specifically, as it relates to his steep driveway. He has requested someone from the City travel to his home to look at the design of his driveway and provide their thoughts on how this project may impact his property and those neighbors wi th similar driveways. 1. APPROVE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTR ACT WITH KTUA IN THE AMOUNT OF $74,509.00 FOR PREPARATION OF THE MICHIGAN STREET WALKABILITY/COMPLETE STREET PLAN, SUBJECT TO CITY ATTORNEY APPROVAL AS TO FORM; 2. AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE CONTRACT, SUBJECT TO CITY ATTORNEY APPROVAL AS TO FORM; 3. APPROPRIATE $74,509.00 FROM THE GENERAL FUND 2011 BOND PROCEEDS BALANCE TO ACCOUNT NO. 10-955-800-XXX FOR KTUA - MICHIGAN STREET WALKABILITY/COMPLETE STREET PLAN; AND B.2 Packet Pg. 13 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Apr 23, 2019 6:00 PM (Consent Calendar) Minutes Grand Terrace City Council and Housing Authority April 23, 2019 City of Grand Terrace Page 6 4. ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE APPROVING AN EXPENDITURE OF BOND PROCEEDS TO CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR THE MICHIGAN STREET WALKABILITY/COMPLETE STREET PLAN. RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER: Jeff Allen, Council Member SECONDER: Sylvia Robles, Council Member AYES: McNaboe, Wilson, Robles, Hussey, Allen 10. Approve Contract for Traffic Signal Modification Design Services with Albert A. Webb Associates and Authorize Expenditure of $9,140 in Spring Mou ntain Ranch Traffic Mitigation Funds for Said Contract Alan French, Director of Public Works gave the Power Point presentation for this item. Council Member Allen asked what type of signal light would be installed at the location. Director French stated that a five head signal allowing a protected left; officially called a permitted protected signal head. Mayor McNaboe expressed her concerns and does not believe the design will change anything at the intersection, that no studies have been performed at the intersection showing that the design will have an impact and that the residents will not like the design change at the location. 1. APPROVE CONTRACT WITH ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TO PROVIDE TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE SIGNAL MODIFICATION PROJECT, IN THE AMOUNT OF $9,140; 2. AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO SIGN THE CONTRACT SUBJECT TO CITY ATTORNEY APPROVAL AS TO FORM; AND 3. AUTHORIZE THE APPROPRIATION OF $9,140 THE SPRING MOUNTAIN RANCH MITIGATION FUND FUND BALANCE FOR THE ABOVE-MENTIONED CONTRACT. RESULT: APPROVED [4 TO 1] MOVER: Bill Hussey, Council Member SECONDER: Jeff Allen, Council Member AYES: Doug Wilson, Sylvia Robles, Bill Hussey, Jeff Allen NAYS: Darcy McNaboe 11. Approval of MOU with City of West Hollywood to Transfer $200,000 of Rule 20A Funds to West Hollywood in Exchange for $100,000 and Authorize Use the Proceeds for Law Enforcement Purposes G. Harold Duffey, City Manager and Doug Wolfe, Lieutenant for the County of San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department gave the Power Point presentation for this item. B.2 Packet Pg. 14 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Apr 23, 2019 6:00 PM (Consent Calendar) Minutes Grand Terrace City Council and Housing Authority April 23, 2019 City of Grand Terrace Page 7 PUBLIC COMMENT Johan Gallo, Grand Terrace supports the approval of an MOU to provide additional funding for the sheriff’s department. Jeffrey McConnell, Grand Terrace supports the approval of an MOU to provide additional funding for the sheriff’s department but would like to see some of the fundi ng used for the Barton Road and Michigan Street beautification projects. Debra Thomas, City Clerk read an email into the record from Ken Henderson, Grand Terrace who provided support for the recommendation to approve the proposed MOU between the City of W est Hollywood and the City of Grand Terrace. Council Member Hussey moved to approve to: 1. Authorize the City Manager to execute the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City of Grand Terrace and City of West Hollywood, subject to City Attorney approval as to form, whereby the City will transfer $200,000 in Rule 20A Funds to West Hollywood in Exchange for $100,000.00; and 2. Authorize the City Manager to Send a Letter to SCE, Directing SCE to Transfer $200,000 of Rule 20A Allocation from Grand Terrace’s Allocation to the City of West Hollywood; and 3. Authorize Revenue and Expense appropriations to the Public Safety Fund (General Fund sub-fund) to Place Proceeds Derived from the MOU for the Express Purpose of Enhanced Law Enforcement Services in F iscal Year 2018/2019 in the amount of $100,000 respectively. The motion by Council Member Hussey died for lack of a second. Council Member Allen moved, with a second from Council Member Robles to bring the item back to the City Council during the budget deliberation process. RESULT: APPROVED [4 TO 1] MOVER: Jeff Allen, Council Member SECONDER: Sylvia Robles, Council Member AYES: Darcy McNaboe, Doug Wilson, Sylvia Robles, Jeff Allen NAYS: Bill Hussey Council Member Robles wants to ensure that staff brings to its budget deliberation process presentation, information that the City does not have enough development to have a permanent revenue stream for the item and she would like staff to perform a deeper dive on when the City incorporated, what the intent of going to charter city was B.2 Packet Pg. 15 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Apr 23, 2019 6:00 PM (Consent Calendar) Minutes Grand Terrace City Council and Housing Authority April 23, 2019 City of Grand Terrace Page 8 and the utility tax issue so Council has a clear understanding, 360 from genesis to now, on where the City is at on the sheriff issue. 12. Priorities Workshop G. Harold Duffey, City Manager gave the presentation for this item. City Manager Duffey asked the Council if staff is hitting the right target by having the type of meeting being proposed. Council Member Robles stated that the City of Highland held a meeting amongst the City Council, welcoming the public, to look at the pieces of initiatives the Counc il had to establish a work plan for the year. Council Member Robles suggested bringing the item back after staff has a chance to review how the City of Highland held its priorities workshop. Mayor McNaboe informed staff that the date being proposed will n ot work for her. City Manager Duffey acknowledged that the staff report will be brought back to the next City Council meeting for discussion. RESULT: NO ACTION TAKEN H. REQUESTS FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS BY CITY COUNCIL 1. Motion: Evaluation of Zoning Near School Properties Council Member Allen moved with a second from Council Member Robles: 1. Direct Staff to bring the item to the Planning Commission to address zoning surrounding the local schools and provide a recommendation to City Council for its review and consideration; and 2. Invite Colton Joint Unified School District for input. RESULT: ADOPTED [4 TO 0] MOVER: Jeff Allen, Council Member SECONDER: Sylvia Robles, Council Member AYES: Darcy McNaboe, Sylvia Robles, Bill Hussey, Jeff Allen ABSTAIN: Doug Wilson I. CITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS G. Harold Duffey, City Manager shared a short video of the volunteers who participated in the April 13, 2019 Pickup Paint and Plant, Keep Grand Terrace Beautiful event. B.2 Packet Pg. 16 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Apr 23, 2019 6:00 PM (Consent Calendar) Minutes Grand Terrace City Council and Housing Authority April 23, 2019 City of Grand Terrace Page 9 The City had a half page feature published in the Inland Empire magazine: Live, Grow & Play in the Center of the Inland Empire along with an article outlining the quality of life within Grand Terrace. City Manager Duffey reminded the City Council of the upcoming Grand Terrace Art Show sponsored by the Grand Terrace Historical & Cultural Activities Committee scheduled Sunday, May 5, 2019 from 1-4 p.m. at City Hall. J. RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION Mayor McNaboe recessed the Regular Meeting of the City Council at 7:50 p.m. CLOSED SESSION 1. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS, pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 (CITY OF GRAND TERRACE) Property: 22273 Barton Road, APN 1167-231-02 City Negotiators: G. Harold Duffey, City Manager Adrian Guerra, City Attorney Negotiating parties: To be determined Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment 2. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS, pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 (HOUSING AUTHORITY OF GRAND TERRACE) Properties: 22317 Barton Road, APN 1167-231-01 and 22293 Barton Road, APN 1167-311-01 Housing Authority Negotiators: G. Harold Duffey, Executive Director Adrian Guerra, General Counsel Negotiating Parties: To be determined Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION Mayor McNaboe reconvened the Regular Meeting of the City Council at 8:20 p.m. REPORT OUT OF CLOSED SESSION Mayor McNaboe announced there was not reportable action taken and direction was given to staff. B.2 Packet Pg. 17 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Apr 23, 2019 6:00 PM (Consent Calendar) Minutes Grand Terrace City Council and Housing Authority April 23, 2019 City of Grand Terrace Page 10 K. ADJOURN Mayor McNaboe adjourned the Regular Meeting of the City Council at 8:21 p.m. The Next Regular City Council Meeting will be held on Tuesday, May 14, 2019 at 6:00 p.m. _________________________________ Darcy McNaboe, Mayor _________________________________ Debra Thomas, City Clerk B.2 Packet Pg. 18 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Apr 23, 2019 6:00 PM (Consent Calendar) CITY OF GRAND TERRACE CITY COUNCIL AND CITY COUNCIL AS THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND HOUSING AUTHORITY MINUTES ● AP RIL 23, 2019 Council Chamber Regular Meeting 6:00 PM Grand Terrace Civic Center ● 22795 Barton Road City of Grand Terrace ATTACHMENTS TO April 23, 2019 City Council Minutes PowerPoint Presentations B.3 Packet Pg. 19 Communication: Attachment to Minutes - 04/23/2019 (Consent Calendar) Additional Gas Tax  and DMV registration Money – estimated 2019‐20 at $200,000 Using year 3 CIP list and a section of Barton Road Provide list to SBCTA B.3 Packet Pg. 20 Communication: Attachment to Minutes - 04/23/2019 (Consent Calendar) Professional Services Agreement with KTUA to Prepare the Michigan Street Walkability/Complete Street Plan APRIL 23, 2019 2030 VISION STATEMENT Supports our Vision, “…a place where residents can enjoy an outstanding quality of life…” Michigan Street traffic reduction Streetscape for build-out of Michigan Street Multi-modal: Pedestrian, Bicyclists, Motorist B.3 Packet Pg. 21 Communication: Attachment to Minutes - 04/23/2019 (Consent Calendar) BACKGROUND April 9, 2019 City Council Meeting Moved to April 23, 2019 October 9, 2018 City Council Meeting Approved a Priority Project List for the Use of BondProceeds Prioritized the Michigan Street Walkability/CompleteStreet Project RFP was sent to 11 consulting firms 3 other contacted us 6 Responses received, reviewed and rated B.3 Packet Pg. 22 Communication: Attachment to Minutes - 04/23/2019 (Consent Calendar) SCOPE OF WORK Two community outreach meetings Two community outreach meetings •Elements: Continuous sidewalks, Parkway Landscaping, Decorative lighting, Traffic Calming, Street furniture, Bikeways Concept DesignConcept Design •Implementation through grants, funding sources, future development Final DesignFinal Design 3-D Fly through video3-D Fly through video B.3 Packet Pg. 23 Communication: Attachment to Minutes - 04/23/2019 (Consent Calendar) RECOMMENDATION Approve Agreement in the amount of $74,509.00 for preparation of the Michigan Street Walkability/Complete Street Plan Approve Authorize the City Manager to Execute the Contract, subject to City Attorney approval as to form; and Authorize Appropriate $74,509.00 from the General Fund 2011 Bond Proceeds BalanceAppropriate Adopt a Resolution approving the expenditure of Bond Proceeds for the ProjectAdopt B.3 Packet Pg. 24 Communication: Attachment to Minutes - 04/23/2019 (Consent Calendar) B.3 Packet Pg. 25 Communication: Attachment to Minutes - 04/23/2019 (Consent Calendar) Traffic  Signal conformance This Contract scope for Signal Modification Design adding new signal head Amount of effort $9,140 Under contract for Commerce Way  Design Use 5% Spring Mountain ranch Fund B.3 Packet Pg. 26 Communication: Attachment to Minutes - 04/23/2019 (Consent Calendar) Approve MOU, Direct City Manager and Appropriate Funds for Enhanced Law Enforcement Services Tonight’s Discussion Tonight’s Discussion 1) Approval of MOU with City of West Hollywood for Transfer of $200,000 Rule 20A Credits. 2) Authorize City Manager to Send Letter to Southern California Edison (SCE), Requesting Exchange (Transfer) of Rule 20A Credits. 3) Appropriate Revenue ($100,000) from MOU Proceeds to Public Safety Fund B.3 Packet Pg. 27 Communication: Attachment to Minutes - 04/23/2019 (Consent Calendar) What is Rule 20A? California Public Utilities Program Developed in 1960 to  Underground Utilities What is Rule 20A? •In Order to Qualify to Use Rule 20A Funding a City Must: •Public Benefit •Eliminate an Unusual Heavy Concentration of Overhead Lines; •Involve Street or Road with High Volume of Traffic; •Benefit Civic, Public Recreation of Scenic Interest •Be Listed as Arterial Street or Major Collector B.3 Packet Pg. 28 Communication: Attachment to Minutes - 04/23/2019 (Consent Calendar) What is Rule 20A? •Each City Originally Allocated Credits Based on Utility Meters. •In the 1990’s Formula Changed to a Complex Formula. •Public Utilities Recoup Their Costs by Taking Total Annual Credit Allotments and Submitting Cost as a Part of Their General Rate Case. •Basically, a Rate Payer Fund Program. B.3 Packet Pg. 29 Communication: Attachment to Minutes - 04/23/2019 (Consent Calendar) What is Rule 20A? •Grand Terrace’s Allotment is Approximately $25,000 Per Year. The Current Balance is $926,000. •TheCityofGrandTerraceHasNever Submitted Any Plan to Use Underground Credits. •Only Real Identified Project is Undergrounding of 1 Pole on Southeast Corner of Barton & Mt. Vernon. (Estimated $446,400.00) * All other poles on Michigan (28 Poles), Mt. Vernon (Over 30) are estimated to cost $100,000 to $125,00 per pole. B.3 Packet Pg. 30 Communication: Attachment to Minutes - 04/23/2019 (Consent Calendar) What is Rule 20A? •If MOU is Approved, Grand Terrace’s Credit Will Be $726,000 (But City Could Tackle Projects Up to $850,000 Because SCE Allows Advances of Up to 5 Years) Approve MOU B.3 Packet Pg. 31 Communication: Attachment to Minutes - 04/23/2019 (Consent Calendar) 1) Approve MOU A) MOU Between City of Grand Terrace & West Hollywood Deal Points. 1) City of Grand Terrace to Request Transfer of $200,000 in Rule 20A Credits to West Hollywood’s Rule 20A Account. 2) West Hollywood Agrees to Pay City of Grand Terrace $100,000 (50% of Transferred Amount) 2) Authorize City Manager to Send Letter to SCE B.3 Packet Pg. 32 Communication: Attachment to Minutes - 04/23/2019 (Consent Calendar) 2) Authorize City Manager to Send Letter to SCE The MOU is an Agreement Between Grand Terrace & West Hollywood. •Therefore, the Exchange (Transfer) Must be Initiated by Grand Terrace, with an Official Request Directing SCE to Transfer $200,000 of Grand Terrace’s Rule 20A Allotment to West Hollywood. •SCE is Not a Party to MOU and Does Not Regulate or Govern the MOU Between Cities 3) Appropriation of Revenue from MOU to Public Safety Fund (Sub‐fund of General Fund) B.3 Packet Pg. 33 Communication: Attachment to Minutes - 04/23/2019 (Consent Calendar) 3) Appropriation of Revenue from MOU to Public Safety Fund Accomplishes 2030 Vision: Goal 1 – Ensure Our Fiscal Viability by Identifying New Revenue Sources. Goal 2 – Maintain Public Safety by Ensuring Staff Levels Remain Adequate for Our Community. 3) Appropriation of Revenue from MOU to Public Safety Fund Action Also Identified in City Manager Implementation Plan of the 2030 Vision. This Action is also Consistent with Section 2.1.3 of City Manager Implementation Plan, Use of One‐Time Resources. B.3 Packet Pg. 34 Communication: Attachment to Minutes - 04/23/2019 (Consent Calendar) Lt. Wolfe Has Developed an Action  Plan to Utilize the Proceeds from  the MOU Grand Terrace  Cover Deputy Overtime Doug Wolfe, Lieutenant  San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department dwolfe@sbcsd.org B.3 Packet Pg. 35 Communication: Attachment to Minutes - 04/23/2019 (Consent Calendar) Recommendation for Increasing Patrol Staffing •Current staffing –1 – 24 hour deputy and 1 – 40 hour deputy •(Option A) Our recommendation add 1 – 40 hour deputy, $296,618 •(Option B) Covering position with overtime –24 hours per week/52 Weeks $100,000 Recommendations Cont.  Increasing Grand Terrace staffing levels will help with the  following: •Will increase staffing levels to provide more coverage during peak times •Increase the level of service to the citizens of Grand Terrace (Quality of life issues) •Create a safer work environment for the Deputies B.3 Packet Pg. 36 Communication: Attachment to Minutes - 04/23/2019 (Consent Calendar) Current vs. upgraded patrol schedule Position can reduce current overtime costs •Quality of life issues within the city of Grand Terrace (10 hours per week) •Help with traffic issues / complaints (Schools) •We can adjust hours for special projects (4th of July, community park events, etc. which adds up to 40+ hours of overtime per year) B.3 Packet Pg. 37 Communication: Attachment to Minutes - 04/23/2019 (Consent Calendar) Recommendation  •I recommend the city of Grand Terrace secures the funding ($100,000) to pay for 24 hours of overtime each week, for a year, which would give us two deputies working in Grand Terrace during the busiest times of the shift. QUESTIONS?  Doug Wolfe, Lieutenant  San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department dwolfe@sbcsd.org B.3 Packet Pg. 38 Communication: Attachment to Minutes - 04/23/2019 (Consent Calendar) Questions? Approve Staff Recommendations B.3 Packet Pg. 39 Communication: Attachment to Minutes - 04/23/2019 (Consent Calendar) City Manager’s Update 4/23/2019 B.3 Packet Pg. 40 Communication: Attachment to Minutes - 04/23/2019 (Consent Calendar) B.3 Packet Pg. 41 Communication: Attachment to Minutes - 04/23/2019 (Consent Calendar) AGENDA REPORT MEETING DATE: May 14, 2019 Council Item TITLE: Planning Commission, Historical & Cultural Activities Committee, and Parks & Recreation Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes PRESENTED BY: Debra Thomas, City Clerk RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. 2030 VISION STATEMENT: This staff report supports Goal #5, Engage in Proactive Communication. BACKGROUND: Beginning with the November 14, 2017 City Council meeting, the City Clerk was directed by the City Manager to provide Council with a copy of the Planning Commission, Historical & Cultural Activities Committee and Volunteer Emergency Operations Committee minutes to keep Council up -to-date on those Commission/Committee activities. On January 16, 2018, the City Manager requested that the Parks & Recreation Advisory Committee minutes be included in the Committee/Commission Report once that advisory body begins its regular meetings. Pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34179(j), the Countywide Oversight Board was created and became effective on July 1, 2018 which has replaced the City’s Oversight Board. Therefore, no future Oversight Board minutes will be included in this report going forward. DISCUSSION: Planning Commission – None to Report. On May 6, 2019, the Historical & Cultural Activities Committee held its Regular Meeting and approved its April 1, 2019 Regular Meeting minutes. The minutes for this meeting are included as an attachment to this report. The Committee’s next Regular Meeting is scheduled for June 3, 2019. On April 11, 2019, the Parks & Recreation Advisory Committee held its Regular Meeting and approved its March 14, 2019 Regular Meeting minutes. The minutes for this meeting is included as an attachment to this report. The Committee’s next Regular Meeting is scheduled for May 9, 2019. B.4 Packet Pg. 42 FISCAL IMPACT: None. ATTACHMENTS: • 04-01-2019 - H&C Minutes (PDF) • 03-14-2019 P&R Minutes (PDF) APPROVALS: Debra Thomas Completed 05/07/2019 11:40 AM City Attorney Completed 05/07/2019 3:52 PM Finance Completed 05/08/2019 10:08 AM City Manager Completed 05/08/2019 11:28 AM City Council Pending 05/14/2019 6:00 PM B.4 Packet Pg. 43 B.4.aPacket Pg. 44Attachment: 04-01-2019 - H&C Minutes (Committee and Commission Minutes) B.4.aPacket Pg. 45Attachment: 04-01-2019 - H&C Minutes (Committee and Commission Minutes) B.4.bPacket Pg. 46Attachment: 03-14-2019 P&R Minutes (Committee and Commission Minutes) B.4.bPacket Pg. 47Attachment: 03-14-2019 P&R Minutes (Committee and Commission Minutes) B.4.bPacket Pg. 48Attachment: 03-14-2019 P&R Minutes (Committee and Commission Minutes) C.5Packet Pg. 49Communication: Colton Joint Unified School District Communication (Public Comment) C.5Packet Pg. 50Communication: Colton Joint Unified School District Communication (Public Comment) AGENDA REPORT MEETING DATE: May 14, 2019 Council Item TITLE: General Plan Amendment 18-01 and Zoning Code Amendment 18-01 to Delete the Requirement of a Specific Plan for Development in the Hillside Residential Areas When the Property is One-Acre or Less in Size and Served by Public Infrastructure and Fire Service PRESENTED BY: Sandra Molina, Planning & Development Services Director RECOMMENDATION: 1) Adopt A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ADOPTING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 18-01 AMENDING POLICY 2.2.1, TABLE 2.3, AND TABLE 2.6 OF THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT ELIMINATING THE SPECIFIC PLAN REQUIREMENT FOR CERTAIN DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN THE HILLSIDE LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LAND USE DESIGNATION; and 2) Read by Title Only, Waive Further Reading and Introduce AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, FINDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT PURSUANT TO SECTION 15061(b)(3) AND AMENDING TITLE 18 (ZONING) OF THE GRAND TERRACE MUNICIPAL CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 18.10.040 OF CHAPTER 18.10 (RESIDENTIAL ZONES) ELIMINATING THE SPECIFIC PLAN REQUIREMENT FOR CERTAIN DEVELOPMENTS IN THE HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL ZONE DISTRICT 2030 VISION STATEMENT: These Amendments support the City’s 2030 Vision Plan, Goal #3, Promote Economic Development by providing for development in hillside residential areas where it is reasonable to develop land without the requirement for a specific plan. BACKGROUND: The Hillside Low Density Residential Designation (HLDR) in the General Plan Land Use Map is located on the east side of the city along the steep slopes of blue mountain. This area is zoned Hillside Residential (HR) in the Zoning Map and it is identified by E.6 Packet Pg. 51 physical characteristics and environmental constraints including steep slopes and rocky slides. The General Plan and Zoning Map require any development proposed within the Hillside designation to have the minimum density of one dwelling u nit per acre and provide a special evaluation of all environmental issues, including provisions for the protection of natural resources, demonstrate that building pads and streets can be graded with minimal impact to the hillside and views, and that adequa te utilities, public services and fire protection can be provided. Prior to development of property in this area, a developer is required to submit a Specific Plan to the City for adoption. A Specific Plan is a comprehensive planning and zoning document for a defined geographic region of the City, i.e. it serves as the zoning code for that specific area. A Specific Plan is regulated by the California Government Code (Section 65451 through 65470), which requires diagrams and text identifying the standards and criteria by which development will proceed, including standards for development, land use, private and public transportation, infrastructure and financing. DISCUSSION: Specific plans are most commonly appropriate for large scale developments that lack infrastructure, access, have topographic constraints, and for which development standards are required. However, the current regulations take a “one -size fits all” approach by requiring all properties to have a specific plan irrespective of the size and actual conditions of the subject site. Accordingly, even for a smaller property where one residential unit is being proposed and it is readily served by infrastructure, access, and the fire department, the current regulations require a Specific Plan, which could be costly and unnecessary. To address this concern, staff has recommended revisions to the General Plan and Zoning Code. The proposed amendments to the General Plan will provide that "a specific plan may not be required for existing parcels that are one acre or less in size, are readily served by existing infrastructure, have public access, and fire services can be readily provided". As a policy document, the words “may not” gives the City Council flexibility in the future to determine if a Specific Plan is necessary without having to amend the General Plan again. Currently, staff does not believe a Specific Plan is necessary for existing parcels that are one acre or less in size, are readily served by existing infrastructure, have public access, and fire services can be readily provided. Accordingly, to implement the General Plan, staff has recommended that the Zoning Code be amended to provide that Specific Plans shall not be required under those circumstances at this time . On April 18, 2019, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed amendments, and voted 5 -0 recommending that the City Council adopt E.6 Packet Pg. 52 General Plan Amendment 18-01 to amend Policy 2.2.1, Table 2.3, and Table 2.6 of the General Plan Land Use Element and Zoning Code Amendment 18-01 to amend Section 18.10.040, Table 18.10.040, Footnote (a) of Chapter 18.10 Residential Zones . The Planning Commission Staff Report is attached. SB 18 CONSULTATION: Pursuant to Senate Bill 18, Government Code §65352.3, whenever the Gener al Plan is proposed to be amended the City must provide for consultation with Native American Tribes for the purpose of preserving places, features and objects of cultural significance. Consultation letters were mailed to the California Native American Tribes identified by the California Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) which began a ninety (90) day consultation period. Only one Native American Tribe commented and recommended conditions related development of the site, but not particularly the general plan amendment. PUBLIC NOTICE: Notice of the public hearing was published in the Grand Terrace City News, posted in three locations, and mailed to property owners ten (10) days prior to the hearing date. The standard mailing radius is 300 feet from the subject property lines. In this instance, the mailing was expanded to property owners within 600 feet from the terminus of Westwood Street. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The General Plan Amendment 18-01 and the Zoning Code Amendment 18-01 (collectively, the “project”) are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) in that the project is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects, which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. The project will not have a significant effect on the environment because the amendments only change administrative procedures relating to the requirement of a specific plan. FISCAL IMPACT: Implementation of the legislative changes will not create a fiscal impact. ATTACHMENTS: • GP Amendment 18-01_Resolution (DOCX) • Ordinance_ZCA 18-01 (DOC) • Notice of Exemption_GPA and ZCA (DOC) E.6 Packet Pg. 53 APPROVALS: Sandra Molina Completed 04/27/2019 9:30 PM City Attorney Completed 05/07/2019 5:08 PM Finance Completed 05/08/2019 3:37 PM City Manager Completed 05/08/2019 5:58 PM City Council Pending 05/14/2019 6:00 PM E.6 Packet Pg. 54 Page 1 of 5 RESOLUTION NO. 2019- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ADOPTING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 18-01 AMENDING POLICY 2.2.1, TABLE 2.3, AND TABLE 2.6 OF THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT ELIMINATING THE SPECIFIC PLAN REQUIREMENT FOR CERTAIN DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN THE HILLSIDE LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LAND USE DESIGNATION WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 65300 of the State Planning and Zoning Law (Division 1 Title 7 of the California Government Code) on April 27, 2010, the City of Grand Terrace adopted Resolution 2010 -10 adopting a General Plan to provide comprehensive, long-range planning guidelines for future growth and development which incorporates the following nine elements: Land Use, Circulation, Open Space and Conservation, Public Health and Safety, Noise, Public Services, Housing, and Sustainable Development. Each element of the General Plan provides Goals, Programs, and Policies as required by State Law; and WHEREAS, the Hillside Low Density Residential (HLDR) designation is applied to the hillside areas of Blue Mountain, considered a natural resource subject to special consideration to protect the scenic views and environmental resources of the mountain ; and WHEREAS, the HLDR designation of the General Plan requires that properties within the designated areas demonstrate that building pads and streets can be graded with minimal impact to the hillside and views, and that adequate utilities and public services, including drainage, domestic water, sanitary sewer, fire protection can be provided. It requires that proposed developments within the HLDR prepare a specific plan; and WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment 18-01 proposes to amend the General Plan Land Use Element so that properties of a certain size with infrastructure readily available and that can be readily provided fire protection services may be developed without the requirement for a specific plan; and WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment 18-01 is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) in that the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects, which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. WHEREAS, on April 18, 2019, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on General Plan Amendment 18-01 at the Grand Terrace Council Chambers located at 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California 92313 and voted 5- 0, recommending that the City Council adopt General Plan Amendment 18 -01 to amend Policy 2.2.1, Table 2.3, and Table 2.6 of the Land Use Element ; and E.6.a Packet Pg. 55 Attachment: GP Amendment 18-01_Resolution [Revision 4] (GPA 18-01 and ZCA 18-01) Page 2 of 5 WHEREAS, on May 14, 2019, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing on General Plan Amendment 18-01 at the Grand Terrace Council Chambers located at 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California 92313 and concluded the hearing on said date; and WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace: Section 1. The Recitals set forth above are true and correct and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 2. Based upon the foregoing, oral and written testimony presented by members of the public and City staff (including reports and presentations made at the public hearing), the City Council hereby finds that the General Plan Amendment 18-01 satisfies the requirements of CEQA because: a. The activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects, which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. The project will not have a significant effect on the environment bec ause the amendment only amends administrative procedures for the requirements of a specific plan. Section 3. Based upon the foregoing, oral and written testimony presented by members of the public and City staff (including reports and presentations made at the public hearing), the City Council finds as follows with respect to General Plan Amendment 18-01: a. General Plan Amendment 18-01 is consistent with the intent of the Hillside Low Density Residential designation of the General Plan Land Use Element. The existing designation identifies that the HLDR designation requires preparation of a specific plan in the hillside area. Given the topography of the hillside area, lack of infrastructure (i.e. sewer, water, etc.); lack of access and challenges related to fire protection services, the preparation of a specific plan is appropriate. However, the HLDR designation does not provide consideration for properties that do not exhibit those characteristics. General Plan Amendment 18-01 proposes to amend the Land Use Element so that it provides consideration from specific plan requirements for those properties that are one acre or less in size, are readily served by existing infrastructure where topography, adequate infrastructure, and access are present. It is appropriate to amend the Land Use Element, as E.6.a Packet Pg. 56 Attachment: GP Amendment 18-01_Resolution [Revision 4] (GPA 18-01 and ZCA 18-01) Page 3 of 5 proposed, because the amendment carves out only limited circumstances where a specific plan would not be required, and therefore, the amendment is a procedural change. In all other circumstances, a specific plan would be required in accordance with the General Plan. Therefore, this amendment is consistent with the General Plan. b. The Amendment promotes Land Use Goal 2.2 to preserve and enhance the quality and character of the City’s residential neighborhoods because it maintains the integrity of the intent of the specific plan requirement. c. Adoption of this General Plan Amendment is not in conflict with Section 65358(b) of the Government Code relating to the number of amendments permitted per year, because this amendment is the first amendment of calendar year 2019. Section 4. Based upon the forgoing, oral and written testimony presented by members of the public and City staff (including reports and presentations made at the public hearing), this Council hereby adopts General Plan Amendment 18-01, attached hereto as Exhibits 1. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace at a regular meeting held on the 14th day of May 2019. __________________________ Darcy McNaboe, Mayor ATTEST: Debra L. Thomas, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Adrian R. Guerra City Attorney E.6.a Packet Pg. 57 Attachment: GP Amendment 18-01_Resolution [Revision 4] (GPA 18-01 and ZCA 18-01) Page 4 of 5 Exhibit 1 General Plan Amendment 18-01 POLICY 2.2.1 OF THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT IS REVISED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: Policy 2.2.1: Any development occurring within the Hillside residential designation shall be required to prepare a Specific Plan. Except that a specific plan may not be required for existing parcels that are one acre or less in size, are readily served by existing infrastructure, have public access, and fire services can be readily provided. TABLE 2.3 OF THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT IS REVISED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: Table 2.3 City of Grand Terrace General Plan Land Use Designations Land Use Designation Purpose of Land Use RESIDENTIAL Hillside Low Density Residential (HLDR) Maximum Density – 1 dwelling unit per gross acre The hillside areas of Blue Mountain located at the far eastern edge of the City are considered a natural resource that requires special consideration to protect the scenic views and environmental resources of the mountain. Any development proposed within the Hillside designation will require special evaluation of all environmental issues and must include provisions for the protection of all natural resources within the area. Properties within the designated areas must demonstrate that building pads and streets can be graded with minimal impact to the hillside and views, and that adequate utilities and public services, including drainage, domestic water, sanitary sewer, fire protection can be provided. Proposed developments within this area shall be required to prepare a Specific Plan. A Specific Plan may not be required for existing parcels that are one acre or less in size, are readily served by existing infrastructure, have public access and fire services can be readily provided. Clustered development that protects sensitive slopes and natural resources shall be strongly encouraged. E.6.a Packet Pg. 58 Attachment: GP Amendment 18-01_Resolution [Revision 4] (GPA 18-01 and ZCA 18-01) Page 5 of 5 TABLE 2.6 GENERAL PLAN IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM OF THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT IS REVISED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: Policy Project Review Initiative Policy/Action Primary Responsibility Support Responsibility Funding Source Priority Land Use Element Goal 2.2: Preserve and enhance the quality and character of the City’s residential neighborhoods. 2.2.1 X Any development occurring within the Hillside Residential designation shall be required to prepare a Specific Plan. A Specific Plan may not be required for existing parcels that are one acre or less in size, are readily served by existing infrastructure, have public access, and fire services can be readily provided. a. Enforce the current requirement for the preparation of a Specific Plan for development proposed in areas designated as Hillside Residential. CD CA GF 1 E.6.a Packet Pg. 59 Attachment: GP Amendment 18-01_Resolution [Revision 4] (GPA 18-01 and ZCA 18-01) ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, FINDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT PURSUANT TO SECTION 15061(b)(3) AND AMENDING TITLE 18 (ZONING) OF THE GRAND TERRACE MUNICIPAL CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 18.10.040 OF CHAPTER 18.10 (RESIDENTIAL ZONES) ELIMINATING THE SPECIFIC PLAN REQUIREMENT FOR CERTAIN DEVELOPMENTS IN THE HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL ZONE DISTRICT WHEREAS, the City of Grand Terrace (“City”) adopted a zoning code, which has been amended from time to time; and WHEREAS, Chapter 18.10 (Residential Zones) requires the preparation of a Specific Plan for all proposed development located within the Hillside Residential zone district; and WHEREAS, Zoning Code Amendment 18-01 proposes to amend Section 18.10.040 (Site Development Standards) of Chapter 18.10 (Residential Zones) relating to the preparation of a specific plan; specifically, a specific plan shall not be required for existing parcels that are one acre or less in size, are readily served by existing infrastructure, have public access, and fire services can be readily provided; and WHEREAS, state law requires that the City’s Zoning Code (Title 18 of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code) conform with the General Plan’s goals and policies. WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections 65800 and 65850 of the California Government Code, the City may adopt ordinances to regulate the use of buildings, structures, and land as between industry, business, residences, and open space, and other purposes; to regulate the location, height, bulk, number of storie s and size of buildings and structures, the size and use of lots, yards, courts and other open spaces, the percentage of a lot which may be occupied by a building or structure, and the intensity of land use; and to establish requirements for off -street parking, in compliance with the California Government Code. WHEREAS, Zoning Code Amendment 18-01 is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) in that the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects, which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. The project will not have a significant effect on the environment because the amendments only change administration procedures to the requirement of the specific plan; and E.6.b Packet Pg. 60 Attachment: Ordinance_ZCA 18-01 [Revision 3] (GPA 18-01 and ZCA 18-01) WHEREAS, on April 18, 2019, the Planning Commission of the City of Grand Terrace conducted a duly noticed public hearing on Zoning Code Amendment 18-01 at the Grand Terrace City Hall Council Chambers located 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California 92313 and concluded the hearing by voting to recommend City Council approval; and WHEREAS, on May 14, 2019, the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace conducted a duly noticed public hearing on Zoning Code Amendment 18-01 at the Grand Terrace City Hall Council Chambers located 22795 Barton Road and concluded the hearing on said date; and WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY GRAND TERRACE DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council hereby specifically finds that all the facts set forth in the above Recitals, are true and correct and are incorporated herein as findings of the City Council. SECTION 2. The City Council hereby finds that the Project is not subject to environmental review pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of Title 14 the California Code of Regulations because the amendments only amend administrative procedures for the requirement of a specific plan. SECTION 3. Based on substantial evidence presented to the City Council during the public hearing, including public testimony, and written and oral staff reports, the City Council specifically finds as follows with regard to Zoning Code Amendment 18-01: a. Zoning Code Amendment 18-01 will not be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare of the persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed amendment or injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood or within the City because the amendment identifies the parameters by which a specific plan is not required, specifically lots that are one acre or less in size, that are served by existing infrastructure, have public access, and that can be provided with fire services. It is not justifiable to requ ire a specific plan that meet these criteria and are not creating the potential impacts of lots without infrastructure, circulation, access or that create other impacts. b. The proposed Zoning Code amendment is consistent with the General Plan for which General Plan Amendment 18-01 has been filed to similarly amend the requirement for a specific plan. SECTION 4. Section 18.10.040 (Site Development Standards), Table 18.10.040, E.6.b Packet Pg. 61 Attachment: Ordinance_ZCA 18-01 [Revision 3] (GPA 18-01 and ZCA 18-01) Footnote (a) of Chapter 18.10 (Residential Zones) of Title 18 of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code is amended as contained in attached Exhibit 1 of this ordinance and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 5. Inconsistencies. Any provision of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code or appendices thereto inconsistent with the provisions of this Ordinance, to the extent of such inconsistencies and no further, is hereby repealed or modified to that extent necessary to affect the provisions of this Ordinance. SECTION 6. Severability. Should any provision of this Ordinance, or its application to any person or circumstance, be determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unlawful, unenforceable or otherwise void, that determination shall have no effect on any other provision of this Ordinance or the application of this Ordinance to any other person or circumstance and, to that end, the provisions hereof are severable. The City Council of the City of Grand Terrace declares that it would have adopted all the provisions of this ordinance that remain valid if any provisions of this ordinance are declared invalid. SECTION 7. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days from and after its adoption. SECTION 8. Certification. The Mayor shall sign, and the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published and posted pursuant to the provisions of law in that regard and this Ordinance shall take effect 30 days after its final passage. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace at a regular meeting held on the _____ day of _____, 2019. __________________________ Darcy McNaboe, Mayor ATTEST: Debra L. Thomas, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Adrian R. Guerra City Attorney E.6.b Packet Pg. 62 Attachment: Ordinance_ZCA 18-01 [Revision 3] (GPA 18-01 and ZCA 18-01) Exhibit 1 Zoning Code Amendment 18-01 SECTION 18.10.040 (SITE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS), TABLE 18.10.040, FOOTNOTE (a) IS REVISED AS FOLLOWS: a. A specific plan shall be required for all proposed projects (including tentative parcel or tract maps) which include any property located within this district, except that a specific plan shall not be required for existing parcels that are one acre or less in size, are readily served by existing infrastructure, have public access, and fire services can be readily provided. Such a specific plan shall establish site development standards on a project by project basis in consideration of the existing topography and other physical constraints. The specific plan shall not create a density greater than one dwelling unit per gross acre and shall be consistent with the city's general plan. The specific plan may consider a clustered development concept in order to preserve large areas of open space and minimize the project's impact on the physical environment. E.6.b Packet Pg. 63 Attachment: Ordinance_ZCA 18-01 [Revision 3] (GPA 18-01 and ZCA 18-01) C:\users\dthomas\appdata\roaming\iqm2\minutetraq\grandterracecityca@grandterracecityca.iqm2.com\work\attachments\5388.doc 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California, 92313-5295 909/824-6621 Fax 909/783-2600 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE NOTICE OF EXEMPTION TO: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors FROM: Planning and Development County of San Bernardino Services Department 385 N. Arrowhead Avenue, 2nd Floor City of Grand Terrace San Bernardino, CA 92415-0130 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92313 Project Title: General Plan Amendment 18-01 and Zoning Code Amendment 18-01 Project Location – Specific: City Wide Description of Project: General Plan Amendment 18-01 and Zoning Code Amendment 18-01 will exempt properties designated Hillside Low Density Residential (HLDR) on the General Plan Land Use Map and Zoned RH-Hillside Residential on the Zoning Map, that are one acre or less in size and are served by existing infrastructure from the requirement to prepare a specific plan. Name of Public Agency Approving Project: City of Grand Terrace, City Council Project Proponent: City of Grand Terrace, Planning and Development Services Department Exempt Status: California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 15061(b)(3) Reasons Why Project is Exempt: Section 15061(b)(3) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. This section exempts projects if the project activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects , which have the potential for causing a significant effect of the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment. The project will not have a significant effect on the environment because the amendments only change administration procedures to the requirement of the specific plan . Lead Agency or Contact Person: Area Code/Telephone (909) 824-6621 ______________________________ _________________ Haide Aguirre Date Assistant Planner E.6.c Packet Pg. 64 Attachment: Notice of Exemption_GPA and ZCA (GPA 18-01 and ZCA 18-01) AGENDA REPORT MEETING DATE: May 14, 2019 Council Item TITLE: Annexation #5 of Tract No. 18604 (Generally Located in the Area of Van Buren Street, Tesoro Court, and Gage Canal) into Landscape & Lighting Assessment District 89-1 PRESENTED BY: Alan French, Public Works Director RECOMMENDATION: 1) Conduct the Public Hearing; and 2) Adopt A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA APPROVING THE ENGINEER’S REPORT AND CONFIRMING A DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT DESCRIBED THEREIN, APPROVING THE ANNEXATION OF TRACT 18604 INTO THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 89-1 AND ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION THEREWITH, AND LEVYING THE ASSESSMENT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2019-2020 2030 VISION STATEMENT: This staff report supports Goal #1, "Ensuring Fiscal Viability" by ensuring proper cost recovery for services. BACKGROUND: In 1989, the City Council formed the City of Grand Terrace Lighting and Landscaping Assessment District No. 89-1 (the “District”) pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (the “Act”). The Act provides for the levy and collection of District assessments on the San Bernardino County tax rolls to pay for the maintenance and operation of lighting facilities, landscaping improvements, and appurtenant facilities and services related thereto within the District. Since 1989, the City Council has annexed land into the District four times. By this agenda item, staff is recommending that the City Council annex the area withi n Tract No. 18604 (which is generally located in the area of Van Buren Street, Tesoro Court, and Gage Canal) into the District. Participation in a Landscaping Assessment District is a condition of approval for Tract No. 18604. DISCUSSION: In order to annex Tract No. 18604 into the District as Annexation No. 5, four steps are E.7 Packet Pg. 65 required: 1. The City Council is required to initiate proceedings for the annexation of territory into the District and order an engineer’s report to be prepared in accordance with the requirements of state law. 2. The City Council is required to preliminarily approve the engineer’s report for the proposed annexation of territory into the District and proposed assessments described in the report. 3. The City Council is required declare its intention to annex the proposed territory into the District and set a public hearing (minimum 45 days thereafter) in accordance with the Act and Proposition 218. 4. Following the public hearing, the City Council may formally take action to annex the proposed territory into the District. At its meeting on March 12, 2019, the City Council adopted resolutions to effectuate the first three steps. In the third resolution adopted at that meeting, the City Council declared its intention to annex the proposed area into the District and set May 14, 2019 as the date for the public hearing in accordance with the Act and Proposition 218. This agenda item is for the purpose of conducting the public hearing and adoption of a Resolution for the annexation of Tract 18604 into the District. Staff notes that the proposed territory is owned by one property owner and that property owner has provided his written consent to the annexation. Staff, therefore, recommends that the City Council adopt the proposed resolution formally annexing the proposed territory into the District and authorizing the levy of the assessment. FISCAL IMPACT: The Engineer's Report has estimated the fiscal impact will be $26.41 per month per lot to maintain the Assessment District. This amoun t will be reimbursed to the City through the collection of property taxes by the County of San Bernardino for each parcel. ATTACHMENTS: • I. Public Hearing Instruction Sheet (DOCX) • II. Order of Procedure (DOCX) • Engineer's Report TR 18604 (PDF) • Confirmation Resolution (DOCX) APPROVALS: Alan French Completed 05/02/2019 3:17 PM City Attorney Completed 05/08/2019 4:51 PM E.7 Packet Pg. 66 Finance Completed 05/08/2019 6:41 PM City Manager Completed 05/08/2019 7:49 PM City Council Pending 05/14/2019 6:00 PM E.7 Packet Pg. 67 INSTRUCTION SHEET – PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF GRAND TERRACE LANDSCAPING AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 89-1 PUBLIC HEARING MAJORITY PROTEST: Any interested person may file a written protest with the City Clerk, stating the grounds for their objection. Said protest shall contain a description of the property sufficient to identified said property. All interested persons shall be afforded the opportunity to be heard at the Public Hearing. If written protests submitted, and not withdrawn, constitutes in excess of fifty (50%) percent of the total value of the assessment, the proceedings must be abandoned. ASSESSMENT ROLL If there are to be no changes or modifications in the individual assessment amounts, then the assessment roll as previously prepared should be confirmed. A copy of the confirmed assessments should be filed in the Office of the City Engineer, with a duplicate copy on file in the office of the City Clerk and open for public inspection. RESOLUTION CONFIRMING ASSESSMENT The adoption of this Resolution constitutes the levy of the special assessment for the fiscal year so referred to in the assessment. COUNTY AUDITOR Immediately after the adoption of the Resolution Confirming the Diagram and the Assessment, and no later than the August 10, 2019, the Clerk shall file a copy of the assessment diagram and the assessment, or a certified copy thereof, with the County Auditor. I would recommend that together with a copy of the diagram and assessment, a certified copy of the Resolution Confirming the Assessment be forwarded also. FISCAL YEAR The Assessment, as levied for these proceedings, will relate to the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2019, and ending June 30, 2020. Note that an annual updating of the proceedings will be required for each subsequent fiscal year to accomplish the levy for the ensuing fiscal year. E.7.a Packet Pg. 68 Attachment: I. Public Hearing Instruction Sheet (Landscape & Lighting Assessment District 89-1 Annexation #5) FUTURE PROCEEDINGS Be advised that it is necessary, each year, to update the Engineer’s “Report” and approve said “Report” for the ensuing fiscal year. We should all probably mark our calendars for some time after the first of the year to begin the process. CHANGES AND MODIFICAITONS AT HEARING During the course of the Public Hearing, or upon the conclusion of said hearing, the legislative body may order changes in the improvements, the boundaries of the District, or any zones thereof. The legislative body may, without further notice, order the exclusion of territory from the district, but no property shall be added to said District except upon the following terms and conditions: a. Upon written request by a property owner for the inclusion of his property; b. Upon the legislative body declaring its intention to add additional property and directing that mailed notice be given to the property owners within the proposed annexed. I would recommend that if any changes are to be considered, the matter be continued so that the proper documentation can be drafted. E.7.a Packet Pg. 69 Attachment: I. Public Hearing Instruction Sheet (Landscape & Lighting Assessment District 89-1 Annexation #5) ORDER OF PROCEDURE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE LANDSCAPING AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 89-1 PUBLIC HEARING DATE: STAFF: CITY COUNCIL: May 14, 2019 Present ENGINEER’S REPORT, general discussion of LANDSCAPING AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 89-1 See attached INSTRUCTION SHEET – PUBLIC HEARING Adopt RESOLUTION CONFIRMING ANNEXATION E.7.b Packet Pg. 70 Attachment: II. Order of Procedure (Landscape & Lighting Assessment District 89-1 Annexation #5) City of Grand Terrace Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District No. 89-1 Annexation #5 Charles Abbott Associates Contact: Richard Pedersen, P.E. Engineer’s Report Tract 18604 E.7.c Packet Pg. 71 Attachment: Engineer's Report TR 18604 (Landscape & Lighting Assessment District 89-1 Annexation #5) 2 Table of Contents Tract 18604 Sheet Exhibit Cover Sheet 1 Table of Contents 2 Annexation Overview Tract 18604 3 Assessment Diagram 4 “A” Tract 18604 Landscape Plan Exhibit 5,6 “B” Estimated Annual Maintenance Cost 7,8 “C” Determined of Assessment amount 9,10 “D” Assessment Roll, Property owners list 11 “E” Landowner Consent 12 “F” E.7.c Packet Pg. 72 Attachment: Engineer's Report TR 18604 (Landscape & Lighting Assessment District 89-1 Annexation #5) 3 City of Grand Terrace Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District No. 89-1 Annexation #5 Annexation Overview Annexation #5, for Tract 18604, to the Grand Terrace Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District No. 89-1 is being proposed to provide funding for the maintenance of landscaped parkways on the north side of Van Buren Street adjacent to lots 1 and 17, graffiti removal on the block wall along the east side of the Gage Canal within the western boundary of the tract, streetlights, and street trees along Tesoro Court and Van Buren Street. Lot B is designated as a retention basin and will be maintained as a dual-purpose basin, for retaining water and for a small playground. E.7.c Packet Pg. 73 Attachment: Engineer's Report TR 18604 (Landscape & Lighting Assessment District 89-1 Annexation #5) 4 E.7.c Packet Pg. 74 Attachment: Engineer's Report TR 18604 (Landscape & Lighting Assessment District 89-1 Annexation #5) 5 EXHIBIT “B” City of Grand Terrace Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District No. 89-1 Annexation #5 LANDSCAPE PLANS Landscape Plans and Specifications for the improvements are those prepared BGE Landscape Design, dated May 1, 2017. These Plans and Specifications have been filed separately with the Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace and are incorporated by reference. In summary, the improvements consist of landscaping. Additionally, the district will include the maintenance of a water quality basin, designed for storm water runoff purposes, designated as Lot “B”. The assessment diagram (Exhibit “A”) and the landscaping plan (Exhibit “B”) illustrate the areas to be improved by the developer and approved and accepted by the City of Grand Terrace. The total square footage of the landscape surface areas is approximately 3,239 square feet. There are 3 streetlights along Tesoro Court and 22 street trees, 17 on Tesoro Court and 5 along Van Buren Street. E.7.c Packet Pg. 75 Attachment: Engineer's Report TR 18604 (Landscape & Lighting Assessment District 89-1 Annexation #5) 6 City of Grand Terrace Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District No. 89-1 Annexation #5 E.7.c Packet Pg. 76 Attachment: Engineer's Report TR 18604 (Landscape & Lighting Assessment District 89-1 Annexation #5) 7 Exhibit C City of Grand Terrace Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District No. 89-1 Annexation #5 Estimated Annual Maintenance Cost Landscape Maintenance: The total landscape area along the adjacent Van Buren Street and in the Basin is approximately 3,239 square feet. It is estimated that this area would cost $0.02 per square foot per month to water and maintain. Cost Estimate: 3,239 s.f. x $0.02 s.f./month x 12 month/year = $777/year Tree Trimming/Pruning: An estimated cost of trimming the trees as needed. It is estimated that tree trimming is $65/per tree per year. It is estimated that tree trimming will be required in 5 years. Cost Estimate: 22 trees x $65/ x 1 time per year = $1,430/year Street Light: The electrical cost is based on the minimum monthly charge. Cost Estimate: $10/month x 3 streetlights x 12 month/year = $360/year Perimeter Wall: The cost to maintain the wall for graffiti abatement Cost Estimate: $50/month x 12 months = $600/year Publishing, Noticing, Miscellaneous: An amount of $200 per year is assigned for the proportionate share of the subject incidental costs. Cost Estimate: $200/year. Contingencies, Administration: An amount for the incidental costs for contingencies including engineering and legal administration. This amount is an estimate based upon the Annual Engineer’s Report for Assessment District 89-1. Legal: $1000 Engineering: $850 Auditor Controller: $20 Cost Estimate: $1,870/year E.7.c Packet Pg. 77 Attachment: Engineer's Report TR 18604 (Landscape & Lighting Assessment District 89-1 Annexation #5) 8 Estimated Annual Maintenance Cost (continued) Annual Cost Estimate Summary: Landscape Maintenance: $777/year Tree Trimming/Pruning: $1,430/year Street Light: $360/year Perimeter Wall: $600/year Publishing, Noticing, Miscellaneous: $200/year Contingencies, Administration: $1,870/year TOTAL $5,237/year Total Regular Annual Maintenance Cost Estimate: $5,237/year CAPITAL RESERVE COST ESTIMATE Irrigation, Landscaping, and Lighting - major repair or replacement cost estimate: A Capital Reserve is added to the annual assessment to cover non-routine maintenance costs. In the event that any or all components of Annexation #5 need replacement or major repairs, which is above and beyond the regular annual maintenance activities, which exceed the regular annual maintenance cost, the Capital Reserve will be utilized. Initial Installation cost The landscape areas: $15,000 Capital Reserve Assessment Estimate (assumed 20 year life) Improvement Initial Construction Cost Annual Reserve Amount Irrigation & Landscaping $15,000 x 5% $750/year Total Capital Reserve, Replacement and Major Repair Cost: $750/year An escalation factor is hereby established to provide for increased maintenance costs due to inflation in future fiscal years. The maximum annual increase shall be the current annualized Consumer Price Index (expressed as a percent) plus two percent (2%). Said Consumer Price Index shall be the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers for the San Bernardino, Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County area, published by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of labor Statistics. The Annualized Capital Reserve Cost along with the Regular Annual Maintenance cost establishes the Maximum Annual Assessment. E.7.c Packet Pg. 78 Attachment: Engineer's Report TR 18604 (Landscape & Lighting Assessment District 89-1 Annexation #5) 9 Exhibit D City of Grand Terrace Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District No. 89-1 Annexation #5 Determination of Assessment Amount The landscape improvements maintained under this annexation will be installed per the conditions of approval for Tract 18604. Because these landscape improvements are intended to be an enhancement within and for the entire tract, they will provide specific and special benefit to each lot within the tract, equally. In performing the analysis, it was necessary to identify the benefits that the improvements being financed and maintained render to the properties within the boundaries of the Assessment District and to determine the extent to which such properties receive a direct and special benefit as distinguished from benefits received by the general public. Special Benefits The maintenance of public landscaping and lighting provide a direct and special benefit to those parcels within the tract boundaries. Landscaping will provide an aesthetic benefit, which will enhance the parcels. Maintenance of this landscaping also improves erosion control and dust abatement resulting in additional special benefits. The landscaping, lighting, and graffiti abatement for the wall provides no benefit to any parcel outside of the boundaries of the Assessment District No. 89-1, Annexation #4. General Benefits The street trees and lighting being maintained is located along Tesoro Court, a private road, which provides primary access for each of the parcels, and the landscaping within the water quality basin for storm water runoff, designated as Lot “B”. All landscaping and lighting are for the sole benefit and enjoyment of those parcels within the boundaries of the Assessment District No. 89-1, Annexation #5; therefore, the landscaping within the boundaries of the tract being maintained does not result in any general benefits. There is approximately 20% landscaping along Van Buren Street that may qualify for partial general benefit. It is recommend that the cost of maintenance be share proportionally on a 50%-50% basis for the landscape parkway along Van Buren Street with the City of Grand Terrace. Public Lands Lot “B”, which is encumbered by an easement to the City of Grand Terrace, is a basin utilized specifically for storm water runoff for water quality purposes and a requirement for the tract to mitigate the tract’s storm water runoff. Since it is used only for water quality purposes created for the parcels within Assessment District No. 89-1, Annexation #5 boundary, the benefits provided by the improvements do not provide any special benefit to lot “B”. Accordingly, this parcel is also exempt from assessment. E.7.c Packet Pg. 79 Attachment: Engineer's Report TR 18604 (Landscape & Lighting Assessment District 89-1 Annexation #5) 10 Therefore, the maximum annual assessment to each lot is established and based on the Regular Annual Maintenance Costs along with the Annualized Capital Reserve Costs per Exhibit “B” divided by the number of lots within the tract. For the first several years, it is anticipated that the cost to maintain the assessment district will be limited to the Regular Maintenance. However, as costs rise due to major repairs and replacement, not covered by regular maintenance, the Capital Reserve portion of the Maximum Annual Assessment will be utilized. The annual assessment will never exceed the Maximum Annual Assessment, excluding the annual escalation factor, without a vote by ballot by the property owners. *Estimated Annual Maintenance and Servicing Costs: Total Regular Annual Maintenance, Servicing and Incidental Costs: $5,237 Total Capital Reserve Costs: $750 Total Costs: $5,987 General Benefit deduction (50% of maintenance cost for Van Buren St.) -$599 Total Adjusted Annual Assessment $5,388 Total Number of Lots: 17 Maximum Per Lot Annual Assessment Amount: $316.94 Maximum Per Lot Monthly Assessment Amount: $26.41 *Excludes future escalation factors. E.7.c Packet Pg. 80 Attachment: Engineer's Report TR 18604 (Landscape & Lighting Assessment District 89-1 Annexation #5) 11 Exhibit E City of Grand Terrace Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District No. 89-1, Annexation #5 PROPERTY OWNER LISTING, ASSESSMENT ROLL Property Owners: Aegis-Van Buren Housing, L.P. Current as of February 19, 2019 Assessor’s Parcel Number: (17 residential lots to receive separate assessor’s numbers) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: TRACT NO. 18604 IN THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA OWNER: DARRYL MOORE Lot # Address APN Assessed Amount 1 Tesoro Court To be assigned after map recordation $316.94 2 Tesoro Court To be assigned after map recordation $316.94 3 Tesoro Court To be assigned after map recordation $316.94 4 Tesoro Court To be assigned after map recordation $316.94 5 Tesoro Court To be assigned after map recordation $316.94 6 Tesoro Court To be assigned after map recordation $316.94 7 Tesoro Court To be assigned after map recordation $316.94 8 Tesoro Court To be assigned after map recordation $316.94 9 Tesoro Court To be assigned after map recordation $316.94 10 Tesoro Court To be assigned after map recordation $316.94 11 Tesoro Court To be assigned after map recordation $316.94 12 Tesoro Court To be assigned after map recordation $316.94 13 Tesoro Court To be assigned after map recordation $316.94 14 Tesoro Court To be assigned after map recordation $316.94 15 Tesoro Court To be assigned after map recordation $316.94 16 Tesoro Court To be assigned after map recordation $316.94 17 Tesoro Court To be assigned after map recordation $316.94 E.7.c Packet Pg. 81 Attachment: Engineer's Report TR 18604 (Landscape & Lighting Assessment District 89-1 Annexation #5) 12 E.7.c Packet Pg. 82 Attachment: Engineer's Report TR 18604 (Landscape & Lighting Assessment District 89-1 Annexation #5) 01247.0006/548186.1 RESOLUTION NO. 2019-xx A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA APPROVING THE ENGINEER’S REPORT AND CONFIRMING A DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT DESCRIBED THEREIN, APPROVING THE ANNEXATION OF TRACT 18604 INTO THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 89-1 AND ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION THEREWITH, AND LEVYING THE ASSESSMENT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2019-2020 WHEREAS, the City Council has, by previous Resolutions, formed and levied annual assessments for the City of Grand Terrace Lighting and Landscaping Assessment District No. 89-1 (hereafter referred to as the “District”) pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code, beginning with Section 22500 (hereafter referred to as the “Act”), which Act provides for the levy and collection of District assessments on the San Bernardino County tax rolls to pay for the maintenance and operation of lighting facilities, landscaping improvements, and appurtenant facilities and services related thereto within the District. WHEREAS, the City Council has also, by previous Resolutions, annexed land into the District. WHEREAS, the City Council now desires to annex Tract 18604 into the District, pursuant to the provisions of the Act, because the landscaping maintenance of certain areas within the City is necessary to preserve the environment and aesthetic beauty of the City and is in the general public interest; and, therefore, proposes to annex Tract 18604 into the City of Grand Terrace Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District No. 89-1, City of Grand Terrace, San Bernardino County, State of California. WHEREAS, therefore, the City Council has retained Charles Abbot Associates, Inc., as the assessment engineer, for the purpose of assisting with preparing a report pursuant to the Act for the purpose of annexing the territory within Tract 18604 into the District (“Engineer’s Report”) and to file the Engineer’s Report with the City Clerk in accordance with Chapter 3, Section 22623 of the Act, and which Engineer’s Report is on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace and incorporated herein by this reference. The specific improvement areas and improvements therefore are described in the Assessment District No. 89-1, Annexation No. 5, Engineer’s Report on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace and incorporated herein by this reference. WHEREAS, on March 12, 2019, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2019- 01, which initiated proceedings for the annexation of the land within Tract 18604 into the District pursuant to the Act. E.7.d Packet Pg. 83 Attachment: Confirmation Resolution [Revision 3] (Landscape & Lighting Assessment District 89-1 Annexation #5) 01247.0006/548186.1 WHEREAS, an Engineer’s Report has been prepared in accordance with the Act and in accordance with the provisions of the California Constitution, Article XIIID, and said report has been filed with the City Clerk, and the City Clerk has presented the report to the City Council pursuant to the Act. WHEREAS, on March 12, 2019, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2019- 02, which resolution preliminarily approved the related Engineer’s Report. WHEREAS, on March 12, 2019, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2019- 03, which declared the City Council’s intent to annex Tract 18604 into the District pursuant to the Act (“Resolution of Intention”). WHEREAS, after adoption thereof, appropriate notice was provided, including notice to all owners of property within T ract 18604, who are subject to any new or increased assessment in compliance with applicable law. WHEREAS, the sole owner of Tract 18604 has provided his written consent to the annexation of Tract 18604 into the District. WHEREAS, the City Council having duly received and considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the annexation of Tract 18604 into the District and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and the City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed maintenance work, now desires to annex the proposed territory into the District. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The preceding recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 2: The City Council, pursuant to Chapter 3 Section 22624 (d) of the Act, hereby approves and adopts the Engineer’s Report, attached hereto and on file with the City Clerk, which contains a full and det ailed description of Annexation No. 5, the improvements, the boundaries of Annexation No. 5, a certified copy of the diagram, and the assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within Annexation No. 5, to pay the costs and expenses associated with the maintenance and operation of lighting, landscaping, and appurtenant facilities and services related thereto. SECTION 3: The public interest and convenience requires the annexation of Tract 18604 into the District and levying assessments for maintenance, and the City Council hereby approves the annexation of Tract 18604 into the District and orders that the work, as set forth and described in the Resolution of Intention, be done and made. SECTION 4: The boundaries of the land within Tract 18640 being annexed into the District are within the incorporated City limits of the City of Grand terrace, within the County of San Bernardino, State of California and in an area designated as: Annexation E.7.d Packet Pg. 84 Attachment: Confirmation Resolution [Revision 3] (Landscape & Lighting Assessment District 89-1 Annexation #5) 01247.0006/548186.1 No. 5 of the Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District No. 89-1 (“Annexation No. 5”). SECTION 5: The assessments for Annexation No. 5, as provided further in the Engineer’s Report, are in compliance with all laws pertaining to the levy of assessments in accordance with Section 53750 et seq. of the Californ ia Government Code and in accordance with Section 22500 et seq. of the California Streets & Highways Code and are hereby approved and levied for fiscal year 2019 -20. SECTION 6: The assessments are levied without regard to the property value. The Annexation No. 5 assessments are detailed in the Engineer’s Report, which includes the requirement that any increase not exceed the greater of the change in Consumer Price Index (CPI) or three percent (2%). SECTION 7: The improvements provided by Annexation No. 5 i nclude the maintenance of landscaped parkways on the north side of Van Buren Street, graffiti removal on the block wall along the east side of the Gage Canal, streetlights, street trees along Tesoro Court and Van Buren Street, and the maintenance of a dual -purpose basin for the retention of water and for a small playground, and may include such improvements, expenses and maintenance as defined in Sections 22525, 22526, 22531 and 22534 of the California Streets & Highways Code. These improvements are more particularly described in the Engineer’s Report. SECTION 8: The assessments shall be collected at the same time and in the same manner as taxes for the County of San Bernardino are collected. SECTION 9: That pursuant to Section 22640 and 22641 of the California Streets & Highways Code, the City Clerk shall file a certified copy of the diagram and assessment with the San Bernardino Auditor-Controller/Treasurer/Tax Collector not later than July 1, 2019 for Fiscal Year 2019/2020. SECTION 10: The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace at a regular meeting held on the 14th day of May 2019. __________________________ Darcy McNaboe, Mayor ATTEST: Debra L. Thomas, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: E.7.d Packet Pg. 85 Attachment: Confirmation Resolution [Revision 3] (Landscape & Lighting Assessment District 89-1 Annexation #5) 01247.0006/548186.1 Adrian R. Guerra City Attorney E.7.d Packet Pg. 86 Attachment: Confirmation Resolution [Revision 3] (Landscape & Lighting Assessment District 89-1 Annexation #5) AGENDA REPORT MEETING DATE: May 14, 2019 Council Item TITLE: Animal Control Community Workshop Results on Proposed Ordinances Amending Regulations Relating to Animal Control PRESENTED BY: Sandra Molina, Planning & Development Services Director RECOMMENDATION: 1. Receive and Accept the Summary Report; and 2. Provide Staff Direction on Items 1, 2, and 11 2030 VISION STATEMENT: This item promotes Our Mission: To preserve and protect our community and its exceptional quality of life through thoughtful planning, within the constraints of fiscally responsible government. BACKGROUND: On April 9, 2019, Staff presented to the City Council introduction of a proposed Ordinance amending Title 6 (Animals) of the Municipal Code by repealing and replacing with new Chapter 6.04 (Animal Control) and a new Chapter 6.08 (Animal Licensing and Vaccinations). Due to the extent of the public comments received, including those primarily related to the maximum number of dogs allowed per household, license renewal dates, and license fees, the City Council directed Staff to hold a community workshop with interested parties. DISCUSSION: On April 30, 2019, a community workshop was held to discuss the proposed regulations. A flyer for the meeting was posted on the City’s website and social media site identifying workshop topics as: license fees, number of pets, annual renewal dates, vaccination clinics, and fines and penalties. However, the discussion was open to any topic a resident wished to discuss. Thirty-eight persons representing 35 households signed in for the meeting. Staff also provided an informational sheet providing a comparison of the license fees, number of pets per household and fines and penalties contained in the existing code and as proposed. The flyer and informa tional sheet are attached. The community workshop was well attended, and everyone present was given more F.8 Packet Pg. 87 than one opportunity to express concerns, comments and/or ask questions. Staff kept a log at the front of the room where points made were written. Prior to concluding the workshop, Staff went over each point on the log to ensure that all comments were captured. A photograph of the log from the workshop is attached. The comments can be summarized as shown below, and staff has provided responses: 1. Increase the number of dogs allowed per residence, including consideration for new residents who already have more than two dogs and consideration for residents caring for the pets of deployed family members. A similar comment is to increase the number of pets to 4-5 dogs per residence, or base the number of permitted dogs to parcel size Response: Attachment 4 shows the number of dogs and cats allowed in nearby jurisdictions. San Bernardino County does consider parcel size in the number of dogs allowed in single family zones. A lot size less than 7,200 square feet is allowed up to two dogs, while a larger lot (20,000 square feet) allows up to 5 dogs. More than 5 dogs would be considered a kennel, and subject to special regulations. It was suggested during the workshop that the City could also consider higher licensing fees for additional dogs. Current fees are $15/year for spayed/neutered dogs, $9/year for seniors licensing spayed/neutered dogs, and $60/year for unaltered dogs. Staff request that the Council provide Staff direction on whether the number of dogs should be increased, whether the number should be tied to lot size and whether fees should be increased for additional dogs. 2. Increase the number of dogs in consideration for private rescues or fostering of dogs Response: A comment was made that the City’s codes should allow more dogs for private rescues or fostering. Staff seeks direction from the City Council on this request. 3. Have the dog licensing period coincide with rabies expiration date. Response: This change could be accommodated, and Staff would devise a tracking mechanism to send out renewal notices at the appropriate time. 4. Allow fee exemptions for service animals. Response: The Code only allows fee exemptions for guide dogs for the bl ind. Staff would not recommend a fee exemption for all service dogs. 5. Concern was expressed with the manner by which the City advertised its canvassing efforts and the method of canvassing. Response: The City posted a flyer on social media that dog canv assing would be F.8 Packet Pg. 88 commencing and advising residents of the requirement to obtain a dog license and on the maximum number of permissible dogs. It’s the City’s practice to advise residents prior to embarking on a city-wide program. An example would be the City ’s Spring Cleaning program to address inoperable vehicles. The City places flyers on its social media pages to advise residents of the program to allow them to address any issues prior to the campaign. Animal control field staff are canvassing residential neighborhoods and providing courtesy notices on doors when they see or hear a dog. The courtesy notice advises that a dog license must be obtained within seven days, and 196 of these notices have been issued. If a license is not obtained, a citation is issued which is dismissed if a license is obtained within seven days. Of the 196 courtesy notices issued, 46 have progressed to the citation stage. Since March 31, 2019, when the City first notified the community of the dog license canvassing program, 216 new dog licenses have been issued. One hundred and four were as a result of the notification, and 112 were issued after the canvassing program began. This is an increase of 25% over the number of recorded licensed dogs, prior to March 31st. 6. Limits and regulations on other animals i.e. cats, birds, reptiles, amphibians, rodents. Response: The code allows a maximum of two cats. It is silent on other small animals such as birds, reptiles, etc. These types of animals have not been problematic, and Staff does not recommend specific regulations at this point. 7. Question on what constitutes an exotic animal. Response: The ordinance includes a definition for exotic animals. Staff will review this section and revise as needed. 8. Update the ordinance i.e. language seems dated. Response: Staff has informed the commenters that we can consider different language based on resident input. 9. Place animal control and an after-hours phone numbers in more visible locations. Response: These numbers are on the City’s website; however, Staff can look to see how to make the numbers either more visible or easier to find. 10. Educate the residents about pet behavior/pet safety. Response: Information could be placed on the City’s website to provide residents F.8 Packet Pg. 89 resources on acceptable pet behavior and safety. 11. City regulations on breeding as a business. Response: The City’s codes do not allow for breeding of dogs. Staff requests direction in this area as to whether Staff should identify regulations for small breeders.. 12. Provide more frequent vaccination clinics and noticing of clinics. Response: The City provides for one vaccination clinic each year during the annual licensing renewal period and provides noticing via social media, on the City’s website and Channel 3. The number of participants has dwindled significantly in the last three years. Other options could be to provide residents information on available vaccination and spay/neuter programs available within the County. 13. Question on animal control officers training, recognition of vicious dogs Response: Animal control officers have experience in field services and shelter services that allow them to recognize animal behavior and posturing to address the issue at hand. The proposed ordinance has provisions to allow the City to address potentially dangerous dogs and vicious dogs. The intent is to provide the City the tools to address these situations. The intent of the ordinance is not to target any particular dog breed. 14. Fines for violations, i.e. animal waste, and clarification on animal waste. Response: The wording states that owners cannot allow their animals to defecate on private or public property, and when this occurs owners must pick up the waste. The intent of this section of the Code is to ensure that owne rs pick up animal waste. Violations of any provisions of the chapter is subject to a $100 citation for the first offense. 15. Guidelines and protocol for barking dog complaints. Response: The protocol for barking dog complaints is two -fold. The person with the barking dog is received a notice of correction advising that a complaint was received alleging barking dogs, the owner is given 14 days to resolve the issue, an informational sheet of methods to help alleviate the issue is provided, and the dog owner is given a 14-day correction period. The complainant receives a letter from the City advising that the complaint was received, the dog owner was contacted and given 14 days to resolve the issue. The complainant is given a complaint form and advised to keep a log (video or audio) of the dates and times that the dog is barking. It is also suggested that the complainant obtain written complaints from adjacent residents. If the barking continues the complainant turns in the barking dog complaint form, along with the video/audio log, which is F.8 Packet Pg. 90 reviewed by the investigating officer. Barking is not deemed a violation if the dog is barking because a person is trespassing, walking by or provoking the dog. If the investigation determines there is a violation, the dog owner is given 72 hours to resolve the issue. If the issue is not resolved, the investigating officer will issue a citation. During this time, animal control staff will also conduct site inspections and meet with the dog owner to find solutions. 16. There was also an overall concern expressed with notification efforts and that the City should consider various methods, such as utilizing the community sign on Mount Vernon/GT Road and direct mailing. Response: The City’s outreach protocol efforts include plac ing the information on the City’s webpage, social media outlets and emailing to email subscribers. Other efforts can include Channel 3 and the City’s radio station. The City uses the community sign for special event activities. Direct mailing for topics of community wide interests would be a significant endeavor. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact other than staff time. ATTACHMENTS: • Community Workshop Flyer (PDF) • Informational Sheet (DOCX) • List of Comments from Workshop (PDF) • Number of Dogs and Cats Allowed by Surrounding Jurisdictions(DOCX) APPROVALS: Sandra Molina Completed 05/08/2019 5:14 PM City Attorney Completed 05/08/2019 6:19 PM Finance Completed 05/08/2019 6:37 PM City Manager Completed 05/08/2019 6:56 PM City Council Pending 05/14/2019 6:00 PM F.8 Packet Pg. 91 F.8.a Packet Pg. 92 Attachment: Community Workshop Flyer (Animal Control Community Workshop - Report) Informational Sheet Animal Control Comparison of Existing Code and Proposed Code License Fees: License Fee Existing Proposed Dog, not spayed or neutered $60/year No change Dog, spayed or neutered $15/\year $28/2 years $40/3 years No change Dog, spayed or neutered belonging to senior or disabled resident $9/year $18 years $27/3 years Cat, not spayed or neutered $9 No change Dog, spayed or neutered $5/year $10/2 years $15/3 years No change Late fees $15 No change Rabies vaccination is required to license dog. This requirement is waived with written certification from a licensed veterinarian that such vaccination would jeopardize the health of the dog. Vaccination Clinic: The City holds a vaccination clinic in January of each year to coincide with annual licensing. Number of Pets per Household: Number of Pets: Number of Pets per Household Existing Proposed Dogs Maximum of 2 No change Cats Maximum of 2 No change Fines and Penalties: Fines and Penalties Existing Proposed Unlicensed dog $100 fine, dismissed if dog is licensed within 7 days No change Violation of any animal control provision Misdemeanor Administrative violation $100/violation $200/ same violation within 12 months $500/each same violation within 12 months F.8.b Packet Pg. 93 Attachment: Informational Sheet (Animal Control Community Workshop - Report) Informational Sheet Animal Control Comparison of Existing Code and Proposed Code F.8.b Packet Pg. 94 Attachment: Informational Sheet (Animal Control Community Workshop - Report) F.8.c Packet Pg. 95 Attachment: List of Comments from Workshop (Animal Control Community Workshop - Report) Jurisdiction Number of Cats and Dogs Allowed Grand Terrace 2 dogs and 2 cats, maximum of 4, but no more than 2 dogs and 2 cats Colton 10 dogs Loma Linda 4 dogs and 4 cats, maximum of 8, but no more than 4 dogs and 4 cats City of Riverside Maximum 4 dogs, and maximum 9 cats City of Redlands Maximum 3 dogs and maximum 3 cats, 6 total County of Riverside Maximum 4 dogs, and maximum 9 cats County of San Bernardino (combination of dogs and/or cats) Based on size of single-family parcel Less than 7,200 sqft. 7,200 to 9,999 sqft. 10,000 to 19,999 sqft. 20,000 sqft. or more 2, maximum 3, maximum 4, maximum 5 maximum* *Five or more dogs and/or cats constitute a private kennel or cattery, which is subject to Private Kennels and/or Catteries Regulations of SB County Code. F.8.d Packet Pg. 96 Attachment: Number of Dogs and Cats Allowed by Surrounding Jurisdictions (Animal Control Community Workshop - Report) AGENDA REPORT MEETING DATE: May 14, 2019 Council Item TITLE: Priorities Work Program PRESENTED BY: Cynthia Fortune, Assistant City Manager RECOMMENDATION: Provide staff with direction to set Priority Work Program Workshop(s) as City Council desires. 2030 VISION STATEMENT: This staff report supports the City Council’s Mission: to preserve and protect our community and its exceptional quality of life through thoughtful planning, within the constraints of fiscally responsible government. BACKGROUND: City Council requested staff to hold a Priorities Work Program Workshop that will provide policy direction from City Council to the organization. The Priorities Work program directs staff to focus their efforts on the issues that are most important as determined by the City Council. In this process, projects, anticipated work hours, costs and projected time of completion are discussed. After these discussions are completed, the City Council, with guidance from staff, sets the priorities for these various goals. City Council will work with staff to acquire an understanding of whether all of their priorities are going to be met in a timely fashion and if the budget will allow these goals to be completed. Occasionally, there are goals that will have to be acc omplished in future years due to budget constraints and/or work hours available. The purpose of the Priorities Work Program is for City Council to: 1. discuss the proposed list of work programs and projects submitted by staff; 2. prioritize and/or rank the proposed work programs and projects; 3. approve the proposed list of work programs and projects; and 4. ensure that there is sufficient funding in the 2019-20 Approved Budget to implement the approved list or work programs and projects. DISCUSSION: City staff is requesting direction from staff to set a date and time for the 1st Priorities Work Program Workshop. Should additional workshops be desired, City Council may schedule additional workshop(s) as deemed necessary. G.9 Packet Pg. 97 At the 1st workshop, staff will be presenting proposed programs and projects with a completion timeline. In this process, projects, anticipated work hours, costs and projected time of completion will be discussed. Staff will be available to discuss, provide detailed information, and answer any inquiries from City Council regarding these programs and projects. Projects will not include current operational core services or day-to-day operating functions. These will be proposed projects that staff and or City Council has expressed a desire that the City pursue for the benefit of the community. After discussion, or should City Council desire to set another workshop , City Council will be asked to rank each proposed program and/or project with the following ranking: Category # of Points Issued Description Urgent 10 It is critically important that this project be completed within the designated timeframe (So important that it would be alright if it were the only item accomplished – although there may be several items that qualify). High Priority 7 Very important that this item be completed within the designated timeframe. Priority 5 This item may be accomplished if all “Urgent” and “High Priority” projects have been completed. Low Priority 2 This item may be accomplished if all “Urgent,” “High Priority,” and “Priority” projects have been completed, and time permits. Delete 0 This item should be removed from the Priorities Work Program. After each Council Member has completed their ranking, staff will consolidate the priority results which will be presented to City Council for their review and approval. As mentioned earlier, each proposed program or project will include anticipated work hours, cost of the program or project, funding source and projected time of completion. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with the scheduling of the Priorities Work Program Workshop. APPROVALS: Cynthia A. Fortune Completed 05/08/2019 7:14 PM Finance Completed 05/08/2019 7:14 PM City Attorney Completed 05/08/2019 7:57 PM G.9 Packet Pg. 98 City Manager Completed 05/08/2019 8:18 PM City Council Pending 05/14/2019 6:00 PM G.9 Packet Pg. 99 AGENDA REPORT MEETING DATE: May 14, 2019 Council Item TITLE: Public Convenience and Necessity Finding for Proposed Grocery Outlet to be Located at 22441 Barton Road for Type 20 Off-Sale Beer and Wine License PRESENTED BY: Sandra Molina, Planning & Development Services Director RECOMMENDATION: 1. Make a positive finding of Public Convenience or Necessity for a Type 20 Off-Sale Beer and Wine License For the Proposed Grocery Outlet Market Located at 22411 Barton Road; and 2. Direct Staff to Issue the Proposed Public Convenience or Necessity Letter to the California Department of Alcohol Beverage Control in Support of Grocery Outlet's Type 20 Off-Sale Beer and Wine License. ]2030 VISION STATEMENT: This item supports Goal #3, "Promote Economic Development" by supporting a local business. BACKGROUND: On February 25, 2019, the City of Grand Terrace Planning and Development Services Department approved Land Use 19-10 to establish a Grocery Outlet market at 22411 Barton Road. The market offers grocery products, frozen foods, deli items, vitamins, health and beauty items, housewares, gift items, and beer and wine for off -premises consumption. Attachment 1 is a Letter from Grocery Outlet further describing the business. Grocery Outlet is also improving the store front facade, ADA accessibility, and re-striping the parking area, which will revitalize the site and provide the community with additional shopping options. The site is zoned Barton Road Specific Plan - Village Commercial. This zoning does not require a Conditional Use Permit for retail alcohol sales, including ancillary sales; however, Condition of Approval No. 7 of the Land Use approval, requires the applicant to obtain the appropriate license from the State of California of Alcoholic Beverage Control (“ABC”) prior to selling alcohol. The sale of beer and wine for off site consumption is subject to the issuance of a Type 20 Beer and Wine license from the ABC. Type 20 licenses only allow the off -sale of packaged beer and wine; as opposed to Type 21 lic enses which includes hard liquor and spirits. The applicant has applied to the ABC for a Type 20 license and was informed by the G.10 Packet Pg. 100 ABC that in order to issue the license the applicant must obtain a finding of Public Convenience or Necessity (PCN) from the City. DISCUSSION: A determination of public convenience or necessity is required when the ABC determines that there is an “over concentration” of off -sale licenses (Type 20 and 21) within a census tract. The City is divided into four census tracts. The proposed Grocery Outlet is located in census tract 71.06, which is located in the southwest corner of the City, as shown in Attachment 2. To determine the number of off -sale licenses that should be issued in a census tract, the ABC Department uses a simple ratio of one license per 1,425 persons in the census tract. Attachment 3, shows that census tract 71.06, has a population of 3,943 persons. Based on the ratio, there should be only two off-sale licenses. ABC records shows that there are currently seven licenses, which means that there is an over-concentration of licenses in the census tract. One license is for Gourmet Beer and Wine which is no longer in business, but still holds a license, and is counted towards the seven licenses. That there is an over-concentration does not mean that negative or adverse impacts have occurred within the census tract; just that based on the ratio used, there are more licenses existing than mathematically permitted. Census tract 71.06 is located along Barton Road which is considered the City's main corridor where most of the commercial activity is located and therefore, there is a higher concentration of ABC licenses. Type 20 and Type 21 Licenses within Census Tract 71.06 Population 3,943 Number of Permitted licenses 2 (1/1,425 persons) Number of Existing licenses 7 (Over-concentration exist) Grand Terrace Market (Type 20) Grand Terrace Liquor (Type 21) Stater Bros Markets (Type 21) G & M Oil 105 (Type 20) Kero Mina Marketplace Inc. (Type 20) Qwik Stop (Type 21) Gourmet Beer and Wine and Food (Type 20) 7 Source: California Department of Alcoholic Beverages Control Grocery Outlet will provide grocery products, frozen foods, deli items, vitamins, health and beautify items, housewares, and gift items. Similar to other grocery and convenience stores, Grocery Outlet proposes to provide off -sale beer and wine to its customers. The off-sale of beer and wine will serve the public convenience by providing a complete grocery shopping experience; thereby, eliminating the need for multiple vehicle trips and reducing traffic along City corridors. G.10 Packet Pg. 101 FISCAL IMPACT: No negative impact to the General Fund will occur; and all costs associated with this application are paid by the applicant. In addition, the business would generate sales tax. ATTACHMENTS: • ABC Letter of Intent (PDF) • Census Tract: 71.06 (DOCX) • Census Tract Authorizations.xlsx (PDF) • ABC Forms (PDF) • Letter to ABC_4.30.2019 (DOC) APPROVALS: Sandra Molina Completed 04/30/2019 8:36 PM City Attorney Completed 05/07/2019 3:46 PM Finance Completed 05/08/2019 10:13 AM Community Development Completed 05/08/2019 11:27 AM City Manager Completed 05/08/2019 11:33 AM City Council Pending 05/14/2019 6:00 PM G.10 Packet Pg. 102 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL Census Tract: 17.06 file://cogt-fs2/vol3/USERS/COMDEV/Project%20Files/Landuse/2019/LU%2019- 10_22441%20Barton%20Road_Grocery%20Outlet/ABC%20License%20for%20Grocery%20Outlet/Tract% 2071.06,%20Active%20Off-sale%20licenses.html G.10.b Packet Pg. 104 Attachment: Census Tract: 71.06 (Public Convenience and Necessity Finding_Grocery Outlet) DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL NUMBER OF LICENSES AUTHORIZED BY CENSUS TRACT County Name County  Population County Ratio  On Sale County Ratio Off  Sale Census  Tract # Census Tract  Population On Sale Off Sale SAN BERNARDINO 2,174,938 1,254 1,425 45.10 5,178 4 3 SAN BERNARDINO 2,174,938 1,254 1,425 46.01 7,032 5 4 SAN BERNARDINO 2,174,938 1,254 1,425 46.03 5,717 4 4 SAN BERNARDINO 2,174,938 1,254 1,425 46.04 5,177 4 3 SAN BERNARDINO 2,174,938 1,254 1,425 47.00 5,791 4 4 SAN BERNARDINO 2,174,938 1,254 1,425 48.00 3,282 2 2 SAN BERNARDINO 2,174,938 1,254 1,425 49.00 7,590 6 5 SAN BERNARDINO 2,174,938 1,254 1,425 51.00 7,749 6 5 SAN BERNARDINO 2,174,938 1,254 1,425 52.00 4,141 3 2 SAN BERNARDINO 2,174,938 1,254 1,425 53.00 5,516 4 3 SAN BERNARDINO 2,174,938 1,254 1,425 54.00 6,590 5 4 SAN BERNARDINO 2,174,938 1,254 1,425 55.00 8,618 6 6 SAN BERNARDINO 2,174,938 1,254 1,425 56.00 7,101 5 4 SAN BERNARDINO 2,174,938 1,254 1,425 57.01 2,216 1 1 SAN BERNARDINO 2,174,938 1,254 1,425 58.00 3,981 3 2 SAN BERNARDINO 2,174,938 1,254 1,425 61.00 8,346 6 5 SAN BERNARDINO 2,174,938 1,254 1,425 62.01 3,583 2 2 SAN BERNARDINO 2,174,938 1,254 1,425 62.03 4,771 3 3 SAN BERNARDINO 2,174,938 1,254 1,425 62.04 4,495 3 3 SAN BERNARDINO 2,174,938 1,254 1,425 63.01 5,324 4 3 SAN BERNARDINO 2,174,938 1,254 1,425 63.02 8,815 7 6 SAN BERNARDINO 2,174,938 1,254 1,425 64.01 3,343 2 2 SAN BERNARDINO 2,174,938 1,254 1,425 64.02 4,951 3 3 SAN BERNARDINO 2,174,938 1,254 1,425 65.00 8,386 6 5 SAN BERNARDINO 2,174,938 1,254 1,425 66.01 4,564 3 3 SAN BERNARDINO 2,174,938 1,254 1,425 66.03 4,958 3 3 SAN BERNARDINO 2,174,938 1,254 1,425 66.04 4,278 3 3 SAN BERNARDINO 2,174,938 1,254 1,425 67.00 4,486 3 3 SAN BERNARDINO 2,174,938 1,254 1,425 70.00 7,898 6 5 SAN BERNARDINO 2,174,938 1,254 1,425 71.04 4,093 3 2 SAN BERNARDINO 2,174,938 1,254 1,425 71.05 2,715 2 1 SAN BERNARDINO 2,174,938 1,254 1,425 71.06 3,943 3 2 SAN BERNARDINO 2,174,938 1,254 1,425 71.07 3,302 2 2 SAN BERNARDINO 2,174,938 1,254 1,425 71.08 2,202 1 1 SAN BERNARDINO 2,174,938 1,254 1,425 71.09 6,064 4 4 SAN BERNARDINO 2,174,938 1,254 1,425 71.10 4,831 3 3 SAN BERNARDINO 2,174,938 1,254 1,425 72.00 6,798 5 4 SAN BERNARDINO 2,174,938 1,254 1,425 73.02 10,039 8 7 SAN BERNARDINO 2,174,938 1,254 1,425 73.03 4,828 3 3 SAN BERNARDINO 2,174,938 1,254 1,425 73.05 4,060 3 2 SAN BERNARDINO 2,174,938 1,254 1,425 73.06 5,859 4 4 SAN BERNARDINO 2,174,938 1,254 1,425 74.03 6,947 5 4 SAN BERNARDINO 2,174,938 1,254 1,425 74.04 4,406 3 3 SAN BERNARDINO 2,174,938 1,254 1,425 74.07 2,940 2 2 SAN BERNARDINO 2,174,938 1,254 1,425 74.08 4,181 3 2 SAN BERNARDINO 2,174,938 1,254 1,425 74.09 5,760 4 4 Updated: Aug 2018 Page 120 https://www.abc.ca.gov/permits/Census%20Tract%20Authorizations.pdf G.10.c Packet Pg. 105 Attachment: Census Tract Authorizations.xlsx (Public Convenience and Necessity Finding_Grocery Outlet) Department of Alcoholic Beverage Conltol iNFORMATION AND INSTRUCTIONS- SECTION 23958.4 B&P Slate of Callfom.a Edmund G. Brown Jr .• Govemor Instructions This fonn is to be used for all ap~lications for original issuance or premises to i:>remises transfer of licenses. Part I is to be completed by an ABC employee, given to applicant with pre-application package, with copy retained in holdins tile or applicant's district file. Part 2 ts to be completed by the applicant, and returned to ABC. Part 3 is to be completed by the local governing body or its designated subordinate officer or body, and returned to ABC. PART 1 ·TO BE COMPLETED BY ABC 1. APPl.tCANrS NAME GROCERY OUTLET INC 2. PREMISES ADDRESS (Slreet number and name. City , tip code } 22441 BARTON RD GRAND TERRACE, CA. 92313 4. TYPE OF BUSINESS Full Service Restaurant Dell or Specialty Restaurant Cafe/Coffee Shop Bed & Breakfast: Wine only All Holbrau/Cafeteria Comedy Club Brew Pub Theater Cocktail Lounge Night Club Tavern: Beer Tavern: Beer & Wine Service Station 3 LICENSE TYPE 20 Private Club Veterans Club Fraternal Club Wine Tasting Room X Supermarket Liquor Store DrugNariety Store Other -describe: Membership Store Department Store Florist/Gift Shop Conven ience Market Convenience Market w/Gasoline Swap Meet/Flea Market Drive-in Dairy 5. COUNTY POPULATION 8 CENSUS TRACT NUMBER 6 TOTAL NUMBER OF LICENSES IN COUNTY On-Sale 9. NO OF L CENSES ALLOWED IN CENSUS TRACT Off-Sale 7 RATIO OF LICENSES TO POPIJlAT ON IN COUNTY On-Sale 10 . NO . OF LICENSES EXISTING IN CENSUS TRACT Off-Sale 71.06 2 On-Sale X Off-Sale 7 On-Sale X Off-Sale TT IS THE ABOVE CENSUS TRACT OVERCONCENTRATEO WITH LICENSES? (I.e .• does the ratio ot l censes to pOl)ulation •n tne census tract exceed the ratio of l;censes to population for the entire county?) X Yes. the number of existing licenses exceeds the number allowed No, the number of existing licenses is lower than the number allowed 12 DOES LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY MAINTAIN CRIME STATISTICS? Yes (Go to Item #13) No (Go to Item #20) Tl CRIME REPORTING DISTRICT NUMBER t4 TOTAL NUMBER OF REPORTING DISTRICTS t 5. TOTAL NUMBER OF OFFENSES IN ALL REPORT ING DISTRICTS 16. AVERAGE NO OF OFFENSES PER DISTRICT T 7 120~ OF AVERAGE NUMBER OF OFFENSES 18 TOTAL NUMBER OF OFFENSES lN REPORTING DISTRICT 19. IS THE PREMISES LOCA TEO IN A HIGH CRIME REPORT NG DISTRICT? 11.e .