Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
07/26/2011
' o • PENDING CRA APPROVAL CITY OF GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES REGULAR MEETING -JULY 26,2011 A regular meeting of the Community Redevelopment Agency, City of Grand Terrace, was held in the Council Chambers,Grand Terrace Civic Center,22795 Barton Road,Grand Terrace,California, on July 26, 2011 at 6:00 p.m. PRESENT: Walt.Stanckiewitz, Chairman Lee Ann Garcia, Vice-Chairman a Darcy McNaboe, Agency Member Bernardo Sandoval; Agency Member Gene Hays, Agency Member Betsy M. Adams, City Manager Brenda Mesa, City Clerk Bernie Simon, Finance Director Joyce Powers, Community& Economic Development Director Richard Shields, Building & Safety Director John Harper, City Attorney Lt. Steve Dorsey, San Bernardino County Sheriffs Department ABSENT: Rick McClintock, San Bernardino County Fire Department CONVENE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AT 6:00 P.M. 1. APPROVAL OF 07-12-2011 MINUTES CRA-2011-41 MOTION BY AGENCY MEMBER MC NABOE, SECOND BY VICE- CHAIRMAN GARCIA, CARRIED 5-0, to approve the July 12, 2011 Minutes. Chairman Stanckiewitz adjourned the Community Redevelopment Agency Meeting in memory of David Zamora,Mayor of the City of Colton,at 9:55 p.m.,until the next CRA/City Council Meeting that is scheduled to be held on Tuesday, August 9, 2011 at 6:00 p.m. SECRETARY of the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Grand Terrace CHAIRMAN of the Community Redevelopment a Agency of the City of Grand Terrace CRA AGENDA ITEM.NO. I • from CEQA, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378 (b)(4), because such approval not considered a project subject to CEQA review. The payment is a government funding mechanism and fiscal activity which does not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant environmental impact. 5 which are trailer bills to the 2011-12 budget bills, were ABX1 26 and ABX1 27, which are trailer bills to the 2011-12 budget bills, were rmation at the July 12 Council,Meeting. For 2011=12, the City expects to have the funds available to make the payment. The combination of funds used to make the 2011.-12 payment will be determined after the City receives the.Director of Finance'.s decision on its appeal. Respectfully submitted: dy . ? ity'Maager F 2,060 $120.00 $247,200.00 56 017003 CATCH BASIN(CURB INLET)(CRS 300) EA 5 $5,000.00 $25,000.00 57 017003 CATCH BASIN(CURB INLET)(CRS 300) EA 1 $16,000.00 $16,000.00 58 017101 MANHOLE(RCFC&WCDS MH 251) EA 10 $5,000.00 $50,000.00 59 017104 JUNCTION STRUCTURE(RCFC&WCDS JS 228) EA 2 $5,000.00 $10,000.00 60 719530 CURB DRAIN LF 40 $25.00 $1,000.00 61 152440 ADJUST MANHOLE TO GRADE EA 1 $500.00 $500.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 SUBTOTAL Items 49- Four Hundred Seventeen Thousand Five Hundred Dollars and No Cents $417,500 61 "Words" SUBTOTAL Items 1-61 Two Million Seven Hundred Fifteen Thousand Two Hundred Thirty Dollars and No Cents $2,715,230 "Words" CONTINGENCY 999994 CONTINGENCY LS 10% $271,523 $271,523 GRAND TOTAL Two Million Nine Hundred Eighty Six Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty Three Dollars and No Cents $2,986,753 "Words" Prepared by: MIKE MUETING 6/15/2011 Checked by Page 2 of 2 $ 98,000.0D $ 115,500.00 CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY CITY $ 17,500.00 $ 17,500.00 _ ADVERTISE&AWARD CO $ 11,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 0 11,000.00 $ - $ 2,000.00 $ 16,000.00 ADVERTISE&AWARD CJUSD $ 10,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 12,000.00 ADVERTISE&AWARD CITY $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CO $ 143,000.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 143,000.00 $ - $ - $ 23,000.00 $ 204,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CJUSD $ 138,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 138,000.00 $ 163,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CITY 5 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 SURVEY CO $ 51,000.00 $ 14,00100 $ 14,000.00 $ 51,000.00 $ - $ _ $ 9,000.00 $ 74,000.00 SURVEY CJUSD $ 49,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 49,000.00 $ 58,000.00 SURVEY CITY $ 9,00100 $ 9,000.00 $ 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY • CITY OF GRAND TERRACE CITY COUNCIL MINUTES PENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL REGULAR MEETING -JULY 26, 2011 A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace was called to order in the Council Chambers,Grand Terrace Civic Center,22795 Barton Road,Grand Terrace,California,on July 26, 2011 at 6:00 p.m. PRESENT: Walt Stanckiewitz, Mayor Lee Ann Garcia, Mayor Pro Tem Darcy McNaboe, Councilmember Bernardo Sandoval, Councilmember Gene Hays, Councilmember Betsy M. Adams, City Manager Brenda Mesa, City Clerk Bernard Simon, Finance Director Joyce Powers, Community&Economic Development Director Richard Shields, Building& Safety Director John Harper, City Attorney Lt. Steve Dorsey, San Bernardino County Sheriffs Department ABSENT: Rick McClintock, San Bernardino County Fire Department The City Council meeting was opened at 6:00 p.m.with the Pledge of Allegiance led by Mayor Pro Tem Garcia, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance led by GTHS Principal, Angela Dischinger. ITEMS TO DELETE 2B. Special Presentation- Chamber of Commerce Business of the Month SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS 2A. GTHS Principal, Angela Dischinger- Presentation on New High School Angela Dischinger, GTHS Principal, gave a presentation with a general overview of facilities and activities planned for Grand Terrace High School. She reported that the school is scheduled to open in the Fall of 2012. ° CONSENT CALENDAR CC-2011-60 MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM GARCIA, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER SANDOVAL,CARRIED 5.0,to approve the following Consent Calendar Items with the removal of 3E and 3F: . COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 C ject to CEQA review. The payment is a government funding mechanism and fiscal activity which does not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant environmental impact. 5 which are trailer bills to the 2011-12 budget bills, were ABX1 26 and ABX1 27, which are trailer bills to the 2011-12 budget bills, were rmation at the July 12 Council,Meeting. For 2011=12, the City expects to have the funds available to make the payment. The combination of funds used to make the 2011.-12 payment will be determined after the City receives the.Director of Finance'.s decision on its appeal. Respectfully submitted: dy . ? ity'Maager F 2,060 $120.00 $247,200.00 56 017003 CATCH BASIN(CURB INLET)(CRS 300) EA 5 $5,000.00 $25,000.00 57 017003 CATCH BASIN(CURB INLET)(CRS 300) EA 1 $16,000.00 $16,000.00 58 017101 MANHOLE(RCFC&WCDS MH 251) EA 10 $5,000.00 $50,000.00 59 017104 JUNCTION STRUCTURE(RCFC&WCDS JS 228) EA 2 $5,000.00 $10,000.00 60 719530 CURB DRAIN LF 40 $25.00 $1,000.00 61 152440 ADJUST MANHOLE TO GRADE EA 1 $500.00 $500.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 SUBTOTAL Items 49- Four Hundred Seventeen Thousand Five Hundred Dollars and No Cents $417,500 61 "Words" SUBTOTAL Items 1-61 Two Million Seven Hundred Fifteen Thousand Two Hundred Thirty Dollars and No Cents $2,715,230 "Words" CONTINGENCY 999994 CONTINGENCY LS 10% $271,523 $271,523 GRAND TOTAL Two Million Nine Hundred Eighty Six Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty Three Dollars and No Cents $2,986,753 "Words" Prepared by: MIKE MUETING 6/15/2011 Checked by Page 2 of 2 $ 98,000.0D $ 115,500.00 CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY CITY $ 17,500.00 $ 17,500.00 _ ADVERTISE&AWARD CO $ 11,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 0 11,000.00 $ - $ 2,000.00 $ 16,000.00 ADVERTISE&AWARD CJUSD $ 10,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 12,000.00 ADVERTISE&AWARD CITY $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CO $ 143,000.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 143,000.00 $ - $ - $ 23,000.00 $ 204,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CJUSD $ 138,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 138,000.00 $ 163,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CITY 5 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 SURVEY CO $ 51,000.00 $ 14,00100 $ 14,000.00 $ 51,000.00 $ - $ _ $ 9,000.00 $ 74,000.00 SURVEY CJUSD $ 49,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 49,000.00 $ 58,000.00 SURVEY CITY $ 9,00100 $ 9,000.00 $ 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Council Minutes 07/26/2011 Page 2 3A. Approve.Check Register No. 07-26-2011 3B. Waive Full Reading of Ordinances on Agenda 3C. Approval of 07-12-2011 Minutes 3D.. Update on Implementation of Accumulation Program for Part-time and Limited-term-Employees (APPLE) Plan ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR 3E. Remote Deposit Service Amendment- Bank of America It was the consensus of Council to direct staff to bring this item back with written.internal control procedures. 3F. Direction to.Staff to Sell Cellular Site Leases at Richard Rollins Park and Grand Terrace Fire Station#23 Council Member McNaboe,indicated that the decision by Council to accept the offer by Unison Site Management was based on the information presented at the Council meeting and felt that this item should be reconsidered. Matt Wirz,Management Analyst,indicated that the discrepancy is due to transposition of numbers. CC-2011-61 MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM GARCIA, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER SANDOVAL,CARRIED 5-0,to move forward with the agreement with Unison Site Management as agreed to at the July 14, 2011 City Council meeting in the amount of$365,897;if anything in the agreement changes it shall be brought back to the City Council fora full review. PUBLIC COMMENT R.A. "Barney" Barnett, reported that yesterday the RCTC adopted the FIR to build a Metrolink station at Marlboro by doing so they will not use any existing trains that go through Grand Terrace or Highgrove. The construction date could be held up in the court • system because of litigation. He felt that there is still hope for the station indicating that the SCAG Regional Transportation Plan is being discussed and the Highgrove station is still a part of that plan. a Jeffrey McConnell, announced that the Lion's Club Free Eyesight Clinic is on Saturday at , the Community Center from 8:00 a.m.to 3:00 p.m. It is first come first served and they are expecting over 500 people to participate. Eyeglasses will be provided to those in need. COUNCIL REPORTS 0 rmation at the July 12 Council,Meeting. For 2011=12, the City expects to have the funds available to make the payment. The combination of funds used to make the 2011.-12 payment will be determined after the City receives the.Director of Finance'.s decision on its appeal. Respectfully submitted: dy . ? ity'Maager F 2,060 $120.00 $247,200.00 56 017003 CATCH BASIN(CURB INLET)(CRS 300) EA 5 $5,000.00 $25,000.00 57 017003 CATCH BASIN(CURB INLET)(CRS 300) EA 1 $16,000.00 $16,000.00 58 017101 MANHOLE(RCFC&WCDS MH 251) EA 10 $5,000.00 $50,000.00 59 017104 JUNCTION STRUCTURE(RCFC&WCDS JS 228) EA 2 $5,000.00 $10,000.00 60 719530 CURB DRAIN LF 40 $25.00 $1,000.00 61 152440 ADJUST MANHOLE TO GRADE EA 1 $500.00 $500.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 SUBTOTAL Items 49- Four Hundred Seventeen Thousand Five Hundred Dollars and No Cents $417,500 61 "Words" SUBTOTAL Items 1-61 Two Million Seven Hundred Fifteen Thousand Two Hundred Thirty Dollars and No Cents $2,715,230 "Words" CONTINGENCY 999994 CONTINGENCY LS 10% $271,523 $271,523 GRAND TOTAL Two Million Nine Hundred Eighty Six Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty Three Dollars and No Cents $2,986,753 "Words" Prepared by: MIKE MUETING 6/15/2011 Checked by Page 2 of 2 $ 98,000.0D $ 115,500.00 CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY CITY $ 17,500.00 $ 17,500.00 _ ADVERTISE&AWARD CO $ 11,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 0 11,000.00 $ - $ 2,000.00 $ 16,000.00 ADVERTISE&AWARD CJUSD $ 10,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 12,000.00 ADVERTISE&AWARD CITY $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CO $ 143,000.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 143,000.00 $ - $ - $ 23,000.00 $ 204,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CJUSD $ 138,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 138,000.00 $ 163,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CITY 5 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 SURVEY CO $ 51,000.00 $ 14,00100 $ 14,000.00 $ 51,000.00 $ - $ _ $ 9,000.00 $ 74,000.00 SURVEY CJUSD $ 49,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 49,000.00 $ 58,000.00 SURVEY CITY $ 9,00100 $ 9,000.00 $ 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Council Minutes 07/26/2011 Page 3 Councilmember Bernardo Sandoval, stated that the football stadium and tennis courts at GTHS were not going to be built until the new CJUSD Board Members came on and Grand Terrace got involved.Expressed concern that the Senior Center is not able'to put up a flag pole because CBH is not giving approval. Expressed his sadness at the passing of David Zamora, Mayor of Colton. He felt that Mayor Zamora was working to build a better relationship with Grand Terrace and the other Colton City Council members are also willing to work with Grand Terrace. He requested that the meeting be adjourned in memory of David Zamora. Councilmember Gene Hays, expressed appreciation for the top revenue producing small businesses in Grand Terrace. Councilmember Darcy McNaboe, CJUSD has announced the rehire of 72 employees that were laid off in May. Senator Bob Dutton recognizes small businesses in his district and this year Burt's Jewelry and Repair of Grand Terrace has made the list. She has received feedback from residents that everyone in the Council Chambers needs to be sure to speak into the microphones so they can be heard. Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Lee Ann Garcia, congratulated Burt's Jewelry and Repair for the award by Senator Dutton. She expressed her excitement about the High School opening in Grand Terrace next year. The new Stater Brothers will have expanded services. Mark your calendars for the opening on August 24t''.Staff is working on sustainability and hopefully we can get recognition for our work with the Stater Brothers project. Petta Park on Grand Terrace Road is beautiful, she thanked the staff for keeping the parks so well maintained. Little League opening is coming up. Pete Parsons does wonderful work on Radio am1640. It is our own radio station with public service announcements. The coverage on the passing of David Zamora was good. She thanked former Council Member Jim Miller for his work in recognizing David Zamora.She reported that the Sheriffs Department is doing a good job on their special projects in town. Assemblyman Mike Morrell is hosting,a business and economic meeting on August 4th in the City of Highland. Mayor Stanckiewitz,reported that there is a new business in Grand Terrace called Computer Clinic and encouraged everyone to use the local businesses.Wilden Pump is hosting a Blood Drive and bone marrow screening on Friday. He visited the Ronald Reagan memorial library and it is interesting to see how little political issues have changed. He encouraged everyone to pay attention and make changes in Washington. PUBLIC HEARINGS 6A. Resolution of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace Adopting Residential and Commercial Solid Waste Recycling Rates ° 00 60 719530 CURB DRAIN LF 40 $25.00 $1,000.00 61 152440 ADJUST MANHOLE TO GRADE EA 1 $500.00 $500.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 SUBTOTAL Items 49- Four Hundred Seventeen Thousand Five Hundred Dollars and No Cents $417,500 61 "Words" SUBTOTAL Items 1-61 Two Million Seven Hundred Fifteen Thousand Two Hundred Thirty Dollars and No Cents $2,715,230 "Words" CONTINGENCY 999994 CONTINGENCY LS 10% $271,523 $271,523 GRAND TOTAL Two Million Nine Hundred Eighty Six Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty Three Dollars and No Cents $2,986,753 "Words" Prepared by: MIKE MUETING 6/15/2011 Checked by Page 2 of 2 $ 98,000.0D $ 115,500.00 CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY CITY $ 17,500.00 $ 17,500.00 _ ADVERTISE&AWARD CO $ 11,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 0 11,000.00 $ - $ 2,000.00 $ 16,000.00 ADVERTISE&AWARD CJUSD $ 10,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 12,000.00 ADVERTISE&AWARD CITY $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CO $ 143,000.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 143,000.00 $ - $ - $ 23,000.00 $ 204,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CJUSD $ 138,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 138,000.00 $ 163,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CITY 5 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 SURVEY CO $ 51,000.00 $ 14,00100 $ 14,000.00 $ 51,000.00 $ - $ _ $ 9,000.00 $ 74,000.00 SURVEY CJUSD $ 49,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 49,000.00 $ 58,000.00 SURVEY CITY $ 9,00100 $ 9,000.00 $ 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Council Minutes 07/26/2011 Page 4 Matt Wirz,Management Analyst,indicated that Burrtec Waste Industries is requesting an adjustment in the residential and commercial service component that is based on the percentage change in the annual Consumer Price Index. Additionally, Burrtec is requesting a pass through of the adjusted increases in disposal and processing fees. Mayor Stanckiewitz opened the Public Hearing. ° Jeffrey McConnell, indicated that he has an issue with Burrtec forcing him to have two accounts because of a guest house. Mike Arreguin, Burrtec, indicated that he will work with staff and residents to resolve issues that need to be addressed. Mayor Stanckiewitz closed the Public Hearing and brought discussion back to Council. Council Member Sandoval, requested a rate comparison study. ° CC-2011-62 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER HAYS, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER SANDOVAL, CARRIED 5-0, to adopt a Resolution setting forth'residential and commercial solid waste and recycling rates. 6B. Barton Plaza Commercial Project ° An Ordinance of the City Council Adopting Zone Change 11-01 to Amend the Zoning Map by Re-Zoning 0.75 Acres located on the West Side of Mt. Vernon • Avenue and Approximately 400 Feet North of Barton Road from Administrative Professional to BRSP -Village Commercial ° An Ordinance of the City Council Adopting Specific Plan Amendment 11-01 to Incorporate 0.75 Acres located on the West Side of Mt. Vernon Avenue and Approximately 400 Feet North of Barton Road into the Barton Road Specific Plan Mayor Stanckiewitz opened the Public Hearing. Jeffiey McConnell, suggested using mixed use zoning throughout the community to prevent vacancies and promote development. Mayor Stanckiewitz closed the Public Hearing and returned discussion to the Council. ° CC-2011-63 MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM GARCIA, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER HAYS, CARRIED 5-0, to approve Tentative Parcel Map 11-01 and General Plan Amendment 11-01,and move to second reading an ordinance to adopt Zone Change ° Assemblyman Mike Morrell is hosting,a business and economic meeting on August 4th in the City of Highland. Mayor Stanckiewitz,reported that there is a new business in Grand Terrace called Computer Clinic and encouraged everyone to use the local businesses.Wilden Pump is hosting a Blood Drive and bone marrow screening on Friday. He visited the Ronald Reagan memorial library and it is interesting to see how little political issues have changed. He encouraged everyone to pay attention and make changes in Washington. PUBLIC HEARINGS 6A. Resolution of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace Adopting Residential and Commercial Solid Waste Recycling Rates ° 00 60 719530 CURB DRAIN LF 40 $25.00 $1,000.00 61 152440 ADJUST MANHOLE TO GRADE EA 1 $500.00 $500.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 SUBTOTAL Items 49- Four Hundred Seventeen Thousand Five Hundred Dollars and No Cents $417,500 61 "Words" SUBTOTAL Items 1-61 Two Million Seven Hundred Fifteen Thousand Two Hundred Thirty Dollars and No Cents $2,715,230 "Words" CONTINGENCY 999994 CONTINGENCY LS 10% $271,523 $271,523 GRAND TOTAL Two Million Nine Hundred Eighty Six Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty Three Dollars and No Cents $2,986,753 "Words" Prepared by: MIKE MUETING 6/15/2011 Checked by Page 2 of 2 $ 98,000.0D $ 115,500.00 CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY CITY $ 17,500.00 $ 17,500.00 _ ADVERTISE&AWARD CO $ 11,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 0 11,000.00 $ - $ 2,000.00 $ 16,000.00 ADVERTISE&AWARD CJUSD $ 10,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 12,000.00 ADVERTISE&AWARD CITY $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CO $ 143,000.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 143,000.00 $ - $ - $ 23,000.00 $ 204,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CJUSD $ 138,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 138,000.00 $ 163,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CITY 5 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 SURVEY CO $ 51,000.00 $ 14,00100 $ 14,000.00 $ 51,000.00 $ - $ _ $ 9,000.00 $ 74,000.00 SURVEY CJUSD $ 49,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 49,000.00 $ 58,000.00 SURVEY CITY $ 9,00100 $ 9,000.00 $ 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY • Council Minutes 07/26/2011 Page 5 a 11-01 and Specific Plan Amendment 11-01. 6C. An Ordinance of the City Council Electing to Comply with and Participate in the Alternative Voluntary Redevelopment Program Contained in Part 1.9 of Division 24 of the California Health and Safety Code City Manager Betsy Adams, reported that changes have been made to the Ordinance originally presented to the City Council on July 12th and indicated that this is the first reading of this ordinance. • She pointed out that the recommendation includes language that gives the City Manager authority to take action to implement this Ordinance. This is because the deadlines are tight.She would advise Council on any actions taken. Mark Huebsch,Special Counsel,indicated that the changes are being recommended to.achieve more , protection for the City. Mayor Stanckiewitz opened the Public Hearing, there being none, he returned discussion to the Council. Council requested regular updates on CRA developments. CC-2011-64 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER MC NABOE, SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER SANDOVAL, CARRIED 5-0, to approve the first`reading of an Ordinance Electing to Comply with and Participate in the Alternative Voluntary Redevelopment Program Contained in Part 1.9 of Division 24 of the California Health and Safety Code. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 7A. Second Reading - An Ordinance of the City Council Amending Title 18, Chapter 18.80 of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code by Amending in its Entirety Section 18.80.130 Political Signs and Adopting a New Section 18.80.130 Political Signs CC-2011-65 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER HAYS, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER MC NABOE, CARRIED 5-0,to adopt an ordinance of the City Council Amending Title 18, Chapter 18.80 of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code by Amending in its entirety Section 18.80.130 Political Signs and Adopting a New Section 18.80.130 Political Signs NEW BUSINESS 8A. Community Redevelopment Agency 5-year Cash Flow Analysis ° nd move to second reading an ordinance to adopt Zone Change ° Assemblyman Mike Morrell is hosting,a business and economic meeting on August 4th in the City of Highland. Mayor Stanckiewitz,reported that there is a new business in Grand Terrace called Computer Clinic and encouraged everyone to use the local businesses.Wilden Pump is hosting a Blood Drive and bone marrow screening on Friday. He visited the Ronald Reagan memorial library and it is interesting to see how little political issues have changed. He encouraged everyone to pay attention and make changes in Washington. PUBLIC HEARINGS 6A. Resolution of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace Adopting Residential and Commercial Solid Waste Recycling Rates ° 00 60 719530 CURB DRAIN LF 40 $25.00 $1,000.00 61 152440 ADJUST MANHOLE TO GRADE EA 1 $500.00 $500.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 SUBTOTAL Items 49- Four Hundred Seventeen Thousand Five Hundred Dollars and No Cents $417,500 61 "Words" SUBTOTAL Items 1-61 Two Million Seven Hundred Fifteen Thousand Two Hundred Thirty Dollars and No Cents $2,715,230 "Words" CONTINGENCY 999994 CONTINGENCY LS 10% $271,523 $271,523 GRAND TOTAL Two Million Nine Hundred Eighty Six Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty Three Dollars and No Cents $2,986,753 "Words" Prepared by: MIKE MUETING 6/15/2011 Checked by Page 2 of 2 $ 98,000.0D $ 115,500.00 CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY CITY $ 17,500.00 $ 17,500.00 _ ADVERTISE&AWARD CO $ 11,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 0 11,000.00 $ - $ 2,000.00 $ 16,000.00 ADVERTISE&AWARD CJUSD $ 10,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 12,000.00 ADVERTISE&AWARD CITY $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CO $ 143,000.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 143,000.00 $ - $ - $ 23,000.00 $ 204,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CJUSD $ 138,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 138,000.00 $ 163,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CITY 5 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 SURVEY CO $ 51,000.00 $ 14,00100 $ 14,000.00 $ 51,000.00 $ - $ _ $ 9,000.00 $ 74,000.00 SURVEY CJUSD $ 49,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 49,000.00 $ 58,000.00 SURVEY CITY $ 9,00100 $ 9,000.00 $ 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Council Minutes 07/26/2011 Page 6 • Alexa Smittle, Rosenow Spevacek Group Inc. (RSG), presented a 5-year cash flow model for the Agency to illustrate the impacts of funding the remittance payments required by Assembly Bill X1 27 through tax increment. The model was created to identify year-end cash available to make the remittance payments after funding existing obligations,based on a conservative forecast of prof ected_ tax increment and other revenues. 8B. Professional Services Agreement with Rosenow Spevacek Group, Inc. For Community Redevelopment Agency Fiscal Services Required by the City of Grand Terrace City Manager Betsy Adams,indicated that this agreement includes preparing updated Agency cash flows and presentation,prepare amended 2008-09 State Controller's Report,CJUSD Pass Through • Payments, Statutory Pass Through payments, analyzing and assembling the Appeal regarding the remittance payment and other services as directed by staff CC-2011-66 MOTION BY MAYOR STANCKIEWITZ,SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER MC NABOE,CARRIED 4-1 (COUNCILMEMBER HAYS VOTED NO),to approve the Professional Services Agreement,appropriate$14,560 from the General Fund for the services, and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement and to seek reimbursement from the Agency for these services when Agency activities are no longer suspended. 8C. Protest Hearing for Placement of Special Assessment Liens for Delinquent Refuse Accounts Matt Wirz,Management Analyst,reported that.a notice was mailed to all property owners who have delinquent refuse accounts and given an opportunity to pay their accounts. • Mary Cozort, indicated that she no longer owns the property listed in the report. Marvene Zinni,requested that the Council forgive the amount due on her propertyadue to personal difficulties. • Jeffrey McConnell, asked if there is an appeal process. Ms. Laesser, stated that she is happy with the service by Burrtec but suggested that they improve their billing systems explaining a billing error that she had to deal with. • Mike Arreguin, Burrtec, stated that he will work with the residents who have concerns. CC-2011-67 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER HAYS, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER MC NABOE,CARRIED 4-1 (COUNCILMEMBER SANDOVAL VOTED NO),to 0 yone to use the local businesses.Wilden Pump is hosting a Blood Drive and bone marrow screening on Friday. He visited the Ronald Reagan memorial library and it is interesting to see how little political issues have changed. He encouraged everyone to pay attention and make changes in Washington. PUBLIC HEARINGS 6A. Resolution of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace Adopting Residential and Commercial Solid Waste Recycling Rates ° 00 60 719530 CURB DRAIN LF 40 $25.00 $1,000.00 61 152440 ADJUST MANHOLE TO GRADE EA 1 $500.00 $500.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 SUBTOTAL Items 49- Four Hundred Seventeen Thousand Five Hundred Dollars and No Cents $417,500 61 "Words" SUBTOTAL Items 1-61 Two Million Seven Hundred Fifteen Thousand Two Hundred Thirty Dollars and No Cents $2,715,230 "Words" CONTINGENCY 999994 CONTINGENCY LS 10% $271,523 $271,523 GRAND TOTAL Two Million Nine Hundred Eighty Six Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty Three Dollars and No Cents $2,986,753 "Words" Prepared by: MIKE MUETING 6/15/2011 Checked by Page 2 of 2 $ 98,000.0D $ 115,500.00 CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY CITY $ 17,500.00 $ 17,500.00 _ ADVERTISE&AWARD CO $ 11,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 0 11,000.00 $ - $ 2,000.00 $ 16,000.00 ADVERTISE&AWARD CJUSD $ 10,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 12,000.00 ADVERTISE&AWARD CITY $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CO $ 143,000.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 143,000.00 $ - $ - $ 23,000.00 $ 204,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CJUSD $ 138,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 138,000.00 $ 163,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CITY 5 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 SURVEY CO $ 51,000.00 $ 14,00100 $ 14,000.00 $ 51,000.00 $ - $ _ $ 9,000.00 $ 74,000.00 SURVEY CJUSD $ 49,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 49,000.00 $ 58,000.00 SURVEY CITY $ 9,00100 $ 9,000.00 $ 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Council Minutes 07/26/2011 Page 7 , adopt a Resolution confirming delinquent charges for solid waste collection and authorize special assessments against the parcels listed. 8D. Seventeenth Amendment to Law Enforcement Services Contract No.94-797 with the County of San Bernardino and Update on Local Government Vehicle License Fee Funds, SEBA membership Vote and Corresponding Impacts to Half Funded Patrol Deputy Position It was the consensus of Council to direct staff to bring this item back with more°information on Sheriff's Deputy staffing levels and crime statistics. CLOSED SESSION 9A. Labor Negotiations Pursuant to GC 54957.6 Mayor Stanckiewitz announced that the Council met in Closed Session for Labor Negotiations Pursuant to GC 54957.6 and there was no reportable action taken. Mayor Stanckiewitz adjourned the meeting in memory of David Zamora, Mayor of the City of Colton,at 10:36 p.m.,until the next City Council Meeting which is scheduled to be held on Tuesday, August 9, 2011 at 6:00 p.m. CITY CLERK of the City of Grand Terrace MAYOR of the City of Grand Terrace l Services Agreement,appropriate$14,560 from the General Fund for the services, and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement and to seek reimbursement from the Agency for these services when Agency activities are no longer suspended. 8C. Protest Hearing for Placement of Special Assessment Liens for Delinquent Refuse Accounts Matt Wirz,Management Analyst,reported that.a notice was mailed to all property owners who have delinquent refuse accounts and given an opportunity to pay their accounts. • Mary Cozort, indicated that she no longer owns the property listed in the report. Marvene Zinni,requested that the Council forgive the amount due on her propertyadue to personal difficulties. • Jeffrey McConnell, asked if there is an appeal process. Ms. Laesser, stated that she is happy with the service by Burrtec but suggested that they improve their billing systems explaining a billing error that she had to deal with. • Mike Arreguin, Burrtec, stated that he will work with the residents who have concerns. CC-2011-67 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER HAYS, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER MC NABOE,CARRIED 4-1 (COUNCILMEMBER SANDOVAL VOTED NO),to 0 yone to use the local businesses.Wilden Pump is hosting a Blood Drive and bone marrow screening on Friday. He visited the Ronald Reagan memorial library and it is interesting to see how little political issues have changed. He encouraged everyone to pay attention and make changes in Washington. PUBLIC HEARINGS 6A. Resolution of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace Adopting Residential and Commercial Solid Waste Recycling Rates ° 00 60 719530 CURB DRAIN LF 40 $25.00 $1,000.00 61 152440 ADJUST MANHOLE TO GRADE EA 1 $500.00 $500.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 SUBTOTAL Items 49- Four Hundred Seventeen Thousand Five Hundred Dollars and No Cents $417,500 61 "Words" SUBTOTAL Items 1-61 Two Million Seven Hundred Fifteen Thousand Two Hundred Thirty Dollars and No Cents $2,715,230 "Words" CONTINGENCY 999994 CONTINGENCY LS 10% $271,523 $271,523 GRAND TOTAL Two Million Nine Hundred Eighty Six Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty Three Dollars and No Cents $2,986,753 "Words" Prepared by: MIKE MUETING 6/15/2011 Checked by Page 2 of 2 $ 98,000.0D $ 115,500.00 CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY CITY $ 17,500.00 $ 17,500.00 _ ADVERTISE&AWARD CO $ 11,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 0 11,000.00 $ - $ 2,000.00 $ 16,000.00 ADVERTISE&AWARD CJUSD $ 10,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 12,000.00 ADVERTISE&AWARD CITY $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CO $ 143,000.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 143,000.00 $ - $ - $ 23,000.00 $ 204,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CJUSD $ 138,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 138,000.00 $ 163,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CITY 5 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 SURVEY CO $ 51,000.00 $ 14,00100 $ 14,000.00 $ 51,000.00 $ - $ _ $ 9,000.00 $ 74,000.00 SURVEY CJUSD $ 49,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 49,000.00 $ 58,000.00 SURVEY CITY $ 9,00100 $ 9,000.00 $ 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY 7/26/2011 r ---—r e" -iea -- 6 w i" `dw a a f a p'"al c a�"i o a -uF-f. f A `F Is� rf °\ ve' � ', $ ,ram 8',TrO July 26,2011 r- r/1: • s fxa. e' is enter ..thil`a studexif stork "- LPodTenLcous ootball Stadium, all-weather track,JV&Varsity Softball and Baseball Site Design 1 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and the Official Seal of the City of this day of ,2011. Brenda Mesa, City Clerk 7 n 24 of the California Health and Safety Code ( ) 1/VS-1. ibit "A" June 8, 2010, Jurisdiction Master Agreement, No. C10246, Exhibit "B". a 7/26/2011 ;i {Yomc o f e % [/ a /t ' t= - D .J410 d . O d ,{ __ 1 oma._a4 __ • : r 1 3 I 4 ' t�* a I . -' . . ' tpy,l k, 4 C -1 I,_ 1 k--oa programs ._.. •'Full Sports programs: 44.4Atis • e..-yrv.,41,517t�a'N •Full activities program " I`~ 4--,......:;Na,..„, , TI Ed.k+::w',..c,,,, !,,s ' I Ii tr:..w:ry♦a t+4Vett Opening Plans 77 a m e, 0 i^ e. f! e r/"e. a /f Sj ` .• Courses listed are for i ' 2012/13 school year s.�3 tI �. -'-�J For grades 9Ih - 11t^. I . i' L 'i1'�^ 4 t'`" n Pure' 4' Additional courses will. I t�T i sIo10 a w � , " ., r: f� be offered iiI 2013/14.:: ' - Social Seienc ,..., t ._ P'• 4 i -^«. r f rs ubrs "_ =' ',-> ,. , .English I+English II 1 _",-y .„,, ._ World'History,US History. ' •Biology , •Physical Education •Anatomy&Physiology Introduction to Kinesiology, •Geometry Advanced Kinesiology •Algebra II •Elective Courses Curriculum Structure 2 for Delinquent Refuse Accounts Matt Wirz,Management Analyst,reported that.a notice was mailed to all property owners who have delinquent refuse accounts and given an opportunity to pay their accounts. • Mary Cozort, indicated that she no longer owns the property listed in the report. Marvene Zinni,requested that the Council forgive the amount due on her propertyadue to personal difficulties. • Jeffrey McConnell, asked if there is an appeal process. Ms. Laesser, stated that she is happy with the service by Burrtec but suggested that they improve their billing systems explaining a billing error that she had to deal with. • Mike Arreguin, Burrtec, stated that he will work with the residents who have concerns. CC-2011-67 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER HAYS, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER MC NABOE,CARRIED 4-1 (COUNCILMEMBER SANDOVAL VOTED NO),to 0 yone to use the local businesses.Wilden Pump is hosting a Blood Drive and bone marrow screening on Friday. He visited the Ronald Reagan memorial library and it is interesting to see how little political issues have changed. He encouraged everyone to pay attention and make changes in Washington. PUBLIC HEARINGS 6A. Resolution of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace Adopting Residential and Commercial Solid Waste Recycling Rates ° 00 60 719530 CURB DRAIN LF 40 $25.00 $1,000.00 61 152440 ADJUST MANHOLE TO GRADE EA 1 $500.00 $500.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 SUBTOTAL Items 49- Four Hundred Seventeen Thousand Five Hundred Dollars and No Cents $417,500 61 "Words" SUBTOTAL Items 1-61 Two Million Seven Hundred Fifteen Thousand Two Hundred Thirty Dollars and No Cents $2,715,230 "Words" CONTINGENCY 999994 CONTINGENCY LS 10% $271,523 $271,523 GRAND TOTAL Two Million Nine Hundred Eighty Six Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty Three Dollars and No Cents $2,986,753 "Words" Prepared by: MIKE MUETING 6/15/2011 Checked by Page 2 of 2 $ 98,000.0D $ 115,500.00 CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY CITY $ 17,500.00 $ 17,500.00 _ ADVERTISE&AWARD CO $ 11,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 0 11,000.00 $ - $ 2,000.00 $ 16,000.00 ADVERTISE&AWARD CJUSD $ 10,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 12,000.00 ADVERTISE&AWARD CITY $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CO $ 143,000.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 143,000.00 $ - $ - $ 23,000.00 $ 204,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CJUSD $ 138,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 138,000.00 $ 163,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CITY 5 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 SURVEY CO $ 51,000.00 $ 14,00100 $ 14,000.00 $ 51,000.00 $ - $ _ $ 9,000.00 $ 74,000.00 SURVEY CJUSD $ 49,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 49,000.00 $ 58,000.00 SURVEY CITY $ 9,00100 $ 9,000.00 $ 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY 7/26/2011 f r r; T/ or e a ' 4I, �reaAe 4'7, w"J J J J J w e J 8r .�J r,,,,_ t:. 0 0 0 fP7 cs3 Off`®, j t' d :O®, ititii i i� ' 1 i �� ip oOo Lr�l 111 i I Interactive Student Student Voice Document Whiteboards Tablets Response Enhancement Cameras Entry Systems Systems Technology i.• r Y f TI0MaI QFr t4!6 7it4 -s - J - . t J j t c141- 1 4 t CC.o3`.l e�nt Y --�p 1 J j' '". a e gb. = N., ,4 • ..,' N ;t' - #,.,Q, r r, am;"§ �,- ; Allm-house, qualified applicants will' w receive an interview in accordance with current contract language. Staffing 3 be offered iiI 2013/14.:: ' - Social Seienc ,..., t ._ P'• 4 i -^«. r f rs ubrs "_ =' ',-> ,. , .English I+English II 1 _",-y .„,, ._ World'History,US History. ' •Biology , •Physical Education •Anatomy&Physiology Introduction to Kinesiology, •Geometry Advanced Kinesiology •Algebra II •Elective Courses Curriculum Structure 2 for Delinquent Refuse Accounts Matt Wirz,Management Analyst,reported that.a notice was mailed to all property owners who have delinquent refuse accounts and given an opportunity to pay their accounts. • Mary Cozort, indicated that she no longer owns the property listed in the report. Marvene Zinni,requested that the Council forgive the amount due on her propertyadue to personal difficulties. • Jeffrey McConnell, asked if there is an appeal process. Ms. Laesser, stated that she is happy with the service by Burrtec but suggested that they improve their billing systems explaining a billing error that she had to deal with. • Mike Arreguin, Burrtec, stated that he will work with the residents who have concerns. CC-2011-67 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER HAYS, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER MC NABOE,CARRIED 4-1 (COUNCILMEMBER SANDOVAL VOTED NO),to 0 yone to use the local businesses.Wilden Pump is hosting a Blood Drive and bone marrow screening on Friday. He visited the Ronald Reagan memorial library and it is interesting to see how little political issues have changed. He encouraged everyone to pay attention and make changes in Washington. PUBLIC HEARINGS 6A. Resolution of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace Adopting Residential and Commercial Solid Waste Recycling Rates ° 00 60 719530 CURB DRAIN LF 40 $25.00 $1,000.00 61 152440 ADJUST MANHOLE TO GRADE EA 1 $500.00 $500.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 SUBTOTAL Items 49- Four Hundred Seventeen Thousand Five Hundred Dollars and No Cents $417,500 61 "Words" SUBTOTAL Items 1-61 Two Million Seven Hundred Fifteen Thousand Two Hundred Thirty Dollars and No Cents $2,715,230 "Words" CONTINGENCY 999994 CONTINGENCY LS 10% $271,523 $271,523 GRAND TOTAL Two Million Nine Hundred Eighty Six Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty Three Dollars and No Cents $2,986,753 "Words" Prepared by: MIKE MUETING 6/15/2011 Checked by Page 2 of 2 $ 98,000.0D $ 115,500.00 CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY CITY $ 17,500.00 $ 17,500.00 _ ADVERTISE&AWARD CO $ 11,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 0 11,000.00 $ - $ 2,000.00 $ 16,000.00 ADVERTISE&AWARD CJUSD $ 10,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 12,000.00 ADVERTISE&AWARD CITY $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CO $ 143,000.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 143,000.00 $ - $ - $ 23,000.00 $ 204,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CJUSD $ 138,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 138,000.00 $ 163,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CITY 5 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 SURVEY CO $ 51,000.00 $ 14,00100 $ 14,000.00 $ 51,000.00 $ - $ _ $ 9,000.00 $ 74,000.00 SURVEY CJUSD $ 49,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 49,000.00 $ 58,000.00 SURVEY CITY $ 9,00100 $ 9,000.00 $ 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY 7/26/2011 {goitre of tke 7Tri' axe If angela cllschinged�ir,cjusd.net . 'V ."` iw�t.gliV ---, Q to !6.rw 1 is ,C itlx�,- t . wivw.colton rvk12.ca.us : ..., o Grand School J �t'i ° nwill aunch its own'website - °^--- „ ,0.,. 2 early August! ' Communications TI n Nr e o I J -/ eft 6 / % Cr a a Football a Girls Volleyball Girls Tennis T' Boys/Girls Cross Country Boys Water Polo SUNKIST LEAGUE Boys Basketball 2012/13 Girls Basketball , Colton HS .J, W Girls Tennis t:15- `r= ZBoys Soccer Bloomington HS y i 3 Girls Soccer Grand Terrace HS , Co-Ed Wrestling s?� . s ' Summit HS Girls Water Polo i Kaiser HS 1 Baseball Softball s - Sample Rendering 1.4 Fontana HS Via. a !, + -. A Z Boys Tennis , Y tx Swimming CI, to Boys/Girls Track Boys Volleyball Cheerleading&Dance Team Athletics 4 on to Kinesiology, •Geometry Advanced Kinesiology •Algebra II •Elective Courses Curriculum Structure 2 for Delinquent Refuse Accounts Matt Wirz,Management Analyst,reported that.a notice was mailed to all property owners who have delinquent refuse accounts and given an opportunity to pay their accounts. • Mary Cozort, indicated that she no longer owns the property listed in the report. Marvene Zinni,requested that the Council forgive the amount due on her propertyadue to personal difficulties. • Jeffrey McConnell, asked if there is an appeal process. Ms. Laesser, stated that she is happy with the service by Burrtec but suggested that they improve their billing systems explaining a billing error that she had to deal with. • Mike Arreguin, Burrtec, stated that he will work with the residents who have concerns. CC-2011-67 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER HAYS, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER MC NABOE,CARRIED 4-1 (COUNCILMEMBER SANDOVAL VOTED NO),to 0 yone to use the local businesses.Wilden Pump is hosting a Blood Drive and bone marrow screening on Friday. He visited the Ronald Reagan memorial library and it is interesting to see how little political issues have changed. He encouraged everyone to pay attention and make changes in Washington. PUBLIC HEARINGS 6A. Resolution of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace Adopting Residential and Commercial Solid Waste Recycling Rates ° 00 60 719530 CURB DRAIN LF 40 $25.00 $1,000.00 61 152440 ADJUST MANHOLE TO GRADE EA 1 $500.00 $500.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 SUBTOTAL Items 49- Four Hundred Seventeen Thousand Five Hundred Dollars and No Cents $417,500 61 "Words" SUBTOTAL Items 1-61 Two Million Seven Hundred Fifteen Thousand Two Hundred Thirty Dollars and No Cents $2,715,230 "Words" CONTINGENCY 999994 CONTINGENCY LS 10% $271,523 $271,523 GRAND TOTAL Two Million Nine Hundred Eighty Six Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty Three Dollars and No Cents $2,986,753 "Words" Prepared by: MIKE MUETING 6/15/2011 Checked by Page 2 of 2 $ 98,000.0D $ 115,500.00 CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY CITY $ 17,500.00 $ 17,500.00 _ ADVERTISE&AWARD CO $ 11,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 0 11,000.00 $ - $ 2,000.00 $ 16,000.00 ADVERTISE&AWARD CJUSD $ 10,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 12,000.00 ADVERTISE&AWARD CITY $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CO $ 143,000.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 143,000.00 $ - $ - $ 23,000.00 $ 204,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CJUSD $ 138,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 138,000.00 $ 163,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CITY 5 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 SURVEY CO $ 51,000.00 $ 14,00100 $ 14,000.00 $ 51,000.00 $ - $ _ $ 9,000.00 $ 74,000.00 SURVEY CJUSD $ 49,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 49,000.00 $ 58,000.00 SURVEY CITY $ 9,00100 $ 9,000.00 $ 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY S . . . .. . - - - - - ' . _ __ , '.,:,,, - . = i i i --• %-.7,1%., \''':',--.-',-:.,---1..,-4-zi-,!-AAT,„1-,,,:.-5.,F-t-Tt,' 4, . _ . 0- • '. . I' I''''... ),i\"\\ ' 1.•-: p , ,,,i „ „ I ...„.„.. - =: r ) :1:: 111 0# i1 1 I [ ' - - , I 1 0 Z/9 Z/L , f • S: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and the Official Seal of the City of this day of ,2011. Brenda Mesa, City Clerk 7 n 24 of the California Health and Safety Code ( ) 1/VS-1. ibit "A" June 8, 2010, Jurisdiction Master Agreement, No. C10246, Exhibit "B". The Blue Mountain CO \`r GCALIFORNIAland Terrace AGENDA REPORT MEETING DATE: July 26, 2011 Council Item (X) CRA Item ( ) TITLE: Check Register No. 07-26-2011 PRESENTED BY: Bernie Simon, Finance Director RECOMMENDATION: Approve BACKGROUND: The Check Register for July 26, 2011 is presented in accordance with Government Code §37202. The attached index to the warrant register is a guideline account list only and is not intended to replace the voluminous list of accounts used by the City and CRA. Expenditure account number formats are XX-XXX-XXX [Fund-Depart-General Account]. Expenditures may be made from trust/agency accounts (fund 23-xxx-) or temporary clearing accounts which do not have budgetary considerations. DISCUSSION: A total of $73,498.99 in accounts payable checks was issued during the period for services, reimbursements, supplies and contracts and are detailed in the attached Check Register sections. 7/26/2011 FY 10-11 Check Register $28,937.96 7/26/2011 FY 11-12 Check Register $44,561.03 Payroll costs for the period amounted to $60,096.77 and are summarized below. Some of the non-routine items include: 66974 Raina Boal Reimbursement for Community Day Purchases $414.70 66989 Dell Marketing DIM 8400 Motherboard $239.24 COUNCIL.AGENDA ITEM NO. 34 re 2 for Delinquent Refuse Accounts Matt Wirz,Management Analyst,reported that.a notice was mailed to all property owners who have delinquent refuse accounts and given an opportunity to pay their accounts. • Mary Cozort, indicated that she no longer owns the property listed in the report. Marvene Zinni,requested that the Council forgive the amount due on her propertyadue to personal difficulties. • Jeffrey McConnell, asked if there is an appeal process. Ms. Laesser, stated that she is happy with the service by Burrtec but suggested that they improve their billing systems explaining a billing error that she had to deal with. • Mike Arreguin, Burrtec, stated that he will work with the residents who have concerns. CC-2011-67 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER HAYS, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER MC NABOE,CARRIED 4-1 (COUNCILMEMBER SANDOVAL VOTED NO),to 0 yone to use the local businesses.Wilden Pump is hosting a Blood Drive and bone marrow screening on Friday. He visited the Ronald Reagan memorial library and it is interesting to see how little political issues have changed. He encouraged everyone to pay attention and make changes in Washington. PUBLIC HEARINGS 6A. Resolution of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace Adopting Residential and Commercial Solid Waste Recycling Rates ° 00 60 719530 CURB DRAIN LF 40 $25.00 $1,000.00 61 152440 ADJUST MANHOLE TO GRADE EA 1 $500.00 $500.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 SUBTOTAL Items 49- Four Hundred Seventeen Thousand Five Hundred Dollars and No Cents $417,500 61 "Words" SUBTOTAL Items 1-61 Two Million Seven Hundred Fifteen Thousand Two Hundred Thirty Dollars and No Cents $2,715,230 "Words" CONTINGENCY 999994 CONTINGENCY LS 10% $271,523 $271,523 GRAND TOTAL Two Million Nine Hundred Eighty Six Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty Three Dollars and No Cents $2,986,753 "Words" Prepared by: MIKE MUETING 6/15/2011 Checked by Page 2 of 2 $ 98,000.0D $ 115,500.00 CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY CITY $ 17,500.00 $ 17,500.00 _ ADVERTISE&AWARD CO $ 11,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 0 11,000.00 $ - $ 2,000.00 $ 16,000.00 ADVERTISE&AWARD CJUSD $ 10,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 12,000.00 ADVERTISE&AWARD CITY $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CO $ 143,000.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 143,000.00 $ - $ - $ 23,000.00 $ 204,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CJUSD $ 138,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 138,000.00 $ 163,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CITY 5 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 SURVEY CO $ 51,000.00 $ 14,00100 $ 14,000.00 $ 51,000.00 $ - $ _ $ 9,000.00 $ 74,000.00 SURVEY CJUSD $ 49,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 49,000.00 $ 58,000.00 SURVEY CITY $ 9,00100 $ 9,000.00 $ 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY 66994 Nichols SB90 Filing Cost Reimbursement Payment# 1 $1,200.00 Consulting Some the larger items include: 66976 Ace Weed Weed Abatement Services (Multiple Invoices) $4,769.16 Abatement Payroll costs processed for period ending July 8, 2011: Date Period Payroll and payroll costs 07/08/11 Biweekly $60,096.77 FISCAL IMPACT: All disbursements are made in accordance with the adopted budget for FY 2010-11 and FY 2011-12. Respectfully submitted, Bernie Simon Finance Director Manager Approval: Betsy/M. Ad ms City Manager ATTACHMENTS: Check Registers—July 26, 2011 Brenda Mesa, City Clerk 7 n 24 of the California Health and Safety Code ( ) 1/VS-1. ibit "A" June 8, 2010, Jurisdiction Master Agreement, No. C10246, Exhibit "B". vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 07/19/2011 4:38:47PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code : bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 66969 7/12/2011 010050 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 103934 Relocate 2 Street Lights-New Staters 32-600-212-000-000 1,742.75 Total : 1,742.75 66974 7/14/2011 011078 BOAL, RAINA 07062011 Reimburse-Community Day Purchases 23-200-12-00 414 70 Total : 414.70 66975 7/14/2011 003210 DEPT 32-2500233683 1124294 CERT EMERG. EQUIPMENT 10-808-221-000-000 626 62 1124296 MAINT SUPPLIES 10-195-245-000-000 17 06 7012171 Maint Supplies 10-195-245-000-000 39 91 10-440-245-000-000 25.02 9013753 MAINT SUPPLIES 10-450-245-000-000 73.80 Total : 782.41 66976 7/18/2011 011188 ACE WEED ABATEMENT, INC. 100 WEED ABATEMENT SRVS 1167-151-62 10-180-257-000-000 1,776 05 101 WEED ABATEMENT SRVS 1167-151-61 10-180-257-000-000 1,062 05 105 WEED ABATEMENT SRVS 1167-231-01 10-180-257-000-000 490 54 107 WEED ABATEMENT SRVS 0275-242-10 10-180-257-000-000 300 35 108 WEED ABATEMENT SRVS 0275-242-11 10-180-257-000-000 326 17 109 WEED ABATEMENT SRVS 1167-161-03 10-180-257-000-000 814 00 Total : 4,769.16 66977 7/19/2011 010218 CHEVRON &TEXACO CARD SERVICES 30578930 June Vehicle Fuel 34-800-272-000-000 24 68 10-175-272-000-000 314 00 Page: 1 \\J 11 vice by Burrtec but suggested that they improve their billing systems explaining a billing error that she had to deal with. • Mike Arreguin, Burrtec, stated that he will work with the residents who have concerns. CC-2011-67 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER HAYS, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER MC NABOE,CARRIED 4-1 (COUNCILMEMBER SANDOVAL VOTED NO),to 0 yone to use the local businesses.Wilden Pump is hosting a Blood Drive and bone marrow screening on Friday. He visited the Ronald Reagan memorial library and it is interesting to see how little political issues have changed. He encouraged everyone to pay attention and make changes in Washington. PUBLIC HEARINGS 6A. Resolution of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace Adopting Residential and Commercial Solid Waste Recycling Rates ° 00 60 719530 CURB DRAIN LF 40 $25.00 $1,000.00 61 152440 ADJUST MANHOLE TO GRADE EA 1 $500.00 $500.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 SUBTOTAL Items 49- Four Hundred Seventeen Thousand Five Hundred Dollars and No Cents $417,500 61 "Words" SUBTOTAL Items 1-61 Two Million Seven Hundred Fifteen Thousand Two Hundred Thirty Dollars and No Cents $2,715,230 "Words" CONTINGENCY 999994 CONTINGENCY LS 10% $271,523 $271,523 GRAND TOTAL Two Million Nine Hundred Eighty Six Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty Three Dollars and No Cents $2,986,753 "Words" Prepared by: MIKE MUETING 6/15/2011 Checked by Page 2 of 2 $ 98,000.0D $ 115,500.00 CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY CITY $ 17,500.00 $ 17,500.00 _ ADVERTISE&AWARD CO $ 11,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 0 11,000.00 $ - $ 2,000.00 $ 16,000.00 ADVERTISE&AWARD CJUSD $ 10,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 12,000.00 ADVERTISE&AWARD CITY $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CO $ 143,000.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 143,000.00 $ - $ - $ 23,000.00 $ 204,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CJUSD $ 138,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 138,000.00 $ 163,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CITY 5 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 SURVEY CO $ 51,000.00 $ 14,00100 $ 14,000.00 $ 51,000.00 $ - $ _ $ 9,000.00 $ 74,000.00 SURVEY CJUSD $ 49,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 49,000.00 $ 58,000.00 SURVEY CITY $ 9,00100 $ 9,000.00 $ 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY vchlist Voucher List Page: 2 07/19/2011 4:38:47PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code : bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 66977 7/19/2011 010218 CHEVRON &TEXACO CARD SERVICES (Continued) Total : 338.68 66978 7/19/2011 006720 SO CA.EDISON COMPANY June 2011 June Energy Usage 16-510-238-000-000 5,479.96 26-600-238-000-000 49.80 26-601-238-000-000 41.50 26-602-238-000-000 - 58.10 Total : 5,629.36 66979 7/19/2011 011138 SPARKLETTS 9637116 070111 June Bottled Water 10-190-238-000-000 93.24 10-450-238-000-000 10.43 10-805-238-000-000 18 41 10-440-238-000-000 79.75 Total : 201.83 66980 7/19/2011 006730 SO CA.GAS COMPANY June 2011 June Natural Gas Usage 10-190-238-000-000 226 42 10-440-238-000-000 49 58 10-175-272-000-000 7 80 10-440-272-000-000 2.60 34-800-272-000-000 2.60 Total : 289.00 66983 7/26/2011 011017 CA. BLDG STANDARDS COMMISSION 4th Qtr 2010-20'4th Qtr Green Building Standards Fee 10-700-01 -11.40 23-200-23-00 114.00 Total : 102.60 66984 7/26/2011 011031 CINTAS CORPORATION #150 150397151 C. CARE PAPER GOODS &SUPPLIES 10-440-228-000-000 125.99 150406199 C. CARE PAPER GOODS &SUPPLIES 10-440-228-000-000 199.60 Total : 325.59 66985 7/26/2011 001840 CITY OF COLTON 001053 April Flow Meter/Trunkline Monitoring 21-573-704-000-000 200.00 21-573-605-000-000 2,716 80 Page: 2 explaining a billing error that she had to deal with. • Mike Arreguin, Burrtec, stated that he will work with the residents who have concerns. CC-2011-67 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER HAYS, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER MC NABOE,CARRIED 4-1 (COUNCILMEMBER SANDOVAL VOTED NO),to 0 yone to use the local businesses.Wilden Pump is hosting a Blood Drive and bone marrow screening on Friday. He visited the Ronald Reagan memorial library and it is interesting to see how little political issues have changed. He encouraged everyone to pay attention and make changes in Washington. PUBLIC HEARINGS 6A. Resolution of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace Adopting Residential and Commercial Solid Waste Recycling Rates ° 00 60 719530 CURB DRAIN LF 40 $25.00 $1,000.00 61 152440 ADJUST MANHOLE TO GRADE EA 1 $500.00 $500.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 SUBTOTAL Items 49- Four Hundred Seventeen Thousand Five Hundred Dollars and No Cents $417,500 61 "Words" SUBTOTAL Items 1-61 Two Million Seven Hundred Fifteen Thousand Two Hundred Thirty Dollars and No Cents $2,715,230 "Words" CONTINGENCY 999994 CONTINGENCY LS 10% $271,523 $271,523 GRAND TOTAL Two Million Nine Hundred Eighty Six Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty Three Dollars and No Cents $2,986,753 "Words" Prepared by: MIKE MUETING 6/15/2011 Checked by Page 2 of 2 $ 98,000.0D $ 115,500.00 CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY CITY $ 17,500.00 $ 17,500.00 _ ADVERTISE&AWARD CO $ 11,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 0 11,000.00 $ - $ 2,000.00 $ 16,000.00 ADVERTISE&AWARD CJUSD $ 10,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 12,000.00 ADVERTISE&AWARD CITY $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CO $ 143,000.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 143,000.00 $ - $ - $ 23,000.00 $ 204,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CJUSD $ 138,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 138,000.00 $ 163,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CITY 5 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 SURVEY CO $ 51,000.00 $ 14,00100 $ 14,000.00 $ 51,000.00 $ - $ _ $ 9,000.00 $ 74,000.00 SURVEY CJUSD $ 49,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 49,000.00 $ 58,000.00 SURVEY CITY $ 9,00100 $ 9,000.00 $ 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY vchlist Voucher List Page: 3 07/19/2011 4:38:47PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE • Bank code : bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 66985 7/26/2011 001840 CITY OF COLTON (Continued) Total : 2,916.80 66986 7/26/2011 011029 COBRA SIMPLE 115 June COBRA Administration Fee 10-190-220-000-000 50.00 Total : 50.00 66987 7/26/2011 011166 CORNERSTONE RECORDS MANAGEMEI 0163649 JUNE ARCHIVE TAPE STORAGE 10-140-250-000-000 56.65 10-380-250-000-000 56.65 Total : 113.30 66988 7/26/2011 001942 DATA TICKET INC. 36623 May Parking Cite Processing Services 10-140-255-000-000 100.00 Total : 100.00 66989 7/26/2011 001960 DELL MARKETING L.P. XFCTNXC92 DIM 8400 MOTHERBOARD 10-380-249-000-000 239.24 Total : 239.24 66990 7/26/2011 002301 FEDEX 7-554-58259 June Document Delivery 10-125-210-000-000 25.46 10-370-210-000-000 67 57 Total : 93.03 66991 7/26/2011 003216 HOUSTON & HARRIS PCS, INC. 11-16633 HYDROWASH-BARTON ROAD EMERGENCY 21-573-602-000-000 415.00 Total : 415.00 66992 7/26/2011 010773 KELLAR SWEEPING INC. 6027 JUNE STREET SWEEPING SERVICES 16-900-254-000-000 4,200.00 Total : 4,200.00 66993 7/26/2011 011158 L-1 ENROLLMENT SERVICES June 360910764 June Fingerprints-P. Saragent 10-440-228-000-000 92.00 Total : 92.00 66994 7/26/2011 011205 NICHOLS CONSULTING 2012-9836337-0 SB90 Cost Reim Filing Payment# 1 10-190-220-000-000 1,200.00 Page: 3 ge: 2 explaining a billing error that she had to deal with. • Mike Arreguin, Burrtec, stated that he will work with the residents who have concerns. CC-2011-67 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER HAYS, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER MC NABOE,CARRIED 4-1 (COUNCILMEMBER SANDOVAL VOTED NO),to 0 yone to use the local businesses.Wilden Pump is hosting a Blood Drive and bone marrow screening on Friday. He visited the Ronald Reagan memorial library and it is interesting to see how little political issues have changed. He encouraged everyone to pay attention and make changes in Washington. PUBLIC HEARINGS 6A. Resolution of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace Adopting Residential and Commercial Solid Waste Recycling Rates ° 00 60 719530 CURB DRAIN LF 40 $25.00 $1,000.00 61 152440 ADJUST MANHOLE TO GRADE EA 1 $500.00 $500.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 SUBTOTAL Items 49- Four Hundred Seventeen Thousand Five Hundred Dollars and No Cents $417,500 61 "Words" SUBTOTAL Items 1-61 Two Million Seven Hundred Fifteen Thousand Two Hundred Thirty Dollars and No Cents $2,715,230 "Words" CONTINGENCY 999994 CONTINGENCY LS 10% $271,523 $271,523 GRAND TOTAL Two Million Nine Hundred Eighty Six Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty Three Dollars and No Cents $2,986,753 "Words" Prepared by: MIKE MUETING 6/15/2011 Checked by Page 2 of 2 $ 98,000.0D $ 115,500.00 CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY CITY $ 17,500.00 $ 17,500.00 _ ADVERTISE&AWARD CO $ 11,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 0 11,000.00 $ - $ 2,000.00 $ 16,000.00 ADVERTISE&AWARD CJUSD $ 10,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 12,000.00 ADVERTISE&AWARD CITY $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CO $ 143,000.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 143,000.00 $ - $ - $ 23,000.00 $ 204,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CJUSD $ 138,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 138,000.00 $ 163,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CITY 5 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 SURVEY CO $ 51,000.00 $ 14,00100 $ 14,000.00 $ 51,000.00 $ - $ _ $ 9,000.00 $ 74,000.00 SURVEY CJUSD $ 49,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 49,000.00 $ 58,000.00 SURVEY CITY $ 9,00100 $ 9,000.00 $ 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY vchlist Voucher List Page: 4 07/19/2011 4:38:47PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code : bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 66994 7/26/2011 011205 NICHOLS CONSULTING (Continued) Total : 1,200.00 66995 7/26/2011 011074 REDFLEX TRAFFIC SYSTEMS 32002 May Contract Services 17-900-255-000-000 3,092.71 Total : 3,092.71 66996 7/26/2011 010171 REPUBLIC ITS INC RR-113253 JUNE ROUTINE SIGNAL MAINTENANCE 16-510-255-000-000 451.68 RR-113254 June Response Call-outs 16-510-255-000-000 194.62 Total : 646.30 66997 7/26/2011 007034 TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING 1128 May Traffic Engineering Services 10-175-255-000-000 1,067.00 Total : 1,067.00 66998 7/26/2011 007220 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT 620110292 June Dig Alert Tickets 16-900-220-000-000 54 00 Total : 54.00 66999 7/26/2011 010693 UNITED WAY PR End 6/24/11 PR End 6/24/2011 Donations 10-022-65-00 62.50 Total : 62.50 25 Vouchers for bank code : bofa Bank total : 28,937.96 25 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 28,937.96 Page. 4 992 7/26/2011 010773 KELLAR SWEEPING INC. 6027 JUNE STREET SWEEPING SERVICES 16-900-254-000-000 4,200.00 Total : 4,200.00 66993 7/26/2011 011158 L-1 ENROLLMENT SERVICES June 360910764 June Fingerprints-P. Saragent 10-440-228-000-000 92.00 Total : 92.00 66994 7/26/2011 011205 NICHOLS CONSULTING 2012-9836337-0 SB90 Cost Reim Filing Payment# 1 10-190-220-000-000 1,200.00 Page: 3 ge: 2 explaining a billing error that she had to deal with. • Mike Arreguin, Burrtec, stated that he will work with the residents who have concerns. CC-2011-67 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER HAYS, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER MC NABOE,CARRIED 4-1 (COUNCILMEMBER SANDOVAL VOTED NO),to 0 yone to use the local businesses.Wilden Pump is hosting a Blood Drive and bone marrow screening on Friday. He visited the Ronald Reagan memorial library and it is interesting to see how little political issues have changed. He encouraged everyone to pay attention and make changes in Washington. PUBLIC HEARINGS 6A. Resolution of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace Adopting Residential and Commercial Solid Waste Recycling Rates ° 00 60 719530 CURB DRAIN LF 40 $25.00 $1,000.00 61 152440 ADJUST MANHOLE TO GRADE EA 1 $500.00 $500.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 SUBTOTAL Items 49- Four Hundred Seventeen Thousand Five Hundred Dollars and No Cents $417,500 61 "Words" SUBTOTAL Items 1-61 Two Million Seven Hundred Fifteen Thousand Two Hundred Thirty Dollars and No Cents $2,715,230 "Words" CONTINGENCY 999994 CONTINGENCY LS 10% $271,523 $271,523 GRAND TOTAL Two Million Nine Hundred Eighty Six Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty Three Dollars and No Cents $2,986,753 "Words" Prepared by: MIKE MUETING 6/15/2011 Checked by Page 2 of 2 $ 98,000.0D $ 115,500.00 CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY CITY $ 17,500.00 $ 17,500.00 _ ADVERTISE&AWARD CO $ 11,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 0 11,000.00 $ - $ 2,000.00 $ 16,000.00 ADVERTISE&AWARD CJUSD $ 10,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 12,000.00 ADVERTISE&AWARD CITY $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CO $ 143,000.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 143,000.00 $ - $ - $ 23,000.00 $ 204,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CJUSD $ 138,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 138,000.00 $ 163,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CITY 5 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 SURVEY CO $ 51,000.00 $ 14,00100 $ 14,000.00 $ 51,000.00 $ - $ _ $ 9,000.00 $ 74,000.00 SURVEY CJUSD $ 49,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 49,000.00 $ 58,000.00 SURVEY CITY $ 9,00100 $ 9,000.00 $ 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the afore-listed checks Tor payment of City and Community Redevelopment Agency liabilities have been audited by me and are necessary and appropriate for the operation of City and Agency. Bernie Simon, Finance Director 1: Date Period Payroll and payroll costs 07/08/11 Biweekly $60,096.77 FISCAL IMPACT: All disbursements are made in accordance with the adopted budget for FY 2010-11 and FY 2011-12. Respectfully submitted, Bernie Simon Finance Director Manager Approval: Betsy/M. Ad ms City Manager ATTACHMENTS: Check Registers—July 26, 2011 Brenda Mesa, City Clerk 7 n 24 of the California Health and Safety Code ( ) 1/VS-1. ibit "A" June 8, 2010, Jurisdiction Master Agreement, No. C10246, Exhibit "B". City of Grand Terrace Warrant Register Index FD No. Fund Name Dept No. Department Name General Account Numbers 10 GENERAL FUND 110 CITY COUNCIL 110 SALARIES/WAGES 11 STREET FUND 120 CITY MANAGER 139 EMPLOYEES'BENEFIT PLAN 12 STORM DRAIN FUND 125 CITY CLERK 140 RETIREMENT 13 PARK FUND 140 FINANCE 142 HEALTH/LIFE INSURANCE 14 AB 3229 COPS FUND 160 CITY ATTORNEY 143 WORKERS'COMPENSATION 15 AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT FUND 172 BUILDING&SAFETY 138/141 MEDICARE/SUI 16 GAS TAX FUND 175 PUBLIC WORKS 210 OFFICE EXPENSE 17 TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND/TDA FUND 180 COMMUNITY EVENTS 218-219 NON-CAPITAL FURN/SMALL TOOLS 19 FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT FUND 185 RENTAL INSPECTION PROGRAM 220 SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL EXP 20 MEASURE I FUND 190 GENERAL GOVERNMENT(NON-DEPT) 230 ADVERTISING 21 WASTE WATER DISPOSAL FUND 195 FACILITIES MAINTENANCE 235 COMMUNICATIONS 22 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT 370 COMMUNITY&ECONOMIC DEV 238-239 UTILITIES 26 LSCPG/LGHTG ASSESSMENT DIST. 380 MGT INFORMATION SYSTEMS 240-242 RENTS&LEASES 44 BIKE LANE CAPITAL FUND 410 LAW ENFORCEMENT 245-246 MAINT BLDG GRNDS EQUIPMNT 46 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS 430 RECREATION SERVICES 250-251 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 47 BARTON RD.BRIDGE PROJECT 440 CHILD CARE 255-256 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 32 CRA-CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND 450 PARKS MAINTENANCE 260 INSURANCE&SURETY BONDS 33 CRA-DEBT SERVICE FUND 631 STORM DRAIN MAINTENANCE 265 MEMBERSHIPS&DUES 34 CRA-LOW&MOD HOUSING 801 PLANNING COMMISSION 268 TRAINING 802 CRIME PREVENTION UNIT 270 TRAVEUCONFERENCES/MTGS 804 HISTORICAL&CULTURAL COMM. 272 FUEL&VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 805 SENIOR CITIZENS PROGRAM 570 WASTEWATER TREATMENT 807 PARKS&REC COMMITTEE 33-300 DEBT SERVICE 808 EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PROG. 7XX FACILITIES IMPRV(NO CIP) 700 COMPUTER-RELATED 701 VEHICLES&EQUIPMENT e residents who have concerns. CC-2011-67 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER HAYS, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER MC NABOE,CARRIED 4-1 (COUNCILMEMBER SANDOVAL VOTED NO),to 0 yone to use the local businesses.Wilden Pump is hosting a Blood Drive and bone marrow screening on Friday. He visited the Ronald Reagan memorial library and it is interesting to see how little political issues have changed. He encouraged everyone to pay attention and make changes in Washington. PUBLIC HEARINGS 6A. Resolution of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace Adopting Residential and Commercial Solid Waste Recycling Rates ° 00 60 719530 CURB DRAIN LF 40 $25.00 $1,000.00 61 152440 ADJUST MANHOLE TO GRADE EA 1 $500.00 $500.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 SUBTOTAL Items 49- Four Hundred Seventeen Thousand Five Hundred Dollars and No Cents $417,500 61 "Words" SUBTOTAL Items 1-61 Two Million Seven Hundred Fifteen Thousand Two Hundred Thirty Dollars and No Cents $2,715,230 "Words" CONTINGENCY 999994 CONTINGENCY LS 10% $271,523 $271,523 GRAND TOTAL Two Million Nine Hundred Eighty Six Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty Three Dollars and No Cents $2,986,753 "Words" Prepared by: MIKE MUETING 6/15/2011 Checked by Page 2 of 2 $ 98,000.0D $ 115,500.00 CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY CITY $ 17,500.00 $ 17,500.00 _ ADVERTISE&AWARD CO $ 11,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 0 11,000.00 $ - $ 2,000.00 $ 16,000.00 ADVERTISE&AWARD CJUSD $ 10,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 12,000.00 ADVERTISE&AWARD CITY $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CO $ 143,000.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 143,000.00 $ - $ - $ 23,000.00 $ 204,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CJUSD $ 138,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 138,000.00 $ 163,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CITY 5 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 SURVEY CO $ 51,000.00 $ 14,00100 $ 14,000.00 $ 51,000.00 $ - $ _ $ 9,000.00 $ 74,000.00 SURVEY CJUSD $ 49,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 49,000.00 $ 58,000.00 SURVEY CITY $ 9,00100 $ 9,000.00 $ 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 07/19/2011 5:14:35PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code : bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 66970 7/12/2011 010996 CA PUB EMPLOYEES' RET SYSTEM H20110714930C JULY EMPLOYEE/DEPENDENT MEDICAL INSURA 32-370-142-000-000 256 55 34-400-142-000-000 342.09 10-022-55-00 2,407.29 10-022-61-00 7,216.94 10-120-142-000-000 363.45 10-125-142-000-000 320.69 10-140-142-000-000 962.07 10-172-142-000-000 406.19 10-175-142-000-000 641.38 10-190-265-000-000 72 40 10-370-142-000-000 641 36 10-380-142-000-000 320 68 10-440-142-000-000 2,256 70 10-450-142-000-000 256 54 10-625-142-000-000 194 55 16-175-142-000-000 726 88 21-175-142-000-000 363.46 21-625-142-000-000 83.36 32-200-142-000-000 619.97 Total : 18,452.55 66971 7/13/2011 011092 METLIFE SBC KM05736710 00 JULY EMPLOYEE/DEPENDENT DENTAL INSURAN 10-022-61-00 1,418.18 Total : 1,418.18 66972 7/13/2011 011196 FIDELITY SECURITY LIFE 3988937 July JULY EMPLOYEE PAID VISION INSURANCE 10-022-61-00 150 80 Total : 150.80 66973 7/13/2011 011195 AMERICAN FIDELITY ASSURANCE CO 684186A JULY EMP PAID FLEX SPENDING/DEPEND CARE 23-250-10-00 1,,170.00 Total : 1,170.00 66981 7/19/2011 001213 AT&T Jul/Aug 2011 Jul/Aug Phone & Internet Service Page: 1 . • • CE 808 EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PROG. 7XX FACILITIES IMPRV(NO CIP) 700 COMPUTER-RELATED 701 VEHICLES&EQUIPMENT e residents who have concerns. CC-2011-67 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER HAYS, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER MC NABOE,CARRIED 4-1 (COUNCILMEMBER SANDOVAL VOTED NO),to 0 yone to use the local businesses.Wilden Pump is hosting a Blood Drive and bone marrow screening on Friday. He visited the Ronald Reagan memorial library and it is interesting to see how little political issues have changed. He encouraged everyone to pay attention and make changes in Washington. PUBLIC HEARINGS 6A. Resolution of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace Adopting Residential and Commercial Solid Waste Recycling Rates ° 00 60 719530 CURB DRAIN LF 40 $25.00 $1,000.00 61 152440 ADJUST MANHOLE TO GRADE EA 1 $500.00 $500.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 SUBTOTAL Items 49- Four Hundred Seventeen Thousand Five Hundred Dollars and No Cents $417,500 61 "Words" SUBTOTAL Items 1-61 Two Million Seven Hundred Fifteen Thousand Two Hundred Thirty Dollars and No Cents $2,715,230 "Words" CONTINGENCY 999994 CONTINGENCY LS 10% $271,523 $271,523 GRAND TOTAL Two Million Nine Hundred Eighty Six Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty Three Dollars and No Cents $2,986,753 "Words" Prepared by: MIKE MUETING 6/15/2011 Checked by Page 2 of 2 $ 98,000.0D $ 115,500.00 CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY CITY $ 17,500.00 $ 17,500.00 _ ADVERTISE&AWARD CO $ 11,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 0 11,000.00 $ - $ 2,000.00 $ 16,000.00 ADVERTISE&AWARD CJUSD $ 10,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 12,000.00 ADVERTISE&AWARD CITY $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CO $ 143,000.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 143,000.00 $ - $ - $ 23,000.00 $ 204,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CJUSD $ 138,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 138,000.00 $ 163,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CITY 5 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 SURVEY CO $ 51,000.00 $ 14,00100 $ 14,000.00 $ 51,000.00 $ - $ _ $ 9,000.00 $ 74,000.00 SURVEY CJUSD $ 49,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 49,000.00 $ 58,000.00 SURVEY CITY $ 9,00100 $ 9,000.00 $ 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY vchlist Voucher List Page: 2' 07/19/2011 5:14:35PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code : bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 66981 7/19/2011 001213 AT&T (Continued) 10-190-235-000-000 308 46 10-440-235-000-000 ' J 298 68 Total : 607.14 66982 7/19/2011 011110 TIME WARNER CABLE Jul 844840. .724 July/Aug Cable & Internet Service-Sr 10-805-238-000-000 121.28 Total : 121.28 67000 7/26/2011 010711 DANKA FINANCIAL SERVICES 74939450 July Lease E-Studio 350 Toshiba Copier 10-172-220-000-000 79.79 10-175-220-000-000 79.78 Total : 159.57 67001 7/26/2011 002740 FRUIT GROWERS SUPPLY 90814092 Maint Supplies-City Hall 10-195-245-000-000 54 95 Total : 54.95 67002 7/26/2011 010164 GREAT-WEST PR End 7/8/201' Contributions for PR End 7/8/2011 10-022-63-00 4,693.41 Total : 4,693.41 67003 7/26/2011 010632 HIGH TECH SECURITY SYSTEMS 96404 July Security Camera Maint Agreement 10-450-246-000-000 60.00 10-195-247-000-000 20.00 96756 August Security Camera Maint Agreement 10-450-246-000-000 60.00 10-195-247-000-000 20.00 Total : 160.00 67004 7/26/2011 003213 HONEYWELL ACS SERVICE 3537612 1st Qtr HVAC Maint Agreement 10-195-257-000-000 5,743.00 Total : 5,743.00 67005 7/26/2011 010552 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL , 07062011 FY 11-12 Class A Membership-Shields 10-172-265-000-000 25.00 Total : 25.00 Page: 2 • • CE 808 EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PROG. 7XX FACILITIES IMPRV(NO CIP) 700 COMPUTER-RELATED 701 VEHICLES&EQUIPMENT e residents who have concerns. CC-2011-67 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER HAYS, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER MC NABOE,CARRIED 4-1 (COUNCILMEMBER SANDOVAL VOTED NO),to 0 yone to use the local businesses.Wilden Pump is hosting a Blood Drive and bone marrow screening on Friday. He visited the Ronald Reagan memorial library and it is interesting to see how little political issues have changed. He encouraged everyone to pay attention and make changes in Washington. PUBLIC HEARINGS 6A. Resolution of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace Adopting Residential and Commercial Solid Waste Recycling Rates ° 00 60 719530 CURB DRAIN LF 40 $25.00 $1,000.00 61 152440 ADJUST MANHOLE TO GRADE EA 1 $500.00 $500.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 SUBTOTAL Items 49- Four Hundred Seventeen Thousand Five Hundred Dollars and No Cents $417,500 61 "Words" SUBTOTAL Items 1-61 Two Million Seven Hundred Fifteen Thousand Two Hundred Thirty Dollars and No Cents $2,715,230 "Words" CONTINGENCY 999994 CONTINGENCY LS 10% $271,523 $271,523 GRAND TOTAL Two Million Nine Hundred Eighty Six Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty Three Dollars and No Cents $2,986,753 "Words" Prepared by: MIKE MUETING 6/15/2011 Checked by Page 2 of 2 $ 98,000.0D $ 115,500.00 CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY CITY $ 17,500.00 $ 17,500.00 _ ADVERTISE&AWARD CO $ 11,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 0 11,000.00 $ - $ 2,000.00 $ 16,000.00 ADVERTISE&AWARD CJUSD $ 10,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 12,000.00 ADVERTISE&AWARD CITY $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CO $ 143,000.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 143,000.00 $ - $ - $ 23,000.00 $ 204,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CJUSD $ 138,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 138,000.00 $ 163,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CITY 5 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 SURVEY CO $ 51,000.00 $ 14,00100 $ 14,000.00 $ 51,000.00 $ - $ _ $ 9,000.00 $ 74,000.00 SURVEY CJUSD $ 49,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 49,000.00 $ 58,000.00 SURVEY CITY $ 9,00100 $ 9,000.00 $ 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY vchlist Voucher List Page: 3 07/19/2011 5:14:35PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code: bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 67006 7/26/2011 002727 J.R. FREEMAN COMPANY 466153-0 Office Supplies 10-120-210-000-000 50.87 Total : 50.87 67007 7/26/2011 010449 KONICA MINOLTA BUS SOLUTIONS 218292990 1st Qtr Copier Maint-Toshiba E-studio 10-172-246-000-000 37.50 10-175-246-000-000 37.50 Total : 75.00 67008 7/26/2011 005024 NEOPOST 47589370 FY 11-12 Rate Change Protection 10-190-211-000-000 182.05 47589376 FY 11-12 Postage Meter Rental 10-190-211-000-000 641.72 Total : 823.77 67009 7/26/2011 005450 OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY SAU06425V711 FY 11-12 Elevator Maint. Services 10-195-246-000-000 4,670 59 Total : 4,670.59 67010 7/26/2011 005688 PROTECTION ONE 2588440 1st Qtr Alarm Monitoring-City Hall 10-195-247-000-000 99.06 3020955 1st Qtr Alarm Monitoring-Building & 10-172-246-000-000 52.62 10-175-246-000-000 52.62 31891344 1st Qtr Alarm Monitoring-Maintenance 10-195-247-000-000 127.34 Total : 331.64 67011 7/26/2011 010565 QUICK LANE Q03247 Repair Window Switch-Ford F-150 10-175-272-000-000 214.94 Total : 214.94 67012 7/26/2011 006070 REDLANDS PLUMBING,HEATING, & 31005 Parts for Pico Park 10-450-245-000-000 67.84 Total : 67.84 67013 7/26/2011 006310 ROADRUNNER SELF STORAGE INC. 13160 August Storage Rental 10-140-241-000-000 " 119.00 Page: 3 ILITIES IMPRV(NO CIP) 700 COMPUTER-RELATED 701 VEHICLES&EQUIPMENT e residents who have concerns. CC-2011-67 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER HAYS, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER MC NABOE,CARRIED 4-1 (COUNCILMEMBER SANDOVAL VOTED NO),to 0 yone to use the local businesses.Wilden Pump is hosting a Blood Drive and bone marrow screening on Friday. He visited the Ronald Reagan memorial library and it is interesting to see how little political issues have changed. He encouraged everyone to pay attention and make changes in Washington. PUBLIC HEARINGS 6A. Resolution of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace Adopting Residential and Commercial Solid Waste Recycling Rates ° 00 60 719530 CURB DRAIN LF 40 $25.00 $1,000.00 61 152440 ADJUST MANHOLE TO GRADE EA 1 $500.00 $500.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 SUBTOTAL Items 49- Four Hundred Seventeen Thousand Five Hundred Dollars and No Cents $417,500 61 "Words" SUBTOTAL Items 1-61 Two Million Seven Hundred Fifteen Thousand Two Hundred Thirty Dollars and No Cents $2,715,230 "Words" CONTINGENCY 999994 CONTINGENCY LS 10% $271,523 $271,523 GRAND TOTAL Two Million Nine Hundred Eighty Six Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty Three Dollars and No Cents $2,986,753 "Words" Prepared by: MIKE MUETING 6/15/2011 Checked by Page 2 of 2 $ 98,000.0D $ 115,500.00 CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY CITY $ 17,500.00 $ 17,500.00 _ ADVERTISE&AWARD CO $ 11,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 0 11,000.00 $ - $ 2,000.00 $ 16,000.00 ADVERTISE&AWARD CJUSD $ 10,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 12,000.00 ADVERTISE&AWARD CITY $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CO $ 143,000.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 143,000.00 $ - $ - $ 23,000.00 $ 204,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CJUSD $ 138,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 138,000.00 $ 163,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CITY 5 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 SURVEY CO $ 51,000.00 $ 14,00100 $ 14,000.00 $ 51,000.00 $ - $ _ $ 9,000.00 $ 74,000.00 SURVEY CJUSD $ 49,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 49,000.00 $ 58,000.00 SURVEY CITY $ 9,00100 $ 9,000.00 $ 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY vchlist Voucher List Page: 4 07/19/2011 5:14:35PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code : bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 67013 7/26/2011 006310 ROADRUNNER SELF STORAGE INC. (Continued) Total : 119.00 67014 7/26/2011 006504 S B FIRE DEPT./HAZ.MATERIAL GT112CC 1st Qtr Haz Waste Services 10-187-258-000-000 4,133 00 Total : 4,133.00 67015 7/26/2011 006695 SO CA.ASS'N OF GOVERNMENT 11-155 FY 11-12 Membership Renewal 10-190-265-000-000 1,256.00 Total : 1,256.00 67016 7/26/2011 010693 UNITED WAY PR End 7/8/201' PR End 7/8/2011 Donations 10-022-65-00 62 50 Total : 62.50 23 Vouchers for bank code : bofa Bank total : 44,561.03 23 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 44,561.03 Page: 4 59 Total : 4,670.59 67010 7/26/2011 005688 PROTECTION ONE 2588440 1st Qtr Alarm Monitoring-City Hall 10-195-247-000-000 99.06 3020955 1st Qtr Alarm Monitoring-Building & 10-172-246-000-000 52.62 10-175-246-000-000 52.62 31891344 1st Qtr Alarm Monitoring-Maintenance 10-195-247-000-000 127.34 Total : 331.64 67011 7/26/2011 010565 QUICK LANE Q03247 Repair Window Switch-Ford F-150 10-175-272-000-000 214.94 Total : 214.94 67012 7/26/2011 006070 REDLANDS PLUMBING,HEATING, & 31005 Parts for Pico Park 10-450-245-000-000 67.84 Total : 67.84 67013 7/26/2011 006310 ROADRUNNER SELF STORAGE INC. 13160 August Storage Rental 10-140-241-000-000 " 119.00 Page: 3 ILITIES IMPRV(NO CIP) 700 COMPUTER-RELATED 701 VEHICLES&EQUIPMENT e residents who have concerns. CC-2011-67 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER HAYS, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER MC NABOE,CARRIED 4-1 (COUNCILMEMBER SANDOVAL VOTED NO),to 0 yone to use the local businesses.Wilden Pump is hosting a Blood Drive and bone marrow screening on Friday. He visited the Ronald Reagan memorial library and it is interesting to see how little political issues have changed. He encouraged everyone to pay attention and make changes in Washington. PUBLIC HEARINGS 6A. Resolution of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace Adopting Residential and Commercial Solid Waste Recycling Rates ° 00 60 719530 CURB DRAIN LF 40 $25.00 $1,000.00 61 152440 ADJUST MANHOLE TO GRADE EA 1 $500.00 $500.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 SUBTOTAL Items 49- Four Hundred Seventeen Thousand Five Hundred Dollars and No Cents $417,500 61 "Words" SUBTOTAL Items 1-61 Two Million Seven Hundred Fifteen Thousand Two Hundred Thirty Dollars and No Cents $2,715,230 "Words" CONTINGENCY 999994 CONTINGENCY LS 10% $271,523 $271,523 GRAND TOTAL Two Million Nine Hundred Eighty Six Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty Three Dollars and No Cents $2,986,753 "Words" Prepared by: MIKE MUETING 6/15/2011 Checked by Page 2 of 2 $ 98,000.0D $ 115,500.00 CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY CITY $ 17,500.00 $ 17,500.00 _ ADVERTISE&AWARD CO $ 11,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 0 11,000.00 $ - $ 2,000.00 $ 16,000.00 ADVERTISE&AWARD CJUSD $ 10,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 12,000.00 ADVERTISE&AWARD CITY $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CO $ 143,000.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 143,000.00 $ - $ - $ 23,000.00 $ 204,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CJUSD $ 138,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 138,000.00 $ 163,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CITY 5 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 SURVEY CO $ 51,000.00 $ 14,00100 $ 14,000.00 $ 51,000.00 $ - $ _ $ 9,000.00 $ 74,000.00 SURVEY CJUSD $ 49,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 49,000.00 $ 58,000.00 SURVEY CITY $ 9,00100 $ 9,000.00 $ 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the afore-listed checks for payment of City and Community Redevelopment Agency liabilities have been audited by me and are necessary and appropriate for the operation of City and Agency. Bernie Simon, Finance Director 1: Date Period Payroll and payroll costs 07/08/11 Biweekly $60,096.77 FISCAL IMPACT: All disbursements are made in accordance with the adopted budget for FY 2010-11 and FY 2011-12. Respectfully submitted, Bernie Simon Finance Director Manager Approval: Betsy/M. Ad ms City Manager ATTACHMENTS: Check Registers—July 26, 2011 Brenda Mesa, City Clerk 7 n 24 of the California Health and Safety Code ( ) 1/VS-1. ibit "A" June 8, 2010, Jurisdiction Master Agreement, No. C10246, Exhibit "B". City of Grand Terrace Warrant Register Index FD No. Fund Name Dept No. Department Name General Account Numbers 10 GENERAL FUND 110 CITY COUNCIL 110 SALARIES/WAGES 11 STREET FUND 120 CITY MANAGER 139 EMPLOYEES'BENEFIT PLAN 12 STORM DRAIN FUND 125 CITY CLERK 140 RETIREMENT 13 PARK FUND - 140 FINANCE 142 HEALTH/LIFE INSURANCE 14 AB 3229 COPS FUND 160 CITY ATTORNEY 143 WORKERS'COMPENSATION 15 AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT FUND 172 BUILDING&SAFETY 138/141 MEDICARE/SUI 16 GAS TAX FUND 175 PUBLIC WORKS 210 OFFICE EXPENSE 17 TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND/TDA FUND 180 COMMUNITY EVENTS 218-219 NON-CAPITAL FURN/SMALL TOOLS 19 FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT FUND 185 RENTAL INSPECTION PROGRAM 220 SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL EXP 20 MEASURE I FUND 190 GENERAL GOVERNMENT(NON-DEPT) 230 ADVERTISING 21 WASTE WATER DISPOSAL FUND 195 FACILITIES MAINTENANCE 235 COMMUNICATIONS 22 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT 370 COMMUNITY&ECONOMIC DEV 238-239 UTILITIES 26 LSCPG/LGHTG ASSESSMENT DIST. 380 MGT INFORMATION SYSTEMS 240-242 RENTS&LEASES 44 BIKE LANE CAPITAL FUND 410 LAW ENFORCEMENT 245-246 MAINT BLDG GRNDS EQUIPMNT 46 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS 430 RECREATION SERVICES 250-251 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 47 BARTON RD.BRIDGE PROJECT 440 CHILD CARE 255-256 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 32 CRA-CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND 450 PARKS MAINTENANCE 260 INSURANCE&SURETY BONDS 33 CRA-DEBT SERVICE FUND 631 STORM DRAIN MAINTENANCE 265 MEMBERSHIPS&DUES 34 CRA-LOW&MOD HOUSING 801 PLANNING COMMISSION 268 TRAINING 802 CRIME PREVENTION UNIT 270 TRAVEUCONFERENCES/MTGS 804 HISTORICAL&CULTURAL COMM. 272 FUEL&VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 805 SENIOR CITIZENS PROGRAM 570 WASTEWATER TREATMENT 807 PARKS&REC COMMITTEE 33-300 DEBT SERVICE 808 EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PROG. 7XX FACILITIES IMPRV(NO CIP) 700 COMPUTER-RELATED 701 VEHICLES&EQUIPMENT idents who have concerns. CC-2011-67 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER HAYS, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER MC NABOE,CARRIED 4-1 (COUNCILMEMBER SANDOVAL VOTED NO),to 0 yone to use the local businesses.Wilden Pump is hosting a Blood Drive and bone marrow screening on Friday. He visited the Ronald Reagan memorial library and it is interesting to see how little political issues have changed. He encouraged everyone to pay attention and make changes in Washington. PUBLIC HEARINGS 6A. Resolution of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace Adopting Residential and Commercial Solid Waste Recycling Rates ° 00 60 719530 CURB DRAIN LF 40 $25.00 $1,000.00 61 152440 ADJUST MANHOLE TO GRADE EA 1 $500.00 $500.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 SUBTOTAL Items 49- Four Hundred Seventeen Thousand Five Hundred Dollars and No Cents $417,500 61 "Words" SUBTOTAL Items 1-61 Two Million Seven Hundred Fifteen Thousand Two Hundred Thirty Dollars and No Cents $2,715,230 "Words" CONTINGENCY 999994 CONTINGENCY LS 10% $271,523 $271,523 GRAND TOTAL Two Million Nine Hundred Eighty Six Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty Three Dollars and No Cents $2,986,753 "Words" Prepared by: MIKE MUETING 6/15/2011 Checked by Page 2 of 2 $ 98,000.0D $ 115,500.00 CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY CITY $ 17,500.00 $ 17,500.00 _ ADVERTISE&AWARD CO $ 11,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 0 11,000.00 $ - $ 2,000.00 $ 16,000.00 ADVERTISE&AWARD CJUSD $ 10,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 12,000.00 ADVERTISE&AWARD CITY $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CO $ 143,000.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 143,000.00 $ - $ - $ 23,000.00 $ 204,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CJUSD $ 138,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 138,000.00 $ 163,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CITY 5 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 SURVEY CO $ 51,000.00 $ 14,00100 $ 14,000.00 $ 51,000.00 $ - $ _ $ 9,000.00 $ 74,000.00 SURVEY CJUSD $ 49,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 49,000.00 $ 58,000.00 SURVEY CITY $ 9,00100 $ 9,000.00 $ 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY The Blue Mountain C Iy CALIcCanaTrelraceEORIdIA AGENDA REPORT MEETING DATE: July 26, 2011 Council Item ( X ) CRA Item ( ) TITLE: Update on Implementation of Accumulation Program for Part-time and Limited-term Employees (APPLE) Plan PRESENTED BY: Betsy M. Adams, City Manager RECOMMENDATION: Receive information on the APPLE Plan implementation. BACKGROUND: On April 26, 2011 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2011-09 authorizing the implementation of the APPLE Plan as an alternative to Social Security for part-time employees who work less than 20 hours per week and for limited service or temporary employees. DISCUSSION: The staff report for the resolution adopting the APPLE Plan contained an error which was discovered as the program was being implemented. It stated that the City was not required to contribute to the APPLE Plan when in actuality the City needs to contribute 1.3% to the program. The employee pre-tax contribution of 6.2% noted in the staff report is correct. The 1.3% employer contribution information was provided to the employees in the documentation they received on the APPLE Plan on June 13, 2011, which is included as Attachment A to this staff report. The APPLE Plan went into effect on June 25. The only remaining action item for this program was to formally advise the Council of the 1.3% City contribution which is accomplished through this staff report. The resolution adopting the APPLE Plan, Resolution No. 2011-09, does not need to be revised. FISCAL IMPACT: In April, when the Council approved the City's participation in the APPLE Program, the estimated annual savings was $7,126. The savings is now anticipated to be $5,632 due to the 1.3% required City contribution. COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 TRAVEUCONFERENCES/MTGS 804 HISTORICAL&CULTURAL COMM. 272 FUEL&VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 805 SENIOR CITIZENS PROGRAM 570 WASTEWATER TREATMENT 807 PARKS&REC COMMITTEE 33-300 DEBT SERVICE 808 EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PROG. 7XX FACILITIES IMPRV(NO CIP) 700 COMPUTER-RELATED 701 VEHICLES&EQUIPMENT idents who have concerns. CC-2011-67 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER HAYS, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER MC NABOE,CARRIED 4-1 (COUNCILMEMBER SANDOVAL VOTED NO),to 0 yone to use the local businesses.Wilden Pump is hosting a Blood Drive and bone marrow screening on Friday. He visited the Ronald Reagan memorial library and it is interesting to see how little political issues have changed. He encouraged everyone to pay attention and make changes in Washington. PUBLIC HEARINGS 6A. Resolution of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace Adopting Residential and Commercial Solid Waste Recycling Rates ° 00 60 719530 CURB DRAIN LF 40 $25.00 $1,000.00 61 152440 ADJUST MANHOLE TO GRADE EA 1 $500.00 $500.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 SUBTOTAL Items 49- Four Hundred Seventeen Thousand Five Hundred Dollars and No Cents $417,500 61 "Words" SUBTOTAL Items 1-61 Two Million Seven Hundred Fifteen Thousand Two Hundred Thirty Dollars and No Cents $2,715,230 "Words" CONTINGENCY 999994 CONTINGENCY LS 10% $271,523 $271,523 GRAND TOTAL Two Million Nine Hundred Eighty Six Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty Three Dollars and No Cents $2,986,753 "Words" Prepared by: MIKE MUETING 6/15/2011 Checked by Page 2 of 2 $ 98,000.0D $ 115,500.00 CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY CITY $ 17,500.00 $ 17,500.00 _ ADVERTISE&AWARD CO $ 11,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 0 11,000.00 $ - $ 2,000.00 $ 16,000.00 ADVERTISE&AWARD CJUSD $ 10,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 12,000.00 ADVERTISE&AWARD CITY $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CO $ 143,000.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 143,000.00 $ - $ - $ 23,000.00 $ 204,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CJUSD $ 138,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 138,000.00 $ 163,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CITY 5 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 SURVEY CO $ 51,000.00 $ 14,00100 $ 14,000.00 $ 51,000.00 $ - $ _ $ 9,000.00 $ 74,000.00 SURVEY CJUSD $ 49,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 49,000.00 $ 58,000.00 SURVEY CITY $ 9,00100 $ 9,000.00 $ 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Update on Implementation of Accumulation Program for Part-time & Limited Service Employees (APPLE) Plan Page 2 Respectfully submitted: Betsy . Ada s, City Manager ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A: City of Grand Terrace APPLE Plan Employee Announcement yroll and payroll costs 07/08/11 Biweekly $60,096.77 FISCAL IMPACT: All disbursements are made in accordance with the adopted budget for FY 2010-11 and FY 2011-12. Respectfully submitted, Bernie Simon Finance Director Manager Approval: Betsy/M. Ad ms City Manager ATTACHMENTS: Check Registers—July 26, 2011 Brenda Mesa, City Clerk 7 n 24 of the California Health and Safety Code ( ) 1/VS-1. ibit "A" June 8, 2010, Jurisdiction Master Agreement, No. C10246, Exhibit "B". Attachment A City of Grand Terrace APPLE Plan Employee Announcement rt-time & Limited Service Employees (APPLE) Plan Page 2 Respectfully submitted: Betsy . Ada s, City Manager ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A: City of Grand Terrace APPLE Plan Employee Announcement yroll and payroll costs 07/08/11 Biweekly $60,096.77 FISCAL IMPACT: All disbursements are made in accordance with the adopted budget for FY 2010-11 and FY 2011-12. Respectfully submitted, Bernie Simon Finance Director Manager Approval: Betsy/M. Ad ms City Manager ATTACHMENTS: Check Registers—July 26, 2011 Brenda Mesa, City Clerk 7 n 24 of the California Health and Safety Code ( ) 1/VS-1. ibit "A" June 8, 2010, Jurisdiction Master Agreement, No. C10246, Exhibit "B". ',APPLE A Keenan Solution CITY OF GRAND TERRACE ANNOUNCEMENT To: Part Time and Limited Term Employees From: Human Resources Department Date: June 13,2011 Re: ACCUMULATION PROGRAM FOR PART-TIME AND LIMITED-TERM EMPLOYEES The City of Grand Terrace (City)is pleased to announce the implementation of the Accumulation Program for Part-Time and Limited Service Employees (APPLE), offered by Keenan & Associates. The new record keeper is MidAmerica Administrative Solutions, Inc. (MidAmerica) and the new funding company is American United Life (AUL). The City Council voted to make this change for part-time employees to provide competitive and consistent returns on funds and increased access to plan information. The APPLE plan is scheduled to become effective June 25,2011. THE ADVANTAGES FOR ELIGIBLE EMPLOYEES INCLUDE: • 6.2%Pre-Tax Employee Contribution • 1.3%Employer Contribution • Current Interest Rate 3.1% • 3% Guaranteed Minimum Interest Rate until 2011 (2012 minimum guaranteed rate set per NAIC [National Association of Insurance Commissions],formula) • No Annual Fees • No Participant Fees • Annual Statements are Mailed Directly to Participants' Homes • Medicare Eligibility Contributions Continue • APPLE Plan Website Access www.keenan.com All of your account information has been transferred to MidAmerica thus providing MidAmerica the ability to continue the Plan activity on the District's behalf. MidAmerica will be sending you updated Participant Balance Statements in the near future. Under the APPLE program,your default beneficiary will automatically be your spouse if you are married or your estate if you are not married. Please complete the enclosed Beneficiary Designation Change Form only if you wish to designate a beneficiary other than your default beneficiary. If married and you elect a beneficiary other than your spouse,your spouse must agree to your election and sign the form in the presence of a Notary Public. This form can also be used to change your address or name. Beneficiary Forms are also available at www.keenan.com or 1-800-634-1178., Once completed, please forward to MidAmerica Administrative Solutions, 211 East Main Street, Suite 100, Lakeland, FL 33801 or fax to: 863-686-9727. If you have any other questions,please contact any of the following: • Plan Administrator,MidAmerica—Customer Service: 800-634-1178 • Plan Consultant, Keenan&Associates—Customer Service 800-444-9995 x 3672 • Benefits Coordinator, City of Grand Terrace, 909-430-2245. Drive and bone marrow screening on Friday. He visited the Ronald Reagan memorial library and it is interesting to see how little political issues have changed. He encouraged everyone to pay attention and make changes in Washington. PUBLIC HEARINGS 6A. Resolution of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace Adopting Residential and Commercial Solid Waste Recycling Rates ° 00 60 719530 CURB DRAIN LF 40 $25.00 $1,000.00 61 152440 ADJUST MANHOLE TO GRADE EA 1 $500.00 $500.