• has a 20% greater number of reported cnmes than the average number of reponed crimes as determined ftom all crime repo<ling districts within Ille juri$diction of the loca law enlon:ement agency) Yes, the total number of offenses In the reporting district equals or exceeds the total number In Item #17 No, the total number of offenses in the reporting district is lower than the total number In item #17 20 CHECK THE BOX THAT APPLIES (check on y one box) a. If "t:JQ" is checked in both item #11 and Item #19, Section 23958.4 B&P does not apply to this application, and no additional information will be needed on this Issue. Advise the appNcant to bring this completed form to ABC when filing the application. b. If·~· is checked In either Item #11 Q! item #19, !!1!J the applicant is applying for a non-retail license, a retail bona fide public eating place license. a retail license issued for a hotel , motel or other lodging estabHshment as defined In Section 25503 .16(b) B&P. or a retail license Issued in conjuction with a beer manufacturer's ficense , or winegrower's license. advise the applicant to complete Section 2 and bring the completed form to ABC when filing the application or as soon as possible thereafter. X c. If "Yes" is checked In either Item #11 Q! item #19, !!l![ the applicant is applying for an off-sale beer and wine license, an off-sale general license , an on· sale beer license, an on-sale beer and wine (public premises) license, or an on-sale general (public premises) license, advise the applicant to take this form to the local qovemino bodv. or its designated subordinate officer or bodv to have tbem complete Section 3. The completed form will need to be provided to ABC in order to process the application. Governing Body/Designated Subordinate Name : COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY PREPARED BY (Name of Oepanment Employee) BJ ABC-245 (rev. 01-11) G.10.d Packet Pg. 106 Attachment: ABC Forms (Public Convenience and Necessity Finding_Grocery Outlet) PART 2 -TO BE COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT (If box #20b Is checked) 21 . Base'd on the information on the reverse, the Department may approve your application if you can show that public convenience or necessity would be served by the Issuance of the license. Please describe below the reasons why issuance of another license is justified in this area. You may attach a separate sheet or additional documenti on, if desired. Do not proceed to Part 3 . 22 APPLICANT SIGNATURE 23 DATE SIGNEO PART 3 -TO BE COMPLETED BY LOCAL OFFICIALS (If box #20c Is checked) The applicant named on the reverse is applv.ing for a license to sell alcoholic beverages at a premises where undue concentration exists (i.e., an over-concentration of licenses and/or a tiigtier than average crime rate as defined in Section 23958.4 of the Business and Professions Code). Sections 23958 and 23958.4 of the Business and Professions Code requires the Department to deny the application unless the local governing body of the area in which the applicant premises are located, or its designated subordinate officer or body , determines within 90 oays of notification of a completed application that public convenience or necessity would be served by the issuance. Please complete items #24 to #30 below and certify or affix an official seal, or attach a copy of the Council or Board resolution or a signed letter on official letterhead staling whether or not the issuance of the applied for license would serve as a public convenience or necessity. 24 WILL PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY BE SERVED BY ISSUANCE OF THIS ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE? Yes No See Attached (i.e .. letter. resolution, etc.) 25 AOOITIONAL COMMENTS, IF DESIRED (may include reasons for aPP<011al or den al ol public convenience or necess ly) 26 CITY/COUNTY OFFICIAL NAME 27 CITY/COU NTY OFFICIAL TITLE 28 CITY/COUNTY OFFICIAL PHONE NUMBER 29-CITY/COUNTY OFFICIAL SIGNATURE 30 DATE SIGNED ABC-245 REVERSE (rev . 01-11) G.10.d Packet Pg. 107 Attachment: ABC Forms (Public Convenience and Necessity Finding_Grocery Outlet) Department of Alcoholic Beverage control APPLICATION QUESTIONNAIRE Stale of C.ilf0t!Q Edmund G-Brown Jr., Govemoi Please reatl i11str11ctio11s, wlriclr incll1des Pril•ac:y Notice, before completing form. 1 .APPLICANT'S NAME(S) en an ondl\Gim, Int n.ne. -· -· ~I name Nltnl DI entity"' COfllCl'•!IO~. tmled patln0!$lflp O<l.m•led 1 .. ~1y ccmp111r ' - -----------P 12UCENSEE Grocery Outlet Inc •ves No tit 19s_ ~ .bmABC·llft 2 LICENSE TYPE[S)~) • 20 Off-Sale Beer & Wine 21 Off-Sale General 3 f RANSllCTION TYPE (0...d< oppropnate otoml x Original (New) Person-to -Person Transfer (check appro riate section): 40 On·Sale Beer _ ------..!-Section 24071 (Surviving s ouse, corporallons, fiduciaries. etc.) 41 On.Sale Beer & Wine Eallnp Place i-Section 24071 .1 (Corporate Stock/limited Partnership) 42 On-Sale Beer & \Mne Public Premises 47 On·Sale General Ealing Place 48 On·Sale General Public Premises Other ---~: Section 24071-2 (Limited Uabillly Company) Premi&es ·to·Premises Transfer Exchange Olher 4 TEMPORARY PERMIT REQUESTED (PWSO<l·lo-Fwaon ll-lel• anlyl Q~:ses ~~w.e tocenaelO llellauml) (Slteel ,,.,,_and ......... aty .lip mcl•l 22441 Barton Rd, Grand Terrace, CA 92313 6. PREMISES TELEPHONE NUMBER 7 PREMISES ARE INS~~TY LIMITS < not ) assigned yet ({]ves L_JNo 9. SUSINESSMAlllNGADOAESS(SllHl--/\lm8.aty,111118,ll!ICO<le) 5650 Hollis St, Emeryville CA 94608 11 ABCLICENSECOST(llem#33aon,_) $0 8 BUSINESS NAME (1>8'1) YOU WIU. USE Grocery Outlet 12 SU8TOT AL (llern r.l3f Oii ntverM) $ 650,000.00 Counly San Bernardino 1D MAILING AOORESS I• Permanent Temporary 13 HAS THE APPUCANT(SI EVER BEEN 14 HAS THE APPl.ICANT(SI EVER VIOl.ATED AN'( OF THE PROVISIONS OF TiiE AC.COHOUC BEVERAGE CONTROL ACT OR REGULATIONS CONlllCTED OF A FELONY? Of Tt-E OEPARTM~RTAiNING TO THE ACT? [Jves [ZJNo [{Jves LJNO 15 IF YES TO ITEM 13 OR 14, PLEASE EXPLAIN P-12 Applicant; Violations on record with base file #318940 15 TRANSFEROR'S NAME (11 tn onai .. auat 1311, 1"11. mdall Name ol entity,, oorpotabon. llmlltd ~p or luntocll11bll11r company ) N/A 18 TRANSFEROR'S PREMISES ADDRESS 1w.ore •cen111,. ,_ lllUOCll 1srroec ,._ -name, air. ZIP CCd•I NIA ~REM I SES UNDER CONSTRUCTION IF YES , LIST ESTllAA TEO COMPLETION DA TE Lt.JYes ONo interior remodel July 2019 21 NAMEOFPl!RSON\\E MAY CONTACT (F orl!Mllpplcant) 22 TITLE OF CONTACT PERSON Katy Schardt, Compass Commercial Group, Inc. Licensing Consultant 23 CONTACT f ,ELEPHONE NlJ MBER 24 CONTACTE ·MAILAOORESS ( 916 ) 660-9623 katy@katyschardt.com 25-PREMISES IS CURRENTlY LICENSED IF YES. TYPE OF UC EN SE Qves R}Jo N/A 46 CURRENTLICENSE IS OPERATING Qves QNo FINANCIAL INFORMATION 27 ESCROWCOMPANY'S NAM£ ESCROW COMPANY'S ADORESS N/A N/A 2a OOOt<KEEPERIACCOUNTANrs NAl.ie BOOt<KEEPERIACCOUNTANT'S i'IOOREss Jn-House 29 t.ANOlORIYS NAME LANDLORIYS AOORESS 17 A8C LICENSE NUMBER ---------N/A --------- 20 FRANCHSE Yes IF NO, DATE CLOSED TELEPHONE NUMBER TEU:PHONE NUMBER TELEPHON E NUMBER Viking lnvos1ment Properties, LP Attn: Anita Jensen, 22441 Barton Rd, Grand Terrace, CA ( 949 ) 697-224 7 30 MONTHLYRENT 31 LEASE EXPIRATION CV.TE J2 INOICA TE \'\+ETHER LEASE OR RENt AL AGREEMENT fNClUOES FURNITURE OR FIXTURES $13,876.00 12/31/2029 All Some x None ABC-217 (rev. 11111) G.10.d Packet Pg. 110 Attachment: ABC Forms (Public Convenience and Necessity Finding_Grocery Outlet) C:\users\dthomas\appdata\roaming\iqm2\minutetraq\grandterracecityca@grandterracecityca.iqm2.com\work\attachments\5415.doc 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California, 92313-5295 909/824-6621 Fax 909/783-2600 Planning and Development Services Department Delivered Via Electronic Mail May 15, 2019 Sadie Gomez Licensing Representative II Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control Board 3737 Main Street, Suite 900 Riverside, CA 92501-3337 Re: Grocery Outlet market located at 22411 Barton Road Dear Mrs. Gomez: During their regular meeting of May 14, 2019, t he City Council of the City of Grand Terrace made a positive finding of Public Convenience and Necessity for the proposed Grocery Outlet market located at 22411 Barton Road. The proposed Grocery Outlet is a neighborhood market that provides products and services to its customers, including frozen foods, deli items, vitamins, health and beauty items, houseware, and gift items. Similar to other grocery and convenience stores, Grocery Outlet proposes to provide off-sale beer and wine to its customers. The off- sale of alcoholic beverages serves public convenience by providing a complete grocery shopping experience; thereby, eliminating the need for multiple vehicle trips and reducing traffic along City corridors. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (909) 824-6621 ext. 225. Sincerely, SANDRA MOLINA Planning and Development Services Director Enclosure: ABC File Cc: Katy Schardt, Compass Commercial Group G.10.e Packet Pg. 122 Attachment: Letter to ABC_4.30.2019 [Revision 3] (Public Convenience and Necessity Finding_Grocery Outlet) AGENDA REPORT MEETING DATE: May 14, 2019 Council Item TITLE: Professional Services Agreement Between the City of Grand Terrace and UltraSystems Environmental, Inc. for Environmental Services Related to Conditional Use Permit 19-01 (Proposed Trailer Storage Use at APN 0275-191-06 and 30) PRESENTED BY: Sandra Molina, Planning & Development Services Director RECOMMENDATION: 1) Approve an Agreement with UltraSystems Environmental, Inc. in the amount of $40,560.00; and 2) Authorize the City Manager to Execute the Contract, subject to City Attorney approval as to form. 2030 VISION STATEMENT: This item supports Goal #1, Ensure Our Fiscal Viability, by ensuring cost recovery for services as the costs will be borne by the project applicant. BACKGROUND: On January 2, 2019, GrandT-1, Inc. submitted a development application for the proposed establishment of a trailer storage use located at APN 0275 -191-06 and 30 (no official address). The project is subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act and, accordingly, environmental documentation must be prepared. The applicant has hired an environmental consulting firm to prepare necessary technical documents and to prepare the environmental documents. However, the City, as the lead agency, is still responsible for the review of the adequacy of environmental documents though a peer review. Further, the City, as the lead agency, would also adopt the environmental documents. The purpose of this item is to request approval of an agreement with an environmental consultant to perform the peer review with all costs of the consultant borne solely by the applicant. DISCUSSION: A Request for Proposals for peer review of the initial study was sent to six (6) environmental consulting firms. The Tasks include re viewing the Initial Study, technical studies, and responses to comments (if any), as well as augmenting Staff through the process. The City received six (6) responses. A list of the firms that received the RFP is attached. G.11 Packet Pg. 123 The six (6) proposals were reviewed and rated. Based on the review UltraSystems Environmental, Inc. (UltraSystems) received the highest ratings. UltraSystems demonstrated an understanding of the project and required services, and the experience and capacity to perform the work in accordan ce with the RFP. The original cost proposal to perform the peer review services was $46,970.00. However, UltraSystems was able to refine the cost proposal and the updated cost to perform the services is $40,560.00 Attached is a copy of the Proposal submitted by UltraSystems. The proposed agreement is also attached with the Scope of Work and Cost. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact to the City. The Project applicant is responsible for consultant and staff’s administrative costs related to the agreement for environmental services. ATTACHMENTS: • Contract Services Agreement Grand Terrace and Ultrasystems(DOCX) • UEI_Proposal_2019-04-25 (PDF) • Consultant List - Peer Review CUP 19-01 (PDF) APPROVALS: Sandra Molina Completed 04/29/2019 2:44 PM City Attorney Completed 05/08/2019 11:09 AM Finance Completed 05/08/2019 3:32 PM City Manager Completed 05/08/2019 4:02 PM City Council Pending 05/14/2019 6:00 PM G.11 Packet Pg. 124 01240.0001/514122.1 10/16/2018 AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES By and Between CITY OF GRAND TERRACE and ULTRASYSTEMS ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. G.11.a Packet Pg. 125 Attachment: Contract Services Agreement Grand Terrace and Ultrasystems [Revision 2] (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental 01240.0001/514122.1 10/16/2018 -2- AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE AND ULTRASYSTEMS ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. This “AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE AND ULTRASYSTEMS ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.” (herein “Agreement”) is made and entered into this 14th day of May, 2019 by and between the City of Grand Terrace, a California municipal corporation (“City”) and UltraSystems Environmental, Inc. (“Consultant”). City and Consultant are sometimes hereinafter individually referred to as “Party” and hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Parties.” RECITALS A. City has sought, by issuance of a Request for Proposals or Invitation for Bids, the performance of the services defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement. B. Consultant, following submission of a proposal or bid for the performance of the services defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement, was selected by the City to perform those services. C. Pursuant to the City of Grand Terrace Municipal Code, City has authority to enter into and execute this Agreement. D. The Parties desire to formalize the selection of Consultant for performance of those services defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement and desire that the terms of that performance be as particularly defined and described herein. OPERATIVE PROVISIONS NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants made by the Parties and contained herein and other consideration, the value and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: ARTICLE 1. SERVICES OF CONSULTANT 1.1 Scope of Services. In compliance with all terms and conditions of this Agreement, the Consultant shall provide those services specified in the “Scope of Services” attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference, which may be referred to herein as the “services” or “work” hereunder. As a material inducement to the City entering into this Agreement, Consultant represents and warrants that it has the qualifications, experience, and facilities necessary to properly perform the services required under this Agreement in a thorough, competent, and professional manner, and is experienced in performing the work and services contemplated herein. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of its ability, experience and talent, perform all services described herein. Consultant covenants that it shall follow the highest professional standards in performing the work and services required hereunder and that all materials will be both of good quality as well as fit for the purpose G.11.a Packet Pg. 126 Attachment: Contract Services Agreement Grand Terrace and Ultrasystems [Revision 2] (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental 01240.0001/514122.1 10/16/2018 -3- intended. For purposes of this Agreement, the phrase “highest professional standards” shall mean those standards of practice recognized by one or more first-class firms performing similar work under similar circumstances. 1.2 Consultant’s Proposal. The Scope of Service shall include the Consultant’s scope of work or bid which shall be incorporated herein by this reference as though fully set forth herein. In the event of any inconsistency between the terms of such proposal and this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall govern. 1.3 Compliance with Law. Consultant shall keep itself informed concerning, and shall render all services hereunder in accordance with, all ordinances, resolutions, statutes, rules, and regulations of the City and any Federal, State or local governmental entity having jurisdiction in effect at the time service is rendered. 1.4 Licenses, Permits, Fees and Assessments. Consultant shall obtain at its sole cost and expense such licenses, permits and approvals as may be required by law for the performance of the services required by this Agreement. Consultant shall have the sole obligation to pay for any fees, assessments and taxes, plus applicable penalties and interest, which may be imposed by law and arise from or are necessary for the Consultant’s performance of the services required by this Agreement, and shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City, its officers, employees or agents of City, against any such fees, assessments, taxes, penalties or interest levied, assessed or imposed against City hereunder. 1.5 Familiarity with Work. By executing this Agreement, Consultant warrants that Consultant (i) has thoroughly investigated and considered the scope of services to be performed, (ii) has carefully considered how the services should be performed, and (iii) fully understands the facilities, difficulties and restrictions attending performance of the services under this Agreement. If the services involve work upon any site, Consultant warrants that Consultant has or will investigate the site and is or will be fully acquainted with the conditions there existing, prior to commencement of services hereunder. Should the Consultant discover any latent or unknown conditions, which will materially affect the performance of the services hereunder, Consultant shall immediately inform the City of such fact and shall not proceed except at Consultant’s risk until written instructions are received from the Contract Officer. 1.6 Care of Work. The Consultant shall adopt reasonable methods during the life of the Agreement to furnish continuous protection to the work, and the equipment, materials, papers, documents, plans, studies and/or other components thereof to prevent losses or damages, and shall be G.11.a Packet Pg. 127 Attachment: Contract Services Agreement Grand Terrace and Ultrasystems [Revision 2] (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental 01240.0001/514122.1 10/16/2018 -4- responsible for all such damages, to persons or property, until acceptance of the work by City, except such losses or damages as may be caused by City’s own negligence. 1.7 Further Responsibilities of Parties. Both parties agree to use reasonable care and diligence to perform their respective obligations under this Agreement. Both parties agree to act in good faith to execute all instruments, prepare all documents and take all actions as may be reasonably necessary to carry out the purposes of this Agreement. Unless hereafter specified, neither party shall be responsible for the service of the other. 1.8 Additional Services. City shall have the right at any time during the performance of the services, without invalidating this Agreement, to order extra work beyond that specified in the Scope of Services or make changes by altering, adding to or deducting from said work. No such extra work may be undertaken unless a written order is first given by the Contract Officer to the Consultant, incorporating therein any adjustment in (i) the Contract Sum for the actual costs of the extra work, and/or (ii) the time to perform this Agreement, which said adjustments are subject to the written approval of the Consultant. Any increase in compensation of up to ten percent (10%) of the Contract Sum or $25,000, whichever is less; or, in the time to perform of up to one hundred eighty (180) days, may be approved by the Contract Officer. Any greater increases, taken either separately or cumulatively, must be approved by the City Council. It is expressly understood by Consultant that the provisions of this Section shall not apply to services specifically set forth in the Scope of Services. Consultant hereby acknowledges that it accepts the risk that the services to be provided pursuant to the Scope of Services may be more costly or time consuming than Consultant anticipates and that Consultant shall not be entitled to additional compensation therefor. City may in its sole and absolute discretion have similar work done by other consultants. No claims for an increase in the Contract Sum or time for performance shall be valid unless the procedures established in this Section are followed. 1.9 Special Requirements. Additional terms and conditions of this Agreement, if any, which are made a part hereof are set forth in the “Special Requirements” attached hereto as Exhibit “B” and incorporated herein by this reference. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of Exhibit “B” and any other provisions of this Agreement, the provisions of Exhibit “B” shall govern. ARTICLE 2. COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT. 2.1 Contract Sum. Subject to any limitations set forth in this Agreement, City agrees to pay Consultant the amounts specified in the “Schedule of Compensation” attached hereto as Exhibit “C” and incorporated herein by this reference. The total compensation, including reimbursement for actual expenses, shall not exceed Forty Thousand Five Hundred Sixty Dollars and No Cents ($40,560.00) (the “Contract Sum”), unless additional compensation is approved pursuant to Section 1.8. G.11.a Packet Pg. 128 Attachment: Contract Services Agreement Grand Terrace and Ultrasystems [Revision 2] (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental 01240.0001/514122.1 10/16/2018 -5- 2.2 Method of Compensation. The method of compensation may include: (i) a lump sum payment upon completion; (ii) payment in accordance with specified tasks or the percentage of completion of the services, less contract retention; (iii) payment for time and materials based upon the Consultant’s rates as specified in the Schedule of Compensation, provided that (a) time estimates are provided for the performance of sub tasks, (b) contract retention is maintained, and (c) the Contract Sum is not exceeded; or (iv) such other methods as may be specified in the Schedule of Compensation. 2.3 Reimbursable Expenses. Compensation may include reimbursement for actual and necessary expenditures for reproduction costs, telephone expenses, and travel expenses approved by the Contract Officer in advance, or actual subcontractor expenses of an approved subcontractor pursuant to Section 4.5, and only if specified in the Schedule of Compensation. The Contract Sum shall include the attendance of Consultant at all project meetings reasonably deemed necessary by the City. Coordination of the performance of the work with City is a critical component of the services. If Consultant is required to attend additional meetings to facilitate such coordination, Consultant shall not be entitled to any additional compensation for attending said meetings. 2.4 Invoices. Each month Consultant shall furnish to City an original invoice for all work performed and expenses incurred during the preceding month in a form approved by City’s Director of Finance. By submitting an invoice for payment under this Agreement, Consultant is certifying compliance with all provisions of the Agreement. The invoice shall detail charges for all necessary and actual expenses by the following categories: labor (by sub-category), travel, materials, equipment, supplies, and sub-contractor contracts. Sub-contractor charges shall also be detailed by such categories. Consultant shall not invoice City for any duplicate services performed by more than one person. City shall independently review each invoice submitted by the Consultant to determine whether the work performed and expenses incurred are in compliance with the provisions of this Agreement. Except as to any charges for work performed or expenses incurred by Consultant which are disputed by City, or as provided in Section 7.3, City will use its best efforts to cause Consultant to be paid within forty-five (45) days of receipt of Consultant’s correct and undisputed invoice; however, Consultant acknowledges and agrees that due to City warrant run procedures, the City cannot guarantee that payment will occur within this time period. In the event any charges or expenses are disputed by City, the original invoice shall be returned by City to Consultant for correction and resubmission. Review and payment by City for any invoice provided by the Consultant shall not constitute a waiver of any rights or remedies provided herein or any applicable law. 2.5 Waiver. Payment to Consultant for work performed pursuant to this Agreement shall not be deemed to waive any defects in work performed by Consultant. G.11.a Packet Pg. 129 Attachment: Contract Services Agreement Grand Terrace and Ultrasystems [Revision 2] (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental 01240.0001/514122.1 10/16/2018 -6- ARTICLE 3. PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE 3.1 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement. 3.2 Schedule of Performance. Consultant shall commence the services pursuant to this Agreement upon receipt of a written notice to proceed and shall perform all services within the time period(s) established in the “Schedule of Performance” attached hereto as Exhibit “D” and incorporated herein by this reference. When requested by the Consultant, extensions to the time period(s) specified in the Schedule of Performance may be approved in writing by the Contract Officer but not exceeding one hundred eighty (180) days cumulatively. 3.3 Force Majeure. The time period(s) specified in the Schedule of Performance for performance of the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be extended because of any delays due to unforeseeable causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the Consultant, including, but not restricted to, acts of God or of the public enemy, unusually severe weather, fires, earthquakes, floods, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, riots, strikes, freight embargoes, wars, litigation, and/or acts of any governmental agency, including the City, if the Consultant shall within ten (10) days of the commencement of such delay notify the Contract Officer in writing of the causes of the delay. The Contract Officer shall ascertain the facts and the extent of delay, and extend the time for performing the services for the period of the enforced delay when and if in the judgment of the Contract Officer such delay is justified. The Contract Officer’s determination shall be final and conclusive upon the parties to this Agreement. In no event shall Consultant be entitled to recover damages against the City for any delay in the performance of this Agreement, however caused, Consultant’s sole remedy being extension of the Agreement pursuant to this Section. 3.4 Term. Unless earlier terminated in accordance with Article 7 of this Agreement, this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect until completion of the services but not exceeding two (2) years from the date hereof, except as otherwise provided in the Schedule of Performance (Exhibit “D”). ARTICLE 4. COORDINATION OF WORK 4.1 Representatives and Personnel of Consultant. The following principals of Consultant (“Principals”) are hereby designated as being the principals and representatives of Consultant authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the work specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith: Betsy A. Lindsay, President/CEO G.11.a Packet Pg. 130 Attachment: Contract Services Agreement Grand Terrace and Ultrasystems [Revision 2] (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental 01240.0001/514122.1 10/16/2018 -7- Margaret Partridge, Senior Project Manager (Name) (Title) It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of the foregoing principals were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, the foregoing principals shall be responsible during the term of this Agreement for directing all activities of Consultant and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the services hereunder. All personnel of Consultant, and any authorized agents, shall at all times be under the exclusive direction and control of the Principals. For purposes of this Agreement, the foregoing Principals may not be replaced nor may their responsibilities be substantially reduced by Consultant without the express written approval of City. Additionally, Consultant shall utilize only competent personnel to perform services pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall make every reasonable effort to maintain the stability and continuity of Consultant’s staff and subcontractors, if any, assigned to perform the services required under this Agreement. Consultant shall notify City of any changes in Consultant’s staff and subcontractors, if any, assigned to perform the services required under this Agreement, prior to and during any such performance. 4.2 Status of Consultant. Consultant shall have no authority to bind City in any manner, or to incur any obligation, debt or liability of any kind on behalf of or against City, whether by contract or otherwise, unless such authority is expressly conferred under this Agreement or is otherwise expressly conferred in writing by City. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that Consultant or any of Consultant’s officers, employees, or agents are in any manner officials, officers, employees or agents of City. Neither Consultant, nor any of Consultant’s officers, employees or agents, shall obtain any rights to retirement, health care or any other benefits which may otherwise accrue to City’s employees. Consultant expressly waives any claim Consultant may have to any such rights. 4.3 Contract Officer. The Contract Officer shall be G. Harold Duffey, City Manager, or such person as may be designated by the City Manager. It shall be the Consultant’s responsibility to assure that the Contract Officer is kept informed of the progress of the performance of the services and the Consultant shall refer any decisions which must be made by City to the Contract Officer. Unless otherwise specified herein, any approval of City required hereunder shall mean the approval of the Contract Officer. The Contract Officer shall have authority, if specified in writing by the City Manager, to sign all documents on behalf of the City required hereunder to carry out the terms of this Agreement. 4.4 Independent Contractor. Neither the City nor any of its employees shall have any control over the manner, mode or means by which Consultant, its agents or employees, perform the services required herein, except as otherwise set forth herein. City shall have no voice in the selection, discharge, supervision or control of Consultant’s employees, servants, representatives or agents, or in fixing G.11.a Packet Pg. 131 Attachment: Contract Services Agreement Grand Terrace and Ultrasystems [Revision 2] (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental 01240.0001/514122.1 10/16/2018 -8- their number, compensation or hours of service. Consultant shall perform all services required herein as an independent contractor of City and shall remain at all times as to City a wholly independent contractor with only such obligations as are consistent with that role. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its agents or employees are agents or employees of City. City shall not in any way or for any purpose become or be deemed to be a partner of Consultant in its business or otherwise or a joint venturer or a member of any joint enterprise with Consultant. 4.5 Prohibition Against Subcontracting or Assignment. The experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of Consultant, its principals and employees were a substantial inducement for the City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, Consultant shall not contract with any other entity to perform in whole or in part the services required hereunder without the express written approval of the City. In addition, neither this Agreement nor any interest herein may be transferred, assigned, conveyed, hypothecated or encumbered voluntarily or by operation of law, whether for the benefit of creditors or otherwise, without the prior written approval of City. Transfers restricted hereunder shall include the transfer to any person or group of persons acting in concert of more than twenty five percent (25%) of the present ownership and/or control of Consultant, taking all transfers into account on a cumulative basis. In the event of any such unapproved transfer, including any bankruptcy proceeding, this Agreement shall be void. No approved transfer shall release the Consultant or any surety of Consultant of any liability hereunder without the express consent of City. ARTICLE 5. INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION 5.1 Insurance Coverages. The Consultant shall procure and maintain, at its sole cost and expense, in a form and content satisfactory to City, during the entire term of this Agreement including any extension thereof, the following policies of insurance which shall cover all elected and appointed officers, employees and agents of City: (a) General Liability Insurance (Occurrence Form CG0001 or equivalent). A policy of comprehensive general liability insurance written on a per occurrence basis for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. The policy of insurance shall be in an amount not less than $1,000,000.00 per occurrence or if a general aggregate limit is used, then the general aggregate limit shall be twice the occurrence limit. (b) Worker’s Compensation Insurance. A policy of worker’s compensation insurance in such amount as will fully comply with the laws of the State of California and which shall indemnify, insure and provide legal defense for the Consultant against any loss, claim or damage arising from any injuries or occupational diseases occurring to any worker employed by or any persons retained by the Consultant in the course of carrying out the work or services contemplated in this Agreement. (c) Automotive Insurance (Form CA 0001 (Ed 1/87) including “any auto” and endorsement CA 0025 or equivalent). A policy of comprehensive automobile liability insurance written on a per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage in an amount not less than G.11.a Packet Pg. 132 Attachment: Contract Services Agreement Grand Terrace and Ultrasystems [Revision 2] (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental 01240.0001/514122.1 10/16/2018 -9- $1,000,000. Said policy shall include coverage for owned, non-owned, leased, hired cars and any automobile. (d) Professional Liability. Professional liability insurance appropriate to the Consultant’s profession. This coverage may be written on a “claims made” basis, and must include coverage for contractual liability. The professional liability insurance required by this Agreement must be endorsed to be applicable to claims based upon, arising out of or related to services performed under this Agreement. The insurance must be maintained for at least 5 consecutive years following the completion of Consultant’s services or the termination of this Agreement. During this additional 5-year period, Consultant shall annually and upon request of the City submit written evidence of this continuous coverage. (e) Subcontractors. Consultant shall include all subcontractors as insureds under its policies or shall furnish separate certificates and certified endorsements for each subcontractor. All coverages for subcontractors shall include all of the requirements stated herein. (f) Additional Insurance. Policies of such other insurance, as may be required in the Special Requirements in Exhibit “B”. 5.2 General Insurance Requirements. All of the above policies of insurance shall be primary insurance and shall name the City, its elected and appointed officers, employees and agents as additional insureds and any insurance maintained by City or its officers, employees or agents may apply in excess of, and not contribute with Consultant’s insurance. The insurer is deemed hereof to waive all rights of subrogation and contribution it may have against the City, its officers, employees and agents and their respective insurers. Moreover, the insurance policy must specify that where the primary insured does not satisfy the self-insured retention, any additional insured may satisfy the self- insured retention. All of said policies of insurance shall provide that said insurance may not be amended or cancelled by the insurer or any party hereto without providing thirty (30) days prior written notice by certified mail return receipt requested to the City. In the event any of said policies of insurance are cancelled, the Consultant shall, prior to the cancellation date, submit new evidence of insurance in conformance with Section 5.1 to the Contract Officer. No work or services under this Agreement shall commence until the Consultant has provided the City with Certificates of Insurance, additional insured endorsement forms or appropriate insurance binders evidencing the above insurance coverages and said Certificates of Insurance or binders are approved by the City. City reserves the right to inspect complete, certified copies of and endorsements to all required insurance policies at any time. Any failure to comply with the reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches or warranties shall not affect coverage provided to City. All certificates shall name the City as additional insured (providing the appropriate endorsement) and shall conform to the following “cancellation” notice: G.11.a Packet Pg. 133 Attachment: Contract Services Agreement Grand Terrace and Ultrasystems [Revision 2] (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental 01240.0001/514122.1 10/16/2018 -10- CANCELLATION: SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATED THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY SHALL MAIL THIRTY (30)-DAY ADVANCE WRITTEN NOTICE TO CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED HEREIN. [to be initialed] ______________ Consultant Initials City, its respective elected and appointed officers, directors, officials, employees, agents and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities Consultant performs; products and completed operations of Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by Consultant; or any automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City, and their respective elected and appointed officers, officials, employees or volunteers. Consultant’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer’s liability. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City. At the option of City, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects City or its respective elected or appointed officers, officials, employees and volunteers or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration, defense expenses and claims. The Consultant agrees that the requirement to provide insurance shall not be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which the Consultant may be held responsible for the payment of damages to any persons or property resulting from the Consultant’s activities or the activities of any person or persons for which the Consultant is otherwise responsible nor shall it limit the Consultant’s indemnification liabilities as provided in Section 5.3. In the event the Consultant subcontracts any portion of the work in compliance with Section 4.5 of this Agreement, the contract between the Consultant and such subcontractor shall require the subcontractor to maintain the same policies of insurance that the Consultant is required to maintain pursuant to Section 5.1, and such certificates and endorsements shall be provided to City. 5.3 Indemnification. To the full extent permitted by law, Consultant agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its officers, employees and agents (“Indemnified Parties”) against, and will hold and save them and each of them harmless from, any and all actions, either judicial, administrative, arbitration or regulatory claims, damages to persons or property, losses, costs, penalties, obligations, errors, omissions or liabilities whether actual or threatened (herein “claims or liabilities”) that may be asserted or claimed by any person, firm or entity arising out of or in connection with the negligent performance of the work, operations or activities provided herein of Consultant, its officers, employees, agents, subcontractors, or invitees, or any individual or G.11.a Packet Pg. 134 Attachment: Contract Services Agreement Grand Terrace and Ultrasystems [Revision 2] (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental 01240.0001/514122.1 10/16/2018 -11- entity for which Consultant is legally liable (“indemnitors”), or arising from Consultant’s or indemnitors’ reckless or willful misconduct, or arising from Consultant’s or indemnitors’ negligent performance of or failure to perform any term, provision, covenant or condition of this Agreement, and in connection therewith: (a) Consultant will defend any action or actions filed in connection with any of said claims or liabilities and will pay all costs and expenses, including legal costs and attorney’s fees incurred in connection therewith; (b) Consultant will promptly pay any judgment rendered against the City, its officers, agents or employees for any such claims or liabilities arising out of or in connection with the negligent performance of or failure to perform such work, operations or activities of Consultant hereunder; and Consultant agrees to save and hold the City, its officers, agents, and employees harmless therefrom; (c) In the event the City, its officers, agents or employees is made a party to any action or proceeding filed or prosecuted against Consultant for such damages or other claims arising out of or in connection with the negligent performance of or failure to perform the work, operation or activities of Consultant hereunder, Consultant agrees to pay to the City, its officers, agents or employees, any and all costs and expenses incurred by the City, its officers, agents or employees in such action or proceeding, including but not limited to, legal costs and attorney’s fees. Consultant shall incorporate similar indemnity agreements with its subcontractors and if it fails to do so Consultant shall be fully responsible to indemnify City hereunder therefore, and failure of City to monitor compliance with these provisions shall not be a wai ver hereof. This indemnification includes claims or liabilities arising from any negligent or wrongful act, error or omission, or reckless or willful misconduct of Consultant in the performance of professional services hereunder. The provisions of this Section do not apply to claims or liabilities occurring as a result of City’s sole negligence or willful acts or omissions, but, to the fullest extent permitted by law, shall apply to claims and liabilities resulting in part from City’s negligence, except that design professionals’ indemnity hereunder shall be limited to claims and liabilities arising out of the negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct of the design professional. The indemnity obligation shall be binding on successors and assigns of Consultant and shall survive termination of this Agreement. 5.4 Sufficiency of Insurer. Insurance required by this Agreement shall be satisfactory only if issued by companies qualified to do business in California, rated “A” or better in the most recent edition of Best Rating Guide, The Key Rating Guide or in the Federal Register, and only if they are of a financial category Class VII or better, unless such requirements are waived by the Risk Manager of the City (“Risk Manager”) due to unique circumstances. If this Agreement continues for more than 3 years duration, or in the event the risk manager determines that the work or services to be performed under this Agreement creates an increased or decreased risk of loss to the City, the Consultant agrees that the minimum limits of the insurance policies may be changed accordingly upon receipt of written notice from the Risk Manager. G.11.a Packet Pg. 135 Attachment: Contract Services Agreement Grand Terrace and Ultrasystems [Revision 2] (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental 01240.0001/514122.1 10/16/2018 -12- ARTICLE 6. RECORDS, REPORTS, AND RELEASE OF INFORMATION 6.1 Records. Consultant shall keep, and require subcontractors to keep, such ledgers, books of accounts, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, reports, studies or other documents relating to the disbursements charged to City and services performed hereunder (the “books and records”), as shall be necessary to perform the services required by this Agreement and enable the Contract Officer to evaluate the performance of such services. Any and all such documents shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be complete and detailed. The Contract Officer shall have full and free access to such books and records at all times during normal business hours of City, including the right to inspect, copy, audit and make records and transcripts from such records. Such records shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years following completion of the services hereunder, and the City shall have access to such records in the event any audit is required. In the event of dissolution of Consultant’s business, custody of the books and records may be given to City, and access shall be provided by Consultant’s successor in interest. Notwithstanding the above, the Consultant shall fully cooperate with the City in providing access to the books and records if a public records request is made and disclosure is required by law including but not limited to the California Public Records Act. 6.2 Reports. Consultant shall periodically prepare and submit to the Contract Officer such reports concerning the performance of the services required by this Agreement as the Contract Officer shall require. Consultant hereby acknowledges that the City is greatly concerned about the cost of work and services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement. For this reason, Consultant agrees that if Consultant becomes aware of any facts, circumstances, techniques, or events that may or will materially increase or decrease the cost of the work or services contemplated herein or, if Consultant is providing design services, the cost of the project being designed, Consultant shall promptly notify the Contract Officer of said fact, circumstance, technique or event and the estimated increased or decreased cost related thereto and, if Consultant is providing design services, the estimated increased or decreased cost estimate for the project being designed. 6.3 Ownership of Documents. All drawings, specifications, maps, designs, photographs, studies, surveys, data, notes, computer files, reports, records, documents and other materials (the “documents and materials”), including any electronic documents and materials, prepared by Consultant, its employees, subcontractors and agents in the performance of this Agreement shall be the property of City and shall be delivered to City in a format of the City’s choice upon request of the Contract Officer or upon the termination of this Agreement, and Consultant shall have no claim for further employment or additional compensation as a result of the exercise by City of its full rights of ownership use, reuse, or assignment of the documents and materials hereunder. Any use, reuse or assignment of such completed documents for other projects and/or use of uncompleted documents without specific written authorization by the Consultant will be at the City’s sole risk and without liability to Consultant, and Consultant’s guarantee and warranties shall not extend to G.11.a Packet Pg. 136 Attachment: Contract Services Agreement Grand Terrace and Ultrasystems [Revision 2] (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental 01240.0001/514122.1 10/16/2018 -13- such use, reuse or assignment. Consultant may retain copies of such documents for its own use. Consultant shall have the right to use the concepts embodied therein. All subcontractors shall provide for assignment to City of any documents or materials prepared by them, and in the event Consultant fails to secure such assignment, Consultant shall indemnify City for all damages resulting therefrom. Moreover, Consultant with respect to any documents and materials that may qualify as “works made for hire” as defined in 17 U.S.C. § 101, such documents and materials are hereby deemed “works made for hire” for the City. 6.4 Confidentiality and Release of Information. (a) All information gained or work product produced by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential, unless such information is in the public domain or already known to Consultant. Consultant shall not release or disclose any such information or work product to persons or entities other than City without prior written authorization from the Contract Officer. (b) Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not, without prior written authorization from the Contract Officer or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide documents, declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement. Response to a subpoena or court order shall n ot be considered “voluntary” provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena. (c) If Consultant, or any officer, employee, agent or subcontractor of Consultant, provides any information or work product in violation of this Agreement, then City shall have the right to reimbursement and indemnity from Consultant for any damages, costs and fees, including attorney’s fees, caused by or incurred as a result of Consultant’s conduct. (d) Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed there under. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, this right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response. ARTICLE 7. ENFORCEMENT OF AGREEMENT AND TERMINATION 7.1 California Law. This Agreement shall be interpreted, construed and governed both as to validity and to performance of the parties in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Legal actions concerning any dispute, claim or matter arising out of or in relation to this Agreement shall be instituted in the Superior Court of the County of San Bernardino, State of California, or any other appropriate court in such county, and Consultant covenants and agrees to submit to the personal jurisdiction of such court in the event of such action. In the event of litigation in a U.S. District G.11.a Packet Pg. 137 Attachment: Contract Services Agreement Grand Terrace and Ultrasystems [Revision 2] (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental 01240.0001/514122.1 10/16/2018 -14- Court, venue shall lie exclusively in the Central District of California, in the County of San Bernardino, State of California. 7.2 Disputes; Default. In the event that Consultant is in default under the terms of this Agreement, the City shall not have any obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default. Instead, the City may give notice to Consultant of the default and the reasons for the default. The notice shall include the timeframe in which Consultant may cure the default. This timeframe is presumptively thirty (30) days, but may be extended, though not reduced, if circumstances warrant. During the period of time that Consultant is in default, the City shall hold all invoices and shall, when the default is cured, proceed with payment on the invoices. In the alternative, the City may, in its sole discretion, elect to pay some or all of the outstanding invoices during the period of default. If Consultant does not cure the default, the City may take necessary steps to terminate this Agreement under this Article. Any failure on the part of the City to give notice of the Consultant’s default shall not be deemed to result in a waiver of the City’s legal rights or any rights arising out of any provision of this Agreement. 7.3 Retention of Funds. Consultant hereby authorizes City to deduct from any amount payable to Consultant (whether or not arising out of this Agreement) (i) any amounts the payment of which may be in dispute hereunder or which are necessary to compensate City for any losses, costs, liabilities, or damages suffered by City, and (ii) all amounts for which City may be liable to third parties , by reason of Consultant’s acts or omissions in performing or failing to perform Consultant’s obligation under this Agreement. In the event that any claim is made by a third party, the amount or validity of which is disputed by Consultant, or any indebtedness shall exist which shall appear to be the basis for a claim of lien, City may withhold from any payment due, without liability for interest because of such withholding, an amount sufficient to cover such claim. The failure of City to exercise such right to deduct or to withhold shall not, however, affect the obligations of the Consultant to insure, indemnify, and protect City as elsewhere provided herein. 7.4 Waiver. Waiver by any party to this Agreement of any term, condition, or covenant of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant. Waiver by any party of any breach of the provisions of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision or a waiver of any subsequent breach or violation of any provision of this Agreement. Acceptance by City of any work or services by Consultant shall not constitute a waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement. No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy by a non-defaulting party on any default shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a waiver. Any waiver by either party of any default must be in writing and shall not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this Agreement. 7.5 Rights and Remedies are Cumulative. Except with respect to rights and remedies expressly declared to be exclusive in this Agreement, the rights and remedies of the parties are cumulative and the exercise by either party G.11.a Packet Pg. 138 Attachment: Contract Services Agreement Grand Terrace and Ultrasystems [Revision 2] (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental 01240.0001/514122.1 10/16/2018 -15- of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other party. 7.6 Legal Action. In addition to any other rights or remedies, either party may take legal action, in law or in equity, to cure, correct or remedy any default, to recover damages for any default, to compel specific performance of this Agreement, to obtain declaratory or injunctive relief, or to obtain any other remedy consistent with the purposes of this Agreement. Notwithstanding any contrary provision herein, Consultant shall file a statutory claim pursuant to Government Code Sections 905 et. seq. and 910 et. seq., in order to pursue a legal action under this Agreement. 7.7 Termination Prior to Expiration of Term. This Section shall govern any termination of this Contract except as specifically provided in the following Section for termination for cause. The City reserves the right to terminate this Contract at any time, with or without cause, upon written notice to Consultant. In addition, the Consultant may terminate this Contract for cause, upon sixty (60) days’ advance written notice to City. Upon receipt of any notice of termination, Consultant shall immediately cease all services hereunder except such as may be specifically approved by the Contract Officer. Except where the Consultant has initiated termination, the Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for all services rendered prior to the effective date of the notice of termination and for any services authorized by the Contract Officer thereafter in accordance with the Schedule of Compensation or such as may be approved by the Contract Officer, except as provided in Section 7.3. In the event the Consultant has initiated termination, the Consultant shall be entitled to compensation only for the reasonable value of the work product actually produced hereunder. In the event of termination without cause pursuant to this Section, the terminating party need not provide the non-terminating party with the opportunity to cure pursuant to Section 7.2. 7.8 Termination for Default of Consultant. If termination is due to the failure of the Consultant to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement, City may, after compliance with the provisions of Section 7.2, take over the work and prosecute the same to completion by contract or otherwise, and the Consultant shall be liable to the extent that the total cost for completion of the services required hereunder exceeds the compensation herein stipulated (provided that the City shall use reasonable efforts to mitigate such damages), and City may withhold any payments to the Consultant for the purpose of set-off or partial payment of the amounts owed the City as previously stated. 7.9 Attorney’s Fees. If either party to this Agreement is required to initiate or defend or made a party to any action or proceeding in any way connected with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action or proceeding, in addition to any other relief which may be granted, whether legal or equitable, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney’s fees. Attorney’s fees shall include attorney’s fees on any appeal, and in addition a party entitled to attorney’s fees shall be entitled to all other reasonable costs for investigating such action, taking depositions and discovery and all other G.11.a Packet Pg. 139 Attachment: Contract Services Agreement Grand Terrace and Ultrasystems [Revision 2] (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental 01240.0001/514122.1 10/16/2018 -16- necessary costs the court allows which are incurred in such litigation. All such fees shall be deemed to have accrued on commencement of such action and shall be enforceable whether or not such action is prosecuted to judgment. ARTICLE 8. CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES: NON-DISCRIMINATION 8.1 Non-liability of City Officers and Employees. No officer or employee of the City shall be personally liable to the Consultant, or any successor in interest, in the event of any default or breach by the City or for any amount which may become due to the Consultant or to its successor, or for breach of any obligation of the terms of this Agreement. 8.2 Conflict of Interest. Consultant covenants that neither it, nor any officer or principal of its firm, has or shall acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, which would conflict in any manner with the interests of City or which would in any way hinder Consultant’s performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it as an officer, employee, agent or subcontractor without the express written consent of the Contract Officer. Consultant agrees to at all times avoid conflicts of interest or the appearance of any conflicts of interest with the interests of City in the performance of this Agreement. 8.3 Covenant Against Discrimination. Consultant covenants that, by and for itself, its heirs, executors, assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of, any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry or other protected class in the performance of this Agreement. Consultant shall take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry or other protected class. 8.4 Unauthorized Aliens. Consultant hereby promises and agrees to comply with all of the provisions of the Federal Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C.A. §§ 1101, et seq., as amended, and in connection therewith, shall not employ unauthorized aliens as defined therein. Should Consultant so employ such unauthorized aliens for the performance of work and/or services covered by this Agreement, and should any liability or sanctions be imposed against City for such use of unauthorized aliens, Consultant hereby agrees to and shall reimburse City for the cost of all such liabilities or sanctions imposed, together with any and all costs, including attorney’s fees, incurred by City. G.11.a Packet Pg. 140 Attachment: Contract Services Agreement Grand Terrace and Ultrasystems [Revision 2] (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental 01240.0001/514122.1 10/16/2018 -17- ARTICLE 9. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 9.1 Notices. Any notice, demand, request, document, consent, approval, or communication either party desires or is required to give to the other party or any other person shall be in writing and either served personally or sent by prepaid, first-class mail, in the case of the City, to the City Manager and to the attention of the Contract Officer (with her/his name and City title), City of Grand Terrace, 22795 Barton Rd, Grand Terrace, CA 92313, and in the case of the Consultant, to the person(s) at the address designated on the execution page of this Agreement. Either party may change its address by notifying the other party of the change of address in writing. Notice shall be deemed communicated at the time personally delivered or in seventy-two (72) hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this Section. 9.2 Interpretation. The terms of this Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the meaning of the language used and shall not be construed for or against either party by reason of the authorship of this Agreement or any other rule of construction which might otherwise apply. 9.3 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, and such counterparts shall constitute one and the same instrument. 9.4 Integration; Amendment. This Agreement including the attachments hereto is the entire, complete and exclusive expression of the understanding of the parties. It is understood that there are no oral agreements between the parties hereto affecting this Agreement and this Agreement supersedes and cancels any and all previous negotiations, arrangements, agreements and understandings, if any, between the parties, and none shall be used to interpret this Agreement. No amendment to or modification of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and approved by the Consultant and by the City Council. The parties agree that this requirement for written modifications cannot be waived and that any attempted waiver shall be void. 9.5 Severability. In the event that any one or more of the phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections contained in this Agreement shall be declared invalid or unenforceable by a val id judgment or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections of this Agreement which are hereby declared as severable and shall be interpreted to carry out the intent of the parties hereunder unless the invalid provision is so material that its invalidity deprives either party of the basic benefit of their bargain or renders this Agreement meaningless. G.11.a Packet Pg. 141 Attachment: Contract Services Agreement Grand Terrace and Ultrasystems [Revision 2] (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental 01240.0001/514122.1 10/16/2018 -18- 9.6 Warranty & Representation of Non-Collusion. No official, officer, or employee of City has any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, nor shall any official, officer, or employee of City participate in any decision relating to this Agreement which may affect his/her financial interest or the financial interest of any corporation, partnership, or association in which (s)he is directly or indirectly interested, or in violation of any corporation, partnership, or association in which (s)he is directly or indirectly interested, or in violation of any State or municipal statute or regulation. The determination of “financial interest” shall be consistent with State law and shall not include interests found to be “remote” or “noninterests” pursuant to Government Code Sections 1091 or 1091.5. Nor shall any such officer or employee participate in any decision relating to the Agreement which affects her/his financial interest or the financial interest of any corporation, partnership or association in which (s)he is, directly or indirectly, interested, in violation of any State statute or regulation, including but not limited to the Political Reform Act (Government Code Sections 81000, et seq.) Consultant warrants and represents that it has not paid or given, and will not pay or give, to any third party including, but not limited to, any City official, officer, or employee, any money, consideration, or other thing of value as a result or consequence of obtaining or being awarded any agreement. Consultant further warrants and represents that (s)he/it has not engaged in any act(s), omission(s), or other conduct or collusion that would result in the payment of any money, consideration, or other thing of value to any third party including, but not limited to, any City official, officer, or employee, as a result of consequence of obtaining or being awarded any agreement. Consultant is aware of and understands that any such act(s), omission(s) or other conduct resulting in such payment of money, consideration, or other thing of value will render this Agreement void and of no force or effect. Consultant’s Authorized Initials _______ 9.7 Corporate Authority. The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the parties hereto warrant that (i) such party is duly organized and existing, (ii) they are duly authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement on behalf of said party, (iii) by so executing this Agreement, such party is formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement, and (iv) the entering into this Agreement does not violate any provision of any other Agreement to which said party is bound. This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the parties. [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE] G.11.a Packet Pg. 142 Attachment: Contract Services Agreement Grand Terrace and Ultrasystems [Revision 2] (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental 01240.0001/514122.1 10/16/2018 19 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year first-above written. CITY: City of Grand Terrace, a municipal corporation _____________________________________ Darcy McNaboe, Mayor ATTEST: _____________________________________ Debra Thomas, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ALESHIRE & WYNDER, LLP ____________________________________ Adrian R. Guerra, City Attorney CONSULTANT: _____________________________________ _____________________________________ By: ___________________________________ Name: Betsy A. Lindsay Title: President/CEO By: ___________________________________ Name: Title: Address: _____________________________ _____________________________ ______________________________ Two corporate officer signatures required when Consultant is a corporation, with one signature required from each of the following groups: 1) Chairman of the Board, President or any Vice President; and 2) Secretary, any Assistant Secretary, Chief Financial Officer or any Assistant Treasurer. CONSULTANT’S SIGNATURES SHALL BE DULY NOTARIZED, AND APPROPRIATE ATTESTATIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE BYLAWS, ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION, OR OTHER RULES OR REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO CONSULTANT’S BUSINESS ENTITY. G.11.a Packet Pg. 143 Attachment: Contract Services Agreement Grand Terrace and Ultrasystems [Revision 2] (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental 01240.0001/514122.1 10/16/2018 CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO On __________, 2019 before me, ________________, personally appeared ________________, proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose names(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of Califor nia that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature: _____________________________________ OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT INDIVIDUAL CORPORATE OFFICER _______________________________ TITLE(S) PARTNER(S) LIMITED GENERAL ATTORNEY-IN-FACT TRUSTEE(S) GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR OTHER_______________________________ ______________________________________ SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: (NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES)) _____________________________________________ _____________________________________________ ___________________________________ TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT ___________________________________ NUMBER OF PAGES ___________________________________ DATE OF DOCUMENT ___________________________________ SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy or validity of that document. G.11.a Packet Pg. 144 Attachment: Contract Services Agreement Grand Terrace and Ultrasystems [Revision 2] (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental 01240.0001/514122.1 10/16/2018 CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO On __________, 2019 before me, ________________, personally appeared ________________, proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose names(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized cap acity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foreg oing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature: _____________________________________ OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT INDIVIDUAL CORPORATE OFFICER _______________________________ TITLE(S) PARTNER(S) LIMITED GENERAL ATTORNEY-IN-FACT TRUSTEE(S) GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR OTHER_______________________________ ______________________________________ SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: (NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES)) _____________________________________________ _____________________________________________ ___________________________________ TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT ___________________________________ NUMBER OF PAGES ___________________________________ DATE OF DOCUMENT ___________________________________ SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy or validity of that document. G.11.a Packet Pg. 145 Attachment: Contract Services Agreement Grand Terrace and Ultrasystems [Revision 2] (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental 01240.0001/514122.1 10/16/2018 A-1 EXHIBIT “A” SCOPE OF SERVICES I. Developer GrandT-1 Inc. (“Developer”) has proposed a trailer storage use at a location south of the Santa Ana River Trail, and between the UPRR and BNSF railroad lines (APN 0275-191-06 and 30; no address) in the City of Grand Terrace. This proposed use requires discretionary land use entitlements and is, therefore, subject to environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”). Developer has contracted with an environmental consultant to prepare technical studies and prepare the environmental documents required by CEQA. The City, as the lead agency, hereby contracts with Consultant whereby Consultant agrees to perform a peer review of the technical studies and environmental documents prepared by Developer’s consultant (“Services”). The Services shall include, but not be limited to, the following: A. Task 1: Project Initiation, Work Program Refinement and Project Management i. Consultant will attend one (1) kick-off meeting with City staff to review the City’s goals and objectives, discuss strategies for accomplishing the work, refine (if necessary) the work scope, identify available data, and review and verify project deliverables. ii. Consultant will conduct bi-weekly conference calls on project progress. B. Task 2: Data Collection, Review and Evaluation i. Consultant will review the existing proposed project documents, and prepare a Data Needs List. The list will provide information to City Staff relating to each topical issue (if needed), the party responsible for providing the information, data requested, requesting party, date provided by the City or Developer, and comments C. Task 3: Peer Review of Technical Studies i. Consultant shall perform a CEQA adequacy peer-review of the technical studies itemized below to determine if the technical studies provided by the Developer’s environmental consultant contains the necessary content to support the environmental analysis that is germane to each of the technical study topics in the IS/MND. Each technical study will be reviewed to verify if any thresholds of significance from the City’s guidelines, applicable thresholds from the City General Plan, and, if applicable, the City’s Development Code. Consultant shall make recommendations if it feels based on the analysis provided that additional technical studies are warranted. G.11.a Packet Pg. 146 Attachment: Contract Services Agreement Grand Terrace and Ultrasystems [Revision 2] (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental 01240.0001/514122.1 10/16/2018 A-2 1. Traffic Impact Analysis 2. Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis 3. Cultural Resources Report 4. Noise Impact Analysis 5. Geotechnical Analysis 6. Hydrology Report/WQMP D. Task 4: Draft Initial Study Review i. Consultant to determine the technical adequacy of the IS was prepared pursuant to the requirements of CEQA Section 21080 and Sections 15060 through 15065 of the CEQA Guidelines. Consultant review will include the following components: 1. Project Description. The project description section will be peer- reviewed to verify that it captures the requirements of State CEQA Guidelines § 15378. Consultant will document if the following components have been included and adequately described, which generally constitute a thorough project description: a. Project background summary. b. List of project objectives. c. Description of project amenities. d. List and discussion of required public agency approvals and entitlements. e. Characteristics of the onsite buildings. f. Landscaping characteristics including a plant palette. g. Hardscaping characteristics including fencing and wall details. h. Lighting characteristics including parking, way finding, and security. i. Offsite vehicular access points including emergency vehicular access. j. Onsite vehicular circulation and parking. k. Onsite pedestrian and bicycle circulation and connectivity to offsite circulation. l. Water and wastewater infrastructure characteristics. m. Stormwater conveyance infrastructure characteristics. n. Any offsite improvements required to implement the project. o. Development phasing and construction phasing. p. Grading and soil balance. G.11.a Packet Pg. 147 Attachment: Contract Services Agreement Grand Terrace and Ultrasystems [Revision 2] (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental 01240.0001/514122.1 10/16/2018 A-3 q. Construction material and vehicle staging areas (i.e., lay- down areas). r. Graphics and exhibits necessary to supplement the narrative including regional and vicinity location maps and a detailed site plan. 2. Topical Issue Analysis. Each of the required topical environmental issue areas will be peer-reviewed by Consultant to document to the City that the following components have been included and adequately analyzed. These issue areas include: a. Description of the project site’s environmental physical characteristics. b. Description of the environmental setting of the vicinity of the project site. c. Description of the regulatory setting that lists the applicable regulations used in the analysis. d. List of the thresholds of significance used in the analysis. e. List of project design features (if used) that would reduce potentially significant impacts below the level of significance. f. Analysis of the potential impacts of the project related to short-term construction activities. g. Analysis of the potential impacts of the project related to long-term operational activities. E. Task 5: Response to Public Comments and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program i. Consultant will review comments received on the IS/MND during the public review period along with the Developer’s response to comments to determine if each response is deemed technical adequate and address each comment received. F. Task 6: Attend Public Meetings and Public Hearings i. Consultant will attend up to two (2) public hearings either before the City’s Planning Commission or City Council. Consultant will provide technical assistance to City staff relating to this proposed project. G. Task 7: Staff Augmentation i. Consultant will prepare the environmental findings that would include in the Resolution adopting the Mitigated Negative Declaration, and assist with the environmental portion of the City staff report to the Planning Commission/City Council. Consultant will represent the City with respect G.11.a Packet Pg. 148 Attachment: Contract Services Agreement Grand Terrace and Ultrasystems [Revision 2] (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental 01240.0001/514122.1 10/16/2018 A-4 to AB52 (Agency to Agency) consultation with the Native American tribes that have requested consultation on this proposal project. II. As part of the Services, Consultant will prepare and deliver the following tangible work products to the City: A. Task 1: Meeting minute notes drafted and then sent to City staff in PDF format within 2-days. B. Task 2: A Data Needs List provided to the City staff in Excel C. Task 3: Provided a written memorandum to the City relating to each technical study in a PDF format. The memorandum will detail and identify deficiencies in the technical work product and address the need for consistency. D. Task 4: Technical Adequacy Peer-Review Memorandum distributed to City staff in a PDF file format. Comments in the IS/MND will also be provide in tracked changes, along with comment bubbles. Two rounds of technical review will be necessary for this task - one to address the entire IS/MND and the other to address comments made by the Developer’s Environmental Consultant to the IS/MND. Consultant will inform the City when the Draft IS/MND is ready for circulation and public review E. Task 5: Consultant will provide comments in track-changes within the Responses to Comments document. It is anticipated that two rounds of technical review will be necessary for this task. F. Task 6: Consultant will attend up to two (2) public hearings either before the City’s Planning Commission or City Council. Consultant will provide technical assistance to City staff relating to this proposed project. G. Task 7: Consultant will provide environmental findings for the Resolution to adopt the IS/MND and provide the environmental portion for the City’s staff report and represent City on AB 52 Consultation. III. In addition to the requirements of Section 6.2, during performance of the Services, Consultant will keep the City appraised of the status of performance by delivering the following status reports: A. In addition to the status reports provided above, Consultant shall provide such other status reports as may be required by the City from time to time. IV. All work product is subject to review and acceptance by the City and must be revised by the Consultant without additional charge to the City until found satisfactory and accepted by City. V. Consultant will utilize the following personnel to accomplish the Services: G.11.a Packet Pg. 149 Attachment: Contract Services Agreement Grand Terrace and Ultrasystems [Revision 2] (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental 01240.0001/514122.1 10/16/2018 A-5 A. Betsy A. Lindsay, President/CEO B. Margaret Partridge, Senior Project Manager G.11.a Packet Pg. 150 Attachment: Contract Services Agreement Grand Terrace and Ultrasystems [Revision 2] (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental 01240.0001/514122.1 10/16/2018 B-1 EXHIBIT “B” SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS (Superseding Contract Boilerplate) G.11.a Packet Pg. 151 Attachment: Contract Services Agreement Grand Terrace and Ultrasystems [Revision 2] (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental 01240.0001/514122.1 10/16/2018 C-1 EXHIBIT “C” SCHEDULE OF COMPENSATION I. Consultant shall perform the Services at the budgeted amounts and hourly rates as provided in Exhibit “C-1.” II. Within the budgeted amounts for each Task, and with the approval of the Contract Officer, funds may be shifted from one Task subbudget to another so long as the Contract Sum is not exceeded per Section 2.1, unless Additional Services are approved per Section 1.8. III. The City will compensate Consultant for the Services performed upon submission of a valid invoice. Each invoice is to include: A. Line items for all personnel describing the work performed, the number of hours worked, and the hourly rate. B. Line items for all materials and equipment properly charged to the Services. C. Line items for all other approved reimbursable expenses claimed, with supporting documentation. D. Line items for all approved subcontractor labor, supplies, equipment, materials, and travel properly charged to the Services. IV. The total compensation for the Services shall not exceed Forty Thousand Five Hundred Sixty Dollars and No Cents ($40,560.00) as provided in Section 2.1 of this Agreement. G.11.a Packet Pg. 152 Attachment: Contract Services Agreement Grand Terrace and Ultrasystems [Revision 2] (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental 01240.0001/514122.1 10/16/2018 C-1 Exhibit “C-1” G.11.a Packet Pg. 153 Attachment: Contract Services Agreement Grand Terrace and Ultrasystems [Revision 2] (Professional 01240.0001/514122.1 10/16/2018 C-2 Professional Rate Schedule G.11.a Packet Pg. 154 Attachment: Contract Services Agreement Grand Terrace and Ultrasystems [Revision 2] (Professional 01240.0001/514122.1 10/16/2018 D-1 EXHIBIT “D” SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE I. Consultant shall commence work under this Agreement within 5 working days of this Agreement’s execution by the parties. II. Consultant shall perform all Services timely in accordance with the Project Schedule developed by Consultant and subject to the written approval of the Contract Officer. G.11.a Packet Pg. 155 Attachment: Contract Services Agreement Grand Terrace and Ultrasystems [Revision 2] (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental PROPOSAL TO CITY OF GRAND TERRACE CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR PEER REVIEW OF AN INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Presented to: City of Grand Terrace Planning and Development Services Attention: Sandra Molina 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92313 Prepared by: UltraSystems Environmental Inc. 16431 Scientific Way Irvine, CA 92618 UEI No. 190222 February 2019 G.11.b Packet Pg. 156 Attachment: UEI_Proposal_2019-04-25 (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental Peer Review)  TABLE OF CONTENTS  190222/City of Grand Terrace – GrandT-1 Industrial Storage Facility Page i February 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 COVER LETTER ......................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS ..................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Firm Profile ................................................................................................................................................. 3 3.0 EXPERIENCE WITH SIMILAR PROJECTS .......................................................................................... 4 3.1 Other Notable Peer Reviews Conducted by UltraSystems ...................................................... 7 4.0 REFERENCES .............................................................................................................................................. 9 5.0 LEGAL ENTITY ....................................................................................................................................... 10 6.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT .................................................................................................................... 10 6.1 Senior Project Leaders ......................................................................................................................... 11 6.2 Subconstant Firm to Assist with Traffic ....................................................................................... 13 7.0 WORK SCOPE AND BUDGET .............................................................................................................. 14 7.1 City’s Objective ........................................................................................................................................ 14 7.2 Project Understanding ......................................................................................................................... 14 8.0 DELIVERABLES ...................................................................................................................................... 18 9.0 COSTS ........................................................................................................................................................ 19 10.0 STAFFING CAPACITY ........................................................................................................................... 22 TABLES Table 2.0-1 Company Profile ........................................................................................................................................... 3 Table 4.0-1 Consultant's Reference Table ................................................................................................................. 9 Table 6.0-1 UltraSystems Key Personnel/Project Roles ................................................................................... 10 Table 8.0-1 Deliverables ................................................................................................................................................. 19 Table 9.0-1 Proposed Fees-Peer Review Services ............................................................................................... 19 Table 9.0-2 UltraSystems Standard Rate Schedule .............................................................................................. 20 Table 9.0-3 Cost Table-Labor Breakdown ............................................................................................................... 21 APPENDICES Appendix A Key Personnel Resumes G.11.b Packet Pg. 157 Attachment: UEI_Proposal_2019-04-25 (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental Peer Review)  CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR PEER REVIEW OF AN IS/ MND  190222/City of Grand Terrace – GrandT-1 Industrial Storage Facility Page 1 February 2019 1.0 COVER LETTER February 18, 2019 Attention: Ms. Sandra Molina Planning and Development Services City of Grand Terrace 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92313 RE: CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR PEER REVIEW OF AN INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Dear Ms. Molina: UltraSystems Environmental, Inc. (UltraSystems) is pleased to submit this technical and cost proposal to the City of Grand Terrace (City) to provide technical peer-review consulting services for the proposed GranT-1 Industrial Semi-Trailer Storage Facility project. Our project team includes experts with unparalleled experience with very complex projects including peer-review of environmental documents and technical studies. Our staff includes environmental and land use planners, scientists, and engineers with the appropriate mix of senior-level management and technical expertise to effectively and efficiently complete the peer-review. Overview of UltraSystems | Qualifications UltraSystems is a full-service planning and environmental consulting firm that serves public and private sector clients throughout California. It was founded in 1994; UltraSystems’ headquarters is in Irvine, CA and also has satellite offices in El Centro, Grass Valley and Sacramento. For over 25 years, UltraSystems has provided consulting services to public and private sector clients throughout California, preparing over 7,000 environmental reports, engineering studies and other technical studies for clients. We also have conducted numerous peer review for public agency clients. And, throughout our CEQA work, we have been called upon to conduct peer reviews on various technical studies before they are incorporated into environmental documents. UltraSystems currently employs a multidisciplinary team of 42 full-time talented and experienced urban and environmental planners, scientists, archaeologists, biologists, geologists, hydrologists, engineers, GIS specialists and support staff to perform environmental analysis and monitoring, CEQA/NEPA document preparation, permit processing and compliance monitoring, technical studies, and construction environmental compliance to satisfy environmental laws and regulations, from initial project planning through construction. UltraSystems Management Team Leadership Our project team will be led by experienced senior-level staff, many of whom have more than 30 years of experience. Betsy Lindsay, MURP, ENV SP and UltraSystems Principal, will act as the Project Director for this contract. Ms. Lindsay has over 35 years of experience preparing and G.11.b Packet Pg. 158 Attachment: UEI_Proposal_2019-04-25 (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental Peer Review)  CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR PEER REVIEW OF AN IS/ MND  190222/City of Grand Terrace – GrandT-1 Industrial Storage Facility Page 2 February 2019 managing environmental documents. She will be assisted by Margaret Partridge, MURP, LEED GA, ENV SP, AICP, who will serve as the Senior Project Manager on this contract. Rounding out our management team is Hina Gupta, MURP, LEED AP B+C who will serve as Deputy Project Manager and will provide Quality Assurance/Quality Control for technical memorandums to the City. Throughout our proposal, we will demonstrate why the UltraSystems project team is ideal for this contract with the City. In summary, our team offers the following advantages over our competition:  Substantial Resource Depth and Capacity.  Having the Right Subconsultant on our Project Team.  Legal Track-Record in Preparing Environmental Documents.  Well-established Relationships with Regulatory Agencies.  Being Cost Effective and Project Delivery Efficient. As the President/CEO of UltraSystems, I am a duly authorized officer of the firm with the legal authority to bind and commit the firm to contractual obligations. Should you need any additional information, you can reach me via email at blindsay@ultrasystems.com or telephone at: (949) 788-4900 ext. 227. Sincerely, ULTRASYSTEMS ENVIRONMENTAL INC. Betsy A. Lindsay President/CEO G.11.b Packet Pg. 159 Attachment: UEI_Proposal_2019-04-25 (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental Peer Review)  CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR PEER REVIEW OF AN IS/ MND  190222/City of Grand Terrace – GrandT-1 Industrial Storage Facility Page 3 February 2019 2.0 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS 2.1 Firm Profile UltraSystems Environmental Inc. (UltraSystems) is a full-service planning and environmental consulting firm. Founded in 1994, UltraSystems is headquartered in Irvine, California and maintains satellite offices in Carlsbad, Grass Valley and Sacramento. Firm Stability and Strength | Resource Depth. For over 25 years, UltraSystems has provided consulting services to public and private sector clients throughout California, preparing over 7,000 environmental reports, engineering studies and other technical studies for clients. We are confident that our extensive project experience, coupled with our senior-level in-house professional and technical resources, will bring a level of technical expertise required to exceed the City’s needs during this EIR contract. UltraSystems employs a multidisciplinary team of 42 talented and experienced urban and environmental planners, scientists, archaeologists, biologists, geologists, hydrologists, engineers, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) specialists, and support staff to complete CEQA and NEPA documents, technical studies, permits, and construction monitoring programs to satisfy environmental laws and regulations from planning through operations. In addition, our firm has under contract up to 100 individuals to supplement (if necessary) existing workloads. Lastly, our firm has master service agreements (MSAs) with 50 firms. Those firms vary from fewer than five to over 43,000 employees. By collaborating across scientific disciplines, UltraSystems delivers practical solutions to environmental problems. UltraSystems emphasizes resolution of environmental issues early in the process when the client has the greatest flexibility for design to avoid or minimize costly permitting and mitigation on their projects. Presented below is our firm profile. Table 2.0-1 COMPANY PROFILE COMPANY PROFILE Company Name: UltraSystems Environmental, Inc. (UltraSystems) Corporation Type: UltraSystems is a S Corporation (privately-held) Corporate Headquarters: 16431 Scientific Way, Irvine, CA 96218 T: 949/788-4900 | F: 949/788-4901 Company Website: www.ultrasystems.com Year Incorporated: July 1, 1994 | S-Corp Years in Business: 25 Diversity Certifications:  Federal Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE)  Small Business Enterprise (SBE)  Woman-owned Business Enterprise (WBE)  Federal Woman-owned Small Business (WOSB)  DIR # 1000006738 Contact Person for the Contract: Betsy A. Lindsay, President/CEO | E: blindsay@ultrasystems.com Number of Employees: Full time employees in Irvine = 42 G.11.b Packet Pg. 160 Attachment: UEI_Proposal_2019-04-25 (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental Peer Review)  CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR PEER REVIEW OF AN IS/ MND  190222/City of Grand Terrace – GrandT-1 Industrial Storage Facility Page 4 February 2019 The preparation and review of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documents has been a core service of UltraSystems since our founding. This expertise includes coordination with local, state, federal and other governmental agencies; managing public participation programs; issuing necessary legal notices; and incorporating the document into the overall planning process. UltraSystems regularly acts as an extension of staff for public agencies to perform all required public and agency notifications for CEQA and NEPA environmental review documents. After review, UltraSystems handles the logistics of distribution, publication, and notifications per California Government Code requirements. 3.0 EXPERIENCE WITH SIMILAR PROJECTS UltraSystems is often called upon to perform third-party reviews of technical studies prepared by other consulting firms on behalf of public agencies and private clients. Those reviews are typically conducted to (1) determine the technical and procedural adequacy of CEQA and NEPA documents; (2) identify informational and analytical deficiencies, (3) determine procedural compliance, (4) document project-induced impacts, (5) assess the effectiveness of recommended mitigation measures, (6) support additional mitigation measures and alternative development plans, and (7) assist legal counsel with judicial challenges to pending projects. A sample of peer-review projects or logistic center projects is summarized below. PROJECT: DCT JURUPA LOGISTICS CENTER II PROJECT – ADDENDUM Relates to this Proposal: Air Quality, GHG Emissions, Health Risk Assessment, Noise, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources and Traffic technical studies. Client: City of Fontana Contact: Brett Hamilton, Assistant Planner | T: (323) 260-4703 | E: bhamilton@fontana.org Contract Duration: November 2017 to February 2018 Contract Amount: $34,215 The proposed project, known as the DCT Jurupa Logistics Center II Project, consists of the development of a single, Class A, 104,530‐ square‐foot, two‐story distribution warehouse facility, located on a 5.24‐acre parcel at the northeast corner of Jurupa Avenue and Catawba Avenue. The proposed warehouse would include 101,530 square feet on the ground floor and 6,000 square feet on the second floor. Parking spaces would be constructed on the north and south sides of the project site. A 360‐foot‐wide truck court, with a capacity of 21 dock doors, would be constructed on the east side of the project site. Landscape improvements are also proposed onsite. Utility connections to water, sewer, and electricity would be constructed. UltraSystems was hired by the City of Fontana to complete an Addendum to the Southwest Industrial Specific Plan Program Environmental Impact Report in compliance with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to account for necessary changes or additions to the project but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines calling for a preparation of a subsequent EIR occurred. G.11.b Packet Pg. 161 Attachment: UEI_Proposal_2019-04-25 (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental Peer Review)  CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR PEER REVIEW OF AN IS/ MND  190222/City of Grand Terrace – GrandT-1 Industrial Storage Facility Page 5 February 2019 PROJECT: LTG PLATINUM CENTER MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT – PEER REVIEW Relates to this Proposal: Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Noise Studies Client: City of Anaheim Contact: Christine Saunders Contract Duration: May 2016 Contract Amount: $20,440 UltraSystems was requested by the City of Anaheim to conduct a peer review on the Modified Project that was the subject of the Addendum No. 5 to SEIR No. 339 would involve the construction of 405 residential units, 433,000 gross square feet of commercial retail space, a 215‐room hotel, and 77,000 gross square feet of office space. The floor area of office space and number of dwelling units proposed for development under the Modified Project are substantially lower than the totals allowed in the Gateway District under the Approved Project. However, the proposed mixed-use development in the Modified Project contains a substantially greater amount of commercial space in the Gateway District than allowed under the Approved Project. Our original scope was to review technical studies of the air quality, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and noise impacts of the project. However, as discussed in Section 2, no new, stand‐alone technical studies of those impact categories were prepared for the Screencheck Addendum. Instead, UltraSystems reviewed the air quality, GHG and noise sections of the Screencheck addendum for technical accuracy and internal consistency. The air quality, GHG emissions, and noise sections of the Screencheck Addendum, along with five technical studies that had already been reviewed by others for technical adequacy, were reviewed to ascertain whether they contained the necessary content to support the environmental analysis in the Screencheck Addendum. Discrepancies between the technical studies and the Addendum were noted. The technical studies included geotechnical/soils, hydrology/drainage, water quality management plan, sewerage, and a Phase I environmental site assessment. UltraSystems also reviewed the Screencheck Addendum to verify that it met the requirement under the CEQA statute and CEQA Guidelines for an addendum. The entire document was reviewed for internal consistency, and to determine whether evidence presented was sufficient to support its findings. The peer review of the Screencheck Addendum was included within a memorandum to the City. PROJECT: KAISER LABORATORY COOLING TOWER Relates to this Proposal: Noise Peer Review Client: City of Chino Hills Contact: JoAnn Lombardo | T: (909) 364-2740 | E: jlombardo@chinohills.org Contract Duration: June 2016 Contract Amount: $3,425 G.11.b Packet Pg. 162 Attachment: UEI_Proposal_2019-04-25 (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental Peer Review)  CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR PEER REVIEW OF AN IS/ MND  190222/City of Grand Terrace – GrandT-1 Industrial Storage Facility Page 6 February 2019 Kaiser Permanente completed construction of the new Inland Empire Satellite Regional Reference Laboratory at 13000 Peyton Drive, Chino Hills, California. The facility includes three Marley MD5018PLD counterflow cooling towers, which are collocated on the northwest side of the laboratory building. The cooling towers have been installed and are now operating at least part of the time. A pre-existing residential neighborhood is located on the west, and northwest sides of the Kaiser facility. Distances from the cooling towers to the nearest tier of residences (on a line-of-sight) range from about 270 to 570 feet. In April 2016, the City of Chino Hills received a letter report from the Culver City office of HOK, an international design firm. The letter included as attachments to reports on noise measurements made at the Kaiser facility boundary, as well as information on the cooling towers. On April 27, 2016, the City asked UltraSystems to peer review the HOK report. On May 3, 2016, the City asked UltraSystems to expand our scope of work to include a site visit and a review of the independent noise reading prepared by a resident. UltraSystems was also to make independent noise measurements related to this project. UltraSystems recommended that a new acoustical study be conducted to gain a more technically sound understanding of the contribution of the cooling towers to exposures at local sensitive receivers. A useful approach would be as follows. First, use three meters of the same make and model, each being Type I meter. Conduct 24-hour sampling at three locations. Two locations would be on the sidewalk in front of nearby residences (at least five feet away from walls in front of the houses). Each residential location would have to be on a direct, unencumbered line of sight from the cooling towers and another unencumbered line of sight from the freeway. If the cooling towers are on the same line of sight as the one from the freeway, they could block out some of the freeway noise. The third sampling location would be at or near UltraSystems’ Location 4, which receives noise from the freeway, but not the cooling towers. All three meters would be programmed to collect 24 consecutive one-hour samples and thereby obtain 24 Leq values and their corresponding sound frequency distributions. Before comparing the Leq values at Location 4 with those collected at the residences, the freeway-only Leq values would have to be adjusted to take into account differences in distance and type of intervening ground surface. The analysis would consist of subtracting the freeway-only values for each hourly Leq value measured at each residence, and then calculating the CNEL. The result would be the CNEL for the cooling towers only. The freeway and cooling tower contributions could then be compared. PROJECT: AIR QUALITY ANALYSIS OF CONCO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA OPERATIONS FACILITY Relates to this Proposal: Air Quality Peer Review Client: County of Riverside Transportation and Land Management Agency Contract Amount: $6,500 UltraSystems reviewed the air quality report prepared for Conco’s proposed 20.50-acre site, located from San Sevaine Street to Bain Street within Mira Loma. The project included Conco’s new Southern California Operations Facility, which encompassed a new, two-story 16,714 sq. ft. office building, a new single-story new single story, 28,240 square foot concrete reinforcing steel and form fabrication building, and a fuel/wash facility for our concrete pumps and trucks. A portion of the phase 1 area was graded and prepared with an all-weather surface for the storage of our fabricated construction forms and form material. The second phase included the improvements to 5 acres that included two new light industrial/warehouse buildings. The smaller of the two buildings will be 35,147 square feet, and the larger building will be 64,010 square feet. These two spec buildings fronted Bain Street. G.11.b Packet Pg. 163 Attachment: UEI_Proposal_2019-04-25 (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental Peer Review)  CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR PEER REVIEW OF AN IS/ MND  190222/City of Grand Terrace – GrandT-1 Industrial Storage Facility Page 7 February 2019 3.1 Other Notable Peer Reviews Conducted by UltraSystems PROJECT NAME: DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 573 FOR THE MCAS EL TORO COMMUNITY REUSE PLAN AND MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN Lead Agency: County of Orange Environmental Management Agency Client Name: Paul Eckles, Executive Director - El Toro Reuse Planning Authority, T: 949/724-6456 Under contract with the El Toro Reuse Planning Authority (ETRPA), UltraSystems conducted a peer- review of the County of Orange EIR/EIS to convert the El Toro Marine Corps Air Station (MCAS) into an International Airport. ETRPA was a seven-city agency representing one million citizens in South Orange County created to represent the “Non-Aviation” alternative and implementation plan for the federal Base Realignment and Closure Act (BRAC) guidelines, and were opposed to continued use of the El Toro MCAS as an airport. UltraSystems also conducted close-scrutiny overviews of the U.S. Naval Facilities Command (NAVFAC) Southwest Division BRAC Closure EIS and specialized studies by civilian consultants. These studies included compliance with and mitigation and/or remediation for a substantial number of identified hazardous materials sites. UltraSystems also completed detailed assignments incorporating geographic information systems (GIS), three-dimensional imagery, and computer modeling of potential impact issues for long-term, non-aviation land-use planning. PROJECT NAME: DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 573 FOR THE MCAS EL TORO MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN Lead Agency: County of Orange Environmental Management Agency Client Name: Marilyn Walczak, General Manager - Aliso Viejo Community Assoc., T: 949/362-5890 On behalf of the Aliso Viejo Community Association, UltraSystems completed a third-party review of the Draft EIR for the El Toro Master Development Plan prepared by the County of Orange. The Aliso Viejo Community Association included approximately 28,000 residents in 12,500 homes. PROJECT NAME: UNIVERSAL STUDIOS SPECIFIC PLAN EIR Lead Agency: County of Los Angeles, Department of Regional Planning, Frank Meneses, Section Head, T: 213/974-6432 Client Name: Lakeside Golf Club c/o Jim Vernon, T: 213/ 683-1480 On behalf of Lakeside Golf Club, UltraSystems completed a third-party review of the Draft EIR for the proposed expansion of Universal Studios, theme park, and City-walk. In addition, UltraSystems conducted an acoustical analysis to independently audit information contained in the Draft EIR. Under this work assignment, UltraSystems supported Lakeside Golf Club’s efforts to ensure a full and faithful disclosure of the potential direct, indirect, and cumulative effects of the pending Universal City project. UltraSystems prepared a detailed review of the information presented in the environmental review record, identified those issues necessitating a technical response by the Lead Agency, provided potential design and development alternatives, identified additional mitigation measures to reduce or avoid project-related effects, evaluated the effectiveness of the proposed mitigation measures, and created a detailed administrative record to assist in future legal challenges. PROJECT NAME: INDUSTRY MATERIALS RECOVERY FACILITY EIR Lead Agency: City of Industry Client Name: Cities of Walnut and Diamond Bar, James DeStefano, Deputy City Manager, T: 909/396- 5676 Under contract to the Cities of Walnut and Diamond, UltraSystems performed a technical due- diligence review of the Draft EIR for the City of Industry Materials Recovery Facility (MRF) and G.11.b Packet Pg. 164 Attachment: UEI_Proposal_2019-04-25 (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental Peer Review)  CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR PEER REVIEW OF AN IS/ MND  190222/City of Grand Terrace – GrandT-1 Industrial Storage Facility Page 8 February 2019 provided permit review, monitoring, and agency consultation for discretionary entitlements which represented key precursors to the approval of the MRF project. PROJECT NAME: ALAMEDA CORRIDOR EIR/EIS Lead Agency: Alameda Corridor Authority Client Name: Burke, Williams, Sorenson, John Schlotterbeck, Esq., T: 213/236-2835 Under contract to Burke, Williams, Sorenson (counsel to the City of Compton), UltraSystems conducted a technical third-party review of the Alameda Corridor Draft Environmental Impact Report/Statement, which analyzed a 30-mile rail corridor between downtown Los Angeles and the Port of Los Angeles. UltraSystems reviewed project documentation to determine whether project implementation would impact the City, its residents, and business community, and whether changes in the project, such as implementation of other project alternatives or the imposition of additional mitigation measures, would alleviate the project's potential impacts. PROJECT NAME: BALDWIN PARK OPERATING UNIT SUPERFUND EIR/EIS Lead Agency: Three Valleys Municipal Water District Client Name: City of Irwindale, Ron Smothers, City Planner, T: 626/430-2200 x 207 Under contract to the City of Irwindale, UltraSystems conducted a peer-review of the EIR/EIS. Of primary concern to the City was the location of the treatment system within their jurisdiction. UltraSystems thoroughly reviewed six “project alternatives”, two “no project” scenarios, three potential “treatment system” processes, five “spreading ground” alternatives, seven “project options,” Cluster 6 Addition, and numerous pipeline alignments. PROJECT NAME: HOME DEPOT MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Lead Agency: City of La Habra Client Name: Beckman Instruments, Eddy F. Atencio, Facilities Engineer, T: 714/773-8157 UltraSystems, under contract to Beckman Instruments, reviewed and commented on the City’s MND and conducted independent analyses of air quality and traffic impacts. PROJECT NAME: LOWER ROSAN/HOME DEPOT Lead Agency: City of Dana Point Client Name: City of Dana Point, Dennis Jue, T: 949/248-9898 UltraSystems, under contract to the City of Dana Point, performed an environmental analysis of (1) project-related impacts affecting the City and its residents, and (2) the effectiveness of measures to minimize or avoid impacts. UltraSystems prepared a detailed administrative record to support anticipated legal challenges. PROJECT NAME: PRICE-COSTCO BULK MERCHANDISE AND GROCERY STORE EIR Lead Agency: City of Torrance Client Name: City of Lomita, Richard Kawasaki, City Planner, T: 310/325-7110 Under contract to the City of Lomita, UltraSystems conducted a peer-review of the Notice of Preparation and Draft EIR prepared for the Price-Costco Store within the City of Torrance. Specific areas of concern to the City of Lomita included (1) project potential impacts on existing “transportation facilities” within City jurisdiction, (2) adequacy of existing storm drain facilities to accommodate storm water discharge demands, (3) roadway improvements, (4) consistency with o the City of Torrance’s General Plan, and (5) specific topical issues addressed in the Draft and Final EIR. G.11.b Packet Pg. 165 Attachment: UEI_Proposal_2019-04-25 (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental Peer Review)  CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR PEER REVIEW OF AN IS/ MND  190222/City of Grand Terrace – GrandT-1 Industrial Storage Facility Page 9 February 2019 PROJECT NAME: GELSON’S AT NORTH TUSTIN VILLAGE NOISE IMPACT STUDY – NORTH TUSTIN Lead Agency: County of Orange Client Name: Neighbors United, Manny Padilla, T: 714/832-8213 UltraSystems performed a technical peer-review of the Noise Impact Study prepared for a proposed commercial shopping center located within the County of Orange, provided comments on the noise analysis, recommended additional mitigation measures, and proposed site planning and design constraints. PROJECT NAME: CYPRESS STREET WATER RESERVOIR REPLACEMENT PROJECT Lead Agency: City of Lomita Client Name: Chandler’s Palos Verdes Sand and Gravel Company, Richard Lawton, President/CEO, T: 310/326-1212 Under contract to Chandler’s, UltraSystems performed a technical review of the MND prepared by the City of Lomita for a 5.5 million-gallon Cypress Street Water Reservoir Replacement Project. UltraSystems recommended (1) relocation the proposed above ground storage tank to a higher elevation outside the Palos Verdes fault zones, and (2) construction of an underground storage tank to avoid light and glare, fault rupture damage, and potential flooding of a Sheriff Station facility. The original site also contained insufficient parking capacity onsite or off-site, and had demonstrable negative aesthetic effects. PROJECT NAME: ONSITE DAIRY DIGESTER/CHINO I DESALTER POWER GENERATION PILOT SCALE PROJECT Lead Agency: Inland Empire Utilities Agency Client Name: City of Chino Hills, Douglas La Belle, City Manager, T: 909/364-2610 UltraSystems conducted a technical peer-review of the IS/MND of a proposed onsite digester project within the City of Chino. 