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 SUBTOTAL Items 49- Four Hundred Seventeen Thousand Five Hundred Dollars and No Cents $417,500 61 "Words" SUBTOTAL Items 1-61 Two Million Seven Hundred Fifteen Thousand Two Hundred Thirty Dollars and No Cents $2,715,230 "Words" CONTINGENCY 999994 CONTINGENCY LS 10% $271,523 $271,523 GRAND TOTAL Two Million Nine Hundred Eighty Six Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty Three Dollars and No Cents $2,986,753 "Words" Prepared by: MIKE MUETING 6/15/2011 Checked by Page 2 of 2 $ 98,000.0D $ 115,500.00 CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY CITY $ 17,500.00 $ 17,500.00 _ ADVERTISE&AWARD CO $ 11,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 0 11,000.00 $ - $ 2,000.00 $ 16,000.00 ADVERTISE&AWARD CJUSD $ 10,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 12,000.00 ADVERTISE&AWARD CITY $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CO $ 143,000.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 143,000.00 $ - $ - $ 23,000.00 $ 204,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CJUSD $ 138,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 138,000.00 $ 163,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CITY 5 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 SURVEY CO $ 51,000.00 $ 14,00100 $ 14,000.00 $ 51,000.00 $ - $ _ $ 9,000.00 $ 74,000.00 SURVEY CJUSD $ 49,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 49,000.00 $ 58,000.00 SURVEY CITY $ 9,00100 $ 9,000.00 $ 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY APPLE WELCOME NEW EMPLOYEE!!! A Keenan Solution City of Grand Terrace Announces an Employer Sponsored 401(a) Program for Part-time and Limited-Service Employees As an Alternative to Social Security City of Grand Terrace sponsors an Alternative to Social Security Program known as APPLE. Effective with your employment at the City, you are automatically enrolled in this program. The Accumulation Plan for Part-time and Limited-Term Employees (APPLE) is a Profit Sharing program for certain eligible employees of the City. MidAmerica Administrative Solutions is the record keeper and American United Life Insurance Company@ (AUL), a OneAmerica Company,is the company providing the investment for the Plan. This valuable program was implemented for short term employees not contributing to the California Public Employees Retirement System (CaIPERS) or Social Security, in order to provide enhanced retirement benefits. Social Security contributions are made on an after tax basis. By implementing a program that allows you to make retirement contributions on a pre-tax basis,more dollars are put to work for your retirement and the taxation is deferred until a later date. The Advantages for Eligible Employees include: 6.2%Pre-Tax Employee Contribution 1.3%Employer Contribution 3%Guaranteed Minimum Interest Rate Until 2011 (2012 minimum guaranteed rate set per NAIC formula) Current net rate of 3.1% Account Balances Accumulate with American United Life Insurance Company(AUL) No Participation Fees No Annual Fees Annual Statements are Mailed Directly to Participants'Homes Account Distributions Available Upon Termination of Employment Medicare Eligibility Contributions Continue APPLE Plan Website Access in the Client Center at www.keenan.com The following two forms (which can also be retrieved from www.keenan.com) are included: Beneficiary Form (Return to Personnel only if Beneficiary is someone other than your Spouse) Your Beneficiary under the Plan will automatically be your spouse if you are married or your estate if you are not married. If you wish to designate a beneficiary other than your spouse or your estate, please complete the attached Beneficiary Designation or Participant Data Change form. If married and you elect a beneficiary other than your spouse,your spouse must agree to your election and sign the form in the presence of a Notary Public. Social Security Form SSA 1945(Must be returned to Personnel no later than your second payroll date) Recent legislation, effective January 1, 2005, requires the City to provide a statement to employees in a job not covered under Social Security. The attached Social Security form "Statement Concerning Your Employment in a Job Not Covered by Social Security" (Form.SSA-1945) meets this requirement. The Statement explains how a pension from that job could affect future Social Security benefits to which you may become entitled. The Statement explains the potential effects of two provisions in the Social Security law for workers who also receive a pension based on their work in a job not covered by Social Security. The Windfall Elimination Provision can affect the amount of a worker's Social Security retirement or disability benefit. The Government Pension Offset Provision can affect any possible Social Security benefit entitlement as a spouse or an ex-spouse. If you have any questions,please contact any of the following Record Keeper: MidAmerica-Customer Service Toll Free Number. (800) 634-1178 Plan Consultant: Keenan&Associates-Customer Service Toll Free Number: (800)z444-9995,Ext. 3672 Social Security:Toll Free Number(800) 385-0778—Website:www.socialsecurity.gov ETING 6/15/2011 Checked by Page 2 of 2 $ 98,000.0D $ 115,500.00 CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY CITY $ 17,500.00 $ 17,500.00 _ ADVERTISE&AWARD CO $ 11,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 0 11,000.00 $ - $ 2,000.00 $ 16,000.00 ADVERTISE&AWARD CJUSD $ 10,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 12,000.00 ADVERTISE&AWARD CITY $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CO $ 143,000.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 143,000.00 $ - $ - $ 23,000.00 $ 204,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CJUSD $ 138,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 138,000.00 $ 163,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CITY 5 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 SURVEY CO $ 51,000.00 $ 14,00100 $ 14,000.00 $ 51,000.00 $ - $ _ $ 9,000.00 $ 74,000.00 SURVEY CJUSD $ 49,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 49,000.00 $ 58,000.00 SURVEY CITY $ 9,00100 $ 9,000.00 $ 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Thee ueMouetainCilb �. GranCALIFORNIAAGENDA REPORT MEETING DATE: July 26, 2011 Council Item (X) CRA Item ( ) TITLE: Remote Deposit Service Amendment— Bank of America PRESENTED BY: Bernie Simon, Finance Director RECOMMENDATION: Approve, Authorize Finance Director to execute agreement BACKGROUND: City Staff makes bank deposits daily, or on an as needed basis, to deposit receipts that are mailed or delivered to the City. The City uses Bank of America for its' general bank account and payroll account. Bank of America is currently the only major bank in the City of Grand Terrace. Bank of America has invited the City to use its' remote deposit services in order to increase efficiency and reduce costs to the City. DISCUSSION: Bank of America is offering an RDS single feed scanner at no cost to the City as an incentive to go to the remote deposit service. In addition, bank charges are estimated to go down roughly one-third prior to the FDIC charge. The current monthly cost of all services is about $600 to 1,000 per month depending on utilization of services. Once implemented, checks images will be scanned and remitted electronically through the Bank of America website rather than taken manually to the bank with the daily deposit. This would speed up the check clearing process and reduce staff trips to go to the bank. Remote deposit service has been authorized and used since 2000. Federal legislation was passed in 2003 and is known as the Check Clearing of the 21 st Century Act, or simply "Check 21". FISCAL IMPACT: Potential savings of$2,400 to $4,800 annually and possible labor savings. Respectfully submitted, COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 j Client Center at www.keenan.com The following two forms (which can also be retrieved from www.keenan.com) are included: Beneficiary Form (Return to Personnel only if Beneficiary is someone other than your Spouse) Your Beneficiary under the Plan will automatically be your spouse if you are married or your estate if you are not married. If you wish to designate a beneficiary other than your spouse or your estate, please complete the attached Beneficiary Designation or Participant Data Change form. If married and you elect a beneficiary other than your spouse,your spouse must agree to your election and sign the form in the presence of a Notary Public. Social Security Form SSA 1945(Must be returned to Personnel no later than your second payroll date) Recent legislation, effective January 1, 2005, requires the City to provide a statement to employees in a job not covered under Social Security. The attached Social Security form "Statement Concerning Your Employment in a Job Not Covered by Social Security" (Form.SSA-1945) meets this requirement. The Statement explains how a pension from that job could affect future Social Security benefits to which you may become entitled. The Statement explains the potential effects of two provisions in the Social Security law for workers who also receive a pension based on their work in a job not covered by Social Security. The Windfall Elimination Provision can affect the amount of a worker's Social Security retirement or disability benefit. The Government Pension Offset Provision can affect any possible Social Security benefit entitlement as a spouse or an ex-spouse. If you have any questions,please contact any of the following Record Keeper: MidAmerica-Customer Service Toll Free Number. (800) 634-1178 Plan Consultant: Keenan&Associates-Customer Service Toll Free Number: (800)z444-9995,Ext. 3672 Social Security:Toll Free Number(800) 385-0778—Website:www.socialsecurity.gov ETING 6/15/2011 Checked by Page 2 of 2 $ 98,000.0D $ 115,500.00 CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY CITY $ 17,500.00 $ 17,500.00 _ ADVERTISE&AWARD CO $ 11,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 0 11,000.00 $ - $ 2,000.00 $ 16,000.00 ADVERTISE&AWARD CJUSD $ 10,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 12,000.00 ADVERTISE&AWARD CITY $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CO $ 143,000.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 143,000.00 $ - $ - $ 23,000.00 $ 204,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CJUSD $ 138,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 138,000.00 $ 163,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CITY 5 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 SURVEY CO $ 51,000.00 $ 14,00100 $ 14,000.00 $ 51,000.00 $ - $ _ $ 9,000.00 $ 74,000.00 SURVEY CJUSD $ 49,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 49,000.00 $ 58,000.00 SURVEY CITY $ 9,00100 $ 9,000.00 $ 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Bernie Simon Finance Director Manager Approval: Betsy K. Adams City Manager ATTACHMENTS: Bank of America Account Analysis Diagram " Deposit Process after Check 21" Remote Deposit Service Amendment Grand Terrace APPLE Plan Employee Announcement yroll and payroll costs 07/08/11 Biweekly $60,096.77 FISCAL IMPACT: All disbursements are made in accordance with the adopted budget for FY 2010-11 and FY 2011-12. Respectfully submitted, Bernie Simon Finance Director Manager Approval: Betsy/M. Ad ms City Manager ATTACHMENTS: Check Registers—July 26, 2011 Brenda Mesa, City Clerk 7 n 24 of the California Health and Safety Code ( ) 1/VS-1. ibit "A" June 8, 2010, Jurisdiction Master Agreement, No. C10246, Exhibit "B". L(7/14/2011) Bernie Simon-City of Grand Terrace-Account Analysis Proposal Page 1 From: "Acosta,Adriana"<adriana.acosta©baml.com> To: "Bernard Simon (bsimon@cityofgrandterrace.org)"<bsimon©cityofgrandterra... Date: 6/29/2011 11:09 AM Subject: City of Grand Terrace-Account Analysis Proposal Attachments: City of Grand Terrace-Cost Analysis.pdf Hello Bernie, It was a pleasure speaking with you. Per our conversation,attached you will find the proposal for your account analysis review. I am pleased to inform you that we will be able to save you money and provide you a more efficient way to do your banking. I would suggest that you have a copy of your most recent account analysis statement(5/31/2011)so that I may point out the price and services changes proposed. I look forward to your phone call. Regards, Adriana Acosta Assistant Vice President Client Manager Bank of America Merrill Lynch Bank of America, N.A. 12747 Central Avenue 2nd Floor I Chino, CA 91710 Office (909) 517-2251 I Fax(704)625-4212 Client Service Center(888)400-9009 adriana.acosta@baml.com<mailto:craig.mcguire@baml.com> This message w/attachments(message) is intended solely for the use of the intended recipient(s)and may contain information that is privileged,confidential or proprietary. If you are not an intended recipient, please notify the sender, and then please delete and destroy all copies and attachments, and be advised that any review or dissemination of, or the taking of any action in reliance on,the information contained in or attached to this message is prohibited. Unless specifically indicated,this message is not an offer to sell or a solicitation of any investment products or other financial product or service, an official confirmation of any transaction, or an official statement of Sender. Subject to applicable law, Sender may intercept, monitor, review and retain e-communications(EC)traveling through its networks/systems and may produce any such EC to regulators, law enforcement, in litigation and as required by law. The laws of the country of each sender/recipient may impact the handling of EC, and EC maybe archived, supervised and produced in countries other than the country in which you are located. This message cannot be guaranteed to be secure or free of errors or viruses. References to"Sender"are references to any subsidiary of Bank of America Corporation. Securities and Insurance Products:*Are Not FDIC Insured*Are Not Bank Guaranteed*May Lose Value*Are Not a Bank Deposit*Are Not a Condition to Any Banking Service or Activity*Are Not Insured by Any Federal Government Agency.Attachments that are part of this EC may have additional important disclosures and disclaimers,which you should read.This message is subject to terms available at the following link: http://www.bankofamerica.com/emaildisdaimer. By messaging with Sender you consent to the foregoing. ects of two provisions in the Social Security law for workers who also receive a pension based on their work in a job not covered by Social Security. The Windfall Elimination Provision can affect the amount of a worker's Social Security retirement or disability benefit. The Government Pension Offset Provision can affect any possible Social Security benefit entitlement as a spouse or an ex-spouse. If you have any questions,please contact any of the following Record Keeper: MidAmerica-Customer Service Toll Free Number. (800) 634-1178 Plan Consultant: Keenan&Associates-Customer Service Toll Free Number: (800)z444-9995,Ext. 3672 Social Security:Toll Free Number(800) 385-0778—Website:www.socialsecurity.gov ETING 6/15/2011 Checked by Page 2 of 2 $ 98,000.0D $ 115,500.00 CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY CITY $ 17,500.00 $ 17,500.00 _ ADVERTISE&AWARD CO $ 11,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 0 11,000.00 $ - $ 2,000.00 $ 16,000.00 ADVERTISE&AWARD CJUSD $ 10,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 12,000.00 ADVERTISE&AWARD CITY $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CO $ 143,000.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 143,000.00 $ - $ - $ 23,000.00 $ 204,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CJUSD $ 138,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 138,000.00 $ 163,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CITY 5 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 SURVEY CO $ 51,000.00 $ 14,00100 $ 14,000.00 $ 51,000.00 $ - $ _ $ 9,000.00 $ 74,000.00 SURVEY CJUSD $ 49,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 49,000.00 $ 58,000.00 SURVEY CITY $ 9,00100 $ 9,000.00 $ 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Bankofilniefica Merritt Lynch. ESTIMATED ACCOUNT ANALYSIS CHARGES • CITY OF GRAND TERRACE • SUMMARY OF PARENT POSITION Amount Amount BALANCE EARNINGS ALLOWANCE $161 47 $561,297.86 INTEREST CHARGES $0.00 ACTIVITY CHARGES $405.16 TOTAL INTEREST AND ACTIVITY CHARGES $405.16 $1,408,413.14 DEFICIT POSITION ($243.69) ($847,115.28) • BALANCE INFORMATION BALANCE AVERAGE MONTHLY BALANCES: LEDGER BALANCE $581,707.66 LESS:FLOAT $20,409.80 COLLECTED BALANCE $561,297.86 NEGATIVE COLLECTED BALANCE $0.00 • RATE INFORMATION EARNINGS ALLOWANCE RATE 0.35% RESERVE REQUIREMENT RATE 0.00% COLLECTED OVERDRAFT INTEREST CHARGE RATE 0.00% MULTIPLIER(POSITIVE COLLECTED BALANCE REQUIRED PER$1.00 OF SERVICE CHARGE 3476.19 Prices are valid for 90 days from receipt of this pro-forma. Other fees may be assessed in accordance with Bank of America's Schedule of Fees. Confidential to Bank of America Page 1 of 3 lto:craig.mcguire@baml.com> This message w/attachments(message) is intended solely for the use of the intended recipient(s)and may contain information that is privileged,confidential or proprietary. If you are not an intended recipient, please notify the sender, and then please delete and destroy all copies and attachments, and be advised that any review or dissemination of, or the taking of any action in reliance on,the information contained in or attached to this message is prohibited. Unless specifically indicated,this message is not an offer to sell or a solicitation of any investment products or other financial product or service, an official confirmation of any transaction, or an official statement of Sender. Subject to applicable law, Sender may intercept, monitor, review and retain e-communications(EC)traveling through its networks/systems and may produce any such EC to regulators, law enforcement, in litigation and as required by law. The laws of the country of each sender/recipient may impact the handling of EC, and EC maybe archived, supervised and produced in countries other than the country in which you are located. This message cannot be guaranteed to be secure or free of errors or viruses. References to"Sender"are references to any subsidiary of Bank of America Corporation. Securities and Insurance Products:*Are Not FDIC Insured*Are Not Bank Guaranteed*May Lose Value*Are Not a Bank Deposit*Are Not a Condition to Any Banking Service or Activity*Are Not Insured by Any Federal Government Agency.Attachments that are part of this EC may have additional important disclosures and disclaimers,which you should read.This message is subject to terms available at the following link: http://www.bankofamerica.com/emaildisdaimer. By messaging with Sender you consent to the foregoing. ects of two provisions in the Social Security law for workers who also receive a pension based on their work in a job not covered by Social Security. The Windfall Elimination Provision can affect the amount of a worker's Social Security retirement or disability benefit. The Government Pension Offset Provision can affect any possible Social Security benefit entitlement as a spouse or an ex-spouse. If you have any questions,please contact any of the following Record Keeper: MidAmerica-Customer Service Toll Free Number. (800) 634-1178 Plan Consultant: Keenan&Associates-Customer Service Toll Free Number: (800)z444-9995,Ext. 3672 Social Security:Toll Free Number(800) 385-0778—Website:www.socialsecurity.gov ETING 6/15/2011 Checked by Page 2 of 2 $ 98,000.0D $ 115,500.00 CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY CITY $ 17,500.00 $ 17,500.00 _ ADVERTISE&AWARD CO $ 11,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 0 11,000.00 $ - $ 2,000.00 $ 16,000.00 ADVERTISE&AWARD CJUSD $ 10,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 12,000.00 ADVERTISE&AWARD CITY $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CO $ 143,000.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 143,000.00 $ - $ - $ 23,000.00 $ 204,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CJUSD $ 138,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 138,000.00 $ 163,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CITY 5 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 SURVEY CO $ 51,000.00 $ 14,00100 $ 14,000.00 $ 51,000.00 $ - $ _ $ 9,000.00 $ 74,000.00 SURVEY CJUSD $ 49,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 49,000.00 $ 58,000.00 SURVEY CITY $ 9,00100 $ 9,000.00 $ 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY BarikofAmericao. Merrill Lynch ESTIMATED ACCOUNT ANALYSIS CHARGES CITY OF GRAND TERRACE • ACTIVITY CHARGE DETAIL - AFP Volume No.of Proposed Service Balance Code Service Range Units Price Charge Required General Account Services 010000 ACCOUNT MAINTENANCE 2 $20.0000 $40.00 $139,047.60 Total General Account Services $40.00 $139,047.60 Depository Services 100000 BANKING CENTER DEPOSIT 21 $2.0000 $42.00 $145,999.98 100000 DEPOSITS/OTHER CREDITS 3 $1.2000 $3.60 $12,514.28 10001A CURR-COIN DEPI$100-QBD-ND 18 $0.1300 $2.34 $8,134.28 10001Z CURR-COIN DEP-PER$100-BC 114 $0.1400 $15.96 $55,479.99 100229 CHECKS DEPOSITED 0 $0.1300 $0.00 $0.00 Total Depository Services $63.90 $222,128.53 Paper Disbursement Services 150102 GEN DISB CKS PD-IS FRONT IMG 139 $0 1700 $23.63 $82,142.37 150102 GENERAL CHECKS PAID TRUNCATED 19 $0.1600 $3.04 $10,567.62 151350 CD ROM MAINTENANCE 2 $15.0000 $30.00 $104,285.70 151351 CD ROM PER IMAGE 158 $0.0450 $7.11 $24,715.71 151351 IMAGE RETRIEVAL 10 $0.2500 $2.50 $8,690.48 151353 CD ROM DISK 1 $10.0000 $10.00 $34,761.90 151399 IMAGE ARCHIVE-7 YEARS 202 $0.0450 $9.09 $31,598.57 151399 IMAGE MAINTENANCE 2 $10.0000 $10.00 $34,761.90 Total Paper Disbursement Services $95.37 $331,524.24 General ACH Services 250200 ACH DEBIT RECEIVED ITEM 9 $0.1200 $1.08 $3,754.29 250201 ACH CREDIT RECEIVED ITEM 5 $0.1200 $0.60 $2,085.71 Total General ACH Services $1.68 $5,840.00 EDI Services 309999 REMOTE DEP CK IMAGE PROCESSING 406 $0.1500 $60.90 $211,699.97 3OTTTT RDS SCANNER SINGLE FEED(WAIVED) 1 $325.0000 $0.00 $0.00 100200 IMAGE DEPOSIT 20 $1.2500 $25.00 $86,904.75 100229 IMAGE DEPOSITED ITEMS-RDSO 406 $0.0600 $24.36 $84,679.99 010000, REMOTE DEP-ACCOUNT MAINTENANCE 1 $25.0000 $25.00 $86,904.75 Total EDI Services $135.26 $470,189.46 Wire Transfer Services 350120 DIRECT ACCOUNT TRANSFER 3 $3.0000 $9.00 $31,285.71 350123 ELEC WIRE OUT-BOOK DB 1 $5.5000 $5.50 $19,119.05 350551 ELEC WIRE BK MNT TEMP STORAGE 3 $1.5000 $4.50 $15,642.86 359999 WIRE MODULE MAINTENANCE SVCS 1 $0.0000 - $0.00 $0.00 Total Wire Transfer Services $19.00 $66,047.61 Information Services 400050 DIRECT PREVIOUS DAY ACCT 3 $16.6500 $49.95 $173,635.69 400051 PREVIOUS DAY EXT ITEM 226 $0.0000 $0.00 $0.00 400053 DIRECT CURRENT DAY ACCT 3 $0.0000 $0.00 $0.00 400054 CURRENT DAY STD ITEM 144 $0.0000 $0.00 $0.00 Total Information Services $49.95 $173,635.69 TOTAL ACTIVITY CHARGES: $405.16 $1,408,413.14 Prices are valid for 90 days from receipt of this pro-forma. Other fees may be assessed in accordance with Bank of America's Schedule of Fees. Confidential to Bank of America Page 2 of 3 Plan Consultant: Keenan&Associates-Customer Service Toll Free Number: (800)z444-9995,Ext. 3672 Social Security:Toll Free Number(800) 385-0778—Website:www.socialsecurity.gov ETING 6/15/2011 Checked by Page 2 of 2 $ 98,000.0D $ 115,500.00 CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY CITY $ 17,500.00 $ 17,500.00 _ ADVERTISE&AWARD CO $ 11,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 0 11,000.00 $ - $ 2,000.00 $ 16,000.00 ADVERTISE&AWARD CJUSD $ 10,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 12,000.00 ADVERTISE&AWARD CITY $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CO $ 143,000.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 143,000.00 $ - $ - $ 23,000.00 $ 204,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CJUSD $ 138,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 138,000.00 $ 163,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CITY 5 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 SURVEY CO $ 51,000.00 $ 14,00100 $ 14,000.00 $ 51,000.00 $ - $ _ $ 9,000.00 $ 74,000.00 SURVEY CJUSD $ 49,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 49,000.00 $ 58,000.00 SURVEY CITY $ 9,00100 $ 9,000.00 $ 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY SIA STP Payments Processing Committee—Educational Review:Understanding"Check 21"and Its Current Status The following diagram presents a high-level depiction of the deposit process after Check 21 is implemented. Note that although Check 21 does not require digital interchange, Check 21 may help facilitate it. Deposit Process after Check 21 Client's bank honors check and debits NEW STEP IN PROCESS-- client's account. Substitute check,or Client mails check Can Occur at into branch. original check,may be returned to client. Point A, Point B,or Point C ii? ,. j13 \�^ - a ti Depositor or depository bank images check and either transmits image or strategically piiiits a substitute check closer to the clearing channel. t<rrr101111.f Branch or operations area Depository bank receives Clearing channel(Federal Reserve, receives and deposits check. Clearinghouse,Direct Send) check. receives substitute check and debits client's bank. NOTE:Truncation and substitute check creation can occur,but does not have to occur,at any point in the process. What Will Change with Check 21? Implementation of Check 21 will result in changes that should be taken into consideration by all financial services participants(banks,broker/dealers,utilities,etc.): ■ Banks can collect or return properly prepared substitute checks without the need for an agreement with the receiving bank ▪ A substitute check is a paper reproduction of the original check that o Contains an image of the front and back of the original check o Bears a MICR line containing all the information appearing on the MICR line of the original check o Conforms with applicable industry standards for substitute checks o Is suitable for automated processing in the same manner as the original check. To be the legal equivalent of the original check,a substitute check must o Accurately represent all of the information on the front and back of the original check Copyright©2004,Securities Industry Association 10 $0.0600 $24.36 $84,679.99 010000, REMOTE DEP-ACCOUNT MAINTENANCE 1 $25.0000 $25.00 $86,904.75 Total EDI Services $135.26 $470,189.46 Wire Transfer Services 350120 DIRECT ACCOUNT TRANSFER 3 $3.0000 $9.00 $31,285.71 350123 ELEC WIRE OUT-BOOK DB 1 $5.5000 $5.50 $19,119.05 350551 ELEC WIRE BK MNT TEMP STORAGE 3 $1.5000 $4.50 $15,642.86 359999 WIRE MODULE MAINTENANCE SVCS 1 $0.0000 - $0.00 $0.00 Total Wire Transfer Services $19.00 $66,047.61 Information Services 400050 DIRECT PREVIOUS DAY ACCT 3 $16.6500 $49.95 $173,635.69 400051 PREVIOUS DAY EXT ITEM 226 $0.0000 $0.00 $0.00 400053 DIRECT CURRENT DAY ACCT 3 $0.0000 $0.00 $0.00 400054 CURRENT DAY STD ITEM 144 $0.0000 $0.00 $0.00 Total Information Services $49.95 $173,635.69 TOTAL ACTIVITY CHARGES: $405.16 $1,408,413.14 Prices are valid for 90 days from receipt of this pro-forma. Other fees may be assessed in accordance with Bank of America's Schedule of Fees. Confidential to Bank of America Page 2 of 3 Plan Consultant: Keenan&Associates-Customer Service Toll Free Number: (800)z444-9995,Ext. 3672 Social Security:Toll Free Number(800) 385-0778—Website:www.socialsecurity.gov ETING 6/15/2011 Checked by Page 2 of 2 $ 98,000.0D $ 115,500.00 CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY CITY $ 17,500.00 $ 17,500.00 _ ADVERTISE&AWARD CO $ 11,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 0 11,000.00 $ - $ 2,000.00 $ 16,000.00 ADVERTISE&AWARD CJUSD $ 10,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 12,000.00 ADVERTISE&AWARD CITY $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CO $ 143,000.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 143,000.00 $ - $ - $ 23,000.00 $ 204,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CJUSD $ 138,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 138,000.00 $ 163,000.00 INSPECTION&TESTING CITY 5 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 SURVEY CO $ 51,000.00 $ 14,00100 $ 14,000.00 $ 51,000.00 $ - $ _ $ 9,000.00 $ 74,000.00 SURVEY CJUSD $ 49,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 49,000.00 $ 58,000.00 SURVEY CITY $ 9,00100 $ 9,000.00 $ 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY SIA SW Payments Processing Committee—Educational Review:Understanding"Check 21"audits Current Status o Bear the legend: "This is a legal copy of your check. You can use it the same way you would use the original check." • A bank that creates a substitute check(the"reconverting bank")indemnifies subsequent parties for losses resulting from receipt of the substitute check instead of the original check • Expedited Recredit provisions for consumers who incur losses due to receipt of a substitute check instead of an original check • Banks must distribute disclosures to their consumer customers who receive substitute checks. Copyright C.2004,Securities Industry Association 11 f the California Health and Safety Code ( ) 1/VS-1. ibit "A" June 8, 2010, Jurisdiction Master Agreement, No. C10246, Exhibit "B". Bankof America Remote Deposit Service Amendment to the Terms and Conditions This Amendment("Amendment")is to the Treasury Services Terms and Conditions Booklet or the Cash Management Services Terms and Conditions Booklet executed by you (the "Booklet"). Terms used but not defined in this Amendment will have the meanings given to them in the Booklet. The purpose of this Amendment is to describe the terms and conditions under which we will provide you with the Remote Deposit Service, as described below. Subject to our specific approval, you may use our Remote Deposit Service under the following terms and conditions once you have signed the Authorization and Agreement signature page for the Booklet and this Amendment, and completed any set up forms and testing requirements for the services. REMOTE DEPOSIT SERVICE The Remote Deposit Service allows you to create or have created on your behalf an Image, Paper Image or an IRD from an Electronic Image of an original paper checks, as described in the applicable User Documentation. CLIENT RESPONSIBILITIES You acknowledge that certain Websites may be made available to you to assist us in providing you this Remote Deposit Service. You understand that you are responsible for capturing and sending fully legible copies of the original paper check or Electronic Image which will be created as a Paper Image or IRD. Prior to sending us an Electronic Image transmission, you and we must agree on image and transmission standards as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation. It is your responsibility to use check imaging equipment acceptable to us as specified to you from time to time("Hardware")to be installed at your site in order to use the Remote Deposit Services. The terms and conditions pursuant to which the Hardware is obtained, installed and maintained shall be as agreed between you and the vendor and/or lessor of such Hardware and we assume no responsibility therefore. You shall pay Bank for the amount of any returned IRDs or returned Images (including rejected IRDs or rejected Images)or any claims for adjustments accepted by Bank, for any IRD or Image which Bank has previously credited to your account. Such amounts shall be charged as returns to your account and are immediately due and payable by you to us. Returned IRDs and returned Images appear on your reports to the extent agreed between you and us. Certain returned IRDs and returned Images shall be redeposited, if you have a separate Reclear Service agreement or arrangement with us. Any IRD created and deposited to your account must comply with all requirements mandated by Check 21. Except as provided herein,for any IRD created under this Remote Deposit Service,you give the same representations,warranties and indemnities to us that we, as reconverting bank,give under 12 CFR Parts 229.52 and 229.53 of Check 21 regulations or any successor legislation. With respect to any Image forward presented by us after your deposit, in paper check or Image form, in your account, you give the,same representations, warranties and indemnities to us that we, as . sending bank,give pursuant to the image exchange rules, including any applicable clearing house rules and/or regulations that govern us. With respect to Images sent by you to us under this Service, your warranties include warranties that the Image accurately represents all the information on the front and back of the original check as of the time the original check was truncated, the MICR-line information contains all information needed for a substitute check or draft, and any transmission to us from you complies with the specifications described in the applicable User Documentation. You agree to indemnify us and any receiving parties that suffer losses as a result of receiving the substitute instead of the original, or receiving duplicate items, whether in paper or Image form. You understand you are responsible for capturing and sending fully legible copies of the item which may be created as an IRD or Image. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Website provided by us operates in a manner which causes you to breach any warranties under Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY REMOTE DEPOSIT SERVICE AMENDMENT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CLIENT RESPONSIBILITIES(continued...) Notwithstanding the preceding paragraph, you acknowledge that we will apply and be responsible for(i)the appropriate endorsement of the bank of first deposit, if applicable, as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation for each printed IRD and each Image(for items collected by image exchange); (ii)the appropriate legend of legal equivalency on the front of the printed IRD; and (iii) appropriate language identifying the reconverting'bank if we do not clear your electronic image transmission through image exchange. If you have captured Images from checks,you agree that you will securely store,safeguard and securely destroy items as set forth in the applicable User Documentation. SECURITY PROCEDURE You agree to use the Security Procedures, if any,when you make requests or take actions with regard to the Service. The purpose of the Security Procedures is to verify the authenticity of the request or action and not to detect errors in the transmission or content of any Image or IRD. Each time you use a Service, you represent and warrant to us that it has determined that, in view of your requirements, the Security Procedure is a satisfactory method of verifying the authenticity of the relevant requests or actions. You agree that we may act upon any request or action of you, the authenticity of which has been verified through the use of the Security Procedures. SUPPLEMENTAL GLOSSARY Check 21. The Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act, 12 CFR 229 or any successor legislation. Any IRD created and deposited in your account must comply with all requirements mandated by Check 21. Electronic Image. An image conforming to the applicable industry standards for Images. Image. An Electronic Image or Paper Image. With regard to an Image of an original paper check, you agree that the check Image that is deposited with us under the Remote Deposit Service shall be a "check" and/or an "item" (as applicable) for all purposes under this Amendment, any agreement between you and us relating to the collection of checks generally, the Uniform Commercial Code, the Expedited Funds Availability Act, Regulation CC, any other federal or state check law, and federal and clearinghouse rules, to the same extent as that original is a"check"or an"item"as applicable. IRD. An Image Replacement Document or substitute check, as set form in Check 21, which provides that a properly prepared substitute check that meets the requirements for legal equivalence is the legal equivalent of the original for all purposes. Paper Image. An Image that is a paper reproduction of the related physical check(the original paper item or substitute check created from an image of the original paper item) created with image technology. Website. Any internet website and/or online access channel for use in accessing one or more Services. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 2 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation . sending bank,give pursuant to the image exchange rules, including any applicable clearing house rules and/or regulations that govern us. With respect to Images sent by you to us under this Service, your warranties include warranties that the Image accurately represents all the information on the front and back of the original check as of the time the original check was truncated, the MICR-line information contains all information needed for a substitute check or draft, and any transmission to us from you complies with the specifications described in the applicable User Documentation. You agree to indemnify us and any receiving parties that suffer losses as a result of receiving the substitute instead of the original, or receiving duplicate items, whether in paper or Image form. You understand you are responsible for capturing and sending fully legible copies of the item which may be created as an IRD or Image. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Website provided by us operates in a manner which causes you to breach any warranties under Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY REMOTE DEPOSIT SERVICE AMENDMENT TO THE•TERMS AND CONDfPIONS Date: 07/06/2011 City of Grand Terrace,The (CLIENT'S LEGAL NAME) _._ (Signature)__ Bernard Simon (Print Name) Finance Director (Print Title) 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 3 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation credit provisions for consumers who incur losses due to receipt of a substitute check instead of an original check • Banks must distribute disclosures to their consumer customers who receive substitute checks. Copyright C.2004,Securities Industry Association 11 f the California Health and Safety Code ( ) 1/VS-1. ibit "A" June 8, 2010, Jurisdiction Master Agreement, No. C10246, Exhibit "B". The Blue2lounlain Cih Grad TORNIAerraee AGENDA REPORT CALIF MEETING DATE: July 26, 2011 Council Item (X) CRA Item ( ) TITLE: City Council's motion regarding the direction to Staff to sell cellular site leases at Richard Rollins Park and Grand Terrace Fire Station #23. PRESENTED BY: Matthew Wirz, Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: 1. Make a new motion directing staff to sell the cellular site leases at Richard Rollins Park and Fire Station No. #23, to Unison Site Management, LLC. in the amount of$356,897. 2. Authorize the City Manager to sign the final agreements for the sale of City owned cellular site leases. BACKGROUND: On April 26, 2011 City Council reviewed the concept of selling City owned cellular site leases and provided direction to Staff to continue to market the City owned cellular site leases and submit all offers for review by the City Council. On July 14, 2011 Staff provided City Council with purchase offers summarized in a chart. There was an error made in the chart transposing the Unison offer to be $365,897 when the offer was $356,897. Council agreed to a motion to direct staff to pursue the cellular lease purchase offer from Unison Site Management, LLC, in the amount of $365,897 as shown on the chart for the sites located at Richard Rollins Park and Grand Terrace Fire Station No. 23. In addition, the City Council authorizes the City Manager to sign the final agreements for the sale of City owned cellular site leases. DISCUSSION: In order to move forward with the sale, Unison Site Management LLC is requesting the motion reflect the accepted offer of $356,897 as initially proposed. The original offer signed by the City Manager dated July 16, 2011 is included as Attachment"A". COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. age. An image conforming to the applicable industry standards for Images. Image. An Electronic Image or Paper Image. With regard to an Image of an original paper check, you agree that the check Image that is deposited with us under the Remote Deposit Service shall be a "check" and/or an "item" (as applicable) for all purposes under this Amendment, any agreement between you and us relating to the collection of checks generally, the Uniform Commercial Code, the Expedited Funds Availability Act, Regulation CC, any other federal or state check law, and federal and clearinghouse rules, to the same extent as that original is a"check"or an"item"as applicable. IRD. An Image Replacement Document or substitute check, as set form in Check 21, which provides that a properly prepared substitute check that meets the requirements for legal equivalence is the legal equivalent of the original for all purposes. Paper Image. An Image that is a paper reproduction of the related physical check(the original paper item or substitute check created from an image of the original paper item) created with image technology. Website. Any internet website and/or online access channel for use in accessing one or more Services. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 2 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation . sending bank,give pursuant to the image exchange rules, including any applicable clearing house rules and/or regulations that govern us. With respect to Images sent by you to us under this Service, your warranties include warranties that the Image accurately represents all the information on the front and back of the original check as of the time the original check was truncated, the MICR-line information contains all information needed for a substitute check or draft, and any transmission to us from you complies with the specifications described in the applicable User Documentation. You agree to indemnify us and any receiving parties that suffer losses as a result of receiving the substitute instead of the original, or receiving duplicate items, whether in paper or Image form. You understand you are responsible for capturing and sending fully legible copies of the item which may be created as an IRD or Image. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Website provided by us operates in a manner which causes you to breach any warranties under Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Respectfully submitted, • atthew Wirz Management Analyst Manager Approval: /4 Bet M. A ams City Manager ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit"A" Offer from Unison Site Management LLC. (Print Name) Finance Director (Print Title) 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 3 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation credit provisions for consumers who incur losses due to receipt of a substitute check instead of an original check • Banks must distribute disclosures to their consumer customers who receive substitute checks. Copyright C.2004,Securities Industry Association 11 f the California Health and Safety Code ( ) 1/VS-1. ibit "A" June 8, 2010, Jurisdiction Master Agreement, No. C10246, Exhibit "B". NI SON:I))) 340 Madison Avenue,Suite 12F,New York,NY 10173 www.unisonslte.com May 25,2011 The offer is subject to due diligence and is based on the assumptions City of Grand Terrace listed below: Richard Shields 22795 Barton Rd • Site Management Services tower with Vcrizorr Wireless as Ste B tenant Grand Terrace,CA 92313-5271 • T-Mobile tower with T-Mobile as tenant • $3,068.76 total current monthly rent • $3,068.76 total purchased monthly rent • No escalation(Site Management Services)escalation&3.0% Site#:457920&471521 annual(T-Mobile)escalation Dear Richard: Thank you for your interest in our cell site lease conversion program. After analyzing the information you provided,Unison is prepared to offer you the three options listed below for the purchase and easement on your cellular site to,include the scheduled cell site tenant revenue. Option I: Unison will pay you S373,775 in exchange for a fifty year,general easement if the offer is accepted by June 8,2011. Option 2: Unison will pay you S369,172 in exchange fora forty year,general easement if the offer is accepted by June 8,2011. Option 3: Unison will pay you S356,897 in exchange for a thirty year,general easement if the offer is accepted by June 8,2011. Our offer is to purchase a defined easement for the cell sites. The final amount off our offer is subject to due diligence and confirmation of your monthly rent escalators and site tenants. The anneal of the Unison deal: • Convert your lease into cash:Unison Site Management,LLC is rapidly building a nationwide portfolio of cell site leases. Our program allows you to convert your lease into hard cash. The telecom industry is changing rapidly and we encourage you to understand and consider your options now. • Secure your asset:With our lump sum cash offer,the value of your lease asset will no longer be dependent on future rent payments. This payment is yours regardless of what happens to your site in the future—even if you sell the property. You can invest your capital payment in real estate,stocks,bonds,or your own business. A reminder why you must act quickly and reduce your risk There is language in your lease stating that it can be terminated with as little as one month's notice. Our lump sum in cash will help you secure your asset from the following: • Debt:To provide service in literally hundreds of markets,each wireless service provider has built out a separate network. Today,there are approximately 300,000 cell sites and antennae,but this build up has been costly:providers have borrowed$100 billion to finance its construction. That is a lot of debt for companies getting 4 cents per minute. • Rent reduction and tower decommissioning:Providers are looking for ways to cut costs and one way to do this is to reduce your rent or decommission your tower. There is a good chance that your current monthly rent income will reduce significantly or disappear altogether,leaving you with a depreciating asset or no asset at all. • Consolidation:A recent and remarkable merger saw AT&T and its 135-year legacy disappear overnight when it merged with SBC. Since February 24th,2004 there have been five major mergers in the telecom industry for a total deal value of over$125 billion. As a result of this ongoing telecom merger epidemic,a substantial number of sites have already become redundant. • Technology gains:Satellite telephone and DAS(Distributed Antenna System)technology has created provider networks that can reach farther and arc more efficient. This increase in coverage will continue to translate to a reduced need for cell towers. If you have any questions,please contact me directly at(951)354-2795.I look forward to discussing our offer with you at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, Craig Bloomingdale Unison Site Management,LLC Unison Site Management Phone:(212)599-2444•Fax:(212)755-4080 nd any receiving parties that suffer losses as a result of receiving the substitute instead of the original, or receiving duplicate items, whether in paper or Image form. You understand you are responsible for capturing and sending fully legible copies of the item which may be created as an IRD or Image. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Website provided by us operates in a manner which causes you to breach any warranties under Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY tf, AJN ■ ®• 340 Madison Avenue,Suite 12F,New York,NY 10173 www.unisonsite.com May 25,2011 Terms of Agreement *Our signatures below acknowledge that these are the business terms upon which this transaction will be completed.However, the terms of this agreement are subject to due diligence and final Underwriting commitment by Unison,and receipt by Unison of all required documentation,including but not limited to the complete Carrier lease(s), proof of scheduled monthly rent(s), escalator(s),and Carrier(s).By signing and dating below, Unison will endeavor to close this transaction within 90 days of the date of your acceptance of these business terms.The terms of this agreement will expire in six(6)months unless extended by mutual consent. *When used herein,the terms Unison and Site Owner shall refer to Unison and the Site Owner and their respective successors and/or assigns. Seller("Site Owner"):City of Grand Terrace Purchaser: Unison Site Management("Unison") Site#:457920 Site Address:22745 De Berry St,Grand Terrace,CA 92313 Tenant/Carrier(s):Site Management Services tower with Verizod Wireless as tenant Current Rent:$1,000.00 Purchased Rent:$1,000.00 Escalator:No escalation(Site Management Services) Site#:471521 Site Address:22582 City Center CT,Grand Terrace,CA 92313 Tenant/Carrier(s):T-Mobile tower with T-Mobile as tenant Current Rent:$2,068.76 Purchased Rent:$2,068.76 Escalator:3.0%annual(T-Mobile) Easement Area:Ground space around the towers described by existing wireless service provider leases including equipment footprints and access and utility easements. Purchase Price(Please indicate the offer accepted by checking and initialing the appropriate boxes below): 0 Option 1:50 Year Easement: $373,775 Initial: The purchase price shall be the gross purchase price from which will be netted: • Pro-rated rent for the remainder of the month of closing plus the next two months(Site Owner shall be entitled to cash and retain the rent check(s)for the pro-rated periods); ❑Option 2:40 Year Easement: $369,172 Initial: The purchase price shall be the gross purchase price from which will be netted: • Pro-rated rent for the remainder of the.month of closing plus the next two months(Site Owner shall be entitled to cash and retain the rent check(s)for the pro-rated periods); Option 3:30 Year Easement: $356,897 Initial: A he purchase price shall be the gross purchase price from which will be netted: • Pro-rated rent for the remainder of the month of closing plus the next two months(Site Owner shall be entitled to cash and retain the rent check(s)for the pro-rated periods); Offer Expiration Date:June 8,2011 Continued on pages 2&3 Unison Site Management Phone:(212)599-2444•Fax:(212)755-4080 ion your tower. There is a good chance that your current monthly rent income will reduce significantly or disappear altogether,leaving you with a depreciating asset or no asset at all. • Consolidation:A recent and remarkable merger saw AT&T and its 135-year legacy disappear overnight when it merged with SBC. Since February 24th,2004 there have been five major mergers in the telecom industry for a total deal value of over$125 billion. As a result of this ongoing telecom merger epidemic,a substantial number of sites have already become redundant. • Technology gains:Satellite telephone and DAS(Distributed Antenna System)technology has created provider networks that can reach farther and arc more efficient. This increase in coverage will continue to translate to a reduced need for cell towers. If you have any questions,please contact me directly at(951)354-2795.I look forward to discussing our offer with you at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, Craig Bloomingdale Unison Site Management,LLC Unison Site Management Phone:(212)599-2444•Fax:(212)755-4080 nd any receiving parties that suffer losses as a result of receiving the substitute instead of the original, or receiving duplicate items, whether in paper or Image form. You understand you are responsible for capturing and sending fully legible copies of the item which may be created as an IRD or Image. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Website provided by us operates in a manner which causes you to breach any warranties under Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY l s( UNISON)) 340 Madison Avenue,Suite 12F,New York,NY 10173 www.unisonsite.com Document Checklist 1. LANDLORD ENTITY TAX ID#or SSN: 2. 1 agree to provide my Unison representative with the following information required for closing: ❑ Full copy of each Telecommunications Tenant Agreement,including any addenda,amendments, assignments,notice or exercise letter ❑ Commencement date verification of each Telecommunications Tenant Agreement and copies of at least the last three months'rent checks ❑ All available correspondence from Telecommunications Tenants ❑ Proof of Site Owner's existence and authority,as applicable: (Entity Documents—Corporate filing receipt,Certificate of Good Standing,Articles of Incorporation,Articles of Formation,By-laws,Operating Agreement;Partnership Agreement;Trust Agreement;Probate documents,Death Certificate;Divorce Decree;Property Management Agreement) ❑ Deed ❑ Survey of property ❑ If there is a mortgage on the property,Site Owner agrees to obtain a Non-Disturbance Agreement from the lender 3. The following documents will substantially expedite closing: ❑ Construction Drawings/Site Plans for the Telecommunication Tenants'installations ❑ Title Report or Title Insurance Policy ❑ Existing Environmental Reports,if applicable(Phase 1 or 2 or comparable) ❑ Current Tax Bill for property ❑ Appraisal or Fair Market Valuation(particularly if Lender may not easily provide Non-Disturbance and Attornment Agreement) ❑ Site Plan Site O Signatu e Date signed: (,//fr/"I Site Owner Contact information Attorney Contact Information Name: Name: Phone: Phone: Fax: Fax: Email: Email: Mortgage(if none,please indicate below) Lender Name: Phone: Mortgage Amount: Fax: Lender Contact: Email: Unison Site Management Phone:(212)599-2444•Fax:(212)755-4080 check(s)for the pro-rated periods); ❑Option 2:40 Year Easement: $369,172 Initial: The purchase price shall be the gross purchase price from which will be netted: • Pro-rated rent for the remainder of the.month of closing plus the next two months(Site Owner shall be entitled to cash and retain the rent check(s)for the pro-rated periods); Option 3:30 Year Easement: $356,897 Initial: A he purchase price shall be the gross purchase price from which will be netted: • Pro-rated rent for the remainder of the month of closing plus the next two months(Site Owner shall be entitled to cash and retain the rent check(s)for the pro-rated periods); Offer Expiration Date:June 8,2011 Continued on pages 2&3 Unison Site Management Phone:(212)599-2444•Fax:(212)755-4080 ion your tower. There is a good chance that your current monthly rent income will reduce significantly or disappear altogether,leaving you with a depreciating asset or no asset at all. • Consolidation:A recent and remarkable merger saw AT&T and its 135-year legacy disappear overnight when it merged with SBC. Since February 24th,2004 there have been five major mergers in the telecom industry for a total deal value of over$125 billion. As a result of this ongoing telecom merger epidemic,a substantial number of sites have already become redundant. • Technology gains:Satellite telephone and DAS(Distributed Antenna System)technology has created provider networks that can reach farther and arc more efficient. This increase in coverage will continue to translate to a reduced need for cell towers. If you have any questions,please contact me directly at(951)354-2795.I look forward to discussing our offer with you at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, Craig Bloomingdale Unison Site Management,LLC Unison Site Management Phone:(212)599-2444•Fax:(212)755-4080 nd any receiving parties that suffer losses as a result of receiving the substitute instead of the original, or receiving duplicate items, whether in paper or Image form. You understand you are responsible for capturing and sending fully legible copies of the item which may be created as an IRD or Image. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Website provided by us operates in a manner which causes you to breach any warranties under Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY " kUN 'SO° ) 340 Madison Avenue,Suite 12F,New York,NY 10173 www.unisonsite.com By signing below,you grant Unison an Option to purchase your interest in the communications facility leases(the"Subject Leases")on land(the"Premises")owned by you,as well as an easement for wireless telecommunications purposes. Unison may exercise the Option at any time within the Option Period,which shall commence upon execution of this Term Sheet and end 6(six)months thereafter. If Unison exercises the Option,you will sell and Unison will purchase the Lease and Easement referenced herein. You acknowledge that a$100 nonrefundable cash deposit and Unison commitment to expend time,effort and expense to evaluate this transaction are good,valuable and sufficient consideration for the Option granted herein. You agree to cooperate fully with Unison in connection with its evaluation of this transaction. You shall not,directly or indirectly (a)offer the Lease or the Premises for sale or assignment to any other person;(b)negotiate,solicit or entertain any offers to sell or assign any interest in the Lease or Premises to any other person;or(c)modify,amend,supplement,extend,renew,terminate or cancel the Lease. This letter is intended as,and shall be,a legally binding commitment.In the event of a breach of this letter agreement by you,Unison shall,in addition to its other rights and remedies,be entitled to compensation for its time,effort and expense to evaluate this transaction and,in any action to enforce this letter agreement,to recovery of its reasonable attorneys' fees. *Site Owner agrees to provide Unison with all due diligence items listed under the Document Checklist on the following page at the point of execution of this agreement by the Site Owner. Site Owner also agrees to provide comments(if any)to the Easement and Assignment agreement within 14 days of the execution of this agreement. The terms of this offer will expire if such comments are not provided within 14 days of the execution of this agreement by the Site Owner. As noted on page 2 hereto,if there is a mortgage on the property,Site Owner agrees to obtain a Non-Disturbance Agreement("NDA")from the lender. If the NDA is impossible to obtain,site owner may request a risk assessment to determine whether Unison will close without the NDA. If the NDA requirement is waived,the purchase price will automatically be reduced by at least 10 times the monthly rent at closing. Craig Bloomingdale Site O Site Development Officer Date: for Unison Site Management Unison Site Management Phone:(212)599-2444•Fax:(212)755-4080 onth of closing plus the next two months(Site Owner shall be entitled to cash and retain the rent check(s)for the pro-rated periods); Offer Expiration Date:June 8,2011 Continued on pages 2&3 Unison Site Management Phone:(212)599-2444•Fax:(212)755-4080 ion your tower. There is a good chance that your current monthly rent income will reduce significantly or disappear altogether,leaving you with a depreciating asset or no asset at all. • Consolidation:A recent and remarkable merger saw AT&T and its 135-year legacy disappear overnight when it merged with SBC. Since February 24th,2004 there have been five major mergers in the telecom industry for a total deal value of over$125 billion. As a result of this ongoing telecom merger epidemic,a substantial number of sites have already become redundant. • Technology gains:Satellite telephone and DAS(Distributed Antenna System)technology has created provider networks that can reach farther and arc more efficient. This increase in coverage will continue to translate to a reduced need for cell towers. If you have any questions,please contact me directly at(951)354-2795.I look forward to discussing our offer with you at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, Craig Bloomingdale Unison Site Management,LLC Unison Site Management Phone:(212)599-2444•Fax:(212)755-4080 nd any receiving parties that suffer losses as a result of receiving the substitute instead of the original, or receiving duplicate items, whether in paper or Image form. You understand you are responsible for capturing and sending fully legible copies of the item which may be created as an IRD or Image. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Website provided by us operates in a manner which causes you to breach any warranties under Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY The Blue Mountain CO Grand Terrace AGENDA REPORT CALIFORNIA MEETING DATE: July 26,2011 Council Item(X) CRA Item ( ) TITLE: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace, adopting residential and commercial solid waste recycling rates. PRESENTED BY: Matt Wirz,Management Analysis RECOMMENDATION: 1. Conduct a Public Hearing to consider the adoption of residential and commercial solid waste and recycling rate increase. 2. Adopt Resolution No. 2011- , setting forth residential and commercial solid waste and recycling rates. BACKGROUND: On July 1, 2007 Burrtec Waste Industries acquired the Solid Waste Franchise Agreement for the City of Grand Terrace. Over the past four years, Burrtec has provided a complete residential and commercial collection program as well as recent program upgrades that included: 1. Illegally dumped materials collection along the City's main streets and thoroughfares. 2. Collection fleet conversion from diesel fuel vehicles to alternative fueled vehicles. 3. Replacement of all previous residential trash, recycling and green waste containers with new containers. Over time, the cost of waste collection, disposal and processing are impacted by a number of variables. These impacts include increased landfill fees, green waste and mixed recyclables processing fees, fuel, equipment,program, and labor costs. • On November 10, 2009 the City Council conducted a workshop to review a proposed refuse rate adjustment and amendment to the existing franchise agreement between the City and Burrtec Waste Industries. At the workshop, City Council directed staff to prepare a proposed refuse rate adjustment for consideration. On December 8, 2009 Staff presented a proposed refuse rate adjustment and resolution setting a public hearing for January 26, 2010 in order to consider adoption of the proposed rate adjustments. The current refuse rates charged by Burrtec Waste Industries include the collection, processing and disposal cost for solid waste, recycling and green wastes for residential, commercial and COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. 64 est a risk assessment to determine whether Unison will close without the NDA. If the NDA requirement is waived,the purchase price will automatically be reduced by at least 10 times the monthly rent at closing. Craig Bloomingdale Site O Site Development Officer Date: for Unison Site Management Unison Site Management Phone:(212)599-2444•Fax:(212)755-4080 onth of closing plus the next two months(Site Owner shall be entitled to cash and retain the rent check(s)for the pro-rated periods); Offer Expiration Date:June 8,2011 Continued on pages 2&3 Unison Site Management Phone:(212)599-2444•Fax:(212)755-4080 ion your tower. There is a good chance that your current monthly rent income will reduce significantly or disappear altogether,leaving you with a depreciating asset or no asset at all. • Consolidation:A recent and remarkable merger saw AT&T and its 135-year legacy disappear overnight when it merged with SBC. Since February 24th,2004 there have been five major mergers in the telecom industry for a total deal value of over$125 billion. As a result of this ongoing telecom merger epidemic,a substantial number of sites have already become redundant. • Technology gains:Satellite telephone and DAS(Distributed Antenna System)technology has created provider networks that can reach farther and arc more efficient. This increase in coverage will continue to translate to a reduced need for cell towers. If you have any questions,please contact me directly at(951)354-2795.I look forward to discussing our offer with you at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, Craig Bloomingdale Unison Site Management,LLC Unison Site Management Phone:(212)599-2444•Fax:(212)755-4080 nd any receiving parties that suffer losses as a result of receiving the substitute instead of the original, or receiving duplicate items, whether in paper or Image form. You understand you are responsible for capturing and sending fully legible copies of the item which may be created as an IRD or Image. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Website provided by us operates in a manner which causes you to breach any warranties under Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY industrial customers. These rates also include two waste related programs: a household hazardous waste drop-off program and a street sweeping program. The rate increase from January 26, 2010 resulted in no-change to the existing residential collection rates. On the commercial side, Staff was able to add the street sweeping component and Pavement Impact Fee to the rates while only requiring a modest rate increase of approximately 2%. DISCUSSION: Burrtec is requesting an adjustment in the residential and commercial service component that is based on the percentage change in the annual Consumer Price Index. Additionally, Burrtec Waste Industries is requesting a pass through of the adjusted increases in disposal and processing fees. Exhibit"A" shows the proposed rate increases for the City of Grand Terrace. The proposed rate adjustment will result in approximately 1.85% increase for residential service and approximately 2.50% for commercial service. The rate includes the collection, disposal and processing fees, city administrative fee, pavement impact fee and street sweeping fee. Proposition 218 notices were mailed by Burrtee Waste Industries on June 1, 2011 to all residential and commercial customers notifying them of the Public Hearing scheduled for July 26, 2011 at which time the City Council would consider adoption of the proposed refuse rate adjustments. A copy of that notice is included with this staff report as Exhibit`B". Staff is recommending that the City Council conduct a public hearing to consider adoption of residential and commercial solid waste and recycling rate increases and adopt the attached resolution setting forth the new solid waste rate increases. FISCAL IMPACT: The proposed rate adjustments will result in minor increase in revenue estimated around $5,800 per year based on the percentage of franchise fees assessed on the increased rates. Res,.= tfully submitted, 1111111111111111"/ Matt Wirz, .nage ent Analysis Manager Approval: r Betsy^I 3 VI. Adams City Manager ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit"A City of Grand Terrace Proposed Rate Increase Exhibit`B".Proposition 218 Notice Resolution without the NDA. If the NDA requirement is waived,the purchase price will automatically be reduced by at least 10 times the monthly rent at closing. Craig Bloomingdale Site O Site Development Officer Date: for Unison Site Management Unison Site Management Phone:(212)599-2444•Fax:(212)755-4080 onth of closing plus the next two months(Site Owner shall be entitled to cash and retain the rent check(s)for the pro-rated periods); Offer Expiration Date:June 8,2011 Continued on pages 2&3 Unison Site Management Phone:(212)599-2444•Fax:(212)755-4080 ion your tower. There is a good chance that your current monthly rent income will reduce significantly or disappear altogether,leaving you with a depreciating asset or no asset at all. • Consolidation:A recent and remarkable merger saw AT&T and its 135-year legacy disappear overnight when it merged with SBC. Since February 24th,2004 there have been five major mergers in the telecom industry for a total deal value of over$125 billion. As a result of this ongoing telecom merger epidemic,a substantial number of sites have already become redundant. • Technology gains:Satellite telephone and DAS(Distributed Antenna System)technology has created provider networks that can reach farther and arc more efficient. This increase in coverage will continue to translate to a reduced need for cell towers. If you have any questions,please contact me directly at(951)354-2795.I look forward to discussing our offer with you at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, Craig Bloomingdale Unison Site Management,LLC Unison Site Management Phone:(212)599-2444•Fax:(212)755-4080 nd any receiving parties that suffer losses as a result of receiving the substitute instead of the original, or receiving duplicate items, whether in paper or Image form. You understand you are responsible for capturing and sending fully legible copies of the item which may be created as an IRD or Image. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Website provided by us operates in a manner which causes you to breach any warranties under Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY EXHIBIT A CITY OF GRAND TERRACE PROPOSED RATE INCREASE Current Proposed Current Service Type Rate Rate Service T •e Rate Proposed Rate Residential Refuse Commercial Front Load Compactor Standard-96 Gallon $ 22.44 $ 22.86 Size Freq 64 Gallon Trash $ 21.02 $ 21.52 2 1 $ 128.34 $ 132.33 Extra 96 Gallon Trash Barrel $ 10.81 $ 11.04 2 2 $ 241.54 $ 249.23 Extra 64 Gallon Trash Barrel $ 8.80 $ 8.99 2 3 $ 369.88 $ 381.58 Extra Recycling Barrel $ 2.03 $ 2.07 2 4 $ 498.22 $ 513.92 Extra Green Waste Barrel $ 2.03 $ 2.07 2 5 $ 625.97 $ 645.68 Backyard/Sideyard Service $ 12.50 $ 12.77 2 6 $ 754.61 $ 778.31 Extra Pick-Up 2yd On-Site $ 21.43 $ 22.19 Extra Pick-Up 2yd Unscheduled $ 37.54 $ 38.63 Commercial Front Load Refuse 3 1 $ 178.46 $ 184.15 Size Freq 3 2 $ 342.19 $ 353.28 2 1 $ 85.51 $ 87.71 3 3 $ 520.73 $ 537.52 2 2 $ 156.21 $ 160.29 3 4 $ 698.96 $ 721.45 2 3 $ 241.71 $ 248.01 3 5 $ 877.77 $ 905.96 2 4 $ 327.24 $ 335.74 3 6 $ 1,056.00 $ 1,089.90 2 5 $ 412.17 $ 422.85 Extra Pick-Up 3 yd On-Site $ 28.35 $ 29.40 2 6 $ 497.97 $ 510.86 Extra Pick-Up 3yd Unscheduled $ 44.45 $ 45.84 Extra Pick-Up 2 yd On-Site $ 12.21 $ 12.56 4 1 $ 236.74 $ 244.32 Extra Pick-Up 2yd Unscheduled $ 28.31 $ 29.01 4 2 $ 458.58 $ 473.42 3 1 $ 114.52 $ 117.53 4 3 $ 695.45 $ 717.88 3 2 $ 214.65 $ 220.37 4 4 $ 932.31 $ 962.31 3 3 $ 329.24 $ 337.99 4 5 $ 1,169.17 $ 1,206.76 3 4 $ 453.33 $ 465.27 4 6 $ 1,404.89 $ 1,450.03 3 5 $ 558.41 $ 573.16 Extra Pick-Up 4 yd On-Site $ 35.27 $ 36.63 3 6 $ 672.70 $ 690.48 Extra Pick-Up 4yd Unscheduled $ 51.37 $ 53.08 Extra Pick-Up 3 yd On-Site $ 14.51 $ 14.96 , Extra Pick-Up 3yd Unscheduled $ 30.62 $ 31.42 Miscellaneous Services 4 1 $ 151.53 $ 155.52 Temporary Bin-3 yd(7-days) $ 53.69 $ 55.48 4 2 $ 288.49 $ 296.18 Burned Bin $ 291.76 $ 297.88 4 3 $ 440.13 $ 451.80 Exchanges $ 61.48 $ 62.77 4 4 $ 591.78 $ 607.44 Lock Rental(Monthly) $ 12.50 $ 12.77 4 5 $ 745.39 $ 765.11 Lost or Stolen Bin $ 521.00 $ 531.93 4 6 $ 893.94 $ 917.57 Overage $ 35.00 $ 35.73 Extra Pick-Up 4 yd On-Site $ 16.82 $ 17.37 Replaced Key $ 5.21 $ 5.32 Extra Pick-Up 4yd Unscheduled $ 32.92 $ 33.82 Locks-Replaced Lock $ 26.05 $ 26.60 6 1 $ 219.49 $ 225.33 6 2 $ 424.20 $ 435.54 Roll-Off&Compactor Services 6 3 $ 644.28 $ 661.46 10 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 4 $ 863.21 $ 886.20 20 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 5 $1,082.71 $1,111.53 40yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 6 $1,302.21 $1,336.86 40 yard Compactor(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Extra Pick-Up 6 yd On-Site $ 21.43 $ 22.19 40 yard Recycling(plus processing) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 Extra Pick-Up 6yd Unscheduled $ 37.54 $ 38.63 40 yard Green Waste(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Refuse Per Ton $ 56.15 $ 57.97 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day, (6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY EXHIBIT B PROPOSITION 218 NOTICE nt st Grand Terrace. CALIFORNIA June 1, 2011 Grand Terrace Refuse Customer or Property Owner: Notice is hereby given that the Grand Terrace City Council will conduct a Public Hearing on the 26 day of July, 2011, at the hour of 6:00 p.m. at the City Council Chambers, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California, in compliance with Proposition 218 regarding proposed adjustments to solid waste and recycling rates and charges. In accordance with Proposition 218, you may protest this proposed adjustment either in person at the public hearing or in writing at City of Grand Terrace, City Clerk, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace California, 92313. The City of Grand Terrace contracts with Burrtec Waste Industries for the provision of solid waste and recycling collection services and charges rates to recover costs associated with providing solid waste and recycling services to customers. RESIDENTIAL: For residential service, the proposed rate adjustment will result in approximately 1.85% increase in the rate charged. The rate includes the collection, disposal and processing fees, city administrative fee, pavement impact fee, street sweeping fee and household hazardous waste fee. Please see the attached rate table on the reverse side of this letter for the proposed rates. COMMERCIAL: For the commercial service, the proposed rate adjustment will result in approximately 2.50% increase in the refuse rate charged. The rate includes the collection, disposal and processing fees, city administrative fee, pavement impact fee and street sweeping fee. Please see the attached rate tables on the reverse side of this letter for the individual rates proposed for each commercial service. Should you have any questions regarding the rate hearing or the proposed increase, please contact the City of Grand Terrace at 824-6621. Sincerely, 32( Betsy Adams City Manager City of Grand Terrace Department of Building & Safety/Public Works 22795 Barton Road, Suite B, Grand Terrace, California, 92313-5295 (909) 825-3825 Fax (909) 825-7506 $ 1,404.89 $ 1,450.03 3 5 $ 558.41 $ 573.16 Extra Pick-Up 4 yd On-Site $ 35.27 $ 36.63 3 6 $ 672.70 $ 690.48 Extra Pick-Up 4yd Unscheduled $ 51.37 $ 53.08 Extra Pick-Up 3 yd On-Site $ 14.51 $ 14.96 , Extra Pick-Up 3yd Unscheduled $ 30.62 $ 31.42 Miscellaneous Services 4 1 $ 151.53 $ 155.52 Temporary Bin-3 yd(7-days) $ 53.69 $ 55.48 4 2 $ 288.49 $ 296.18 Burned Bin $ 291.76 $ 297.88 4 3 $ 440.13 $ 451.80 Exchanges $ 61.48 $ 62.77 4 4 $ 591.78 $ 607.44 Lock Rental(Monthly) $ 12.50 $ 12.77 4 5 $ 745.39 $ 765.11 Lost or Stolen Bin $ 521.00 $ 531.93 4 6 $ 893.94 $ 917.57 Overage $ 35.00 $ 35.73 Extra Pick-Up 4 yd On-Site $ 16.82 $ 17.37 Replaced Key $ 5.21 $ 5.32 Extra Pick-Up 4yd Unscheduled $ 32.92 $ 33.82 Locks-Replaced Lock $ 26.05 $ 26.60 6 1 $ 219.49 $ 225.33 6 2 $ 424.20 $ 435.54 Roll-Off&Compactor Services 6 3 $ 644.28 $ 661.46 10 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 4 $ 863.21 $ 886.20 20 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 5 $1,082.71 $1,111.53 40yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 6 $1,302.21 $1,336.86 40 yard Compactor(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Extra Pick-Up 6 yd On-Site $ 21.43 $ 22.19 40 yard Recycling(plus processing) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 Extra Pick-Up 6yd Unscheduled $ 37.54 $ 38.63 40 yard Green Waste(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Refuse Per Ton $ 56.15 $ 57.97 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day, (6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY RESOLUTION NO.2011- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, ADOPTING RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL SOLID WASTE AND RECYCLING RATES. WHEREAS; the City Council has determined that due to changes in operating and program costs, an adjustment in the service rates for the provision of refuse and recycling collection as shown by Exhibit "A", attached, is hereby deemed appropriate and reasonable. All other rates existing and not separately identified in Exhibit "A" shall remain the same; and, WHEREAS; a Public Hearing was conducted on July 26, 2011, at 6:00 p.m., at the City Council Chambers, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace California, at which time all persons interested in or objecting to the proposed solid waste and recycling rate adjustments were heard; and, WHEREAS; Notice of said solid waste and recycling rate adjustments were mailed using the U.S. Postal Mail Service to all residential and commercial customers of record by Burrtec Waste Industries on or about July 1, 2011 and that said Notice was provided 45-days prior to the Public Hearing in accordance with Proposition 218; and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace that the solid waste and recycling rate adjustments were approved and adopted by the Council on July 26,2011 and shall become effective on August 26,2011. ADOPTED this 26th day of July,2011. Walt Stanckiewitz,Mayor ATTEST: Brenda Mesa, City Clerk collection, disposal and processing fees, city administrative fee, pavement impact fee and street sweeping fee. Please see the attached rate tables on the reverse side of this letter for the individual rates proposed for each commercial service. Should you have any questions regarding the rate hearing or the proposed increase, please contact the City of Grand Terrace at 824-6621. Sincerely, 32( Betsy Adams City Manager City of Grand Terrace Department of Building & Safety/Public Works 22795 Barton Road, Suite B, Grand Terrace, California, 92313-5295 (909) 825-3825 Fax (909) 825-7506 $ 1,404.89 $ 1,450.03 3 5 $ 558.41 $ 573.16 Extra Pick-Up 4 yd On-Site $ 35.27 $ 36.63 3 6 $ 672.70 $ 690.48 Extra Pick-Up 4yd Unscheduled $ 51.37 $ 53.08 Extra Pick-Up 3 yd On-Site $ 14.51 $ 14.96 , Extra Pick-Up 3yd Unscheduled $ 30.62 $ 31.42 Miscellaneous Services 4 1 $ 151.53 $ 155.52 Temporary Bin-3 yd(7-days) $ 53.69 $ 55.48 4 2 $ 288.49 $ 296.18 Burned Bin $ 291.76 $ 297.88 4 3 $ 440.13 $ 451.80 Exchanges $ 61.48 $ 62.77 4 4 $ 591.78 $ 607.44 Lock Rental(Monthly) $ 12.50 $ 12.77 4 5 $ 745.39 $ 765.11 Lost or Stolen Bin $ 521.00 $ 531.93 4 6 $ 893.94 $ 917.57 Overage $ 35.00 $ 35.73 Extra Pick-Up 4 yd On-Site $ 16.82 $ 17.37 Replaced Key $ 5.21 $ 5.32 Extra Pick-Up 4yd Unscheduled $ 32.92 $ 33.82 Locks-Replaced Lock $ 26.05 $ 26.60 6 1 $ 219.49 $ 225.33 6 2 $ 424.20 $ 435.54 Roll-Off&Compactor Services 6 3 $ 644.28 $ 661.46 10 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 4 $ 863.21 $ 886.20 20 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 5 $1,082.71 $1,111.53 40yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 6 $1,302.21 $1,336.86 40 yard Compactor(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Extra Pick-Up 6 yd On-Site $ 21.43 $ 22.19 40 yard Recycling(plus processing) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 Extra Pick-Up 6yd Unscheduled $ 37.54 $ 38.63 40 yard Green Waste(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Refuse Per Ton $ 56.15 $ 57.97 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day, (6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY EXHIBIT A CITY OF GRAND TERRACE PROPOSED RATE INCREASE Current Proposed Current Service Type Rate Rate Service T .e Rate Proposed Rate Residential Refuse Commercial Front Load Compactor Standard-96 Gallon $ 22.44 $ 22.86 Size Freq 64 Gallon Trash $ 21.02 $ 21.52 2 1 $ 128.34 $ 132.33 Extra 96 Gallon Trash Barrel $ 10.81 $ 11.04 2 2 $ 241.54 $ 249.23 Extra 64 Gallon Trash Barrel $ 8.80 $ 8.99 2 3 $ 369.88 $ 381.58 Extra Recycling Barrel $ 2.03 $ 2.07 2 4 $ 498.22 $ 513.92 Extra Green Waste Barrel $ 2.03 $ 2.07 2 5 $ 625.97 $ 645.68 6ackyard/Sideyard Service $ 12.50 $ 12.77 2 6 $ 754.61 $ 778.31 Extra Pick-Up 2 yd On-Site $ 21 43 $ 22.19 Extra Pick-Up 2yd Unscheduled $ 37.54 $ 38.63 Commercial Front Load Refuse 3 1 $ 178.46 $ 184.15 Size Freq 3 2 $ 342.19 $ 353.28 2 1 $ 85.51 $ 87.71 3 3 $ 520.73 $ 537.52 2 2 $ 156.21 $ 160.29 3 4 $ 698.96 $ 721.45 2 3 $ 241 71 $ 248.01 3 5 $ 877 77 $ 905.96 2 4 $ 327.24 $ 335.74 3 6 $ 1,056.00 $ 1,089.90 2 5 $ 412.17 $ 422.85 Extra Pick-Up 3 yd On-Site $ 28.35 $ 29.40 2 6 $ 497.97 $ 510.86 Extra Pick-Up 3yd Unscheduled $ 44.45 $ 45.84 Extra Pick-Up 2 yd On-Site $ 12.21 $ 12.56 4 1 $ 236.74 $ 244.32 Extra Pick-Up 2yd Unscheduled $ 28.31 $ 29.01 4 2 $ 458.58 $ 473.42 3 1 $ 114.52 $ 117.53 4 3 $ 695.45 $ 717.88 3 2 $ 214.65 $ 220.37 4 4 $ 932.31 $ 962.31 3 3 $ 329.24 $ 337.99 4 5 $ 1,169.17 $ 1,206.76 3 4 $ 453.33 $ 465.27 4 6 $ 1,404.89 $ 1,450.03 3 5 $ 558.41 $ 573.16 Extra Pick-Up 4 yd On-Site $ 35.27 $ 36.63 3 6 $ 672.70 $ 690.48 Extra Pick-Up 4yd Unscheduled $ 51.37 $ 53.08 Extra Pick-Up 3 yd On-Site $ 14.51 $ 14.96 Extra Pick-Up 3yd Unscheduled $ 30.62 $ 31 42 Miscellaneous Services 4 1 $ 151.53 $ 155.52 Temporary Bin-3 yd(7-days) $ 53.69 $ 55.48 4 2 $ 288.49 $ 296.18 Burned Bin $ 291 76 $ 297.88 4 3 $ 440.13 $ 451.80 Exchanges $ 61.48 $ 62.77 4 4 $ 591.78 $ 607.44 Lock Rental(Monthly) $ 12.50 $ 12.77 4 5 $ 745.39 $ 765.11 Lost or Stolen Bin $ 521.00 $ 531.93 4 6 $ 893.94 $ 917.57 Overage $ 35.00 $ 35.73 Extra Pick-Up 4 yd On-Site $ 18.82 $ 17.37 Replaced Key $ 5.21 $ 5.32 Extra Pick-Up 4yd Unscheduled $ 32.92 $ 33.82 Locks-Replaced Lock $ 26.05 $ 26.60 6 1 $ 219.49 $ 225.33 6 2 $ 424.20 $ 435.54 Roll-Off 8 Compactor Services 6 3 $ 644.28 $ 661.46 10 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 4 $ 863.21 $ 886.20 20 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 5 $1,082.71 $1,111.53 40 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 6 $1,302.21 $1,336.86 40 yard Compactor(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Extra Pick-Up 6 yd On-Site $ 21 43 $ 22.19 40 yard Recycling(plus processing) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 Extra Pick-Up 6yd Unscheduled $ 37.54 $ 38.63 40 yard Green Waste(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Refuse Per Ton $ 56.15 $ 57.97 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY IhrItlur\luiinI intro +. Gland Terrace AGENDA REPORT CALIFORNIA MEETING DATE: July 26, 2011 Council Item (X) •CRA Item ( ) TITLE: Barton Plaza PRESENTED BY: Joyce Powers, Community and.Economic Development Director RECOMMENDATION: Conduct a public hearing and vote to approve Tentative Parcel Map 11-01 and General Plan Amendment 11-01, and move to second reading an ordinance- to adopt Zone Change 11-01 and Specific Plan Amendment 11-01. BACKGROUND:The 3.6-acre Barton Plaza Project, located at the northwest corner of Barton Road and Mount Vernon Avenue, was first approved by the Planning Commission on December 18, 2008, for the construction of the commercial center. The commercial- center included the construction of a Walgreens. drugstore, Fresh & Easy Market, a restaurant/retail outbuilding and re-façade of the existing retail building. Part of that approval was a recommendation that the City Council approve a tentative parcel map and vacate Britton Way for public roadway purposes. On February 10, 2009, the City Council took both of those actions. Since those actions, Walgreens has re-evaluated the site plan and has proposed changes to the site layout, which resulted in re-consideration of the Project. The Project still consists of the uses noted above; however due to site changes which include eliminating access to Mount Vernon Avenue through the Project site. via Britton Way, shifting -the Walgreens and Market buildings to the north, and amendments to the General Plan Land Use Map, Zoning Map and. Barton Road Specific Plan boundaries, new Project review is required. On July 14, 2011, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing of the Project • and approved Site and.Architectural Review (SA) 11-02 and Sign Program 11-02, which approved the site layout, architectural theme, and sign program for the Project. The SA and Sign Program approvals become effective on July 25, 2011. At the same hearing, COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. //--e) P $ 36.63 3 6 $ 672.70 $ 690.48 Extra Pick-Up 4yd Unscheduled $ 51.37 $ 53.08 Extra Pick-Up 3 yd On-Site $ 14.51 $ 14.96 Extra Pick-Up 3yd Unscheduled $ 30.62 $ 31 42 Miscellaneous Services 4 1 $ 151.53 $ 155.52 Temporary Bin-3 yd(7-days) $ 53.69 $ 55.48 4 2 $ 288.49 $ 296.18 Burned Bin $ 291 76 $ 297.88 4 3 $ 440.13 $ 451.80 Exchanges $ 61.48 $ 62.77 4 4 $ 591.78 $ 607.44 Lock Rental(Monthly) $ 12.50 $ 12.77 4 5 $ 745.39 $ 765.11 Lost or Stolen Bin $ 521.00 $ 531.93 4 6 $ 893.94 $ 917.57 Overage $ 35.00 $ 35.73 Extra Pick-Up 4 yd On-Site $ 18.82 $ 17.37 Replaced Key $ 5.21 $ 5.32 Extra Pick-Up 4yd Unscheduled $ 32.92 $ 33.82 Locks-Replaced Lock $ 26.05 $ 26.60 6 1 $ 219.49 $ 225.33 6 2 $ 424.20 $ 435.54 Roll-Off 8 Compactor Services 6 3 $ 644.28 $ 661.46 10 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 4 $ 863.21 $ 886.20 20 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 5 $1,082.71 $1,111.53 40 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 6 $1,302.21 $1,336.86 40 yard Compactor(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Extra Pick-Up 6 yd On-Site $ 21 43 $ 22.19 40 yard Recycling(plus processing) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 Extra Pick-Up 6yd Unscheduled $ 37.54 $ 38.63 40 yard Green Waste(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Refuse Per Ton $ 56.15 $ 57.97 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Agenda Report Re: Barton Plaza Page 2 of 4 the Commission recommended that the City Council approve Tentative Parcel Map 11- 01, General Plan Amendment 11-01, Zone Change 11-01 and Specific Plan Amendment 11-01. For reference, the site plan and architectural renderings are included as Attachments 7 and 8. DISCUSSION Amendments Due to the shifting of the Walgreens and Market buildings, the Market straddles two different zoning districts (BRSP-Village Commercial and Administrative Professional), two different General Plan land use designations (General Commercial and Office Professional) and straddles the boundaries of the BRSP. The proposed amendments for the northerly 0.75-acres of the site would consolidate the commercial center into one zone district (BRSP-Village Commercial) and one land use designation (General Commercial). The Specific Plan Amendment would bring the 0.75 acres into the BRSP boundaries. The Resolution of Approval and Ordinances to approve these amendments are attached to this Report, (Attachments 1 through 3), and depict these changes. The General Commercial Land Use designation is intended for general commercial uses to serve the retail and service needs of the community. The BSRP-VC zoning designation is intended to allow for varied types of commercial development such as cafes, bakeries, gift shops, florist shops, bookstores, and other similar commercial retail uses of a scale and quality that are compatible with a pedestrian-oriented village atmosphere. The uses proposed within the Project are consistent with the intended uses of both the General Plan and BRSP-VC designations. Further, the incorporation of the 0.75 acres into the BRSP is appropriate because it results in cohesive development of the commercial corner in terms of land uses and development standards. Tentative Parcel Map The Tentative Parcel Map proposes to assemble the nine existing lots and subdivide them into four new parcels. Each proposed lot will contain one of the commercial buildings, landscaping and parking. All parking will be shared among the different users, and agreements will be recorded to assure maintenance of the common areas. In order to reduce the number of driveways on Barton Road the BRSP encourages 300 feet of street frontage under single ownership when lots are consolidated, or participation with adjoining property owners in reciprocal access easements designed to reduce the total number of driveways on Barton Road. As proposed, the new Walgreens and existing structure will each sit on its own lot; however, the site plan and reciprocal agreements will limit the Project site to two driveways along Barton Road. In compliance with the Circulation Element of the General Plan, the developer is On-Site $ 18.82 $ 17.37 Replaced Key $ 5.21 $ 5.32 Extra Pick-Up 4yd Unscheduled $ 32.92 $ 33.82 Locks-Replaced Lock $ 26.05 $ 26.60 6 1 $ 219.49 $ 225.33 6 2 $ 424.20 $ 435.54 Roll-Off 8 Compactor Services 6 3 $ 644.28 $ 661.46 10 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 4 $ 863.21 $ 886.20 20 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 5 $1,082.71 $1,111.53 40 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 6 $1,302.21 $1,336.86 40 yard Compactor(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Extra Pick-Up 6 yd On-Site $ 21 43 $ 22.19 40 yard Recycling(plus processing) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 Extra Pick-Up 6yd Unscheduled $ 37.54 $ 38.63 40 yard Green Waste(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Refuse Per Ton $ 56.15 $ 57.97 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Agenda Report Re: Barton Plaza Page 3 of 4 dedicating additional right of way along both Barton Road and Mount Vernon Avenue. Dedication and improvement of right of way are standard development conditions. The Resolution of Approval with conditions of approval is included as Attachment 4; the Tentative Parcel Map exhibit is Attachment 6. Britton Way Britton Way has already been vacated for public roadway purposes. Britton Way will end at the west boundary of the site and through access to Mount Vernon Avenue will no longer be provided through the Project site. This is caused by the shifting of the buildings and site grading that is necessary to build the Project. This site design has been reviewed by the Fire Department and determined that it does not create a safety issue relating to emergency access. Mount Vernon Avenue can be accessed through nearby local streets, and the residential neighborhood northwesterly of the Project is accessible via Canal Street. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW An Environmental Initial Study ("IS") and Mitigated Negative Declaration ("MND") were prepared, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The IS and MND were made available for public review and comment from June 13, 2011 to July 12, 2011, and are included in Attachment 5. The Initial Study determined that the Project would not have a significant effect on the environment because mitigation measures have been incorporated into the Project to reduce all potential impacts to insignificant levels, as more thoroughly discussed in the attached IS. FISCAL IMPACT The applicant has paid all filing fees associated with the Project submittal. Development Impact Fees for Phase 1 are estimated at approximately $163,000 and approximately $175,000 for Phase 2. General fund revenue would be generated through increased property and sales tax. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council conduct the public hearing and take the following actions: (1) Adopt the Resolution of Approval for General Plan Amendment 11-01; (2) Move to second reading Zone Change 11-01 and Specific Plan Amendment 11-01; and - (3) Adopt the Resolution of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map 11-01; driveways on Barton Road the BRSP encourages 300 feet of street frontage under single ownership when lots are consolidated, or participation with adjoining property owners in reciprocal access easements designed to reduce the total number of driveways on Barton Road. As proposed, the new Walgreens and existing structure will each sit on its own lot; however, the site plan and reciprocal agreements will limit the Project site to two driveways along Barton Road. In compliance with the Circulation Element of the General Plan, the developer is On-Site $ 18.82 $ 17.37 Replaced Key $ 5.21 $ 5.32 Extra Pick-Up 4yd Unscheduled $ 32.92 $ 33.82 Locks-Replaced Lock $ 26.05 $ 26.60 6 1 $ 219.49 $ 225.33 6 2 $ 424.20 $ 435.54 Roll-Off 8 Compactor Services 6 3 $ 644.28 $ 661.46 10 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 4 $ 863.21 $ 886.20 20 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 5 $1,082.71 $1,111.53 40 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 6 $1,302.21 $1,336.86 40 yard Compactor(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Extra Pick-Up 6 yd On-Site $ 21 43 $ 22.19 40 yard Recycling(plus processing) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 Extra Pick-Up 6yd Unscheduled $ 37.54 $ 38.63 40 yard Green Waste(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Refuse Per Ton $ 56.15 $ 57.97 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Agenda Report Re: Barton Plaza Page 4 of 4 Respectfully submitted, Joyce Powers Director of Community and Economic Development Manager Approval: A )2(difj/d-99()6' Betsy4A. Adams City Manager ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution for GPA 11-01 2. Ordinance for Zone Change 11-01 3. Ordinance for Specific Plan 11-01 4. Resolution for TPM 11-01 5. MND/Initial Study 6. TPM 11-01 Exhibit 7. Site Plan Exhibit 8. Architectural Renderings istribute disclosures to their consumer customers who receive substitute checks. Copyright C.2004,Securities Industry Association 11 f the California Health and Safety Code ( ) 1/VS-1. ibit "A" June 8, 2010, Jurisdiction Master Agreement, No. C10246, Exhibit "B". Attachment 1 Resolution of Approval General Plan Amendment 11-01 oyce Powers Director of Community and Economic Development Manager Approval: A )2(difj/d-99()6' Betsy4A. Adams City Manager ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution for GPA 11-01 2. Ordinance for Zone Change 11-01 3. Ordinance for Specific Plan 11-01 4. Resolution for TPM 11-01 5. MND/Initial Study 6. TPM 11-01 Exhibit 7. Site Plan Exhibit 8. Architectural Renderings istribute disclosures to their consumer customers who receive substitute checks. Copyright C.2004,Securities Industry Association 11 f the California Health and Safety Code ( ) 1/VS-1. ibit "A" June 8, 2010, Jurisdiction Master Agreement, No. C10246, Exhibit "B". RESOLUTION NO. 11- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 11-01 TO REDESIGNATE 0.75 ACRES LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE MOUNT VERNON AVENUE AND APPROXIMATELY 400 FEET NORTH OF BARTON ROAD FROM OFFICE PROFESSIONAL TO BRSP-VC WHEREAS, Evergreen DevCo, Inc., represented by Katie Rounds, has applied for the approval of General Plan Amendment (GPA) 11-01, Zone Change (ZC) 11-01, and Specific Plan Amendment (SPA) 11-01 to amend the designations on northerly 0.75 acres by amending the General Plan land use designation from Office Commercial to General Commercial, change the zoning classification from Administrative Professional, to BRSP-Village Commercial, and amend the boundaries of the Barton Road Specific Plan to include the northerly 0.75 acres of the site in the Specific Plan. WHEREAS, concurrent applications filed include Site and Architectural Review (SA) 11-02, Tentative Parcel Map 11-01 (Tentative Map No. 19131), Sign Program 11- 02, to re-subdivide approximately 3.6 acres into four lots and develop, in two Phases, a 37,700 square foot commercial center with 1,800 square feet of outdoor seating. The Sign Program establishes the sign standards for the commercial center. WHEREAS, an environmental Initial Study was prepared for the Project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), which was circulated for public review from June 13, 2011 to July 12, 2011. The Initial Study determined that the project would not have a significant effect on the environment because mitigation measures have been incorporated into the project to reduce all potential impacts to insignificant. WHEREAS, on July 14, 2011, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Project at the Grand Terrace Council Chambers located at 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California 92313 and concluded the hearing on said date by voting 4-0 approving Site and Architectural Review 11-02 and Sign Program 11-02, and recommending City Council approval of General Plan Amendment 11-01. WHEREAS, on July 26, 2011, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Project at the Grand Terrace Council Chambers located at 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California 92313 and concluded the hearing on said date. WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace: 1. The City Council hereby finds that, based on the Initial Study, the public hearing, te plan and reciprocal agreements will limit the Project site to two driveways along Barton Road. In compliance with the Circulation Element of the General Plan, the developer is On-Site $ 18.82 $ 17.37 Replaced Key $ 5.21 $ 5.32 Extra Pick-Up 4yd Unscheduled $ 32.92 $ 33.82 Locks-Replaced Lock $ 26.05 $ 26.60 6 1 $ 219.49 $ 225.33 6 2 $ 424.20 $ 435.54 Roll-Off 8 Compactor Services 6 3 $ 644.28 $ 661.46 10 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 4 $ 863.21 $ 886.20 20 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 5 $1,082.71 $1,111.53 40 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 6 $1,302.21 $1,336.86 40 yard Compactor(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Extra Pick-Up 6 yd On-Site $ 21 43 $ 22.19 40 yard Recycling(plus processing) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 Extra Pick-Up 6yd Unscheduled $ 37.54 $ 38.63 40 yard Green Waste(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Refuse Per Ton $ 56.15 $ 57.97 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY and substantial evidence in the record, the Project will not have a significant effect on the environment because all potential environmental impacts have been mitigated to a level of non-significance through the incorporation of mitigation measures in the Project approval. The Mitigated Negative Declaration has been reviewed and considered and reflects the independent judgment of the City Council. 2. The City Council finds as follows with respect to General Plan Amendment 11- 01: a. The General Plan Amendment promotes the Grand Terrace General Plan and each element thereof, and leaves the General Plan a compatible, integrated and internally consistent statement of goals and policies because the proposed amendment conforms to Land Use Element Goal 2.3 to provide a wide range of retail and service commercial opportunities designed to meet the needs of the City's residents, businesses, and visitors while also providing employment opportunities and with Public Services Goal. 7.1 to coordinate and balance the provision of public services with planned development because the site can be served by existing public services and utilities. b. The General Plan Amendment is consistent with key objectives of the General Plan to promote new commercial development that will capitalize on the City's proximity to major transportation corridors and to provide for balanced growth, which seeks to provide opportunities for a wide range of employment and housing and the maintenance of a healthy diversified economy; and consistent with the intent of the General Commercial designation provides for general commercial uses to serve the retail and service needs of the community. c. Adoption of this General Plan Amendment will not be in conflict with Section 65358 (b) of the Government Code relating to the number of amendments permitted per year, because this amendment is the first amendment of calendar year 2011. 3. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration and approves General Plan Amendment 11-01 to amend the General Plan Land Use Map by amending the Land Use designation on property shown on the attached Exhibit 1 from Office Commercial (OC) to General Commercial (GC). Page 2 of 4 l legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace: 1. The City Council hereby finds that, based on the Initial Study, the public hearing, te plan and reciprocal agreements will limit the Project site to two driveways along Barton Road. In compliance with the Circulation Element of the General Plan, the developer is On-Site $ 18.82 $ 17.37 Replaced Key $ 5.21 $ 5.32 Extra Pick-Up 4yd Unscheduled $ 32.92 $ 33.82 Locks-Replaced Lock $ 26.05 $ 26.60 6 1 $ 219.49 $ 225.33 6 2 $ 424.20 $ 435.54 Roll-Off 8 Compactor Services 6 3 $ 644.28 $ 661.46 10 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 4 $ 863.21 $ 886.20 20 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 5 $1,082.71 $1,111.53 40 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 6 $1,302.21 $1,336.86 40 yard Compactor(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Extra Pick-Up 6 yd On-Site $ 21 43 $ 22.19 40 yard Recycling(plus processing) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 Extra Pick-Up 6yd Unscheduled $ 37.54 $ 38.63 40 yard Green Waste(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Refuse Per Ton $ 56.15 $ 57.97 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace, California, at a meeting held on the 26th day of July, 2011. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: Brenda Mesa Walt Stanckiewitz City Clerk Mayor Page 3 of 4 2. Ordinance for Zone Change 11-01 3. Ordinance for Specific Plan 11-01 4. Resolution for TPM 11-01 5. MND/Initial Study 6. TPM 11-01 Exhibit 7. Site Plan Exhibit 8. Architectural Renderings istribute disclosures to their consumer customers who receive substitute checks. Copyright C.2004,Securities Industry Association 11 f the California Health and Safety Code ( ) 1/VS-1. ibit "A" June 8, 2010, Jurisdiction Master Agreement, No. C10246, Exhibit "B". -:•,:. Exhibit 1 4,p.,,,,-.,,,,•]_:. .. _ , • . _ , , rig,* Atitair ::ii:, llittif oyffle .. ,„ . , - ..• „,. . • - ,. • •. „ wit . 41 itifiguisit .4 froto, Nsinvitiniono,...;eki , - ".:8#1 a At. - - , . oth.„,are, 1:01.114.4"1„40 imolg 111,414114, dieS. General Plan Land Use Map ''' ' ''''' ..... %.1":04il' /1/1 MIli.,....5101 •:;:ji. ' ..,,kki:110,6 „.....4 ,ffit!!14,4441 ,.4114 ..4!ftif,t:.....4,..105,- .. -,.. ,.......i.iio Proposed Change : iii 1111` to to Gerverartorinnercial 1,4#1 pit Or, f*P3pa!PFICATartge , .General Coonnerc'ial ' -';.,.',:".. , .-, 111121097'-': . . :: - - -. " • Ak lin N.,., T „Tr,it.„„, . terogoit.w • '' -- :,..... 116 ill•:'.,';',7.--,;,y ri„,.7-:q11 ;2"m, r it% Reposed Change to ,.."mts Genetal Commercial •._:-; . ,.,.;';',,1. ' ,'*:.....•...',4 -' .e,'",t, '' ;;::: *mat Office Commercial ,',-:-F:;'`,.:' ''.f' .. - •:1'' ', .;:,4%,•;; Wee Cannata/ -, ":• , ,--- ,-,..,1'.,4', .:,,, --,, ,;isof ,r— - III '....t„y,-, Y,., ''' ''":',?% ,.,...,' . -- L,',,:,...1 Genera Cananentai :.-:VS•37,a,..::-,,L V `,;1<:::,:$4: ,,,, .i:',*;1 -,-,.. ;',4,,4 4,,,,If TE lila, ,,,',4 i'l. l',.7,:' ;:,".k,..-',....i.: :.;....,,i'::'','" '‘...',...f,"A.:,•.". ''‘ ,•:":.. =I liar Density Resift/Mal 1, •, :, ' •!;•, :a.,•.7,..', :;,: '','r:.A -;.',4"',.:* "-''I, ''''4 B 6 . #.. ... ..... . ... 1111111P4111 :• :- •-• Taints], 7,,,. 5 . .. . .....:. :. .. , • For ,,-r.,.,-1 ......7 •;:' 7n7 -....mil c ,1 2 - ---::. - kleitheinguninonnemm g 1 ., .....im ... ,-."!-.'. ...Jiff Iiiii t ,tilitivixlm!igi ar . .- -... „ .;;;,'7.-:--,; twx....-,• ..,...o, — PA-}...rf-t-04,-ri:„....„-- — 147.,•;„4„- .:4.1,1;;.....1 :.::••WY ' t L.: .1" 11111'•7;,441/ 1 tur•fin iy, siminprior:' 441 igegiggifoggigig aig I. 4, .., Page 4 of 4 p by amending the Land Use designation on property shown on the attached Exhibit 1 from Office Commercial (OC) to General Commercial (GC). Page 2 of 4 l legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace: 1. The City Council hereby finds that, based on the Initial Study, the public hearing, te plan and reciprocal agreements will limit the Project site to two driveways along Barton Road. In compliance with the Circulation Element of the General Plan, the developer is On-Site $ 18.82 $ 17.37 Replaced Key $ 5.21 $ 5.32 Extra Pick-Up 4yd Unscheduled $ 32.92 $ 33.82 Locks-Replaced Lock $ 26.05 $ 26.60 6 1 $ 219.49 $ 225.33 6 2 $ 424.20 $ 435.54 Roll-Off 8 Compactor Services 6 3 $ 644.28 $ 661.46 10 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 4 $ 863.21 $ 886.20 20 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 5 $1,082.71 $1,111.53 40 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 6 $1,302.21 $1,336.86 40 yard Compactor(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Extra Pick-Up 6 yd On-Site $ 21 43 $ 22.19 40 yard Recycling(plus processing) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 Extra Pick-Up 6yd Unscheduled $ 37.54 $ 38.63 40 yard Green Waste(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Refuse Per Ton $ 56.15 $ 57.97 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Attachment 2 Ordinance Zone Change 11-01 ifornia, at a meeting held on the 26th day of July, 2011. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: Brenda Mesa Walt Stanckiewitz City Clerk Mayor Page 3 of 4 2. Ordinance for Zone Change 11-01 3. Ordinance for Specific Plan 11-01 4. Resolution for TPM 11-01 5. MND/Initial Study 6. TPM 11-01 Exhibit 7. Site Plan Exhibit 8. Architectural Renderings istribute disclosures to their consumer customers who receive substitute checks. Copyright C.2004,Securities Industry Association 11 f the California Health and Safety Code ( ) 1/VS-1. ibit "A" June 8, 2010, Jurisdiction Master Agreement, No. C10246, Exhibit "B". ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE ADOPTING ZONE CHANGE 11-01 TO AMEND THE ZONING MAP BY RE-ZONING 0.75 ACRES LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF MOUNT VERNON AVENUE AND APPROXIMATELY 400 FEET NORTH OF BARTON ROAD FROM ADMINISTRATIVE PROFESSIONAL TO BRSP- VILLAGE COMMERCIAL WHEREAS, Evergreen DevCo, Inc., represented by Katie Rounds, has applied for the approval of General Plan Amendment (GPA) 11-01, Zone Change (ZC) 11-01, and Specific Plan Amendment (SPA) 11-01 to amend the designations on northerly 0.75 acres by amending the General Plan land use designation from Office Commercial to General Commercial, change the zoning classification from Administrative Professional, to BRSP-Village Commercial, and amend the-boundaries of the Barton Road Specific Plan to include the northerly 0.75 acres of the site in the Specific Plan. WHEREAS, concurrent applications filed include Site and Architectural Review (SA) 11-02, Tentative Parcel Map 11-01 (Tentative Map No. 19131), Sign Program 11- 02, to re-subdivide approximately 3.6 acres into four lots and develop, in two Phases, a 37,700 square foot commercial center with 1,800 square feet of outdoor seating. The Sign Program establishes the sign standards for the commercial center. WHEREAS, an environmental Initial Study was prepared for the Project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), which was circulated for public review from June 13, 2011 to July 12, 2011. The Initial Study determined that the project would not have a significant effect on the environment because mitigation measures have been incorporated into the project to reduce all potential impacts to insignificant. WHEREAS, on July 14, 2011, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Project at the Grand Terrace Council Chambers located at 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California 92313 and concluded the hearing on said date by voting 4-0 approving Site and Architectural Review 11-02 and Sign Program 11-02, and recommending City Council approval of Zone Change 11-01. WHEREAS, on July 26, 2011, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Project at the Grand Terrace Council Chambers located at 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California 92313 and conducted second reading on August 9, 2011. WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace, as follows Page 1 of 4 , based on the Initial Study, the public hearing, te plan and reciprocal agreements will limit the Project site to two driveways along Barton Road. In compliance with the Circulation Element of the General Plan, the developer is On-Site $ 18.82 $ 17.37 Replaced Key $ 5.21 $ 5.32 Extra Pick-Up 4yd Unscheduled $ 32.92 $ 33.82 Locks-Replaced Lock $ 26.05 $ 26.60 6 1 $ 219.49 $ 225.33 6 2 $ 424.20 $ 435.54 Roll-Off 8 Compactor Services 6 3 $ 644.28 $ 661.46 10 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 4 $ 863.21 $ 886.20 20 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 5 $1,082.71 $1,111.53 40 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 6 $1,302.21 $1,336.86 40 yard Compactor(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Extra Pick-Up 6 yd On-Site $ 21 43 $ 22.19 40 yard Recycling(plus processing) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 Extra Pick-Up 6yd Unscheduled $ 37.54 $ 38.63 40 yard Green Waste(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Refuse Per Ton $ 56.15 $ 57.97 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY SECTION 1. The City Council hereby finds that, based on the Initial Study, the public hearing, and substantial evidence in the record, the Project will not have a significant effect on the environment because all potential environmental impacts have been mitigated to a level of non-significance through the incorporation of mitigation measures in the Project approval. The Mitigated Negative Declaration has been reviewed and considered and reflects the independent judgment of the City Council. SECTION 2. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare of the persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed amendment or be injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood or within the city because the re-designation permits the same level of commercial development as the existing designation. The zone change will allow the development of a cohesive commercial center under one zoning classification, subject to one set of development standards, and subject to specific conditions of approval. SECTION 3. The proposed amendment will be consistent with the latest adopted General Plan. The Zone Change to BRSP-VC would permit a variety of village commercial uses such drug stores, markets, cafes, bakeries, gift shops, bookstores, food and restaurant uses, and other similar commercial retail uses. The proposed re- zoning will allow for the ultimate development of a village commercial center consistent with the intent of the proposed GC General Plan land use designation to provide for general commercial uses that would serve the retail and service needs of the community. SECTION 4. The Council hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration and adopts Zone Change 11-01 to amend the Zoning Map by re-zoning the property shown on Exhibit 1, attached hereto, from Administrative Professional (AP) to Barton Road Specific Plan-Village Commercial (BRSP-VC). SECTION 5. The City Council declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of it irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases or portions of it be declared invalid or unconstitutional. If for any reason any portion of this ordinance is declared invalid, or unconstitutional, then all other provisions shall remain valid and enforceable. SECTION 6. This ordinance shall take effect thirty days from the date of adoption. SECTION 7. First read at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 26th day of July, 2011 and finally adopted and ordered posted at a regular meeting of said City Council on the 26th day of July, 2011. ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor Page 2 of 4 on Element of the General Plan, the developer is On-Site $ 18.82 $ 17.37 Replaced Key $ 5.21 $ 5.32 Extra Pick-Up 4yd Unscheduled $ 32.92 $ 33.82 Locks-Replaced Lock $ 26.05 $ 26.60 6 1 $ 219.49 $ 225.33 6 2 $ 424.20 $ 435.54 Roll-Off 8 Compactor Services 6 3 $ 644.28 $ 661.46 10 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 4 $ 863.21 $ 886.20 20 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 5 $1,082.71 $1,111.53 40 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 6 $1,302.21 $1,336.86 40 yard Compactor(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Extra Pick-Up 6 yd On-Site $ 21 43 $ 22.19 40 yard Recycling(plus processing) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 Extra Pick-Up 6yd Unscheduled $ 37.54 $ 38.63 40 yard Green Waste(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Refuse Per Ton $ 56.15 $ 57.97 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY I, Brenda Mesa, City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the city Council of the City of Grand Terrace held on the 26th day of July, 2011, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: City Clerk Approved as to form: City Attorney Page 3 of 4 Resolution for TPM 11-01 5. MND/Initial Study 6. TPM 11-01 Exhibit 7. Site Plan Exhibit 8. Architectural Renderings istribute disclosures to their consumer customers who receive substitute checks. Copyright C.2004,Securities Industry Association 11 f the California Health and Safety Code ( ) 1/VS-1. ibit "A" June 8, 2010, Jurisdiction Master Agreement, No. C10246, Exhibit "B". Exhibit 1 g,' y° .F _ fir'% ..•. { ...*.. -. .. .. .. .. .. -.. .. .- .. _. .. ... .. .. ram: : . :: Zoning Map Proposed Change — i r W: r : ` F,proposed nge to BRSP-kfiAage Crminerraal BRSP`Village Cammemia9 -' _3'::.:?.,.. ....::�..: ProposedChangeto g ";is 4::�;: l;: 6RSP-Lime Ganune ▪ Wt: F ; „a ;;,' �.; ® --Administ�tive Professional '-•c_;,.• �.._--..,.----__...._."..M_...„;_._ R1-72-SingleFwelly :7: .- r._ ,°'d g.,...--, .,__.�.__. ,..,.....s..., .-'--i";p!'i,':;',,,,,�`1V.-,•:' • R2—LowMeZ££isliyREatf ts• y -.�;,,., i ; - dA:',..r t'iel,,,;t ;" =.Fr - �,3-McQ7an Density ReSsfe ai _ iM: mr'"`�. • '�_: �t t.c : , „a = ' i �°x,a .� s.as7-GenEfal C:inRStDa1 '".,� f � -• � e `��a+: %-14'I''k% , `i:3 ''.$ 3.�^ a. ,<` Mm = „��r= bdiL7-..". t .�qs fxa rq>;: y `;�; `=� � C , of SP-Vtla3EConso ld =' :- f: Ete , ."-.-:'''-w^'f ;, v a .}1, :[ ;-2 ' r : qf .▪ =. I • ' ' :: 1 f P.a-rartastrallsa Professorial : m • � . L '.t [4 . =i M z� Ili, Pir9-PutzFanles l'€x'I!:''' / .I.R i l;'.1.:t 1I, t_I.`l ,l t; hi :=C�u, f,1-`!:<..ii:P.;: i �ke 1 Page 4 of 4 the proposed GC General Plan land use designation to provide for general commercial uses that would serve the retail and service needs of the community. SECTION 4. The Council hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration and adopts Zone Change 11-01 to amend the Zoning Map by re-zoning the property shown on Exhibit 1, attached hereto, from Administrative Professional (AP) to Barton Road Specific Plan-Village Commercial (BRSP-VC). SECTION 5. The City Council declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of it irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases or portions of it be declared invalid or unconstitutional. If for any reason any portion of this ordinance is declared invalid, or unconstitutional, then all other provisions shall remain valid and enforceable. SECTION 6. This ordinance shall take effect thirty days from the date of adoption. SECTION 7. First read at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 26th day of July, 2011 and finally adopted and ordered posted at a regular meeting of said City Council on the 26th day of July, 2011. ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor Page 2 of 4 on Element of the General Plan, the developer is On-Site $ 18.82 $ 17.37 Replaced Key $ 5.21 $ 5.32 Extra Pick-Up 4yd Unscheduled $ 32.92 $ 33.82 Locks-Replaced Lock $ 26.05 $ 26.60 6 1 $ 219.49 $ 225.33 6 2 $ 424.20 $ 435.54 Roll-Off 8 Compactor Services 6 3 $ 644.28 $ 661.46 10 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 4 $ 863.21 $ 886.20 20 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 5 $1,082.71 $1,111.53 40 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 6 $1,302.21 $1,336.86 40 yard Compactor(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Extra Pick-Up 6 yd On-Site $ 21 43 $ 22.19 40 yard Recycling(plus processing) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 Extra Pick-Up 6yd Unscheduled $ 37.54 $ 38.63 40 yard Green Waste(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Refuse Per Ton $ 56.15 $ 57.97 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Attachment 3 Ordinance Specific Plan Amendment 11-01 foregoing Ordinance was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the city Council of the City of Grand Terrace held on the 26th day of July, 2011, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: City Clerk Approved as to form: City Attorney Page 3 of 4 Resolution for TPM 11-01 5. MND/Initial Study 6. TPM 11-01 Exhibit 7. Site Plan Exhibit 8. Architectural Renderings istribute disclosures to their consumer customers who receive substitute checks. Copyright C.2004,Securities Industry Association 11 f the California Health and Safety Code ( ) 1/VS-1. ibit "A" June 8, 2010, Jurisdiction Master Agreement, No. C10246, Exhibit "B". ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE ADOPTING SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 11-01 TO INCORPORATE 0.75 ACRES LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF MOUNT VERNON AVENUE AND APPROXIMATELY 400 FEET NORTH OF BARTON ROAD INTO THE BARTON ROAD SPECIFIC PLAN WHEREAS, Evergreen DevCo, Inc., represented by Katie Rounds, has applied for the approval of General Plan Amendment (GPA) 11-01, Zone Change (ZC) 11-01, and Specific Plan Amendment (SPA) 11-01 to amend the designations on northerly 0.75 acres by amending the General Plan land use designation from Office Commercial to General Commercial, change the zoning classification from Administrative Professional, to BRSP-Village Commercial, and amend the boundaries of the Barton Road Specific Plan to include the northerly 0.75 acres of the site in the Specific Plan. WHEREAS, concurrent applications filed include Site and Architectural Review (SA) 11-02, Tentative Parcel Map 11-01 (Tentative Map No. 19131), Sign Program 11- 02, to re-subdivide approximately 3.6 acres into four lots and develop, in two Phases, a 37,700 square foot commercial center with 1,800 square feet of outdoor seating. The Sign Program establishes the sign standards for the commercial center. WHEREAS, an environmental Initial Study was prepared for the Project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), which was circulated for public review from June 13, 2011 to July 12, 2011. The Initial Study determined that the project would not have a significant effect on the environment because mitigation measures have been incorporated into the project to reduce all potential impacts to insignificant. WHEREAS, on July 14, 2011, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Project at the Grand Terrace Council Chambers located at 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California 92313 and concluded the hearing on said date by voting 4-0 approving Site and Architectural Review 11-02 and Sign Program 11-02, and recommending City Council approval of Specific Plan Amendment 11-01. WHEREAS, on July 26, 2011, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Project at the Grand Terrace Council Chambers located at 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California 92313 and conducted second reading on August 9, 2011. WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace, as follows SECTION 1. The City Council hereby finds that, based on the Initial Study, the Page 1 of 11 ouncil on the 26th day of July, 2011. ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor Page 2 of 4 on Element of the General Plan, the developer is On-Site $ 18.82 $ 17.37 Replaced Key $ 5.21 $ 5.32 Extra Pick-Up 4yd Unscheduled $ 32.92 $ 33.82 Locks-Replaced Lock $ 26.05 $ 26.60 6 1 $ 219.49 $ 225.33 6 2 $ 424.20 $ 435.54 Roll-Off 8 Compactor Services 6 3 $ 644.28 $ 661.46 10 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 4 $ 863.21 $ 886.20 20 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 5 $1,082.71 $1,111.53 40 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 6 $1,302.21 $1,336.86 40 yard Compactor(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Extra Pick-Up 6 yd On-Site $ 21 43 $ 22.19 40 yard Recycling(plus processing) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 Extra Pick-Up 6yd Unscheduled $ 37.54 $ 38.63 40 yard Green Waste(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Refuse Per Ton $ 56.15 $ 57.97 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY public hearing, and substantial evidence in the record, the Project will not have a significant effect on the environment because all potential environmental impacts have been mitigated to a level of non-significance through the incorporation of mitigation measures in the Project approval. The Mitigated Negative Declaration has been reviewed and considered and reflects the independent judgment of the City Council. SECTION 2. The proposed amendment to consistent with the adopted Barton Road Specific Plan. The proposed Amendment to incorporate the 0.75-acre site into the BRSP and zone it BRSP-VC is consistent with Land Use/Economic objectives of the BRSP to maximize the economic position of the BRSP by promoting sales tax- generating uses because commercial retail uses will be developed on the site; and the design promotes Land Use/Economic objectives to promote a distinctive commercial cluster rather than strip commercial. SECTION 3. The proposed amendment will be consistent with the latest adopted General Plan. The inclusion of the 0.75-acre site into the BRSP will allow for the ultimate development of a cohesive village commercial center consistent with the intent of the proposed GC General Plan land use designation to provide for general commercial uses that would serve the retail and service needs of the community, and is consistent with General Plan Amendment 110-1. SECTION 4. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare of the persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed amendment or be injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood or within the city because the incorporation of the 0.75 acres into the BRSP will allow the development of a cohesive commercial center under one zoning classification, subject to one set of development standards, and subject to specific conditions of approval. SECTION 5. The Council hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration and adopts Specific Plan Amendment 11-01 to amend the Barton Road Specific Plan as shown on the Exhibits 1 a through 1 h, attached hereto. SECTION 6. The City Council declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of it irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases or portions of it be declared invalid or unconstitutional. If for any reason any portion of this ordinance is declared invalid, or unconstitutional, then all other provisions shall remain valid and enforceable. SECTION 7. This ordinance shall take effect thirty days from the date of adoption. SECTION 8. First read at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 26th day of July, 2011 and finally adopted and ordered posted at a regular meeting of said City Council on the 26th day of July, 2011. Page 2 of 11 scheduled $ 32.92 $ 33.82 Locks-Replaced Lock $ 26.05 $ 26.60 6 1 $ 219.49 $ 225.33 6 2 $ 424.20 $ 435.54 Roll-Off 8 Compactor Services 6 3 $ 644.28 $ 661.46 10 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 4 $ 863.21 $ 886.20 20 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 5 $1,082.71 $1,111.53 40 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 6 $1,302.21 $1,336.86 40 yard Compactor(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Extra Pick-Up 6 yd On-Site $ 21 43 $ 22.19 40 yard Recycling(plus processing) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 Extra Pick-Up 6yd Unscheduled $ 37.54 $ 38.63 40 yard Green Waste(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Refuse Per Ton $ 56.15 $ 57.97 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor I, Brenda Mesa, City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the city Council of the City of Grand Terrace held on the 26th day of July, 2011, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: City Clerk Approved as to form: City Attorney Page 3of11 MND/Initial Study 6. TPM 11-01 Exhibit 7. Site Plan Exhibit 8. Architectural Renderings istribute disclosures to their consumer customers who receive substitute checks. Copyright C.2004,Securities Industry Association 11 f the California Health and Safety Code ( ) 1/VS-1. ibit "A" June 8, 2010, Jurisdiction Master Agreement, No. C10246, Exhibit "B". Exhibit 1 a `4 9 ` Specific Plan Area Map City of Barton Road Specific PlanFi Grand Terrace Proposed boundary chan'ge_'i �i'� AI I II 5 el e � - � �liyllll Ifll1(Ul Rill AND ammo nth,` ��>�t 15 t" Li = Cam' ■MUTT MO n — Planning Area: M'', Specific Plan Area Conarunitf Qevelapmeet Etep lment,J,ty 2011 "Ws manes far re fecerce only.Forded informatim,please consult vat the Community Devekvme tt CepLalment Page 4 of 11 receive substitute checks. Copyright C.2004,Securities Industry Association 11 f the California Health and Safety Code ( ) 1/VS-1. ibit "A" June 8, 2010, Jurisdiction Master Agreement, No. C10246, Exhibit "B". Exhibit 1 b .„„...,,,,,,,,,.., 1-, - Existing Land Use Map j City of Barton Road Specific Plan F Grand Terrace x ip - - : 1" Proposed boundary change. OAS r- w . 1.7 II i viraiir— oryo ram A. ...rsiii ',P, 1 i. .2 14 4.a PA L 7 moos :. ii ' .' * " Fib _ /702,feoolitio. 10l1' Ill 'IA ` TAN Imo lip m ima r-rivircsmeoots am .._ f1111'" , A.It LI"_.I_!9_ o Ill Planning Area: 2 ME Specific Plan Area `_,2 Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential MI Public!Institutional k'././j Vacant Land ,.,,,,., Office Commercial ComrnuavDeveloonenf Deoxfi�.enL rulv2011. General Commercial Page 5 of 11 amendment will be consistent with the latest adopted General Plan. The inclusion of the 0.75-acre site into the BRSP will allow for the ultimate development of a cohesive village commercial center consistent with the intent of the proposed GC General Plan land use designation to provide for general commercial uses that would serve the retail and service needs of the community, and is consistent with General Plan Amendment 110-1. SECTION 4. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare of the persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed amendment or be injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood or within the city because the incorporation of the 0.75 acres into the BRSP will allow the development of a cohesive commercial center under one zoning classification, subject to one set of development standards, and subject to specific conditions of approval. SECTION 5. The Council hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration and adopts Specific Plan Amendment 11-01 to amend the Barton Road Specific Plan as shown on the Exhibits 1 a through 1 h, attached hereto. SECTION 6. The City Council declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of it irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases or portions of it be declared invalid or unconstitutional. If for any reason any portion of this ordinance is declared invalid, or unconstitutional, then all other provisions shall remain valid and enforceable. SECTION 7. This ordinance shall take effect thirty days from the date of adoption. SECTION 8. First read at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 26th day of July, 2011 and finally adopted and ordered posted at a regular meeting of said City Council on the 26th day of July, 2011. Page 2 of 11 scheduled $ 32.92 $ 33.82 Locks-Replaced Lock $ 26.05 $ 26.60 6 1 $ 219.49 $ 225.33 6 2 $ 424.20 $ 435.54 Roll-Off 8 Compactor Services 6 3 $ 644.28 $ 661.46 10 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 4 $ 863.21 $ 886.20 20 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 5 $1,082.71 $1,111.53 40 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 6 $1,302.21 $1,336.86 40 yard Compactor(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Extra Pick-Up 6 yd On-Site $ 21 43 $ 22.19 40 yard Recycling(plus processing) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 Extra Pick-Up 6yd Unscheduled $ 37.54 $ 38.63 40 yard Green Waste(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Refuse Per Ton $ 56.15 $ 57.97 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Exhibit 1 c - • ,„,- . PlanPlannbig Area MaPA City of Barton Road Specific Plan Grand Terrace ♦/ 177 4 1 Ns 100 +. • Proposed.boundary change: 4 ,-k--'`'"_ „i Y #� /7/ =1111111 1 =... p r vve . ram. Aare MrAerippror f4111111111r A r 0, ,„, / '�(l ri 41 o mill in T ■ter g �* n�11111 i= a ®11-:' PLANNING r [ A all Irmo , NMI 0 Q-� Li s 0 � a PLANNING PLANNING AREA 1 AREA 2 Planning Area: QSpecific Plan Area /4 Planning Area corearun'ityDsvebpenmtDepa•1rrent July7011. I I Planninn Araa9 N. Page 6 of 11 Exhibit 1 d fr ,-- Zoning Map ----7 , ,,th,li,y., .ty A N , C f Barton Road Specific Plan Grand Terrace "a 42 Ey 4_ ti.4 '; Proposed boundary change_ h,714 .. :}j E j i 1 3r g .1 :.:cE r ` 111 ►* , _ ,tt_gI 9i ,:il rlI.—sr mi'•tm:rli::::t,r.....g_--4:/1s111.1 mI � � s e,, 4 pen 1fUInUf— E l 1 l L t - �ill �%� O '`x 4 '�,� , 11 111 am " <r— .�4 , tag r' C 4P DTIIIVISTR4T + 1titMB flr m nu f ait / 7/ i=- j 1 —`-- PROFESSIONAL 1. . U-lLL [� I ! II1tI.I I ri �.. _ PLANA7NG..4kEA 3 (GC)GENERAL (VC) VILLAGE CO MERCL4L COMMMERCL4L Planning Area: PLANNING ARE..41(P.A.1) PLANNING AREA 2(P 1.2) Specific Plan Area V/A (GC)General Commercial(PAl) Community Development Department,July209t_ (VC)Village Commercial(P_A2) Ths map is far refisrence c nly_Fer eetated irrfermat nn,please emmult vith the Ccrnrrunity Development Depa-trrent I i (AP)Adminisirative‘ , Page 7 of 11 of the proposed GC General Plan land use designation to provide for general commercial uses that would serve the retail and service needs of the community, and is consistent with General Plan Amendment 110-1. SECTION 4. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare of the persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed amendment or be injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood or within the city because the incorporation of the 0.75 acres into the BRSP will allow the development of a cohesive commercial center under one zoning classification, subject to one set of development standards, and subject to specific conditions of approval. SECTION 5. The Council hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration and adopts Specific Plan Amendment 11-01 to amend the Barton Road Specific Plan as shown on the Exhibits 1 a through 1 h, attached hereto. SECTION 6. The City Council declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of it irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases or portions of it be declared invalid or unconstitutional. If for any reason any portion of this ordinance is declared invalid, or unconstitutional, then all other provisions shall remain valid and enforceable. SECTION 7. This ordinance shall take effect thirty days from the date of adoption. SECTION 8. First read at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 26th day of July, 2011 and finally adopted and ordered posted at a regular meeting of said City Council on the 26th day of July, 2011. Page 2 of 11 scheduled $ 32.92 $ 33.82 Locks-Replaced Lock $ 26.05 $ 26.60 6 1 $ 219.49 $ 225.33 6 2 $ 424.20 $ 435.54 Roll-Off 8 Compactor Services 6 3 $ 644.28 $ 661.46 10 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 4 $ 863.21 $ 886.20 20 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 5 $1,082.71 $1,111.53 40 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 6 $1,302.21 $1,336.86 40 yard Compactor(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Extra Pick-Up 6 yd On-Site $ 21 43 $ 22.19 40 yard Recycling(plus processing) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 Extra Pick-Up 6yd Unscheduled $ 37.54 $ 38.63 40 yard Green Waste(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Refuse Per Ton $ 56.15 $ 57.97 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Exhibit 1 e ,,...... . ,..„. . na' Existing Transportation Map A 6 VAIOP 1 4,..... Barton Road Specific Plan N i 4 City of Grand Terrace ' 1112 et Proposed boundary change_ ,,,,r' j • .. • al 'MA.°-." 111141 ow --I - 411,- 'fflii iidil bgLL___,,,,1 ,1„,1 ' , 0 i -• . .• ' 3 '11 I a -e-•--CCI. p,T , - . s_____j I iii 7-1> '-'ILIMLUI—Ai. * - 1 4 1 III RN] Olioth ' imilit 1 .. • i 11 4- '--11 align tlIffi , 1 I lit 1 i , , r 1 m[1) ri ILILL1111 › U0 Road Ways i L..1 . 1 ..., Specific Plan Area "±- 1 Major Highway Modified Major Highway Carranly Development Department My 21211. Secondary Highway This map:s fix referema crly.F detated tatc,,,,ton,pease oxistit wlh the Comm=iy Dess'aopmait Cepartrrtsrit im I. .1 Collector ....._•-... Local Street — . Page 8 of 11 l uses that would serve the retail and service needs of the community, and is consistent with General Plan Amendment 110-1. SECTION 4. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare of the persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed amendment or be injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood or within the city because the incorporation of the 0.75 acres into the BRSP will allow the development of a cohesive commercial center under one zoning classification, subject to one set of development standards, and subject to specific conditions of approval. SECTION 5. The Council hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration and adopts Specific Plan Amendment 11-01 to amend the Barton Road Specific Plan as shown on the Exhibits 1 a through 1 h, attached hereto. SECTION 6. The City Council declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of it irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases or portions of it be declared invalid or unconstitutional. If for any reason any portion of this ordinance is declared invalid, or unconstitutional, then all other provisions shall remain valid and enforceable. SECTION 7. This ordinance shall take effect thirty days from the date of adoption. SECTION 8. First read at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 26th day of July, 2011 and finally adopted and ordered posted at a regular meeting of said City Council on the 26th day of July, 2011. Page 2 of 11 scheduled $ 32.92 $ 33.82 Locks-Replaced Lock $ 26.05 $ 26.60 6 1 $ 219.49 $ 225.33 6 2 $ 424.20 $ 435.54 Roll-Off 8 Compactor Services 6 3 $ 644.28 $ 661.46 10 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 4 $ 863.21 $ 886.20 20 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 5 $1,082.71 $1,111.53 40 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 6 $1,302.21 $1,336.86 40 yard Compactor(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Extra Pick-Up 6 yd On-Site $ 21 43 $ 22.19 40 yard Recycling(plus processing) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 Extra Pick-Up 6yd Unscheduled $ 37.54 $ 38.63 40 yard Green Waste(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Refuse Per Ton $ 56.15 $ 57.97 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Exhibit If ,...,. Existing Water Line Map vios# Citof Barton Road Specific Plan N y Grand Terrace, • - - .cr 4 . w• , 114 Proposed boundary change. la ' lop , 4 1 1 . ° 244) II , I' ...., i us , 1111111111111; ,ett t . I it UM. 11011 `" - - wit 1/IIIIIball .., ' rail 8` i 1 iii,,,L6. .i i Ct4„ i ,, Fit,•, • • FL r • k J g..] Ir ....,Jci il 1 " '4 '17r— . .. 14 1 Er 131L,[ 7: ' E1U . 1 - ,,,,.....7 ill '-:.atkii JiLLILIE --- ui [50 I Water Line Diagram z iz 0 ig Ai. Specific Plan Area t2 m •"N./ Waterline Community Deuelaprrent Depatrent,July 2011. This rrap is fcr reference enly.Fcrdetalleci infannahm,please oarsult with,the Crrnrngstity Develcvnent Depairrent \ l Page 9 of 11 — . Page 8 of 11 l uses that would serve the retail and service needs of the community, and is consistent with General Plan Amendment 110-1. SECTION 4. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare of the persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed amendment or be injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood or within the city because the incorporation of the 0.75 acres into the BRSP will allow the development of a cohesive commercial center under one zoning classification, subject to one set of development standards, and subject to specific conditions of approval. SECTION 5. The Council hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration and adopts Specific Plan Amendment 11-01 to amend the Barton Road Specific Plan as shown on the Exhibits 1 a through 1 h, attached hereto. SECTION 6. The City Council declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of it irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases or portions of it be declared invalid or unconstitutional. If for any reason any portion of this ordinance is declared invalid, or unconstitutional, then all other provisions shall remain valid and enforceable. SECTION 7. This ordinance shall take effect thirty days from the date of adoption. SECTION 8. First read at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 26th day of July, 2011 and finally adopted and ordered posted at a regular meeting of said City Council on the 26th day of July, 2011. Page 2 of 11 scheduled $ 32.92 $ 33.82 Locks-Replaced Lock $ 26.05 $ 26.60 6 1 $ 219.49 $ 225.33 6 2 $ 424.20 $ 435.54 Roll-Off 8 Compactor Services 6 3 $ 644.28 $ 661.46 10 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 4 $ 863.21 $ 886.20 20 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 5 $1,082.71 $1,111.53 40 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 6 $1,302.21 $1,336.86 40 yard Compactor(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Extra Pick-Up 6 yd On-Site $ 21 43 $ 22.19 40 yard Recycling(plus processing) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 Extra Pick-Up 6yd Unscheduled $ 37.54 $ 38.63 40 yard Green Waste(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Refuse Per Ton $ 56.15 $ 57.97 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Exhibit lg .01.7N- Existing Sewer Line Map,....zep ...._,, City of Grand Terrace Barton Road Specific Plan ets. la Kr 4E. Proposal boundary change. 1 ,,,,,,-- F.4.s. ' I-1i • , 4 p,. ._ ' 7i 1.— ,im , diab odnu i24-7.jd ,MI COL,1 ----I s- Pdo 7-1-J- 1 ' • to t• ids 1.. -1--•••= : • ,,.= . , , .,.. ..._ 1-1 Z r-IL]C-1i — fil 'a4 L 11111111111111111— NIORLI1111111 5g— › Sewer Line Diagram z ce . • < w 'i, : Specific Plan Area 0 > Sewer Line 2 Corommay Development Dwa-trent,aty 2131't. This trap to for reerance only.Fcr detailed inforrneork please consultwth re Commallty Development Depamnent. Page 10 of 11 Ai. Specific Plan Area t2 m •"N./ Waterline Community Deuelaprrent Depatrent,July 2011. This rrap is fcr reference enly.Fcrdetalleci infannahm,please oarsult with,the Crrnrngstity Develcvnent Depairrent \ l Page 9 of 11 — . Page 8 of 11 l uses that would serve the retail and service needs of the community, and is consistent with General Plan Amendment 110-1. SECTION 4. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare of the persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed amendment or be injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood or within the city because the incorporation of the 0.75 acres into the BRSP will allow the development of a cohesive commercial center under one zoning classification, subject to one set of development standards, and subject to specific conditions of approval. SECTION 5. The Council hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration and adopts Specific Plan Amendment 11-01 to amend the Barton Road Specific Plan as shown on the Exhibits 1 a through 1 h, attached hereto. SECTION 6. The City Council declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of it irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases or portions of it be declared invalid or unconstitutional. If for any reason any portion of this ordinance is declared invalid, or unconstitutional, then all other provisions shall remain valid and enforceable. SECTION 7. This ordinance shall take effect thirty days from the date of adoption. SECTION 8. First read at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 26th day of July, 2011 and finally adopted and ordered posted at a regular meeting of said City Council on the 26th day of July, 2011. Page 2 of 11 scheduled $ 32.92 $ 33.82 Locks-Replaced Lock $ 26.05 $ 26.60 6 1 $ 219.49 $ 225.33 6 2 $ 424.20 $ 435.54 Roll-Off 8 Compactor Services 6 3 $ 644.28 $ 661.46 10 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 4 $ 863.21 $ 886.20 20 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 5 $1,082.71 $1,111.53 40 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 6 $1,302.21 $1,336.86 40 yard Compactor(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Extra Pick-Up 6 yd On-Site $ 21 43 $ 22.19 40 yard Recycling(plus processing) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 Extra Pick-Up 6yd Unscheduled $ 37.54 $ 38.63 40 yard Green Waste(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Refuse Per Ton $ 56.15 $ 57.97 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Exhibit 1 h 44 Y Existing Storm Drain Map City ofN Barton Road Specific Plan Grand Terrace c Proposed boundary change S*.• 1}1 iiii Mak Ar zr 1 t `ice 14, IMF I in ir 0 -„AJ. _ .a iii 4".'' rr1 1s0. 1 111 go me ii. ll Li _,L,„ 1 ....L.: IN to [.---J r ,��_J L i` 1111111111 *11111 [III Ell 1x Storm Drain Diagram I l Specific Plan Area a r \ Storm Drain C.M.P. Cv' Storm Drain R.C.F. Cannsmity Day e°opaaea Department,July 2011. Ms map isfor reference orgy.For detaled ilcanalon,ple se oansut with the Cemrnm ty De.ecprrent Depattneri �i._1, 'n Page 11 of 11 Attachment 4 Resolution of Approval Tentative Parcel Map 11-01 Barton Road Specific Plan Grand Terrace c Proposed boundary change S*.• 1}1 iiii Mak Ar zr 1 t `ice 14, IMF I in ir 0 -„AJ. _ .a iii 4".'' rr1 1s0. 1 111 go me ii. ll Li _,L,„ 1 ....L.: IN to [.---J r ,��_J L i` 1111111111 *11111 [III Ell 1x Storm Drain Diagram I l Specific Plan Area a r \ Storm Drain C.M.P. Cv' Storm Drain R.C.F. Cannsmity Day e°opaaea Department,July 2011. Ms map isfor reference orgy.For detaled ilcanalon,ple se oansut with the Cemrnm ty De.ecprrent Depattneri �i._1, 'n Page 11 of 11 RESOLUTION NO. 11- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 11-01 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 19131) TO CONSOLIDATE NINE LOTS AND RESUBDIVIDE THEM INTO FOUR NEW PARCELS LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BARTON ROAD AND MOUNT VERNON AVENUE WHEREAS, Evergreen DevCo, Inc., represented by Katie Rounds, has submitted applications for Site and Architectural Review (SA) 11-02, Tentative Parcel Map 11-01 (Tentative Map No. 19131), Sign Program 11-02, General Plan Amendment (GPA) 11-01, Zone Change (ZC) 11-01, and Specific Plan Amendment (SPA) 11-01 to resubdivide approximately 3.6 acres into four lots and develop, in two Phases, a 37,700 square foot commercial center with 1,800 square feet of outdoor seating. Phase 1 includes grading the entire site and construction of a 14,820 square foot Walgreens drug store, re-façade of the existing 6,900 square foot building and site improvements. Phase 2 includes the construction of a 10,581 square foot grocery store, a 5,400 square restaurant/retail pad building, and remaining site improvements. The Sign Program establishes the sign standards for the commercial center. WHEREAS, the concurrent GPA, ZC and SPA applications propose to amend the designations on northerly 0.75 acres by amending the General Plan land use designation from Office Commercial to General Commercial, change the zoning classification from Administrative Professional, to BRSP-Village Commercial, and amend the boundaries of the Barton Road Specific Plan to include the northerly 0.75 acres of the site into the Specific Plan. WHEREAS, the Applicant has applied for approval of Tentative Parcel Map 11- 01 (TPM No. 19131), which contemplates the re-subdivision of nine existing lots into four new parcels. WHEREAS, an environmental Initial Study was prepared for the Project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), which was circulated for public review from June 13, 2011 to July 12, 2011. The Initial Study determined that the project would not have a significant effect on the environment because mitigation measures have been incorporated into the project to reduce all potential impacts to insignificant levels. WHEREAS, on July 14, 2011, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Project at the Grand Terrace Council Chambers located at 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California 92313 and concluded the hearing by voting 4-0 approving Site and Architectural Review 11-02 and Sign Program 11-02, and recommending City Council approval of Tentative Parcel Map 11-01. Page 1 of 8 First read at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 26th day of July, 2011 and finally adopted and ordered posted at a regular meeting of said City Council on the 26th day of July, 2011. Page 2 of 11 scheduled $ 32.92 $ 33.82 Locks-Replaced Lock $ 26.05 $ 26.60 6 1 $ 219.49 $ 225.33 6 2 $ 424.20 $ 435.54 Roll-Off 8 Compactor Services 6 3 $ 644.28 $ 661.46 10 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 4 $ 863.21 $ 886.20 20 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 5 $1,082.71 $1,111.53 40 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 6 $1,302.21 $1,336.86 40 yard Compactor(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Extra Pick-Up 6 yd On-Site $ 21 43 $ 22.19 40 yard Recycling(plus processing) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 Extra Pick-Up 6yd Unscheduled $ 37.54 $ 38.63 40 yard Green Waste(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Refuse Per Ton $ 56.15 $ 57.97 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY WHEREAS, on July 26, 2011, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Project at the Grand Terrace Council Chambers located at 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California 92313, and concluded the hearing on said date. WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace: 1. The City Council finds that, based on the Initial Study, the public hearing, and substantial evidence in the record, the Project will not have a significant effect on the environment because all potential environmental impacts have been mitigated to a level of non-significance through the incorporation of mitigation measures in the Project approval. The Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan prepared in connection with the Project have been reviewed and considered and reflect the independent judgment of the City Council. 2. The City Council finds as follows with respect Tentative Parcel Map 11-01 (TPM No. 19131): a. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the City of Grand Terrace General Plan, Zoning Code and any applicable specific plan for the area. The subdivision re-subdivides nine small parcels into four viable parcels for the development of a village commercial center in compliance with the General Commercial Land Use designation, and the intended land uses of the BRSP-VC and zoning designation. b. The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the City of Grand Terrace General Plan and any applicable specific plan for the area. The design and improvements are consistent with the General Plan, BRSP, Development Code and the California Subdivision Map Act. The proposed map, its design and improvements are consistent with the requirements of the BRSP regarding lot assembly, street frontage, shared access points and reciprocal access and parking. It conforms to the development standards of the Zoning Code. The subdivision conforms with the Circulation Element because the subdivider has been conditioned to dedicate and improve additional right-of-way along Project frontages. It complies with the Open Space and Conservation Element because the tentative map meets or will be required to meet federal, state and local regulations governing grading, erosion control, water quality, and cultural resources. c. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the tentative map. The tentative map has been Page 2 of 8 al of Tentative Parcel Map 11-01. Page 1 of 8 First read at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 26th day of July, 2011 and finally adopted and ordered posted at a regular meeting of said City Council on the 26th day of July, 2011. Page 2 of 11 scheduled $ 32.92 $ 33.82 Locks-Replaced Lock $ 26.05 $ 26.60 6 1 $ 219.49 $ 225.33 6 2 $ 424.20 $ 435.54 Roll-Off 8 Compactor Services 6 3 $ 644.28 $ 661.46 10 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 4 $ 863.21 $ 886.20 20 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 5 $1,082.71 $1,111.53 40 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 6 $1,302.21 $1,336.86 40 yard Compactor(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Extra Pick-Up 6 yd On-Site $ 21 43 $ 22.19 40 yard Recycling(plus processing) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 Extra Pick-Up 6yd Unscheduled $ 37.54 $ 38.63 40 yard Green Waste(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Refuse Per Ton $ 56.15 $ 57.97 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY filed with SA 11-02 and the site plan demonstrates that the proposed parcels can accommodate anticipated development of the 3.6-acre site, including compliance with building setbacks, building and landscaping coverage requirements, in accordance with the BRSP and Zoning Code. d. The design of the subdivision and proposed improvements are not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. An environmental Initial Study was prepared, which determined that the project would not have a significant effect on the environment because mitigation measures have been incorporated into the project to reduce potential impacts to biological resources (nesting birds) to insignificant levels. e. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. The subdivision can accommodate anticipated , development of the site and mitigation measures have been incorporated into the project to reduce potential environmental impacts to levels of insignificance. f. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating and cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible. The subdivision design provides, to the extent feasible, for passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities. The proposed parcels are of sufficient size to orient structures to take advantage of solar exposure during the winter months, and are of sufficient size to accommodate landscape materials include trees that will provide shading during the summer months. g. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision, or the design of the alternate easements which are substantially equivalent to those previously acquired by the public will not be provided. The subdivision design and improvements include the re-location of existing water and sewer line easements and infrastructure that are equivalent to existing easements. h. In approving the subdivision the approving authority has considered its effects and the effects of adopted ordinances and actions relating to the review and approval of subdivisions on the housing needs of the region and balanced those needs against the public service needs of its residents and available fiscal and environmental. The commercial subdivision will not impact the City's housing needs. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT based on the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Council adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration and approves Tentative Parcel Map 11-01 (Tentative Parcel Map No. 19131), subject to the following conditions of approval: Page 3 of 8 ge 2 of 11 scheduled $ 32.92 $ 33.82 Locks-Replaced Lock $ 26.05 $ 26.60 6 1 $ 219.49 $ 225.33 6 2 $ 424.20 $ 435.54 Roll-Off 8 Compactor Services 6 3 $ 644.28 $ 661.46 10 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 4 $ 863.21 $ 886.20 20 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 5 $1,082.71 $1,111.53 40 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 6 $1,302.21 $1,336.86 40 yard Compactor(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Extra Pick-Up 6 yd On-Site $ 21 43 $ 22.19 40 yard Recycling(plus processing) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 Extra Pick-Up 6yd Unscheduled $ 37.54 $ 38.63 40 yard Green Waste(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Refuse Per Ton $ 56.15 $ 57.97 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY General Conditions of Approval: 1. This approval is granted based on the application materials submitted by Evergreen Devco, Inc., represented by Katie Rounds, on March 30, 2011, including the tentative parcel map dated December 11, 2008, as revised on June 28, 2011. All plans shall be consistent in terms of property lines, easement location and dimensions and other measurements. 2. This approval shall expire twenty-four (24) months from the date of adoption of this resolution. This approval shall become null and void if a final map has not been timely filed prior to the expiration date in accordance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act. An extension of time may be granted by the Community and Economic Development Director upon submittal of a time extension request and appropriate filing fees. In granting any such time extension the City may impose new conditions and standards on the tentative map, pursuant to Section 66452.6(e).of the California Government Code. 3. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Grand Terrace and its officers, employees, and agents from and against any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Grand Terrace, its officers, employees, or agents to attack, set aside, void, or annul any approval or condition of approval of the City of Grand Terrace concerning this project, including but not limited to any approval or condition of approval of the Planning Commission, City Council or Community and Economic Development Director, which action is brought within the time period provided for in Government Code Section 66499.37. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding concerning the project and the City shall cooperate fully in the defense of the matter. The City reserves the right, at its own option, to choose its own attorney to represent the City, its officers, employees, and agents in the defense of the matter. 4. Details shown on the tentative tract map are not necessarily approved. Any details which are inconsistent with requirements of state and local ordinances, conditions of approval, or City policies must be specifically approved in the final map or improvement plan approvals. 5. In the event that exhibits and written conditions are inconsistent, the written conditions shall prevail. 6. Upon approval of these conditions and prior to becoming final and binding, the applicant must sign and return an "Acceptance of Conditions" form. The form • and content shall be prepared by the Community and Economic Development Department. Page 4 of 8 sing needs. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT based on the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Council adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration and approves Tentative Parcel Map 11-01 (Tentative Parcel Map No. 19131), subject to the following conditions of approval: Page 3 of 8 ge 2 of 11 scheduled $ 32.92 $ 33.82 Locks-Replaced Lock $ 26.05 $ 26.60 6 1 $ 219.49 $ 225.33 6 2 $ 424.20 $ 435.54 Roll-Off 8 Compactor Services 6 3 $ 644.28 $ 661.46 10 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 4 $ 863.21 $ 886.20 20 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 5 $1,082.71 $1,111.53 40 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 6 $1,302.21 $1,336.86 40 yard Compactor(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Extra Pick-Up 6 yd On-Site $ 21 43 $ 22.19 40 yard Recycling(plus processing) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 Extra Pick-Up 6yd Unscheduled $ 37.54 $ 38.63 40 yard Green Waste(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Refuse Per Ton $ 56.15 $ 57.97 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY 7. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Director of Building and Safety/Public Works, including the conditions of approval contained in the Director's memorandum dated May 11, 2011, attached hereto as Exhibit 1. 8. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the San Bernardino County Fire Department, Office of the Fire Marshal Community Safety Division, including the conditions of approval contained in their letter dated May 5, 2011, attached hereto attached hereto as Exhibit 2. 9. The applicant shall comply with the Mitigation Monitoring Plan prepared for the project, attached hereto as Exhibit 3. Conditions Prior to Final Map Approval: 10. The Subdivider shall comply with all applicable local and state regulations governing preparation and acceptance of the final map, including the requirements for all bonds, deposits and/or securities required by the Subdivision Map Act. 11. A final parcel map prepared by, or under the direction of a registered civil engineer authorized to practice land surveying, or a licensed land surveyor, must be processed through the City prior to being filed with the County Recorder. 12. The applicant shall submit a preliminary title report and subdivision guarantee showing all fee interest holders, all interest holders whose interest could ripen into a fee, all trust deeds, together with the names of the trustee and all easement holders. The account for this title report shall remain open until the final parcel map is filed with the County Recorder. No easements shall be granted and recorded until after the final map is recorded, unless approved by the City Engineer and subordinated to any City easements by a certification upon the title sheet of the final map, prior to the grant. 13. The applicant shall incorporate into the project design all existing easements within the project boundaries. In the case where easements are proposed to be abandoned, the applicant shall obtain abandonment of said easements from the affected easement holder(s). If this requirement cannot be accomplished, the project shall be redesigned accordingly and as approved by the City. 14. Easements for all on-site facilities, public and private, shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to recordation. Such easements may include, but are not limited to, sewer, water, electric, gas, telephone, storm drains, detention basins, and landscaping. 15. Pay all required fees for the processing and approval of the final tract map. Page 5 of 8 Page 4 of 8 sing needs. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT based on the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Council adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration and approves Tentative Parcel Map 11-01 (Tentative Parcel Map No. 19131), subject to the following conditions of approval: Page 3 of 8 ge 2 of 11 scheduled $ 32.92 $ 33.82 Locks-Replaced Lock $ 26.05 $ 26.60 6 1 $ 219.49 $ 225.33 6 2 $ 424.20 $ 435.54 Roll-Off 8 Compactor Services 6 3 $ 644.28 $ 661.46 10 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 4 $ 863.21 $ 886.20 20 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 5 $1,082.71 $1,111.53 40 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 6 $1,302.21 $1,336.86 40 yard Compactor(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Extra Pick-Up 6 yd On-Site $ 21 43 $ 22.19 40 yard Recycling(plus processing) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 Extra Pick-Up 6yd Unscheduled $ 37.54 $ 38.63 40 yard Green Waste(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Refuse Per Ton $ 56.15 $ 57.97 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY 16. Prior to final map approval, all on-site and off-site curbs, gutters, paving, street lights, sewer laterals, water services, utilities, grading, storm drain improvements shall be installed or sufficient surety shall be posted to the satisfaction of the City to guarantee their installation. 17. Prior to final map approval, plans and specifications for the water system facilities shall be submitted for approval to the Riverside Highland Water Company. The subdivider shall submit an agreement and other evidence, satisfactory to the City, indicating that the subdivider has entered into a contract with the water purveyor guaranteeing payment and installation of the water - improvements. 18. - - Prior to the final map approval, there shall also be filed with the City Engineer, a statement from the water purveyor indicating subdivider compliance with the Fire Department's fire flow requirements. 19. Improvement plans for utility. connections and services, including water, fire hydrant and/or fire sprinklers, sewer, storm drain, gas, electric, phone, and television, shall be submitted to and approved by the City. 20. Access rights shall be granted to the City for the purpose of allowing access over private drives within the development for all City vehicles, including police, fire, and other emergency vehicles. The document(s) recording this access shall be prepared by the applicant for review and approval by the City Engineer, prior to recordation. 21. The applicant shall record an easement over Parcels 1, 2, 3, and 4 proposed within Tentative Parcel Map 11-02 for proposed reciprocal drainage, access, sewer, and parking crossing lot lines. Prior to recordation, easement documents shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval. 22. The applicant shall prepare Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&R's) for the commercial center and submit the CC&R's to the City for review and approval. The CC&R's shall include provisions for the maintenance of common area improvements including landscaping, perimeter fencing, infrastructure improvements, and parking areas; and structural BMP's identified in the WQMP. The CC&R's shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map, and the applicant shall be responsible for all City Attorney costs regarding review of said CC&R's. 23. All perimeter walls and retaining walls shall be decorative, which may include the incorporation of stucco, split-face block, stone veneer and/or other materials that match the colors and materials of the project. The retaining wall shall incorporate additional architectural interest. 24. The following intersection improvements shall be constructed: Page 6 of 8 itigated Negative Declaration and approves Tentative Parcel Map 11-01 (Tentative Parcel Map No. 19131), subject to the following conditions of approval: Page 3 of 8 ge 2 of 11 scheduled $ 32.92 $ 33.82 Locks-Replaced Lock $ 26.05 $ 26.60 6 1 $ 219.49 $ 225.33 6 2 $ 424.20 $ 435.54 Roll-Off 8 Compactor Services 6 3 $ 644.28 $ 661.46 10 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 4 $ 863.21 $ 886.20 20 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 5 $1,082.71 $1,111.53 40 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 6 $1,302.21 $1,336.86 40 yard Compactor(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Extra Pick-Up 6 yd On-Site $ 21 43 $ 22.19 40 yard Recycling(plus processing) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 Extra Pick-Up 6yd Unscheduled $ 37.54 $ 38.63 40 yard Green Waste(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Refuse Per Ton $ 56.15 $ 57.97 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY a. Improve the intersection of Project Access 1 (NS) at Barton Road (EW) shall be improved to provide the following geometrics: i. Northbound: N/A ii. Southbound: one shared left-turn and right-turn lane iii. Eastbound: one left-turn lane, two through lanes iv. Westbound: one through lane, one shared through and right-turn lane b. Improve the intersection of Project Access 2 (NS) at Barton Road (EW) shall be improved to provide the following geometrics: i. Northbound: N/A ii. Southbound: one right-turn lane iii. Eastbound: two through lanes iv. Westbound: one through lane, one shared through and right-turn lane c. The intersection of Project Access 3 (NS) at Barton Road (EW) shall be improved to provide the following geometrics i. Northbound: one left-turn lane, two through lanes ii. Southbound: one through lane, one shared through and right-turn lane iii. Eastbound: one shared left-turn and right-turn lane iv. Westbound: N/A Conditions after Final Map Approval: 25. Final map shall be filed with the County Recorder and one (1) Mylar copy of the filed map shall be submitted to the City offices prior to the issuance of any building permits. 26. Corner monuments indicating the new property corners shall be set in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act, and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Appropriate documentation that the monuments have been set must be submitted to the City Engineer. 27. Construction and operational activities associated with the project shall comply with the regulations of the City's Noise Ordinance, Chapter 8.108 of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code. 28. The project shall be constructed in accordance with all the approved plans and conditions of approval, including but not limited to site plans, grading plans, wall plans, and building elevations. Page 7 of 8 and approval. The CC&R's shall include provisions for the maintenance of common area improvements including landscaping, perimeter fencing, infrastructure improvements, and parking areas; and structural BMP's identified in the WQMP. The CC&R's shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map, and the applicant shall be responsible for all City Attorney costs regarding review of said CC&R's. 23. All perimeter walls and retaining walls shall be decorative, which may include the incorporation of stucco, split-face block, stone veneer and/or other materials that match the colors and materials of the project. The retaining wall shall incorporate additional architectural interest. 24. The following intersection improvements shall be constructed: Page 6 of 8 itigated Negative Declaration and approves Tentative Parcel Map 11-01 (Tentative Parcel Map No. 19131), subject to the following conditions of approval: Page 3 of 8 ge 2 of 11 scheduled $ 32.92 $ 33.82 Locks-Replaced Lock $ 26.05 $ 26.60 6 1 $ 219.49 $ 225.33 6 2 $ 424.20 $ 435.54 Roll-Off 8 Compactor Services 6 3 $ 644.28 $ 661.46 10 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 4 $ 863.21 $ 886.20 20 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 5 $1,082.71 $1,111.53 40 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 6 $1,302.21 $1,336.86 40 yard Compactor(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Extra Pick-Up 6 yd On-Site $ 21 43 $ 22.19 40 yard Recycling(plus processing) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 Extra Pick-Up 6yd Unscheduled $ 37.54 $ 38.63 40 yard Green Waste(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Refuse Per Ton $ 56.15 $ 57.97 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY 29. The applicant shall maintain the Project site and perimeter boundary and retaining walls in good condition at all times, including the prompt removal of graffiti. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace, California, at a meeting held on the 26th of July, 2011. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: Brenda Mesa Walt Stanckiewitz City Clerk Mayor Page 8 of 8 1 ....L.: IN to [.---J r ,��_J L i` 1111111111 *11111 [III Ell 1x Storm Drain Diagram I l Specific Plan Area a r \ Storm Drain C.M.P. Cv' Storm Drain R.C.F. Cannsmity Day e°opaaea Department,July 2011. Ms map isfor reference orgy.For detaled ilcanalon,ple se oansut with the Cemrnm ty De.ecprrent Depattneri �i._1, 'n Page 11 of 11 Exhibit 1 Building and Safety/Public Works Department Conditions of Approval Date: May 11, 2011 Applicant: Barton Circle, LLC. Dr. Robert Ha Site Location: Northwest Corner of Barton Road and Mount Vernon Avenue. Barton Plaza Development Project W.O. # 12-8-5450, SA 11-02, TPM 11-01, TPM 19131 Provide four (4) construction plans and information for review of the proposed project. Below is a list of the plans and documents needed for plan review. The initial plan review usually will take three weeks on most projects. You have received work order number 12-8.5450, for the proposed project. This number will be needed to obtain information regarding your plan review. A plan review fee and permit fee will be charged at the time plans are approved and are ready to issue. Provide the following sets of plans and documents for the proposed project. Public Works/Engineering submittal's required at first plan review. (2) Parcel Map 19131, see attached checklist for submittal requirements. (2) Title Reports (1) Grant Deed showing all easements (2) Street Utility Plans (1) Street Water Plans. (2) Street Sewer Plans. (2) Storm Water Plans (1) Dedications of right of way prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer. (2) Street improvement plans prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer. (2) Proposed utility easement documents. Building and Safety submittal's required at first plan review for each building. (4) Architectural Plans (4) Structural Plans (2) Structural Calculations (4) Plot/Site Plans (4) Electrical Plans (4) Electrical Load Calculations (4) Plumbing Plans/Isometrics, Water, Sewer and Gas (4) Mechanical Plans (4) Mechanical Duct Layout Plans (2) Roof and Floor Truss Plans 1 and conditions of approval, including but not limited to site plans, grading plans, wall plans, and building elevations. Page 7 of 8 and approval. The CC&R's shall include provisions for the maintenance of common area improvements including landscaping, perimeter fencing, infrastructure improvements, and parking areas; and structural BMP's identified in the WQMP. The CC&R's shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map, and the applicant shall be responsible for all City Attorney costs regarding review of said CC&R's. 23. All perimeter walls and retaining walls shall be decorative, which may include the incorporation of stucco, split-face block, stone veneer and/or other materials that match the colors and materials of the project. The retaining wall shall incorporate additional architectural interest. 24. The following intersection improvements shall be constructed: Page 6 of 8 itigated Negative Declaration and approves Tentative Parcel Map 11-01 (Tentative Parcel Map No. 19131), subject to the following conditions of approval: Page 3 of 8 ge 2 of 11 scheduled $ 32.92 $ 33.82 Locks-Replaced Lock $ 26.05 $ 26.60 6 1 $ 219.49 $ 225.33 6 2 $ 424.20 $ 435.54 Roll-Off 8 Compactor Services 6 3 $ 644.28 $ 661.46 10 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 4 $ 863.21 $ 886.20 20 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 5 $1,082.71 $1,111.53 40 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 6 $1,302.21 $1,336.86 40 yard Compactor(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Extra Pick-Up 6 yd On-Site $ 21 43 $ 22.19 40 yard Recycling(plus processing) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 Extra Pick-Up 6yd Unscheduled $ 37.54 $ 38.63 40 yard Green Waste(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Refuse Per Ton $ 56.15 $ 57.97 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY (2) Title 24 Energy Calculations (4) Precise Grading Plan (2) Water Quality Management Plan, (WQMP) and Erosion Control Plan (2) Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan, (SWPPP) (2) Soils reports that include percolation information for any proposed storm water facility. Building & Safety/Public Works General Information All structures shall be designed in accordance with the 2010 California Building Code, 2010 California Mechanical Code, 2010 California Plumbing Code, 2010 California • Electrical Code and the 2010 California Green Building Standards Code adopted by the State of California and the City of Grand Terrace. All construction work performed in the public right of way shall comply with the San Bernardino County Public Works Standards and the City of Grand Terrace Specifications for Construction Within Public Right of Way. The Developer/Owner is responsible for the coordination of the final occupancy. The Developer/Owner shall obtain clearances from each department and division prior to requesting a final building inspection from Building & Safety. Each agency shall sign the,bottom of the Building & Safety Job Card. Building & Safety inspection requests and Public Works inspection requests can be made twenty four (24) hours in advance for next day inspection. Please contact (909) 825-3825. You may also request inspections at the Building & Safety public counter. All construction sites must be protected by a security fence and screening. The fencing and screening shall be maintained at all times. The city right of way next to the construction site shall be maintained at all times to protect pedestrians. Toilet facilities shall be provided for construction workers. Toilet facilities shall be maintained in a sanitary condition at all times. Construction toilet facilities of the non sewer type shall conform at ANSI ZA.3. All construction projects are required to divert at least sixty percent of the estimated tonnage of construction and demolition materials generated. Sixty percent of the estimated tonnage of construction materials shall not include any inert materials that are disposed in an inert backfill site. The project will be required to comply with Grand Terrace Ordinance No. 243, see attached ordinance. Construction projects which require temporary electrical power shall obtain an Electrical Permit from Building & Safety. No temporary electrical power will be granted to a project unless one of the following items is in place and approved by Building & Safety. (A) Installation of a construction trailer. or, 2 ing intersection improvements shall be constructed: Page 6 of 8 itigated Negative Declaration and approves Tentative Parcel Map 11-01 (Tentative Parcel Map No. 19131), subject to the following conditions of approval: Page 3 of 8 ge 2 of 11 scheduled $ 32.92 $ 33.82 Locks-Replaced Lock $ 26.05 $ 26.60 6 1 $ 219.49 $ 225.33 6 2 $ 424.20 $ 435.54 Roll-Off 8 Compactor Services 6 3 $ 644.28 $ 661.46 10 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 4 $ 863.21 $ 886.20 20 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 5 $1,082.71 $1,111.53 40 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 6 $1,302.21 $1,336.86 40 yard Compactor(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Extra Pick-Up 6 yd On-Site $ 21 43 $ 22.19 40 yard Recycling(plus processing) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 Extra Pick-Up 6yd Unscheduled $ 37.54 $ 38.63 40 yard Green Waste(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Refuse Per Ton $ 56.15 $ 57.97 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY (B) Security fenced and screened area where the electrical power will be located. Installation of construction/sales trailers must be located on private property. No trailers can be located in the public street right of way. Construction vehicles and construction workers vehicles shall be parked on site at all times. Work hours are from 7:00 am, to 7:00 pm, or sundown Monday through Saturday. No construction shall be permitted on Sunday or national holidays. Public Works and Engineering Conditions 1. The applicant shall pay all development impact fees prior to obtaining Grading permits. 2. All on site utilities are required to be underground to all new proposed structures. 3. Performance, labor and materials bonds are required before work begins in the public right of way. 4. All proposed public street improvements shall be designed by persons registered and licensed pursuant to the Business and Professions Code. 5. The applicant shall dedicate and construct all missing and proposed public improvements on Barton Road and Mount Vernon Avenue. The missing public improvements shall include, but are not limited to, pavement, curb, gutter, sidewalk, driveway approach, corner ramps, cross gutters and street light and all necessary right of way construction all of which shall be shown on the street improvement plans. 6. Curb return radius at all entrances and exit driveways shall be set at 35—feet minimum. The curb radius at the northwest corner of Britton Way and Mount Vernon Avenue can be reduced to no less than 15 feet to accommodate a disabled ramp and a building structural column in this area if desired. Creative disabled ramp designs can be proposed to allow for a greater radius above 15 foot on this corner. All traffic sight lines shall be checked against San Bernardino County Transportation Department Standards. 7. Existing disabled ramp and radius on the northwest corner of Mount Vernon and Barton shall be upgraded to comply with current standards and ADA requirements. 8. Street work performed on Mount Vernon Avenue will be required to incorporate petromate underpavement prior to paving repairs. All street repairs and work in 3 ct will be required to comply with Grand Terrace Ordinance No. 243, see attached ordinance. Construction projects which require temporary electrical power shall obtain an Electrical Permit from Building & Safety. No temporary electrical power will be granted to a project unless one of the following items is in place and approved by Building & Safety. (A) Installation of a construction trailer. or, 2 ing intersection improvements shall be constructed: Page 6 of 8 itigated Negative Declaration and approves Tentative Parcel Map 11-01 (Tentative Parcel Map No. 19131), subject to the following conditions of approval: Page 3 of 8 ge 2 of 11 scheduled $ 32.92 $ 33.82 Locks-Replaced Lock $ 26.05 $ 26.60 6 1 $ 219.49 $ 225.33 6 2 $ 424.20 $ 435.54 Roll-Off 8 Compactor Services 6 3 $ 644.28 $ 661.46 10 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 4 $ 863.21 $ 886.20 20 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 5 $1,082.71 $1,111.53 40 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 6 $1,302.21 $1,336.86 40 yard Compactor(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Extra Pick-Up 6 yd On-Site $ 21 43 $ 22.19 40 yard Recycling(plus processing) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 Extra Pick-Up 6yd Unscheduled $ 37.54 $ 38.63 40 yard Green Waste(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Refuse Per Ton $ 56.15 $ 57.97 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY the public right of way shall be in accordance with the City of Grand Terrace Paving Policy. 9. Pursuant to the City of Grand Terrace Circulation Element, a median is required on Barton Road from Mount Vernon Avenue west to the projects limits. The median will be constructed with an opening west of the median to allow full turning access in and out of the projects westerly driveway. The City reserves the right to study movements generated from the westerly driveway in the event the City finds that this area has encounter vehicular movement problems. - 10. Applicant shall make all necessary public right of way improvements as required by the City Traffic Engineer. 11. Submit Tentative Parcel Map 19131, and all standard engineering conditions of approval used by the City. . 12. Submit utility alteration and utility easement plans and documents for review. Building Permit Conditions 1. Prior to issuance of Building Permits, on site water service shall be installed and approved by the responsible agency. On site Fire Hydrants shall be approved by the Fire Department. No flammable materials will be allowed on the site until the Fire Hydrants are established and approved. 2. Prior to issuance of permits, site grading and pad certifications shall be submitted to Building & Safety. Prior to concrete placement, submit a certification for the finish floor elevations and set backs of structures. The certification needs to reflect that the structures are in conformance with the Precise Grading Plans. Compaction reports shall accompany pad certifications. 3. Prior to issuance of building permits, provide a certificate from Colton Joint Unified School District stating that all school fees have been paid. 4. Prior to issuance of building permits, provide Building & Safety with a will service letter from Riverside Highland Water Company. (909) 825-4128. 5. Pay all required state storm water fees and provide copy of payment along with the Notice of Intent prior to grading permits. 6. All construction projects shall comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Systems (NPDES) and the current San Bernardino County MS-4 permit requirements. 4 rs. All street repairs and work in 3 ct will be required to comply with Grand Terrace Ordinance No. 243, see attached ordinance. Construction projects which require temporary electrical power shall obtain an Electrical Permit from Building & Safety. No temporary electrical power will be granted to a project unless one of the following items is in place and approved by Building & Safety. (A) Installation of a construction trailer. or, 2 ing intersection improvements shall be constructed: Page 6 of 8 itigated Negative Declaration and approves Tentative Parcel Map 11-01 (Tentative Parcel Map No. 19131), subject to the following conditions of approval: Page 3 of 8 ge 2 of 11 scheduled $ 32.92 $ 33.82 Locks-Replaced Lock $ 26.05 $ 26.60 6 1 $ 219.49 $ 225.33 6 2 $ 424.20 $ 435.54 Roll-Off 8 Compactor Services 6 3 $ 644.28 $ 661.46 10 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 4 $ 863.21 $ 886.20 20 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 5 $1,082.71 $1,111.53 40 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 6 $1,302.21 $1,336.86 40 yard Compactor(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Extra Pick-Up 6 yd On-Site $ 21 43 $ 22.19 40 yard Recycling(plus processing) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 Extra Pick-Up 6yd Unscheduled $ 37.54 $ 38.63 40 yard Green Waste(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Refuse Per Ton $ 56.15 $ 57.97 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY • SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY COUNTY OF SAN BERNAnDINO It 2 �R®/ Q FIRE DEPARTMENT �, PUBLIC AND SUPPORT C' •� �Y' ' C \ SERVICES GROUP OFFICE.OF THE FIRE MARSHAL sue:.',`.2'.: ' .: MARK A. HARTWIG COMMUNITY SAFETY DIVISION Fire Chief 620 South"E"Street 'San ,C` ` S Bernardino,Ca.92415-0179 (909)386.8465-Fax(909)386-8460 / DEPART T �/ � DATE: May 5,2011 EXPIRATION: May 2012 EVERGREEN DEVCO, INC. 2390 E CANIELBACK RD, STE 410 PHOENIX,AZ 85016 PERMIT NUMBER: F201100228 PROJECT NUMBER: LOCATION: NORTHWEST CORNER OF BARTON RD&MOUNT VERNON AVE PROJECT TYPE: SPRM OCCUPANCY TYPE APN: 0275-251-14-0000 PROPOSAL:. PLANNER SANDRA MOLINA Dear Applicant With respect to the conditions of approval regarding the above referenced project, the San Bernardino County Fire, Department requires the following fire protection measures to be provided in accordance with applicable local ordinances, codes, and/or.recognized fire protection standards. The Fire Conditions Attach merit of this document sets forth the FIRE CONDITIONS and STANDARDS which are applied to. this project. FIRE CONDITIONS; All FIRE CONDITIONS FOR THIS PROJECT ARE ATTACHED REVISION_TO AN APPROVED ACTION. Page L of Sincerely, 1/4\ Mar Anderson,.Fire Prevention Specialist San Bernardino_County Fire Department Valley Division Community Safety Division Duty, Honor, Community ifications. 3. Prior to issuance of building permits, provide a certificate from Colton Joint Unified School District stating that all school fees have been paid. 4. Prior to issuance of building permits, provide Building & Safety with a will service letter from Riverside Highland Water Company. (909) 825-4128. 5. Pay all required state storm water fees and provide copy of payment along with the Notice of Intent prior to grading permits. 6. All construction projects shall comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Systems (NPDES) and the current San Bernardino County MS-4 permit requirements. 4 rs. All street repairs and work in 3 ct will be required to comply with Grand Terrace Ordinance No. 243, see attached ordinance. Construction projects which require temporary electrical power shall obtain an Electrical Permit from Building & Safety. No temporary electrical power will be granted to a project unless one of the following items is in place and approved by Building & Safety. (A) Installation of a construction trailer. or, 2 ing intersection improvements shall be constructed: Page 6 of 8 itigated Negative Declaration and approves Tentative Parcel Map 11-01 (Tentative Parcel Map No. 19131), subject to the following conditions of approval: Page 3 of 8 ge 2 of 11 scheduled $ 32.92 $ 33.82 Locks-Replaced Lock $ 26.05 $ 26.60 6 1 $ 219.49 $ 225.33 6 2 $ 424.20 $ 435.54 Roll-Off 8 Compactor Services 6 3 $ 644.28 $ 661.46 10 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 4 $ 863.21 $ 886.20 20 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 5 $1,082.71 $1,111.53 40 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 6 $1,302.21 $1,336.86 40 yard Compactor(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Extra Pick-Up 6 yd On-Site $ 21 43 $ 22.19 40 yard Recycling(plus processing) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 Extra Pick-Up 6yd Unscheduled $ 37.54 $ 38.63 40 yard Green Waste(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Refuse Per Ton $ 56.15 $ 57.97 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY FIRE CONDITIONS ATTACHMENT DI PATE! 05-05-2011 4?) - • kw- PRO4gcr• j." , skiwaSaa s'Z'tg PERMIT NUMBER: F201100228 ko) • LOCATION: ' NORTHWEST CORNER OF , BARTON RD&MOUNT VE "sips " PARCEL: 0275.251-14-0000 DEPART V / CONDITIONS Cond:Fol Jurisdiction.The above referenced project is under the jurisdiction of the San Bernardino County Fire Department herein('Fire Departmenf). Prior to any construction occurring on any parcel,the applicant shall contact the Fire Department for verification of current fire protection reqUirements.All new construction shall comply with the current Uniform Fire Code requirements and all applicable statutes,codes,ordinances and standardsof the Fire'Department.[F01] Cond: F05' Water System. Prior to any land disturbance;the water systems shall be designed to meet the required fire flow for this development and shall be approved by the Fire bepattrnent.The required fire flow shalt be determ in ed by•using Appendix-IIIA of the Uniform Fire'dode..[F05] COnci: Fire Flow Test.Your submittal did notinCludea flow test report to establish whether the public Water-supply is capable of meeting your project fire flow demand You will be required to either produce a current,flow test report from your water purveyor demonstrating that the fire flow demand is satisfied Or you Must install an approved fire sprinkler system.This requirement shall be• completed prior to combination inspection by,Building'and Safety. [F058) obi* F41 AcOeSS,The development shall have a minimum of points of vehicular access.These are for fire/emergency equipment access and for evacuation routes.,Standard-9022.1 Single.Story Road Access Width: Mbuildings shall:have access proVidedby approved roads,alleys and private drives with-a Minimum twenty six(26)foot unobstructed width and vertically to fourteen (14)feet six(6)inches in height: Other recognized standards may be more restrictive by requiring wider access provisions. Multi-Story Road Access Width: Buildings three(3):stories in height or more shall have a minimum access d thirty(30)feet unobstructed width and vertically to fourteen (14)feet six(6)inches in height. [F41] Cond: F54 Water System Commercial.A water system approved and inspected by the Fire Department is required. Thesystem shall be operational,,prior to any combustibles-being stored on the site.All fire 'hydrants shall be spaced no more than three hundred(300)feet apart(as measured along vehicular traVekvayS).and no more than three hundred poo)feet from any portion of a structure. [F54.1 Cond: F57 Water System Certifidation.The applicant shall provide the Fire Department with a letter from the serving Water company,certifying that the required water improvements have been,made or that the existing fire hydrants and water system will meet distance and fire flow requirements. Fire flaw water supply shall be in place prior to placing combustible materials on the job-site. [FM Cond: F59 Fire Sprinkler-NFPA#13.An putornatic fire sprinkler systern complying with NFPA Partiphlet#13 and Page 1.2- of -3 $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 4 $ 863.21 $ 886.20 20 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 5 $1,082.71 $1,111.53 40 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 6 $1,302.21 $1,336.86 40 yard Compactor(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Extra Pick-Up 6 yd On-Site $ 21 43 $ 22.19 40 yard Recycling(plus processing) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 Extra Pick-Up 6yd Unscheduled $ 37.54 $ 38.63 40 yard Green Waste(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Refuse Per Ton $ 56.15 $ 57.97 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY FIRE.CONDITIONS ATTACHMENT DATE: 05-05-2011 C>, PROJECT: PERMIT NUMBER: F201100228 Art LOCATION:- NORTHWEST CORNER OF BARTON RD&MOUNt vE PARCEL: 0275-251-14-0000 DEPARni,2 the Fire Department standards is required.The applicant shall hire a Fire Department approved fire eptinkter .cOntraCtor:The'fire sprinkler contractor shall submit three(3)sets of detailed plans to the Fire Department for review and aPproVal. The plans (Minimum 1/8"scale)shall include hydraulic calculations and manufactures--specification sheets The contractor shall submit plans ehoWing type of storage and use with the applicable protection sYetem.The required fees shall be paid at the time-of plan stibMittal.Standard 101.1 [F59] 00110: F62 Fire Alarm An automatic monitoring fire alarm system complying with the California Fire Code,NFPA and all applicable codes is required for 100 heads or more.The applicant shall hire a Fire Department approved fire alarm contractor The fire alarm contractor shall submit three(3)sets of detailed plans to the Fire Department for review and approVal.The required fees shall be paid at thetime of plan submittal Standard 1007.1..1FA. [FOT Cond: F65 Hood And Duct Suppression.An automatic hood and duct fire extinguishing system is required.A Fire Department approved designer/installer shall submit three(3)sets of detailed plans (minienutn.1/8" scale)with manufactures'specification,sheets to the Fire Department for review.andepprOVal.The required feesshall be paid at the time of plan submittal:[F651 Cond: Commercial Addtetsing. Commercial and industrial developments of 100,000 sq.ft or less shall have the etreet addreta installed on the buildingrwith numbers that are a minimum six(6)inches in height and with a three quarter(3/4)inch etroke.The street address shall be visible from the Street During the tibUrt of darkness,the nunibers shall be electtically illuminatect(Internal or external).Where tha building,is two hundred(200)feet or morefrom the roadway, additional non-illuminated contrasting six(p)inch numbers shall be displayed at the property access entrances.Standard 901.4.4[F82], Cond;F85 Key Box.An approved Fire Department key box is requited.The key boX shall be provided with a tamper switch and shall be monitored by a Fire Department approved central monitoring service. In cOrnmerdial,industrial and multi-family complexes, all swing gates shall have an approved fire department Knox Lock.Standerd"902.4[F85] Cond::Ftia Fire Extinguishers Hand portable fire extinguishers are required.The location, type;and cabinet design shall be approved bythe Fire Department. [F88] Cond: Fire Lanes.The applicant shall submit a fire lane plan to the Fire Department for review and approval. Fire lane curbs shall be painted red.The"No Parking, Fire Lane"signs shall be installed on public/private roads In'accordance with the approved plan.Standard 901.4[F93] Cond:CON0016878- Vegetation management is to be provided to maintain twenty six feet width and a clear height of fourteen feet six inches. Cond: CON0016879 Any planned rooftop photovOltaic arrays requires a separate submittal to the Fire Department for approval: Page ) of 3 -3 $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 4 $ 863.21 $ 886.20 20 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 5 $1,082.71 $1,111.53 40 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 6 $1,302.21 $1,336.86 40 yard Compactor(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Extra Pick-Up 6 yd On-Site $ 21 43 $ 22.19 40 yard Recycling(plus processing) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 Extra Pick-Up 6yd Unscheduled $ 37.54 $ 38.63 40 yard Green Waste(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Refuse Per Ton $ 56.15 $ 57.97 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM BARTON PLAZA W EVERGREEN DEVCO, INC. PAGE 1 of10 Responsible Timing of Method of Monitoring Date Sanctions Mitigation Measure Verified for Non- Party Verification Verification Frequency /Initials Compliance Aesthetics AESTH-01: All exposed retaining and Community and Prior to Review of During Withhold perimeter walls shall be decorative, Economic issuance of a grading plans construction grading which may include the incorporation or Development grading permits permits combination of stucco, split-face block, Director or and approval of and/or stop stone veneer and/or other materials that designee landscape work order for match the colors and materials of the plans • grading Project;and shall include the installation operations. of landscape material along the west boundary retaining wall to the satisfaction of the Community and Economic Development Department. Air Quality AQ-01: Vehicle Emissions-The - Building Official Prior to Submittal of During -Withhold following measures are recommended to or designee issuance of a evidence on construction grading further reduce vehicle emission impacts grading permit grading plans permits during Project construction: that include and/or stop a. Construction equipment shall be appropriate work order for maintained in proper tune. measures to grading b. Utilize gasoline or electricity-powered satisfy the operations. equipment instead of diesel mtent of this equipment whenever possible. measure. c. Suspend use of heavy construction equipment during first stage smog alerts. or morefrom the roadway, additional non-illuminated contrasting six(p)inch numbers shall be displayed at the property access entrances.Standard 901.4.4[F82], Cond;F85 Key Box.An approved Fire Department key box is requited.The key boX shall be provided with a tamper switch and shall be monitored by a Fire Department approved central monitoring service. In cOrnmerdial,industrial and multi-family complexes, all swing gates shall have an approved fire department Knox Lock.Standerd"902.4[F85] Cond::Ftia Fire Extinguishers Hand portable fire extinguishers are required.The location, type;and cabinet design shall be approved bythe Fire Department. [F88] Cond: Fire Lanes.The applicant shall submit a fire lane plan to the Fire Department for review and approval. Fire lane curbs shall be painted red.The"No Parking, Fire Lane"signs shall be installed on public/private roads In'accordance with the approved plan.Standard 901.4[F93] Cond:CON0016878- Vegetation management is to be provided to maintain twenty six feet width and a clear height of fourteen feet six inches. Cond: CON0016879 Any planned rooftop photovOltaic arrays requires a separate submittal to the Fire Department for approval: Page ) of 3 -3 $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 4 $ 863.21 $ 886.20 20 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 5 $1,082.71 $1,111.53 40 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 6 $1,302.21 $1,336.86 40 yard Compactor(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Extra Pick-Up 6 yd On-Site $ 21 43 $ 22.19 40 yard Recycling(plus processing) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 Extra Pick-Up 6yd Unscheduled $ 37.54 $ 38.63 40 yard Green Waste(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Refuse Per Ton $ 56.15 $ 57.97 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM BARTON PLAZA EVERGREEN DEVCO, INC. PAGE 2 of 10 Responsible Timing of Method of Monitoring Date Sanctions Mitigation Measure Verified for Non- Party Verification Verification Frequency Y /Initials Compliance d. All construction vehicles shall be prohibited from excessive idling. Excessive idling is defined as five minutes or longer. e. Encourage use of"clean diesel" equipment if modified engines (catalyst equipped or newer Moyer Program retrofit)are available at a reasonable cost. AQ-02: Fugitive Dust Emissions and Building Official Prior to Submittal of During Withhold Control--To reduce fugitive dust or designee issuance of a evidence on construction grading emissions during construction, the use of grading permit grading plans permits best available control measures (BACM) that include and/or stop shall be implemented during grading, appropriate work order for including the following: measures to grading a. Water all active construction areas satisfy the operations. three times daily. intent of this b. Cover all haul trucks or maintain at measure. least 2 feet of freeboard. c. Pave or apply water three times daily to all unpaved parking or staging areas. d. Reduce speed on unpaved roads to less than 15 mph. e. Sweep or wash any site access points within 30 minutes of any visible dirt deposition on any public roadway. oline or electricity-powered satisfy the operations. equipment instead of diesel mtent of this equipment whenever possible. measure. c. Suspend use of heavy construction equipment during first stage smog alerts. or morefrom the roadway, additional non-illuminated contrasting six(p)inch numbers shall be displayed at the property access entrances.Standard 901.4.4[F82], Cond;F85 Key Box.An approved Fire Department key box is requited.The key boX shall be provided with a tamper switch and shall be monitored by a Fire Department approved central monitoring service. In cOrnmerdial,industrial and multi-family complexes, all swing gates shall have an approved fire department Knox Lock.Standerd"902.4[F85] Cond::Ftia Fire Extinguishers Hand portable fire extinguishers are required.The location, type;and cabinet design shall be approved bythe Fire Department. [F88] Cond: Fire Lanes.The applicant shall submit a fire lane plan to the Fire Department for review and approval. Fire lane curbs shall be painted red.The"No Parking, Fire Lane"signs shall be installed on public/private roads In'accordance with the approved plan.Standard 901.4[F93] Cond:CON0016878- Vegetation management is to be provided to maintain twenty six feet width and a clear height of fourteen feet six inches. Cond: CON0016879 Any planned rooftop photovOltaic arrays requires a separate submittal to the Fire Department for approval: Page ) of 3 -3 $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 4 $ 863.21 $ 886.20 20 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 5 $1,082.71 $1,111.53 40 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 6 $1,302.21 $1,336.86 40 yard Compactor(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Extra Pick-Up 6 yd On-Site $ 21 43 $ 22.19 40 yard Recycling(plus processing) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 Extra Pick-Up 6yd Unscheduled $ 37.54 $ 38.63 40 yard Green Waste(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Refuse Per Ton $ 56.15 $ 57.97 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM BARTON PLAZA EVERGREEN DEVCO, INC. PAGE 3 of 10 Responsible Timing of Method of Monitoring Date Sanctions Mitigation Measure Verified for Non- Party Verification Verification Frequency y /Initials Compliance f. Cover or water twice daily any on- site stockpiles of debris, dirt or other dusty material. g. Suspend all operations on any unpaved surface if winds exceed 25 mph. h. Take measures to limit daily disturbance area to 5 acres or less. AQ-03 Off-Site Impacts--The following Building Official Prior to Submittal of During Withhold measures are recommended to further or designee issuance of a evidence on construction grading reduce construction-related air quality grading permit grading plans permits impacts: that include and/or stop a. Encourage car pooling for appropriate work order for construction workers. measures to grading b. Limit lane closures to off-peak travel satisfythe operations. periods, when feasible. intent of this measure c. Park construction vehicles off traveled roadways. d. Wet down or cover dirt hauled off- site. e. Wash or sweep access points daily. f. Encourage receipt of materials during non-peak traffic hours,when feasible. g. Sand/gravel bag construction sites for erosion control. te access points within 30 minutes of any visible dirt deposition on any public roadway. oline or electricity-powered satisfy the operations. equipment instead of diesel mtent of this equipment whenever possible. measure. c. Suspend use of heavy construction equipment during first stage smog alerts. or morefrom the roadway, additional non-illuminated contrasting six(p)inch numbers shall be displayed at the property access entrances.Standard 901.4.4[F82], Cond;F85 Key Box.An approved Fire Department key box is requited.The key boX shall be provided with a tamper switch and shall be monitored by a Fire Department approved central monitoring service. In cOrnmerdial,industrial and multi-family complexes, all swing gates shall have an approved fire department Knox Lock.Standerd"902.4[F85] Cond::Ftia Fire Extinguishers Hand portable fire extinguishers are required.The location, type;and cabinet design shall be approved bythe Fire Department. [F88] Cond: Fire Lanes.The applicant shall submit a fire lane plan to the Fire Department for review and approval. Fire lane curbs shall be painted red.The"No Parking, Fire Lane"signs shall be installed on public/private roads In'accordance with the approved plan.Standard 901.4[F93] Cond:CON0016878- Vegetation management is to be provided to maintain twenty six feet width and a clear height of fourteen feet six inches. Cond: CON0016879 Any planned rooftop photovOltaic arrays requires a separate submittal to the Fire Department for approval: Page ) of 3 -3 $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 4 $ 863.21 $ 886.20 20 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 5 $1,082.71 $1,111.53 40 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 6 $1,302.21 $1,336.86 40 yard Compactor(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Extra Pick-Up 6 yd On-Site $ 21 43 $ 22.19 40 yard Recycling(plus processing) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 Extra Pick-Up 6yd Unscheduled $ 37.54 $ 38.63 40 yard Green Waste(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Refuse Per Ton $ 56.15 $ 57.97 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM BARTON PLAZA EVERGREEN DEVCO, INC. PAGE 4 of 10 Responsible Timing of Method of Monitoring Date Sanctions Mitigation Measure Verified for Non- Party Verification Verification Frequency Initials Compliance Biological Resources BIO-01: Removal of existing on-site trees Building Official Prior to Submittal of During Withhold must be conducted outside the avian or designee issuance of a evidence to construction. grading nesting season (February through grading permit City that a nest permits August). If construction occurs during the or other earth- survey(if and/or stop avian nesting season,the Project moving activity required) has work order for applicant shall provide evidence to the been grading City that a pre-construction nesting bird conducted and operations. survey has been conducted within 7 days - the inclusion in prior to any ground disturbance activities. construction If birds are found to be nesting inside or documents of within 250 feet(500 feet for raptors)of the appropriate area of constraint, the nest or nesting tree measures to plus a 250-foot buffer must be flagged satisfy the and avoided until it is determined by a intent of this qualified biologist that active nesting no measure longer is occurring. 