4.0 REFERENCES The table below provides references from public agency clients who will attest to the quality of work performed by UltraSystems in its capacity as providing environmental consulting services in Southern California. Table 4.0-1 CONSULTANTS REFERENCE TABLE Client | Dates of Performance Scope of Services Contact Name and Address City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, CA 92701 December 2018 – Present Legacy Square IS/MND, Biological, Noise, Cultural, Traffic Candida Neal, Planning Director Pedro Gomez, Assistant Planner T:714/667-2790 E: PGomez@santa-ana.org City of Fontana 8353 Sierra Avenue Fontana, CA 92335 December 2018 – Present Fontana Victoria Residential Project Addendum, Air Quality, GHG, Biological, Cultural, Noise DCT Industrial Addendum, Air Quality, GHG, Biological, Cultural, Noise Brett Hamilton, Associate Planner T: 909/350-6656 E: bhamilton@fontana.org G.11.b Packet Pg. 166 Attachment: UEI_Proposal_2019-04-25 (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental Peer Review)  CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR PEER REVIEW OF AN IS/ MND  190222/City of Grand Terrace – GrandT-1 Industrial Storage Facility Page 10 February 2019 Client | Dates of Performance Scope of Services Contact Name and Address City of West Covina 1444 West Garvey Avenue West Covina, CA 91790 August 2017 to November 2018 Portos Bakery and Café IS/MND IS/MND, AQ/GHG, Biological, Cultural, Noise, Traffic 7-Unit Subdivision IS/MND, AQ/GHG, Biological, Cultural, Noise, Traffic Jeff Anderson, Community Development Director T: 626/939-8423 E: jeff.anderson@westcovina.org Los Angeles County Department of Public Works 900 S Fremont Ave Alhambra, CA 91803 October 2016 – Present On-call Environmental and Regulatory Services Contract – (public works projects) CEQA/NEPA, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Historical Resources, Air Quality, Noise, GIS, Habitat Restoration, Regulatory Permitting, Mitigation Monitoring, Phase I ESA Albert Anidi, Project Manager T: (626) 458-5199 T: (626) 458-3916 E: aanidi@dpw.lacounty.gov US Army Corp of Engineers Los Angeles District, CESPLCT Los Angeles, CA 90053-2325 December 2013 – Present Santa Ana River Mainstem Flood Control Project, Norco, CA Biological Surveys and Biological Monitoring during vegetation clearance and restoration Hayley Lovan, Project Engineer T: 402/691-9736 E: Hayley.j.lovan@usace.army.mil 5.0 LEGAL ENTITY UltraSystems is a S-Corporation, established in California. UltraSystems has no ownership interest in the project. We have been in business since July 1994, and we have 42 employees in California. 6.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT The UltraSystems project team that will be assigned to this project is identified in the Table 6.0-1 below. All members of the project team are available and will remain committed to successfully completing their respective responsibilities throughout this contract performance period. Additionally, UltraSystems has selected key in-house personnel to oversee the peer review that will be required for this work assignment Resumes for each project team member are provided in the Technical Appendix. Table 6.0-1 ULTRASYSTEMS KEY PERSONNEL/PROJECT ROLES NAME | TITLE PROJECT ROLE ON PROJECT Yrs. Exp. Key Management on this Contract Betsy A. Lindsay, MURP, ENV SP Project Director Project Management, Contract Administration, Resource Allocation, Memorandum, Public Hearings, QA/QC 35 Margaret Partridge, MURP, AICP, LEED GA. ENV SP Senior Project Manager Primary Point of Contact Mineral Resources, Agriculture & Forestry Resources Public Hearings, Staff Augment 14 Hina Gupta, MURP, LEED-AP Deputy Project Manager Aesthetics, Land Use, Public Services, Utilities and Service Systems, Population/Housing, Wildfire, Staff Augment 12 Key Technical Leads – Peer Review Dr. Michael Rogozen, D.Env. Senior Principal Engineer Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Noise 40 G.11.b Packet Pg. 167 Attachment: UEI_Proposal_2019-04-25 (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental Peer Review)  CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR PEER REVIEW OF AN IS/ MND  190222/City of Grand Terrace – GrandT-1 Industrial Storage Facility Page 11 February 2019 NAME | TITLE PROJECT ROLE ON PROJECT Yrs. Exp. Dan Herlihy, MS, CEG, PG, CHG Senior Technical Advisor Geology/Soils, Hazards & Hazardous Materials 35 Steven O’Neil, MS, RPA Cultural Resources Manager Cultural Resources, AB 52 Compliance, Staff Augment 38 Michelle Tollett BA Senior Biologist Biological Resources 18 Subconsultant Brian Marchetti, BS VP/Senior Transportation Planner KOA Corporation Traffic Impact Analysis 22 6.1 Senior Project Leaders UltraSystems has assembled a project team specifically tailored to meet the requirements of the upcoming assignment. The Primary Point of Contact and Senior Project Manager for this project will be Margaret Partridge, MURP, LEED-GA, ENV SP, AICP and the Deputy Project Manager will be Hina Gupta, MURP, LEED AP B+C. Both of these individuals have experience preparing environmental documents, conducting peer reviews on behalf of numerous public agency clients. Brief descriptions summarizing the qualifications of our Senior Project Manager and Deputy Project Manager are provided below, along with the Project Director. BETSY LINDSAY, MURP, ENV SP | Project Director As UltraSystems’ Principal, Ms. Lindsay will ensure client satisfaction of all services provided by the UltraSystems project team under this contract to the City. In her capacity as Senior Project Manager on this assignment, Ms. Lindsay will be responsible for overall project management and assuring resources are available to complete this project within budget and on schedule. She will help oversee the quality assurance program, and be responsible for all contract management and execution functions. Ms. Lindsay has over 35 years of professional environmental consulting experience. This experience has encompassed the successful preparation of more than 400 environmental documents and management of more than 20 large-scale, on-call/as-needed contracts with a variety of public agencies that have literally encompassed 1,000’s of individual task orders. EDUCATION  MURP., Urban and Regional Planning, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, CA  B.S., Geography, California State University, Long Beach, CA PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS, LICENSES AND AFFILIATIONS  Environmental Sustainability Professional RECENT RELEVANT EXPERIENCE  City of Fontana, Sierra Ave. Apartment – IS/MND  City of Fontana, DCT Jurupa Logistics Center Distribution Center – Addendum  City of Fontana, Fontana Victoria Residential – Addendum G.11.b Packet Pg. 168 Attachment: UEI_Proposal_2019-04-25 (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental Peer Review)  CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR PEER REVIEW OF AN IS/ MND  190222/City of Grand Terrace – GrandT-1 Industrial Storage Facility Page 12 February 2019  Related of California, Rose Hill Courts – EIR  Los Angeles Unified School District, Venice High School, Venice, CA – IS/MND  LAUSD, North Hollywood High School, North Hollywood, CA – IS/MND  LAUSD, Grant High School, Van Nuys, CA – IS/MND  Murrieta Senior Living Facility, Murrieta, CA – IS/MND  Rose Hill Courts Modernization, Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles – IS/MND and EA/FONSI  Portos Bakery, City of West Covina, CA - IS/MND  County of Los Angeles, Department of Public Works – Countywide Residential and Garbage Collection Districts – Addendum  Lenity Architecture, City of Murrieta, Senior Living Facility – IS/MND MARGARET PARTRIDGE, MURP, AICP, LEED GA, ENV SP | Senior Project Manager Ms. Partridge would serve as the Project Manager on this contract. She has over 14 years of experience in community and environmental planning. Ms. Partridge has experience in both the public and private sectors as a city planner and as an environmental planner for residential, commercial, industrial, mixed-use, and specific plan projects. Ms. Partridge’s areas of expertise include CEQA, EIRs, Initial Studies, MNDs, and land use research. She is certified as a LEED Green Associate and is a member of the American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP). Ms. Partridge is trained in environmental analysis for a variety of project types and has experience conducting current planning and permit work for local cities. EDUCATION  M.A., Urban and Regional Planning, University of California, Irvine California State University  B.A., Environmental Analysis and Design, University of California, Irvine PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS, LICENSES AND AFFILIATIONS  American Institute of Certified Planners  LEED – Green Associate  Environmental Sustainability Professional RECENT RELEVANT EXPERIENCE  Related of California, Rose Hill Courts – EIR  Los Angeles Unified School District, Venice High School, Venice, CA – IS/MND  LAUSD, North Hollywood High School, North Hollywood, CA – IS/MND  LAUSD, Grant High School, Van Nuys, CA – IS/MND  Rose Hill Courts Modernization, Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles – IS/MND and EA/FONSI  City of Fontana, Sierra Ave. Apartment – IS/MND  City of Fontana, DCT Jurupa Logistics Center Distribution Center – Addendum  County of Los Angeles, Department of Public Works – Countywide Residential and Garbage Collection Districts – Addendum G.11.b Packet Pg. 169 Attachment: UEI_Proposal_2019-04-25 (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental Peer Review)  CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR PEER REVIEW OF AN IS/ MND  190222/City of Grand Terrace – GrandT-1 Industrial Storage Facility Page 13 February 2019 HINA GUPTA, MURP, LEED AP B+C | Deputy Project Manager Ms. Gupta is a seasoned professional urban and regional planner with over 12 years of environmental project management and planning experience. She has prepared and/or managed the preparation of CEQA compliance documents for a wide variety of projects including master planned developments, multi-family housing, educational facilities, industrial facilities, infrastructure improvements and transportation-related projects. Ms. Gupta’s areas of technical expertise include: Aesthetics and Visual Impact Analysis, Community Impact Assessment, Sustainable Land Use and Transit Oriented Development, Streetscape Improvement, Architectural Design and Data Analysis. Ms. Gupta will oversee the day to day technical operations on this assignment, undertake the preparation of technical sections for which she has primary responsibility, and conduct QA/QC reviews of all UltraSystems deliverables prior to submittal to the City. EDUCATION  MURP University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA  B.Arch., Chandigarh College of Architecture, Chandigarh, India PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS, LICENSES AND AFFILIATIONS  LEED – Building +Architecture Associate  Environmental Sustainability Professional RECENT RELEVANT EXPERIENCE  City of Fontana, Sierra Ave. Apartment – IS/MND  City of Fontana, DCT Jurupa Logistics Center Distribution Center – Addendum  Related of California, Rose Hill Courts – EIR  Los Angeles Unified School District, Venice High School, Venice, CA – IS/MND  LAUSD, North Hollywood High School, North Hollywood, CA – IS/MND  LAUSD, Grant High School, Van Nuys, CA – IS/MND  Murrieta Senior Living Facility, Murrieta, CA – IS/MND  Rose Hill Courts Modernization, Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles – IS/MND and EA/FONSI  Portos Bakery, City of West Covina, CA – IS/MND  County of Los Angeles, Department of Public Works – Pitchess EVOC for Sheriff’s 6.2 Subconsultant Firm to Assist with Traffic UltraSystems would perform all work in-house with the exception of the Traffic Impact Report. For the peer-review of the Traffic Impact Report, we would hire KOA Corporation. We have successfully worked with KOA on numerous projects throughout Southern California. Founded in 1987, KOA Corporation (KOA) is a leading provider in traffic engineering, transportation planning and construction management services for public agencies and private sector clients. They offer clients technical knowledge, innovative solutions and responsive services. Their staff includes certified transportation planners, registered civil and traffic engineers, project/construction managers, and construction inspectors. With four offices located in Southern California, KOA has provided services for some of the largest public works and transportation G.11.b Packet Pg. 170 Attachment: UEI_Proposal_2019-04-25 (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental Peer Review)  CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR PEER REVIEW OF AN IS/ MND  190222/City of Grand Terrace – GrandT-1 Industrial Storage Facility Page 14 February 2019 planning projects in California. KOA has conducted a wide variety of transportation planning and traffic impact studies for public and private developments throughout Southern California. Nearly a third of their staff members are transportation planners. These planners are able to define methodology with the lead agency, analyze project impacts thoroughly and properly, and offer feasible and effective mitigation options and design solutions for identified transportation concerns. KOA has prepared studies for numerous public sector jurisdictions, each with customize elements as required for each project and its aspects. Brian Marchetti, BS, AICP, Senior Transportation Planner, would lead all technical resources relating to the peer review of the traffic impact study. 7.0 WORK SCOPE AND BUDGET 7.1 City’s Objective Contract for Peer Review Services of a Developer-driven IS/MND with resulting technical studies. The City wants a consultant with a thorough understanding of CEQA to objectively analyze the impacts of the project, confirm mitigation, and impartially represent the environmental document before the key decision-makers in the City. 7.2 Project Understanding The project is located on approximately 22 acres, at the northerly terminus of Terrace Avenue and fronting Railroad Access Road, and south of the Santa Ana River in the City. The project site is currently zoned Heavy Industrial (M-2), with a small portion along the northern boundary with an Agricultural Overlay District (AG). The proposed operations will support local and regional businesses, associated with fulfillment centers, delivery services, retail merchants, and major wholesale retailers, such as: Costco, Amazon, UPS, Ashley Furniture, and others within Riverside and San Bernardino County. A maximum of 650 semi-trailers, shipping and storage containers with chassis would be stored onsite. Hours of operation would be Monday through Saturday, 6AM to 10PM. Proposed improvements would include a security/caretaker’s office, and a 4,800 sq. ft. maintenance building, which would be used for regulatory inspection and maintenance of the trailers and containers. The proposed scope of work is intended to satisfy the following objectives.  Analyze project information for compliance with CEQA requirements including project description, Initial Study, project objectives and project alternatives.  Describe the process to compete the peer-review. Below is a task-by-task description of the proposed scope of work. G.11.b Packet Pg. 171 Attachment: UEI_Proposal_2019-04-25 (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental Peer Review)  CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR PEER REVIEW OF AN IS/ MND  190222/City of Grand Terrace – GrandT-1 Industrial Storage Facility Page 15 February 2019 TASK 1 – PROJECT INITIATION, WORK PROGRAM REFINEMENT, AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT UltraSystems’ assigned project manager will attend one (1) kick-off meeting with City staff to review the City’s goals and objectives, discuss strategies for accomplishing the work, refine (if necessary) the work scope and identify available data. Additional purposes of the project initiation meeting are to (1) introduce key personnel, (2) review and verify the project schedule, (3) review and verify project deliverables, and (4) define avenues of communication and discuss any other related matters concerning the contract. UltraSystems will document the meeting; therefore, we would be responsible to taking meeting minutes and then distribute meeting minutes to City staff. At this meeting, UltraSystems will collect all materials in the possession of the City relevant to the performance of this work assignment. The City has requested that UltraSystems hold monthly meetings if necessary. Our suggestion is that we hold bi-weekly conference calls with City staff on designated days/times to discuss with the City any data gaps that are needed from the Developer for the peer review assignment, and update City staff on the progress taken to-date on this project, including confirmation of the project schedule. Deliverables: Meeting minute notes drafted and then sent to City staff in PDF format within 2-days following project initiation meeting. TASK 2 – DATA COLLECTION, REVIEW AND EVALUATION This task includes UltraSystems reviewing and evaluating the existing proposed project documents. After review of this technical information UltraSystems will prepare a Data Needs List in Excel. The list will provide information to City Staff relating to each topical issue (if needed), the party responsible for providing the information, data requested, requesting party, date provided by the City or Developer, and comments. Deliverable: A Data Needs List provided to the City staff in Excel. TASK 3 – PEER REVIEW OF TECHNICAL STUDIES UltraSystems understands that six (6) technical studies were prepared by the Developer’s environmental consultants for this proposed project. UltraSystems will perform a CEQA adequacy peer-review of the following technical studies: 1. Traffic Impact Analysis; 2. Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis; 3. Cultural Resources Report; 4. Noise Impact Analysis; 5. Geotechnical Analysis; and 6. Hydrology Report/WQMP. The purpose of performing a CEQA adequacy peer-review is to determine the following: (1) if the technical studies contains the necessary content to support the environmental analysis provided in the IS; (2) if the project description is consistent with the technical content in each of the technical G.11.b Packet Pg. 172 Attachment: UEI_Proposal_2019-04-25 (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental Peer Review)  CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR PEER REVIEW OF AN IS/ MND  190222/City of Grand Terrace – GrandT-1 Industrial Storage Facility Page 16 February 2019 studies; and (3) if applicable thresholds of significance contained in Appendix G of the State CEQA Guidelines are properly represented and analyzed. In addition, each technical study will be reviewed to verify if any thresholds of significance from the City’s guidelines, applicable thresholds from the City General Plan, and, if applicable, the City’s Development Code. UltraSystems will also make a recommendation, if it feels based on the technical analysis if additional technical studies are warranted. The purpose of performing a CEQA adequacy peer-review is to determine if the technical studies provided by the Developer’s environmental consultant contains the necessary content to support the environmental analysis that is germane to each of the technical study topics in the IS/MND. For each of these technical studies, UltraSystems will determine the following:  Table of Contents. If a table of contents is included, a comparison will be made to text to verify consistent referencing. If the technical study includes an Appendix, verification will be made if the Appendix is attached, and correctly referenced.  Table and Exhibit Numbering. Table numbers and exhibit numbers will be compared to their respective in-text references to verify consistent referencing.  Consistency Between Technical Studies. UltraSystems comprehends that technical studies may have been prepared by different consulting firms that employ different writing styles, formatting techniques, use of graphics and exhibits, and other variables. Regardless of the authoring techniques employed by different firms, the technical studies used to supplement the analysis and be appended to the IS/MND must be sufficiently similar to each other in the technical content conveyed or the overall environmental analysis could become misleading, incorrect, or both. UltraSystems’ peer review will look for variables such as a consistent structure of the information presented, use of abbreviations and acronyms, bibliography and other variables.  Consistent Representation of Project Information. The Project description contained in the IS/MND must be consistent with the technical content in each of the technical studies. The technical analysis of each study will be compared to the project description to verify it is accurately represented and that the analysis presented in the technical study has a logical nexus to the description of the proposed project.  Contains Necessary Thresholds of Significance. Each technical study will be reviewed to verify each of the thresholds of significance contained in Appendix G of the State CEQA Guidelines are represented and analyzed. In addition, each technical study will be reviewed to verify if any thresholds of significance from the City’s guidelines for the implementation of CEQA are included along with any applicable thresholds from the City’s General Plan and, if applicable, the City’s Development Code. Deliverable: Provided a written memorandum to the City relating to each technical study in a PDF format. The memorandum will detail and deficiencies in the technical work product, and address the need for consistency. G.11.b Packet Pg. 173 Attachment: UEI_Proposal_2019-04-25 (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental Peer Review)  CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR PEER REVIEW OF AN IS/ MND  190222/City of Grand Terrace – GrandT-1 Industrial Storage Facility Page 17 February 2019 City Staff’s Obligation. The Developer will have their consultants review and re-submit an updated version of the technical studies, based on the comments received from UltraSystems. The City will be responsible for forwarding UltraSystems’ memo to the Developer. TASK 4 – DRAFT INITIAL STUDY - REVIEW The approach UltraSystems will take to determine the technical adequacy of the IS was prepared pursuant to the requirements of CEQA Section 21080 and Sections 15060 through 15065 of the CEQA Guidelines. Our review will include the following components: Project Description. The project description section will be peer-reviewed to verify that it captures the requirements of State CEQA Guidelines § 15378. UltraSystems will document if the following components have been included and adequately described, which generally constitute a thorough project description:  Project background summary.  List of project objectives.  Description of project amenities.  List and discussion of required public agency approvals and entitlements.  Characteristics of the onsite buildings.  Landscaping characteristics including a plant palette.  Hardscaping characteristics including fencing and wall details.  Lighting characteristics including parking, way finding, and security.  Offsite vehicular access points including emergency vehicular access.  Onsite vehicular circulation and parking.  Onsite pedestrian and bicycle circulation and connectivity to offsite circulation.  Water and wastewater infrastructure characteristics.  Stormwater conveyance infrastructure characteristics.  Any offsite improvements required to implement the project.  Development phasing and construction phasing.  Grading and soil balance.  Construction material and vehicle staging areas (i.e., lay-down areas).  Graphics and exhibits necessary to supplement the narrative including regional and vicinity location maps and a detailed site plan. Topical Issue Analysis. Each of the 19 topical environmental issue areas will be peer-reviewed by UltraSystems to document to the City that the following components have been included and their adequately analyzed. These issue areas include:  Description of the project site’s environmental physical characteristics.  Description of the environmental setting of the vicinity of the project site.  Description of the regulatory setting that lists the applicable regulations used in the analysis.  List of the thresholds of significance used in the analysis.  List of project design features (if used) that would reduce potentially significant impacts below the level of significance.  Analysis of the potential impacts of the project related to short-term construction activities.  Analysis of the potential impacts of the project related to long-term operational activities. G.11.b Packet Pg. 174 Attachment: UEI_Proposal_2019-04-25 (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental Peer Review)  CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR PEER REVIEW OF AN IS/ MND  190222/City of Grand Terrace – GrandT-1 Industrial Storage Facility Page 18 February 2019 References and Sources. The list of sources will be peer-reviewed by UltraSystems to verify that references and technical sources cited in the narrative are correct and accurate. Legal Defensibility. UltraSystems will be proactive with respect to legal defensibility of the IS/MND document, on behalf of the City. We will demonstrate that our work product will meet legal scrutiny, as your technical consultant. Review. UltraSystems will provide comments in track-changes within the IS/MND document. This review will also include specific comment bubbles. Additional comments will be provided in a memorandum to City staff. It is expected that two rounds of technical review will be necessary for this task. One, to address the entire IS/MND and the other to address comments made by the Developer’s Environmental Consultant to the IS/MND. UltraSystems will inform the City when the Draft IS/MND is ready for circulation and public review. Task 5 - Response to Public Comments and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Review. UltraSystems will review comments received on the IS/MND during the public review period along with the Developer’s response to comments to determine if each response is deemed technical adequate and address each comment received. UltraSystems will provide comments in track-changes within the Responses to Comments document. This review will also include specific comment bubbles. It is anticipated that two rounds of technical review will be necessary for this task. TASK 6 – ATTEND PUBLIC MEETINGS AND PUBLIC HEARINGS UltraSystems will attend up to two (2) public hearings either before the City’s Planning Commission or City Council. UltraSystems will provide technical assistance to City staff relating to this proposed project. Any additional meetings will be invoiced based on UltraSystems Labor Rate Schedule. TASK 7 – STAFF AUGMENTATION UltraSystems will prepare the environmental findings that would include in the Resolution adopting the Mitigated Negative Declaration, and assist with the environmental portion of the City staff report to the Planning Commission/City Council. UltraSystems will represent the City with respect to AB52 (Agency to Agency) consultation with the Native American tribes that have requested consultation on this proposal project. 8.0 DELIVERABLES Table 8.0-1 below lists of deliverables that will be provided by UltraSystems. G.11.b Packet Pg. 175 Attachment: UEI_Proposal_2019-04-25 (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental Peer Review)  CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR PEER REVIEW OF AN IS/ MND  190222/City of Grand Terrace – GrandT-1 Industrial Storage Facility Page 19 February 2019 Table 8.0-1 DELIVERABLES TASK # TASK NAME DELIVERABLES 1 Project Initiation Meeting Meeting notes distributed to City staff in a PDF file format within two days following the meeting. 2 Data Collection and Review Data Needs List in Excel. 3 CEQA Adequacy Peer-Review of Technical Studies Separate Technical Adequacy Peer-Review Memorandum technical studies distributed to City staff. Memorandum provided in a PDF file format. 4 Technical Adequacy Peer-Review of Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Technical Adequacy Peer-Review Memorandum distributed to City staff in a PDF file format. Comments in the IS/MND will also be provide in tracked changes, along with comment bubbles. 5 Peer-Review of the Developers Responses to Comments Response to Public Comments document will be provide in tracked changes, along with comment bubbles back to City staff. 7 Staff Augmentation UltraSystems will provide environmental findings for the Resolution to adopt the IS/MND and provide the environmental portion for the City’s staff report. 9.0 COSTS The following table provides a cost summary of our proposed fees. A summary table of costs is provided below, along with a detailed cost breakdown provided on with Table 9.0-3, herein. Table 9.0-1 PROPOSED FEES – PEER REVIEW SERVICES TASK # TASKS FEE ($) 1 Project Initiation, Work Program Refinement, and Project Management $4,000 2 Data Collection, Review and Evaluation $5,050 3 Peer Review of Technical Studies $12,490 4 Draft Initial Study – Review $9,550 5 Response to Public Comments and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program $2,330 6 Attend Public Meetings and Public Hearings $1,450 7 Staff Augmentation $5,690 TOTAL COST $40,560 Notes: 1. Fees were calculated using UltraSystems’ 2019 Standard Rate Schedule that is provided in Table 9.0-2 below. 2. Mileage associated with direct costs was calculated using the IRS rates of $0.58 cents per mile. 3. Fees include labor and direct costs (including mileage, and printing and mailing of reports and notices). G.11.b Packet Pg. 176 Attachment: UEI_Proposal_2019-04-25 (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental Peer Review)  CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR PEER REVIEW OF AN IS/ MND  190222/City of Grand Terrace – GrandT-1 Industrial Storage Facility Page 20 February 2019 Table 9.0-2 ULTRASYSTEMS STANDARD RATE SCHEDULE G.11.b Packet Pg. 177 Attachment: UEI_Proposal_2019-04-25 (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental Peer Review)  CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR PEER REVIEW OF AN IS/ MND  190222/City of Grand Terrace – GrandT-1 Industrial Storage Facility Page 21 February 2019 Table 9.0-3 COST TABLE – LABOR BREAKDOWN G.11.b Packet Pg. 178 Attachment: UEI_Proposal_2019-04-25 (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental Peer Review)  CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR PEER REVIEW OF AN IS/ MND  190222/City of Grand Terrace – GrandT-1 Industrial Storage Facility Page 22 February 2019 10.0 STAFFING CAPACITY UltraSystems has sufficient staff resources and capability to perform the work contained within the City RFP specified timeframe. UltraSystems understands that the basic philosophy of keeping a project on track involves maintaining individual project tasks and activities by allocating the appropriate resources and professional staff members with the right technical knowledge and experience. UltraSystems will have the most qualified and experienced personnel fully committed to this project. As noted previously, all the personnel identified in this submittal are currently available and will be committed to project for its duration. G.11.b Packet Pg. 179 Attachment: UEI_Proposal_2019-04-25 (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental Peer Review)  Appendices  APPENDIX A KEY STAFF RESUMES G.11.b Packet Pg. 180 Attachment: UEI_Proposal_2019-04-25 (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental Peer Review) Betsy A. Lindsay, MURP, ENV SP Project Director Corporate Office – Orange County Telephone: 949.788.4900 16431 Scientific Way Facsimile: 949.788.4901 Irvine, CA 92618-4355 Website: www.ultrasystems.com PROFESSIONAL SUMMARY Ms. Lindsay is the founder and chief executive of UltraSystems Environmental. A building industry veteran, she has 35 years of experience in environmental planning and permitting, preparing more than 400 environmental documents. Her background includes managing over 20 on-call professional service contracts for public agencies, which have included hundreds of projects. At UltraSystems, her day-to-day responsibilities include business and project management, contract administration, resource allocation, and quality control. She is responsible for overall project management, the preparation and processing of CEQA/NEPA documents, and associated entitlement obligations for large-scale public and private infrastructure projects. SELECT PROJECT EXPERIENCE Bus Parking Expansion, Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND), Riverside County, CA Ms. Lindsay was Principal-in-Charge of development of an IS/MND for a project to acquire and develop a parcel adjoining the Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) facility in the City of Riverside. This facility includes all of RTA’s administration, operations, and maintenance activities, including fleet fueling and washing. Approximately 200 employees are located at this location. This facility is at capacity and is experiencing serious overcrowding due to inadequate bus and employee parking and on-site vehicular traffic conflicts. The project site would be improved with additional bus and employee parking spaces. The IS/MND prepared for this project will be used by the Federal Transit Administration to determine whether the project meets the requirements of a Categorical Exclusion as provided in 23 CFR 771.117. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND), Division 9 Transportation Building, Los Angeles, CA Working with the Senior Project Manager, Ms. Lindsay negotiated each task order and coordinated all project aspects to ensure services were delivered on time and within budget. UltraSystems was hired by the Metropolitan Transit Authority (Metro) to complete an Initial Study/MND involving the demolition of the existing transportation building and sector office, to be replaced with a three-story complex. The IS/MND served to determine whether the project would have a significant effect on the environment; identify measures that would mitigate project impacts, define the EIR’s scope; and determine whether to rely on a previous EIR. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND), La Pata Park, San Clemente, CA Ms. Lindsay served as Principal-In-Charge for this project, providing technical review and direction to project staff members. She was responsible for all contractual negotiations with the client, the City of San Clemente, and sub consultant partners. The project involved plans by the City to develop a master plan establishing land uses for a 53-acre City-owned site. UltraSystems prepared an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND), in compliance with CEQA, for proposed improvements to the Avenida La Pata/Avenida Vista Hermosa Development site covering approximately 54 acres in the city. UltraSystems prepared a Screencheck IS/MND, sans technical studies (i.e., traffic study, noise, aesthetics, and air quality), to help the City of San Years of Experience 35 Years with Firm 24 Education • Graduate Program, Public Policy and Administration, California State University, Long Beach, CA, 1992 • Graduate Program, Business Administration, Pepperdine University, Irvine, CA, 1991 • M.U.R.P., Master of Urban and Regional Planning, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, CA, 1989 • B.A., Geography, California State University, Long Beach, CA, 1978 Professional Affiliations • American Planning Association • Urban Land Institute • Association of Environmental Professionals • National Association of Women Business Owners • National Association for Female Executives Areas of Expertise • CEQA • NEPA • Entitlement • Energy • Federal • Institutional • Infrastructure G.11.b Packet Pg. 181 Attachment: UEI_Proposal_2019-04-25 (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental Peer Review) Betsy A. Lindsay Page 2 Clemente to secure Proposition 40 grant funding. The Screencheck IS/MND presented an assessment of the project's potential environmental impacts, for use by the City, along with a description of how they intend to complete the CEQA process within one year from the grant award announcement, to obtain funding. UltraSystems was approved to finalize the IS/MND, which included overseeing the work of sub-consultants to complete the necessary technical studies, as well as assisting the City of San Clemente with public noticing and processing of the IS/MND. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND), Arlington Heights Sports Park (formerly Riverside Youth Sports Complex), Riverside, CA Ms. Lindsay was UltraSystems’ Principal-in-Charge for preparation of an IS/MND addressing development of this public park. UltraSystems contributed to the analysis of the site’s agricultural resources, as the site had been used as an orange grove. Planned facilities included lighted sports fields, eight soccer fields, three baseball fields, two basketball courts, two playgrounds, a trail, central plaza, restrooms, concessions facility, picnic area, and on -site parking. The sports park was proposed for an area transitioning from rural to more urban uses. Other issues including traffic and public services; utilities were carefully analyzed to give the City the information necessary to plan for future infrastructure improvements. The IS/MND also addressed the issues of light and glare, air quality, and noise, important due to the proximity of adjacent homes. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND), Arlington Heights Sports Park (formerly Riverside Youth Sports Complex), Riverside, CA Ms. Lindsay was UltraSystems’ Principal-in-Charge for preparation of an IS/MND addressing development of this public park. UltraSystems contributed to the analysis of the site’s agricultural resources, as the site had been used as an orange grove. Planned facilities included lighted sports fields, eight soccer fields, three baseball fields, two basketball courts, two playgrounds, a trail, central plaza, restrooms, concessions facility, picnic area, and on -site parking. The sports park was proposed for an area transitioning from rural to more urban uses. Other issues including traffic and public services; utilities were carefully analyzed to give the City the information necessary to plan for future infrastructure improvements. The IS/MND also addressed the issues of light and glare, air quality, and noise, important due to the proximity of adjacent homes. Avenida Columbo Storm Drain Extension, San Clemente, CA A new, above-ground 24" High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) pipe will be connected to an existing 24" HDPE pipe. The existing storm drain line is an underground 24" HDPE pipe that extends approximately 46 feet from the upstream catch basin, at the end of the Avenida Columbo cul-de-sac, down the canyon slope, and outlets on the hillside into an existing concrete outlet structure. UltraSystems was contracted by the City of San Clemente to write the IS/MND for the project. UltraSystems’ role has been the preparation of all necessary environmental documentation in accordance with CEQA and associated technical studies, including: Biological Assessment, Wetland Study, Air Quality Technical Study, Greenhouse Gas Technical Study, Cultural Report, Geotechnical Plans and Noise Study. Ms. Lindsay served as the Principal-in-Charge. Mitigated Negative Declaration/Categorical Exclusion (MND/CE), City of Gardena Bus and Maintenance Facility, Gardena, CA As Principal-in-Charge, Ms. Lindsay oversaw UltraSystems’ work on this project for the City of Gardena Transportation Department. The work involved construction of a 100-bus operations and maintenance facility of 10,000 to 15,000 square feet. The complex would house an administration building, vehicle maintenance building, a bus-wash facility, a bus-fueling facility, and parking for the buses and 150 employees. The project occupied a 9.2- acre site once used as a commercial strip mall. UltraSystems prepared an IS/MND in accordance with CEQA and “Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act,” for analyzing the direct, indirect, and cumulative environmental effects associated with the proposed project. Preliminary consultation with the FTA determined that the project met the criteria for a Class II Categorical Exclusion (CE). Compliance Monitoring Services, Sunshine Canyon Landfill, Sylmar, CA Ms. Lindsay serves as Principal in Charge for mitigation monitoring services at the Sunshine Canyon Landfill. The UltraSystems team performs site visits to monitor over 400 conditions of approval and/or mitigation measures and writes monthly and quarterly reports on the findings. G.11.b Packet Pg. 182 Attachment: UEI_Proposal_2019-04-25 (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental Peer Review) Margaret Partridge, MURP, AICP, LEED GA, ENV SP Senior Project Manager Corporate Office – Orange County Telephone: 949.788.4900 16431 Scientific Way Facsimile: 949.788.4901 Irvine, CA 92618-4355 Website: www.ultrasystems.com PROFESSIONAL SUMMARY Ms. Partridge is a planner with over 14 years of experience in community and environmental planning. Ms. Partridge has experience in both the public and private sectors as a city planner and as an environmental planner for residential, commercial, industrial, mixed-use, and specific plan projects. Ms. Partridge’s areas of expertise include CEQA, EIRs, Initial Studies, MNDs, and land use research. She is certified as a LEED Green Associate and is a member of the American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP). Ms. Partridge is trained in environmental analysis for a variety of project types and has experience conducting current planning and permit work for local cities. SELECT PROJECT EXPERIENCE Serrano Woods Apartment Complex Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND), Orange, CA Ms. Partridge co-authored an IS/MND for the Serrano Woods affordable housing apartment complex. The project involved development of a 65-unit affordable housing development in the City of Orange. The project required a general plan amendment, zone change, tentative parcel map, and major site plan review by the City Design Review Committee. As Environmental Analyst/Assistant Project Manager for this project, Ms. Partridge conducted a site visit and photographed the project site. Additionally, she conducted all the background research and performed the environmental analysis. The City of Orange Planning Commission recommended approval in February of 2011 and the project was approved by the City Council in March of 2011. 150 Newport Center, MND, IS and EIR, Newport Beach, CA Ms. Partridge assisted with the preparation of the MND, and subsequently the Initial Study and EIR sections for the 150 Newport Center project in the City of Newport Beach. Additionally, Ms. Partridge conducted a site visit and photographed surrounding land uses. The project would involve the demolition of a car wash, convenience market, and gas station to accommodate the development of a 7-story 49 unit residential condominium building with three levels of subterranean parking. The Project Applicant withdrew the application to the City in September 2016. Solar Facility, IS/MND, Central CA Ms. Partridge co-authored an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for a confidential client. This proposed solar facility project would be several hundred acres in size and is located in Central California. As an Environmental Analyst for this project, Ms. Partridge conducted site-specific research and wrote portions of the IS/MND. Oak Flat Towers Project, IS/MND, Orange County, CA Ms. Partridge co-authored an IS/MND for the development of a new radio transmitting tower facility in the Santa Ana Mountains for radio station KBRT AM 740. The new tower facility would replace the existing transmitting facility located in Los Angeles County. As an Assistant Project Manager for this project, Ms. Partridge coordinated with County staff and the Client regarding the project and assisted in research. The project was unanimously approved by the County of Orange Planning Commission in October 2011. Years of Experience 14 Years with Firm 1 Education • M.A., Urban and Regional Planning, University of California, Irvine (UCI), 2005 • B.A., Environmental Analysis and Design, University of California, Irvine (UCI), 2002 Professional Certificates • American Institute of Certified Planners • LEED Green Associate Professional Affiliations • American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP) • American Planning Association (APA) • Association of Environmental Professionals (AEP) • U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) Areas of Expertise • CEQA • EIRs • Initial Studies • Mixed-Use • MNDs • Land Use • Research • Aesthetics • Permits G.11.b Packet Pg. 183 Attachment: UEI_Proposal_2019-04-25 (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental Peer Review) Margaret Partridge Page 2 Wardlow and Lamb Residential Projects, Mitigated Negative Declarations (MNDs), Huntington Beach, CA Ms. Partridge co-authored the Mitigated Negative Declarations for these detached single-family residential developments, proposed on former elementary school sites. The Wardlow project proposed the development of 49 homes and the Lamb Residential Project proposed 81 homes. Ms. Partridge attended the public scoping meetings for both projects and coordinated with subconsultants and City staff members regarding the projects. These projects were approved by the City of Huntington Beach City Council in November 2012. Vernola Marketplace Apartments, MND, Jurupa Valley, CA Ms. Partridge assisted with the preparation of the MND for the Vernola Marketplace Apartments in the City of Jurupa Valley. The project proposed a General Plan amendment to re-designate property from Light Industrial to Highest Density Residential and for a change of zone from Industrial Park to General Residential (C-3). The project also involved a development agreement, specific plan amendment to remove portion of the Project site from Specific Plan No. 266 (I-15 Corridor Specific Plan), and a site development permit to allow for development of 397 apartment units. The Project was approved by the City of Jurupa Valley City Council in March 2015. Village Activities Center Specific Plan, IS and ADEIR, Laguna Woods, CA Ms. Partridge assisted with the preparation of the NOP, IS and ADEIR for the proposed Village Activities Center Specific Plan (VACSP) project. The land use plan for the Specific Plan included the following five land use designations located within 11 planning areas: Open Space/General, Community Center/Office, Open Space/Equestrian, Business Park, and Open Space/Garden Center. The VACSP was developed to implement the goals and policies of the City of Laguna Woods General Plan. The Specific Plan provided a site specific detailed description of development regulations, standards and guidelines. The project as proposed was withdrawn by the applicant and the DEIR was not released for public review. Boat Central Dry Stack Boat Storage Facility, ADEIR, Marina Del Rey, CA Ms. Partridge assisted in writing an ADEIR for a dry stack boat storage facility in Los Angeles County. The Project proposed to demolish a 238 space temporary public parking lot, the Department of Beaches and Harbor’s trailer complex, and the Sheriff’s Boatwright/Life Guard facility. The project would construct a 345-space dry stack boat storage facility with an additional area for 30 mast-up storage spaces. This facility would extend 97 feet over the water. The project was approved by the County of Los Angeles Department of Regional Planning Commission in April 2013. Nichols Mine Project, EIR, Lake Elsinore, CA Ms. Partridge assisted with drafting sections of the EIR for the Nichols Canyon Mine Project, comprised of approximately 211 acres in the City of Lake Elsinore. The Project proposed expansion of the area permitted to be mined by 24 acres; reduced the Mine’s permitted annual tonnage of exported materials from 4,000,000 tons per year (tpy) to 856,560 tpy (inclusive of aggregate materials); and lengthen the hours of operation for mining, processing, and export activities. The City of Lake Elsinore approved the Project in December 2016. Nichols Canyon Mine, Mining and Reclamation Plan, Lake Elsinore, CA This project involved the development of a mining and reclamation plan for an approximately 200-acre mining site located in the northern part of the City of Lake Elsinore. The reclamation plan was designed to minimize impacts to the surrounding community and the environment and to meet the City’s Surface Mining and Reclamation Ordinance. Ms. Partridge coordinated with colleagues to write the mining and reclamation plan so that the client could secure rights to mineral resources while doing so in a manner that complied with CEQA and was environmentally sound. G.11.b Packet Pg. 184 Attachment: UEI_Proposal_2019-04-25 (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental Peer Review) Hina Gupta, MURP, LEED-AP Deputy Project Manager Corporate Office – Orange County Telephone: 949.788.4900 16431 Scientific Way Facsimile: 949.788.4901 Irvine, CA 92618-4355 Website: www.ultrasystems.com PROFESSIONAL SUMMARY Ms. Gupta is an urban planner with 12 years of experience in environmental planning and regulatory permitting for a variety of projects including infrastructure, transportation, renewable energy, commercial, residential, mixed use and master planned development, and educational facilities. Her areas of expertise include: Sustainable Land use, Aesthetics and Visual Analysis, Socioeconomics and Community Impact Assessment, and Green Building Design. Ms. Gupta is a LEED Accredited Professional and has experience working with public agency staff at various city and county departments within southern California. SELECT PROJECT EXPERIENCE Los Angeles Interoperable Communications System (LARICS) Project, Los Angeles County, CA The LARICS Joint Powers Authority in cooperation with the National Telecommunication and Information Administration (NTIA) is building an interoperable communications system in Los Angeles County. UltraSystems, on behalf of the Authority and NTIA, prepared the Project-level IS-MND/EA- FONSI to evaluate the environmental effects of constructing and operating this system. Ms. Gupta was responsible for preparing the Aesthetics and Visual Quality technical report. Her responsibilities included coordinating the work with different environmental team members, conducting related research for baseline conditions and aesthetic impacts and preparing the Aesthetics and Visual Quality section of the IS-MND/EA-FONSI. In addition, she helped prepare outlines and templates for the environmental document and the supporting technical reports, in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the Broadband Technology Opportunities Program Environmental Assessment Guidance. Judicial Assistance Grant Project, Los Angeles County, CA The City of Los Angeles is planning to use the Recovery Act: Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Formula Program-Local Solicitation funds to provide upgrades to five existing communications facilities located in the County of Los Angeles. UltraSystems on behalf of the City is preparing Project-level IS-MND/EA-FONSI to evaluate the environmental effects of constructing and operating the proposed upgrades. Ms. Gupta was responsible for preparing the Aesthetics and Visual Quality technical reports for this project. Her responsibilities included coordinating the work with different environmental team members, conducting related research for baseline conditions and aesthetic impacts and preparing the Aesthetics and Visual Quality section of the IS-MND/EA-FONSI. In addition, she helped prepare outlines and templates for the environmental document and the supporting technical reports, in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Years of Experience 12 Years with Firm 12 Education • Master of Urban and Regional Planning, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 2009 • B Arch, Chandigarh College of Architecture, Chandigarh, India, 2007 Professional Certification • LEED Accredited Professional – BD+C (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design Areas of Expertise • CEQA • NEPA • EIR/EIS • IS/MND • EA • Land Use • Mitigation • Permits • PES • Relocation Impacts • GIS • Specific Plans • General Plans • Socio- economics • Aesthetics • Noticing • Mixed-Use • Technical Studies • Entitlements G.11.b Packet Pg. 185 Attachment: UEI_Proposal_2019-04-25 (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental Peer Review) Hina Gupta Page 2 Uptown Orange Residential Project, City of Orange, CA Ms. Gupta is working with the Project Manager on the preparation of an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to evaluate the environmental effects of constructing and operating a mixed use residential complex in the City of Orange, CA. Ms. Gupta is analyzing the effects on population and housing, utilities and service systems, public services, and recreation. She is also responsible for drafting various sections of the IS-MND including information on baseline setting, environmental impact and mitigation. San Fernando High School Teen Health Center Project, Los Angeles County, CA Ms. Gupta is working with the Project Manager on the preparation of an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to evaluate the environmental effects of constructing and operating a Teen Health Center within the San Fernando Valley High School Campus, San Fernando, CA. Above Ground Storage Tank Project - Cypress College, Cypress, CA Ms. Gupta is working with the Project Manager on the preparation of an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to evaluate the environmental effects of constructing and operating an Above Ground Storage Tank within the campus of Cypress College in the City of Cypress, CA. Guidance. Jamboree Road Widening Project, Cities of Irvine and Newport Beach, CA Ms. Gupta prepared sections of the draft Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND), the final MND including response to comments received during the public review period and errata for the draft MND. She prepared all notices for public review, a list of resource agencies as well as a database of all residences and businesses within a 300 feet radius for document circulation. She also prepared a No Effect Determination in compliance with the requirements of the California Department of Fish & Game. Pico Park Master Plan Project, City of Pico Rivera, CA Ms. Gupta worked with the Project Manager on the preparation of an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to evaluate the environmental effects of demolition and renovation work at Pico Park. Her tasks included completing notifications, preparing distributions lists and mailing packets for public review. G.11.b Packet Pg. 186 Attachment: UEI_Proposal_2019-04-25 (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental Peer Review) Dr. Michael Rogozen, D.Env. Senior Principal Engineer Corporate Office – Orange County Telephone: 949.788.4900 16431 Scientific Way Facsimile: 949.788.4901 Irvine, CA 92618-4355 Website: www.ultrasystems.com PROFESSIONAL SUMMARY Dr. Rogozen, who heads UltraSystems’ air and noise practice, has 40 years of experience in project management, health risk assessment, air and industrial wastewater permitting, carbon footprint studies, ambient monitoring, dispersion modeling, pollution control technology assessment, economic analysis of air pollution control alternatives, air toxics emission inventory development, offsite consequence analysis, environmental database design, survey design and management, source test design and analysis, railroad noise investigations, regulatory analysis, water resources studies, CEQA and NEPA documentation, and technical writing and editing. Dr. Rogozen is responsible for consulting, technical project management, and business development. He has assisted industrial and governmental clients in complying with federal and local air quality regulations. His work has included managing air compliance audits, preparing applications for permits to construct and operate (including Title V permits), annual emissions reports, and responses to notices to comply and notices of violation. He has also conducted many health risk assessments under AB2588, Proposition 65, and SCAQMD Rule 1401. Dr. Rogozen serves as lead quality assurance officer for UltraSystems’ submittals. SELECT PROJECT EXPERIENCE Greenhouse Gas Emission Inventory, Hollywood Target Store, Los Angeles, CA As support to an environmental impact assessment prepared by another consultant, Dr. Rogozen constructed a comprehensive inventory of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from a proposed commercial center consisting of a Target store, restaurant and other commercial uses. The inventory included both direct and indirect emissions. Projected GHG emissions were compared with emissions as of the Notice of Preparation and emissions under a “business as usual” (BAU) scenario in which none of the GHG reduction measures under AB 32 and other California regulations and programs would be implemented. Dr. Rogozen and his staff evaluated a large number of emission reduction measures proposed by Target to estimate the emission savings versus BAU. Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Proposed Target Store, San Clemente, CA Dr. Rogozen headed the air, noise and greenhouse gas analyses for the EIR for a proposed 142,000-square-foot Target retail store, recently approved by the San Clemente City Council. He was a member of a six-person team of UltraSystems technical specialists who assessed the project’s potential impacts on the environment. The Draft EIR has identified project impacts such as increased traffic, and impacts on biological resources, aesthetics, noise, air quality, soils, and geology. Peer Review of Anaheim Platinum Triangle SEIR Addendum Dr. Rogozen was project manager for a peer review of an addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) No. 339 for the LTG Platinum Triangle mixed use development in Anaheim, California. He managed a team of planners and scientists who evaluated the document to determine whether the technical information presented was consistent with supporting technical studies, and to verify that the document met the requirement under the CEQA statute and CEQA Guidelines for an addendum. He also conducted Years of Experience 40 Years with Firm 11 Education • D.Env., Environmental Science and Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 1978 • M.S., Systems Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 1968 • B.S., Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 1966 Areas of Expertise • CEQA • NEPA • EIR/EIS • IS/MND • EA • QA/QC • Air Permitting • Dispersion Modeling • Cost- Benefit Analysis • Transit • SCAQMD • Economic Analysis • Survey Design • Noise Analysis • CAAP • GHG • Sound-walls • Sensitive Receptors • Mitigation • Compliance • Toxic Emissions • Database Design • Health & Safety Plan • Technical Editing • Noise Control Plan • HRA G.11.b Packet Pg. 187 Attachment: UEI_Proposal_2019-04-25 (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental Peer Review) Dr. Michael Rogozen Page 2 a technical peer review of the air, greenhouse gas emissions, and noise analyses. UltraSystems recommended improvements to the addendum, which were implemented. University Business Park Specific Plan EIR, San Marcos, CA Dr. Rogozen was task manager for the air and noise analyses for this residential and commercial development. Construction impacts on existing residential areas were of particular concern, since blasting and on-site rock crushing will be required. Dr. Rogozen determined the maximum amounts of rock that could be processed per day without exceeding San Diego Air Pollution Control District thresholds for significance. For the construction noise analysis, Dr. Rogozen reviewed five studies of rock crushing operations in the San Marcos area and determined a 95th- percentile sound exposure level for use in the present project. He then used the Federal Highway Administration’s Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM) to determine the distance from existing residences at which the San Diego County construction noise limit of 75 dBA (for eight hours) would be exceeded under worst-case conditions. This analysis assumed that blasting and rock crushing would occur during an eight-hour workday, simultaneously with grading operations. Dr. Rogozen also analyzed the impacts of vibrations due to the blasting activity. Redlands Commons/Trojan Groves Multi-Use Developments, Redlands, CA The City of Redlands retained UltraSystems to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) to assess a proposed project consisting of retail, office and single-family residential, and identified as the “Redlands Commons.” The proposed retail center will be comprised of 85,500 square feet; the office component will comprise 20,000 square feet, and there will be 205 single-family residential homes. The entire development will encompass 37.24 acres of land, located on the north side of San Bernardino Avenue, one-half mile east of the 210 Freeway (formerly State Route 30), west of Texas Street, and south of Pioneer Avenue in the City of Redlands. Additionally, the project will include the four vacant parcels (Trojan Groves) located directly to the west of this project site. Those properties include approximately 32 acres. Dr. Rogozen prepared the Hydrology and Water Quality section and conducted a localized significance analysis for the Air Quality section, including dispersion modeling. Peer Review of Noise Section of Environmental Impact Report, Home Depot Facility, Fontana, CA Dr. Rogozen conducted an independent review of the noise impacts section of the environmental impact report for a new Home Depot facility in Fontana, CA. He obtained data on noise emissions characteristics of onsite equipment (forklifts, sweepers, truck idling, etc.) and developed noise contours near existing residential areas. He later testified on the analysis before the Fontana City Council. G.11.b Packet Pg. 188 Attachment: UEI_Proposal_2019-04-25 (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental Peer Review) Dan Herlihy, MS, CEG, PG, CHG Senior Technical Advisor Corporate Office – Orange County Telephone: 949.788.4900 16431 Scientific Way Facsimile: 949.788.4901 Irvine, CA 92618-4355 Website: www.ultrasystems.com PROFESSIONAL SUMMARY Mr. Herlihy has more than 35 years of Hazardous Materials Management experience with knowledge and senior-level qualifications to evaluate hazardous materials and other wastes in accordance with applicable regulations for solar projects, brownfields, contaminated properties, and railway, freeway and bridge right-of-way projects. These include assessments of: (1) aerially deposited lead (ADL), (2) oversight of asbestos containing material (ACM), lead-based paint (LBP) and polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) sampling/abatement, (3) hazardous materials and wastes storage, transportation and disposal, and (4) Spill Prevention control and Countermeasures (SPCC) Plans. Mr. Herlihy has completed the forty-hour Hazardous Waste Operation and Emergency Response (HAZWOPER) training and annual certification refreshers. SELECT PROJECT EXPERIENCE Initial Site Assessment for Bridge Realignment, Glen Helen Parkway, San Bernardino County, CA Mr. Herlihy conducted a Phase I Environmental Assessment for the Glen Helen Parkway and bridge realignment in the vicinity of the BNSF Railroad tracks and Cajon Creek Wash. The assessment was performed in conformance with industry‐accepted practices, American Society of Testing Materials (ASTM) Designation E1527‐05, and the EPA All Appropriate Inquiry (AAI) Rule (40 CFR 312). Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure Plan, Pine Tree Wind Farm and ISEC South, CA Mr. Herlihy prepared Spill Control and Countermeasures (SPCC) Plans to satisfy federal and California requirements for petroleum and oil storage at the Pine Tree Wind Project and the ISEC South Project, which described the equipment, workforce, procedures and steps to prevent, control and provide adequate countermeasures for petroleum and oil that were stored on site, and that could be discharged to navigable waters. These projects used or stored diesel fuel, gasoline, oil and lubricants for the operation, maintenance and fueling of vehicles, heavy equipment and construction equipment to construct roads, foundations, and facility structures. The SPCC Plan included provisions for: (1) spill kits with absorbent booms to divert or contain spill material, (2) the availability of on-site bulldozers and excavators to localize and contain larger discharges, (3) availability of trained facility personnel to contain spills, and (4) management of cleanup activities through the Emergency Coordinator or Alternate Emergency Coordinator. A firm specializing in emergency response was placed under contract to respond to and cleanup major spills. Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), Gerald Desmond Bridge Replacement Project, Port of Long Beach, CA Mr. Herlihy prepared the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for potholing and exploratory drilling as part of the design/build project to comply with California’s General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction Activity (Construction General Permit). The SWPPP LUP satisfied the following seven major objectives: (1) identified practices to protect water quality for harbors within the port of Long Beach, (2) determine the risk to water and sediment quality, (3) identified potential Years of Experience 35 Years with Firm 16 Education • Hydrogeologic Studies under National Science Foundation Traineeship, Spears and Belford Fellowships, University of Wyoming, 1977 • M.S., Geology, University of New Hampshire, 1975 • B.S., Geology (Cum Laude), Long Island University- Southampton College, 1973 Professional Registrations • Professional Geologist (PG #4388), CA • Certified Engineering Geologist (CEG #1378), CA • Certified Hydrogeologist (CHG #107), CA • Qualified SWPPP Practitioner/Developer (QSP/QSD #No. 23577) • OSHA HAZWOPER 40-Hour Training (29 CFR 1910.120) Areas of Expertise • CEQA • NEPA • CERCLA • RCRA • ISA • Phase I&II • PEA • Geohazards G.11.b Packet Pg. 189 Attachment: UEI_Proposal_2019-04-25 (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental Peer Review) Dan Herlihy Page 2 pollutants and their sources, (4) identified non-storm water discharges to be eliminated, controlled, or treated, (5) identified Best Management Practices (BMPs) to reduce or eliminate pollutants in storm water discharges, and authorized non-storm water discharges, (6) identified and assigned maintenance responsibilities for post- construction BMPs to reduce or eliminate pollutants after potholing and exploratory drilling, and (7) demonstrated compliance with the Construction General Permit. Bridge Construction Soil Management Plan (SMP), New River Bridge, Imperial County, CA Mr. Herlihy prepared a sampling and management plan (SMP) to establish procedures for sampling, remediation and management of saturated soils impacted by infectious biological pathogens from sewage waste in the vicinity of the proposed New River Bridge, where approximately 4,440 cubic meters of saturated soil along the New River banks and saturate soil from pilings drilled for bridge supports were excavated during the summer months. The plan allowed for the successful on‐site remediation and reuse of impacted soil. Baldwin Hills, 4203 South La Brea Avenue, Los Angeles, CA Mr. Herlihy supervised friable and non‐friable asbestos‐containing material (ACM) and lead‐based paint (LBP) surveys for buildings to be demolished in the Baldwin Hills area of Los Angeles County, CA. ACM sampling was conducted in accordance with the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA), National Emissions Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP), South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) and California Occupational Safety and Health Administration (Cal‐OSHA) guidelines and requirements. LBP samples were analyzed using x‐ray fluorescence (XRF). ACM and LBP samples were collected from accessible building materials. A report documenting the findings was prepared describing appropriate abatement protocols. Contaminated Materials Management Plan, Port of Long Beach, CA Mr. Herlihy prepared a Contaminated Materials Management Plan (CMMP) for the handling, removal, transportation and disposal of contaminated materials and hazardous waste generated from soil excavation, lead and asbestos abatement, spills, building demolition and other sources as part of the Gerald Desmond Bridge (GDB) Replacement Project. According to the plan soils will be excavated during pre‐construction exploratory activities, and during construction for the installation of roads, pile caps, retaining walls, pile‐shafts and other structures were segregated to avoid mixing of spoils with contaminant concentrations above Port of Long Beach (POLB) Soil Surplus‐material Reuse Requirements (SSRRs) with other soils. Mr. Herlihy included provisions to evaluate the feasibility and cost of on‐site thermal treatment, and soil vapor extraction (SVE) and landfarming of spoil stockpiles contaminated with volatile organic compounds (VOCs), polynuclear aromatic compounds (PAHs) and total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) at concentrations that exceed SSRRs to reduce these contaminants to levels acceptable for reuse. Water Resource Study, Municipal Water Supply, Yucaipa, CA Mr. Herlihy conducted a water resource study to determine the proportion of groundwater in the Yucaipa basin that could be impacted by previous releases of petroleum hydrocarbons. The Yucaipa Valley Water District (YVWD) obtains most of its municipal water supply from groundwater sources within older alluvium deposits in the Yucaipa Basin. Concerns were raised about the impact on groundwater in the vicinity of service stations of known gasoline releases, and the proportion of the YVWD that could be potentially impacted. The investigation found that local groundwater flow throughout the basin was controlled by faulting, which separated the Yucaipa Basin into several sub-basins. Impermeable boundaries along faults served to minimize migration of contaminants and degradation of the groundwater supply. Audit of Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program, San Diego, CA Mr. Herlihy audited Storm Water Pollution Prevention Programs (SWPPPs) for existing and new construction projects managed by the San Diego County Water Authority (SDCWA). The purpose was to improve and standardize Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) documentation and implementation for existing and future construction projects under the agency’s jurisdiction. The activities included: (1) development of Standard Specifications for Best Management Practices (BMPs) and Strom Water Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPPs) for all SDCWA construction activity, (2) auditing existing SWPPPs and field implementation, (3) inspecting existing projects to determine if the selected BMPs are functional, and (4) reviewing future projects to ensure that the SWPPPs include all essential elements. G.11.b Packet Pg. 190 Attachment: UEI_Proposal_2019-04-25 (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental Peer Review) Steven O’Neil, MS, RPA Cultural Resources Manager Corporate Office – Orange County Telephone: 949.788.4900 16431 Scientific Way Facsimile: 949.788.4901 Irvine, CA 92618-4355 Website: www.ultrasystems.com PROFESSIONAL SUMMARY Mr. O'Neil has over 38 years of experience as a cultural resource specialist in California. He has researched and written on archaeology, ethnography, and history throughout California. Mr. O'Neil has archaeological experience in excavation, survey, monitoring, and lab work. Most of this has been on Native American prehistoric sites, but also includes Spanish, Mexican, and American period adobe sites. His project management experience includes private, municipal, county, state and federal survey, excavation and monitoring projects. He has range of expertise in Phase I & II Cultural Resource Inventories, and archaeological, historical and paleontological survey assessments, and cultural background studies for various EIR projects. Mr. O'Neil has worked for cultural resource management firms as well as government agencies and Native American entities. He has prepared technical reports as well as published journal articles. SELECT PROJECT EXPERIENCE Cameron Ranch Residential Development Project, Riverside County, CA Mr. O’Neil is the director of cultural resources studies for the Cameron Ranch Residential Development Project located in the northern foothills of the San Jacinto Mountains, above the City of Banning. He directed UltraSystems’ archaeologists on the cultural resources field survey. He conducted the CHRIS records search and Native American outreach, and prepared the subsequent Phase I technical report. He coordinated the paleontological field survey and subsequent technical report. Client: Kojima Development Corporation. Identification and Evaluation of Historic Properties, ADA Wheelchair Access Ramp Improvement Project, City of Lake Forest, Orange County Mr. O’Neil directed and conducted archaeological field survey, cultural resource records search, Native American contacts and report writing for this project. This residential area required wheelchair access ramps on every corner in in the neighborhood. An assessment of possible cultural resources that may be affected by the construction was made for the City of Lake Forest. Mr. O’Neil directed research into historic and prehistoric background, and prepared the final assessment of potential impacts. Cultural Resources Survey, Ortega Highway Residential Project, Orange County, CA On behalf of the U.S. Forest Service, Mr. O’Neil served as Crew Chief of Survey for prehistoric, historic and paleontological; material on private and public lands, conducted interviews, prepared subsequent report. The project entailed plans for a housing development in the Santa Ana Mountains on private land within the Cleveland National Forest and a proposed swap of private and federal forest lands. A Phase I cultural resources survey was conducted on both the private and Forest Service lands potentially included in the swap. Inglewood Corridor Widening Project, City of Lawndale, Los Angeles County, CA Mr. O’Neil directed and conducted an archaeological field survey, cultural resource records search, Native American contacts and report writing for this project. The City of Lawndale is widening Inglewood Avenue from Years of Experience 38 Years with Firm 9 Education • M.A., Anthropology, California State University, Fullerton, CA, 2002 • B.A., Anthropology, California State University, Long Beach, CA, 1979 Professional Registrations • Register of Professional Archaeologists (No. 16104) • Riverside County, CA, Cultural Resource Consultant (No. 259) • Cultural Resource Field Director, BLM, Permit (CA-15-10) CA, 2015 • Contractor Safety Orientation, Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railroad 2014, BNSF-US-CA- 0814-02153 Professional Affiliations • Orange County Natural History Museum; Board Member • Pacific Coast Archaeological Society; Past President • Society of CA Archaeology Areas of Expertise • CEQA • NEPA • Phase I/II • Federal G.11.b Packet Pg. 191 Attachment: UEI_Proposal_2019-04-25 (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental Peer Review) Steven O’Neil Page 2 Marine Avenue north. A portion of the project uses Caltrans funds and the cultural resources report was prepared in Caltrans format. A separate historic property survey report was prepared as well. Cultural Resource Evaluation, Union Station, City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County, CA UltraSystems was contacted by Berg & Associates regarding the MetroLink Reconstruction Project at Los Angeles Union Station to provide evaluation of faunal material discovery in a tunnel trench at the project site. The project involved the building of a new passenger platform, three loading tracks, and connecting platform access tunnel to the main passenger tunnel of Union Station. The project increased the length of the passenger access tunnel to be brought up to American Disabilities Act regulation. The faunal bone was located at 130 cm below the current railroad track and determined to be the metatarsal of a young domesticated cow. A site survey was conducted to determine the presence of other historic cultural resources after the initial faunal finding. Further excavation of the site found no more faunal bones or any other archeological artifacts. A final technical report was prepared documenting monitoring and an analysis of findings. NEPA/CEQA Documentation, Los Angeles Regional Interoperable Communications System/Long Term Evolution, Los Angeles County, CA UltraSystems’ team prepared technical studies and NEPA and CEQA documentation toward the construction of LA- RICS/LTE, an $800-million emergency communications system that will provide a highly coordinated emergency communications system to all first-responders to natural and man-made disasters throughout Los Angeles County. Mr. O’Neil was the cultural and historical resources studies team leader, directing 13 archaeologists, architectural historians, paleontologists and technical writers. These studies include coordination of field visits to more than 260 locations for archaeologists and architectural historians with agency escorts to observe and record any on-site prehistoric and historic features, performing records and literature searches at information centers and local archives, contacting local agencies for historically listed structures and districts, coordinate public notices of the project throughout Los Angeles County, consultation with the Native American Heritage Commission and local tribal organizations, and direct consultation with the California State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO). This information was compiled by Mr. O’Neil and used to prepare FCC 620/621 historical resource forms which were submitted to the SHPO for review. G.11.b Packet Pg. 192 Attachment: UEI_Proposal_2019-04-25 (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental Peer Review) Michelle Tollett, BA Senior Biologist Corporate Office – Orange County Telephone: 949.788.4900 16431 Scientific Way Facsimile: 949.788.4901 Irvine, CA 92618-4355 Website: www.ultrasystems.com PROFESSIONAL SUMMARY Ms. Tollett is a biological resources scientist and regulatory specialist with 18 years of environmental consulting experience within the public and private sectors of central and southern California. She is the chief Sr. Biologist and Project Manager at UltraSystems Environmental in Irvine, California. Her responsibilities include biological constraints surveys, reconnaissance field surveys, wetland delineations, CRAM assessments, and focused special-status species surveys. She manages a variety of environmental compliance management responsibilities, from planning to post-construction phases of projects. Ms. Tollett has experience conducting and supervising habitat mitigation monitoring projects ranging from simple to complex within riparian, wetland, coastal sage scrub, chaparral, desert, and other sensitive habitat areas throughout southern California and the northern Rocky Mountains. Specifically, Ms. Tollett understands the regulatory framework necessary for the preparation of biological technical reports and environmental documents for compliance with CEQA, NEPA, CESA, ESA, invasive species control measures, mitigation monitoring and planning, construction monitoring and post-construction restoration and reporting. Prior to her biological consulting experience, she specialized in storm water and hazardous materials management, as well as environmental training and education. Ms. Tollett’s industry experience includes oil and gas transmission lines, energy transmission lines, wind and solar renewable energy, private development, transportation, flood control, military base, mineral mining, and conservation- oriented projects. SELECT PROJECT EXPERIENCE Dogwood Road Bridge Improvement Project, Imperial County, CA Ms. Tollett supervised and participated in several surveys for this bridge replacement project located over the Central Main Canal near the intersection of Dogwood Road and Willoughby Road in Imperial County, California. The project included an Initial Study Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) to adopt measures to avoid or reduce potential environmental impacts to less than significant levels. Also completed was a biological resources survey, jurisdictional delineation of Waters of the United States (WOTUS) and Waters of the State (WOS), Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Program (HMMP), and focused burrowing owl (BUOW) surveys because the bridge is located within BUOW habitat. Irvine Unified School District Planning Area 5B Elementary School Project, Orange County, CA Ms. Tollett directed the literature review, reconnaissance-level surveys, and preparation of the Initial Study Mitigated Negative Declaration Biological Resources Section for this school improvement project. Long Beach Unified School District Educare Facility Project, Los Angeles County, CA Ms. Tollett directed the literature review, reconnaissance-level surveys, and preparation of the Initial Study Mitigated Negative Declaration Biological Resources Section for this school improvement project. Years of Experience 18 Years with Firm 8 Education • B.A., Botany and Environmental Science, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, 2000 Professional Affiliations • Certified Arborist (WE-12103- A) • CRAM Vernal Pools (2017). • CRAM Instructor-in-Training (2017). • Certified Caulerpa taxifolia Surveyor, NMFS (2013/2014). • Southwestern Willow Flycatcher (2013). • Western Pond Turtle Workshop, Elkhorn Slough Coastal Training (2012). • Sea and Sage Audubon Society, Advanced Bird Identification Courses (2012). • CDFW Flat-tailed Horned Lizard Training (2012). • California Rapid Assessment Method (CRAM) (2012, 2017). • CDFW Scientific Collection Permit, SCP#8526. • Wetland Regional Field Training, Wetland Training Institute, Certificate (2011). • The Desert Tortoise Council, Workshop (2011). • 24-hour HazComm Hazardous Materials Training (2004). G.11.b Packet Pg. 193 Attachment: UEI_Proposal_2019-04-25 (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental Peer Review) Michelle Tollett Page 2 Venice High School Comprehensive Modernization Project, Los Angeles County, CA Ms. Tollett directed the literature review, reconnaissance-level surveys, and preparation of the Initial Study Mitigated Negative Declaration Biological Resources Section for this school improvement project. North Hollywood High School Comprehensive Modernization Project, Los Angeles County, CA Ms. Tollett directed the literature review, reconnaissance-level surveys, and preparation of the Initial Study Mitigated Negative Declaration Biological Resources Section for this school improvement project. Ulysses S. Grant Senior High School Comprehensive Modernization Project, Los Angeles County, CA Ms. Tollett directed the literature review, reconnaissance-level surveys, and preparation of the Initial Study Mitigated Negative Declaration Biological Resources Section for this school improvement project. Murrieta Senior Living Facility, Murrieta, CA Ms. Tollett supervised the peer review of a jurisdictional and a biological technical report for preparation of an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration. Ms. Tollett supervised additional research to complement the information provided regarding jurisdictional waterway connectivity and Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) requirements for defensibility of the final environmental document. Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department Emergency Vehicle Operation Center (EVOC) and Role-Play Training Facility, Pitchess Detention Center, Castaic, Los Angeles County, CA Ms. Tollett supervised field studies for preparation of several technical reports including a biological resources evaluation, jurisdictional delineation, focused burrowing owl surveys (breeding and non-breeding season), and rare plant survey. The technical studies were prepared to support the findings within the subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for an Emergency Vehicle Operating Center for the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s driver training track, skid pad, motorcycle training area, and a role play training center for emergency vehicles. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, San Timoteo Storm Drain, Moreno Valley, CA Ms. Tollett supervised the biological surveys, including reconnaissance-level habitat assessment, focused burrowing owl surveys, jurisdictional delineation, and preparation of an IS/MND for the City of Moreno Valley to assess and mitigate significant environmental impacts associated with the construction a 0.53-mile long underground storm drain system in the San Timoteo Foothill Neighborhood. The new storm drain system protected approximately 100 to 150 residents in 23 homes from repetitive flooding. Huntington Beach Bridge Preventive Maintenance Project, Orange County, CA Ms. Tollett was the biological resources supervisor for three bridge repair and maintenance projects for the City of Huntington Beach within three ecological preserves consisting of coastal salt marsh, coastal sage scrub habitats, and eelgrass beds within tidal waters. She led the preparation of the Preliminary Environmental Study (PES), Natural Environment Study (NES), Essential Fish Habitat Assessment (EFH Assessment), Wetland Delineation, Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND), Coastal Development Permit (CDP), USFWS Section 7 Consultation, CDFW 2081 Consultation, and Caulerpa /Eelgrass Surveys. Regulatory permitting included issuance of a Section 404 Dredge and Fill permit, Section 401 Water Quality Certification, Rivers and Harbors Act Sections 9 and 10 authorizations, Section 1602 Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement, Coastal Development Permit, and USFWS Section 7 Concurrence, and CESA 2081 Consistency Analysis within habitats known to support listed species, such as the Belding’s savannah sparrow (Passerculus sandwichensis beldingi), coastal California gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica) and Least Tern (Sternula antillarum). Ms. Tollett was also lead liaison between the client and resource agencies and advised on avoidance and minimization measures for potential impacts to Primary Constituent Elements within designated critical habitat for the western snowy plover (Charadrius nivosus nivosus). Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting, Alton Parkway Extension Project, Irvine, CA Ms. Tollett helped implement the requirements of environmental planning documents and agency-approved permits. These included the Alton Parkway EIS/EIR, FWS Section 7 Conservation Permit, CDFW 1600 SAA, USACE 404 Permit, and a RWQCB 401 Certification. Ms. Tollett supervised a crew of five rotating staff members, trained to monitor and consult with the client, through review of environmental documents and submittal of monitoring reports on a regular basis. The team conducted surveys of nesting birds and sensitive wildlife, both prior to and during construction. Ms. Tollett also prepared and presented a Worker Environmental Education and Awareness Program (WEAP) and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP). G.11.b Packet Pg. 194 Attachment: UEI_Proposal_2019-04-25 (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental Peer Review) Consultant List RFP Peer Review - CUP 19-01 Firm Name Address Dudek & Assoc 3544 University Avenue, Riverside, CA 92507 MIG 1500 Iowa Avenue, Suite 110 Riverside, CA 92507 Michael Baker International 3536 Concours St. Ontario, CA 91764 T&B Planning 17542 East 17th Street, Ste 100 Tustin, CA 92780 McKenna Lanier 30520 Rancho California Rd Suite 107 Temecula, CA 92590 The Altum Group 73-710 Fred Waring Drive #219, Palm Desert, CA 92260 Other Consultants that responded to RFP UltraSystems Environmental, Inc.16431 Scientific Way, Irvine, CA 92618 G.11.c Packet Pg. 195 Attachment: Consultant List - Peer Review CUP 19-01 (Professional Services Agreement - Environmental AGENDA REPORT MEETING DATE: May 14, 2019 Council Item TITLE: Professional Service Agreements for on Call Planning and Environmental Services Between the City of Grand Terrace and Moore, Iacofano, Goltsman, Inc., and Mike Baker International PRESENTED BY: Sandra Molina, Planning & Development Services Director RECOMMENDATION: 1. Approve Professional Services Agreements Between the City of Grand Terrace and Moore Iacofano Goltsman, Inc., and Michael Baker International (each with 3 year terms), subject to the City Manager’s approval/negotiation and the City Attorney’s approval as to form; and 2. Authorize the City Manager to Execute the Agreements, subject to the City Manager’s approval/negotiation and the City Attorney’s approval as to form. 2030 VISION STATEMENT: This staff report supports Goal #3, Promote Economic Development, specifically Strategy 3.3 to ensure adequate and creative staffing solutions to facilitate the entitlement process for new development; and Implementation Strategy 3.3 to ensure adequate and creative staffing solutions to facilitate the entitlement process for new development. BACKGROUND: Contracting with consulting firms to provide on -call planning and environmental services provides the City the ability to have process development applications more efficiently than in-house staff given the realities of the City’s staffing resources. When applications for development are submitted, City Staff will evaluate the project proposals and evaluate staffing resources and based on the evaluation assign the project to the on -call consultant. The consultant would handle all aspects of the work, including reviewing for application completeness, attending development review meetings, working directly with the applicant on plan revisions, preparing all notices and staff reports, and presenting at public hearings. Prior to initiating the work, a project overview meeting would be conducted by Staff and the consultant. G.12 Packet Pg. 196 For projects that would require the preparation of an environmental initial study or environmental impact report, staff would first obtain a cost proposal, which would need to be accepted prior to work commencing. In accordance, with the City’s fee resolution, the developer would pay the consultant fees through a deposit-based system. DISCUSSION: On April 5, 2019, the City sent out a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) to five (5) consulting firms experienced in planning and environmental services. The RFQ included the scope of work that the consultant would be requ ired to provide. A copy of the scope of work is attached. Staff received responses from all five (5) consulting firms. The responses were reviewed and rated by Staff. Three (3) firms provide both planning and environmental services, with the other two (2) firms primarily providing environmental services. Considering staffing needs, Staff is recommending that the City Council enter into three - year contract services with the firms that provide both planning and environmental services. These three (3) firms have provided these services to other cities and have also provided staff augmentation services. The three (3) firms are Moore Iacofano Goltsman, Inc. (MIG), Michael Baker International (MBI) and McKenna Lanier Group, Inc. However, McKenna Lanier Group contacted City Staff and withdrew their proposal. Staff now recommends agreements with MIG and MBI. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact related to establishing the on-call planning and environmental services list. The costs associated with providing development services is borne by the developer. In the event Staff proposes to use either of these firms for City -projects, Staff will bring the proposal to the Council for authorization. ATTACHMENTS: • RFQ- Planning & Environmental Services April 2019 (PDF) • MIG On-Call Planning and Environmental Services Proposal-FINAL_04.22.19 (PDF) • GT_ MIG On Call Services Agreement (DOCX) • Michael Baker Intl City of Grand Terrace SOQ_Plng Srvc and Env Review Srvc - 4- 22-2019(FINAL) (PDF) • GT_ Michael Baker On Call Services Agreement (DOCX) • 2019 Consultants for Planning and Environmental Services RFP(PDF) G.12 Packet Pg. 197 APPROVALS: Sandra Molina Completed 05/06/2019 3:47 PM City Attorney Completed 05/08/2019 12:45 PM Finance Completed 05/08/2019 3:35 PM City Manager Completed 05/08/2019 4:02 PM City Council Pending 05/14/2019 6:00 PM G.12 Packet Pg. 198 Request for Qualifications to Establish On-Call Lists for Planning Services and Environmental Review Services Issued: April 5, 2019 Responses Due: April 22, 2019, by 2:00 p.m. (PDT) RFP Contact: Sandra Molina Planning and Development Services Director City of Grand Terrace (909) 824-6621 x225 smolina@grandterrace-ca.gov G.12.a Packet Pg. 199 Attachment: RFQ- Planning & Environmental Services April 2019 (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) Page 1 of 5 Request for Qualifications Establish On-Call Lists for Planning and Environmental Review Services Introduction The City of Grand Terrace Planning and Development Services Department is responsible for providing planning, economic development, zoning, code enforcement, animal control and development services. The Department advises, administers and implements policies established by the Planning Commission and the City Council on matters concerning the orderly growth, and physical and economic development of the City. The Department processes development cases and responds to numerous counter and phone inquiries, issues environmental clearances, monitors and evaluates project entitlement conditions, is responsible for implementation and updating the City’s General Plan, Zoning Code and Specific Plans, processing of zoning and sign code enforcement cases, participation in San Bernardino Association of Governments (SANBAG), comprehensive transportation plan development and participation in the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan. Background Grand Terrace is located approximately 60-miles from Los Angeles in the County of San Bernardino. The City is situated off the I-215 freeway, between the I-10 and the 60 freeways, encompassing an area of approximately 3.6 square miles. The City has a current population of 12,285. The City was incorporated in 1978 as a general law city, operating under a council/city manager form of government. The City is comprised of four Council Members (with one seat currently vacant), elected at large for four-year terms. The Mayor is directly elected for a four- year term. The City Council appoints the City Manager and City Attorney. The City’s fiscal year begins on July 1 and ends on June 30. Scope of Service From time to time the Planning Division requires additional professional services, environmental review services and technical expertise either acting as an extension of the City staff for project management or as an independent technical consultant. The City is issuing this request for qualifications (RFQ) to identify the consultant(s) who has extensive experiences working with public entities to provide planning services and environmental review services and to streamline the Consultant selection process for the provision of these services. A. Creation of a Planning Services-On-Call Consultant List and Environmental Review Services On-Call Consultant List: Statements of Qualifications (SOQ) are to be submitted by consultant in response to the RFQ. Only firms which respond to the RFQ will be considered for the Planning Services On-Call List or Environmental Review Services On-Call List or both. The City will use the On-Call Consultant Lists to select qualified planning and/or environmental review services consultants on as needed basis. The City intends to contract with at least two G.12.a Packet Pg. 200 Attachment: RFQ- Planning & Environmental Services April 2019 (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) Page 2 of 5 firms. Once approved by the City Council, the On-Call Lists (List) will be valid for a three (3) year period. B. Selection of Firm to Provide Planning Services and/or Environmental Review Services: As projects are received that require additional professional planning and/or environmental review services and technical expertise, the City staff will provide a description of the project and the requested services to at least two firms on the List with demonstrated expertise in the services requested. Each consultant will in turn provide a scope of work and a not to exceed cost estimate based upon its fixed fee schedule. Planning will review the materials received from each consultant to identify the consultant with the best work plan and budget (selection may not be based on the lowest budget), and will then negotiate with that consultant to develop a mutually acceptable professional services agreement. If the City and selected consultant are not able to reach an agreement, the City will consider the second highest ranked proposal. Scope of Work A. Planning Services: Selected consultants for Planning Services shall have demonstrated expertise in processing applications for various types of projects that include, but not limited to, residential, commercial, industrial, mixed use and transit-oriented development. Some applications may require a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, establishment of a Planned Development Overlay, etc. Typical and examples of Planning Services Tasks are: •Initial Site Assessment •Review project for completeness and compliance with the General Plan, Zoning Ordinances, Barton Road Specific Plan (if applicable) Design Guidelines, and all applicable codes and ordinances •Prepare letters for Director’s review •Attend Development Advisory Board meetings for the project •Coordinate comments from members of the Development Advisory Board •Meet with applicants •Coordinate the Project Review with CEQA Review •Prepare public hearing notices, staff reports, resolutions and conditions of approval •Attend Planning and/or City Council meetings •File management for the project •Plan Check review of projects including, but not limited to construction plans, grading plan, landscape and irrigation plans, lighting plans, etc. for compliance with conditions of approval. G.12.a Packet Pg. 201 Attachment: RFQ- Planning & Environmental Services April 2019 (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) Page 3 of 5 B. Environmental Review Services. Selected consultants for Environmental Review Services shall have demonstrated expertise in preparing environmental review documents as required by CEQA that include, but not limited to, one or more of the following environmental review tasks: • Initial Site Assessment • CEQA Initial Study to determine whether project requires EIR, MND, ND, or CE • Nosie Studies • Air Quality • Transportation Studies • Water Quality/Storm and Wastewater Control Management • Greenhouse Gas Emission Studies • Biological and Cultural Resources Studies • Environmental Mitigation Studies/Reports • Coordinate and distribute environmental documents and notices • Mitigation Monitoring • Preparation of Public Notices • Presentations at public meetings • Coordinate the CEQA Review with Project Review In addition to the above environmental review tasks, the consultant may be assigned to conduct a peer review of the EIR, MND or ND submitted by the project applicant for a review of completeness, adequacy and compliance with CEQA. Statement of Qualifications Format The Statement of Qualifications must include at a minimum, the following information: A. A brief description of the consultant’s firm, including the year the firm was established, the type of organization (partnership, corporation, etc.) and a statement of the firms qualifications for performing the subject consultant services. B. A summary of the qualifications and experience of each member proposed to provide planning services and/or environmental review services. C. A project summary list with descriptions of the proposed team’s experience relative to the provision of planning services and/or environmental review services. Emphasis should be given to work done for public entities. D. A list of sub-consultants to be used, if any, and their relevant expertise. E. A list of references of relevant clients, including a contact person with their current telephone number and email address. F. A fixed fee schedule that includes the hourly rate and classification of all employees who would be assigned to the anticipated projects. The fee schedule must be submitted in a separate sealed envelope and will not be used as part of the evaluation criteria. G.12.a Packet Pg. 202 Attachment: RFQ- Planning & Environmental Services April 2019 (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) Page 4 of 5 Statement of Qualifications Submittal Requirements An original, two paper copies and one original copy of the fee schedule in a separate sealed envelope must be received at City Hall no later than April 22, 2019 at 2:00 p.m. Proposals are limited to 7 pages, double sided. Late submittals will not be accepted. Submissions are to be mailed or hand delivered to: Sandra Molina Planning and Development Services Director City of Grand Terrace 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92313-5295 Evaluation Procedure City staff will review each Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) for completeness and content. Each SOQ will be evaluated upon the relevant qualifications and experience of the consultant. Staff my conduct interviews if necessary. License status and references will also be verified. The SOQ will focus on upon the following criteria: A. Organization. Does the firm offer the breadth and quality of services required for the types of planning services and/or environmental review services listed in the Scope of Work? Does the firm’s organizational structure show sufficient depth, capacity for its present and additional workload? B. Staff: do the qualifications of key personnel to be assigned to the anticipated projects coincide with the tasks listed in the Scope of Work? Do assigned personnel have requisite education, experience and professional qualifications? C. Experience. Has the firm demonstrated the ability to successfully provide services for projects of a similar complexity and nature described herein? D. Specific Management Approach. Has the firm described its ability to achieve budget and project delivery goals for projects of a similar complexity and nature as described in the Scope of Work? E. Professional Standing. Are the firm’s references from past clients and associates favorable? Are deliverables submitted on time and within the budget? F. Familiarity with Locality. Is the firm familiar with the City and the Inland Empire? Selection Process Based on staff recommendation, the City Council will consider approval of the on-call list for the Planning and Environmental Services On-Call Lists for a three-year period. The City Council G.12.a Packet Pg. 203 Attachment: RFQ- Planning & Environmental Services April 2019 (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) Page 5 of 5 may select more than one consultant /firm or choose to determine that no SOQ proposal exhibits adequate qualifications. Upon selection by the City Council, consultants/firms may or may not be called upon by the City to provide planning and/or environmental services. During the three-year period, the City will have the discretion to negotiate with a consultant on the total cost for the consultant services based upon its fixed fee schedule and the scope of work of the project. Acceptance or Rejection of Proposal The City reserves the right to accept or reject any and all proposals. The City also reserves the right to waive any informality or irregularity in any Qualifications. Additionally, the City may, for any reason decide not to award an agreement as a result of this RFQ or cancel the RFP process. The City shall not be obligated to respond to any proposal submitted, nor be legally bound in any manner by the submission of the proposal. The City reserves the right to negotiate the project deliverables and associated costs. Professional Services Agreement The award of a professional services agreement resulting from the RFQ shall include terms and conditions similar to those referenced in the City’s standard agreement, which is attached. Exceptions proposed by the consulting firm, if any, to the terms and conditions included in the City’s standard agreement should be included in the response. The City reserves the right to consider any proposed exceptions during its evaluation of the acceptability of a proposal. Estimated Timeline • Request for Qualifications Issued April 5, 2019 • Statement of Qualifications Due April 22, 2019 • Interviews (if necessary) Week of April 22, 2019 • City Council Approval May 14, 2019 Inquiries For questions regarding this RFQ, please contact: Sandra Molina Planning and Development Services Director City of Grand Terrace (909) 824-6621 x225 smolina@grandterrace-ca.gov G.12.a Packet Pg. 204 Attachment: RFQ- Planning & Environmental Services April 2019 (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01240.0001/514122.1 10/16/2018 AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES By and Between CITY OF GRAND TERRACE and _____________________________________ G.12.a Packet Pg. 205 Attachment: RFQ- Planning & Environmental Services April 2019 (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01240.0001/514122.1 10/16/2018 -2- AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE AND ____________________ This “AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE AND ____________________” (herein “Agreement”) is made and entered into this ____ day of ________, 2018 by and between the City of Grand Terrace, a California municipal corporation (“City”) and ___________________________, _________________ (“Consultant”). City and Consultant are sometimes hereinafter individually referred to as “Party” and hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Parties.” RECITALS A. City has sought, by issuance of a Request for Proposals or Invitation for Bids, the performance of the services defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement. B. Consultant, following submission of a proposal or bid for the performance of the services defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement, was selected by the City to perform those services. C. Pursuant to the City of Grand Terrace Municipal Code, City has authority to enter into and execute this Agreement. D. The Parties desire to formalize the selection of Consultant for performance of those services defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement and desire that the terms of that performance be as particularly defined and described herein. OPERATIVE PROVISIONS NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants made by the Parties and contained herein and other consideration, the value and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: ARTICLE 1. SERVICES OF CONSULTANT 1.1 Scope of Services. In compliance with all terms and conditions of this Agreement, the Consultant shall provide those services specified in the “Scope of Services” attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference, which may be referred to herein as the “services” or “work” hereunder. As a material inducement to the City entering into this Agreement, Consultant represents and warrants that it has the qualifications, experience, and facilities necessary to properly perform the services required under this Agreement in a thorough, competent, and professional manner, and is experienced in performing the work and services contemplated herein. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of its ability, experience and talent, perform all services described herein. Consultant covenants that it shall follow the highest professional standards in performing the work and services required hereunder and that all materials will be both of good quality as well as fit for the purpose intended. For purposes of this Agreement, the phrase “highest G.12.a Packet Pg. 206 Attachment: RFQ- Planning & Environmental Services April 2019 (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01240.0001/514122.1 10/16/2018 -3- professional standards” shall mean those standards of practice recognized by one or more first- class firms performing similar work under similar circumstances. 1.2 Consultant’s Proposal. The Scope of Service shall include the Consultant’s scope of work or bid which shall be incorporated herein by this reference as though fully set forth herein. In the event of any inconsistency between the terms of such proposal and this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall govern. 1.3 Compliance with Law. Consultant shall keep itself informed concerning, and shall render all services hereunder in accordance with, all ordinances, resolutions, statutes, rules, and regulations of the City and any Federal, State or local governmental entity having jurisdiction in effect at the time service is rendered. 1.4 Licenses, Permits, Fees and Assessments. Consultant shall obtain at its sole cost and expense such licenses, permits and approvals as may be required by law for the performance of the services required by this Agreement. Consultant shall have the sole obligation to pay for any fees, assessments and taxes, plus applicable penalties and interest, which may be imposed by law and arise from or are necessary for the Consultant’s performance of the services required by this Agreement, and shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City, its officers, employees or agents of City, against any such fees, assessments, taxes, penalties or interest levied, assessed or imposed against City hereunder. 1.5 Familiarity with Work. By executing this Agreement, Consultant warrants that Consultant (i) has thoroughly investigated and considered the scope of services to be performed, (ii) has carefully considered how the services should be performed, and (iii) fully understands the facilities, difficulties and restrictions attending performance of the services under this Agreement. If the services involve work upon any site, Consultant warrants that Consultant has or will investigate the site and is or will be fully acquainted with the conditions there existing, prior to commencement of services hereunder. Should the Consultant discover any latent or unknown conditions, which will materially affect the performance of the services hereunder, Consultant shall immediately inform the City of such fact and shall not proceed except at Consultant’s risk until written instructions are received from the Contract Officer. 1.6 Care of Work. The Consultant shall adopt reasonable methods during the life of the Agreement to furnish continuous protection to the work, and the equipment, materials, papers, documents, plans, studies and/or other components thereof to prevent losses or damages, and shall be responsible for all such damages, to persons or property, until acceptance of the work by City, except such losses or damages as may be caused by City’s own negligence. G.12.a Packet Pg. 207 Attachment: RFQ- Planning & Environmental Services April 2019 (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01240.0001/514122.1 10/16/2018 -4- 1.7 Further Responsibilities of Parties. Both parties agree to use reasonable care and diligence to perform their respective obligations under this Agreement. Both parties agree to act in good faith to execute all instruments, prepare all documents and take all actions as may be reasonably necessary to carry out the purposes of this Agreement. Unless hereafter specified, neither party shall be responsible for the service of the other. 1.8 Additional Services. City shall have the right at any time during the performance of the services, without invalidating this Agreement, to order extra work beyond that specified in the Scope of Services or make changes by altering, adding to or deducting from said work. No such extra work may be undertaken unless a written order is first given by the Contract Officer to the Consultant, incorporating therein any adjustment in (i) the Contract Sum for the actual costs of the extra work, and/or (ii) the time to perform this Agreement, which said adjustments are subject to the written approval of the Consultant. Any increase in compensation of up to ten percent (10%) of the Contract Sum or $25,000, whichever is less; or, in the time to perform of up to one hundred eighty (180) days, may be approved by the Contract Officer. Any greater increases, taken either separately or cumulatively, must be approved by the City Council. It is expressly understood by Consultant that the provisions of this Section shall not apply to services specifically set forth in the Scope of Services. Consultant hereby acknowledges that it accepts the risk that the services to be provided pursuant to the Scope of Services may be more costly or time consuming than Consultant anticipates and that Consultant shall not be entitled to additional compensation therefor. City may in its sole and absolute discretion have similar work done by other consultants. No claims for an increase in the Contract Sum or time for performance shall be valid unless the procedures established in this Section are followed. 1.9 Special Requirements. Additional terms and conditions of this Agreement, if any, which are made a part hereof are set forth in the “Special Requirements” attached hereto as Exhibit “B” and incorporated herein by this reference. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of Exhibit “B” and any other provisions of this Agreement, the provisions of Exhibit “B” shall govern. ARTICLE 2. COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT. 2.1 Contract Sum. Subject to any limitations set forth in this Agreement, City agrees to pay Consultant the amounts specified in the “Schedule of Compensation” attached hereto as Exhibit “C” and incorporated herein by this reference. The total compensation, including reimbursement for actual expenses, shall not exceed __________________________________ Dollars ($______) (the “Contract Sum”), unless additional compensation is approved pursuant to Section 1.8. G.12.a Packet Pg. 208 Attachment: RFQ- Planning & Environmental Services April 2019 (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01240.0001/514122.1 10/16/2018 -5- 2.2 Method of Compensation. The method of compensation may include: (i) a lump sum payment upon completion; (ii) payment in accordance with specified tasks or the percentage of completion of the services, less contract retention; (iii) payment for time and materials based upon the Consultant’s rates as specified in the Schedule of Compensation, provided that (a) time estimates are provided for the performance of sub tasks, (b) contract retention is maintained, and (c) the Contract Sum is not exceeded; or (iv) such other methods as may be specified in the Schedule of Compensation. 2.3 Reimbursable Expenses. Compensation may include reimbursement for actual and necessary expenditures for reproduction costs, telephone expenses, and travel expenses approved by the Contract Officer in advance, or actual subcontractor expenses of an approved subcontractor pursuant to Section 4.5, and only if specified in the Schedule of Compensation. The Contract Sum shall include the attendance of Consultant at all project meetings reasonably deemed necessary by the City. Coordination of the performance of the work with City is a critical component of the services. If Consultant is required to attend additional meetings to facilitate such coordination, Consultant shall not be entitled to any additional compensation for attending said meetings. 2.4 Invoices. Each month Consultant shall furnish to City an original invoice for all work performed and expenses incurred during the preceding month in a form approved by City’s Director of Finance. By submitting an invoice for payment under this Agreement, Consultant is certifying compliance with all provisions of the Agreement. The invoice shall detail charges for all necessary and actual expenses by the following categories: labor (by sub-category), travel, materials, equipment, supplies, and sub-contractor contracts. Sub-contractor charges shall also be detailed by such categories. Consultant shall not invoice City for any duplicate services performed by more than one person. City shall independently review each invoice submitted by the Consultant to determine whether the work performed and expenses incurred are in compliance with the provisions of this Agreement. Except as to any charges for work performed or expenses incurred by Consultant which are disputed by City, or as provided in Section 7.3, City will use its best efforts to cause Consultant to be paid within forty-five (45) days of receipt of Consultant’s correct and undisputed invoice; however, Consultant acknowledges and agrees that due to City warrant run procedures, the City cannot guarantee that payment will occur within this time period. In the event any charges or expenses are disputed by City, the original invoice shall be returned by City to Consultant for correction and resubmission. Review and payment by City for any invoice provided by the Consultant shall not constitute a waiver of any rights or remedies provided herein or any applicable law. 2.5 Waiver. Payment to Consultant for work performed pursuant to this Agreement shall not be deemed to waive any defects in work performed by Consultant. G.12.a Packet Pg. 209 Attachment: RFQ- Planning & Environmental Services April 2019 (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01240.0001/514122.1 10/16/2018 -6- ARTICLE 3. PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE 3.1 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement. 3.2 Schedule of Performance. Consultant shall commence the services pursuant to this Agreement upon receipt of a written notice to proceed and shall perform all services within the time period(s) established in the “Schedule of Performance” attached hereto as Exhibit “D” and incorporated herein by this reference. When requested by the Consultant, extensions to the time period(s) specified in the Schedule of Performance may be approved in writing by the Contract Officer but not exceeding one hundred eighty (180) days cumulatively. 3.3 Force Majeure. The time period(s) specified in the Schedule of Performance for performance of the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be extended because of any delays due to unforeseeable causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the Consultant, including, but not restricted to, acts of God or of the public enemy, unusually severe weather, fires, earthquakes, floods, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, riots, strikes, freight embargoes, wars, litigation, and/or acts of any governmental agency, including the City, if the Consultant shall within ten (10) days of the commencement of such delay notify the Contract Officer in writing of the causes of the delay. The Contract Officer shall ascertain the facts and the extent of delay, and extend the time for performing the services for the period of the enforced delay when and if in the judgment of the Contract Officer such delay is justified. The Contract Officer’s determination shall be final and conclusive upon the parties to this Agreement. In no event shall Consultant be entitled to recover damages against the City for any delay in the performance of this Agreement, however caused, Consultant’s sole remedy being extension of the Agreement pursuant to this Section. 3.4 Term. Unless earlier terminated in accordance with Article 7 of this Agreement, this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect until completion of the services but not exceeding one (1) years from the date hereof, except as otherwise provided in the Schedule of Performance (Exhibit “D”). ARTICLE 4. COORDINATION OF WORK 4.1 Representatives and Personnel of Consultant. The following principals of Consultant (“Principals”) are hereby designated as being the principals and representatives of Consultant authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the work specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith: G.12.a Packet Pg. 210 Attachment: RFQ- Planning & Environmental Services April 2019 (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01240.0001/514122.1 10/16/2018 -7- (Name) (Title) (Name) (Title) (Name) (Title) It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of the foregoing principals were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, the foregoing principals shall be responsible during the term of this Agreement for directing all activities of Consultant and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the services hereunder. All personnel of Consultant, and any authorized agents, shall at all times be under the exclusive direction and control of the Principals. For purposes of this Agreement, the foregoing Principals may not be replaced nor may their responsibilities be substantially reduced by Consultant without the express written approval of City. Additionally, Consultant shall utilize only competent personnel to perform services pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall make every reasonable effort to maintain the stability and continuity of Consultant’s staff and subcontractors, if any, assigned to perform the services required under this Agreement. Consultant shall notify City of any changes in Consultant’s staff and subcontractors, if any, assigned to perform the services required under this Agreement, prior to and during any such performance. 4.2 Status of Consultant. Consultant shall have no authority to bind City in any manner, or to incur any obligation, debt or liability of any kind on behalf of or against City, whether by contract or otherwise, unless such authority is expressly conferred under this Agreement or is otherwise expressly conferred in writing by City. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that Consultant or any of Consultant’s officers, employees, or agents are in any manner officials, officers, employees or agents of City. Neither Consultant, nor any of Consultant’s officers, employees or agents, shall obtain any rights to retirement, health care or any other benefits which may otherwise accrue to City’s employees. Consultant expressly waives any claim Consultant may have to any such rights. 4.3 Contract Officer. The Contract Officer shall be [_____________________________ or] such person as may be designated by the City Manager. It shall be the Consultant’s responsibility to assure that the Contract Officer is kept informed of the progress of the performance of the services and the Consultant shall refer any decisions which must be made by City to the Contract Officer. Unless otherwise specified herein, any approval of City required hereunder shall mean the approval of the Contract Officer. The Contract Officer shall have authority, if specified in writing by the City Manager, to sign all documents on behalf of the City required hereunder to carry out the terms of this Agreement. 4.4 Independent Contractor. Neither the City nor any of its employees shall have any control over the manner, mode or means by which Consultant, its agents or employees, perform the services required herein, except as otherwise set forth herein. City shall have no voice in the selection, discharge, supervision or G.12.a Packet Pg. 211 Attachment: RFQ- Planning & Environmental Services April 2019 (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01240.0001/514122.1 10/16/2018 -8- control of Consultant’s employees, servants, representatives or agents, or in fixing their number, compensation or hours of service. Consultant shall perform all services required herein as an independent contractor of City and shall remain at all times as to City a wholly independent contractor with only such obligations as are consistent with that role. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its agents or employees are agents or employees of City. City shall not in any way or for any purpose become or be deemed to be a partner of Consultant in its business or otherwise or a joint venturer or a member of any joint enterprise with Consultant. 4.5 Prohibition Against Subcontracting or Assignment. The experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of Consultant, its principals and employees were a substantial inducement for the City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, Consultant shall not contract with any other entity to perform in whole or in part the services required hereunder without the express written approval of the City. In addition, neither this Agreement nor any interest herein may be transferred, assigned, conveyed, hypothecated or encumbered voluntarily or by operation of law, whether for the benefit of creditors or otherwise, without the prior written approval of City. Transfers restricted hereunder shall include the transfer to any person or group of persons acting in concert of more than twenty five percent (25%) of the present ownership and/or control of Consultant, taking all transfers into account on a cumulative basis. In the event of any such unapproved transfer, including any bankruptcy proceeding, this Agreement shall be void. No approved transfer shall release the Consultant or any surety of Consultant of any liability hereunder without the express consent of City. ARTICLE 5. INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION 5.1 Insurance Coverages. The Consultant shall procure and maintain, at its sole cost and expense, in a form and content satisfactory to City, during the entire term of this Agreement including any extension thereof, the following policies of insurance which shall cover all elected and appointed officers, employees and agents of City: (a) General Liability Insurance (Occurrence Form CG0001 or equivalent). A policy of comprehensive general liability insurance written on a per occurrence basis for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. The policy of insurance shall be in an amount not less than $1,000,000.00 per occurrence or if a general aggregate limit is used, then the general aggregate limit shall be twice the occurrence limit. (b) Worker’s Compensation Insurance. A policy of worker’s compensation insurance in such amount as will fully comply with the laws of the State of California and which shall indemnify, insure and provide legal defense for the Consultant against any loss, claim or damage arising from any injuries or occupational diseases occurring to any worker employed by or any persons retained by the Consultant in the course of carrying out the work or services contemplated in this Agreement. (c) Automotive Insurance (Form CA 0001 (Ed 1/87) including “any auto” and endorsement CA 0025 or equivalent). A policy of comprehensive automobile liability insurance G.12.a Packet Pg. 212 Attachment: RFQ- Planning & Environmental Services April 2019 (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01240.0001/514122.1 10/16/2018 -9- written on a per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage in an amount not less than $1,000,000. Said policy shall include coverage for owned, non-owned, leased, hired cars and any automobile. (d) Professional Liability. Professional liability insurance appropriate to the Consultant’s profession. This coverage may be written on a “claims made” basis, and must include coverage for contractual liability. The professional liability insurance required by this Agreement must be endorsed to be applicable to claims based upon, arising out of or related to services performed under this Agreement. The insurance must be maintained for at least 5 consecutive years following the completion of Consultant’s services or the termination of this Agreement. During this additional 5-year period, Consultant shall annually and upon request of the City submit written evidence of this continuous coverage. (e) Subcontractors. Consultant shall include all subcontractors as insureds under its policies or shall furnish separate certificates and certified endorsements for each subcontractor. All coverages for subcontractors shall include all of the requirements stated herein. (f) Additional Insurance. Policies of such other insurance, as may be required in the Special Requirements in Exhibit “B”. 5.2 General Insurance Requirements. All of the above policies of insurance shall be primary insurance and shall name the City, its elected and appointed officers, employees and agents as additional insureds and any insurance maintained by City or its officers, employees or agents may apply in excess of, and not contribute with Consultant’s insurance. The insurer is deemed hereof to waive all rights of subrogation and contribution it may have against the City, its officers, employees and agents and their respective insurers. Moreover, the insurance policy must specify that where the primary insured does not satisfy the self-insured retention, any additional insured may satisfy the self-insured retention. All of said policies of insurance shall provide that said insurance may not be amended or cancelled by the insurer or any party hereto without providing thirty (30) days prior written notice by certified mail return receipt requested to the City. In the event any of said policies of insurance are cancelled, the Consultant shall, prior to the cancellation date, submit new evidence of insurance in conformance with Section 5.1 to the Contract Officer. No work or services under this Agreement shall commence until the Consultant has provided the City with Certificates of Insurance, additional insured endorsement forms or appropriate insurance binders evidencing the above insurance coverages and said Certificates of Insurance or binders are approved by the City. City reserves the right to inspect complete, certified copies of and endorsements to all required insurance policies at any time. Any failure to comply with the reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches or warranties shall not affect coverage provided to City. All certificates shall name the City as additional insured (providing the appropriate endorsement) and shall conform to the following “cancellation” notice: CANCELLATION: G.12.a Packet Pg. 213 Attachment: RFQ- Planning & Environmental Services April 2019 (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01240.0001/514122.1 10/16/2018 -10- SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATED THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY SHALL MAIL THIRTY (30)-DAY ADVANCE WRITTEN NOTICE TO CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED HEREIN. [to be initialed] ______________ Consultant Initials City, its respective elected and appointed officers, directors, officials, employees, agents and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities Consultant performs; products and completed operations of Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by Consultant; or any automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City, and their respective elected and appointed officers, officials, employees or volunteers. Consultant’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer’s liability. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City. At the option of City, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects City or its respective elected or appointed officers, officials, employees and volunteers or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration, defense expenses and claims. The Consultant agrees that the requirement to provide insurance shall not be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which the Consultant may be held responsible for the payment of damages to any persons or property resulting from the Consultant’s activities or the activities of any person or persons for which the Consultant is otherwise responsible nor shall it limit the Consultant’s indemnification liabilities as provided in Section 5.3. In the event the Consultant subcontracts any portion of the work in compliance with Section 4.5 of this Agreement, the contract between the Consultant and such subcontractor shall require the subcontractor to maintain the same policies of insurance that the Consultant is required to maintain pursuant to Section 5.1, and such certificates and endorsements shall be provided to City. 5.3 Indemnification. To the full extent permitted by law, Consultant agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its officers, employees and agents (“Indemnified Parties”) against, and will hold and save them and each of them harmless from, any and all actions, either judicial, administrative, arbitration or regulatory claims, damages to persons or property, losses, costs, penalties, obligations, errors, omissions or liabilities whether actual or threatened (herein “claims or liabilities”) that may be asserted or claimed by any person, firm or entity arising out of or in connection with the negligent performance of the work, operations or activities provided herein of Consultant, its officers, employees, agents, subcontractors, or invitees, or any individual or entity for which Consultant is legally liable (“indemnitors”), or arising from Consultant’s or indemnitors’ reckless or willful misconduct, or arising from Consultant’s or indemnitors’ negligent performance G.12.a Packet Pg. 214 Attachment: RFQ- Planning & Environmental Services April 2019 (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01240.0001/514122.1 10/16/2018 -11- of or failure to perform any term, provision, covenant or condition of this Agreement, and in connection therewith: (a) Consultant will defend any action or actions filed in connection with any of said claims or liabilities and will pay all costs and expenses, including legal costs and attorney’s fees incurred in connection therewith; (b) Consultant will promptly pay any judgment rendered against the City, its officers, agents or employees for any such claims or liabilities arising out of or in connection with the negligent performance of or failure to perform such work, operations or activities of Consultant hereunder; and Consultant agrees to save and hold the City, its officers, agents, and employees harmless therefrom; (c) In the event the City, its officers, agents or employees is made a party to any action or proceeding filed or prosecuted against Consultant for such damages or other claims arising out of or in connection with the negligent performance of or failure to perform the work, operation or activities of Consultant hereunder, Consultant agrees to pay to the City, its officers, agents or employees, any and all costs and expenses incurred by the City, its officers, agents or employees in such action or proceeding, including but not limited to, legal costs and attorney’s fees. Consultant shall incorporate similar indemnity agreements with its subcontractors and if it fails to do so Consultant shall be fully responsible to indemnify City hereunder therefore, and failure of City to monitor compliance with these provisions shall not be a waiver hereof. This indemnification includes claims or liabilities arising from any negligent or wrongful act, error or omission, or reckless or willful misconduct of Consultant in the performance of professional services hereunder. The provisions of this Section do not apply to claims or liabilities occurring as a result of City’s sole negligence or willful acts or omissions, but, to the fullest extent permitted by law, shall apply to claims and liabilities resulting in part from City’s negligence, except that design professionals’ indemnity hereunder shall be limited to claims and liabilities arising out of the negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct of the design professional. The indemnity obligation shall be binding on successors and assigns of Consultant and shall survive termination of this Agreement. 5.4 Sufficiency of Insurer. Insurance required by this Agreement shall be satisfactory only if issued by companies qualified to do business in California, rated “A” or better in the most recent edition of Best Rating Guide, The Key Rating Guide or in the Federal Register, and only if they are of a financial category Class VII or better, unless such requirements are waived by the Risk Manager of the City (“Risk Manager”) due to unique circumstances. If this Agreement continues for more than 3 years duration, or in the event the risk manager determines that the work or services to be performed under this Agreement creates an increased or decreased risk of loss to the City, the Consultant agrees that the minimum limits of the insurance policies may be changed accordingly upon receipt of written notice from the Risk Manager. G.12.a Packet Pg. 215 Attachment: RFQ- Planning & Environmental Services April 2019 (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01240.0001/514122.1 10/16/2018 -12- ARTICLE 6. RECORDS, REPORTS, AND RELEASE OF INFORMATION 6.1 Records. Consultant shall keep, and require subcontractors to keep, such ledgers, books of accounts, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, reports, studies or other documents relating to the disbursements charged to City and services performed hereunder (the “books and records”), as shall be necessary to perform the services required by this Agreement and enable the Contract Officer to evaluate the performance of such services. Any and all such documents shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be complete and detailed. The Contract Officer shall have full and free access to such books and records at all times during normal business hours of City, including the right to inspect, copy, audit and make records and transcripts from such records. Such records shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years following completion of the services hereunder, and the City shall have access to such records in the event any audit is required. In the event of dissolution of Consultant’s business, custody of the books and records may be given to City, and access shall be provided by Consultant’s successor in interest. Notwithstanding the above, the Consultant shall fully cooperate with the City in providing access to the books and records if a public records request is made and disclosure is required by law including but not limited to the California Public Records Act. 6.2 Reports. Consultant shall periodically prepare and submit to the Contract Officer such reports concerning the performance of the services required by this Agreement as the Contract Officer shall require. Consultant hereby acknowledges that the City is greatly concerned about the cost of work and services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement. For this reason, Consultant agrees that if Consultant becomes aware of any facts, circumstances, techniques, or events that may or will materially increase or decrease the cost of the work or services contemplated herein or, if Consultant is providing design services, the cost of the project being designed, Consultant shall promptly notify the Contract Officer of said fact, circumstance, technique or event and the estimated increased or decreased cost related thereto and, if Consultant is providing design services, the estimated increased or decreased cost estimate for the project being designed. 6.3 Ownership of Documents. All drawings, specifications, maps, designs, photographs, studies, surveys, data, notes, computer files, reports, records, documents and other materials (the “documents and materials”), including any electronic documents and materials, prepared by Consultant, its employees, subcontractors and agents in the performance of this Agreement shall be the property of City and shall be delivered to City in a format of the City’s choice upon request of the Contract Officer or upon the termination of this Agreement, and Consultant shall have no claim for further employment or additional compensation as a result of the exercise by City of its full rights of ownership use, reuse, or assignment of the documents and materials hereunder. Any use, reuse or assignment of such completed documents for other projects and/or use of uncompleted documents without specific written authorization by the Consultant will be at the City’s sole risk and without liability to Consultant, and Consultant’s guarantee and warranties shall not extend to such use, reuse or assignment. Consultant may retain copies of such documents for its own use. Consultant G.12.a Packet Pg. 216 Attachment: RFQ- Planning & Environmental Services April 2019 (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01240.0001/514122.1 10/16/2018 -13- shall have the right to use the concepts embodied therein. All subcontractors shall provide for assignment to City of any documents or materials prepared by them, and in the event Consultant fails to secure such assignment, Consultant shall indemnify City for all damages resulting therefrom. Moreover, Consultant with respect to any documents and materials that may qualify as “works made for hire” as defined in 17 U.S.C. § 101, such documents and materials are hereby deemed “works made for hire” for the City. 6.4 Confidentiality and Release of Information. (a) All information gained or work product produced by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential, unless such information is in the public domain or already known to Consultant. Consultant shall not release or disclose any such information or work product to persons or entities other than City without prior written authorization from the Contract Officer. (b) Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not, without prior written authorization from the Contract Officer or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide documents, declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered “voluntary” provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena. (c) If Consultant, or any officer, employee, agent or subcontractor of Consultant, provides any information or work product in violation of this Agreement, then City shall have the right to reimbursement and indemnity from Consultant for any damages, costs and fees, including attorney’s fees, caused by or incurred as a result of Consultant’s conduct. (d) Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed there under. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, this right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response. ARTICLE 7. ENFORCEMENT OF AGREEMENT AND TERMINATION 7.1 California Law. This Agreement shall be interpreted, construed and governed both as to validity and to performance of the parties in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Legal actions concerning any dispute, claim or matter arising out of or in relation to this Agreement shall be instituted in the Superior Court of the County of San Bernardino, State of California, or any other appropriate court in such county, and Consultant covenants and agrees to submit to the personal jurisdiction of such court in the event of such action. In the event of litigation in a U.S. District G.12.a Packet Pg. 217 Attachment: RFQ- Planning & Environmental Services April 2019 (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01240.0001/514122.1 10/16/2018 -14- Court, venue shall lie exclusively in the Central District of California, in the County of San Bernardino, State of California. 7.2 Disputes; Default. In the event that Consultant is in default under the terms of this Agreement, the City shall not have any obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default. Instead, the City may give notice to Consultant of the default and the reasons for the default. The notice shall include the timeframe in which Consultant may cure the default. This timeframe is presumptively thirty (30) days, but may be extended, though not reduced, if circumstances warrant. During the period of time that Consultant is in default, the City shall hold all invoices and shall, when the default is cured, proceed with payment on the invoices. In the alternative, the City may, in its sole discretion, elect to pay some or all of the outstanding invoices during the period of default. If Consultant does not cure the default, the City may take necessary steps to terminate this Agreement under this Article. Any failure on the part of the City to give notice of the Consultant’s default shall not be deemed to result in a waiver of the City’s legal rights or any rights arising out of any provision of this Agreement. 7.3 Retention of Funds. Consultant hereby authorizes City to deduct from any amount payable to Consultant (whether or not arising out of this Agreement) (i) any amounts the payment of which may be in dispute hereunder or which are necessary to compensate City for any losses, costs, liabilities, or damages suffered by City, and (ii) all amounts for which City may be liable to third parties, by reason of Consultant’s acts or omissions in performing or failing to perform Consultant’s obligation under this Agreement. In the event that any claim is made by a third party, the amount or validity of which is disputed by Consultant, or any indebtedness shall exist which shall appear to be the basis for a claim of lien, City may withhold from any payment due, without liability for interest because of such withholding, an amount sufficient to cover such claim. The failure of City to exercise such right to deduct or to withhold shall not, however, affect the obligations of the Consultant to insure, indemnify, and protect City as elsewhere provided herein. 7.4 Waiver. Waiver by any party to this Agreement of any term, condition, or covenant of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant. Waiver by any party of any breach of the provisions of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision or a waiver of any subsequent breach or violation of any provision of this Agreement. Acceptance by City of any work or services by Consultant shall not constitute a waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement. No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy by a non-defaulting party on any default shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a waiver. Any waiver by either party of any default must be in writing and shall not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this Agreement. 7.5 Rights and Remedies are Cumulative. Except with respect to rights and remedies expressly declared to be exclusive in this Agreement, the rights and remedies of the parties are cumulative and the exercise by either party G.12.a Packet Pg. 218 Attachment: RFQ- Planning & Environmental Services April 2019 (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01240.0001/514122.1 10/16/2018 -15- of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other party. 7.6 Legal Action. In addition to any other rights or remedies, either party may take legal action, in law or in equity, to cure, correct or remedy any default, to recover damages for any default, to compel specific performance of this Agreement, to obtain declaratory or injunctive relief, or to obtain any other remedy consistent with the purposes of this Agreement. Notwithstanding any contrary provision herein, Consultant shall file a statutory claim pursuant to Government Code Sections 905 et. seq. and 910 et. seq., in order to pursue a legal action under this Agreement. 7.7 Termination Prior to Expiration of Term. This Section shall govern any termination of this Contract except as specifically provided in the following Section for termination for cause. The City reserves the right to terminate this Contract at any time, with or without cause, upon written notice to Consultant. In addition, the Consultant may terminate this Contract for cause, upon sixty (60) days’ advance written notice to City. Upon receipt of any notice of termination, Consultant shall immediately cease all services hereunder except such as may be specifically approved by the Contract Officer. Except where the Consultant has initiated termination, the Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for all services rendered prior to the effective date of the notice of termination and for any services authorized by the Contract Officer thereafter in accordance with the Schedule of Compensation or such as may be approved by the Contract Officer, except as provided in Section 7.3. In the event the Consultant has initiated termination, the Consultant shall be entitled to compensation only for the reasonable value of the work product actually produced hereunder. In the event of termination without cause pursuant to this Section, the terminating party need not provide the non-terminating party with the opportunity to cure pursuant to Section 7.2. 7.8 Termination for Default of Consultant. If termination is due to the failure of the Consultant to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement, City may, after compliance with the provisions of Section 7.2, take over the work and prosecute the same to completion by contract or otherwise, and the Consultant shall be liable to the extent that the total cost for completion of the services required hereunder exceeds the compensation herein stipulated (provided that the City shall use reasonable efforts to mitigate such damages), and City may withhold any payments to the Consultant for the purpose of set-off or partial payment of the amounts owed the City as previously stated. 7.9 Attorney’s Fees. If either party to this Agreement is required to initiate or defend or made a party to any action or proceeding in any way connected with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action or proceeding, in addition to any other relief which may be granted, whether legal or equitable, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney’s fees. Attorney’s fees shall include attorney’s fees on any appeal, and in addition a party entitled to attorney’s fees shall be entitled to all other reasonable costs for investigating such action, taking depositions and discovery and all other necessary costs G.12.a Packet Pg. 219 Attachment: RFQ- Planning & Environmental Services April 2019 (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01240.0001/514122.1 10/16/2018 -16- the court allows which are incurred in such litigation. All such fees shall be deemed to have accrued on commencement of such action and shall be enforceable whether or not such action is prosecuted to judgment. ARTICLE 8. CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES: NON-DISCRIMINATION 8.1 Non-liability of City Officers and Employees. No officer or employee of the City shall be personally liable to the Consultant, or any successor in interest, in the event of any default or breach by the City or for any amount which may become due to the Consultant or to its successor, or for breach of any obligation of the terms of this Agreement. 8.2 Conflict of Interest. Consultant covenants that neither it, nor any officer or principal of its firm, has or shall acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, which would conflict in any manner with the interests of City or which would in any way hinder Consultant’s performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it as an officer, employee, agent or subcontractor without the express written consent of the Contract Officer. Consultant agrees to at all times avoid conflicts of interest or the appearance of any conflicts of interest with the interests of City in the performance of this Agreement. 8.3 Covenant Against Discrimination. Consultant covenants that, by and for itself, its heirs, executors, assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of, any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry or other protected class in the performance of this Agreement. Consultant shall take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry or other protected class. 8.4 Unauthorized Aliens. Consultant hereby promises and agrees to comply with all of the provisions of the Federal Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C.A. §§ 1101, et seq., as amended, and in connection therewith, shall not employ unauthorized aliens as defined therein. Should Consultant so employ such unauthorized aliens for the performance of work and/or services covered by this Agreement, and should any liability or sanctions be imposed against City for such use of unauthorized aliens, Consultant hereby agrees to and shall reimburse City for the cost of all such liabilities or sanctions imposed, together with any and all costs, including attorney’s fees, incurred by City. G.12.a Packet Pg. 220 Attachment: RFQ- Planning & Environmental Services April 2019 (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01240.0001/514122.1 10/16/2018 -17- ARTICLE 9. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 9.1 Notices. Any notice, demand, request, document, consent, approval, or communication either party desires or is required to give to the other party or any other person shall be in writing and either served personally or sent by prepaid, first-class mail, in the case of the City, to the City Manager and to the attention of the Contract Officer (with her/his name and City title), City of Grand Terrace, 22795 Barton Rd, Grand Terrace, CA 92313, and in the case of the Consultant, to the person(s) at the address designated on the execution page of this Agreement. Either party may change its address by notifying the other party of the change of address in writing. Notice shall be deemed communicated at the time personally delivered or in seventy-two (72) hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this Section. 9.2 Interpretation. The terms of this Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the meaning of the language used and shall not be construed for or against either party by reason of the authorship of this Agreement or any other rule of construction which might otherwise apply. 9.3 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, and such counterparts shall constitute one and the same instrument. 9.4 Integration; Amendment. This Agreement including the attachments hereto is the entire, complete and exclusive expression of the understanding of the parties. It is understood that there are no oral agreements between the parties hereto affecting this Agreement and this Agreement supersedes and cancels any and all previous negotiations, arrangements, agreements and understandings, if any, between the parties, and none shall be used to interpret this Agreement. No amendment to or modification of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and approved by the Consultant and by the City Council. The parties agree that this requirement for written modifications cannot be waived and that any attempted waiver shall be void. 9.5 Severability. In the event that any one or more of the phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections contained in this Agreement shall be declared invalid or unenforceable by a valid judgment or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections of this Agreement which are hereby declared as severable and shall be interpreted to carry out the intent of the parties hereunder unless the invalid provision is so material that its invalidity deprives either party of the basic benefit of their bargain or renders this Agreement meaningless. G.12.a Packet Pg. 221 Attachment: RFQ- Planning & Environmental Services April 2019 (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01240.0001/514122.1 10/16/2018 -18- 9.6 Warranty & Representation of Non-Collusion. No official, officer, or employee of City has any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, nor shall any official, officer, or employee of City participate in any decision relating to this Agreement which may affect his/her financial interest or the financial interest of any corporation, partnership, or association in which (s)he is directly or indirectly interested, or in violation of any corporation, partnership, or association in which (s)he is directly or indirectly interested, or in violation of any State or municipal statute or regulation. The determination of “financial interest” shall be consistent with State law and shall not include interests found to be “remote” or “noninterests” pursuant to Government Code Sections 1091 or 1091.5. Nor shall any such officer or employee participate in any decision relating to the Agreement which affects her/his financial interest or the financial interest of any corporation, partnership or association in which (s)he is, directly or indirectly, interested, in violation of any State statute or regulation, including but not limited to the Political Reform Act (Government Code Sections 81000, et seq.) Consultant warrants and represents that it has not paid or given, and will not pay or give, to any third party including, but not limited to, any City official, officer, or employee, any money, consideration, or other thing of value as a result or consequence of obtaining or being awarded any agreement. Consultant further warrants and represents that (s)he/it has not engaged in any act(s), omission(s), or other conduct or collusion that would result in the payment of any money, consideration, or other thing of value to any third party including, but not limited to, any City official, officer, or employee, as a result of consequence of obtaining or being awarded any agreement. Consultant is aware of and understands that any such act(s), omission(s) or other conduct resulting in such payment of money, consideration, or other thing of value will render this Agreement void and of no force or effect. Consultant’s Authorized Initials _______ 9.7 Corporate Authority. The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the parties hereto warrant that (i) such party is duly organized and existing, (ii) they are duly authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement on behalf of said party, (iii) by so executing this Agreement, such party is formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement, and (iv) the entering into this Agreement does not violate any provision of any other Agreement to which said party is bound. This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the parties. [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE] G.12.a Packet Pg. 222 Attachment: RFQ- Planning & Environmental Services April 2019 (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01240.0001/514122.1 10/16/2018 19 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year first-above written. CITY: City of Grand Terrace, a municipal corporation _____________________________________ _ Darcy McNaboe, Mayor ATTEST: _____________________________________ _ Debra Thomas, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ALESHIRE & WYNDER, LLP _____________________________________ _ Adrian R. Guerra, City Attorney CONSULTANT: _____________________________________ _ _____________________________________ _ By: ___________________________________ Name: Title: By: ___________________________________ Name: Title: Address: _____________________________ _ _____________________________ _ _____________________________ _ G.12.a Packet Pg. 223 Attachment: RFQ- Planning & Environmental Services April 2019 (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 20 01240.0001/514122.1 10/16/2018 Two corporate officer signatures required when Consultant is a corporation, with one signature required from each of the following groups: 1) Chairman of the Board, President or any Vice President; and 2) Secretary, any Assistant Secretary, Chief Financial Officer or any Assistant Treasurer. CONSULTANT’S SIGNATURES SHALL BE DULY NOTARIZED, AND APPROPRIATE ATTESTATIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE BYLAWS, ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION, OR OTHER RULES OR REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO CONSULTANT’S BUSINESS ENTITY. G.12.a Packet Pg. 224 Attachment: RFQ- Planning & Environmental Services April 2019 (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01240.0001/514122.1 10/16/2018 CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO On __________, 2018 before me, ________________, personally appeared ________________, proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose names(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature: _____________________________________ OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT INDIVIDUAL CORPORATE OFFICER _______________________________ TITLE(S) PARTNER(S) LIMITED GENERAL ATTORNEY-IN-FACT TRUSTEE(S) GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR OTHER_______________________________ ______________________________________ SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: (NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES)) _____________________________________________ _____________________________________________ ___________________________________ TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT ___________________________________ NUMBER OF PAGES ___________________________________ DATE OF DOCUMENT ___________________________________ SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy or validity of that document. G.12.a Packet Pg. 225 Attachment: RFQ- Planning & Environmental Services April 2019 (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01240.0001/514122.1 10/16/2018 CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO On __________, 2018 before me, ________________, personally appeared ________________, proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose names(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature: _____________________________________ OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT INDIVIDUAL CORPORATE OFFICER _______________________________ TITLE(S) PARTNER(S) LIMITED GENERAL ATTORNEY-IN-FACT TRUSTEE(S) GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR OTHER_______________________________ ______________________________________ SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: (NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES)) _____________________________________________ _____________________________________________ ___________________________________ TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT ___________________________________ NUMBER OF PAGES ___________________________________ DATE OF DOCUMENT ___________________________________ SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy or validity of that document. G.12.a Packet Pg. 226 Attachment: RFQ- Planning & Environmental Services April 2019 (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01240.0001/514122.1 10/16/2018 A-1 EXHIBIT “A” SCOPE OF SERVICES I. Consultant will perform the following Services: A. B. C. II. As part of the Services, Consultant will prepare and deliver the following tangible work products to the City: A. B. C. III. In addition to the requirements of Section 6.2, during performance of the Services, Consultant will keep the City appraised of the status of performance by delivering the following status reports: A. B. C. IV. All work product is subject to review and acceptance by the City, and must be revised by the Consultant without additional charge to the City until found satisfactory and accepted by City. V. Consultant will utilize the following personnel to accomplish the Services: A. B. C. G.12.a Packet Pg. 227 Attachment: RFQ- Planning & Environmental Services April 2019 (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01240.0001/514122.1 10/16/2018 B-1 EXHIBIT “B” SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS (Superseding Contract Boilerplate) G.12.a Packet Pg. 228 Attachment: RFQ- Planning & Environmental Services April 2019 (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01240.0001/514122.1 10/16/2018 C-1 EXHIBIT “C” SCHEDULE OF COMPENSATION I. Consultant shall perform the following tasks at the following rates: RATE TIME SUB-BUDGET A. __________ __________ __________ __________ B. __________ __________ __________ __________ C. __________ __________ __________ __________ D. __________ __________ __________ __________ II. A retention of ten percent (10%) shall be held from each payment as a contract retention to be paid as part of the final payment upon satisfactory completion of services. III. Within the budgeted amounts for each Task, and with the approval of the Contract Officer, funds may be shifted from one Task subbudget to another so long as the Contract Sum is not exceeded per Section 2.1, unless Additional Services are approved per Section 1.8. IV. The City will compensate Consultant for the Services performed upon submission of a valid invoice. Each invoice is to include: A. Line items for all personnel describing the work performed, the number of hours worked, and the hourly rate. B. Line items for all materials and equipment properly charged to the Services. C. Line items for all other approved reimbursable expenses claimed, with supporting documentation. D. Line items for all approved subcontractor labor, supplies, equipment, materials, and travel properly charged to the Services. V. The total compensation for the Services shall not exceed $______ as provided in Section 2.1 of this Agreement. VI. The Consultant’s billing rates for all personnel are attached as Exhibit C-1. G.12.a Packet Pg. 229 Attachment: RFQ- Planning & Environmental Services April 2019 (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01240.0001/514122.1 10/16/2018 D-1 EXHIBIT “D” SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE I. Consultant shall perform all Services timely in accordance with the schedule to be developed by Consultant and subject to the written approval of the Contract Officer and the City Attorney’s office. II. Consultant shall deliver the following tangible work products to the City by the following dates. A. B. C. III. The Contract Officer may approve extensions for performance of the services in accordance with Section 3.2. G.12.a Packet Pg. 230 Attachment: RFQ- Planning & Environmental Services April 2019 (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 1500 Iowa Avenue, Suite 110 Riverside, CA 92507 P (951) 787-9222 F (951) 781-6014 www.migcom.com CALIFORNIA BERKELEY, FULLERTON, KENWOOD, LOS ANGELES, PASADENA, RIVERSIDE, SACRAMENTO, SAN DIEGO AND SAN JOSE COLORADO DENVER OREGON EUGENE AND PORTLAND TEXAS SAN ANTONIO WASHINGTON SEATTLE PLANNING / DESIGN / COMMUNICATIONS / MANAGEMENT / TECHNOLOGY / SCIENCE April 22, 2019 Sandra Molina Planning and Development Services Director City of Grand Terrace 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92313-5295 Re: On-Call List for Planning and Environmental Review Services MIG is pleased to submit our statement of qualifi cations to the City of Grand Terrace to provide planning and environmental review services. With our Riverside offi ce located just ten minutes from City Hall, we are immediately available to assist the City. In fact, MIG has worked with the City of Grand Terrace providing contract staffi ng services as well as preparing the Barton Road Specifi c Plan. Our environmental team has prepared numerous CEQA documents and is well versed in local environmental issues. MIG has a 37-year track record of working interactively with our public and private clients, becoming an extension of their staff. We have a staff of over 260 employees among all of our offi ces including professionals specializing in land planning, environmental analysis, landscape architecture, parks planning, urban design, public facilitation and community outreach. Our fi rm has provided professional services to more than 300 cities, eight counties, the State of California, states through the United States, the Federal Government, college and corporate campuses, and many recreation, park, and school districts. The success of our on-call and as-needed services stems from our interdisciplinary project team approach. We have hand-picked members of our staff of professionals who have niche expertiseWe have hand-picked members of our staff of professionals who have niche expertise in providing on-call services to jurisdictions. We are excited to submit the enclosed Statement of Qualifi cations for the following requested services: • Planning Services • Environmental Review Services On behalf of MIG, we look forward to working with and assisting you, the City, and the community with insuring that development projects are designed and implemented with an effective, effi cient, and sustainable approach and tailored specifi cally to the City’s vision and standards. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or Bob Prasse at 951-787-9222, or email us at pams@ migcom.com or bprasse@migcom.com. Sincerely, Pamela D. Steele Principal G.12.b Packet Pg. 231 Attachment: MIG On-Call Planning and Environmental Services Proposal-FINAL_04.22.19 (Professional Services -On Call Planning and G.12.b Packet Pg. 232 Attachment: MIG On-Call Planning and Environmental Services Proposal-FINAL_04.22.19 (Professional Services -On Call Planning and MIG Environmental and Planning Services YEARS IN BUSINESS | DATE ESTABLISHED 37 years | 1982 COMPANY OWNERSHIP California Corporation PRINCIPAL OFFICERS Pamela Steele, Principal Riverside Offi ce 1500 Iowa Avenue, Suite 110 | Riverside, CA 92507 P: (951) 787-9222 | F: (951) 781-6014 pams@migcom.com Bob Prasse, Director of Environmental Services Riverside Offi ce 1500 Iowa Avenue, Suite 110 | Riverside, CA 92507 P: (951) 787-9222 | F: (951) 781-6014 bprasse@migcom.com MIG is a multidisciplinary fi rm that provides environmental, planning, design, management, communications and technology services to public and private agencies throughout California and the United States. We develop innovative planning and design solutions through a highly interactive and participatory process. We specialize in contract planning, CEQA compliance, landscape architecture, park and recreation planning, urban planning, entitlement, environmental and ecological planning and design. MIG has successfully assisted public and private agencies with their contract planning and environmental; engaging communities, stakeholders and decision-makers in planning, policy and design projects. We offer a full range of planning and environmental services and assist in creating innovative environments that: • Foster a sense of place; • Contribute to neighborhood and community identity; • Promote public safety; • Facilitate intergenerational recreation opportunities; • Promote environmental stewardship and sustainability; • Honor the community’s history and natural environment; • Meet maintenance and program needs; and • Support revenue generating goals. Our work is characterized by a dedication to quality, a fl exible approach, compliance with City, State and Federal require- ments, creativity in planning and design, and a commitment to completing projects on time and within budget. Over the past three decades MIG has grown to be a strong team of over 260 employees. The diversity of our staff bridges technical expertise and values, and facilitates the exchange of information between all parties engaged in the planning and design process. Staff backgrounds include urban and regional planning, environmental analysis, landscape architecture, public participation, communications, graphic design, and public policy. AREAS OF EXPERTISE • Contract Planning (On-site and On-call) • Environmental Services (CEQA/NEPA) • Technical Services Including: Air Quality and Climate Change Analysis, Energy Analysis, Health Risk Assess- ments, Biological Resources Analysis, Acoustical and Vibration Analysis, and Visual Impact Assessments • Landscape Architecture & Ecological Design • Land Planning • General Plans / Development Codes / Specifi c Plans • Urban Planning & Design • Geographic Information Systems • Graphics / Visual Simulations and Analyses • Entitlement Processing Planning and Environmental Services 1 Firm Overview SECTION A G.12.b Packet Pg. 233 Attachment: MIG On-Call Planning and Environmental Services Proposal-FINAL_04.22.19 (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Approach to On-Call Contracts MIG has successfully initiated, organized, and managed MIG has successfully initiated, organized, and managed a diverse array of planning and environmental projects in a diverse array of planning and environmental projects in western San Bernardino County,western San Bernardino County, as well as many CEQA and NEPA documents for Southern California cities and jurisdic- tions throughout the entire state. Our staff has a long and successful record working on complex planning and environ- mental projects, including tasks through on-call contracts and third party peer review of all types of environmental documents. We understand the unique project and staffi ng needs required of on-call contracts, necessitating proactive management, quickly formulating project teams, and aligning expectations between the client and the consultant. Our experienced staff is capable of acting as the extension of the Grand Terrace Community Development Services Department. We can coordinate Project and CEQA Review, including the applicable noticing and submittal require- ments for public disclosure and processes through the State Clearinghouse and/or County. Our staff is also experienced in making presentations to Commissions, City Councils, and community groups. As a multidisciplinary fi rm, our array of services benefi ts clients; we can seamlessly integrate our areas of expertise to support the specifi c characteristics and unique environmental challenges of each project. MEETING ON-CALL PROJECT NEEDS MIG utilizes integrated project management and accounting software to ensure that our projects are completed on time and within budget. We will work with City staff to expedite the process of acquiring and managing new assignments, thus ensuring project delivery, quality control, and quality assurance, as well as full capability and fl exibility to provide the appropriate services when needed. STAFF AVAILABILITY With over 260 people on staff, MIG is able to advance multiple assignments simultaneously. We have the personnel and fi rm resources to accommodate new projects and to respond to unexpected assignments. Our project teams are assembled based on staff expertise and capacity. The MIG staff assigned to any project that may come from this on-call contract will be committed for the duration of the project, and their current workload will not impact their availability to successfully complete the assignment. All our projects and staff capacity are monitored and scheduled in coordination with existing project workloads. Weekly in-house fi rm wide Management Team meetings ensure a high level of communication among project leaders and the effi cient allocation of personnel and other fi rm resources. Additional meetings are held with business lines that frequently work together on projects; in particular, our planning, design, and environmental planning groups work closely to ensure optimal allocation of staff to projects. 2 City of Grand Terrace FIRM OVERVIEW G.12.b Packet Pg. 234 Attachment: MIG On-Call Planning and Environmental Services Proposal-FINAL_04.22.19 (Professional Services -On Call Planning and MIG Contract Planning Services MIG has a long history of providing contract planning services to Southern California jurisdictions. We place seasoned contract planning professionals who are experienced with how local jurisdictions work and are able to quickly familiarize themselves with City procedures and processes. Our staff can address your needs with their knowledge of land planning, zoning, design guidelines, as well as the Subdivision Map Act. We are familiar with the challenges that cities face and are prepared to start work immediately upon award of contract. Our team knows how to get up to speed quickly and keep projects moving. Our breadth of experience is not the only thing that distin- guishes MIG. Our staff are actual employees of the company, not subcontractors. This sets us apart from other organiza- tions because it fosters a stable, dependable environment for our staff, where they feel secure and committed even as assignments change. Our staff regularly attend MIG staff meetings and events, as well as continued staff training, assuring that the City of Grand Terrace will get true planning professionals, committed to excellence -- not the subcon- tractors of contractors. We invest in our employees to help them be productive members of both the MIG Team and our clients' teams. To retain the best employees, we focus on the overall satisfaction of employees with their jobs, which allows them to focus on their work --meeting the clients needs. ON-SITE/ON-CALL ASSISTANCE MIG has offi ces throughout Southern California, including Riverside, Pasadena, and Fullerton. Our staff is ready to work on-site part- or full-time. Since we have local offi ces and planning specialists, we are immediately available to City Hall, or we can provide remote or off-site assistance to the City for those projects that do not require on-going on-site assistance. In these cases, our staff works in MIG offi ces, while closely coordinating and collaborating with City Staff, coming to City Hall whenever they are needed for meetings, presentations, etc. MIG’s local presence gives us the fl exi- bility to fully meet the City’s needs, whether full-or part-time, on-site or off. The MIG Team includes professional planners who were selected based on their specialized capabilities and experience. We are pleased to present a team with a depth of knowledge from working in many cities and processing hundreds of cases, from pre-application stage, through the the fi nal approval and even Certifi cate of Occupancy. We will provide focused, continuous involvement of key staff, supplemented by the strategic addition of specialized staff at the appropriate time, as needed. Typical examples of our planning services include initial site assessments, reviewing projects for completeness and compliance with the General Plan, Zoning Ordinances, Specifi c Plan and Design Guidelines,Design Guidelines, and all applicable codes and ordinances, and preparing letters for Director’s review. Also, we will attend Development Advisory Board meetings, coordinate comments from members of the Development Advisory Board, meet with applicants, and coordinate the project review with CEQA review. In addition, we will prepare public hearing notices, staff reports, resolutions and condi- tions of approval, attend Planning Commission and/or City Council meetings, and manage the project fi les. Following project approval, we have experience in plan check review of projects including, but not limited to construction plans, grading plan, landscape and irrigation plans, lighting plans, etc. for compliance with conditions of approval and mitigation measures. MIG has supplied on-call and contract services to over 100 cities, counties and special districts. Additionally, we provide project management for all types of development application processing. Our services range from full-time staff, including entire planning departments to interim, part-time and on-call contracts. Our contract staff work directly with cities and counties as staff as well as with three-party contracts where developers agree to pay the jurisdiction for the services of a dedicated contract planner to manage their particular project. Planning and Environmental Services 3 FIRM OVERVIEW G.12.b Packet Pg. 235 Attachment: MIG On-Call Planning and Environmental Services Proposal-FINAL_04.22.19 (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental On-Call Services MIG’s CEQA work is guided by three principles: fi rst, the methodology and content are consistent with the most current CEQA statutes, guidelines, and case law; second, that mitigation recommendations are realistic and feasible; and, third, that fi ndings are effectively presented through clear and concise writing, informative graphic design, and skillful oral presentation. These principles result in legally sound CEQA documents that fully and clearly inform the public, decision-makers, and interested agencies. MIG assumes project work will primarily be a mix of EIRs and IS/MNDs. Compared to preparing an EIR, the sequences for preparing an IS/MND or ND are similar but occur on a substan- tially reduced schedule with fewer noticing requirements. CEQA/NEPA DOCUMENTS MIG’s dedicated environmental staff have the background and experience to properly scope and prepare environmental impact analysis documents for a wide variety of projects. MIG prepares clearly written, legally defensible environmental impact reports (EIR) and other CEQA/NEPA compliance documentation—initial studies (IS)/mitigated negative decla- rations (MND), environmental assessments (EA)/Findings of No Signifi cant Impact (FONSI), environmental impact statements (EIS), and Categorical Exemptions/Exclusions. We specialize in preparing both “project-specifi c” environ- mental documents for site-specifi c industrial, residential, commercial, institutional, and mixed-use developments, as well as broad-based “program EIRs” for specifi c plans, general plans, and other policy plans. MIG has successfully completed over 300 EIRs, as well as numerous other CEQA and NEPA compliance documents for public agencies. We also provide third party peer review services for all types of CEQA and NEPA environmental documents and technical studies. We regularly provide these services to the City of Menifee and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. We have provided more than 50 reviews in the last calendar year alone. VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENTS MIG’s graphic and computer simulation staff specialize in computerized view simulations and preparation of visual impact analyses. Our team can prepare and/or review visual simulations, urban design height analyses, shade studies, and other illustrative plans needed for all types of projects. Our team has extensive experience creating illustrations and analyzing environments allowing for objective review and understanding of projects. BIOLOGICAL SITE SURVEYS / SPECIAL-STATUS SPECIES SURVEYS MIG’s experience in biological studies and impact assess- ments includes the preparation of biological surveys to evaluate existing conditions and the presence of sensitive habitat or special-status plant or animal species and appli- cable laws pertaining to the resources found. Biological impact assessments evaluate the effects of a proposed project on biological resources and are used to support CEQA/ NEPA documents and permit applications. MIG also provides the technical support required for Endan- gered Species Act Section 7 or Section 10 consultations and California Fish and Wildlife Endangered Species Act 2081 permits. We have expertise in assessing the potential occurrence of many sensitive species, including many butterfl y species and birds such as the coastal California gnat catcher, least bell’s vireo, and Cooper’s hawk. REGULATORY PERMITTING MIG’s wetland delineators maintain current training and can identify whether specifi c areas are covered under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), US Department of Fish and Wildlife (USFWS), California Coastal Commission, and local regulatory agencies. MIG assists cities or projects in obtaining permits from various regulatory agencies, including, but not limited to, the 404 Nationwide or Individual Permits from the USACE, the Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement from CDFW, and the 401 Water Quality Certifi cation from the RWQCB. MIG prepares technical studies required for these permits as well as the permit applications. AIR QUALITY IMPACT AND HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENTS MIG prepares the technical air quality analyses necessary to obtain CEQA, NEPA, and other permitting/regulatory approvals from regional, state, and federal air agencies. MIG 4 City of Grand Terrace FIRM OVERVIEW G.12.b Packet Pg. 236 Attachment: MIG On-Call Planning and Environmental Services Proposal-FINAL_04.22.19 (Professional Services -On Call Planning and prepares area and fugitive (e.g., dust and emissions from soil disturbance and material transfer), mobile, and stationary source emissions estimates using agency-recommended models. The emissions estimates developed by these models and methodologies are compared to regulatory thresholds of respective air quality management districts, CEQA signifi cance thresholds or other state or federal regulatory requirements as appropriate. MIG is skilled in quantifying the emissions levels from all aspects of a project, comparing emissions levels and concen- trations against applicable thresholds, and developing project design features or mitigation measures that reduce project emissions and associated risks. ENERGY MIG also has expertise in evaluating the new energy impact requirements of the recently amended state CEQA Guide- lines, including project energy consumption is estimated using information from air quality emissions estimates or modeling conducted for the project. MIG would then evaluate whether the project would result in the wasteful, ineffi cient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, including mobile sources. Energy saving factors analyzed would include, site layout and orientation, proximity to regional arterials, building design, and any trip reducing or other energy saving operations that result in the effi cient use of available energy resources. GREENHOUSE GAS (GHG) / CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT In California, local land use authorities are required to consider the effects of project- and plan-level greenhouse gas emissions as part of the CEQA review process. Many of the models (e.g., CalEEMod) and inventories (e.g., OFFROAD) MIG uses to estimate emissions of criteria air pollutants like particulate matter also quantify GHG emissions from common GHG sources like vehicles, electricity consumption, space heating, etc.; however, the methods for evaluating GHG emissions levels can differ from traditional air quality analyses because GHG emissions represent a global impact, and there are a myriad of state, national, and international goals, policies, and programs adopted for the purposes of reducing GHG emissions. GHG emissions are also produced from less common but high-emitting sources such as refrigerants and electrical insulators that fall outside the scope of traditional air quality analyses. Planning and Environmental Services 5 NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT MIG performs noise monitoring and impact assessments for environmental analysis, mitigation monitoring, and other compliance purposes. MIG has the necessary expertise and equipment to monitor pre- and post-project noise levels, documenting in-situ attenuation patterns, and evaluating the effectiveness of noise-reducing insulation and infrastructure. MIG has monitored noise levels from construction equipment, traffi c, public events (with and without amplifi ed sound), and various types of stationary equipment (e.g., HVAC units, generators, concrete batch plants). MIG collects and analyzes project-specifi c noise data to assess the compatibility of pre- and post-project noise levels with zoning standards, general plan standards, and general quality of life standards. MIG staff can clearly articulate noise impact fi ndings to decision-making bodies and have worked with community members, project architects, municipal staff, and project proponents to develop mitigation in the form of operating restrictions, sound barriers, and sound power output limits that provide community and project benefi ts. CULTURAL AND PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES We take a comprehensive and technical approach in our cultural resource services to support CEQA documents with the goal of developing feasible strategies that move a project forward while satisfying applicable environmental regulations. Cultural resource services are conducted by a qualifi ed MIG archaeologist. Cultural services are conducted in accordance with industry standards and state requirements and guidelines. Paleontological services will be performed by a qualifi ed MIG paleontologist. All palentological services and technical reports will be prepared in a manner consistent with industry standard procedures for the assessment and mitigation of adverse impacts on paleontological resources. MIG, in a consultative capacity, advises our clients regarding cost-ef- fective options to avoid or reduce project impacts. The MIG tailored approach also includes the documentary procedures concerning Native American Consultation and/ or Coordination as specifi ed in SB 18 and AB 52 to ensure their involvement in protecting Tribal Cultural Resources, properties and sensitive archaeological sites. FIRM OVERVIEW G.12.b Packet Pg. 237 Attachment: MIG On-Call Planning and Environmental Services Proposal-FINAL_04.22.19 (Professional Services -On Call Planning and SECTION B PAMELA STEELE Ms. Steele will serve as the primary Contract/Project Manager for the City of Grand Terrace. She will coordinate direct staffi ng service to the City, coordinating all of the City’s staff needs. Ms. Steele has over 30 years of public sector planning experience, including entitlement processing, advanced planning projects, land use, policy planning and implementation, and CEQA project management. Working with our staff or the public, Ms. Steele can address confl ict and challenges, fi nding intelligent and well-communicated solutions. Planning Team LISETTE SANCHEZ-MENDOZA Ms. Sanchez-Mendoza has over 13 years of planning in the public sector, working with the City of Covina, City of Murrieta, City of Hesperia, and the County of San Bernardino, where she has managed numerous entitlement projects, including industrial, commercial, and residential development projects. In addition, she has signifi cant experience in the devel- opment of policy through amendments to the City Municipal Code. Ms. Sanchez-Mendoza is well versed in community development, planning, and administrative processes. MINA MORGAN Mr. Morgan is an Associate Planner with MIG’s Contract Planning Services team with over 6 years of experience. He has worked in the public sector providing contract planning services to the City of Big Bear Lake, City of Menifee, Orange County, and Sonoma County. Mr. Morgan has experience processing entitlement projects, developing staff reports, conditions of approval, and presenting to approval bodies.. He has experience with current and long-range planning applications involving the General Plan, zoning, development standards, subdivisions, variances, home occupation permits, variances, temporary use permits, and conditional use permits. Mr. Morgan served as the Team Lead for the Planned Commu- nities Division in the Orange County Planning Department supervising not only MIG contract staff, but also the staff of four other consulting fi rms, to ensure timely and accurate processing of permits and entitlements. Environmental Team BOB PRASSE Mr. Prasse will serve as Project Manager for CEQA Services and brings over 30 year of experience in environmental planning. Bob has prepared numerous complex and controversial EIR’s and other environmental documents. He has also prepared and is familiar with Specifi c Plans, zoning ordinances and general plans. JOHN CAMPBELL, PHD Mr. Campbell has over 16 years of experience in biological services in conjunction with the implementation of environ- mental policies and compliance with local, state and federal regulations. He is profi cient at performing assessments of wetland function, jurisdictional delineations, general and focused biological surveys, and construction monitoring. CHRISTOPHER PURTELL, RPA With over 14 years of archaeological experience, Mr. Purtell will serve as Archaeologist and Cultural Resource Specialist. He is well-versed in environmental compliance, archaeological surveys, excavation, monitoring, data recovery, laboratory analysis and in developing mitigation and treatment plans. CHRIS DUGAN Mr. Dugan has 12 years experience planning, preparing and managing environmental compliance documents required by local, state and federal regulations, including air quality and greenhouse gas studies, health risk assessments, energy, noise, and vibration studies. CAMERON HILE Mr. Hile will serve as Primary Project Analyst supporting our environmental planning group’s development of a variety of environmental documents such as EIR’s, Initial Studies, Negative Declarations, Mitigated Negative Declarations, EIR Addenda, and Air Quality Analyses. Additional Staff Members can be made available to the City of Grand Terrace if the need or specifi c expertise is needed. 6 City of Grand Terrace Team Qualifi cations SECTION B G.12.b Packet Pg. 238 Attachment: MIG On-Call Planning and Environmental Services Proposal-FINAL_04.22.19 (Professional Services -On Call Planning and PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Contract Agency Project Dates Description CONTRACT PLANNING County of Riverside 1999-Ongoing MIG has been providing contract planning services to the County Transportation and Land Management Agency for more than 12 years. Currently, MIG has six full-time positions assigned. We also assisted the County with the general plan update, devel- opment of a new zoning ordinance, and preparation of county-wide design guidelines. County of Orange 2007-Ongoing MIG is currently is providing six contract planners to both the Land Use Planning Division and the Planned Development Division of the Public Works Department. Services have and/or currently include providing staffi ng the public counter, entitlement processing services, post-entitlement permit plan check and issuance services, preparation of environmental documents and peer review of environmental documents prepared by other consultants. City of Hemet 2013-Ongoing MIG provides part-time staffi ng services for the City of Hemet City of Menifee 2013-Ongoing We have provided the Interim Community Development Director as well as two support contract staffers to the City. We are currently providing CEQA Services and peer reviews of CEQA documents. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES City of El Segundo 2014-2018 For the Smoky Hollow Specifi c Plan Update and EIR, MIG provided Comprehensive update and associated program EIR for a 120-acre industrial and offi ce district that will increase building area from a little less than 2.5 million square feet to approximately 3 million square feet as redevelopment occurs over time. The update also includes circulation system improvements and parking supply increase. Key environmental issues included land use, noise, traffi c, air quality, greenhouse gases and historical resources. City of Rancho Cucamonga 2017-Ongoing MIG provided a Peer Review, Fourth and Utica Warehouse IS/MND MIG performed a comprehensive peer review of an IS/MND for a 14-acre, 293,000 square foot, three- building warehouse distribution center. Associated technical study reviews included air quality and greenhouse gases, Health Risk Assessment, Biotic Resources including the Delhi Sands fl ower-loving fl y, cultural resources and an acoustical analysis. MIG also provides environmental services including the preparation of IS/MNDs and peer review for the City. City of Highland 2016-2017 MIG prepared an IS/MND and technical studies for the Church and Fifth Street Warehouses project two-building. 117,860 square foot warehouse project located on 12.5 acres. Key issues included, traffi c, air quality and noise. Planning and Environmental Services 7 Project Summary List SECTION C jy G.12.b Packet Pg. 239 Attachment: MIG On-Call Planning and Environmental Services Proposal-FINAL_04.22.19 (Professional Services -On Call Planning and 8 City of Grand Terrace Subconsultant SECTION D    GIANCARLOGANDDINI,PE,PTP Principal  GiancarloGanddinihasextensiveexperiencein trafficengineeringandtransportationplanningfor publicandprivatesectorprojectsthroughout California.Hehasdirectedandassistedonhundreds ofprojectsinvolvingtransportationandparking analysis,withanemphasisontrafficimpactstudies forenvironmentaldocumentation.  Giancarloispassionateaboutapplyinghisexpertise todevelopcreativesolutionsforbothcommonand uniquetrafficissuesinvolvingroadwayoperations, trafficforecasting,impactanalysis,parking operations,roadwaysafety,andmultiŊmodal circulation.Heiswellversedinthestandardsof transportationplanningpracticeandisskilledat communicatingcomplextrafficengineeringconcepts tothepublicanddecisionmakers.  HisleadershipinvolvementwiththeInstituteof TransportationEngineershasallowedhimtobuild strongrelationshipswithcolleaguesandstaywell informedofcurrentbestŊpracticesanddeveloping transportationtrends.Theseleadershipskillshave alsobeeninstrumentalindirectingourteamat GanddiniGroup,Inc.  RELEVANTPROJECTEXPERIENCE:  ƒ8822EtiwandaAvenueTruckTerminalTrafficImpactAnalysis|CityofRanchoCucamonga ƒCampRockSolarConstructionManagementPlan|CountyofSanBernardino ƒEtiwandaTCEPGrantTravelTimeAnalysis|CityofRanchoCucamonga ƒGarnetStreetBridgeReplacementTrafficImpactAnalysis|CountyofSanBernardino ƒGeneralPlanUpdateTrafficImpactAnalysis|CityofWalnut ƒGreenHorizonsCultivationFacilityTrafficImpactAnalysis|CityofDesertHotSprings ƒHyssopDriveTrafficImpactAnalysis|CityofRanchoCucamonga ƒJazminSolarProjectFocusedTrafficAnalysis|CountyofSanBernardino ƒLakeGregoryDamRehabilitationHauling&CirculationAssessment|CountyofSanBernardino ƒLugoniaAvenueResidentialTrafficAnalysisPeerReview|CityofRedlands ƒRichmondPlace/6thStreetTrafficSignalWarrantAnalysis|CityofRanchoCucamonga ƒWalnutRanchParkTrafficImpactAnalysis|CityofWalnut ƒVictorValleyCommunityCollegeStudentServicesTrafficImpactAnalysis|CityofVictorville ƒVillageBuildoutPlanTrafficImpactAnalysis|CityofLaQuinta  CERTIFICATIONS:  ProfessionalEngineer(Traffic),TR2663 StateofCalifornia  ProfessionalTransportationPlanner,No.597 TransportationProfessionalCertificationBoard  EDUCATION:  UniversityofCalifornia,Irvine: B.S.CivilEngineering  PROFESSIONALAFFILIATIONS:  InstituteofTransportationEngineers(ITE) ƒSecretary/TreasurerŊWesternDistrict ƒPastPresident,VicePresident,Secretary/ Treasurer–SouthernCaliforniaSection  OrangeCountyTrafficEngineeringCouncil  HONORS&AWARDS:  YoungTransportationEngineeroftheYear(2011), ITESouthernCaliforniaSection Traf fi c G.12.b Packet Pg. 240 Attachment: MIG On-Call Planning and Environmental Services Proposal-FINAL_04.22.19 (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Planning and Environmental Services 9 We invite you to contact the following references regarding our professionalism, problem-solving abilities, product quality and on time and on budget performance. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Juan C. Perez, Director of Trans. & Land Management 951-955-6742 jcperez@rctlma.org COUNTY OF ORANGE PLANNING SERVICES Ms. Laree Brommer, Manager Planned Communities Div. 714-667-9649 laree.brommer@ocpw.ocgov.com CITY OF HEMET PLANNING SERVICES Deanna Elliano, Community Development Director 951-765-2375 delliano@cityofhemet.org CITY OF MENIFEE CONTRACT STAFFING Lisa Gordon, Planning Manager 951-672-6777 lgordon@cityofmenifee.us CITY OF LOMA LINDA ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Guillermo Arreola, Associate Planner Community Development Department 909-799-2830 garreola@lomalinda-ca.gov CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Candyce Burnett, City Planner Community Development Department 909-477-2750 candyce.burnett@cityofrc.us References SECTION E G.12.b Packet Pg. 241 Attachment: MIG On-Call Planning and Environmental Services Proposal-FINAL_04.22.19 (Professional Services -On Call Planning and 10 City of Grand Terrace MIG’s project team fee schedules are provided in a separate sealed envelope as requested in the RFQ. Fee Schedule SECTION F G.12.b Packet Pg. 242 Attachment: MIG On-Call Planning and Environmental Services Proposal-FINAL_04.22.19 (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Fee Schedule - Planning and Environmental Services Schedule of Hourly Rates MIG is sensitive to the budget challenges cities face today. Our standard fee schedule is provided for the City’s review and consideration. However, we can structure a fee arrangement for Grand Terrace that provides the highest quality of service while addressing your needs for specifi c project assignments. Classifi cation Rate Principal $205.00 Director of Environmental Services / Analyses $185.00 Senior Project Planner $125.00 Primary Analyst $125.00 Associate Project Planner $100.00 Assistant Project Planner $90.00 Assistant Analyst $90.00 Word Processing $65.00 Reimbursable Expenses The following reimbursable expenses will be charged for tasks/projects assigned by the Staff when the cost is incurred by MIG. Description Cost Black/White Prints $0.10/page Color Prints $1.00/page 11”x17” Color Prints $2.00/page Postage At Cost Other Cost plus 10% Expert Witness Fee If requested to be an expert witness by the City, the fees for deposition and testimony will be billed at $350.00/hour. G.12.b Packet Pg. 243 Attachment: MIG On-Call Planning and Environmental Services Proposal-FINAL_04.22.19 (Professional Services -On Call Planning and 01247.0005/553298.1 5/8/2019 AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES By and Between CITY OF GRAND TERRACE and MOORE IACOFANO GOLTSMAN, INCORPORATED G.12.c Packet Pg. 244 Attachment: GT_ MIG On Call Services Agreement (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01247.0005/553298.1 5/8/2019 -2- AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE AND MOORE IACOFANO GOLTSMAN, INCORPORATED This “AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE AND MOORE IACOFANO GOLTSMAN, INCORPORATED (herein “Agreement”) is made and entered into this 14th day of May, 2019 by and between the City of Grand Terrace, a California municipal corporation (“City”) and Moore Iacofano Goltsman, Incorporated, a California corporation (“Consultant”). City and Consultant are sometimes hereinafter individually referred to as “Party” and hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Parties.” RECITALS A. City has sought the performance of the services, defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement, pursuant to the City of Grand Terrace Municipal Code. B. Consultant was selected by the City to perform those services more particularly described in Article 1 of this Agreement.. C. Pursuant to the City of Grand Terrace Municipal Code, City has authority to enter into and execute this Agreement. D. The Parties desire to formalize the selection of Consultant for performance of those services defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement and desire that the terms of that performance be as particularly defined and described herein. OPERATIVE PROVISIONS NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants made by the Parties and contained herein and other consideration, the value and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: ARTICLE 1. SERVICES OF CONSULTANT 1.1 Scope of Services. In compliance with all terms and conditions of this Agreement, the Consultant shall provide those services specified in the “Scope of Services” attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference, which may be referred to herein as the “services” or “work” hereunder. As a material inducement to the City entering into this Agreement, Consultant represents and warrants that it has the qualifications, experience, and facilities necessary to properly perform the services required under this Agreement in a thorough, competent, and professional manner, and is experienced in performing the work and services contemplated herein. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of its ability, experience and talent, perform all services described herein. Consultant covenants that it shall follow the highest professional standards in performing the work and services required G.12.c Packet Pg. 245 Attachment: GT_ MIG On Call Services Agreement (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01247.0005/553298.1 5/8/2019 -3- hereunder and that all materials will be both of good quality as well as fit for the purpose intended. For purposes of this Agreement, the phrase “highest professional standards” shall mean those standards of practice recognized by one or more first-class firms performing similar work under similar circumstances. 1.2 Consultant’s Proposal. The Scope of Service shall include the Consultant’s scope of work or bid which shall be incorporated herein by this reference as though fully set forth herein. In the event of any inconsistency between the terms of such proposal and this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall govern. 1.3 Compliance with Law. Consultant shall keep itself informed concerning, and shall render all services hereunder in accordance with, all ordinances, resolutions, statutes, rules, and regulations of the City and any Federal, State or local governmental entity having jurisdiction in effect at the time service is rendered. 1.4 Licenses, Permits, Fees and Assessments. Consultant shall obtain at its sole cost and expense such licenses, permits and approvals as may be required by law for the performance of the services required by this Agreement. Consultant shall have the sole obligation to pay for any fees, assessments and taxes, plus applicable penalties and interest, which may be imposed by law and arise from or are necessary for the Consultant’s performance of the services required by this Agreement, and shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City, its officers, employees or agents of City, against any such fees, assessments, taxes, penalties or interest levied, assessed or imposed against City hereunder. 1.5 Familiarity with Work. By executing this Agreement, Consultant warrants that Consultant (i) has thoroughly investigated and considered the scope of services to be performed, (ii) has carefully considered how the services should be performed, and (iii) fully understands the facilities, difficulties and restrictions attending performance of the services under this Agreement. If the services involve work upon any site, Consultant warrants that Consultant has or will investigate the site and is or will be fully acquainted with the conditions there existing, prior to commencement of services hereunder. Should the Consultant discover any latent or unknown conditions, which will materially affect the performance of the services hereunder, Consultant shall immediately inform the City of such fact and shall not proceed except at Consultant’s risk until written instructions are received from the Contract Officer. 1.6 Care of Work. The Consultant shall adopt reasonable methods during the life of the Agreement to furnish continuous protection to the work, and the equipment, materials, papers, documents, plans, studies and/or other components thereof to prevent losses or damages, and shall be G.12.c Packet Pg. 246 Attachment: GT_ MIG On Call Services Agreement (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01247.0005/553298.1 5/8/2019 -4- responsible for all such damages, to persons or property, until acceptance of the work by City, except such losses or damages as may be caused by City’s own negligence. 1.7 Further Responsibilities of Parties. Both parties agree to use reasonable care and diligence to perform their respective obligations under this Agreement. Both parties agree to act in good faith to execute all instruments, prepare all documents and take all actions as may be reasonably necessary to carry out the purposes of this Agreement. Unless hereafter specified, neither party shall be responsible for the service of the other. 1.8 Additional Services. City shall have the right at any time during the performance of the services, without invalidating this Agreement, to order extra work beyond that specified in the Scope of Services or make changes by altering, adding to or deducting from said work. No such extra work may be undertaken unless a written order is first given by the Contract Officer to the Consultant, incorporating therein any adjustment in (i) the Contract Sum for the actual costs of the extra work, and/or (ii) the time to perform this Agreement, which said adjustments are subject to the written approval of the Consultant. Any increase in compensation of up to ten percent (10%) of the Contract Sum or $25,000, whichever is less; or, in the time to perform of up to one hundred eighty (180) days, may be approved by the Contract Officer. Any greater increases, taken either separately or cumulatively, must be approved by the City Council. It is expressly understood by Consultant that the provisions of this Section shall not apply to services specifically set forth in the Scope of Services. Consultant hereby acknowledges that it accepts the risk that the services to be provided pursuant to the Scope of Services may be more costly or time consuming than Consultant anticipates and that Consultant shall not be entitled to additional compensation therefor. City may in its sole and absolute discretion have similar work done by other consultants. No claims for an increase in the Contract Sum or time for performance shall be valid unless the procedures established in this Section are followed. 1.9 Special Requirements. Additional terms and conditions of this Agreement, if any, which are made a part hereof are set forth in the “Special Requirements” attached hereto as Exhibit “B” and incorporated herein by this reference. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of Exhibit “B” and any other provisions of this Agreement, the provisions of Exhibit “B” shall govern. ARTICLE 2. COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT. 2.1 Contract Sum. Subject to any limitations set forth in this Agreement, City agrees to pay Con sultant the amounts specified in the “Schedule of Compensation” attached hereto as Exhibit “C” and incorporated herein by this reference. The total compensation, including reimbursement for actual expenses, shall not exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit “C” (the “Contract Sum”), unless additional compensation is approved pursuant to Section 1.8. G.12.c Packet Pg. 247 Attachment: GT_ MIG On Call Services Agreement (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01247.0005/553298.1 5/8/2019 -5- 2.2 Method of Compensation. The method of compensation may include: (i) a lump sum payment upon completion; (ii) payment in accordance with specified tasks or the percentage of completion of the services, less contract retention; (iii) payment for time and materials based upon the Consultant’s rates as specified in the Schedule of Compensation, provided that (a) time estimates are provided for the performance of sub tasks, (b) contract retention is maintained, and (c) the Contract Sum is not exceeded; or (iv) such other methods as may be specified in the Schedule of Compensation. 2.3 Reimbursable Expenses. Compensation may include reimbursement for actual and necessary expenditures for reproduction costs, telephone expenses, and travel expenses approved by the Contract Officer in advance, or actual subcontractor expenses of an approved subcontractor pursuant to Section 4.5, and only if specified in the Schedule of Compensation. The Contract Sum shall include the attendance of Consultant at all project meetings reasonably deemed necessary by the City. Coordination of the performance of the work with City is a critical component of the services. If Consultant is required to attend additional meetings to facilitate such coordination, Consultant shall not be entitled to any additional compensation for attending said meetings. 2.4 Invoices. Each month Consultant shall furnish to City an original invoice for all work performed and expenses incurred during the preceding month in a form approved by City’s Director of Finance. By submitting an invoice for payment under this Agreement, Consultant is certifying compliance with all provisions of the Agreement. The invoice shall detail charges for all necessary and actual expenses by the following categories: labor (by sub-category), travel, materials, equipment, supplies, and sub-contractor contracts. Sub-contractor charges shall also be detailed by such categories. Consultant shall not invoice City for any duplicate services performed by more than one person. City shall independently review each invoice submitted by the Consultant to determine whether the work performed and expenses incurred are in compliance with the provisions of this Agreement. Except as to any charges for work performed or expenses incurred by Consultant which are disputed by City, or as provided in Section 7.3, City will use its best efforts to cause Consultant to be paid within forty-five (45) days of receipt of Consultant’s correct and undisputed invoice; however, Consultant acknowledges and agrees that due to City warrant run procedures, the City cannot guarantee that payment will occur within this time period. In the event any charges or expenses are disputed by City, the original invoice shall be returned by City to Consultant for correction and resubmission. Review and payment by City for any invoice provided by the Consultant shall not constitute a waiver of any rights or remedies provided herein or any applicable law. 2.5 Waiver. Payment to Consultant for work performed pursuant to this Agreement shall not be deemed to waive any defects in work performed by Consultant. G.12.c Packet Pg. 248 Attachment: GT_ MIG On Call Services Agreement (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01247.0005/553298.1 5/8/2019 -6- ARTICLE 3. PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE 3.1 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement. 3.2 Schedule of Performance. Consultant shall commence the services pursuant to this Agreement upon receipt of a written notice to proceed and shall perform all services within the time period(s) established in the “Schedule of Performance” attached hereto as Exhibit “D” and incorporated herein by this reference. When requested by the Consultant, extensions to the time period(s) specified in the Schedule of Performance may be approved in writing by the Contract Officer but no t exceeding one hundred eighty (180) days cumulatively. 3.3 Force Majeure. The time period(s) specified in the Schedule of Performance for performance of the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be extended because of any delays due to unforeseeable causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the Consultant, including, but not restricted to, acts of God or of the public enemy, unusually severe weather, fires, earthquakes, floods, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, riots, strikes, freight embargoes, wars, litigation, and/or acts of any governmental agency, including the City, if the Consultant shall within ten (10) days of the commencement of such delay notify the Contract Officer in writing of the causes of the delay. The Contract Officer shall ascertain the facts and the extent of delay, and extend the time for performing the services for the period of the enforced delay when and if in the judgment of the Contract Officer such delay is justified. The Contract Officer’s determination shall be final and conclusive upon the parties to this Agreement. In no event shall Consultant be entitled to recover damages against the City for any delay in the performance of this Agreement, however caused, Consultant’s sole remedy being extension of the Agreement pursuant to this Section. 3.4 Term. Unless earlier terminated in accordance with Article 7 of this Agreement, this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect until completion of the services but not exceeding one (1) years from the date hereof, except as otherwise provided in the Schedule of Performance (Exhibit “D”). ARTICLE 4. COORDINATION OF WORK 4.1 Representatives and Personnel of Consultant. The following principals of Consultant (“Principals”) are hereby designated as being the principals and representatives of Consultant authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the work specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith: G.12.c Packet Pg. 249 Attachment: GT_ MIG On Call Services Agreement (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01247.0005/553298.1 5/8/2019 -7- Pamela D. Steele, Principal (Name) (Title) (Name) (Title) (Name) (Title) It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of the foregoing principals were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, the foregoing principals shall be responsible during the term of this Agreement for directing all activities of Consultant and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the services hereunder. All personnel of Consultant, and any authorized agents, shall at all times be under the exclusive direction and control of the Principals. For purposes of this Agreement, the foregoing Principals may not be replaced nor may their responsibilities be substantially reduced by Consultant without the express written approval of City. Additionally, Consultant shall utilize only competent personnel to perform services pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall make every reasonable effort to maintain the stability and continuity of Consultant’s staff and subcontractors, if any, assigned to perform the services required under this Agreement. Consultant shall notify City of any changes in Consultant’s staff and subcontractors, if any, assigned to perform the services required under this Agreement, prior to and during any such performance. 4.2 Status of Consultant. Consultant shall have no authority to bind City in any manner, or to incur any obligation, debt or liability of any kind on behalf of or against City, whether by contract or otherwise, unless such authority is expressly conferred under this Agreement or is otherwise expressly conferred in writing by City. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that Consultant or any of Consultant’s officers, employees, or agents are in any manner officials, officers, employees or agents of City. Neither Consultant, nor any of Consultant’s officers, employees or agents, shall obtain any rights to retirement, health care or any other benefits which may otherwise accrue to City’s employees. Consultant expressly waives any claim Consultant may have to any such rights. 4.3 Contract Officer. The Contract Officer shall be G. Harold Duffey, City Manager, or such person as may be designated by the City Manager. It shall be the Consultant’s responsibility to assure that the Contract Officer is kept informed of the progress of the performance of the services and the Consultant shall refer any decisions which must be made by City to the Contract Officer. Unless otherwise specified herein, any approval of City required hereunder shall mean the approval of the Contract Officer. The Contract Officer shall have authority, if specified in writing by the City Manager, to sign all documents on behalf of the City required hereunder to carry out the terms of this Agreement. G.12.c Packet Pg. 250 Attachment: GT_ MIG On Call Services Agreement (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01247.0005/553298.1 5/8/2019 -8- 4.4 Independent Contractor. Neither the City nor any of its employees shall have any control over the manner, mode or means by which Consultant, its agents or employees, perform the services required herein, except as otherwise set forth herein. City shall have no voice in the selection, discharge, supervision or control of Consultant’s employees, servants, representatives or agents, or in fixing their number, compensation or hours of service. Consultant shall perform all services required herein as an independent contractor of City and shall remain at all times as to City a wholly independent contractor with only such obligations as are consistent with that role. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its agents or employees are agents or employees of City. City shall not in any way or for any purpose become or be deemed to be a partner of Consultant in its business or otherwise or a joint venturer or a member of any joint enterprise with Consultant. 4.5 Prohibition Against Subcontracting or Assignment. The experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of Consultant, its principals and employees were a substantial inducement for the City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, Consultant shall not contract with any other entity to perform in whole or in part the services required hereunder without the express written approval of the City. In addition, neither this Agreement nor any interest herein may be transferred, assigned, conveyed, hypothecated or encumbered voluntarily or by operation of law, whether for the benefit of creditors or otherwise, without the prior written approval of City. Transfers restricted hereunder shall include the transfer to any person or group of persons acting in concert of more than twenty five percent (25%) of the present ownership and/or control of Consultant, taking all transfers into account on a cumulative basis. In the event of any such unapproved transfer, including any bankruptcy proceeding, this Agreement shall be void. No approved transfer shall release the Consultant or any surety of Consultant of any liability hereunder without the express consent of City. ARTICLE 5. INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION 5.1 Insurance Coverages. The Consultant shall procure and maintain, at its sole cost and expense, in a form and content satisfactory to City, during the entire term of this Agreement including any extension thereof, the following policies of insurance which shall cover all elected and appointed officers, employees and agents of City: (a) General Liability Insurance (Occurrence Form CG0001 or equivalent). A policy of comprehensive general liability insurance written on a per occurrence basis for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. The policy of insurance shall be in an amount not less than $1,000,000.00 per occurrence or if a general aggregate limit is used, then the general aggregate limit shall be twice the occurrence limit. (b) Worker’s Compensation Insurance. A policy of worker’s compensation insurance in such amount as will fully comply with the laws of the State of California and which shall indemnify, insure and provide legal defense for the Consultant against any loss, claim or damage arising from any injuries or occupational diseases occurring to any worker employed by G.12.c Packet Pg. 251 Attachment: GT_ MIG On Call Services Agreement (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01247.0005/553298.1 5/8/2019 -9- or any persons retained by the Consultant in the course of carrying out the work or services contemplated in this Agreement. (c) Automotive Insurance (Form CA 0001 (Ed 1/87) including “any auto” and endorsement CA 0025 or equivalent). A policy of comprehensive automobile liability insurance written on a per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage in an amount not less than $1,000,000. Said policy shall include coverage for owned, non-owned, leased, hired cars and any automobile. (d) Professional Liability. Professional liability insurance appropriate to the Consultant’s profession. This coverage may be written on a “claims made” basis, and must include coverage for contractual liability. The professional liability insurance required by this Agreement must be endorsed to be applicable to claims based upon, arising out of or related to services performed under this Agreement. The insurance must be maintained for at least 5 consecutive years following the completion of Consultant’s services or the termination of this Agreement. During this additional 5-year period, Consultant shall annually and upon request of the City submit written evidence of this continuous coverage. (e) Subcontractors. Consultant shall include all subcontractors as insureds under its policies or shall furnish separate certificates and certified endorsements for each subcontractor. All coverages for subcontractors shall include all of the requirements stated herein. (f) Additional Insurance. Policies of such other insurance, as may be required in the Special Requirements in Exhibit “B”. 5.2 General Insurance Requirements. All of the above policies of insurance shall be primary insurance and shall name the City, its elected and appointed officers, employees and agents as additional insureds and any insurance maintained by City or its officers, employees or agents may apply in excess of, and not contribute with Consultant’s insurance. The insurer is deemed hereof to waive all rights of subrogation and contribution it may have against the City, its officers, employees and agents and their respective insurers. Moreover, the insurance policy must specify that where the primary insured does not satisfy the self-insured retention, any additional insured may satisfy the self- insured retention. All of said policies of insurance shall provide that said insurance may not be amended or cancelled by the insurer or any party hereto without providing thirty (30) days prior written notice by certified mail return receipt requested to the City. In the event any of said policies of insurance are cancelled, the Consultant shall, prior to the cancellation date, submit new evidence of insurance in conformance with Section 5.1 to the Contract Officer. No work or services under this Agreement shall commence until the Consultant has provided the City with Certificates of Insurance, additional insured endorsement forms or appropriate insurance binders evidencing the above insurance coverages and said Certificates of Insurance or binders are approved by the City. City reserves the right to inspect complete, certified copies of and endorsements to all required insurance policies at any time. Any failure G.12.c Packet Pg. 252 Attachment: GT_ MIG On Call Services Agreement (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01247.0005/553298.1 5/8/2019 -10- to comply with the reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches or warranties shall not affect coverage provided to City. All certificates shall name the City as additional insured (providing the appropriate endorsement) and shall conform to the following “cancellation” notice: CANCELLATION: SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATED THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY SHALL MAIL THIRTY (30)-DAY ADVANCE WRITTEN NOTICE TO CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED HEREIN. [to be initialed] ______________ Consultant Initials City, its respective elected and appointed officers, directors, officials, employees, agents and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities Consultant performs; products and completed operations of Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by Consultant; or any automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City, and their respective elected and appointed officers, officials, employees or volunteers. Consultant’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer’s liability. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City. At the option of City, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects City or its respective elected or appointed officers, officials, employees and volunteers or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration, defense expenses and claims. The Consultant agrees that the requirement to provide insurance shall not be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which the Consultant may be held responsible for the payment of damages to any persons or property resulting from the Consultant’s activities or the activities of any person or persons for which the Consultant is otherwise responsible nor shall it limit the Consultant’s indemnification liabilities as provided in Section 5.3. In the event the Consultant subcontracts any portion of the work in compliance with Section 4.5 of this Agreement, the contract between the Consultant and such subcontractor shall require the subcontractor to maintain the same policies of insurance that the Consultant is required to maintain pursuant to Section 5.1, and such certificates and endorsements shall be provided to City. 5.3 Indemnification. To the full extent permitted by law, Consultant agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its officers, employees and agents (“Indemnified Parties”) against, and will hold and save them and each of them harmless from, any and all actions, either judicial, G.12.c Packet Pg. 253 Attachment: GT_ MIG On Call Services Agreement (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01247.0005/553298.1 5/8/2019 -11- administrative, arbitration or regulatory claims, damages to persons or property, losses, costs, penalties, obligations, errors, omissions or liabilities whether actual or threatened (herein “claims or liabilities”) that may be asserted or claimed by any person, firm or entity arising out of or in connection with the negligent performance of the work, operations or activities provided herein of Consultant, its officers, employees, agents, subcontractors, or invitees, or any individual or entity for which Consultant is legally liable (“indemnitors”), or arising from Consultant’s or indemnitors’ reckless or willful misconduct, or arising from Consultant’s or indemnitors’ negligent performance of or failure to perform any term, provision, covenant or condition of this Agreement, and in connection therewith: (a) Consultant will defend any action or actions filed in connection with any of said claims or liabilities and will pay all costs and expenses, including legal costs and attorney’s fees incurred in connection therewith; (b) Consultant will promptly pay any judgment rendered against the City, its officers, agents or employees for any such claims or liabilities arising out of or in connection with the negligent performance of or failure to perform such work, operations or activities of Consultant hereunder; and Consultant agrees to save and hold the City, its officers, agents, and employees harmless therefrom; (c) In the event the City, its officers, agents or employees is made a party to any action or proceeding filed or prosecuted against Consultant for such damages or other claims arising out of or in connection with the negligent performance of or failure to perform the work, operation or activities of Consultant hereunder, Consultant agrees to pay to the City, its officers, agents or employees, any and all costs and expenses incurred by the City, its officers, agents or employees in such action or proceeding, including but not limited to, legal costs and attorney’s fees. Consultant shall incorporate similar indemnity agreements with its subcontractors and if it fails to do so Consultant shall be fully responsible to indemnify City hereunder therefore, and failure of City to monitor compliance with these provisions shall not be a wai ver hereof. This indemnification includes claims or liabilities arising from any negligent or wrongful act, error or omission, or reckless or willful misconduct of Consultant in the performance of professional services hereunder. The provisions of this Section do not apply to claims or liabilities occurring as a result of City’s sole negligence or willful acts or omissions, but, to the fullest extent permitted by law, shall apply to claims and liabilities resulting in part from City’s negligence, except that design professionals’ indemnity hereunder shall be limited to claims and liabilities arising out of the negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct of the design professional. The indemnity obligation shall be binding on successors and assigns of Consultant and shall survive termination of this Agreement. 5.4 Sufficiency of Insurer. Insurance required by this Agreement shall be satisfactory only if issued by companies qualified to do business in California, rated “A” or better in the most recent edition of Best Rating Guide, The Key Rating Guide or in the Federal Register, and only if they are of a financial category Class VII or better, unless such requirements are waived by the Risk Manager G.12.c Packet Pg. 254 Attachment: GT_ MIG On Call Services Agreement (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01247.0005/553298.1 5/8/2019 -12- of the City (“Risk Manager”) due to unique circumstances. If this Agreement continues for more than 3 years duration, or in the event the risk manager determines that the work or services to be performed under this Agreement creates an increased or decreased risk of loss to the City, the Consultant agrees that the minimum limits of the insurance policies may be changed accordingly upon receipt of written notice from the Risk Manager. ARTICLE 6. RECORDS, REPORTS, AND RELEASE OF INFORMATION 6.1 Records. Consultant shall keep, and require subcontractors to keep, such ledgers, books of accounts, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, reports, studies or other documents relating to the disbursements charged to City and services performed hereunder (the “books and records”), as shall be necessary to perform the services required by this Agreement and enable the Contract Officer to evaluate the performance of such services. Any and all such documents shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be complete and detailed. The Contract Officer shall have full and free access to such books and records at all times during normal business hours of City, including the right to inspect, copy, audit and make records and transcripts from such records. Such records shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years following completion of the services hereunder, and the City shall have access to such records in the event any audit is required. In the event of dissolution of Consultant’s business, custody of the books and records may be given to City, and access shall be provided by Consultant’s successor in interest. Notwithstanding the above, the Consultant shall fully cooperate with the City in providing access to the books and records if a public records request is made and disclosure is required by law including but not limited to the California Public Records Act. 6.2 Reports. Consultant shall periodically prepare and submit to the Contract Officer such reports concerning the performance of the services required by this Agreement as the Contract Officer shall require. Consultant hereby acknowledges that the City is greatly concerned about the cost of work and services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement. For this reason, Consultant agrees that if Consultant becomes aware of any facts, circumstances, techniques, or events that may or will materially increase or decrease the cost of the work or services contemplated herein or, if Consultant is providing design services, the cost of the project being designed, Consultant shall promptly notify the Contract Officer of said fact, circumstance, technique or event and the estimated increased or decreased cost related thereto and, if Consultant is providing design services, the estimated increased or decreased cost estimate for the project being designed. 6.3 Ownership of Documents. All drawings, specifications, maps, designs, photographs, studies, surveys, data, notes, computer files, reports, records, documents and other materials (the “documents and materials”), including any electronic documents and materials, prepared by Consultant, its employees, subcontractors and agents in the performance of this Agreement shall be the property of City and shall be delivered to City in a format of the City’s choice upon request of the Contract Officer or G.12.c Packet Pg. 255 Attachment: GT_ MIG On Call Services Agreement (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01247.0005/553298.1 5/8/2019 -13- upon the termination of this Agreement, and Consultant shall have no claim for further employment or additional compensation as a result of the exercise by City of its full rights of ownership use, reuse, or assignment of the documents and materials hereunder. Any use, reuse or assignment of such completed documents for other projects and/or use of uncompleted documents without specific written authorization by the Consultant will be at the City’s sole risk and without liability to Consultant, and Consultant’s guarantee and warranties shall not extend to such use, reuse or assignment. Consultant may retain copies of such documents for its own use. Consultant shall have the right to use the concepts embodied therein. All subcontractors shall provide for assignment to City of any documents or materials prepared by them, and in the event Consultant fails to secure such assignment, Consultant shall indemnify City for all damages resulting therefrom. Moreover, Consultant with respect to any documents and materials that may qualify as “works made for hire” as defined in 17 U.S.C. § 101, such documents and materials are hereby deemed “works made for hire” for the City. 6.4 Confidentiality and Release of Information. (a) All information gained or work product produced by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential, unless such information is in the public domain or already known to Consultant. Consultant shall not release or disclose any such information or work product to persons or entities other than City without prior written authorization from the Contract Officer. (b) Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not, without prior written authorization from the Contract Officer or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide documents, declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered “voluntary” provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena. (c) If Consultant, or any officer, employee, agent or subcontractor of Consultant, provides any information or work product in violation of this Agreement, then City shall have the right to reimbursement and indemnity from Consultant for any damages, costs and fees, including attorney’s fees, caused by or incurred as a result of Consultant’s conduct. (d) Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed there under. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, this right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response. G.12.c Packet Pg. 256 Attachment: GT_ MIG On Call Services Agreement (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01247.0005/553298.1 5/8/2019 -14- ARTICLE 7. ENFORCEMENT OF AGREEMENT AND TERMINATION 7.1 California Law. This Agreement shall be interpreted, construed and governed both as to validity and to performance of the parties in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Legal ac tions concerning any dispute, claim or matter arising out of or in relation to this Agreement shall be instituted in the Superior Court of the County of San Bernardino, State of California, or any other appropriate court in such county, and Consultant covenants and agrees to submit to the personal jurisdiction of such court in the event of such action. In the event of litigation in a U.S. District Court, venue shall lie exclusively in the Central District of California, in the County of San Bernardino, State of California. 7.2 Disputes; Default. In the event that Consultant is in default under the terms of this Agreement, the City shall not have any obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default. Instead, the City may give notice to Consultant of the default and the reasons for the default. The notice shall include the timeframe in which Consultant may cure the default. This timeframe is presumptively thirty (30) days, but may be extended, though not reduced, if circumstances warrant. During the period of time that Consultant is in default, the City shall hold all invoices and shall, when the default is cured, proceed with payment on the invoices. In the alternative, the City may, in its sole discretion, elect to pay some or all of the outstanding invoices during the period of default. If Consultant does not cure the default, the City may take necessary steps to terminate this Agreement under this Article. Any failure on the part of the City to give notice of the Consultant’s default shall not be deemed to result in a waiver of the City’s legal rights or any rights arising out of any provision of this Agreement. 7.3 Retention of Funds. Consultant hereby authorizes City to deduct from any amount payable to Consultant (whether or not arising out of this Agreement) (i) any amounts the payment of which may be in dispute hereunder or which are necessary to compensate City for any losses, costs, liabilities, or damages suffered by City, and (ii) all amounts for which City may be liable to third parties, by reason of Consultant’s acts or omissions in performing or failing to perform Consultant’s obligation under this Agreement. In the event that any claim is made by a third party, the amount or validity of which is disputed by Consultant, or any indebtedness shall exist which shall appear to be the basis for a claim of lien, City may withhold from any payment due, without liability for interest because of such withholding, an amount sufficient to cover such claim. The failure of City to exercise such right to deduct or to withhold shall not, however, affect the obligations of the Consultant to insure, indemnify, and protect City as elsewhere provided herein. 7.4 Waiver. Waiver by any party to this Agreement of any term, condition, or covenant of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant. Waiver by any party of any breach of the provisions of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision or a waiver of any subsequent breach or violation of any provision of this G.12.c Packet Pg. 257 Attachment: GT_ MIG On Call Services Agreement (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01247.0005/553298.1 5/8/2019 -15- Agreement. Acceptance by City of any work or services by Consultant shall not constitute a waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement. No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy by a non-defaulting party on any default shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a waiver. Any waiver by either party of any default must be in writing and shall not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this Agreement. 7.5 Rights and Remedies are Cumulative. Except with respect to rights and remedies expressly declared to be exclusive in thi s Agreement, the rights and remedies of the parties are cumulative and the exercise by either party of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other party. 7.6 Legal Action. In addition to any other rights or remedies, either party may take legal action, in law or in equity, to cure, correct or remedy any default, to recover damages for any default, to compel specific performance of this Agreement, to obtain declaratory or injunctive relief, or to obtain any other remedy consistent with the purposes of this Agreement. Notwithstanding any contrary provision herein, Consultant shall file a statutory claim pursuant to Government Code Sections 905 et. seq. and 910 et. seq., in order to pursue a legal action under this Agreement. 7.7 Termination Prior to Expiration of Term. This Section shall govern any termination of this Contract except as specifically provided in the following Section for termination for cause. The City reserves the right to terminate this Contract at any time, with or without cause, upon written notice to Consultant. In addition, the Consultant may terminate this Contract for cause, upon sixty (60) days’ advance written notice to City. Upon receipt of any notice of termination, Consultant shall immediately cease all services hereunder except such as may be specifically approved by the Contract Officer. Except where the Consultant has initiated termination, the Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for all services rendered prior to the effective date of the notice of termination and for any services authorized by the Contract Officer thereafter in accordance with the Schedule of Compensation or such as may be approved by the Contract Officer, except as provided in Section 7.3. In the event the Consultant has initiated termination, the Consultant shall be entitled to compensation only for the reasonable value of the work product actually produced hereunder. In the event of termination without cause pursuant to this Section, the terminating party need not provide the non-terminating party with the opportunity to cure pursuant to Section 7.2. 7.8 Termination for Default of Consultant. If termination is due to the failure of the Consultant to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement, City may, after compliance with the provisions of Section 7.2, take over the work and prosecute the same to completion by contract or otherwise, and the Consultant shall be liable to the extent that the total cost for completion of the services required hereunder exceeds the compensation herein stipulated (provided that the City shall use reasonable efforts to mitigate G.12.c Packet Pg. 258 Attachment: GT_ MIG On Call Services Agreement (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01247.0005/553298.1 5/8/2019 -16- such damages), and City may withhold any payments to the Consultant for the purpose of set-off or partial payment of the amounts owed the City as previously stated. 7.9 Attorney’s Fees. If either party to this Agreement is required to initiate or defend or made a party to any action or proceeding in any way connected with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action or proceeding, in addition to any other relief which may be granted, whether legal or equitable, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney’s fees. Attorney’s fees shall include attorney’s fees on any appeal, and in addition a party entitled to attorney’s fees shall be entitled to all other reasonable costs for investigating such action, taking depositions and discovery and all other necessary costs the court allows which are incurred in such litigation. All such fees shall be deemed to have accrued on commencement of such action and shall be enforceable whether or not such action is prosecuted to judgment. ARTICLE 8. CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES: NON-DISCRIMINATION 8.1 Non-liability of City Officers and Employees. No officer or employee of the City shall be personally liable to the Consultant, or any successor in interest, in the event of any default or breach by the City or for any amount which may become due to the Consultant or to its successor, or for breach of any obligation of the terms of this Agreement. 8.2 Conflict of Interest. Consultant covenants that neither it, nor any officer or principal of its firm, has or shall acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, which would conflict in any manner with the interests of City or which would in any way hinder Consultant’s performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it as an officer, employee, agent or subcontractor without the express written consent of the Contract Officer. Consultant agrees to at all times avoid conflicts of interest or the appearance of any conflicts of interest with the interests of City in the performance of this Agreement. 8.3 Covenant Against Discrimination. Consultant covenants that, by and for itself, its heirs, executors, assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of, any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry or other protected class in the performance of this Agreement. Consultant shall take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry or other protected class. G.12.c Packet Pg. 259 Attachment: GT_ MIG On Call Services Agreement (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01247.0005/553298.1 5/8/2019 -17- 8.4 Unauthorized Aliens. Consultant hereby promises and agrees to comply with all of the provisions of the Federal Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C.A. §§ 1101, et seq., as amended, and in connection therewith, shall not employ unauthorized aliens as defined therein. Should Consultant so employ such unauthorized aliens for the performance of work and/or services covered by this Agreement, and should any liability or sanctions be imposed against City for such use of unauthorized aliens, Consultant hereby agrees to and shall reimburse City for the cost of all such liabilities or sanctions imposed, together with any and all costs, including attorney’s fees, incurred by City. ARTICLE 9. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 9.1 Notices. Any notice, demand, request, document, consent, approval, or communication either party desires or is required to give to the other party or any other person shall be in writing and either served personally or sent by prepaid, first-class mail, in the case of the City, to the City Manager and to the attention of the Contract Officer (with her/his name and City title), City of Grand Terrace, 22795 Barton Rd, Grand Terrace, CA 92313, and in the case of the Consultant, to the person(s) at the address designated on the execution page of this Agreement. Either party may change its address by notifying the other party of the change of address in writing. Notice shall be deemed communicated at the time personally delivered or in seventy-two (72) hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this Section. 9.2 Interpretation. The terms of this Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the meaning of the language used and shall not be construed for or against either party by reason of the authorship of this Agreement or any other rule of construction which might otherwise apply. 9.3 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, and such counterparts shall constitute one and the same instrument. 9.4 Integration; Amendment. This Agreement including the attachments hereto is the entire, complete and exclusive expression of the understanding of the parties. It is understood that there are no oral agreements between the parties hereto affecting this Agreement and this Agreement supersedes and cancels any and all previous negotiations, arrangements, agreements and understandings, if any, between the parties, and none shall be used to interpret this Agreement. No amendment to or modification of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and approved by the Consultant and by the City Council. The parties agree that this requirement for written modifications cannot be waived and that any attempted waiver shall be void. G.12.c Packet Pg. 260 Attachment: GT_ MIG On Call Services Agreement (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01247.0005/553298.1 5/8/2019 -18- 9.5 Severability. In the event that any one or more of the phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections contained in this Agreement shall be declared invalid or unenforceable by a valid judgment or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections of this Agreement which are hereby declared as severable and shall be interpreted to carry out the intent of the parties hereunder unless the invalid provision is so material that its invalidity deprives either party of the basic benefit of their bargain or renders this Agreement meaningless. 9.6 Warranty & Representation of Non-Collusion. No official, officer, or employee of City has any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, nor shall any official, officer, or employee of City participate in any decision relating to this Agreement which may affect his/her financial interest or the financial int erest of any corporation, partnership, or association in which (s)he is directly or indirectly interested, or in violation of any corporation, partnership, or association in which (s)he is directly or indirectly interested, or in violation of any State or municipal statute or regulation. The determination of “financial interest” shall be consistent with State law and shall not include interests found to be “remote” or “noninterests” pursuant to Government Code Sections 1091 or 1091.5. Nor shall any such officer or employee participate in any decision relating to the Agreement which affects her/his financial interest or the financial interest of any corporation, partnership or association in which (s)he is, directly or indirectly, interested, in violation of any State statute or regulation, including but not limited to the Political Reform Act (Government Code Sections 81000, et seq.) Consultant warrants and represents that it has not paid or given, and will not pay or give, to any third party including, but not limited to, any City official, officer, or employee, any money, consideration, or other thing of value as a result or consequence of obt aining or being awarded any agreement. Consultant further warrants and represents that (s)he/it has not engaged in any act(s), omission(s), or other conduct or collusion that would result in the payment of any money, consideration, or other thing of value to any third party including, but not limited to, any City official, officer, or employee, as a result of consequence of obtaining or being awarded any agreement. Consultant is aware of and understands that any such act(s), omission(s) or other conduct resulting in such payment of money, consideration, or other thing of value will render this Agreement void and of no force or effect. Consultant’s Authorized Initials _______ 9.7 Corporate Authority. The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the parties hereto warrant that (i) such party is duly organized and existing, (ii) they are duly authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement on behalf of said party, (iii) by so executing this Agreement, such party is formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement, and (iv) the entering into this Agreement does not violate any provision of any other Agreement to which said party is bound. This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the parties. G.12.c Packet Pg. 261 Attachment: GT_ MIG On Call Services Agreement (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01247.0005/553298.1 5/8/2019 -19- [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE] G.12.c Packet Pg. 262 Attachment: GT_ MIG On Call Services Agreement (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01247.0005/553298.1 5/8/2019 20 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year first-above written. CITY: City of Grand Terrace, a municipal corporation _____________________________________ G. Harold Duffey, City Manager ATTEST: ____________________________________ Debra Thomas, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ALESHIRE & WYNDER, LLP ____________________________________ Adrian R. Guerra, City Attorney CONSULTANT: Moore Iacofano Goltsman, Incorporated, a California Corporation By: ___________________________________ Name: Title: By: ___________________________________ Name: Title: Address: 1500 Iowa Avenue, Suite 110 Riverside, CA 92507 _____________________________ Two corporate officer signatures required when Consultant is a corporation, with one signature required from each of the following groups: 1) Chairman of the Board, President or any Vice President; and 2) Secretary, any Assistant Secretary, Chief Financial Officer or any Assistant Treasurer. CONSULTANT’S SIGNATURES SHALL BE DULY NOTARIZED, AND APPROPRIATE ATTESTATIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE BYLAWS, ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION, OR OTHER RULES OR REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO CONSULTANT’S BUSINESS ENTITY. G.12.c Packet Pg. 263 Attachment: GT_ MIG On Call Services Agreement (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01247.0005/553298.1 5/8/2019 CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO On __________, 2019 before me, ________________, personally appeared ________________, proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose names(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature: _____________________________________ OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT INDIVIDUAL CORPORATE OFFICER _______________________________ TITLE(S) PARTNER(S) LIMITED GENERAL ATTORNEY-IN-FACT TRUSTEE(S) GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR OTHER_______________________________ ______________________________________ SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: (NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES)) _____________________________________________ _____________________________________________ ___________________________________ TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT ___________________________________ NUMBER OF PAGES ___________________________________ DATE OF DOCUMENT ___________________________________ SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy or validity of that document. G.12.c Packet Pg. 264 Attachment: GT_ MIG On Call Services Agreement (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01247.0005/553298.1 5/8/2019 CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO On __________, 2019 before me, ________________, personally appeared ________________, proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose names(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature: _____________________________________ OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT INDIVIDUAL CORPORATE OFFICER _______________________________ TITLE(S) PARTNER(S) LIMITED GENERAL ATTORNEY-IN-FACT TRUSTEE(S) GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR OTHER_______________________________ ______________________________________ SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: (NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES)) _____________________________________________ _____________________________________________ ___________________________________ TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT ___________________________________ NUMBER OF PAGES ___________________________________ DATE OF DOCUMENT ___________________________________ SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy or validity of that document. G.12.c Packet Pg. 265 Attachment: GT_ MIG On Call Services Agreement (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01247.0005/553298.1 5/8/2019 A-1 EXHIBIT “A” SCOPE OF SERVICES I. Consultant will provide on-call planning and environmental services to the City (“Services”). Depending on the needs of each individual project, the Services more specifically may include, but are not limited to, the following: A. Planning Services including, but not limited to: i. Initial Site Assessment ii. Review project for completeness and compliance with the General Plan, Zoning Ordinances, Barton Road Specific Plan (if applicable) Design Guidelines, and all applicable codes and ordinances iii. Prepare letters for Director’s review iv. Attend Development Advisory Board meetings for the project v. Coordinate comments from members of the Development Advisory Board vi. Meet with applicants vii. Coordinate the Project Review with CEQA Review viii. Prepare public hearing notices, staff reports, resolutions and conditions of approval ix. Attend Planning and/or City Council meetings x. File management for the project xi. Plan Check review of projects including, but not limited to construction plans, grading plan, landscape and irrigation plans, lighting plans, etc. for compliance with conditions of approval. B. Environmental Review Services, including, but not limited to: i. Initial Site Assessment ii. CEQA Initial Study to determine whether project requires EIR, MND, ND, or CE iii. Nosie Studies iv. Air Quality v. Transportation Studies vi. Water Quality/Storm and Wastewater Control Management G.12.c Packet Pg. 266 Attachment: GT_ MIG On Call Services Agreement (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01247.0005/553298.1 5/8/2019 A-2 vii. Greenhouse Gas Emission Studies viii. Biological and Cultural Resources Studies ix. Environmental Mitigation Studies/Reports x. Coordinate and distribute environmental documents and notices xi. Mitigation Monitoring xii. Preparation of Public Notices xiii. Presentations at public meetings xiv. Coordinate the CEQA Review with Project Review C. Staff Augmentation with AB 18 and AB 52 Consultation D. Prepare scope of work, budget, and schedule for assigned projects, to include project coordination meetings with City Staff and applicant and all public meetings and hearings. E. Coordination with applicable agencies, including San Bernardino County Departments, CalTrans, SCAQMD, Department of Fish and Wildlife, and any other regulatory or advisory agencies related to project processing. F. Assist City staff on City-initiated projects, as approved by the Contract Officer. II. The Consultant has been selected to provide the Services which will be readily available when needed for the fixed rates set forth in Exhibit C. However, before any work is performed, the Consultant must provide a specific written Task Proposal for any requested Services and get written approval of the terms of the Task Proposal from the City, as such process is more fully described in the Work Request Procedure below in Section III. Unless specifically defined, each category or type of work listed in Exhibit C shall be construed broadly to include all services customarily described under such category or type. III. Work Request Procedure A. Each task to be performed shall be set forth in a written request (“Request”) produced by the Contract Officer with a description of the work to be performed, and the time desired for completion. All tasks shall be carried out in conformity with all provisions of this Agreement. B. Following receipt of the Request, the Consultant shall prepare a “Task Proposal” that includes the following components: (1) a written description of the requested task (“Task Description”) including all components and subtasks, and including any clarifications of the descriptions provided in the Request; (2) the costs to perform the task (“Task Budget”); G.12.c Packet Pg. 267 Attachment: GT_ MIG On Call Services Agreement (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01247.0005/553298.1 5/8/2019 A-3 (3) an explanation of how the cost was determined; and (4) a schedule for completion of the task (“Task Completion Schedule”), including a final completion date (“Task Completion Date”). C. Contract Officer shall approve, modify, or reject the Task Proposal in writing, and issue a Notice to Proceed when a written agreement has been reached on the Task Proposal. D. The task shall be performed at a cost not exceeding the Task Budget. E. Consultant shall complete the task and deliver all deliverables to Contract Officer by the Task Completion Date and in accordance with the Task Completion Schedule. IV. Consultant acknowledges that City has no obligation to request work from Consultant under this Agreement. City may establish a rotation schedule with multiple consultants, and may seek competing Task Proposals. V. In addition to the requirements of Section 6.2, during performance of the Services, Consultant will keep the City appraised of the status of performance by delivering the following status reports: A. Consultant shall provide to City a weekly written summary of progress on all approved Task Proposals for services lasting longer than one week. VI. As part of the Services, Consultant will prepare and deliver the following tangible work products to the City: A. Work products and timelines based on agreed upon scope of work for assigned projects. VII. All work product is subject to review and acceptance by the City, and must be revised by the Consultant without additional charge to the City until found satisfactory and accepted by City. VIII. Consultant will utilize the following personnel to accomplish the Services: A. Pamela D. Steele, Principal B. Lisette Sanchez-Mendoza, Senior Planner C. Mina Morgan, Associate Planner D. Bob Prasse, Project Manager E. John Campbell, PHD F. Christopher Purtell, RPA G. Chris Dugan H. Cameron Hill G.12.c Packet Pg. 268 Attachment: GT_ MIG On Call Services Agreement (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01247.0005/553298.1 5/8/2019 A-4 I. Giancarlo Ganddini, PE, PTP, Ganddini (Sub-consultant) G.12.c Packet Pg. 269 Attachment: GT_ MIG On Call Services Agreement (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01247.0005/553298.1 5/8/2019 B-1 EXHIBIT “B” SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS (Superseding Contract Boilerplate) I. The following Sections are hereby added to Article 2: 2.6 CalPERS Exclusion. Under no circumstances shall any worker be assigned by Consultant to provide City with continued service in excess of six months in accordance with California Government Code section 20305. If a person is assigned by Consultant to perform work for the City on a per diem basis, such person cannot work for City in excess of 125 days within a calendar year. If a person is contracted to perform work for City by Consultant, in other than a per diem basis, such person cannot perform work for City in excess of hours of services within the fiscal year. 2.7 CalPERS Temporary Retired Annuitant. Unless approved by the Contract Officer, no personnel of Consultant assigned to perform Services under this Agreement shall be a “retired annuitant” from the California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS). Prior to assigning any personnel of Consultant to perform any work for the City, Consultant shall identify potential candidates to the Contract Officer that are “retired annuitants” from CalPERS. If approved by the Contract Officer, under no circumstances shall a retired annuitant work more than 960 hours within a fiscal year. The compensation for the retired person shall be an hourly pay rate that is within the salary schedule for the position and shall not exceed the maximum monthly base salary paid to other employees performing comparable duties as listed on a publicly available pay schedule divided by 173.333 to equal an hourly rate in accordance with California Government Code section 21224. A retired person appointed pursuant to this Agreement shall not receive any benefit, incentive, compensation in lieu of benefits, or other form of compensation in addition to the hourly pay rate. A retired annuitant will not accrue service credit or any additional retirement rights or benefits. G.12.c Packet Pg. 270 Attachment: GT_ MIG On Call Services Agreement (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01247.0005/553298.1 5/8/2019 C-1 EXHIBIT “C” SCHEDULE OF COMPENSATION I. Consultant shall perform the on-call services at the rates listed in Exhibit “C-1”. The rates provided in Exhibit “C-1” may not be escalated during the term of this Agreement. Consultant shall be compensated based upon the time and rates of the personnel performing the tasks and itemizing materials and equipment utilized and the costs thereof, which shall conform to the requirements provided in Exhibit “A”. II. The City will compensate Consultant for the Services performed upon submission of a valid invoice. Each invoice shall be accompanied by all Task Proposal’s for which Consultant is requesting compensation. Each invoice is to include: A. Line items for all personnel describing the work performed, the number of hours worked, and the hourly rate. B. Line items for all materials and equipment properly charged to the Services. C. Line items for all other approved reimbursable expenses claimed, with supporting documentation. D. Line items for all approved subconsultant labor, supplies, equipment, materials, and travel properly charged to the Services. III. The total compensation for the Services shall be as follows: A. For Services that will be reimbursed by an applicant/developer, the maximum amount of compensation shall be established in accordance with the procedure described in Section III of Exhibit “A”. B. For Services provided under Section I.F of Exhibit “A” (City initiated projects), there shall be a maximum total compensation of $25,000 during the term of this Agreement. G.12.c Packet Pg. 271 Attachment: GT_ MIG On Call Services Agreement (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01247.0005/553298.1 5/8/2019 C-2 EXHIBIT “C-1” RATE SCHEDULE Consultant shall perform the Services under Exhibit A based upon an hourly, time, and materials basis. Consultant shall also be compensated for reimbursements and out of pocket expenses, provided that City approves such reimbursements and out of pocket expenses in writing. Consultant’s rates are as follows: Principal $205.00 Director of Environmental Services / Analyses $185.00 Senior Project Planner $125.00 Primary Analyst $125.00 Associate Project Planner $100.00 Assistant Project Planner $90.00 Assistant Analyst $90.00 Word Processing $65.00 Reimbursable Expenses Black/White Prints $0.10/page Color Prints $1.00/page 11”x17” Color Prints $2.00/page Postage At Cost Other Cost plus 10% Expert Witness Fee If requested to be an expert witness by the City, the fees for deposition and testimony will be billed at $350.00/hour. G.12.c Packet Pg. 272 Attachment: GT_ MIG On Call Services Agreement (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01247.0005/553298.1 5/8/2019 D-1 EXHIBIT “D” SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE I. Consultant shall perform all Services timely to ensure the prompt and timely processing of all planning related applications and approval thereof by the planning department, Planning Commission, and/or City Council. II. Consultant shall timely deliver the any and all documents related to the Services, as described in Section I of Exhibit “A”, to the City for the process ing of, and approval, of any and all applications for development by the planning department, Planning Commission, and/or City Council. III. The Contract Officer may approve extensions for performance of the services in accordance with Section 3.2. IV. Unless earlier terminated in accordance with Article 7 of this Agreement, this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect from and after the Effective Date of this Agreement for a term of three (3) years (“Term”). G.12.c Packet Pg. 273 Attachment: GT_ MIG On Call Services Agreement (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) G.12.d Packet Pg. 274 Attachment: Michael Baker Intl City of Grand Terrace SOQ_Plng Srvc and Env Review Srvc - 4-22-2019(FINAL) (Professional Services -On Call STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS On-Call Planning Services and Environmental Review Services Page i April 22, 2019 Sandra Molina City of Grand Terrace Planning and Development Services Department 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92313 RE: STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS: ON-CALL FOR PLANNING SERVICES AND ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW SERVICES Dear Ms. Molina: Michael Baker International Inc. is pleased to submit this Statement of Qualifications for On-Call Planning Services and Environmental Review Services. We understand the demands placed on planning and development departments in small jurisdictions and are committed to helping our clients with cost- effective solutions and flexible approaches, which build on the following highlights of our qualifications: • We are local. We know the Inland Empire and live and work in communities throughout the Counties of Riverside and San Bernardino, including the City of Redlands, the County of San Bernardino, the City of Eastvale, and the County of Riverside. As a result, we have a keen understanding of the issues and challenges faced by the City and it’s applicants. • We are steadfast project managers with strong communication skills and technical expertise. • We deliver high quality consulting services on time and within budget. • We function as an extension of your staff and are available to work at your offices or at our office in Ontario. • We offer a wide range of bill rates and areas of expertise, which are available when you need them without burdening your department with the day-to-day expenses of a larger staff. Our team includes a highly responsive and experienced team of project managers and leaders including Siri Champion, Emily Elliott, and Peter Minegar who are supported by Senior, Associate, and Assistant level staff. We appreciate the City’s consideration of our proposal. Should you have any questions or wish to discuss the details of Michael Baker’s proposal, please do not hesitate to contact me at (858) 527 -7829 or bstark@mbakerintl.com. Sincerely, Bob Stark, AICP Principal-in-Charge G.12.d Packet Pg. 275 Attachment: Michael Baker Intl City of Grand Terrace SOQ_Plng Srvc and Env Review Srvc - 4-22-2019(FINAL) (Professional Services -On Call STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS On-Call Planning Services and Environmental Review Services Page ii A. Qualifications of firm .....................................................................................................................1 About Michael Baker International ........................................................................................................... 1 Planning Services .................................................................................................................................. 1 Environmental Review Services ............................................................................................................ 3 B. Qualifications of Staff .....................................................................................................................5 Key Personnel ........................................................................................................................................... 5 Additional Staff ......................................................................................................................................... 8 C. Project List .....................................................................................................................................9 D. Subconsultants ............................................................................................................................ 13 E. List of References ......................................................................................................................... 13 F. Fee Schedule ................................................................................................................................ 13 G. Exceptions to the Professional Services Agreement ...................................................................... 13 Attachment B: Exceptions to the Professional Services Agreement .................................................... 14 G.12.d Packet Pg. 276 Attachment: Michael Baker Intl City of Grand Terrace SOQ_Plng Srvc and Env Review Srvc - 4-22-2019(FINAL) (Professional Services -On Call 1 Response for Planning Services On-Call and Environmental Review On-Call Consultant Selection Michael Baker International is a full-service planning, environmental, and engineering firm with in-house experts qualified to provide all planning and environmental review services anticipated, without the need for subconsultants, based on the types of work identified in the Request for Qualifications. The Michael Baker team will build on past and current experience working on projects in and around Grand Terrace to bring local expertise, insight from experiences shared by communities across the Inland Empire, and a commitment to help Planning and Development Services Department staff deliver exceptional planning, environmental, and technical services. Michael Baker, a Pennsylvania Corporation, is a full-service planning, engineering, design, and construction firm working with both public and private sector clients. The firm maintains a professional staff of approximately 600 employees located in 13 offices throughout California. Michael Baker offers the resources of more than 3,300 employees in 100 global office locations. Michael Baker is a strong, financially stable firm, operating continuously since its founding in 1940. The firm has served public and private sector clients in Southern California for 78 years. Michael Baker’s dedication to providing municipal planning services has established our reputation as an industry leader. We provide professional planning services as extension of staff or as independent consultants to cities, counties, state agencies, and special districts in an era of limited financial resources. Public agencies, such as those listed on the next page, have found the use of Michael Baker planning staff to be an efficient and effective way to deal with fluctuating workloads, state and federal mandates, and local priorities—all while finding ways to continue to provide effective and reliable customer service. For agencies that need assistance with their short- and long-term staffing requirements, we offer experienced and personable planning professionals on a contract basis. We also provide planning services as independent consultants on a task order basis as well as dedicated, technical experts to enhance and extend the reach of municipal clients. Our consulting and staffing services consist of providing: ▪ Experienced, technically astute planners ▪ Training and guidance for new legislation including SB 743, 2017 and 2018 housing packages, and more ▪ Grant-writing support to extend City resources, including SB 2 allocation ▪ Staff for temporary or long-term needs ▪ Flexible staffing levels and classification levels ▪ On-call, as-needed, and consulting options ▪ Cost-effective staffing options G.12.d Packet Pg. 277 Attachment: Michael Baker Intl City of Grand Terrace SOQ_Plng Srvc and Env Review Srvc - 4-22-2019(FINAL) (Professional Services -On Call 2 Response for Planning Services On-Call and Environmental Review On-Call Consultant Selection We structure staffing and planning services task orders to match an agency’s needs. This can include a range of options such as the provision of: ▪ One contract staff employee on a part-time, short-term basis ▪ Multiple contract staff to cover an entire department’s needs on a long- term basis ▪ Entry-level staff to work the planning counter and offer municipal staff time to focus on current planning projects ▪ Experienced project managers and technical staff to take on special projects or to lead an independent consultant team. We build flexibility into our contract staffing and task order work programs to better respond to what sometimes can be a fluctuating workload, resulting in cost savings to our clients. Michael Baker’s approach to assisting the City of Grand Terrace—and to all staffing services we provide throughout California—is to work in close cooperation with the City as a seamless extension of your own staff. Our planners bring significant experience to their work, but we are of course cognizant of our role and the need to implement the policy direction given by the City’s elected officials and the procedures developed by internal departments. We will work with City staff to fully understand not only the specifics of the projects we are assigned but the history and background that will help us to create an analysis and recommendation that reflects City policies and practices. Since we work for agencies throughout the Inland Empire, California, and the United States, we can also provide examples of successful programs, policies, and documents from other agencies, which is something our clients have found particularly helpful. Several of the proposed staff included in this proposal have provided staffing support to organizations that perform similar functions as the City of Grand Terrace. Emily Elliott, Siri Champion, Peter Minegar, Alex Pohlman, Renee Gleason, and Kendell Hillis are all a part of the staffing support for the Cities of Eastvale and Redlands. As part of those contracts, Michael Baker has task orders for general staff support, including project management, coordination of development projects, and implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). In responding to the City’s needs, Michael Baker is prepared to provide the City with a team of highly experienced planners who are fully capable of successfully performing all tasks associated with the processing of discretionary development applications, including General Plan amendments, zone changes, development agreements, specific plans, site development permits, conditional use permits, variances, and subdivision maps. Our staff will also prepare any necessary environmental documentation pursuant to CEQA, which is discussed further under Environmental Review Services. Michael Baker planners will be available on short-term notice to provide services on an as-needed, task order basis for the processing of specific discretionary development applications. Our staff will perform, Agency Staffing Services Cities Avalon Banning Beaumont Blythe Bradbury Burbank Calimesa Chino Hills Citrus Heights Covina Eastvale Elk Grove El Segundo Hemet La Habra Menifee Palmdale Paramount Pasadena Perris Rancho Cucamonga San Gabriel Santa Paula Sierra Madre West Hollywood Wildomar Counties Contra Costa Marin Monterey Riverside San Bernardino Santa Clara G.12.d Packet Pg. 278 Attachment: Michael Baker Intl City of Grand Terrace SOQ_Plng Srvc and Env Review Srvc - 4-22-2019(FINAL) (Professional Services -On Call 3 Response for Planning Services On-Call and Environmental Review On-Call Consultant Selection coordinate, and manage all the tasks associated with the processing of such applications. These tasks include: ▪ Receiving and determining the completeness of applications. ▪ Reviewing applications for compliance with the General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and applicable development standards and other City policies and regulation. ▪ Preparing the appropriate environmental documentation in compliance with CEQA. ▪ Preparing staff reports and making recommendations to the City Council with accompanying conditions of approval, resolutions, and ordinances, as necessary. ▪ Facilitating and participating in meetings and coordinating the exchange of comments among applicants, City staff, other consultants, and the public during the review and processing of applications, as necessary. ▪ Attending and making presentations on discretionary development applications at City Council meetings, as necessary. ▪ Preparing all required notices for filing with appropriate county and state agencies. Michael Baker has a range of staff available to provide the as-needed services being requested by the City, from assistant to senior planners. We will assign the appropriate level of planner to serve as the case planner for each project commensurate with the complexity of the development application being processed. While our staff may be required to periodically attend meetings in the Grand Terrace area, our work will be performed either on- or off-site, consistent with the direction provided by the City. Michael Baker is recognized as an innovative and strategic partner in the preparation and processing of environmental documents and supporting technical studies. We have successfully completed hundreds of environmental documents in compliance with CEQA and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) for public agency clients. We have prepared environmental documents for a variety of project types from land development/planning entitlements projects to long-range plans and programs to public works and capital improvement projects. We coordinate regularly with local, state, and federal regulatory agencies both during the environmental process and in acquiring regulatory permits/approvals for our clients. Below is a description of our extensive capabilities regarding environmental services. Environmental (CEQA Advising, Peer Review, IS/MND and EIR Preparation): Environmental documents prepared in-house by Michael Baker’s technical staff address the full spectrum of environmental and technical issues ranging from traffic and transportation to climate change. Michael Baker produces environmental documents that are sensitive to both the public’s concern for resource protection and community impacts, as well as real-world issues associated with cost and feasibility of implementing mitigation measures. Our team has a thorough understanding of CEQA, NEPA, the Endangered Species Act, Clean Water Act, Clean Air Act, National Historic Preservation Act, and other local, state, and federal regulations. Michael Baker also provides peer review of environmental documents and technical studies that are supported by professionals with expertise in acoustics, air quality, climate change, traffic/transportation, hydrology, water quality, water/wastewater, landscape architecture, urban design, policy planning, structural design, civil engineering, GIS, mapping, and surveying. G.12.d Packet Pg. 279 Attachment: Michael Baker Intl City of Grand Terrace SOQ_Plng Srvc and Env Review Srvc - 4-22-2019(FINAL) (Professional Services -On Call 4 Response for Planning Services On-Call and Environmental Review On-Call Consultant Selection Air Quality Studies/Health Risk Assessments: Michael Baker utilizes air quality models that are developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, California Air Resources Board, and local air pollution control districts. Michael Baker’s air quality services include project-specific analysis of regulatory impacts, short-term construction emissions, and long-term operational emissions, and computer modeling of source-specific pollutant emissions and dispersion analysis. Additionally, Michael Baker has carried out mitigation programs for commercial, transportation, and industrial projects, as well as general plan air quality elements. Michael Baker also prepares health risk assessments in accordance with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment guidelines to evaluate potential health risks associated with toxic air contaminants. Our capabilities include emission inventory preparation, meteorological air dispersion modeling, and risk calculation. Greenhouse Gas Studies: Michael Baker’s climate change experts are at the forefront in developing sound scientific regulatory assessments and strategies within the rapidly changing regulatory environment. We advise both government and private industry on greenhouse gas (GHG) policies and methodologies and the impact that they have on the new carbon-constrained business future. To ensure a sustainable future, there is a great need to understand and manage GHG emissions in ways that promote economic growth. Michael Baker has developed proprietary models for quantifying and analyzing GHGs from a variety of direct and indirect sources including construction, vehicular traffic, electricity consumption, water conveyance, and sewage treatment. Biological Resources: Michael Baker has expert in-house biologists experienced with the federal and state Endangered Species Acts, the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, the California Department of Fish and Game Code, the Clean Water Act, and biological analyses under CEQA and NEPA. Michael Baker’s relationships with wildlife agencies, regulatory agencies, federal land managers, and various conservation groups allow the firm to serve as a liaison between the City and these agencies/organizations. Valued services provided by Michael Baker include conducting habitat assessments to characterize the biological features of an area, rapidly identifying any sensitive features, suggesting a compliance strategy to resolve identified impacts, and working with the client to make sure their planning needs are met while meeting permitting and mitigation requirements. Michael Baker biologists prepare general biological inventories, endangered species/sensitive plant surveys, and biological monitoring. In consultation with resource agencies, Michael Baker staff has extensive experience in mitigating biological resources impacts through restoration/revegetation and conservation/mitigation banking. Hazardous Materials/Environmental Site Assessment: Michael Baker provides a range of hazardous materials assessments to meet our clients’ needs for various project types. Michael Baker has prepared hundreds of Phase I Hazardous Materials Assessments for projects throughout California utilizing the American Society for Testing & Materials (ASTM) standards for commercial real estate transactions (E1527-05 and E1528-06), All Appropriate Inquiry (AAI), as well as appropriate protocol from lending institutions and regulatory agencies. The comprehensive capabilities and professional experience of our in-house staff allow Michael Baker to effectively and efficiently complete hazardous materials assessments for any type of property. Michael Baker’s capabilities include Phase I Environmental Site Assessments (ASTM E1527-05), Transaction Screens (ASTM E1528-06), Preliminary Hazardous Materials Assessments, Environmental Baselines Surveys (for the U.S. Department of the Navy), and Initial Site Assessments (for Caltrans). G.12.d Packet Pg. 280 Attachment: Michael Baker Intl City of Grand Terrace SOQ_Plng Srvc and Env Review Srvc - 4-22-2019(FINAL) (Professional Services -On Call 5 Response for Planning Services On-Call and Environmental Review On-Call Consultant Selection Hydrology/Water Quality: Michael Baker has a broad base of experience that can provide a wide variety of services to meet the challenges associated with stormwater quality. Current projects give the Michael Baker team a unique and clear understanding of the requirements that the regulated community faces in complying with court orders, fulfilling National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit obligations, and other related stormwater activities. Our stormwater quality capabilities include the identification of constituents of concern, research relative to best management practices (BMP) effectiveness, BMP siting, design, construction, construction management and operation, and maintenance and monitoring. Noise and Vibration: Michael Baker’s acoustical services include instrument-assisted noise and vibration field surveys, commercial and industrial stationary sources noise impact analyses, Federal Highway Administration computer modeling of motor vehicle noise impacts for roadway and freeway projects, and rail noise impact analysis. Michael Baker’s acoustical staff also evaluates sound insulation performance, manufacturing and industrial noise impact mitigation, building exterior and interior sound and vibration isolation analysis, and room acoustics, and prepares general plan noise elements. Services typically provided include technical analysis for NEPA or CEQA documents, or focused studies used in planning and civil design projects. Traffic/Parking/Circulation: Michael Baker emphasizes traffic planning and design techniques to satisfy the requirements of the study site and the adjacent areas. This is accomplished by utilizing any or all of the following external study site traffic analyses. ▪ Trip generation / vehicle miles traveled ▪ Directional distribution of traffic ▪ Access design criteria ▪ Traffic signal considerations ▪ Adjacent land access needs ▪ Impact on existing streets ▪ Evaluation of alternate designs ▪ Intersection capacity utilization Our goal is to achieve safe and efficient movement of vehicles and plan adequate parking facilities for the projected land uses and economic growth. Currently, Michael Baker uses traffic models derived from data collected at peak intervals to capture the current performance of the traffic system and simulate potential need. As Project Director, Bob Stark will be the main point of contact for the City of Grand Terrace. Bob prides himself on client responsiveness and a commitment to budget and schedule expectations. He has established himself as a trusted and highly competent manager over his 20+ year career as a CEQA consultant and as a director of planning services staff for municipal governments in the Inland Empire. As Planning Services Lead, Rameeta Garewal will work under Bob’s direction and prepare responses to planning services task orders. They will hand-select the project manager or planner to meet the City’s needs. Our bench of senior planners includes Siri Champion, Emily Elliott, and Peter Minegar. These three have extensive experience working with community development departments, development review committees, and project applicants to process land use applications through the planning and G.12.d Packet Pg. 281 Attachment: Michael Baker Intl City of Grand Terrace SOQ_Plng Srvc and Env Review Srvc - 4-22-2019(FINAL) (Professional Services -On Call 6 Response for Planning Services On-Call and Environmental Review On-Call Consultant Selection environmental review process. They have gained this experience in communities throughout the Inland Empire including the Cities of Big Bear Lake, Redlands, Eastvale, and Wildomar, as well as the Counties of San Bernardino and Riverside. Our key personnel will be supported by a talented team of Michael Baker community and environmental planners. KEY PERSONNEL ROLE Bob Stark, AICP Project Director, Advisor, Primary Contact Bob has 22 years of experience in the preparation and management of environmental review documents pursuant to CEQA and NEPA. His expertise in guiding high-profile and controversial projects through the rigors of state and federal environmental review and permitting processes has made him a valued advisor to public agencies throughout California. His broad base of knowledge ranges from air quality, noise, and traffic analysis to habitat restoration and climate change. Bob is a member of the American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP) and a highly regarded instructor of professional-level seminars and continuing education courses on the topics of CEQA and environmental impact analysis. KEY PERSONNEL ROLE Rameeta Garewal, AICP Planning Services Lead/Senior Project Manager Rameeta specializes in regional and urban planning, and sustainability of infrastructure and resources. She directs expert teams to meet clients’ requirements for comprehensive plans, specific plans, general plans, sustainability programs, planned unit developments, zoning, community/neighborhood plans, tentative mapping, design guidelines, and streetscape standards. Rameeta’s areas of expertise include sustainability; environmental and energy management systems; policy, land, and facilities planning; development and permitting; and advisory services in infrastructure, regulatory compliance, and capital improvement strategy. G.12.d Packet Pg. 282 Attachment: Michael Baker Intl City of Grand Terrace SOQ_Plng Srvc and Env Review Srvc - 4-22-2019(FINAL) (Professional Services -On Call 7 Response for Planning Services On-Call and Environmental Review On-Call Consultant Selection KEY PERSONNEL ROLE Siri Champion Lead Project Manager, Senior Staff Planner Siri has more than 10 years of experience living and working in the Inland Empire as a planning professional and has nearly 20 years of experience filling a variety of roles as both contract and agency staff. Her roles have included assistant planning director for the City of Eastvale, special projects manager for the County of San Bernardino, active transportation and trail-planning advisor to the Rim of the World Recreation and Parks District, and associate planner for the City of Big Bear Lake. Her responsibilities have included intergovernmental relations, interpreting and writing code, developer negotiation, public communications, economic development initiatives, and processing commercial, residential, industrial, civic, and special land use applications. Siri is known for staying calm during tense public engagement scenarios. She seizes opportunities for new partnerships and innovation. Through grant writing, capacity-building, and brokering new partnerships, she helps to pilot change-making projects focused on underutilized areas where streets, sidewalks, infill lots, and public spaces may be used to promote sustainability, resiliency, equity, and social cohesion. KEY PERSONNEL ROLE Emily Elliott, AICP Entitlements Lead, Senior Staff Planner Emily has nine years of community and environmental planning experience in the Inland Empire within both the public and private sectors. She is experienced with processing land use entitlements for large and complex projects, reaching consensus between City staff and project proponents, engaging with stakeholders, and presenting to elected and appointed officials. Emily has processed a variety of project types including capital improvements for recreation and infrastructure, professional campus expansion, hotel development, single-family and multifamily housing developments, use permits, shopping centers, downtown infill development, and projects related to historic preservation. She has a demonstrated record of processing general plan amendments, specific plan amendment, zone changes, Williamson Act cancellation, agricultural preserve removal, historic designations, and site plan and architectural reviews, as well as authoring code/plan amendments. She has a background in environmental planning and assisting lead agencies and applicants with CEQA compliance. G.12.d Packet Pg. 283 Attachment: Michael Baker Intl City of Grand Terrace SOQ_Plng Srvc and Env Review Srvc - 4-22-2019(FINAL) (Professional Services -On Call 8 Response for Planning Services On-Call and Environmental Review On-Call Consultant Selection KEY PERSONNEL ROLE Peter Minegar, CEP-IT Environmental Review Services Lead/Senior Staff Planner Peter is responsible for coordinating and undertaking environmental impact analyses, project management, and public involvement. He has authored and managed the preparation of environmental documents to satisfy CEQA/NEPA requirements as well as other federal, state, and local requirements in California. He typically serves as lead author/editor for the applicable CEQA/NEPA document and as an environmental task leader and/or project manager. His project experience is focused largely on private and public development projects in the fields of land use, residential and commercial development, infrastructure/utilities, industrial, schools, energy, and other municipal projects. He has assisted in the coordination for agency and public meetings and participated in project presentations. Peter has been involved in representing agency staff for a range of highly controversial projects subject to scrutiny by the public, environmental organizations, and public agencies. Additional Personnel Role Years of Experience Staffing Experience Nicole Marotz, AICP, LEED AP CEQA Planner 20 City of Grand Terrace City of Wildomar Darren Edgington, CEP-IT CEQA and Land Use Planner 20 City of Temecula City of Eastvale County of Riverside Renee Gleason CEQA Planner 13 City of Eastvale County of Riverside Alex Pohlman, LEED AP, EIT Environmental Planner 11 City of Eastvale City of Redlands Kendell Hillis Assistant Planner 3 County of Riverside City of Redlands Western Riverside Council of Governments Connor Szeto Assistant Planner 1 City of Eastvale County of Riverside G.12.d Packet Pg. 284 Attachment: Michael Baker Intl City of Grand Terrace SOQ_Plng Srvc and Env Review Srvc - 4-22-2019(FINAL) (Professional Services -On Call 9 Response for Planning Services On-Call and Environmental Review On-Call Consultant Selection The following pages include an overview of staffing and consulting services provided to municipal agencies in San Bernardino and Riverside Counties. For each jurisdiction, a list of example task orders or projects is included. Michael Baker provides comprehensive land use entitlement planning and processing services for the City of Redlands Development Services Department, acting as extension of City staff. Staff provided by Michael Baker is dedicated to a single developer with multiple ongoing projects on an aggressive timeline with the task of achieving high-quality development in line with City standards while expediting the development process and providing full-service project review, management, and coordination. ▪ The Packing House District Shopping Center II: Conditional Use Permit Revision, Variance, Socioeconomic Cost Benefit Study, and EIR Addendum ▪ Escape Craft Brewery: Conditional Use Permit, Historic Resource Designation, Historic Parking Modification, and Off-Site Parking Agreement ▪ Drive-through Coffee Shop: Conditional Use Permit, Traffic Impact Analysis, Off-Site Parking Agreement ▪ J. Riley Distillery: Conditional Use Permit, Variance, Socioeconomic Cost Benefit Study, Off-Site Parking Agreement ▪ Three-Story Parking Structure with Retail and Office Space: Conditional Use Permit, Variance, Socioeconomic Cost Benefit Study ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ G.12.d Packet Pg. 285 Attachment: Michael Baker Intl City of Grand Terrace SOQ_Plng Srvc and Env Review Srvc - 4-22-2019(FINAL) (Professional Services -On Call 10 Response for Planning Services On-Call and Environmental Review On-Call Consultant Selection Michael Baker provided adjunct staffing and on-call environmental consulting services to the City of Wildomar beginning with the City’s incorporation, including all planning department environmental services such as current and advance planning. Environmental services included: ▪ CEQA/NEPA ▪ Draft EIR review ▪ Feasibility and appropriateness of mitigation measures, alternatives, and consistency with City CEQA guidelines Issues and challenges arose almost daily from meeting California Department of Housing and Community Development deadlines to craft an approved Housing Element and EIR to ensuring staff reports and public notices are prepared and distributed on time to meet legal mandates. Michael Baker staff met these challenges by maintaining close communication with the City’s Community Development Director, City Attorney, and other planning staff. Staff would meet in person every week at City Hall to review ongoing projects and identify potential upcoming issues and challenges so that solutions were devised before problems occurred. Weekly coordination also helped control costs by reviewing project budgets and billing status. Where potential budget issues were identified, staff worked with the City to help identify cost-savings opportunities or scope for expanded services to be authorized by the City to meet critical project needs. Because of this close coordination, the team did not exceed project budgets or miss deadlines throughout the duration of the contract. Sample task orders include: ▪ Oak Creek Canyon Specific Plan Update EIR ▪ Wildomar General Plan Update EIR ▪ Housing Element Update EIR ▪ Cornerstone Church EIR ▪ Horizons EIR ▪ Wildomar Housing Element EIR ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ G.12.d Packet Pg. 286 Attachment: Michael Baker Intl City of Grand Terrace SOQ_Plng Srvc and Env Review Srvc - 4-22-2019(FINAL) (Professional Services -On Call 11 Response for Planning Services On-Call and Environmental Review On-Call Consultant Selection Michael Baker provides comprehensive planning services to the City of Eastvale in western Riverside County. Michael Baker serves directly as the City’s planning staff, providing current and advance planning services, counter staffing, facilitation of Planning Commission meetings, plan review, preparing staff reports, CEQA compliance and review, consultation with tribes per SB 18 and AB 52 requirements, coordinating with other local and regional agencies, and leading special projects like developing the City’s Economic Development website. The Planning team routinely coordinates with the City Manager, City Attorney, Public Works team, and other key staff. Project examples include: ▪ Eastvale Crossings: The project involves the development of a Walmart shopping center. Staff processed the project application, conducted plan review, and oversaw the preparation of an EIR to satisfy CEQA. ▪ Goodman Business Center: The project involves the development of an industrial and business park. Staff processed the application, conducted plan review, and oversaw conditions of approval. ▪ The Campus: The project involves the development of an industrial park. Originally processed by the City, the team processed an application to modify the originally approved project and prepared an EIR Addendum. ▪ Costco: The project involves the development of a new commercial shopping center. Staff work to efficiently review and process project plans in time for a fall 2018 opening. ▪ Lewis Retail Center: The project involves the development of a new retail center, and municipal center including a government center and library. Staff is coordinating with the developer to process the appropriate entitlements, peer-review technical reports, and oversee the preparation of an EIR. ▪ Milliken Distribution Center: The project involves the development of a new warehouse in the northern portion of the city. The planning team is processing the project entitlements, coordinating with the Regional Conservation Authority regarding potential impacts to Delhi sand flower-loving fly, conducting AB 52 consultation, and preparing an IS/MND to satisfy project CEQA requirements. ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ G.12.d Packet Pg. 287 Attachment: Michael Baker Intl City of Grand Terrace SOQ_Plng Srvc and Env Review Srvc - 4-22-2019(FINAL) (Professional Services -On Call 12 Response for Planning Services On-Call and Environmental Review On-Call Consultant Selection Michael Baker has provided on-call planning and environmental services for the County of Riverside since 2014. Services provided to the County include long-range planning support including CEQA compliance documentation, general plan amendments, zoning code amendments, transit planning documents, community engagement, GIS services and climate action plan support. Key projects completed for the County include: ▪ Wine County Community Plan Program EIR (certified March 2014) ▪ Wine Country Trails Plan Addendum EIR (approved December 2017) ▪ 2014 Countywide General Plan Update, Climate Action Plan, and Program EIR (approved and certified December 2015) ▪ 5th Cycle Housing Element Update and Housing Element Update EIR (certified December 2016) ▪ Lakeland Village Community Plan and Program EIR (currently under development) Michael Baker continues to provide support services to the County, including implementation support of major long-range planning documents. ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ G.12.d Packet Pg. 288 Attachment: Michael Baker Intl City of Grand Terrace SOQ_Plng Srvc and Env Review Srvc - 4-22-2019(FINAL) (Professional Services -On Call 13 Response for Planning Services On-Call and Environmental Review On-Call Consultant Selection Michael Baker has the in-house resources and experience to meet the anticipated needs of the City of Grand Terrace. As such, this proposal does not include any subconsultants. City of Wildomar City of Eastvale Matthew C. Bassi, Planning Director Phone: (951) 677-7751 mbassi@cityofwildomar.org Bryan Jones, City Manager Phone: (951) 703-4411 bjones@eastvaleca.gov City of Redlands County of Riverside Brian Desatnik, Director, Development Services Department (909) 798-7555 bdesatnik@citasdfasdfyofredlands.org Phayvanh Nanthavongdouangsy, Principal Planner Phone: (951) 955-6573 pnanthav@rivco.org Fee schedule is submitted in a separate sealed envelope. Michael Baker has reviewed the Professional Services Agreement provided by the City and has several noted exceptions. These exceptions are attached herein as Attachment B. Michael Baker is available to discuss any questions the City may have regarding the exceptions identified. G.12.d Packet Pg. 289 Attachment: Michael Baker Intl City of Grand Terrace SOQ_Plng Srvc and Env Review Srvc - 4-22-2019(FINAL) (Professional Services -On Call G.12.d Packet Pg. 290 Attachment: Michael Baker Intl City of Grand Terrace SOQ_Plng Srvc and Env Review Srvc - 4-22-2019(FINAL) (Professional Services -On Call G.12.d Packet Pg. 291 Attachment: Michael Baker Intl City of Grand Terrace SOQ_Plng Srvc and Env Review Srvc - 4-22-2019(FINAL) (Professional Services -On Call G.12.d Packet Pg. 292 Attachment: Michael Baker Intl City of Grand Terrace SOQ_Plng Srvc and Env Review Srvc - 4-22-2019(FINAL) (Professional Services -On Call G.12.d Packet Pg. 293 Attachment: Michael Baker Intl City of Grand Terrace SOQ_Plng Srvc and Env Review Srvc - 4-22-2019(FINAL) (Professional Services -On Call (c) G.12.d Packet Pg. 294 Attachment: Michael Baker Intl City of Grand Terrace SOQ_Plng Srvc and Env Review Srvc - 4-22-2019(FINAL) (Professional Services -On Call G.12.d Packet Pg. 295 Attachment: Michael Baker Intl City of Grand Terrace SOQ_Plng Srvc and Env Review Srvc - 4-22-2019(FINAL) (Professional Services -On Call G.12.d Packet Pg. 296 Attachment: Michael Baker Intl City of Grand Terrace SOQ_Plng Srvc and Env Review Srvc - 4-22-2019(FINAL) (Professional Services -On Call 01247.0005/553342.1 5/8/2019 AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES By and Between CITY OF GRAND TERRACE and MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL G.12.e Packet Pg. 297 Attachment: GT_ Michael Baker On Call Services Agreement (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01247.0005/553342.1 5/8/2019 -2- AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE AND MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL This “AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE AND MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL (herein “Agreement”) is made and entered into this 14th day of May, 2019 by and between the City of Grand Terrace, a California municipal corporation (“City”) and Michael Baker International, a California corporation (“Consultant”). City and Consultant are sometimes hereinafter individually referred to as “Party” and hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Parties.” RECITALS A. City has sought the performance of the services, defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement, pursuant to the City of Grand Terrace Municipal Code. B. Consultant was selected by the City to perform those services more particularly described in Article 1 of this Agreement.. C. Pursuant to the City of Grand Terrace Municipal Code, City has authority to enter into and execute this Agreement. D. The Parties desire to formalize the selection of Consultant for performance of those services defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement and desire that the terms of that performance be as particularly defined and described herein. OPERATIVE PROVISIONS NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants made by the Parties and contained herein and other consideration, the value and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: ARTICLE 1. SERVICES OF CONSULTANT 1.1 Scope of Services. In compliance with all terms and conditions of this Agreement, the Consultant shall provide those services specified in the “Scope of Services” attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference, which may be referred to herein as the “services” or “work” hereunder. As a material inducement to the City entering into this Agreement, Consultant represents and warrants that it has the qualifications, experience, and facilities necessary to properly perform the services required under this Agreement in a thorough, competent, and professional manner, and is experienced in performing the work and services contemplated herein. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of its ability, experience and talent, perform all services described herein. Consultant covenants that it shall follow the highest professional standards in performing the work and services required hereunder and that all materials will be both of good quality as well as fit for the purpose intended. For purposes of this Agreement, the phrase “highest G.12.e Packet Pg. 298 Attachment: GT_ Michael Baker On Call Services Agreement (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01247.0005/553342.1 5/8/2019 -3- professional standards” shall mean those standards of practice recognized by one or more first - class firms performing similar work under similar circumstances. 1.2 Consultant’s Proposal. The Scope of Service shall include the Consultant’s scope of work or bid which shall be incorporated herein by this reference as though fully set forth herein. In the event of any inconsistency between the terms of such proposal and this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall govern. 1.3 Compliance with Law. Consultant shall keep itself informed concerning, and shall render all services hereunder in accordance with, all ordinances, resolutions, statutes, rules, and regulations of the City and any Federal, State or local governmental entity having jurisdiction in effect at the time service is rendered. 1.4 Licenses, Permits, Fees and Assessments. Consultant shall obtain at its sole cost and expense such licenses, permits and approvals as may be required by law for the performance of the services required by this Agreement. Consultant shall have the sole obligation to pay for any fees, assessments and taxes, plus applicable penalties and interest, which may be imposed by law and arise from or are necessary for the Consultant’s performance of the services required by this Agreement, and shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City, its officers, employees or agents of City, against any such fees, assessments, taxes, penalties or interest levied, assessed or imposed against City hereunder. 1.5 Familiarity with Work. By executing this Agreement, Consultant warrants that Consultant (i) has thoroughly investigated and considered the scope of services to be performed, (ii) has carefully considered how the services should be performed, and (iii) fully understands the facilities, difficulties and restrictions attending performance of the services under this Agreement. If the services involve work upon any site, Consultant warrants that Consultant has or will investigate the site and is or will be fully acquainted with the conditions there existing, prior to commencement of services hereunder. Should the Consultant discover any latent or unknown conditions, which will materially affect the performance of the services hereunder, Consultant shall immediately inform the City of such fact and shall not proceed except at Consultant’s risk until written instructions are received from the Contract Officer. 1.6 Care of Work. The Consultant shall adopt reasonable methods during the life of the Agreement to furnish continuous protection to the work, and the equipment, materials, papers, documents, plans, studies and/or other components thereof to prevent losses or damages, and shall be responsible for all such damages, to persons or property, until acceptance of the work by City, except such losses or damages as may be caused by City’s own negligence. G.12.e Packet Pg. 299 Attachment: GT_ Michael Baker On Call Services Agreement (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01247.0005/553342.1 5/8/2019 -4- 1.7 Further Responsibilities of Parties. Both parties agree to use reasonable care and diligence to perform their respective obligations under this Agreement. Both parties agree to act in good faith to execute all instruments, prepare all documents and take all actions as may be reasonably necessary to carry out the purposes of this Agreement. Unless hereafter specified, neither party shall be responsible for the service of the other. 1.8 Additional Services. City shall have the right at any time during the performance of the services, without invalidating this Agreement, to order extra work beyond that specified in the Scope of Services or make changes by altering, adding to or deducting from said work. No such extra work may be undertaken unless a written order is first given by the Contract Officer to the Consultant, incorporating therein any adjustment in (i) the Contract Sum for the actual costs of the extra work, and/or (ii) the time to perform this Agreement, which said adjustments are subject to the written approval of the Consultant. Any increase in compensation of up to ten percent (10%) of the Contract Sum or $25,000, whichever is less; or, in the time to perform of up to one hundred eighty (180) days, may be approved by the Contract Officer. Any greater increases, taken either separately or cumulatively, must be approved by the City Council. It is expressly understood by Consultant that the provisions of this Section shall not apply to services specifically set forth in the Scope of Services. Consultant hereby acknowledges that it accepts the risk that the services to be provided pursuant to the Scope of Services may be more costly or time consuming than Consultant anticipates and that Consultant shall not be entitled to additional compensation therefor. City may in its sole and absolute discretion have similar work done by other consultants. No claims for an increase in the Contract Sum or time for performance shall be valid unless the procedures established in this Section are followed. 1.9 Special Requirements. Additional terms and conditions of this Agreement, if any, which are made a part hereof are set forth in the “Special Requirements” attached hereto as Exhibit “B” and incorporated herein by this reference. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of Exhibit “B” and any other provisions of this Agreement, the provisions of Exhibit “B” shall govern. ARTICLE 2. COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT. 2.1 Contract Sum. Subject to any limitations set forth in this Agreement, City agrees to pay Con sultant the amounts specified in the “Schedule of Compensation” attached hereto as Exhibit “C” and incorporated herein by this reference. The total compensation, including reimbursement for actual expenses, shall not exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit “C” (the “Contract Sum”), unless additional compensation is approved pursuant to Section 1.8. G.12.e Packet Pg. 300 Attachment: GT_ Michael Baker On Call Services Agreement (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01247.0005/553342.1 5/8/2019 -5- 2.2 Method of Compensation. The method of compensation may include: (i) a lump sum payment upon completion; (ii) payment in accordance with specified tasks or the percentage of completion of the services, less contract retention; (iii) payment for time and materials based upon the Consultant’s rates as specified in the Schedule of Compensation, provided that (a) time estimates are provided for the performance of sub tasks, (b) contract retention is maintained, and (c) the Contract Sum is not exceeded; or (iv) such other methods as may be specified in the Schedule of Compensation. 2.3 Reimbursable Expenses. Compensation may include reimbursement for actual and necessary expenditures for reproduction costs, telephone expenses, and travel expenses approved by the Contract Officer in advance, or actual subcontractor expenses of an approved subcontractor pursuant to Section 4.5, and only if specified in the Schedule of Compensation. The Contract Sum shall include the attendance of Consultant at all project meetings reasonably deemed necessary by the City. Coordination of the performance of the work with City is a critical component of the services. If Consultant is required to attend additional meetings to facilitate such coordination, Consultant shall not be entitled to any additional compensation for attending said meetings. 2.4 Invoices. Each month Consultant shall furnish to City an original invoice for all work performed and expenses incurred during the preceding month in a form approved by City’s Director of Finance. By submitting an invoice for payment under this Agreement, Consultant is certifying compliance with all provisions of the Agreement. The invoice shall detail charges for all necessary and actual expenses by the following categories: labor (by sub-category), travel, materials, equipment, supplies, and sub-contractor contracts. Sub-contractor charges shall also be detailed by such categories. Consultant shall not invoice City for any duplicate services performed by more than one person. City shall independently review each invoice submitted by the Consultant to determine whether the work performed and expenses incurred are in compliance with the provisions of this Agreement. Except as to any charges for work performed or expenses incurred by Consultant which are disputed by City, or as provided in Section 7.3, City will use its best efforts to cause Consultant to be paid within forty-five (45) days of receipt of Consultant’s correct and undisputed invoice; however, Consultant acknowledges and agrees that due to City warrant run procedures, the City cannot guarantee that payment will occur within this time period. In the event any charges or expenses are disputed by City, the original invoice shall be returned by City to Consultant for correction and resubmission. Review and payment by City for any invoice provided by the Consultant shall not constitute a waiver of any rights or remedies provided herein or any applicable law. 2.5 Waiver. Payment to Consultant for work performed pursuant to this Agreement shall not be deemed to waive any defects in work performed by Consultant. G.12.e Packet Pg. 301 Attachment: GT_ Michael Baker On Call Services Agreement (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01247.0005/553342.1 5/8/2019 -6- ARTICLE 3. PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE 3.1 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement. 3.2 Schedule of Performance. Consultant shall commence the services pursuant to this Agreement upon receipt of a written notice to proceed and shall perform all services within the time period(s) established in the “Schedule of Performance” attached hereto as Exhibit “D” and incorporated herein by this reference. When requested by the Consultant, extensions to the time period(s) specified in the Schedule of Performance may be approved in writing by the Contract Officer but no t exceeding one hundred eighty (180) days cumulatively. 3.3 Force Majeure. The time period(s) specified in the Schedule of Performance for performance of the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be extended because of any delays due to unforeseeable causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the Consultant, including, but not restricted to, acts of God or of the public enemy, unusually severe weather, fires, earthquakes, floods, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, riots, strikes, freight embargoes, wars, litigation, and/or acts of any governmental agency, including the City, if the Consultant shall within ten (10) days of the commencement of such delay notify the Contract Officer in writing of the causes of the delay. The Contract Officer shall ascertain the facts and the extent of delay, and extend the time for performing the services for the period of the enforced delay when and if in the judgment of the Contract Officer such delay is justified. The Contract Officer’s determination shall be final and conclusive upon the parties to this Agreement. In no event shall Consultant be entitled to recover damages against the City for any delay in the performance of this Agreement, however caused, Consultant’s sole remedy being extension of the Agreement pursuant to this Section. 3.4 Term. Unless earlier terminated in accordance with Article 7 of this Agreement, this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect until completion of the services but not exceeding one (1) years from the date hereof, except as otherwise provided in the Schedule of Performance (Exhibit “D”). ARTICLE 4. COORDINATION OF WORK 4.1 Representatives and Personnel of Consultant. The following principals of Consultant (“Principals”) are hereby designated as being the principals and representatives of Consultant authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the work specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith: G.12.e Packet Pg. 302 Attachment: GT_ Michael Baker On Call Services Agreement (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01247.0005/553342.1 5/8/2019 -7- Bob Stark, AICP, Project Director (Name) (Title) (Name) (Title) (Name) (Title) It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of the foregoing principals were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, the foregoing principals shall be responsible during the term of this Agreement for directing all activities of Consultant and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the services hereunder. All personnel of Consultant, and any authorized agents, shall at all times be under the exclusive direction and control of the Principals. For purposes of this Agreement, the foregoing Principals may not be replaced nor may their responsibilities be substantially reduced by Consultant without the express written approval of City. Additionally, Consultant shall utilize only competent personnel to perform services pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall make every reasonable effort to maintain the stability and continuity of Consultant’s staff and subcontractors, if any, assigned to perform the services required under this Agreement. Consultant shall notify City of any changes in Consultant’s staff and subcontractors, if any, assigned to perform the services required under this Agreement, prior to and during any such performance. 4.2 Status of Consultant. Consultant shall have no authority to bind City in any manner, or to incur any obligation, debt or liability of any kind on behalf of or against City, whether by contract or otherwise, unless such authority is expressly conferred under this Agreement or is otherwise expressly conferred in writing by City. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that Consultant or any of Consultant’s officers, employees, or agents are in any manner officials, officers, employees or agents of City. Neither Consultant, nor any of Consultant’s officers, employees or agents, shall obtain any rights to retirement, health care or any other benefits which may otherwise accrue to City’s employees. Consultant expressly waives any claim Consultant may have to any such rights. 4.3 Contract Officer. The Contract Officer shall be G. Harold Duffey, City Manager, or such person as may be designated by the City Manager. It shall be the Consultant’s responsibility to assure that the Contract Officer is kept informed of the progress of the performance of the services and the Consultant shall refer any decisions which must be made by City to the Contract Officer. Unless otherwise specified herein, any approval of City required hereunder shall mean the approval of the Contract Officer. The Contract Officer shall have authority, if specified in writing by the City Manager, to sign all documents on behalf of the City required hereunder to carry out the t erms of this Agreement. 4.4 Independent Contractor. Neither the City nor any of its employees shall have any control over the manner, mode or means by which Consultant, its agents or employees, perform the services required herein, except G.12.e Packet Pg. 303 Attachment: GT_ Michael Baker On Call Services Agreement (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01247.0005/553342.1 5/8/2019 -8- as otherwise set forth herein. City shall have no voice in the selection, discharge, supervision or control of Consultant’s employees, servants, representatives or agents, or in fixing their number, compensation or hours of service. Consultant shall perform all services required herein as an independent contractor of City and shall remain at all times as to City a wholly independent contractor with only such obligations as are consistent with that role. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its agents or employees are agents or employees of City. City shall not in any way or for any purpose become or be deemed to be a partner of Consultant in its business or otherwise or a joint venturer or a member of any joint enterprise with Consultant. 4.5 Prohibition Against Subcontracting or Assignment. The experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of Consultant, its principals and employees were a substantial inducement for the City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, Consultant shall not contract with any other entity to perform in whole or in part the services required hereunder without the express written approval of the City. In addition, neither this Agreement nor any interest herein may be transferred, assigned, conveyed, hypothecated or encumbered voluntarily or by operation of law, whether for the benefit of creditors or otherwise, without the prior written approval of City. Transfers restricted hereunder shall include the transfer to any person or group of persons acting in concert of more than twenty five percent (25%) of the present ownership and/or control of Consultant, taking all transfers into account on a cumulative basis. In the event of any such unapproved transfer, including any bankruptcy proceeding, this Agreement shall be void. No approved transfer shall release the Consultant or any surety of Consultant of any liability hereunder without the express consent of City. ARTICLE 5. INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION 5.1 Insurance Coverages. The Consultant shall procure and maintain, at its sole cost and expense, in a form and content satisfactory to City, during the entire term of this Agreement including any extension thereof, the following policies of insurance which shall cover all elected and appointed officers, employees and agents of City: (a) General Liability Insurance (Occurrence Form CG0001 or equivalent). A policy of comprehensive general liability insurance written on a per occurrence basis for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. The policy of insurance shall be in an amount not less than $1,000,000.00 per occurrence or if a general aggregate limit is used, then the general aggregate limit shall be twice the occurrence limit. (b) Worker’s Compensation Insurance. A policy of worker’s compensation insurance in such amount as will fully comply with the laws of the State of California and which shall indemnify, insure and provide legal defense for the Consultant against any loss, claim or damage arising from any injuries or occupational diseases occurring to any worker employed by or any persons retained by the Consultant in the course of carrying out the work or services contemplated in this Agreement. G.12.e Packet Pg. 304 Attachment: GT_ Michael Baker On Call Services Agreement (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01247.0005/553342.1 5/8/2019 -9- (c) Automotive Insurance (Form CA 0001 (Ed 1/87) including “any auto” and endorsement CA 0025 or equivalent). A policy of comprehensive automobile liability insurance written on a per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage in an amount not less than $1,000,000. Said policy shall include coverage for owned, non-owned, leased, hired cars and any automobile. (d) Professional Liability. Professional liability insurance appropriate to the Consultant’s profession. This coverage may be written on a “claims made” basis, and must include coverage for contractual liability. The professional liability insurance required by this Agreement must be endorsed to be applicable to claims based upon, arising out of or related to services performed under this Agreement. The insurance must be maintained for at least 5 consecutive years following the completion of Consultant’s services or the termination of this Agreement. During this additional 5-year period, Consultant shall annually and upon request of the City submit written evidence of this continuous coverage. (e) Subcontractors. Consultant shall include all subcontractors as insureds under its policies or shall furnish separate certificates and certified endorsements for each subcontractor. All coverages for subcontractors shall include all of the requirements stated herein. (f) Additional Insurance. Policies of such other insurance, as may be required in the Special Requirements in Exhibit “B”. 5.2 General Insurance Requirements. All of the above policies of insurance shall be primary insurance and shall name the City, its elected and appointed officers, employees and agents as additional insureds and any insurance maintained by City or its officers, employees or agents may apply in excess of, and not contribute with Consultant’s insurance. The insurer is deemed hereof to waive all rights of subrogation and contribution it may have against the City, its officers, employees and agents and their respective insurers. Moreover, the insurance policy must specify that where the primary insured does not satisfy the self-insured retention, any additional insured may satisfy the self-insured retention. All of said policies of insurance shall provide that said insurance may not be amended or cancelled by the insurer or any party hereto without providing thirty (30) days prior written notice by certified mail return receipt requested to the City. In the event any of said policies of insurance are cancelled, the Consultant shall, prior to the cancellation date, submit new evidence of insurance in conformance with Section 5.1 to the Contract Officer. No work or services under this Agreement shall commence until the Consultant has provided the City with Certificates of Insurance, additional insured endorsement forms or appropriate insurance binders evidencing the above insurance coverages and said Certificates of Insurance or binders are approved by the City. City reserves the right to inspect complete, certified copies of and endorsements to all required insurance policies at any time. Any failure to comply with the reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches or warranties shall not affect coverage provided to City. All certificates shall name the City as additional insured (providing the appropriate endorsement) and shall conform to the following “cancellation” notice: G.12.e Packet Pg. 305 Attachment: GT_ Michael Baker On Call Services Agreement (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01247.0005/553342.1 5/8/2019 -10- CANCELLATION: SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATED THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY SHALL MAIL THIRTY (30)-DAY ADVANCE WRITTEN NOTICE TO CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED HEREIN. [to be initialed] ______________ Consultant Initials City, its respective elected and appointed officers, directors, officials, employees, agents and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities Consultant performs; products and completed operations of Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by Consultant; or any automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City, and their respective elected and appointed officers, officials, employees or volunteers. Consultant’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer’s liability. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City. At the option of City, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects City or its respective elected or appointed officers, officials, employees and volunteers or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration, defense expenses and claims. The Consultant agrees that the requirement to provide insurance shall not be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which the Consultant may be held responsible for the payment of damages to any persons or property resulting from the Consultant’s activities or the activities of any person or persons for which the Consultant is otherwise responsible nor shall it limit the Consultant’s indemnification liabilities as provided in Section 5.3. In the event the Consultant subcontracts any portion of the work in compliance with Section 4.5 of this Agreement, the contract between the Consultant and such subcontractor shall require the subcontractor to maintain the same policies of insurance that the Consultant is required to maintain pursuant to Section 5.1, and such certificates and endorsements shall be provided to City. 5.3 Indemnification. To the full extent permitted by law, Consultant agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its officers, employees and agents (“Indemnified Parties”) against, and will hold and save them and each of them harmless from, any and all actions, either judicial, administrative, arbitration or regulatory claims, damages to persons or property, losses, costs, penalties, obligations, errors, omissions or liabilities whether actual or threatened (herein “claims or liabilities”) that may be asserted or claimed by any person, firm or entity arising out of or in connection with the negligent performance of the work, operations or activities provided herein of Consultant, its officers, employees, agents, subcontractors, or invitees, or any individual or entity G.12.e Packet Pg. 306 Attachment: GT_ Michael Baker On Call Services Agreement (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01247.0005/553342.1 5/8/2019 -11- for which Consultant is legally liable (“indemnitors”), or arising from Consultant’s or indemnitors’ reckless or willful misconduct, or arising from Consultant’s or indemnitors’ negligent performance of or failure to perform any term, provision, covenant or condition of this Agreement, and in connection therewith: (a) Consultant will defend any action or actions filed in connection with any of said claims or liabilities and will pay all costs and expenses, including legal costs and attorney’s fees incurred in connection therewith; (b) Consultant will promptly pay any judgment rendered against the City, its officers, agents or employees for any such claims or liabilities arising out of or in connection with the negligent performance of or failure to perform such work, operations or activities of Consultant hereunder; and Consultant agrees to save and hold the City, its officers, agents, and employees harmless therefrom; (c) In the event the City, its officers, agents or employees is made a party to any action or proceeding filed or prosecuted against Consultant for such damages or other claims arising out of or in connection with the negligent performance of or failure to perform the work, operation or activities of Consultant hereunder, Consultant agrees to pay to the City, its officers, agents or employees, any and all costs and expenses incurred by the City, its officers, agents or employees in such action or proceeding, including but not limited to, legal costs and attorney’s fees. Consultant shall incorporate similar indemnity agreements with its subcontractors and if it fails to do so Consultant shall be fully responsible to indemnify City hereunder therefore, and failure of City to monitor compliance with these provisions shall not be a waiver hereof. This indemnification includes claims or liabilities arising from any negligent or wrongful act, error or omission, or reckless or willful misconduct of Consultant in the performance of professional services hereunder. The provisions of this Section do not apply to claims or liabilities occurring as a result of City’s sole negligence or willful acts or omissions, but, to the fullest extent permitted by law, shall apply to claims and liabilities resulting in part from City’s negligence, except that design professionals’ indemnity hereunder shall be limited to claims and liabilities arising out of the negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct of the design professional. The indemnity obligation shall be binding on successors and assigns of Consultant and shall survive termination of this Agreement. 5.4 Sufficiency of Insurer. Insurance required by this Agreement shall be satisfactory only if issued by companies qualified to do business in California, rated “A” or better in the most recent edition of Best Rating Guide, The Key Rating Guide or in the Federal Register, and only if they are of a financial category Class VII or better, unless such requirements are waived by the Risk Manager of the City (“Risk Manager”) due to unique circumstances. If this Agreement continues for more than 3 years duration, or in the event the risk manager determines that the work or services to be performed under this Agreement creates an increased or decreased risk of loss to the City, the Consultant agrees that the minimum limits of the insurance policies may be changed accordingly upon receipt of written notice from the Risk Manager. G.12.e Packet Pg. 307 Attachment: GT_ Michael Baker On Call Services Agreement (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01247.0005/553342.1 5/8/2019 -12- ARTICLE 6. RECORDS, REPORTS, AND RELEASE OF INFORMATION 6.1 Records. Consultant shall keep, and require subcontractors to keep, such ledgers, books of accounts, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, reports, studies or other documents relating to the disbursements charged to City and services performed hereunder (the “books and records”), as shall be necessary to perform the services required by this Agreement and enable the Contract Officer to evaluate the performance of such services. Any and all such documents shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be complete and detailed. The Contract Officer shall have full and free access to such books and records at all times during normal business hours of City, including the right to inspect, copy, audit and make records and transcripts from such records. Such records shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years following completion of the services hereunder, and the City shall have access to such records in the event any audit is required. In the event of dissolution of Consultant’s business, custody of the books and records may be given to City, and access shall be provided by Consultant’s successor in interest. Notwithstanding the above, the Consultant shall fully cooperate with the City in providing access to the books and records if a public records request is made and disclosure is required by law including but not limited to the California Public Records Act. 6.2 Reports. Consultant shall periodically prepare and submit to the Contract Officer such reports concerning the performance of the services required by this Agreement as the Contract Officer shall require. Consultant hereby acknowledges that the City is greatly concerned about the cost of work and services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement. For this reason, Consultant agrees that if Consultant becomes aware of any facts, circumstances, techniques, or events that may or will materially increase or decrease the cost of the work or services contemplated herein or, if Consultant is providing design services, the cost of the project being designed, Consultant shall promptly notify the Contract Officer of said fact, circumstance, technique or event and the estimated increased or decreased cost related thereto and, if Consultant is providing design services, the estimated increased or decreased cost estimate for the project being designed. 6.3 Ownership of Documents. All drawings, specifications, maps, designs, photographs, studies, surveys, data, notes, computer files, reports, records, documents and other materials (the “documents and materials”), including any electronic documents and materials, prepared by Consultant, its employees, subcontractors and agents in the performance of this Agreement shall be the property of City and shall be delivered to City in a format of the City’s choice upon request of the Contract Officer or upon the termination of this Agreement, and Consultant shall have no claim for further employment or additional compensation as a result of the exercise by City of its full rights of ownership use, reuse, or assignment of the documents and materials hereunder. Any use, reuse or assignment of such completed documents for other projects and/or use of uncompleted documents without specific written authorization by the Consultant will be at the City’s sole risk and without liability to Consultant, and Consultant’s guarantee and warranties shall not extend to such use, reuse or assignment. Consultant may retain copies of such documents for its own use. Consultant G.12.e Packet Pg. 308 Attachment: GT_ Michael Baker On Call Services Agreement (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01247.0005/553342.1 5/8/2019 -13- shall have the right to use the concepts embodied therein. All subcontractors shall provide for assignment to City of any documents or materials prepared by them, and in the event Consultant fails to secure such assignment, Consultant shall indemnify City for all damages resulting therefrom. Moreover, Consultant with respect to any documents and materials that may qualify as “works made for hire” as defined in 17 U.S.C. § 101, such documents and materials are hereby deemed “works made for hire” for the City. 6.4 Confidentiality and Release of Information. (a) All information gained or work product produced by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential, unless such information is in the public domain or already known to Consultant. Consultant shall not release or disclose any such information or work product to persons or entities other than City without prior written authorization from the Contract Officer. (b) Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not, without prior written authorization from the Contract Officer or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide documents, declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered “voluntary” provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena. (c) If Consultant, or any officer, employee, agent or subcontractor of Consultant, provides any information or work product in violation of this Agreement, then City shall have the right to reimbursement and indemnity from Consultant for any damages, costs and fees, including attorney’s fees, caused by or incurred as a result of Consultant’s conduct. (d) Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed there under. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, this right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response. ARTICLE 7. ENFORCEMENT OF AGREEMENT AND TERMINATION 7.1 California Law. This Agreement shall be interpreted, construed and governed both as to validity and to performance of the parties in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Legal ac tions concerning any dispute, claim or matter arising out of or in relation to this Agreement shall be instituted in the Superior Court of the County of San Bernardino, State of California, or any other appropriate court in such county, and Consultant covenants and agrees to submit to the personal jurisdiction of such court in the event of such action. In the event of litigation in a U.S. District G.12.e Packet Pg. 309 Attachment: GT_ Michael Baker On Call Services Agreement (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01247.0005/553342.1 5/8/2019 -14- Court, venue shall lie exclusively in the Central District of California, in the County of San Bernardino, State of California. 7.2 Disputes; Default. In the event that Consultant is in default under the terms of this Agreement, the City shall not have any obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default. Instead, the City may give notice to Consultant of the default and the reasons for the default. The notice shall include the timeframe in which Consultant may cure the default. This timeframe is presumptively thirty (30) days, but may be extended, though not reduced, if circumstances warrant. During the period of time that Consultant is in default, the City shall hold all invoices and shall, when the default is cured, proceed with payment on the invoices. In the alternative, the City may, in its sole discretion, elect to pay some or all of the outstanding invoices during the period of default. If Consultant does not cure the default, the City may take necessary steps to terminate this Agreement under this Article. Any failure on the part of the City to give notice of the Consultant’s default shall not be deemed to result in a waiver of the City’s legal rights or any rights arising out of any provision of this Agreement. 7.3 Retention of Funds. Consultant hereby authorizes City to deduct from any amount payable to Consultant (whether or not arising out of this Agreement) (i) any amounts the payment of which may be in dispute hereunder or which are necessary to compensate City for any losses, costs, liabilities, or damages suffered by City, and (ii) all amounts for which City may be liable to third parties, by reason of Consultant’s acts or omissions in performing or failing to perform Consultant’s obligation under this Agreement. In the event that any claim is made by a third party, the amount or validity of which is disputed by Consultant, or any indebtedness shall exist which shall appear to be the basis for a claim of lien, City may withhold from any payment due, without liability for interest because of such withholding, an amount sufficient to cover such claim. The failure of City to exercise such right to deduct or to withhold shall not, however, affect the obligations of the Consultant to insure, indemnify, and protect City as elsewhere provided herein. 7.4 Waiver. Waiver by any party to this Agreement of any term, condition, or covenant of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant. Waiver by any party of any breach of the provisions of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision or a waiver of any subsequent breach or violation of any provision of this Agreement. Acceptance by City of any work or services by Consultant shall not constitute a waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement. No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy by a non-defaulting party on any default shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a waiver. Any waiver by either party of any default must be in writing and shall not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this Agreement. 7.5 Rights and Remedies are Cumulative. Except with respect to rights and remedies expressly declared to be exclusive in this Agreement, the rights and remedies of the parties are cumulative and the exercise by either party G.12.e Packet Pg. 310 Attachment: GT_ Michael Baker On Call Services Agreement (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01247.0005/553342.1 5/8/2019 -15- of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other party. 7.6 Legal Action. In addition to any other rights or remedies, either party may take legal action, in law or in equity, to cure, correct or remedy any default, to recover damages for any default, to compel specific performance of this Agreement, to obtain declaratory or injunctive relief, or to obtain any other remedy consistent with the purposes of this Agreement. Notwithstanding any contrary provision herein, Consultant shall file a statutory claim pursuant to Government Code Sections 905 et. seq. and 910 et. seq., in order to pursue a legal action under this Agreement. 7.7 Termination Prior to Expiration of Term. This Section shall govern any termination of this Contract except as specifically provided in the following Section for termination for cause. The City reserves the right to terminate this Contract at any time, with or without cause, upon written notice to Consultant. In addition, the Consultant may terminate this Contract for cause, upon sixty (60) days’ advance written notice to City. Upon receipt of any notice of termination, Consultant shall immediately cease all services hereunder except such as may be specifically approved by the Contract Officer. Except where the Consultant has initiated termination, the Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for all services rendered prior to the effective date of the notice of termination and for any services authorized by the Contract Officer thereafter in accordance with the Schedule of Compensation or such as may be approved by the Contract Officer, except as provided in Section 7.3. In the event the Consultant has initiated termination, the Consultant shall be entitled to compensation only for the reasonable value of the work product actually produced hereunder. In the event of termination without cause pursuant to this Section, the terminating party need not provide the non-terminating party with the opportunity to cure pursuant to Section 7.2. 7.8 Termination for Default of Consultant. If termination is due to the failure of the Consultant to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement, City may, after compliance with the provisions of Section 7.2, take over the work and prosecute the same to completion by contract or otherwise, and the Consultant shall be liable to the extent that the total cost for completion of the services required hereunder exceeds the compensation herein stipulated (provided that the City shall use reasonable efforts to mitigate such damages), and City may withhold any payments to the Consultant for the purpose of set-off or partial payment of the amounts owed the City as previously stated. 7.9 Attorney’s Fees. If either party to this Agreement is required to initiate or defend or made a party to any action or proceeding in any way connected with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action or proceeding, in addition to any other relief which may be granted, whether legal or equitable, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney’s fees. Attorney’s fees shall include attorney’s fees on any appeal, and in addition a party entitled to attorney’s fees shall be entitled to all other reasonable costs for investigating such action, taking depositions and discovery and all other necessary costs G.12.e Packet Pg. 311 Attachment: GT_ Michael Baker On Call Services Agreement (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01247.0005/553342.1 5/8/2019 -16- the court allows which are incurred in such litigation. All such fees shall be deemed to have accrued on commencement of such action and shall be enforceable whether or not su ch action is prosecuted to judgment. ARTICLE 8. CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES: NON-DISCRIMINATION 8.1 Non-liability of City Officers and Employees. No officer or employee of the City shall be personally liable to the Consultant, or any successor in interest, in the event of any default or breach by the City or for any amount which may become due to the Consultant or to its successor, or for breach of any obligation of the terms of this Agreement. 8.2 Conflict of Interest. Consultant covenants that neither it, nor any officer or principal of its firm, has or shall acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, which would conflict in any manner with the interests of City or which would in any way hinder Consultant’s performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it as an officer, employee, agent or subcontractor without the express written consent of the Contract Officer. Consultant agrees to at all times avoid conflicts of interest or the appearance of any conflicts of interest with the interests of City in the performance of this Agreement. 8.3 Covenant Against Discrimination. Consultant covenants that, by and for itself, its heirs, executors, assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of, any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry or other protected class in the performance of this Agreement. Consultant shall take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry or other protected class. 8.4 Unauthorized Aliens. Consultant hereby promises and agrees to comply with all of the provisions of the Federal Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C.A. §§ 1101, et seq., as amended, and in connection therewith, shall not employ unauthorized aliens as defined therein. Should Consultant so employ such unauthorized aliens for the performance of work and/or services covered by this Agreement, and should any liability or sanctions be imposed against City for such use of unauthorized aliens, Consultant hereby agrees to and shall reimburse City for the cost of all such liabilities or sanctions imposed, together with any and all costs, including attorney’s fees, incurred by City. G.12.e Packet Pg. 312 Attachment: GT_ Michael Baker On Call Services Agreement (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01247.0005/553342.1 5/8/2019 -17- ARTICLE 9. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 9.1 Notices. Any notice, demand, request, document, consent, approval, or communication either party desires or is required to give to the other party or any other person shall be in writing and either served personally or sent by prepaid, first-class mail, in the case of the City, to the City Manager and to the attention of the Contract Officer (with her/his name and City title), City of Grand Terrace, 22795 Barton Rd, Grand Terrace, CA 92313, and in the case of the Consultant, to the person(s) at the address designated on the execution page of this Agreement. Either party may change its address by notifying the other party of the change of address in writing. Notice shall be deemed communicated at the time personally delivered or in seventy-two (72) hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this Section. 9.2 Interpretation. The terms of this Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the meaning of the language used and shall not be construed for or against either party by reason of the authorship of this Agreement or any other rule of construction which might otherwise apply. 9.3 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, and such counterparts shall constitute one and the same instrument. 9.4 Integration; Amendment. This Agreement including the attachments hereto is the entire, complete and exclusive expression of the understanding of the parties. It is understood that there are no oral agreements between the parties hereto affecting this Agreement and this Agreement supersedes and cancels any and all previous negotiations, arrangements, agreements and understandings, if any, between the parties, and none shall be used to interpret this Agreement. No amendment to or modification of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and approved by the Consultant and by the City Council. The parties agree that this requirement for written modifications cannot be waived and that any attempted waiver shall be void. 9.5 Severability. In the event that any one or more of the phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections contained in this Agreement shall be declared invalid or unenforceable by a valid judgment or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections of this Agreement which are hereby declared as severable and shall be interpreted to carry out the intent of the parties hereunder unless the invalid provision is so material that its invalidity deprives either party of the basic benefit of their bargain or renders this Agreement meaningless. G.12.e Packet Pg. 313 Attachment: GT_ Michael Baker On Call Services Agreement (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01247.0005/553342.1 5/8/2019 -18- 9.6 Warranty & Representation of Non-Collusion. No official, officer, or employee of City has any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, nor shall any official, officer, or employee of City participate in any decision relating to this Agreement which may affect his/her financial interest or the financial interest of any corporation, partnership, or association in which (s)he is directly or indirectly interested, or in violation of any corporation, partnership, or association in which (s)he is directly or indirectly interested, or in violation of any State or municipal statute or regulation. The determination of “financial interest” shall be consistent with State law and shall not include interests found to be “remote” or “noninterests” pursuant to Government Code Sections 1091 or 1091.5. Nor shall any such officer or employee participate in any decision relating to the Agreement which affects her/his financial interest or the financial interest of any corporation, partnership or association in which (s)he is, directly or indirectly, interested, in violation of any State statute or regulation, including but not limited to the Political Reform Act (Government Code Sections 81000, et seq.) Consultant warrants and represents that it has not paid or given, and will not pay or give, to any third party including, but not limited to, any City official, officer, or employee, any money, consideration, or other thing of value as a result or consequence of obtaining or being awarded any agreement. Consultant further warrants and represents that (s)he/it has not engaged in any act(s), omission(s), or other conduct or collusion that would result in the payment of any money, consideration, or other thing of value to any third party including, but not limited to, any City official, officer, or employee, as a result of consequence of obtaining or being awarded any agreement. Consultant is aware of and understands that any such act(s), omission(s) or other conduct resulting in such payment of money, consideration, or other thing of value will render this Agreement void and of no force or effect. Consultant’s Authorized Initials _______ 9.7 Corporate Authority. The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the parties hereto warrant that (i) such party is duly organized and existing, (ii) they are duly authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement on behalf of said party, (iii) by so executing this Agreement, such party is formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement, and (iv) the entering into this Agreement does not violate any provision of any other Agreement to which said party is bound. This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the parties. [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE] G.12.e Packet Pg. 314 Attachment: GT_ Michael Baker On Call Services Agreement (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01247.0005/553342.1 5/8/2019 19 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year first-above written. CITY: City of Grand Terrace, a municipal corporation _____________________________________ G. Harold Duffey, City Manager ATTEST: ____________________________________ Debra Thomas, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ALESHIRE & WYNDER, LLP ____________________________________ Adrian R. Guerra, City Attorney CONSULTANT: Michael Baker International, a California Corporation By: ___________________________________ Name: Title: By: ___________________________________ Name: Title: Address: 3536 Concours Street, Suite 100 Ontario, CA 91764 _____________________________ Two corporate officer signatures required when Consultant is a corporation, with one signature required from each of the following groups: 1) Chairman of the Board, President or any Vice President; and 2) Secretary, any Assistant Secretary, Chief Financial Officer or any Assistant Treasurer. CONSULTANT’S SIGNATURES SHALL BE DULY NOTARIZED, AND APPROPRIATE ATTESTATIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE BYLAWS, ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION, OR OTHER RULES OR REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO CONSULTANT’S BUSINESS ENTITY. G.12.e Packet Pg. 315 Attachment: GT_ Michael Baker On Call Services Agreement (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01247.0005/553342.1 5/8/2019 CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO On __________, 2019 before me, ________________, personally appeared ________________, proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose names(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature: _____________________________________ OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT INDIVIDUAL CORPORATE OFFICER _______________________________ TITLE(S) PARTNER(S) LIMITED GENERAL ATTORNEY-IN-FACT TRUSTEE(S) GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR OTHER_______________________________ ______________________________________ SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: (NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES)) _____________________________________________ _____________________________________________ ___________________________________ TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT ___________________________________ NUMBER OF PAGES ___________________________________ DATE OF DOCUMENT ___________________________________ SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy or validity of that document. G.12.e Packet Pg. 316 Attachment: GT_ Michael Baker On Call Services Agreement (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01247.0005/553342.1 5/8/2019 CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO On __________, 2019 before me, ________________, personally appeared ________________, proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose names(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature: _____________________________________ OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT INDIVIDUAL CORPORATE OFFICER _______________________________ TITLE(S) PARTNER(S) LIMITED GENERAL ATTORNEY-IN-FACT TRUSTEE(S) GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR OTHER_______________________________ ______________________________________ SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: (NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES)) _____________________________________________ _____________________________________________ ___________________________________ TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT ___________________________________ NUMBER OF PAGES ___________________________________ DATE OF DOCUMENT ___________________________________ SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy or validity of that document. G.12.e Packet Pg. 317 Attachment: GT_ Michael Baker On Call Services Agreement (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01247.0005/553342.1 5/8/2019 A-1 EXHIBIT “A” SCOPE OF SERVICES I. Consultant will provide on-call planning and environmental services to the City (“Services”). Depending on the needs of each individual project, the Services more specifically may include, but are not limited to, the following: A. Planning Services including, but not limited to: i. Initial Site Assessment ii. Review project for completeness and compliance with the General Plan, Zoning Ordinances, Barton Road Specific Plan (if applicable) Design Guidelines, and all applicable codes and ordinances iii. Prepare letters for Director’s review iv. Attend Development Advisory Board meetings for the project v. Coordinate comments from members of the Development Advisory Board vi. Meet with applicants vii. Coordinate the Project Review with CEQA Review viii. Prepare public hearing notices, staff reports, resolutions and conditions of approval ix. Attend Planning and/or City Council meetings x. File management for the project xi. Plan Check review of projects including, but not limited to construction plans, grading plan, landscape and irrigation plans, lighting plans, etc. for compliance with conditions of approval. B. Environmental Review Services, including, but not limited to: i. Initial Site Assessment ii. CEQA Initial Study to determine whether project requires EIR, MND, ND, or CE iii. Nosie Studies iv. Air Quality v. Transportation Studies vi. Water Quality/Storm and Wastewater Control Management G.12.e Packet Pg. 318 Attachment: GT_ Michael Baker On Call Services Agreement (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01247.0005/553342.1 5/8/2019 A-2 vii. Greenhouse Gas Emission Studies viii. Biological and Cultural Resources Studies ix. Environmental Mitigation Studies/Reports x. Coordinate and distribute environmental documents and notices xi. Mitigation Monitoring xii. Preparation of Public Notices xiii. Presentations at public meetings xiv. Coordinate the CEQA Review with Project Review C. Staff Augmentation with AB 18 and AB 52 Consultation D. Prepare scope of work, budget, and schedule for assigned projects, to include project coordination meetings with City Staff and applicant and all public meetings and hearings. E. Coordination with applicable agencies, including San Bernardino County Departments, CalTrans, SCAQMD, Department of Fish and Wildlife, and any other regulatory or advisory agencies related to project processing. F. Assist City staff on City-initiated projects, as approved by the Contract Officer. II. The Consultant has been selected to provide the Services which will be readily available when needed for the fixed rates set forth in Exhibit C. However, before any work is performed, the Consultant must provide a specific written Task Proposal for any requested Services and get written approval of the terms of the Task Proposal from the City, as such process is more fully described in the Work Request Procedure below in Section III. Unless specifically defined, each category or type of work listed in Exhibit C shall be construed broadly to include all services customarily described under such category or type. III. Work Request Procedure A. Each task to be performed shall be set forth in a written request (“Request”) produced by the Contract Officer with a description of the work to be performed, and the time desired for completion. All tasks shall be carried out in conformity with all provisions of this Agreement. B. Following receipt of the Request, the Consultant shall prepare a “Task Proposal” that includes the following components: (1) a written description of the requested task (“Task Description”) including all components and subtasks, and including any clarifications of the descriptions provided in the Request; (2) the costs to perform the task (“Task Budget”); G.12.e Packet Pg. 319 Attachment: GT_ Michael Baker On Call Services Agreement (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01247.0005/553342.1 5/8/2019 A-3 (3) an explanation of how the cost was determined; and (4) a schedule for completion of the task (“Task Completion Schedule”), including a final completion date (“Task Completion Date”). C. Contract Officer shall approve, modify, or reject the Task Proposal in writing, and issue a Notice to Proceed when a written agreement has been reached on the Task Proposal. D. The task shall be performed at a cost not exceeding the Task Budget. E. Consultant shall complete the task and deliver all deliverables to Contract Officer by the Task Completion Date and in accordance with the Task Completion Schedule. IV. Consultant acknowledges that City has no obligation to request work from Consultant under this Agreement. City may establish a rotation schedule with multiple consultants, and may seek competing Task Proposals. V. In addition to the requirements of Section 6.2, during performance of the Services, Consultant will keep the City appraised of the status of performance by delivering the following status reports: A. Consultant shall provide to City a weekly written summary of progress on all approved Task Proposals for services lasting longer than one week. VI. As part of the Services, Consultant will prepare and deliver the following tangible work products to the City: A. Work products and timelines based on agreed upon scope of work for assigned projects. VII. All work product is subject to review and acceptance by the City, and must be revised by the Consultant without additional charge to the City until found satisfactory and accepted by City. VIII. Consultant will utilize the following personnel to accomplish the Services: A. Bob Stark, AICP, Project Director B. Rameeta Garewal, AICP, Planning Services Lead/Senior Project Manager C. Siri Champion, Lead Project Manager, Senior Staff Planner D. Emily Elliott, Entitlements Lead, Senior Staff Planner E. Peter Minegar, CEP-IT, Environmental Review Services Lead/Senior Staff Planner G.12.e Packet Pg. 320 Attachment: GT_ Michael Baker On Call Services Agreement (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01247.0005/553342.1 5/8/2019 B-1 EXHIBIT “B” SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS (Superseding Contract Boilerplate) I. The following Sections are hereby added to Article 2: 2.6 CalPERS Exclusion. Under no circumstances shall any worker be assigned by Consultant to provide City with continued service in excess of six months in accordance with California Government Code section 20305. If a person is assigned by Consultant to perform work for the City on a per diem basis, such person cannot work for City in excess of 125 days within a calendar year. If a person is contracted to perform work for City by Consultant, in other than a per diem basis, such person cannot perform work for City in excess of hours of services within the fiscal year. 2.7 CalPERS Temporary Retired Annuitant. Unless approved by the Contract Officer, no personnel of Consultant assigned to perform Services under this Agreement shall be a “retired annuitant” from the California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS). Prior to assigning any personnel of Consultant to perform any work for the City, Consultant shall identify potential candidates to the Contract Officer that are “retired annuitants” from CalPERS. If approved by the Contract Officer, under no circumstances shall a retired annuitant work more than 960 hours within a fiscal year. The compensation for the retired person shall be an hourly pay rate that is within the salary schedule for the position and shall not exceed the maximum monthly base salary paid to other employees performing comparable duties as listed on a publicly available pay schedule divided by 173.333 to equal an hourly rate in accordance with California Government Code section 21224. A retired person appointed pursuant to this Agreement shall not receive any benefit, incentive, compensation in lieu of benefits, or other form of compensation in addition to the hourly pay rate. A retired annuitant will not accrue service credit or any additional retirement rights or benefits. G.12.e Packet Pg. 321 Attachment: GT_ Michael Baker On Call Services Agreement (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01247.0005/553342.1 5/8/2019 C-1 EXHIBIT “C” SCHEDULE OF COMPENSATION I. Consultant shall perform the on-call services at the rates listed in Exhibit “C-1”. The rates provided in Exhibit “C-1” may not be escalated during the term of this Agreement. Consultant shall be compensated based upon the time and rates of the personnel performing the tasks and itemizing materials and equipment utilized and the costs thereof, which shall conform to the requirements provided in Exhibit “A”. II. The City will compensate Consultant for the Services performed upon submission of a valid invoice. Each invoice shall be accompanied by all Task Proposal’s for which Consultant is requesting compensation. Each invoice is to include: A. Line items for all personnel describing the work performed, the number of hours worked, and the hourly rate. B. Line items for all materials and equipment properly charged to the Services. C. Line items for all other approved reimbursable expenses claimed, with supporting documentation. D. Line items for all approved subconsultant labor, supplies, equipment, materials, and travel properly charged to the Services. III. The total compensation for the Services shall be as follows: A. For Services that will be reimbursed by an applicant/developer, the maximum amount of compensation shall be established in accordance with the procedure described in Section III of Exhibit “A”. B. For Services provided under Section I.F of Exhibit “A” (City initiated projects), there shall be a maximum total compensation of $25,000 during the term of this Agreement. G.12.e Packet Pg. 322 Attachment: GT_ Michael Baker On Call Services Agreement (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01247.0005/553342.1 5/8/2019 C-2 EXHIBIT “C-1” RATE SCHEDULE Consultant shall perform the Services under Exhibit A based upon an hourly, time, and materials basis. Consultant shall also be compensated for reimbursements and out of pocket expenses, provided that City approves such reimbursements and out of pocket expenses in writing. Consultant’s rates are as follows: Team Member Role Hourly Rate Bob Stark, AICP Project Director/Advisor 235.00 Rameeta Garewal, AICP Planning Lead/Senior Project Manager 260.00 Siri Champion Lead Project Manager 175.00 Nicole Marotz, AICP, LEED AP CEQA Planner 160.00 Darren Edgington, CEP-IT CEQA Project Manager 155.00 Renee Gleason CEQA Planner 150.00 Peter Minegar, CEP-IT CEQA Lead 148.00 Emily Elliott, AICP Entitlements Lead 145.00 Alex Pohlman, EIT GIS Lead 130.00 Kendell Hillis GIS Planner 105.00 Connor Szeto Assistant Planner 80.00 A 3% escalation rate will apply to the above rates for each subsequent year of the contract duration. G.12.e Packet Pg. 323 Attachment: GT_ Michael Baker On Call Services Agreement (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01247.0005/553342.1 5/8/2019 C-3 Other Direct Costs: Other Direct Costs: Mileage for travel to and from City offices to project sites would be reimbursed at the applicable federal rate. Administrative costs (copies, mailing, etc.) will be billed at cost with no markup (our current rates are listed below). Services for long-range planning and special projects and environmental services will be billed in accordance with the terms established under specific task orders. Type of ODC Unit Cost Estimated Budget Amount 8.5x11 b/w $ .04 $ EA 8.5x11 color $ .17 $ EA 11x17 b/w $ .18 $ EA 11x17 color $ . 34 $ EA Full Size Plotting $ At cost $ Per SF Outside Vendor Reprographics $ At Cost $ Mileage $ At Current Federal Rate $ Per Diem (Hotel & Incidentals) $ At Current Federal Rate $ Air Travel $ At Cost $ Certified Mailing $ At Cost $ Non-Standard/Specialized Software $ At Cost $ Non-Standard/Specialized Equipment $ At Cost $ Other Public Meeting Costs (venue rental, food, etc.) $ At Cost $ G.12.e Packet Pg. 324 Attachment: GT_ Michael Baker On Call Services Agreement (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) 01247.0005/553342.1 5/8/2019 D-1 EXHIBIT “D” SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE I. Consultant shall perform all Services timely to ensure the prompt and timely processing of all planning related applications and approval thereof by the planning department, Planning Commission, and/or City Council. II. Consultant shall timely deliver the any and all documents related to the Services, as described in Section I of Exhibit “A”, to the City for the processing of, and approval, of any and all applications for development by the planning department, Planning Commission, and/or City Council. III. The Contract Officer may approve extensions for performance of the services in accordance with Section 3.2. IV. Unless earlier terminated in accordance with Article 7 of this Agreement, th is Agreement shall continue in full force and effect from and after the Effective Date of this Agreement for a term of three (3) years (“Term”). G.12.e Packet Pg. 325 Attachment: GT_ Michael Baker On Call Services Agreement (Professional Services -On Call Planning and Environmental Services) Consultant List On-Call Planning and Environmental Services MIG 1500 Iowa Avenue, Suite 110 Riverside, CA 92507 Michael Baker International 3536 Concours Street, Suite 100 Ontario, CA 91764 T&B Planning 17542 East 17th Street, Ste 100 Tustin, CA 92780 McKenna Lanier 30520 Rancho California Rd Suite 107 Temecula, CA 92590 LSA Associates, Inc.1500 Iowa Avenue, Suite 200 Riverside, CA 92507 G.12.f Packet Pg. 326 Attachment: 2019 Consultants for Planning and Environmental Services RFP (Professional Services -On AGENDA REPORT MEETING DATE: May 14, 2019 Council Item TITLE: Notice of Completion for the Dog Park and Settlement Agreement with Clean Cut Landscaping PRESENTED BY: Alan French, Public Works Director RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the appropriation of $66,493 from the following $54,254 from the General Fund bond proceeds; and $12,239 from Measure I funds to fund the final payments to Clean Cut Landscaping; Direct Staff to file a Notice of Completion for the Dog Park work completed by Clean Cut Landscaping; and Approve the settlement agreement and authorize the Mayor to execute the settlement agreement, subject to City Attorney approval as to form, that authorizes the final payment to Clean Cut Landscaping in the amount of $102,645.67 (representing all final outstanding payments due to Clean Cut Landscaping) as provided in the settlement agreement. 2030 VISION STATEMENT: This staff report supports 2030 Vision Goal #4 to develop and implement successful partnerships by working collaboratively with community groups to facilitate the delivery of services benefitting our youth, seniors and the community. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: On June 13, 2017, the City Council awarded a project to Clean Cut Landscaping (“Contractor”) in the amount of $373,525.15, with a 5% contingency, for the Dog Park. The project included demolition/clearing, earthwork and grading; civil street improvements, furnishing and installation of site amenities, planting and irrigation, and short-term landscape and irrigation maintenance to include plant establishment. On November 19, 2018, Change Order No. 1 was executed. Change Order No. 1 added two additional benches in the Dog Park. This increased the contract amount by an additional $6,109.68. G.13 Packet Pg. 327 Additional work was p erformed on the project; however, a Change Order was never executed expressly defining the additional work and the cost thereof. Work included site clearing, fence changes, additional benches, revised drainage facilities and grading work (“Additional Work”). All work for the Dog Park was completed on April 17, 2018 and the Contractor maintenance term ended November 25, 2018. However, the Additional Work negotiations were not completed until February 2019. The Contractor and the City have agreed that the cost of the Additional Work is $66,492.99, which is just under 18% of the original contract amount. With the original contract amount ($373,525.15), the amount of Change Order No. 1 ($6,109.68), and the agreed upon amount of the Additional Work ($66,492.99), the total project cost is $446,127.82. This amount is still $27,300 less than the next lowest bid received for this project. Of the $446,127.82 total project cost, the City has already paid $343,482.15 to the Contractor. This leaves $102,645.67 remaining to be paid. The City Attorney and staff have worked with the Contractor to resolve all disputes that have arisen during the course of the project, including reaching agreement on the amount of the Additional Work. The settlement agreement provides that, within 35 days of the filing of the Notice of Completion (see below), t he City would provide for a final payment of $102,645.67 to the Contractor. In turn, the Contractor would release the City from any liability in relation to any alleged liability asserted by Contractor against the City. Assuming the settlement agreement is approved, a Notice of Completion for the Dog Park Project would then be filed with the San Bernardino County Recorder’s Office to close the project out. FISCAL IMPACT: The total cost of the Dog Park Project is $446,127.82. There have been two progress payments made totaling $343,482.15. Within 35 days of filing the Notice of Completion, the settlement agreement requires the City to make a final payment $102,645.67. City staff further recommends that City Council authorize the appropriation of the Bond Proceed and Measure I Funds to process the final progress payment and retention payment to Clean Cut, direct staff to file the Notice of Completion and authorize the City Manager to execute the Settlement Agreement with Clean Cut Landscaping. Below are the approved bond proceeds projects to date with the proposed additional amount for the Dog Park. City of Grand Terrace G.13 Packet Pg. 328 Use of Approved 2011A Bond Proceeds (20%) Amount Bond Proceeds as approved by the Department of Finance (20%) 5% of proceeds $289,015 15% of proceeds $2,026,585 Total Authorized $2,315,600 Completed Projects: 10-955-705 Dog Park $50,000 10-955-706 Playground Resurfacing - Child Care Facility $26,826 10-955-707 Traffic Signal Lighting $23,200 10-955-708 Tree Replacement $15,282 10-955-709 Playground Resurfacing - Richard Rollins Park $116,064 10-955-710 Sidewalk Repair $19,818 10-955-800-101 ALPR Cameras $142,147 10-955-800-102 Woody's Classic Grill Incentive Agreement $50,000 $443,337 Balance as of 12-10-2018 $1,872,263 Approved Projects: 10-955-800-103 Architecture & Planning Svcs (KTGY) $18,500 10-955-800-104 Purchase of Housing Authority Property $665,000 10-955-800-105 Mount Vernon Slope (grant writing services) $20,000 10-955-800-106 Barton Road Streetscape Plan (KTUA) $60,000 $763,500 Balance $1,108,763 Other City Council-Approved Priority Projects Mount Vernon Slope $580,000 Sidewalk & Storm Drains on Michigan $300,000 Proposed 4/23/19 Michigan Walkable Street Plan (KTUA) $74,509 Barton Road Business Sign Program $100,000 $1,054,509 Net $54,254 Proposed 4/23/19 Notice of Completion for Dog Park $54,254 Balance $0 ATTACHMENTS: • (Clean Cut - Dog Park) Settlement Agreement and Release (DOC) • Notice of Completion (PDF) • Settlement Agreement (PDF) G.13 Packet Pg. 329 APPROVALS: Alan French Completed 04/15/2019 12:49 PM City Attorney Completed 05/08/2019 7:01 PM Finance Completed 05/08/2019 7:14 PM City Manager Completed 05/08/2019 7:51 PM City Council Pending 05/14/2019 6:00 PM G.13 Packet Pg. 330 01247.0006/537848.7 -1- SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT & GENERAL RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS This Settlement Agreement and General Release of All Claims (the “Agreement”) is entered into by and between CLEAN CUT LANDSCAPE, INC., a California corporation (the “Contractor” or “Clean Cut”), and the CITY OF GRAND TERRACE a municipal corporation (the “City”), (collectively, the “Parties”, and individually, “Party”) with reference to the following recitals: RECITALS WHEREAS, on or about June 13, 2017, the City and Contractor entered into a “Contractors Agreement” in which Contractor agreed to construct certain improvements at the City’s Dog Park located at 22720 Vista Grande Way, Grand Terrace, CA 92313 (the “Dog Park”) and to provide certain landscape and irrigation maintenance at the Dog Park with a total contract sum of $373,525.15 (the “Original Agreement”). WHEREAS, on or about November 19, 2018, City and Contractor executed Change Order No. 1 to the Original Agreement, which required the Contractor to install an additional two benches in the Dog Park and required City to compensate Contractor for such services and which accordingly increased the total contract sum of the Original Agreement by $6,109.68 (the “Change Order No. 1”). WHEREAS, the Contractor carried out certain work in addition to the work contemplated by the Original Agreement and Change Order No. 1; the additional work, which includes the installation of extra curb heights, and the quantity adjustments for work done under the Original Agreement, Change Order No. 1 and the aforementioned additional work (the “Additional Work”). The Parties mutually agree that the cost of the Additional Work is $66,492.99. WHEREAS, therefore, the total not exceed contract sum of the Original Agreement, Change Order No. 1, and the Additional Work is $446,127.82 (the “Total Cost”). WHEREAS, a dispute between the Parties arose when, after the Additional Work was completed, Contractor alleges that (1) there have been numerous delays in the completion of the improvements contemplated by the Original Agreement, Change Order No. 1, and the Additional Work, which have also resulted in Contractor in not being paid in a timely manner; (2) Contractor carried out the Additional Work prior to the City Council approving an additional change order for the Additional Work in good faith reliance upon the City’s representations that Contractor will be compensated; and (3) Contractor has suffered injuries due to alleged delays by the City (the “Dispute”). WHEREAS, the work set forth in the Original Agreement, Change Order No. 1, and the Additional Work has been completed by Contractor to the satisfaction of the City. G.13.a Packet Pg. 331 Attachment: (Clean Cut - Dog Park) Settlement Agreement and Release [Revision 2] (Notice of Completion for Dog Park and Settlement 01247.0006/537848.7 -2- WHEREAS, the City has paid $343,482.15 of the Total Cost to Contractor prior to the Effective Date of this Agreement. WHEREAS, the City has not paid the final payment amount of $102,645.67 (the “Final Payment”), which includes the remaining unpaid portion of the Additional Work ($66,492.99), the remaining unpaid portion of Change Order No. 1 ($6,109.68), the remaining unpaid portion of the Original Agreement ($11,964.99), and the retention amounts for all payments made by the City to Contractor prior to the Effective Date of this Agreement ($18,078.01). WHEREAS, the City intends to approve and file a Notice of Completion for all work completed by the Contractor pursuant to the Original Agreement, Change Order No. 1, and the Additional Work with the County of San Bernardino Assessor-Recorder-County Clerk’s Office. WHEREAS, to resolve the Dispute, City agrees to pay Contractor the Final Payment and Contractor agrees to release the City from all liability relating the Original Agreement, Change Order No. 1, the Additional Work, and all other work performed by Contractor in relation to the Dog Park, as set forth in this Agreement. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, for full and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, and based upon the foregoing recitals and the terms, conditions, covenants, and agreements contained herein, all Parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Recitals. All of the foregoing Recitals above are to be deemed true and material statements upon which this Agreement is based and the terms therein are deemed agreed upon by all Parties. 2. Effective Date. This Agreement shall become effective as of the date all Parties have signed the Agreement (the “Effective Date”). 3. Settlement. As provided for by this Agreement, the Parties desire to fully settle all outstanding claims, burdens, obligations, liabilities, costs and expenses associated with the Dispute. Following the mutual execution and delivery of this Agreement, the Parties agree to do the following: 3.1 City shall pay the Final Payment to Contractor within thirty (35) days of filing of a Notice of Completion with the County of San Bernardino Assessor-Recorder-County Clerk’s Office by the City for work completed under the Original Agreement, Change Order No. 1, and the Additional Work. Thereafter, Contractor shall not be entitled to any additional money or compensation, including interest, other than the Final Payment for any matter relating to the G.13.a Packet Pg. 332 Attachment: (Clean Cut - Dog Park) Settlement Agreement and Release [Revision 2] (Notice of Completion for Dog Park and Settlement 01247.0006/537848.7 -3- Dispute, including to the Original Agreement, Change Order No. 1, the Additional Work, and any other work Contractor may have performed in relation to the Dog Park; 3.2 Contractor agrees that all terms and conditions in the Original Agreement, including any amendments and/or change orders as may be applicable, shall apply to the Additional Work and any other work performed by Contractor in relation to the Dog Park. 4. Mutual Release. For valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, City and Contractor do hereby each mutually release and discharge the “Releasees” hereunder, consisting of City and Contractor (including, without limitation, any Parties’ elected and/or appointed public officials, officers, employees, and agents, including, each and all of them and (as the case may be) each of the Parties’ respective associates, predecessors, successors, heirs, assignees, agents, directors, officers, employees, representatives, lawyers, and all persons acting by, through, under or in concert with them, or any of them) of and from any and all manner of action or actions, cause or causes of action, in law or in equity, suits, debts, liens, contracts, agreements, promises, liability, claims, demands, damages, loss, cost or expenses, of any nature whatsoever, known or unknown, fixed or contingent (hereinafter called “Claims”), which the Parties now have or may hereafter have against the Releasees, or any of them, by reason of any matter, cause, or thing whatsoever from the beginning of time to the date hereof for any and all Claims constituting, arising out of, or based upon the Dispute, including the Original Agreement, Change Order No. 1, Additional Work, and any other work completed by Contractor in relation to the Dog Park. This Mutual Release shall not apply to (a) any and all warranties, whether express or implied, provided for by the Original Agreement, Change Order No. 1, and Paragraph 3.2 of this Agreement; and (b) any matter related to the provisions of the Original Agreement, Change Order No. 1, and Paragraph 3.2 of this Agreement relating to insurance, indemnification, and bonds, which shall remain in full force and effect. 5. Indemnity. In addition to any other obligation to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City, Contractor agrees to indemnify and defend City, its officers, agents and employees against, and will hold and save them and each of them harmless from, any and all actions, suits, claims, liens, damages to persons or property, losses, costs, penalties, obligations, or liabilities (herein “Claims or Liabilities”) that may be asserted or claimed by any person, firm or entity arising out of or in connection with this Agreement and Contractor’s work under the Original Agreement, Change Order No. 1, the Additional Work, or any other work by Contractor in relation to the Dog Park, including, but not limited to, Claims and Liabilities by any insurance and/or bonding companies. Contractor shall defend any action or actions filed in connection with any of said Claims or Liabilities and will pay all costs and expenses, including legal costs and attorneys’ fees incurred in connection therewith, and any judgment resulting therefrom. 6. Discovery of Different or Additional Facts. The Parties acknowledge that they may hereafter discover facts different from or in addition to those that they now know or believe G.13.a Packet Pg. 333 Attachment: (Clean Cut - Dog Park) Settlement Agreement and Release [Revision 2] (Notice of Completion for Dog Park and Settlement 01247.0006/537848.7 -4- to be true with respect to the claims, demands, causes of action, obligations, damages, and liabilities of any nature whatsoever that are the subject of the Release set forth in Paragraph 4 of this Agreement, and expressly agree to assume the risk of the possible discovery of additional or different facts, and the Parties agree that this Agreement shall be and remain effective in all respects regardless of such additional or different facts. 7. Release of Unknown Claims. Except as expressly provided herein this Agreement, the Release set forth above in Paragraph 4 of this Agreement is a release of ALL claims, demands, causes of action, obligations, damages, and liabilities of any nature whatsoever that are described in the Release and is intended to encompass all known and unknown, foreseen and unforeseen claims which the Parties may have arising out of the Dispute (including those relating to the Original Agreement, Change Order No. 1, the Additional Work, and any other work completed by Contractor in relation to the Dog Park), except for any claims which may arise from the terms of this Agreement. 8. Waiver of Civil Code Section 1542. Except as provided herein this Agreement, the Parties expressly agree to waive and relinquish all rights and benefits they may have against the each other under Paragraph 4 of this Agreement based on Section 1542 of the Civil Code of the State of California. The Parties understand and acknowledge that Section 1542 reads as follows: " §1542. [General release; extent] A general release does not extend to claims that the creditor or releasing party does not know or suspect to exist in his or her favor at the time of executing the release and that, if known by him or her, would have materially affected his or her settlement with the debtor or released party." ____________ Contractor’s Initials ___________ City’s Initials After reading and understanding Civil Code section 1542, the City and Contractor voluntarily waive the application of Section 1542 to this Agreement, except as expressly provided herein this Agreement. The City and Contractor understand and acknowledge that the significance and consequence of this waiver is that even if the City or Contractor should eventually suffer additional damages arising out of the Dispute, including the Original Agreement, Change Order No. 1, Additional Work, and any other work completed by Contractor G.13.a Packet Pg. 334 Attachment: (Clean Cut - Dog Park) Settlement Agreement and Release [Revision 2] (Notice of Completion for Dog Park and Settlement 01247.0006/537848.7 -5- in relation to the Dog Park, the City and Contractor will not be permitted to make any claim against the other party for those damages. Furthermore, the City and Contractor acknowledge that the City and Contractor intend these consequences even as to claims for damages that may exist, and which, if known, would materially affect the City or Contractor’s decision to execute this Agreement, regardless of whether the City or Contractor’s lack of knowledge is the result of ignorance, oversight, error, negligence, or any other cause. 9. No Other Pending Actions. The Parties represent that they have not filed any complaints, claims, or charges against each other with any local, state or federal agency or court; and that if any such agency or court assumes jurisdiction of any complaint or charge against either of the Parties, or its respective predecessors, successors, heirs, assigns, employees, shareholders, officers, directors, agents, attorneys, subsidiaries, divisions or affiliated corporations or organizations, whether previously or hereafter affiliated in any manner, on behalf of such Party, whenever filed, the other Party will request such agency or court to withdraw and dismiss the matter forthwith. 10. No Admission of Liability. The Parties acknowledge and agree that this Agreement is a settlement of disputed claims. Neither the fact that the Parties have settled nor the terms of this Agreement shall be construed in any manner as an admission of any liability by any Party hereto, or any of its employees, or an affiliated person(s) or entity/ies. 11. No Assignment of Claims. The Parties each warrant that they have made no assignment, and will make no assignment, of any claim, cause of action, right of action or any right of any kind whatsoever, embodied in any of the claims and allegations referred to herein, and that no other person or entity of any kind had or has any interest in any of the demands, obligations, actions, causes of action, debts, liabilities, rights, contracts, damages, attorneys' fees, costs, expenses, losses or claims referred to herein. 12. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement, and all the terms and provisions hereof, shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the Parties and their respective heirs, legal representatives, successors and assigns. 13. Knowing and Voluntary. This Agreement is an important legal document and in all respects has been voluntarily and knowingly executed by the Parties hereto. The Parties specifically represent that prior to signing this Agreement they have been provided a reasonable period of time within which to consider whether to accept this Agreement. The Parties further represent that they have each carefully read and fully understand all of the provisions of this Agreement, and that they are voluntarily, knowingly, and without coercion entering into this Agreement based upon their own judgment. The Parties further specifically represent that prior to signing this Agreement they have conferred with their counsel to the extent desired concerning the legal effect of this Agreement. G.13.a Packet Pg. 335 Attachment: (Clean Cut - Dog Park) Settlement Agreement and Release [Revision 2] (Notice of Completion for Dog Park and Settlement 01247.0006/537848.7 -6- 14. Assistance of Counsel. The Parties each specifically represent that they have consulted to their satisfaction with and received independent advice from their respective counsel prior to executing this Agreement concerning the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 15. Attorneys’ Fees and Costs. Each Party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs in all respects and as to all matters relating to this Agreement and the Dispute. 16. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be considered an original but all of which shall constitute one agreement. 17. Singular and Plural. Whenever required by the context, as used in this Agreement the singular shall include the plural, and the masculine gender shall include the feminine and the neuter, and the feminine gender shall include the masculine and the neuter. 18. Enforcement Costs. Should any legal action be required to enforce the terms of this Agreement, the prevailing Party shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs in addition to any other relief to which that Party may be entitled. 19. Injunctive Relief for Breach. The Parties acknowledge and agree that any material violation of this Agreement is likely to result in immediate and irreparable harm for which monetary damages are likely to be inadequate. Accordingly, the Parties consent to injunctive and other appropriate equitable relief upon the institution of proceedings therefor by any other Party in order to protect the rights of the Parties under this Agreement. Such relief shall be in addition to any other relief to which the Parties may be entitled at law or in equity. 20. No Third Party Beneficiaries. No person or entity shall be deemed to be a third Party beneficiary hereof, and nothing in this Agreement (either express or implied) is intended to confer upon any person or entity, other than the Parties hereto, any rights, remedies, obligations or liabilities under or by reason of this Agreement, except as set forth in Paragraph 12, above. 21. Severability. Should any portion, word, clause, phrase, sentence or paragraph of this Agreement be declared void or unenforceable, such portion shall be considered independent and severable from the remainder, the validity of which shall remain unaffected. 22. Headings. Headings at the beginning of each numbered section of this Agreement are solely for the convenience of the Parties and are not a substantive part of this Agreement. 23. Ambiguity. The Parties acknowledge that this Agreement was jointly prepared by them, by and through their respective legal counsel, and any uncertainty or ambiguity existing herein shall not be interpreted against any of the Parties, but otherwise shall be interpreted according to the application of the rules on interpretation of contracts. G.13.a Packet Pg. 336 Attachment: (Clean Cut - Dog Park) Settlement Agreement and Release [Revision 2] (Notice of Completion for Dog Park and Settlement 01247.0006/537848.7 -7- 24. Waiver. Failure to insist on compliance with any term, covenant or condition contained in this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of that term, covenant or condition, nor shall any waiver or relinquishment of any right or power contained in this Agreement at any one time or more times be deemed a waiver or relinquishment of any right or power at any other time or times. 25. Governing Law and Jurisdiction. This Agreement is made and entered into in the State of California, and shall in all respects be interpreted, enforced and governed under the laws of said State without giving effect to conflicts of laws principles. If any Party to this Agreement brings a lawsuit to enforce or interpret this Agreement, the lawsuit shall be filed in the Superior Court for the County of San Bernardino, California. 26. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties who have executed it and supersedes any and all other agreements, understandings, negotiations, or discussions, either oral or in writing, express or implied between the Parties to this Agreement. The Parties to this Agreement each acknowledge that no representations, inducements, promises, agreements, or warranties, oral or otherwise, have been made by them, or anyone acting on their behalf, which are not embodied in this Agreement, that they have not executed this Agreement in reliance on any such representation, inducement, promise, agreement or warranty, and that no representation, inducement, promise, agreement or warranty not contained in this Agreement, including, but not limited to, any purported supplements, modifications, waivers, or terminations of this Agreement shall be valid or binding, unless executed in writing by all of the Parties to this Agreement. 27. Modifications. Any alteration, change, or modification of or to this Agreement shall be made by written instrument executed by each Party hereto in order to become effective. 28. Authority to Bind. Each of the Parties represents, warrants and agrees that any person executing this Agreement on its behalf has the full right and authority to enter this Agreement on behalf of that Party and has the full right and authority to execute this Agreement and to fully bind that Party to the terms and obligations of this Agreement and that the execution and consummation of this Agreement will not result in any breach of, contravene any provision of, violate or constitute a default under any article of incorporation, charter, bylaw, mortgage, indenture, contract, agreement, instrument, judgment, statute, rule, or regulation to which that Party is subject, and there is no claim or assertion or potential claim or assertion to the contrary. Each of the persons signing this Agreement on behalf of one or more of the Parties hereto makes the same warranties reference above. [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS] G.13.a Packet Pg. 337 Attachment: (Clean Cut - Dog Park) Settlement Agreement and Release [Revision 2] (Notice of Completion for Dog Park and Settlement 01247.0006/537848.7 3 -8- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Settlement Agreement and Release of All Claims, consisting of a total of 8 pages, and agree to all of the above terms and conditions, on the dates set forth below. CITY: CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, a municipal corporation ___________________________________ Darcy McNaboe, Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________________ Debra Thomas, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ALESHIRE & WYNDER, LLP ___________________________________ Adrian R. Guerra, City Attorney APPROVED AS TO FORM: ___________________________________ Contractor’s Legal Counsel CONTRACTOR: CLEAN CUT LANDSCAPE, INC., a California corporation By:_________________________________ Name: Title: Address: ____________________________ ____________________________ ____________________________ G.13.a Packet Pg. 338 Attachment: (Clean Cut - Dog Park) Settlement Agreement and Release [Revision 2] (Notice of Completion for Dog Park and Settlement City Manager of Debra Thomas, City Clerk City of Grand Terrace 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92313 City of Grand Terrace 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, CA 92313 2/23/2018 Construction of a dog park including ldscaping, irrigation and fencing. APN 0276 -462-10-0000 Clean Cut Landscape June 13, 2017 Grand Terrace San Bernardino On Vista Grande Way 300 feet north of Grand Terrace Road. 22720 Vista Grande Way, Grand Terrace, CA 92313 March 26, 2019 Grand Terrace G.13.b Packet Pg. 339 Attachment: Notice of Completion (Notice of Completion for Dog Park and Settlement Agreement with Clean Cut Landscaping) G.13.cPacket Pg. 340Attachment: Settlement Agreement (Notice of Completion for Dog Park and Settlement Agreement with Clean Cut Landscaping) G.13.cPacket Pg. 341Attachment: Settlement Agreement (Notice of Completion for Dog Park and Settlement Agreement with Clean Cut Landscaping) G.13.cPacket Pg. 342Attachment: Settlement Agreement (Notice of Completion for Dog Park and Settlement Agreement with Clean Cut Landscaping) G.13.cPacket Pg. 343Attachment: Settlement Agreement (Notice of Completion for Dog Park and Settlement Agreement with Clean Cut Landscaping) G.13.cPacket Pg. 344Attachment: Settlement Agreement (Notice of Completion for Dog Park and Settlement Agreement with Clean Cut Landscaping) G.13.cPacket Pg. 345Attachment: Settlement Agreement (Notice of Completion for Dog Park and Settlement Agreement with Clean Cut Landscaping) G.13.cPacket Pg. 346Attachment: Settlement Agreement (Notice of Completion for Dog Park and Settlement Agreement with Clean Cut Landscaping) G.13.cPacket Pg. 347Attachment: Settlement Agreement (Notice of Completion for Dog Park and Settlement Agreement with Clean Cut Landscaping) G.13.cPacket Pg. 348Attachment: Settlement Agreement (Notice of Completion for Dog Park and Settlement Agreement with Clean Cut Landscaping) AGENDA REPORT MEETING DATE: May 14, 2019 Council Item TITLE: Approval of Contract with the Boys & Girls Clubs of Greater Redlands-Riverside to Provide the City of Grand Terrace’s 2019 Summer Swim Program in the Amount Not to Exceed $25,198.00 PRESENTED BY: Cynthia Fortune, Assistant City Manager RECOMMENDATION: 1. Waive the Competitive Bidding Requirement for the 2019 City of Grand Terrace Summer Swim Program; and 2. Approve Contract with The Boys & Girls Clubs of Greater Redlands-Riverside to Provide the City of Grand Terrace’s 2019 Summer Swim Program in the Amount Not to Exceed $25,198.00, subject to City Attorney approval as to form; and 3. Authorize the City Manager to Execute the Agreement Between the City of Grand Terrace and the Boys & Girls Club of Greater Redlands-Riverside for the 2019 Summer Swim Program, subject to City Attorney approval as to form . 