1 Cultural Resources CUL-01: In the event that a Community and Prior to Incorporation of During Issuance of a paleontological, archeological, and/or Economic issuance of a MM CUL-01 on construction Stop Work historical resource are uncovered during Development grading permit grading plan Order and/or the course of the construction phase of Director or citation the project, ground disturbing activities in designee the vicinity of the find should be redirected until the nature and extent of the find can Key Box.An approved Fire Department key box is requited.The key boX shall be provided with a tamper switch and shall be monitored by a Fire Department approved central monitoring service. In cOrnmerdial,industrial and multi-family complexes, all swing gates shall have an approved fire department Knox Lock.Standerd"902.4[F85] Cond::Ftia Fire Extinguishers Hand portable fire extinguishers are required.The location, type;and cabinet design shall be approved bythe Fire Department. [F88] Cond: Fire Lanes.The applicant shall submit a fire lane plan to the Fire Department for review and approval. Fire lane curbs shall be painted red.The"No Parking, Fire Lane"signs shall be installed on public/private roads In'accordance with the approved plan.Standard 901.4[F93] Cond:CON0016878- Vegetation management is to be provided to maintain twenty six feet width and a clear height of fourteen feet six inches. Cond: CON0016879 Any planned rooftop photovOltaic arrays requires a separate submittal to the Fire Department for approval: Page ) of 3 -3 $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 4 $ 863.21 $ 886.20 20 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 5 $1,082.71 $1,111.53 40 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 6 $1,302.21 $1,336.86 40 yard Compactor(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Extra Pick-Up 6 yd On-Site $ 21 43 $ 22.19 40 yard Recycling(plus processing) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 Extra Pick-Up 6yd Unscheduled $ 37.54 $ 38.63 40 yard Green Waste(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Refuse Per Ton $ 56.15 $ 57.97 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM BARTON PLAZA EVERGREEN DEVCO, INC. PAGE 5 of 10 Responsible Timing of Method of Monitoring Date Sanctions Mitigation Measure Verified for Non- Party Verification Verification Frequency Initials Compliance CUL-01 Con't. be evaluated by a qualified archaeologist and/or paleontologist(as determined by the City). Any such resource uncovered during the course of project-related to grading or construction shall be recorded and/or removed per applicable City and/or State regulations. GEOLOGY GEO-01 The design and construction of Building Official Prior to Review of Prior to I Withhold all structures and facilities, site grading or designee issuance of construction construction building and soil preparation activities within the building permit documents permit Project limits shall be in accordance with the regulations and recommendations established by the City of Grand Terrace, applicable and appropriate measures identified in the Uniform Building Code, California Building Code and the site- specific recommendations of the geotechnical investigation prepared for the proposed Project. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS GHG-01 The following measures are Building Official Prior to Submittal of During Withhold recommended to further reduce vehicle or designee issuance of evidence on construction grading emission impacts during Project grading permit grading plans permits construction that include and/or stop a. Construction equipment shall be appropriate work order for maintained in proper tune. measures to grading satisfy the operations. intent of this measure construction phase of Director or citation the project, ground disturbing activities in designee the vicinity of the find should be redirected until the nature and extent of the find can Key Box.An approved Fire Department key box is requited.The key boX shall be provided with a tamper switch and shall be monitored by a Fire Department approved central monitoring service. In cOrnmerdial,industrial and multi-family complexes, all swing gates shall have an approved fire department Knox Lock.Standerd"902.4[F85] Cond::Ftia Fire Extinguishers Hand portable fire extinguishers are required.The location, type;and cabinet design shall be approved bythe Fire Department. [F88] Cond: Fire Lanes.The applicant shall submit a fire lane plan to the Fire Department for review and approval. Fire lane curbs shall be painted red.The"No Parking, Fire Lane"signs shall be installed on public/private roads In'accordance with the approved plan.Standard 901.4[F93] Cond:CON0016878- Vegetation management is to be provided to maintain twenty six feet width and a clear height of fourteen feet six inches. Cond: CON0016879 Any planned rooftop photovOltaic arrays requires a separate submittal to the Fire Department for approval: Page ) of 3 -3 $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 4 $ 863.21 $ 886.20 20 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 5 $1,082.71 $1,111.53 40 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 6 $1,302.21 $1,336.86 40 yard Compactor(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Extra Pick-Up 6 yd On-Site $ 21 43 $ 22.19 40 yard Recycling(plus processing) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 Extra Pick-Up 6yd Unscheduled $ 37.54 $ 38.63 40 yard Green Waste(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Refuse Per Ton $ 56.15 $ 57.97 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM BARTON PLAZA EVERGREEN DEVCO, INC. PAGE 6 of 10 Responsible Timing of Method of Monitoring Date Sanctions Mitigation Measure Verified for Non- Party Verification Verification Frequency y /Initials Compliance b. Utilize gasoline or electricity-powered equipment instead of diesel equipment whenever possible. c. Suspend use of heavy construction equipment during first stage smog alerts. d. All construction vehicles shall be prohibited from excessive idling. Excessive idling is defined as five minutes or longer. e. Encourage use of"clean diesel" equipment if modified engines (catalyst equipped or newer Moyer Program retrofit)are available at a reasonable cost. GHG-02 Encourage building construction Building Official Prior to Submittal of During Withhold design to exceed the minimum statewide or designee issuance of evidence on construction building energy requirements of Title 24; this may building permit building permits. include but is not limited to: construction a. Use of low emission water heaters plans that b. Use of central air heating systems include appropriate c. Use of energy efficient appliances measures to d. Use of increased insulation satisfy the e. Use of energy-efficient parking lot intent of this lights measure f. Use of lighting controls and energy efficient lighting. include and/or stop a. Construction equipment shall be appropriate work order for maintained in proper tune. measures to grading satisfy the operations. intent of this measure construction phase of Director or citation the project, ground disturbing activities in designee the vicinity of the find should be redirected until the nature and extent of the find can Key Box.An approved Fire Department key box is requited.The key boX shall be provided with a tamper switch and shall be monitored by a Fire Department approved central monitoring service. In cOrnmerdial,industrial and multi-family complexes, all swing gates shall have an approved fire department Knox Lock.Standerd"902.4[F85] Cond::Ftia Fire Extinguishers Hand portable fire extinguishers are required.The location, type;and cabinet design shall be approved bythe Fire Department. [F88] Cond: Fire Lanes.The applicant shall submit a fire lane plan to the Fire Department for review and approval. Fire lane curbs shall be painted red.The"No Parking, Fire Lane"signs shall be installed on public/private roads In'accordance with the approved plan.Standard 901.4[F93] Cond:CON0016878- Vegetation management is to be provided to maintain twenty six feet width and a clear height of fourteen feet six inches. Cond: CON0016879 Any planned rooftop photovOltaic arrays requires a separate submittal to the Fire Department for approval: Page ) of 3 -3 $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 4 $ 863.21 $ 886.20 20 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 5 $1,082.71 $1,111.53 40 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 6 $1,302.21 $1,336.86 40 yard Compactor(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Extra Pick-Up 6 yd On-Site $ 21 43 $ 22.19 40 yard Recycling(plus processing) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 Extra Pick-Up 6yd Unscheduled $ 37.54 $ 38.63 40 yard Green Waste(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Refuse Per Ton $ 56.15 $ 57.97 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM BARTON PLAZA EVERGREEN DEVCO, INC. PAGE 7 of 10 Responsible Timing of Method of Monitoring Date Sanctions Mitigation Measure Verified for Non- Party Verification Verification Frequency y /Initials Compliance NOISE NOS-01: During all Project site Building Official Throughout On-site During grading Stop work excavation and grading on site,the or designee construction inspection and construction order and/or project contractors shall equip all activities citation construction equipment,fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers consistent with manufacturers' standards. NOS-02: The Project contractor shall Building Official Throughout Show During grading Stop work place all stationary construction or designee construction construction and construction order and/or equipment so that emitted noise is staging area on activities citation directed away from sensitive receptors site plan/On- nearest the project site. site inspection NOS-03: The construction contractor Building Official Throughout Show During grading Stop work shall locate equipment staging, building or designee construction construction and construction order and/or materials, and grading debris a minimum staging area on activities citation of 50 feet from the west property line site plan/On- during all Project construction. site inspection NOS-04: On-site construction activities Building Official Throughout On-site During grading Stop work shall be restricted to the hours permitted or designee construction inspection and construction order and/or under the City's Noise Ordinance.The activities citation Noise Ordinance prohibits noise associated with construction activities between the hours of eight p.m. and seven a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. NOS-05: A six-foot high shielding wall Building Official Prior to On-site Prior to Withhold shall be constructed along the northwest or designee issuance of inspection occupancy certificate of corner property line(adjacent to occupancy occupancy residential units)and along the Market (Phase II)loading dock. et design shall be approved bythe Fire Department. [F88] Cond: Fire Lanes.The applicant shall submit a fire lane plan to the Fire Department for review and approval. Fire lane curbs shall be painted red.The"No Parking, Fire Lane"signs shall be installed on public/private roads In'accordance with the approved plan.Standard 901.4[F93] Cond:CON0016878- Vegetation management is to be provided to maintain twenty six feet width and a clear height of fourteen feet six inches. Cond: CON0016879 Any planned rooftop photovOltaic arrays requires a separate submittal to the Fire Department for approval: Page ) of 3 -3 $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 4 $ 863.21 $ 886.20 20 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 5 $1,082.71 $1,111.53 40 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 6 $1,302.21 $1,336.86 40 yard Compactor(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Extra Pick-Up 6 yd On-Site $ 21 43 $ 22.19 40 yard Recycling(plus processing) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 Extra Pick-Up 6yd Unscheduled $ 37.54 $ 38.63 40 yard Green Waste(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Refuse Per Ton $ 56.15 $ 57.97 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM BARTON PLAZA EVERGREEN DEVCO, INC. PAGE 8 of 10 Responsible Timing of Method of Monitoring Date Sanctions Mitigation Measure Verified for Non- Party Verification Verification Frequency Initials Compliance NOS-06: Truck deliveries and loading Community and Ongoing On-site Ongoing Issuance of a dock activity shall be limited to between Economic throughout inspection throughout citation the hours of 7:00 AM to 9:00 PM. Development occupancy of occupancy of Director, Code site site Enforcement NOS-07: Deliveries should limit their Community and Ongoing On-site Ongoing Issuance of a engines to idle 5 minutes or less. Trucks Economic throughout inspection throughout citation should be encouraged to turn off engines Development occupancy of occupancy of once they reach loading dock Director, Code site site destination. Enforcement TRANSPORTATION TRANS-01: Prior to the issuance of Building Official Prior to Evidence of the Prior to issuance Withhold grading permits for Phase 1 of the or designee issuance of payment of of grading grading Project, the Developer shall participate in grading permits impact fees permit and/or a fair-share contribution,via the payment building of Development Impact Fees,for the permit construction of a southbound left turn lane and an eastbound thru lane at the 1-215 Southbound Ramps and Barton Road. TRANS-02: Prior to the issuance of Building Official Prior to Evidence of the Prior to issuance Withhold grading permits for Phase 1 of the or designee issuance of payment of of grading grading Project,the Developer shall participate in grading permits impact fees permit and/or a fair-share contribution, via the payment building of Development Impact Fees,for the permit construction of a northbound left-turn lane and Michigan Street and Barton Road. ng wall Building Official Prior to On-site Prior to Withhold shall be constructed along the northwest or designee issuance of inspection occupancy certificate of corner property line(adjacent to occupancy occupancy residential units)and along the Market (Phase II)loading dock. et design shall be approved bythe Fire Department. [F88] Cond: Fire Lanes.The applicant shall submit a fire lane plan to the Fire Department for review and approval. Fire lane curbs shall be painted red.The"No Parking, Fire Lane"signs shall be installed on public/private roads In'accordance with the approved plan.Standard 901.4[F93] Cond:CON0016878- Vegetation management is to be provided to maintain twenty six feet width and a clear height of fourteen feet six inches. Cond: CON0016879 Any planned rooftop photovOltaic arrays requires a separate submittal to the Fire Department for approval: Page ) of 3 -3 $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 4 $ 863.21 $ 886.20 20 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 5 $1,082.71 $1,111.53 40 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 6 $1,302.21 $1,336.86 40 yard Compactor(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Extra Pick-Up 6 yd On-Site $ 21 43 $ 22.19 40 yard Recycling(plus processing) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 Extra Pick-Up 6yd Unscheduled $ 37.54 $ 38.63 40 yard Green Waste(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Refuse Per Ton $ 56.15 $ 57.97 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM BARTON PLAZA EVERGREEN DEVCO, INC. PAGE 9 of 10 Responsible Timing of Method of Monitoring Date Sanctions Mitigation Measure Verified for Non- Party Verification Verification Frequency Initials Compliance TRANS-03: The Developer shall Building Official Prior to Acceptance of Prior to issuance Withhold complete any remaining half-section or designee occupancy improvements of grading grading street improvements along Mount Vernon by the City permit permit and/or Avenue and Barton Road, directly building adjacent to the Project boundaries. permit TRANS-04: The Developer shall submit Building Official Prior to grading Site inspection Prior to issuance Withhold a signing and striping plan prior to the or designee permit issuance and acceptance of grading grading issuance of grading permits, and signing and prior to of improvements permit and prior permit or and striping shall be completed prior to occupancy to occupancy occupancy opening of Phase 1. TRANS-05: Prior to the issuance of Building Official Prior to Acceptance of Prior to issuance Withhold building permits for Phase 2 of the or designee occupancy improvements of grading grading Project, the Developer shall implement by the City permit permit and/or Mitigation Measures TRANS-01 through building TRANS-05, if not already completed. permit TRANS-06: Construct on-site circulation Building Official Prior to On-site Prior to Withhold system per the detailed site plan, or designee occupancy inspection occupancy of occupancy including the phasing plan. each Phase. TRANS-07: Install stop signs, stop bars, Building Official Prior to On-site Prior to Withhold and stop legends at all Project access or designee occupancy inspection occupancy of occupancy points. each Phase. TRANS-08: Install one (1)southbound Building Official Prior to On-site Prior to Withhold left/right turn land and one(1)eastbound or designee occupancy inspection occupancy of occupancy left turn lane at Project Access 1 at each Phase. Barton Road. TRANS-09: Install one(1)southbound Building Official Prior to On-site Prior to Withhold right turn lane at Project Access 2 at or designee occupancy inspection occupancy of occupancy Barton Road. each Phase. painted red.The"No Parking, Fire Lane"signs shall be installed on public/private roads In'accordance with the approved plan.Standard 901.4[F93] Cond:CON0016878- Vegetation management is to be provided to maintain twenty six feet width and a clear height of fourteen feet six inches. Cond: CON0016879 Any planned rooftop photovOltaic arrays requires a separate submittal to the Fire Department for approval: Page ) of 3 -3 $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 4 $ 863.21 $ 886.20 20 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 5 $1,082.71 $1,111.53 40 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 6 $1,302.21 $1,336.86 40 yard Compactor(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Extra Pick-Up 6 yd On-Site $ 21 43 $ 22.19 40 yard Recycling(plus processing) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 Extra Pick-Up 6yd Unscheduled $ 37.54 $ 38.63 40 yard Green Waste(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Refuse Per Ton $ 56.15 $ 57.97 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM BARTON PLAZA EVERGREEN DEVCO, INC. PAGE 10 of 10 Responsible Timing of Method of Monitoring Date Sanctions Mitigation Measure Verified for Non- Party Verification Verification Frequency / Initials Compliance TRANS-10: Install one (1)northbound Building Official Prior to On-site Prior to Withhold left turn lane at Mount Vernon Avenue or designee occupancy inspection occupancy of occupancy and Project Access 3. each Phase. TRANS-11: Prior to the certificate of Building Official Prior to On-site Prior to Withhold occupancy, the Developer shall or designee occupancy inspection occupancy of occupancy implement Mitigation Measures TRANS- each Phase. 05 through TRANS-10, if not already completed. nd acceptance of grading grading issuance of grading permits, and signing and prior to of improvements permit and prior permit or and striping shall be completed prior to occupancy to occupancy occupancy opening of Phase 1. TRANS-05: Prior to the issuance of Building Official Prior to Acceptance of Prior to issuance Withhold building permits for Phase 2 of the or designee occupancy improvements of grading grading Project, the Developer shall implement by the City permit permit and/or Mitigation Measures TRANS-01 through building TRANS-05, if not already completed. permit TRANS-06: Construct on-site circulation Building Official Prior to On-site Prior to Withhold system per the detailed site plan, or designee occupancy inspection occupancy of occupancy including the phasing plan. each Phase. TRANS-07: Install stop signs, stop bars, Building Official Prior to On-site Prior to Withhold and stop legends at all Project access or designee occupancy inspection occupancy of occupancy points. each Phase. TRANS-08: Install one (1)southbound Building Official Prior to On-site Prior to Withhold left/right turn land and one(1)eastbound or designee occupancy inspection occupancy of occupancy left turn lane at Project Access 1 at each Phase. Barton Road. TRANS-09: Install one(1)southbound Building Official Prior to On-site Prior to Withhold right turn lane at Project Access 2 at or designee occupancy inspection occupancy of occupancy Barton Road. each Phase. painted red.The"No Parking, Fire Lane"signs shall be installed on public/private roads In'accordance with the approved plan.Standard 901.4[F93] Cond:CON0016878- Vegetation management is to be provided to maintain twenty six feet width and a clear height of fourteen feet six inches. Cond: CON0016879 Any planned rooftop photovOltaic arrays requires a separate submittal to the Fire Department for approval: Page ) of 3 -3 $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 4 $ 863.21 $ 886.20 20 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 5 $1,082.71 $1,111.53 40 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 6 $1,302.21 $1,336.86 40 yard Compactor(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Extra Pick-Up 6 yd On-Site $ 21 43 $ 22.19 40 yard Recycling(plus processing) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 Extra Pick-Up 6yd Unscheduled $ 37.54 $ 38.63 40 yard Green Waste(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Refuse Per Ton $ 56.15 $ 57.97 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Attachment 5 Mitigated Negative Declaration/Initial Study boundary and retaining walls in good condition at all times, including the prompt removal of graffiti. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace, California, at a meeting held on the 26th of July, 2011. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: Brenda Mesa Walt Stanckiewitz City Clerk Mayor Page 8 of 8 1 ....L.: IN to [.---J r ,��_J L i` 1111111111 *11111 [III Ell 1x Storm Drain Diagram I l Specific Plan Area a r \ Storm Drain C.M.P. Cv' Storm Drain R.C.F. Cannsmity Day e°opaaea Department,July 2011. Ms map isfor reference orgy.For detaled ilcanalon,ple se oansut with the Cemrnm ty De.ecprrent Depattneri �i._1, 'n Page 11 of 11 Community and Economic Development Department Grand Terrace DRAFT MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION CALIFORNIA Date: June 9, 2011 Project Title: Barton Plaza (Site and Architectural Review 11-01, Tentative Parcel Map 11- 01, Sign Program 11-02, General Plan Amendment 11-01, Zone Change/Specific Plan Amendment) Project Location: Northwest corner of Barton Road and Mount Vernon Avenue, and northwest corner of Britton Way and Mount Vernon Avenue (Assessor's Parcel Numbers 0275-251-14, 21 27, 30, 31, 32, 55, 73 and 74) Description of Project: A proposal to develop, in two Phases, a commercial center made up of four buildings totaling 37,700 square feet with 1,800 square feet of outdoor seating. Phase 1 includes grading the entire site and construction of a Walgreens drug store, re-façade of the existing building and site improvements. Phase 2 includes the construction of the grocery store, restaurant/retail pad building, and remaining site improvements. The General Plan and Zoning designations of the northerly 0.75 acres are proposed to be amended as follows: amend the General Plan designation from Office Commercial to General Commercial, change the Zoning from Administrative Professional to BRSP-Village Commercial, and amend the boundaries of the Barton Road Specific Plan to include the northerly 0.75 acres of the site into BRSP. A tentative parcel map and sign program are included. Project Proponent: Evergreen Devco, Inc. Lead Agency: City of Grand Terrace, Community and Economic Development Department Contact Person: Sandra Molina, Senior Planner (909)430-2218 Public Hearing: Planning Commission -Thursday, July 14, 2011 at 6:30 P.M. Environmental Finding: On the basis of the Initial Study prepared for the project, it has been determined that the project been modified to incorporate the mitigation measures listed below so that it would not have a potentially significant effect on the environment. A copy of said Initial Study is available for review from June 13, 2011 to July 12, 2011 at the Community and Economic Development Department, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California 92313. This document constitutes a Mitigated Negative Declaration. AESTH-01: All exposed retaining and perimeter walls shall be decorative, which may include the incorporation or combination of stucco, split-face block, stone veneer and/or other materials that match the colors and materials of the Project; and shall include the installation of landscape material along the west boundary retaining wall to the satisfaction of the Community and Economic Development Department. AQ-01 Vehicle Emissions - The following measures are recommended to further reduce vehicle emission impacts during Project construction: a. Construction equipment shall be maintained in proper tune. shall be installed on public/private roads In'accordance with the approved plan.Standard 901.4[F93] Cond:CON0016878- Vegetation management is to be provided to maintain twenty six feet width and a clear height of fourteen feet six inches. Cond: CON0016879 Any planned rooftop photovOltaic arrays requires a separate submittal to the Fire Department for approval: Page ) of 3 -3 $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 4 $ 863.21 $ 886.20 20 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 5 $1,082.71 $1,111.53 40 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 6 $1,302.21 $1,336.86 40 yard Compactor(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Extra Pick-Up 6 yd On-Site $ 21 43 $ 22.19 40 yard Recycling(plus processing) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 Extra Pick-Up 6yd Unscheduled $ 37.54 $ 38.63 40 yard Green Waste(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Refuse Per Ton $ 56.15 $ 57.97 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Mitigated Negative Declaration Barton Plaza Page 2 of 4 b. Utilize gasoline or electricity-powered equipment instead of diesel equipment whenever possible. c. Suspend use of heavy construction equipment during first stage smog alerts. d. All construction vehicles shall be prohibited from excessive idling. Excessive idling is defined as five minutes or longer. e. Encourage use of "clean diesel" equipment if modified engines (catalyst equipped or newer Moyer Program retrofit) are available at a reasonable cost. AQ-02 Fugitive Dust Emissions and Control - To reduce fugitive dust emissions during construction, the use of best available control measures (BACM) shall be implemented during grading, including the following: a. Water all active construction areas three times daily. b. Cover all haul trucks or maintain at least 2 feet of freeboard. c. Pave or apply water three times daily to all unpaved parking or staging areas. ,d. Reduce speed on unpaved roads to less than 15 mph. e. Sweep or wash any site access points within 30 minutes of any visible dirt deposition on any public roadway. f. Cover or water twice daily any on-site stockpiles of debris, dirt or other dusty material. g. Suspend all operations on any unpaved surface if winds exceed 25 mph. h. Take measures to limit daily disturbance area to 5 acres or less. AQ-03 Off-Site Impacts — The following measures are recommended to further reduce construction-related air quality impacts: a. Encourage car pooling for construction workers. b. Limit lane closures to off-peak travel periods, when feasible. c. Park construction vehicles off traveled roadways. d. Wet down or cover dirt hauled off-site. e. Wash or sweep access points daily. f. Encourage receipt of materials during non-peak traffic hours, when feasible. g. Sand/gravel bag construction sites for erosion control. BIO-01: Removal of existing on-site trees must be conducted outside the avian nesting season (February through August). If construction occurs during the avian nesting season, the Project applicant shall provide evidence to the City that a pre-construction nesting bird survey has been conducted within 7 days prior to any ground disturbance activities. If birds are found to be nesting inside or within 250 feet (500 feet for raptors) of the area of constraint, the nest or nesting tree plus a 250-foot buffer must be flagged and avoided until it is determined by a qualified biologist that active nesting no longer is occurring. CUL-01 In the event that a paleontological, archeological, and/or historical resource are uncovered during the course of the construction phase of the project, ground disturbing activities in the vicinity of the find should be redirected until the nature and extent of the find can be evaluated by a qualified archaeologist and/or paleontologist (as determined by the City). Any such resource uncovered during the course of project-related to Y:\Project Files\SA 11-02 Barton Plaza\Environmental Review\MND Barton Plaza_6.9.2011.doc tment for approval: Page ) of 3 -3 $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 4 $ 863.21 $ 886.20 20 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 5 $1,082.71 $1,111.53 40 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 6 $1,302.21 $1,336.86 40 yard Compactor(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Extra Pick-Up 6 yd On-Site $ 21 43 $ 22.19 40 yard Recycling(plus processing) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 Extra Pick-Up 6yd Unscheduled $ 37.54 $ 38.63 40 yard Green Waste(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Refuse Per Ton $ 56.15 $ 57.97 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Mitigated Negative Declaration Barton Plaza Page 3 of 4 grading or construction shall be recorded and/or removed per applicable City and/or State regulations. GEO-01 The design and construction of all structures and facilities,, site grading and soil preparation activities within the Project limits shall be in accordance with the regulations and recommendations established by the City of Grand Terrace, applicable and appropriate measures identified in the Uniform Building Code, California Building Code and the site-specific recommendations of the geotechnical investigation prepared for the proposed Project. GHG-01 The following measures are recommended to further reduce vehicle emission impacts during Project construction a. Construction equipment shall be maintained in proper tune. b. Utilize gasoline or electricity-powered equipment instead of diesel equipment whenever possible: c. Suspend use of heavy construction equipment during first stage smog alerts. d. All construction vehicles shall be prohibited from excessive idling. Excessive idling is defined as five minutes or longer. e. Encourage use of "clean diesel" equipment if modified engines (catalyst equipped or newer Moyer Program retrofit) are available at a reasonable cost. GHG-02 Encourage building construction design to exceed the minimum statewide energy requirements of Title 24; this may include but is not limited to: a. Use of low emission water heaters b. Use of central air heating systems c. Use of energy efficient appliances d. Use of increased insulation e. Use of energy-efficient parking lot lights f. Use of lighting controls and energy efficient lighting. NOS-01: During all Project site excavation and grading on site, the project contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers consistent with manufacturers' standards. NOS-02: The Project contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site. NOS-03: The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging, building materials, and grading debris a minimum of 50 feet from the west property line during all Project construction. NOS-04: On-site construction activities shall be restricted to the hours permitted under the City's Noise Ordinance. The Noise Ordinance prohibits noise associated with construction activities between the hours of eight p.m. and seven a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Y:\Project Files\SA 11-02 Barton Plaza\Environmental Review\MND Barton Plaza_6.9.2011.doc ject, ground disturbing activities in the vicinity of the find should be redirected until the nature and extent of the find can be evaluated by a qualified archaeologist and/or paleontologist (as determined by the City). Any such resource uncovered during the course of project-related to Y:\Project Files\SA 11-02 Barton Plaza\Environmental Review\MND Barton Plaza_6.9.2011.doc tment for approval: Page ) of 3 -3 $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 4 $ 863.21 $ 886.20 20 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 5 $1,082.71 $1,111.53 40 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 6 $1,302.21 $1,336.86 40 yard Compactor(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Extra Pick-Up 6 yd On-Site $ 21 43 $ 22.19 40 yard Recycling(plus processing) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 Extra Pick-Up 6yd Unscheduled $ 37.54 $ 38.63 40 yard Green Waste(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Refuse Per Ton $ 56.15 $ 57.97 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Mitigated Negative Declaration Barton Plaza Page 4 of 4 NOS-05: A six-foot high shielding wall shall be constructed along the northwest corner property line (adjacent to residential units) and along the Market (Phase II) loading dock. NOS-06: Truck deliveries and loading dock activity shall be limited to between the hours of 7:00 AM to 9:00 PM. NOS-07: Deliveries should limit their engines to idle 5 minutes or less. Trucks should be encouraged to turn off engines once they reach loading dock destination. TRANS-01: Prior to the issuance of grading permits for Phase 1 of the.Project, the Developer shall participate in a fair-share contribution, via the payment of Development Impact Fees, for the construction of a southbound left turn lane and an eastbound thru lane at the 1-215 Southbound Ramps and Barton Road. TRANS-02: Prior to the issuance of grading permits for Phase 1 of the Project, the Developer shall participate in a fair-share contribution, via the payment of Development Impact Fees, for the construction of a northbound left-turn lane and Michigan Street and Barton Road. TRANS-03: The Developer shall complete any remaining half-section street improvements along Mount Vernon Avenue and Barton Road, directly adjacent to the Project boundaries. TRANS-04: The Developer shall submit a signing and striping plan prior to the issuance of grading permits, and signing and striping shall be completed prior to opening of Phase 1. TRANS-05: Prior to the issuance of building permits for Phase 2 of the Project, the Developer shall implement Mitigation Measures TRANS-01 and TRANS-05, if not already completed. TRANS-06: Construct on-site circulation system per the detailed site plan, including the phasing plan. TRANS-07: Install stop signs, stop bars, and stop legends at all Project access points. TRANS-08: Install one (1) southbound left/right turn land and one (1) eastbound left turn lane at Project Access 1 at Barton Road. TRANS-09: Install one (1) southbound right turn lane at Project Access 2 at Barton Road. TRANS-1 0: Install one (1) northbound left turn lane at Mount Vernon Avenue and Project Access 3. TRANS-11: Prior to the certificate of occupancy, the Developer shall implement Mitigation Measures TRANS-05 and TRANS-10, if not already completed. Signature: Joyce Powers Community and Economic Development Director Date: Y:\Project Files\SA 11-02 Barton Plaza\Environmental Review\MND Barton Plaza_6.9.2011.doc Noise Ordinance. The Noise Ordinance prohibits noise associated with construction activities between the hours of eight p.m. and seven a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Y:\Project Files\SA 11-02 Barton Plaza\Environmental Review\MND Barton Plaza_6.9.2011.doc ject, ground disturbing activities in the vicinity of the find should be redirected until the nature and extent of the find can be evaluated by a qualified archaeologist and/or paleontologist (as determined by the City). Any such resource uncovered during the course of project-related to Y:\Project Files\SA 11-02 Barton Plaza\Environmental Review\MND Barton Plaza_6.9.2011.doc tment for approval: Page ) of 3 -3 $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 4 $ 863.21 $ 886.20 20 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 5 $1,082.71 $1,111.53 40 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 6 $1,302.21 $1,336.86 40 yard Compactor(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Extra Pick-Up 6 yd On-Site $ 21 43 $ 22.19 40 yard Recycling(plus processing) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 Extra Pick-Up 6yd Unscheduled $ 37.54 $ 38.63 40 yard Green Waste(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Refuse Per Ton $ 56.15 $ 57.97 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY City of Grand Terrace Community and Economic Development Department Environmental Checklist Form 1. Project Title: Barton Plaza Site and Architectural Review 11-02, Tentative Parcel Map 11-01 (TPM 19131), Sign Program 11-02, General Plan Amendment 11-01, Zone Change/Specific Plan Amendment 11-01 2. Lead Agency Name &Address: City of Grand Terrace Community & Economic Development Department 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92313 3. Contact Person & Phone Number: Sandra Molina, Senior Planner (909)430-2218 4. Project Location: The northwest corner of Barton Road and Mount Vernon Avenue 5. Project Sponsor's Name: Dr. Robert Ha 5661 Ocean Terrace Drive Huntington Beach, California 92648 6. General Plan Designation: Existing: General Commercial and Office Commercial Proposed: Change Office Commercial designation to General Commercial 7. Zoning Designation: Existing: BRSP-Village Commercial and Administrative Professional Proposed: Change Administrative Professional designation to BRSP-Village Commercial 8. Description of project: The—approximately--3.6—acre Project site is located at the northwest corner of Mount Vernon Avenue and Barton Road in the City of Grand Terrace. The majority of the site is located within the City's Barton Road Specific Plan (BRSP), with the 'exception of the northerly 0.75 acres square feet (32,527) of the site. The applicant proposes to develop a cohesive retail commercial center made up of four buildings. In addition to the existing 6,900 square foot building with outdoor seating, the proposed Project consists of the construction of a 14,820 square foot drugstore with pharmacy pick up window (Walgreens), 10,581 square foot grocery market to include alcohol sales, a 5,400 square foot multi tenant restaurant with 750 square feet of outdoor seating. The facade of the existing structure will be upgraded in keeping with the proposed architectural themes of the new center. In total, the Project will encompass approximately 37,700 square feet of building area, and about 1,800 square feet of outdoor dining area. The proposed Project includes the Page 1 of 65 conomic Development Director Date: Y:\Project Files\SA 11-02 Barton Plaza\Environmental Review\MND Barton Plaza_6.9.2011.doc Noise Ordinance. The Noise Ordinance prohibits noise associated with construction activities between the hours of eight p.m. and seven a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Y:\Project Files\SA 11-02 Barton Plaza\Environmental Review\MND Barton Plaza_6.9.2011.doc ject, ground disturbing activities in the vicinity of the find should be redirected until the nature and extent of the find can be evaluated by a qualified archaeologist and/or paleontologist (as determined by the City). Any such resource uncovered during the course of project-related to Y:\Project Files\SA 11-02 Barton Plaza\Environmental Review\MND Barton Plaza_6.9.2011.doc tment for approval: Page ) of 3 -3 $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 4 $ 863.21 $ 886.20 20 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 5 $1,082.71 $1,111.53 40 yard(plus disposal) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 6 6 $1,302.21 $1,336.86 40 yard Compactor(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Extra Pick-Up 6 yd On-Site $ 21 43 $ 22.19 40 yard Recycling(plus processing) $ 195.53 $ 199.64 Extra Pick-Up 6yd Unscheduled $ 37.54 $ 38.63 40 yard Green Waste(plus disposal) $ 218.51 $ 223.10 Refuse Per Ton $ 56.15 $ 57.97 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Environmental Initial Study Barton Plaza installation of 182 parking spaces, landscaping, and lighting features and will require connections to existing utility features. Because the site is currently served by utilities, the extension of utility infrastructure to the site is not required. Access to the Project site will be via two driveways on Barton Road and one driveway on Mount Vernon Avenue. Britton Way was previously vacated, and it will be closed off to through traffic. Construction of the Project is proposed in two phases. Phase 1 includes grading the entire site and construction of the Walgreens drug store, re-façade of the existing building and relating parking, landscaping and driveways to support the operation of Phase 1 uses. Phase 2 includes the construction of the grocery store (anticipated to be Fresh & Easy), restaurant/retail pad building, and remaining parking lot and landscaping improvements. Additionally, the applicant proposes to revise the designations of the northerly 0.75 acres as follows: amend the General Plan designation from Office Commercial to General Commercial, change the Zoning from Administrative Professional to BRSP-Village Commercial, and amend the boundaries of the BRSP to include the northerly 0.75 acres of the site into BRSP. Site and Architectural Review 11-01 has been submitted to establish the site and building design of the commercial center and the associated uses. Tentative Parcel Map 11-01 (Tentative Parcel Map No. 19131) has been submitted to consolidate the nine underlying lots and create four new underlying lots. General Plan Amendment 11-01, Zone Change 11-01, and Specific Plan Amendment 11-01 have been submitted to effectuate the changes described above. Additionally, in accordance with the BRSP, the developer is allowed development incentives when lots are consolidated. In this instance, nine separate lots are being , consolidated into a cohesive shopping center with four underlying parcels. The developer is requesting development incentives related to a reduction of the amount of required onsite landscaping. The proposed Project includes a Sign Program that is compatible with the architectural theme and site layout, and compliant with the intent of the BRSP and Chapter 18.80 (Signs) of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code. The Sign Program for the proposed Project identifies a unified sign design and guidelines for all monument and wall signs for the Project. In accordance with the BRSP, monument type signs shall not exceed 32 square feet for any parcel with 300 feet or more of street frontage and shall not exceed a height of 6 feet above grade. Wall signs are limited to a maximum sign area of 75 square feet per building street frontage for single tenants and a maximum sign area of 50 square feet per building street frontage for multiple tenants. However, pursuant to the BRSP, the Planning Commission has the authority to allow deviations from the City's sign ordinance to approve creative and innovative sign programs or sign solutions under exceptional or unusual circumstances. 9. Des criptior_oLSite; The project site is located at the intersection of two of the City's primary streets: Barton Road and Mount Vernon Avenue. Adjacent land uses include the Stater Bros. shopping center and Chevron gas station to the south (across Barton Road), the CVS shopping center and single- family residential uses to the east (across Mount Vernon Avenue), a nursing/rehabilitation center and multiple-family residences to the north, and commercial, day care and multiple-family residential uses to the west. Aside from the existing commercial building and parking lot, the site is vacant. The site is relatively level with onsite grades trending downward east to west. Page 2 of 65 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Environmental Initial Study Barton Plaza 10. Surrounding Land Uses, General Plan Designations, and Zoning: Zoning General Plan Existing Land Uses North Administrative Professional (AP) Office Commercial Vacant/Commercial Barton Road Specific Plan- East Village Commercial and Single General Commercial General Commercial and Family Residential (R1-7.2) Single Family Residential South Barton Road Specific Plan- Village Commercial General Commercial Commercial West Barton Road Specific Plan- Village Commercial General Commercial West Commercial 11. Other public agencies whose approval is required: • City of Grand Terrace Department of Building and Safety: Building Permit • County of San Bernardino Fire Department: Plan Check Review and Approval • Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region: Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan, Water Quality Management Plan • Riverside Highland Water Company: Water connection. • City of Grand Terrace Public Works: Street storm drain and utilities. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ❑ Aesthetics ❑ Agriculture Resources ❑ Air Quality ❑ Biological Resources ❑ Cultural Resources ❑ Geology/Soils 0 Greenhouse Gas ❑ Hazards & Hazardous ❑ Hydrology/Water Quality Emissions Materials ❑ Land Use/Plannin _O_Mineral-Resaurses —El-Noise l -Population/Housing ❑ Public Services ❑Trans ortation/Traffic ❑ Recreation p ❑ Utilities/Service Systems ❑ Mandatory Findings of Significance Page 3 of 65 ots are being , consolidated into a cohesive shopping center with four underlying parcels. The developer is requesting development incentives related to a reduction of the amount of required onsite landscaping. The proposed Project includes a Sign Program that is compatible with the architectural theme and site layout, and compliant with the intent of the BRSP and Chapter 18.80 (Signs) of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code. The Sign Program for the proposed Project identifies a unified sign design and guidelines for all monument and wall signs for the Project. In accordance with the BRSP, monument type signs shall not exceed 32 square feet for any parcel with 300 feet or more of street frontage and shall not exceed a height of 6 feet above grade. Wall signs are limited to a maximum sign area of 75 square feet per building street frontage for single tenants and a maximum sign area of 50 square feet per building street frontage for multiple tenants. However, pursuant to the BRSP, the Planning Commission has the authority to allow deviations from the City's sign ordinance to approve creative and innovative sign programs or sign solutions under exceptional or unusual circumstances. 9. Des criptior_oLSite; The project site is located at the intersection of two of the City's primary streets: Barton Road and Mount Vernon Avenue. Adjacent land uses include the Stater Bros. shopping center and Chevron gas station to the south (across Barton Road), the CVS shopping center and single- family residential uses to the east (across Mount Vernon Avenue), a nursing/rehabilitation center and multiple-family residences to the north, and commercial, day care and multiple-family residential uses to the west. Aside from the existing commercial building and parking lot, the site is vacant. The site is relatively level with onsite grades trending downward east to west. Page 2 of 65 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Environmental Initial Study Barton Plaza DETERMINATION: On the basis of this initial evaluation: ❑ I find that the project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. l I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or"potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Prepared by: Date Sandra Molina Senior Planner Approved by: 6.- Pe Date oycers Community and Economic Development Director Page 4 of 65 ots are being , consolidated into a cohesive shopping center with four underlying parcels. The developer is requesting development incentives related to a reduction of the amount of required onsite landscaping. The proposed Project includes a Sign Program that is compatible with the architectural theme and site layout, and compliant with the intent of the BRSP and Chapter 18.80 (Signs) of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code. The Sign Program for the proposed Project identifies a unified sign design and guidelines for all monument and wall signs for the Project. In accordance with the BRSP, monument type signs shall not exceed 32 square feet for any parcel with 300 feet or more of street frontage and shall not exceed a height of 6 feet above grade. Wall signs are limited to a maximum sign area of 75 square feet per building street frontage for single tenants and a maximum sign area of 50 square feet per building street frontage for multiple tenants. However, pursuant to the BRSP, the Planning Commission has the authority to allow deviations from the City's sign ordinance to approve creative and innovative sign programs or sign solutions under exceptional or unusual circumstances. 9. Des criptior_oLSite; The project site is located at the intersection of two of the City's primary streets: Barton Road and Mount Vernon Avenue. Adjacent land uses include the Stater Bros. shopping center and Chevron gas station to the south (across Barton Road), the CVS shopping center and single- family residential uses to the east (across Mount Vernon Avenue), a nursing/rehabilitation center and multiple-family residences to the north, and commercial, day care and multiple-family residential uses to the west. Aside from the existing commercial building and parking lot, the site is vacant. The site is relatively level with onsite grades trending downward east to west. Page 2 of 65 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Environmental Initial Study Barton Plaza EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis). 2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3. Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4. "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact". The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from "Earlier Analyses," as described in (5) below, may be cross-referenced). 5. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). Earlier analyses are discussed in Section XIV at the end of the checklist. 6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the-page-orpages-where-the-statementis-substantiiated. Studies cited are available for review at the City of Grand Terrace Community and Economic Development Department located at 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, CA 92313 7. Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. Page 5 of 65 owever, pursuant to the BRSP, the Planning Commission has the authority to allow deviations from the City's sign ordinance to approve creative and innovative sign programs or sign solutions under exceptional or unusual circumstances. 9. Des criptior_oLSite; The project site is located at the intersection of two of the City's primary streets: Barton Road and Mount Vernon Avenue. Adjacent land uses include the Stater Bros. shopping center and Chevron gas station to the south (across Barton Road), the CVS shopping center and single- family residential uses to the east (across Mount Vernon Avenue), a nursing/rehabilitation center and multiple-family residences to the north, and commercial, day care and multiple-family residential uses to the west. Aside from the existing commercial building and parking lot, the site is vacant. The site is relatively level with onsite grades trending downward east to west. Page 2 of 65 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Environmental Initial Study Barton Plaza Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated I. AESTHETICS—Would the project: a. Have a substantial adverse effect ❑ O on a scenic vista? CI 0 b. Substantially damage scenic CI resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? The Project site is located adjacent to the existing commercial uses and development and is bound by two public roadways, Barton Road and Mount Vernon Avenue. According to the General Plan EIR there are no state or county scenic highways within the City', nor does the site contain any scenic trees, rock outcroppings or historic buildings2. Views afforded from the Project site consist of existing single-family residential uses to the west, vacant land to the north, and commercial to the east and south. Beyond the developed area immediately surrounding the project Blue Mountain is visible to the southeast and the San Bernardino Mountains can be seen to the north. The Proposed project would slightly modify views of the Project site but would not obstruct views of Blue Mountain or the San Bernardino Mountains to any greater extent than what occurs in the existing partially developed condition of the site and surrounding area. Because the proposed Project would not significantly impact a designated or eligible scenic highway or scenic resource, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required.3 Finding: Less Than Significant Impact. No mitigation is required. c. Substantially degrade the existing t] l CI visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? 'The--Project-site is adjacent—to—existing commercial—development—to—the east and west. Development of the commercial Project within the City's commercial corridor would not result in an adverse aesthetic impact. Temporary visual impacts from construction activities would occur but are temporary and would not have and would not have a significant impact on surrounding uses. The Project would create a commercial center with a cohesive architectural and sign design theme in compliance with existing design guidelines of the City and the BRSP. The buildings City of Grand Terrace General Plan EIR,Section 4A,April 27,2011. 2 Historical Resources Assessment for the Mount Vernon and Barton Road Commercial Center, City of Grand Terrace, San Bernardino County LSA Associates,Inc.November 24,2008. 3 Barton Plaza Initial Study and Environmental Analysis,December 18,2008 Page 6 of 65 es used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. Page 5 of 65 owever, pursuant to the BRSP, the Planning Commission has the authority to allow deviations from the City's sign ordinance to approve creative and innovative sign programs or sign solutions under exceptional or unusual circumstances. 9. Des criptior_oLSite; The project site is located at the intersection of two of the City's primary streets: Barton Road and Mount Vernon Avenue. Adjacent land uses include the Stater Bros. shopping center and Chevron gas station to the south (across Barton Road), the CVS shopping center and single- family residential uses to the east (across Mount Vernon Avenue), a nursing/rehabilitation center and multiple-family residences to the north, and commercial, day care and multiple-family residential uses to the west. Aside from the existing commercial building and parking lot, the site is vacant. The site is relatively level with onsite grades trending downward east to west. Page 2 of 65 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY • Environmental Initial Study Barton Plaza Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated are proposed to have a stucco finish with the incorporation of a ledger stone wainscoting, variation in building wall planes, the use of trellises, insets and the use of earth tone colors in conformance with the BRSP architectural guidelines. The Barton Road Specific Plan permits a relaxation of development standards as an incentive when a developer consolidates lots. In this instance, the developer is consolidating nine separate lots and is requesting a reduction in the amount of landscaping to be provided for the project. A review of the proposed site and landscaping plans indicate that the reduction in landscaping will not have a demonstrable negative visual effect and can be supported. The Project includes a Sign Program that is compatible with the architectural theme and site layout of the Project in accordance with the provisions of the BRSP and the City's Sign Ordinance. The Sign Program identifies a unified sign design and guidelines for all signs for the Project. The Sign Program includes guidelines for wall, monument, and directional signs; identifies prohibited signs, and includes construction requirements. The Sign Program provides greater sign flexibility for the two major tenants (Walgreens and Market) by allowing up to 300 square feet of sign area for the major tenants, transferable from one building elevation to another. Two monument signs are also proposed at a height of 9.5 feet with 49 square feet of sign area. These guidelines exceed the BRSP requirements. The BRSP states that monument type signs shall not exceed 32 square feet of sign area (single sided) for any parcel with 300 feet or more of street frontage and shall not exceed a height of 6 feet above grade. Wall signs are limited to a maximum sign area of 75 square feet per building street frontage for single tenants and a maximum sign area of 50 square feet per building street frontage for multiple tenants. However, pursuant to the BRSP, the Planning Commission has the authority to allow deviations from the City's sign ordinance to approve creative and innovative sign programs or sign solutions under exceptional or unusual circumstances. Because the design and placement of signs associated with the proposed Project would adhere to provisions of the Sign Program, BRSP, and the GTMC, a less than significant impact related to this issue would occur and no mitigation is required. A retaining wall will be constructed along the west and north property lines. The retaining wall height along the west boundary will range from 2 feet to approximately 7 feet in height with open view fencing on top. The retaining wall will be visible along the west boundary of the Project site. However, incorporation of Mitigation Measure AESTH-01 will reduce potential impacts from the retaining walls to less than significant levels. Mitigation Measure AESTH-01: All exposed retaining and perimeter walls shall be decorative, which may include the incorporation or combination of stucco, split-face block, stone veneer and/or, other materials that match the colors and materials of the Project; and shall include the installation of landscape material along the west boundary retaining Page 7 of 65 ast (across Mount Vernon Avenue), a nursing/rehabilitation center and multiple-family residences to the north, and commercial, day care and multiple-family residential uses to the west. Aside from the existing commercial building and parking lot, the site is vacant. The site is relatively level with onsite grades trending downward east to west. Page 2 of 65 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Environmental Initial Study Barton Plaza Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated wall to the satisfaction of the Community and Economic Development Department. Development of the proposed project would not completely obstruct any prominent scenic view or vista, or create a negative visual impact to the environment. As such, impacts related to this issue are considered to be less than significant and no mitigation is required. Finding: Less Than Significant Impact with the Incorporation of Mitigation Measures. El d. Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Develof : , t of the Project would result in the installation of outdoor lighting for parking', ,?anage, and the maintenance of public safety and security. The City Municipal Code4 contains •dards for outdoor lighting. These standards identify the preferred lighting source, maximum intensity, and dictate shielding requirements that the developer must comply with for the installation of the lighting standards. Adherence to the lighting standards established by the City would reduce potential impacts related to this issue to less than significant levels. Finding: Less Than Significant Impact. No mitigation is required. II. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Department of conservation as an optional model used in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: 111 .a. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique U U U Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? The proposed subject site is classified as "urban and built-up land" and is not farmland, according to the State of California, Department of Conservation, Division of Land Resource Protection, California Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Programs. Therefore, no impact to agricultural resources will occur. 4 Chapter 18.60,Section 18.60.040(C)of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code 1990 5 California Department of Conservation.http://www.consrv.ca.gov/dlro/FMMP/Pages/Index.aspx,site accessed March 28,2011. Page 8 of 65 north property lines. The retaining wall height along the west boundary will range from 2 feet to approximately 7 feet in height with open view fencing on top. The retaining wall will be visible along the west boundary of the Project site. However, incorporation of Mitigation Measure AESTH-01 will reduce potential impacts from the retaining walls to less than significant levels. Mitigation Measure AESTH-01: All exposed retaining and perimeter walls shall be decorative, which may include the incorporation or combination of stucco, split-face block, stone veneer and/or, other materials that match the colors and materials of the Project; and shall include the installation of landscape material along the west boundary retaining Page 7 of 65 ast (across Mount Vernon Avenue), a nursing/rehabilitation center and multiple-family residences to the north, and commercial, day care and multiple-family residential uses to the west. Aside from the existing commercial building and parking lot, the site is vacant. The site is relatively level with onsite grades trending downward east to west. Page 2 of 65 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Environmental Initial Study Barton Plaza Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated Finding: No Impact. No mitigation is required. b. Conflict with existing zoning for ❑ ❑ ❑ lJ agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? See response to Section II.a above. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation is required. c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? The Project site contains an existing 6,900 square foot commercial building. The remainder of the site has been disturbed through demolition of previous commercial structures and paving, and weed abatement activities on the north portion of the site. No forest land or timberland exists on the site. Therefore, no impact will occur. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation is required. d. Result in the loss of forest land or ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 conversion of forest land to non-forest use? See response to Section Il.c. above. —Einding`No impact.-No-mitigatiion-is-required. e. Involve other changes to the ❑ ❑ ❑ existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non- agricultural use? The Project site is located at the intersection of Barton Road and Mount Vernon Avenue, adjacent to the existing commercial uses and development, in the City's main commercial intersection. Farmland is located over approximately one mile to the southwest of the Project Page 9 of 65 land, Unique U U U Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? The proposed subject site is classified as "urban and built-up land" and is not farmland, according to the State of California, Department of Conservation, Division of Land Resource Protection, California Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Programs. Therefore, no impact to agricultural resources will occur. 4 Chapter 18.60,Section 18.60.040(C)of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code 1990 5 California Department of Conservation.http://www.consrv.ca.gov/dlro/FMMP/Pages/Index.aspx,site accessed March 28,2011. Page 8 of 65 north property lines. The retaining wall height along the west boundary will range from 2 feet to approximately 7 feet in height with open view fencing on top. The retaining wall will be visible along the west boundary of the Project site. However, incorporation of Mitigation Measure AESTH-01 will reduce potential impacts from the retaining walls to less than significant levels. Mitigation Measure AESTH-01: All exposed retaining and perimeter walls shall be decorative, which may include the incorporation or combination of stucco, split-face block, stone veneer and/or, other materials that match the colors and materials of the Project; and shall include the installation of landscape material along the west boundary retaining Page 7 of 65 ast (across Mount Vernon Avenue), a nursing/rehabilitation center and multiple-family residences to the north, and commercial, day care and multiple-family residential uses to the west. Aside from the existing commercial building and parking lot, the site is vacant. The site is relatively level with onsite grades trending downward east to west. Page 2 of 65 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Environmental Initial Study Barton Plaza Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated sites. Development of the Project, in the City's commercial corridor, would not result in the conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural uses. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation is required. III. AIR QUALITY— Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a. Conflict with or obstruct El � implementation of the applicable air quality plan? The City is located in the South Coast Air Basin (Basin). The air pollution control agency for the Basin is the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). SCAQMD is responsible for controlling emissions primarily from stationary sources. The SCAQMD and the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) are responsible for formulating and implementing the Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP), which has a 20-year horizon for the Basin. The current regional air quality plan is the Final 2007 Air Quality Management Plan adopted by the SCAQMD on June 1, 2007. The AQMP for the Basin sets forth a comprehensive program that will lead the Basin into compliance with all federal and state air quality standards. The AQMP's control measures and related emission reduction estimates are based upon emissions projections for a future development scenario derived from land use, population, and employment characteristics defined in consultation with local governments. Accordingly, conformance with the AQMP for development projects is determined by demonstrating compliance with local land use plans and/or population projections. The 3.6-acre Project site is zoned BRSP-VC except for the northerly 0.75 acres which is designated Administrative Professional (AP). The Project includes an amendment to the Zoning Map to change the AP designation to BRSP-VC, consistent with the remainder of the site. The BRSP boundary-would-Ise amended to inck de-the 0:-75 acres t1�e General Plan land use designation will be amended consistent with the zoning changes. The current AP designation allows administrative professional land uses and all uses permitted in the C-2 General Commercial classification, which would allow for a variety of commercial uses and intensities. The proposed BRSP-VC designation would allow similar land uses to the existing AP classification. Therefore, for purposes of intended land uses, the Project is in compliance with local land use plans and will not conflict with or obstruct implementation of the AQMP. No mitigation is required. Finding: Less Than Significant Impact. No mitigation is required. 6 'bid Page 10 of 65 e retaining walls to less than significant levels. Mitigation Measure AESTH-01: All exposed retaining and perimeter walls shall be decorative, which may include the incorporation or combination of stucco, split-face block, stone veneer and/or, other materials that match the colors and materials of the Project; and shall include the installation of landscape material along the west boundary retaining Page 7 of 65 ast (across Mount Vernon Avenue), a nursing/rehabilitation center and multiple-family residences to the north, and commercial, day care and multiple-family residential uses to the west. Aside from the existing commercial building and parking lot, the site is vacant. The site is relatively level with onsite grades trending downward east to west. Page 2 of 65 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Environmental Initial Study Barton Plaza Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated b. Violate any air quality standard or ❑ p ❑ ❑ contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? The SCAQMD California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Handbook (SCAQMD, 1993) establishes mass daily thresholds on a regional level for both construction and operational impacts. The SCAQMD has developed suggested significance thresholds based on the volume of pollution emitted rather than on actual ambient air quality because the direct air quality impact of a project is not quantifiable on a regional scale. The 1993 SCAQMD Handbook (as subsequently revised) states that any projects in the SCAB (South Coast Air Basin) with daily emissions that may exceed any of the thresholds should be considered as having an individually and cumulatively significant air quality impact. The SCAQMD has also developed analysis parameters to evaluate ambient air quality on a local level in addition to the more regional emissions-based thresholds of significance. These analysis elements are called Localized Significance Thresholds (LST). LSTs were developed in response to Governing Board's Environmental Justice Enhancement Initiative 1-4 and the LST methodology was provisionally adopted in October 2003 and formally approved by SCAQMD's Mobile Source Committee in February 2005. LSTs represent the maximum emissions from a project that are not expected to cause or contribute to an exceedance of the most stringent applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard, and are developed based on the - ambient concentrations of that pollutant for each source receptor area (SRA) and distance to the nearest sensitive receptor. Air pollution emissions associated with the proposed Project would occur over both a short and long-term time period. Short-term emissions include fugitive dust from construction activities (i.e., demo, grading, and exhaust emission) at the Project site. Long-term emissions review the operational effect the Project would have over the Project's life cycle. Long-term emissions include vehicle exhaust traveling to and from the Project site, electricity and natural gas. An Air Quality Impact Study dated February 21, 2011, was prepared by RK Engineering Group, Inc'The Air QL1alityJmpact_Study_evaluated-aiquality-impacts-associated--witl1-the-Project by evaluating both short-term (construction) and long-term (operational) impacts and comparing them to SCAQMD regional and localized significance thresholds. The study determined that the Project would not exceed SCAQMD regional and localized thresholds. To evaluate both construction and operational emission impacts of the proposed project, URBEMIS 2007 (9.2.4) was utilized. Construction data, starting with project construction phasing, typical construction equipment and timeline was inputted into the computer model to simulate realistic construction activities. The short-term and long-term impacts were compared to the regional and localized significance thresholds Mt. Vernon Avenue and Barton Road Commercial Center Air Quality Analysis RK Engineering Group,Inc.March 1,2011. Page 11 of 65 dary retaining Page 7 of 65 ast (across Mount Vernon Avenue), a nursing/rehabilitation center and multiple-family residences to the north, and commercial, day care and multiple-family residential uses to the west. Aside from the existing commercial building and parking lot, the site is vacant. The site is relatively level with onsite grades trending downward east to west. Page 2 of 65 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Environmental Initial Study Barton Plaza Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated Short Term Impacts Regional Significance Thresholds Temporary construction activity emissions will occur during Project build-out. The Project site is subject to follow SCAQMD rules for the reduction of fugitive dust emissions, Rule 403. SCAQMD Rule 403 requires the use of best available control measures (BACM) to mitigate construction and operation activities. In order to assess short-term construction emissions and potential impacts, the following assumptions were made: • Phase 1 is expected to begin construction in late 2011 and will take approximately nine months to one year to complete. • Phase 1 site grading will take approximately one week, building/construction will take 7 months and painting/paving will take three weeks. • Phase 2 is expected to begin in late 2014 and will take one year to complete. • Phase 2 site grading will take approximately two weeks, building/construction will take 12 months and painting/paving will take three months. • It is estimated that a maximum of two acres would be disturbed on any one day. There is no estimated soil hauling. - As shown in Table 1, the short-term construction emissions for Phase 1 and Phase 2 do not exceed SCAQMD daily emission thresholds. Table 1 Regional Significance—Maximum Daily Construction Emissions (lbs/day) ActivityTime VOC NO, CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 CO2 Period Grading 1 Week 2.86 23.49 12.93 0.0 4.58 1.79 2,371.69 Building 7 1.15 8.70 5.72 0.01 0.56 0.51 1,041.71 Construction Months N Painting 2 Weeks 21 17 _0_0t__0 22 •0 0.Q Paving 1 Week 1.84 10.92 8.51 0.0 0.94 0.85 1,229.2 cn = Maximum' 21.17 23.49 12.93 0.01 4.58 1.79 2,371.69 a SCAQMD Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 N/A2 Exceeds Threshold (?) No No No No No No N/A Page 12 of 65 e. Long-term emissions include vehicle exhaust traveling to and from the Project site, electricity and natural gas. An Air Quality Impact Study dated February 21, 2011, was prepared by RK Engineering Group, Inc'The Air QL1alityJmpact_Study_evaluated-aiquality-impacts-associated--witl1-the-Project by evaluating both short-term (construction) and long-term (operational) impacts and comparing them to SCAQMD regional and localized significance thresholds. The study determined that the Project would not exceed SCAQMD regional and localized thresholds. To evaluate both construction and operational emission impacts of the proposed project, URBEMIS 2007 (9.2.4) was utilized. Construction data, starting with project construction phasing, typical construction equipment and timeline was inputted into the computer model to simulate realistic construction activities. The short-term and long-term impacts were compared to the regional and localized significance thresholds Mt. Vernon Avenue and Barton Road Commercial Center Air Quality Analysis RK Engineering Group,Inc.March 1,2011. Page 11 of 65 dary retaining Page 7 of 65 ast (across Mount Vernon Avenue), a nursing/rehabilitation center and multiple-family residences to the north, and commercial, day care and multiple-family residential uses to the west. Aside from the existing commercial building and parking lot, the site is vacant. The site is relatively level with onsite grades trending downward east to west. Page 2 of 65 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Environmental Initial Study Barton Plaza Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated ActivityTime VOC NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 CO2 Period Grading 3 Weeks 2.44 19.12 11.52 0.0 4.50 1.57 2,371.64 Building 12 0.86 6.20 5.16 0.03 0.36 0.33 1,053.26 o Construction Months T. N Painting Months 16.30 0.01 0.13 0.0 0.0 0.0 23.65 N w Paving 1 Month 1.38 8.43 .7.86 0.0 0.65 0.59 1,209.2 Q = Maximum' 16.30 19.12 11.52 0.03 4.50 1.57 2,371.64 a. SCAQMD Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 N/A2 Exceeds Threshold (?) No_ No No No No No N/A Source:RK Engineering Group,Inc.2011 1 Construction activities are not expected to overlap except during paving and painting;therefore the maximum emissions represent the largest of each activity alone and the combined paving and painting emissions. 2 There is no significance threshold for CO2 emissions. Localized Significance Thresholds Since the Project's maximum disturbance area is approximately 2 acres per day, the SCAQMD localized thresholds lookup tables for a 1, 2 and 5 acres site was utilized. The information is provided for a 2 acre disturbance footprint, the LST concentration thresholds for a 2 acre site were compared to the Project's emissions. The SCAQMD tables contain emission thresholds at a distance of 50 meters, 200 meters and 500 meters. For purposes of this project, the thresholds for a distance of 50 meters (164 feet) were used. As shown in Table 2, the Project's emissions from construction will not exceed the SCAQMD localized significance thresholds. Table 2 Localized Significance-Daily Construction Emissions' CO NOx PM, PM21--- - N LST Pollutants (lbs/day) (lbs/day) (lbs/day) (lbs/day) a Maximum (from Table 1) 12.93 23.49 4.58 1.79 N w SCAQMD Construction a Threshold 1,877 200 19 8 a Exceeds Threshold (?)2 No No No No Page 13 of 65 21, 2011, was prepared by RK Engineering Group, Inc'The Air QL1alityJmpact_Study_evaluated-aiquality-impacts-associated--witl1-the-Project by evaluating both short-term (construction) and long-term (operational) impacts and comparing them to SCAQMD regional and localized significance thresholds. The study determined that the Project would not exceed SCAQMD regional and localized thresholds. To evaluate both construction and operational emission impacts of the proposed project, URBEMIS 2007 (9.2.4) was utilized. Construction data, starting with project construction phasing, typical construction equipment and timeline was inputted into the computer model to simulate realistic construction activities. The short-term and long-term impacts were compared to the regional and localized significance thresholds Mt. Vernon Avenue and Barton Road Commercial Center Air Quality Analysis RK Engineering Group,Inc.March 1,2011. Page 11 of 65 dary retaining Page 7 of 65 ast (across Mount Vernon Avenue), a nursing/rehabilitation center and multiple-family residences to the north, and commercial, day care and multiple-family residential uses to the west. Aside from the existing commercial building and parking lot, the site is vacant. The site is relatively level with onsite grades trending downward east to west. Page 2 of 65 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Environmental Initial Study Barton Plaza Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated CO NO. PM10 PM2.5 LST Pollutants (lbs/day) (lbs/day) (lbs/day) (lbs/day) N Maximum (from Table 1) 11.52 19.12 4.50 1.57 N ' co SCAQMD Construction Threshold 1,877 200 19 8 a Exceeds Threshold (?)2 No No No No Source:RK Engineering Group,Inc.2011 'Reference LST thresholds are from 2006-2008 SCAQMD Mass rate Localized Significant Thresholds for construction and operation Table C-1 for a disturbance area of 2 acres and at a receptor distance of 50 meters. While the proposed Project would not exceed any of the SCAQMD regional or localized significance construction emissions thresholds, the proposed Project would be required to comply with standard regional rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emissions. In addition, the following recommended emissions reduction Mitigation Measures AQ-1 through AQ-3, are proposed to be incorporated into the Project conditions to yield further reductions in potential air quality impacts, resulting in a less than significant impact. AQ-1 Vehicle Emissions - The following measures are recommended to further reduce vehicle emission impacts during Project construction: a. Construction equipment shall be maintained in proper tune. b. Utilize gasoline or electricity-powered equipment instead of diesel equipment whenever possible. c. Suspend use of heavy construction equipment during first stage smog alerts. d. All construction vehicles shall be prohibited from excessive idling. Excessive idling is defined as five minutes or longer. e. Encourage use of "clean diesel" equipment if modified engines--(catalyst equipped or newer Moyer Program retrofit) are available at a reasonable cost. AQ-2 Fugitive Dust Emissions and Control - To reduce fugitive dust emissions during construction, the use of best available control measures (BACM) shall be implemented during grading, including the following: a. Water all active construction areas three times daily. b. Cover all haul trucks or maintain at least 2 feet of freeboard. c. Pave or apply water three times daily to all unpaved parking or staging areas. d. Reduce speed on unpaved roads to less than 15 mph. e. Sweep or wash any site access points within 30 minutes of any visible dirt deposition on any public roadway. Page 14 of 65 exceed SCAQMD regional and localized thresholds. To evaluate both construction and operational emission impacts of the proposed project, URBEMIS 2007 (9.2.4) was utilized. Construction data, starting with project construction phasing, typical construction equipment and timeline was inputted into the computer model to simulate realistic construction activities. The short-term and long-term impacts were compared to the regional and localized significance thresholds Mt. Vernon Avenue and Barton Road Commercial Center Air Quality Analysis RK Engineering Group,Inc.March 1,2011. Page 11 of 65 dary retaining Page 7 of 65 ast (across Mount Vernon Avenue), a nursing/rehabilitation center and multiple-family residences to the north, and commercial, day care and multiple-family residential uses to the west. Aside from the existing commercial building and parking lot, the site is vacant. The site is relatively level with onsite grades trending downward east to west. Page 2 of 65 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Environmental Initial Study Barton Plaza Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated f. Cover or water twice daily any on-site stockpiles of debris, dirt or other dusty material. g. Suspend all operations on any unpaved surface if winds exceed 25 mph. h. Take measures to limit daily disturbance area to 5 acres or less. AQ-3 Off-Site Impacts — The following measures are recommended to further reduce construction-related air quality impacts: a. Encourage car pooling for construction workers. b. Limit lane closures to off-peak travel periods, when feasible. c. Park construction vehicles off traveled roadways. d. Wet down or cover dirt hauled off-site. e. Wash or sweep access points daily. f. Encourage receipt of materials during nori-peak traffic hours, when feasible. g. Sand/gravel bag construction sites for erosion control. Long-Term Impacts Regional Significance Thresholds Long-term operational impacts typically include vehicles traveling in and out of the Project site and land use emissions. Land use emissions can include natural gas and electricity use (i.e. stove, lawn mower, etc). The URBEMIS 2007 Version 9.2.4 was utilized to determine the estimated daily emissions from mobile sources. In order to calculate accurately the mobile emissions, the daily trip rates for the Project and the fleet mix (per the traffic impact study) were used to reflect the vehicle distribution data. The default trip lengths, average speed, fleet mix, and parking spaces were utilized with the URBEMIS model. Table 3 compares the long-term operational emissions for Phase 1 and Phase 2. Long-term operational emissior&do not excepci SCAQMD_daity_emissiorl-thresholds. Page 15 of 65 ive idling is defined as five minutes or longer. e. Encourage use of "clean diesel" equipment if modified engines--(catalyst equipped or newer Moyer Program retrofit) are available at a reasonable cost. AQ-2 Fugitive Dust Emissions and Control - To reduce fugitive dust emissions during construction, the use of best available control measures (BACM) shall be implemented during grading, including the following: a. Water all active construction areas three times daily. b. Cover all haul trucks or maintain at least 2 feet of freeboard. c. Pave or apply water three times daily to all unpaved parking or staging areas. d. Reduce speed on unpaved roads to less than 15 mph. e. Sweep or wash any site access points within 30 minutes of any visible dirt deposition on any public roadway. Page 14 of 65 exceed SCAQMD regional and localized thresholds. To evaluate both construction and operational emission impacts of the proposed project, URBEMIS 2007 (9.2.4) was utilized. Construction data, starting with project construction phasing, typical construction equipment and timeline was inputted into the computer model to simulate realistic construction activities. The short-term and long-term impacts were compared to the regional and localized significance thresholds Mt. Vernon Avenue and Barton Road Commercial Center Air Quality Analysis RK Engineering Group,Inc.March 1,2011. Page 11 of 65 dary retaining Page 7 of 65 ast (across Mount Vernon Avenue), a nursing/rehabilitation center and multiple-family residences to the north, and commercial, day care and multiple-family residential uses to the west. Aside from the existing commercial building and parking lot, the site is vacant. The site is relatively level with onsite grades trending downward east to west. Page 2 of 65 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Environmental Initial Study Barton Plaza Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated Table 3 Regional Significance- Maximum Daily Operational Emissions (lbs/day) Activity VOC NO. CO SO2 PMio PM2.5 CO2 Vehicles Emissions 7.39 8.81 76.65 0.07 11.19 2.19 6,730.1 Area Source N Emissions 0.22 0.02 1.60 0.0 0.00 0.0 2.75 aw Total: Vehicles +Area 7.61 8.83 78.25 0.07 11.19 2.19 6,732.8 Source a SCAQMD Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55 N/A1 Exceeds Threshold (?) No No No No No No N/A Activity VOC NO, CO SO2 PMio PM2.5 CO2 Vehicles Emissions 9.61 10.92 90.37 0.09 13.61 2.66 8,217.0 Area Source N Emissions 0.36 0.19 3.34 0.0 0.00 0.0 190.87 Total: Vehicles +Area 9.97 11.11 93.71 0.09 13.61 2.67 8,407.9 Q Source a SCAQMD Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55 N/A1 Exceeds Threshold (?) No No No No No No N/A Source RK-EngineeringGroup-fne-2011 'There is no significance threshold for CO2 emissions Localized Significance Thresholds According to the LST methodology, mobile source emissions do not need to be included in the LST analysis. Only land use emissions and on-site vehicle emissions need to be analyzed for the Project. Table 4 compares the operational emissions from the land use emissions to the localized significance thresholds. The emissions from operations will not exceed the SCAQMD localized thresholds of significance. Page 16 of 65 Page 15 of 65 ive idling is defined as five minutes or longer. e. Encourage use of "clean diesel" equipment if modified engines--(catalyst equipped or newer Moyer Program retrofit) are available at a reasonable cost. AQ-2 Fugitive Dust Emissions and Control - To reduce fugitive dust emissions during construction, the use of best available control measures (BACM) shall be implemented during grading, including the following: a. Water all active construction areas three times daily. b. Cover all haul trucks or maintain at least 2 feet of freeboard. c. Pave or apply water three times daily to all unpaved parking or staging areas. d. Reduce speed on unpaved roads to less than 15 mph. e. Sweep or wash any site access points within 30 minutes of any visible dirt deposition on any public roadway. Page 14 of 65 exceed SCAQMD regional and localized thresholds. To evaluate both construction and operational emission impacts of the proposed project, URBEMIS 2007 (9.2.4) was utilized. Construction data, starting with project construction phasing, typical construction equipment and timeline was inputted into the computer model to simulate realistic construction activities. The short-term and long-term impacts were compared to the regional and localized significance thresholds Mt. Vernon Avenue and Barton Road Commercial Center Air Quality Analysis RK Engineering Group,Inc.March 1,2011. Page 11 of 65 dary retaining Page 7 of 65 ast (across Mount Vernon Avenue), a nursing/rehabilitation center and multiple-family residences to the north, and commercial, day care and multiple-family residential uses to the west. Aside from the existing commercial building and parking lot, the site is vacant. The site is relatively level with onsite grades trending downward east to west. Page 2 of 65 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Environmental Initial Study - Barton Plaza Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated Table 4 Localized Significance—Daily Operational Emissions'.2 CO NO„ PM10 PM2.5 LST Pollutants (lbs/day) (lbs/day) (lbs/day) (lbs/day) Emissions (calculated from Table 2)3 7.7 0.90 1.12 0.22 aSCAQMD Operational = Thresholds 1,877 200 3 2 a Exceeds Threshold (?) No No No No CO NOx PM10 PM2.5 LST Pollutants (lbs/day) (lbs/day) (lbs/day) (lbs/day) Emissions (calculated from Table 2)3 12.4 12.38 1.36 0.28 N N SCAQMD Operational Thresholds 1,877 200 3 2 a. Exceeds Threshold (?) No No No No Source:RK Engineering Group,Inc.2011 'Reference LST thresholds are from 2006-2008 SCAQMD Mass rate Localized Significant Thresholds for construction and operation Table C-1 for a disturbance area of 2 acres and at a receptor distance of 50 meters. 2 Per LST methodology,mobile source emissions do not need to be included except for land use emissions and on-site vehicle emissions. 3 It is estimated that only 10% of the overall trip length for the project will occur on-site (parking lot), therefore LST mobile emissions are reduced to 10%of the overall LST emissions.LST=(.1*vehicle emission)+Area Source The Project will not exceed any of the SCAQMD regional or localized significance operational___ (forrg=termrernissions thresholds. Therefore, no mitigation is required. Finding: Less Than Significant Impact. No mitigation is required. c. Result in cumulatively considerable ❑ ❑ p ❑ net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard • (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? Page 17 of 65 CM) shall be implemented during grading, including the following: a. Water all active construction areas three times daily. b. Cover all haul trucks or maintain at least 2 feet of freeboard. c. Pave or apply water three times daily to all unpaved parking or staging areas. d. Reduce speed on unpaved roads to less than 15 mph. e. Sweep or wash any site access points within 30 minutes of any visible dirt deposition on any public roadway. Page 14 of 65 exceed SCAQMD regional and localized thresholds. To evaluate both construction and operational emission impacts of the proposed project, URBEMIS 2007 (9.2.4) was utilized. Construction data, starting with project construction phasing, typical construction equipment and timeline was inputted into the computer model to simulate realistic construction activities. The short-term and long-term impacts were compared to the regional and localized significance thresholds Mt. Vernon Avenue and Barton Road Commercial Center Air Quality Analysis RK Engineering Group,Inc.March 1,2011. Page 11 of 65 dary retaining Page 7 of 65 ast (across Mount Vernon Avenue), a nursing/rehabilitation center and multiple-family residences to the north, and commercial, day care and multiple-family residential uses to the west. Aside from the existing commercial building and parking lot, the site is vacant. The site is relatively level with onsite grades trending downward east to west. Page 2 of 65 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Environmental Initial Study Barton Plaza Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated According to the General Plan EIR8, the Basin is non-attainment for ozone (03), particulate matter (PM), nitrogen oxides (NO„), and carbon monoxide (CO). Since reactive hydrocarbons and nitrogen oxides are precursors to ozone, pollutants of concern include volatile organic compounds (VOC), NO„, CO, particulate matter less than 10 micrometers (PM-10) and particulate matter less than 2.5 micrometers (PM-2.5). However, as noted in Tables 1 through 4, above, the Project will not exceed short or long-term emission thresholds for these pollutants. Further, given the low emission levels, the Project is not expected to result in a cumulatively considerable increase in area pollutants. Therefore, a less than significant impact will occur. Finding: Less Than Significant Impact. No mitigation is required. d. Expose sensitive receptors to ❑ ❑ p ❑ substantial pollutant concentrations? Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large. The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors: long- term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities. The closest sensitive receptors to the project site are the existing residences adjacent to the project site on the west and approximately 80 feet to the east of the project site, a child care center approximately 125 feet west of the project site, and a nursing rehabilitation center 130 feet to the north of the site.9 As stated in the Air Quality Impact Study performed for the Project, SCAQMD tables contain emission thresholds a distance of 50, 200 and 500 meters, and thresholds for a distance of 50 meters (164)feet were used. As identified in Tables 1 through 4, above, the Project will not exceed regional or local threshold emissions; therefore, no significant impact to adjacent sensitive receptors would occur, and no mitigation is required.10 Finding: Less Than Significant Impact. No mitigation is required. e. Create objectionable odors affecting ❑ ❑ p ❑ — a substantial-number-of-people? Heavy-duty equipment in the project area during construction would emit odors. However, the construction activity would be short term and would cease to occur after individual construction is completed. The application of architectural coatings and installation of asphalt may generate odors. However, these odors are temporary and not likely to be noticeable beyond the project boundaries. SCAQMD Rules 1108 and 1113, which are required for all development, identify standards regarding the application of asphalt and architectural coatings, respectively11. No 8 City of Grand Terrace General Plan EIR,Section 4B,April 27,2010. 9 Barton Plaza Initial Study and Environmental Analysis,December 18,2008. 10 Mt. Vernon Avenue and Barton Road Commercial Center Air Quality Analysis RK Engineering Group,Inc.March 1,2011. 11 Barton Plaza Initial Study and Environmental Analysis,December 18,2008. Page 18 of 65 ial Center Air Quality Analysis RK Engineering Group,Inc.March 1,2011. Page 11 of 65 dary retaining Page 7 of 65 ast (across Mount Vernon Avenue), a nursing/rehabilitation center and multiple-family residences to the north, and commercial, day care and multiple-family residential uses to the west. Aside from the existing commercial building and parking lot, the site is vacant. The site is relatively level with onsite grades trending downward east to west. Page 2 of 65 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Environmental Initial Study Barton Plaza Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated other sources of objectionable odors have been identified for the proposed project, and no mitigation measures are required. As further discussed in previous Initial Study12, the proposed project would result in the development of commercial and restaurant uses. Odors typically associated with the proposed uses include those associated with the preparation of food products. The control of such odors is typically achieved through the sanitary storage and disposal of organic waste and the utilization of equipment and/or measures to contain and/or neutralize objectionable odors. Finding: Less Than Significant Impact. No mitigation is required. IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES—Would the project: El a. Have a substantial adverse effect, ❑ ❑ ❑ either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations by the Cal Dept. of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b. Have a substantial adverse effect ❑ ❑ ❑ on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the Cal Dept. of Fish and Game or U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service? IV a. and b: LSA Associates, Inc. conducted an Updated Biological Resources Assessment of the site which included a site visit on May 25, 2011, by LSA Biologist Sarah Barrera. The site visirdetermined that the site is highly disturbed due to previous site activities and most of the site contains sparse cover of weedy species. The site contains ruderal vegetation community with the most dominant species being cheeseweed (Malva parviflora), wild oats (Avena sp.), fostail barley (Hordeum miurinum), red brome (Bromus madritensis ssp. Rubens), Russian thistle (Salsoala tragus), and Canadian horseweed (Conyza Canadensis). . No burrows were observed and it is likely that the site is only used by species common to disturbed areas. Although twelve federal and/or state threatened or endangered species and thirty special interest species are known to occur in the San Bernardino County region, suitable habitat does 12 Ibid. Page 19 of 65 to occur after individual construction is completed. The application of architectural coatings and installation of asphalt may generate odors. However, these odors are temporary and not likely to be noticeable beyond the project boundaries. SCAQMD Rules 1108 and 1113, which are required for all development, identify standards regarding the application of asphalt and architectural coatings, respectively11. No 8 City of Grand Terrace General Plan EIR,Section 4B,April 27,2010. 