2030 VISION STATEMENT: This staff report supports Goal 3; to Promote Economic Development and Goal 4; to Develop and Implement Successful Partnerships. BACKGROUND: On May 24, 2016, the City Council approved an agreement with the Boys & Girls Club of Greater Redlands-Riverside to operate the City of Grand Terrace’s 2016 Summer Swim Program. The program operated for six weeks, mornings and afternoons, Monday through Friday and provided the public with swim sessions for adults and seniors, lessons for youth, as well as open swim. In 2018, the Summer Swim Program returned on a limited basis as a part of the City’s Summer Rec reational Activities Program, serving the community on Fridays and Saturdays. The program had excellent attendance and demonstrated a need in the community for expanded Summer Swim Program hours. The Summer Swim Program is a partnership that has been established between the City of Grand Terrace and the Colton Joint Unified School District (CJUSD). While G.14 Packet Pg. 349 CJUSD provides the City with the facility, it is the City’s responsibility to implement the Summer Swim Program. The goal of the Summer Swim Program is to provide all ages the opportunity to enjoy swimming in a safe and positive environment, mornings and afternoons, throughout the week, at Grand Terrace High School. In order to implement a full comprehensive program, the City must partner with another organ ization to operate the program. DISCUSSION: Due to our limited staffing capacity, it isn’t feasible for the City to hire staff and manage a Summer Swim Program. Therefore, a partner must operate the Summer Swim Program on behalf of the City of Grand Ter race. The partner would manage all aspects of the program, including promotion, setup, teaching and employment of certified life guards. On January 16th, 2019, the City requested a proposal services from The Boys & Girls Club of Greater Redlands-Riverside for the 2019 Summer Swim Program. The proposal requested a return to the expanded 2016 Summer Swim Program format. The program proposal received would provide six weeks of availability to the Grand Terrace High School pool, from Monday, June 17th, through Friday, July 26th. Program hours were adjusted per availability of the facilities, and would provide youth, adults and seniors designated times for swim sessions, or lessons, as well as the option of open swim in the afternoons. The cost of the program p roposed is not to exceed $25,198.00. Having utilized the Boys & Girls Clubs for its Summer Swim Program in 2016, City staff opted not to follow the competitive bidding process. Several costs were considered with respect to the competitive bidding process, including the cost of going out to bid and the cost of any delays to the program which may result in a crimped program negatively impacting attendance. The City also recognizes the value of the efficiency and quality of professionalism which would be gained from working with a long-standing organization and past partner, which previously administered a similar program, customized to the needs of the community before. Staff believes that all this considered makes the Boys and Girls Club the best cost-saving option to implement our comprehensive Summer Swim Program. In addition to providing a safe and positive environment for Grand Terrace youth to learn to swim and improve their swimming abilities, as well as a way for adults and seniors to exercise, The Boys & Girls Clubs of Greater Redlands-Riverside would also like to hire a responsible male and female student, or recent graduate, to be a Jr. Lifeguard for the 2019 Summer Swim Program. This will provide two young Grand Terrace residents an opportunity to develop professional skills and earn money. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds ($25,198.00) for the 2019 Summer Swim Program are available in the City G.14 Packet Pg. 350 Manager’s 2018-19 Adopted Budget, Professional and Contractual Services account as shown below: Fund Account Amount General Fund – 100 10-120-250: City Manager’s Office, Professional & Contractual Services Budget $61,000.00 Expenditures to-date ($29,891.50) Balance available for the 2019 Summer Swim program $31,108.50 ATTACHMENTS: • Boys and Girls Club Swim 2019 Summer Swim Program (DOCX) • Proposal-Grand Terrace Swimming 2019-04 (APR V5) (PDF) APPROVALS: Cynthia A. Fortune Completed 05/08/2019 6:30 PM City Attorney Completed 05/08/2019 6:45 PM Finance Completed 05/08/2019 7:55 PM City Manager Completed 05/08/2019 8:19 PM City Council Pending 05/14/2019 6:00 PM G.14 Packet Pg. 351 01247.0001/553343.2 5/8/2019 AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES By and Between CITY OF GRAND TERRACE and THE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER REDLANDS-RIVERSIDE G.14.a Packet Pg. 352 Attachment: Boys and Girls Club Swim 2019 Summer Swim Program (2019 Summer Swin Program) 01247.0001/553343.2 5/8/2019 -2- AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE AND THE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER REDLANDS-RIVERSIDE This “AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE AND THE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER REDLANDS - RIVERSIDE” (herein “Agreement”) is made and entered into this ____ day of May, 2019 by and between the City of Grand Terrace, a California municipal corporation (“City”) and The Boys & Girls Clubs of Greater Redlands-Riverside, a California nonprofit corporation (“Consultant”). City and Consultant are sometimes hereinafter individually referred to as “Party” and hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Parties.” RECITALS A. City has sought, by issuance of a Request for Proposals or Invitation for Bids, the performance of the services defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement. B. Consultant, following submission of a proposal or bid for the performance of the services defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement, was selected by the City to perform those services. C. Pursuant to the City of Grand Terrace Municipal Code, City has authority to enter into and execute this Agreement. D. The Parties desire to formalize the selection of Consultant for performance of those services defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement and desire that the terms of that performance be as particularly defined and described herein. OPERATIVE PROVISIONS NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants made by the Parties and contained herein and other consideration, the value and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: ARTICLE 1. SERVICES OF CONSULTANT 1.1 Scope of Services. In compliance with all terms and conditions of this Agreement, the Consultant shall provide those services specified in the “Scope of Services” attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference, which may be referred to herein as the “services” or “work” hereunder. As a material inducement to the City entering into this Agreement, Consultant represents and warrants that it has the qualifications, experience, and facilities necessary to properly perform the services required under this Agreement in a thorough, competent, and professional manner, and is experienced in performing the work and services contemplated herein. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of its ability, experience and talent, perform all services described herein. Consultant covenants that it shall follow the highest professional standards in performing the work and services required hereunder and that all materials will be both of good G.14.a Packet Pg. 353 Attachment: Boys and Girls Club Swim 2019 Summer Swim Program (2019 Summer Swin Program) 01247.0001/553343.2 5/8/2019 -3- quality as well as fit for the purpose intended. For purposes of this Agreement, the phrase “highest professional standards” shall mean those standards of practice recognized by one or more first-class firms performing similar work under similar circumstances. 1.2 Consultant’s Proposal. The Scope of Service shall include the Consultant’s scope of work or bid which shall be incorporated herein by this reference as though fully set forth herein. In the event of any inconsistency between the terms of such proposal and this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall govern. 1.3 Compliance with Law. Consultant shall keep itself informed concerning, and shall render all services hereunder in accordance with, all ordinances, resolutions, statutes, rules, and regulations of the City and any Federal, State or local governmental entity having jurisdiction in effect at the time service is rendered. 1.4 Licenses, Permits, Fees and Assessments. Consultant shall obtain at its sole cost and expense such licenses, permits and approvals as may be required by law for the performance of the services required by this Agreement. Consultant shall have the sole obligation to pay for any fees, assessments and taxes, plus applicable penalties and interest, which may be imposed by law and arise from or are necessary for the Consultant’s performance of the services required by this Agreement, and shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City, its officers, employees or agents of City, against any such fees, assessments, taxes, penalties or interest levied, assessed or imposed against City hereunder. 1.5 Familiarity with Work. By executing this Agreement, Consultant warrants that Consultant (i) has thoroughly investigated and considered the scope of services to be performed, (ii) has carefully considered how the services should be performed, and (iii) fully understands the facilities, difficulties and restrictions attending performance of the services under this Agreement. If the services involve work upon any site, Consultant warrants that Consultant has or will investigate the site and is or will be fully acquainted with the conditions there existing, prior to commencement of services hereunder. Should the Consultant discover any latent or unknown conditions, which will materially affect the performance of the services hereunder, Consultant shall immediately inform the City of such fact and shall not proceed except at Consultant’s risk until written instructions are received from the Contract Officer. 1.6 Care of Work. The Consultant shall adopt reasonable methods during the life of the Agreement to furnish continuous protection to the work, and the equipment, materials, papers, documents, plans, studies and/or other components thereof to prevent losses or damages, and shall be responsible for all such damages, to persons or property, until acceptance of the work by City, except such losses or damages as may be caused by City’s own negligence. G.14.a Packet Pg. 354 Attachment: Boys and Girls Club Swim 2019 Summer Swim Program (2019 Summer Swin Program) 01247.0001/553343.2 5/8/2019 -4- 1.7 Further Responsibilities of Parties. Both parties agree to use reasonable care and diligence to perform their respective obligations under this Agreement. Both parties agree to act in good faith to execute all instruments, prepare all documents and take all actions as may be reasonably necessary to carry out the purposes of this Agreement. Unless hereafter specified, neither party shall be responsible for the service of the other. 1.8 Additional Services. City shall have the right at any time during the performance of the services, without invalidating this Agreement, to order extra work beyond that specified in the Scope of Services or make changes by altering, adding to or deducting from said work. No such extra work may be undertaken unless a written order is first given by the Contract Officer to the Consultant, incorporating therein any adjustment in (i) the Contract Sum for the actual costs of the extra work, and/or (ii) the time to perform this Agreement, which said adjustments are subject to the written approval of the Consultant. Any increase in compensation of up to ten percent (10%) of the Contract Sum or $25,000, whichever is less; or, in the time to perform of up to one hundred eighty (180) days, may be approved by the Contract Officer. Any greater increases, taken either separately or cumulatively, must be approved by the City Council. It is expressly understood by Consultant that the provisions of this Section shall not apply to services specifically set forth in the Scope of Services. Consultant hereby acknowledges that it accepts the risk that the services to be provided pursuant to the Scope of Services may be more costly or time consuming than Consultant anticipates and that Consultant shall not be entitled to additional compensation therefor. City may in its sole and absolute discretion have similar work done by other consultants. No claims for an increase in the Contract Sum or time for performance shall be valid unless the procedures established in this Section are followed. 1.9 Special Requirements. Additional terms and conditions of this Agreement, if any, which are made a part hereof are set forth in the “Special Requirements” attached hereto as Exhibit “B” and incorporated herein by this reference. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of Exhibit “B” and any other provisions of this Agreement, the provisions of Exhibit “B” shall govern. ARTICLE 2. COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT. 2.1 Contract Sum. Subject to any limitations set forth in this Agreement, City agrees to pay Consultant the amounts specified in the “Schedule of Compensation” attached hereto as Exhibit “C” and incorporated herein by this reference. The total compensation, including reimbursement for actual expenses, shall not exceed Twenty Five Thousand One Hundred Ninety Eight Dollars ($25,198) (the “Contract Sum”), unless additional compensation is approved pursuant to Section 1.8. 2.2 Method of Compensation. The method of compensation may include: (i) a lump sum payment upon completion; (ii) payment in accordance with specified tasks or the percentage of completion of the services, less G.14.a Packet Pg. 355 Attachment: Boys and Girls Club Swim 2019 Summer Swim Program (2019 Summer Swin Program) 01247.0001/553343.2 5/8/2019 -5- contract retention; (iii) payment for time and materials based upon the Consultant’s rates as specified in the Schedule of Compensation, provided that (a) time estimates are provided for the performance of sub tasks, (b) contract retention is maintained, and (c) the Contract Sum is not exceeded; or (iv) such other methods as may be specified in the Schedule of Compensation. 2.3 Reimbursable Expenses. Compensation may include reimbursement for actual and necessary expenditures for reproduction costs, telephone expenses, and travel expenses approved by the Contract Officer in advance, or actual subcontractor expenses of an approved subcontractor pursuant to Section 4.5, and only if specified in the Schedule of Compensation. The Contract Sum shall include the attendance of Consultant at all project meetings reasonably deemed necessary by the City. Coordination of the performance of the work with City is a critical component of the services. If Consultant is required to attend additional meetings to facilitate such coordination, Consultant shall not be entitled to any additional compensation for attending said meetings. 2.4 Invoices. Each month Consultant shall furnish to City an original invoice for all work performed and expenses incurred during the preceding month in a form approved by City’s Director of Finance. By submitting an invoice for payment under this Agreement, Consultant is certifying compliance with all provisions of the Agreement. The invoice shall detail charges for all necessary and actual expenses by the following categories: labor (by sub-category), travel, materials, equipment, supplies, and sub-contractor contracts. Sub-contractor charges shall also be detailed by such categories. Consultant shall not invoice City for any duplicate services performed by more than one person. City shall independently review each invoice submitted by the Consultant to determine whether the work performed and expenses incurred are in compliance with the provisions of this Agreement. Except as to any charges for work performed or expenses incurred by Consultant which are disputed by City, or as provided in Section 7.3, City will use its best efforts to cause Consultant to be paid within forty-five (45) days of receipt of Consultant’s correct and undisputed invoice; however, Consultant acknowledges and agrees that due to City warrant run procedures, the City cannot guarantee that payment will occur within this time period. In the event any charges or expenses are disputed by City, the original invoice shall be returned by City to Consultant for correction and resubmission. Review and payment by Cit y for any invoice provided by the Consultant shall not constitute a waiver of any rights or remedies provided herein or any applicable law. 2.5 Waiver. Payment to Consultant for work performed pursuant to this Agreement shall not be deemed to waive any defects in work performed by Consultant. ARTICLE 3. PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE 3.1 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement. G.14.a Packet Pg. 356 Attachment: Boys and Girls Club Swim 2019 Summer Swim Program (2019 Summer Swin Program) 01247.0001/553343.2 5/8/2019 -6- 3.2 Schedule of Performance. Consultant shall commence the services pursuant to this Agreement upon receipt of a written notice to proceed and shall perform all services within the time period(s) established in the “Schedule of Performance” attached hereto as Exhibit “D” and incorporated herein by this reference. When requested by the Consultant, extensions to the time period(s) specified in the Schedule of Performance may be approved in writing by the Contract Officer but not exceeding one hundred eighty (180) days cumulatively. 3.3 Force Majeure. The time period(s) specified in the Schedule of Performance for performance of the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be extended because of any delays due to unforeseeable causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the Consultant, including, but not restricted to, acts of God or of the public enemy, unusually severe weather, fires, earthquakes, floods, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, riots, strikes, freight embargoes, wars, litigation, and/or acts of any governmental agency, including the City, if the Consultant shall within ten (10) days of the commencement of such delay notify the Contract Officer in writing of the causes of the delay. The Contract Officer shall ascertain the facts and the extent of delay, and extend the time for performing the services for the period of the enforced delay when and if in the judgment of the Contract Officer such delay is justified. The Contract Officer’s determination shall be final and conclusive upon the parties to this Agreement. In no event shall Consultant be entitled to recover damages against the City for any delay in the performance of this Agreement, however caused, Consultant’s sole remedy being extension of the Agreement pursuant to this Section. 3.4 Term. Unless earlier terminated in accordance with Article 7 of this Agreement, this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect until completion of the services but not exceeding one (1) years from the date hereof, except as otherwise provided in the Schedule of Performance (Exhibit “D”). ARTICLE 4. COORDINATION OF WORK 4.1 Representatives and Personnel of Consultant. The following principals of Consultant (“Principals”) are hereby designated as being the principals and representatives of Consultant authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the work specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith: (Name) (Title) (Name) (Title) (Name) (Title) It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of the foregoing principals were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, G.14.a Packet Pg. 357 Attachment: Boys and Girls Club Swim 2019 Summer Swim Program (2019 Summer Swin Program) 01247.0001/553343.2 5/8/2019 -7- the foregoing principals shall be responsible during the term of this Agreement for directing all activities of Consultant and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the services hereunder. All personnel of Consultant, and any authorized agents, shall at all times be under the exclusive direction and control of the Principals. For purposes of this Agreement, the foregoing Principals may not be replaced nor may their responsibilities be substantially reduced by Consultant without the express written approval of City. Additionally, Consultant shall utilize only competent personnel to perform services pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall make every reasonable effort to maintain the stability and continuity of Consultant’s staff and subcontractors, if any, assigned to perform the services required under this Agreement. Consultant shall notify City of any changes in Consultant’s staff and subcontractors, if any, assigned to perform the services required under this Agreement, prior to and during any such performance. 4.2 Status of Consultant. Consultant shall have no authority to bind City in any manner, or to incur any obligation, debt or liability of any kind on behalf of or against City, whether by contract or otherwise, unless such authority is expressly conferred under this Agreement or is otherwise expressly conferred in writing by City. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that Consultant or any of Consultant’s officers, employees, or agents are in any manner officials, officers, employees or agents of City. Neither Consultant, nor any of Consultant’s officers, employees or agents, shall obtain any rights to retirement, health care or any other benefits which may otherwise accrue to City’s employees. Consultant expressly waives any claim Consultant may have to any such rights. 4.3 Contract Officer. The Contract Officer shall be the City Manager or such person as may be designated by the City Manager. It shall be the Consultant’s responsibility to assure that the Contract Officer is kept informed of the progress of the performance of the services and the Consultant shall refer any decisions which must be made by City to the Contract Officer. Unless otherwise specified herein, any approval of City required hereunder shall mean the approval of the Contract Officer. The Contract Officer shall have authority, if specified in writing by the City Manager, to sign all documents on behalf of the City required hereunder to carry out the terms of this Agreement. 4.4 Independent Contractor. Neither the City nor any of its employees shall have any control over the manner, mode or means by which Consultant, its agents or employees, perform the services required herein, except as otherwise set forth herein. City shall have no voice in the selection, discharge, supervision or control of Consultant’s employees, servants, representatives or agents, or in fixing their number, compensation or hours of service. Consultant shall perform all services required herein as an independent contractor of City and shall remain at all times as to City a wholly ind ependent contractor with only such obligations as are consistent with that role. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its agents or employees are agents or employees of City. City shall not in any way or for any purpose become or be deemed to be a partner of Consultant in its business or otherwise or a joint venturer or a member of any joint enterprise with Consultant. G.14.a Packet Pg. 358 Attachment: Boys and Girls Club Swim 2019 Summer Swim Program (2019 Summer Swin Program) 01247.0001/553343.2 5/8/2019 -8- 4.5 Prohibition Against Subcontracting or Assignment. The experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of Consultant, its principals and employees were a substantial inducement for the City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, Consultant shall not contract with any other entity to perform in whole or in part the services required hereunder without the express written approval of the City. In addition, neither this Agreement nor any interest herein may be transferred, assigned, conveyed, hypothecated or encumbered voluntarily or by operation of law, whether for the benefit of creditors or otherwise, without the prior written approval of City. Transfers restricted hereunder shall include the transfer to any person or group of persons acting in concert of more than twenty five percent (25%) of the present ownership and/or control of Consultant, taking all transfers into account on a cumulative basis. In the event of any such unapproved transfer, including any bankruptcy proceeding, this Agreement shall be void. No approved transfer shall release the Consultant or any surety of Consultant of any liability hereunder without the express consent of City. ARTICLE 5. INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION 5.1 Insurance Coverages. The Consultant shall procure and maintain, at its sole cost and expense, in a form and content satisfactory to City, during the entire term of this Agreement including any extension thereof, the following policies of insurance which shall cover all elected and appointed officers, employees and agents of City: (a) General Liability Insurance (Occurrence Form CG0001 or equivalent). A policy of comprehensive general liability insurance written on a per occurrence basis for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. The policy of insurance shall be in an amount not less than $1,000,000.00 per occurrence or if a general aggregate limit is used, then the general aggregate limit shall be twice the occurrence limit. (b) Worker’s Compensation Insurance. A policy of worker’s compensation insurance in such amount as will fully comply with the laws of the State of California and which shall indemnify, insure and provide legal defense for the Consultant against any loss, claim or damage arising from any injuries or occupational diseases occurring to any worker employed by or any persons retained by the Consultant in the course of carrying out the work or services contemplated in this Agreement. (c) Automotive Insurance (Form CA 0001 (Ed 1/87) including “any auto” and endorsement CA 0025 or equivalent). A policy of comprehensive automobile liability insurance written on a per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage in an amount not less than $1,000,000. Said policy shall include coverage for owned, non-owned, leased, hired cars and any automobile. (d) Professional Liability. Professional liability insurance appropriate to the Consultant’s profession. This coverage may be written on a “claims made” basis, and must include coverage for contractual liability. The professional liability insurance required by this Agreement must be endorsed to be applicable to claims based upon, arising out of or related to services performed under this Agreement. The insurance must be maintained for at least 5 consecutive years G.14.a Packet Pg. 359 Attachment: Boys and Girls Club Swim 2019 Summer Swim Program (2019 Summer Swin Program) 01247.0001/553343.2 5/8/2019 -9- following the completion of Consultant’s services or the termination of this Agreement. During this additional 5-year period, Consultant shall annually and upon request of the City submit written evidence of this continuous coverage. (e) Subcontractors. Consultant shall include all subcontractors as insureds under its policies or shall furnish separate certificates and certified endorsements for each subcontractor. All coverages for subcontractors shall include all of the requirements stated herein. (f) Additional Insurance. Policies of such other insurance, as may be required in the Special Requirements in Exhibit “B”. 5.2 General Insurance Requirements. All of the above policies of insurance shall be primary insurance and shall name the City, its elected and appointed officers, employees and agents as additional insureds and any insurance maintained by City or its officers, employees or agents may apply in excess of, and not contribute with Consultant’s insurance. The insurer is deemed hereof to waive all rights of subrogation and contribution it may have against the City, its officers, employees and agents and their respective insurers. Moreover, the insurance policy must specify that where the primary insured does not satisfy the self-insured retention, any additional insured may satisfy the self-insured retention. All of said policies of insurance shall provide that said insurance may not be amended or cancelled by the insurer or any party hereto without providing thirty (30) days prior written notice by certified mail return receipt requested to the City. In the event any of said policies of insurance are cancelled, the Consultant shall, prior to the cancellation date, submit new evidence of insurance in conformance with Section 5.1 to the Contract Officer. No work or services under this Agreement shall commence until the Consultant has provided the City with Certificates of Insurance, additional insured endorsement forms or appropriate insurance binders evidencing the above insurance coverages and said Certificates of Insurance or binders are approved by the City. City reserves the right to inspect complete, certified copies of and endorsements to all required insurance policies at any time. Any failure to comply with the reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches or warranties shall not affect coverage provided to City. All certificates shall name the City as additional insured (providing the appropriate endorsement) and shall conform to the following “cancellation” notice: CANCELLATION: SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATED THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY SHALL MAIL THIRTY (30)-DAY ADVANCE WRITTEN NOTICE TO CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED HEREIN. [to be initialed] ______________ Consultant Initials G.14.a Packet Pg. 360 Attachment: Boys and Girls Club Swim 2019 Summer Swim Program (2019 Summer Swin Program) 01247.0001/553343.2 5/8/2019 -10- City, its respective elected and appointed officers, directors, officials, employees, agents and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities Consultant performs; products and completed operations of Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by Consultant; or any automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City, and their respective elected and appointed officers, officials, employees or volunteers. Consultant’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer’s liability. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City. At the option of City, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects City or its respective elected or appointed officers, officials, employees and volunteers or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration, defense expenses and claims. The Consultant agrees that the requirement to provide insurance shall not be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which the Consultant may be held responsible for the payment of damages to any persons or property resulting from the Consultant’s activities or the activities of any person or persons for which the Consultant is otherwise responsible nor shall it limit the Consultant’s indemnification liabilities as provided in Section 5.3. In the event the Consultant subcontracts any portion of the work in compliance with Section 4.5 of this Agreement, the contract between the Consultant and such subcontractor shall require the subcontractor to maintain the same policies of insurance that the Consultant is required to maintain pursuant to Section 5.1, and such certificates and endorsements shall be provided to City. 5.3 Indemnification. To the full extent permitted by law, Consultant agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its officers, employees and agents (“Indemnified Parties”) against, and will hold and save them and each of them harmless from, any and all actions, either judicial, administrative, arbitration or regulatory claims, damages to persons or property, losses, costs, penalties, obligations, errors, omissions or liabilities whether actual or threatened (herein “claims or liabilities”) that may be asserted or claimed by any person, firm or entity arising out of or in connection with the negligent performance of the work, operations or activities provided herein of Consultant, its officers, employees, agents, subcontractors, or invitees, or any individual or entity for which Consultant is legally liable (“indemnitors”), or arising from Consultant’s or indemnitors’ reckless or willful misconduct, or arising from Consultant’s or indemnitors’ negligent performance of or failure to perform any term, provision, covenant or condition of this Agreement, and in connection therewith: (a) Consultant will defend any action or actions filed in connection with any of said claims or liabilities and will pay all costs and expenses, including legal costs and attorney’s fees incurred in connection therewith; (b) Consultant will promptly pay any judgment rendered against the City, its officers, agents or employees for any such claims or liabilities arising out of or in connection with the negligent performance of or failure to perform such work, operations or activities of Consultant G.14.a Packet Pg. 361 Attachment: Boys and Girls Club Swim 2019 Summer Swim Program (2019 Summer Swin Program) 01247.0001/553343.2 5/8/2019 -11- hereunder; and Consultant agrees to save and hold the City, its officers, agents, and employees harmless therefrom; (c) In the event the City, its officers, agents or employees is made a party to any action or proceeding filed or prosecuted against Consultant for such damages or other claims arising out of or in connection with the negligent performance of or failure to perform the work, operation or activities of Consultant hereunder, Consultant agrees to pay to the City, its officers, agents or employees, any and all costs and expenses incurred by the City, its officers, agents or employees in such action or proceeding, including but not limited to, legal costs and attorney’s fees. Consultant shall incorporate similar indemnity agreements with its subcontractors and if it fails to do so Consultant shall be fully responsible to indemnify City hereunder therefore, and failure of City to monitor compliance with these provisions shall not be a waiver hereof. This indemnification includes claims or liabilities arising from any negligent or wrongful act, error or omission, or reckless or willful misconduct of Consultant in the performance of professional services hereunder. The provisions of this Section do not apply to claims or liabilities occurring as a result of City’s sole negligence or willful acts or omissions, but, to the fullest extent permitted by law, shall apply to claims and liabilities resulting in part from City’s negligence, except that design professionals’ indemnity hereunder shall be limited to claims and liabilities arising out of the negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct of the design professional. The indemnity obligation shall be binding on successors and assigns of Consultant and shall survive termination of this Agreement. 5.4 Sufficiency of Insurer. Insurance required by this Agreement shall be satisfactory only if issued by companies qualified to do business in California, rated “A” or better in the most recent edition of Best Rating Guide, The Key Rating Guide or in the Federal Register, and only if they are of a financial category Class VII or better, unless such requirements are waived by the Risk Manager of the City (“Risk Manager”) due to unique circumstances. If this Agreement continues for more than 3 years duration, or in the event the risk manager determines that the work or services to be performed under this Agreement creates an increased or decreased risk of loss to the City, the Consultant agrees that the minimum limits of the insurance policies may be changed accordingly upon receipt of written notice from the Risk Manager. ARTICLE 6. RECORDS, REPORTS, AND RELEASE OF INFORMATION 6.1 Records. Consultant shall keep, and require subcontractors to keep, such ledgers, books of accounts, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, reports, studies or other documents relating to the disbursements charged to City and services performed hereunder (the “books and records”), as shall be necessary to perform the services required by this Agreement and enable the Contract Officer to evaluate the performance of such services. Any and all such documents shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be complete and detailed. The Contract Officer shall have full and free access to such books and records at all times during normal business hours of City, including the right to inspect, copy, audit and make records and transcripts G.14.a Packet Pg. 362 Attachment: Boys and Girls Club Swim 2019 Summer Swim Program (2019 Summer Swin Program) 01247.0001/553343.2 5/8/2019 -12- from such records. Such records shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years following completion of the services hereunder, and the City shall have access to such records in the event any audit is required. In the event of dissolution of Consultant’s business, custody of the books and records may be given to City, and access shall be provided by Consultant’s successor in interest. Notwithstanding the above, the Consultant shall fully cooperate with the City in providing access to the books and records if a public records request is made and disclosure is required by law including but not limited to the California Public Records Act. 6.2 Reports. Consultant shall periodically prepare and submit to the Contract Officer such reports concerning the performance of the services required by this Agreement as the Contract Officer shall require. Consultant hereby acknowledges that the City is greatly concerned about the cost of work and services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement. For this reason, Consultant agrees that if Consultant becomes aware of any facts, circumstances, techniques, or events that may or will materially increase or decrease the cost of the work or services contemplated herein or, if Consultant is providing design services, the cost of the project being designed, Consultant shall promptly notify the Contract Officer of said fact, circumstance, technique or event and the estimated increas ed or decreased cost related thereto and, if Consultant is providing design services, the estimated increased or decreased cost estimate for the project being designed. 6.3 Ownership of Documents. All drawings, specifications, maps, designs, photographs, studies, surveys, data, notes, computer files, reports, records, documents and other materials (the “documents and materials”), including any electronic documents and materials, prepared by Consultant, its employees, subcontractors and agents in the performance of this Agreement shall be the property of City and shall be delivered to City in a format of the City’s choice upon request of the Contract Officer or upon the termination of this Agreement, and Consultant shall have no claim for further employment or additional compensation as a result of the exercise by City of its full rights of ownership use, reuse, or assignment of the documents and materials hereunder. Any use, reuse or assignment of such completed documents for other projects and/or use of uncompleted documents without specific written authorization by the Consultant will be at the City’s sole risk and without liability to Consultant, and Consultant’s guarantee and warranties shall not extend to such use, reuse or assignment. Consultant may retain copies of such documents for its own use. Consultant shall have the right to use the concepts embodied therein. All subcontractors shall provide for assignment to City of any documents or materials prepared by them, and in the event Consultant fails to secure such assignment, Consultant shall indemnify City for all damages resulting therefrom. Moreover, Consultant with respect to any documents and materials that may qualify as “works made for hire” as defined in 17 U.S.C. § 101, such documents and materials are hereby deemed “works made for hire” for the City. 6.4 Confidentiality and Release of Information. (a) All information gained or work product produced by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential, unless such information is in the public domain or already known to Consultant. Consultant shall not release or disclose any such G.14.a Packet Pg. 363 Attachment: Boys and Girls Club Swim 2019 Summer Swim Program (2019 Summer Swin Program) 01247.0001/553343.2 5/8/2019 -13- information or work product to persons or entities other than City without prior written authorization from the Contract Officer. (b) Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not, without prior written authorization from the Contract Officer or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide documents, declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered “voluntary” provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena. (c) If Consultant, or any officer, employee, agent or subcontractor of Consultant, provides any information or work product in violation of this Agreement, then City shall have the right to reimbursement and indemnity from Consultant for any damages, costs and fees, including attorney’s fees, caused by or incurred as a result of Consultant’s conduct. (d) Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed there under. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, this right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response. ARTICLE 7. ENFORCEMENT OF AGREEMENT AND TERMINATION 7.1 California Law. This Agreement shall be interpreted, construed and governed both as to validity and to performance of the parties in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Legal actions concerning any dispute, claim or matter arising out of or in relation to this Agreement shall be instituted in the Superior Court of the County of San Bernardino, State of California, or any other appropriate court in such county, and Consultant covenants and agrees to submit to the personal jurisdiction of such court in the event of such action. In the event of litigation in a U.S. District Court, venue shall lie exclusively in the Central District of California, in the County of San Bernardino, State of California. 7.2 Disputes; Default. In the event that Consultant is in default under the terms of this Agreement, the City shall not have any obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default. Instead, the City may give notice to Consultant of the default and the reasons for the default. The notice shall include the timeframe in which Consultant may cure the default. This timeframe is presumptively thirty (30) days, but may be extended, though not reduced, if circumstances warrant. During the period of time that Consultant is in default, the City shall hold all invoices and shall, when the default is cured, proceed with payment on the invoices. In the alternative, the City may, in its sole discretion, elect to pay some or all of the outstanding invoices G.14.a Packet Pg. 364 Attachment: Boys and Girls Club Swim 2019 Summer Swim Program (2019 Summer Swin Program) 01247.0001/553343.2 5/8/2019 -14- during the period of default. If Consultant does not cure the default, the City may take necessary steps to terminate this Agreement under this Article. Any failure on the part of the City to give notice of the Consultant’s default shall not be deemed to result in a waiver of the City’s legal rights or any rights arising out of any provision of this Agreement. 7.3 Retention of Funds. Consultant hereby authorizes City to deduct from any amount payable to Consultant (whether or not arising out of this Agreement) (i) any amounts the payment of which may be in dispute hereunder or which are necessary to compensate City for any losses, costs, liabilities, or damages suffered by City, and (ii) all amounts for which City may be liable to third parties, by reason of Consultant’s acts or omissions in performing or failing to perform Consultant’s obligation under this Agreement. In the event that any claim is made by a third party, the amount or validity of which is disputed by Consultant, or any indebtedness shall exist which shall appear to be the basis for a claim of lien, City may withhold from any payment due, without liability for interest because of such withholding, an amount sufficient to cover such claim. The failure of City to exercise such right to deduct or to withhold shall not, however, affect the obligations of the Consultant to insure, indemnify, and protect City as elsewhere provided herein. 7.4 Waiver. Waiver by any party to this Agreement of any term, condition, or covenant of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant. Waiver by any party of any breach of the provisions of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision or a waiver of any subsequent breach or violation of any provision of this Agreement. Acceptance by City of any work or services by Consultant shall not constitute a waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement. No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy by a non-defaulting party on any default shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a waiver. Any waiver by either party of any default must be in writing and shall not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this Agreement. 7.5 Rights and Remedies are Cumulative. Except with respect to rights and remedies expressly declared to be exclusive in this Agreement, the rights and remedies of the parties are cumulative and the exercise by either party of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other party. 7.6 Legal Action. In addition to any other rights or remedies, either party may take le gal action, in law or in equity, to cure, correct or remedy any default, to recover damages for any default, to compel specific performance of this Agreement, to obtain declaratory or injunctive relief, or to obtain any other remedy consistent with the purposes of this Agreement. Notwithstanding any contrary provision herein, Consultant shall file a statutory claim pursuant to Government Code Sections 905 et. seq. and 910 et. seq., in order to pursue a legal action under this Agreement. G.14.a Packet Pg. 365 Attachment: Boys and Girls Club Swim 2019 Summer Swim Program (2019 Summer Swin Program) 01247.0001/553343.2 5/8/2019 -15- 7.7 Termination Prior to Expiration of Term. This Section shall govern any termination of this Contract except as specifically provided in the following Section for termination for cause. The City reserves the right to terminate this Contract at any time, with or without cause, upon written notice to Consultant. In addition, the Consultant may terminate this Contract for cause, upon sixty (60) days’ advance written notice to City. Upon receipt of any notice of termination, Consultant shall immediately cease all services hereunder except such as may be specifically approved by the Contract Officer. Except where the Consultant has initiated termination, the Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for all services rendered prior to the effective date of the notice of termination and for any services authorized by the Contract Officer thereafter in accordance with the Schedule of Compensation or such as may be approved by the Contract Officer, except as provided in Section 7.3. In the event the Consultant has initiated termination, the Consultant shall be entitled to compensation only for the reasonable value of the work product actually produced hereunder. In the event of termination without cause pursuant to this Section, the terminating party need not provide the non-terminating party with the opportunity to cure pursuant to Section 7.2. 7.8 Termination for Default of Consultant. If termination is due to the failure of the Consultant to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement, City may, after compliance with the provisions of Section 7.2, take over the work and prosecute the same to completion by contract or otherwise, and the Consultant shall be liable to the extent that the total cost for completion of the services required hereunder exceeds the compensation herein stipulated (provided that the City shall use reasonable efforts to mitigate such damages), and City may withhold any payments to the Consultant for the purpose of set-off or partial payment of the amounts owed the City as previously stated. 7.9 Attorney’s Fees. If either party to this Agreement is required to initiate or defend or made a party to any action or proceeding in any way connected with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action or proceeding, in addition to any other relief which may be granted, whether legal or equitable, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney’s fees. Attorney’s fees shall include attorney’s fees on any appeal, and in addition a party entitled to attorney’s fees shall be entitled to all other reasonable costs for investigating such action, taking depositions and discovery and all other necessary costs the court allows which are incurred in such litigation. All such fees shall be deemed to have accrued on commencement of such action and shall be enforceable whether or not such action is prosecuted to judgment. ARTICLE 8. CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES: NON-DISCRIMINATION 8.1 Non-liability of City Officers and Employees. No officer or employee of the City shall be personally liable to the Consultant, or any successor in interest, in the event of any default or breach by the City or for any amount which may become due to the Consultant or to its successor, or for breach of any obligation of the terms of this Agreement. G.14.a Packet Pg. 366 Attachment: Boys and Girls Club Swim 2019 Summer Swim Program (2019 Summer Swin Program) 01247.0001/553343.2 5/8/2019 -16- 8.2 Conflict of Interest. Consultant covenants that neither it, nor any officer or principal of its firm, has or shall acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, which would conflict in any manner with the interests of City or which would in any way hinder Consultant’s performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it as an officer, employee, agent or subcontractor without the express written consent of the Contract Officer. Consultant agrees to at all times avoid conflicts of interest or the appearance of any conflicts of interest with the interests of City in the performance of this Agreement. 8.3 Covenant Against Discrimination. Consultant covenants that, by and for itself, its heirs, executors, assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of, any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry or other protected class in the performance of this Agreement. Consultant shall take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry or other protected class. 8.4 Unauthorized Aliens. Consultant hereby promises and agrees to comply with all of the provisions of the Federal Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C.A. §§ 1101, et seq., as amended, and in connection therewith, shall not employ unauthorized aliens as defined therein. Should Consultant so employ such unauthorized aliens for the performance of work and/or services covered by this Agreement, and should any liability or sanctions be imposed against City for such use of unauthorized aliens, Consultant hereby agrees to and shall reimburse City for the cost of all such liabilities or sanctions imposed, together with any and all costs, including attorney’s fees, incurred by City. ARTICLE 9. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 9.1 Notices. Any notice, demand, request, document, consent, approval, or communication either party desires or is required to give to the other party or any other person shall be in writing and either served personally or sent by prepaid, first-class mail, in the case of the City, to the City Manager and to the attention of the Contract Officer (with her/his name and City title), City of Grand Terrace, 22795 Barton Rd, Grand Terrace, CA 92313, and in the case of the Consultant, to the person(s) at the address designated on the execution page of this Agreement. Either party may change its address by notifying the other party of the change of address in writing. Notice shall be deemed communicated at the time personally delivered or in seventy-two (72) hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this Section. G.14.a Packet Pg. 367 Attachment: Boys and Girls Club Swim 2019 Summer Swim Program (2019 Summer Swin Program) 01247.0001/553343.2 5/8/2019 -17- 9.2 Interpretation. The terms of this Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the meaning of the language used and shall not be construed for or against either party by reason of the authorship of this Agreement or any other rule of construction which might otherwise apply. 9.3 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, and such counterparts shall constitute one and the same instrument. 9.4 Integration; Amendment. This Agreement including the attachments hereto is the entire, complete and exclusive expression of the understanding of the parties. It is understood that there are no oral agreements between the parties hereto affecting this Agreement and this Agreement supersedes and cancels any and all previous negotiations, arrangements, agreements and understandings, if any, between the parties, and none shall be used to interpret this Agreement. No amendment to or modification of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and approved by the Consultant and by the City Council. The parties agree that this requirement for written modifications cannot be waived and that any attempted waiver shall be void. 9.5 Severability. In the event that any one or more of the phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections contained in this Agreement shall be declared invalid or unenforceable by a valid judgment or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections of this Agreement which are hereby declared as severable and shall be interpreted to carry out the intent of the parties hereunder unless the invalid provision is so material that its invalidity deprives either party of the basic benefit of their bargain or renders this Agreement meaningless. 9.6 Warranty & Representation of Non-Collusion. No official, officer, or employee of City has any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, nor shall any official, officer, or employee of City participate in any decision relating to this Agreement which may affect his/her financial interest or the financial interest of any corporation, partnership, or association in which (s)he is directly or indirectly interested, or in violation of any corporation, partnership, or association in which (s)he is directly or indirectly interested, or in violation of any State or municipal statute or regulation. The determination of “financial interest” shall be consistent with State law and shall not include interests found to be “remote” or “noninterests” pursuant to Government Code Sections 1091 or 1091.5. Nor shall any such officer or employee participate in any decision relating to the Agreement which affects her/his financial interest or the financial interest of any corporation, partnership or association in which (s)he is, directly or indirectly, interested, in vi olation of any State statute or regulation, including but not limited to the Political Reform Act (Government Code Sections 81000, et seq.) G.14.a Packet Pg. 368 Attachment: Boys and Girls Club Swim 2019 Summer Swim Program (2019 Summer Swin Program) 01247.0001/553343.2 5/8/2019 -18- Consultant warrants and represents that it has not paid or given, and will not pay or give, to any third party including, but not limited to, any City official, officer, or employee, any money, consideration, or other thing of value as a result or consequence of obtaining or being awarded any agreement. Consultant further warrants and represents that (s)he/it has not engaged in any act(s), omission(s), or other conduct or collusion that would result in the payment of any money, consideration, or other thing of value to any third party including, but not limited to, any City official, officer, or employee, as a result of consequence of obtaining or being awarded any agreement. Consultant is aware of and understands that any such act(s), omission(s) or other conduct resulting in such payment of money, consideration, or other thing of value will render this Agreement void and of no force or effect. Consultant’s Authorized Initials _______ 9.7 Corporate Authority. The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the parties hereto warrant that (i) such party is duly organized and existing, (ii) they are duly authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement on behalf of said party, (iii) by so executing this Agreement, such party is formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement, and (iv) the entering into this Agreement does not violate any provision of any other Agreement to which said party is bound. This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the parties. [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE] G.14.a Packet Pg. 369 Attachment: Boys and Girls Club Swim 2019 Summer Swim Program (2019 Summer Swin Program) 01247.0001/553343.2 5/8/2019 19 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year first-above written. CITY: City of Grand Terrace, a municipal corporation ______________________________________ Darcy McNaboe, Mayor ATTEST: ______________________________________ Debra Thomas, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ALESHIRE & WYNDER, LLP ______________________________________ Adrian R. Guerra, City Attorney CONSULTANT: The Boys & Girls Clubs of Greater Redlands- Riverside, a California nonprofit corporation By: ___________________________________ Name: Title: By: ___________________________________ Name: Title: Address: 1251 Clay Street Redlands, CA 92374 Two corporate officer signatures required when Consultant is a corporation, with one signature required from each of the following groups: 1) Chairman of the Board, President or any Vice President; and 2) Secretary, any Assistant Secretary, Chief Financial Officer or any Assistant Treasurer. CONSULTANT’S SIGNATURES SHALL BE DULY NOTARIZED, AND APPROPRIATE ATTESTATIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE BYLAWS, ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION, OR OTHER RULES OR REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO CONSULTANT’S BUSINESS ENTITY. G.14.a Packet Pg. 370 Attachment: Boys and Girls Club Swim 2019 Summer Swim Program (2019 Summer Swin Program) 01247.0001/553343.2 5/8/2019 CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO On __________, 2019 before me, ________________, personally appeared ________________, proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose names(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature: _____________________________________ OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT INDIVIDUAL CORPORATE OFFICER _______________________________ TITLE(S) PARTNER(S) LIMITED GENERAL ATTORNEY-IN-FACT TRUSTEE(S) GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR OTHER_______________________________ ______________________________________ SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: (NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES)) _____________________________________________ _____________________________________________ ___________________________________ TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT ___________________________________ NUMBER OF PAGES ___________________________________ DATE OF DOCUMENT ___________________________________ SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy or validity of that document. G.14.a Packet Pg. 371 Attachment: Boys and Girls Club Swim 2019 Summer Swim Program (2019 Summer Swin Program) 01247.0001/553343.2 5/8/2019 CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO On __________, 2019 before me, ________________, personally appeared ________________, proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose names(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature: _____________________________________ OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT INDIVIDUAL CORPORATE OFFICER _______________________________ TITLE(S) PARTNER(S) LIMITED GENERAL ATTORNEY-IN-FACT TRUSTEE(S) GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR OTHER_______________________________ ______________________________________ SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: (NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES)) _____________________________________________ _____________________________________________ ___________________________________ TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT ___________________________________ NUMBER OF PAGES ___________________________________ DATE OF DOCUMENT ___________________________________ SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy or validity of that document. G.14.a Packet Pg. 372 Attachment: Boys and Girls Club Swim 2019 Summer Swim Program (2019 Summer Swin Program) 01247.0001/553343.2 5/8/2019 A-1 EXHIBIT “A” SCOPE OF SERVICES I. Consultant will perform the following Services: A. In coordination with the City, Consultant shall implement and operate a swimming and swimming instruction program beginning on Monday, June 17, 2019 and ending on Friday, July 26, 2019 (“Program”). The Program shall be implemented and operated pursuant to the Schedule of Performance provided in Exhibit “D” and provided at the following address: Grand Terrace High School 21810 Main St. Grand Terrace, CA 92313 Consultant shall coordinate with the City to determine the exact location of the pool to be utilized pursuant to this Agreement (“Pool Site”). B. Program activities at the Pool Site include but are not limited to “Open Swim,” “Senior & Adult Swim,” and “Youth Swim Lessons.” Consultant shall coordinate with City for the purpose of carrying out these activities. C. Consultant shall provide a supervising life guard, two regular life guards, and two junior life guards in-training at the Pool Site at all times when the Program is scheduled to occur pursuant to Exhibit “D.” D. When the Program is scheduled to occur pursuant to Exhibit “D,” Consultant’s staff shall arrive at least 30 minutes prior to the commencement of the Program for the purpose of Pool Site set-up; complying with pool safety checklist procedures (checklist procedures shall be in a form approved by the City); carrying out any other activities necessary to securely and safely open the Pool Site; and opening the Program/Pool Site. Additionally, Consultant’s staff shall stay 30 minutes after the scheduled closure of the Program for the purpose of securing the Pool Site; complying with pool safety checklist procedures (checklist procedures shall be in a form approved by the City); carrying out any other activities necessary to secure and close the Pool Site; and closing the Pool Site. E. Consultant shall ensure that all individuals sign a waiver of liability releasing the City from liability and indemnifying and holding harmless the City in relation to the Program prior to allowing such individuals to engage in any of the Program activities. Such waiver of liability shall be in a form approved at the sole and absolute discretion of the City. F. Consultant shall be responsible for all of its costs in carrying out the Services under this Agreement, including but not limited to Consultant’s staff compensation, any taxes that may be owed by Consultant, expenses, indirect costs, life guard equipment and uniforms, and any insurance riders or policies relating to this Agreement. G.14.a Packet Pg. 373 Attachment: Boys and Girls Club Swim 2019 Summer Swim Program (2019 Summer Swin Program) 01247.0001/553343.2 5/8/2019 A-2 II. As part of the Services, Consultant will prepare and deliver the following tangible work products: A. Consultant shall produce and distribute 5,000 postcards for the purpose of advertising the Program. i. The form and content of the postcards shall be approved by the City in writing prior to printing and distribution. ii. By May 27, 2019, Consultant shall deliver 4,750 postcards to the following schools located in the City in the following manner: Grand Terrace High School (2,200 postcards), Terrace Hills Middle School (1,038 postcards), Grand Terrace Elementary School (735 postcards), and Terrace View Elementary School (777 postcards). iii. By May 27, 2019, Consultant shall deliver 250 postcards to the City for its use. III. In addition to the requirements of Section 6.2, during performance of the Services, Consultant will keep the City appraised of the status of performance by providing such updates as the City may require from time to time. IV. All work product is subject to review and acceptance by the City, and must be revised by the Consultant without additional charge to the City until found satisfactory and accepted by City. G.14.a Packet Pg. 374 Attachment: Boys and Girls Club Swim 2019 Summer Swim Program (2019 Summer Swin Program) 01247.0001/553343.2 5/8/2019 B-1 EXHIBIT “B” SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS (Superseding Contract Boilerplate) G.14.a Packet Pg. 375 Attachment: Boys and Girls Club Swim 2019 Summer Swim Program (2019 Summer Swin Program) 01247.0001/553343.2 5/8/2019 C-1 EXHIBIT “C” SCHEDULE OF COMPENSATION I. If Consultant has fully complied with the requirements of this Agreement and there are no disputes relating to Consultant’s performance of Services under this Agreement, then Consultant shall be paid in two lump sums as follows: A. On June 28, 2019, City will pay Consultant a lump sum of $12,599.00. B. On July 26, 2019, City will pay Consultant a lump sum of $12,599.00. II. The City will only compensate Consultant for the Services performed upon submission of a valid invoice as provided above. Each invoice is to include (to the extent applicable): A. Line items for all personnel describing the work performed, the number of hours worked, and the hourly rate. B. Line items for all materials and equipment properly charged to the Services. C. Line items for all other approved reimbursable expenses claimed, with supporting documentation. D. Line items for all approved subcontractor labor, supplies, equipment, materials, and travel properly charged to the Services. III. The total compensation for the Services shall not exceed $25,198.00 as provided in Section 2.1 of this Agreement. G.14.a Packet Pg. 376 Attachment: Boys and Girls Club Swim 2019 Summer Swim Program (2019 Summer Swin Program) 01247.0001/553343.2 5/8/2019 D-1 EXHIBIT “D” SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE I. Consultant shall perform all Services timely in accordance with the following schedule: Table 1 Program Schedule for June 17, 2019 through July 3, 2019 Monday through Friday Time Activity 2:00 p.m. to 2:30 p.m. Pool Site Set-up & Safety Check (See Section I(D) of Exhibit “A”) 2:30 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. Open Swim 6:00 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. Pool Site Close down & Lock-up (See Section I(D) of Exhibit “A”) Table 2 Program Schedule for Saturday, June 22, 2019 and Saturday, June 29, 2019 Time Activity 8:30 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. Pool Site Set-up & Safety Check (See Section I(D) of Exhibit “A”) 9:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. Senior & Adult Swim 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. Youth Swim Lessons 12:00 p.m. to 1:00 p.m. Pool Site Closed for Lunch Break 1:00 p.m. to 4:45 p.m. Open Swim 4:45 p.m. to 5:15 p.m. Pool Site Close down & Lock-up (See Section I(D) of Exhibit “A”) Table 3 Program Schedule for July 5, 2019 through July 26, 2019 Mondays, Wednesdays, Thursdays, Fridays (See Table 3.1 for Tuesday schedule) Time Activity 8:30 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. Pool Site Set-up & Safety Check (See Section I(D) of Exhibit “A”) 9:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. Senior & Adult Swim 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. Youth Swim Lessons 12:00 p.m. to 1:00 p.m. Pool Site closed for Lunch Break 1:00 p.m. to 4:45 p.m. Open Swim 4:45 p.m. to 5:15 p.m. Pool Site Close down & Lock-up (See Section I(D) of Exhibit “A”) G.14.a Packet Pg. 377 Attachment: Boys and Girls Club Swim 2019 Summer Swim Program (2019 Summer Swin Program) 01247.0001/553343.2 5/8/2019 D-2 Table 3.1 Program Schedule for July 5, 2019 through July 26, 2019 Tuesdays Time Activity 8:30 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. Closed 9:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. Closed 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. Closed 12:30 p.m. to 1:00 p.m. Pool Site Set-up & Safety Check (See Section I(D) of Exhibit “A”) 1:00 p.m. to 4:45 p.m. Open Swim 4:45 p.m. to 5:15 p.m. Pool Site Close down & Lock-up (See Section I(D) of Exhibit “A”) II. Consultant shall deliver the following tangible work products by the following dates: A. Pursuant to Exhibit “A,” by May 27, 2019, Consultant shall deliver 4,750 postcards to the following schools located in the City in the following manner: Grand Terrace High School (2,200 postcards), Terrace Hills Middle School (1,038 postcards), Grand Terrace Elementary School (735 postcards), and Terrace View Elementary School (777 postcards). B. Pursuant to Exhibit “A,” by May 27, 2019, Consultant shall deliver 250 postcards to the City for its use. III. The Contract Officer may approve extensions for performance of the services in accordance with Section 3.2. G.14.a Packet Pg. 378 Attachment: Boys and Girls Club Swim 2019 Summer Swim Program (2019 Summer Swin Program) A Collaborative for Swimming Programs between and April 2019 Program Proposal G.14.b Packet Pg. 379 Attachment: Proposal-Grand Terrace Swimming 2019-04 (APR V5) (2019 Summer Swin Program) April 2019 Boys & Girls Clubs of Greater Redlands-Riverside Page 1 Table of Contents I. Overview ......................................................................................................................................... 2 Philosophy and Goals ................................................................................................................. 2 II. Key Elements of Boys & Girls Clubs ........................................................................................... 2 Youth Development Outcomes ................................................................................................. 3 Core Program Areas .................................................................................................................... 3 III. Summer Swimming & Swimming Lessons Program ................................................................. 4 IV. Program Costs ............................................................................................................................... 5 V. Insurance & Waiver Requirements ............................................................................................... 6 VI. Thank You ....................................................................................................................................... 8 G.14.b Packet Pg. 380 Attachment: Proposal-Grand Terrace Swimming 2019-04 (APR V5) (2019 Summer Swin Program) April 2019 Boys & Girls Clubs of Greater Redlands-Riverside Page 2 Boys & Girls Clubs Mission Statement To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens. I. Overview Boys & Girls Clubs of Greater Redlands-Riverside has been providing hope and opportunity to kids in the Inland Empire for over 50 years. Boys & Girls Clubs offers a wide range of programs for youth ages 6 to 18. On any given day, the Club is serving over 3,600 kids and teens at 36 locations in Riverside and San Bernardino Counties. Philosophy and Goals Boys & Girls Clubs of Greater Redlands-Riverside has a philosophy to serve all youth, but especially those from disadvantage circumstances. Offering our programs to serve those youth who need us most is a great opportunity for the Boys & Girls Clubs to expand and enhance our services to youth. The Clubs are a second home to many young people in our communities – providing them with caring adults who have expectations for them and will not let them fail. II. Key Elements of Boys & Girls Clubs Four key characteristics define the essence of a Boys & Girls Club. All are critical in exerting positive impact on the life of a child: Referral · Safe, Positive Environment Club staff, facilities, programs and age-appropriate settings create stability, consistency and a sense of physical and emotional safety for members. The Club provides structure and clearly defines acceptable behaviors. · Fun Clubs generate fun for members. Members develop a strong sense of belonging through connections they establish with staff and peers. Staff members make the Club feel like home, fostering a family atmosphere and creating a sense of ownership for members. · Supportive Relationships Club youth develop meaningful relationships with peers and adults. Staff members actively encourage such relationships. Staff members display warmth, caring, appreciation, acceptance and guidance in their interactions with members. · Opportunities & Expectations Club youth acquire physical, social, technological, artistic and life skills. Clubs G.14.b Packet Pg. 381 Attachment: Proposal-Grand Terrace Swimming 2019-04 (APR V5) (2019 Summer Swin Program) April 2019 Boys & Girls Clubs of Greater Redlands-Riverside Page 3 encourage members to develop a moral character while staff reinforce high expectations and help members with school and post-secondary education. · Recognition Clubs recognize and support young people’s self-worth and accomplishments. Staff members encourage youth and provide positive reinforcement as they make improvements and experience successes. The Club showcases young people’s achievements. Youth Development Outcomes Through frequent participation in programming that intentionally incorporates the Key Elements, young people become productive, caring, responsible, citizens. · Positive Self-Identity Youth set and attain goals and have a positive view of their future, confidently making the necessary decisions to achieve their life plans. They become self- sufficient and are able to support themselves and others. · Healthy & Well-Being Youth adopt a healthy diet. They practice healthy lifestyle choices and make a lifelong commitment to fitness. · Positive Values Youth develop and demonstrate character and are guided by positive values including honesty, integrity, caring, and fairness. · Commitment to Learning Youth value education and lifelong learning and make them an integral part of their future plans. · Social Competency Youth have positive relationships with family, friends, and coworkers and appreciate cultural diversity. · Community & Civic Involvement Youth are engaged citizens of their community and the world. Core Program Areas The club provides diversified activities that meet the interests of all young people. Core programs encourage activities with adults, peers, and family members that enable kids to enhance self-esteem and fulfill their potential. The Club offers diversified program activities in five areas based on physical, emotional, cultural, and social needs and interest of boys and girls and recognizing developmental principles. G.14.b Packet Pg. 382 Attachment: Proposal-Grand Terrace Swimming 2019-04 (APR V5) (2019 Summer Swin Program) April 2019 Boys & Girls Clubs of Greater Redlands-Riverside Page 4 · The Arts The Arts Core Program Area enables youth to develop their creativity and cultural awareness through knowledge and appreciation of visual and tactile arts and crafts, performing arts and creative writing. · Sports, Fitness and Recreation The Sports, Recreation and Fitness Core Program Area develops fitness, positive use of leisure time, skills for stress management, appreciation for the environment and social and interpersonal skills. · Health and Life Skills The Health and Life Skills Core Program Area develops young people’s capacity to engage in positive behaviors that nurture their own well-being, set personal goals and develop the competencies to live successfully as self-sufficient adults. · Character Development and Leadership Development The Character Development and Leadership Development Core Program Area empowers youth to support and influence their Club and community, sustain meaningful relationships with others, develop a positive self-image, participate in the democratic process and respect their own and others’ cultural identities. · Education and Career Development The Education and Career Development Core Program Area enables youth to become proficient in basic education disciplines, apply learning to everyday situations and embrace technology to optimize employability. III. Summer Swimming & Swimming Lessons Program Boys & Girls Clubs, in coordination with the City of Grand Terrace, propose the following swimming and swimming instruction schedule for the summer of 2019. Summer Swim Program will be on weekdays starting on Monday, June 17 and conclude on Friday, July 26, 2019. It will be closed for the July 4th holiday. Staff would arrive 30 minutes prior to open for the safety pool checklist procedures and stay 30 minutes after to secure the pool and closedown. The weekly schedule from June 17 through July 3 will run as follows: TIME MON, TUE, WED, THU, FRI 2:00pm – 2:30pm Set-up & Safety Check 2:30pm – 6:00pm Open Swim 6:00pm – 6:30pm Close down & Lock-up *All participants will need to have a signed waiver on file prior to entering the pool (see waiver below). G.14.b Packet Pg. 383 Attachment: Proposal-Grand Terrace Swimming 2019-04 (APR V5) (2019 Summer Swin Program) April 2019 Boys & Girls Clubs of Greater Redlands-Riverside Page 5 On Saturday June 22 & June 29 the schedule will be as follows: TIME SAT 8:30am – 9:00am Set-up & Safety Check 9:00am – 10:00am Senior & Adult Swim 10:00am – 12:00pm Youth Swim Lessons 12:00pm – 1:00pm Closed for Lunch Break 1:00pm – 4:45pm Open Swim 4:45pm – 5:15pm Close down & Lock-up *All participants will need to have a signed waiver on file prior to entering the pool (see waiver below). The weekly schedule from July 5 through July 26 will run as follows TIME MON, WED, THU, FRI TUE 8:30am – 9:00am Set-up & Safety Check Closed 9:00am – 10:00am Senior & Adult Swim Closed 10:00am – 12:00pm Youth Swim Lessons Closed 1:00pm – 4:45pm Open Swim Open Swim 4:45pm – 5:15pm Close down & Lock-up Close down & Lock-up *All participants will need to have a signed waiver on file prior to entering the pool (see waiver below). The Club will produce 5,000 postcards for distribution at the area schools (Grand Terrace High School-2200, Terrace Hills Middle School-1038, Grand Terrace Elementary School-735, and Terrace View Elementary School-777) to advertise the program. The postcards will be distributed to the schools. Extras will be delivered to the City for use. IV. Program Costs Boys & Girls Clubs, will provide and coordinate swimming and swimming lessons in coordination with the City of Grand Terrace. The program will consist of a supervising life guard, two regular life guards, and two junior life guards in-training. Cost includes salaries, payroll taxes, indirect costs, life guard equipment and uniforms, and insurance rider. This totals $25,198.00 for the six weeks swimming program and the added Community Day. This Invoicing schedule will be as follows: June 28 $12,599.00 July 26 $12,599.00 Payment is due by the 15th of the month following the invoice date. G.14.b Packet Pg. 384 Attachment: Proposal-Grand Terrace Swimming 2019-04 (APR V5) (2019 Summer Swin Program) April 2019 Boys & Girls Clubs of Greater Redlands-Riverside Page 6 V. Insurance & Waiver Requirements For Boys & Girls Clubs to consider operating a pool(s), the following insurance and waiver will need to be completed. Boys & Girls Clubs of Greater Redlands-Riverside will need to be listed as additionally insured by the organization/corporation responsible for the maintenance of the pool(s) included in this agreement. This includes additional insured endorsements, with primary and non-contributory language or a primary insured endorsement, for General Liability insurance. The additional insured should read “Boys & Girls Clubs of Greater Redlands-Riverside, their officers, employees, agents, and volunteers are named as additional insured. The Insurance as is afforded by the policy is primary and any other insurance shall be excess and not contribute to the insurance afforded by this endorsement.” Certificate holder should appear as follows: Boys & Girls Clubs of Greater Redlands-Riverside 1251 Clay Street, Redlands CA 92374 In addition to the above certificate of insurance requested by the Club, we will require each participant involved in the swimming and pool activities to sign a waiver. Below is the verbiage of the waiver that will be issued: G.14.b Packet Pg. 385 Attachment: Proposal-Grand Terrace Swimming 2019-04 (APR V5) (2019 Summer Swin Program) April 2019 Boys & Girls Clubs of Greater Redlands-Riverside Page 7 Boys & Girls Clubs of Greater Redlands-Riverside Swimming Pool Use Acknowledge of Risk Waiver and Release of Liability In consideration of my use of swimming pool, I hereby forever release and covenant not-to-sue the Boys & Girls Clubs of Greater Redlands-Riverside (club), its Board, employees, agents, volunteers, and all others who are involved, from any and all present and future claims resulting from ordinary negligence on the part of the club or others listed for property damage, personal injury, or wrongful death, arising as a result of my engaging in or receiving instruction in pool use activities or any activities incidental thereto, wherever, whenever, or however the same may occur. I hereby voluntarily waive any and all claims both present and future, resulting from ordinary negligence, that may be made by me, my family, estate, heirs, estate or assigns, and I relinquish on behalf of myself, spouse, heirs and assigns the right to recover for injury or death. I am aware that swimming and other pool activities are vigorous and can involve severe cardiovascular stress. I understand that swimming and other pool activities involve certain risks, including but not limited to death. In addition, I understand that participation in swimming pool use involves activities incidental thereto, including, but not limited to, the possible reckless conduct of other participants. All stresses and hazards associated with this activity cannot be foreseen. I will voluntarily use pool facilities with knowledge of the danger involved and hereby agree to accept any and all risks of property damage, personal injury, or death. I have a personal responsibility to follow any safety rules and procedures established by the club and that are associated normally with swimming and other pool use activities. I further agree to indemnify and hold harmless the club and others listed for any and all claims arising as a result of my participation in pool activities or any activities incidental thereto, wherever, whenever, or however the same may occur. I understand that this waiver is intended to be as broad and inclusive as permitted by the laws of the State of California, and I agree that if any portion is held invalid, the remainder of the waiver will continue in full legal force and effect. I further agree that the venue for any legal proceedings shall be in the County of San Bernardino, State of California. If I am at least 18 years of age, I affirm that I signing this agreement solely and freely. If I am under 18 years of age, I will also obtain the signature of my parent or guardian. I have read this form and fully understand that by signing this form, I am giving up legal rights and/or remedies which may be available to me for the ordinary negligence of the club or any of the parties listed above. I understand that this agreement is a binding legal document. G.14.b Packet Pg. 386 Attachment: Proposal-Grand Terrace Swimming 2019-04 (APR V5) (2019 Summer Swin Program) April 2019 Boys & Girls Clubs of Greater Redlands-Riverside Page 8 For persons under the age of 18, the parent or guardian who signs below also commits to the participant conditions of this agreement. Signature lines follow. VI. Thank You Boys & Girls Clubs of Greater Redlands-Riverside wants to thank you for the opportunity to partner with City of Grand Terrace for summer swimming pool program services for the summer of 2019. G.14.b Packet Pg. 387 Attachment: Proposal-Grand Terrace Swimming 2019-04 (APR V5) (2019 Summer Swin Program) AGENDA REPORT MEETING DATE: May 14, 2019 Council Item TITLE: Adoption of a Resolution Setting a Public Hearing Relating to Refuse Rate Increases PRESENTED BY: Alan French, Public Works Director RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. 2019-__ setting forth a public hearing date of July 9, 2019, to hear matters pertaining to proposed waste and recycle rate increases. 2030 VISION STATEMENT: This staff report supports Goal #1 “Ensure Our Fiscal Viability” by ensuring appropriate cost recovery for services. BACKGROUND: The solid waste franchise agreement was originally established between the City and USA Waste. In 2007, USA Waste, dba Waste Management of the Inland Empire, sold the Integrated Waste Management Agreement (Franchise Agreement) to Burrtec Waste Industries (Burrtec), and on June 12, 2007, the Council formally approved the transfer of the franchise agreement. Since then, Burrtec has held the franchise agreement. Refuse rates will typically have some level of adjustment due to Consumer Price Index increases, and/or cost related to services such as delivering waste to the landfill. Additionally, the State of California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) has several mandates pertaining to Commercial Recycling and Organic s Recycling that are in effect, and enforcement of these mandates has increased for municipalities. To meet requirements, Burrtec has created rates that the City may adopt to increase compliance. Rate increases are proposed for both residential and commercial customers. The residential component is to be implemented over a two year time frame. DISCUSSION: The last rate adjustment occurred in 2017. Therefore, Burrtec has requested various rate increases on the basis that it is absorbing rising costs. The rising costs are due, in part, to increasing disposal and processing costs related to the recycling market (China has stopped receiving plastics) and Title 14 green waste issues. Therefore, in the rates discussed, Council will find that Burrtec has offered to implement a multi-year rate increase. The first residential rate increase will take effect July 1, 2019, and the second G.15 Packet Pg. 388 adjustment shall be implemented on July 1, 2020. However, commercial rates are proposed to be raised to the appropriate level July 1, 2019. Residential Refuse and Recycling Rate Adjustments Exhibit A of the Resolution shows the propose residential rate adjustments. Exhibit A shows that the proposed rate adjustment will result in the existing residential collection rates changing from $23.98 per month for the 96-gallon cart service to $26.04 per month (8.5%), and from $22.61 per month for the 64-gallon cart service to $24.68 per month (9%) for the first year. The second adjustment shown in Table 1 and Table 2 of Exhibit A show s that the proposed rate adjustment will result in the 2020 residential collection rates changing from $26.04 per month for the 96-gallon cart service to $29.13 per month (12%), and from $24.68 per month for the 64-gallon cart service to $27.67 per month (12%) for the second year. Please note that the rates for green waste disposal increased due to increased processing expense of material and increased travel cost for disposal. The Household Hazardous Waste (HHW) program fee will remain $0.32 per household and the Street Sweeping fee will increase from $0.96 per household to $1.14. The Pavement Impact Fee will be $0.73 per household for a 96-gallon cart and $0.69 per household for the 64-gallon cart. The Franchise fee will be increased slightly from $2.87 per household to $3.11 per household for the 96-gallon cart and from $2.70 to $2.94 for the 64-gallon cart. Table 3 and Table 4 of Exhibit A shows additional services offered to residential customers. Commercial Refuse and Recycling Rate Adjustments Exhibit B of the Resolution shows the proposed rate adjustments for commercial rates. The 3-yard bin service at a frequency of once, twice or three times per week is the most common commercial service throughout the city Burrtec has put forth three (3) options for commercial service rate adjustments. The options are as follows: 1. Option 1: a standard CPI adjustment with administration fee (Exhibit B, Table 1) 2. Option 2: a standard CPI adjustment with administration fee and recycling fee (Exhibit B, Table 1) 3. Option 3: a standard CPI adjustment with equalized rates for commercial recycling and organics recycling (Exhibit C) The administration fee covers Burrtec's staff augmentation to assist the City with required Cal Recycle reporting and outreach, and the recycling fee is to bring businesses in the City in compliance with mandatory commercial recycling. For the G.15 Packet Pg. 389 commercial front-load service, the proposed rate adjustment will result in an approximately 2% rate increase for Option 1 and Option 2 will have a 17% rate increase. Option 3 - equalized rates (Exhibit C) will result in an approximately 27% rate increase. Table 2 of Exhibit B shows the proposed increase for Multi -Family Housing Complexes that are billed commercial rates. Multi-Family Housing complexes will see similar rate increase to commercial bin services. The California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) has significantly increased enforcement of AB 341, which mandates commercial recycling and AB 1826, which mandates organics (food waste) recycling for business that generate more than 4 cubic yards of food waste. The City of Grand Terrace implemented an organics rate with the 2017 rate increase. By implementing the new rate, the City was able to show good faith effort towards compliance with Cal Recycle during the annual audit. Please note that in Fiscal Year 2017-18, Cal Recycle placed some cities in San Bernardino County on compliance orders and ordered them to attend penalty hearings at the State Capital until a solution is put forward to bring commercial customers into compliance with recycling requirements. To date, the City of Grand Terrace has received warning s about low commercial recycling participation, but no compliance orders or penalties have been received. Because there are few businesses in the City that meet the threshold for organics recycling, staff does not believe that Option 3 is necessary at this time. Staff recommends adopting Option 2 to increase commercial recycling compliance. Special Services Rate Adjustments Exhibit D , Table 1 and Table 2 list proposed rate increases for additional services offered to residential and commercial customers. Burrtec advised the City that these additional services are seldom utilized. The Council is being asked to direct staff to undertake the appropriate measures to notify the citizens of the City regarding the proposed refuse rate adjustments as necessary under Proposition 218. Staff will work with Burrtec to prepare and mail out notices of the proposed rate adjustments, and to schedule a Public Hearing, to be conducted on July 9, 2019, at the hour of 6:00 p.m. at the City Council Chambers, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace California, at which time all persons interested in or objecting to the proposed solid waste and recycling rate adjustments will be heard. Proposition 218 requires that at the public hearing, the City Council must consider all protests against the proposed fee adjustments and if protests are received from a majority of the property owners prior to the close of the public hearing, the City Council G.15 Packet Pg. 390 would not be able to impose the proposed adjustments in the rates. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact to the City by the rate adjustment as it is anticipated that the cost of services will be offset by Burrtec customers. ATTACHMENTS: • Resolution Setting a Public Hearing to Adjust Refuse Rates (DOCX) • Exhibit A- Residential Rates (PDF) • Exhibit B - Commercial Rates (PDF) • Exhibit C- Equalized Rates (PDF) • Exhibit D- Special Services (PDF) APPROV ALS: Alan French Completed 05/08/2019 7:02 PM City Attorney Completed 05/08/2019 8:00 PM Finance Completed 05/08/2019 8:58 PM City Manager Completed 05/08/2019 8:59 PM City Council Pending 05/14/2019 6:00 PM G.15 Packet Pg. 391 RESOLUTION NO. 2019-_____ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO SET A PUBLIC HEARING FOR JULY 9, 2019, TO CONSIDER INCREASES TO RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL SOLID WASTE COLLECTION, RECYCLING AND DISPOSAL SERVICE RATES AND STREET SWEEPING RATES FOR FISCAL YEARS 2019-2020 AND 2020-2021 WHEREAS, the City of Grand Terrace is a municipal corporation duly organi zed and existing pursuant to the Constitution and laws of the State of California, (hereinafter the “City”); and WHEREAS, the City Council has by previous action entered into a franchise agreement with Burrtec Waste Industries, (hereinafter “Burrtec”), for the collection and disposal of residential and commercial waste within the City; and WHEREAS, Burrtec has requested rate increases to residential and commercial solid waste collection, recycling and disposal service rates and street sweeping rates for fiscal years 2019-2020 and 2020-2021; and WHEREAS, as proposed, the first residential rate increase will take effect July 1, 2019, and the second residential rate increases shall be implemented on July 1,2020; and WHEREAS, as proposed, commercial rates are proposed to be raised effective July 1, 2019; and WHEREAS, the City Council now desires to declare its intention to conduct a Public Hearing concerning residential and commercial solid waste collection, recycling and disposal service rates and street sweeping rates for Fiscal Years 2019-2020 and 2020-2021, in accordance with Section 6 of Article 13D of the California Constitution. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The preceding recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 2: The City Council will consider an adjustment in the service rates for the provision of residential and commercial solid waste collection, recycling and disposal services, along with street sweeping rates, and it has deemed that the proposed refuse rate adjustments, set forth in "Exhibit A", “Exhibit B” and “Exhibit C” are G.15.a Packet Pg. 392 Attachment: Resolution Setting a Public Hearing to Adjust Refuse Rates [Revision 2] (Resolution Setting a Public Hearing Relating to Refuse appropriate and reasonable. All other rates existing and not separately identified in “Exhibit A”, “Exhibit B” and “Exhibit C” shall remain the same. The Council will give consideration to new rates identified in “Exhibit D”. SECTION 3: The City Council hereby declares its intention to conduct a Public Hearing concerning residential and commercial solid waste collection, recycling and disposal service rates, and street sweeping rates, for Fiscal Years 2019-2020 and 2020- 2021, in accordance with Section 6 of Article 13D of the California Constitution; and, notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing on these matters will be held by the City Council on Tuesday, July 9, 2019 at 6:00 P.M., o r as soon thereafter as feasible, in the City Council Chambers located at 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace California. At the Public Hearing, all interested persons shall be afforded the opportunity to hear and be heard. SECTION 4: The City Council hereby authorizes and directs the City’s franchise refuse collection services provider, Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc., to provide notice to all residential and commercial refuse/recycling and street sweeping customers within the City, not less than forty-five (45) days prior to the Public Hearing, pursuant to California Government Code Section 53755 and Section 6 of Article 13D of the California Constitution. SECTION 5: The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace at a regular meeting held on the 14th day of May, 2019. __________________________ Darcy McNaboe, Mayor ATTEST: Debra L. Thomas, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Adrian R. Guerra, City Attorney G.15.a Packet Pg. 393 Attachment: Resolution Setting a Public Hearing to Adjust Refuse Rates [Revision 2] (Resolution Setting a Public Hearing Relating to Refuse Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc City of Grand Terrace Residential & Multi Family Barrel Rates Effective July 1, 2019 Changes Current Proposed Proposed from Standard 96 Gallon Barrel 2017 2019 2020 2019 Components Rate Rate Rate $ Service a/13.58$ 14.01$ 14.33$ 0.32$ 1)Landfill / Disposal Transfer 3.41 3.58 3.83 2)Green Waste Disposal 2.17 3.04 2.90 3)MRF Fee 0.11 0.97 Disposal/Processing Total 5.58$ 6.73$ 7.70$ 0.97$ 2018 Service & Disp./Proc. Catch-Up Fee 1.32 1.32$ Franchise Fees 15.0%2.87 3.11 3.50 Pavement Impact Fee 3.5%0.67 0.73 0.82 Household Haz Waste 0.32$ 0.32 0.32 0.32 Street Sweeping 0.96$ 0.96 1.14 1.14 City Fees Total 4.82$ 5.30$ 5.78$ 0.48$ Total 23.98$ 26.04$ 29.13$ 3.09$ Changes vs Current Rate 0.13$ 2.06$ 5.15$ 0.55%8.59%21.48% 2017 2019 2020 a/February CPI 2.7%3.6%2.5% 90.0%2.4%3.2%2.3% 1)Landfill / Disposal Transfer WDA Fee per Ton 37.13$ 38.21$ 39.55$ Annual Refuse Tons/House 1.1020 1.1255 1.1624 2)Green Waste Disposal Agua Mansa Fee per Ton 40.47$ 48.60$ 50.09$ Annual GW Tons/House 0.6440 0.7512 0.6940 3)MRF Fee Processing Cost per Ton 4.40$ 38.11$ Annual Rec Tons/House 0.2954 0.3062 G.15.b Packet Pg. 394 Attachment: Exhibit A- Residential Rates (Resolution Setting a Public Hearing Relating to Refuse Rate Adjustments) Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc City of Grand Terrace Residential & Multi Family Barrel Rates Effective July 1, 2019 Changes Current Proposed Proposed from Standard 64 Gallon Barrel 2017 2019 2020 2019 Components Rate Rate Rate $ Service a/13.58$ 14.01$ 14.33$ 0.32$ 1)Landfill / Disposal Transfer 2.25 2.43 2.59 2)Green Waste Disposal 2.17 3.04 2.90 3)MRF Fee 0.11 0.97 Disposal/Processing Total 4.42$ 5.58$ 6.46$ 0.88$ 2018 Service & Disp./Proc. Catch-Up Fee 1.33 1.33$ Franchise Fees 15.0%2.70 2.94 3.32 Pavement Impact Fee 3.5%0.63 0.69 0.77 Household Haz Waste 0.32$ 0.32 0.32 0.32 Street Sweeping 0.96$ 0.96 1.14 1.14 City Fees Total 4.61$ 5.09$ 5.55$ 0.46$ Total 22.61$ 24.68$ 27.67$ 2.99$ Changes vs Current Rate 0.05$ 2.07$ 5.06$ 0.22%9.16%22.38% 2017 2019 2020 a/February CPI 2.7%3.6%2.5% 90.0%2.4%3.2%2.3% 1)Landfill / Disposal Transfer WDA Fee per Ton 37.13$ 38.21$ 39.55$ Annual Refuse Tons/House 0.7282 0.7620 0.7870 2)Green Waste Disposal Agua Mansa Fee per Ton 40.47$ 48.60$ 50.09$ Annual GW Tons/House 0.6440 0.7512 0.6940 3)MRF Fee Processing Cost per Ton 4.40$ 38.11$ Annual Rec Tons/House 0.2954 0.3062 G.15.b Packet Pg. 395 Attachment: Exhibit A- Residential Rates (Resolution Setting a Public Hearing Relating to Refuse Rate Adjustments) Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc City of Grand Terrace Senior Rate Discontinued Effective July 1, 2019 Current Proposed Proposed Senior 64 Gallon Barrel 2017 2019 2020 Changes from 2019 Components Rate Rate Rate $ Service a/12.92$ 13.57$ 14.33$ 0.76$ 1)Landfill / Disposal Transfer 2.25 2.43 2.59 2)Green Waste Disposal 2.17 3.04 2.90 3)MRF Fee 0.11 0.97 Disposal/Processing Total 4.42$ 5.58$ 6.46$ 0.88$ 2018 Service & Disp./Proc. Catch-Up Fee 1.33 1.33$ Franchise Fees 15.0%2.60 2.87 3.32 Pavement Impact Fee 3.5%0.61 0.67 0.77 Household Haz Waste 0.32$ 0.32 0.32 0.32 Street Sweeping 0.96$ 0.96 1.14 1.14 City Fees Total 4.49$ 5.00$ 5.55$ 0.55$ Total 21.83$ 24.15$ 27.67$ 3.52$ Changes vs Current Rate 0.39$ 2.32$ 3.52$ 1.82%10.63%14.58% Memo Per Mike A.: - City has not approved a Sr Rate, customers were grandfathered (113 in 2016) - Rate to be phased out in three years - the same as regular 64Gal Barrel by 2019 - Rate phased out in 2019. For 2019 use the same rate as 64 gallon barrel. - Do not include in 218 Notice 2017 2019 2020 a/February CPI 2.7%3.6%2.5% 90.0%2.4%3.2%2.3% 1)Landfill / Disposal Transfer WDA Fee per Ton 37.13$ 38.21$ Annual Refuse Tons/House 0.7282 0.7620 2)Green Waste Disposal Agua Mansa Fee per Ton 40.47$ 48.60$ Annual GW Tons/House 0.6440 0.7512 3)MRF Fee Processing Cost per Ton -$ 4.40$ Annual Rec Tons/House - 0.2954 G.15.b Packet Pg. 396 Attachment: Exhibit A- Residential Rates (Resolution Setting a Public Hearing Relating to Refuse Rate Adjustments) Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc City of Grand Terrace Commercial Barrel Rate Effective July 1, 2019 Changes Current Proposed Proposed from Standard 96 Gallon Barrel 2017 2019 2020 2019 Components Rate Rate Rate $ Service a/24.41$ 25.19$ 25.77$ 0.58$ 1)Landfill / Disposal Transfer 3.41 3.58 3.83 2)MRF Fee 0.11 0.97 3)Compliance Fee 0.46 Disposal/Processing Total 3.41$ 3.69$ 5.26$ 1.57$ 2018 Service & Disp./Proc. Catch-Up Fee 0.88 0.88$ Franchise Fees 15.0%4.17 4.33 4.79 Pavement Impact Fee 3.5%0.97 1.01 1.12 Household Haz Waste 0.32$ 0.32 0.32 0.32 Street Sweeping 0.96$ 0.96 1.14 1.14 City Fees Total 6.42$ 6.80$ 7.37$ 0.57$ Total 34.24$ 35.68$ 39.28$ 3.60$ Changes vs Current Rate 1.37$ 1.44$ 5.04$ 4.17%4.21%14.72% 2017 2019 2020 a/February CPI 2.7%3.6%2.5% 90.0%2.4%3.2%2.3% 1)Landfill / Disposal Transfer WDA Fee per Ton 37.13$ 38.21$ 39.55$ Annual Refuse Tons/House 1.1020 1.1255 1.1624 2)MRF Fee Processing Cost per Ton 4.40$ 38.11$ Annual Rec Tons/House 0.2954 0.3062 G.15.b Packet Pg. 397 Attachment: Exhibit A- Residential Rates (Resolution Setting a Public Hearing Relating to Refuse Rate Adjustments) 2019 Grand Terrace Rates 3-12-19.xlsx Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc. City of Grand Terrace Effective July 1, 2019 Additional Services and Fees - Residential Changes from current Current Proposed Proposed 2017 Components 2017 Rate 2019 Rate 2020 Rate $ Extra Cart - 64 Gal Service and Disposal a/8.28$ 8.54$ 8.74$ Franchise Fees (1)1.24 1.28 1.31 Pavement Impact Fee (2)0.29 0.30 0.31 Customer Rate 9.81$ 10.12$ 10.36$ 0.55$ Extra Cart - 96 Gal Service and Disposal a/10.19$ 10.52$ 10.76$ Franchise Fees (1)1.53 1.58 1.61 Pavement Impact Fee (2)0.36 0.37 0.38 Customer Rate 12.08$ 12.47$ 12.75$ 0.67$ Extra Cart - Recycling Service and Disposal a/1.91$ 1.97$ 2.02$ Franchise Fees (1)0.29 0.30 0.30 Pavement Impact Fee (2)0.07 0.07 0.07 Customer Rate 2.27$ 2.34$ 2.39$ 0.12$ Extra Cart - Greenwaste Service and Disposal a/1.91$ 1.97$ 2.02$ Franchise Fees (1)0.29 0.30 0.30 Pavement Impact Fee (2)0.07 0.07 0.07 Customer Rate 2.27$ 2.34$ 2.39$ 0.12$ Backyard/Sideyard Service and Disposal a/11.79$ 12.17$ 12.45$ Franchise Fees (1)1.77 1.83 1.87 Pavement Impact Fee (2)0.41 0.43 0.44 Customer Rate 13.97$ 14.43$ 14.76$ 0.79$ Extra Pick-Up On Site - Barrels Service and Disposal a/8.83$ 9.11$ 9.32$ Franchise Fees (1)1.32 1.37 1.40 Pavement Impact Fee (2)0.31 0.32 0.33 Customer Rate 10.46$ 10.80$ 11.05$ 0.59$ Extra Pick-Up Unscheduled - Barrels Service and Disposal a/17.66$ 18.23$ 18.65$ Franchise Fees (1)2.65 2.73 2.80 Pavement Impact Fee (2)0.62 0.64 0.65 Customer Rate 20.93$ 21.60$ 22.10$ 1.17$ General References: (1)15% of sum of service and disposal (2)3.5% of sum of service and disposal Other Notes 2017 2019 2020 a/February CPI 2.7%3.6%2.5% 90.0%2.4%3.2%2.3% G.15.b Packet Pg. 398 Attachment: Exhibit A- Residential Rates (Resolution Setting a Public Hearing Relating to Refuse Rate Adjustments) 2019 Grand Terrace Rates 3-12-19.xlsx 5 Comm Recycling Bin Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc. City of Grand Terrace Effective July 1, 2019 Commercial Commingled Recycling Bin Service 90% of CPI Changes CPI 3.5%2.5%2018 Lbs/Yrd 3.5%from 2.4%15.0%Pavement 90% of Service &71.00 15.0%Pavement current from Bin Franchise Impact Total 2.3%Processing Processing Franchise Impact Total 2017 2017 Size Freq Service*Fee (a)Fee (b)Rate Service*Catch Up 39.89$ Fee (a)Fee (b)Rate $% 2 1 59.71 8.96 2.09 70.76 63.04 4.63 12.27 11.99 2.80 94.73 23.97 33.88% 2 2 105.44 15.82 3.69 124.95 111.31 8.88 24.54 21.71 5.07 171.51 46.56 37.26% 3 1 76.60 11.49 2.68 90.77 80.87 6.60 18.41 15.88 3.71 125.47 34.70 38.23% 3 2 139.60 20.94 4.89 165.43 147.38 12.84 36.82 29.56 6.90 233.50 68.07 41.15% 4 1 101.03 15.15 3.54 119.72 106.66 8.77 24.54 21.00 4.90 165.87 46.15 38.55% 4 2 188.32 28.25 6.59 223.16 198.82 17.18 49.09 39.76 9.28 314.13 90.97 40.76% 6 1 144.19 21.63 5.05 170.87 152.22 12.96 36.82 30.30 7.07 239.37 68.50 40.09% 6 2 274.44 41.17 9.61 325.22 289.73 25.55 73.63 58.34 13.61 460.86 135.64 41.71% ----- * Service fee is adjusted at 90% of CPI (a) 15% of the sum of service and disposal (b) 3.5% of the sum of service and disposal 2017 Rate Components Proposed 2019 Rate Components G.15.c Packet Pg. 399 Attachment: Exhibit B - Commercial Rates (Resolution Setting a Public Hearing Relating to Refuse Rate Adjustments) 2019 Grand Terrace Rates 3-12-19.xlsx 6 Comm Refuse Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc. City of Grand Terrace Effective July 1, 2019 Commercial Bin Service 90% of CPI Changes CPI Changes CPI 3.5%0.500$ 2.5%2018 Fee per Yard Lbs/Yr 3.5%0.570$ from 2.5%2018 Fee per Yard Lbs/Yr 3.5%0.570$ from 2.4%159.00 15.0%Pavement Street 90% of Service &$0.15 131.00 15.0%Pavement Street current from 90% of Service &$0.15 131.00 Recycling 15.0%Pavement Street current from Bin 37.13$ Franchise Impact Sweeping Total 2.3%Disposal Compliance 39.55$ Franchise Impact Sweeping Total 2017 2017 2.3%Disposal Compliance 39.55$ 1.73$ Franchise Impact Sweeping Total 2017 2017 Size Freq Service*Disposal Fee (a)Fee (b)Fee Rate Service*Catch Up Fee to Burrtec Disposal Fee (a)Fee (b)Fee Rate $%Service*Catch Up Fee to Burrtec Disposal Fee Fee (a)Fee (b)Fee Rate $% 2 1 59.71 25.58 12.79 2.99 4.33 105.40 63.04 0.28 1.30 22.45 13.06 3.05 4.94 108.12 2.72 2.58%63.04 0.28 1.30 22.45 14.99 15.31 3.57 4.94 125.88 20.48 19.43% 2 2 105.44 51.17 23.49 5.48 8.67 194.25 111.31 0.18 2.60 44.90 23.85 5.56 9.88 198.28 4.03 2.07%111.31 0.18 2.60 44.90 29.99 28.35 6.61 9.88 233.82 39.57 20.37% 2 3 165.14 76.75 36.28 8.47 13.00 299.64 174.34 0.47 3.90 67.35 36.91 8.61 14.82 306.40 6.76 2.26%174.34 0.47 3.90 67.35 44.98 43.66 10.19 14.82 359.71 60.07 20.05% 2 4 224.86 102.33 49.08 11.45 17.33 405.05 237.40 0.75 5.20 89.80 49.97 11.66 19.76 414.54 9.49 2.34%237.40 0.75 5.20 89.80 59.97 58.97 13.76 19.76 485.61 80.56 19.89% 2 5 284.02 127.91 61.79 14.42 21.67 509.81 299.85 1.02 6.50 112.26 62.94 14.69 24.70 521.96 12.15 2.38%299.85 1.02 6.50 112.26 74.97 74.19 17.31 24.70 610.80 100.99 19.81% 2 6 343.99 153.50 74.62 17.41 26.00 615.52 363.17 1.30 7.80 134.71 76.05 17.74 29.64 630.41 14.89 2.42%363.17 1.30 7.80 134.71 89.96 89.54 20.89 29.64 737.01 121.49 19.74% Add. Pickup (on-site)7.15 5.90 1.96 0.46 0.00 15.47 7.55 (0.11)5.18 1.89 0.44 0.00 14.95 (0.52)-3.36%7.55 (0.11)5.18 3.46 2.41 0.56 0.00 19.05 3.58 23.14% Add. Pickup (unsched)22.35 5.90 4.24 0.99 0.00 33.48 23.60 0.30 5.18 4.36 1.02 0.00 34.46 0.98 2.93%23.60 0.30 5.18 3.46 4.88 1.14 0.00 38.56 5.08 15.17% 3 1 76.60 38.37 17.25 4.02 6.50 142.74 80.87 0.08 1.95 33.68 17.49 4.08 7.41 145.56 2.82 1.98%80.87 0.08 1.95 33.68 22.49 20.86 4.87 7.41 172.21 29.47 20.65% 3 2 139.60 76.75 32.45 7.57 13.00 269.37 147.38 (0.21)3.90 67.35 32.76 7.64 14.82 273.64 4.27 1.59%147.38 (0.21)3.90 67.35 44.98 39.51 9.22 14.82 326.95 57.58 21.38% 3 3 216.31 115.12 49.71 11.60 19.50 412.24 228.36 (0.13)5.85 101.03 50.27 11.73 22.23 419.34 7.10 1.72%228.36 (0.13)5.85 101.03 67.47 60.39 14.09 22.23 499.29 87.05 21.12% 3 4 301.90 153.50 68.31 15.94 26.00 565.65 318.73 0.18 7.80 134.71 69.21 16.15 29.64 576.42 10.77 1.90%318.73 0.18 7.80 134.71 89.96 82.71 19.30 29.64 683.03 117.38 20.75% 3 5 369.60 191.87 84.22 19.65 32.50 697.84 390.20 0.02 9.75 168.38 85.25 19.89 37.05 710.54 12.70 1.82%390.20 0.02 9.75 168.38 112.45 102.12 23.83 37.05 843.80 145.96 20.92% 3 6 445.99 230.24 101.43 23.67 39.00 840.33 470.85 0.09 11.70 202.06 102.71 23.96 44.46 855.83 15.50 1.84%470.85 0.09 11.70 202.06 134.94 122.95 28.69 44.46 1,015.74 175.41 20.87% Add. Pickup (on-site)7.15 8.85 2.40 0.56 0.00 18.96 7.55 (0.26)7.77 2.26 0.53 0.00 17.85 (1.11)-5.85%7.55 (0.26)7.77 5.19 3.04 0.71 0.00 24.00 5.04 26.58% Add. Pickup (unsched)22.35 8.85 4.68 1.09 0.00 36.97 23.60 0.15 7.77 4.73 1.10 0.00 37.35 0.38 1.03%23.60 0.15 7.77 5.19 5.51 1.28 0.00 43.50 6.53 17.66% 4 1 101.03 51.17 22.83 5.33 8.67 189.03 106.66 0.07 2.60 44.90 23.13 5.40 9.88 192.64 3.61 1.91%106.66 0.07 2.60 44.90 29.99 27.63 6.45 9.88 228.18 39.15 20.71% 4 2 188.32 102.33 43.60 10.17 17.33 361.75 198.82 (0.22)5.20 89.80 44.04 10.28 19.76 367.68 5.93 1.64%198.82 (0.22)5.20 89.80 59.97 53.04 12.37 19.76 438.74 76.99 21.28% 4 3 289.45 153.50 66.44 15.50 26.00 550.89 305.58 (0.16)7.80 134.71 67.19 15.68 29.64 560.44 9.55 1.73%305.58 (0.16)7.80 134.71 89.96 80.68 18.83 29.64 667.04 116.15 21.08% 4 4 390.59 204.66 89.29 20.83 34.67 740.04 412.36 (0.08)10.40 179.61 90.34 21.08 39.52 753.23 13.19 1.78%412.36 (0.08)10.40 179.61 119.95 108.34 25.28 39.52 895.38 155.34 20.99% 4 5 493.60 255.83 112.41 26.23 43.33 931.40 521.12 0.05 13.00 224.51 113.80 26.55 49.40 948.43 17.03 1.83%521.12 0.05 13.00 224.51 149.93 136.29 31.80 49.40 1,126.10 194.70 20.90% 4 6 591.81 306.99 134.82 31.46 52.00 1,117.08 624.80 0.04 15.60 269.41 136.48 31.84 59.28 1,137.45 20.37 1.82%624.80 0.04 15.60 269.41 179.92 163.47 38.14 59.28 1,350.66 233.58 20.91% Add. Pickup (on-site)7.15 11.81 2.84 0.66 0.00 22.46 7.55 (0.42)10.36 2.62 0.61 0.00 20.72 (1.74)-7.75%7.55 (0.42)10.36 6.92 3.66 0.85 0.00 28.92 6.46 28.76% Add. Pickup (unsched)22.35 11.81 5.12 1.20 0.00 40.48 23.60 (0.01)10.36 5.09 1.19 0.00 40.23 (0.25)-0.62%23.60 (0.01)10.36 6.92 6.13 1.43 0.00 48.43 7.95 19.64% 6 1 144.19 76.75 33.14 7.73 13.00 274.81 152.22 (0.09)3.90 67.35 33.51 7.82 14.82 279.53 4.72 1.72%152.22 (0.09)3.90 67.35 44.98 40.25 9.39 14.82 332.82 58.01 21.11% 6 2 274.44 153.50 64.19 14.98 26.00 533.11 289.73 (0.56)7.80 134.71 64.75 15.11 29.64 541.18 8.07 1.51%289.73 (0.56)7.80 134.71 89.96 78.25 18.26 29.64 647.79 114.68 21.51% 6 3 419.18 230.24 97.41 22.73 39.00 808.56 442.54 (0.63)11.70 202.06 98.35 22.95 44.46 821.43 12.87 1.59%442.54 (0.63)11.70 202.06 134.94 118.59 27.67 44.46 981.33 172.77 21.37% 6 4 562.84 306.99 130.47 30.44 52.00 1,082.74 594.21 (0.73)15.60 269.41 131.77 30.75 59.28 1,100.29 17.55 1.62%594.21 (0.73)15.60 269.41 179.92 158.76 37.04 59.28 1,313.49 230.75 21.31% 6 5 707.04 383.74 163.62 38.18 65.00 1,357.58 746.45 (0.82)19.50 336.77 165.29 38.57 74.10 1,379.86 22.28 1.64%746.45 (0.82)19.50 336.77 224.90 199.02 46.44 74.10 1,646.36 288.78 21.27% 6 6 851.23 460.49 196.76 45.91 78.00 1,632.39 898.67 (0.91)23.40 404.12 198.79 46.38 88.92 1,659.37 26.98 1.65%898.67 (0.91)23.40 404.12 269.88 239.27 55.83 88.92 1,979.18 346.79 21.24% Add. Pickup (on-site)7.15 17.71 3.73 0.87 0.00 29.46 7.55 (0.72)15.54 3.36 0.78 0.00 26.51 (2.95)-10.01%7.55 (0.72)15.54 10.38 4.91 1.15 0.00 38.81 9.35 31.74% Add. Pickup (unsched)22.35 17.71 6.01 1.40 0.00 47.47 23.60 (0.31)15.54 5.82 1.36 0.00 46.01 (1.46)-3.08%23.60 (0.31)15.54 10.38 7.38 1.72 0.00 58.31 10.84 22.84% Add'l Charges T-Bins - 3 yards (COD)22.35 38.37 9.11 2.13 N/A 71.96 23.60 (1.37)33.68 8.39 1.96 N/A 66.26 (5.70)-7.92%23.60 (1.37)33.68 22.49 11.76 2.74 N/A 92.90 20.94 29.10% 96 Gal Commingled Recycling N/C N/C N/A N/C N/A Extra Recycling Barrel 2.17 2.29 0.12 5.53%2.29 0.12 5.53% Locks Burned Bin 283.45 42.52 N/A N/A 325.97 299.25 7.56 46.02 N/A N/A 352.83 26.86 8.24%299.25 7.56 46.02 N/A N/A 352.83 26.86 8.24% Exchanges 59.73 8.96 N/A N/A 68.69 63.06 1.59 9.70 N/A N/A 74.35 5.66 8.24%63.06 1.59 9.70 N/A N/A 74.35 5.66 8.24% Lock Rental (Monthly)12.15 1.82 N/A N/A 13.97 12.83 0.32 1.97 N/A N/A 15.12 1.15 8.23%12.83 0.32 1.97 N/A N/A 15.12 1.15 8.23% Lost or Stolen Bin 506.15 75.92 N/A N/A 582.07 534.36 13.50 82.18 N/A N/A 630.04 47.97 8.24%534.36 13.50 82.18 N/A N/A 630.04 47.97 8.24% Overage 33.99 5.10 N/A N/A 39.09 35.89 0.91 5.52 N/A N/A 42.32 3.23 8.26%35.89 0.91 5.52 N/A N/A 42.32 3.23 8.26% Replaced Key 5.06 0.76 N/A N/A 5.82 5.34 0.13 0.82 N/A N/A 6.29 0.47 8.08%5.34 0.13 0.82 N/A N/A 6.29 0.47 8.08% Replaced Lock 25.30 3.80 N/A N/A 29.10 26.71 0.67 4.11 N/A N/A 31.49 2.39 8.21%26.71 0.67 4.11 N/A N/A 31.49 2.39 8.21% ----- * Service fee is adjusted at 90% of CPI (a) 15% of the sum of service and disposal (b) 3.5% of the sum of service and disposal 2017 Rate Components Proposed 2019 Rate Components 7/1/19 - Option 2Proposed 2019 Rate Components - Option 1 G.15.c Packet Pg. 400 Attachment: Exhibit B - Commercial Rates (Resolution Setting a Public Hearing Relating to Refuse Rate Adjustments) 2019 Grand Terrace Rates 3-12-19.xlsx 7 MF Refuse Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc. City of Grand Terrace Effective July 1, 2019 Multi-Family Commercial Bin Service 90% of CPI Changes CPI Changes CPI 3.5%0.160$ 0.500$ 2.5%2018 Fee per Yard Lbs/Yr 3.5%0.160$ 0.570$ from 2.5%2018 Fee per Yard Lbs/Yr 3.5%0.160$ 0.570$ from 2.4%159.00 15.0%Pavement Street 90% of Service &$0.15 131.00 15.0%Pavement Street current from 90% of Service &$0.15 131.00 Recycling 15.0%Pavement Street current from Bin 37.13$ Franchise Impact HHW Sweeping Total 2.3%Disposal Compliance 39.55$ Franchise Impact HHW Sweeping Total 2017 2017 2.3%Disposal Compliance 39.55$ 1.73$ Franchise Impact HHW Sweeping Total 2017 2017 Size Freq Service*Disposal Fee (a)Fee (b)Fee Fee Rate Service*Catch Up Fee to Burrtec Disposal Fee (a)Fee (b)Fee Fee Rate $%Service*Catch Up Fee to Burrtec Disposal Fee Fee (a)Fee (b)Fee Fee Rate $% 2 1 59.71 25.58 12.79 2.99 1.39 4.33 106.79 63.04 0.28 1.30 22.45 13.06 3.05 1.39 4.94 109.51 2.72 2.55%63.04 0.28 1.30 22.45 14.99 15.31 3.57 1.39 4.94 127.27 20.48 19.18% 2 2 105.44 51.16 23.49 5.48 2.77 8.67 197.01 111.31 0.19 2.60 44.90 23.85 5.57 2.77 9.88 201.07 4.06 2.06%111.31 0.19 2.60 44.90 29.99 28.35 6.61 2.77 9.88 236.60 39.59 20.10% 2 3 165.14 76.74 36.28 8.47 4.16 13.00 303.79 174.34 0.47 3.90 67.35 36.91 8.61 4.16 14.82 310.56 6.77 2.23%174.34 0.47 3.90 67.35 44.98 43.66 10.19 4.16 14.82 363.87 60.08 19.78% 2 4 224.86 102.32 49.08 11.45 5.55 17.33 410.59 237.40 0.77 5.20 89.80 49.98 11.66 5.55 19.76 420.12 9.53 2.32%237.40 0.77 5.20 89.80 59.97 58.97 13.76 5.55 19.76 491.18 80.59 19.63% 2 5 284.02 127.90 61.79 14.42 6.93 21.67 516.73 299.85 1.03 6.50 112.25 62.94 14.69 6.93 24.70 528.89 12.16 2.35%299.85 1.03 6.50 112.25 74.97 74.19 17.31 6.93 24.70 617.73 101.00 19.55% 2 6 343.99 153.48 74.62 17.41 8.32 26.00 623.82 363.17 1.32 7.80 134.70 76.05 17.74 8.32 29.64 638.74 14.92 2.39%363.17 1.32 7.80 134.70 89.96 89.54 20.89 8.32 29.64 745.34 121.52 19.48% Add. Pickup (on-site)7.15 5.90 1.96 0.46 0.00 0.00 15.47 7.55 (0.11)5.18 1.89 0.44 0.00 0.00 14.95 (0.52)-3.36%7.55 (0.11)5.18 3.46 2.41 0.56 0.00 0.00 19.05 3.58 23.14% Add. Pickup (unsched)22.35 5.90 4.24 0.99 0.00 0.00 33.48 23.60 0.30 5.18 4.36 1.02 0.00 0.00 34.46 0.98 2.93%23.60 0.30 5.18 3.46 4.88 1.14 0.00 0.00 38.56 5.08 15.17% 3 1 76.60 38.37 17.25 4.02 2.08 6.50 144.82 80.87 0.08 1.95 33.68 17.49 4.08 2.08 7.41 147.64 2.82 1.95%80.87 0.08 1.95 33.68 22.49 20.86 4.87 2.08 7.41 174.29 29.47 20.35% 3 2 139.60 76.74 32.45 7.57 4.16 13.00 273.52 147.38 (0.21)3.90 67.37 32.77 7.65 4.16 14.82 277.84 4.32 1.58%147.38 (0.21)3.90 67.37 44.98 39.51 9.22 4.16 14.82 331.13 57.61 21.06% 3 3 216.31 115.11 49.71 11.60 6.24 19.50 418.47 228.36 (0.13)5.85 101.05 50.27 11.73 6.24 22.23 425.60 7.13 1.70%228.36 (0.13)5.85 101.05 67.47 60.39 14.09 6.24 22.23 505.55 87.08 20.81% 3 4 301.90 153.48 68.31 15.94 8.32 26.00 573.95 318.73 0.18 7.80 134.74 69.22 16.15 8.32 29.64 584.78 10.83 1.89%318.73 0.18 7.80 134.74 89.96 82.71 19.30 8.32 29.64 691.38 117.43 20.46% 3 5 369.60 191.85 84.22 19.65 10.40 32.50 708.22 390.20 0.02 9.75 168.42 85.26 19.89 10.40 37.05 720.99 12.77 1.80%390.20 0.02 9.75 168.42 112.45 102.13 23.83 10.40 37.05 854.25 146.03 20.62% 3 6 445.99 230.22 101.43 23.67 12.48 39.00 852.79 470.85 0.09 11.70 202.11 102.71 23.97 12.48 44.46 868.37 15.58 1.83%470.85 0.09 11.70 202.11 134.94 122.95 28.69 12.48 44.46 1,028.27 175.48 20.58% Add. Pickup (on-site)7.15 8.85 2.40 0.56 0.00 0.00 18.96 7.55 (0.26)7.77 2.26 0.53 0.00 0.00 17.85 (1.11)-5.85%7.55 (0.26)7.77 5.19 3.04 0.71 0.00 0.00 24.00 5.04 26.58% Add. Pickup (unsched)22.35 8.85 4.68 1.09 0.00 0.00 36.97 23.60 0.15 7.77 4.73 1.10 0.00 0.00 37.35 0.38 1.03%23.60 0.15 7.77 5.19 5.51 1.28 0.00 0.00 43.50 6.53 17.66% 4 1 101.03 51.17 22.83 5.33 2.77 8.67 191.80 106.66 0.07 2.60 44.90 23.13 5.40 2.77 9.88 195.41 3.61 1.88%106.66 0.07 2.60 44.90 29.99 27.63 6.45 2.77 9.88 230.95 39.15 20.41% 4 2 188.32 102.34 43.60 10.17 5.55 17.33 367.31 198.82 (0.22)5.20 89.80 44.04 10.28 5.55 19.76 373.23 5.92 1.61%198.82 (0.22)5.20 89.80 59.97 53.04 12.37 5.55 19.76 444.29 76.98 20.96% 4 3 289.45 153.51 66.44 15.50 8.32 26.00 559.22 305.58 (0.16)7.80 134.70 67.19 15.68 8.32 29.64 568.75 9.53 1.70%305.58 (0.16)7.80 134.70 89.96 80.68 18.83 8.32 29.64 675.35 116.13 20.77% 4 4 390.59 204.68 89.29 20.83 11.09 34.67 751.15 412.36 (0.08)10.40 179.60 90.34 21.08 11.09 39.52 764.31 13.16 1.75%412.36 (0.08)10.40 179.60 119.95 108.33 25.28 11.09 39.52 906.45 155.30 20.67% 4 5 493.60 255.85 112.42 26.23 13.87 43.33 945.30 521.12 0.04 13.00 224.50 113.80 26.55 13.87 49.40 962.28 16.98 1.80%521.12 0.04 13.00 224.50 149.93 136.29 31.80 13.87 49.40 1,139.95 194.65 20.59% 4 6 591.81 307.02 134.82 31.46 16.64 52.00 1,133.75 624.80 0.03 15.60 269.40 136.47 31.84 16.64 59.28 1,154.06 20.31 1.79%624.80 0.03 15.60 269.40 179.92 163.46 38.14 16.64 59.28 1,367.27 233.52 20.60% Add. Pickup (on-site)7.15 11.81 2.84 0.66 0.00 0.00 22.46 7.55 (0.42)10.36 2.62 0.61 0.00 0.00 20.72 (1.74)-7.75%7.55 (0.42)10.36 6.92 3.66 0.85 0.00 0.00 28.92 6.46 28.76% Add. Pickup (unsched)22.35 11.81 5.12 1.20 0.00 0.00 40.48 23.60 (0.01)10.36 5.09 1.19 0.00 0.00 40.23 (0.25)-0.62%23.60 (0.01)10.36 6.92 6.13 1.43 0.00 0.00 48.43 7.95 19.64% 6 1 144.19 76.75 33.14 7.73 4.16 13.00 278.97 152.22 (0.09)3.90 67.35 33.51 7.82 4.16 14.82 283.69 4.72 1.69%152.22 (0.09)3.90 67.35 44.98 40.25 9.39 4.16 14.82 336.98 58.01 20.79% 6 2 274.44 153.50 64.19 14.98 8.32 26.00 541.43 289.73 (0.55)7.80 134.70 64.75 15.11 8.32 29.64 549.50 8.07 1.49%289.73 (0.55)7.80 134.70 89.96 78.25 18.26 8.32 29.64 656.11 114.68 21.18% 6 3 419.18 230.25 97.41 22.73 12.48 39.00 821.05 442.54 (0.63)11.70 202.05 98.35 22.95 12.48 44.46 833.90 12.85 1.57%442.54 (0.63)11.70 202.05 134.94 118.59 27.67 12.48 44.46 993.80 172.75 21.04% 6 4 562.84 307.00 130.48 30.44 16.64 52.00 1,099.40 594.21 (0.73)15.60 269.40 131.77 30.75 16.64 59.28 1,116.92 17.52 1.59%594.21 (0.73)15.60 269.40 179.92 158.76 37.04 16.64 59.28 1,330.12 230.72 20.99% 6 5 707.04 383.75 163.62 38.18 20.80 65.00 1,378.39 746.45 (0.81)19.50 336.75 165.28 38.57 20.80 74.10 1,400.64 22.25 1.61%746.45 (0.81)19.50 336.75 224.90 199.02 46.44 20.80 74.10 1,667.15 288.76 20.95% 6 6 851.23 460.50 196.76 45.91 24.96 78.00 1,657.36 898.67 (0.90)23.40 404.10 198.79 46.38 24.96 88.92 1,684.32 26.96 1.63%898.67 (0.90)23.40 404.10 269.88 239.27 55.83 24.96 88.92 2,004.13 346.77 20.92% Add. Pickup (on-site)7.15 17.71 3.73 0.87 0.00 0.00 29.46 7.55 (0.72)15.54 3.36 0.78 0.00 0.00 26.51 (2.95)-10.01%7.55 (0.72)15.54 10.38 4.91 1.15 0.00 0.00 38.81 9.35 31.74% Add. Pickup (unsched)22.35 17.71 6.01 1.40 0.00 0.00 47.47 23.60 (0.31)15.54 5.82 1.36 0.00 0.00 46.01 (1.46)-3.08%23.60 (0.31)15.54 10.38 7.38 1.72 0.00 0.00 58.31 10.84 22.84% Add'l Charges T-Bins - 3 yards (COD)22.35 38.37 9.11 2.13 N/A N/A 71.96 23.60 (1.37)33.68 8.39 1.96 N/A N/A 66.26 (5.70)-7.92%23.60 (1.37)33.68 22.49 11.76 2.74 N/A N/A 92.90 20.94 29.10% 96 Gal Commingled Recycling N/C N/C N/C Extra Recycling Barrel 2.17 2.29 0.12 5.53%2.22 0.05 2.30% Locks Burned Bin 283.45 42.52 N/A N/A N/A 325.97 299.25 7.56 46.02 N/A N/A N/A 352.83 26.86 8.24%299.25 7.56 46.02 N/A N/A N/A 352.83 26.86 8.24% Exchanges 59.73 8.96 N/A N/A N/A 68.69 63.06 1.59 9.70 N/A N/A N/A 74.35 5.66 8.24%63.06 1.59 9.70 N/A N/A N/A 74.35 5.66 8.24% Lock Rental (Monthly)12.15 1.82 N/A N/A N/A 13.97 12.83 0.32 1.97 N/A N/A N/A 15.12 1.15 8.23%12.83 0.32 1.97 N/A N/A N/A 15.12 1.15 8.23% Lost or Stolen Bin 506.15 75.92 N/A N/A N/A 582.07 534.36 13.50 82.18 N/A N/A N/A 630.04 47.97 8.24%534.36 13.50 82.18 N/A N/A N/A 630.04 47.97 8.24% Overage 33.99 5.10 N/A N/A N/A 39.09 35.89 0.91 5.52 N/A N/A N/A 42.32 3.23 8.26%35.89 0.91 5.52 N/A N/A N/A 42.32 3.23 8.26% Replaced Key 5.06 0.76 N/A N/A N/A 5.82 5.34 0.13 0.82 N/A N/A N/A 6.29 0.47 8.08%5.34 0.13 0.82 N/A N/A N/A 6.29 0.47 8.08% Replaced Lock 25.30 3.80 N/A N/A N/A 29.10 26.71 0.67 4.11 N/A N/A N/A 31.49 2.39 8.21%26.71 0.67 4.11 N/A N/A N/A 31.49 2.39 8.21% ----- * Service fee is adjusted at 90% of CPI (a) 15% of the sum of service and disposal (b) 3.5% of the sum of service and disposal 2017 Rate Components Propsed 2019 Rate Components - Option 2Proposed 2019 Rate Components - Option 1 G.15.c Packet Pg. 401 Attachment: Exhibit B - Commercial Rates (Resolution Setting a Public Hearing Relating to Refuse Rate Adjustments) 2019 Grand Terrace Rates 3-12-19.xlsx 8 Comm Compactor Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc. City of Grand Terrace Effective July 1, 2019 Commercial Compactor Bin Service 90% of CPI Changes CPI Changes CPI 3.5%0.500$ 2.5%2018 Fee per Yard 3.5%0.570$ from 2.5%2018 Fee per Yard 3.5%0.570$ from 2.4%375.00 15.0%Pavement Street 90% of Service &$0.15 375.00 15.0%Pavement Street current from 90% of Service &$0.15 375.00 Recycling 15.0%Pavement Street current from Bin 37.13$ Franchise Impact Sweeping Total 2.3%Disposal Compliance 39.55$ Franchise Impact Sweeping Total 2017 2017 2.3%Disposal Compliance 39.55$ 1.73$ Franchise Impact Sweeping Total 2017 2017 Size Freq Service*Disposal Fee (a)Fee (b)Fee Rate Service*Catch Up Fee to Burrtec Disposal Fee (a)Fee (b)Fee Rate $%Service*Catch Up Fee to Burrtec Disposal Fee Fee (a)Fee (b)Fee Rate $% 2 1 62.39 60.34 18.41 4.30 4.33 149.77 65.87 3.13 1.30 64.27 20.19 4.71 4.94 164.41 14.64 9.77%65.87 3.13 1.30 64.27 14.99 22.43 5.23 4.94 182.16$ 32.39 21.63% 2 2 110.53 120.67 34.68 8.09 8.67 282.64 116.69 5.88 2.60 128.54 38.06 8.88 9.88 310.53 27.89 9.87%116.69 5.88 2.60 128.54 29.99 42.56 9.93 9.88 346.07$ 63.43 22.44% 2 3 172.93 181.01 53.09 12.39 13.00 432.42 182.56 8.99 3.90 192.81 58.24 13.59 14.82 474.91 42.49 9.83%182.56 8.99 3.90 192.81 44.98 64.99 15.16 14.82 528.21$ 95.79 22.15% 2 4 235.33 241.35 71.50 16.68 17.33 582.19 248.45 12.13 5.20 257.08 78.43 18.30 19.76 639.35 57.16 9.82%248.45 12.13 5.20 257.08 59.97 87.42 20.40 19.76 710.41$ 128.22 22.02% 2 5 297.18 301.68 89.83 20.96 21.67 731.32 313.74 15.24 6.50 321.34 98.52 22.99 24.70 803.03 71.71 9.81%313.74 15.24 6.50 321.34 74.97 109.77 25.61 24.70 891.87$ 160.55 21.95% 2 6 359.84 362.02 108.28 25.27 26.00 881.41 379.89 18.37 7.80 385.61 118.75 27.71 29.64 967.77 86.36 9.80%379.89 18.37 7.80 385.61 89.96 132.24 30.86 29.64 1,074.37$ 192.96 21.89% Add. Pickup (on-site)7.15 13.92 3.16 0.74 0.00 24.97 7.55 0.53 14.83 3.44 0.80 0.00 27.15 2.18 8.73%7.55 0.53 14.83 3.46 3.96 0.92 0.00 31.25$ 6.28 25.15% Add. Pickup (unsched)22.35 13.92 5.44 1.27 0.00 42.98 23.60 0.94 14.83 5.91 1.38 0.00 46.66 3.68 8.56%23.60 0.94 14.83 3.46 6.42 1.50 0.00 50.75$ 7.77 18.08% 3 1 80.36 90.50 25.63 5.98 6.50 208.97 84.84 4.34 1.95 96.40 28.13 6.56 7.41 229.63 20.66 9.89%84.84 4.34 1.95 96.40 22.49 31.50 7.35 7.41 256.28$ 47.31 22.64% 3 2 146.82 181.01 49.17 11.47 13.00 401.47 155.00 8.30 3.90 192.81 54.00 12.60 14.82 441.43 39.96 9.95%155.00 8.30 3.90 192.81 44.98 60.75 14.17 14.82 494.73$ 93.26 23.23% 3 3 227.26 271.51 74.82 17.46 19.50 610.55 239.92 12.64 5.85 289.21 82.14 19.17 22.23 671.16 60.61 9.93%239.92 12.64 5.85 289.21 67.47 92.26 21.53 22.23 751.11$ 140.56 23.02% 3 4 307.39 362.02 100.41 23.43 26.00 819.25 324.53 16.98 7.80 385.61 110.24 25.72 29.64 900.52 81.27 9.92%324.53 16.98 7.80 385.61 89.96 123.73 28.87 29.64 1,007.12$ 187.87 22.93% 3 5 388.08 452.52 126.09 29.42 32.50 1,028.61 409.71 21.32 9.75 482.02 138.42 32.30 37.05 1,130.57 101.96 9.91%409.71 21.32 9.75 482.02 112.45 155.29 36.23 37.05 1,263.82$ 235.21 22.87% 3 6 468.21 543.03 151.69 35.39 39.00 1,237.32 494.30 25.64 11.70 578.42 166.51 38.85 44.46 1,359.88 122.56 9.91%494.30 25.64 11.70 578.42 134.94 186.75 43.58 44.46 1,519.79$ 282.47 22.83% Add. Pickup (on-site)7.15 20.88 4.20 0.98 0.00 33.21 7.55 0.70 22.25 4.58 1.07 0.00 36.15 2.94 8.85%7.55 0.70 22.25 5.19 5.35 1.25 0.00 42.29$ 9.08 27.34% Add. Pickup (unsched)22.35 20.88 6.48 1.51 0.00 51.22 23.60 1.11 22.25 7.04 1.64 0.00 55.64 4.42 8.63%23.60 1.11 22.25 5.19 7.82 1.83 0.00 61.80$ 10.58 20.66% 4 1 105.99 120.67 34.00 7.93 8.67 277.26 111.90 5.75 2.60 128.54 37.32 8.71 9.88 304.70 27.44 9.90%111.90 5.75 2.60 128.54 29.99 41.82 9.76 9.88 340.24$ 62.98 22.72% 4 2 197.96 241.35 65.90 15.38 17.33 537.92 208.99 11.13 5.20 257.08 72.36 16.88 19.76 591.40 53.48 9.94%208.99 11.13 5.20 257.08 59.97 81.36 18.98 19.76 662.47$ 124.55 23.15% 4 3 304.08 362.02 99.92 23.31 26.00 815.33 321.03 16.88 7.80 385.61 109.70 25.60 29.64 896.26 80.93 9.93%321.03 16.88 7.80 385.61 89.96 123.19 28.74 29.64 1,002.85$ 187.52 23.00% 4 4 410.19 482.69 133.93 31.25 34.67 1,092.73 433.06 22.64 10.40 514.15 147.04 34.31 39.52 1,201.12 108.39 9.92%433.06 22.64 10.40 514.15 119.95 165.03 38.51 39.52 1,343.26$ 250.53 22.93% 4 5 516.30 603.36 167.95 39.19 43.33 1,370.13 545.07 28.39 13.00 642.69 184.37 43.02 49.40 1,505.94 135.81 9.91%545.07 28.39 13.00 642.69 149.93 206.86 48.27 49.40 1,683.61$ 313.48 22.88% 4 6 621.34 724.04 201.81 47.09 52.00 1,646.28 655.97 34.12 15.60 771.23 221.54 51.69 59.28 1,809.43 163.15 9.91%655.97 34.12 15.60 771.23 179.92 248.53 57.99 59.28 2,022.64$ 376.36 22.86% Add. Pickup (on-site)7.15 27.85 5.25 1.23 0.00 41.48 7.55 0.87 29.66 5.71 1.33 0.00 45.12 3.64 8.78%7.55 0.87 29.66 6.92 6.75 1.58 0.00 53.33$ 11.85 28.57% Add. Pickup (unsched)22.35 27.85 7.53 1.76 0.00 59.49 23.60 1.28 29.66 8.18 1.91 0.00 64.63 5.14 8.64%23.60 1.28 29.66 6.92 9.22 2.15 0.00 72.83$ 13.34 22.42% * Service fee is adjusted at 90% of CPI (a) 15% of the sum of service and disposal (b) 3.5% of the sum of service and disposal 2017 Rate Components Proposed 2019 Rate Components - Option 2Proposed 2019 Rate Components - Option 1 G.15.c Packet Pg. 402 Attachment: Exhibit B - Commercial Rates (Resolution Setting a Public Hearing Relating to Refuse Rate Adjustments) 2019 Grand Terrace Rates 3-12-19.xlsx 8 Comm Compactor Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc. City of Grand Terrace Effective July 1, 2019 Commercial Compactor Bin Service 90% of CPI Changes CPI Changes CPI 3.5%0.500$ 2.5%2018 Fee per Yard 3.5%0.570$ from 2.5%2018 Fee per Yard 3.5%0.570$ from 2.4%375.00 15.0%Pavement Street 90% of Service &$0.15 375.00 15.0%Pavement Street current from 90% of Service &$0.15 375.00 Recycling 15.0%Pavement Street current from Bin 37.13$ Franchise Impact Sweeping Total 2.3%Disposal Compliance 39.55$ Franchise Impact Sweeping Total 2017 2017 2.3%Disposal Compliance 39.55$ 1.73$ Franchise Impact Sweeping Total 2017 2017 Size Freq Service*Disposal Fee (a)Fee (b)Fee Rate Service*Catch Up Fee to Burrtec Disposal Fee (a)Fee (b)Fee Rate $%Service*Catch Up Fee to Burrtec Disposal Fee Fee (a)Fee (b)Fee Rate $% 2 1 62.39 60.34 18.41 4.30 4.33 149.77 65.87 3.13 1.30 64.27 20.19 4.71 4.94 164.41 14.64 9.77%65.87 3.13 1.30 64.27 14.99 22.43 5.23 4.94 182.16$ 32.39 21.63% 2 2 110.53 120.67 34.68 8.09 8.67 282.64 116.69 5.88 2.60 128.54 38.06 8.88 9.88 310.53 27.89 9.87%116.69 5.88 2.60 128.54 29.99 42.56 9.93 9.88 346.07$ 63.43 22.44% 2 3 172.93 181.01 53.09 12.39 13.00 432.42 182.56 8.99 3.90 192.81 58.24 13.59 14.82 474.91 42.49 9.83%182.56 8.99 3.90 192.81 44.98 64.99 15.16 14.82 528.21$ 95.79 22.15% 2 4 235.33 241.35 71.50 16.68 17.33 582.19 248.45 12.13 5.20 257.08 78.43 18.30 19.76 639.35 57.16 9.82%248.45 12.13 5.20 257.08 59.97 87.42 20.40 19.76 710.41$ 128.22 22.02% 2 5 297.18 301.68 89.83 20.96 21.67 731.32 313.74 15.24 6.50 321.34 98.52 22.99 24.70 803.03 71.71 9.81%313.74 15.24 6.50 321.34 74.97 109.77 25.61 24.70 891.87$ 160.55 21.95% 2 6 359.84 362.02 108.28 25.27 26.00 881.41 379.89 18.37 7.80 385.61 118.75 27.71 29.64 967.77 86.36 9.80%379.89 18.37 7.80 385.61 89.96 132.24 30.86 29.64 1,074.37$ 192.96 21.89% Add. Pickup (on-site)7.15 13.92 3.16 0.74 0.00 24.97 7.55 0.53 14.83 3.44 0.80 0.00 27.15 2.18 8.73%7.55 0.53 14.83 3.46 3.96 0.92 0.00 31.25$ 6.28 25.15% Add. Pickup (unsched)22.35 13.92 5.44 1.27 0.00 42.98 23.60 0.94 14.83 5.91 1.38 0.00 46.66 3.68 8.56%23.60 0.94 14.83 3.46 6.42 1.50 0.00 50.75$ 7.77 18.08% 3 1 80.36 90.50 25.63 5.98 6.50 208.97 84.84 4.34 1.95 96.40 28.13 6.56 7.41 229.63 20.66 9.89%84.84 4.34 1.95 96.40 22.49 31.50 7.35 7.41 256.28$ 47.31 22.64% 3 2 146.82 181.01 49.17 11.47 13.00 401.47 155.00 8.30 3.90 192.81 54.00 12.60 14.82 441.43 39.96 9.95%155.00 8.30 3.90 192.81 44.98 60.75 14.17 14.82 494.73$ 93.26 23.23% 3 3 227.26 271.51 74.82 17.46 19.50 610.55 239.92 12.64 5.85 289.21 82.14 19.17 22.23 671.16 60.61 9.93%239.92 12.64 5.85 289.21 67.47 92.26 21.53 22.23 751.11$ 140.56 23.02% 3 4 307.39 362.02 100.41 23.43 26.00 819.25 324.53 16.98 7.80 385.61 110.24 25.72 29.64 900.52 81.27 9.92%324.53 16.98 7.80 385.61 89.96 123.73 28.87 29.64 1,007.12$ 187.87 22.93% 3 5 388.08 452.52 126.09 29.42 32.50 1,028.61 409.71 21.32 9.75 482.02 138.42 32.30 37.05 1,130.57 101.96 9.91%409.71 21.32 9.75 482.02 112.45 155.29 36.23 37.05 1,263.82$ 235.21 22.87% 3 6 468.21 543.03 151.69 35.39 39.00 1,237.32 494.30 25.64 11.70 578.42 166.51 38.85 44.46 1,359.88 122.56 9.91%494.30 25.64 11.70 578.42 134.94 186.75 43.58 44.46 1,519.79$ 282.47 22.83% Add. Pickup (on-site)7.15 20.88 4.20 0.98 0.00 33.21 7.55 0.70 22.25 4.58 1.07 0.00 36.15 2.94 8.85%7.55 0.70 22.25 5.19 5.35 1.25 0.00 42.29$ 9.08 27.34% Add. Pickup (unsched)22.35 20.88 6.48 1.51 0.00 51.22 23.60 1.11 22.25 7.04 1.64 0.00 55.64 4.42 8.63%23.60 1.11 22.25 5.19 7.82 1.83 0.00 61.80$ 10.58 20.66% 4 1 105.99 120.67 34.00 7.93 8.67 277.26 111.90 5.75 2.60 128.54 37.32 8.71 9.88 304.70 27.44 9.90%111.90 5.75 2.60 128.54 29.99 41.82 9.76 9.88 340.24$ 62.98 22.72% 4 2 197.96 241.35 65.90 15.38 17.33 537.92 208.99 11.13 5.20 257.08 72.36 16.88 19.76 591.40 53.48 9.94%208.99 11.13 5.20 257.08 59.97 81.36 18.98 19.76 662.47$ 124.55 23.15% 4 3 304.08 362.02 99.92 23.31 26.00 815.33 321.03 16.88 7.80 385.61 109.70 25.60 29.64 896.26 80.93 9.93%321.03 16.88 7.80 385.61 89.96 123.19 28.74 29.64 1,002.85$ 187.52 23.00% 4 4 410.19 482.69 133.93 31.25 34.67 1,092.73 433.06 22.64 10.40 514.15 147.04 34.31 39.52 1,201.12 108.39 9.92%433.06 22.64 10.40 514.15 119.95 165.03 38.51 39.52 1,343.26$ 250.53 22.93% 4 5 516.30 603.36 167.95 39.19 43.33 1,370.13 545.07 28.39 13.00 642.69 184.37 43.02 49.40 1,505.94 135.81 9.91%545.07 28.39 13.00 642.69 149.93 206.86 48.27 49.40 1,683.61$ 313.48 22.88% 4 6 621.34 724.04 201.81 47.09 52.00 1,646.28 655.97 34.12 15.60 771.23 221.54 51.69 59.28 1,809.43 163.15 9.91%655.97 34.12 15.60 771.23 179.92 248.53 57.99 59.28 2,022.64$ 376.36 22.86% Add. Pickup (on-site)7.15 27.85 5.25 1.23 0.00 41.48 7.55 0.87 29.66 5.71 1.33 0.00 45.12 3.64 8.78%7.55 0.87 29.66 6.92 6.75 1.58 0.00 53.33$ 11.85 28.57% Add. Pickup (unsched)22.35 27.85 7.53 1.76 0.00 59.49 23.60 1.28 29.66 8.18 1.91 0.00 64.63 5.14 8.64%23.60 1.28 29.66 6.92 9.22 2.15 0.00 72.83$ 13.34 22.42% * Service fee is adjusted at 90% of CPI (a) 15% of the sum of service and disposal (b) 3.5% of the sum of service and disposal 2017 Rate Components Proposed 2019 Rate Components - Option 2Proposed 2019 Rate Components - Option 1 G.15.c Packet Pg. 403 Attachment: Exhibit B - Commercial Rates (Resolution Setting a Public Hearing Relating to Refuse Rate Adjustments) 2019 Grand Terrace Rates 3-12-19.xlsx 9 Rolloff Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc. City of Grand Terrace Effective July 1, 2019 Rolloff Service 90% of CPI Changes CPI 3.5%2.5%2018 Fee per Load 3.5%from 2.4%15.0%Pavement 90% of Service &$2.75 15.0%Pavement current from 49.13$ Franchise Impact Total 2.3%Disposal Compliance 51.55$ Franchise Impact Total 2017 2017 Size Tons Service*Disposal Fee (a)Fee (b)Rate Service*Catch Up Fee to Burrtec Disposal Fee (a)Fee (b)Rate $% Permanent 40 6 184.36 Actual 27.65 6.45 218.46 194.64 4.92 2.75 Actual 30.35 7.08 239.74$ 21.28 9.74% 20 6 184.36 Actual 27.65 6.45 218.46 194.64 4.92 2.75 Actual 30.35 7.08 239.74$ 21.28 9.74% 10 8 184.36 Actual 27.65 6.45 218.46 194.64 4.92 2.75 Actual 30.35 7.08 239.74$ 21.28 9.74% 40 184.36 Actual 27.65 6.45 218.46 194.64 4.92 Actual 29.93 6.98 236.47$ 18.01 8.24% (Recycling) 40 184.36 Actual 27.65 6.45 218.46 194.64 4.92 Actual 29.93 6.98 236.47$ 18.01 8.24% (Green Waste) 40 8 206.03 Actual 30.90 7.21 244.14 217.51 5.49 2.75 Actual 33.86 7.90 267.51$ 23.37 9.57% (Compactor) Temporary 40 6 206.03 294.78 75.12 17.53 593.46 217.51 5.49 2.75 309.30 80.26 18.73 634.04$ 40.58 6.84% 20 6 206.03 294.78 75.12 17.53 593.46 217.51 5.49 2.75 309.30 80.26 18.73 634.04$ 40.58 6.84% 10 6 206.03 294.78 75.12 17.53 593.46 217.51 5.49 2.75 309.30 80.26 18.73 634.04$ 40.58 6.84% 40 (Rent per Day)24.59 N/A 3.69 0.86 29.14 25.96 0.66 N/A 3.89 0.91 31.42$ 2.28 7.82% Dump Fee 49.13 7.37 1.72 58.22 51.55 7.73 1.80 61.08$ 2.86 4.91% (Temp. Additional Over 5 Tons)49.13 7.37 1.72 58.22 51.55 7.73 1.80 61.08$ 2.86 4.91% ----- * Service fee is adjusted at 90% of CPI (a) 15% of the sum of service and disposal (b) 3.5% of the service Perm. Box serviced a minimum of four (4) times per month and left on premises full time Temp. Box serviced a minimum of one time every seven (7) days 2017 Rate Components Proposed 2019 Rate Components G.15.c Packet Pg. 404 Attachment: Exhibit B - Commercial Rates (Resolution Setting a Public Hearing Relating to Refuse Rate Adjustments) 2019 Grand Terrace Rates 3-12-19.xlsx 12 Equal Comm Refuse w Recyc Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc. City of Grand Terrace Effective July 1, 2019 Commercial Bin Service - Equalized Rates 90% of CPI Changes CPI 3.5%0.500$ 2.5%Fee per Yard Lbs/Yr 3.5%0.570$ from 2.4%159.00 15.0%Pavement Street 90% of $0.15 131.00 Recycling FW 15.0%Pavement Street current from Bin 37.13$ Franchise Impact Sweeping Total 2.3%Compliance 39.55$ 1.73$ 1.59$ Franchise Impact Sweeping Total 2017 2017 Size Freq Service*Disposal Fee (a)Fee (b)Fee Rate Service*Fee to Burrtec Disposal Fee Fee Fee (a)Fee (b)Fee Rate $% 2 1 59.71 25.58 12.79 2.99 4.33 105.40 63.04 1.30 22.45 14.99 13.78 17.33 4.04 4.94 141.87$ 36.47 34.60% 2 2 105.44 51.17 23.49 5.48 8.67 194.25 111.31 2.60 44.90 29.99 27.56 32.45 7.57 9.88 266.26$ 72.01 37.07% 2 3 165.14 76.75 36.28 8.47 13.00 299.64 174.34 3.90 67.35 44.98 41.34 49.79 11.62 14.82 408.14$ 108.50 36.21% 2 4 224.86 102.33 49.08 11.45 17.33 405.05 237.40 5.20 89.80 59.97 55.12 67.12 15.66 19.76 550.03$ 144.98 35.79% 2 5 284.02 127.91 61.79 14.42 21.67 509.81 299.85 6.50 112.26 74.97 68.90 84.37 19.69 24.70 691.24$ 181.43 35.59% 2 6 343.99 153.50 74.62 17.41 26.00 615.52 363.17 7.80 134.71 89.96 82.68 101.75 23.74 29.64 833.45$ 217.93 35.41% Add. Pickup (on-site)7.15 5.90 1.96 0.46 0.00 15.47 7.55 5.18 3.46 3.18 2.91 0.68 0.00 22.96$ 7.49 48.42% Add. Pickup (unsched)22.35 5.90 4.24 0.99 0.00 33.48 23.60 5.18 3.46 3.18 5.31 1.24 0.00 41.97$ 8.49 25.36% 3 1 76.60 38.37 17.25 4.02 6.50 142.74 80.87 1.95 33.68 22.49 20.67 23.95 5.59 7.41 196.61$ 53.87 37.74% 3 2 139.60 76.75 32.45 7.57 13.00 269.37 147.38 3.90 67.35 44.98 41.34 45.74 10.67 14.82 376.18$ 106.81 39.65% 3 3 216.31 115.12 49.71 11.60 19.50 412.24 228.36 5.85 101.03 67.47 62.01 69.71 16.27 22.23 572.93$ 160.69 38.98% 3 4 301.90 153.50 68.31 15.94 26.00 565.65 318.73 7.80 134.71 89.96 82.68 95.08 22.19 29.64 780.79$ 215.14 38.03% 3 5 369.60 191.87 84.22 19.65 32.50 697.84 390.20 9.75 168.38 112.45 103.35 117.62 27.44 37.05 966.24$ 268.40 38.46% 3 6 445.99 230.24 101.43 23.67 39.00 840.33 470.85 11.70 202.06 134.94 124.02 141.54 33.02 44.46 1,162.59$ 322.26 38.35% Add. Pickup (on-site)7.15 8.85 2.40 0.56 0.00 18.96 7.55 7.77 5.19 4.77 3.79 0.88 0.00 29.95$ 10.99 57.96% Add. Pickup (unsched)22.35 8.85 4.68 1.09 0.00 36.97 23.60 7.77 5.19 4.77 6.20 1.45 0.00 48.98$ 12.01 32.49% 4 1 101.03 51.17 22.83 5.33 8.67 189.03 106.66 2.60 44.90 29.99 27.56 31.76 7.41 9.88 260.76$ 71.73 37.95% 4 2 188.32 102.33 43.60 10.17 17.33 361.75 198.82 5.20 89.80 59.97 55.12 61.34 14.31 19.76 504.32$ 142.57 39.41% 4 3 289.45 153.50 66.44 15.50 26.00 550.89 305.58 7.80 134.71 89.96 82.68 93.11 21.73 29.64 765.21$ 214.32 38.90% 4 4 390.59 204.66 89.29 20.83 34.67 740.04 412.36 10.40 179.61 119.95 110.24 124.88 29.14 39.52 1,026.10$ 286.06 38.65% 4 5 493.60 255.83 112.41 26.23 43.33 931.40 521.12 13.00 224.51 149.93 137.80 156.95 36.62 49.40 1,289.33$ 357.93 38.43% 4 6 591.81 306.99 134.82 31.46 52.00 1,117.08 624.80 15.60 269.41 179.92 165.36 188.26 43.93 59.28 1,546.56$ 429.48 38.45% Add. Pickup (on-site)7.15 11.81 2.84 0.66 0.00 22.46 7.55 10.36 6.92 6.36 4.68 1.09 0.00 36.96$ 14.50 64.56% Add. Pickup (unsched)22.35 11.81 5.12 1.20 0.00 40.48 23.60 10.36 6.92 6.36 7.09 1.65 0.00 55.98$ 15.50 38.29% 6 1 144.19 76.75 33.14 7.73 13.00 274.81 152.22 3.90 67.35 44.98 41.34 46.47 10.84 14.82 381.92$ 107.11 38.98% 6 2 274.44 153.50 64.19 14.98 26.00 533.11 289.73 7.80 134.71 89.96 82.68 90.73 21.17 29.64 746.42$ 213.31 40.01% 6 3 419.18 230.24 97.41 22.73 39.00 808.56 442.54 11.70 202.06 134.94 124.02 137.29 32.03 44.46 1,129.04$ 320.48 39.64% 6 4 562.84 306.99 130.47 30.44 52.00 1,082.74 594.21 15.60 269.41 179.92 165.36 183.68 42.86 59.28 1,510.32$ 427.58 39.49% 6 5 707.04 383.74 163.62 38.18 65.00 1,357.58 746.45 19.50 336.77 224.90 206.70 230.15 53.70 74.10 1,892.27$ 534.69 39.39% 6 6 851.23 460.49 196.76 45.91 78.00 1,632.39 898.67 23.40 404.12 269.88 248.04 276.62 64.54 88.92 2,274.19$ 641.80 39.32% Add. Pickup (on-site)7.15 17.71 3.73 0.87 0.00 29.46 7.55 15.54 10.38 9.54 6.45 1.51 0.00 50.97$ 21.51 73.01% Add. Pickup (unsched)22.35 17.71 6.01 1.40 0.00 47.47 23.60 15.54 10.38 9.54 8.86 2.07 0.00 69.99$ 22.52 47.44% Add'l Charges T-Bins - 3 yards (COD)22.35 38.37 9.11 2.13 N/A 71.96 23.60 33.68 22.49 20.67 15.07 3.52 N/A 119.03$ 47.07 65.41% 96 Gal Commingled Recycling N/C N/C N/A Extra Recycling Barrel 2.17 2.29$ 0.12 5.53% Locks Burned Bin 283.45 42.52 N/A N/A 325.97 299.25 44.89 N/A N/A 344.14$ 18.17 5.57% Exchanges 59.73 8.96 N/A N/A 68.69 63.06 9.46 N/A N/A 72.52$ 3.83 5.58% Lock Rental (Monthly)12.15 1.82 N/A N/A 13.97 12.83 1.92 N/A N/A 14.75$ 0.78 5.58% Lost or Stolen Bin 506.15 75.92 N/A N/A 582.07 534.36 80.15 N/A N/A 614.51$ 32.44 5.57% Overage 33.99 5.10 N/A N/A 39.09 35.89 5.38 N/A N/A 41.27$ 2.18 5.58% Replaced Key 5.06 0.76 N/A N/A 5.82 5.34 0.80 N/A N/A 6.14$ 0.32 5.50% Replaced Lock 25.30 3.80 N/A N/A 29.10 26.71 4.01 N/A N/A 30.72$ 1.62 5.57% ----- * Service fee is adjusted at 90% of CPI (a) 15% of the sum of service and disposal (b) 3.5% of the sum of service and disposal 2017 Rate Components Proposed 2019 Rate Components - Option 3 G.15.d Packet Pg. 405 Attachment: Exhibit C- Equalized Rates (Resolution Setting a Public Hearing Relating to Refuse Rate Adjustments) 2019 Grand Terrace Rates 3-12-19.xlsx 12b Equal MF Refuse w Recyc Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc. City of Grand Terrace Effective July 1, 2019 Multi-Family Commercial Bin Service - Equalized Rates 90% of CPI Changes CPI 3.5%0.160$ 0.500$ 2.5%Fee per Yard Lbs/Yr 3.5%0.160$ 0.570$ from 2.4%159.00 15.0%Pavement Street 90% of $0.15 131.00 Recycling FW 15.0%Pavement Street current from Bin 37.13$ Franchise Impact HHW Sweeping Total 2.3%Compliance 39.55$ 1.73$ 1.59$ Franchise Impact HHW Sweeping Total 2017 2017 Size Freq Service*Disposal Fee (a)Fee (b)Fee Fee Rate Service*Fee to Burrtec Disposal Fee Fee Fee (a)Fee (b)Fee Fee Rate $% 2 1 59.71 25.58 12.79 2.99 1.39 4.33 106.79 63.04 1.30 22.45 14.99 13.78 17.33 4.04 1.39 4.94 143.26$ 36.47 34.15% 2 2 105.44 51.16 23.49 5.48 2.77 8.67 197.01 111.31 2.60 44.90 29.99 27.56 32.45 7.57 2.77 9.88 269.03$ 72.02 36.56% 2 3 165.14 76.74 36.28 8.47 4.16 13.00 303.79 174.34 3.90 67.35 44.98 41.34 49.79 11.62 4.16 14.82 412.30$ 108.51 35.72% 2 4 224.86 102.32 49.08 11.45 5.55 17.33 410.59 237.40 5.20 89.80 59.97 55.12 67.12 15.66 5.55 19.76 555.58$ 144.99 35.31% 2 5 284.02 127.90 61.79 14.42 6.93 21.67 516.73 299.85 6.50 112.25 74.97 68.90 84.37 19.69 6.93 24.70 698.16$ 181.43 35.11% 2 6 343.99 153.48 74.62 17.41 8.32 26.00 623.82 363.17 7.80 134.70 89.96 82.68 101.75 23.74 8.32 29.64 841.76$ 217.94 34.94% Add. Pickup (on-site)7.15 5.90 1.96 0.46 0.00 0.00 15.47 7.55 5.18 3.46 3.18 2.91 0.68 0.00 0.00 22.96$ 7.49 48.42% Add. Pickup (unsched)22.35 5.90 4.24 0.99 0.00 0.00 33.48 23.60 5.18 3.46 3.18 5.31 1.24 0.00 0.00 41.97$ 8.49 25.36% 3 1 76.60 38.37 17.25 4.02 2.08 6.50 144.82 80.87 1.95 33.68 22.49 20.67 23.95 5.59 2.08 7.41 198.69$ 53.87 37.20% 3 2 139.60 76.74 32.45 7.57 4.16 13.00 273.52 147.38 3.90 67.36 44.98 41.34 45.74 10.67 4.16 14.82 380.35$ 106.83 39.06% 3 3 216.31 115.11 49.71 11.60 6.24 19.50 418.47 228.36 5.85 101.04 67.47 62.01 69.71 16.27 6.24 22.23 579.18$ 160.71 38.40% 3 4 301.90 153.48 68.31 15.94 8.32 26.00 573.95 318.73 7.80 134.72 89.96 82.68 95.08 22.19 8.32 29.64 789.12$ 215.17 37.49% 3 5 369.60 191.85 84.22 19.65 10.40 32.50 708.22 390.20 9.75 168.40 112.45 103.35 117.62 27.45 10.40 37.05 976.67$ 268.45 37.90% 3 6 445.99 230.22 101.43 23.67 12.48 39.00 852.79 470.85 11.70 202.08 134.94 124.02 141.54 33.03 12.48 44.46 1,175.10$ 322.31 37.79% Add. Pickup (on-site)7.15 8.85 2.40 0.56 0.00 0.00 18.96 7.55 7.77 5.19 4.77 3.79 0.88 0.00 0.00 29.95$ 10.99 57.96% Add. Pickup (unsched)22.35 8.85 4.68 1.09 0.00 0.00 36.97 23.60 7.77 5.19 4.77 6.20 1.45 0.00 0.00 48.98$ 12.01 32.49% 4 1 101.03 51.17 22.83 5.33 2.77 8.67 191.80 106.66 2.60 44.90 29.99 27.56 31.76 7.41 2.77 9.88 263.53$ 71.73 37.40% 4 2 188.32 102.34 43.60 10.17 5.55 17.33 367.31 198.82 5.20 89.80 59.97 55.12 61.34 14.31 5.55 19.76 509.87$ 142.56 38.81% 4 3 289.45 153.51 66.44 15.50 8.32 26.00 559.22 305.58 7.80 134.70 89.96 82.68 93.11 21.73 8.32 29.64 773.52$ 214.30 38.32% 4 4 390.59 204.68 89.29 20.83 11.09 34.67 751.15 412.36 10.40 179.60 119.95 110.24 124.88 29.14 11.09 39.52 1,037.18$ 286.03 38.08% 4 5 493.60 255.85 112.42 26.23 13.87 43.33 945.30 521.12 13.00 224.50 149.93 137.80 156.95 36.62 13.87 49.40 1,303.19$ 357.89 37.86% 4 6 591.81 307.02 134.82 31.46 16.64 52.00 1,133.75 624.80 15.60 269.40 179.92 165.36 188.26 43.93 16.64 59.28 1,563.19$ 429.44 37.88% Add. Pickup (on-site)7.15 11.81 2.84 0.66 0.00 0.00 22.46 7.55 10.36 6.92 6.36 4.68 1.09 0.00 0.00 36.96$ 14.50 64.56% Add. Pickup (unsched)22.35 11.81 5.12 1.20 0.00 0.00 40.48 23.60 10.36 6.92 6.36 7.09 1.65 0.00 0.00 55.98$ 15.50 38.29% 6 1 144.19 76.75 33.14 7.73 4.16 13.00 278.97 152.22 3.90 67.35 44.98 41.34 46.47 10.84 4.16 14.82 386.08$ 107.11 38.39% 6 2 274.44 153.50 64.19 14.98 8.32 26.00 541.43 289.73 7.80 134.70 89.96 82.68 90.73 21.17 8.32 29.64 754.73$ 213.30 39.40% 6 3 419.18 230.25 97.41 22.73 12.48 39.00 821.05 442.54 11.70 202.05 134.94 124.02 137.29 32.03 12.48 44.46 1,141.51$ 320.46 39.03% 6 4 562.84 307.00 130.48 30.44 16.64 52.00 1,099.40 594.21 15.60 269.40 179.92 165.36 183.67 42.86 16.64 59.28 1,526.94$ 427.54 38.89% 6 5 707.04 383.75 163.62 38.18 20.80 65.00 1,378.39 746.45 19.50 336.75 224.90 206.70 230.15 53.70 20.80 74.10 1,913.05$ 534.66 38.79% 6 6 851.23 460.50 196.76 45.91 24.96 78.00 1,657.36 898.67 23.40 404.10 269.88 248.04 276.61 64.54 24.96 88.92 2,299.12$ 641.76 38.72% Add. Pickup (on-site)7.15 17.71 3.73 0.87 0.00 0.00 29.46 7.55 15.54 10.38 9.54 6.45 1.51 0.00 0.00 50.97$ 21.51 73.01% Add. Pickup (unsched)22.35 17.71 6.01 1.40 0.00 0.00 47.47 23.60 15.54 10.38 9.54 8.86 2.07 0.00 0.00 69.99$ 22.52 47.44% Add'l Charges T-Bins - 3 yards (COD)22.35 38.37 9.11 2.13 N/A N/A 71.96 23.60 33.68 22.49 20.67 15.07 3.52 N/A N/A 119.03$ 47.07 65.41% 96 Gal Commingled Recycling N/C N/C Extra Recycling Barrel 2.17 2.29$ 0.12 5.53% Locks Burned Bin 283.45 42.52 N/A N/A N/A 325.97 299.25 44.89 N/A N/A N/A 344.14$ 18.17 5.57% Exchanges 59.73 8.96 N/A N/A N/A 68.69 63.06 9.46 N/A N/A N/A 72.52$ 3.83 5.58% Lock Rental (Monthly)12.15 1.82 N/A N/A N/A 13.97 12.83 1.92 N/A N/A N/A 14.75$ 0.78 5.58% Lost or Stolen Bin 506.15 75.92 N/A N/A N/A 582.07 534.36 80.15 N/A N/A N/A 614.51$ 32.44 5.57% Overage 33.99 5.10 N/A N/A N/A 39.09 35.89 5.38 N/A N/A N/A 41.27$ 2.18 5.58% Replaced Key 5.06 0.76 N/A N/A N/A 5.82 5.34 0.80 N/A N/A N/A 6.14$ 0.32 5.50% Replaced Lock 25.30 3.80 N/A N/A N/A 29.10 26.71 4.01 N/A N/A N/A 30.72$ 1.62 5.57% ----- * Service fee is adjusted at 90% of CPI (a) 15% of the sum of service and disposal (b) 3.5% of the sum of service and disposal 2017 Rate Components Proposed 2019 Rate Components - Option 3 G.15.d Packet Pg. 406 Attachment: Exhibit C- Equalized Rates (Resolution Setting a Public Hearing Relating to Refuse Rate Adjustments) 2019 Grand Terrace Rates 3-12-19.xlsx 12c Equal FW Refuse w Recy Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc. City of Grand Terrace Effective July 1, 2019 Food Waste Service - Equalized Rates Changes Fee per Yard Lbs/Yr 3.5%0.570$ from $0.15 131.00 Recycling FW 15.0%Pavement Street proposed from Bin Compliance 39.55$ 1.73$ 1.59$ Franchise Impact Sweeping Total 2018 2018 Size Freq Service*Fee to Burrtec Disposal Fee/Yrd Fee/Yrd Fee (a)Fee (b)Fee Rate $% 1.5 1 54.81 0.98 16.84 11.25 10.34 14.13 3.30 3.71 115.36$ 7.14$ 6.60% 1.5 2 90.52 1.95 33.68 22.49 20.67 25.40 5.93 7.41 208.05$ 6.45$ 3.20% 1.5 3 138.74 2.93 50.52 33.74 31.01 38.54 8.99 11.12 315.59$ 5.79$ 1.87% 1.5 4 184.54 3.90 67.35 44.98 41.34 51.32 11.97 14.82 420.22$ 2.20$ 0.53% 1.5 5 212.06 4.88 84.19 56.23 51.68 61.36 14.32 18.53 503.25$ (22.39)$ -4.26% 1.5 6 273.51 5.85 101.03 67.47 62.01 76.48 17.85 22.23 626.43$ (7.67)$ -1.21% Add. Pickup (on-site)7.55 3.89 2.60 2.39 2.46 0.58 0.00 19.47$ 1.19$ 6.51% Add. Pickup (unsched)23.60 3.89 2.60 2.39 4.87 1.14 0.00 38.49$ 1.61$ 4.37% 2 1 63.04 1.30 22.45 14.99 13.78 17.33 4.04 4.94 141.87$ 8.86$ 6.66% 2 2 111.31 2.60 44.90 29.99 27.56 32.45 7.57 9.88 266.26$ 17.34$ 6.97% 2 3 174.34 3.90 67.35 44.98 41.34 49.79 11.62 14.82 408.14$ 26.22$ 6.87% 2 4 237.40 5.20 89.80 59.97 55.12 67.12 15.66 19.76 550.03$ 35.08$ 6.81% 2 5 299.85 6.50 112.26 74.97 68.90 84.37 19.69 24.70 691.24$ 43.96$ 6.79% 2 6 363.17 7.80 134.71 89.96 82.68 101.75 23.74 29.64 833.45$ 52.84$ 6.77% Add. Pickup (on-site)7.55 5.18 3.46 3.18 2.91 0.68 0.00 22.96$ 1.51$ 7.04% Add. Pickup (unsched)23.60 5.18 3.46 3.18 5.31 1.24 0.00 41.97$ 1.93$ 4.82% 65Gal 1 25.77 0.46 3.83 0.97 3.27 5.15 1.20 1.14 41.79$ 3.11$ 8.04% 65Gal 2 45.50 0.46 7.66 1.94 6.54 9.32 2.17 2.28 75.87$ 5.50$ 7.82% 65Gal 3 71.26 0.46 11.49 2.91 9.81 14.39 3.36 3.42 117.10$ 8.05$ 7.38% 65Gal 4 97.04 0.46 15.32 3.88 13.08 19.47 4.54 4.56 158.35$ 10.61$ 7.18% 65Gal 5 122.57 0.46 19.15 4.85 16.35 24.51 5.72 5.70 199.31$ 13.16$ 7.07% 65Gal 6 148.45 0.46 22.98 5.82 19.62 29.60 6.91 6.84 240.68$ 15.72$ 6.99% Add. Pickup (on-site)7.55 0.88 0.22 0.75 1.41 0.33 0.00 11.14$ 0.61$ 5.79% Add. Pickup (unsched)23.60 0.88 0.22 0.75 3.82 0.89 0.00 30.16$ 1.03$ 3.54% ----- * Service fee is adjusted at 90% of CPI (a) 15% of the sum of service and disposal (b) 3.5% of the sum of service and disposal Proposed 2019 Rate Components - Option 3 G.15.d Packet Pg. 407 Attachment: Exhibit C- Equalized Rates (Resolution Setting a Public Hearing Relating to Refuse Rate Adjustments) 2019 Grand Terrace Rates 3-12-19.xlsx 12d Equal Compactor w Recyc Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc. City of Grand Terrace Effective July 1, 2019 Commercial Compactor Bin Service - Equalized Rates 90% of CPI Changes CPI 3.5%0.500$ 2.5%Fee per Yard 3.5%0.570$ from 2.4%375.00 15.0%Pavement Street 90% of $0.15 375.00 Recycling FW 15.0%Pavement Street current from Bin 37.13$ Franchise Impact Sweeping Total 2.3%Compliance 39.55$ 1.73$ 1.59$ Franchise Impact Sweeping Total 2017 2017 Size Freq Service*Disposal Fee (a)Fee (b)Fee Rate Service*Fee to Burrtec Disposal Fee Fee Fee (a)Fee (b)Fee Rate $% 2 1 62.39 60.34 18.41 4.30 4.33 149.77 65.87 1.30 64.27 14.99 13.78 24.03 5.61 4.94 194.79 45.02 30.06% 2 2 110.53 120.67 34.68 8.09 8.67 282.64 116.69 2.60 128.54 29.99 27.56 45.81 10.69 9.88 371.76 89.12 31.53% 2 3 172.93 181.01 53.09 12.39 13.00 432.42 182.56 3.90 192.81 44.98 41.34 69.84 16.30 14.82 566.55 134.13 31.02% 2 4 235.33 241.35 71.50 16.68 17.33 582.19 248.45 5.20 257.08 59.97 55.12 93.87 21.90 19.76 761.35 179.16 30.77% 2 5 297.18 301.68 89.83 20.96 21.67 731.32 313.74 6.50 321.34 74.97 68.90 117.82 27.49 24.70 955.46 224.14 30.65% 2 6 359.84 362.02 108.28 25.27 26.00 881.41 379.89 7.80 385.61 89.96 82.68 141.89 33.11 29.64 1,150.58 269.17 30.54% Add. Pickup (on-site)7.15 13.92 3.16 0.74 0.00 24.97 7.55 14.83 3.46 3.18 4.35 1.02 0.00 34.39 9.42 37.73% Add. Pickup (unsched)22.35 13.92 5.44 1.27 0.00 42.98 23.60 14.83 3.46 3.18 6.76 1.58 0.00 53.41 10.43 24.27% 3 1 80.36 90.50 25.63 5.98 6.50 208.97 84.84 1.95 96.40 22.49 20.67 33.95 7.92 7.41 275.63 66.66 31.90% 3 2 146.82 181.01 49.17 11.47 13.00 401.47 155.00 3.90 192.81 44.98 41.34 65.70 15.33 14.82 533.88 132.41 32.98% 3 3 227.26 271.51 74.82 17.46 19.50 610.55 239.92 5.85 289.21 67.47 62.01 99.67 23.26 22.23 809.62 199.07 32.61% 3 4 307.39 362.02 100.41 23.43 26.00 819.25 324.53 7.80 385.61 89.96 82.68 133.59 31.17 29.64 1,084.98 265.73 32.44% 3 5 388.08 452.52 126.09 29.42 32.50 1,028.61 409.71 9.75 482.02 112.45 103.35 167.59 39.10 37.05 1,361.02 332.41 32.32% 3 6 468.21 543.03 151.69 35.39 39.00 1,237.32 494.30 11.70 578.42 134.94 124.02 201.51 47.02 44.46 1,636.37 399.05 32.25% Add. Pickup (on-site)7.15 20.88 4.20 0.98 0.00 33.21 7.55 22.25 5.19 4.77 5.96 1.39 0.00 47.11 13.90 41.85% Add. Pickup (unsched)22.35 20.88 6.48 1.51 0.00 51.22 23.60 22.25 5.19 4.77 8.37 1.95 0.00 66.13 14.91 29.11% 4 1 105.99 120.67 34.00 7.93 8.67 277.26 111.90 2.60 128.54 29.99 27.56 45.09 10.52 9.88 366.08 88.82 32.03% 4 2 197.96 241.35 65.90 15.38 17.33 537.92 208.99 5.20 257.08 59.97 55.12 87.95 20.52 19.76 714.59 176.67 32.84% 4 3 304.08 362.02 99.92 23.31 26.00 815.33 321.03 7.80 385.61 89.96 82.68 133.06 31.05 29.64 1,080.83 265.50 32.56% 4 4 410.19 482.69 133.93 31.25 34.67 1,092.73 433.06 10.40 514.15 119.95 110.24 178.17 41.57 39.52 1,447.06 354.33 32.43% 4 5 516.30 603.36 167.95 39.19 43.33 1,370.13 545.07 13.00 642.69 149.93 137.80 223.27 52.10 49.40 1,813.26 443.13 32.34% 4 6 621.34 724.04 201.81 47.09 52.00 1,646.28 655.97 15.60 771.23 179.92 165.36 268.21 62.58 59.28 2,178.15 531.87 32.31% Add. Pickup (on-site)7.15 27.85 5.25 1.23 0.00 41.48 7.55 29.66 6.92 6.36 7.57 1.77 0.00 59.83 18.35 44.24% Add. Pickup (unsched)22.35 27.85 7.53 1.76 0.00 59.49 23.60 29.66 6.92 6.36 9.98 2.33 0.00 78.85 19.36 32.54% * Service fee is adjusted at 90% of CPI (a) 15% of the sum of service and disposal (b) 3.5% of the sum of service and disposal 2017 Rate Components 2019 Rate Components - Option 3 G.15.d Packet Pg. 408 Attachment: Exhibit C- Equalized Rates (Resolution Setting a Public Hearing Relating to Refuse Rate Adjustments) 2019 Grand Terrace Rates 3-12-19.xlsx 13 Special Services Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc. City of Grand Terrace Effective July 1, 2019 Residential and Commercial - Special Services Push Bin Rates Push Bin Rates Per Pick-Up Frequency:1/week 2/week 3/week per Pick Up 1/week 2/week 3/week 4/week 5/week 6/week 0-25 feet N/C N/C N/C 0-25 feet 20.00$ 40.00$ 60.00$ 80.00$ 100.00$ 120.00$ 26-50 feet 7.63$ 15.27$ 22.90$ 26-50 feet 40.00$ 80.00$ 120.00$ 160.00$ 200.00$ 240.00$ 51-75 feet 9.82$ 19.63$ 29.44$ 50-75 Feet 60.00$ 120.00$ 180.00$ 240.00$ 300.00$ 360.00$ 76-100 feet 10.91$ 21.81$ 32.72$ Over 75 Feet 101-125 feet 11.99$ 23.98$ 35.99$ 126-150 feet 13.09$ 26.16$ 39.26$ 151-175 feet 14.18$ 28.35$ 42.53$ 176-200 feet 15.27$ 30.54$ 45.79$ Over 200 feet 16.35$ 32.72$ 49.07$ 90% of CPI 2.4% Proposed Rates 2019 Scout Service Required - Rate $150 per hour Current Rates - 2017 8/1/17 G.15.e Packet Pg. 409 Attachment: Exhibit D- Special Services (Resolution Setting a Public Hearing Relating to Refuse Rate Adjustments) 2019 Grand Terrace Rates 3-12-19.xlsx 14 Comm Add'l Fees Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc. City of Grand Terrace Effective July 1, 2019 Additional Fees Changes from current from 2017 2018 2019 2017 2017 Additional Services Rate Rate Rate $% Residential & Commercial On-call Bulky Pickup - First Item $27.73 $28.62 $29.28 $1.55 5.6% On-call Bulky Pickup - Each Additional Item $16.35 $16.87 $17.26 $0.91 5.6% . Commercial Bin enclosure Clean Up - Per Hour $47.09 $48.60 $49.72 $2.63 5.6% Extra Barrel $11.04 $11.39 $11.65 $0.61 5.5% Residential Extra Pick Up - On Service Day $10.47 $10.81 $11.06 $0.59 5.6% Extra Pick Up - All Other Days $20.93 $21.60 $22.10 $1.17 5.6% Roll-Off Relocation/Extra Trip Charge (no pull)$75.00 $77.40 $79.18 $4.18 5.6% Contamination Fee Barrel/Bin FW/Recycling/GW $50.00 $55.00 $56.27 $6.27 12.5% Tilthopper $35.00 $36.12 $36.95 $1.95 5.6% 90% of CPI 2.4%3.2%2.3% G.15.e Packet Pg. 410 Attachment: Exhibit D- Special Services (Resolution Setting a Public Hearing Relating to Refuse Rate Adjustments) AGENDA REPORT MEETING DATE: May 14, 2019 Council Item TITLE: Rescind Authorization to Enter into Lease Agreement with EVGO and Approve Lease Agreement with Carbon Solutions to Provide Electric Vehicle Equipment and Related Services for Electric Vehicle Charging Stations (EVCS) on City Property PRESENTED BY: Alan French, Public Works Director RECOMMENDATION: 1. Rescind authorization to enter into Lease Agreement previously awarded to EVGO for Electric Vehicle Service Equipment and Related Services for an Electric Vehicle Charging Station Project (EVCS) on City property; 2. Approve a Lease Agreement between the City and Carbon Solutions for Electric Vehicle Service Equipment and Related Services for an EV Charging Station Project on City property, subject to City Attorney approval as to form; 3. Authorize the City Manager to Execute the Agreement , subject to City Attorney approval as to form; 4. Acknowledge, by executing the lease agreement, the City agrees to use or sign over the California Energy Commission's Southern California Incentive Program (SCIP) grant for up to $140,000 for the project. 2030 VISION STATEMENT: This staff report supports Goal #3 to “Promote Economic Development” and Goal #4 “Develop and Implement Successful Partnerships” by working with local, regional and state agencies. BACKGROUND: City staff have secured funding from multiple sources to install EV charging stations in the City of Grand Terrace. The grants included a $140,000 SCIP grant for use at public G.16 Packet Pg. 411 facilities and a $45,000 MSRC Grant. The total amount of grants available to establish EV charging stations in the City is $185,000. On February 26, 2019; the City Council approved a Lease Agreement with EVGO to provide electric vehicle charging station services at City Hall in the amount of $170,000. Any additional costs above grant proceeds was to be covered by EVGO. DISCUSSION: EVGO’s original proposal included trenching from the transformer in the front of City Hall to the City’s Corporation Yard. However, EVGO modified their proposal to use existing power lines in the Corporation Yard. EVGO felt this was a more efficient alternative than trenching from the front of City Hall to the Corporation Yard. However, this alternative requires Edison to install a new power pole next to the EVGO Charging station. Edison can’t guarantee the installation of the new power pole will be in place before the SCIP grant expires at the end of September 2019. It is possible that EVGO would not be able to meet the timelines of the grant if they pursued their modified proposal. Therefore, City staff and EVGO believe the best solution is to cancel the Lease Agreement, which would allow the City to work with the other proposer. On April 23, 2019, City staff met with Carbon Solutions, the other proposer, to determine their interest in providing EVCS services for the City. In addition, staff confirmed Carbon Solutions ability to meet the grant timelines. Carbon Solutions representative, Mr. O’ Donnell, assured staff that Carbon Solutions can meet the grant timeline. Therefore, City staff recommends the rejection of Proposal 2 (EVGO) and award of Proposal I (Carbon Solutions). The lease option proposals submitted include: Proposal 1 Carbon Solutions (ChargePoint) - Chicago, IL $173,155.00 Proposal 2 EVGO Fast Charging - Los Angeles, CA $170,000.00 In addition, Carbon Solutions agreed to install the charging stations behind City Hall at the south end of the parking lot (see Attachment III). In addition to the two (2) DC Fast Chargers, Carbon Solutions will also replace the existing Level II charger from the 1990s that is currently in the parking lot in front of the Annex Building. Carbon Solutions will also be responsible for all monthly and/or annual report ing required by the City's grantor organizations for the project, and all related costs. The design-build EVCS is expected to start by the end of May 2019 with installation of the stations to be completed in the fall. Once EVGO appeared to be unable to honor the contract, staff reconnected with the funding agency of the SCIP grant and asked if we could move the location of the charging station to a commercial site. However, staff was told that these funds are specifically for public facilities. However, Staff applied to add additional EVCS in commercial locations. G.16 Packet Pg. 412 FISCAL IMPACT: The City has received $185,000 total in grant funding to -date for EV projects. Funding includes: $140,000 from SCIP and $45,000 from MSRC. The MSRC funding will be split with $26,000 designated for the City Hall project and the other $19,000 designated for a future commercial site project. Furthermore, the City has a $16,000 match requirement for the MSRC grant to be covered by the Air Quality Improvement Fund. The new EVCS contract would still utilize the following appropriation that was approved by City Council on February 26, 2019: Fund No. Fund Title Description Amount 15 Air Quality Improvement Fund Available Fund Balance $17,456.00 15 Air Quality Improvement Fund Appropriation for City’s portion (match requirement) ($16,000.00) Revised Fund Balance $1,456.00 After the EV charging stations are operational, the City will receive monthly lease payments of at least $250 per month regardless of use or energy charges. ATTACHMENTS: • Lease Agreement (DOCX) • Carbon Solutions Proposal (PDF) • Attachment III (PDF) APPROVALS: Alan French Completed 05/08/2019 7:52 PM City Attorney Completed 05/08/2019 8:20 PM Finance Completed 05/08/2019 8:33 PM City Manager Completed 05/08/2019 8:34 PM City Council Pending 05/14/2019 6:00 PM G.16 Packet Pg. 413 01247.0006/538679.5 RK CHARGING STATION LICENSE AGREEMENT Host: City of Grand Terrace, Agreement Date: _______________, 2019 a municipal corporation This Charging Station License Agreement (“Agreement”) is entered into as of the Agreement Date by Host and CARBON SOLUTIONS GROUP, LLC, an Illinois limited liability company (“Carbon Solutions”). I. AGREEMENT TERM SUMMARY Host Property: Grand Terrace City Hall Parking Lot located at: 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, CA 92313 (“Host Property”) Licensed Area: See II.A Host hereby grants to Carbon Solutions the right to the Licensed Area designated on Exhibit A (the “Licensed Area”) as set forth herein for the purposes described below. Exclusivity: Host grants to Carbon Solutions the exclusive right to provide DC fast- charging at the Licensed Area during the Term. Initial Term: See II.B. The Initial Term shall commence on the Agreement Date and continue for a period of ten (10) years following the date the Charging Station (defined below) is first available for commercial charging activity (the “Commencement Date”). Number of Carbon Solutions Charging Stalls: Three (3) charging stalls, across three (3) parking spaces. Charging Station Equipment: Carbon Solutions intends to install two (2) DC fast-chargers. Rent Payments: See II.C Rent shall be $250 per month plus tiered revenue share based on KWh usage, due on the first business day of the calendar month, commencing on the Commencement Date and terminating on the expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement. If the Commencement Date falls on a day after the first day of the month, then the payment obligation for that first month shall be prorated to cover the portion of the month between the Commencement Date and the end of the month. Electricity See II.D Carbon Solutions shall set up separate meter service for the Charging Stations and shall be customer of record with the applicable electricity provider. Carbon Solutions Customers See II.E The Charging Stations shall be available for exclusive use by Carbon Solutions Customers as determined in Carbon Solutions’ sole discretion. Carbon Solutions may use appropriate signage and striping to indicate and restrict permitted users of the Charging Stations and Charging Stalls. Operation & Maintenance See II.A.3 Carbon Solutions is responsible for constructing, operating and maintaining the Charging Stations in good working order and repair. Construction See II.G Carbon Solutions shall be responsible for all installation of the Charging Stations, ancillary equipment, and supporting infrastructure, including without limitation grading, paving, and related utility work. G.16.a Packet Pg. 414 Attachment: Lease Agreement (Reject Lease Agreement with EVGO and Approve Lease Agreement for EVSE Stations) 01247.0006/538679.5 RK THIS TERM SUMMARY IS EXPRESSLY INCORPORATED INTO THE BODY OF THIS AGREEMENT AS THROUGH SET FORTH IN FULL THEREIN; HOWEVER, IF THERE IS ANY CONFLICT BETWEEN THIS TERM SUMMARY AND THE BODY OF THIS AGREEMENT, THEN THE BODY OF THIS AGREEMENT SHALL GOVERN II. AGREEMENT A. Licensed Area Rights, Use and Maintenance. 1. Grant of rights. Host is the owner of the Host Property and grants to Carbon Solutions, for the Term of this Agreement, in each case for the sole purposes set forth herein: (i) subject to the terms of this Agreement, the right to possess, control and occupy the Carbon Solutions Charging Stalls described on Exhibit A attached hereto, (ii) the right to use and occupy the other areas of the Licensed Area described on Exhibit A attached hereto, including without limitation for the installation, maintenance and operation of electric vehicle charging stations and related equipment. However, Carbon Solutions’ rights under this Agreement shall be subject to the Host’s right to enter into Carbon Solutions Charging Stalls for the purpose of immediately abating any condition which endangers public health and safety as determined by the Host in its sole discretion. If such conditions are caused by Carbon Solutions’ activities or equipment, then Carbon Solutions shall fully reimburse Host for all costs incurred. 2. Use of Licensed Area. The Licensed Area may be used by Carbon Solutions for any lawful activity in connection with the development, construction, installation, maintenance, repair, replacement, removal, and operation of electric vehicle chargers and ancillary items, including, without limitation, electrical equipment, hardware, software, signage and all supporting equipment and structures (which may include concrete pads and protective bollards) (collectively, the “Charging Station”), together with any other uses permitted herein, on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. 3. Maintenance of Licensed Area. a. Host shall cause the Licensed Area, including Carbon Solutions Charging Stalls, to be maintained in a clean, safe, and orderly condition, to at least the same standard as other areas at the Host Property that are under Host control are maintained. (i) However, to the extent that Carbon Solutions engages in activities that inhibit the cleanliness, safety, and orderly condition of the License Area, Carbon Solutions shall maintain the Licensed Area to Host’s sole and absolute satisfaction. In the event that Carbon Solutions fails to maintain the Licensed Area as described herein, then Host may immediately take all actions necessary to ensure the cleanliness, safety, and orderly condition of the License Area and Carbon Solutions shall reimburse Host for all such costs. b. Host shall have no responsibility to maintain Carbon Solutions’ Charging Station or related Carbon Solutions equipment, hardware, software, or signage. Host shall not retain any ownership rights in the Charging Station and related Carbon Solutions equipment. Carbon Solutions shall maintain Carbon Solutions’ Charging Station and related Carbon Solutions equipment, hardware, software, and signage in clean, safe, and orderly condition. Carbon Solutions is solely responsible for personal property taxes imposed on the Charging Station. However, if Carbon Solutions fails to maintain Carbon Solutions’ Charging Station (including related Carbon Solutions equipment, hardware, software, G.16.a Packet Pg. 415 Attachment: Lease Agreement (Reject Lease Agreement with EVGO and Approve Lease Agreement for EVSE Stations) 01247.0006/538679.5 RK and signage) in a clean, safe, and orderly condition, then Host may immediately take all actions necessary to ensure the cleanliness, safety, and orderly condition of Carbon Solutions’ Charging Station and Carbon Solutions shall reimburse Host for all such costs. 4. Condition of Premises. a. Carbon Solutions has inspected the Licensed Area and knows the extent and condition thereof and accepts same in its present condition, subject to and including all defects, latent or patent. Carbon Solutions shall not commit or suffer to be committed any waste upon the Licensed Area, improvements, and fixtures or commit or allow any nuisance or other act which may disturb or interfere with the Host Property and its surroundings. If Carbon Solutions fails to perform the obligations under this Section, after 30 days written notice setting forth such failure, then Host shall have the right to perform the same and to charge Carbon Solutions therefor, and Carbon Solutions shall pay the Host such costs upon Host’s demand. b. Carbon Solutions shall not use, keep, store or place in or on the Licensed Area any petroleum products or any materials that are in any way hazardous, toxic, radioactive or explosive, except those which are necessary and appropriate to accomplish the purpose of this Agreement. All such materials shall be used, stored, handled, dispensed and disposed of as required by applicable governmental regulations and laws. Any spills of such materials by Carbon Solutions anywhere on Host Property shall be immediately reported to Host and cleaned up by Carbon Solutions, at Carbon Solutions’ sole expense, in accordance with standards of the industry and applicable governmental regulations and laws. 5. Right of Entry. Carbon Solutions shall permit Host’s authorized agents the right and privilege, at all times, of entering the Licensed Area for the purposes of inspection, performing necessary improvements, determining whether the terms of this Agreement are being kept and performed, and posting notices of nonresponsibility. B. Term & Termination. 1. Term. The Initial Term of this Agreement shall be as set forth in Section I hereinabove. Following the expiration of the Initial Term, the Host shall have the three (3) options to extend this Agreement of one (1) year each, unless terminated by either party by providing written notice to the other party no less than thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the then-current term. The Initial Term and any renewal term(s) are referred to collectively herein as the “Term.” 2. Termination for Convenience. This Agreement may be terminated for convenience upon thirty (30) days’ written notice to either party without penalty or fee: a. in the case of Carbon Solutions, at any time prior to the submission of the permit application for construction of the Charging Station at the Host Property or if Carbon Solutions determines that the construction or continued operation of the Charging Station is impracticable or uneconomical; and b. in the case of Host, in the event the Commencement Date has not occurred within fifteen (15) months following this Agreement Date; provided that the foregoing right shall terminate upon the Commencement Date. G.16.a Packet Pg. 416 Attachment: Lease Agreement (Reject Lease Agreement with EVGO and Approve Lease Agreement for EVSE Stations) 01247.0006/538679.5 RK c. in the case of Host, in the event that the Grand Terrace City Council in its sole and absolute discretion determines that the Agreement is no longer in the interest of the City. 3. Termination for Cause. This Agreement may be terminated for cause by either party in the event of the following: a. Breach of Obligation. The other party breaches or fails to perform any of its obligations hereunder in any material respect, and such default or failure continues uncured for thirty (30) business days after receipt of written notice; provided, however, that if such default or failure reasonably requires more than thirty (30) business days to cure, this provision shall not be triggered if such breaching party commences to cure within such period and diligently proceeds to complete such cure; b. False Representation or Warranty. Any representation made by the other party is found to be inaccurate when made, or any warranty made by the other party is breached; provided, however, that the party that allegedly made the false representation or warranty shall have thirty (30) business days within receipt of written notice to demonstrate to truth or accuracy of such representation or warranty; or c. Insolvency. The other party becomes insolvent or proceedings are instituted by or against it under any provision of any federal or state bankruptcy or insolvency laws. C. Payment Terms. For any amounts owed by Carbon Solutions to Host, on or before the thirtieth (30th) day following the applicable due date, Carbon Solutions shall make a payment to Host of such amount by ACH or other method mutually agreed upon by Carbon Solutions and Host. Prior to Host receiving any accrued payments owed under this Agreement and in order to facilitate such payments, Host shall provide Carbon Solutions with a completed Form W-9 and valid ACH payment information substantially in the form(s) attached hereto as Exhibit B. D. Electricity. 1. Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, Carbon Solutions shall be responsible for all electricity costs of the Charging Station by obtaining separately-metered electricity service. Host shall reasonably cooperate with Carbon Solutions’ efforts regarding the provision of electricity to the Charging Station. Neither Host nor Carbon Solutions has any responsibility or liability for interruption, curtailment, failure, or defect in the supply or character of utilities furnished to the Charging Station, unless the cause of the interruption is covered by the party’s indemnity provided for in Section III(C)(1). 2. Host grants to Carbon Solutions the non-exclusive right to receive utility services, including but not limited to electric services, and the right for any applicable utility service providers to construct, reconstruct, install, inspect, maintain, replace, remove, and use said utility services to serve the Charging Station. Host grants such utility service providers with ingress to and egress from said utility service facilities across the Host Property. Host grants such utility service providers with the right to trim, cut down, and clear away or otherwise control any trees or brush within five (5) feet of said route. Prior to erecting or constructing any building or other structure, or drilling or operating any well, under or within five (5) feet of said route, Host shall coordinate with Carbon Solutions in ensuring such activities do not result in an interruption of utility service. In the event that Host Property is damaged due to Carbon Solutions’ activities, Carbon Solutions shall restore the Host Property to its original condition at Carbon Solutions’ sole cost. G.16.a Packet Pg. 417 Attachment: Lease Agreement (Reject Lease Agreement with EVGO and Approve Lease Agreement for EVSE Stations) 01247.0006/538679.5 RK E. Carbon Solutions Customers; Access. 1. Carbon Solutions Customers. Carbon Solutions may provide access to the Charging Station and Carbon Solutions Charging Stalls to its subscribers, customers, agents, employees, contractors, vendors, guests and invitees (“Carbon Solutions Customers”), who shall be charged in amounts reasonably determined by Carbon Solutions, which may change from time to time in Carbon Solutions’ sole discretion. Carbon Solutions Customers may include members of the public, as well as commercial fleet and rideshare vehicles. 2. Access. During the Term, Host will ensure that Carbon Solutions Customers have reasonable access to the Licensed Area twenty-four (24) hours per day, seven (7) days per week, and 365/366 days per year. Carbon Solutions and its agents, employees, contractors, and vendors may, at any time during the Term, reasonably access the Licensed Area and Host Property to maintain, inspect, repair, upgrade, remove or replace any portion of the Charging Station, provided that Carbon Solutions notifies Host of such activities at least 48 hours’ prior to commencement of such activities. Carbon Solutions may install a parking card reader or similar hardware or software, if necessary, to ensure Carbon Solutions Customers access to the Licensed Area. F. Signage & Promotional Activities. 1. Signage; Branding. Subject to Host’s prior approval, Carbon Solutions may stripe and place appropriate signage at Carbon Solutions Charging Stalls, and mark the Charging Station and related Carbon Solutions equipment in Carbon Solutions’ sole discretion; provided, however, that Host may require Carbon Solutions to replace any marks or signage that are reasonably offensive or otherwise violate applicable laws or regulations. In addition, subject to Host’s prior approval, not to be unreasonably withheld, Carbon Solutions may place signage, marks, or advertising devices in, on, or about and around the Licensed Area within the Host Property, including “wayfinding” signage as may be required of Carbon Solutions by contract or applicable law, at Carbon Solutions’ sole cost and subject to applicable laws and regulations. At no time may Host place any signage on Carbon Solutions property except as may be required for public health and safety and any applicable law. Carbon Solutions shall not place any type of advertising other than for Carbon Solutions’ Charging Stalls. 2. Promotional Activities. During the Term of this Agreement, Carbon Solutions may promote the availability of the Charging Station (to the extent it is on Carbon Solutions’ network of EV charging stations) through traditional and/or electronic media, including providing the address of the Host Property and a description thereof. Carbon Solutions and its employees, agents, and representatives shall have the right to enter the Licensed Area and photograph the Charging Station at least once per year during the Term. No party shall use the other party’s trade or service marks, logos or other proprietary materials without the prior written consent of the other party. G. Construction. 1. Installation Activities. Carbon Solutions shall, at its sole cost and expense, be responsible for all installation activities (the “Installation Activities”) required to support the operation of the Charging Station and services therewith, including the hiring and coordination of all vendors and contractors; the installation of electrical equipment, utility lines, hardware, and software; site preparation, trenching, grading, repaving, and landscaping. G.16.a Packet Pg. 418 Attachment: Lease Agreement (Reject Lease Agreement with EVGO and Approve Lease Agreement for EVSE Stations) 01247.0006/538679.5 RK 2. Plans. Before beginning any Installation Activities, Carbon Solutions shall provide a copy of the construction schedule and installation plans to Host for its approval, which approval shall not be unreasonably delayed or withheld. However, the submission of the construction schedule and installation plans to Host pursuant to this Agreement shall not waive or satisfy any licensing, permitting, or any other approvals required under applicable federal, State, and local law, including but not limited to the Grand Terrace Municipal Code. 3. Contractor Activities. Carbon Solutions shall ensure that it or its designated contractor(s) and/or service providers: a. obtain from all governmental authorities, including the Host, all licenses, permits, or other approvals (collectively, “Approvals”) required to conduct such installations. Host will reasonably cooperate with Carbon Solutions’ designated contractors and service providers as required to obtain such Approvals. b. bring on the Licensed Area and permitted adjacent areas of the Host Property only those materials and equipment that are being used directly in the Installation Activities, provided that Carbon Solutions shall not store any materials and equipment inside or outside of the Licensed Area without the express written permission of the Host; c. perform Installation Activities only during times and days acceptable to Host and in a manner so as to not unreasonably interfere with Host’s business operations; d. not permit or suffer any mechanic’s or materialmen’s liens to attach to the Licensed Area. If such a lien attaches to the Licensed Area, Carbon Solutions shall remove or bond over such lien at Carbon Solutions’ sole cost and expense, within twenty (20) days of Carbon Solutions receiving written notice thereof from Host. 4. Removal. Within ninety (90) days following the termination of this Agreement, Carbon Solutions shall remove the Charging Station and all of Carbon Solutions’ other equipment and personal property from the Licensed Area, but not electric infrastructure, which shall remain with and become part of the real property. Following such removal, Carbon Solutions shall restore the Licensed Area to a condition that is satisfactory to the Host in its sole and absolute discretion, excluding ordinary wear and tear and the electric infrastructure, which shall be capped off and secured but not removed. All improvements shall be surrendered in good and clean condition and the title thereto shall automatically, upon termination, vest in the Host. Notwithstanding the forgoing, all uncompleted or partially or totally destroyed improvements shall, at Host’s option, be removed prior to surrender of the Licensed Area at Carbon Solutions’ sole cost, and the site of such improvements shall be returned in the same condition as prior to the execution of this Agreement, except as relating to the electric infrastructure. This provision shall survive the termination of this Agreement. H. Costs of Lease Agreement 1. Carbon Solutions shall promptly pay all costs and expenses, including utilities (Utilities include, but are not limited to, gas, electricity, telephone, telecommunication, water, sewer and refuse collection services). Carbon Solutions also agrees to reimburse Host for any and all expenses that City incurs in modifying existing utilities for Carbon Solutions’ benefit relating to possession and use of the Licensed Area. The possessory interest created by this Agreement may be subject to taxation, and Carbon Solutions may be subject to the payment of taxes levied on such interest. Carbon Solutions acknowledges its actual knowledge of the existence of a possessory interest tax and receipt of this notice of Carbon G.16.a Packet Pg. 419 Attachment: Lease Agreement (Reject Lease Agreement with EVGO and Approve Lease Agreement for EVSE Stations) 01247.0006/538679.5 RK Solutions’ potential tax liability. Carbon Solutions agrees that it is solely responsible for the timely payment before delinquency of possessory interest taxes and any other tax, levy or assessment upon the Lease Area, the aircraft, Carbon Solutions’ personal property, improvements, and fixtures upon the Licensed Area. 2. Carbon Solutions shall also reimburse Host for all of Host’s costs in reasonably cooperating with Carbon Solutions, including its subcontractors, in carrying out any activity under this Agreement. III. LEGAL PROVISIONS A. Representations, Warranties & Covenants. 1. General. Each of Host and Carbon Solutions hereby represents and warrants to the other that, to the best of its knowledge, as of this Agreement Date and throughout the Term: (a) it has all necessary power and authority to execute, deliver, and perform its obligations hereunder; (b) the execution, delivery, and performance of this Agreement have been duly authorized by all necessary action and do not violate any of the terms or conditions of its governing documents, any contract to which it is a party, or any law, regulation, order, or other legal determination applicable to it; (c) there is no pending or, to its knowledge, threatened litigation or proceeding that may adversely affect its ability to perform this Agreement; (d) it is duly organized and validly existing under the laws of the jurisdicti on of its organization; (e) this Agreement constitutes a legal, valid and binding obligation of such party, except as enforceability may be limited by applicable bankruptcy, insolvency or similar laws affecting creditors’ rights and by general principles of equity; and (f) at all times during the Term, it will comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, rules, regulations (including, without limitation, all zoning ordinances and building codes) in performing its obligations under this Agreement. 2. Consents and Approvals. Host further represents, warrants and covenants that it has obtained or shall obtain prior to the commencement of Carbon Solutions’ Installation Activities or operation and maintenance of the Charging Station, and shall maintain at all times during the Term, any and all consents or approvals required in order for Host to grant the rights and perform its obligations under this Agreement, and for Carbon Solutions to take the actions contemplated in this Agreement. Copies of all required third party consents required for Host to grant the license to Carbon Solutions and for Carbon Solutions to install, operate, and maintain the Charging Station pursuant to this Agreement are attached as Exhibit C, and Host represents and warrants that no other third-party consents are required. B. Insurance. 1. Carbon Solutions Insurance. Carbon Solutions shall procure and maintain, at its sole cost and expense, in a form and content satisfactory to Host, during the entire term of this Agreement including any extension thereof, the following policies of insurance which shall cover all elected and appointed officers, employees and agents of Host: a. General Liability Insurance (Occurrence Form CG0001 or equivalent). A policy of comprehensive general liability insurance written on a per occurrence basis for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage (including death). The policy of insurance shall be in an amount not less than $1,000,000.00 per occurrence or if a general aggregate limit is used, then the general aggregate limit shall be twice the occurrence limit. G.16.a Packet Pg. 420 Attachment: Lease Agreement (Reject Lease Agreement with EVGO and Approve Lease Agreement for EVSE Stations) 01247.0006/538679.5 RK b. Worker’s Compensation Insurance. A policy of worker’s compensation insurance in such amount as will fully comply with the laws of the State of California and which shall indemnify, insure and provide legal defense for the Carbon Solutions against any loss, claim or damage arising from any injuries or occupational diseases occurring to any worker employed by or any persons retained by the Carbon Solutions in the course of carrying out the work or services contemplated in this Agreement. c. Automotive Insurance (Form CA 0001 (Ed 1/87) including “any auto” and endorsement CA 0025 or equivalent). A policy of comprehensive automobile liability insurance written on a per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage in an amount not less than $1,000,000. Said policy shall include coverage for owned, non-owned, leased, hired cars and any automobile. d. Professional Liability. Professional liability insurance appropriate to the Carbon Solutions’ profession. This coverage may be written on a “claims made” basis, and must include coverage for contractual liability. The professional liability insurance required by this Agreement must be endorsed to be applicable to claims based upon, arising out of or related to services performed under this Agreement. The insurance must be maintained for at least 5 consecutive years following the completion of Carbon Solutions’ services or the termination of this Agreement. During this additional 5- year period, Carbon Solutions shall annually and upon request of Host submit written evidence of this continuous coverage. e. Excess Liability. $1,000,000 in excess liability coverage per occurrence, which coverage shall sit excess of the scheduled underlying General Liability and Automobile Liability Insurance policies with exclusions that are no more broad than those contained in the underlying policies. f. Subcontractors. Carbon Solutions shall include all subcontractors as insureds under its policies or shall furnish separate certificates and certified endorsements for each subcontractor. All coverages for subcontractors shall include all of the requirements stated herein. g. General Provisions i) All of the above policies of insurance shall be primary insurance and shall name the Host, its elected and appointed officers, employees and agents as additional insureds and any insurance maintained by Host or its officers, employees or agents may apply in excess of, and not contribute with Carbon Solutions’ insurance. The insurer is deemed hereof to waive all rights of subrogation and contribution it may have against the Host, its officers, employees and agents and their respective insurers. Moreover, the insurance policy must specify that where the primary insured does not satisfy the self-insured retention, any additional insured may satisfy the self-insured retention. ii) The insurer is deemed hereof to waive all rights of subrogation and contribution it may have against the Host, its officers, employees and agents and their respective insurers. Moreover, the insurance policy must specify that where the primary insured does not satisfy the self - insured retention, any additional insured may satisfy the self-insured retention. iii) All of said policies of insurance shall provide that said insurance may not be amended or cancelled by the insurer or any party hereto without providing thirty (30) days prior written notice by certified mail return receipt requested to the Host. In the event any of said policies of insurance are cancelled, the Carbon Solutions shall, prior to the cancellation date, submit new evidence of insurance in conformance with Section III(B) to the Host. iv) No work under this Agreement shall commence until Carbon Solutions G.16.a Packet Pg. 421 Attachment: Lease Agreement (Reject Lease Agreement with EVGO and Approve Lease Agreement for EVSE Stations) 01247.0006/538679.5 RK has provided Host with Certificates of Insurance, additional insured endorsement forms or appropriate insurance binders evidencing the above insurance coverages and said Certificates of Insurance or binders are approved by Host. Host reserves the right to inspect complete, certified copies of and endorsements to all required insurance policies at any time. Any failure to comply with the reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches or warranties shall not affect coverage provided to Host. v) Host, its respective elected and appointed officers, directors, officials, employees, agents and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities Carbon Solutions performs; products and completed operations of Carbon Solutionst; premises owned, occupied or used by Carbon Solutions; or any automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by Carbon Solutions. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to Host, and their respective elected and appointed officers, officials, employees or volunteers. Carbon Solutions’ insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer’s liability. vi) Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by Host. At the option of Host, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects to Host or its respective elected or appointed officers, officials, employees and volunteers or Carbon Solutions shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration, defense expenses and claims. Carbon Solutions agrees that the requirement to provide insurance shall not be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which Carbon Solutions may be held responsible for the payment of damages to any persons or property resulting from Carbon Solutions’ activities or the activities of any person or persons for which Carbon Solutions is otherwise responsible nor shall it limit the Carbon Solutions’ indemnification liabilities as provided in this Agreement. vii) In the event Carbon Solutions subcontracts any portion of the work for this Agreement, the contract between the Carbon Solutions and such subcontractor shall require the subcontractor to maintain the same policies of insurance that Carbon Solutions is required to maintain pursuant to Section III(B), and such certificates and endorsements shall be provided to Host. 2. Policy Requirements. The insurance policies required under Sections III(B)(1) and (B)(2) shall: (a) be issued by insurance companies licensed to do business in the state in which the Host Property is located, with a general policyholder’s ratings of at least “A-” and a financial rating of at least “Class VIII,” in the most current Best’s Insurance Reports available on the Agreement Date; if the Best’s ratings are changed or discontinued, the parties shall agree to a comparable method of rating insurance companies. 3. Casualty and Condemnation. If any portion of the Host Property is damaged by fire or other casualty in a manner that adversely affects Carbon Solutions’ use of the Licensed Area, then either party may, within thirty (30) days of the date of such fire or other casualty elect to terminate this Agreement on written notice to the other party. If any portion of the Host Property is condemned or taken in any manner for a public or quasipublic use that could adversely affect Carbon Solutions’ use of the Licensed Area, then Carbon Solutions may elect to terminate this Agreement effective as of the date title to the condemned portion of the Host Property is transferred to the condemning authority. C. Indemnity. 1. Indemnification. Carbon Solutions shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless Host and each of its officers, employees and agents (“Indemnified Parties”) against any and all liability, claims, loss, damages, or expenses, including attorneys’ fees and costs (“Damages”) arising by reason of t he G.16.a Packet Pg. 422 Attachment: Lease Agreement (Reject Lease Agreement with EVGO and Approve Lease Agreement for EVSE Stations) 01247.0006/538679.5 RK death or injury of any person, including Carbon Solutions and each of its officers, employees, representatives and agents (“Indemnifying Parties”), or by reason of damage to or destruction of any property, including property owned by any of the Indemnifying Parties, caused or allegedly caused by (1) any cause whatsoever while any of the Indemnifying Parties is in or on the Licensed Area or in any way connected with the Licensed Area or with any improvements or personal property on the Licensed Area , (2) some condition of the Licensed Area or some building or improvements on the Licensed Area, (3) some act or omission on the Licensed Area of Carbon Solutions or any person in, on or about the Licensed Area with the permission and consent of Carbon Solutions, or (4) any matter connected with Carbon Solutions’ occupation and use of the Licensed Area; provided, that the obligations of Carbon Solutions to defend, indemnify and hold harmless are only to the extent to the Damages are caused by any of the Indemnifying Parties. 2. Limitation of Liability. In no event shall either party be liable (in contract or in tort, including negligence and strict liability) to such other party or its Related Parties for any special, indirect or consequential damages relating to this Agreement. The entire liability of each party for any and all claims of any kind arising from or relating to this Agreement will be subject in all cases to an affirmative obligation on the part of the other party to mitigate its damages. D. Miscellaneous. 1. Notice. a. Any notice provided or permitted to be given under this Agreement must be in writing and be served either by (i) deposit in the mail, addressed to the party to be notified, postage prepaid, and registered or certified, with a return receipt requested, or (ii) deposit with an internationally- recognized overnight delivery carrier, with notice of delivery to the recipient party. Notice given by registered or certified mail or overnight carrier shall be deemed delivered and effective on the date of delivery shown on the return receipt or proof of receipt. For purposes of notice the addresses of the parties shall be as set forth in this Agreement. Each party may change its address for notice by giving notice thereof to the other party. b. Notice shall be given as follows: If to Host: City of Grand Terrace 22795 Barton Rd. Grand Terrace, CA 92313 Attn: City Manager with a copy to: Aleshire & Wynder, LLP 18881 Von Karman Ave., Suite 1700 Irvine, CA 92612 Attn: Grand Terrace City Attorney If to Carbon Solutions: 11390 West Olympic Blvd., Suite 250 Los Angeles, CA 90064 Attn: Site Development with a copy to: 11390 West Olympic Blvd., Suite 250 Los Angeles, CA 90064 Attn: Legal Department 2. Property Rights; Assignment. G.16.a Packet Pg. 423 Attachment: Lease Agreement (Reject Lease Agreement with EVGO and Approve Lease Agreement for EVSE Stations) 01247.0006/538679.5 RK a. The rights granted to Carbon Solutions in this Agreement shall constitute covenants running with the land as to the interests in real property which are made subject hereto and shall bind Host's successors and assigns. b. This Agreement is binding on and inures to the benefit of the parties and their respective heirs, successors, assigns, and personal representatives. Carbon Solutions may assign this Agreement and any or all of its rights and obligations hereunder to any Carbon Solutions affiliate, subject to the prior written approval of the Host. Any attempt by Carbon Solutions to assign this Agreement without the Host’s prior written approval is void. In addition to such other conditions Host may impose, Carbon Solutions shall pay to Host 10% percent of the amount of any sublease, plus the rent described in this Agreement. c. In the event the Licensed Area is transferred or Host ceases to have the requisite level of control over the Licensed Area necessary to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement (each, a “Transfer Event”), Host shall assign its rights and obligations under this Agreement to the person or entity which would be able to comply with Host’s obligations following such Transfer Event (the “Transfer Host”). Further, Host agrees that any such Transfer Event shall not affect, terminate or disturb Carbon Solutions’ right to quiet enjoyment and possession of the Licensed Area under the terms of this Agreement or any of Carbon Solutions’ other rights under this Agreement. 3. No Agency Relationship. Nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed or construed to create a joint venture, partnership, fiduciary, or agency relationship between the parties for any purpose, and the employees of one party shall not be deemed to be the employees of the other party. Except as otherwise stated in this Agreement, neither party has any right to act on behalf of the other, nor represent that it has such right or authority. 4. Severability. If any term of this Agreement is held by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such invalidity shall not invalidate the remainder of this Agreement and this Agreement shall be construed and deemed reformed to the extent necessary to render valid such term and the rights and obligations of the parties shall be enforced accordingly. 5. Survival. The provisions of Sections II(G)(4), III(B)(4), III(C), and III(D)(7) shall survive termination of this Agreement. 6. Governing Law; Jurisdiction. The terms, provisions and conditions of this Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the state of California, without regard to its laws on conflict of laws. The parties further agree that the Superior Court of San Bernardino County, California and the United States District Court, Central District of California, Eastern Division shall have exclusive jurisdiction over all actions and disputes brought under this Agreement. 7. No Waiver. The failure of a party to insist on strict performance of any provision of this Agreement does not constitute a waiver of or estoppel against asserting the right to require performance in the future and a waiver or estoppel given in any one instance does not constitute the same with respect to a later obligation or breach. 8. Remedies. The rights and remedies provided by this Agreement are cumulative, and the use of any right or remedy by any party does not preclude or waive its right to use any or a ll other remedies. These rights and remedies are given in addition to any other rights a party may have under any applicable law, in equity or otherwise. G.16.a Packet Pg. 424 Attachment: Lease Agreement (Reject Lease Agreement with EVGO and Approve Lease Agreement for EVSE Stations) 01247.0006/538679.5 RK 9. Confidential Information. As used herein, “Confidential Information” means any information that is disclosed by one party to the other party that is either marked as confidential or would customarily be treated as confidential by a reasonable person. Each party agrees that it will, and will cause its employees, representatives and agents to, keep confi dential and not disclose the Confidential Information of the other party. If a party is compelled to disclose Confidential Information under the authority of a court or governmental agency, the compelled party shall promptly notify the other party and the notified party. Notwithstanding the forgoing, Carbon Solutions acknowledges that Host is subject to the California Public Records Act, and agrees to release and hold Host harmless from any disclosure of Confidential Information resulting from Host’s obligation to comply with the California Public Records Act or any other similar law. 10. Force Majeure. Neither party is responsible for any delay or failure in performance of any part of this Agreement to the extent that delay or failure is caused by fire, flood, explosion, war, embargo, government requirement, civil or military authority, act of God, act or omission of carriers or other similar causes beyond the party’s control. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent such delay or failure in performance extends beyond fifteen (15) consecutive days, the other party shall have the right, but not the obligation, to terminate this Agreement at its sole discretion. 11. No Third Party Beneficiaries. This Agreement does not confer any rights or remedies on any person other than the parties and their respective successors and permitted assigns. 12. Further Assurances. Each party agrees to execute and deliver additional documents and instruments and to perform additional acts as may be reasonably necessary or appropriate to effectuate, carry out, and perform all of the terms, provisions and conditions of this Agreement. 13. Integration; Amendments. This Agreement contains all Agreements, promises and understandings between the parties, and that there are no verbal or oral Agreements, promises or understandings between the parties. Any amendment, modification or other change to this Agreement shall be ineffective unless made in a writing signed by the parties hereto. 14. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts with the same effect as if all the parties had signed the same document. 15. Construction. All documents or items attached to, or referred to in, this Agreement are incorporated into this Agreement as fully as if stated within the body of this Agreement. Each party has cooperated in the drafting, negotiation and preparation of this Agreement and nothing herein shall be construed against either party on the basis of that party being the drafter of such language. [Signatures on Following Page] G.16.a Packet Pg. 425 Attachment: Lease Agreement (Reject Lease Agreement with EVGO and Approve Lease Agreement for EVSE Stations) 01247.0006/538679.5 RK IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties execute this Agreement as of the date first above written. HOST: CARBON SOLUTIONS: CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, a California municipal corporation CARBON SOLUTIONS GROUP LLC, an Illinois limited liability company By: By: Name: Name: _________________________________ Title: Title: _________________________________ ATTEST: By: Name: Debra Thomas Title: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Name: Adrian R. Guerra Title: City Attorney G.16.a Packet Pg. 426 Attachment: Lease Agreement (Reject Lease Agreement with EVGO and Approve Lease Agreement for EVSE Stations) 01247.0006/538679.5 RK EXHIBIT A Licensed Area - Site Plan See attached. G.16.a Packet Pg. 427 Attachment: Lease Agreement (Reject Lease Agreement with EVGO and Approve Lease Agreement for EVSE Stations) 01247.0006/538679.5 RK EXHIBIT B ACH/W-9 Payment Information See attached. G.16.a Packet Pg. 428 Attachment: Lease Agreement (Reject Lease Agreement with EVGO and Approve Lease Agreement for EVSE Stations) 01247.0006/538679.5 RK EXHIBIT C Third Party Consents See attached (if applicable). G.16.a Packet Pg. 429 Attachment: Lease Agreement (Reject Lease Agreement with EVGO and Approve Lease Agreement for EVSE Stations) 01247.0006/538679.5 RK Exhibit D Termination Schedule Early Termination Date Termination Percentage Early Termination Fee prior to the first (1st) anniversary of the Commencement Date 100% $_______/Charging Stall after the first (1st) anniversary of the Commencement Date, but prior to the second (2nd) anniversary of the Commencement Date 90% $_______/Charging Stall after the second (2nd) anniversary of the Commencement Date, but prior to the third (3rd) anniversary of the Commencement Date 80% $_______/Charging Stall after the third (3rd) anniversary of the Commencement Date, but prior to the fourth (4th) anniversary of the Commencement Date 70% $_______/Charging Stall after the fourth (4th) anniversary of the Commencement Date, but prior to the fifth (5th) anniversary of the Commencement Date 60% $_______/Charging Stall after the fifth (5th) anniversary of the Commencement Date, but prior to the sixth (6th) anniversary of the Commencement Date 50% $_______/Charging Stall after the sixth (6th) anniversary of the Commencement Date, but prior to the seventh (7th) anniversary of the Commencement Date 40% $_______/Charging Stall After the seventh (7th) anniversary of the Commencement Date 0% $0 G.16.a Packet Pg. 430 Attachment: Lease Agreement (Reject Lease Agreement with EVGO and Approve Lease Agreement for EVSE Stations) G.16.bPacket Pg. 431Attachment: Carbon Solutions Proposal (Reject Lease Agreement with EVGO and Approve Lease Agreement for EVSE Stations) G.16.bPacket Pg. 432Attachment: Carbon Solutions Proposal (Reject Lease Agreement with EVGO and Approve Lease Agreement for EVSE Stations) G.16.bPacket Pg. 433Attachment: Carbon Solutions Proposal (Reject Lease Agreement with EVGO and Approve Lease Agreement for EVSE Stations) Attachment III G.16.c Packet Pg. 434 Attachment: Attachment III (Reject Lease Agreement with EVGO and Approve Lease Agreement for EVSE AGENDA REPORT MEETING DATE: May 14, 2019 Council Item TITLE: Update and Implementation of Parking Restrictions on De Berry PRESENTED BY: Alan French, Public Works Director RECOMMENDATION: 1. Review findings from staff. 2. Direct staff with respect to implementation of parking restrictions on De Berry, including conducting any related studies. 2030 VISION STATEMENT: This staff report supports Goal #2 "Maintain Public Safety" to ensure that our residents continue to enjoy an outstanding quality of life. BACKGROUND: Section 22507 of the California Vehicle Code provides the following: “(a) Local authorities may, by ordinance or resolution, prohibit or restrict the stopping, parking, or standing of vehicles, including, but not limited to, vehicles that are six feet or more in height (including any load thereon) within 100 feet of any intersection, on certain streets or highways, or portions thereof, during all or certain hours of the day. The ordinance or resolution may include a designation of certain streets upon which preferential parking privileges are given to residents and merchants adjacent to the streets for their use and the use of their guests, under which the residents and merchants may be issued a permit or permits that exempt them from the prohibition or restriction of the ordinance or resolution. With the exception of alleys, the ordinance or resolution shall not apply until signs or markings giving adequate notice thereof have been placed. A local ordinance or resolution adopted pursuant to this section may contain provisions that are reasonable and necessary to ensure the effectiveness of a preferential parking program. (b) An ordinance or resolution adopted under this section may also authorize preferential parking permits for me mbers of organizations, professions, or other designated groups, including, but not limited to, school personnel, to park on specified streets if the local authority determines that the use of the permits will not adversely affect parking G.17 Packet Pg. 435 conditions for residents and merchants in the area.” Based on this section, parking restrictions must be adopted by either an ordinance or resolution. DISCUSSION: On June 23, 2009, the City Council approved the implementation of a parking permit program for the north side of De Berry from Mt. Vernon to Mirado Avenue. The program began in September 2009 and signs for the parking restrictions were installed as directed per City Council at the June 23, 2009 meeting agenda item 7 -B regarding "overnight" parking. However, following review by current staff, it was determined that the City Council did not formally adopt these regulations by ordinance or resolution; rather, it was approved via a minute action. Accordingly, staff and the City Attorney recommend that the City Council now take formal action by either ordinance or resolution , or some combination of both, to formally adopt the parking regulations and, in so doing, consider current circumstances warranting the restrictions. Additionally, the ordinance and/or resolution will need to define the term "overnight" to enforce the use of permits for the parking within the public road right-of-way as this was not defined in the prior program. For purposes of tonight’s meeting, staff would like direction from the City Council whether to formally codify the prior regulations via ordinance or resolution as they were adopted in 2009 or whether the City Council desires any changes thereto. Upon receiving Council direction, staff will prepare the ordinance and/or resolution and present them at a future meeting for consideration and adoption. FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact for this item. ATTACHMENTS: • FINAL De Berry permit parking application (DOC) • Deberry Parking Permit Program (PDF) APPROVALS: Alan French Completed 05/07/2019 12:06 PM City Attorney Completed 05/08/2019 3:56 PM Finance Completed 05/08/2019 6:39 PM City Manager Completed 05/08/2019 7:49 PM City Council Pending 05/14/2019 6:00 PM G.17 Packet Pg. 436 APPLICATION FOR PARKING PERMIT NAME: ______________________________________________________ PERMIT ADDRESS: ____________________________________________ PHONE NUMBER: ____________________________________________ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Approved Program regulations: • Maximum 2 permits per household (the permit can be used for any car and are not vehicle specific) • Permits are valid for use within 100 ft. of the permit residence. • Permit fee of $50.00 for 2-years per vehicle plus the cost of the placard - $7.50, totaling $57.50. • Permit placard replacement fee if $15.00 Permit #________________Date Issued: ________________ Permit #________________ Date Issued: _______________ Fee paid: _______________ Date paid: _________________ Received by _______________________________________ Date _______________________ CITY OF GRAND TERRACE 22795 BARTON RD GRAND TERRACE, CA 92313 909-824-6621 G.17.a Packet Pg. 437 Attachment: FINAL De Berry permit parking application (Update on Overnight Parking) G.17.b Packet Pg. 438 Attachment: Deberry Parking Permit Program (Update on Overnight Parking) G.17.bPacket Pg. 439Attachment: Deberry Parking Permit Program (Update on Overnight Parking)