9 Barton Plaza Initial Study and Environmental Analysis,December 18,2008. 10 Mt. Vernon Avenue and Barton Road Commercial Center Air Quality Analysis RK Engineering Group,Inc.March 1,2011. 11 Barton Plaza Initial Study and Environmental Analysis,December 18,2008. Page 18 of 65 ial Center Air Quality Analysis RK Engineering Group,Inc.March 1,2011. Page 11 of 65 dary retaining Page 7 of 65 ast (across Mount Vernon Avenue), a nursing/rehabilitation center and multiple-family residences to the north, and commercial, day care and multiple-family residential uses to the west. Aside from the existing commercial building and parking lot, the site is vacant. The site is relatively level with onsite grades trending downward east to west. Page 2 of 65 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Environmental Initial Study Barton Plaza Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated not occur due to the developed and disturbed nature of the site, nor were any observed. Therefore, no impact would occur and no mitigation is necessary. . Finding: No Impact. No mitigation is required. c. Have a substantial adverse effect on ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, - marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? As noted in the Updated Biological Resources Assessment conducted by LSA Associates, Inc.14, there are no on-site drainage features subject to jurisdiction by the California Department of Fish and Game, Army Corps of Engineers and/or the Regional Water Quality Control Board. Therefore, no impact will occur. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation is required. d. Interfere substantially with the ❑ El ❑ ❑ movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? The Project site is located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Barton Road and Mount Vernon Avenue, generally the center of the City and surrounding by development. According to the General Plan EIR, the only area of substantial open space with the potential for wildlife corridors to exist is at the southeast corner oLthe_Gitythe Blue_Mountain--area;which-eenfieet to other mountains to the south, southeast and southwest.15 Therefore, given the Project location there is no potential to impact wildlife movement, including corridors. During the avian breeding season (typically February 1 through August 31), most birds and their active nests are protected from "take" (destruction, pursuit, possession, etc.) under' the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and/or Sections 3503-3801 of California Fish and Game Code. Activities that cause destruction of active nests, or that cause nest abandonment and subsequent death of eggs or young, may constitute violations of one or both of these laws. 13 Updated Biological Resources Assessment for the Mount Vernon and Barton Road Commercial Center,City of Grand Terrace, San Bernardino County,LSA Associates,Inc.,October 17,2008 14 Ibid. 15 City of Grand Terrace General Plan EIR,Section 4C.1,April 27,2010 Page 20 of 65 ation of asphalt may generate odors. However, these odors are temporary and not likely to be noticeable beyond the project boundaries. SCAQMD Rules 1108 and 1113, which are required for all development, identify standards regarding the application of asphalt and architectural coatings, respectively11. No 8 City of Grand Terrace General Plan EIR,Section 4B,April 27,2010. 9 Barton Plaza Initial Study and Environmental Analysis,December 18,2008. 10 Mt. Vernon Avenue and Barton Road Commercial Center Air Quality Analysis RK Engineering Group,Inc.March 1,2011. 11 Barton Plaza Initial Study and Environmental Analysis,December 18,2008. Page 18 of 65 ial Center Air Quality Analysis RK Engineering Group,Inc.March 1,2011. Page 11 of 65 dary retaining Page 7 of 65 ast (across Mount Vernon Avenue), a nursing/rehabilitation center and multiple-family residences to the north, and commercial, day care and multiple-family residential uses to the west. Aside from the existing commercial building and parking lot, the site is vacant. The site is relatively level with onsite grades trending downward east to west. Page 2 of 65 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Environmental Initial Study Barton Plaza Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated Trees on site and adjacent to the site provide suitable nesting habitat for small birds. Although no birds were,observed using the site at the time of the survey, birds protected under the MBTA and/or Fish and Game Code may use the site for nesting. If development of the Project occurs during the breeding season, a nesting survey should be conducted by a qualified biologist in order to avoid impacts to nesting avian species. Implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-01 would reduce to a less than significant level any impacts to nesting birds during the avian breeding season. Mitigation Measure BIO-01: Removal of existing on-site trees must be conducted outside the avian nesting season (February through August). If construction occurs during the avian nesting season, the Project applicant shall provide evidence to the City that a pre- construction nesting bird survey has been conducted within 7 days prior to any ground disturbance activities. If birds are found to be nesting inside or within 250 feet (500 feet for raptors) of the area of constraint, the nest or nesting tree plus a 250-foot buffer must be flagged and avoided until it is determined by a qualified biologist that active nesting no longer is occurring. Finding: Less than Significant Impact with Implementation of Mitigation e. Conflict with any local policies or ❑ ❑ ❑ ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? The degree of site disturbance and adjacent development reduces the potential for significant biological resources to be present. Nevertheless, the Biological Assessment that was conducted concluded that sensitive resources are not present on the site: Additionally, the Project does not conflict with any policies or ordinances protecting biological resources. No impact will occur. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation is required. f. Conflict with the provisions of an ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? The Project site is not included in any Habitat Conservation Plans, or other conservation plans. Therefore, no conflicts occur. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation is required. Page 21 of 65 General Plan EIR,Section 4C.1,April 27,2010 Page 20 of 65 ation of asphalt may generate odors. However, these odors are temporary and not likely to be noticeable beyond the project boundaries. SCAQMD Rules 1108 and 1113, which are required for all development, identify standards regarding the application of asphalt and architectural coatings, respectively11. No 8 City of Grand Terrace General Plan EIR,Section 4B,April 27,2010. 9 Barton Plaza Initial Study and Environmental Analysis,December 18,2008. 10 Mt. Vernon Avenue and Barton Road Commercial Center Air Quality Analysis RK Engineering Group,Inc.March 1,2011. 11 Barton Plaza Initial Study and Environmental Analysis,December 18,2008. Page 18 of 65 ial Center Air Quality Analysis RK Engineering Group,Inc.March 1,2011. Page 11 of 65 dary retaining Page 7 of 65 ast (across Mount Vernon Avenue), a nursing/rehabilitation center and multiple-family residences to the north, and commercial, day care and multiple-family residential uses to the west. Aside from the existing commercial building and parking lot, the site is vacant. The site is relatively level with onsite grades trending downward east to west. Page 2 of 65 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Environmental Initial Study Barton Plaza Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated V. CULTURAL RESOURCES-Would the project: a. Cause a substantial adverse ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? b. Cause a substantial adverse ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to§ 15064.5? c. Directly or inc :tly destroy a ❑ ❑ ❑ unique paler 'ical resource or site or unique, ,;c feature? c. The site previously contained numerous commercial buildings and associated ig lot improvements. A Historical Resources Assessment16 dated November 24, 2008, was prepared for the original project, which evaluated the then existing on-site buildings for historical significance. The Historical Resources Assessment determined that none of the structures constituted a historical resource. In 2009, all structures, except for the existing buildinq demolished including removal of building foundations, and onsite paving irr determined by the Historical Resources Assessment, the remaining structure does riot constitute a historical resource. In accordance with California Government Code 65352.3, the City contacted the Native American Heritage Commission to solicit a list of California Native Tribes for the purpose of informing them of the proposed general plan and specific plan amendments. Upon receipt of the list, staff sent written notifications to the five listed tribes advising them of the Project and asking t re-Tribes to contact City staff if consultation wouki be requited. C ~ response-was received from the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians indicating that the Project bite falls within the bounds of their Tribal Traditional Use Areas; however that the Soboba Band did not have any specific concerns regarding the Project.17 Further, due to the level of prior site disturbance and previous development on the site there is little potential for previously undocumented cultural resources within the Project boundaries. Although the Project site is not anticipated to yield any paleontological, -1-chaeological, and/or historical resources, the potential for unknown buried paleontologica , ^logical, and/or 16 Historical Resources Assessment for the Mount Vernon and Barton Road Commercial Center, City of Grand Terrace,San Bernardino County LSA Associates,Inc.November 24,2008 17 Letter from Joseph Ontiveros Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians,November 24,2010. Page 22 of 65 owever, these odors are temporary and not likely to be noticeable beyond the project boundaries. SCAQMD Rules 1108 and 1113, which are required for all development, identify standards regarding the application of asphalt and architectural coatings, respectively11. No 8 City of Grand Terrace General Plan EIR,Section 4B,April 27,2010. 9 Barton Plaza Initial Study and Environmental Analysis,December 18,2008. 10 Mt. Vernon Avenue and Barton Road Commercial Center Air Quality Analysis RK Engineering Group,Inc.March 1,2011. 11 Barton Plaza Initial Study and Environmental Analysis,December 18,2008. Page 18 of 65 ial Center Air Quality Analysis RK Engineering Group,Inc.March 1,2011. Page 11 of 65 dary retaining Page 7 of 65 ast (across Mount Vernon Avenue), a nursing/rehabilitation center and multiple-family residences to the north, and commercial, day care and multiple-family residential uses to the west. Aside from the existing commercial building and parking lot, the site is vacant. The site is relatively level with onsite grades trending downward east to west. Page 2 of 65 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Environmental Initial Study Barton Plaza Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated historical resources is present. Implementation of Mitigation Measure CUL-01 would ensure that any potential impacts to paleontological, archeological, and/or historical resources are reduced to a less than significant level18. Mitigation Measure: CUL-01 In the event that a paleontological, archeological, and/or historical resource are uncovered during the course of the construction phase of the project, ground disturbing activities in the vicinity of the find should be redirected until the nature and extent of the find can be evaluated by a qualified archaeologist and/or paleontologist (as determined by the City). Any such resource uncovered during the course of project-related to grading or construction shall be recorded and/or removed per applicable City and/or State regulations. Finding: Less Than Significant Impact with Implementation of Mitigation d. Disturb any human remains, ❑ ❑ ❑ including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? The Project site has not been identified as having been utilized for religious or sacred purposes. Additionally, no evidence is in place to suggest the Project site has been used for human burials. However in the unlikely event that human remains ,are found, California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050.5) states that if human remains are discovered on site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. As adherence to State regulations is required for all development, no mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on site. No impact to a sacred or religious site, including a human interment site, would occur. 19 Finding: No Impact. No mitigation is required. VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS—Would the project: a. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, ❑ ❑ as delineated on the most recent ❑ El Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning 18 Barton Plaza Initial Study and Environmental Analysis,December 18,2008 18 Ibid. • Page 23 of 65 County LSA Associates,Inc.November 24,2008 17 Letter from Joseph Ontiveros Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians,November 24,2010. Page 22 of 65 owever, these odors are temporary and not likely to be noticeable beyond the project boundaries. SCAQMD Rules 1108 and 1113, which are required for all development, identify standards regarding the application of asphalt and architectural coatings, respectively11. No 8 City of Grand Terrace General Plan EIR,Section 4B,April 27,2010. 9 Barton Plaza Initial Study and Environmental Analysis,December 18,2008. 10 Mt. Vernon Avenue and Barton Road Commercial Center Air Quality Analysis RK Engineering Group,Inc.March 1,2011. 11 Barton Plaza Initial Study and Environmental Analysis,December 18,2008. Page 18 of 65 ial Center Air Quality Analysis RK Engineering Group,Inc.March 1,2011. Page 11 of 65 dary retaining Page 7 of 65 ast (across Mount Vernon Avenue), a nursing/rehabilitation center and multiple-family residences to the north, and commercial, day care and multiple-family residential uses to the west. Aside from the existing commercial building and parking lot, the site is vacant. The site is relatively level with onsite grades trending downward east to west. Page 2 of 65 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Environmental Initial Study Barton Plaza Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? The Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act (A-P Act) mitigates fault rupture hazards by prohibiting the location of structures for human occupancy across the trace of an active fault. The boundary of an "Earthquake Fault Zone" is generally 500 feet from major active faults and from 200 to 300 feet from well defined minor faults. The mapping of active faults is distributed to all affected cities, counties, and state agencies for their use in developing planning policies and controlling renovation or new construction. As identified in the Geotechnical Engineering Investigation completed for the proposed Project, the nearest significant active fault to the project site is the San Bernardino-San Jacinto Fault Zone which is approximately 1.86 miles away. No active fault traverses the project site, nor is the site located within an earthquake fault zone.20. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation is required. ii. Strong seismic ground shaking? ❑ ❑ ❑ Although there are no known seismic faults within the Project site, the Project is located in an area of high regional seismicity. The site is likely to experience ground shaking in the event of an earthquake. However, the applicant will be required to adhere to the California Building Code (California Code of Regulation's, Title 24), which establishes engineering standards appropriate for the seismic zone in which development may occur. Implementation of Mitigation Measures GEO-01 would ensure that potential ground shaking impacts would be reduced to a less than significant level. Mitigation Measure: GEO-01 The design and construction of all structures and facilities, site grading and soil preparation activities within the Project limits shall be in accordance with the regulations and recommendations estahlished by the--City-ef-Grand-Terrace;--- applicable and appropriate measures identified in the Uniform Building Code, California Building Code and the site-specific recommendations of the geotechnical investigation prepared for the proposed Project. Finding: Less than Significant Impact with Implementation of Mitigation 2D Geotechnical Engineering Investigation,Proposed Walgreens Pharmacy Barton Road and Mt. Vernon Avenue, Grand Terrace, CA Salem Engineering Group, February 28,2011. Page 24 of 65 h Ontiveros Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians,November 24,2010. Page 22 of 65 owever, these odors are temporary and not likely to be noticeable beyond the project boundaries. SCAQMD Rules 1108 and 1113, which are required for all development, identify standards regarding the application of asphalt and architectural coatings, respectively11. No 8 City of Grand Terrace General Plan EIR,Section 4B,April 27,2010. 9 Barton Plaza Initial Study and Environmental Analysis,December 18,2008. 10 Mt. Vernon Avenue and Barton Road Commercial Center Air Quality Analysis RK Engineering Group,Inc.March 1,2011. 11 Barton Plaza Initial Study and Environmental Analysis,December 18,2008. Page 18 of 65 ial Center Air Quality Analysis RK Engineering Group,Inc.March 1,2011. Page 11 of 65 dary retaining Page 7 of 65 ast (across Mount Vernon Avenue), a nursing/rehabilitation center and multiple-family residences to the north, and commercial, day care and multiple-family residential uses to the west. Aside from the existing commercial building and parking lot, the site is vacant. The site is relatively level with onsite grades trending downward east to west. Page 2 of 65 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Environmental Initial Study Barton Plaza Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated iii. Seismic-related ground failure, - ❑ ❑ l ❑ including liquefaction? Liquefaction is a phenomenon that occurs when strong earthquake shakes causes soils to collapse from a sudden loss of cohesion and undergo a transformation from a solid state to a liquefied state. This happens in areas where the soils are saturated with groundwater. Loose soils with particle size in the medium sand to silt range are particularly susceptible to liquefaction when subject to seismic ground shaking. Affected soils lose all strength during liquefaction and failure of building foundations can occur. Liquefaction typically occurs when groundwater is present within 50 feet of the surface. According to the Geotechnical Engineering Investigation performed for the Project, soil borings were taken throughout the site at a depth of 50 feet. The soils encountered predominately consisted of silty sand and sandy silt, and no groundwater was encountered. The Geotechnical Investigation concluded that site soils had a low potential for liquefaction under seismic conditions.21 Therefore, a less than significant impact would occur. Finding: Less Than Significant Impact. No mitigation is required. iv. Landslides? ❑ ❑ ❑ According to Exhibit 4E-1 of the General Plan EIR, the Project site is not located in area susceptible to landslides.22 Finding: No impact. No mitigation is required. b. Result in substantial soil erosion or ❑ ❑ l ❑ the loss of topsoil? Although onsite building construction will occur in two phases, the overall site will be graded at one time. Project-grading would require the movement of on-site soils, and all on-site grading activity would conform to City grading standards, which is a requirement of any development in the-City The-proposed-project-will--be-required-to-adhere to applicable provisions of the City's National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit, including the submittal of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to address erosion and discharge impacts associated with the proposed on-site grading. In addition to the preparation of an SWPPP, the developer will be required to submit a Project-specific Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP). The WQMP will identify measures to treat and/or limit the post-construction entry of contaminants into storm flows. A preliminary Water Quality Management Plan has been submitted which identifies these measures23. Additionally, the Final WQMP is required to be incorporated by reference or attached to the project's SWPPP as the Post-Construction 21 Ibid. 22 City of Grand Terrace General Plan EIR,Section 4E.3—Geology and Soils,April 27,2010 23 Water Quality Management Plan(WQMP)for Barton Plaza Collins&Associates Engineering,Inc.March 24,2011 Page 25 of 65 er 18,2008. 10 Mt. Vernon Avenue and Barton Road Commercial Center Air Quality Analysis RK Engineering Group,Inc.March 1,2011. 11 Barton Plaza Initial Study and Environmental Analysis,December 18,2008. Page 18 of 65 ial Center Air Quality Analysis RK Engineering Group,Inc.March 1,2011. Page 11 of 65 dary retaining Page 7 of 65 ast (across Mount Vernon Avenue), a nursing/rehabilitation center and multiple-family residences to the north, and commercial, day care and multiple-family residential uses to the west. Aside from the existing commercial building and parking lot, the site is vacant. The site is relatively level with onsite grades trending downward east to west. Page 2 of 65 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Environmental Initial Study Barton Plaza Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated Management Plan. Adherence to the grading regulations, SWPPP, and WQMP would ensure a less than significant impact, and no mitigation is required. Finding: Less Than Significant. No mitigation is required. c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on-or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? The Project site is relatively level. As indicated in Section Vl.a.iv, above, the Project site is not located within an area that is designated as being susceptible to landslides or liquefaction. Subsidence is the sudden sinking or gradual downward settling of the earth's surface with little or no horizontal motion that may result from any number of human activities (e.g., subterranean mining, groundwater withdrawal, or oil drilling) or natural phenomena (e.g., dissolution in limestone aquifers, hydrocompaction, liquefaction, or crustal deformation). Fill soils are anticipated to be present on site since the site was previously graded, and will be required to be replaced24. Adherence to Mitigation Measure GEO-01, above, would reduce impacts associate with this issue to a less than significant level. Finding: Less than Significant Impact with Implementation of Mitigation d. Be located on expansive soil, as ❑ ❑ p ❑ defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? According to the previous Initial Study prepared for the Barton Square Project, expansive soils are those with a significant amount of clay particles that have the ability to give up water (shrink) or-take-on-water-(swett hen-these soils swetr the change in volume exerts significant pressures on loads (such as buildings) that are placed on them. Two types of soil are present on the Project site: Greenfield Sandy Loam, 2-9 percent (GtC) and Ramona Sandy Loam (RmC). The design and construction of all structures and facilities within the Project limits would be in accordance with the regulations and recommendations established by the City of Grand Terrace and the applicable and appropriate measures identified in the Project-specific geotechnical study and/or the Uniform Building Code. Adherence to these measures would ensure a less than significant impact related to this issue would occur and no mitigation is required.25 24 Geotechnical Engineering Investigation,Proposed Walgreens Pharmacy Barton Road and Mt. Vernon Avenue, Grand Terrace, CA Salem Engineering Group, February 28,2011. 25 Barton Plaza Initial Study and Environmental Analysis,December 18,2008 Page 26 of 65 Engineering,Inc.March 24,2011 Page 25 of 65 er 18,2008. 10 Mt. Vernon Avenue and Barton Road Commercial Center Air Quality Analysis RK Engineering Group,Inc.March 1,2011. 11 Barton Plaza Initial Study and Environmental Analysis,December 18,2008. Page 18 of 65 ial Center Air Quality Analysis RK Engineering Group,Inc.March 1,2011. Page 11 of 65 dary retaining Page 7 of 65 ast (across Mount Vernon Avenue), a nursing/rehabilitation center and multiple-family residences to the north, and commercial, day care and multiple-family residential uses to the west. Aside from the existing commercial building and parking lot, the site is vacant. The site is relatively level with onsite grades trending downward east to west. Page 2 of 65 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Environmental Initial Study Barton Plaza Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated Finding: Less Than Significant. No mitigation is required. e. Have soils incapable of adequately ❑ ❑ CI supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? The Project will connect to the public sanitary sewer system; therefore, there is no potential for an adverse impact, relating to septic tanks. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation is required. VII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS-Would❑the project: ❑ ❑ ❑ a. Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? An Air Quality Impact Study dated February 21, 2011, was prepared by RK Engineering Group, Inc., which included an analysis of short-term (construction) and long-term (operational) greenhouse gas emissions.26 The Climate is generally defined as average weather, and as such climate change and weather are intertwined. The Earth's climate is regulated by naturally occurring atmospheric gases such as water vapor, carbon dioxide (CO2), oxygen, methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N20). As sunlight strikes the atmosphere some of the infrared radiation passes through, but most is absorbed and re-emitted in all directions by these greenhouse gas molecules and clouds. The effect of this is to warm the Earth's surface and lower atmosphere. This effect is known as "green house effect." Many Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions from human sources are expected-to-increase-as-a-result-ef-arban--deve}opment-growth-trran effort to curtail emission levels an ongoing effort of newer cleaner technologies and policies continue to be explored. These efforts extend from local municipalities to the national government all the way to international territories. At each agency level, GHG reduction measures are being formulated. In an effort to help quantify GHG emissions, the EPA has constructed an index of Global Warming Potentials (GWPs) based upon the radiative properties each individual greenhouse gas. GWP is based on a variety of factors including; radiative efficiency (relative to that of CO2) and the decay rate of each gas. The EPA has defined GWP, as the cumulative radiative forcing effects of a gas over a specified time horizon, resulting from the emission of a unit mass of gas 26 Mt. Vernon Avenue and Barton Road Commercial Center Air Quality Analysis RK Engineering Group,Inc.March 1,2011. Page 27 of 65 related to this issue would occur and no mitigation is required.25 24 Geotechnical Engineering Investigation,Proposed Walgreens Pharmacy Barton Road and Mt. Vernon Avenue, Grand Terrace, CA Salem Engineering Group, February 28,2011. 25 Barton Plaza Initial Study and Environmental Analysis,December 18,2008 Page 26 of 65 Engineering,Inc.March 24,2011 Page 25 of 65 er 18,2008. 10 Mt. Vernon Avenue and Barton Road Commercial Center Air Quality Analysis RK Engineering Group,Inc.March 1,2011. 11 Barton Plaza Initial Study and Environmental Analysis,December 18,2008. Page 18 of 65 ial Center Air Quality Analysis RK Engineering Group,Inc.March 1,2011. Page 11 of 65 dary retaining Page 7 of 65 ast (across Mount Vernon Avenue), a nursing/rehabilitation center and multiple-family residences to the north, and commercial, day care and multiple-family residential uses to the west. Aside from the existing commercial building and parking lot, the site is vacant. The site is relatively level with onsite grades trending downward east to west. Page 2 of 65 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Environmental Initial Study - Barton Plaza Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated relative to a reference gas (the reference gas being CO2). One teragram of carbon dioxide equivalent (Tg CO2 Eq) is the emission of the gas multiplied by the GWP. The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) has complied annual GHG data. According to the UNFCCC, in 2004 the U.S. contributed 7,074.4 Tg CO2 Eq. (nearly 35% of global emissions). A total of 20,135 Tg CO2 Eq., were emitted worldwide (excluding emissions from removals from land use, land use change and forestry). The U.S. had an increase of 15.8% from 1990 emission levels. California is the second largest contributor to GHGs in the U.S. During 1990 to 2003, California's gross state product grew by 83% while GHG emissions grew by 12%. In 2004, California produced 492 Tg CO2 Eq, which is approximately 7% of U.S. emissions. The main contributors to California's GHG emissions are transportation (41%) and electricity generation (22%). Over that same period of time (1990 to 2004), GHG emissions from the residential/commercial sectors decreased by 9.7%. This decrease in GHGs could illustrate the effectiveness of energy conservation in buildings (Title 24 requirements) and appliances. During that same period of time, California saw an increase in population. In 2006, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger signed Assembly Bill (AB) 32, the California Climate Solutions Act. AB 32 requires that statewide GHG emissions be reduced to 1990 levels by the year 2020. This reduction will be accomplished by an enforceable statewide cap on GHG emissions. AB 32 requires that the CARB adopt a quantified cap on GHG emissions representing 1990 levels and disclose how it arrives at the cap. The CARB must institute a schedule to meet emission standards, develop tracking, reporting and enforcement mechanisms to ensure that the state achieves reductions in GHG emissions necessary to meet the cap. Currently, GHG levels have been estimated to be 600 million metric tons (MMTs) of CO2 Eq., while 1990 levels have been estimated to be 427 MMTs. Accordingly, emissions need to be reduced by 173 MMTs by 2020. In 2007, the Legislature adopted Senate Bill 97 (SB 97) which requires the California Office of Planning and Research (OPR) to prepare anttransmit nPW CFQA-guidelines for the-mitigation of GHG emissions or the effects of GHG emissions to the Resources agency by July 2009. These guidelines for mitigation must address but are not limited to,, GHG emissions and effects associated with transportation and energy consumption. On December 11, 2008, CARB adopted a scoping plan to reduce GHG emissions to 1990 levels. The Scoping Plan's recommendations for reducing GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020 include, a cap-and-trade program linked to Western Climate Initiative partner jurisdictions, green building strategies, recycling and waste-related measures, and Voluntary Early Action and Reductions. CARB has until January 11, 2011, to adopt the necessary regulations to implement that plan. Implementation of the plan must begin no later than January 1, 2012, so that emission reduction target can be achieved by 2020. Page 28 of 65 arch 1,2011. Page 11 of 65 dary retaining Page 7 of 65 ast (across Mount Vernon Avenue), a nursing/rehabilitation center and multiple-family residences to the north, and commercial, day care and multiple-family residential uses to the west. Aside from the existing commercial building and parking lot, the site is vacant. The site is relatively level with onsite grades trending downward east to west. Page 2 of 65 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Environmental Initial Study Barton Plaza Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated In 2008, Senate Bill (SB) 375 was signed by Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger. SB 375 requires the CARB to develop regional GHG emission reduction targets to be achieved from passenger vehicles, for 2020 and 2035. The 18 metropolitan planning organizations (i.e. SCAG) are responsible to prepare a "sustainable communities strategy" to reduce the amount of vehicle miles traveled (VMT) in their respective regions and demonstrate the ability for the region to attain CARB's targets. On January 8, 2009, OPR released its preliminary draft CEQA Guideline Amendments for GHG emissions. Shortly thereafter in April, OPR submitted its final proposed guidelines to the Secretary of Natural Resources. On March 18, 2010, the final proposed guidelines were approved. In the CEQA Guideline amendments, the OPR does not identify a threshold of significance for GHG emissions, nor does it specify an assessment methodology or specific mitigation measure. Furthermore it states that a lead agency shall have discretion to determine whether to: (1) Use a model or methodology to quantify GHG emissions resulting from a project, and which methodology to use...; or (2) Rely on a qualitative analysis or performance standards. The OPR calls for a "good faith effort, based on available information, to describe, calculate or estimate the amount of GHG emissions resulting from a project." The Amendments are relatively modest and leave substantial discretion to lead agencies to evaluate and mitigate GHG emissions in an environmental document. The Technical Advisory encourages lead agencies to follow three basic steps: (1) identify and quantify the greenhouse gas emissions that could result from the proposed project; (2) analyze the effects of those emissions and determine whether the effect is significant, and (3) if the impact is significant, identify feasible mitigation measures or alternatives that will reduce the impact below a level of significance. In the effort to develop the CEQA Guidelines Amendments, OPR's Technical Advisory has asked CARB to recommend GHG-related significance thresholds. CARB released a draft proposal in Oct, 2008 with interim guidance on significance thresholds. The proposal takes a different approach for different sectors - (1) industrial projects and (2) commercial and residential projects. A numerical threshold foriadtistrial prnjects__oL10 009-metric tons-of-602 eq/year has been devised by the SCAQMD, however for commercial and residential projects, CARB recommends the consideration of performance standards which address energy usage (transportation, water use, waste and construction) above Title 24 requirements. Short-Term Construction Emissions During the construction phase, GHG emissions will be released through the burning of fossil fuels in construction equipment. During Phase 1 of construction, the Project's worst-case GHG emissions are expected to be approximately 5, 629 pounds per day of CO2 equivalents. During Phase 2 of construction, the Project's worst-case GHG emissions are expected to be approximately 4,844 pounds per day of CO2 equivalents. There are no significant criteria for these emissions at this time. Given the scope of the Project in relation to the region construction related GHG emissions would not be considered significant. Additionally, Page 29 of 65 ercial building and parking lot, the site is vacant. The site is relatively level with onsite grades trending downward east to west. Page 2 of 65 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Environmental Initial Study Barton Plaza Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated implementation of Mitigation Measure GHG-01 would further serve to reduce potential impacts to less than significant levels. Mitigation Measure: GHG-01 The following measures are recommended to further reduce vehicle emission impacts during Project construction / a. Construction equipment shall be maintained in proper tune. b. Utilize gasoline or electricity-powered equipment instead of diesel equipment whenever possible. c. Suspend use of heavy construction equipment during first stage smog alerts. d. All construction vehicles shall be prohibited from excessive idling. Excessive idling is defined as five minutes or longer. e. Encourage use of "clean diesel" equipment if modified engines (catalyst equipped or newer Moyer Program retrofit) are available at a reasonable cost. Table 5 Construction_Greenhouse Gas Emissions (lbs/day) CO2 N20 CH4 Activity (lbs/day) (lbs/day) (lbs/day) EQ (lbs/day) (lbs/day) EQ N N Grading 1,599.96 0 0.00 0.17 3.57 Building w Construction/Painting 2,101.15 0 0.00 0.17 3.57 Q Paving 1,916.11 0 0.00 0.22 4.62 a. Total (lbs/day) 5,617.22 0.00 0.00 0.56 11.76 Total (Teragrams CO2 equivalent) 0.00562898 CO2 N20 CH4 N_ Activity (lbs/day) (lbs/day) (lbs/day) CO aEQ (lbs/day) (lbs/day) co o Grading 1,476.12 0 0.00 0.21 4.41 CNi Building N W Construction/Painting 1,945.40 0 0.00 0.23 4.83 4 Paving 1,408.52 0 0.00 0.24 5.04 a Total (lbs/day) 4,830.04 0.00 0.00 0.68 14.28 Total (Teragrams CO2 equivalent) 0.00484432 Source:RK Engineering Group,Inc.2011 Pounds(Ibs)per day 2 See Appendix B of Study for GHG Emission Calculations Page 30 of 65 e. In the effort to develop the CEQA Guidelines Amendments, OPR's Technical Advisory has asked CARB to recommend GHG-related significance thresholds. CARB released a draft proposal in Oct, 2008 with interim guidance on significance thresholds. The proposal takes a different approach for different sectors - (1) industrial projects and (2) commercial and residential projects. A numerical threshold foriadtistrial prnjects__oL10 009-metric tons-of-602 eq/year has been devised by the SCAQMD, however for commercial and residential projects, CARB recommends the consideration of performance standards which address energy usage (transportation, water use, waste and construction) above Title 24 requirements. Short-Term Construction Emissions During the construction phase, GHG emissions will be released through the burning of fossil fuels in construction equipment. During Phase 1 of construction, the Project's worst-case GHG emissions are expected to be approximately 5, 629 pounds per day of CO2 equivalents. During Phase 2 of construction, the Project's worst-case GHG emissions are expected to be approximately 4,844 pounds per day of CO2 equivalents. There are no significant criteria for these emissions at this time. Given the scope of the Project in relation to the region construction related GHG emissions would not be considered significant. Additionally, Page 29 of 65 ercial building and parking lot, the site is vacant. The site is relatively level with onsite grades trending downward east to west. Page 2 of 65 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Environmental Initial Study Barton Plaza Potentially , Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated Long-Term Operational Emissions The projected GHG operational emissions are presented in Table 6. The Project site is expected to produce on average 4,266 tons of CO2 per year. These emissions include mobile sources, electrical usage, and combustion of natural gas. The EPA estimates that approximately 5% of the VMT's for the project would include CH4 and N2O emissions. It should be noted that mobile source emissions will vary due to the fact there is existing traffic in the area. Table 6 Proposed Project Greenhouse Gas Emissions during Operation (MTPY1)2 CO2 N2O CH4 mtpy CO2 mtpy CO2 Emission Source mtpy mtpy EQ mtpy EQ N Ces NI Mobile Source 1,379.2 0.00 0.006 0.055 1.15 w Electrical Usage 1.4 0.00 0.006 0.000 0.00 a = Natural Gas 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 a Total (mtpy) 1,380.6 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.15 Total (Teragrams CO2 equivalent) 0.001382 CO2 N2O CH4 mtpy CO2 mtpy CO2 0 Emission Source mtpy mtpy EQ mtpy EQ c�•i Mobile Source 2,793.2 0.00 0.001 0.111 2.34 w Electrical Usage 88.1 0.00 0.566 0.002 0.04 a = Natural Gas 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 ' a Total (mtpy) 2,881.2 0.0 0.6 0.1 2.38 Total (Teragrams CO2 equivalent) 0.002884 Page 31 of 65 uilding N W Construction/Painting 1,945.40 0 0.00 0.23 4.83 4 Paving 1,408.52 0 0.00 0.24 5.04 a Total (lbs/day) 4,830.04 0.00 0.00 0.68 14.28 Total (Teragrams CO2 equivalent) 0.00484432 Source:RK Engineering Group,Inc.2011 Pounds(Ibs)per day 2 See Appendix B of Study for GHG Emission Calculations Page 30 of 65 e. In the effort to develop the CEQA Guidelines Amendments, OPR's Technical Advisory has asked CARB to recommend GHG-related significance thresholds. CARB released a draft proposal in Oct, 2008 with interim guidance on significance thresholds. The proposal takes a different approach for different sectors - (1) industrial projects and (2) commercial and residential projects. A numerical threshold foriadtistrial prnjects__oL10 009-metric tons-of-602 eq/year has been devised by the SCAQMD, however for commercial and residential projects, CARB recommends the consideration of performance standards which address energy usage (transportation, water use, waste and construction) above Title 24 requirements. Short-Term Construction Emissions During the construction phase, GHG emissions will be released through the burning of fossil fuels in construction equipment. During Phase 1 of construction, the Project's worst-case GHG emissions are expected to be approximately 5, 629 pounds per day of CO2 equivalents. During Phase 2 of construction, the Project's worst-case GHG emissions are expected to be approximately 4,844 pounds per day of CO2 equivalents. There are no significant criteria for these emissions at this time. Given the scope of the Project in relation to the region construction related GHG emissions would not be considered significant. Additionally, Page 29 of 65 ercial building and parking lot, the site is vacant. The site is relatively level with onsite grades trending downward east to west. Page 2 of 65 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Environmental Initial Study Barton Plaza Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated CO2 N20 CH4 mtpymtpymtpy CO2 mtpy mtpy CO2 Emission Source EQ EQ z z Mobile Source 4,172.4 0.0 0.0 0.2 3.5 N Electrical Usage 89.5 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 ✓ w Natural Gas 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total (mtpy) 4,261.8 0.0 0.6 0.2 3.5 O Total (Teragrams CO2 equivalent) 0.004266 Source:RK Engineering Group,Inc.2011 ' Metric Tons Per Year 2 See Appendix B of Study for Operational GHG emission calculations 3 See Appendix C of Study for Existing GHG emission calculations In accordance with the 2007 AQMP, the emission levels in California are estimated to be approximately 600 million metric tons of CO2 equivalents (Eq.) for 2010. At approximately 4,266 tons per year, the Project's emissions from operations represent less than 0.0007 percent of this state's annual 2011 emissions budget. Applying the conversion factor of teragrams per year to the CO2 Eq, the overall estimated GHG contribution to California's emission levels is .0043 Tg CO2 as indicated in Table 6. At approximately 0.0043 CO2 Eq. per year, the Project operations emissions represent less than 0.00008 percent of California's annual emissions budget. Strategies that reduce California's overall emission levels include design features, and operational procedures that aim to reduce energy consumption, reduce the generation of waste, encourage recycling of resources, and reduce water usage. The Project will be required to comply with standard regulations relating to water efficient landscaping, recycling during construction, water quality treatment, and the California Building Code. In addition, the following energy-efficient features are expected to be incorporated into the Project: Walgreens27 • An option of using a white roof membrane in building specifications. • Energy usage exceeds ASHRAE 90.1-2004 standards by 17-23% depending on location. • All Flooring meets either FloorScore or Green Guard standards for low VOC emissions. • LEED standards are met for fundamental refrigerant management and use all non-CFC refrigerants. • Specified materials contain over 10% recycled content. 27 Email correspondence with Katie Rounds,Evergreen DevCo.,May 16,2011 Page 32 of 65 residential projects. A numerical threshold foriadtistrial prnjects__oL10 009-metric tons-of-602 eq/year has been devised by the SCAQMD, however for commercial and residential projects, CARB recommends the consideration of performance standards which address energy usage (transportation, water use, waste and construction) above Title 24 requirements. Short-Term Construction Emissions During the construction phase, GHG emissions will be released through the burning of fossil fuels in construction equipment. During Phase 1 of construction, the Project's worst-case GHG emissions are expected to be approximately 5, 629 pounds per day of CO2 equivalents. During Phase 2 of construction, the Project's worst-case GHG emissions are expected to be approximately 4,844 pounds per day of CO2 equivalents. There are no significant criteria for these emissions at this time. Given the scope of the Project in relation to the region construction related GHG emissions would not be considered significant. Additionally, Page 29 of 65 ercial building and parking lot, the site is vacant. The site is relatively level with onsite grades trending downward east to west. Page 2 of 65 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Environmental Initial Study Barton Plaza Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated • Over 10% of specified materials originate from within a 500 mile radius of the store. • HVAC system uses increased ventilation and complies with ASHRAE 55 standards for thermal comfort. It also complies with minimum indoor air quality standards set forth by ASHRAE 62.1-2004 standards. • Lighting contains extremely low levels of mercury that qualify for an Innovation Credit according to LEED standards. • Use of LED lighting in the store to reduce energy usage. Market (the Market is expected to be Fresh & Easy) • Skylights on Fresh & Easy buildings with overhead lighting that dims automatically as ambient light levels increase from natural sources. • Increased insulation, reducing the need for heating and air conditioning. • Night shades on refrigeration cases to keep cool air from escaping. • Hybrid parking spaces and bike racks for employees and customers. • In-store recycling available for employees and customers. • Secondary-loop system on refrigeration cases designed to capture and reuse cool air. • LED lighting in external signage and freezer cases, reducing energy use. • Water conserving plumbing fixtures. • Buildings constructed from environmentally friendly materials. • Low VOC emitting finishes and materials as part of creating indoor environmental quality for customers and employees • Fresh & Easy is a member of the California Climate Action Registry, California's only voluntary registry for greenhouse gas emissions, and the Climate registry, a group that standardized the measurement for greenhouse gas emissions across North America. www.climateregistry.org • Every Fresh & Easy store recycles all of its display and shipping materials. • Sites that promotes community connectivity and are near residential development and basic community services to promote walking and biking to reduce vehicular usage. • Maximize water efficiency within the building to reduce the burden on municipal water supply and wastewater systems. • Design the building envelope, HVAC, lighting, and other systems to maximize energy performance that will comply with both California codes.28 The Project's expected operational emissions would represent less than 0.00008 percent of California's annual emissions budget. This incremental contribution of potential climate change impacts would be less than significant. However, as recommended in the Air Quality Study 9, 28 Email correspondence with Katie Rounds,Evergreen DevCo.,May 26,2011 28 Mt. Vernon Avenue and Barton Road Commercial Center Air Quality Analysis RK Engineering Group,Inc.March 1,2011. Page 33 of 65 Construction Emissions During the construction phase, GHG emissions will be released through the burning of fossil fuels in construction equipment. During Phase 1 of construction, the Project's worst-case GHG emissions are expected to be approximately 5, 629 pounds per day of CO2 equivalents. During Phase 2 of construction, the Project's worst-case GHG emissions are expected to be approximately 4,844 pounds per day of CO2 equivalents. There are no significant criteria for these emissions at this time. Given the scope of the Project in relation to the region construction related GHG emissions would not be considered significant. Additionally, Page 29 of 65 ercial building and parking lot, the site is vacant. The site is relatively level with onsite grades trending downward east to west. Page 2 of 65 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Environmental Initial Study Barton Plaza Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated incorporation of Mitigation Measure GHG-02 would further reduce potential impacts to less than significant levels. Mitigation Measure GHG-02 Encourage building construction design to exceed the minimum statewide energy requirements of Title 24; this may include but is not limited to: a. Use of low emission water heaters b. Use of central air heating systems c. Use of energy efficient appliances d. Use of increased insulation e. Use of energy-efficient parking lot lights f. Use of lighting controls and energy efficient lighting. Finding: Less Than a Significant With the Implementation of Mitigation. b. Conflict with an applicable plan, ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? As discussed in Section VII.a, above, there are no established thresholds of significance for greenhouse gas emissions. However, the Project's GHG operational emission levels represent less than 0.00008 percent of California's annual emissions budget. This incremental contribution of potential GHG emissions and the incorporation of Mitigation Measures GHG-01 and GHG- 02 would result in a less than significant impact. Finding: Less Than a Significant With the Implementation of Mitigation. VIII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS—Would the project: a. Create a significant hazard to the ❑ CI l ❑ public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b. Create a significant hazard to the ❑ ❑ p ❑ public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? Page 34 of 65 connectivity and are near residential development and basic community services to promote walking and biking to reduce vehicular usage. • Maximize water efficiency within the building to reduce the burden on municipal water supply and wastewater systems. • Design the building envelope, HVAC, lighting, and other systems to maximize energy performance that will comply with both California codes.28 The Project's expected operational emissions would represent less than 0.00008 percent of California's annual emissions budget. This incremental contribution of potential climate change impacts would be less than significant. However, as recommended in the Air Quality Study 9, 28 Email correspondence with Katie Rounds,Evergreen DevCo.,May 26,2011 28 Mt. Vernon Avenue and Barton Road Commercial Center Air Quality Analysis RK Engineering Group,Inc.March 1,2011. Page 33 of 65 Construction Emissions During the construction phase, GHG emissions will be released through the burning of fossil fuels in construction equipment. During Phase 1 of construction, the Project's worst-case GHG emissions are expected to be approximately 5, 629 pounds per day of CO2 equivalents. During Phase 2 of construction, the Project's worst-case GHG emissions are expected to be approximately 4,844 pounds per day of CO2 equivalents. There are no significant criteria for these emissions at this time. Given the scope of the Project in relation to the region construction related GHG emissions would not be considered significant. Additionally, Page 29 of 65 ercial building and parking lot, the site is vacant. The site is relatively level with onsite grades trending downward east to west. Page 2 of 65 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Environmental Initial Study Barton Plaza Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated VIII. a and b: The proposed Project would require the transport of potentially hazardous materials (e.g., paints and fuels). The transport and use of hazardous materials during the construction of the proposed Project would comply with applicable city, state, and federal requirements, standards, and/or guidelines pertaining to the use of these substances. Compliance with applicable hazardous material regulations would reduce any such potential hazardous material impact to a less than significant level. The proposed Project is composed of commercial and restaurant uses. The commercial operations may sell household chemicals in small quantities and they may be used on site for store operations. It is not anticipated that the quantity or type of chemicals kept or transported to the site would cause a significant hazard in relation to this issue. Hazardous substances associated with these uses are household chemicals and may include cleaners, paint, and pesticides; however, these are typically found in small quantities. Therefore, construction and operational impacts associated with this issue are anticipated to be less than significant and no mitigation is required. 30 Finding: Less Than a Significant Impact. No mitigation is required. c. Emit hazardous emissions or handle ❑ ❑ E ❑ hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? The Project site is 0.26 miles north of Terrace Hills Middle School and less than a quarter mile from the Grand Terrace Child Care Center. As discussed in Section VIII.a above, construction and operation of the Project would include the use of potentially hazardous materials, such as the transport and use of paints and fuels during construction, the use of cleansers and pesticides associated with housekeeping and gardening activities and the sale of cleansers, paints, batteries or pesticides. However, as concluded in Section VIII.a it is not anticipated that the quantity or type of chemicals kept, transported or used would cause a significant hazard in relation to this issue. Therefore, a less than significant impact will occur. Finding: Less Than a Significant Impact. No mitigation is required. d. Be located on a site which is ❑ ❑ ❑ El included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? 3°Barton Plaza Initial Study and Environmental Analysis,December 18,2008 Page 35 of 65 Page 33 of 65 Construction Emissions During the construction phase, GHG emissions will be released through the burning of fossil fuels in construction equipment. During Phase 1 of construction, the Project's worst-case GHG emissions are expected to be approximately 5, 629 pounds per day of CO2 equivalents. During Phase 2 of construction, the Project's worst-case GHG emissions are expected to be approximately 4,844 pounds per day of CO2 equivalents. There are no significant criteria for these emissions at this time. Given the scope of the Project in relation to the region construction related GHG emissions would not be considered significant. Additionally, Page 29 of 65 ercial building and parking lot, the site is vacant. The site is relatively level with onsite grades trending downward east to west. Page 2 of 65 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Environmental Initial Study Barton Plaza Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated The Project site is not included on the Department of Toxic Substance Control, Hazardous Waste and Substance Site List31 compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5; therefore no adverse impact will be created. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation is required. e. For a project located within an ❑ ❑ ❑ airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f. For a project within the vicinity of a ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? VIIl.e and f: Pursuant to the General Plan EIR32, no portion of the City is located within an airport land use plan or within two miles of a public or private airport. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation is required. g. Impair implementation of or ❑ ❑ E ❑ physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? The proposed Project would be designed, constructed, and maintained to comply with applicable requirements related to emergency access and evacuation plans. Primary access to the-Project-site-would-be-via-BdIturf Road and-Mount-Vernzsn Avenue. These roadways will remain open and unimpeded at completion of the Project. Britton Way was vacated in 2008 and it will terminate at the west boundary of the Project site, eliminating through access to Mount Vernon. However the San Bernardino County Fire Office of the Fire Marshal Community Safety Division has reviewed the Project design and indicated that termination of Britton Way would not impact fire services or access33, and have provided conditions of approval for the Project. Construction activities, which may temporarily restrict vehicular traffic, would be required to implement adequate and appropriate measures to facilitate the passage of persons and 31 California Department of Toxic Substance Control, htto://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.Qov/public/search.asp?cmd=search&reporttvpe=CORTESE&site type=CSITES,ERAP,OPEN,FUDS,C LOSE&StatUS=ACT.BKLG.COM&rePOrttItIeHARDOUS+WASTE+AND+SUBSTANCES SITE LIST site accessed May 2,2011. 32 City of Grand Terrace General Plan EIR,Appendix A,April 27,2010 33 Telephone conversation with Mark Anderson,Fire Prevention Specialist,October 2010. Page 36 of 65 esult, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? 3°Barton Plaza Initial Study and Environmental Analysis,December 18,2008 Page 35 of 65 Page 33 of 65 Construction Emissions During the construction phase, GHG emissions will be released through the burning of fossil fuels in construction equipment. During Phase 1 of construction, the Project's worst-case GHG emissions are expected to be approximately 5, 629 pounds per day of CO2 equivalents. During Phase 2 of construction, the Project's worst-case GHG emissions are expected to be approximately 4,844 pounds per day of CO2 equivalents. There are no significant criteria for these emissions at this time. Given the scope of the Project in relation to the region construction related GHG emissions would not be considered significant. Additionally, Page 29 of 65 ercial building and parking lot, the site is vacant. The site is relatively level with onsite grades trending downward east to west. Page 2 of 65 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Environmental Initial Study Barton Plaza Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated vehicles through/around any required road closures. Therefore, a less than significant impact will occur. Finding: Less Than Significant Impact. No mitigation is required. h. Expose people or structures to a ❑ ❑ ❑ p significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? The Project site is not located within or in proximity to a designed Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone as shown on Exhibit 4F-1 of the General Plan. Additionally, construction of the Project would be in accordance with current building and fire codes. Therefore, the potential for a significant impact related to wildland fires is not expected to occur. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation is required. IX. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY—Would the project: a. Violate any water quality standards ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ or waste discharge requirements? The southeast corner of the Project site is developed and the remainder of the site is vacant. The developer will also be subject to standard permitting requirements relating to water quality. Any site disturbance of an acre or more is required to obtain an NPDES permit, which includes the preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The purpose of the SWPPP is to identify various best management practices (BMPs) that would prevent and reduce construction-related pollutants from entering local drainage ways. These BMPs may include the use of gravel bags, silt fences, hay bales, check dams, hydroseed, and soil binders. The construction contractor will be required to operate and maintain these controls throughout the diuration-of--on-site activities. The-use of these-BMPswoutd-prevent erosion from occurring and construction-related sediment from entering nearby waterways. The applicant has submitted a preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) to address post-construction water quality measures that will be put in place. Storm waters will be directed to onsite catch basins that have filter devices in them to treat storm waters. Storm water is then conveyed to an underground storage filtration system at the northwest corner of the site. With implementation of the identified BMPs in the WQMP, runoff from the Project site would be reduced and flows would be treated before leaving the site; thereby maintaining existing water quality. Other operational BMP's include regular inspection of the infiltration system and catch basins, and regular upkeep of the site, such as litter pickup and parking lot sweeping. sa Water Quality Management Plan for Barton Plaza, Collins &Associates Engineering Inc. March 24, 2011 Page 37 of 65 ng the construction phase, GHG emissions will be released through the burning of fossil fuels in construction equipment. During Phase 1 of construction, the Project's worst-case GHG emissions are expected to be approximately 5, 629 pounds per day of CO2 equivalents. During Phase 2 of construction, the Project's worst-case GHG emissions are expected to be approximately 4,844 pounds per day of CO2 equivalents. There are no significant criteria for these emissions at this time. Given the scope of the Project in relation to the region construction related GHG emissions would not be considered significant. Additionally, Page 29 of 65 ercial building and parking lot, the site is vacant. The site is relatively level with onsite grades trending downward east to west. Page 2 of 65 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Environmental Initial Study Barton Plaza - Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated Adherence to BMP's during and after construction would reduce potential water quality impacts to a less than significant level. Finding: Less Than Significant Impact. No mitigation is required. b. Substantially deplete groundwater ❑ ❑ l ❑ supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? The Project site is underlain by the Riverside-Arlington Sub basin of the Upper Santa Ana Valley Groundwater Basin which encompasses approximately 58,600 acre.35 The project site would be provided water service through an existing distribution system owned and operated by the Riverside Highland Water Company. The RHWC provides domestic and irrigation water services to the City of Grand Terrace, portions of the City of Colton, and portions of the unincorporated areas of the Counties of San Bernardino and Riverside. The majority of the Project site would be permanently covered with impermeable surfaces. This area represents 0.006 percent of the total area of the local groundwater basin's area. Therefore, the project would not adversely interfere with groundwater recharge. The Project would increase the overall demand for water within the RHWC service area. However, build-out of the City has been considered and accounted for within the Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) prepared by RHWC. Re-designation of the northerly 0.75 acres from-AP to BRSP-VC witl-not-adversetyraffect--water supplies-because butte-ttre-current-arid proposed designations allow commercial uses, including the restaurant use proposed on this portion of the site. Additionally, the Project has been reviewed by RHWC, and RHWC has indicated that they can serve the Project36. Therefore, the Project will not adversely impact water supplies. Finding: Less than Significant Impact. No mitigation is required. 35 Environmental Impact Report Grand Terrace Town Square Master Development Plan,July 27,2010. 38 Conversation with Don Hough,RHWC General Manager,May 3,2011. Page 38 of 65 duced and flows would be treated before leaving the site; thereby maintaining existing water quality. Other operational BMP's include regular inspection of the infiltration system and catch basins, and regular upkeep of the site, such as litter pickup and parking lot sweeping. sa Water Quality Management Plan for Barton Plaza, Collins &Associates Engineering Inc. March 24, 2011 Page 37 of 65 ng the construction phase, GHG emissions will be released through the burning of fossil fuels in construction equipment. During Phase 1 of construction, the Project's worst-case GHG emissions are expected to be approximately 5, 629 pounds per day of CO2 equivalents. During Phase 2 of construction, the Project's worst-case GHG emissions are expected to be approximately 4,844 pounds per day of CO2 equivalents. There are no significant criteria for these emissions at this time. Given the scope of the Project in relation to the region construction related GHG emissions would not be considered significant. Additionally, Page 29 of 65 ercial building and parking lot, the site is vacant. The site is relatively level with onsite grades trending downward east to west. Page 2 of 65 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Environmental Initial Study Barton Plaza Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated c. Substantially alter the existing 1:3 El drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in a substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? d. Substantially alter the existing ❑ ❑ E ❑ drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? IX c and d: There are no onsite streams or rivers. As identified in the Preliminary Hydrology Study prepared for the Project, in the present condition, off-site runoff from the west side of Mount Vernon Avenue flows onto Britton Way and is conveyed west. The east side of Mount Vernon flows into an existing catch basin at the southeast corner of existing Britton Way and Mount Vernon Avenue,which is then conveyed to Britton Way. Runoff from the north half of the Project (north of Britton Way) and including runoff from the vacant land north of the Project site flows southwesterly to Britton Way. The area with the existing commercial building flows to Mount Vernon Avenue and is conveyed north, then ultimately onto Britton Way. The remainder of the site flows northwesterly onto Britton Way. Thus, on and offsite runoff, eventually makes its way to Britton Way where it flows westward to other catch basins in Britton Way continuing through the storm drain system. 37 In the developed condition the site will be designed to match the drainage patterns of the existing condition. To adjust for the grade differences, retaining walls will be constructed along the-north-and-west-proper lines; e-adjust-fer-the-elesure-ef-Britton-Way new storm dtdirdine— and catch basins will be constructed to continue to convey runoff that enters from the Mount Vernon Avenue to Britton Way, west of the Project site. All on site drainage will be conveyed via onsite inlets and storm drain lines to the proposed underground filtration system at the northwest corner of the site for water quality treatment, before discharging into Britton Way. The proposed drainage pattern essentially matches the existing condition and therefore, it does not result in adverse on or offsite erosion. As shown in the Preliminary Hydrology Study, development of the Project site would result in an a slight increase in runoff of 0.2 cfs during a 10 year storm event and of 0.3 cfs during a 100-year storm event, from the existing condition. However, development in the City is required to design the Project so that post-development 37 Preliminary Hydrology Study Grand Terrace Commercial Plaza,Collins&Associates Engineering,Inc.March 2011. Page 39 of 65 65 ng the construction phase, GHG emissions will be released through the burning of fossil fuels in construction equipment. During Phase 1 of construction, the Project's worst-case GHG emissions are expected to be approximately 5, 629 pounds per day of CO2 equivalents. During Phase 2 of construction, the Project's worst-case GHG emissions are expected to be approximately 4,844 pounds per day of CO2 equivalents. There are no significant criteria for these emissions at this time. Given the scope of the Project in relation to the region construction related GHG emissions would not be considered significant. Additionally, Page 29 of 65 ercial building and parking lot, the site is vacant. The site is relatively level with onsite grades trending downward east to west. Page 2 of 65 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Environmental Initial Study Barton Plaza Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated flows leaving the project site are not greater than pre-development runoff flow rates. Therefore, this slight increase in post-development flows would be attenuated by the underground treatment basins, which would not only treat runoff for water quality but to ensure that flows leaving the site would be no greater than what currently exists. Therefore, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. Finding: Less Than Significant Impact. No mitigation is required. e. Create or contribute runoff water ❑ ❑ p ❑ which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. Refer to Sections IX c and d. Finding: Less Than Significant Impact. No mitigation is required. f. Otherwise substantially degrade ❑ ❑ p ❑ water quality? Refer to Section IX.a. Finding: Less Than Significant Impact. No mitigation is required. g. Place housing within a 100-year ❑ ❑ ❑ p flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h. Place within 100-year flood hazard ❑ ❑ ❑ p area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? IX.g and h: No residential uses are associated with the Project. As depicted on Exhibit 4G-1 of the General Plan EIR38, the Project site is not located within a Flood Hazard Zone. Therefore, no adverse flooding impact to housing or structures will occur. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation is required. 38 City of Grand Terrace General Plan EIR,Section 4G.3,April 27,2010 Page 40 of 65 sins will be constructed to continue to convey runoff that enters from the Mount Vernon Avenue to Britton Way, west of the Project site. All on site drainage will be conveyed via onsite inlets and storm drain lines to the proposed underground filtration system at the northwest corner of the site for water quality treatment, before discharging into Britton Way. The proposed drainage pattern essentially matches the existing condition and therefore, it does not result in adverse on or offsite erosion. As shown in the Preliminary Hydrology Study, development of the Project site would result in an a slight increase in runoff of 0.2 cfs during a 10 year storm event and of 0.3 cfs during a 100-year storm event, from the existing condition. However, development in the City is required to design the Project so that post-development 37 Preliminary Hydrology Study Grand Terrace Commercial Plaza,Collins&Associates Engineering,Inc.March 2011. Page 39 of 65 65 ng the construction phase, GHG emissions will be released through the burning of fossil fuels in construction equipment. During Phase 1 of construction, the Project's worst-case GHG emissions are expected to be approximately 5, 629 pounds per day of CO2 equivalents. During Phase 2 of construction, the Project's worst-case GHG emissions are expected to be approximately 4,844 pounds per day of CO2 equivalents. There are no significant criteria for these emissions at this time. Given the scope of the Project in relation to the region construction related GHG emissions would not be considered significant. Additionally, Page 29 of 65 ercial building and parking lot, the site is vacant. The site is relatively level with onsite grades trending downward east to west. Page 2 of 65 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Environmental Initial Study Barton Plaza Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated i. Expose people or structures to a ❑ ❑ ❑ p significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? According to Exhibit 4G-1 of the General Plan EIR, the subject site is not located within a Flood Hazard Zone. There are no major dams or levees located within the surrounding subject site that would create significant risk of flooding if they were to fail. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation is required. j. Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or ❑ ❑ ❑ p mudflow? As discussed in the General Plan EIR (Appendix A)39, the City is not exposed to conditions triggering inundation by seiche, tsunami or mudflow; therefore, no impact will occur. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation is required. X. LAND USE AND PLANNING —Would the project: a. Physically divide an established ❑ ❑ ❑ lE community? The 3.86-acre site contains an existing 6,900 square foot commercial building and the remainder of,the site is vacant. The north portion of the site is proposed to be re-zoned from Administrative Professional (AP) to BRSP-Village Commercial (BRSP-VC). However, the AP designation also allowed commercial uses; therefore, BRSP-VC land uses would be similar to the AP designation, which in fact also allows market, retail and food service uses, and is consistent with intended commercial land uses. Britton Way through the Project site was previously vacated in 2008. The Project design would eliminate through access to create a cohesive commercial center on commercially designated land. Therefore, the Project would not divide-an-establis+red-community;arid-no-sigrr No mitigation is required. Finding: Less Than Significant Impact. No mitigation is required. b. Conflict with any applicable land use ❑ ❑ p ❑ plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or 39 City of Grand Terrace General Plan EIR,Appendix A,April 27,2010 Page 41 of 65 tion and therefore, it does not result in adverse on or offsite erosion. As shown in the Preliminary Hydrology Study, development of the Project site would result in an a slight increase in runoff of 0.2 cfs during a 10 year storm event and of 0.3 cfs during a 100-year storm event, from the existing condition. However, development in the City is required to design the Project so that post-development 37 Preliminary Hydrology Study Grand Terrace Commercial Plaza,Collins&Associates Engineering,Inc.March 2011. Page 39 of 65 65 ng the construction phase, GHG emissions will be released through the burning of fossil fuels in construction equipment. During Phase 1 of construction, the Project's worst-case GHG emissions are expected to be approximately 5, 629 pounds per day of CO2 equivalents. During Phase 2 of construction, the Project's worst-case GHG emissions are expected to be approximately 4,844 pounds per day of CO2 equivalents. There are no significant criteria for these emissions at this time. Given the scope of the Project in relation to the region construction related GHG emissions would not be considered significant. Additionally, Page 29 of 65 ercial building and parking lot, the site is vacant. The site is relatively level with onsite grades trending downward east to west. Page 2 of 65 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Environmental Initial Study Barton Plaza Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated mitigating an environmental effect? The 3.6-acre Project site is designated General Commercial on the General Plan Land Use Map and zoned BRSP-VC on the Zoning Map, with the exception of the northerly 0.75 acres, which is currently, designated Office Commercial and Administrative Professional, respectively, but for which a general plan amendment, zone change and specific plan amendment are proposed. The zone change/specific plan amendment would include the 0.75 acres into the boundaries of BRSP and change the zoning to BRSP-VC; and the general plan amendment would re- designate the land to General Commercial, consistent with the remainder of the site. from Off The General Commercial Land Use designation is intended for general commercial uses to serve the retail and service needs of the community. The BSRP-VC zoning designation is intended to allow for varied types of commercial development such as cafes, bakeries, gift shops, florist shops, bookstores, and other similar commercial retail uses of a scale and quality that are compatible with a pedestrian-oriented village atmosphere. The proposed drug store, grocery, retail and restaurant uses are consistent with the intended uses of both the General Plan and BRSP-VC designation. Further, the incorporation of the 0.75 acres into the BRSP is appropriate because it results in cohesive development of the commercial corner in terms of land uses and development standards. The Project promotes Land Use Element Policies 2.32 and 2.34 to maintain and develop the commercial corridor and to avoid strip commercial projects; and Circulation Element Policy 3.1.7 to maintain LOS D at peak hours. The Project is consistent with Open Space and Conservation Element Policies 4.8.1 and 4.8.2 regarding protection of water quality. Spoecifically, ,ahe City has d address evaluated the Project in both the CEQA and Project-reviewprocess potential point and non-point sources of groundwater contamination; enforcing compliance with NPDES, WQMP, BMP and RWQCB requirements. The Project conforms to Noise Element Policy 6.2.1 regarding potential noise impacts because the Project has been evaluated for potential noise impacts and appropriate mitigation is being applied. The Project promotes the Sustainable Development Element in that recycling will incorporated during construction (Policy 9.2.2), and the Walgreens and the Market buildings gs (Policypr� � nerg � � 9 Therefore;the-Project-doesi iut ccnftict-w armin � ��e �t�a purpose or tie of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. No mitigation is required. Finding: Less Than Significant Impact. No mitigation is required. c. Conflict with any applicable habitat El conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? The Project Site is not located within a habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan area; therefore, no impact will occur. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation is required. Page 42 of 65 HG emissions are expected to be approximately 4,844 pounds per day of CO2 equivalents. There are no significant criteria for these emissions at this time. Given the scope of the Project in relation to the region construction related GHG emissions would not be considered significant. Additionally, Page 29 of 65 ercial building and parking lot, the site is vacant. The site is relatively level with onsite grades trending downward east to west. Page 2 of 65 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Environmental Initial Study Barton Plaza Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated Xl. MINERAL RESOURCES —Would the project: a. Result in the loss of availability of a ❑ ❑ ❑ known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b. Result in the loss of availability of a ❑ ❑ ❑ p locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Xl.a and b: No significant mineral resources have been identified in the City40. Therefore, a less than significant impact will occur. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation is required. XII. NOISE—Would the project result in: a. Exposure of persons to or ❑ l ❑ ❑ generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? Implementation of the Project would create both short-term and long-term noise sources. The City's General Plan Noise Element establishes exterior noise levels of 65 dBA and interior noise levels 45 dBA for residential land uses, and establishes noise/land use compatibility noise levels of conditionally acceptable at 60 dBA CNEL for residential land uses41. The majority of the land surrounding the project is commercial property; with residential land uses to the northwest and across Mount Vernon to the east. Short Term Impacts Short-term noise impacts associated with on-site excavation, grading, and building construction will occur during each phase of the Project. (Although the Project is phased, the entire site will be graded at one time.) Short-term construction-related noise levels would be higher than existing ambient noise levels in the project area today but would no longer occur once construction activities have been completed. 4°City of Grand Terrace General Plan EIR,Appendix A,April 27,2010 41 Grand Terrace General Plan Noise Element,April 27,2010 Page 43 of 65 NPDES, WQMP, BMP and RWQCB requirements. The Project conforms to Noise Element Policy 6.2.1 regarding potential noise impacts because the Project has been evaluated for potential noise impacts and appropriate mitigation is being applied. The Project promotes the Sustainable Development Element in that recycling will incorporated during construction (Policy 9.2.2), and the Walgreens and the Market buildings gs (Policypr� � nerg � � 9 Therefore;the-Project-doesi iut ccnftict-w armin � ��e �t�a purpose or tie of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. No mitigation is required. Finding: Less Than Significant Impact. No mitigation is required. c. Conflict with any applicable habitat El conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? The Project Site is not located within a habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan area; therefore, no impact will occur. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation is required. Page 42 of 65 HG emissions are expected to be approximately 4,844 pounds per day of CO2 equivalents. There are no significant criteria for these emissions at this time. Given the scope of the Project in relation to the region construction related GHG emissions would not be considered significant. Additionally, Page 29 of 65 ercial building and parking lot, the site is vacant. The site is relatively level with onsite grades trending downward east to west. Page 2 of 65 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Environmental Initial Study Barton Plaza Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated As discussed in the original Initial Study42, construction is completed in discrete steps, each of which has its own mix of equipment and, consequently, its own noise characteristics. These various sequential phases would change the character of the noise generated on the site and, therefore, the noise levels surrounding the site as construction progresses. Despite the variety in the type and size of construction equipment, similarities in the dominant noise sources and patterns of operation allow construction-related noise ranges to be categorized by work phase. The site preparation phase, which includes excavation and grading of the site, tends to generate the highest noise levels because the noisiest construction equipment is typically earthmoving equipment. Earthmoving equipment includes excavating machinery such as backfillers, bulldozers, draglines, and front loaders. Earthmoving and compacting equipment includes compactors, scrapers, and graders. Construction of the proposed Project is expected to require the use of earthmovers, bulldozers, and water and pickup trucks. The maximum noise level generated by each earthmover on the proposed project site is assumed to be 88 dBA Lmax43 at 50 feet from the earthmover. Each bulldozer would also generate 88 dBA Lmax at 50 feet. The maximum noise level generated by water and pickup trucks is approximately 86 dBA Lmax at 50 feet from these vehicles. Each doubling of the sound sources with equal strength increases the noise level by 3 dBA. Assuming that each piece of construction equipment operates at some distance from the other equipment, the worst-case combined noise level during this phase of construction would be 91 dBA Lmax at a distance of 50 feet from the active construction area. The residences nearest to the project site are within 50 feet of the northwest Project site boundary. These residences may be subject to short-term, intermittent noise generated by construction activities on the project site. Construction-related noise impacts from the proposed project would be above the City's identified exterior and interior noise levels of 65 dBA CNEL and 45 dBA CNEL. However, Section 8.108.040.D. of the City's Noise Ordinance exempts noise sources associated with construction or grading, provided those activities do not occur between the hours of eight p.m. and seven a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Nevertheless, to minimize potential short term noise impacts to adjacent residential uses, Mitigation Measures NOS-1 through NOS-04 have been incorporated into the Project to reduce short term noise impact to less than significant levels. Mitigation Measures NOS-01: During all Project site excavation and grading on site, the project contractors shall equip all construction-equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers consistent with manufacturers' standards. NOS-02: The Project contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site. 42 Barton Plaza Initial Study and Environmental Analysis,December 18,2008 43 dLmax=The maximum sound level Page 44 of 65 se emissions at this time. Given the scope of the Project in relation to the region construction related GHG emissions would not be considered significant. Additionally, Page 29 of 65 ercial building and parking lot, the site is vacant. The site is relatively level with onsite grades trending downward east to west. Page 2 of 65 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY • Environmental Initial Study Barton Plaza Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated NOS-03: The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging, building materials, and grading debris a minimum of 50 feet from the west property line during all Project construction. NOS-04: On-site construction activities shall be restricted to the hours permitted under the City's Noise Ordinance. The Noise Ordinance prohibits noise associated with construction activities between the hours of eight p.m. and seven am. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Long-Term Impacts Potential long-term stationary noise impacts would primarily be associated with operation of proposed onsite uses. The proposed on-site commercial uses would generate noise from truck delivery, loading/unloading activities at the loading areas, and other noise-producing activities at the parking lots, such as speakerphone usage. These activities are potential noise point sources that could affect noise sensitive receptors such as existing residential to the northwest and northeast of the Project site; however they are intermittent uses that vary with operation of the uses. Noise levels from the proposed Project are not anticipated to have a significant impact to the nearest sensitive land uses (residential). The worst case unmitigated noise level from the project site would range from 58.7 (residential to the west) to 59.0 (commercial uses to the west) dBA Leg during daytime hours. Although this represents an increase in noise levels, the noise levels do not exceed the City's noise level thresholds of 65 dBA (exterior) for residential land uses, or the Noise/Land Use Compatibility Index which finds that noise levels less than 60 dBA are generally acceptable. Further, with the incorporation of the following mitigation measures, stationary noise levels will be further reduced to less approximately 56 dBA. Therefore, with incorporation of Mitigation Measures NOS-05 through NOS-7, a less than significant noise impact will occur. Mitigation-Measure: NOS-05: A six-foot high shielding wall shall be constructed along the northwest corner property line (adjacent to residential units) and along the Market (Phase II) loading dock. NOS-06: Truck deliveries and loading dock activity shall be limited to between the hours of 7:00 AM to 9:00 PM. NOS-07: Deliveries should limit their engines to idle 5 minutes or less. Trucks should be encouraged to turn off engines once they reach loading dock destination. Finding: Less Than Significant Impact with Implementation of Mitigation Page 45 of 65 significant levels. Mitigation Measures NOS-01: During all Project site excavation and grading on site, the project contractors shall equip all construction-equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers consistent with manufacturers' standards. NOS-02: The Project contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site. 42 Barton Plaza Initial Study and Environmental Analysis,December 18,2008 43 dLmax=The maximum sound level Page 44 of 65 se emissions at this time. Given the scope of the Project in relation to the region construction related GHG emissions would not be considered significant. Additionally, Page 29 of 65 ercial building and parking lot, the site is vacant. The site is relatively level with onsite grades trending downward east to west. Page 2 of 65 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Environmental Initial Study Barton Plaza Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated b. Exposure of persons to or ❑ ❑ ❑ generation of excessive groundbourne vibration or groundbourne noise levels? Vibration refers to groundborne noise and perceptible motion. Some common sources of ground-borne vibration are trains, buses on rough roads, and construction activities such as blasting, pile-driving and the operation of heavy earthmoving equipment. The rumbling sound caused by the vibration of equipment during construction building structures is referred to as ground-borne noise. The Project site is not near a rail line, and roadways in the Project area are paved and would not result in traffic driving over rough roads. Construction activities for the Project site do not include blasting or pile driving. -The primary vibratory source during the construction of the proposed project would be large bulldozers. The primary receptors of potential groundborne vibration impacts are the residences to the west during grading operations. However, any groundborne vibration generated will be short term limited to during grading. Additionally, grading and construction activities are regulated by the City's Municipal Code. Therefore, adherence to Municipal Code Section 8.108.040.D which prohibits vibration created by construction activities between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. Monday through Saturday, and at any time on Sunday or a national holiday, will reduce impacts to a level below significance and no mitigation is required. Finding: Less Than Significant Impact. No mitigation is required. c. A substantial permanent increase in ❑ ❑ ❑ ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Roadway traffic along Barton Road and Mount Vernon would be the main source of off-site roadway noise impacting the Project site. The projected build-out average daily traffic volumes taken from the Traffic Impact Analysis were used to predict the exterior noise levels for the Project. The General Plan EIR indicates that the normally acceptable exterior residential noise standard is 65 dBA CNEL. A significant impact would be created if Project-generated traffic does not exceed the 65 dBA threshold but adds 5 dBA CNEL or more to existing noise levels. Although'the Project will be phased, noise level increases were tabulated at Project build-out conditions. Project-generated traffic will create noise levels of 65.6 dBA CNEL from the centerline of Barton Road and 64.0 dBA CNEL from the centerline of Mount Vernon Avenue. This results in an increase of 1.5 dBA CNEL and 1.6 dBA CNEL, respectively.45 Noise level increases are less than 5 dBA CNEL; further, exterior noise levels for the residential uses will 44 Grand Terrace General Plan Noise Element,April 27,2010 45 Mt. Vernon Avenue and Barton Road Commercial Center Acoustical Study,RK Engineering Group,Inc.March 22,2011 Page 46 of 65 ary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site. 42 Barton Plaza Initial Study and Environmental Analysis,December 18,2008 43 dLmax=The maximum sound level Page 44 of 65 se emissions at this time. Given the scope of the Project in relation to the region construction related GHG emissions would not be considered significant. Additionally, Page 29 of 65 ercial building and parking lot, the site is vacant. The site is relatively level with onsite grades trending downward east to west. Page 2 of 65 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Environmental Initial Study Barton Plaza Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated not be greater than 65 dBA because the residential uses located on Britton Way are over 100 feet from the centerline of Barton Road. Thus, a significant impact will not be created. Finding: Less Than Significant Impact with Implementation of Mitigation. d. A substantial temporary or periodic ❑ I ❑ ❑ increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Refer to response to XII a. above. Finding: Less Than Significant Impact with Implementation of Mitigation. e. For a project located within an ❑ ❑ ❑ p airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f. For a project within the vicinity of a ❑ ❑ ❑ p private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? XII. e and f: Pursuant to the General Plan EIR46, no portion of the City is located within an airport land use plan or within two miles of a public or private airport. Therefore, no airport related noise impacts will occur. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation is required. XIII. POPULATION AND HOUSING —Would the project: a. Include substantial population ❑ ❑ ❑ growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? 46 City of Grand Terrace General Plan EIR,Appendix A,April 27,2010 Page 47 of 65 ? Roadway traffic along Barton Road and Mount Vernon would be the main source of off-site roadway noise impacting the Project site. The projected build-out average daily traffic volumes taken from the Traffic Impact Analysis were used to predict the exterior noise levels for the Project. The General Plan EIR indicates that the normally acceptable exterior residential noise standard is 65 dBA CNEL. A significant impact would be created if Project-generated traffic does not exceed the 65 dBA threshold but adds 5 dBA CNEL or more to existing noise levels. Although'the Project will be phased, noise level increases were tabulated at Project build-out conditions. Project-generated traffic will create noise levels of 65.6 dBA CNEL from the centerline of Barton Road and 64.0 dBA CNEL from the centerline of Mount Vernon Avenue. This results in an increase of 1.5 dBA CNEL and 1.6 dBA CNEL, respectively.45 Noise level increases are less than 5 dBA CNEL; further, exterior noise levels for the residential uses will 44 Grand Terrace General Plan Noise Element,April 27,2010 45 Mt. Vernon Avenue and Barton Road Commercial Center Acoustical Study,RK Engineering Group,Inc.March 22,2011 Page 46 of 65 ary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site. 42 Barton Plaza Initial Study and Environmental Analysis,December 18,2008 43 dLmax=The maximum sound level Page 44 of 65 se emissions at this time. Given the scope of the Project in relation to the region construction related GHG emissions would not be considered significant. Additionally, Page 29 of 65 ercial building and parking lot, the site is vacant. The site is relatively level with onsite grades trending downward east to west. Page 2 of 65 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Environmental Initial Study Barton Plaza ' Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation ' Incorporated The Project site is located within an existing suburban area. The area surrounding the site is currently developed with similar commercial uses and existing residential uses. The existing commercial use is served with all utilities. Gas, electricity, water, and wastewater lines are located in an immediately accessible area within existing adjacent roadways and within the Project site. Because the proposed Project would be constructed in an area currently fully serviced by roadway and utility infrastructure, the Project would not induce, either directly or indirectly, growth not previously anticipated by the City or local utility providers. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation is required. b. Displace substantial numbers of ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c. Displace substantial numbers of ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? XIII.b. and c.: The 3.86-acre Project site contains one commercial structure and the remainder of the site is vacant. No aspect of the Project will displace housing or people. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation is required. XIV. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically alterecLgovernmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Cli. Fire protection? ❑ ❑ Fire protection services for the City are provided by the San Bernardino County Fire Protection District (County Fire). Primary fire protection services are operated from the City's only fire station, Station 23 located at 22582 Center City Court in Grand Terrace. This station is staffed by three full-time fire personnel during the fire season (May 1 through November 30) and by two fulltime fire personnel during the non-fire season (December 1 through April 30). The full time Page 48 of 65 es not exceed the 65 dBA threshold but adds 5 dBA CNEL or more to existing noise levels. Although'the Project will be phased, noise level increases were tabulated at Project build-out conditions. Project-generated traffic will create noise levels of 65.6 dBA CNEL from the centerline of Barton Road and 64.0 dBA CNEL from the centerline of Mount Vernon Avenue. This results in an increase of 1.5 dBA CNEL and 1.6 dBA CNEL, respectively.45 Noise level increases are less than 5 dBA CNEL; further, exterior noise levels for the residential uses will 44 Grand Terrace General Plan Noise Element,April 27,2010 45 Mt. Vernon Avenue and Barton Road Commercial Center Acoustical Study,RK Engineering Group,Inc.March 22,2011 Page 46 of 65 ary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site. 42 Barton Plaza Initial Study and Environmental Analysis,December 18,2008 43 dLmax=The maximum sound level Page 44 of 65 se emissions at this time. Given the scope of the Project in relation to the region construction related GHG emissions would not be considered significant. Additionally, Page 29 of 65 ercial building and parking lot, the site is vacant. The site is relatively level with onsite grades trending downward east to west. Page 2 of 65 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Environmental Initial Study Barton Plaza Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated personnel are augmented by an on-call company of 20 paid call firefighters who respond to fire and rescue calls and provide response coverage to the station when on-duty personnel are committed to an emergency call. Equipment stationed at Station 23 includes a Type 1 Fire Engine, Type 3 Rescue, Type 2 Squad Truck, and a shoring trailer. The City of Grand Terrace is located in one Fire Demand Zone. The combined average response time is 5 minutes, 23 seconds. All fire personnel and facilities of County Fire are available to the City's contract fire services. In the event of an emergency that challenges existing capabilities, the City of Grand Terrace may also request assistance from surrounding jurisdictions pursuant to established mutual aid agreements.47 Development of the proposed Project may incrementally increase the demand for fire protection services. The proposed Project would be designed and constructed per applicable fire prevention/protection standards, including the determination of the water supply to meet fire flow requirements. Fire Department personnel have reviewed the proposed Project including site plans and determined that the serroject can e vice. Thereforeb impacts served relat d to the provision established of fire protection approval for fire protection sery services are less than significant and no mitigation is required. Findings: Less Than Significant Impact. No mitigation is required. ii. Police protection? Police services to the Project area would be provided by the San Bernardino County Sheriffs Department (SBCSD). Development of the proposed commercial and restaurant uses may result in an incremental increase in demand for police protection services. Sheriffs Department personnel have reviewed the proposed Project and no service issues were identified49. Therefore, impacts related to the provision for police protection services to a less than significant level Findings: Less Than Significant Impact. No mitigation is required. iii. Schools? School facilities and services are provided by the Colton Joint Unified School District (CJUSD). While the commercial Project will not generate students, it is subject to the payment of development, which are currently assessed at $0.47 per square foot of commercial development.50 These fees would go to CJUSD to compensate for the impacts of the commercial uses on local school capacity and the maintenance of adequate classroom seating and facilities. Therefore, a less than significant impact would occur and no mitigation is required. 41 Grand Terrace General Plan April 27,2010. 48 San Bernardino County Fire Conditions of Approval,May 5,2011 49 Email Correspondence from Sergeant Finneran,April 21,2011 5°Correspondence from Darryl Taylor,Director,Facilities Planning&Construction,April 8,2011 Page 49 of 65 Study,RK Engineering Group,Inc.March 22,2011 Page 46 of 65 ary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site. 42 Barton Plaza Initial Study and Environmental Analysis,December 18,2008 43 dLmax=The maximum sound level Page 44 of 65 se emissions at this time. Given the scope of the Project in relation to the region construction related GHG emissions would not be considered significant. Additionally, Page 29 of 65 ercial building and parking lot, the site is vacant. The site is relatively level with onsite grades trending downward east to west. Page 2 of 65 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Environmental Initial Study Barton Plaza Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With t Mitigation Incorporated Findings: Less Than Significant Impact. No mitigation is required. iv. Parks? CI The proposed commercial use is subject to Chapter c aler dov not oper directlydirectplyct generates) f population the Grand Terrace Municipal Code. Although comm project increases, developers of commercial project s must pinto the Parkland of $0.51 per Acquisition Fund for the future acquisitionparkland and open space. Payment square foot of commercial space satisfies the developer's impact to parks. Therefore, a less than significant impact would occur and no mitigation is required. Findings: No Impact. No mitigation is required. v. Other public facilities? The proposed project would result in the development of an approximately 37,700 square foot commercial center and would increase additionalre assenger ar trips on local roads. oTraffic Signal 4.80 of the Grand Terrace MunicipalCode requires the assessment Improvement and Arterial Improvement Fees of designated nated fund the streetsStThelon of traffic City determinesrthe timentsming which will improve the carrying capacity 9 of necessary roadway improvements to ensure Chat construction and needed's performance standards to ensuee that ments occurs before the LOS degrades beyond City's impacts are avoided. Pursuant to Chapter 4.80 of the Municipal Code, the developer is also required to pay General onal eneral Facilities impact fees, which will be used demanlre or d from additiontal aesilde tsgand bus ne'sses. vehicles and equipment to contend with the To offset the increase in storm runoff created bedused tment theto extend the eveIoper sameNlelvel be drainage subject to Storm Drainage impact fees, which will protection currently provided to existing development. No mitigation is required. Findings: No Impact. No mitigation is required. XV. RECREATION ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 a. Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? Page 50 of 65 ial development.50 These fees would go to CJUSD to compensate for the impacts of the commercial uses on local school capacity and the maintenance of adequate classroom seating and facilities. Therefore, a less than significant impact would occur and no mitigation is required. 41 Grand Terrace General Plan April 27,2010. 48 San Bernardino County Fire Conditions of Approval,May 5,2011 49 Email Correspondence from Sergeant Finneran,April 21,2011 5°Correspondence from Darryl Taylor,Director,Facilities Planning&Construction,April 8,2011 Page 49 of 65 Study,RK Engineering Group,Inc.March 22,2011 Page 46 of 65 ary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site. 42 Barton Plaza Initial Study and Environmental Analysis,December 18,2008 43 dLmax=The maximum sound level Page 44 of 65 se emissions at this time. Given the scope of the Project in relation to the region construction related GHG emissions would not be considered significant. Additionally, Page 29 of 65 ercial building and parking lot, the site is vacant. The site is relatively level with onsite grades trending downward east to west. Page 2 of 65 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Environmental Initial Study Barton Plaza Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated b. Does the project include ❑ ❑ ❑ p _ recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? XV.a and b: The 3.86-acre Project site contains an existing 6,900 square foot commercial structure and the remainder of the site is vacant. The Project site is intended for commercial uses and the Project entails the construction-of a commercial center. The Project does not contain nor propose any residential uses that would increase the number of residents that would utilize recreational facilities. Therefore, no impact to parks or other recreational facilities would occur and no mitigation is required. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation is required. XVI. TRANSPORATION/TRAFFIC —Would the project: a. Cause an increase in traffic which is ❑ ❑ ❑ substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? A Traffic Impact Study was prepared by RK Engineering Group, Inc. to analyze Project- generated impacts. Because the Project is proposed to be constructed in two phases, the Study analyzed traffic impacts associated with development of Phase 1 (Walgreens and renovation of existing building) and traffic impacts associated with build-out, which includes Phase 1 development—and development of Phase 2 (Market and new 5,400 square foot building). Phase 1 of the Project will generate a total net increase of 1,202 daily trips, and Project build-out would generate a net increase of 2,529 daily trips.51 51 Mount Vernon Avenue and Barton Road Commercial Center Traffic Impact Study,RK Engineering Group,Inc.June 9,2011. Page 51 of 65 required. Findings: No Impact. No mitigation is required. XV. RECREATION ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 a. Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? Page 50 of 65 ial development.50 These fees would go to CJUSD to compensate for the impacts of the commercial uses on local school capacity and the maintenance of adequate classroom seating and facilities. Therefore, a less than significant impact would occur and no mitigation is required. 41 Grand Terrace General Plan April 27,2010. 48 San Bernardino County Fire Conditions of Approval,May 5,2011 49 Email Correspondence from Sergeant Finneran,April 21,2011 5°Correspondence from Darryl Taylor,Director,Facilities Planning&Construction,April 8,2011 Page 49 of 65 Study,RK Engineering Group,Inc.March 22,2011 Page 46 of 65 ary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site. 42 Barton Plaza Initial Study and Environmental Analysis,December 18,2008 43 dLmax=The maximum sound level Page 44 of 65 se emissions at this time. Given the scope of the Project in relation to the region construction related GHG emissions would not be considered significant. Additionally, Page 29 of 65 ercial building and parking lot, the site is vacant. The site is relatively level with onsite grades trending downward east to west. Page 2 of 65 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Environmental Initial Study Barton Plaza Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated Table 7 Phase 1 and Project Build-out (Phase 1 & 2)Trip Generation a c Peak Hour _ ° AM PM 41,� la Condition In Out Total In Out Total Daily m 0 Proposed 20 15 35 67 67 134 - 1,202 Net Total Peak Hour N c od 2 AM PM Condition In Out Total In Out Total Daily co c a. 0 Proposed 62 49 111 137 127 264 2,529 Net Total Source:RK Engineering Group,Inc.2011 The City's General Plan Circulation Element.requires that all intersections operate at a level of service (LOS) of D or better. Any intersection operating at an LOS of E or F would be deficient Fourteen study intersections were included in the Traffic Impact Study. These intersections are currently operating at acceptable levels of service. The Traffic Study evaluated LOS for the 14 intersections for Phase 1 Year 2012, shown in Table 8 and for Project build-out Year 2016 (Phase 1 and 2) , shown in Table 9. Page 52 of 65 to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? A Traffic Impact Study was prepared by RK Engineering Group, Inc. to analyze Project- generated impacts. Because the Project is proposed to be constructed in two phases, the Study analyzed traffic impacts associated with development of Phase 1 (Walgreens and renovation of existing building) and traffic impacts associated with build-out, which includes Phase 1 development—and development of Phase 2 (Market and new 5,400 square foot building). Phase 1 of the Project will generate a total net increase of 1,202 daily trips, and Project build-out would generate a net increase of 2,529 daily trips.51 51 Mount Vernon Avenue and Barton Road Commercial Center Traffic Impact Study,RK Engineering Group,Inc.June 9,2011. Page 51 of 65 required. Findings: No Impact. No mitigation is required. XV. RECREATION ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 a. Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? Page 50 of 65 ial development.50 These fees would go to CJUSD to compensate for the impacts of the commercial uses on local school capacity and the maintenance of adequate classroom seating and facilities. Therefore, a less than significant impact would occur and no mitigation is required. 41 Grand Terrace General Plan April 27,2010. 48 San Bernardino County Fire Conditions of Approval,May 5,2011 49 Email Correspondence from Sergeant Finneran,April 21,2011 5°Correspondence from Darryl Taylor,Director,Facilities Planning&Construction,April 8,2011 Page 49 of 65 Study,RK Engineering Group,Inc.March 22,2011 Page 46 of 65 ary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site. 42 Barton Plaza Initial Study and Environmental Analysis,December 18,2008 43 dLmax=The maximum sound level Page 44 of 65 se emissions at this time. Given the scope of the Project in relation to the region construction related GHG emissions would not be considered significant. Additionally, Page 29 of 65 ercial building and parking lot, the site is vacant. The site is relatively level with onsite grades trending downward east to west. Page 2 of 65 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Environmental Initial Study Barton Plaza Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated Table 8 Opening Year 2012 Levels of Service (Phase 1) Levels of Service Intersections Without Project With Project AM PM AM PM 1-215 Southbound Ramps @ Barton Road D F D F With Mitigation C C , 1-215 Northbound Ramps @ Barton Road A B A B Michigan Street @ Barton Road (CMP) C E D F With Mitigation B D Canal Street @ Barton Road (CMP) B B B B Project Access 1 @ Barton Road N/A N/A B C Project Access 2 @ Barton Road N/A N/A B B Mount Vernon Avenue @ Washington Street B B B B Mount Vernon Avenue @ 1-215 Northbound Ramps C B D B Mount Vernon Avenue @ Grand Terrace Road C C C C Mount Vernon Avenue @ Project Access 3 C B B C Mount Vernon Avenue @ Barton Road (CMP) C C C C Mount Vernon Avenue @ De Berry Street B B B B Mount Vernon Avenue @ Van Burn Avenue B C B C Mount Vernon Avenue @ Main Street C C C C Source:RK Engineering Group,Inc.2011 Page 53 of 65 e the Project is proposed to be constructed in two phases, the Study analyzed traffic impacts associated with development of Phase 1 (Walgreens and renovation of existing building) and traffic impacts associated with build-out, which includes Phase 1 development—and development of Phase 2 (Market and new 5,400 square foot building). Phase 1 of the Project will generate a total net increase of 1,202 daily trips, and Project build-out would generate a net increase of 2,529 daily trips.51 51 Mount Vernon Avenue and Barton Road Commercial Center Traffic Impact Study,RK Engineering Group,Inc.June 9,2011. Page 51 of 65 required. Findings: No Impact. No mitigation is required. XV. RECREATION ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 a. Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? Page 50 of 65 ial development.50 These fees would go to CJUSD to compensate for the impacts of the commercial uses on local school capacity and the maintenance of adequate classroom seating and facilities. Therefore, a less than significant impact would occur and no mitigation is required. 41 Grand Terrace General Plan April 27,2010. 48 San Bernardino County Fire Conditions of Approval,May 5,2011 49 Email Correspondence from Sergeant Finneran,April 21,2011 5°Correspondence from Darryl Taylor,Director,Facilities Planning&Construction,April 8,2011 Page 49 of 65 Study,RK Engineering Group,Inc.March 22,2011 Page 46 of 65 ary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site. 42 Barton Plaza Initial Study and Environmental Analysis,December 18,2008 43 dLmax=The maximum sound level Page 44 of 65 se emissions at this time. Given the scope of the Project in relation to the region construction related GHG emissions would not be considered significant. Additionally, Page 29 of 65 ercial building and parking lot, the site is vacant. The site is relatively level with onsite grades trending downward east to west. Page 2 of 65 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Environmental Initial Study Barton Plaza Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated Table 9 Project Build-out Year 2016 Levels of Service (Phase 1 and 2) Levels of Service Intersections Without Project With Project AM PM AM PM 1-215 Southbound Ramps @ Barton Road D F D F With Mitigation C D 1-215 Northbound Ramps @ Barton Road A C A B Michigan Street @ Barton Road (CMP) D F D F With Mitigation B D Canal Street @ Barton Road (CMP) B B B B Project Access 1 @ Barton Road N/A N/A B D Project Access 2 @ Barton Road N/A N/A B B Mount Vernon Avenue @ Washington Street B B B B Mount Vernon Avenue @ 1-215 Northbound Ramps C B C B Mount Vernon Avenue @ Grand Terrace Road C C C C Mount Vernon Avenue @ Project Access 3 C C B C Mount Vernon Avenue @ Barton Road (CMP) C C , C C Mount Vernon Avenue @ De Berry Street C B B B Mount Vernon Avenue @ Van Burn Avenue B C B C Mount Vernon Avenue @ Main Street C D C D Source:RK Engineering Group,Inc.2011 As shown-above two inteers�ctions (1-215-Southbound Ramps @ Barton Road, and Michigan Street @ Barton Road)would operate at unsatisfactory LOS during the PM peak hours at Phase 1 Year 2012 without development and with development of Phase 1 of the Project. The same two intersections would also operate at unsatisfactory LOS during the PM peak hours at Project Build-out Year 2016 without Project Build-out and with Project build-out of both Phase 1 and 2. It should be noted that these two intersections would operate at unsatisfactory LOS even without the Phase 1 and Project Build-out (Phase 1 and 2); nevertheless, mitigation is required due to the Project's incremental increase to traffic volumes. Implementation of Mitigation Measures TRANS-01 through TRANS-05, will result in satisfactory LOS, as shown in Tables 8 and 9, above, and a less than significant impact will occur. Page 54 of 65 parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? Page 50 of 65 ial development.50 These fees would go to CJUSD to compensate for the impacts of the commercial uses on local school capacity and the maintenance of adequate classroom seating and facilities. Therefore, a less than significant impact would occur and no mitigation is required. 41 Grand Terrace General Plan April 27,2010. 48 San Bernardino County Fire Conditions of Approval,May 5,2011 49 Email Correspondence from Sergeant Finneran,April 21,2011 5°Correspondence from Darryl Taylor,Director,Facilities Planning&Construction,April 8,2011 Page 49 of 65 Study,RK Engineering Group,Inc.March 22,2011 Page 46 of 65 ary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site. 42 Barton Plaza Initial Study and Environmental Analysis,December 18,2008 43 dLmax=The maximum sound level Page 44 of 65 se emissions at this time. Given the scope of the Project in relation to the region construction related GHG emissions would not be considered significant. Additionally, Page 29 of 65 ercial building and parking lot, the site is vacant. The site is relatively level with onsite grades trending downward east to west. Page 2 of 65 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Environmental Initial Study Barton Plaza Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated Mitigation Measures— Phase 1: TRANS-01 Prior to the issuance of grading permits for Phase 1 of the Project, the Developer shall participate in a fair-share contribution, via the payment of Development Impact Fees, for the construction of a southbound left turn lane and an eastbound thru lane at the 1-215 Southbound Ramps and Barton Road., TRANS-02 Prior to the issuance of grading permits for Phase 1 of the Project, the Developer shall participate in a fair-share contribution, via the payment of Development Impact Fees, for the construction of a northbound left-turn lane and Michigan Street and Barton Road. TRANS-03 The Developer shall complete any remaining half-section street improvements along Mount Vernon Avenue and Barton Road, directly adjacent to the Project boundaries. TRANS-04 The Developer shall submit a signing and striping plan prior to the issuance of grading permits, and signing and striping shall be completed prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy of Phase 1. Mitigation Measures—Project Build-out (Phase 1 &2): TRANS-05 Prior to the issuance of building permits for Phase 2 of the Project, the Developer shall implement Mitigation Measures TRANS-01 and TRANS-04, if not already completed. Finding: Less Than Significant Impact with Implementation of Mitigation Measures. b. Conflict with an applicable ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? The Project is required to conform to the requirements of the San Bernardino Congestion Management Program (CMP), administered by SANBAG. In accordance with the CMP Nexus Study, the City has adopted its current transportation development impact fee program. In accordance with City regulations, the Developer is subject to the payment of Traffic Signal Improvement and Circulation Improvement Fees. Page 55 of 65 Page 54 of 65 parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? Page 50 of 65 ial development.50 These fees would go to CJUSD to compensate for the impacts of the commercial uses on local school capacity and the maintenance of adequate classroom seating and facilities. Therefore, a less than significant impact would occur and no mitigation is required. 41 Grand Terrace General Plan April 27,2010. 48 San Bernardino County Fire Conditions of Approval,May 5,2011 49 Email Correspondence from Sergeant Finneran,April 21,2011 5°Correspondence from Darryl Taylor,Director,Facilities Planning&Construction,April 8,2011 Page 49 of 65 Study,RK Engineering Group,Inc.March 22,2011 Page 46 of 65 ary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site. 42 Barton Plaza Initial Study and Environmental Analysis,December 18,2008 43 dLmax=The maximum sound level Page 44 of 65 se emissions at this time. Given the scope of the Project in relation to the region construction related GHG emissions would not be considered significant. Additionally, Page 29 of 65 ercial building and parking lot, the site is vacant. The site is relatively level with onsite grades trending downward east to west. Page 2 of 65 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Environmental Initial Study Barton Plaza Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated Three of the fourteen study intersections are CMP intersections: Michigan Street at Barton Road, Canal Street at Barton Road and Mount Vernon Avenue at Barton Road. Consistent with the CMP, the City has adopted an acceptable LOS of D. As shown Tables 8 and 9, the CMP intersection of Michigan Street and Barton Road will operate at unsatisfactory levels with implementation of Phase 1 - Year 2012 and at Project Build-out-Year 2016 (Phase 1 and 2). Although, not a CMP intersection the same Tables show that the intersection of the 1-215 Southbound ramps at Barton Road would also operate at unsatisfactory LOS. However, incorporation of Mitigation Measures TRANS-01 through TRANS 05, above, will reduce impacts intersection impacts to less than significant levels. Finding: Less Than Significant Impact with Implementation of Mitigation Measures. c. Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? Pursuant to the General Plan EIR, no portion of the City is located within an airport land use plan or within two miles of a public or private airport. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation is required. d. Substantially increase hazards due 0 U to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? The Project is fronted by Barton Road on the south and Mount Vernon Avenue on the east. The Project will have three access points: Project Access 1 is the westerl drivewa on B d-fu urning movemen s are proposed at this intersection, Project Access 2 is the easterly driveway on Barton Road, which is limited to right turn in and right turn out movements and Project Access 3 is the driveway at Mount Vernon Avenue with full turning movements. As shown in Tables 8 and 9, above, Project intersections will operate at satisfactory levels of service. However, the design of the access points for the Project must provide adequate site distance and traffic control measthrou h TRANSres. Therefore, -11 would identified ensure the that impacts related to this Mitigation Measures TRANS-06 g issue remain less than significant. Mitigation Measures —Phase 1: 52 Ibid. Page 56 of 65 Page 50 of 65 ial development.50 These fees would go to CJUSD to compensate for the impacts of the commercial uses on local school capacity and the maintenance of adequate classroom seating and facilities. Therefore, a less than significant impact would occur and no mitigation is required. 41 Grand Terrace General Plan April 27,2010. 48 San Bernardino County Fire Conditions of Approval,May 5,2011 49 Email Correspondence from Sergeant Finneran,April 21,2011 5°Correspondence from Darryl Taylor,Director,Facilities Planning&Construction,April 8,2011 Page 49 of 65 Study,RK Engineering Group,Inc.March 22,2011 Page 46 of 65 ary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site. 42 Barton Plaza Initial Study and Environmental Analysis,December 18,2008 43 dLmax=The maximum sound level Page 44 of 65 se emissions at this time. Given the scope of the Project in relation to the region construction related GHG emissions would not be considered significant. Additionally, Page 29 of 65 ercial building and parking lot, the site is vacant. The site is relatively level with onsite grades trending downward east to west. Page 2 of 65 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Environmental Initial Study Barton Plaza Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated TRANS-06 Construct on-site circulation system per the detailed site plan, including the phasing plan. TRANS-07 Install stop signs, stop bars, and stop legends at all Project access points. TRANS-08 Install one (1) southbound left/right turn land and one (1) eastbound left turn lane at Project Access 1 at Barton Road. TRANS-09 Install one (1) southbound right turn lane at Project Access 2 at Barton Road. TRANS-10 Install one (1) northbound left turn lane at Mount Vernon Avenue and Project Access 3. Mitigation Measures -Project Build-out (Phase 1 & 2): TRANS-11 Prior to the certificate of occupancy, the Developer shall implement Mitigation Measures TRANS-05 and TRANS-10, if not already completed. e. Result in inadequate emergency ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ access? Emergency access to the site will be via Barton Road and Mount Vernon Avenue. The site plan shows that Britton Way will terminate at the west boundary of the Project site and through traffic will no longer be able to access Mount.Vernon Avenue. Emergency access to the uses west of the site will still be available via Canal Street, Terrace Pines Drive and Chaparral Lane. The San Bernardino County Fire Office of the Fire Marshal Community Safety Division has reviewed the Project design and indicated that termination of Britton Way would not impact fire services or access53 and have provided conditions of approval for the Project. Therefore, a less than significant impact will occur FindingrLess-Than-Significant-Impact:Na-mitiigation-is-required. f. Result in inadequate parking ❑ ❑ ❑ capacity? As required by Chapter 18.60 Off-Street Parking of the City's Zoning Code, 180 parking spaces are required to serve on site uses and 182 are proposed to be provided. Further, 102 spaces are required to support Phase 1 (drug store and existing commercial building uses, and 144 spaces will be provided. With the completion of Phase 2 (grocery store, pad building) the remaining 38 spaces will be constructed. Therefore, no impact will occur. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation is required. 53 Telephone conversation with Mark Anderson,Fire Prevention Specialist,October 2010. Page 57 of 65 Mitigation Measures —Phase 1: 52 Ibid. Page 56 of 65 Page 50 of 65 ial development.50 These fees would go to CJUSD to compensate for the impacts of the commercial uses on local school capacity and the maintenance of adequate classroom seating and facilities. Therefore, a less than significant impact would occur and no mitigation is required. 41 Grand Terrace General Plan April 27,2010. 48 San Bernardino County Fire Conditions of Approval,May 5,2011 49 Email Correspondence from Sergeant Finneran,April 21,2011 5°Correspondence from Darryl Taylor,Director,Facilities Planning&Construction,April 8,2011 Page 49 of 65 Study,RK Engineering Group,Inc.March 22,2011 Page 46 of 65 ary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site. 42 Barton Plaza Initial Study and Environmental Analysis,December 18,2008 43 dLmax=The maximum sound level Page 44 of 65 se emissions at this time. Given the scope of the Project in relation to the region construction related GHG emissions would not be considered significant. Additionally, Page 29 of 65 ercial building and parking lot, the site is vacant. The site is relatively level with onsite grades trending downward east to west. Page 2 of 65 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Environmental Initial Study Barton Plaza Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated g. Conflict with adopted policies, plans, 171 ❑ or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? Public transit in the City is provided by Omnitrans, which operates OmniGo Route 325. OmniGo Route 325, generally runs along Barton Road and connects residents to locations such as the Grand Terrace Senior Center, Loma Linda University Medical Center, City Hall, Pettis Veterans' Hospital, and the future Grand Terrace High School. Development of the site will not impact bus service along Barton Road, nor will it impact pedestrian or bicycle transportation. Therefore, a less than significant impact will occur. I, Finding: Less Than Signifcant Impact. No mitigation is required. XVII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS —Would the project: a. Exceed wastewater treatment CI ❑ l ❑ requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Board? Developed uses will connect to the public sanitary sewer system, which are maintained by the City of Grand Terrace. Wastewaters are conveyed through sewer main lines to the City of Colton Wastewater Treatment Facility. The City of Colton owns, operates and maintains a wastewater collection, pumping and treatment system. The wastewater treatment plant also serves the City of Grand Terrace and unincorporated County areas. The plant utilizes a conventional and extended aeration secondary treatment process to product treated effluent in compliance with Regional Water Quality Control Board regulations.55 Therefore, the Project will not adversely impact RWQCB regulations relating to wastewater. Finding: Less Than Significant Impact. No mitigation is required. b. Require or result in the construction ❑ ❑ l ❑ of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? The Project will connect to the public sanitary sewer system which conveys wastewater to the City of Colton wastewater treatment facility. The City contracts with the City of Colton for 54 Omnitrans.http://www.omnitrans.oro/index.shtml,accessed May 31,2011. es City of Colton Water Department.http://www.ci.colton.ca.us/wwd.html.May 31,2011 Page 58 of 65 commercial uses on local school capacity and the maintenance of adequate classroom seating and facilities. Therefore, a less than significant impact would occur and no mitigation is required. 41 Grand Terrace General Plan April 27,2010. 48 San Bernardino County Fire Conditions of Approval,May 5,2011 49 Email Correspondence from Sergeant Finneran,April 21,2011 5°Correspondence from Darryl Taylor,Director,Facilities Planning&Construction,April 8,2011 Page 49 of 65 Study,RK Engineering Group,Inc.March 22,2011 Page 46 of 65 ary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site. 42 Barton Plaza Initial Study and Environmental Analysis,December 18,2008 43 dLmax=The maximum sound level Page 44 of 65 se emissions at this time. Given the scope of the Project in relation to the region construction related GHG emissions would not be considered significant. Additionally, Page 29 of 65 ercial building and parking lot, the site is vacant. The site is relatively level with onsite grades trending downward east to west. Page 2 of 65 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Environmental Initial Study Barton Plaza Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated wastewater treatment. Current capacity at this facility is'6.4 million gallons per day (mgd) with an existing inflow of approximately 5.0 mgd. For current_conditions, the average daily surplus treatment capacity is approximately 1.4 mgd.56 Based on a wastewater generation factor of 80 gallons of wastewater per 1,000 square feet of restaurant use and 300 gallons of wastewater per 1,000 square feet of commercial use per day, the proposed Project would increase wastewater flows in local conveyance and treatment facilities by approximately 2,727 gallons per day, or 0.0027 mgd57. The additional wastewater treatment demand of 0.0027 mgd expected to be generated by the Project totals approximately 0.20 percent of the current surplus capacity. The Project site is served by the Riverside Highland Water Company (RHWC). Existing water mainlines are located within Mount Vernon Avenue, Barton Road, and vacated Britton Way. A easement for public utilities has been retained with the Britton Way vacation for water and sewer main lines. The easement and utility lines are proposed to be shifted slightly towards the north within the Project site; however, they would still connect to the main lines within Britton Way to the west of the site. This relocation of the water main line was discussed with General Manager Don Hough, who indicated that the relocation would be feasible, and subject to review of improvement plans. Additionally, Mr. Hough indicated that sufficient water supplies exist to serve the Project58. Therefore, a less than significant impact will occur. Finding: Less Than Significant Impact. No mitigation is required. c. Require or result in the construction ❑ ❑ p ❑ Of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Development of the commercial center includes shifting a segment of an existing storm water main line within the Project boundaries approximately 50 feet to the north of its current location. The new storm drain main line would remain within the Project site. The new segment will connect with the existing storm drain main line to the west oLthP Project_site.—A-series-of-iniets and storm lines within the development will convey onsite storm waters to the main line; however, the Project will not require the expansion of existing or construction of new public storm drain lines that would cause significant environmental effects. Therefore, no mitigation is required. Finding: Less Than Significant Impact. No mitigation is required. d. Have sufficient water supplies ❑ ❑ p ❑ 5e Environmental Impact Report Grand Terrace Master Development Plan,July 27,2010 57 Barton Plaza Initial Study and Environmental Analysis,December 18,2008 58 Direct conversation with Don Hough,Grand Terrace City Hall,May 3,2011. Page 59 of 65 Page 46 of 65 ary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site. 42 Barton Plaza Initial Study and Environmental Analysis,December 18,2008 43 dLmax=The maximum sound level Page 44 of 65 se emissions at this time. Given the scope of the Project in relation to the region construction related GHG emissions would not be considered significant. Additionally, Page 29 of 65 ercial building and parking lot, the site is vacant. The site is relatively level with onsite grades trending downward east to west. Page 2 of 65 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Environmental Initial Study Barton Plaza Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? Refer to XVII.b above. Finding: Less Than Significant Impact. No mitigation is required. e. Result in a determination by the ❑ ❑ E ❑ wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? Refer to XVII.b above. Finding: Less Than Significant Impact. No mitigation is required. f. Be served by a landfill with sufficient ❑ ❑ O ❑ permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? Solid waste collection services in the City are provided under a franchise agreement with Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc. Solid waste from the City, which includes the project site, would be collected and transported to the San Timoteo Landfill in the City of Redlands. The San Timoteo Landfill is permitted to accept a maximum of 1,000 tons of solid waste per day with average daily disposal rates at the landfill totaling approximately 593 tons/day59. This would result in an excess daily capacity of approximately 407 tons/day at the San Timoteo. Based on this solid waste generation, the proposed on-site uses would ger��I 2,448 pounds (1.22 tons) of waste per day. Waste generated from the proposed Project would be approximately 0.12 percent of the daily permitted throughput and approximately 0.29 percent of the daily existing surplus capacity. As a substantial daily surplus capacity exists at the San Timoteo landfill, development of the proposed Project would not significantly impact current operation or the expected lifetime of this facility. Therefore, a less than significant impact is anticipated to occur and no mitigation is required.6° Finding: Less Than Significant Impact. No mitigation is required. se htto://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/Profiles/Facility/Landfill/LFProfile1.asp?COID=36&FACID=36-AA-0087 date accessed May 11,2011. B0 Barton Plaza Initial Study and Environmental Analysis,December 18,2008 Page 60 of 65 in main line to the west oLthP Project_site.—A-series-of-iniets and storm lines within the development will convey onsite storm waters to the main line; however, the Project will not require the expansion of existing or construction of new public storm drain lines that would cause significant environmental effects. Therefore, no mitigation is required. Finding: Less Than Significant Impact. No mitigation is required. d. Have sufficient water supplies ❑ ❑ p ❑ 5e Environmental Impact Report Grand Terrace Master Development Plan,July 27,2010 57 Barton Plaza Initial Study and Environmental Analysis,December 18,2008 58 Direct conversation with Don Hough,Grand Terrace City Hall,May 3,2011. Page 59 of 65 Page 46 of 65 ary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site. 42 Barton Plaza Initial Study and Environmental Analysis,December 18,2008 43 dLmax=The maximum sound level Page 44 of 65 se emissions at this time. Given the scope of the Project in relation to the region construction related GHG emissions would not be considered significant. Additionally, Page 29 of 65 ercial building and parking lot, the site is vacant. The site is relatively level with onsite grades trending downward east to west. Page 2 of 65 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Environmental Initial Study Barton Plaza Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated g. Comply with federal, state, and local ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ statutes and regulations related to solid waste? In 2009 the City adopted Ordinance 243, Recycling and Diversion of Construction Waste and Demolition Ordinance, in compliance with the California Waste Management Act of 1989. The Ordinance promotes the reduction of solid waste and reduces the solid waste stream going to landfills. The developer is subject to this ordinance and will be required to prepare a waste management plan that identifies the Project parameters, the estimated waste to be generated, the weight of waste materials that can be recycled for the purposes of demonstrating that at least 60 percent of the estimated tonnage of construction and demolition material generated from the Project is diverted from disposal. Therefore, the Project complies with state and local statutes related to solid waste. No mitigation is required. Finding: No Impact. No mitigation is required. XVIII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a. Does the project have a potential to ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant of animal or eliminate important examples of the major-periods California-history nr prehistory? Development of the 3.6 Project site would result in the development of a 37,700 square foot commercial center with approximately 1,800 square feet of outdoor dining area and associated parking, landscaping and lighting improvements. As discussed in this analysis, no aspect of the_, Project has the potential to degrade the environment,adversely impact plant or animal life, or adversely impact cultural resources. Therefore, impacts related to this issue are considered to be less than significant. Finding: Less than Significant Impact. No mitigation is required. b. Does the project have impacts that ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ are individually limited, but Page 61 of 65 ite.—A-series-of-iniets and storm lines within the development will convey onsite storm waters to the main line; however, the Project will not require the expansion of existing or construction of new public storm drain lines that would cause significant environmental effects. Therefore, no mitigation is required. Finding: Less Than Significant Impact. No mitigation is required. d. Have sufficient water supplies ❑ ❑ p ❑ 5e Environmental Impact Report Grand Terrace Master Development Plan,July 27,2010 57 Barton Plaza Initial Study and Environmental Analysis,December 18,2008 58 Direct conversation with Don Hough,Grand Terrace City Hall,May 3,2011. Page 59 of 65 Page 46 of 65 ary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site. 42 Barton Plaza Initial Study and Environmental Analysis,December 18,2008 43 dLmax=The maximum sound level Page 44 of 65 se emissions at this time. Given the scope of the Project in relation to the region construction related GHG emissions would not be considered significant. Additionally, Page 29 of 65 ercial building and parking lot, the site is vacant. The site is relatively level with onsite grades trending downward east to west. Page 2 of 65 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Environmental Initial Study Barton Plaza Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? City for The proposed Project site is located within an area that airs been designated noisd bythe commercial uses. While short-term construction relateimpacts would result from construction of the proposed commercial uses, adherence to the standard City regulations and mitigation identified in this Initial Study would consistent reduce eh thsurese impacts land less g Project would than significant level. The proposedpotential impacts and would not have effects that ibilie land fatively use density,lnoise,l traffic, and aesthetics would be associated with land use compatibility, less than significant. Finding: Less than Significant Impact. No mitigation is required. 'c. Does the project have El L=1 environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Build out of the proposed Project may result in direct e seismic ground-shaking,t�ncreased traffic, human beings, such as exposure to hazards associated with strong and impacts to air quality and noise. However, based on the analysis contained in this report, such impacts are anticipated to be less than significantth duentiue oeddmeig nce to standard s. requirements or reduced to a less than significant level Finding: Less than Significant Impact. No mitigation is required. Page 62 of 65 scussed in this analysis, no aspect of the_, Project has the potential to degrade the environment,adversely impact plant or animal life, or adversely impact cultural resources. Therefore, impacts related to this issue are considered to be less than significant. Finding: Less than Significant Impact. No mitigation is required. b. Does the project have impacts that ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ are individually limited, but Page 61 of 65 ite.—A-series-of-iniets and storm lines within the development will convey onsite storm waters to the main line; however, the Project will not require the expansion of existing or construction of new public storm drain lines that would cause significant environmental effects. Therefore, no mitigation is required. Finding: Less Than Significant Impact. No mitigation is required. d. Have sufficient water supplies ❑ ❑ p ❑ 5e Environmental Impact Report Grand Terrace Master Development Plan,July 27,2010 57 Barton Plaza Initial Study and Environmental Analysis,December 18,2008 58 Direct conversation with Don Hough,Grand Terrace City Hall,May 3,2011. Page 59 of 65 Page 46 of 65 ary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site. 42 Barton Plaza Initial Study and Environmental Analysis,December 18,2008 43 dLmax=The maximum sound level Page 44 of 65 se emissions at this time. Given the scope of the Project in relation to the region construction related GHG emissions would not be considered significant. Additionally, Page 29 of 65 ercial building and parking lot, the site is vacant. The site is relatively level with onsite grades trending downward east to west. Page 2 of 65 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY XIV. Earlier Analysis. IR, or other rocess, Earlier analysis may be used where, pursuant to the antierlearlier EIR,ng, program rEnegative decla axon A pSe ton one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in 15063(c)(3)(D). a) Earlier analysis used. Identify earlier analysis and state where they are available for review. Barton Plaza Initial Study and Environmental Analysis, December 18, 2008 Amendment No. Environmental Impact Report, City of Grand Terrace General a d Ter Tean rrace Comate and munity ry Redevelopment 6 to the Redevelopment Plan for the 0ROevise Project(SCH#2008011109), April Env ironmental Impact Report Grand Terrace Town Square Master Development Plan (SCH #2008071017), July 27, 2010 Th ese documents are available for review at the Grand Terrace Community and Economic Development Department. P b) the Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects ursuant to applicable legal standa dsrom the above checklist were nand scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier documentp stat e whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measured based on the earlier analysis. Not Applicable act with c) Mitiga tion measures. For effects that are "Less than SignificantfImp the earl Implemerentation d Mitigation," describe the mitigation measured incorporated or refined the extent they address site specific conditions for the project. Not Applicable Page 63 of 65 fic, human beings, such as exposure to hazards associated with strong and impacts to air quality and noise. However, based on the analysis contained in this report, such impacts are anticipated to be less than significantth duentiue oeddmeig nce to standard s. requirements or reduced to a less than significant level Finding: Less than Significant Impact. No mitigation is required. Page 62 of 65 scussed in this analysis, no aspect of the_, Project has the potential to degrade the environment,adversely impact plant or animal life, or adversely impact cultural resources. Therefore, impacts related to this issue are considered to be less than significant. Finding: Less than Significant Impact. No mitigation is required. b. Does the project have impacts that ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ are individually limited, but Page 61 of 65 ite.—A-series-of-iniets and storm lines within the development will convey onsite storm waters to the main line; however, the Project will not require the expansion of existing or construction of new public storm drain lines that would cause significant environmental effects. Therefore, no mitigation is required. Finding: Less Than Significant Impact. No mitigation is required. d. Have sufficient water supplies ❑ ❑ p ❑ 5e Environmental Impact Report Grand Terrace Master Development Plan,July 27,2010 57 Barton Plaza Initial Study and Environmental Analysis,December 18,2008 58 Direct conversation with Don Hough,Grand Terrace City Hall,May 3,2011. Page 59 of 65 Page 46 of 65 ary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site. 42 Barton Plaza Initial Study and Environmental Analysis,December 18,2008 43 dLmax=The maximum sound level Page 44 of 65 se emissions at this time. Given the scope of the Project in relation to the region construction related GHG emissions would not be considered significant. Additionally, Page 29 of 65 ercial building and parking lot, the site is vacant. The site is relatively level with onsite grades trending downward east to west. Page 2 of 65 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Environmental Initial Study Barton Plaza References w California Department of Toxic Substance Control, �cmd steaor�h&rea o t eesiCORTESE&site tTE+A te htt ://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca. ov/ ubl'clsear CSITES ERAP OPEN FUDS CLOSE&status=ACT BKLG COM&re orttitle=HAZARDOUS WA ND+SUBSTANCES+SITE+LIST. California Division of Mines and Geology, Regional Geologic Hazards aao maMap ping aProgram s —Alquist- ww Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone Maps website htt •llw California Department of Conservation website htt ://www.consrv.ca. °Wolk /FMMP/Pa es/Indekas x California Integrated Waste Management Board website htt ://www.calrec cle.ca. ov/Profiles/Facili /Landfill/LFP ?COIDCO D 36&AC D 60051 and htt :llwww.calrec cle.ca. ovlProfiles/Facilit /Landfi LFProf let .asAA- 0087 City of Grand Terrace 2010 General Plan, April 27 2010. City of Grand Terrace Municipal Code, Title 4 Comprehensive Fee Schedules, Fines, and Taxes, 1983 and subsequent amendments City of Grand Terrace Municipal Code, Title 18 Zoning, 1983 and subsequent amendments Collins &Associates Engineering, Inc, Preliminary Hydrology Study Grand Terrace Commercial Plaza, March 24, 2011 Collins &Associates Engineering, Inc, Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for Barton Plaza, March 24, 2011 Environmental Impact Report, City of Grand Terrace Comeneralmunity Redevelopment Projectan Update and AmendmentNAprilo. 6 t27, the Redevelopment Plan for the Revised Grand Terrace 2010. Environmental Impact Report Grand Terrace TownSquare Master Development Plan (SCH #2008071017) prepared by LSA Associates, July , Barton Plaza Initial Study and Environmental Analysis, December 18, 2008 LSA Associates, Inc., Updated Biological Resources Assessment for the Mount Vernon and Barton Road Commercial Center, City of Grand Terrace, San Bernardino County, May 31, 2011. LSA Associates, Inc., Historical Resources Assessment for the Mount Vernon ar 2d,Barton Road Commercial Center, City of Grand Terrace, San Bernardino 08. RK Engineering Group, Inc., Mt. Vernon Avenue and Barton Road Commercial Center Acoustical Study, March 22, 2011 Page 64 of 65 than Significant Impact. No mitigation is required. b. Does the project have impacts that ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ are individually limited, but Page 61 of 65 ite.—A-series-of-iniets and storm lines within the development will convey onsite storm waters to the main line; however, the Project will not require the expansion of existing or construction of new public storm drain lines that would cause significant environmental effects. Therefore, no mitigation is required. Finding: Less Than Significant Impact. No mitigation is required. d. Have sufficient water supplies ❑ ❑ p ❑ 5e Environmental Impact Report Grand Terrace Master Development Plan,July 27,2010 57 Barton Plaza Initial Study and Environmental Analysis,December 18,2008 58 Direct conversation with Don Hough,Grand Terrace City Hall,May 3,2011. Page 59 of 65 Page 46 of 65 ary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site. 42 Barton Plaza Initial Study and Environmental Analysis,December 18,2008 43 dLmax=The maximum sound level Page 44 of 65 se emissions at this time. Given the scope of the Project in relation to the region construction related GHG emissions would not be considered significant. Additionally, Page 29 of 65 ercial building and parking lot, the site is vacant. The site is relatively level with onsite grades trending downward east to west. Page 2 of 65 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Environmental Initial Study Barton Plaza RK Engineering Group, Inc., Mt. Vernon Avenue and Barton Road Commercial Center Air Quality Analysis, March 1, 2011 RK Engineering Group, Inc., Mt. Vernon Avenue and Barton Road Commercial Center Traffic Impact Study, June 9, 2011 Salem Engineering Group, Geotechnical Grand'neering Terrace,Investigation,CA, February 28,Proposed01 Walgreens Pharmacy Barton Road and Mt. Vernon Avenue, Page 65 of 65 of 8 1 ....L.: IN to [.---J r ,��_J L i` 1111111111 *11111 [III Ell 1x Storm Drain Diagram I l Specific Plan Area a r \ Storm Drain C.M.P. Cv' Storm Drain R.C.F. Cannsmity Day e°opaaea Department,July 2011. Ms map isfor reference orgy.For detaled ilcanalon,ple se oansut with the Cemrnm ty De.ecprrent Depattneri �i._1, 'n Page 11 of 11 g west line of Mt. Vernon Avenue, presently i i.uu feet wine ktormerry Known as Loma Avenue) being the Southeast corner; 19'39'27" West along the North line of said Barton Road, 28.00 feet; 4'49'03" East, 39.71 feet to a point on the West line of said Mt. Vernon Avenue; 1r01'21" West, along said West line, 28.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. 0 feet of: Lot 1, Block E of Grand Terrace in the County of Sand Bernardino, State of California, as per plat )k 11 of Maps, Page 4, records of said county, described as follows: point in the West line of Mt. Vernon Avenue (66 feet wide) which bears North 00'11'30" East, m the Southeast corner of said Lot 1; rig North 00'11'30" East along the West line of said Mt. Vernon Avenue 217.50 feet to the :r of that certain parcel of land conveyed to Thrift Development Corporation by deed recorded June strument No. 438 in Book 6176, Page 439, Official Records of said County; 9'59'58" West along the South line of said Thrift Development Corporation Parcel 361.00 feet; 1011'30" West along a line parallel with the West line of said we 217.50 feet; I9'59'58" East 361.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. Lot 1, Block "E", of Grand Terrace, as per plat recorded in Book 11 of Maps, Page 4, records of scribed as follows: a point in the West line of Mt. Vernon Avenue (66 feet wide) which bears North 0'11'30" East, m the Southeast corner of said Lot 1; 9'59,58" West along the South line of the property conveyed to Elden Dale Keeney, et ux., by deed nber 16, 1966, in Book 6697, Page 519, Official Records, a distance of 225 feet to the True Point ri 1'30" West parallel with the West line of said Mt. Vernon Avenue, to a point in the North line of fnveyed to the County of San Bernardino, by deed recorded August 25, 1966, in Book 6686, Page 'cords; 9'50'10" West along the North line of said county property to a point in the Southerly extension of e of said Keeney Property; '11'30" East along said Southerly extension, to the Southwest corner of said Keeney Property. I9'59'58" East along the South line of said Keeney Property to the True Point of Beginning. Lot 1, Block "E" of Grand Terrace Tract, the County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per i Book 11, of Maps, Page 4, Records of said county, described as follows: point in the West line of Mt. Vernon Avenue (66 feet wide) which bears North 00'11'30" East, m the Southwest corner of said Lot 1; rig North 00'11'30" East along the West line of said Mt. Vernon Avenue, 271.50 feet to the :r of that certain parcel of land conveyed to Thrift Development Corporation, by deed recorded as Instrument No. 438, in Book 6176, Page 439, Official Records; 9059'58" West along the South line of said Thrift Development Corporation Parcel, 361.00 feet; 10'11'30" West along a line parallel with the West line of said Mt. Vernon Avenue, 217.50 feet; 9'59'58" East, 361.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. 'rom any portion which lies within that certain parcel of land conveyed to the County of San i road easement, recorded February 5, 1964, in Book 6082, Page 309, Official Records. therefrom the South 87.50 feet. ARK: Attachment 6 _ SHEET NO. JUN 2 8 201 TENTATIVE Community&Be s, 111 c 1 Deveelopment Dep 14 ent PARCEL MAP 19131 OF 1 SHTS. FOR As Shown BARTON RD & MT. VERNON AVE une 2011 FOR: DR. Roemer HAw.o. i Page 44 of 65 se emissions at this time. Given the scope of the Project in relation to the region construction related GHG emissions would not be considered significant. Additionally, Page 29 of 65 ercial building and parking lot, the site is vacant. The site is relatively level with onsite grades trending downward east to west. Page 2 of 65 Commercial Front Load Recycling Temp 10,20,40 7-day,(6 Ton $ 555.39 $ 570.92 Size Freq Rental Fee(minimum every 7- $ 26.07 $ 26.62 2 1 $ 63.33 $ 64.65 2 2 $ 111.84 $ 114.18 3 1 $ 81.24 $ 82.95 3 2 $ 148.09 $ 151.20 4 1 $ 107.16 $ 109.41 4 2 $ 199.74 $ 203.94 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 6 1 $ 152.94 $ 156.15 6 2 $ 291.08 $ 297.20 er Check 21, in spite of your exercise of reasonable care, you shall report such Website issues to us as soon as reasonably practicable, and as more fully described in the applicable User Documentation,and we will not hold you responsible for such breach of warranty. 00-35-2568NSBW 02-23-2011 PS Page 1 of 3 Bank of America — Confidential ©2011 Bank of America Corporation 2,600,000.00 $ 805,200.00 $ 354,000.00 :$ 228,500.00 $ 2213,500.00 $ 1,328,000.00 ,$ 1,274,000.00 $ - S - $ 213,030.00 $ 1,893,030.00 $ 1,500,500.00 IMPROV TOTAL S 807,00000 IMPROV TOTAL $ 2,800,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY SITE SUMMARY l'IDLR Group ZONING: VILLAGE COMMERCIAL [ ADMINISTRATIVE PROFESSIONAL `n/WCOT BDo•-0• r v 1 TRASH ENCLOSURE PROPOSED USE: GROCERY/DRUG STORE/RESTAURANT 8 Mills Place, 3F raw a suety wAu (VACANT) PROPOSED SCREEN WALL 5'SETBACK I I I TOTAL SITE ACREAGE(GROSS): ±4.64 AC ±202,052 SF Pasadena,CA 91101 TOTAL SITE ACREAGE(NET):): ±3.68 AC ±160,373 SF :T--�`/ :::I>. '- : .-:u.-.::w�-.:': •`::=- '-- --. µ-. .,:" . I t:626.796.8230 ;' I I ill I I I I I I I L 'OBb' PROPOSED RESTAURANT/RETAIL, 'II' i / Is' --AGK APN(S): 02757-250-014 02751-250-021 02751-250-027 f:626.796.8735 $ Tsaoo SF 9 02751-250-030 RI PI OCCIPANCY A R M 2 CONSTRUCTION TYPE,V-B .I: RI _ oPOSE• 02751-250-031 ARO-rrECTs SEAL „ s FIRE LANE 4 FF=54.20 DI-'i I 02751-250-055 �' -- ® '� OUTDOOR BEATINB AREA -1,+ STAMPED I(.MF•o��,NG-ITE 02751-250-073 ED ARP-,,, 1 -; uABB sr ,', I W/INT6R14TED 02751-250-074 ,cY}y5�v 4y�, COL Yr' `���" t tI N/ MONJMENT SIGN BUILDING DATA L G./sFA PARER.RATIO REGD BMus ' I. " .19r. tI 1�- c`$• 7 FIRE LANE 4' ?'S<' G P DRUG: ±14,820 SF 1 per 225 SF 66 STALLS ®`� �"—~J - REEF Q GROCERY* ±10,581 SF 1per 225 SF 47 STALLS `�'r ' IL-Ct STOP STOP TS—OP ':�1■■■ RETAIL(E): OF vaT + + + f ! + + , __IL o RETAIL USE: ±3,450 SF 1 per 225 SF 15 STALLS j.:jr �, N FOOD USE: ±3,4505F 1 per200SF 17STALLS r "' ' r ' RETAIL(N): RETAIL I '::...., I Y A PROJECT FOR A I, 11 4 1 1 t. RETAIL USE: ±2,400 SF 1 per 225 SF 11 STALLS nosy sP ® F. li j. /O UPANCT M R£RCANTLEI ` ; - ; I FOOD USE: ±3,000 SF 1 per 200 SF 15 STALLS EVERGREEN DEVCO,INC. CONSTRUCTION TYPE.v-e ® 'I' ' j TOTAL BUILDING AREA. ±37,701 SF 171 STALLS ® 1�i' I i 2390 E Camelback Road, FF= 53.20 0 -4. 1:-I' OUTDOOR SEATING AREA: ±1,800 SF 1per 200 SF 9 STALLS IEI .g; . I Suite 410 I I: ' TOTAL AREA: ±39,501 SF 180 STALLS �'-� t. A o.25 Phoenix,AZ 85016 1 R D `r :.:" F.A.R. T:602/808-8600 • �, ���• PAIN MEDIAN (' s B t.J F:602/808-9100 I 'L REQUIRED PARKING T (: . - PARKING RATIO(RETAIL): 1 STALL PER 225 SF --i o� , f�l ;:.}:' . b PARKING RATIO(RESTAURANT): 1 STALL PER 200 SF -, '- - pppwww i;f. • ' PARKING REQUIRED: 180 STALLS PROJECT LOCATION .•b• - T;g: I PARKING PROVIDED' BARTON PI.AZ, JNALGREENS g t d015 i t. 1 PARKING AREA: ±87,484 SF 04070 sP �a • — f' i TRASH ENCL05 PARKING AREA PERCENTAGE: 55% DcANPANCn M(MERCANTILE( LLD :NI;'; I 1 TOTAL STALLS PROVIDED: 182 STALLS E. CON.aTREIGTION TYPE,V-E E IFP fin, % i OVERALL PARKING RATIO: 4.55/1000 @R) ' 1. �,:;} I w NWC Barton Road&Mt Vernon Ave. • �R ' u STOP �..'_. I i V LANDSCAPING mod Terrace,CA QIII _, I• LANDSCAPING PROVIDED: ±23.005 SF FF= 54.50 T wR _.� J. Z LANDSCAPING PERCENTAGE: 14% i /N '1---'p I, iW E H f �' "mI I •NOTE:SITE CANNOT ACCOMODATE THE WALGREENS Na Date RnvuE Dmptim Y i 1 . o,�, �_ ,.o' I I i QI 65'TRUCK TEMPLATE. ueoo cnT•SSorr.D. n` E �� FF=58.5 I 1 - 00010011 Ott Re-9.6MITTAL �� 4 !@ ® �- ®. EXISTING I I Z1 1 oaaenOn r�o,.wo�eiwa.u.w+o.ew - - .7. ,/ O/ + 1.h e" ®iiii4 RETAIL ft) OI d VICINITY MAP m I I �® I® *ADO 5F ...JCT.A ' ,1 1 LI �� OT NOT TO SCALE `` fe ,• -!fmm, 5..G-°TED COLOR r;1 A)T W 3 - S� &7'td 7--A.,-!W- .:.'xlmi :,`P ''t- 4 ADA PATH OF TRAVEL II IrT •-1 '�a V _ .':T , �,41 -� �,so 34:5 _� :rM'-r N."' 6'BENCH ~ �,, c W f1 A I 1, ' I : ir J =.J I I er s.iX 1•4 C'':4. �,•{, f5•r �I. Te • -ia„ .q •.. ' �a moo`R SEwTING I cp # I- I' +.. ,r.,✓N 'ill�Iq • �,!•t �ide___� - 1 r.�',.;.x�ttt^:r�•�tiP•-%• " � z• ' "S .*r 9 �>019 �..+. "1 ds3: • BICYCLE- F,•- -T a. -• ` o• DIRECTIONAL 516N MO. . SIGN (5)BIC,'. -— - 1i €.`'1-,--Y, '*',4,± ,1 l MPED CONCRETE♦W BARTON RTON ROAD -- -- ` "` f- ' ' Attachment 7 GRATED DOLOR jt T ROAD RAISED MEDIAN [r'' - r w -tr,,,,,-:',*4:I'lf Y w.g�;N�'KgNi{Ip,t+.�,;: ':P'7 •Ns u E,�''R .Y arF±l� T '-'• E (STING EGNALIZ;D ...,4;,,_kg',`"„ ;.° 2,BZERg/t-• :'lij; �;ry A„F, 1, ,., SITE PLAN INTERS GTION ,*.y"M`+J a'L?- -`i • f f.- ,4 •r C •- STA THERS I COMMERCIAL -, Wit. -„ - gg � .1' ° 1 1 I \1 �+.a q1;„ z-=' re`.,^y �# SCALE 1"=30'0" I]&1'-s• Yx." ,.1 .,:;sT '.L::ti;,F'<':-..F 1;;.4 s1`1-f4- ,72.. i.,00 DATE:June 28, 2011 holed TS1BSlm(o013.IIBBAU OnWQPoAbb Case No.: 11-02 G""D" A101 Chocbed by T.A.UNPDBUSMED WORK Of MB ARanECT Alm S D SAID BAY NOT BE DIRUUR➢.MO OR O5¢OSED KNEW ME 50 5FN CONSENT OF ME,RURTECI COBB...TIN CREW RENAL AU ARTS REBR.5O Wee.R>on ATDLLooRBA OT , lid •, DLR Group . • • ...,... ., , , , ,e ..:,... 2 J ... , __, c': s'-';.. ' --,, • MATERIALS.. ,,, , I. 51•11COO & o%rti ALUMINUM ' STOREFRONT WWCOT 8 Milli Place,3F s. woe vezez '' /,// ' 1 Pasadena,CA 91101 6. SISNASE I:.626.796.823.0 < , s, ./,/ '' 1. LOADINE•pock DOOR \cki + I ' , N., ./ / 'e II, TRASN ENCLOSLRE . . . . • . . . • • ' 113.METAL CANCVY AUPSIECI'S 5SAL . . . , • . • 1 ../ 14.CORTOCE 1 1 I L. I-.1 -% / 1.5.•ARONTELTURAL ELEMENT- J .. 13/ •eta caa",•In risit VA.Mo., ,VAR49%.. . . 3 ..:...,.. 4,0... . _ . . . 0 CD 0 ID . CO 00 '00 -0 ® i0 - 00_ ,....,...4. _....1...._4,. ••••••morN , r•ouvou. - A. elm EITIARO5 Cr CAO . oases-.user AsPuisioN . , - . .. . _. .4_ b. PAN EDRARDS -.P.:_i. . ,• . _ _ , cec-k22-minGuE ROSE. .. . . • • ' , .. A no*ciFoi . ,rET---• 1 ..1nn 1. ..1• 1 v. DUNN EDYWZOS idt I . -.1 11. 117E/0J74-OLIVE OCURT •I — ...,_ EVERGREEN DEVCO,INC., ' . ..— . • ,e----------N , i 4. . -4_ 2390 F.Cantelback Road - _ , Site 410 rn *P.-- imp l' .imrsq--• ' i____.__.1 .N. _ b., h. . Phoeni);Az 85016 . ——— .._ 1 1_ 1:qiliffni . , , T:601../808-8000 ' F:02/ 089100 • TA.' VATI ON . 00 O0 . • .E ' (3 . fiPECT 1.0CApON BARTON CIRCLE . 'NU Barton Road A Mt Vernon AVe .1, L7 .Kf - - it - " Grand Terme,CA. 1- . 0 Il ' ,-. ,, • a . +43 .p.ie. _iation Dorii ,_.,___ , TrrJ• . '11.1200,1 cire 9.0mn4AL. . in.. •.....:111-1'.= • pitareaa arr me-ani..airm. • 'I c'''' ' .1.1k,.,•F N.\.. ' . . . . . . . , . • • . . .. . . . . . , , . , . . . .. . ... . . _ . . . . . , • . 00 00- 00 0 00 00 00 . 00 _ • ••_#....4. , _ _...,_.4.. . %rag: :I V JIlRl'f. . •Ila,i, i * Attachment 8 . . . . . . - . . .. . WAG'ELEVATIONS .-1,1' '=I JL_i_ 71 e- Is? _ .c- ---te ' IP; I, r- , , SCAle 1/8'=T-o• . • - - - - • .. . • • " ® B 00 00 0 ',0 00 0 . . . . . (1) 00 . . .. Pajact 73.81:57007,A&101/ Iluraki!Ciotti DATE June 28,2011 party ' ' A201 _ 1:-VAT I ON Case NO:.11-02 Mewl* • 411.•1•11•01ca.sucor . imUr Int cum.. Axu wows..am or n x anotrrcv ma ult SAC ISO!.1 Er 11,1.6•17.0 tan ca q.v..n,,uccu 1.e...n.cmu-,u,a-nrc AP,.ou,uuu,r,,T., 1..i'jU co., �- ®. EXISTING I I Z1 1 oaaenOn r�o,.wo�eiwa.u.w+o.ew - - .7. ,/ O/ + 1.h e" ®iiii4 RETAIL ft) OI d VICINITY MAP m I I �® I® *ADO 5F ...JCT.A ' ,1 1 LI �� OT NOT TO SCALE `` fe ,• -!fmm, 5..G-°TED COLOR r;1 A)T W 3 - S� &7'td 7--A.,-!W- .:.'xlmi :,`P ''t- 4 ADA PATH OF TRAVEL II IrT •-1 '�a V _ .':T , �,41 -� �,so 34:5 _� :rM'-r N."' 6'BENCH ~ �,, c W f1 A I 1, ' I : ir J =.J I I er s.iX 1•4 C'':4. �,•{, f5•r �I. Te • -ia„ .q •.. ' �a moo`R SEwTING I cp # I- I' +.. ,r.,✓N 'ill�Iq • �,!•t �ide___� - 1 r.�',.;.x�ttt^:r�•�tiP•-%• " � z• ' "S .*r 9 �>019 �..+. "1 ds3: • BICYCLE- F,•- -T a. -• ` o• DIRECTIONAL 516N MO. . SIGN (5)BIC,'. -— - 1i €.`'1-,--Y, '*',4,± ,1 l MPED CONCRETE♦W BARTON RTON ROAD -- -- ` "` f- ' ' Attachment 7 GRATED DOLOR jt T ROAD RAISED MEDIAN [r'' - r w -tr,,,,,-:',*4:I'lf Y w.g�;N�'KgNi{Ip,t+.�,;: ':P'7 •Ns u E,�''R .Y arF±l� T '-'• E (STING EGNALIZ;D ...,4;,,_kg',`"„ ;.° 2,BZERg/t-• :'lij; �;ry A„F, 1, ,., SITE PLAN INTERS GTION ,*.y"M`+J a'L?- -`i • f f.- ,4 •r C •- STA THERS I COMMERCIAL -, Wit. -„ - gg � .1' ° 1 1 I \1 �+.a q1;„ z-=' re`.,^y �# SCALE 1"=30'0" I]&1'-s• Yx." ,.1 .,:;sT '.L::ti;,F'<':-..F 1;;.4 s1`1-f4- ,72.. i.,00 DATE:June 28, 2011 holed TS1BSlm(o013.IIBBAU OnWQPoAbb Case No.: 11-02 G""D" A101 Chocbed by T.A.UNPDBUSMED WORK Of MB ARanECT Alm S D SAID BAY NOT BE DIRUUR➢.MO OR O5¢OSED KNEW ME 50 5FN CONSENT OF ME,RURTECI COBB...TIN CREW RENAL AU ARTS REBR.5O Wee.R>on ATDLLooRBA OT . • • • • 1" . . . . . . 1. . . . . . . . . . IdDLR Group • . .'MATERIALS' i. Sli,...40 . • a. 6LAZINS t/ALUM kl..1.1. WWCOT 5TOREMCN1 5. STC62 V . INEER • 4. C/I) 8 Mills Place,3F try , .. • 0 . 71.11 ' 5. METAL RALIMS Pasadena,CA 91101 0 -0 -0 I ./.\ .1 L.---- --..., • //g 1 LOADit46 DOCX DO9R t:.Eq6:79§.8230 I L . liE a. LIGHT.FIXR1R5 I -Hill q. exn-rem f:626.796.8735 !'":' 0..120,416POLT =. = " . "•••• 5I2...TWERATA A5LH CANOPY. . . RE . . . AltqINECTS SEAL• .AN 5.ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENT -micas pima.siraorca 1....ur wits . i 0 00 ® .00 0 0 D • 'C‘OLGR5 CZ= T.q.M-1.19.4 . .). on...” .7 . ....-.--.."'" fl .litZLIEDAARDS DP-6/55-LI51-T ASPIRATION 1,, 5. DUNN E126{AR325 -4141;i1615-1---—-- . • - _ ..--, ..—'.' rj 'E " - - P,4 DEC-'02-A.NTIOLE ROSE - I' - — DUNN ED/I-ARDS - • "— c'''/ ra g C. N' 1 ' EF-6214-PlerEON ISRA:f • . / - - D. DtkiN EIMARDS A PkOFCT FOR , ..,6_. _ , 1. DEAD4-OLIVE CCORt _ EVERGREEN DEVCO,INC _ _. i___;_H L___..1-1,1_1' ,41 o 2390 E Carnelbadc Road, I ' L te 410. , ' - ' -.-rimidit T:602/808-8600 . . . . . F:602/808-9100 , 0 0 0 2 Oa .EVATION PROSECT LOCATIC6I 0° BARTON PLAZA Hy (- -I rd. r\ !f 4 mt. Ili-:...- , • ' NINC&ince Road&Mt Venial Ave ' , ..._ . . . . Grand Terrace,CA . . • • • ' - I Af. . ME . . . GM . • • •' 1 . ' 1;P. I. t+ - . . • - • • No Date Wien Ocafptien . ., . ' . .. , nrsooq arr alae,A•t. ff:1 1 .7.40., Tie 1 . ..... • anew., Whrr......'=6..."'"rd= AN ' .. , .OT 00 ® C® .00 . —. . , ,- 414.0.Re— I6 "---,,-. -_ . - - , . • II •Ficrrogbay-----—-- I 1 . , • i . . . . . . • EZ ___ ,z_-__JIZeal - ELEVATIONS (RETAIL Tth-11F.11-a1117- 6 6 .... . , -nal-- scregi+ BLDG.)6 . . . . . . . . . . . • . L i -753 ubiaill+ SCALE•I'' 8'-0* !..1..! ,4.17.",Of.191115011 Oarabedntor :LEVAT I ON ' , DATE June 28,2011 6e No:11-02 MP MVO by 0. . . . . . • MITTI..7 NC Tr..413‘..y10 1..0.0.B.P..00 0.1.Cif TK O....7/.0 r.f...”I.Ig...NOT 1.1 PM....t.521 pv 11,41,...I.lar.10,MI 0.114 COW-5,C.Tri•Ot...MCT ow...,.0.1(41,i.S.....t..-,Y...13 RC.. • 01ca.sucor . imUr Int cum.. Axu wows..am or n x anotrrcv ma ult SAC ISO!.1 Er 11,1.6•17.0 tan ca q.v..n,,uccu 1.e...n.cmu-,u,a-nrc AP,.ou,uuu,r,,T., 1..i'jU co., �- ®. EXISTING I I Z1 1 oaaenOn r�o,.wo�eiwa.u.w+o.ew - - .7. ,/ O/ + 1.h e" ®iiii4 RETAIL ft) OI d VICINITY MAP m I I �® I® *ADO 5F ...JCT.A ' ,1 1 LI �� OT NOT TO SCALE `` fe ,• -!fmm, 5..G-°TED COLOR r;1 A)T W 3 - S� &7'td 7--A.,-!W- .:.'xlmi :,`P ''t- 4 ADA PATH OF TRAVEL II IrT •-1 '�a V _ .':T , �,41 -� �,so 34:5 _� :rM'-r N."' 6'BENCH ~ �,, c W f1 A I 1, ' I : ir J =.J I I er s.iX 1•4 C'':4. �,•{, f5•r �I. Te • -ia„ .q •.. ' �a moo`R SEwTING I cp # I- I' +.. ,r.,✓N 'ill�Iq • �,!•t �ide___� - 1 r.�',.;.x�ttt^:r�•�tiP•-%• " � z• ' "S .*r 9 �>019 �..+. "1 ds3: • BICYCLE- F,•- -T a. -• ` o• DIRECTIONAL 516N MO. . SIGN (5)BIC,'. -— - 1i €.`'1-,--Y, '*',4,± ,1 l MPED CONCRETE♦W BARTON RTON ROAD -- -- ` "` f- ' ' Attachment 7 GRATED DOLOR jt T ROAD RAISED MEDIAN [r'' - r w -tr,,,,,-:',*4:I'lf Y w.g�;N�'KgNi{Ip,t+.�,;: ':P'7 •Ns u E,�''R .Y arF±l� T '-'• E (STING EGNALIZ;D ...,4;,,_kg',`"„ ;.° 2,BZERg/t-• :'lij; �;ry A„F, 1, ,., SITE PLAN INTERS GTION ,*.y"M`+J a'L?- -`i • f f.- ,4 •r C •- STA THERS I COMMERCIAL -, Wit. -„ - gg � .1' ° 1 1 I \1 �+.a q1;„ z-=' re`.,^y �# SCALE 1"=30'0" I]&1'-s• Yx." ,.1 .,:;sT '.L::ti;,F'<':-..F 1;;.4 s1`1-f4- ,72.. i.,00 DATE:June 28, 2011 holed TS1BSlm(o013.IIBBAU OnWQPoAbb Case No.: 11-02 G""D" A101 Chocbed by T.A.UNPDBUSMED WORK Of MB ARanECT Alm S D SAID BAY NOT BE DIRUUR➢.MO OR O5¢OSED KNEW ME 50 5FN CONSENT OF ME,RURTECI COBB...TIN CREW RENAL AU ARTS REBR.5O Wee.R>on ATDLLooRBA OT • • II. 1 PI II in , ®DLR Group f III II II .i MATERIALS'. ®�J1�� T li JL - - li. 1., Mr f () I. •5TI.GG[' - YV V V C�1 _-__; I I 1 I I .I I �,` 9: STO,E.VET♦EER I I I I l I �/ �, I, I I/ 4. ENV 8 Mills Place,3F. _ _ 5. wA Pasadena,CA 91101- y 6. 5SNA6C �Ir _ Id- `�I - j /` _L.,.0n9IH5DOCK t 626.796.8230 �I --_.--___ -_- • 3' DOORB. 'JANNE . ==oi 3U_' -j`_ b- `-tk .. IL_, t=fli;. . 1U II. �ESL f:626.796.8735 '', 'la.METAL GOOF , 14.CORVIGE ARUmRCTSSAL 15.ARUITEGIURAL ELEMH,T . M.ROOD T1 L 4 0,117'• wxm.mw...a..e00 1 8 ® 0®. /1 J 14 C - 15 . '1.0 .DO • •• .• s2E_-0-., -0_Qgs.. 0E6165—uGHT ASPIRATIOV Y DFL702-.Armax ROSE .) 'L. DUM EDP1AWi5 - , IY a . - - -i ....__ _.._'_ _. i. �. _ SI DCb214-R6Ca16.RAY APROW!'FOR ,, if P--:moo p.---=c� IT Z. - - T4 . 1]'-0 0" O. DEA1 4 WARDS OLIVE GG9RT - - _ (La,� --,m�9 - ' " ""D a ww+EDwAQDs EVERGREEN DEVCO,,INC . DE5O70-E 1EO aRonta 2390 E Camelback Road, I I ------,—.....-,.--1- 1 � —-14- I' I' - Suite 410- S r" '' • I — I • Phoenix,AZ 85016 II I 41 ' I I I 0 �- T 602/80848600 i, I - .. 1 ,1 . _4 1 • ` .1 T•' - ` •F.602/B08.9100 V' 3 - ® Tema tocarow BARTON NAM. j ," .i i �' MNC Balton Road-&Mt Veim Me. I I �' �� Grand Term cot • O. 0 16E 08 00 1 A • „, 1. —_ i. ' . it j ;1 v' • 44 • RETAIL ELEVATIONS 1 4 1 1 I • r ' 11 c, .m nv • C) u Ret-rso- SCALE 1 =8'-0 IbYR l!jr0.0,10.3110O.1) On:ie tBA , LIMera A205 .am0 nit 644..u5 NNa:.wIa,a..c.=.,mcn.t nc Yvcc.,.,>.a 011,00,.v a 0,..r..vats,of non aw.,an,,nOnc,:0ra.,.'MR(PPP.rs,.y nSas)Znro qy. earwmvw.m� - • • No Date Wien Ocafptien . ., . ' . .. , nrsooq arr alae,A•t. ff:1 1 .7.40., Tie 1 . ..... • anew., Whrr......'=6..."'"rd= AN ' .. , .OT 00 ® C® .00 . —. . , ,- 414.0.Re— I6 "---,,-. -_ . - - , . • II •Ficrrogbay-----—-- I 1 . , • i . . . . . . • EZ ___ ,z_-__JIZeal - ELEVATIONS (RETAIL Tth-11F.11-a1117- 6 6 .... . , -nal-- scregi+ BLDG.)6 . . . . . . . . . . . • . L i -753 ubiaill+ SCALE•I'' 8'-0* !..1..! ,4.17.",Of.191115011 Oarabedntor :LEVAT I ON ' , DATE June 28,2011 6e No:11-02 MP MVO by 0. . . . . . • MITTI..7 NC Tr..413‘..y10 1..0.0.B.P..00 0.1.Cif TK O....7/.0 r.f...”I.Ig...NOT 1.1 PM....t.521 pv 11,41,...I.lar.10,MI 0.114 COW-5,C.Tri•Ot...MCT ow...,.0.1(41,i.S.....t..-,Y...13 RC.. • 01ca.sucor . imUr Int cum.. Axu wows..am or n x anotrrcv ma ult SAC ISO!.1 Er 11,1.6•17.0 tan ca q.v..n,,uccu 1.e...n.cmu-,u,a-nrc AP,.ou,uuu,r,,T., 1..i'jU co., �- ®. EXISTING I I Z1 1 oaaenOn r�o,.wo�eiwa.u.w+o.ew - - .7. ,/ O/ + 1.h e" ®iiii4 RETAIL ft) OI d VICINITY MAP m I I �® I® *ADO 5F ...JCT.A ' ,1 1 LI �� OT NOT TO SCALE `` fe ,• -!fmm, 5..G-°TED COLOR r;1 A)T W 3 - S� &7'td 7--A.,-!W- .:.'xlmi :,`P ''t- 4 ADA PATH OF TRAVEL II IrT •-1 '�a V _ .':T , �,41 -� �,so 34:5 _� :rM'-r N."' 6'BENCH ~ �,, c W f1 A I 1, ' I : ir J =.J I I er s.iX 1•4 C'':4. �,•{, f5•r �I. Te • -ia„ .q •.. ' �a moo`R SEwTING I cp # I- I' +.. ,r.,✓N 'ill�Iq • �,!•t �ide___� - 1 r.�',.;.x�ttt^:r�•�tiP•-%• " � z• ' "S .*r 9 �>019 �..+. "1 ds3: • BICYCLE- F,•- -T a. -• ` o• DIRECTIONAL 516N MO. . SIGN (5)BIC,'. -— - 1i €.`'1-,--Y, '*',4,± ,1 l MPED CONCRETE♦W BARTON RTON ROAD -- -- ` "` f- ' ' Attachment 7 GRATED DOLOR jt T ROAD RAISED MEDIAN [r'' - r w -tr,,,,,-:',*4:I'lf Y w.g�;N�'KgNi{Ip,t+.�,;: ':P'7 •Ns u E,�''R .Y arF±l� T '-'• E (STING EGNALIZ;D ...,4;,,_kg',`"„ ;.° 2,BZERg/t-• :'lij; �;ry A„F, 1, ,., SITE PLAN INTERS GTION ,*.y"M`+J a'L?- -`i • f f.- ,4 •r C •- STA THERS I COMMERCIAL -, Wit. -„ - gg � .1' ° 1 1 I \1 �+.a q1;„ z-=' re`.,^y �# SCALE 1"=30'0" I]&1'-s• Yx." ,.1 .,:;sT '.L::ti;,F'<':-..F 1;;.4 s1`1-f4- ,72.. i.,00 DATE:June 28, 2011 holed TS1BSlm(o013.IIBBAU OnWQPoAbb Case No.: 11-02 G""D" A101 Chocbed by T.A.UNPDBUSMED WORK Of MB ARanECT Alm S D SAID BAY NOT BE DIRUUR➢.MO OR O5¢OSED KNEW ME 50 5FN CONSENT OF ME,RURTECI COBB...TIN CREW RENAL AU ARTS REBR.5O Wee.R>on ATDLLooRBA OT The Ike tlounlain City Grand Terrace AG EN DA REPORT CALIFORNIA MEETING DATE: July 26, 2011 Council Item ( X ) CRA Item ( ) TITLE: Ordinance Electing to Comply with and Participate in the Alternative Voluntary Redevelopment Program Contained in Park 1.9 of Division 24 of the California Health and Safety Code PRESENTED BY: Betsy M. Adams, City Manager RECOMMENDATION: Conduct a public hearing and move the Ordinance to participate in the Alternative Voluntary Redevelopment Program to the second reading. BACKGROUND: On July 12, 2011 the City Council had the first reading of the Ordinance to continue the Community Redevelopment Agency as required by ABX1 27, a 2011-12 budget trailer bill signed by the Governor on June 28. Subsequent to the Council Meeting, special counsel to the City's redevelopment agency, Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth, advised the City that additional language should be added to the Ordinance which necessitates a first reading of the revised ordinance. DISCUSSION: The focus of the discussion will be on the revisions recommended by the agency's special counsel which focus primarily on reserving constitutional, legal and appeal rights for the City. On page 4 of the proposed Ordinance, the second, third and fourth paragraphs have been highlighted to note where language was added to preserve these rights. On page 5 of the Ordinance, in the last paragraph on the page, two phrases (subject to the provisions hereof and appeal rights in relation thereto) have been added to also preserves the rights. On page 6 of the proposed Ordinance are the final two additions. The first is the second sentence in the first paragraph which authorizes the City manager to implement the Ordinance and copy with Part 1.9 of the California Community Redevelopment Law. The Council will be advised of any actions taken to do this. The second is the addition of the third paragraph which explicitly reserves the City's right to challenge the validity of the ABX1 26 and ABX1 27, including the right to recover any payments remitted under Part 1.9. On July 18, 2011, the League of California Cities and the California Redevelopment Association filed a law suit with the California Supreme Court challenging the COUNCIL.AGENDA ITEM NO. 6, • C) u Ret-rso- SCALE 1 =8'-0 IbYR l!jr0.0,10.3110O.1) On:ie tBA , LIMera A205 .am0 nit 644..u5 NNa:.wIa,a..c.=.,mcn.t nc Yvcc.,.,>.a 011,00,.v a 0,..r..vats,of non aw.,an,,nOnc,:0ra.,.'MR(PPP.rs,.y nSas)Znro qy. earwmvw.m� - • • No Date Wien Ocafptien . ., . ' . .. , nrsooq arr alae,A•t. ff:1 1 .7.40., Tie 1 . ..... • anew., Whrr......'=6..."'"rd= AN ' .. , .OT 00 ® C® .00 . —. . , ,- 414.0.Re— I6 "---,,-. -_ . - - , . • II •Ficrrogbay-----—-- I 1 . , • i . . . . . . • EZ ___ ,z_-__JIZeal - ELEVATIONS (RETAIL Tth-11F.11-a1117- 6 6 .... . , -nal-- scregi+ BLDG.)6 . . . . . . . . . . . • . L i -753 ubiaill+ SCALE•I'' 8'-0* !..1..! ,4.17.",Of.191115011 Oarabedntor :LEVAT I ON ' , DATE June 28,2011 6e No:11-02 MP MVO by 0. . . . . . • MITTI..7 NC Tr..413‘..y10 1..0.0.B.P..00 0.1.Cif TK O....7/.0 r.f...”I.Ig...NOT 1.1 PM....t.521 pv 11,41,...I.lar.10,MI 0.114 COW-5,C.Tri•Ot...MCT ow...,.0.1(41,i.S.....t..-,Y...13 RC.. • 01ca.sucor . imUr Int cum.. Axu wows..am or n x anotrrcv ma ult SAC ISO!.1 Er 11,1.6•17.0 tan ca q.v..n,,uccu 1.e...n.cmu-,u,a-nrc AP,.ou,uuu,r,,T., 1..i'jU co., �- ®. EXISTING I I Z1 1 oaaenOn r�o,.wo�eiwa.u.w+o.ew - - .7. ,/ O/ + 1.h e" ®iiii4 RETAIL ft) OI d VICINITY MAP m I I �® I® *ADO 5F ...JCT.A ' ,1 1 LI �� OT NOT TO SCALE `` fe ,• -!fmm, 5..G-°TED COLOR r;1 A)T W 3 - S� &7'td 7--A.,-!W- .:.'xlmi :,`P ''t- 4 ADA PATH OF TRAVEL II IrT •-1 '�a V _ .':T , �,41 -� �,so 34:5 _� :rM'-r N."' 6'BENCH ~ �,, c W f1 A I 1, ' I : ir J =.J I I er s.iX 1•4 C'':4. �,•{, f5•r �I. Te • -ia„ .q •.. ' �a moo`R SEwTING I cp # I- I' +.. ,r.,✓N 'ill�Iq • �,!•t �ide___� - 1 r.�',.;.x�ttt^:r�•�tiP•-%• " � z• ' "S .*r 9 �>019 �..+. "1 ds3: • BICYCLE- F,•- -T a. -• ` o• DIRECTIONAL 516N MO. . SIGN (5)BIC,'. -— - 1i €.`'1-,--Y, '*',4,± ,1 l MPED CONCRETE♦W BARTON RTON ROAD -- -- ` "` f- ' ' Attachment 7 GRATED DOLOR jt T ROAD RAISED MEDIAN [r'' - r w -tr,,,,,-:',*4:I'lf Y w.g�;N�'KgNi{Ip,t+.�,;: ':P'7 •Ns u E,�''R .Y arF±l� T '-'• E (STING EGNALIZ;D ...,4;,,_kg',`"„ ;.° 2,BZERg/t-• :'lij; �;ry A„F, 1, ,., SITE PLAN INTERS GTION ,*.y"M`+J a'L?- -`i • f f.- ,4 •r C •- STA THERS I COMMERCIAL -, Wit. -„ - gg � .1' ° 1 1 I \1 �+.a q1;„ z-=' re`.,^y �# SCALE 1"=30'0" I]&1'-s• Yx." ,.1 .,:;sT '.L::ti;,F'<':-..F 1;;.4 s1`1-f4- ,72.. i.,00 DATE:June 28, 2011 holed TS1BSlm(o013.IIBBAU OnWQPoAbb Case No.: 11-02 G""D" A101 Chocbed by T.A.UNPDBUSMED WORK Of MB ARanECT Alm S D SAID BAY NOT BE DIRUUR➢.MO OR O5¢OSED KNEW ME 50 5FN CONSENT OF ME,RURTECI COBB...TIN CREW RENAL AU ARTS REBR.5O Wee.R>on ATDLLooRBA OT Ordinance Electing to Comply with and Participate in the Alternative Voluntary Redevelopment Program Contained in Park 1.9 of Division 24 of the California.Health and Safety Code Page 2 constitutionality of ABX1 26 and ABX1 27. The cities of San Jose and Union City,are also plaintiffs in .the lawsuit which includes the request that the Court issue a stay to prevent the legislation from going. into effect until the Court can decide the lawsuit. If the Court grants the stay then the dates noted in this staff report for various activities required by ABX1 27 will be delayed. FISCAL IMPACT: The redevelopment agency's fiscal consultant, Rosenow Spevacek Group Inc. (RSG), will present five year cash flow analysis showing the impacts of the ABX1 27 mandated payments on the City of Grand Terrace as well as the Community Redevelopment Agency at the July 26.Council Meeting. In addition, the information below was provided at the July 12 Council Meeting in the • staff report for the first version of the ordinance: ABX1 27, section 34194 (J), states that the Director of Finance shall notify each city or county of its payment amount for the 2011-12 fiscal year on or before August 1, 2011. On June 20, the California Redevelopment Association (CRA) published its estimate of the required payments for each City that could choose to make a payment.in order to avoid dissolution of its redevelopment agency. For Grand Terrace, the CRA estimates the City's 2011-12 :payment to be $2,850,665 and for subsequent fiscal years the ;payment to be $670,745. The City may file an appeal on these numbers with the Director of Finance on or before August 15, 2011 and intends to do so. The Director of, Finance is required to make a decision on the appeal by September 15, 2011 but has the discretion to extend the decision deadline until October 15. One-half of the required .payment is due on or before January 15 and the remaining on- half is due May 15 of each year. ABX1 27 specifies that it is a city, not its redevelopment agency, which is required to make the payments. A city is allowed to enter into an. agreement with its redevelopment agency to transfer a portion of its tax increment to the city in an amount not to exceed the annual payment, For 2011-12, the City expects to have the funds available to make the payment. The combination of funds used to make the 2011-12 payment Will be determined after the City receives the Director of Finance's decision on.its appeal. Respectfully submitted: Betsy$.Adams, City Manager 0 nit 644..u5 NNa:.wIa,a..c.=.,mcn.t nc Yvcc.,.,>.a 011,00,.v a 0,..r..vats,of non aw.,an,,nOnc,:0ra.,.'MR(PPP.rs,.y nSas)Znro qy. earwmvw.m� - • • No Date Wien Ocafptien . ., . ' . .. , nrsooq arr alae,A•t. ff:1 1 .7.40., Tie 1 . ..... • anew., Whrr......'=6..."'"rd= AN ' .. , .OT 00 ® C® .00 . —. . , ,- 414.0.Re— I6 "---,,-. -_ . - - , . • II •Ficrrogbay-----—-- I 1 . , • i . . . . . . • EZ ___ ,z_-__JIZeal - ELEVATIONS (RETAIL Tth-11F.11-a1117- 6 6 .... . , -nal-- scregi+ BLDG.)6 . . . . . . . . . . . • . L i -753 ubiaill+ SCALE•I'' 8'-0* !..1..! ,4.17.",Of.191115011 Oarabedntor :LEVAT I ON ' , DATE June 28,2011 6e No:11-02 MP MVO by 0. . . . . . • MITTI..7 NC Tr..413‘..y10 1..0.0.B.P..00 0.1.Cif TK O....7/.0 r.f...”I.Ig...NOT 1.1 PM....t.521 pv 11,41,...I.lar.10,MI 0.114 COW-5,C.Tri•Ot...MCT ow...,.0.1(41,i.S.....t..-,Y...13 RC.. • 01ca.sucor . imUr Int cum.. Axu wows..am or n x anotrrcv ma ult SAC ISO!.1 Er 11,1.6•17.0 tan ca q.v..n,,uccu 1.e...n.cmu-,u,a-nrc AP,.ou,uuu,r,,T., 1..i'jU co., �- ®. EXISTING I I Z1 1 oaaenOn r�o,.wo�eiwa.u.w+o.ew - - .7. ,/ O/ + 1.h e" ®iiii4 RETAIL ft) OI d VICINITY MAP m I I �® I® *ADO 5F ...JCT.A ' ,1 1 LI �� OT NOT TO SCALE `` fe ,• -!fmm, 5..G-°TED COLOR r;1 A)T W 3 - S� &7'td 7--A.,-!W- .:.'xlmi :,`P ''t- 4 ADA PATH OF TRAVEL II IrT •-1 '�a V _ .':T , �,41 -� �,so 34:5 _� :rM'-r N."' 6'BENCH ~ �,, c W f1 A I 1, ' I : ir J =.J I I er s.iX 1•4 C'':4. �,•{, f5•r �I. Te • -ia„ .q •.. ' �a moo`R SEwTING I cp # I- I' +.. ,r.,✓N 'ill�Iq • �,!•t �ide___� - 1 r.�',.;.x�ttt^:r�•�tiP•-%• " � z• ' "S .*r 9 �>019 �..+. "1 ds3: • BICYCLE- F,•- -T a. -• ` o• DIRECTIONAL 516N MO. . SIGN (5)BIC,'. -— - 1i €.`'1-,--Y, '*',4,± ,1 l MPED CONCRETE♦W BARTON RTON ROAD -- -- ` "` f- ' ' Attachment 7 GRATED DOLOR jt T ROAD RAISED MEDIAN [r'' - r w -tr,,,,,-:',*4:I'lf Y w.g�;N�'KgNi{Ip,t+.�,;: ':P'7 •Ns u E,�''R .Y arF±l� T '-'• E (STING EGNALIZ;D ...,4;,,_kg',`"„ ;.° 2,BZERg/t-• :'lij; �;ry A„F, 1, ,., SITE PLAN INTERS GTION ,*.y"M`+J a'L?- -`i • f f.- ,4 •r C •- STA THERS I COMMERCIAL -, Wit. -„ - gg � .1' ° 1 1 I \1 �+.a q1;„ z-=' re`.,^y �# SCALE 1"=30'0" I]&1'-s• Yx." ,.1 .,:;sT '.L::ti;,F'<':-..F 1;;.4 s1`1-f4- ,72.. i.,00 DATE:June 28, 2011 holed TS1BSlm(o013.IIBBAU OnWQPoAbb Case No.: 11-02 G""D" A101 Chocbed by T.A.UNPDBUSMED WORK Of MB ARanECT Alm S D SAID BAY NOT BE DIRUUR➢.MO OR O5¢OSED KNEW ME 50 5FN CONSENT OF ME,RURTECI COBB...TIN CREW RENAL AU ARTS REBR.5O Wee.R>on ATDLLooRBA OT Ordinance Electing to Comply with and Participate in the Alternative Voluntary Redevelopment Program Contained in Park 1.9 of Division 24 of the California. Health and Safety Code Page 3 ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A: Changes highlighted on Ordinance of the City of Grand Terrace Electing to Comply with, and Participate in the Alternative Voluntary Redevelopment Program Contained in Part 1.9 of Division 24 of the California Health and Safety Code Attachment B Ordinance of the City of Grand Terrace Electing to Comply with and Participate in the Alternative Voluntary Redevelopment Program Contained in Part 1.9 of Division 24 of the California Health and Safety Code Ms map isfor reference orgy.For detaled ilcanalon,ple se oansut with the Cemrnm ty De.ecprrent Depattneri �i._1, 'n Page 11 of 11 Attachment A Changes Highlighted on Ordinance of the City of Grand Terrace Electing to Comply with and i Participate in the Alternative Voluntary Redevelopment Program Contained in Part 1.9 of Division 24 of the California Health and Safety Code , the City of Grand Terrace Electing to Comply with, and Participate in the Alternative Voluntary Redevelopment Program Contained in Part 1.9 of Division 24 of the California Health and Safety Code Attachment B Ordinance of the City of Grand Terrace Electing to Comply with and Participate in the Alternative Voluntary Redevelopment Program Contained in Part 1.9 of Division 24 of the California Health and Safety Code Ms map isfor reference orgy.For detaled ilcanalon,ple se oansut with the Cemrnm ty De.ecprrent Depattneri �i._1, 'n Page 11 of 11 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE ELECTING TO COMPLY WITH AND PARTICIPATE IN THE ALTERNATIVE VOLUNTARY REDEVELOPMENT PROGRAM CONTAINED IN PART 1.9 OF DIVISION 24 OF THE CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE WHEREAS, the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Grand Terrace, ("Agency") is a. community redevelopment agency organized and existing under the California Community Redevelopment Law, Health and Safety Code Sections 33000, et seq..("CRL") and has been authorized to transact business and exercise the powers of a redevelopment agency pursuant to action of the,City Council ("City Council") of the City of Grand Terrace ("City"); and WHEREAS, the City Council approved a redevelopment plan for a redevelopment project and project area (the "Original Plan" and"Original.Project Area", respectively, by Ordinance No. 25 adopted September 27, 1979, which has subsequently been amended by an amendment ("Amendment No. 1"), as approved by Ordinance No. 31 adopted.on January 17, 1980, an additional amendment ("Amendment No. 2") as approved by Ordinance No. 52 on July 15, 1981, an additional amendment("Amendment No. 3") as approved by Ordinance No. 187 on July 22, 1999, an additional amendment ("Amendment No. 4") as approved by Ordinance No. 202 on September 12, 2002, an additional amendment ("Amendment No. 5") as approved by Ordinance No. 212 on July 22, 2004, and an additional amendment ("Amendment No. 6") as approved by Ordinance No. 250 on May 11, 2010 approving an amended and restated redevelopment plan (herein,the "Amended Redevelopment Plan") for the project area as established by Ordinance No. 25 and thereafter amended as set forth above under the Amended Redevelopment Plan(the"Amended Project Area"); and WHEREAS, Parts 1.8, 1.85 and 1.9 of Division 24 of the Health and Safety Code were added to the CRL by ABX1 26 and ABX1 27, which measures purport to become effective immediately. ABX1 .26 and ABX1 27, which are trailer bills to the 2011-12 budget bills, were is a city, not its redevelopment agency, which is required to make the payments. A city is allowed to enter into an. agreement with its redevelopment agency to transfer a portion of its tax increment to the city in an amount not to exceed the annual payment, For 2011-12, the City expects to have the funds available to make the payment. The combination of funds used to make the 2011-12 payment Will be determined after the City receives the Director of Finance's decision on.its appeal. Respectfully submitted: Betsy$.Adams, City Manager 0 nit 644..u5 NNa:.wIa,a..c.=.,mcn.t nc Yvcc.,.,>.a 011,00,.v a 0,..r..vats,of non aw.,an,,nOnc,:0ra.,.'MR(PPP.rs,.y nSas)Znro qy. earwmvw.m� - • • No Date Wien Ocafptien . ., . ' . .. , nrsooq arr alae,A•t. ff:1 1 .7.40., Tie 1 . ..... • anew., Whrr......'=6..."'"rd= AN ' .. , .OT 00 ® C® .00 . —. . , ,- 414.0.Re— I6 "---,,-. -_ . - - , . • II •Ficrrogbay-----—-- I 1 . , • i . . . . . . • EZ ___ ,z_-__JIZeal - ELEVATIONS (RETAIL Tth-11F.11-a1117- 6 6 .... . , -nal-- scregi+ BLDG.)6 . . . . . . . . . . . • . L i -753 ubiaill+ SCALE•I'' 8'-0* !..1..! ,4.17.",Of.191115011 Oarabedntor :LEVAT I ON ' , DATE June 28,2011 6e No:11-02 MP MVO by 0. . . . . . • MITTI..7 NC Tr..413‘..y10 1..0.0.B.P..00 0.1.Cif TK O....7/.0 r.f...”I.Ig...NOT 1.1 PM....t.521 pv 11,41,...I.lar.10,MI 0.114 COW-5,C.Tri•Ot...MCT ow...,.0.1(41,i.S.....t..-,Y...13 RC.. • 01ca.sucor . imUr Int cum.. Axu wows..am or n x anotrrcv ma ult SAC ISO!.1 Er 11,1.6•17.0 tan ca q.v..n,,uccu 1.e...n.cmu-,u,a-nrc AP,.ou,uuu,r,,T., 1..i'jU co., �- ®. EXISTING I I Z1 1 oaaenOn r�o,.wo�eiwa.u.w+o.ew - - .7. ,/ O/ + 1.h e" ®iiii4 RETAIL ft) OI d VICINITY MAP m I I �® I® *ADO 5F ...JCT.A ' ,1 1 LI �� OT NOT TO SCALE `` fe ,• -!fmm, 5..G-°TED COLOR r;1 A)T W 3 - S� &7'td 7--A.,-!W- .:.'xlmi :,`P ''t- 4 ADA PATH OF TRAVEL II IrT •-1 '�a V _ .':T , �,41 -� �,so 34:5 _� :rM'-r N."' 6'BENCH ~ �,, c W f1 A I 1, ' I : ir J =.J I I er s.iX 1•4 C'':4. �,•{, f5•r �I. Te • -ia„ .q •.. ' �a moo`R SEwTING I cp # I- I' +.. ,r.,✓N 'ill�Iq • �,!•t �ide___� - 1 r.�',.;.x�ttt^:r�•�tiP•-%• " � z• ' "S .*r 9 �>019 �..+. "1 ds3: • BICYCLE- F,•- -T a. -• ` o• DIRECTIONAL 516N MO. . SIGN (5)BIC,'. -— - 1i €.`'1-,--Y, '*',4,± ,1 l MPED CONCRETE♦W BARTON RTON ROAD -- -- ` "` f- ' ' Attachment 7 GRATED DOLOR jt T ROAD RAISED MEDIAN [r'' - r w -tr,,,,,-:',*4:I'lf Y w.g�;N�'KgNi{Ip,t+.�,;: ':P'7 •Ns u E,�''R .Y arF±l� T '-'• E (STING EGNALIZ;D ...,4;,,_kg',`"„ ;.° 2,BZERg/t-• :'lij; �;ry A„F, 1, ,., SITE PLAN INTERS GTION ,*.y"M`+J a'L?- -`i • f f.- ,4 •r C •- STA THERS I COMMERCIAL -, Wit. -„ - gg � .1' ° 1 1 I \1 �+.a q1;„ z-=' re`.,^y �# SCALE 1"=30'0" I]&1'-s• Yx." ,.1 .,:;sT '.L::ti;,F'<':-..F 1;;.4 s1`1-f4- ,72.. i.,00 DATE:June 28, 2011 holed TS1BSlm(o013.IIBBAU OnWQPoAbb Case No.: 11-02 G""D" A101 Chocbed by T.A.UNPDBUSMED WORK Of MB ARanECT Alm S D SAID BAY NOT BE DIRUUR➢.MO OR O5¢OSED KNEW ME 50 5FN CONSENT OF ME,RURTECI COBB...TIN CREW RENAL AU ARTS REBR.5O Wee.R>on ATDLLooRBA OT approved by both houses of the Legislature on June 15, 2011 and signed by the Governor on June 28, 2011; and WHEREAS, Part 1.85 of the CRL ("Part 1.85") provides for the statewide dissolution of all redevelopment agencies, including the Agency, as of October 1, 2011, and provides that,thereafter, a 'successor agency to administer the enforceable obligations of the Agency and otherwise wind up the Agency's affairs, all subject to the review and approval by an oversight committee; and WHEREAS, Part 1.8 of the CRL ("Part 1.8") provides for the restriction of activities and authority of the Agency in the interim period prior to dissolution to certain "enforceable obligations" and to actions required for the general winding up of affairs, preservation of assets, and certain other goals delineated in Part 1.8; and WHEREAS, the dissolution of the Agency would be detrimental to the health, safety, and economic well-being of the residents of the City and cause irreparable harm to the community, because, among other reasons, the redevelopment activities and projects made possible, implemented, and funded by the Agency are highly significant and of enduring benefit to the community and the City, and are a critical component of its future; and WHEREAS, Part 1.9 of the CRL ("Part 1.9") provides that a redevelopment agency may continue in operation if a city or county that includes a redevelopment agency adopts an ordinance agreeing to comply with and participate in the Alternative Voluntary Redevelopment Program established in Part 1.9 ("Program"); and WHEREAS, as a condition of the Agency's continued existence and operation of its redevelopment agency, the City is required to make certain annual remittances to the county auditor-controller pursuant to Chapter 3 of Part 1.9, beginning with a larger upfront remittance for 2 he Health and Safety Code were added to the CRL by ABX1 26 and ABX1 27, which measures purport to become effective immediately. ABX1 .26 and ABX1 27, which are trailer bills to the 2011-12 budget bills, were is a city, not its redevelopment agency, which is required to make the payments. A city is allowed to enter into an. agreement with its redevelopment agency to transfer a portion of its tax increment to the city in an amount not to exceed the annual payment, For 2011-12, the City expects to have the funds available to make the payment. The combination of funds used to make the 2011-12 payment Will be determined after the City receives the Director of Finance's decision on.its appeal. Respectfully submitted: Betsy$.Adams, City Manager 0 nit 644..u5 NNa:.wIa,a..c.=.,mcn.t nc Yvcc.,.,>.a 011,00,.v a 0,..r..vats,of non aw.,an,,nOnc,:0ra.,.'MR(PPP.rs,.y nSas)Znro qy. earwmvw.m� - • • No Date Wien Ocafptien . ., . ' . .. , nrsooq arr alae,A•t. ff:1 1 .7.40., Tie 1 . ..... • anew., Whrr......'=6..."'"rd= AN ' .. , .OT 00 ® C® .00 . —. . , ,- 414.0.Re— I6 "---,,-. -_ . - - , . • II •Ficrrogbay-----—-- I 1 . , • i . . . . . . • EZ ___ ,z_-__JIZeal - ELEVATIONS (RETAIL Tth-11F.11-a1117- 6 6 .... . , -nal-- scregi+ BLDG.)6 . . . . . . . . . . . • . L i -753 ubiaill+ SCALE•I'' 8'-0* !..1..! ,4.17.",Of.191115011 Oarabedntor :LEVAT I ON ' , DATE June 28,2011 6e No:11-02 MP MVO by 0. . . . . . • MITTI..7 NC Tr..413‘..y10 1..0.0.B.P..00 0.1.Cif TK O....7/.0 r.f...”I.Ig...NOT 1.1 PM....t.521 pv 11,41,...I.lar.10,MI 0.114 COW-5,C.Tri•Ot...MCT ow...,.0.1(41,i.S.....t..-,Y...13 RC.. • 01ca.sucor . imUr Int cum.. Axu wows..am or n x anotrrcv ma ult SAC ISO!.1 Er 11,1.6•17.0 tan ca q.v..n,,uccu 1.e...n.cmu-,u,a-nrc AP,.ou,uuu,r,,T., 1..i'jU co., �- ®. EXISTING I I Z1 1 oaaenOn r�o,.wo�eiwa.u.w+o.ew - - .7. ,/ O/ + 1.h e" ®iiii4 RETAIL ft) OI d VICINITY MAP m I I �® I® *ADO 5F ...JCT.A ' ,1 1 LI �� OT NOT TO SCALE `` fe ,• -!fmm, 5..G-°TED COLOR r;1 A)T W 3 - S� &7'td 7--A.,-!W- .:.'xlmi :,`P ''t- 4 ADA PATH OF TRAVEL II IrT •-1 '�a V _ .':T , �,41 -� �,so 34:5 _� :rM'-r N."' 6'BENCH ~ �,, c W f1 A I 1, ' I : ir J =.J I I er s.iX 1•4 C'':4. �,•{, f5•r �I. Te • -ia„ .q •.. ' �a moo`R SEwTING I cp # I- I' +.. ,r.,✓N 'ill�Iq • �,!•t �ide___� - 1 r.�',.;.x�ttt^:r�•�tiP•-%• " � z• ' "S .*r 9 �>019 �..+. "1 ds3: • BICYCLE- F,•- -T a. -• ` o• DIRECTIONAL 516N MO. . SIGN (5)BIC,'. -— - 1i €.`'1-,--Y, '*',4,± ,1 l MPED CONCRETE♦W BARTON RTON ROAD -- -- ` "` f- ' ' Attachment 7 GRATED DOLOR jt T ROAD RAISED MEDIAN [r'' - r w -tr,,,,,-:',*4:I'lf Y w.g�;N�'KgNi{Ip,t+.�,;: ':P'7 •Ns u E,�''R .Y arF±l� T '-'• E (STING EGNALIZ;D ...,4;,,_kg',`"„ ;.° 2,BZERg/t-• :'lij; �;ry A„F, 1, ,., SITE PLAN INTERS GTION ,*.y"M`+J a'L?- -`i • f f.- ,4 •r C •- STA THERS I COMMERCIAL -, Wit. -„ - gg � .1' ° 1 1 I \1 �+.a q1;„ z-=' re`.,^y �# SCALE 1"=30'0" I]&1'-s• Yx." ,.1 .,:;sT '.L::ti;,F'<':-..F 1;;.4 s1`1-f4- ,72.. i.,00 DATE:June 28, 2011 holed TS1BSlm(o013.IIBBAU OnWQPoAbb Case No.: 11-02 G""D" A101 Chocbed by T.A.UNPDBUSMED WORK Of MB ARanECT Alm S D SAID BAY NOT BE DIRUUR➢.MO OR O5¢OSED KNEW ME 50 5FN CONSENT OF ME,RURTECI COBB...TIN CREW RENAL AU ARTS REBR.5O Wee.R>on ATDLLooRBA OT the 2011-2012 fiscal year ("First Remittance"), to be paid in two equal installments on January 15, 2012 and May 15,2012; and WHEREAS, the City will have sufficient moneys and revenues to fund an amount equal to the City's payment of the First Remittance and expects to have sufficient moneys and revenues to fund the subsequent annual remittances required by Part 1.9; and WHEREAS, the City's needs are such that it can commit to spend the funds received from the Agency pursuant to the Agreement to Transfer Tax Increment (defined below) to finance activities within the Redevelopment Project that are related to accomplishing the goals of the Redevelopment Project, including without limitation: the promotion of public improvement facilities; the provision of adequate roadways to correct street alignment problems, to provide adequate circulation and access to highways; the provision of needed improvements to the community's recreational, cultural and other community facilities to better serve the Amended Project Area; to eliminate and prevent the spread of blight and deterioration; the enhancement and renovation of businesses within the Amended Project Area; and expanding the resource of developable land .by making underutilized land available for development; and WHEREAS, the City and Agency intend to execute an agreement pursuant to CRL Section 34194.2, whereby the Agency shall make an initial transfer of a portion of its tax increment to the City in an amount equal the First Remittance, and thereafter to transfer amounts of tax increment equal to any subsequent remittance which the City is required to make to the county auditor- controller pursuant to the City's participation in the Program ("Agreement to Transfer Tax Increment"); and WHEREAS, the City is aware that the validity, passage, and applicability of ABX1 26 and ABX1 27 may become the subject of a judicial challenge; and 3 nd ABX1 27, which measures purport to become effective immediately. ABX1 .26 and ABX1 27, which are trailer bills to the 2011-12 budget bills, were is a city, not its redevelopment agency, which is required to make the payments. A city is allowed to enter into an. agreement with its redevelopment agency to transfer a portion of its tax increment to the city in an amount not to exceed the annual payment, For 2011-12, the City expects to have the funds available to make the payment. The combination of funds used to make the 2011-12 payment Will be determined after the City receives the Director of Finance's decision on.its appeal. Respectfully submitted: Betsy$.Adams, City Manager 0 nit 644..u5 NNa:.wIa,a..c.=.,mcn.t nc Yvcc.,.,>.a 011,00,.v a 0,..r..vats,of non aw.,an,,nOnc,:0ra.,.'MR(PPP.rs,.y nSas)Znro qy. earwmvw.m� - • • No Date Wien Ocafptien . ., . ' . .. , nrsooq arr alae,A•t. ff:1 1 .7.40., Tie 1 . ..... • anew., Whrr......'=6..."'"rd= AN ' .. , .OT 00 ® C® .00 . —. . , ,- 414.0.Re— I6 "---,,-. -_ . - - , . • II •Ficrrogbay-----—-- I 1 . , • i . . . . . . • EZ ___ ,z_-__JIZeal - ELEVATIONS (RETAIL Tth-11F.11-a1117- 6 6 .... . , -nal-- scregi+ BLDG.)6 . . . . . . . . . . . • . L i -753 ubiaill+ SCALE•I'' 8'-0* !..1..! ,4.17.",Of.191115011 Oarabedntor :LEVAT I ON ' , DATE June 28,2011 6e No:11-02 MP MVO by 0. . . . . . • MITTI..7 NC Tr..413‘..y10 1..0.0.B.P..00 0.1.Cif TK O....7/.0 r.f...”I.Ig...NOT 1.1 PM....t.521 pv 11,41,...I.lar.10,MI 0.114 COW-5,C.Tri•Ot...MCT ow...,.0.1(41,i.S.....t..-,Y...13 RC.. • 01ca.sucor . imUr Int cum.. Axu wows..am or n x anotrrcv ma ult SAC ISO!.1 Er 11,1.6•17.0 tan ca q.v..n,,uccu 1.e...n.cmu-,u,a-nrc AP,.ou,uuu,r,,T., 1..i'jU co., �- ®. EXISTING I I Z1 1 oaaenOn r�o,.wo�eiwa.u.w+o.ew - - .7. ,/ O/ + 1.h e" ®iiii4 RETAIL ft) OI d VICINITY MAP m I I �® I® *ADO 5F ...JCT.A ' ,1 1 LI �� OT NOT TO SCALE `` fe ,• -!fmm, 5..G-°TED COLOR r;1 A)T W 3 - S� &7'td 7--A.,-!W- .:.'xlmi :,`P ''t- 4 ADA PATH OF TRAVEL II IrT •-1 '�a V _ .':T , �,41 -� �,so 34:5 _� :rM'-r N."' 6'BENCH ~ �,, c W f1 A I 1, ' I : ir J =.J I I er s.iX 1•4 C'':4. �,•{, f5•r �I. Te • -ia„ .q •.. ' �a moo`R SEwTING I cp # I- I' +.. ,r.,✓N 'ill�Iq • �,!•t �ide___� - 1 r.�',.;.x�ttt^:r�•�tiP•-%• " � z• ' "S .*r 9 �>019 �..+. "1 ds3: • BICYCLE- F,•- -T a. -• ` o• DIRECTIONAL 516N MO. . SIGN (5)BIC,'. -— - 1i €.`'1-,--Y, '*',4,± ,1 l MPED CONCRETE♦W BARTON RTON ROAD -- -- ` "` f- ' ' Attachment 7 GRATED DOLOR jt T ROAD RAISED MEDIAN [r'' - r w -tr,,,,,-:',*4:I'lf Y w.g�;N�'KgNi{Ip,t+.�,;: ':P'7 •Ns u E,�''R .Y arF±l� T '-'• E (STING EGNALIZ;D ...,4;,,_kg',`"„ ;.° 2,BZERg/t-• :'lij; �;ry A„F, 1, ,., SITE PLAN INTERS GTION ,*.y"M`+J a'L?- -`i • f f.- ,4 •r C •- STA THERS I COMMERCIAL -, Wit. -„ - gg � .1' ° 1 1 I \1 �+.a q1;„ z-=' re`.,^y �# SCALE 1"=30'0" I]&1'-s• Yx." ,.1 .,:;sT '.L::ti;,F'<':-..F 1;;.4 s1`1-f4- ,72.. i.,00 DATE:June 28, 2011 holed TS1BSlm(o013.IIBBAU OnWQPoAbb Case No.: 11-02 G""D" A101 Chocbed by T.A.UNPDBUSMED WORK Of MB ARanECT Alm S D SAID BAY NOT BE DIRUUR➢.MO OR O5¢OSED KNEW ME 50 5FN CONSENT OF ME,RURTECI COBB...TIN CREW RENAL AU ARTS REBR.5O Wee.R>on ATDLLooRBA OT WHEREAS, the City, by the adoption of this Ordinance, does not represent, disclaim, or take any position whatsoever on the issue of the validity of ABX1 26 or ABX1 27,but rather the City seeks to comply with the Constitution and laws of the State of California, including Part 1.9, in order to preserve the ability of the Agency to continue to operate and thereby benefit the community; and WHEREAS, it is hereby acknowledged by the City Council that the League of California Cities and the California Redevelopment Association have respectively expressed the view tha' certain or all provisions of ABX1 26 and ABX1 27 including, but not limited to the effectivenes date,violate the State Constitution and other laws(collectively, "Laws"); anc� WHEREAS,the City Council does not intend, by enactment of this Ordinance, to waive any zonstitutional and/or legal rights by virtue of the enactment of this Ordinance and,therefore, reserves all of its rights under Laws regarding challenges, by the City or others, to the validity of any or all rovisions of ABX1 26 and ABX1 27 in any administrative or judicial proceeding and/or repeal this rdinance, rj without prejudice to the City's right to recover any amounts remitted under Part 1.9;anc ty kVHEREAS, the City Council does not intend, by enactment of this Ordinance to waive any rights of appeal regarding the amount of any remittance established by the Department of Finance, as rovided in Part 1.9; and WHEREAS,the City is the lead agency concerning this Ordinance pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (codified as Public Resources Code Sections 21000 et seq) ("CEQA") and the State CEQA Guidelines; and WHEREAS, City staff has determined that this Ordinance is exempt from CEQA, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378 (b)(4), because such authorizations are not considered a project subject to CEQA review. The community remittance is a government funding mechanism and fiscal 4 ome effective immediately. ABX1 .26 and ABX1 27, which are trailer bills to the 2011-12 budget bills, were is a city, not its redevelopment agency, which is required to make the payments. A city is allowed to enter into an. agreement with its redevelopment agency to transfer a portion of its tax increment to the city in an amount not to exceed the annual payment, For 2011-12, the City expects to have the funds available to make the payment. The combination of funds used to make the 2011-12 payment Will be determined after the City receives the Director of Finance's decision on.its appeal. Respectfully submitted: Betsy$.Adams, City Manager 0 nit 644..u5 NNa:.wIa,a..c.=.,mcn.t nc Yvcc.,.,>.a 011,00,.v a 0,..r..vats,of non aw.,an,,nOnc,:0ra.,.'MR(PPP.rs,.y nSas)Znro qy. earwmvw.m� - • • No Date Wien Ocafptien . ., . ' . .. , nrsooq arr alae,A•t. ff:1 1 .7.40., Tie 1 . ..... • anew., Whrr......'=6..."'"rd= AN ' .. , .OT 00 ® C® .00 . —. . , ,- 414.0.Re— I6 "---,,-. -_ . - - , . • II •Ficrrogbay-----—-- I 1 . , • i . . . . . . • EZ ___ ,z_-__JIZeal - ELEVATIONS (RETAIL Tth-11F.11-a1117- 6 6 .... . , -nal-- scregi+ BLDG.)6 . . . . . . . . . . . • . L i -753 ubiaill+ SCALE•I'' 8'-0* !..1..! ,4.17.",Of.191115011 Oarabedntor :LEVAT I ON ' , DATE June 28,2011 6e No:11-02 MP MVO by 0. . . . . . • MITTI..7 NC Tr..413‘..y10 1..0.0.B.P..00 0.1.Cif TK O....7/.0 r.f...”I.Ig...NOT 1.1 PM....t.521 pv 11,41,...I.lar.10,MI 0.114 COW-5,C.Tri•Ot...MCT ow...,.0.1(41,i.S.....t..-,Y...13 RC.. • 01ca.sucor . imUr Int cum.. Axu wows..am or n x anotrrcv ma ult SAC ISO!.1 Er 11,1.6•17.0 tan ca q.v..n,,uccu 1.e...n.cmu-,u,a-nrc AP,.ou,uuu,r,,T., 1..i'jU co., �- ®. EXISTING I I Z1 1 oaaenOn r�o,.wo�eiwa.u.w+o.ew - - .7. ,/ O/ + 1.h e" ®iiii4 RETAIL ft) OI d VICINITY MAP m I I �® I® *ADO 5F ...JCT.A ' ,1 1 LI �� OT NOT TO SCALE `` fe ,• -!fmm, 5..G-°TED COLOR r;1 A)T W 3 - S� &7'td 7--A.,-!W- .:.'xlmi :,`P ''t- 4 ADA PATH OF TRAVEL II IrT •-1 '�a V _ .':T , �,41 -� �,so 34:5 _� :rM'-r N."' 6'BENCH ~ �,, c W f1 A I 1, ' I : ir J =.J I I er s.iX 1•4 C'':4. �,•{, f5•r �I. Te • -ia„ .q •.. ' �a moo`R SEwTING I cp # I- I' +.. ,r.,✓N 'ill�Iq • �,!•t �ide___� - 1 r.�',.;.x�ttt^:r�•�tiP•-%• " � z• ' "S .*r 9 �>019 �..+. "1 ds3: • BICYCLE- F,•- -T a. -• ` o• DIRECTIONAL 516N MO. . SIGN (5)BIC,'. -— - 1i €.`'1-,--Y, '*',4,± ,1 l MPED CONCRETE♦W BARTON RTON ROAD -- -- ` "` f- ' ' Attachment 7 GRATED DOLOR jt T ROAD RAISED MEDIAN [r'' - r w -tr,,,,,-:',*4:I'lf Y w.g�;N�'KgNi{Ip,t+.�,;: ':P'7 •Ns u E,�''R .Y arF±l� T '-'• E (STING EGNALIZ;D ...,4;,,_kg',`"„ ;.° 2,BZERg/t-• :'lij; �;ry A„F, 1, ,., SITE PLAN INTERS GTION ,*.y"M`+J a'L?- -`i • f f.- ,4 •r C •- STA THERS I COMMERCIAL -, Wit. -„ - gg � .1' ° 1 1 I \1 �+.a q1;„ z-=' re`.,^y �# SCALE 1"=30'0" I]&1'-s• Yx." ,.1 .,:;sT '.L::ti;,F'<':-..F 1;;.4 s1`1-f4- ,72.. i.,00 DATE:June 28, 2011 holed TS1BSlm(o013.IIBBAU OnWQPoAbb Case No.: 11-02 G""D" A101 Chocbed by T.A.UNPDBUSMED WORK Of MB ARanECT Alm S D SAID BAY NOT BE DIRUUR➢.MO OR O5¢OSED KNEW ME 50 5FN CONSENT OF ME,RURTECI COBB...TIN CREW RENAL AU ARTS REBR.5O Wee.R>on ATDLLooRBA OT activity, which does not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant environmental impact; and WHEREAS, the City has duly considered all other related matters and has determined that the City's participation in the Program is in the best interests of the City,,and the health, safety, and welfare of its residents, and in accord with the public purposes and provisions of applicable state and local laws and requirements. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: - 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct. 2. The City hereby finds that (i) the dissolution of the Agency would be detrimental and cause irreparable harm to the community and to the health, safety, and economic well-being of the citizens of the City, and (ii) the types of activities and projects made possible, implemented, and funded by the Agency are highly significant and of enduring benefit to the community and the City, and are a critical component of its future; and 3. The City hereby ordains that the City shall comply with the Constitution and the laws of the State of California, abject to the provisions hereof including Part 1.9, including the determination of remittance amounts, 4)oeal ri•hts I relation thereto and the making of the remittances referred to in CRL Section 34194(b) and (c) at the times and in the manner described in Part 1.9. This ordinance is that ordinance referred to in CRL Section 34193 and shall be interpreted and applied in all respects so as to comply with Part 1.9,to the fullest extent permitted by law. 5 and the State CEQA Guidelines; and WHEREAS, City staff has determined that this Ordinance is exempt from CEQA, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378 (b)(4), because such authorizations are not considered a project subject to CEQA review. The community remittance is a government funding mechanism and fiscal 4 ome effective immediately. ABX1 .26 and ABX1 27, which are trailer bills to the 2011-12 budget bills, were is a city, not its redevelopment agency, which is required to make the payments. A city is allowed to enter into an. agreement with its redevelopment agency to transfer a portion of its tax increment to the city in an amount not to exceed the annual payment, For 2011-12, the City expects to have the funds available to make the payment. The combination of funds used to make the 2011-12 payment Will be determined after the City receives the Director of Finance's decision on.its appeal. Respectfully submitted: Betsy$.Adams, City Manager 0 nit 644..u5 NNa:.wIa,a..c.=.,mcn.t nc Yvcc.,.,>.a 011,00,.v a 0,..r..vats,of non aw.,an,,nOnc,:0ra.,.'MR(PPP.rs,.y nSas)Znro qy. earwmvw.m� - • • No Date Wien Ocafptien . ., . ' . .. , nrsooq arr alae,A•t. ff:1 1 .7.40., Tie 1 . ..... • anew., Whrr......'=6..."'"rd= AN ' .. , .OT 00 ® C® .00 . —. . , ,- 414.0.Re— I6 "---,,-. -_ . - - , . • II •Ficrrogbay-----—-- I 1 . , • i . . . . . . • EZ ___ ,z_-__JIZeal - ELEVATIONS (RETAIL Tth-11F.11-a1117- 6 6 .... . , -nal-- scregi+ BLDG.)6 . . . . . . . . . . . • . L i -753 ubiaill+ SCALE•I'' 8'-0* !..1..! ,4.17.",Of.191115011 Oarabedntor :LEVAT I ON ' , DATE June 28,2011 6e No:11-02 MP MVO by 0. . . . . . • MITTI..7 NC Tr..413‘..y10 1..0.0.B.P..00 0.1.Cif TK O....7/.0 r.f...”I.Ig...NOT 1.1 PM....t.521 pv 11,41,...I.lar.10,MI 0.114 COW-5,C.Tri•Ot...MCT ow...,.0.1(41,i.S.....t..-,Y...13 RC.. • 01ca.sucor . imUr Int cum.. Axu wows..am or n x anotrrcv ma ult SAC ISO!.1 Er 11,1.6•17.0 tan ca q.v..n,,uccu 1.e...n.cmu-,u,a-nrc AP,.ou,uuu,r,,T., 1..i'jU co., �- ®. EXISTING I I Z1 1 oaaenOn r�o,.wo�eiwa.u.w+o.ew - - .7. ,/ O/ + 1.h e" ®iiii4 RETAIL ft) OI d VICINITY MAP m I I �® I® *ADO 5F ...JCT.A ' ,1 1 LI �� OT NOT TO SCALE `` fe ,• -!fmm, 5..G-°TED COLOR r;1 A)T W 3 - S� &7'td 7--A.,-!W- .:.'xlmi :,`P ''t- 4 ADA PATH OF TRAVEL II IrT •-1 '�a V _ .':T , �,41 -� �,so 34:5 _� :rM'-r N."' 6'BENCH ~ �,, c W f1 A I 1, ' I : ir J =.J I I er s.iX 1•4 C'':4. �,•{, f5•r �I. Te • -ia„ .q •.. ' �a moo`R SEwTING I cp # I- I' +.. ,r.,✓N 'ill�Iq • �,!•t �ide___� - 1 r.�',.;.x�ttt^:r�•�tiP•-%• " � z• ' "S .*r 9 �>019 �..+. "1 ds3: • BICYCLE- F,•- -T a. -• ` o• DIRECTIONAL 516N MO. . SIGN (5)BIC,'. -— - 1i €.`'1-,--Y, '*',4,± ,1 l MPED CONCRETE♦W BARTON RTON ROAD -- -- ` "` f- ' ' Attachment 7 GRATED DOLOR jt T ROAD RAISED MEDIAN [r'' - r w -tr,,,,,-:',*4:I'lf Y w.g�;N�'KgNi{Ip,t+.�,;: ':P'7 •Ns u E,�''R .Y arF±l� T '-'• E (STING EGNALIZ;D ...,4;,,_kg',`"„ ;.° 2,BZERg/t-• :'lij; �;ry A„F, 1, ,., SITE PLAN INTERS GTION ,*.y"M`+J a'L?- -`i • f f.- ,4 •r C •- STA THERS I COMMERCIAL -, Wit. -„ - gg � .1' ° 1 1 I \1 �+.a q1;„ z-=' re`.,^y �# SCALE 1"=30'0" I]&1'-s• Yx." ,.1 .,:;sT '.L::ti;,F'<':-..F 1;;.4 s1`1-f4- ,72.. i.,00 DATE:June 28, 2011 holed TS1BSlm(o013.IIBBAU OnWQPoAbb Case No.: 11-02 G""D" A101 Chocbed by T.A.UNPDBUSMED WORK Of MB ARanECT Alm S D SAID BAY NOT BE DIRUUR➢.MO OR O5¢OSED KNEW ME 50 5FN CONSENT OF ME,RURTECI COBB...TIN CREW RENAL AU ARTS REBR.5O Wee.R>on ATDLLooRBA OT 4. On or before November 1, 2011,.the City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to notify the county auditor-controller, the Controller of the State, and the State Department of Finance that the City agrees to comply with the provisions of Part 1.9 as provided hereunder, such notice to be in accordance with CRL Section 34193.1. The City Manager is hereby authorized to take any actions necessary to implement this Ordinance and comply with Part 1.9, including without limitation, providing required notices to the Auditor Controller, the State Controller, and the Department of Finance entering into any agreements with the Agency to make the remittance payments; or making any remittance payments. 5. The City's remittances to the county auditor-controller made pursuant to Part 1.9 may be paid from any legally available funds of the City not otherwise obligated for other uses in accordance with Section 34194.1. Nothing herein is intended or shall be interpreted to require any payments or impose any financial or other obligation of the City other than in accordance with the Constitution and laws of the State of California, including Part 1.9. 6. Neither the adoption of this Ordinance, nor the acknowledgment of or references to any provisions of ABX1 26 and ABX1 27, nor the City's payment of any remittances contemplated by ABX1 27 shall be deemed to be, nor are they intended as, an acknowledgment of the validity o ABX1 26 and ABX1 27, and the City reserves all right in its sole discretion to challenge the validi of any or all provisions of ABX1 26 and ABX1 27 in any administrative or judicial proceedin and/or re eal this Ordinance withoutprejudice to the Cit 's ri ht to recover an amounts remitte under Part 1.9. 7. The City Council determines that approval of this Ordinance exempt from CEQA, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378 (b)(4), because such approval not considered a project subject to CEQA review. The payment is a government funding mechanism and fiscal activity which 6 r bills to the 2011-12 budget bills, were is a city, not its redevelopment agency, which is required to make the payments. A city is allowed to enter into an. agreement with its redevelopment agency to transfer a portion of its tax increment to the city in an amount not to exceed the annual payment, For 2011-12, the City expects to have the funds available to make the payment. The combination of funds used to make the 2011-12 payment Will be determined after the City receives the Director of Finance's decision on.its appeal. Respectfully submitted: Betsy$.Adams, City Manager 0 nit 644..u5 NNa:.wIa,a..c.=.,mcn.t nc Yvcc.,.,>.a 011,00,.v a 0,..r..vats,of non aw.,an,,nOnc,:0ra.,.'MR(PPP.rs,.y nSas)Znro qy. earwmvw.m� - • • No Date Wien Ocafptien . ., . ' . .. , nrsooq arr alae,A•t. ff:1 1 .7.40., Tie 1 . ..... • anew., Whrr......'=6..."'"rd= AN ' .. , .OT 00 ® C® .00 . —. . , ,- 414.0.Re— I6 "---,,-. -_ . - - , . • II •Ficrrogbay-----—-- I 1 . , • i . . . . . . • EZ ___ ,z_-__JIZeal - ELEVATIONS (RETAIL Tth-11F.11-a1117- 6 6 .... . , -nal-- scregi+ BLDG.)6 . . . . . . . . . . . • . L i -753 ubiaill+ SCALE•I'' 8'-0* !..1..! ,4.17.",Of.191115011 Oarabedntor :LEVAT I ON ' , DATE June 28,2011 6e No:11-02 MP MVO by 0. . . . . . • MITTI..7 NC Tr..413‘..y10 1..0.0.B.P..00 0.1.Cif TK O....7/.0 r.f...”I.Ig...NOT 1.1 PM....t.521 pv 11,41,...I.lar.10,MI 0.114 COW-5,C.Tri•Ot...MCT ow...,.0.1(41,i.S.....t..-,Y...13 RC.. • 01ca.sucor . imUr Int cum.. Axu wows..am or n x anotrrcv ma ult SAC ISO!.1 Er 11,1.6•17.0 tan ca q.v..n,,uccu 1.e...n.cmu-,u,a-nrc AP,.ou,uuu,r,,T., 1..i'jU co., �- ®. EXISTING I I Z1 1 oaaenOn r�o,.wo�eiwa.u.w+o.ew - - .7. ,/ O/ + 1.h e" ®iiii4 RETAIL ft) OI d VICINITY MAP m I I �® I® *ADO 5F ...JCT.A ' ,1 1 LI �� OT NOT TO SCALE `` fe ,• -!fmm, 5..G-°TED COLOR r;1 A)T W 3 - S� &7'td 7--A.,-!W- .:.'xlmi :,`P ''t- 4 ADA PATH OF TRAVEL II IrT •-1 '�a V _ .':T , �,41 -� �,so 34:5 _� :rM'-r N."' 6'BENCH ~ �,, c W f1 A I 1, ' I : ir J =.J I I er s.iX 1•4 C'':4. �,•{, f5•r �I. Te • -ia„ .q •.. ' �a moo`R SEwTING I cp # I- I' +.. ,r.,✓N 'ill�Iq • �,!•t �ide___� - 1 r.�',.;.x�ttt^:r�•�tiP•-%• " � z• ' "S .*r 9 �>019 �..+. "1 ds3: • BICYCLE- F,•- -T a. -• ` o• DIRECTIONAL 516N MO. . SIGN (5)BIC,'. -— - 1i €.`'1-,--Y, '*',4,± ,1 l MPED CONCRETE♦W BARTON RTON ROAD -- -- ` "` f- ' ' Attachment 7 GRATED DOLOR jt T ROAD RAISED MEDIAN [r'' - r w -tr,,,,,-:',*4:I'lf Y w.g�;N�'KgNi{Ip,t+.�,;: ':P'7 •Ns u E,�''R .Y arF±l� T '-'• E (STING EGNALIZ;D ...,4;,,_kg',`"„ ;.° 2,BZERg/t-• :'lij; �;ry A„F, 1, ,., SITE PLAN INTERS GTION ,*.y"M`+J a'L?- -`i • f f.- ,4 •r C •- STA THERS I COMMERCIAL -, Wit. -„ - gg � .1' ° 1 1 I \1 �+.a q1;„ z-=' re`.,^y �# SCALE 1"=30'0" I]&1'-s• Yx." ,.1 .,:;sT '.L::ti;,F'<':-..F 1;;.4 s1`1-f4- ,72.. i.,00 DATE:June 28, 2011 holed TS1BSlm(o013.IIBBAU OnWQPoAbb Case No.: 11-02 G""D" A101 Chocbed by T.A.UNPDBUSMED WORK Of MB ARanECT Alm S D SAID BAY NOT BE DIRUUR➢.MO OR O5¢OSED KNEW ME 50 5FN CONSENT OF ME,RURTECI COBB...TIN CREW RENAL AU ARTS REBR.5O Wee.R>on ATDLLooRBA OT does not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant environmental impact. 8. The City Council hereby authorizes and directs that a Notice of Exemption shall be filed with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino, California, within five(5)working days following the date of adoption of this Ordinance. 9. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause it, or a summary of it, to be published once within 15 days of adoption in a newspaper of general circulation printed and published within the City of Grand Terrace, and shall post a certified copy of this Ordinance, including the vote for and against the same, in the Office of the City Clerk in accordance with Government Code § 36933.. 10. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and the same shall thereupon take effect and be in force immediately upon its adoption. 11. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after the date of the final passage and adoption hereof. 7 ution and laws of the State of California, including Part 1.9. 6. Neither the adoption of this Ordinance, nor the acknowledgment of or references to any provisions of ABX1 26 and ABX1 27, nor the City's payment of any remittances contemplated by ABX1 27 shall be deemed to be, nor are they intended as, an acknowledgment of the validity o ABX1 26 and ABX1 27, and the City reserves all right in its sole discretion to challenge the validi of any or all provisions of ABX1 26 and ABX1 27 in any administrative or judicial proceedin and/or re eal this Ordinance withoutprejudice to the Cit 's ri ht to recover an amounts remitte under Part 1.9. 7. The City Council determines that approval of this Ordinance exempt from CEQA, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378 (b)(4), because such approval not considered a project subject to CEQA review. The payment is a government funding mechanism and fiscal activity which 6 r bills to the 2011-12 budget bills, were is a city, not its redevelopment agency, which is required to make the payments. A city is allowed to enter into an. agreement with its redevelopment agency to transfer a portion of its tax increment to the city in an amount not to exceed the annual payment, For 2011-12, the City expects to have the funds available to make the payment. The combination of funds used to make the 2011-12 payment Will be determined after the City receives the Director of Finance's decision on.its appeal. Respectfully submitted: Betsy$.Adams, City Manager 0 nit 644..u5 NNa:.wIa,a..c.=.,mcn.t nc Yvcc.,.,>.a 011,00,.v a 0,..r..vats,of non aw.,an,,nOnc,:0ra.,.'MR(PPP.rs,.y nSas)Znro qy. earwmvw.m� - • • No Date Wien Ocafptien . ., . ' . .. , nrsooq arr alae,A•t. ff:1 1 .7.40., Tie 1 . ..... • anew., Whrr......'=6..."'"rd= AN ' .. , .OT 00 ® C® .00 . —. . , ,- 414.0.Re— I6 "---,,-. -_ . - - , . • II •Ficrrogbay-----—-- I 1 . , • i . . . . . . • EZ ___ ,z_-__JIZeal - ELEVATIONS (RETAIL Tth-11F.11-a1117- 6 6 .... . , -nal-- scregi+ BLDG.)6 . . . . . . . . . . . • . L i -753 ubiaill+ SCALE•I'' 8'-0* !..1..! ,4.17.",Of.191115011 Oarabedntor :LEVAT I ON ' , DATE June 28,2011 6e No:11-02 MP MVO by 0. . . . . . • MITTI..7 NC Tr..413‘..y10 1..0.0.B.P..00 0.1.Cif TK O....7/.0 r.f...”I.Ig...NOT 1.1 PM....t.521 pv 11,41,...I.lar.10,MI 0.114 COW-5,C.Tri•Ot...MCT ow...,.0.1(41,i.S.....t..-,Y...13 RC.. • 01ca.sucor . imUr Int cum.. Axu wows..am or n x anotrrcv ma ult SAC ISO!.1 Er 11,1.6•17.0 tan ca q.v..n,,uccu 1.e...n.cmu-,u,a-nrc AP,.ou,uuu,r,,T., 1..i'jU co., �- ®. EXISTING I I Z1 1 oaaenOn r�o,.wo�eiwa.u.w+o.ew - - .7. ,/ O/ + 1.h e" ®iiii4 RETAIL ft) OI d VICINITY MAP m I I �® I® *ADO 5F ...JCT.A ' ,1 1 LI �� OT NOT TO SCALE `` fe ,• -!fmm, 5..G-°TED COLOR r;1 A)T W 3 - S� &7'td 7--A.,-!W- .:.'xlmi :,`P ''t- 4 ADA PATH OF TRAVEL II IrT •-1 '�a V _ .':T , �,41 -� �,so 34:5 _� :rM'-r N."' 6'BENCH ~ �,, c W f1 A I 1, ' I : ir J =.J I I er s.iX 1•4 C'':4. �,•{, f5•r �I. Te • -ia„ .q •.. ' �a moo`R SEwTING I cp # I- I' +.. ,r.,✓N 'ill�Iq • �,!•t �ide___� - 1 r.�',.;.x�ttt^:r�•�tiP•-%• " � z• ' "S .*r 9 �>019 �..+. "1 ds3: • BICYCLE- F,•- -T a. -• ` o• DIRECTIONAL 516N MO. . SIGN (5)BIC,'. -— - 1i €.`'1-,--Y, '*',4,± ,1 l MPED CONCRETE♦W BARTON RTON ROAD -- -- ` "` f- ' ' Attachment 7 GRATED DOLOR jt T ROAD RAISED MEDIAN [r'' - r w -tr,,,,,-:',*4:I'lf Y w.g�;N�'KgNi{Ip,t+.�,;: ':P'7 •Ns u E,�''R .Y arF±l� T '-'• E (STING EGNALIZ;D ...,4;,,_kg',`"„ ;.° 2,BZERg/t-• :'lij; �;ry A„F, 1, ,., SITE PLAN INTERS GTION ,*.y"M`+J a'L?- -`i • f f.- ,4 •r C •- STA THERS I COMMERCIAL -, Wit. -„ - gg � .1' ° 1 1 I \1 �+.a q1;„ z-=' re`.,^y �# SCALE 1"=30'0" I]&1'-s• Yx." ,.1 .,:;sT '.L::ti;,F'<':-..F 1;;.4 s1`1-f4- ,72.. i.,00 DATE:June 28, 2011 holed TS1BSlm(o013.IIBBAU OnWQPoAbb Case No.: 11-02 G""D" A101 Chocbed by T.A.UNPDBUSMED WORK Of MB ARanECT Alm S D SAID BAY NOT BE DIRUUR➢.MO OR O5¢OSED KNEW ME 50 5FN CONSENT OF ME,RURTECI COBB...TIN CREW RENAL AU ARTS REBR.5O Wee.R>on ATDLLooRBA OT PASSED APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of , 2011. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney 8 ntary Redevelopment Program Contained in Part 1.9 of Division 24 of the California Health and Safety Code , the City of Grand Terrace Electing to Comply with, and Participate in the Alternative Voluntary Redevelopment Program Contained in Part 1.9 of Division 24 of the California Health and Safety Code Attachment B Ordinance of the City of Grand Terrace Electing to Comply with and Participate in the Alternative Voluntary Redevelopment Program Contained in Part 1.9 of Division 24 of the California Health and Safety Code Ms map isfor reference orgy.For detaled ilcanalon,ple se oansut with the Cemrnm ty De.ecprrent Depattneri �i._1, 'n Page 11 of 11 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) ss CITY OF GRAND TERRACE ) I, Brenda Mesa, City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, do hereby certify.that the foregoing Ordinance No. was duly passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace held on the day of , 2011. Upon motion of City Council Member , seconded by City Council Member ,the foregoing Ordinance No; was duly passed and adopted. Vote on the motion: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: AB STAIN: IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and the Official Seal of the City of this day of ,2011. Brenda Mesa, City Clerk 9 of Division 24 of the California Health and Safety Code Ms map isfor reference orgy.For detaled ilcanalon,ple se oansut with the Cemrnm ty De.ecprrent Depattneri �i._1, 'n Page 11 of 11 Attachment B Ordinance of the City of Grand Terrace Electing to Comply with and Participate in the Alternative Voluntary Redevelopment Program Contained in Part 1.9 of Division 24 of the California Health and Safety Code t a meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace held on the day of , 2011. Upon motion of City Council Member , seconded by City Council Member ,the foregoing Ordinance No; was duly passed and adopted. Vote on the motion: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: AB STAIN: IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and the Official Seal of the City of this day of ,2011. Brenda Mesa, City Clerk 9 of Division 24 of the California Health and Safety Code Ms map isfor reference orgy.For detaled ilcanalon,ple se oansut with the Cemrnm ty De.ecprrent Depattneri �i._1, 'n Page 11 of 11 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE ELECTING TO COMPLY WITH AND PARTICIPATE IN THE ALTERNATIVE VOLUNTARY REDEVELOPMENT PROGRAM CONTAINED IN PART 1.9 OF DIVISION 24 OF THE CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE WHEREAS, the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Grand Terrace, ("Agency") is a community redevelopment agency organized and existing under the California Community Redevelopment Law, Health and Safety Code Sections 33000, et seq. ("CRL") and has been authorized to transact business and exercise the powers of a redevelopment agency pursuant to action of the City Council("City Council")of the City of Grand Terrace ("City"); and WHEREAS, the City Council approved a redevelopment plan for a redevelopment project and project area(the "Original Plan" and"Original Project Area", respectively,by Ordinance No. 25 adopted September 27, 1979, which has subsequently been amended by an amendment ("Amendment No. 1"), as approved by Ordinance No. 31 adopted on January 17, 1980, an additional amendment("Amendment No. 2") as approved by Ordinance No. 52 on July 15, 1981, an additional amendment("Amendment No. 3") as approved by Ordinance No. 187 on July 22, 1999,an additional amendment ("Amendment No. 4") as approved by Ordinance No. 202 on September 12, 2002, an additional amendment ("Amendment No. 5") as approved by Ordinance No. 212 on July 22, 2004, and an additional amendment("Amendment No. 6") as approved by Ordinance No. 250 on May 11, 2010 approving an amended and restated redevelopment plan (herein,the "Amended Redevelopment Plan") for the project area as established by Ordinance No. 25 and thereafter amended as set forth above under the Amended Redevelopment Plan(the"Amended Project Area");and WHEREAS, Parts 1.8, 1.85 and 1.9 of Division 24 of the Health and Safety Code were added to the CRL by ABX1 26 and ABX1 27, which measures purport to become effective immediately. ABX1 26 and ABX1 27, which are trailer bills to the 2011-12 budget bills, were 2011-12 budget bills, were is a city, not its redevelopment agency, which is required to make the payments. A city is allowed to enter into an. agreement with its redevelopment agency to transfer a portion of its tax increment to the city in an amount not to exceed the annual payment, For 2011-12, the City expects to have the funds available to make the payment. The combination of funds used to make the 2011-12 payment Will be determined after the City receives the Director of Finance's decision on.its appeal. Respectfully submitted: Betsy$.Adams, City Manager 0 nit 644..u5 NNa:.wIa,a..c.=.,mcn.t nc Yvcc.,.,>.a 011,00,.v a 0,..r..vats,of non aw.,an,,nOnc,:0ra.,.'MR(PPP.rs,.y nSas)Znro qy. earwmvw.m� - • • No Date Wien Ocafptien . ., . ' . .. , nrsooq arr alae,A•t. ff:1 1 .7.40., Tie 1 . ..... • anew., Whrr......'=6..."'"rd= AN ' .. , .OT 00 ® C® .00 . —. . , ,- 414.0.Re— I6 "---,,-. -_ . - - , . • II •Ficrrogbay-----—-- I 1 . , • i . . . . . . • EZ ___ ,z_-__JIZeal - ELEVATIONS (RETAIL Tth-11F.11-a1117- 6 6 .... . , -nal-- scregi+ BLDG.)6 . . . . . . . . . . . • . L i -753 ubiaill+ SCALE•I'' 8'-0* !..1..! ,4.17.",Of.191115011 Oarabedntor :LEVAT I ON ' , DATE June 28,2011 6e No:11-02 MP MVO by 0. . . . . . • MITTI..7 NC Tr..413‘..y10 1..0.0.B.P..00 0.1.Cif TK O....7/.0 r.f...”I.Ig...NOT 1.1 PM....t.521 pv 11,41,...I.lar.10,MI 0.114 COW-5,C.Tri•Ot...MCT ow...,.0.1(41,i.S.....t..-,Y...13 RC.. • 01ca.sucor . imUr Int cum.. Axu wows..am or n x anotrrcv ma ult SAC ISO!.1 Er 11,1.6•17.0 tan ca q.v..n,,uccu 1.e...n.cmu-,u,a-nrc AP,.ou,uuu,r,,T., 1..i'jU co., �- ®. EXISTING I I Z1 1 oaaenOn r�o,.wo�eiwa.u.w+o.ew - - .7. ,/ O/ + 1.h e" ®iiii4 RETAIL ft) OI d VICINITY MAP m I I �® I® *ADO 5F ...JCT.A ' ,1 1 LI �� OT NOT TO SCALE `` fe ,• -!fmm, 5..G-°TED COLOR r;1 A)T W 3 - S� &7'td 7--A.,-!W- .:.'xlmi :,`P ''t- 4 ADA PATH OF TRAVEL II IrT •-1 '�a V _ .':T , �,41 -� �,so 34:5 _� :rM'-r N."' 6'BENCH ~ �,, c W f1 A I 1, ' I : ir J =.J I I er s.iX 1•4 C'':4. �,•{, f5•r �I. Te • -ia„ .q •.. ' �a moo`R SEwTING I cp # I- I' +.. ,r.,✓N 'ill�Iq • �,!•t �ide___� - 1 r.�',.;.x�ttt^:r�•�tiP•-%• " � z• ' "S .*r 9 �>019 �..+. "1 ds3: • BICYCLE- F,•- -T a. -• ` o• DIRECTIONAL 516N MO. . SIGN (5)BIC,'. -— - 1i €.`'1-,--Y, '*',4,± ,1 l MPED CONCRETE♦W BARTON RTON ROAD -- -- ` "` f- ' ' Attachment 7 GRATED DOLOR jt T ROAD RAISED MEDIAN [r'' - r w -tr,,,,,-:',*4:I'lf Y w.g�;N�'KgNi{Ip,t+.�,;: ':P'7 •Ns u E,�''R .Y arF±l� T '-'• E (STING EGNALIZ;D ...,4;,,_kg',`"„ ;.° 2,BZERg/t-• :'lij; �;ry A„F, 1, ,., SITE PLAN INTERS GTION ,*.y"M`+J a'L?- -`i • f f.- ,4 •r C •- STA THERS I COMMERCIAL -, Wit. -„ - gg � .1' ° 1 1 I \1 �+.a q1;„ z-=' re`.,^y �# SCALE 1"=30'0" I]&1'-s• Yx." ,.1 .,:;sT '.L::ti;,F'<':-..F 1;;.4 s1`1-f4- ,72.. i.,00 DATE:June 28, 2011 holed TS1BSlm(o013.IIBBAU OnWQPoAbb Case No.: 11-02 G""D" A101 Chocbed by T.A.UNPDBUSMED WORK Of MB ARanECT Alm S D SAID BAY NOT BE DIRUUR➢.MO OR O5¢OSED KNEW ME 50 5FN CONSENT OF ME,RURTECI COBB...TIN CREW RENAL AU ARTS REBR.5O Wee.R>on ATDLLooRBA OT approved by both houses of the Legislature on June 15, 2011 and signed by the Governor on June 28, 2011; and WHEREAS, Part 1.85 of the CRL ("Part 1.85") provides for the statewide dissolution of all redevelopment agencies, including the Agency, as of October 1, 2011, and provides that,thereafter, a successor agency to administer the enforceable obligations of the Agency and otherwise wind up the Agency's affairs,all subject to the review and approval by an oversight committee; and WHEREAS, Part 1.8 of the CRL ("Part 1.8") provides for the restriction of activities and authority of the Agency in the interim period prior to dissolution to certain "enforceable obligations" and to actions required for the general winding up of affairs, preservation of assets, and certain other goals delineated in Part 1.8; and WHEREAS, the dissolution of the Agency would be detrimental to the health, safety, and economic well-being of the residents of the City and cause irreparable harm to the community, because, among other reasons, the redevelopment activities and projects made possible, implemented, and funded by the Agency are highly significant and of enduring benefit to the community and the City,and are a critical component of its future; and WHEREAS, Part 1.9 of the CRL ("Part 1.9") provides that a redevelopment agency may continue in operation if a city or county that includes a redevelopment agency adopts an ordinance agreeing to comply with and participate in the Alternative Voluntary Redevelopment Program established in Part 1.9("Program"); and WHEREAS, as a condition of the Agency's continued existence and operation of its redevelopment agency, the City is required to make certain annual remittances to the county auditor-controller pursuant to Chapter 3 of Part 1.9, beginning with a larger upfront remittance for 2 and Safety Code were added to the CRL by ABX1 26 and ABX1 27, which measures purport to become effective immediately. ABX1 26 and ABX1 27, which are trailer bills to the 2011-12 budget bills, were 2011-12 budget bills, were is a city, not its redevelopment agency, which is required to make the payments. A city is allowed to enter into an. agreement with its redevelopment agency to transfer a portion of its tax increment to the city in an amount not to exceed the annual payment, For 2011-12, the City expects to have the funds available to make the payment. The combination of funds used to make the 2011-12 payment Will be determined after the City receives the Director of Finance's decision on.its appeal. Respectfully submitted: Betsy$.Adams, City Manager 0 nit 644..u5 NNa:.wIa,a..c.=.,mcn.t nc Yvcc.,.,>.a 011,00,.v a 0,..r..vats,of non aw.,an,,nOnc,:0ra.,.'MR(PPP.rs,.y nSas)Znro qy. earwmvw.m� - • • No Date Wien Ocafptien . ., . ' . .. , nrsooq arr alae,A•t. ff:1 1 .7.40., Tie 1 . ..... • anew., Whrr......'=6..."'"rd= AN ' .. , .OT 00 ® C® .00 . —. . , ,- 414.0.Re— I6 "---,,-. -_ . - - , . • II •Ficrrogbay-----—-- I 1 . , • i . . . . . . • EZ ___ ,z_-__JIZeal - ELEVATIONS (RETAIL Tth-11F.11-a1117- 6 6 .... . , -nal-- scregi+ BLDG.)6 . . . . . . . . . . . • . L i -753 ubiaill+ SCALE•I'' 8'-0* !..1..! ,4.17.",Of.191115011 Oarabedntor :LEVAT I ON ' , DATE June 28,2011 6e No:11-02 MP MVO by 0. . . . . . • MITTI..7 NC Tr..413‘..y10 1..0.0.B.P..00 0.1.Cif TK O....7/.0 r.f...”I.Ig...NOT 1.1 PM....t.521 pv 11,41,...I.lar.10,MI 0.114 COW-5,C.Tri•Ot...MCT ow...,.0.1(41,i.S.....t..-,Y...13 RC.. • 01ca.sucor . imUr Int cum.. Axu wows..am or n x anotrrcv ma ult SAC ISO!.1 Er 11,1.6•17.0 tan ca q.v..n,,uccu 1.e...n.cmu-,u,a-nrc AP,.ou,uuu,r,,T., 1..i'jU co., �- ®. EXISTING I I Z1 1 oaaenOn r�o,.wo�eiwa.u.w+o.ew - - .7. ,/ O/ + 1.h e" ®iiii4 RETAIL ft) OI d VICINITY MAP m I I �® I® *ADO 5F ...JCT.A ' ,1 1 LI �� OT NOT TO SCALE `` fe ,• -!fmm, 5..G-°TED COLOR r;1 A)T W 3 - S� &7'td 7--A.,-!W- .:.'xlmi :,`P ''t- 4 ADA PATH OF TRAVEL II IrT •-1 '�a V _ .':T , �,41 -� �,so 34:5 _� :rM'-r N."' 6'BENCH ~ �,, c W f1 A I 1, ' I : ir J =.J I I er s.iX 1•4 C'':4. �,•{, f5•r �I. Te • -ia„ .q •.. ' �a moo`R SEwTING I cp # I- I' +.. ,r.,✓N 'ill�Iq • �,!•t �ide___� - 1 r.�',.;.x�ttt^:r�•�tiP•-%• " � z• ' "S .*r 9 �>019 �..+. "1 ds3: • BICYCLE- F,•- -T a. -• ` o• DIRECTIONAL 516N MO. . SIGN (5)BIC,'. -— - 1i €.`'1-,--Y, '*',4,± ,1 l MPED CONCRETE♦W BARTON RTON ROAD -- -- ` "` f- ' ' Attachment 7 GRATED DOLOR jt T ROAD RAISED MEDIAN [r'' - r w -tr,,,,,-:',*4:I'lf Y w.g�;N�'KgNi{Ip,t+.�,;: ':P'7 •Ns u E,�''R .Y arF±l� T '-'• E (STING EGNALIZ;D ...,4;,,_kg',`"„ ;.° 2,BZERg/t-• :'lij; �;ry A„F, 1, ,., SITE PLAN INTERS GTION ,*.y"M`+J a'L?- -`i • f f.- ,4 •r C •- STA THERS I COMMERCIAL -, Wit. -„ - gg � .1' ° 1 1 I \1 �+.a q1;„ z-=' re`.,^y �# SCALE 1"=30'0" I]&1'-s• Yx." ,.1 .,:;sT '.L::ti;,F'<':-..F 1;;.4 s1`1-f4- ,72.. i.,00 DATE:June 28, 2011 holed TS1BSlm(o013.IIBBAU OnWQPoAbb Case No.: 11-02 G""D" A101 Chocbed by T.A.UNPDBUSMED WORK Of MB ARanECT Alm S D SAID BAY NOT BE DIRUUR➢.MO OR O5¢OSED KNEW ME 50 5FN CONSENT OF ME,RURTECI COBB...TIN CREW RENAL AU ARTS REBR.5O Wee.R>on ATDLLooRBA OT the 2011-2012 fiscal year ("First Remittance"), to be paid in two equal installments on January 15, 2012 and May 15, 2012; and WHEREAS, the City will have sufficient moneys and revenues to fund an amount equal to the City's payment of the First Remittance and expects to have sufficient moneys and revenues to fund the subsequent annual remittances required by Part 1.9; and • WHEREAS, the City's needs are such that it can commit to spend the funds received from the Agency pursuant to the Agreement to Transfer Tax Increment (defined below) to finance activities within the Redevelopment Project that are related to accomplishing the goals of the Redevelopment Project, including without limitation: the promotion of public improvement facilities; the provision of adequate roadways to correct street alignment problems, to provide adequate circulation and access to highways; the provision of needed improvements to the community's recreational, cultural and other community facilities to better serve the Amended Project Area; to eliminate and prevent the spread of blight and deterioration; the enhancement and renovation of businesses within the Amended Project Area; and expanding the resource of developable land by making underutilized land available for development; and WHEREAS, the City and Agency intend to execute an agreement pursuant to CRL Section 34194.2, whereby the Agency shall make an initial transfer of a portion of its tax increment to the City in an amount equal the First Remittance, and thereafter to transfer amounts of tax increment equal to any subsequent remittance which the City is required to make to the county auditor- controller pursuant to the City's participation in the Program ("Agreement to Transfer Tax Increment");and WHEREAS, the City is aware that the validity, passage, and applicability of ABX1 26 and ABX1 27 may become the subject of a judicial challenge; and 3 to become effective immediately. ABX1 26 and ABX1 27, which are trailer bills to the 2011-12 budget bills, were 2011-12 budget bills, were is a city, not its redevelopment agency, which is required to make the payments. A city is allowed to enter into an. agreement with its redevelopment agency to transfer a portion of its tax increment to the city in an amount not to exceed the annual payment, For 2011-12, the City expects to have the funds available to make the payment. The combination of funds used to make the 2011-12 payment Will be determined after the City receives the Director of Finance's decision on.its appeal. Respectfully submitted: Betsy$.Adams, City Manager 0 nit 644..u5 NNa:.wIa,a..c.=.,mcn.t nc Yvcc.,.,>.a 011,00,.v a 0,..r..vats,of non aw.,an,,nOnc,:0ra.,.'MR(PPP.rs,.y nSas)Znro qy. earwmvw.m� - • • No Date Wien Ocafptien . ., . ' . .. , nrsooq arr alae,A•t. ff:1 1 .7.40., Tie 1 . ..... • anew., Whrr......'=6..."'"rd= AN ' .. , .OT 00 ® C® .00 . —. . , ,- 414.0.Re— I6 "---,,-. -_ . - - , . • II •Ficrrogbay-----—-- I 1 . , • i . . . . . . • EZ ___ ,z_-__JIZeal - ELEVATIONS (RETAIL Tth-11F.11-a1117- 6 6 .... . , -nal-- scregi+ BLDG.)6 . . . . . . . . . . . • . L i -753 ubiaill+ SCALE•I'' 8'-0* !..1..! ,4.17.",Of.191115011 Oarabedntor :LEVAT I ON ' , DATE June 28,2011 6e No:11-02 MP MVO by 0. . . . . . • MITTI..7 NC Tr..413‘..y10 1..0.0.B.P..00 0.1.Cif TK O....7/.0 r.f...”I.Ig...NOT 1.1 PM....t.521 pv 11,41,...I.lar.10,MI 0.114 COW-5,C.Tri•Ot...MCT ow...,.0.1(41,i.S.....t..-,Y...13 RC.. • 01ca.sucor . imUr Int cum.. Axu wows..am or n x anotrrcv ma ult SAC ISO!.1 Er 11,1.6•17.0 tan ca q.v..n,,uccu 1.e...n.cmu-,u,a-nrc AP,.ou,uuu,r,,T., 1..i'jU co., �- ®. EXISTING I I Z1 1 oaaenOn r�o,.wo�eiwa.u.w+o.ew - - .7. ,/ O/ + 1.h e" ®iiii4 RETAIL ft) OI d VICINITY MAP m I I �® I® *ADO 5F ...JCT.A ' ,1 1 LI �� OT NOT TO SCALE `` fe ,• -!fmm, 5..G-°TED COLOR r;1 A)T W 3 - S� &7'td 7--A.,-!W- .:.'xlmi :,`P ''t- 4 ADA PATH OF TRAVEL II IrT •-1 '�a V _ .':T , �,41 -� �,so 34:5 _� :rM'-r N."' 6'BENCH ~ �,, c W f1 A I 1, ' I : ir J =.J I I er s.iX 1•4 C'':4. �,•{, f5•r �I. Te • -ia„ .q •.. ' �a moo`R SEwTING I cp # I- I' +.. ,r.,✓N 'ill�Iq • �,!•t �ide___� - 1 r.�',.;.x�ttt^:r�•�tiP•-%• " � z• ' "S .*r 9 �>019 �..+. "1 ds3: • BICYCLE- F,•- -T a. -• ` o• DIRECTIONAL 516N MO. . SIGN (5)BIC,'. -— - 1i €.`'1-,--Y, '*',4,± ,1 l MPED CONCRETE♦W BARTON RTON ROAD -- -- ` "` f- ' ' Attachment 7 GRATED DOLOR jt T ROAD RAISED MEDIAN [r'' - r w -tr,,,,,-:',*4:I'lf Y w.g�;N�'KgNi{Ip,t+.�,;: ':P'7 •Ns u E,�''R .Y arF±l� T '-'• E (STING EGNALIZ;D ...,4;,,_kg',`"„ ;.° 2,BZERg/t-• :'lij; �;ry A„F, 1, ,., SITE PLAN INTERS GTION ,*.y"M`+J a'L?- -`i • f f.- ,4 •r C •- STA THERS I COMMERCIAL -, Wit. -„ - gg � .1' ° 1 1 I \1 �+.a q1;„ z-=' re`.,^y �# SCALE 1"=30'0" I]&1'-s• Yx." ,.1 .,:;sT '.L::ti;,F'<':-..F 1;;.4 s1`1-f4- ,72.. i.,00 DATE:June 28, 2011 holed TS1BSlm(o013.IIBBAU OnWQPoAbb Case No.: 11-02 G""D" A101 Chocbed by T.A.UNPDBUSMED WORK Of MB ARanECT Alm S D SAID BAY NOT BE DIRUUR➢.MO OR O5¢OSED KNEW ME 50 5FN CONSENT OF ME,RURTECI COBB...TIN CREW RENAL AU ARTS REBR.5O Wee.R>on ATDLLooRBA OT WHEREAS, the City, by the adoption of this Ordinance, does not represent, disclaim, or take any position whatsoever on the issue of the validity of ABX1 26 or ABX1 27,but rather the City seeks to comply with the Constitution and laws of the State of California, including Part 1.9, in order to preserve the ability of the Agency to continue to operate and thereby benefit the community; and WHEREAS, it is hereby acknowledged by the City Council that the League of California Cities and the California Redevelopment Association have respectively expressed the view that certain or all provisions of ABX1 26 and ABX1 27 including, but not limited to the effectiveness date,violate the State Constitution and other laws(collectively, "Laws"); and WHEREAS,the City Council does not intend, by enactment of this Ordinance,to waive any constitutional and/or legal rights by virtue of the enactment of this Ordinance and,therefore, reserves all of its rights under Laws regarding challenges, by the City or others, to the validity of any or all - provisions of ABX1 26 and ABX1 27 in any administrative or judicial proceeding and/or repeal this Ordinance,without prejudice to the City's right to recover any amounts remitted under Part 1.9;and WHEREAS, the City Council does not intend, by enactment of this Ordinance to waive any rights of appeal regarding the amount of any remittance established by the Department of Finance, as provided in Part 1.9; and WHEREAS,the City is the lead agency concerning this Ordinance pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (codified as Public Resources Code Sections 21000 et seq) ("CEQA") and the State CEQA Guidelines; and WHEREAS, City staff has determined that this Ordinance is exempt from CEQA, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378 (b)(4), because such authorizations are not considered a project subject to CEQA review. The community remittance is a government funding mechanism and fiscal 4 me effective immediately. ABX1 26 and ABX1 27, which are trailer bills to the 2011-12 budget bills, were 2011-12 budget bills, were is a city, not its redevelopment agency, which is required to make the payments. A city is allowed to enter into an. agreement with its redevelopment agency to transfer a portion of its tax increment to the city in an amount not to exceed the annual payment, For 2011-12, the City expects to have the funds available to make the payment. The combination of funds used to make the 2011-12 payment Will be determined after the City receives the Director of Finance's decision on.its appeal. Respectfully submitted: Betsy$.Adams, City Manager 0 nit 644..u5 NNa:.wIa,a..c.=.,mcn.t nc Yvcc.,.,>.a 011,00,.v a 0,..r..vats,of non aw.,an,,nOnc,:0ra.,.'MR(PPP.rs,.y nSas)Znro qy. earwmvw.m� - • • No Date Wien Ocafptien . ., . ' . .. , nrsooq arr alae,A•t. ff:1 1 .7.40., Tie 1 . ..... • anew., Whrr......'=6..."'"rd= AN ' .. , .OT 00 ® C® .00 . —. . , ,- 414.0.Re— I6 "---,,-. -_ . - - , . • II •Ficrrogbay-----—-- I 1 . , • i . . . . . . • EZ ___ ,z_-__JIZeal - ELEVATIONS (RETAIL Tth-11F.11-a1117- 6 6 .... . , -nal-- scregi+ BLDG.)6 . . . . . . . . . . . • . L i -753 ubiaill+ SCALE•I'' 8'-0* !..1..! ,4.17.",Of.191115011 Oarabedntor :LEVAT I ON ' , DATE June 28,2011 6e No:11-02 MP MVO by 0. . . . . . • MITTI..7 NC Tr..413‘..y10 1..0.0.B.P..00 0.1.Cif TK O....7/.0 r.f...”I.Ig...NOT 1.1 PM....t.521 pv 11,41,...I.lar.10,MI 0.114 COW-5,C.Tri•Ot...MCT ow...,.0.1(41,i.S.....t..-,Y...13 RC.. • 01ca.sucor . imUr Int cum.. Axu wows..am or n x anotrrcv ma ult SAC ISO!.1 Er 11,1.6•17.0 tan ca q.v..n,,uccu 1.e...n.cmu-,u,a-nrc AP,.ou,uuu,r,,T., 1..i'jU co., �- ®. EXISTING I I Z1 1 oaaenOn r�o,.wo�eiwa.u.w+o.ew - - .7. ,/ O/ + 1.h e" ®iiii4 RETAIL ft) OI d VICINITY MAP m I I �® I® *ADO 5F ...JCT.A ' ,1 1 LI �� OT NOT TO SCALE `` fe ,• -!fmm, 5..G-°TED COLOR r;1 A)T W 3 - S� &7'td 7--A.,-!W- .:.'xlmi :,`P ''t- 4 ADA PATH OF TRAVEL II IrT •-1 '�a V _ .':T , �,41 -� �,so 34:5 _� :rM'-r N."' 6'BENCH ~ �,, c W f1 A I 1, ' I : ir J =.J I I er s.iX 1•4 C'':4. �,•{, f5•r �I. Te • -ia„ .q •.. ' �a moo`R SEwTING I cp # I- I' +.. ,r.,✓N 'ill�Iq • �,!•t �ide___� - 1 r.�',.;.x�ttt^:r�•�tiP•-%• " � z• ' "S .*r 9 �>019 �..+. "1 ds3: • BICYCLE- F,•- -T a. -• ` o• DIRECTIONAL 516N MO. . SIGN (5)BIC,'. -— - 1i €.`'1-,--Y, '*',4,± ,1 l MPED CONCRETE♦W BARTON RTON ROAD -- -- ` "` f- ' ' Attachment 7 GRATED DOLOR jt T ROAD RAISED MEDIAN [r'' - r w -tr,,,,,-:',*4:I'lf Y w.g�;N�'KgNi{Ip,t+.�,;: ':P'7 •Ns u E,�''R .Y arF±l� T '-'• E (STING EGNALIZ;D ...,4;,,_kg',`"„ ;.° 2,BZERg/t-• :'lij; �;ry A„F, 1, ,., SITE PLAN INTERS GTION ,*.y"M`+J a'L?- -`i • f f.- ,4 •r C •- STA THERS I COMMERCIAL -, Wit. -„ - gg � .1' ° 1 1 I \1 �+.a q1;„ z-=' re`.,^y �# SCALE 1"=30'0" I]&1'-s• Yx." ,.1 .,:;sT '.L::ti;,F'<':-..F 1;;.4 s1`1-f4- ,72.. i.,00 DATE:June 28, 2011 holed TS1BSlm(o013.IIBBAU OnWQPoAbb Case No.: 11-02 G""D" A101 Chocbed by T.A.UNPDBUSMED WORK Of MB ARanECT Alm S D SAID BAY NOT BE DIRUUR➢.MO OR O5¢OSED KNEW ME 50 5FN CONSENT OF ME,RURTECI COBB...TIN CREW RENAL AU ARTS REBR.5O Wee.R>on ATDLLooRBA OT activity, which does not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant environmental impact; and WHEREAS, the City has duly considered all other related matters and-has determined that the City's participation in the Program is in the best interests of the City, and the health, safety, and welfare of its residents, and in accord with the public purposes and provisions of applicable state and local laws and requirements. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct. 2. The City hereby finds that(i)the dissolution of the Agency would be detrimental and cause irreparable harm to the community and to the health, safety, and economic well-being of the citizens of the City, and (ii) the types of activities and projects made possible, implemented, and funded by the Agency are highly significant and of enduring benefit to the community and the City, and are a critical component of its future; and 3. The City hereby ordains that the City shall comply with the Constitution and the laws of the State of California, subject to the provisions hereof, including Part 1.9, including the determination of remittance amounts, appeal rights in relation thereto, and the making of the remittances referred to in CRL Section 34194(b) and (c) at the times and in the manner described in Part 1.9. This ordinance is that ordinance referred to in CRL Section 34193 and shall be interpreted and applied in all respects so as to comply with Part 1.9,to the fullest extent permitted by law. 5 delines; and WHEREAS, City staff has determined that this Ordinance is exempt from CEQA, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378 (b)(4), because such authorizations are not considered a project subject to CEQA review. The community remittance is a government funding mechanism and fiscal 4 me effective immediately. ABX1 26 and ABX1 27, which are trailer bills to the 2011-12 budget bills, were 2011-12 budget bills, were is a city, not its redevelopment agency, which is required to make the payments. A city is allowed to enter into an. agreement with its redevelopment agency to transfer a portion of its tax increment to the city in an amount not to exceed the annual payment, For 2011-12, the City expects to have the funds available to make the payment. The combination of funds used to make the 2011-12 payment Will be determined after the City receives the Director of Finance's decision on.its appeal. Respectfully submitted: Betsy$.Adams, City Manager 0 nit 644..u5 NNa:.wIa,a..c.=.,mcn.t nc Yvcc.,.,>.a 011,00,.v a 0,..r..vats,of non aw.,an,,nOnc,:0ra.,.'MR(PPP.rs,.y nSas)Znro qy. earwmvw.m� - • • No Date Wien Ocafptien . ., . ' . .. , nrsooq arr alae,A•t. ff:1 1 .7.40., Tie 1 . ..... • anew., Whrr......'=6..."'"rd= AN ' .. , .OT 00 ® C® .00 . —. . , ,- 414.0.Re— I6 "---,,-. -_ . - - , . • II •Ficrrogbay-----—-- I 1 . , • i . . . . . . • EZ ___ ,z_-__JIZeal - ELEVATIONS (RETAIL Tth-11F.11-a1117- 6 6 .... . , -nal-- scregi+ BLDG.)6 . . . . . . . . . . . • . L i -753 ubiaill+ SCALE•I'' 8'-0* !..1..! ,4.17.",Of.191115011 Oarabedntor :LEVAT I ON ' , DATE June 28,2011 6e No:11-02 MP MVO by 0. . . . . . • MITTI..7 NC Tr..413‘..y10 1..0.0.B.P..00 0.1.Cif TK O....7/.0 r.f...”I.Ig...NOT 1.1 PM....t.521 pv 11,41,...I.lar.10,MI 0.114 COW-5,C.Tri•Ot...MCT ow...,.0.1(41,i.S.....t..-,Y...13 RC.. • 01ca.sucor . imUr Int cum.. Axu wows..am or n x anotrrcv ma ult SAC ISO!.1 Er 11,1.6•17.0 tan ca q.v..n,,uccu 1.e...n.cmu-,u,a-nrc AP,.ou,uuu,r,,T., 1..i'jU co., �- ®. EXISTING I I Z1 1 oaaenOn r�o,.wo�eiwa.u.w+o.ew - - .7. ,/ O/ + 1.h e" ®iiii4 RETAIL ft) OI d VICINITY MAP m I I �® I® *ADO 5F ...JCT.A ' ,1 1 LI �� OT NOT TO SCALE `` fe ,• -!fmm, 5..G-°TED COLOR r;1 A)T W 3 - S� &7'td 7--A.,-!W- .:.'xlmi :,`P ''t- 4 ADA PATH OF TRAVEL II IrT •-1 '�a V _ .':T , �,41 -� �,so 34:5 _� :rM'-r N."' 6'BENCH ~ �,, c W f1 A I 1, ' I : ir J =.J I I er s.iX 1•4 C'':4. �,•{, f5•r �I. Te • -ia„ .q •.. ' �a moo`R SEwTING I cp # I- I' +.. ,r.,✓N 'ill�Iq • �,!•t �ide___� - 1 r.�',.;.x�ttt^:r�•�tiP•-%• " � z• ' "S .*r 9 �>019 �..+. "1 ds3: • BICYCLE- F,•- -T a. -• ` o• DIRECTIONAL 516N MO. . SIGN (5)BIC,'. -— - 1i €.`'1-,--Y, '*',4,± ,1 l MPED CONCRETE♦W BARTON RTON ROAD -- -- ` "` f- ' ' Attachment 7 GRATED DOLOR jt T ROAD RAISED MEDIAN [r'' - r w -tr,,,,,-:',*4:I'lf Y w.g�;N�'KgNi{Ip,t+.�,;: ':P'7 •Ns u E,�''R .Y arF±l� T '-'• E (STING EGNALIZ;D ...,4;,,_kg',`"„ ;.° 2,BZERg/t-• :'lij; �;ry A„F, 1, ,., SITE PLAN INTERS GTION ,*.y"M`+J a'L?- -`i • f f.- ,4 •r C •- STA THERS I COMMERCIAL -, Wit. -„ - gg � .1' ° 1 1 I \1 �+.a q1;„ z-=' re`.,^y �# SCALE 1"=30'0" I]&1'-s• Yx." ,.1 .,:;sT '.L::ti;,F'<':-..F 1;;.4 s1`1-f4- ,72.. i.,00 DATE:June 28, 2011 holed TS1BSlm(o013.IIBBAU OnWQPoAbb Case No.: 11-02 G""D" A101 Chocbed by T.A.UNPDBUSMED WORK Of MB ARanECT Alm S D SAID BAY NOT BE DIRUUR➢.MO OR O5¢OSED KNEW ME 50 5FN CONSENT OF ME,RURTECI COBB...TIN CREW RENAL AU ARTS REBR.5O Wee.R>on ATDLLooRBA OT 4. On or before November 1, 2011, the City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to notify the county auditor-controller, the Controller of the State, and the State Department of J • Finance that the City agrees to comply with the provisions of Part 1.9 as provided hereunder, such notice to be in accordance with CRL Section 34193.1. The City Manager is hereby authorized to take any actions necessary to implement this Ordinance and comply with Part 1.9, including without limitation, providing required notices to the Auditor Controller, the State Controller, and the Department of Finance; entering into any agreements with the Agency to make the remittance payments; or making any remittance payments. 5. The City's remittances to the county auditor-controller made pursuant to Part 1.9 may be paid from any legally available funds of the City not otherwise obligated for other uses in accordance with Section 34194.1. Nothing herein is intended or shall be interpreted to require any payments or impose any financial or other obligation of the City other than in accordance with the Constitution and laws of the State of California, including Part 1.9. 6. Neither the adoption of this Ordinance, nor the acknowledgment of or references to any provisions of ABX1 26 and ABX1 27, nor the City's payment of any remittances contemplated by ABX1 27 shall be deemed to be, nor are they intended as, an acknowledgment of the validity of ABX1 26 and ABX1 27, and the City reserves all right in its sole discretion to challenge the validity of any or all provisions of ABX1 26 and ABX1 27 in any, administrative or judicial proceeding and/or repeal this Ordinance, without prejudice to the City's right to recover any amounts remitted under Part 1.9. 7. - The City Council determines that approval of this Ordinance exempt from CEQA, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378 (b)(4), because such approval not considered a project subject to CEQA review. The payment is a government funding mechanism and fiscal activity which 6 city, not its redevelopment agency, which is required to make the payments. A city is allowed to enter into an. agreement with its redevelopment agency to transfer a portion of its tax increment to the city in an amount not to exceed the annual payment, For 2011-12, the City expects to have the funds available to make the payment. The combination of funds used to make the 2011-12 payment Will be determined after the City receives the Director of Finance's decision on.its appeal. Respectfully submitted: Betsy$.Adams, City Manager 0 nit 644..u5 NNa:.wIa,a..c.=.,mcn.t nc Yvcc.,.,>.a 011,00,.v a 0,..r..vats,of non aw.,an,,nOnc,:0ra.,.'MR(PPP.rs,.y nSas)Znro qy. earwmvw.m� - • • No Date Wien Ocafptien . ., . ' . .. , nrsooq arr alae,A•t. ff:1 1 .7.40., Tie 1 . ..... • anew., Whrr......'=6..."'"rd= AN ' .. , .OT 00 ® C® .00 . —. . , ,- 414.0.Re— I6 "---,,-. -_ . - - , . • II •Ficrrogbay-----—-- I 1 . , • i . . . . . . • EZ ___ ,z_-__JIZeal - ELEVATIONS (RETAIL Tth-11F.11-a1117- 6 6 .... . , -nal-- scregi+ BLDG.)6 . . . . . . . . . . . • . L i -753 ubiaill+ SCALE•I'' 8'-0* !..1..! ,4.17.",Of.191115011 Oarabedntor :LEVAT I ON ' , DATE June 28,2011 6e No:11-02 MP MVO by 0. . . . . . • MITTI..7 NC Tr..413‘..y10 1..0.0.B.P..00 0.1.Cif TK O....7/.0 r.f...”I.Ig...NOT 1.1 PM....t.521 pv 11,41,...I.lar.10,MI 0.114 COW-5,C.Tri•Ot...MCT ow...,.0.1(41,i.S.....t..-,Y...13 RC.. • 01ca.sucor . imUr Int cum.. Axu wows..am or n x anotrrcv ma ult SAC ISO!.1 Er 11,1.6•17.0 tan ca q.v..n,,uccu 1.e...n.cmu-,u,a-nrc AP,.ou,uuu,r,,T., 1..i'jU co., �- ®. EXISTING I I Z1 1 oaaenOn r�o,.wo�eiwa.u.w+o.ew - - .7. ,/ O/ + 1.h e" ®iiii4 RETAIL ft) OI d VICINITY MAP m I I �® I® *ADO 5F ...JCT.A ' ,1 1 LI �� OT NOT TO SCALE `` fe ,• -!fmm, 5..G-°TED COLOR r;1 A)T W 3 - S� &7'td 7--A.,-!W- .:.'xlmi :,`P ''t- 4 ADA PATH OF TRAVEL II IrT •-1 '�a V _ .':T , �,41 -� �,so 34:5 _� :rM'-r N."' 6'BENCH ~ �,, c W f1 A I 1, ' I : ir J =.J I I er s.iX 1•4 C'':4. �,•{, f5•r �I. Te • -ia„ .q •.. ' �a moo`R SEwTING I cp # I- I' +.. ,r.,✓N 'ill�Iq • �,!•t �ide___� - 1 r.�',.;.x�ttt^:r�•�tiP•-%• " � z• ' "S .*r 9 �>019 �..+. "1 ds3: • BICYCLE- F,•- -T a. -• ` o• DIRECTIONAL 516N MO. . SIGN (5)BIC,'. -— - 1i €.`'1-,--Y, '*',4,± ,1 l MPED CONCRETE♦W BARTON RTON ROAD -- -- ` "` f- ' ' Attachment 7 GRATED DOLOR jt T ROAD RAISED MEDIAN [r'' - r w -tr,,,,,-:',*4:I'lf Y w.g�;N�'KgNi{Ip,t+.�,;: ':P'7 •Ns u E,�''R .Y arF±l� T '-'• E (STING EGNALIZ;D ...,4;,,_kg',`"„ ;.° 2,BZERg/t-• :'lij; �;ry A„F, 1, ,., SITE PLAN INTERS GTION ,*.y"M`+J a'L?- -`i • f f.- ,4 •r C •- STA THERS I COMMERCIAL -, Wit. -„ - gg � .1' ° 1 1 I \1 �+.a q1;„ z-=' re`.,^y �# SCALE 1"=30'0" I]&1'-s• Yx." ,.1 .,:;sT '.L::ti;,F'<':-..F 1;;.4 s1`1-f4- ,72.. i.,00 DATE:June 28, 2011 holed TS1BSlm(o013.IIBBAU OnWQPoAbb Case No.: 11-02 G""D" A101 Chocbed by T.A.UNPDBUSMED WORK Of MB ARanECT Alm S D SAID BAY NOT BE DIRUUR➢.MO OR O5¢OSED KNEW ME 50 5FN CONSENT OF ME,RURTECI COBB...TIN CREW RENAL AU ARTS REBR.5O Wee.R>on ATDLLooRBA OT does not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant environmental impact. 8. The City Council hereby authorizes and directs that a Notice of Exemption shall be filed with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino, California, within five(5)working days following the date of adoption of this Ordinance. 9. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause it, or a summary of it, to be published once within 15 days of adoption in a newspaper of general circulation printed and published within the City of Grand Terrace, and shall post a certified copy of this Ordinance, including the vote for and against the same, in the Office of the City Clerk in accordance with Government Code § 36933. 10. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and the same shall thereupon take effect and be in force immediately upon its adoption. 11. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after the date of the final passage and adoption hereof: 7 dance with the Constitution and laws of the State of California, including Part 1.9. 6. Neither the adoption of this Ordinance, nor the acknowledgment of or references to any provisions of ABX1 26 and ABX1 27, nor the City's payment of any remittances contemplated by ABX1 27 shall be deemed to be, nor are they intended as, an acknowledgment of the validity of ABX1 26 and ABX1 27, and the City reserves all right in its sole discretion to challenge the validity of any or all provisions of ABX1 26 and ABX1 27 in any, administrative or judicial proceeding and/or repeal this Ordinance, without prejudice to the City's right to recover any amounts remitted under Part 1.9. 7. - The City Council determines that approval of this Ordinance exempt from CEQA, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378 (b)(4), because such approval not considered a project subject to CEQA review. The payment is a government funding mechanism and fiscal activity which 6 city, not its redevelopment agency, which is required to make the payments. A city is allowed to enter into an. agreement with its redevelopment agency to transfer a portion of its tax increment to the city in an amount not to exceed the annual payment, For 2011-12, the City expects to have the funds available to make the payment. The combination of funds used to make the 2011-12 payment Will be determined after the City receives the Director of Finance's decision on.its appeal. Respectfully submitted: Betsy$.Adams, City Manager 0 nit 644..u5 NNa:.wIa,a..c.=.,mcn.t nc Yvcc.,.,>.a 011,00,.v a 0,..r..vats,of non aw.,an,,nOnc,:0ra.,.'MR(PPP.rs,.y nSas)Znro qy. earwmvw.m� - • • No Date Wien Ocafptien . ., . ' . .. , nrsooq arr alae,A•t. ff:1 1 .7.40., Tie 1 . ..... • anew., Whrr......'=6..."'"rd= AN ' .. , .OT 00 ® C® .00 . —. . , ,- 414.0.Re— I6 "---,,-. -_ . - - , . • II •Ficrrogbay-----—-- I 1 . , • i . . . . . . • EZ ___ ,z_-__JIZeal - ELEVATIONS (RETAIL Tth-11F.11-a1117- 6 6 .... . , -nal-- scregi+ BLDG.)6 . . . . . . . . . . . • . L i -753 ubiaill+ SCALE•I'' 8'-0* !..1..! ,4.17.",Of.191115011 Oarabedntor :LEVAT I ON ' , DATE June 28,2011 6e No:11-02 MP MVO by 0. . . . . . • MITTI..7 NC Tr..413‘..y10 1..0.0.B.P..00 0.1.Cif TK O....7/.0 r.f...”I.Ig...NOT 1.1 PM....t.521 pv 11,41,...I.lar.10,MI 0.114 COW-5,C.Tri•Ot...MCT ow...,.0.1(41,i.S.....t..-,Y...13 RC.. • 01ca.sucor . imUr Int cum.. Axu wows..am or n x anotrrcv ma ult SAC ISO!.1 Er 11,1.6•17.0 tan ca q.v..n,,uccu 1.e...n.cmu-,u,a-nrc AP,.ou,uuu,r,,T., 1..i'jU co., �- ®. EXISTING I I Z1 1 oaaenOn r�o,.wo�eiwa.u.w+o.ew - - .7. ,/ O/ + 1.h e" ®iiii4 RETAIL ft) OI d VICINITY MAP m I I �® I® *ADO 5F ...JCT.A ' ,1 1 LI �� OT NOT TO SCALE `` fe ,• -!fmm, 5..G-°TED COLOR r;1 A)T W 3 - S� &7'td 7--A.,-!W- .:.'xlmi :,`P ''t- 4 ADA PATH OF TRAVEL II IrT •-1 '�a V _ .':T , �,41 -� �,so 34:5 _� :rM'-r N."' 6'BENCH ~ �,, c W f1 A I 1, ' I : ir J =.J I I er s.iX 1•4 C'':4. �,•{, f5•r �I. Te • -ia„ .q •.. ' �a moo`R SEwTING I cp # I- I' +.. ,r.,✓N 'ill�Iq • �,!•t �ide___� - 1 r.�',.;.x�ttt^:r�•�tiP•-%• " � z• ' "S .*r 9 �>019 �..+. "1 ds3: • BICYCLE- F,•- -T a. -• ` o• DIRECTIONAL 516N MO. . SIGN (5)BIC,'. -— - 1i €.`'1-,--Y, '*',4,± ,1 l MPED CONCRETE♦W BARTON RTON ROAD -- -- ` "` f- ' ' Attachment 7 GRATED DOLOR jt T ROAD RAISED MEDIAN [r'' - r w -tr,,,,,-:',*4:I'lf Y w.g�;N�'KgNi{Ip,t+.�,;: ':P'7 •Ns u E,�''R .Y arF±l� T '-'• E (STING EGNALIZ;D ...,4;,,_kg',`"„ ;.° 2,BZERg/t-• :'lij; �;ry A„F, 1, ,., SITE PLAN INTERS GTION ,*.y"M`+J a'L?- -`i • f f.- ,4 •r C •- STA THERS I COMMERCIAL -, Wit. -„ - gg � .1' ° 1 1 I \1 �+.a q1;„ z-=' re`.,^y �# SCALE 1"=30'0" I]&1'-s• Yx." ,.1 .,:;sT '.L::ti;,F'<':-..F 1;;.4 s1`1-f4- ,72.. i.,00 DATE:June 28, 2011 holed TS1BSlm(o013.IIBBAU OnWQPoAbb Case No.: 11-02 G""D" A101 Chocbed by T.A.UNPDBUSMED WORK Of MB ARanECT Alm S D SAID BAY NOT BE DIRUUR➢.MO OR O5¢OSED KNEW ME 50 5FN CONSENT OF ME,RURTECI COBB...TIN CREW RENAL AU ARTS REBR.5O Wee.R>on ATDLLooRBA OT PASSED APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of , 2011. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney 8 d in Part 1.9 of Division 24 of the California Health and Safety Code t a meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace held on the day of , 2011. Upon motion of City Council Member , seconded by City Council Member ,the foregoing Ordinance No; was duly passed and adopted. Vote on the motion: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: AB STAIN: IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and the Official Seal of the City of this day of ,2011. Brenda Mesa, City Clerk 9 of Division 24 of the California Health and Safety Code Ms map isfor reference orgy.For detaled ilcanalon,ple se oansut with the Cemrnm ty De.ecprrent Depattneri �i._1, 'n Page 11 of 11 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO )ss CITY OF GRAND TERRACE ) I, Brenda Mesa, City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. was duly passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand`Terrace held on the day of , 2011. Upon motion of City Council Member , seconded by City Council Member ,the foregoing Ordinance No. was duly passed and adopted. Vote on the motion: - AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and the Official Seal of the City of this - day of , 2011. Brenda Mesa, City Clerk 9 ion 24 of the California Health and Safety Code Ms map isfor reference orgy.For detaled ilcanalon,ple se oansut with the Cemrnm ty De.ecprrent Depattneri �i._1, 'n Page 11 of 11 The Blue Mountain Cilr G CALIFORNIArand Terrace AGENDA REPORT MEETING DATE: July 26, 2011 Council Item (X) CRA Item ( ) TITLE: Amend Zoning Code Section 18.80.130 Regarding Political Signs—Zone Change 10-02 PRESENTED BY: Joyce Powers, Community and Economic Development Director John R. Harper, City Attorney RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the attached revisions to the Sign Ordinance BACKGROUND: On July 12, 2011, the City Council moved to second reading a proposed ordinance to revise Section 18.80.130 of the Municipal Code relating to Political Signs. DISCUSSION: Staff recommends adoption of the proposed sign revisions. FISCAL IMPACT: The $50.00 political sign permit fee will no longer be collected. Respectfully submitted, ilden-ke-eA4--- oyce Powers Director of Community and Economic Development Manager Approval: Betsy/M. Ad ms City Manager ATTACHMENTS: 1. Ordinance - Zone Change 10-02 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. .7 ,i- 0) days after the date of the final passage and adoption hereof: 7 dance with the Constitution and laws of the State of California, including Part 1.9. 6. Neither the adoption of this Ordinance, nor the acknowledgment of or references to any provisions of ABX1 26 and ABX1 27, nor the City's payment of any remittances contemplated by ABX1 27 shall be deemed to be, nor are they intended as, an acknowledgment of the validity of ABX1 26 and ABX1 27, and the City reserves all right in its sole discretion to challenge the validity of any or all provisions of ABX1 26 and ABX1 27 in any, administrative or judicial proceeding and/or repeal this Ordinance, without prejudice to the City's right to recover any amounts remitted under Part 1.9. 7. - The City Council determines that approval of this Ordinance exempt from CEQA, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378 (b)(4), because such approval not considered a project subject to CEQA review. The payment is a government funding mechanism and fiscal activity which 6 city, not its redevelopment agency, which is required to make the payments. A city is allowed to enter into an. agreement with its redevelopment agency to transfer a portion of its tax increment to the city in an amount not to exceed the annual payment, For 2011-12, the City expects to have the funds available to make the payment. The combination of funds used to make the 2011-12 payment Will be determined after the City receives the Director of Finance's decision on.its appeal. Respectfully submitted: Betsy$.Adams, City Manager 0 nit 644..u5 NNa:.wIa,a..c.=.,mcn.t nc Yvcc.,.,>.a 011,00,.v a 0,..r..vats,of non aw.,an,,nOnc,:0ra.,.'MR(PPP.rs,.y nSas)Znro qy. earwmvw.m� - • • No Date Wien Ocafptien . ., . ' . .. , nrsooq arr alae,A•t. ff:1 1 .7.40., Tie 1 . ..... • anew., Whrr......'=6..."'"rd= AN ' .. , .OT 00 ® C® .00 . —. . , ,- 414.0.Re— I6 "---,,-. -_ . - - , . • II •Ficrrogbay-----—-- I 1 . , • i . . . . . . • EZ ___ ,z_-__JIZeal - ELEVATIONS (RETAIL Tth-11F.11-a1117- 6 6 .... . , -nal-- scregi+ BLDG.)6 . . . . . . . . . . . • . L i -753 ubiaill+ SCALE•I'' 8'-0* !..1..! ,4.17.",Of.191115011 Oarabedntor :LEVAT I ON ' , DATE June 28,2011 6e No:11-02 MP MVO by 0. . . . . . • MITTI..7 NC Tr..413‘..y10 1..0.0.B.P..00 0.1.Cif TK O....7/.0 r.f...”I.Ig...NOT 1.1 PM....t.521 pv 11,41,...I.lar.10,MI 0.114 COW-5,C.Tri•Ot...MCT ow...,.0.1(41,i.S.....t..-,Y...13 RC.. • 01ca.sucor . imUr Int cum.. Axu wows..am or n x anotrrcv ma ult SAC ISO!.1 Er 11,1.6•17.0 tan ca q.v..n,,uccu 1.e...n.cmu-,u,a-nrc AP,.ou,uuu,r,,T., 1..i'jU co., �- ®. EXISTING I I Z1 1 oaaenOn r�o,.wo�eiwa.u.w+o.ew - - .7. ,/ O/ + 1.h e" ®iiii4 RETAIL ft) OI d VICINITY MAP m I I �® I® *ADO 5F ...JCT.A ' ,1 1 LI �� OT NOT TO SCALE `` fe ,• -!fmm, 5..G-°TED COLOR r;1 A)T W 3 - S� &7'td 7--A.,-!W- .:.'xlmi :,`P ''t- 4 ADA PATH OF TRAVEL II IrT •-1 '�a V _ .':T , �,41 -� �,so 34:5 _� :rM'-r N."' 6'BENCH ~ �,, c W f1 A I 1, ' I : ir J =.J I I er s.iX 1•4 C'':4. �,•{, f5•r �I. Te • -ia„ .q •.. ' �a moo`R SEwTING I cp # I- I' +.. ,r.,✓N 'ill�Iq • �,!•t �ide___� - 1 r.�',.;.x�ttt^:r�•�tiP•-%• " � z• ' "S .*r 9 �>019 �..+. "1 ds3: • BICYCLE- F,•- -T a. -• ` o• DIRECTIONAL 516N MO. . SIGN (5)BIC,'. -— - 1i €.`'1-,--Y, '*',4,± ,1 l MPED CONCRETE♦W BARTON RTON ROAD -- -- ` "` f- ' ' Attachment 7 GRATED DOLOR jt T ROAD RAISED MEDIAN [r'' - r w -tr,,,,,-:',*4:I'lf Y w.g�;N�'KgNi{Ip,t+.�,;: ':P'7 •Ns u E,�''R .Y arF±l� T '-'• E (STING EGNALIZ;D ...,4;,,_kg',`"„ ;.° 2,BZERg/t-• :'lij; �;ry A„F, 1, ,., SITE PLAN INTERS GTION ,*.y"M`+J a'L?- -`i • f f.- ,4 •r C •- STA THERS I COMMERCIAL -, Wit. -„ - gg � .1' ° 1 1 I \1 �+.a q1;„ z-=' re`.,^y �# SCALE 1"=30'0" I]&1'-s• Yx." ,.1 .,:;sT '.L::ti;,F'<':-..F 1;;.4 s1`1-f4- ,72.. i.,00 DATE:June 28, 2011 holed TS1BSlm(o013.IIBBAU OnWQPoAbb Case No.: 11-02 G""D" A101 Chocbed by T.A.UNPDBUSMED WORK Of MB ARanECT Alm S D SAID BAY NOT BE DIRUUR➢.MO OR O5¢OSED KNEW ME 50 5FN CONSENT OF ME,RURTECI COBB...TIN CREW RENAL AU ARTS REBR.5O Wee.R>on ATDLLooRBA OT ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE TO AMEND TITLE 18, CHAPTER 18.80 OF THE GRAND TERRACE MUNICIPAL CODE BY AMENDING IN ITS ENTIRETY SECTION 18.80.130 POLITICAL SIGNS AND ADOPTING A NEW SECTION 18.80.130 POLITICAL SIGNS WHEREAS, on August 23, 1990, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 126, amending Title 18 of the City of Grand Terrace Municipal Code. WHEREAS, changes have occurred in State and Federal law since the enactment of the Municipal Code Section 18.80.130, regulating political signs. WHEREAS, as a result of such changes, it is necessary to amend Section 18.80.130 of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code. WHEREAS, the Project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15060(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines because the Project is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. WHEREAS, on June 17, 2010, the Planning Commission of the City of Grand Terrace conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Project at the Grand Terrace City Hall Council Chambers located 22795 Barton Road and voted 3-1 recommending approval. WHEREAS, on July 13, 2010, and July 12, 2011, the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace conducted duly noticed public hearings on the Project at the Grand Terrace City Hall Council Chambers located at 22795 Barton Road. WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace, as follows SECTION 1. Zone Change 10-02 is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15060(b)(3), because the Project merely establishes regulations for the erection of political signs. SECTION 2. Zone Change 10-02 will not be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare of the persons residing or working within the City f its tax increment to the city in an amount not to exceed the annual payment, For 2011-12, the City expects to have the funds available to make the payment. The combination of funds used to make the 2011-12 payment Will be determined after the City receives the Director of Finance's decision on.its appeal. Respectfully submitted: Betsy$.Adams, City Manager 0 nit 644..u5 NNa:.wIa,a..c.=.,mcn.t nc Yvcc.,.,>.a 011,00,.v a 0,..r..vats,of non aw.,an,,nOnc,:0ra.,.'MR(PPP.rs,.y nSas)Znro qy. earwmvw.m� - • • No Date Wien Ocafptien . ., . ' . .. , nrsooq arr alae,A•t. ff:1 1 .7.40., Tie 1 . ..... • anew., Whrr......'=6..."'"rd= AN ' .. , .OT 00 ® C® .00 . —. . , ,- 414.0.Re— I6 "---,,-. -_ . - - , . • II •Ficrrogbay-----—-- I 1 . , • i . . . . . . • EZ ___ ,z_-__JIZeal - ELEVATIONS (RETAIL Tth-11F.11-a1117- 6 6 .... . , -nal-- scregi+ BLDG.)6 . . . . . . . . . . . • . L i -753 ubiaill+ SCALE•I'' 8'-0* !..1..! ,4.17.",Of.191115011 Oarabedntor :LEVAT I ON ' , DATE June 28,2011 6e No:11-02 MP MVO by 0. . . . . . • MITTI..7 NC Tr..413‘..y10 1..0.0.B.P..00 0.1.Cif TK O....7/.0 r.f...”I.Ig...NOT 1.1 PM....t.521 pv 11,41,...I.lar.10,MI 0.114 COW-5,C.Tri•Ot...MCT ow...,.0.1(41,i.S.....t..-,Y...13 RC.. • 01ca.sucor . imUr Int cum.. Axu wows..am or n x anotrrcv ma ult SAC ISO!.1 Er 11,1.6•17.0 tan ca q.v..n,,uccu 1.e...n.cmu-,u,a-nrc AP,.ou,uuu,r,,T., 1..i'jU co., �- ®. EXISTING I I Z1 1 oaaenOn r�o,.wo�eiwa.u.w+o.ew - - .7. ,/ O/ + 1.h e" ®iiii4 RETAIL ft) OI d VICINITY MAP m I I �® I® *ADO 5F ...JCT.A ' ,1 1 LI �� OT NOT TO SCALE `` fe ,• -!fmm, 5..G-°TED COLOR r;1 A)T W 3 - S� &7'td 7--A.,-!W- .:.'xlmi :,`P ''t- 4 ADA PATH OF TRAVEL II IrT •-1 '�a V _ .':T , �,41 -� �,so 34:5 _� :rM'-r N."' 6'BENCH ~ �,, c W f1 A I 1, ' I : ir J =.J I I er s.iX 1•4 C'':4. �,•{, f5•r �I. Te • -ia„ .q •.. ' �a moo`R SEwTING I cp # I- I' +.. ,r.,✓N 'ill�Iq • �,!•t �ide___� - 1 r.�',.;.x�ttt^:r�•�tiP•-%• " � z• ' "S .*r 9 �>019 �..+. "1 ds3: • BICYCLE- F,•- -T a. -• ` o• DIRECTIONAL 516N MO. . SIGN (5)BIC,'. -— - 1i €.`'1-,--Y, '*',4,± ,1 l MPED CONCRETE♦W BARTON RTON ROAD -- -- ` "` f- ' ' Attachment 7 GRATED DOLOR jt T ROAD RAISED MEDIAN [r'' - r w -tr,,,,,-:',*4:I'lf Y w.g�;N�'KgNi{Ip,t+.�,;: ':P'7 •Ns u E,�''R .Y arF±l� T '-'• E (STING EGNALIZ;D ...,4;,,_kg',`"„ ;.° 2,BZERg/t-• :'lij; �;ry A„F, 1, ,., SITE PLAN INTERS GTION ,*.y"M`+J a'L?- -`i • f f.- ,4 •r C •- STA THERS I COMMERCIAL -, Wit. -„ - gg � .1' ° 1 1 I \1 �+.a q1;„ z-=' re`.,^y �# SCALE 1"=30'0" I]&1'-s• Yx." ,.1 .,:;sT '.L::ti;,F'<':-..F 1;;.4 s1`1-f4- ,72.. i.,00 DATE:June 28, 2011 holed TS1BSlm(o013.IIBBAU OnWQPoAbb Case No.: 11-02 G""D" A101 Chocbed by T.A.UNPDBUSMED WORK Of MB ARanECT Alm S D SAID BAY NOT BE DIRUUR➢.MO OR O5¢OSED KNEW ME 50 5FN CONSENT OF ME,RURTECI COBB...TIN CREW RENAL AU ARTS REBR.5O Wee.R>on ATDLLooRBA OT because the amendment will be consistent with current Federal and State law, and the amendment regulates the location of such signs so that the general public health and safety is protected. SECTION 3. Zone Change 10-02 will not be injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood or within the City because it allows the placement of political signs provided that they do not obstruct visibility of pedestrians and vehicle traffic, and that they are not placed on utility poles, public property and within the right- of-way. SECTION 4. Zone Change 10-02 is consistent with the latest adopted General Plan as it does not conflict with goals, policies and actions of the General Plan. SECTION 5. Section 18.80.130 (Political Signs) of Chapter 18.80, Title 18 of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code, shall be amended in its entirety to read as follows: "18.80.130 Political Signs A. Political signs are hereby defined as signs having to do with any issue, ballot measure or candidate in any municipal, state or federal election, or political statements and expressions. Political signs shall be permitted in any zone subject to the following provisions: 1. Any person, party or group posting political signs in the City shall abide by the provisions set forth in this Section. 2. All political signs pertaining to an election shall be removed no later than ten days following the date of the election to which they pertain. 3. A political sign shall not exceed sixteen (16) square feet in total area for one side. No signs shall be placed in a manner that would unsafely obstruct visibility of pedestrian or vehicle traffic. 4. No political sign shall be placed or fixed on a utility pole, nor placed on any public property or within the public right-of-way. 5. The Code Enforcement Officer or designee shall have the right to remove all signs placed within the public right-of-way or affixed to a utility pole." SECTION 6. The City Council declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of it irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases or portions of it be declared invalid or unconstitutional. If for any reason any portion of this ordinance is declared invalid, or unconstitutional, then all other provisions shall remain valid and enforceable. Page 2 of 3 City receives the Director of Finance's decision on.its appeal. Respectfully submitted: Betsy$.Adams, City Manager 0 nit 644..u5 NNa:.wIa,a..c.=.,mcn.t nc Yvcc.,.,>.a 011,00,.v a 0,..r..vats,of non aw.,an,,nOnc,:0ra.,.'MR(PPP.rs,.y nSas)Znro qy. earwmvw.m� - • • No Date Wien Ocafptien . ., . ' . .. , nrsooq arr alae,A•t. ff:1 1 .7.40., Tie 1 . ..... • anew., Whrr......'=6..."'"rd= AN ' .. , .OT 00 ® C® .00 . —. . , ,- 414.0.Re— I6 "---,,-. -_ . - - , . • II •Ficrrogbay-----—-- I 1 . , • i . . . . . . • EZ ___ ,z_-__JIZeal - ELEVATIONS (RETAIL Tth-11F.11-a1117- 6 6 .... . , -nal-- scregi+ BLDG.)6 . . . . . . . . . . . • . L i -753 ubiaill+ SCALE•I'' 8'-0* !..1..! ,4.17.",Of.191115011 Oarabedntor :LEVAT I ON ' , DATE June 28,2011 6e No:11-02 MP MVO by 0. . . . . . • MITTI..7 NC Tr..413‘..y10 1..0.0.B.P..00 0.1.Cif TK O....7/.0 r.f...”I.Ig...NOT 1.1 PM....t.521 pv 11,41,...I.lar.10,MI 0.114 COW-5,C.Tri•Ot...MCT ow...,.0.1(41,i.S.....t..-,Y...13 RC.. • 01ca.sucor . imUr Int cum.. Axu wows..am or n x anotrrcv ma ult SAC ISO!.1 Er 11,1.6•17.0 tan ca q.v..n,,uccu 1.e...n.cmu-,u,a-nrc AP,.ou,uuu,r,,T., 1..i'jU co., �- ®. EXISTING I I Z1 1 oaaenOn r�o,.wo�eiwa.u.w+o.ew - - .7. ,/ O/ + 1.h e" ®iiii4 RETAIL ft) OI d VICINITY MAP m I I �® I® *ADO 5F ...JCT.A ' ,1 1 LI �� OT NOT TO SCALE `` fe ,• -!fmm, 5..G-°TED COLOR r;1 A)T W 3 - S� &7'td 7--A.,-!W- .:.'xlmi :,`P ''t- 4 ADA PATH OF TRAVEL II IrT •-1 '�a V _ .':T , �,41 -� �,so 34:5 _� :rM'-r N."' 6'BENCH ~ �,, c W f1 A I 1, ' I : ir J =.J I I er s.iX 1•4 C'':4. �,•{, f5•r �I. Te • -ia„ .q •.. ' �a moo`R SEwTING I cp # I- I' +.. ,r.,✓N 'ill�Iq • �,!•t �ide___� - 1 r.�',.;.x�ttt^:r�•�tiP•-%• " � z• ' "S .*r 9 �>019 �..+. "1 ds3: • BICYCLE- F,•- -T a. -• ` o• DIRECTIONAL 516N MO. . SIGN (5)BIC,'. -— - 1i €.`'1-,--Y, '*',4,± ,1 l MPED CONCRETE♦W BARTON RTON ROAD -- -- ` "` f- ' ' Attachment 7 GRATED DOLOR jt T ROAD RAISED MEDIAN [r'' - r w -tr,,,,,-:',*4:I'lf Y w.g�;N�'KgNi{Ip,t+.�,;: ':P'7 •Ns u E,�''R .Y arF±l� T '-'• E (STING EGNALIZ;D ...,4;,,_kg',`"„ ;.° 2,BZERg/t-• :'lij; �;ry A„F, 1, ,., SITE PLAN INTERS GTION ,*.y"M`+J a'L?- -`i • f f.- ,4 •r C •- STA THERS I COMMERCIAL -, Wit. -„ - gg � .1' ° 1 1 I \1 �+.a q1;„ z-=' re`.,^y �# SCALE 1"=30'0" I]&1'-s• Yx." ,.1 .,:;sT '.L::ti;,F'<':-..F 1;;.4 s1`1-f4- ,72.. i.,00 DATE:June 28, 2011 holed TS1BSlm(o013.IIBBAU OnWQPoAbb Case No.: 11-02 G""D" A101 Chocbed by T.A.UNPDBUSMED WORK Of MB ARanECT Alm S D SAID BAY NOT BE DIRUUR➢.MO OR O5¢OSED KNEW ME 50 5FN CONSENT OF ME,RURTECI COBB...TIN CREW RENAL AU ARTS REBR.5O Wee.R>on ATDLLooRBA OT SECTION 7. This ordinance shall take effect thirty days from the date of adoption. SECTION 8. First read at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 12th day of July, 2011 and finally adopted and ordered posted at a regular meeting of said City Council on the 26th day of July, 2011. ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor I, Brenda Mesa, City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the city Council of the City of Grand Terrace held on the 26th day of July, 2011, by the following vote: AYES: ' NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: City Clerk Approved as to form: City Attorney Page 3 of 3 afety Code Ms map isfor reference orgy.For detaled ilcanalon,ple se oansut with the Cemrnm ty De.ecprrent Depattneri �i._1, 'n Page 11 of 11 • The Blue leonlain Clly CALIFORNIA AGENDA REPORT MEETING DATE: July 26, 2011 Council Item (X ) CRA Item ( ) TITLE: Community Redevelopment Agency 5-Year Cash Flow Analysis PRESENTED BY: Betsy M. Adams, City Manager RECOMMENDATION: Review Agency funds available for the annual payments required by Assembly Bill X1 27. BACKGROUND: As of June 28, 2011, all redevelopment agencies were effectively suspended by the Governor's signature of Assembly Bills (AB) X1 26 and 27, which respectively dissolve all redevelopment agencies and allow for a "voluntary" continuance of redevelopment in exchange for a significant and ongoing payment to the local county auditor-controller to assist the state's funding of local schools, as well as certain fire and transit districts. The choice between dissolution or the "voluntary" continuation alternative must be made no later than October 1, 2011, and should be based on analysis of the fiscal, policy and legal implications in each community. For some cities, the costs of the additional mandatory contributions are so significant that continuance is not a financially prudent alternative. In other cases, such as with Grand Terrace, protection of existing obligations may be better achieved by continuing with redevelopment, even if the amounts of future discretionary funds are impacted by the mandatory payments. DISCUSSION: The California League of Cities (League), the California Redevelopment Association (CRA), and City staff, especially following the voters' approval of Proposition 22 less than 9 months ago, believe that the State Constitution prohibits the taking of local redevelopment dollars by the State for any reason. The League, CRA, and others have filed a lawsuit in the State Supreme Court to challenge both ABX1 26 and 27. However, in the meantime, cities and counties that have redevelopment agencies must contend with the implications of this law. Under the Dissolution Act (ABX1 26), redevelopment agencies are effectively suspended. They may spend this time identifying certain existing indebtedness that could be eligible for repayment under the terms and conditions of the Act, identifying a ,successor agency to assume control of the agency's assets and obligations, and terminating other redevelopment actions by October 1, 2011. It is important to note that despite the fact that state law allows a COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. 7n 's decision on.its appeal. Respectfully submitted: Betsy$.Adams, City Manager 0 nit 644..u5 NNa:.wIa,a..c.=.,mcn.t nc Yvcc.,.,>.a 011,00,.v a 0,..r..vats,of non aw.,an,,nOnc,:0ra.,.'MR(PPP.rs,.y nSas)Znro qy. earwmvw.m� - • • No Date Wien Ocafptien . ., . ' . .. , nrsooq arr alae,A•t. ff:1 1 .7.40., Tie 1 . ..... • anew., Whrr......'=6..."'"rd= AN ' .. , .OT 00 ® C® .00 . —. . , ,- 414.0.Re— I6 "---,,-. -_ . - - , . • II •Ficrrogbay-----—-- I 1 . , • i . . . . . . • EZ ___ ,z_-__JIZeal - ELEVATIONS (RETAIL Tth-11F.11-a1117- 6 6 .... . , -nal-- scregi+ BLDG.)6 . . . . . . . . . . . • . L i -753 ubiaill+ SCALE•I'' 8'-0* !..1..! ,4.17.",Of.191115011 Oarabedntor :LEVAT I ON ' , DATE June 28,2011 6e No:11-02 MP MVO by 0. . . . . . • MITTI..7 NC Tr..413‘..y10 1..0.0.B.P..00 0.1.Cif TK O....7/.0 r.f...”I.Ig...NOT 1.1 PM....t.521 pv 11,41,...I.lar.10,MI 0.114 COW-5,C.Tri•Ot...MCT ow...,.0.1(41,i.S.....t..-,Y...13 RC.. • 01ca.sucor . imUr Int cum.. Axu wows..am or n x anotrrcv ma ult SAC ISO!.1 Er 11,1.6•17.0 tan ca q.v..n,,uccu 1.e...n.cmu-,u,a-nrc AP,.ou,uuu,r,,T., 1..i'jU co., �- ®. EXISTING I I Z1 1 oaaenOn r�o,.wo�eiwa.u.w+o.ew - - .7. ,/ O/ + 1.h e" ®iiii4 RETAIL ft) OI d VICINITY MAP m I I �® I® *ADO 5F ...JCT.A ' ,1 1 LI �� OT NOT TO SCALE `` fe ,• -!fmm, 5..G-°TED COLOR r;1 A)T W 3 - S� &7'td 7--A.,-!W- .:.'xlmi :,`P ''t- 4 ADA PATH OF TRAVEL II IrT •-1 '�a V _ .':T , �,41 -� �,so 34:5 _� :rM'-r N."' 6'BENCH ~ �,, c W f1 A I 1, ' I : ir J =.J I I er s.iX 1•4 C'':4. �,•{, f5•r �I. Te • -ia„ .q •.. ' �a moo`R SEwTING I cp # I- I' +.. ,r.,✓N 'ill�Iq • �,!•t �ide___� - 1 r.�',.;.x�ttt^:r�•�tiP•-%• " � z• ' "S .*r 9 �>019 �..+. "1 ds3: • BICYCLE- F,•- -T a. -• ` o• DIRECTIONAL 516N MO. . SIGN (5)BIC,'. -— - 1i €.`'1-,--Y, '*',4,± ,1 l MPED CONCRETE♦W BARTON RTON ROAD -- -- ` "` f- ' ' Attachment 7 GRATED DOLOR jt T ROAD RAISED MEDIAN [r'' - r w -tr,,,,,-:',*4:I'lf Y w.g�;N�'KgNi{Ip,t+.�,;: ':P'7 •Ns u E,�''R .Y arF±l� T '-'• E (STING EGNALIZ;D ...,4;,,_kg',`"„ ;.° 2,BZERg/t-• :'lij; �;ry A„F, 1, ,., SITE PLAN INTERS GTION ,*.y"M`+J a'L?- -`i • f f.- ,4 •r C •- STA THERS I COMMERCIAL -, Wit. -„ - gg � .1' ° 1 1 I \1 �+.a q1;„ z-=' re`.,^y �# SCALE 1"=30'0" I]&1'-s• Yx." ,.1 .,:;sT '.L::ti;,F'<':-..F 1;;.4 s1`1-f4- ,72.. i.,00 DATE:June 28, 2011 holed TS1BSlm(o013.IIBBAU OnWQPoAbb Case No.: 11-02 G""D" A101 Chocbed by T.A.UNPDBUSMED WORK Of MB ARanECT Alm S D SAID BAY NOT BE DIRUUR➢.MO OR O5¢OSED KNEW ME 50 5FN CONSENT OF ME,RURTECI COBB...TIN CREW RENAL AU ARTS REBR.5O Wee.R>on ATDLLooRBA OT Community Redevelopment Agency 5-Year Cash Flow Analysis Page 2 broader use of redevelopment funds, the Dissolution Act limits the types of obligations that may be repaid by the successor agency. For example, agencies that legally transferred funds, property, or other assets to the city in the past year would be forced to return such assets to the agency for the purpose of liquidation and disbursement of proceeds to other taxing agencies. An oversight body, made up of representatives of local taxing agencies, would review the successor agency's affairs. In short, the primary objective of the successor agency and oversight body is to wind down the financial affairs of the former redevelopment agency as quickly as possible. The Continuation Program (ABX1 27) provides a costly means to continue redevelopment activities, in exchange for the City making annual payments. On August 1, the State Director of Finance will release the amounts of these initial "community remittance" payments, at which point the City may file an appeal with the Department of Finance by August 15. In the meantime, estimates of the 2011-12 and 2012-13 payments have been calculated (the latter which continues as long as the redevelopment agency exists). These amounts are shown below: Estimated Community Remittance Payment (As a Percentage of Estimated 2011-12 CRA Gross Tax Increment Revenue) Year Annual Amount % 2011-12 $2,850,655 42% 2012-13 (and thereafter) $670,745 11% The City, not the Agency, is responsible for these remittance payments, due in equal installments by January 15 and May 15 each year. It may use any available funds not otherwise obligated for other uses, including tax increment revenues. A 5-year cash flow model for the Agency was prepared by the redevelopment agency's fiscal consultant, Rosenow Spevacek Group Inc. (RSG), to illustrate the impacts of funding the remittance payments through tax increment. The model, Attachment A of this staff report, segregates the Agency's finances between the non-housing fund, bond funds, and the low and moderate income housing set aside fund. The model was created to identify year-end cash available to make the remittance payments after funding existing obligations, based on a conservative forecast of projected tax increment and other revenues. The estimated cash flow demonstrates that the Agency can expect to afford the remittance payments for about four years based on the assumptions described below. It is imperative to note that this timing generally coincides with the 3-year timeframe in which the Agency must spend its proceeds from the 2011 bond issue. Under dissolution, it is unclear if any projects would be allowed, even those funded by bond proceeds, particularly as the funds are not yet tied to third party obligations. The Agency has, at the least, this short window of opportunity to expend these funds, for the purposes they were issued and in a manner which can dramatically improve the Community Redevelopment Project Area and provide for the health, safety, and welfare of residents. Should the current litigation be unsuccessful, the City can 6 "---,,-. -_ . - - , . • II •Ficrrogbay-----—-- I 1 . , • i . . . . . . • EZ ___ ,z_-__JIZeal - ELEVATIONS (RETAIL Tth-11F.11-a1117- 6 6 .... . , -nal-- scregi+ BLDG.)6 . . . . . . . . . . . • . L i -753 ubiaill+ SCALE•I'' 8'-0* !..1..! ,4.17.",Of.191115011 Oarabedntor :LEVAT I ON ' , DATE June 28,2011 6e No:11-02 MP MVO by 0. . . . . . • MITTI..7 NC Tr..413‘..y10 1..0.0.B.P..00 0.1.Cif TK O....7/.0 r.f...”I.Ig...NOT 1.1 PM....t.521 pv 11,41,...I.lar.10,MI 0.114 COW-5,C.Tri•Ot...MCT ow...,.0.1(41,i.S.....t..-,Y...13 RC.. • 01ca.sucor . imUr Int cum.. Axu wows..am or n x anotrrcv ma ult SAC ISO!.1 Er 11,1.6•17.0 tan ca q.v..n,,uccu 1.e...n.cmu-,u,a-nrc AP,.ou,uuu,r,,T., 1..i'jU co., �- ®. EXISTING I I Z1 1 oaaenOn r�o,.wo�eiwa.u.w+o.ew - - .7. ,/ O/ + 1.h e" ®iiii4 RETAIL ft) OI d VICINITY MAP m I I �® I® *ADO 5F ...JCT.A ' ,1 1 LI �� OT NOT TO SCALE `` fe ,• -!fmm, 5..G-°TED COLOR r;1 A)T W 3 - S� &7'td 7--A.,-!W- .:.'xlmi :,`P ''t- 4 ADA PATH OF TRAVEL II IrT •-1 '�a V _ .':T , �,41 -� �,so 34:5 _� :rM'-r N."' 6'BENCH ~ �,, c W f1 A I 1, ' I : ir J =.J I I er s.iX 1•4 C'':4. �,•{, f5•r �I. Te • -ia„ .q •.. ' �a moo`R SEwTING I cp # I- I' +.. ,r.,✓N 'ill�Iq • �,!•t �ide___� - 1 r.�',.;.x�ttt^:r�•�tiP•-%• " � z• ' "S .*r 9 �>019 �..+. "1 ds3: • BICYCLE- F,•- -T a. -• ` o• DIRECTIONAL 516N MO. . SIGN (5)BIC,'. -— - 1i €.`'1-,--Y, '*',4,± ,1 l MPED CONCRETE♦W BARTON RTON ROAD -- -- ` "` f- ' ' Attachment 7 GRATED DOLOR jt T ROAD RAISED MEDIAN [r'' - r w -tr,,,,,-:',*4:I'lf Y w.g�;N�'KgNi{Ip,t+.�,;: ':P'7 •Ns u E,�''R .Y arF±l� T '-'• E (STING EGNALIZ;D ...,4;,,_kg',`"„ ;.° 2,BZERg/t-• :'lij; �;ry A„F, 1, ,., SITE PLAN INTERS GTION ,*.y"M`+J a'L?- -`i • f f.- ,4 •r C •- STA THERS I COMMERCIAL -, Wit. -„ - gg � .1' ° 1 1 I \1 �+.a q1;„ z-=' re`.,^y �# SCALE 1"=30'0" I]&1'-s• Yx." ,.1 .,:;sT '.L::ti;,F'<':-..F 1;;.4 s1`1-f4- ,72.. i.,00 DATE:June 28, 2011 holed TS1BSlm(o013.IIBBAU OnWQPoAbb Case No.: 11-02 G""D" A101 Chocbed by T.A.UNPDBUSMED WORK Of MB ARanECT Alm S D SAID BAY NOT BE DIRUUR➢.MO OR O5¢OSED KNEW ME 50 5FN CONSENT OF ME,RURTECI COBB...TIN CREW RENAL AU ARTS REBR.5O Wee.R>on ATDLLooRBA OT Community Redevelopment Agency 5-Year Cash Flow Analysis Page 3 reevaluate the financial and political options for the Agency once the bond funds are expended, and either choose to remain operational if the remittance payments can be made, or dissolve at that time. Model Assumptions RSG employed the following assumptions in this analysis: 1. Cash Balance: Cash balances were determined in conjunction with the Finance Director using 2010-11 year end unaudited figures as of July 15, 2011. 2. Revenues: Tax increment revenues, generated by increases in the assessed value of Project Area property, are the primary source of financing for redevelopment and affordable housing in the Project Area. Secured assessed values are assumed to grow by 2 percent each year. Other revenues include interest earnings, and use of money and property. 3. Expenditures: Expenses are based on the terms of the following obligations and are categorized by RSG into the following general categories: a. Enforceable Obligations generally include RSG's preliminary review of indebtedness of the agency that would likely be paid under either dissolution or continuance of the Agency, following the description of these obligations Sections 34167(d) and 34171(d) of the Health and Safety Code. These may be subject to change, but generally include third-party agreements between the Agency and bondholders, property owners, and contractors. b. Other Contractual Indebtedness includes obligations that are subject to a written contract, but only likely to be paid in our opinion if the Agency continues. These include payments to taxing agencies, the County Auditor-Controller administrative fee and the City's administrative fees. c. Other Obligations are expenditures that are the least likely to be collected to their full extent under dissolution. This includes projects the Agency had hoped to perform in the future, as well as most administrative costs. Where project costs have yet to be identified, estimates were used. Should the Agency be dissolved, a limited amount of administrative funding is allowed by AB X1 26 for a Successor Agency to oversee payment of enforceable obligations. 4. Remittance Payment Estimates: Remittance payments are determined by the State Department of Finance annually in August of each year. These payments are intended to total $1.7 billion statewide in 2011-12 and over $400 million in each year thereafter. RSG estimated these payments and inflated future payments by 2 percent annually. FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal impact is significant, expected to be approximately $2.9 million in 2011-12, and at least $670,000 annually thereafter. Annual payments will increase or decrease at an y has, at the least, this short window of opportunity to expend these funds, for the purposes they were issued and in a manner which can dramatically improve the Community Redevelopment Project Area and provide for the health, safety, and welfare of residents. Should the current litigation be unsuccessful, the City can 6 "---,,-. -_ . - - , . • II •Ficrrogbay-----—-- I 1 . , • i . . . . . . • EZ ___ ,z_-__JIZeal - ELEVATIONS (RETAIL Tth-11F.11-a1117- 6 6 .... . , -nal-- scregi+ BLDG.)6 . . . . . . . . . . . • . L i -753 ubiaill+ SCALE•I'' 8'-0* !..1..! ,4.17.",Of.191115011 Oarabedntor :LEVAT I ON ' , DATE June 28,2011 6e No:11-02 MP MVO by 0. . . . . . • MITTI..7 NC Tr..413‘..y10 1..0.0.B.P..00 0.1.Cif TK O....7/.0 r.f...”I.Ig...NOT 1.1 PM....t.521 pv 11,41,...I.lar.10,MI 0.114 COW-5,C.Tri•Ot...MCT ow...,.0.1(41,i.S.....t..-,Y...13 RC.. • 01ca.sucor . imUr Int cum.. Axu wows..am or n x anotrrcv ma ult SAC ISO!.1 Er 11,1.6•17.0 tan ca q.v..n,,uccu 1.e...n.cmu-,u,a-nrc AP,.ou,uuu,r,,T., 1..i'jU co., �- ®. EXISTING I I Z1 1 oaaenOn r�o,.wo�eiwa.u.w+o.ew - - .7. ,/ O/ + 1.h e" ®iiii4 RETAIL ft) OI d VICINITY MAP m I I �® I® *ADO 5F ...JCT.A ' ,1 1 LI �� OT NOT TO SCALE `` fe ,• -!fmm, 5..G-°TED COLOR r;1 A)T W 3 - S� &7'td 7--A.,-!W- .:.'xlmi :,`P ''t- 4 ADA PATH OF TRAVEL II IrT •-1 '�a V _ .':T , �,41 -� �,so 34:5 _� :rM'-r N."' 6'BENCH ~ �,, c W f1 A I 1, ' I : ir J =.J I I er s.iX 1•4 C'':4. �,•{, f5•r �I. Te • -ia„ .q •.. ' �a moo`R SEwTING I cp # I- I' +.. ,r.,✓N 'ill�Iq • �,!•t �ide___� - 1 r.�',.;.x�ttt^:r�•�tiP•-%• " � z• ' "S .*r 9 �>019 �..+. "1 ds3: • BICYCLE- F,•- -T a. -• ` o• DIRECTIONAL 516N MO. . SIGN (5)BIC,'. -— - 1i €.`'1-,--Y, '*',4,± ,1 l MPED CONCRETE♦W BARTON RTON ROAD -- -- ` "` f- ' ' Attachment 7 GRATED DOLOR jt T ROAD RAISED MEDIAN [r'' - r w -tr,,,,,-:',*4:I'lf Y w.g�;N�'KgNi{Ip,t+.�,;: ':P'7 •Ns u E,�''R .Y arF±l� T '-'• E (STING EGNALIZ;D ...,4;,,_kg',`"„ ;.° 2,BZERg/t-• :'lij; �;ry A„F, 1, ,., SITE PLAN INTERS GTION ,*.y"M`+J a'L?- -`i • f f.- ,4 •r C •- STA THERS I COMMERCIAL -, Wit. -„ - gg � .1' ° 1 1 I \1 �+.a q1;„ z-=' re`.,^y �# SCALE 1"=30'0" I]&1'-s• Yx." ,.1 .,:;sT '.L::ti;,F'<':-..F 1;;.4 s1`1-f4- ,72.. i.,00 DATE:June 28, 2011 holed TS1BSlm(o013.IIBBAU OnWQPoAbb Case No.: 11-02 G""D" A101 Chocbed by T.A.UNPDBUSMED WORK Of MB ARanECT Alm S D SAID BAY NOT BE DIRUUR➢.MO OR O5¢OSED KNEW ME 50 5FN CONSENT OF ME,RURTECI COBB...TIN CREW RENAL AU ARTS REBR.5O Wee.R>on ATDLLooRBA OT Community Redevelopment Agency 5-Year Cash Flow Analysis Page 4 inflationary rate reflective of growth in assessed value. Payments may also increase when and if the Agency enters into new debt agreements to be funded with future non-housing tax increment. The City intends to file an appeal, as provided for in ABX1 27, by the August 15 deadline. Additional information on the appeal is provide in the staff report for the professional services agreement with RSG which is also on the agenda of the July 26 Council Meeting. Respectfully submitted, Betsy . Adams City Manager ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A: 5-Year Cash Flow Analysis for Community Redevelopment Agency o form: City Attorney Page 3 of 3 afety Code Ms map isfor reference orgy.For detaled ilcanalon,ple se oansut with the Cemrnm ty De.ecprrent Depattneri �i._1, 'n Page 11 of 11 Attachment A 5-Year Cash Flow Analysis for Community Redevelopment Agency ge 4 inflationary rate reflective of growth in assessed value. Payments may also increase when and if the Agency enters into new debt agreements to be funded with future non-housing tax increment. The City intends to file an appeal, as provided for in ABX1 27, by the August 15 deadline. Additional information on the appeal is provide in the staff report for the professional services agreement with RSG which is also on the agenda of the July 26 Council Meeting. Respectfully submitted, Betsy . Adams City Manager ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A: 5-Year Cash Flow Analysis for Community Redevelopment Agency o form: City Attorney Page 3 of 3 afety Code Ms map isfor reference orgy.For detaled ilcanalon,ple se oansut with the Cemrnm ty De.ecprrent Depattneri �i._1, 'n Page 11 of 11 FUND SUMMARY �a� Grand'Terrace Redevelopment Agency 2011-12 I 2012-13 I 2013-14 I 2014-15 I 2015-16 Projected Available Cash by Fund $ 19,240,714 $ 9,735,853 $ 2,533,651 $ 1,857,319 $ 1,218,963 Nonhousing Fund 5,645,949 2,651,174 1,736,224 794,154 (142,632) Tax-Exempt 2011 Bond Fund 8,643,979 4,543,979 - - - Taxable 2011 Bond Fund 3,998,105 1,977,585 - - - Housing Fund 952,681 563,115 797,426 1,063,166 1,361,595 Community Remittance Payment Sources 2,850,655 670,745 686,638 702,849 719,384 Nonhousing Fund 2,850,655 670,745 686,638 702,849 719,384 Tax-Exempt 2011 Bond Fund - - - - - Taxable 2011 Bond Fund - - - - - Housing Fund - - - - - Ending Cash Balance by Fund 16,390,059 9,065,108 1,847,013 1,154,470 499,579 Nonhousing Fund 2,795,294 1,980,429 1,049,586 91,304 (862,016) Tax-Exempt 2011 Bond Fund 8,643,979 4,543,979 - - - Taxable 2011 Bond Fund 3,998,105 1,977,585 - - - Housing Fund 952,681 563,115 797,426 1,063,166 1,361,595 RSG Page 1 of 5 Summary by Fund y, following the description of these obligations Sections 34167(d) and 34171(d) of the Health and Safety Code. These may be subject to change, but generally include third-party agreements between the Agency and bondholders, property owners, and contractors. b. Other Contractual Indebtedness includes obligations that are subject to a written contract, but only likely to be paid in our opinion if the Agency continues. These include payments to taxing agencies, the County Auditor-Controller administrative fee and the City's administrative fees. c. Other Obligations are expenditures that are the least likely to be collected to their full extent under dissolution. This includes projects the Agency had hoped to perform in the future, as well as most administrative costs. Where project costs have yet to be identified, estimates were used. Should the Agency be dissolved, a limited amount of administrative funding is allowed by AB X1 26 for a Successor Agency to oversee payment of enforceable obligations. 4. Remittance Payment Estimates: Remittance payments are determined by the State Department of Finance annually in August of each year. These payments are intended to total $1.7 billion statewide in 2011-12 and over $400 million in each year thereafter. RSG estimated these payments and inflated future payments by 2 percent annually. FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal impact is significant, expected to be approximately $2.9 million in 2011-12, and at least $670,000 annually thereafter. Annual payments will increase or decrease at an y has, at the least, this short window of opportunity to expend these funds, for the purposes they were issued and in a manner which can dramatically improve the Community Redevelopment Project Area and provide for the health, safety, and welfare of residents. Should the current litigation be unsuccessful, the City can 6 "---,,-. -_ . - - , . • II •Ficrrogbay-----—-- I 1 . , • i . . . . . . • EZ ___ ,z_-__JIZeal - ELEVATIONS (RETAIL Tth-11F.11-a1117- 6 6 .... . , -nal-- scregi+ BLDG.)6 . . . . . . . . . . . • . L i -753 ubiaill+ SCALE•I'' 8'-0* !..1..! ,4.17.",Of.191115011 Oarabedntor :LEVAT I ON ' , DATE June 28,2011 6e No:11-02 MP MVO by 0. . . . . . • MITTI..7 NC Tr..413‘..y10 1..0.0.B.P..00 0.1.Cif TK O....7/.0 r.f...”I.Ig...NOT 1.1 PM....t.521 pv 11,41,...I.lar.10,MI 0.114 COW-5,C.Tri•Ot...MCT ow...,.0.1(41,i.S.....t..-,Y...13 RC.. • 01ca.sucor . imUr Int cum.. Axu wows..am or n x anotrrcv ma ult SAC ISO!.1 Er 11,1.6•17.0 tan ca q.v..n,,uccu 1.e...n.cmu-,u,a-nrc AP,.ou,uuu,r,,T., 1..i'jU co., �- ®. EXISTING I I Z1 1 oaaenOn r�o,.wo�eiwa.u.w+o.ew - - .7. ,/ O/ + 1.h e" ®iiii4 RETAIL ft) OI d VICINITY MAP m I I �® I® *ADO 5F ...JCT.A ' ,1 1 LI �� OT NOT TO SCALE `` fe ,• -!fmm, 5..G-°TED COLOR r;1 A)T W 3 - S� &7'td 7--A.,-!W- .:.'xlmi :,`P ''t- 4 ADA PATH OF TRAVEL II IrT •-1 '�a V _ .':T , �,41 -� �,so 34:5 _� :rM'-r N."' 6'BENCH ~ �,, c W f1 A I 1, ' I : ir J =.J I I er s.iX 1•4 C'':4. �,•{, f5•r �I. Te • -ia„ .q •.. ' �a moo`R SEwTING I cp # I- I' +.. ,r.,✓N 'ill�Iq • �,!•t �ide___� - 1 r.�',.;.x�ttt^:r�•�tiP•-%• " � z• ' "S .*r 9 �>019 �..+. "1 ds3: • BICYCLE- F,•- -T a. -• ` o• DIRECTIONAL 516N MO. . SIGN (5)BIC,'. -— - 1i €.`'1-,--Y, '*',4,± ,1 l MPED CONCRETE♦W BARTON RTON ROAD -- -- ` "` f- ' ' Attachment 7 GRATED DOLOR jt T ROAD RAISED MEDIAN [r'' - r w -tr,,,,,-:',*4:I'lf Y w.g�;N�'KgNi{Ip,t+.�,;: ':P'7 •Ns u E,�''R .Y arF±l� T '-'• E (STING EGNALIZ;D ...,4;,,_kg',`"„ ;.° 2,BZERg/t-• :'lij; �;ry A„F, 1, ,., SITE PLAN INTERS GTION ,*.y"M`+J a'L?- -`i • f f.- ,4 •r C •- STA THERS I COMMERCIAL -, Wit. -„ - gg � .1' ° 1 1 I \1 �+.a q1;„ z-=' re`.,^y �# SCALE 1"=30'0" I]&1'-s• Yx." ,.1 .,:;sT '.L::ti;,F'<':-..F 1;;.4 s1`1-f4- ,72.. i.,00 DATE:June 28, 2011 holed TS1BSlm(o013.IIBBAU OnWQPoAbb Case No.: 11-02 G""D" A101 Chocbed by T.A.UNPDBUSMED WORK Of MB ARanECT Alm S D SAID BAY NOT BE DIRUUR➢.MO OR O5¢OSED KNEW ME 50 5FN CONSENT OF ME,RURTECI COBB...TIN CREW RENAL AU ARTS REBR.5O Wee.R>on ATDLLooRBA OT I NONHOUSING TAX INCREMENT FUNDS - - . - Grand Terrace Redevelopment-Agency--; I 2011-12 I 2012-13 I 2013-14 I 2014-15 I 2015-16 Starting Cash Balance $ 6,917,900 $ 2,795,294 $ 1,980,429 $ 1,049,586 $ 91,304 Beginning Cash Balance FY 2010-11 9,205,144 Net Revenue FY 2010-11 (1,815,580) Remittance of Funds Held for CJUSD (930,736) Correction to PY LMIHF Overpayment 459,072 Revenues 7,810,040 7,558,657 6,946,543 7,048,777 7,183,201 Tax Increment 6,365,893 6,517,290 6,671,715 6,829,229 6,989,893 Investment Earnings 389,634 239,546 81,520 26,240 - Use of Money and Property 46,000 46,000 46,000 46,000 46,000 Sale of Property 400,000 - - - - Transfer from Fund 34(2004 TA Debt Service) 608,513 608,513 - - - Repayment of General Fund Loan - 147,308 147,308 147,308 147,308 Expenditures 9,081,991 7,702,777 7,190,748 7,304,209 7,417,137 Enforceable Obligations 3,217,602 2,861,588 2,238,870 2,238,000 2,234,188 2004 Bond 1,824,625 634,765 - - - 2011"A"Bonds 598,610 1,099,195 1,112,395 1,108,920 1,108,745 2011"B"Bonds 298,020 631,280 630,128 632,733 629,095 Zion Bank Loan(COP Lease) 254,848 254,848 254,848 254,848 254,848 Stater Brothers Econ Dev Agreement 241,500 241,500 241,500 241,500 241,500 Other Indebtedness 4,254,511 4,045,711 4,136,732 4,230,885 4,326,921 Housing Fund Set Aside(Transfer to Fund 34) 1,273,179 1,303,458 1,334,343 1,365,846 1,397,979 Pass Through Payments 2,212,205 2,235,459 2,294,285 2,354,287 2,415,488 Water District Repayments 271,402 271,402 271,402 271,402 271,402 County Admin Fee 110,610 111,117 112,428 115,076 117,778 Trustee Admin Fee 12,115 12,115 12,115 12,115 12,115 May 2011 SERAF Loan Repayment to LMIHF - 112,159 112,159 ` 112,159 112,159 MOU Termination Grand Crossings 375,000 - - - - Capital Projects 872,604 39,035 39,035 39,035 39,035 Commercial Improvements 220,429 - - - - Neighborhood Improvements -39,035 39,035 39,035 39,035 39,035 Park Improvements 77,469 - - - - Mich/Barton/LaPaix Street Improvements 535,671 - - - - Administration Expenses 737,274 756,443 776,111 796,290 816,993 Staff Salaries and Benefits 261,985 268,797 275,785 282,956 290,313 Attorney 60,000 61,560 63,161 64,803 66,488 Professional Services 20,000 20,520 21,054 21,601 22,163 Office and Supplies Expense 500 513 526 540 554 Advertising 10,000 10,260 10,527 10,800 11,081 Contractual Services 91,820 94,207 96,657 99,170 101,748 Membership,Travel,Training,Auto Allowance 4,050 4,155 4,263 4,374 4,488 Cost Allocation 288,919 296,431 304,138 312,046 320,159 Net Revenue(Deficit) (1,271,951) (144,120) (244,205) (255,433) (233,936) Available Cash Balance 5,645,949 2,651,174 1,736,224 794,154 (142,632) Community Remittance Payment 2,850,655 670,745 686,638 702,849 719,384 Ending Cash Balance 2,795,294 1,980,429 1,049,586 91,304 (862,016) RsG Page 2 of 5 Nonhousing Tax Increment 6 6 .... . , -nal-- scregi+ BLDG.)6 . . . . . . . . . . . • . L i -753 ubiaill+ SCALE•I'' 8'-0* !..1..! ,4.17.",Of.191115011 Oarabedntor :LEVAT I ON ' , DATE June 28,2011 6e No:11-02 MP MVO by 0. . . . . . • MITTI..7 NC Tr..413‘..y10 1..0.0.B.P..00 0.1.Cif TK O....7/.0 r.f...”I.Ig...NOT 1.1 PM....t.521 pv 11,41,...I.lar.10,MI 0.114 COW-5,C.Tri•Ot...MCT ow...,.0.1(41,i.S.....t..-,Y...13 RC.. • 01ca.sucor . imUr Int cum.. Axu wows..am or n x anotrrcv ma ult SAC ISO!.1 Er 11,1.6•17.0 tan ca q.v..n,,uccu 1.e...n.cmu-,u,a-nrc AP,.ou,uuu,r,,T., 1..i'jU co., �- ®. EXISTING I I Z1 1 oaaenOn r�o,.wo�eiwa.u.w+o.ew - - .7. ,/ O/ + 1.h e" ®iiii4 RETAIL ft) OI d VICINITY MAP m I I �® I® *ADO 5F ...JCT.A ' ,1 1 LI �� OT NOT TO SCALE `` fe ,• -!fmm, 5..G-°TED COLOR r;1 A)T W 3 - S� &7'td 7--A.,-!W- .:.'xlmi :,`P ''t- 4 ADA PATH OF TRAVEL II IrT •-1 '�a V _ .':T , �,41 -� �,so 34:5 _� :rM'-r N."' 6'BENCH ~ �,, c W f1 A I 1, ' I : ir J =.J I I er s.iX 1•4 C'':4. �,•{, f5•r �I. Te • -ia„ .q •.. ' �a moo`R SEwTING I cp # I- I' +.. ,r.,✓N 'ill�Iq • �,!•t �ide___� - 1 r.�',.;.x�ttt^:r�•�tiP•-%• " � z• ' "S .*r 9 �>019 �..+. "1 ds3: • BICYCLE- F,•- -T a. -• ` o• DIRECTIONAL 516N MO. . SIGN (5)BIC,'. -— - 1i €.`'1-,--Y, '*',4,± ,1 l MPED CONCRETE♦W BARTON RTON ROAD -- -- ` "` f- ' ' Attachment 7 GRATED DOLOR jt T ROAD RAISED MEDIAN [r'' - r w -tr,,,,,-:',*4:I'lf Y w.g�;N�'KgNi{Ip,t+.�,;: ':P'7 •Ns u E,�''R .Y arF±l� T '-'• E (STING EGNALIZ;D ...,4;,,_kg',`"„ ;.° 2,BZERg/t-• :'lij; �;ry A„F, 1, ,., SITE PLAN INTERS GTION ,*.y"M`+J a'L?- -`i • f f.- ,4 •r C •- STA THERS I COMMERCIAL -, Wit. -„ - gg � .1' ° 1 1 I \1 �+.a q1;„ z-=' re`.,^y �# SCALE 1"=30'0" I]&1'-s• Yx." ,.1 .,:;sT '.L::ti;,F'<':-..F 1;;.4 s1`1-f4- ,72.. i.,00 DATE:June 28, 2011 holed TS1BSlm(o013.IIBBAU OnWQPoAbb Case No.: 11-02 G""D" A101 Chocbed by T.A.UNPDBUSMED WORK Of MB ARanECT Alm S D SAID BAY NOT BE DIRUUR➢.MO OR O5¢OSED KNEW ME 50 5FN CONSENT OF ME,RURTECI COBB...TIN CREW RENAL AU ARTS REBR.5O Wee.R>on ATDLLooRBA OT i TAX-EXEMPT 2011 BOND FUND - Grand'Terrace Redevelopment Agency I 2011-12 I 2012-13 2013-14 I 2014-15 2015-16 Starting Cash Balance $ 13,510,567 $ 8,643,979 $ 4,543,979 $ - $ - Net Proceeds Deposit-2011 TABS,Series A 13,510,567 Revenues - - - - - Investment Earnings - - - - - Expenditures 4,866,588 4,100,000 4,543,979 - - Enforceable Obligations - - - - - Other Indebtedness - - - - - Capital Projects 4,766,588 4,000,000 4,443,979 - - Three Intersection Projects 266,588 Estimated Land Purchases 4,000,000 Estimated Projects 500,000 Estimated Projects - 4,000,000 Estimated Projects - 4,443,979 Administration Expenses 100,000 100,000 100,000 - - Staff Salaries and Benefits - - - - Attorney - - - - Professional Services(Projects) 100,000 100,000 100,000 - - Office and Supplies Expense - - - - Advertising - - - - Contractual Services - - - - Membership,Travel,Training,Auto Allowance - - - - Cost Allocation - - - - Net Revenue(Deficit) (4,866,588) (4,100,000) (4,543,979) - - Available Cash Balance 8,643,979 4,543,979 - - - Community Remittance Payment - - - - - Ending Cash Balance 8,643,979 4,543,979 - - - e RS'G Page 3 of 5 Tax Exempt Bonds ,732 4,230,885 4,326,921 Housing Fund Set Aside(Transfer to Fund 34) 1,273,179 1,303,458 1,334,343 1,365,846 1,397,979 Pass Through Payments 2,212,205 2,235,459 2,294,285 2,354,287 2,415,488 Water District Repayments 271,402 271,402 271,402 271,402 271,402 County Admin Fee 110,610 111,117 112,428 115,076 117,778 Trustee Admin Fee 12,115 12,115 12,115 12,115 12,115 May 2011 SERAF Loan Repayment to LMIHF - 112,159 112,159 ` 112,159 112,159 MOU Termination Grand Crossings 375,000 - - - - Capital Projects 872,604 39,035 39,035 39,035 39,035 Commercial Improvements 220,429 - - - - Neighborhood Improvements -39,035 39,035 39,035 39,035 39,035 Park Improvements 77,469 - - - - Mich/Barton/LaPaix Street Improvements 535,671 - - - - Administration Expenses 737,274 756,443 776,111 796,290 816,993 Staff Salaries and Benefits 261,985 268,797 275,785 282,956 290,313 Attorney 60,000 61,560 63,161 64,803 66,488 Professional Services 20,000 20,520 21,054 21,601 22,163 Office and Supplies Expense 500 513 526 540 554 Advertising 10,000 10,260 10,527 10,800 11,081 Contractual Services 91,820 94,207 96,657 99,170 101,748 Membership,Travel,Training,Auto Allowance 4,050 4,155 4,263 4,374 4,488 Cost Allocation 288,919 296,431 304,138 312,046 320,159 Net Revenue(Deficit) (1,271,951) (144,120) (244,205) (255,433) (233,936) Available Cash Balance 5,645,949 2,651,174 1,736,224 794,154 (142,632) Community Remittance Payment 2,850,655 670,745 686,638 702,849 719,384 Ending Cash Balance 2,795,294 1,980,429 1,049,586 91,304 (862,016) RsG Page 2 of 5 Nonhousing Tax Increment 6 6 .... . , -nal-- scregi+ BLDG.)6 . . . . . . . . . . . • . L i -753 ubiaill+ SCALE•I'' 8'-0* !..1..! ,4.17.",Of.191115011 Oarabedntor :LEVAT I ON ' , DATE June 28,2011 6e No:11-02 MP MVO by 0. . . . . . • MITTI..7 NC Tr..413‘..y10 1..0.0.B.P..00 0.1.Cif TK O....7/.0 r.f...”I.Ig...NOT 1.1 PM....t.521 pv 11,41,...I.lar.10,MI 0.114 COW-5,C.Tri•Ot...MCT ow...,.0.1(41,i.S.....t..-,Y...13 RC.. • 01ca.sucor . imUr Int cum.. Axu wows..am or n x anotrrcv ma ult SAC ISO!.1 Er 11,1.6•17.0 tan ca q.v..n,,uccu 1.e...n.cmu-,u,a-nrc AP,.ou,uuu,r,,T., 1..i'jU co., �- ®. EXISTING I I Z1 1 oaaenOn r�o,.wo�eiwa.u.w+o.ew - - .7. ,/ O/ + 1.h e" ®iiii4 RETAIL ft) OI d VICINITY MAP m I I �® I® *ADO 5F ...JCT.A ' ,1 1 LI �� OT NOT TO SCALE `` fe ,• -!fmm, 5..G-°TED COLOR r;1 A)T W 3 - S� &7'td 7--A.,-!W- .:.'xlmi :,`P ''t- 4 ADA PATH OF TRAVEL II IrT •-1 '�a V _ .':T , �,41 -� �,so 34:5 _� :rM'-r N."' 6'BENCH ~ �,, c W f1 A I 1, ' I : ir J =.J I I er s.iX 1•4 C'':4. �,•{, f5•r �I. Te • -ia„ .q •.. ' �a moo`R SEwTING I cp # I- I' +.. ,r.,✓N 'ill�Iq • �,!•t �ide___� - 1 r.�',.;.x�ttt^:r�•�tiP•-%• " � z• ' "S .*r 9 �>019 �..+. "1 ds3: • BICYCLE- F,•- -T a. -• ` o• DIRECTIONAL 516N MO. . SIGN (5)BIC,'. -— - 1i €.`'1-,--Y, '*',4,± ,1 l MPED CONCRETE♦W BARTON RTON ROAD -- -- ` "` f- ' ' Attachment 7 GRATED DOLOR jt T ROAD RAISED MEDIAN [r'' - r w -tr,,,,,-:',*4:I'lf Y w.g�;N�'KgNi{Ip,t+.�,;: ':P'7 •Ns u E,�''R .Y arF±l� T '-'• E (STING EGNALIZ;D ...,4;,,_kg',`"„ ;.° 2,BZERg/t-• :'lij; �;ry A„F, 1, ,., SITE PLAN INTERS GTION ,*.y"M`+J a'L?- -`i • f f.- ,4 •r C •- STA THERS I COMMERCIAL -, Wit. -„ - gg � .1' ° 1 1 I \1 �+.a q1;„ z-=' re`.,^y �# SCALE 1"=30'0" I]&1'-s• Yx." ,.1 .,:;sT '.L::ti;,F'<':-..F 1;;.4 s1`1-f4- ,72.. i.,00 DATE:June 28, 2011 holed TS1BSlm(o013.IIBBAU OnWQPoAbb Case No.: 11-02 G""D" A101 Chocbed by T.A.UNPDBUSMED WORK Of MB ARanECT Alm S D SAID BAY NOT BE DIRUUR➢.MO OR O5¢OSED KNEW ME 50 5FN CONSENT OF ME,RURTECI COBB...TIN CREW RENAL AU ARTS REBR.5O Wee.R>on ATDLLooRBA OT TAXABLE 2011 BOND FUND • - , - _ - - • Grand Terrace Redevelopment Agency'j I 2011-12 I 2012-13 I 2013-14 I 2014-15 I 2015-16 Starting Cash Balance $ 5,018,105 $ 3,998,105 $ 1,977,585 $ - $ - Net Proceeds Deposit-2011 TABS,Series B 5,018,105 Revenues - - - - - Investment Earnings - - - - - Expenditures 1,020,000 2,020,520 1,977,585 - - Enforceable Obligations - - - - - Other Indebtedness - - - - - Capital Projects 1,000,000 2,000,000 1,956,531 - - Estimated Projects 1,000,000 Estimated Projects 2,000,000 Estimated Projects 1,956,531 Administration Expenses 20,000 20,520 21,054 - - Staff Salaries and Benefits - - - - Attorney - - - - Professional Services 20,000 20,520 21,054 - - Office and Supplies Expense - - - - Advertising - - - - Contractual Services - - - - Membership,Travel,Training,Auto Allowance - - - - Cost Allocation - - - - Net Revenue(Deficit) (1,020,000) (2,020,520) (1,977,585) - - Available Cash Balance 3,998,105 1,977,585 - - - Community Remittance Payment - - - - - Ending Cash Balance 3,998,105 1,977,585 - - - O PSG Page 4 of 5 Taxable Bonds Page 3 of 5 Tax Exempt Bonds ,732 4,230,885 4,326,921 Housing Fund Set Aside(Transfer to Fund 34) 1,273,179 1,303,458 1,334,343 1,365,846 1,397,979 Pass Through Payments 2,212,205 2,235,459 2,294,285 2,354,287 2,415,488 Water District Repayments 271,402 271,402 271,402 271,402 271,402 County Admin Fee 110,610 111,117 112,428 115,076 117,778 Trustee Admin Fee 12,115 12,115 12,115 12,115 12,115 May 2011 SERAF Loan Repayment to LMIHF - 112,159 112,159 ` 112,159 112,159 MOU Termination Grand Crossings 375,000 - - - - Capital Projects 872,604 39,035 39,035 39,035 39,035 Commercial Improvements 220,429 - - - - Neighborhood Improvements -39,035 39,035 39,035 39,035 39,035 Park Improvements 77,469 - - - - Mich/Barton/LaPaix Street Improvements 535,671 - - - - Administration Expenses 737,274 756,443 776,111 796,290 816,993 Staff Salaries and Benefits 261,985 268,797 275,785 282,956 290,313 Attorney 60,000 61,560 63,161 64,803 66,488 Professional Services 20,000 20,520 21,054 21,601 22,163 Office and Supplies Expense 500 513 526 540 554 Advertising 10,000 10,260 10,527 10,800 11,081 Contractual Services 91,820 94,207 96,657 99,170 101,748 Membership,Travel,Training,Auto Allowance 4,050 4,155 4,263 4,374 4,488 Cost Allocation 288,919 296,431 304,138 312,046 320,159 Net Revenue(Deficit) (1,271,951) (144,120) (244,205) (255,433) (233,936) Available Cash Balance 5,645,949 2,651,174 1,736,224 794,154 (142,632) Community Remittance Payment 2,850,655 670,745 686,638 702,849 719,384 Ending Cash Balance 2,795,294 1,980,429 1,049,586 91,304 (862,016) RsG Page 2 of 5 Nonhousing Tax Increment 6 6 .... . , -nal-- scregi+ BLDG.)6 . . . . . . . . . . . • . L i -753 ubiaill+ SCALE•I'' 8'-0* !..1..! ,4.17.",Of.191115011 Oarabedntor :LEVAT I ON ' , DATE June 28,2011 6e No:11-02 MP MVO by 0. . . . . . • MITTI..7 NC Tr..413‘..y10 1..0.0.B.P..00 0.1.Cif TK O....7/.0 r.f...”I.Ig...NOT 1.1 PM....t.521 pv 11,41,...I.lar.10,MI 0.114 COW-5,C.Tri•Ot...MCT ow...,.0.1(41,i.S.....t..-,Y...13 RC.. • 01ca.sucor . imUr Int cum.. Axu wows..am or n x anotrrcv ma ult SAC ISO!.1 Er 11,1.6•17.0 tan ca q.v..n,,uccu 1.e...n.cmu-,u,a-nrc AP,.ou,uuu,r,,T., 1..i'jU co., �- ®. EXISTING I I Z1 1 oaaenOn r�o,.wo�eiwa.u.w+o.ew - - .7. ,/ O/ + 1.h e" ®iiii4 RETAIL ft) OI d VICINITY MAP m I I �® I® *ADO 5F ...JCT.A ' ,1 1 LI �� OT NOT TO SCALE `` fe ,• -!fmm, 5..G-°TED COLOR r;1 A)T W 3 - S� &7'td 7--A.,-!W- .:.'xlmi :,`P ''t- 4 ADA PATH OF TRAVEL II IrT •-1 '�a V _ .':T , �,41 -� �,so 34:5 _� :rM'-r N."' 6'BENCH ~ �,, c W f1 A I 1, ' I : ir J =.J I I er s.iX 1•4 C'':4. �,•{, f5•r �I. Te • -ia„ .q •.. ' �a moo`R SEwTING I cp # I- I' +.. ,r.,✓N 'ill�Iq • �,!•t �ide___� - 1 r.�',.;.x�ttt^:r�•�tiP•-%• " � z• ' "S .*r 9 �>019 �..+. "1 ds3: • BICYCLE- F,•- -T a. -• ` o• DIRECTIONAL 516N MO. . SIGN (5)BIC,'. -— - 1i €.`'1-,--Y, '*',4,± ,1 l MPED CONCRETE♦W BARTON RTON ROAD -- -- ` "` f- ' ' Attachment 7 GRATED DOLOR jt T ROAD RAISED MEDIAN [r'' - r w -tr,,,,,-:',*4:I'lf Y w.g�;N�'KgNi{Ip,t+.�,;: ':P'7 •Ns u E,�''R .Y arF±l� T '-'• E (STING EGNALIZ;D ...,4;,,_kg',`"„ ;.° 2,BZERg/t-• :'lij; �;ry A„F, 1, ,., SITE PLAN INTERS GTION ,*.y"M`+J a'L?- -`i • f f.- ,4 •r C •- STA THERS I COMMERCIAL -, Wit. -„ - gg � .1' ° 1 1 I \1 �+.a q1;„ z-=' re`.,^y �# SCALE 1"=30'0" I]&1'-s• Yx." ,.1 .,:;sT '.L::ti;,F'<':-..F 1;;.4 s1`1-f4- ,72.. i.,00 DATE:June 28, 2011 holed TS1BSlm(o013.IIBBAU OnWQPoAbb Case No.: 11-02 G""D" A101 Chocbed by T.A.UNPDBUSMED WORK Of MB ARanECT Alm S D SAID BAY NOT BE DIRUUR➢.MO OR O5¢OSED KNEW ME 50 5FN CONSENT OF ME,RURTECI COBB...TIN CREW RENAL AU ARTS REBR.5O Wee.R>on ATDLLooRBA OT HOUSING FUND. r Grand Terrace Redevelopment Agency:' I 2011-12 I 2012-13 2013-14 I 2014-15 I 2015-16 Starting Cash Balance $ 800,666 $ 952,681 $ 563,115 $ 797,426 $ 1,063,166 Beginning Cash Balance FY 2010-11 1,309,418 Net Revenue FY 2010-11 (49,680) Correction to PY LMIHF Overpayment (459,072) Revenues 1,277,279 1,441,334 1,462,480 1,499,840 1,538,617 Tax Increment Transfer In from Fund 33 1,273,179 1,303,458 1,334,343 1,365,846 1,397,979 SERAF Loan Repayment - 112,159 112,159 112,159 112,159 Program Revenue 2,200 Investment Earnings - 23,817 14,078 19,936 26,579 Principal and Interest on Loans 1,900 1,900 1,900 1,900 1,900 Expenditures 1,125,264 1,830,900 1,228,169 1,234,101 1,240,188 Enforceable Obligations 608,513 608,513 - - - Share of 2004 TA Bond 608,513 608,513 - - - Other Indebtedness 300,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 Residual Receipts Agreement w/City 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 Estimated Projects 700,000 700,000 700,000 700,000 Administration 216,751 222,387 228,169 234,101 240,188 Staff Salaries and Benefits 156,606 160,678 164,855 169,142 173,539 Legal and Professional Services 40,000 41,040 42,107 43,202 44,325 Office and Supplies Expense 3,270 3,355 3,442 3,532 3,624 Contractual Services - - - - - Membership,Travel,Training,Auto Allowance 4,825 4,950 5,079 5,211 5,347 Cost Allocation 12,050 12,363 12,685 13,015 13,353 Net Revenue(Deficit) 152,015 (389,565) 234,311 265,740 298,429 Available Cash Balance 952,681 563,115 797,426 1,063,166 1,361,595 Community Remittance Payment - - - - - Ending Cash Balance 952,681 563,115 797,426 1,063,166 1,361,595 O RSG. Page 5 of 5 LMIHF 2,159 112,159 MOU Termination Grand Crossings 375,000 - - - - Capital Projects 872,604 39,035 39,035 39,035 39,035 Commercial Improvements 220,429 - - - - Neighborhood Improvements -39,035 39,035 39,035 39,035 39,035 Park Improvements 77,469 - - - - Mich/Barton/LaPaix Street Improvements 535,671 - - - - Administration Expenses 737,274 756,443 776,111 796,290 816,993 Staff Salaries and Benefits 261,985 268,797 275,785 282,956 290,313 Attorney 60,000 61,560 63,161 64,803 66,488 Professional Services 20,000 20,520 21,054 21,601 22,163 Office and Supplies Expense 500 513 526 540 554 Advertising 10,000 10,260 10,527 10,800 11,081 Contractual Services 91,820 94,207 96,657 99,170 101,748 Membership,Travel,Training,Auto Allowance 4,050 4,155 4,263 4,374 4,488 Cost Allocation 288,919 296,431 304,138 312,046 320,159 Net Revenue(Deficit) (1,271,951) (144,120) (244,205) (255,433) (233,936) Available Cash Balance 5,645,949 2,651,174 1,736,224 794,154 (142,632) Community Remittance Payment 2,850,655 670,745 686,638 702,849 719,384 Ending Cash Balance 2,795,294 1,980,429 1,049,586 91,304 (862,016) RsG Page 2 of 5 Nonhousing Tax Increment 6 6 .... . , -nal-- scregi+ BLDG.)6 . . . . . . . . . . . • . L i -753 ubiaill+ SCALE•I'' 8'-0* !..1..! ,4.17.",Of.191115011 Oarabedntor :LEVAT I ON ' , DATE June 28,2011 6e No:11-02 MP MVO by 0. . . . . . • MITTI..7 NC Tr..413‘..y10 1..0.0.B.P..00 0.1.Cif TK O....7/.0 r.f...”I.Ig...NOT 1.1 PM....t.521 pv 11,41,...I.lar.10,MI 0.114 COW-5,C.Tri•Ot...MCT ow...,.0.1(41,i.S.....t..-,Y...13 RC.. • 01ca.sucor . imUr Int cum.. Axu wows..am or n x anotrrcv ma ult SAC ISO!.1 Er 11,1.6•17.0 tan ca q.v..n,,uccu 1.e...n.cmu-,u,a-nrc AP,.ou,uuu,r,,T., 1..i'jU co., �- ®. EXISTING I I Z1 1 oaaenOn r�o,.wo�eiwa.u.w+o.ew - - .7. ,/ O/ + 1.h e" ®iiii4 RETAIL ft) OI d VICINITY MAP m I I �® I® *ADO 5F ...JCT.A ' ,1 1 LI �� OT NOT TO SCALE `` fe ,• -!fmm, 5..G-°TED COLOR r;1 A)T W 3 - S� &7'td 7--A.,-!W- .:.'xlmi :,`P ''t- 4 ADA PATH OF TRAVEL II IrT •-1 '�a V _ .':T , �,41 -� �,so 34:5 _� :rM'-r N."' 6'BENCH ~ �,, c W f1 A I 1, ' I : ir J =.J I I er s.iX 1•4 C'':4. �,•{, f5•r �I. Te • -ia„ .q •.. ' �a moo`R SEwTING I cp # I- I' +.. ,r.,✓N 'ill�Iq • �,!•t �ide___� - 1 r.�',.;.x�ttt^:r�•�tiP•-%• " � z• ' "S .*r 9 �>019 �..+. "1 ds3: • BICYCLE- F,•- -T a. -• ` o• DIRECTIONAL 516N MO. . SIGN (5)BIC,'. -— - 1i €.`'1-,--Y, '*',4,± ,1 l MPED CONCRETE♦W BARTON RTON ROAD -- -- ` "` f- ' ' Attachment 7 GRATED DOLOR jt T ROAD RAISED MEDIAN [r'' - r w -tr,,,,,-:',*4:I'lf Y w.g�;N�'KgNi{Ip,t+.�,;: ':P'7 •Ns u E,�''R .Y arF±l� T '-'• E (STING EGNALIZ;D ...,4;,,_kg',`"„ ;.° 2,BZERg/t-• :'lij; �;ry A„F, 1, ,., SITE PLAN INTERS GTION ,*.y"M`+J a'L?- -`i • f f.- ,4 •r C •- STA THERS I COMMERCIAL -, Wit. -„ - gg � .1' ° 1 1 I \1 �+.a q1;„ z-=' re`.,^y �# SCALE 1"=30'0" I]&1'-s• Yx." ,.1 .,:;sT '.L::ti;,F'<':-..F 1;;.4 s1`1-f4- ,72.. i.,00 DATE:June 28, 2011 holed TS1BSlm(o013.IIBBAU OnWQPoAbb Case No.: 11-02 G""D" A101 Chocbed by T.A.UNPDBUSMED WORK Of MB ARanECT Alm S D SAID BAY NOT BE DIRUUR➢.MO OR O5¢OSED KNEW ME 50 5FN CONSENT OF ME,RURTECI COBB...TIN CREW RENAL AU ARTS REBR.5O Wee.R>on ATDLLooRBA OT R s G City of Grand Terrace Redevelopment Agency Cash Flow July 26,2011 tive of growth in assessed value. Payments may also increase when and if the Agency enters into new debt agreements to be funded with future non-housing tax increment. The City intends to file an appeal, as provided for in ABX1 27, by the August 15 deadline. Additional information on the appeal is provide in the staff report for the professional services agreement with RSG which is also on the agenda of the July 26 Council Meeting. Respectfully submitted, Betsy . Adams City Manager ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A: 5-Year Cash Flow Analysis for Community Redevelopment Agency o form: City Attorney Page 3 of 3 afety Code Ms map isfor reference orgy.For detaled ilcanalon,ple se oansut with the Cemrnm ty De.ecprrent Depattneri �i._1, 'n Page 11 of 11 Brief History • Began with Governor Brown's budget proposal in January 2011 — Eliminate redevelopment — Reallocate money to other taxing entities • Current budget official on June 29, 2011 • Included trailer bills ABx1 26 and ABx1 27 • Lawsuit filed in State Supreme Court on July 18 ORSG . Additional information on the appeal is provide in the staff report for the professional services agreement with RSG which is also on the agenda of the July 26 Council Meeting. Respectfully submitted, Betsy . Adams City Manager ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A: 5-Year Cash Flow Analysis for Community Redevelopment Agency o form: City Attorney Page 3 of 3 afety Code Ms map isfor reference orgy.For detaled ilcanalon,ple se oansut with the Cemrnm ty De.ecprrent Depattneri �i._1, 'n Page 11 of 11 Dissolution .Act (ABx1-26) • Effective June 29, 2011 — Suspended all RDAs — May continue to .pay obligations/preserve assets — Prepare Enforceable Obligation Payment Schedule • Dissolves RDAs effective October 1 , 2011 — Creates Successor Agency & Oversight Board — RDA assets are sold off .0\ RSG ion on the appeal is provide in the staff report for the professional services agreement with RSG which is also on the agenda of the July 26 Council Meeting. Respectfully submitted, Betsy . Adams City Manager ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A: 5-Year Cash Flow Analysis for Community Redevelopment Agency o form: City Attorney Page 3 of 3 afety Code Ms map isfor reference orgy.For detaled ilcanalon,ple se oansut with the Cemrnm ty De.ecprrent Depattneri �i._1, 'n Page 11 of 11 Continuation. Program ABx1 -27) • RDAs can continue if City makes community remittances — Beginning in FY 2011-12 — Paid annually starting in FY 2012-13 • The City must adopt ordinance opting in for "Voluntary Payments" no later than October 1 , 2011 • Community remittance payments go to: — School districts = Fire districts — Transit Districts professional services agreement with RSG which is also on the agenda of the July 26 Council Meeting. Respectfully submitted, Betsy . Adams City Manager ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A: 5-Year Cash Flow Analysis for Community Redevelopment Agency o form: City Attorney Page 3 of 3 afety Code Ms map isfor reference orgy.For detaled ilcanalon,ple se oansut with the Cemrnm ty De.ecprrent Depattneri �i._1, 'n Page 11 of 11 rem :^. ip..:$• -,teCy „ s iCommunitY !'Aa :Sy� ,F Ty:,, .�j1x n , h,. yh i Ni,� :AT A gtA`.e t`-II 6 A . 1 , u - � ,sRemittance Payments .b ° ' f SE iAJa .t . J1. f ' 'y o , ...,C_.y p ‹�43 '0.v ' ,▪ , ,, ER`AF funds cz ..- a 12,7.1 apportioned to school • .irx:ale �. � V'Jhere Does it >,�,"` �' `i & '8811 districts arid COE n3'MT.▪F=,',.Mi" =a ' =Tr ? based on AQA. ``z� iwNipl't . r a� W Pa ments net of ass' : Z FIa: .` O through payments ier:% si z >iT•il �+ Must serve pupils living ka s t, = ' s ss : s .� ,ra au: E: 0,p,ii How Spent by 5it ; s^ i r. : ss.« µ '�i l in a) redevelo;pmeit _; 3�: :x. : , ;x,, s areas or b� housing IMEr;h;iii,:`M.:3.i:n-tUtliki?.t 13,18111E i' Recipients? supported by sik! W • ;i;� ;mii i.=.s°w fi,L�ffi:!fiiS i1 redeuelo meet funds n ; '; niRki>~ !ftiRki&niSrai>Eit:,itaipI, p csw u cc; iu tr;ia ,ii! i�!�; s i ©RSG . . 55 169,142 173,539 Legal and Professional Services 40,000 41,040 42,107 43,202 44,325 Office and Supplies Expense 3,270 3,355 3,442 3,532 3,624 Contractual Services - - - - - Membership,Travel,Training,Auto Allowance 4,825 4,950 5,079 5,211 5,347 Cost Allocation 12,050 12,363 12,685 13,015 13,353 Net Revenue(Deficit) 152,015 (389,565) 234,311 265,740 298,429 Available Cash Balance 952,681 563,115 797,426 1,063,166 1,361,595 Community Remittance Payment - - - - - Ending Cash Balance 952,681 563,115 797,426 1,063,166 1,361,595 O RSG. Page 5 of 5 LMIHF 2,159 112,159 MOU Termination Grand Crossings 375,000 - - - - Capital Projects 872,604 39,035 39,035 39,035 39,035 Commercial Improvements 220,429 - - - - Neighborhood Improvements -39,035 39,035 39,035 39,035 39,035 Park Improvements 77,469 - - - - Mich/Barton/LaPaix Street Improvements 535,671 - - - - Administration Expenses 737,274 756,443 776,111 796,290 816,993 Staff Salaries and Benefits 261,985 268,797 275,785 282,956 290,313 Attorney 60,000 61,560 63,161 64,803 66,488 Professional Services 20,000 20,520 21,054 21,601 22,163 Office and Supplies Expense 500 513 526 540 554 Advertising 10,000 10,260 10,527 10,800 11,081 Contractual Services 91,820 94,207 96,657 99,170 101,748 Membership,Travel,Training,Auto Allowance 4,050 4,155 4,263 4,374 4,488 Cost Allocation 288,919 296,431 304,138 312,046 320,159 Net Revenue(Deficit) (1,271,951) (144,120) (244,205) (255,433) (233,936) Available Cash Balance 5,645,949 2,651,174 1,736,224 794,154 (142,632) Community Remittance Payment 2,850,655 670,745 686,638 702,849 719,384 Ending Cash Balance 2,795,294 1,980,429 1,049,586 91,304 (862,016) RsG Page 2 of 5 Nonhousing Tax Increment 6 6 .... . , -nal-- scregi+ BLDG.)6 . . . . . . . . . . . • . L i -753 ubiaill+ SCALE•I'' 8'-0* !..1..! ,4.17.",Of.191115011 Oarabedntor :LEVAT I ON ' , DATE June 28,2011 6e No:11-02 MP MVO by 0. . . . . . • MITTI..7 NC Tr..413‘..y10 1..0.0.B.P..00 0.1.Cif TK O....7/.0 r.f...”I.Ig...NOT 1.1 PM....t.521 pv 11,41,...I.lar.10,MI 0.114 COW-5,C.Tri•Ot...MCT ow...,.0.1(41,i.S.....t..-,Y...13 RC.. • 01ca.sucor . imUr Int cum.. Axu wows..am or n x anotrrcv ma ult SAC ISO!.1 Er 11,1.6•17.0 tan ca q.v..n,,uccu 1.e...n.cmu-,u,a-nrc AP,.ou,uuu,r,,T., 1..i'jU co., �- ®. EXISTING I I Z1 1 oaaenOn r�o,.wo�eiwa.u.w+o.ew - - .7. ,/ O/ + 1.h e" ®iiii4 RETAIL ft) OI d VICINITY MAP m I I �® I® *ADO 5F ...JCT.A ' ,1 1 LI �� OT NOT TO SCALE `` fe ,• -!fmm, 5..G-°TED COLOR r;1 A)T W 3 - S� &7'td 7--A.,-!W- .:.'xlmi :,`P ''t- 4 ADA PATH OF TRAVEL II IrT •-1 '�a V _ .':T , �,41 -� �,so 34:5 _� :rM'-r N."' 6'BENCH ~ �,, c W f1 A I 1, ' I : ir J =.J I I er s.iX 1•4 C'':4. �,•{, f5•r �I. Te • -ia„ .q •.. ' �a moo`R SEwTING I cp # I- I' +.. ,r.,✓N 'ill�Iq • �,!•t �ide___� - 1 r.�',.;.x�ttt^:r�•�tiP•-%• " � z• ' "S .*r 9 �>019 �..+. "1 ds3: • BICYCLE- F,•- -T a. -• ` o• DIRECTIONAL 516N MO. . SIGN (5)BIC,'. -— - 1i €.`'1-,--Y, '*',4,± ,1 l MPED CONCRETE♦W BARTON RTON ROAD -- -- ` "` f- ' ' Attachment 7 GRATED DOLOR jt T ROAD RAISED MEDIAN [r'' - r w -tr,,,,,-:',*4:I'lf Y w.g�;N�'KgNi{Ip,t+.�,;: ':P'7 •Ns u E,�''R .Y arF±l� T '-'• E (STING EGNALIZ;D ...,4;,,_kg',`"„ ;.° 2,BZERg/t-• :'lij; �;ry A„F, 1, ,., SITE PLAN INTERS GTION ,*.y"M`+J a'L?- -`i • f f.- ,4 •r C •- STA THERS I COMMERCIAL -, Wit. -„ - gg � .1' ° 1 1 I \1 �+.a q1;„ z-=' re`.,^y �# SCALE 1"=30'0" I]&1'-s• Yx." ,.1 .,:;sT '.L::ti;,F'<':-..F 1;;.4 s1`1-f4- ,72.. i.,00 DATE:June 28, 2011 holed TS1BSlm(o013.IIBBAU OnWQPoAbb Case No.: 11-02 G""D" A101 Chocbed by T.A.UNPDBUSMED WORK Of MB ARanECT Alm S D SAID BAY NOT BE DIRUUR➢.MO OR O5¢OSED KNEW ME 50 5FN CONSENT OF ME,RURTECI COBB...TIN CREW RENAL AU ARTS REBR.5O Wee.R>on ATDLLooRBA OT . , . .New Debt• • NEW SCHOOL PASS THROUGH rr n:'pl NEW ANNUAL nI' DEBT SERVICE ��'TRIGGERS --- BO/o OF SCHOOL r �, $ GENERAL LEVY INCREASE IN. SCHOOL PASS • THROUGH ` 4 — EXISTING SCHOOL " PASS THROUGH NEW ANNUAL NEW SCHOOL TOTAL EXPENSE DEBT SERVICE PASS THROUGH OF NEW DEBT • ©RSG ctfully submitted, Betsy . Adams City Manager ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A: 5-Year Cash Flow Analysis for Community Redevelopment Agency o form: City Attorney Page 3 of 3 afety Code Ms map isfor reference orgy.For detaled ilcanalon,ple se oansut with the Cemrnm ty De.ecprrent Depattneri �i._1, 'n Page 11 of 11 LOCAL IMPLICATIONS • Loss of revenues - Over $5.6 million in General Fund w/o Agency _ next five years — 42% revenue loss in _ _ ___ loom 201.1-12, about 11% Agency thereafter • Loss of ability to 2012-13 create jobs and Agency __. il investment • Shift to More 0.0% 50.0% 100.0°%o strategic actions ::Local Share ■Community Remittance C1RSG ©RSG ctfully submitted, Betsy . Adams City Manager ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A: 5-Year Cash Flow Analysis for Community Redevelopment Agency o form: City Attorney Page 3 of 3 afety Code Ms map isfor reference orgy.For detaled ilcanalon,ple se oansut with the Cemrnm ty De.ecprrent Depattneri �i._1, 'n Page 11 of 11 Impact of Payment Non Housing, Funds NONHOUSING TAX INCREMENT FUNDS Grand Terrace Redevelopment Agency 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 I 2014-15 2015-16 Starting Cash Balance $6,917,900 $2,795,294 $ 1,980,429 $ 1,049,586 $ 91,304 Revenues 7,810,040 7,558,657 6,946,543 7,048,777 7,183,201 Expenditures 9,081,991 7,702,777 7,190,748 7,304,209: 7,417,137 Net Revenue(Deficit) (1,271,951) (144,120) (244,205) (255,433) (233,936) Available Cash Balance 5,645,949 2,651,174 1,736,224 794,154 (142,632) Community Remittance Transfer 2,850,655 670,745 686,638 702,849 719,384 Ending Cash Balance 2,795,294 1,980,429 1,049,586 91,304 (862,016) CIRSG ,ple se oansut with the Cemrnm ty De.ecprrent Depattneri �i._1, 'n Page 11 of 11 Cash Flow Summary All Funds FUND SUMMARY Grand Terrace Redevelopment Agency I 2011-12.1 2012-13 I 2013-14 I 2014-15 I 2015-16 Ending Cash Balance by Fund 16,390,059 9,065,108 1,847,013 1,154,470 499,579 Nonhousing Fund 2,795,294 1,980,429 1,049,586. 91,304 (862,016)_ Tax-Exempt 2011 Bond Fund 8,643,979 4,543,979 - - - Taxable 2011 Bond Fund 3,998,105 1,977,585 - - - Housing Fund 952,681 563,115 797,426 1,063,166 1,361,595 RSG • 1,736,224 794,154 (142,632) Community Remittance Transfer 2,850,655 670,745 686,638 702,849 719,384 Ending Cash Balance 2,795,294 1,980,429 1,049,586 91,304 (862,016) CIRSG ,ple se oansut with the Cemrnm ty De.ecprrent Depattneri �i._1, 'n Page 11 of 11 WHAT DO WE HAVE TO DO NEXT? Have $lOpt In4= Decision Can't PaylOpt Out Ili Appeal Act as Obligation Ordinance: Payment ttccessor Schedule and j Amount_' Agency? ,back up 4Pr ' • Back to worC - Other Administer Use tlme wisely SOl and°Back preparations for Obligation for projects Up Data Housing Assets . Schedule � ..., . • :.v .. and Admin • : _ --_ )RSG Community Remittance Transfer 2,850,655 670,745 686,638 702,849 719,384 Ending Cash Balance 2,795,294 1,980,429 1,049,586 91,304 (862,016) CIRSG ,ple se oansut with the Cemrnm ty De.ecprrent Depattneri �i._1, 'n Page 11 of 11 QUESTIONS? R S G • • • • , reo - • Out Ili Appeal Act as Obligation Ordinance: Payment ttccessor Schedule and j Amount_' Agency? ,back up 4Pr ' • Back to worC - Other Administer Use tlme wisely SOl and°Back preparations for Obligation for projects Up Data Housing Assets . Schedule � ..., . • :.v .. and Admin • : _ --_ )RSG Community Remittance Transfer 2,850,655 670,745 686,638 702,849 719,384 Ending Cash Balance 2,795,294 1,980,429 1,049,586 91,304 (862,016) CIRSG ,ple se oansut with the Cemrnm ty De.ecprrent Depattneri �i._1, 'n Page 11 of 11 The BIue:lountain City crania TerraceCALIFORNIA AGENDA REPORT MEETING DATE: July 26, 2011 Council Item (X ) CRA Item ( ) TITLE: Professional Services Agreement with Rosenow Spevacek Group Inc. for Community Redevelopment Agency Fiscal Services Required by the City of Grand Terrace PRESENTED BY: Betsy M. Adams, City Manager RECOMMENDATION: Approve the professional services agreement, appropriate $14,560 from the General Fund for the services, and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement and to seek reimbursement from the Agency for these services when Agency activities are no longer suspended. BACKGROUND: When the Governor signed budget trailer bills ABX1 26 and ABX1 27 into law on June 28, 2011, any new redevelopment agency activities had to cease until the City Council adopted a Resolution of Intent and an Ordinance to continue the City's redevelopment agency, including the required "voluntary" annual payments. On July 12, the Council adopted the Resolution of Intent and had the first reading of the Ordinance. Subsequent to that Council Meeting, the special counsel to the City's redevelopment agency, advised the City that additional language should be added to the Ordinance which necessitates,doing a first reading of the revised ordinance on July 26. The second reading of the Ordinance will be on August 9, with the Ordinance being enacted after 30 days, on September 9. DISCUSSION: With the passage of ABX1 27, any new redevelopment activities are in a state of suspense until the Ordinance to continue the City's redevelopment agency becomes effective. The City has an immediate need for fiscal services from the Agency's fiscal consultant, Rosenow Spevacek Group Inc. (RSG), necessitating the City to enter into an agreement with RSG for these services and then later seeking reimbursement from the Agency. The scope of these services is listed in Exhibit A of the agreement which is Attachment A to this staff report. It needs to be noted that some of the services required relate to a Closed Session matter which has a material impact on the appeal the City will file with the State Director of Finance, as provided for in ABX1 27. COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. PE) 39,035 39,035 39,035 Park Improvements 77,469 - - - - Mich/Barton/LaPaix Street Improvements 535,671 - - - - Administration Expenses 737,274 756,443 776,111 796,290 816,993 Staff Salaries and Benefits 261,985 268,797 275,785 282,956 290,313 Attorney 60,000 61,560 63,161 64,803 66,488 Professional Services 20,000 20,520 21,054 21,601 22,163 Office and Supplies Expense 500 513 526 540 554 Advertising 10,000 10,260 10,527 10,800 11,081 Contractual Services 91,820 94,207 96,657 99,170 101,748 Membership,Travel,Training,Auto Allowance 4,050 4,155 4,263 4,374 4,488 Cost Allocation 288,919 296,431 304,138 312,046 320,159 Net Revenue(Deficit) (1,271,951) (144,120) (244,205) (255,433) (233,936) Available Cash Balance 5,645,949 2,651,174 1,736,224 794,154 (142,632) Community Remittance Payment 2,850,655 670,745 686,638 702,849 719,384 Ending Cash Balance 2,795,294 1,980,429 1,049,586 91,304 (862,016) RsG Page 2 of 5 Nonhousing Tax Increment 6 6 .... . , -nal-- scregi+ BLDG.)6 . . . . . . . . . . . • . L i -753 ubiaill+ SCALE•I'' 8'-0* !..1..! ,4.17.",Of.191115011 Oarabedntor :LEVAT I ON ' , DATE June 28,2011 6e No:11-02 MP MVO by 0. . . . . . • MITTI..7 NC Tr..413‘..y10 1..0.0.B.P..00 0.1.Cif TK O....7/.0 r.f...”I.Ig...NOT 1.1 PM....t.521 pv 11,41,...I.lar.10,MI 0.114 COW-5,C.Tri•Ot...MCT ow...,.0.1(41,i.S.....t..-,Y...13 RC.. • 01ca.sucor . imUr Int cum.. Axu wows..am or n x anotrrcv ma ult SAC ISO!.1 Er 11,1.6•17.0 tan ca q.v..n,,uccu 1.e...n.cmu-,u,a-nrc AP,.ou,uuu,r,,T., 1..i'jU co., �- ®. EXISTING I I Z1 1 oaaenOn r�o,.wo�eiwa.u.w+o.ew - - .7. ,/ O/ + 1.h e" ®iiii4 RETAIL ft) OI d VICINITY MAP m I I �® I® *ADO 5F ...JCT.A ' ,1 1 LI �� OT NOT TO SCALE `` fe ,• -!fmm, 5..G-°TED COLOR r;1 A)T W 3 - S� &7'td 7--A.,-!W- .:.'xlmi :,`P ''t- 4 ADA PATH OF TRAVEL II IrT •-1 '�a V _ .':T , �,41 -� �,so 34:5 _� :rM'-r N."' 6'BENCH ~ �,, c W f1 A I 1, ' I : ir J =.J I I er s.iX 1•4 C'':4. �,•{, f5•r �I. Te • -ia„ .q •.. ' �a moo`R SEwTING I cp # I- I' +.. ,r.,✓N 'ill�Iq • �,!•t �ide___� - 1 r.�',.;.x�ttt^:r�•�tiP•-%• " � z• ' "S .*r 9 �>019 �..+. "1 ds3: • BICYCLE- F,•- -T a. -• ` o• DIRECTIONAL 516N MO. . SIGN (5)BIC,'. -— - 1i €.`'1-,--Y, '*',4,± ,1 l MPED CONCRETE♦W BARTON RTON ROAD -- -- ` "` f- ' ' Attachment 7 GRATED DOLOR jt T ROAD RAISED MEDIAN [r'' - r w -tr,,,,,-:',*4:I'lf Y w.g�;N�'KgNi{Ip,t+.�,;: ':P'7 •Ns u E,�''R .Y arF±l� T '-'• E (STING EGNALIZ;D ...,4;,,_kg',`"„ ;.° 2,BZERg/t-• :'lij; �;ry A„F, 1, ,., SITE PLAN INTERS GTION ,*.y"M`+J a'L?- -`i • f f.- ,4 •r C •- STA THERS I COMMERCIAL -, Wit. -„ - gg � .1' ° 1 1 I \1 �+.a q1;„ z-=' re`.,^y �# SCALE 1"=30'0" I]&1'-s• Yx." ,.1 .,:;sT '.L::ti;,F'<':-..F 1;;.4 s1`1-f4- ,72.. i.,00 DATE:June 28, 2011 holed TS1BSlm(o013.IIBBAU OnWQPoAbb Case No.: 11-02 G""D" A101 Chocbed by T.A.UNPDBUSMED WORK Of MB ARanECT Alm S D SAID BAY NOT BE DIRUUR➢.MO OR O5¢OSED KNEW ME 50 5FN CONSENT OF ME,RURTECI COBB...TIN CREW RENAL AU ARTS REBR.5O Wee.R>on ATDLLooRBA OT Professional Services Agreement with RSG for CRA Fiscal Services Required by the City Page 2 The scope of services fall into three general categories — Agency cash flow analysis (item 1), Closed Session matter related to the City's appeal (items 2, 3 and 4), and preparation of the City's-appeal (items 5 and 6). Item 1 is a 5-year cash flow analysis for the Agency. While the City has been operating under the assumption that its redevelopment agency would continue, in part because of the tax allocation bonds recently issued by the Agency, it is important to look at the City's ability to be able to make the required annual payments. ABX1 27 specifies that these payments are the City's responsibility and allows for a variety of funding sources. With the tenuous condition of the General Fund, the City will need to rely on Agency funds to make the payments. The Agency cash flow analysis prepared by RSG will be presented in a separate staff report for the July 26 Council Meeting. It is important to note in that staff report that the Agency is able to fully make the required payments for four years. This horizon may extend further depending on the success of the City's appeal. ABX1 27 provides for a one-time option to appeal the annual payments to the State Director of Finance. On or before August 1, 2011, the Director will notify the City of the amount determined as the required payment for the 2011-12 budget year and for the subsequent years. The city has until August 15, 2011, just two weeks, to file its written appeal to the Director. The California Redevelopment Agency (CRA) has prepared an estimate of the payments for each city. For Grand Terrace, the CRA estimates the 2011-12 payment to be $2,850,665 and for subsequent fiscal years the payment to be $670,745. It is important to keep in mind that the Legislature can increase the required payments in future years with a simple majority vote. ABX1 27 provides for an appeal basis in two areas: " information in the Controller's report was in error or that the percentage of tax increment necessary to pay for tax allocation bonds and interest payments has increased by 10 percent or more over the percentage calculated pursuant to the Controller's redevelopment agency 2008-09 annual report." The City's appeal will encompass both areas. The first area (items 2, 3 and 4) is the Closed Session matter which cannot be brought forward for resolution by the Agency Board until September 13, when the Agency is allow to resume operation. The second area is the 2011 tax allocation bonds issued by the Agency. These comprise the second category of services to be provided by RSG under the professional services. The third category of services (items 5 and 6), preparing the City's appeal, includes a contingency of 22 hours. The reason for a large contingency is because the appeal process has yet been defined other than what is written in ABX1 27. We do not know if there will be only the written appeal or if'there will also be an opportunity to meet with representatives of the State Director of Finance to discuss our appeal. RSG has staff located in Sacramento who can be available for such a meeting, if required. It should be noted that time ABX1 27 allows to prepare for the appeal is just over six weeks, and only two weeks from August 1 when the official numbers are to be provided by the Director of Finance. Such a short time period makes it difficult for smaller cities to prepare an appeal while at the same time starting a new fiscal year, closing out the ALE•I'' 8'-0* !..1..! ,4.17.",Of.191115011 Oarabedntor :LEVAT I ON ' , DATE June 28,2011 6e No:11-02 MP MVO by 0. . . . . . • MITTI..7 NC Tr..413‘..y10 1..0.0.B.P..00 0.1.Cif TK O....7/.0 r.f...”I.Ig...NOT 1.1 PM....t.521 pv 11,41,...I.lar.10,MI 0.114 COW-5,C.Tri•Ot...MCT ow...,.0.1(41,i.S.....t..-,Y...13 RC.. • 01ca.sucor . imUr Int cum.. Axu wows..am or n x anotrrcv ma ult SAC ISO!.1 Er 11,1.6•17.0 tan ca q.v..n,,uccu 1.e...n.cmu-,u,a-nrc AP,.ou,uuu,r,,T., 1..i'jU co., �- ®. EXISTING I I Z1 1 oaaenOn r�o,.wo�eiwa.u.w+o.ew - - .7. ,/ O/ + 1.h e" ®iiii4 RETAIL ft) OI d VICINITY MAP m I I �® I® *ADO 5F ...JCT.A ' ,1 1 LI �� OT NOT TO SCALE `` fe ,• -!fmm, 5..G-°TED COLOR r;1 A)T W 3 - S� &7'td 7--A.,-!W- .:.'xlmi :,`P ''t- 4 ADA PATH OF TRAVEL II IrT •-1 '�a V _ .':T , �,41 -� �,so 34:5 _� :rM'-r N."' 6'BENCH ~ �,, c W f1 A I 1, ' I : ir J =.J I I er s.iX 1•4 C'':4. �,•{, f5•r �I. Te • -ia„ .q •.. ' �a moo`R SEwTING I cp # I- I' +.. ,r.,✓N 'ill�Iq • �,!•t �ide___� - 1 r.�',.;.x�ttt^:r�•�tiP•-%• " � z• ' "S .*r 9 �>019 �..+. "1 ds3: • BICYCLE- F,•- -T a. -• ` o• DIRECTIONAL 516N MO. . SIGN (5)BIC,'. -— - 1i €.`'1-,--Y, '*',4,± ,1 l MPED CONCRETE♦W BARTON RTON ROAD -- -- ` "` f- ' ' Attachment 7 GRATED DOLOR jt T ROAD RAISED MEDIAN [r'' - r w -tr,,,,,-:',*4:I'lf Y w.g�;N�'KgNi{Ip,t+.�,;: ':P'7 •Ns u E,�''R .Y arF±l� T '-'• E (STING EGNALIZ;D ...,4;,,_kg',`"„ ;.° 2,BZERg/t-• :'lij; �;ry A„F, 1, ,., SITE PLAN INTERS GTION ,*.y"M`+J a'L?- -`i • f f.- ,4 •r C •- STA THERS I COMMERCIAL -, Wit. -„ - gg � .1' ° 1 1 I \1 �+.a q1;„ z-=' re`.,^y �# SCALE 1"=30'0" I]&1'-s• Yx." ,.1 .,:;sT '.L::ti;,F'<':-..F 1;;.4 s1`1-f4- ,72.. i.,00 DATE:June 28, 2011 holed TS1BSlm(o013.IIBBAU OnWQPoAbb Case No.: 11-02 G""D" A101 Chocbed by T.A.UNPDBUSMED WORK Of MB ARanECT Alm S D SAID BAY NOT BE DIRUUR➢.MO OR O5¢OSED KNEW ME 50 5FN CONSENT OF ME,RURTECI COBB...TIN CREW RENAL AU ARTS REBR.5O Wee.R>on ATDLLooRBA OT Professional Services Agreement with RSG for CRA Fiscal Services Required by the City Page 3 provided by the Director of Finance. Such a short time period makes it difficult for smaller cities to prepare a detailed appeal while at the same time starting a new fiscal year, closing out the prior fiscal year, and beginning the annual financial audit process. For Grand Terrace, the appeal is further complicated by the Closed Session matter and the need to amend the 2008-09 State Controller's Report for the Agency for the appeal. This coupled with the vital need for the City to keep the Agency going enough years for General Fund revenues to improve, and the Agency's bond proceeds to be fully obligated, is why staff recommends contracting with RSG for the fiscal services specified in the agreement. RSG has the depth of resources and experience to prepare a thorough, high-quality appeal for the City. FISCAL IMPACT: An appropriation of $14,560 in the General Fund (10) to the Non-Departmental Professional Services account#10-190-250 will reduce the available fund balance of the General Fund by a corresponding amount. The City intends to seek reimbursement from the Agency for this expense when the Agency is allowed to resume operations in September. If the California Supreme Court issues a stay in the lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of ABX1 26 and ABX1 27 filed by the California Redevelopment Agency and the League of California Cities, the expenses for this work can be charged directly to the Agency. Respectfully submitted, Betsy M. A ams City Manager ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A: Professional Services Agreement with Rosenow Spevacek Group Inc. for Community Redevelopment Agency Fiscal Services Required by the City of Grand Terrace payment to be $670,745. It is important to keep in mind that the Legislature can increase the required payments in future years with a simple majority vote. ABX1 27 provides for an appeal basis in two areas: " information in the Controller's report was in error or that the percentage of tax increment necessary to pay for tax allocation bonds and interest payments has increased by 10 percent or more over the percentage calculated pursuant to the Controller's redevelopment agency 2008-09 annual report." The City's appeal will encompass both areas. The first area (items 2, 3 and 4) is the Closed Session matter which cannot be brought forward for resolution by the Agency Board until September 13, when the Agency is allow to resume operation. The second area is the 2011 tax allocation bonds issued by the Agency. These comprise the second category of services to be provided by RSG under the professional services. The third category of services (items 5 and 6), preparing the City's appeal, includes a contingency of 22 hours. The reason for a large contingency is because the appeal process has yet been defined other than what is written in ABX1 27. We do not know if there will be only the written appeal or if'there will also be an opportunity to meet with representatives of the State Director of Finance to discuss our appeal. RSG has staff located in Sacramento who can be available for such a meeting, if required. It should be noted that time ABX1 27 allows to prepare for the appeal is just over six weeks, and only two weeks from August 1 when the official numbers are to be provided by the Director of Finance. Such a short time period makes it difficult for smaller cities to prepare an appeal while at the same time starting a new fiscal year, closing out the ALE•I'' 8'-0* !..1..! ,4.17.",Of.191115011 Oarabedntor :LEVAT I ON ' , DATE June 28,2011 6e No:11-02 MP MVO by 0. . . . . . • MITTI..7 NC Tr..413‘..y10 1..0.0.B.P..00 0.1.Cif TK O....7/.0 r.f...”I.Ig...NOT 1.1 PM....t.521 pv 11,41,...I.lar.10,MI 0.114 COW-5,C.Tri•Ot...MCT ow...,.0.1(41,i.S.....t..-,Y...13 RC.. • 01ca.sucor . imUr Int cum.. Axu wows..am or n x anotrrcv ma ult SAC ISO!.1 Er 11,1.6•17.0 tan ca q.v..n,,uccu 1.e...n.cmu-,u,a-nrc AP,.ou,uuu,r,,T., 1..i'jU co., �- ®. EXISTING I I Z1 1 oaaenOn r�o,.wo�eiwa.u.w+o.ew - - .7. ,/ O/ + 1.h e" ®iiii4 RETAIL ft) OI d VICINITY MAP m I I �® I® *ADO 5F ...JCT.A ' ,1 1 LI �� OT NOT TO SCALE `` fe ,• -!fmm, 5..G-°TED COLOR r;1 A)T W 3 - S� &7'td 7--A.,-!W- .:.'xlmi :,`P ''t- 4 ADA PATH OF TRAVEL II IrT •-1 '�a V _ .':T , �,41 -� �,so 34:5 _� :rM'-r N."' 6'BENCH ~ �,, c W f1 A I 1, ' I : ir J =.J I I er s.iX 1•4 C'':4. �,•{, f5•r �I. Te • -ia„ .q •.. ' �a moo`R SEwTING I cp # I- I' +.. ,r.,✓N 'ill�Iq • �,!•t �ide___� - 1 r.�',.;.x�ttt^:r�•�tiP•-%• " � z• ' "S .*r 9 �>019 �..+. "1 ds3: • BICYCLE- F,•- -T a. -• ` o• DIRECTIONAL 516N MO. . SIGN (5)BIC,'. -— - 1i €.`'1-,--Y, '*',4,± ,1 l MPED CONCRETE♦W BARTON RTON ROAD -- -- ` "` f- ' ' Attachment 7 GRATED DOLOR jt T ROAD RAISED MEDIAN [r'' - r w -tr,,,,,-:',*4:I'lf Y w.g�;N�'KgNi{Ip,t+.�,;: ':P'7 •Ns u E,�''R .Y arF±l� T '-'• E (STING EGNALIZ;D ...,4;,,_kg',`"„ ;.° 2,BZERg/t-• :'lij; �;ry A„F, 1, ,., SITE PLAN INTERS GTION ,*.y"M`+J a'L?- -`i • f f.- ,4 •r C •- STA THERS I COMMERCIAL -, Wit. -„ - gg � .1' ° 1 1 I \1 �+.a q1;„ z-=' re`.,^y �# SCALE 1"=30'0" I]&1'-s• Yx." ,.1 .,:;sT '.L::ti;,F'<':-..F 1;;.4 s1`1-f4- ,72.. i.,00 DATE:June 28, 2011 holed TS1BSlm(o013.IIBBAU OnWQPoAbb Case No.: 11-02 G""D" A101 Chocbed by T.A.UNPDBUSMED WORK Of MB ARanECT Alm S D SAID BAY NOT BE DIRUUR➢.MO OR O5¢OSED KNEW ME 50 5FN CONSENT OF ME,RURTECI COBB...TIN CREW RENAL AU ARTS REBR.5O Wee.R>on ATDLLooRBA OT Attachment A Professional Services Agreement with Rosenow Spevacek Group Inc. for Community Redevelopment Agency Fiscal Services Required by the City of Grand Terrace ion Ordinance: Payment ttccessor Schedule and j Amount_' Agency? ,back up 4Pr ' • Back to worC - Other Administer Use tlme wisely SOl and°Back preparations for Obligation for projects Up Data Housing Assets . Schedule � ..., . • :.v .. and Admin • : _ --_ )RSG Community Remittance Transfer 2,850,655 670,745 686,638 702,849 719,384 Ending Cash Balance 2,795,294 1,980,429 1,049,586 91,304 (862,016) CIRSG ,ple se oansut with the Cemrnm ty De.ecprrent Depattneri �i._1, 'n Page 11 of 11 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT Rosenow Spevacek Group Inc. Community Redevelopment Agency Fiscal Services Required by the City of Grand Terrace THIS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made and entered into this 26th day of July, 2011, ("Effective Date") by and between the CITY OF _ GRAND TERRACE ("City"), a public entity, and the Rosenow Spevacek Group Inc. ("RSG"), the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Grand Terrace's fiscal consultant. 1. Scope of Services. City agrees to retain and does hereby retain RSG and RSG agrees to provide the services more particularly described in Exhibit "A", "Scope of Services and Fees", attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, in conjunction with Animal Control and Housing Services ("Services"). 2. Term. This Agreement shall be effective on the date first written above unless otherwise provided in Exhibit "A" and the Agreement shall remain in effect until January 26, 2012, unless otherwise terminated pursuant to the provisions herein. This Agreement may be extended up to six months at the discretion of the City Manager. 3. Compensation/Payment. RSG shall perform the Services under this Agreement for fees not to exceed $14,560, payable as the fiscal services are'provided, in accordance with the terms set forth in Exhibit "A". Said payment shall be made in accordance with the City's usual accounting procedures upon receipt and approval of an invoice setting forth the services performed. The invoices shall be delivered to the City at the address set forth in Section 4 hereof. 4. Notices. Any notices required to be given hereunder shall be in writing and shall be personally served or given by mail. Any notice given by mail shall be deemed given when deposited in the United States Mail, certified and postage prepaid, addressed to the party to be served as follows: To City: To RSG: City of Grand Terrace Rosenow Spevacek Group Inc. Attn: Bernie Simon, Finance Director 309 West 4th Street 22795 Barton Road Santa Ana, CA 92701-4502 Grand Terrace, CA 92313 5. Prevailing Wage. If applicable, RSG and all subcontractors are required to pay the general prevailing wage rates of per diem wages and overtime and holiday wages determined by the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations under Page 1 of 12 ht forward for resolution by the Agency Board until September 13, when the Agency is allow to resume operation. The second area is the 2011 tax allocation bonds issued by the Agency. These comprise the second category of services to be provided by RSG under the professional services. The third category of services (items 5 and 6), preparing the City's appeal, includes a contingency of 22 hours. The reason for a large contingency is because the appeal process has yet been defined other than what is written in ABX1 27. We do not know if there will be only the written appeal or if'there will also be an opportunity to meet with representatives of the State Director of Finance to discuss our appeal. RSG has staff located in Sacramento who can be available for such a meeting, if required. It should be noted that time ABX1 27 allows to prepare for the appeal is just over six weeks, and only two weeks from August 1 when the official numbers are to be provided by the Director of Finance. Such a short time period makes it difficult for smaller cities to prepare an appeal while at the same time starting a new fiscal year, closing out the ALE•I'' 8'-0* !..1..! ,4.17.",Of.191115011 Oarabedntor :LEVAT I ON ' , DATE June 28,2011 6e No:11-02 MP MVO by 0. . . . . . • MITTI..7 NC Tr..413‘..y10 1..0.0.B.P..00 0.1.Cif TK O....7/.0 r.f...”I.Ig...NOT 1.1 PM....t.521 pv 11,41,...I.lar.10,MI 0.114 COW-5,C.Tri•Ot...MCT ow...,.0.1(41,i.S.....t..-,Y...13 RC.. • 01ca.sucor . imUr Int cum.. Axu wows..am or n x anotrrcv ma ult SAC ISO!.1 Er 11,1.6•17.0 tan ca q.v..n,,uccu 1.e...n.cmu-,u,a-nrc AP,.ou,uuu,r,,T., 1..i'jU co., �- ®. EXISTING I I Z1 1 oaaenOn r�o,.wo�eiwa.u.w+o.ew - - .7. ,/ O/ + 1.h e" ®iiii4 RETAIL ft) OI d VICINITY MAP m I I �® I® *ADO 5F ...JCT.A ' ,1 1 LI �� OT NOT TO SCALE `` fe ,• -!fmm, 5..G-°TED COLOR r;1 A)T W 3 - S� &7'td 7--A.,-!W- .:.'xlmi :,`P ''t- 4 ADA PATH OF TRAVEL II IrT •-1 '�a V _ .':T , �,41 -� �,so 34:5 _� :rM'-r N."' 6'BENCH ~ �,, c W f1 A I 1, ' I : ir J =.J I I er s.iX 1•4 C'':4. �,•{, f5•r �I. Te • -ia„ .q •.. ' �a moo`R SEwTING I cp # I- I' +.. ,r.,✓N 'ill�Iq • �,!•t �ide___� - 1 r.�',.;.x�ttt^:r�•�tiP•-%• " � z• ' "S .*r 9 �>019 �..+. "1 ds3: • BICYCLE- F,•- -T a. -• ` o• DIRECTIONAL 516N MO. . SIGN (5)BIC,'. -— - 1i €.`'1-,--Y, '*',4,± ,1 l MPED CONCRETE♦W BARTON RTON ROAD -- -- ` "` f- ' ' Attachment 7 GRATED DOLOR jt T ROAD RAISED MEDIAN [r'' - r w -tr,,,,,-:',*4:I'lf Y w.g�;N�'KgNi{Ip,t+.�,;: ':P'7 •Ns u E,�''R .Y arF±l� T '-'• E (STING EGNALIZ;D ...,4;,,_kg',`"„ ;.° 2,BZERg/t-• :'lij; �;ry A„F, 1, ,., SITE PLAN INTERS GTION ,*.y"M`+J a'L?- -`i • f f.- ,4 •r C •- STA THERS I COMMERCIAL -, Wit. -„ - gg � .1' ° 1 1 I \1 �+.a q1;„ z-=' re`.,^y �# SCALE 1"=30'0" I]&1'-s• Yx." ,.1 .,:;sT '.L::ti;,F'<':-..F 1;;.4 s1`1-f4- ,72.. i.,00 DATE:June 28, 2011 holed TS1BSlm(o013.IIBBAU OnWQPoAbb Case No.: 11-02 G""D" A101 Chocbed by T.A.UNPDBUSMED WORK Of MB ARanECT Alm S D SAID BAY NOT BE DIRUUR➢.MO OR O5¢OSED KNEW ME 50 5FN CONSENT OF ME,RURTECI COBB...TIN CREW RENAL AU ARTS REBR.5O Wee.R>on ATDLLooRBA OT Section 1720 et seq. of the California Labor Code and implemented be the City Council of the City. The Director's determination is on file and open to inspection in the office of the City Clerk and is referred to and made a part hereof; the wage rates therein ascertained, determined, and specified are referred to and made a part hereof as though fully set forth herein. 6. Contract Administration. A designee of the City will be appointed to administer this Agreement on behalf of the City and shall be referred to herein as Contract Administrator. 7. Standard of Performance. While performing the Services, RSG shall exercise the reasonable professional care and skill customarily exercised by reputable members of RSG's profession practicing in the Metropolitan Southern California Area, and shall use reasonable diligence and best judgment while exercising its professional skill and expertise. 8. Personnel. RSG shall furnish all personnel necessary to perform the Services and shall be responsible for their performance and compensation. RSG recognizes that the qualifications and experience of the personnel to be used are vital to professional and timely completion of the Services. The key personnel listed in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and assigned to perform portions of the Services shall remain assigned through completion of the Services, unless otherwise mutually agreed by the parties in writing, or caused by hardship or resignation in which case substitutes shall be subject to City approval. 9. Assignment and Subcontracting. Neither party shall transfer any right, interest, or obligation in or under this Agreement to any other entity without prior written consent of the other party. In any event, no assignment shall be made unless the assignee expressly assumes the obligations of assignor under this Agreement, in writing satisfactory to the parties. RSG shall not subcontract any portion of the work required by this Agreement without prior written approval by the responsible City's Contract Administrator. Subcontracts, if any, shall contain a provision making them subject to all provisions stipulated in this Agreement, including without limitation, the insurance obligations set forth in Section 12. RSG acknowledges that any transfer of rights may require City Manager and/or City Council approval. 10. Independent Contractor. In the performance of this Agreement, RSG, and RSG's employees, subcontractors and agents, shall act in an independent capacity as independent contractors, and not as officers or employees of the City of Grand Terrace. RSG acknowledges and agrees that City has no obligation to pay or withhold state or federal taxes or to provide workers' compensation or unemployment insurance to RSG, or to RSG's employees, subcontractors and agents. RSG, as an independent contractor, shall be responsible for any and all taxes that apply to RSG as an employer. Page 2 of 12 ll also be an opportunity to meet with representatives of the State Director of Finance to discuss our appeal. RSG has staff located in Sacramento who can be available for such a meeting, if required. It should be noted that time ABX1 27 allows to prepare for the appeal is just over six weeks, and only two weeks from August 1 when the official numbers are to be provided by the Director of Finance. Such a short time period makes it difficult for smaller cities to prepare an appeal while at the same time starting a new fiscal year, closing out the ALE•I'' 8'-0* !..1..! ,4.17.",Of.191115011 Oarabedntor :LEVAT I ON ' , DATE June 28,2011 6e No:11-02 MP MVO by 0. . . . . . • MITTI..7 NC Tr..413‘..y10 1..0.0.B.P..00 0.1.Cif TK O....7/.0 r.f...”I.Ig...NOT 1.1 PM....t.521 pv 11,41,...I.lar.10,MI 0.114 COW-5,C.Tri•Ot...MCT ow...,.0.1(41,i.S.....t..-,Y...13 RC.. • 01ca.sucor . imUr Int cum.. Axu wows..am or n x anotrrcv ma ult SAC ISO!.1 Er 11,1.6•17.0 tan ca q.v..n,,uccu 1.e...n.cmu-,u,a-nrc AP,.ou,uuu,r,,T., 1..i'jU co., �- ®. EXISTING I I Z1 1 oaaenOn r�o,.wo�eiwa.u.w+o.ew - - .7. ,/ O/ + 1.h e" ®iiii4 RETAIL ft) OI d VICINITY MAP m I I �® I® *ADO 5F ...JCT.A ' ,1 1 LI �� OT NOT TO SCALE `` fe ,• -!fmm, 5..G-°TED COLOR r;1 A)T W 3 - S� &7'td 7--A.,-!W- .:.'xlmi :,`P ''t- 4 ADA PATH OF TRAVEL II IrT •-1 '�a V _ .':T , �,41 -� �,so 34:5 _� :rM'-r N."' 6'BENCH ~ �,, c W f1 A I 1, ' I : ir J =.J I I er s.iX 1•4 C'':4. �,•{, f5•r �I. Te • -ia„ .q •.. ' �a moo`R SEwTING I cp # I- I' +.. ,r.,✓N 'ill�Iq • �,!•t �ide___� - 1 r.�',.;.x�ttt^:r�•�tiP•-%• " � z• ' "S .*r 9 �>019 �..+. "1 ds3: • BICYCLE- F,•- -T a. -• ` o• DIRECTIONAL 516N MO. . SIGN (5)BIC,'. -— - 1i €.`'1-,--Y, '*',4,± ,1 l MPED CONCRETE♦W BARTON RTON ROAD -- -- ` "` f- ' ' Attachment 7 GRATED DOLOR jt T ROAD RAISED MEDIAN [r'' - r w -tr,,,,,-:',*4:I'lf Y w.g�;N�'KgNi{Ip,t+.�,;: ':P'7 •Ns u E,�''R .Y arF±l� T '-'• E (STING EGNALIZ;D ...,4;,,_kg',`"„ ;.° 2,BZERg/t-• :'lij; �;ry A„F, 1, ,., SITE PLAN INTERS GTION ,*.y"M`+J a'L?- -`i • f f.- ,4 •r C •- STA THERS I COMMERCIAL -, Wit. -„ - gg � .1' ° 1 1 I \1 �+.a q1;„ z-=' re`.,^y �# SCALE 1"=30'0" I]&1'-s• Yx." ,.1 .,:;sT '.L::ti;,F'<':-..F 1;;.4 s1`1-f4- ,72.. i.,00 DATE:June 28, 2011 holed TS1BSlm(o013.IIBBAU OnWQPoAbb Case No.: 11-02 G""D" A101 Chocbed by T.A.UNPDBUSMED WORK Of MB ARanECT Alm S D SAID BAY NOT BE DIRUUR➢.MO OR O5¢OSED KNEW ME 50 5FN CONSENT OF ME,RURTECI COBB...TIN CREW RENAL AU ARTS REBR.5O Wee.R>on ATDLLooRBA OT 11. Indemnification. 11.1 Indemnity. Except as to the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City, RSG shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, and its officers, employees and agents, harmless from any and all loss, damage, claim for damage, liability, expense or cost, including attorneys' fees, which arises out of or is in any way connected with the performance of work under this Agreement by RSG or any of the RSG's employees, agents or subcontractors and from all claims by RSG's employees, subcontractors and agents for compensation for services rendered to RSG in the performance of this Agreement, notwithstanding that the City may have benefitted from their services. This indemnification provision shall apply to any acts or omissions, willful misconduct or negligent conduct, whether active or passive, on the part of RSG or of RSG's employees, subcontractors or agents. Except as to the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the RSG, City shall defend, indemnify and hold the RSG, and its officers, employees and agents, harmless from any and all loss, damage, claim for damage, liability, expense or cost, including attorneys' fees, which arises out of or is in any way connected with the performance of work under this Agreement by City. This indemnification provision shall apply to any acts or omissions, willful misconduct or negligent conduct, whether active or passive, on the part of City and its employees, subcontractors or agents. 12. Insurance. 12.1 General Provisions. Prior to the City's execution of this Agreement, RSG shall provide satisfactory evidence of, and shall thereafter maintain during the term of this Agreement, such insurance policies and coverages in the types, limits, forms and ratings required herein. The rating and required insurance policies and coverages may be modified in writing by the City's Risk Manager or City Attorney, or a designee, unless • such modification is prohibited by law. 12.1.1 Limitations. These minimum amounts of coverage shall not constitute any limitation or cap on RSG's indemnification obligations under Section 11 hereof. 12.1.2 Ratings. Any insurance policy or coverage provided by RSG or subcontractors as required by this Agreement shall be deemed inadequate and a material breach of this Agreement, unless such policy or coverage is issued by insurance companies authorized to transact insurance business in the State of California with a policy holder's rating of B+ or higher and a Financial Class of VII or higher. Page 3 of 12 ndependent capacity as independent contractors, and not as officers or employees of the City of Grand Terrace. RSG acknowledges and agrees that City has no obligation to pay or withhold state or federal taxes or to provide workers' compensation or unemployment insurance to RSG, or to RSG's employees, subcontractors and agents. RSG, as an independent contractor, shall be responsible for any and all taxes that apply to RSG as an employer. Page 2 of 12 ll also be an opportunity to meet with representatives of the State Director of Finance to discuss our appeal. RSG has staff located in Sacramento who can be available for such a meeting, if required. It should be noted that time ABX1 27 allows to prepare for the appeal is just over six weeks, and only two weeks from August 1 when the official numbers are to be provided by the Director of Finance. Such a short time period makes it difficult for smaller cities to prepare an appeal while at the same time starting a new fiscal year, closing out the ALE•I'' 8'-0* !..1..! ,4.17.",Of.191115011 Oarabedntor :LEVAT I ON ' , DATE June 28,2011 6e No:11-02 MP MVO by 0. . . . . . • MITTI..7 NC Tr..413‘..y10 1..0.0.B.P..00 0.1.Cif TK O....7/.0 r.f...”I.Ig...NOT 1.1 PM....t.521 pv 11,41,...I.lar.10,MI 0.114 COW-5,C.Tri•Ot...MCT ow...,.0.1(41,i.S.....t..-,Y...13 RC.. • 01ca.sucor . imUr Int cum.. Axu wows..am or n x anotrrcv ma ult SAC ISO!.1 Er 11,1.6•17.0 tan ca q.v..n,,uccu 1.e...n.cmu-,u,a-nrc AP,.ou,uuu,r,,T., 1..i'jU co., �- ®. EXISTING I I Z1 1 oaaenOn r�o,.wo�eiwa.u.w+o.ew - - .7. ,/ O/ + 1.h e" ®iiii4 RETAIL ft) OI d VICINITY MAP m I I �® I® *ADO 5F ...JCT.A ' ,1 1 LI �� OT NOT TO SCALE `` fe ,• -!fmm, 5..G-°TED COLOR r;1 A)T W 3 - S� &7'td 7--A.,-!W- .:.'xlmi :,`P ''t- 4 ADA PATH OF TRAVEL II IrT •-1 '�a V _ .':T , �,41 -� �,so 34:5 _� :rM'-r N."' 6'BENCH ~ �,, c W f1 A I 1, ' I : ir J =.J I I er s.iX 1•4 C'':4. �,•{, f5•r �I. Te • -ia„ .q •.. ' �a moo`R SEwTING I cp # I- I' +.. ,r.,✓N 'ill�Iq • �,!•t �ide___� - 1 r.�',.;.x�ttt^:r�•�tiP•-%• " � z• ' "S .*r 9 �>019 �..+. "1 ds3: • BICYCLE- F,•- -T a. -• ` o• DIRECTIONAL 516N MO. . SIGN (5)BIC,'. -— - 1i €.`'1-,--Y, '*',4,± ,1 l MPED CONCRETE♦W BARTON RTON ROAD -- -- ` "` f- ' ' Attachment 7 GRATED DOLOR jt T ROAD RAISED MEDIAN [r'' - r w -tr,,,,,-:',*4:I'lf Y w.g�;N�'KgNi{Ip,t+.�,;: ':P'7 •Ns u E,�''R .Y arF±l� T '-'• E (STING EGNALIZ;D ...,4;,,_kg',`"„ ;.° 2,BZERg/t-• :'lij; �;ry A„F, 1, ,., SITE PLAN INTERS GTION ,*.y"M`+J a'L?- -`i • f f.- ,4 •r C •- STA THERS I COMMERCIAL -, Wit. -„ - gg � .1' ° 1 1 I \1 �+.a q1;„ z-=' re`.,^y �# SCALE 1"=30'0" I]&1'-s• Yx." ,.1 .,:;sT '.L::ti;,F'<':-..F 1;;.4 s1`1-f4- ,72.. i.,00 DATE:June 28, 2011 holed TS1BSlm(o013.IIBBAU OnWQPoAbb Case No.: 11-02 G""D" A101 Chocbed by T.A.UNPDBUSMED WORK Of MB ARanECT Alm S D SAID BAY NOT BE DIRUUR➢.MO OR O5¢OSED KNEW ME 50 5FN CONSENT OF ME,RURTECI COBB...TIN CREW RENAL AU ARTS REBR.5O Wee.R>on ATDLLooRBA OT 12.1.3 Cancellation. The policies shall not be canceled unless thirty (30) days prior written notification of intended cancellation has been given to City by certified or registered mail, postage prepaid. 12.1.4 Adequacy. The City, its officers, employees and agents make no representation that the types or limits of insurance specified to be carried by RSG pursuant to this Agreement are adequate to protect RSG. If RSG believes that any required insurance coverage is inadequate, RSG will obtain such additional insurance coverage as RSG deems adequate, at RSG's sole expense. 12.2 Workers' Compensation Insurance: By executing this Agreement, RSG certifies that RSG is aware of and will comply with Section 3700 of the Labor Code of the State of California requiring every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation, or to undertake self-insurance before commencing any of the work. RSG shall carry the insurance or provide for self-insurance required by California law to protect said RSG from claims under the Workers' Compensation Act. Prior to City's execution of this Agreement, RSG shall file with City either (1) a certificate of insurance showing that such insurance is in effect, or that RSG is self-insured for such coverage, or (2) a certified statement that RSG has no employees, and acknowledging that if RSG does employ any person, the necessary certificate of insurance will immediately be filed with City. Any certificate filed with City shall provide that City will be given ten (10) days prior written notice before modification or cancellation thereof. 12.3 Automobile Insurance. Prior to City's execution of this Agreement, RSG shall obtain, and shall thereafter maintain during the term of this Agreement, automobile liability insurance as required to insure RSG against damages for personal injury, including accidental death, as well as from claims for property damage, which may arise from or which may concern operations by anyone directly or indirectly employed by, connected with, or acting for or on behalf of RSG. The City, and its officers, employees and agents, shall be named as additional insureds under the RSG's insurance policies. 12.3.1 RSG's automobile liability policy shall cover both bodily injury and property damage in an amount not less than $500,000 per occurrence and an aggregate limit of not less than $1,000,000. All of RSG's automobile and/or commercial general liability insurance policies shall cover all vehicles used in connection with RSG's performance of this Agreement, which vehicles shall include, but are not limited to, RSG owned vehicles, RSG leased vehicles, RSG's employee vehicles, non-RSG owned vehicles and hired vehicles. 12.3.2 Prior to City's execution of this Agreement, copies of insurance policies or original certificates and additional insured endorsements evidencing the coverage required by this Agreement, for automobile liability insurance, shall be filed with the City and shall include the City and its officers, employees and agents, as additional insureds. Page 4 of 12 of the State Director of Finance to discuss our appeal. RSG has staff located in Sacramento who can be available for such a meeting, if required. It should be noted that time ABX1 27 allows to prepare for the appeal is just over six weeks, and only two weeks from August 1 when the official numbers are to be provided by the Director of Finance. Such a short time period makes it difficult for smaller cities to prepare an appeal while at the same time starting a new fiscal year, closing out the ALE•I'' 8'-0* !..1..! ,4.17.",Of.191115011 Oarabedntor :LEVAT I ON ' , DATE June 28,2011 6e No:11-02 MP MVO by 0. . . . . . • MITTI..7 NC Tr..413‘..y10 1..0.0.B.P..00 0.1.Cif TK O....7/.0 r.f...”I.Ig...NOT 1.1 PM....t.521 pv 11,41,...I.lar.10,MI 0.114 COW-5,C.Tri•Ot...MCT ow...,.0.1(41,i.S.....t..-,Y...13 RC.. • 01ca.sucor . imUr Int cum.. Axu wows..am or n x anotrrcv ma ult SAC ISO!.1 Er 11,1.6•17.0 tan ca q.v..n,,uccu 1.e...n.cmu-,u,a-nrc AP,.ou,uuu,r,,T., 1..i'jU co., �- ®. EXISTING I I Z1 1 oaaenOn r�o,.wo�eiwa.u.w+o.ew - - .7. ,/ O/ + 1.h e" ®iiii4 RETAIL ft) OI d VICINITY MAP m I I �® I® *ADO 5F ...JCT.A ' ,1 1 LI �� OT NOT TO SCALE `` fe ,• -!fmm, 5..G-°TED COLOR r;1 A)T W 3 - S� &7'td 7--A.,-!W- .:.'xlmi :,`P ''t- 4 ADA PATH OF TRAVEL II IrT •-1 '�a V _ .':T , �,41 -� �,so 34:5 _� :rM'-r N."' 6'BENCH ~ �,, c W f1 A I 1, ' I : ir J =.J I I er s.iX 1•4 C'':4. �,•{, f5•r �I. Te • -ia„ .q •.. ' �a moo`R SEwTING I cp # I- I' +.. ,r.,✓N 'ill�Iq • �,!•t �ide___� - 1 r.�',.;.x�ttt^:r�•�tiP•-%• " � z• ' "S .*r 9 �>019 �..+. "1 ds3: • BICYCLE- F,•- -T a. -• ` o• DIRECTIONAL 516N MO. . SIGN (5)BIC,'. -— - 1i €.`'1-,--Y, '*',4,± ,1 l MPED CONCRETE♦W BARTON RTON ROAD -- -- ` "` f- ' ' Attachment 7 GRATED DOLOR jt T ROAD RAISED MEDIAN [r'' - r w -tr,,,,,-:',*4:I'lf Y w.g�;N�'KgNi{Ip,t+.�,;: ':P'7 •Ns u E,�''R .Y arF±l� T '-'• E (STING EGNALIZ;D ...,4;,,_kg',`"„ ;.° 2,BZERg/t-• :'lij; �;ry A„F, 1, ,., SITE PLAN INTERS GTION ,*.y"M`+J a'L?- -`i • f f.- ,4 •r C •- STA THERS I COMMERCIAL -, Wit. -„ - gg � .1' ° 1 1 I \1 �+.a q1;„ z-=' re`.,^y �# SCALE 1"=30'0" I]&1'-s• Yx." ,.1 .,:;sT '.L::ti;,F'<':-..F 1;;.4 s1`1-f4- ,72.. i.,00 DATE:June 28, 2011 holed TS1BSlm(o013.IIBBAU OnWQPoAbb Case No.: 11-02 G""D" A101 Chocbed by T.A.UNPDBUSMED WORK Of MB ARanECT Alm S D SAID BAY NOT BE DIRUUR➢.MO OR O5¢OSED KNEW ME 50 5FN CONSENT OF ME,RURTECI COBB...TIN CREW RENAL AU ARTS REBR.5O Wee.R>on ATDLLooRBA OT Said policies shall be in the usual form of commercial general and automobile liability insurance policies, but shall include the following provisions: It is agreed that the City of Grand Terrace and its officers, employees and agents, are added as additional insureds under this policy, solely for work done by and on behalf of the named insured for the City of Grand Terrace. 12.4 Errors and Omissions Insurance. Prior to City's execution of this Agreement, RSG shall obtain, and shall thereafter maintain during the term of this Agreement, errors and omissions professional liability insurance in the minimum amount of$1,000,000 to protect the City from claims resulting from the RSG's activities. 12.5 Subcontractors' Insurance. RSG shall require all of its subcontractors to carry insurance, in an amount sufficient to cover the risk of injury, damage or loss, that may be caused by the subcontractors' scope of work and activities provided in furtherance of this Agreement, including, but without limitation, the following coverages: Workers Compensation (except for a sole proprietor), Commercial General Liability, and Automobile liability. Upon City's request, RSG shall provide the City with satisfactory evidence that Subcontractors have obtained insurance policies and coverages required by this section. 13. Business Tax. RSG is a municipal government and exempt from the City's Business Tax. 14. Time of Essence. Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement. 15. City's Right to Employ Other Consultants. City reserves the right to employ other RSGs in connection with these Services. 16. Accounting Records. RSG shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to costs incurred under this Agreement. All such records shall be clearly identifiable. RSG shall allow a representative of City during normal business hours to examine, audit, and make transcripts or copies of such records and any other documents created pursuant to this Agreement. RSG shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to the Agreement for a period of three (3) years from the date of final payment under this Agreement. 17. Confidentiality. All ideas, memoranda, specifications, plans, procedures, drawings, descriptions, computer program data, input record data, written information, and other materials either created by or provided to RSG in connection with the performance of this Agreement shall be held confidential by RSG, except as otherwise directed by City's Contract Administrator. Nothing furnished to RSG which is otherwise known to the RSG or is generally known, or has become known, to the related industry Page 5 of 12 r to City's execution of this Agreement, copies of insurance policies or original certificates and additional insured endorsements evidencing the coverage required by this Agreement, for automobile liability insurance, shall be filed with the City and shall include the City and its officers, employees and agents, as additional insureds. Page 4 of 12 of the State Director of Finance to discuss our appeal. RSG has staff located in Sacramento who can be available for such a meeting, if required. It should be noted that time ABX1 27 allows to prepare for the appeal is just over six weeks, and only two weeks from August 1 when the official numbers are to be provided by the Director of Finance. Such a short time period makes it difficult for smaller cities to prepare an appeal while at the same time starting a new fiscal year, closing out the ALE•I'' 8'-0* !..1..! ,4.17.",Of.191115011 Oarabedntor :LEVAT I ON ' , DATE June 28,2011 6e No:11-02 MP MVO by 0. . . . . . • MITTI..7 NC Tr..413‘..y10 1..0.0.B.P..00 0.1.Cif TK O....7/.0 r.f...”I.Ig...NOT 1.1 PM....t.521 pv 11,41,...I.lar.10,MI 0.114 COW-5,C.Tri•Ot...MCT ow...,.0.1(41,i.S.....t..-,Y...13 RC.. • 01ca.sucor . imUr Int cum.. Axu wows..am or n x anotrrcv ma ult SAC ISO!.1 Er 11,1.6•17.0 tan ca q.v..n,,uccu 1.e...n.cmu-,u,a-nrc AP,.ou,uuu,r,,T., 1..i'jU co., �- ®. EXISTING I I Z1 1 oaaenOn r�o,.wo�eiwa.u.w+o.ew - - .7. ,/ O/ + 1.h e" ®iiii4 RETAIL ft) OI d VICINITY MAP m I I �® I® *ADO 5F ...JCT.A ' ,1 1 LI �� OT NOT TO SCALE `` fe ,• -!fmm, 5..G-°TED COLOR r;1 A)T W 3 - S� &7'td 7--A.,-!W- .:.'xlmi :,`P ''t- 4 ADA PATH OF TRAVEL II IrT •-1 '�a V _ .':T , �,41 -� �,so 34:5 _� :rM'-r N."' 6'BENCH ~ �,, c W f1 A I 1, ' I : ir J =.J I I er s.iX 1•4 C'':4. �,•{, f5•r �I. Te • -ia„ .q •.. ' �a moo`R SEwTING I cp # I- I' +.. ,r.,✓N 'ill�Iq • �,!•t �ide___� - 1 r.�',.;.x�ttt^:r�•�tiP•-%• " � z• ' "S .*r 9 �>019 �..+. "1 ds3: • BICYCLE- F,•- -T a. -• ` o• DIRECTIONAL 516N MO. . SIGN (5)BIC,'. -— - 1i €.`'1-,--Y, '*',4,± ,1 l MPED CONCRETE♦W BARTON RTON ROAD -- -- ` "` f- ' ' Attachment 7 GRATED DOLOR jt T ROAD RAISED MEDIAN [r'' - r w -tr,,,,,-:',*4:I'lf Y w.g�;N�'KgNi{Ip,t+.�,;: ':P'7 •Ns u E,�''R .Y arF±l� T '-'• E (STING EGNALIZ;D ...,4;,,_kg',`"„ ;.° 2,BZERg/t-• :'lij; �;ry A„F, 1, ,., SITE PLAN INTERS GTION ,*.y"M`+J a'L?- -`i • f f.- ,4 •r C •- STA THERS I COMMERCIAL -, Wit. -„ - gg � .1' ° 1 1 I \1 �+.a q1;„ z-=' re`.,^y �# SCALE 1"=30'0" I]&1'-s• Yx." ,.1 .,:;sT '.L::ti;,F'<':-..F 1;;.4 s1`1-f4- ,72.. i.,00 DATE:June 28, 2011 holed TS1BSlm(o013.IIBBAU OnWQPoAbb Case No.: 11-02 G""D" A101 Chocbed by T.A.UNPDBUSMED WORK Of MB ARanECT Alm S D SAID BAY NOT BE DIRUUR➢.MO OR O5¢OSED KNEW ME 50 5FN CONSENT OF ME,RURTECI COBB...TIN CREW RENAL AU ARTS REBR.5O Wee.R>on ATDLLooRBA OT shall be deemed confidential. RSG shall not use City's name or insignia, photographs of the Services, or any publicity pertaining to the Services in any magazine, trade paper, newspaper, television or radio production, website, or other similar medium without the prior written consent of the City. 18. Ownership of Documents. All contracts and invoices prepared under this Agreement by RSG shall be and remain the property of City upon City's compensation to RSG for its services as herein provided. RSG shall not release to others information furnished by City without prior express written approval of City. 19. Conflict of Interest. RSG warrants that neither RSG, nor the individuals listed in Exhibit "B" have any real property, business interests or income interests that will be affected by this project or, alternatively, that RSG will file with the City an affidavit disclosing any such interest. 20. Solicitation. RSG warrants that RSG has not employed or retained any person or City to solicit or secure this Agreement, nor has it entered into any agreement or understanding for a commission, percentage, brokerage, or contingent fee to be paid to secure this Agreement. For breach of this warranty, City shall have the right to terminate this Agreement without liability and pay RSG only for the value of work RSG has actually performed, or, in its sole discretion, to deduct from the Agreement price or otherwise recover from RSG the full amount of such commission, percentage, brokerage or commission fee. The remedies specified in this section shall be in addition to and not in lieu of those remedies otherwise specified in this Agreement. 21. General Compliance with Laws. RSG shall keep fully informed of federal, state and local laws and ordinances and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by RSG, or in any way affect the performance of services by RSG pursuant to this Agreement. RSG shall at all times observe and comply with all such laws, ordinances and regulations, and shall be solely responsible for any failure to comply with all applicable laws, ordinances and regulations. 22. Amendments. This Agreement may be modified or amended only by a written Agreement and/or change order executed by the RSG and City. 23. Termination. City and the RSG, by notifying the other party in writing, shall have the right to terminate any or all of RSG's services and work covered by this Agreement at any time. In the event of such termination, RSG may submit RSG's final written statement of the amount of RSG's services as of the date of such termination based upon the ratio that the work completed bears to the total work required to make the report complete, subject to the City's rights under Sections 15 and 24 hereof. In ascertaining the work actually rendered through the termination date, City shall consider completed work, work in progress and complete and incomplete reports and other documents only after delivered to City. Page 6 of 12 clude the City and its officers, employees and agents, as additional insureds. Page 4 of 12 of the State Director of Finance to discuss our appeal. RSG has staff located in Sacramento who can be available for such a meeting, if required. It should be noted that time ABX1 27 allows to prepare for the appeal is just over six weeks, and only two weeks from August 1 when the official numbers are to be provided by the Director of Finance. Such a short time period makes it difficult for smaller cities to prepare an appeal while at the same time starting a new fiscal year, closing out the ALE•I'' 8'-0* !..1..! ,4.17.",Of.191115011 Oarabedntor :LEVAT I ON ' , DATE June 28,2011 6e No:11-02 MP MVO by 0. . . . . . • MITTI..7 NC Tr..413‘..y10 1..0.0.B.P..00 0.1.Cif TK O....7/.0 r.f...”I.Ig...NOT 1.1 PM....t.521 pv 11,41,...I.lar.10,MI 0.114 COW-5,C.Tri•Ot...MCT ow...,.0.1(41,i.S.....t..-,Y...13 RC.. • 01ca.sucor . imUr Int cum.. Axu wows..am or n x anotrrcv ma ult SAC ISO!.1 Er 11,1.6•17.0 tan ca q.v..n,,uccu 1.e...n.cmu-,u,a-nrc AP,.ou,uuu,r,,T., 1..i'jU co., �- ®. EXISTING I I Z1 1 oaaenOn r�o,.wo�eiwa.u.w+o.ew - - .7. ,/ O/ + 1.h e" ®iiii4 RETAIL ft) OI d VICINITY MAP m I I �® I® *ADO 5F ...JCT.A ' ,1 1 LI �� OT NOT TO SCALE `` fe ,• -!fmm, 5..G-°TED COLOR r;1 A)T W 3 - S� &7'td 7--A.,-!W- .:.'xlmi :,`P ''t- 4 ADA PATH OF TRAVEL II IrT •-1 '�a V _ .':T , �,41 -� �,so 34:5 _� :rM'-r N."' 6'BENCH ~ �,, c W f1 A I 1, ' I : ir J =.J I I er s.iX 1•4 C'':4. �,•{, f5•r �I. Te • -ia„ .q •.. ' �a moo`R SEwTING I cp # I- I' +.. ,r.,✓N 'ill�Iq • �,!•t �ide___� - 1 r.�',.;.x�ttt^:r�•�tiP•-%• " � z• ' "S .*r 9 �>019 �..+. "1 ds3: • BICYCLE- F,•- -T a. -• ` o• DIRECTIONAL 516N MO. . SIGN (5)BIC,'. -— - 1i €.`'1-,--Y, '*',4,± ,1 l MPED CONCRETE♦W BARTON RTON ROAD -- -- ` "` f- ' ' Attachment 7 GRATED DOLOR jt T ROAD RAISED MEDIAN [r'' - r w -tr,,,,,-:',*4:I'lf Y w.g�;N�'KgNi{Ip,t+.�,;: ':P'7 •Ns u E,�''R .Y arF±l� T '-'• E (STING EGNALIZ;D ...,4;,,_kg',`"„ ;.° 2,BZERg/t-• :'lij; �;ry A„F, 1, ,., SITE PLAN INTERS GTION ,*.y"M`+J a'L?- -`i • f f.- ,4 •r C •- STA THERS I COMMERCIAL -, Wit. -„ - gg � .1' ° 1 1 I \1 �+.a q1;„ z-=' re`.,^y �# SCALE 1"=30'0" I]&1'-s• Yx." ,.1 .,:;sT '.L::ti;,F'<':-..F 1;;.4 s1`1-f4- ,72.. i.,00 DATE:June 28, 2011 holed TS1BSlm(o013.IIBBAU OnWQPoAbb Case No.: 11-02 G""D" A101 Chocbed by T.A.UNPDBUSMED WORK Of MB ARanECT Alm S D SAID BAY NOT BE DIRUUR➢.MO OR O5¢OSED KNEW ME 50 5FN CONSENT OF ME,RURTECI COBB...TIN CREW RENAL AU ARTS REBR.5O Wee.R>on ATDLLooRBA OT 23.1 Other than as stated below, City and RSG shall provide the other party thirty (30) days prior written notice prior to termination. 23.2 City may terminate this Agreement upon fifteen (15) days written notice to RSG, in the event: 23.2.1 RSG substantially fails to perform or materially breaches the Agreement; or 23.2.2 City decides to abandon or postpone the Services. 24. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding upon City and its successors and assigns, and upon RSG and its permitted successors and assigns, and shall not be assigned by RSG, either in whole or in part, except as otherwise provided in paragraph 9 of this Agreement. 25. Venue and Attorneys' Fees. Any action at law or in equity brought by either of the parties hereto for the purpose of enforcing a right or rights provided for by this Agreement shall be tried in a court of competent jurisdiction in the County of San Bernardino, State of California, and the parties hereby waive all provisions of law providing for a change of venue in such proceedings to any other county. In the event either party hereto shall bring suit to enforce any term of this Agreement or to recover any damages for and on account of the breach of any term or condition of this Agreement, it is mutually agreed that the prevailing party in such action shall recover all costs thereof, including reasonable attorneys' fees, to be set by the court in such action. 26. Nondiscrimination. During RSG's performance of this Agreement, RSG shall not discriminate on the grounds of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, age, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, including the medical condition ,of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) or any condition related thereto, marital status, sex, or sexual orientation, in the selection and retention of employees and subcontractors and the procurement of materials and equipment, except as provided in Section 12940 of the California Government Code. Further, RSG agrees to conform to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act in the performance of this Agreement. 27. Severability. Each provision, term, condition, covenant and/or restriction, in whole and in part, of this Agreement shall be considered severable. In the event any provision, term, condition, covenant and/or restriction, in whole and/or in part, of this Agreement is declared invalid, unconstitutional, or void for any reason, such provision or part thereof shall be severed from this Agreement and shall not affect any other provision, term, condition, covenant and/or restriction of this Agreement, and the remainder of the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. Page 7 of 12 n ascertaining the work actually rendered through the termination date, City shall consider completed work, work in progress and complete and incomplete reports and other documents only after delivered to City. Page 6 of 12 clude the City and its officers, employees and agents, as additional insureds. Page 4 of 12 of the State Director of Finance to discuss our appeal. RSG has staff located in Sacramento who can be available for such a meeting, if required. It should be noted that time ABX1 27 allows to prepare for the appeal is just over six weeks, and only two weeks from August 1 when the official numbers are to be provided by the Director of Finance. Such a short time period makes it difficult for smaller cities to prepare an appeal while at the same time starting a new fiscal year, closing out the ALE•I'' 8'-0* !..1..! ,4.17.",Of.191115011 Oarabedntor :LEVAT I ON ' , DATE June 28,2011 6e No:11-02 MP MVO by 0. . . . . . • MITTI..7 NC Tr..413‘..y10 1..0.0.B.P..00 0.1.Cif TK O....7/.0 r.f...”I.Ig...NOT 1.1 PM....t.521 pv 11,41,...I.lar.10,MI 0.114 COW-5,C.Tri•Ot...MCT ow...,.0.1(41,i.S.....t..-,Y...13 RC.. • 01ca.sucor . imUr Int cum.. Axu wows..am or n x anotrrcv ma ult SAC ISO!.1 Er 11,1.6•17.0 tan ca q.v..n,,uccu 1.e...n.cmu-,u,a-nrc AP,.ou,uuu,r,,T., 1..i'jU co., �- ®. EXISTING I I Z1 1 oaaenOn r�o,.wo�eiwa.u.w+o.ew - - .7. ,/ O/ + 1.h e" ®iiii4 RETAIL ft) OI d VICINITY MAP m I I �® I® *ADO 5F ...JCT.A ' ,1 1 LI �� OT NOT TO SCALE `` fe ,• -!fmm, 5..G-°TED COLOR r;1 A)T W 3 - S� &7'td 7--A.,-!W- .:.'xlmi :,`P ''t- 4 ADA PATH OF TRAVEL II IrT •-1 '�a V _ .':T , �,41 -� �,so 34:5 _� :rM'-r N."' 6'BENCH ~ �,, c W f1 A I 1, ' I : ir J =.J I I er s.iX 1•4 C'':4. �,•{, f5•r �I. Te • -ia„ .q •.. ' �a moo`R SEwTING I cp # I- I' +.. ,r.,✓N 'ill�Iq • �,!•t �ide___� - 1 r.�',.;.x�ttt^:r�•�tiP•-%• " � z• ' "S .*r 9 �>019 �..+. "1 ds3: • BICYCLE- F,•- -T a. -• ` o• DIRECTIONAL 516N MO. . SIGN (5)BIC,'. -— - 1i €.`'1-,--Y, '*',4,± ,1 l MPED CONCRETE♦W BARTON RTON ROAD -- -- ` "` f- ' ' Attachment 7 GRATED DOLOR jt T ROAD RAISED MEDIAN [r'' - r w -tr,,,,,-:',*4:I'lf Y w.g�;N�'KgNi{Ip,t+.�,;: ':P'7 •Ns u E,�''R .Y arF±l� T '-'• E (STING EGNALIZ;D ...,4;,,_kg',`"„ ;.° 2,BZERg/t-• :'lij; �;ry A„F, 1, ,., SITE PLAN INTERS GTION ,*.y"M`+J a'L?- -`i • f f.- ,4 •r C •- STA THERS I COMMERCIAL -, Wit. -„ - gg � .1' ° 1 1 I \1 �+.a q1;„ z-=' re`.,^y �# SCALE 1"=30'0" I]&1'-s• Yx." ,.1 .,:;sT '.L::ti;,F'<':-..F 1;;.4 s1`1-f4- ,72.. i.,00 DATE:June 28, 2011 holed TS1BSlm(o013.IIBBAU OnWQPoAbb Case No.: 11-02 G""D" A101 Chocbed by T.A.UNPDBUSMED WORK Of MB ARanECT Alm S D SAID BAY NOT BE DIRUUR➢.MO OR O5¢OSED KNEW ME 50 5FN CONSENT OF ME,RURTECI COBB...TIN CREW RENAL AU ARTS REBR.5O Wee.R>on ATDLLooRBA OT 28. Authority: The individuals executing this Agreement and the instruments referenced herein on behalf of RSG each represent and warrant that they have the legal power, right and actual authority to bind RSG to the terms and conditions hereof and thereof. 29. Entire Agreement: This Agreement constitutes the final, complete, and exclusive statement of the terms of the agreement between the parties pertaining to the subject matter of this Agreement, and supersedes all prior and contemporaneous understandings or agreements of the parties. Neither party has been induced to enter into this Agreement by, and neither party is relying on, any representation or warranty outside those expressly set forth in this Agreement. 30. Interpretation. City and RSG acknowledge and agree that this Agreement is the product of mutual arms-length negotiations and accordingly, the rule of construction, which provides that the ambiguities in a document shall be construed against the drafter of that document, shall have no application to the interpretation and enforcement of this Agreement. 30.1 Titles and captions are for convenience of reference only and do not define, describe or limit the scope or the intent of the Agreement or any of its terms. Reference to section numbers are to sections in the Agreement unless expressly stated otherwise. 30.2 This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California in effect at the time of the execution of this Agreement. 31.3 In the event of a conflict between the body of this Agreement and Exhibit "A" hereto, the terms contained in Exhibit "A" shall be controlling. 32. Exhibits. The following exhibits attached hereto are incorporated herein to this Agreement by this reference: Exhibit "A" — Scope of Work, Schedule, and Fees Page 8 of 12 of employees and subcontractors and the procurement of materials and equipment, except as provided in Section 12940 of the California Government Code. Further, RSG agrees to conform to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act in the performance of this Agreement. 27. Severability. Each provision, term, condition, covenant and/or restriction, in whole and in part, of this Agreement shall be considered severable. In the event any provision, term, condition, covenant and/or restriction, in whole and/or in part, of this Agreement is declared invalid, unconstitutional, or void for any reason, such provision or part thereof shall be severed from this Agreement and shall not affect any other provision, term, condition, covenant and/or restriction of this Agreement, and the remainder of the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. Page 7 of 12 n ascertaining the work actually rendered through the termination date, City shall consider completed work, work in progress and complete and incomplete reports and other documents only after delivered to City. Page 6 of 12 clude the City and its officers, employees and agents, as additional insureds. Page 4 of 12 of the State Director of Finance to discuss our appeal. RSG has staff located in Sacramento who can be available for such a meeting, if required. It should be noted that time ABX1 27 allows to prepare for the appeal is just over six weeks, and only two weeks from August 1 when the official numbers are to be provided by the Director of Finance. Such a short time period makes it difficult for smaller cities to prepare an appeal while at the same time starting a new fiscal year, closing out the ALE•I'' 8'-0* !..1..! ,4.17.",Of.191115011 Oarabedntor :LEVAT I ON ' , DATE June 28,2011 6e No:11-02 MP MVO by 0. . . . . . • MITTI..7 NC Tr..413‘..y10 1..0.0.B.P..00 0.1.Cif TK O....7/.0 r.f...”I.Ig...NOT 1.1 PM....t.521 pv 11,41,...I.lar.10,MI 0.114 COW-5,C.Tri•Ot...MCT ow...,.0.1(41,i.S.....t..-,Y...13 RC.. • 01ca.sucor . imUr Int cum.. Axu wows..am or n x anotrrcv ma ult SAC ISO!.1 Er 11,1.6•17.0 tan ca q.v..n,,uccu 1.e...n.cmu-,u,a-nrc AP,.ou,uuu,r,,T., 1..i'jU co., �- ®. EXISTING I I Z1 1 oaaenOn r�o,.wo�eiwa.u.w+o.ew - - .7. ,/ O/ + 1.h e" ®iiii4 RETAIL ft) OI d VICINITY MAP m I I �® I® *ADO 5F ...JCT.A ' ,1 1 LI �� OT NOT TO SCALE `` fe ,• -!fmm, 5..G-°TED COLOR r;1 A)T W 3 - S� &7'td 7--A.,-!W- .:.'xlmi :,`P ''t- 4 ADA PATH OF TRAVEL II IrT •-1 '�a V _ .':T , �,41 -� �,so 34:5 _� :rM'-r N."' 6'BENCH ~ �,, c W f1 A I 1, ' I : ir J =.J I I er s.iX 1•4 C'':4. �,•{, f5•r �I. Te • -ia„ .q •.. ' �a moo`R SEwTING I cp # I- I' +.. ,r.,✓N 'ill�Iq • �,!•t �ide___� - 1 r.�',.;.x�ttt^:r�•�tiP•-%• " � z• ' "S .*r 9 �>019 �..+. "1 ds3: • BICYCLE- F,•- -T a. -• ` o• DIRECTIONAL 516N MO. . SIGN (5)BIC,'. -— - 1i €.`'1-,--Y, '*',4,± ,1 l MPED CONCRETE♦W BARTON RTON ROAD -- -- ` "` f- ' ' Attachment 7 GRATED DOLOR jt T ROAD RAISED MEDIAN [r'' - r w -tr,,,,,-:',*4:I'lf Y w.g�;N�'KgNi{Ip,t+.�,;: ':P'7 •Ns u E,�''R .Y arF±l� T '-'• E (STING EGNALIZ;D ...,4;,,_kg',`"„ ;.° 2,BZERg/t-• :'lij; �;ry A„F, 1, ,., SITE PLAN INTERS GTION ,*.y"M`+J a'L?- -`i • f f.- ,4 •r C •- STA THERS I COMMERCIAL -, Wit. -„ - gg � .1' ° 1 1 I \1 �+.a q1;„ z-=' re`.,^y �# SCALE 1"=30'0" I]&1'-s• Yx." ,.1 .,:;sT '.L::ti;,F'<':-..F 1;;.4 s1`1-f4- ,72.. i.,00 DATE:June 28, 2011 holed TS1BSlm(o013.IIBBAU OnWQPoAbb Case No.: 11-02 G""D" A101 Chocbed by T.A.UNPDBUSMED WORK Of MB ARanECT Alm S D SAID BAY NOT BE DIRUUR➢.MO OR O5¢OSED KNEW ME 50 5FN CONSENT OF ME,RURTECI COBB...TIN CREW RENAL AU ARTS REBR.5O Wee.R>on ATDLLooRBA OT IN WITNESS WHEREOF City and RSG have caused this Agreement to be duly executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, A Public Entity By: By: City Manager Principal, RSG APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM: 1 By: City Attorney Rosenow Spevacek Group Inc. Page 9 of 12 Ol and°Back preparations for Obligation for projects Up Data Housing Assets . Schedule � ..., . • :.v .. and Admin • : _ --_ )RSG Community Remittance Transfer 2,850,655 670,745 686,638 702,849 719,384 Ending Cash Balance 2,795,294 1,980,429 1,049,586 91,304 (862,016) CIRSG ,ple se oansut with the Cemrnm ty De.ecprrent Depattneri �i._1, 'n Page 11 of 11 EXHIBIT "A" Y RSG SCOPE OF SERVICES, SCHEDULE, AND FEES INTELLIGENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP INC. T 714 541 4585 309 WEST 4TH STREET F 714 5411175 SANTA ANA. CALIFORNIA E INFOIaoWEBRSG.COM 92701-4502 WEBRSG.COM July 6, 2011 Via Electronic Mail Betsy M. Adams, City Manager CITY OF GRAND TERRACE 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92323-5295 PROPOSAL FOR CONSULTING SERVICES Dear Betsy: At your request, RSG has prepared this brief fee estimate to assist the City continue the existence of the City of Grand Terrace Redevelopment Agency during the current suspension period as a result of the state's enactment of AB x1 26 & 27. Until the City Council enacts a' continuing ordinance, which in part establishes a new financial obligation to assist the state fund schools, fire districts and transit districts, the Redevelopment Agency is subject to the Dissolution Act provisions of AB x1 26 that terminates most activities including entering into new contracts even for redevelopment work associated with the dissolution or continuing activities. As such, this proposal is directed to the City who would undertake certain redevelopment activities on behalf of the Redevelopment Agency. Our scope of services includes the following activities: 1. Prepare Updated Agency Cash Flows: The Agency and City need to understand the capabilities of handling the new remittances required under AB x1 27, including where available funds may be located, the implications on programs or projects that were planned or proposed, and the overall financial viability of the Agency to function going forward. RSG is recommending 5-10 year cash flows for each Agency fund for this purpose. 2. Present Agency Cash Flows on July 26 City Council Meeting: RSG would present the fiscal implications of AB x1 26/27 at the City Council's meeting on July 26, as part of the consideration of the continuing ordinance. 3. Prepare Amended 2008-09 State Controller's Report: RSG is aware of the fact that the County Auditor-Controller's error in the apportionment of property tax increment revenues in 2008-09 and 2009-10 have led to overstated reports of actual receipts, for which the Agency is working with the affected parties to correct. Since the 2008-09 State Controller's Report provides the basis for computing the Agency's 2011-12 community remittance payment if the City Council enacts the continuing ordinance, REDEVELOPMENT PLANNING REAL ESTATE ECONOMICS HOUSING I FINANCING REAL ESTATE ACQUISITION MIDOCUME-11asmittlelLOCALS-1\TempOELF28Uuly5 fee estimatePoage 10 of 12 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT GOVERNMENT SERVICES d effect. Page 7 of 12 n ascertaining the work actually rendered through the termination date, City shall consider completed work, work in progress and complete and incomplete reports and other documents only after delivered to City. Page 6 of 12 clude the City and its officers, employees and agents, as additional insureds. Page 4 of 12 of the State Director of Finance to discuss our appeal. RSG has staff located in Sacramento who can be available for such a meeting, if required. It should be noted that time ABX1 27 allows to prepare for the appeal is just over six weeks, and only two weeks from August 1 when the official numbers are to be provided by the Director of Finance. Such a short time period makes it difficult for smaller cities to prepare an appeal while at the same time starting a new fiscal year, closing out the ALE•I'' 8'-0* !..1..! ,4.17.",Of.191115011 Oarabedntor :LEVAT I ON ' , DATE June 28,2011 6e No:11-02 MP MVO by 0. . . . . . • MITTI..7 NC Tr..413‘..y10 1..0.0.B.P..00 0.1.Cif TK O....7/.0 r.f...”I.Ig...NOT 1.1 PM....t.521 pv 11,41,...I.lar.10,MI 0.114 COW-5,C.Tri•Ot...MCT ow...,.0.1(41,i.S.....t..-,Y...13 RC.. • 01ca.sucor . imUr Int cum.. Axu wows..am or n x anotrrcv ma ult SAC ISO!.1 Er 11,1.6•17.0 tan ca q.v..n,,uccu 1.e...n.cmu-,u,a-nrc AP,.ou,uuu,r,,T., 1..i'jU co., �- ®. EXISTING I I Z1 1 oaaenOn r�o,.wo�eiwa.u.w+o.ew - - .7. ,/ O/ + 1.h e" ®iiii4 RETAIL ft) OI d VICINITY MAP m I I �® I® *ADO 5F ...JCT.A ' ,1 1 LI �� OT NOT TO SCALE `` fe ,• -!fmm, 5..G-°TED COLOR r;1 A)T W 3 - S� &7'td 7--A.,-!W- .:.'xlmi :,`P ''t- 4 ADA PATH OF TRAVEL II IrT •-1 '�a V _ .':T , �,41 -� �,so 34:5 _� :rM'-r N."' 6'BENCH ~ �,, c W f1 A I 1, ' I : ir J =.J I I er s.iX 1•4 C'':4. �,•{, f5•r �I. Te • -ia„ .q •.. ' �a moo`R SEwTING I cp # I- I' +.. ,r.,✓N 'ill�Iq • �,!•t �ide___� - 1 r.�',.;.x�ttt^:r�•�tiP•-%• " � z• ' "S .*r 9 �>019 �..+. "1 ds3: • BICYCLE- F,•- -T a. -• ` o• DIRECTIONAL 516N MO. . SIGN (5)BIC,'. -— - 1i €.`'1-,--Y, '*',4,± ,1 l MPED CONCRETE♦W BARTON RTON ROAD -- -- ` "` f- ' ' Attachment 7 GRATED DOLOR jt T ROAD RAISED MEDIAN [r'' - r w -tr,,,,,-:',*4:I'lf Y w.g�;N�'KgNi{Ip,t+.�,;: ':P'7 •Ns u E,�''R .Y arF±l� T '-'• E (STING EGNALIZ;D ...,4;,,_kg',`"„ ;.° 2,BZERg/t-• :'lij; �;ry A„F, 1, ,., SITE PLAN INTERS GTION ,*.y"M`+J a'L?- -`i • f f.- ,4 •r C •- STA THERS I COMMERCIAL -, Wit. -„ - gg � .1' ° 1 1 I \1 �+.a q1;„ z-=' re`.,^y �# SCALE 1"=30'0" I]&1'-s• Yx." ,.1 .,:;sT '.L::ti;,F'<':-..F 1;;.4 s1`1-f4- ,72.. i.,00 DATE:June 28, 2011 holed TS1BSlm(o013.IIBBAU OnWQPoAbb Case No.: 11-02 G""D" A101 Chocbed by T.A.UNPDBUSMED WORK Of MB ARanECT Alm S D SAID BAY NOT BE DIRUUR➢.MO OR O5¢OSED KNEW ME 50 5FN CONSENT OF ME,RURTECI COBB...TIN CREW RENAL AU ARTS REBR.5O Wee.R>on ATDLLooRBA OT Betsy M. Adams, City Manager CITY OF GRAND TERRACE July 6, 2011 Page 2 correcting this report will be critical and save the Agency as much as $1.0 million based on preliminary estimates. 4. CJUSD Pass Through Payments: Each year, RSG provides the Agency with an estimated payment for CJUSD. It was agreed that beginning this year, RSG would expand this work and provide more worksheets and materials to show CJUSD how the payments are computed and how the funds may be used. 5. Statutory Pass Through Payments: The Agency has been annually remitting statutory taxing agency payments to the City General Fund, ERAF, and the Community College District. In September 2010, the state Attorney General issued an opinion modifying the methodology that these payments are computed. The overpayment referenced in item 4 above must also be considered in these calculations for 2010-11. 6. Analyze and Assemble Appeal Information: The City may have three bases for appealing the estimated $2.8 million community remittance payment: overstated and incorrect 2008-09 data which affects the City's share of the total amount sought from redevelopment agencies statewide, a decline in tax increment revenues in the past few years, and an increase in tax allocation bond debt since 2008-09. RSG would work with staff and the City's advocates on the appeal to compute these amounts and provide exhibits to support the appeal. 7. Other services as directed by staff: RSG may be needed to assist staff in presenting the appeal in person to Department of Finance staff, most of whom have little knowledge or background in local redevelopment matters. Jim Simon, or Ya-yin Isle (an Associate based in Sacramento) are available to assist. Other services may also be needed — as the interpretation of these bills becomes clearer. Our budget for this work totals $14,560, which would be billed on a time and materials basis. The graphic below summarizes the breakdown by task: Page 11 of 12 Controller's Report: RSG is aware of the fact that the County Auditor-Controller's error in the apportionment of property tax increment revenues in 2008-09 and 2009-10 have led to overstated reports of actual receipts, for which the Agency is working with the affected parties to correct. Since the 2008-09 State Controller's Report provides the basis for computing the Agency's 2011-12 community remittance payment if the City Council enacts the continuing ordinance, REDEVELOPMENT PLANNING REAL ESTATE ECONOMICS HOUSING I FINANCING REAL ESTATE ACQUISITION MIDOCUME-11asmittlelLOCALS-1\TempOELF28Uuly5 fee estimatePoage 10 of 12 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT GOVERNMENT SERVICES d effect. Page 7 of 12 n ascertaining the work actually rendered through the termination date, City shall consider completed work, work in progress and complete and incomplete reports and other documents only after delivered to City. Page 6 of 12 clude the City and its officers, employees and agents, as additional insureds. Page 4 of 12 of the State Director of Finance to discuss our appeal. RSG has staff located in Sacramento who can be available for such a meeting, if required. It should be noted that time ABX1 27 allows to prepare for the appeal is just over six weeks, and only two weeks from August 1 when the official numbers are to be provided by the Director of Finance. Such a short time period makes it difficult for smaller cities to prepare an appeal while at the same time starting a new fiscal year, closing out the ALE•I'' 8'-0* !..1..! ,4.17.",Of.191115011 Oarabedntor :LEVAT I ON ' , DATE June 28,2011 6e No:11-02 MP MVO by 0. . . . . . • MITTI..7 NC Tr..413‘..y10 1..0.0.B.P..00 0.1.Cif TK O....7/.0 r.f...”I.Ig...NOT 1.1 PM....t.521 pv 11,41,...I.lar.10,MI 0.114 COW-5,C.Tri•Ot...MCT ow...,.0.1(41,i.S.....t..-,Y...13 RC.. • 01ca.sucor . imUr Int cum.. Axu wows..am or n x anotrrcv ma ult SAC ISO!.1 Er 11,1.6•17.0 tan ca q.v..n,,uccu 1.e...n.cmu-,u,a-nrc AP,.ou,uuu,r,,T., 1..i'jU co., �- ®. EXISTING I I Z1 1 oaaenOn r�o,.wo�eiwa.u.w+o.ew - - .7. ,/ O/ + 1.h e" ®iiii4 RETAIL ft) OI d VICINITY MAP m I I �® I® *ADO 5F ...JCT.A ' ,1 1 LI �� OT NOT TO SCALE `` fe ,• -!fmm, 5..G-°TED COLOR r;1 A)T W 3 - S� &7'td 7--A.,-!W- .:.'xlmi :,`P ''t- 4 ADA PATH OF TRAVEL II IrT •-1 '�a V _ .':T , �,41 -� �,so 34:5 _� :rM'-r N."' 6'BENCH ~ �,, c W f1 A I 1, ' I : ir J =.J I I er s.iX 1•4 C'':4. �,•{, f5•r �I. Te • -ia„ .q •.. ' �a moo`R SEwTING I cp # I- I' +.. ,r.,✓N 'ill�Iq • �,!•t �ide___� - 1 r.�',.;.x�ttt^:r�•�tiP•-%• " � z• ' "S .*r 9 �>019 �..+. "1 ds3: • BICYCLE- F,•- -T a. -• ` o• DIRECTIONAL 516N MO. . SIGN (5)BIC,'. -— - 1i €.`'1-,--Y, '*',4,± ,1 l MPED CONCRETE♦W BARTON RTON ROAD -- -- ` "` f- ' ' Attachment 7 GRATED DOLOR jt T ROAD RAISED MEDIAN [r'' - r w -tr,,,,,-:',*4:I'lf Y w.g�;N�'KgNi{Ip,t+.�,;: ':P'7 •Ns u E,�''R .Y arF±l� T '-'• E (STING EGNALIZ;D ...,4;,,_kg',`"„ ;.° 2,BZERg/t-• :'lij; �;ry A„F, 1, ,., SITE PLAN INTERS GTION ,*.y"M`+J a'L?- -`i • f f.- ,4 •r C •- STA THERS I COMMERCIAL -, Wit. -„ - gg � .1' ° 1 1 I \1 �+.a q1;„ z-=' re`.,^y �# SCALE 1"=30'0" I]&1'-s• Yx." ,.1 .,:;sT '.L::ti;,F'<':-..F 1;;.4 s1`1-f4- ,72.. i.,00 DATE:June 28, 2011 holed TS1BSlm(o013.IIBBAU OnWQPoAbb Case No.: 11-02 G""D" A101 Chocbed by T.A.UNPDBUSMED WORK Of MB ARanECT Alm S D SAID BAY NOT BE DIRUUR➢.MO OR O5¢OSED KNEW ME 50 5FN CONSENT OF ME,RURTECI COBB...TIN CREW RENAL AU ARTS REBR.5O Wee.R>on ATDLLooRBA OT Betsy M. Adams, City Manager CITY OF GRAND TERRACE July 6, 2011 Page 3 Initial List of As-Needed Consulting Services CITY OF GRAND TERRACE July 1,2011 Item Description Consultant Hours by Task Total Hours Total Fees Principal Associate Analyst $195 $140 $100 1 Update Agency Cash Flows 8 4 12 24 $ 3,320 2 Present Cash Flow on 7/26 4 0 0 4 $ 780 3 Prepare Amended 2008-09 State 5 2 12 19 $ 2,455 Controller's Report 4 CJUSD Pass Through Payments 1 3 8 12 $ 1,415 5 Statutory Pass Through Payments 2 3 6 11 $ 1,410 6 Analyze and Assemble Appeal 4 4 3 11 $ 1,640 information 7 Other services as directed by staff 12 5 5 22 $ 3,540 Total 103 $ 14,560 We hope this information is helpful and are available to answer any questions you may have. Sincerely, ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. • Jim Simon Principal cc: Alexa Smittle, RSG Page 12 of 12 from redevelopment agencies statewide, a decline in tax increment revenues in the past few years, and an increase in tax allocation bond debt since 2008-09. RSG would work with staff and the City's advocates on the appeal to compute these amounts and provide exhibits to support the appeal. 7. Other services as directed by staff: RSG may be needed to assist staff in presenting the appeal in person to Department of Finance staff, most of whom have little knowledge or background in local redevelopment matters. Jim Simon, or Ya-yin Isle (an Associate based in Sacramento) are available to assist. Other services may also be needed — as the interpretation of these bills becomes clearer. Our budget for this work totals $14,560, which would be billed on a time and materials basis. The graphic below summarizes the breakdown by task: Page 11 of 12 Controller's Report: RSG is aware of the fact that the County Auditor-Controller's error in the apportionment of property tax increment revenues in 2008-09 and 2009-10 have led to overstated reports of actual receipts, for which the Agency is working with the affected parties to correct. Since the 2008-09 State Controller's Report provides the basis for computing the Agency's 2011-12 community remittance payment if the City Council enacts the continuing ordinance, REDEVELOPMENT PLANNING REAL ESTATE ECONOMICS HOUSING I FINANCING REAL ESTATE ACQUISITION MIDOCUME-11asmittlelLOCALS-1\TempOELF28Uuly5 fee estimatePoage 10 of 12 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT GOVERNMENT SERVICES d effect. Page 7 of 12 n ascertaining the work actually rendered through the termination date, City shall consider completed work, work in progress and complete and incomplete reports and other documents only after delivered to City. Page 6 of 12 clude the City and its officers, employees and agents, as additional insureds. Page 4 of 12 of the State Director of Finance to discuss our appeal. RSG has staff located in Sacramento who can be available for such a meeting, if required. It should be noted that time ABX1 27 allows to prepare for the appeal is just over six weeks, and only two weeks from August 1 when the official numbers are to be provided by the Director of Finance. Such a short time period makes it difficult for smaller cities to prepare an appeal while at the same time starting a new fiscal year, closing out the ALE•I'' 8'-0* !..1..! ,4.17.",Of.191115011 Oarabedntor :LEVAT I ON ' , DATE June 28,2011 6e No:11-02 MP MVO by 0. . . . . . • MITTI..7 NC Tr..413‘..y10 1..0.0.B.P..00 0.1.Cif TK O....7/.0 r.f...”I.Ig...NOT 1.1 PM....t.521 pv 11,41,...I.lar.10,MI 0.114 COW-5,C.Tri•Ot...MCT ow...,.0.1(41,i.S.....t..-,Y...13 RC.. • 01ca.sucor . imUr Int cum.. Axu wows..am or n x anotrrcv ma ult SAC ISO!.1 Er 11,1.6•17.0 tan ca q.v..n,,uccu 1.e...n.cmu-,u,a-nrc AP,.ou,uuu,r,,T., 1..i'jU co., �- ®. EXISTING I I Z1 1 oaaenOn r�o,.wo�eiwa.u.w+o.ew - - .7. ,/ O/ + 1.h e" ®iiii4 RETAIL ft) OI d VICINITY MAP m I I �® I® *ADO 5F ...JCT.A ' ,1 1 LI �� OT NOT TO SCALE `` fe ,• -!fmm, 5..G-°TED COLOR r;1 A)T W 3 - S� &7'td 7--A.,-!W- .:.'xlmi :,`P ''t- 4 ADA PATH OF TRAVEL II IrT •-1 '�a V _ .':T , �,41 -� �,so 34:5 _� :rM'-r N."' 6'BENCH ~ �,, c W f1 A I 1, ' I : ir J =.J I I er s.iX 1•4 C'':4. �,•{, f5•r �I. Te • -ia„ .q •.. ' �a moo`R SEwTING I cp # I- I' +.. ,r.,✓N 'ill�Iq • �,!•t �ide___� - 1 r.�',.;.x�ttt^:r�•�tiP•-%• " � z• ' "S .*r 9 �>019 �..+. "1 ds3: • BICYCLE- F,•- -T a. -• ` o• DIRECTIONAL 516N MO. . SIGN (5)BIC,'. -— - 1i €.`'1-,--Y, '*',4,± ,1 l MPED CONCRETE♦W BARTON RTON ROAD -- -- ` "` f- ' ' Attachment 7 GRATED DOLOR jt T ROAD RAISED MEDIAN [r'' - r w -tr,,,,,-:',*4:I'lf Y w.g�;N�'KgNi{Ip,t+.�,;: ':P'7 •Ns u E,�''R .Y arF±l� T '-'• E (STING EGNALIZ;D ...,4;,,_kg',`"„ ;.° 2,BZERg/t-• :'lij; �;ry A„F, 1, ,., SITE PLAN INTERS GTION ,*.y"M`+J a'L?- -`i • f f.- ,4 •r C •- STA THERS I COMMERCIAL -, Wit. -„ - gg � .1' ° 1 1 I \1 �+.a q1;„ z-=' re`.,^y �# SCALE 1"=30'0" I]&1'-s• Yx." ,.1 .,:;sT '.L::ti;,F'<':-..F 1;;.4 s1`1-f4- ,72.. i.,00 DATE:June 28, 2011 holed TS1BSlm(o013.IIBBAU OnWQPoAbb Case No.: 11-02 G""D" A101 Chocbed by T.A.UNPDBUSMED WORK Of MB ARanECT Alm S D SAID BAY NOT BE DIRUUR➢.MO OR O5¢OSED KNEW ME 50 5FN CONSENT OF ME,RURTECI COBB...TIN CREW RENAL AU ARTS REBR.5O Wee.R>on ATDLLooRBA OT The Blue?taualain Cit Grand Terrace AGENDA REPORT CALIFORNIA MEETING DATE: July 26,2011 Council Item(X) CRA Item ( ) TITLE: Protest hearing for placement of special assessment liens for delinquent refuse accounts. PRESENTED BY: Matt Wirz,Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: 1)Adopt Resolution No. 2011- _ , confirming delinquent charges for solid waste collection. 2) Authorizing special assessments against the parcels listed in Exhibit"A"Attached. BACKGROUND: In 1996 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 162 which was codified as Municipal Code Chapter 5.42. The main purpose of Municipal Code Chapter 5.42, is to control integrated waste management services. In order to avoid illegal dumping or stockpiling of trash, the City instituted mandatory refuse collection requiring the franchise hauler (Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc.) to collect all trash placed at the curb and to use all reasonable means to collect fees for the service. The City and Burrtec Waste Industries Inc. (Burrtec) monitor the participation of all property owners within the City for refuse collection and proper disposal. DISCUSSION: Section 5.42.120, "Liability for Fees" identifies the financial responsibility for refuse fees, and the arrangement for the collection to meet the requirements of Chapter 5.42. The franchise hauler's responsibility is to pursue the collection of the fees. However, where the franchise hauler is unsuccessful in their attempts, the City then conducts a hearing prior to placing a lien on the property. The collection of fees will be collected at the same time and manner as other property taxes. A notice was mailed on June 17, 2011, to all property owners who have delinquent refuse accounts. The notice sent to property owners reminds them that failure to pay delinquent amounts owed would result in a lien placed on their property and provides them the opportunity to clear delinquent accounts with Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc., before July 26, 2011. To date, numerous property owners have contacted Burrtec to resolve past due accounts. COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. �� revenues in 2008-09 and 2009-10 have led to overstated reports of actual receipts, for which the Agency is working with the affected parties to correct. Since the 2008-09 State Controller's Report provides the basis for computing the Agency's 2011-12 community remittance payment if the City Council enacts the continuing ordinance, REDEVELOPMENT PLANNING REAL ESTATE ECONOMICS HOUSING I FINANCING REAL ESTATE ACQUISITION MIDOCUME-11asmittlelLOCALS-1\TempOELF28Uuly5 fee estimatePoage 10 of 12 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT GOVERNMENT SERVICES d effect. Page 7 of 12 n ascertaining the work actually rendered through the termination date, City shall consider completed work, work in progress and complete and incomplete reports and other documents only after delivered to City. Page 6 of 12 clude the City and its officers, employees and agents, as additional insureds. Page 4 of 12 of the State Director of Finance to discuss our appeal. RSG has staff located in Sacramento who can be available for such a meeting, if required. It should be noted that time ABX1 27 allows to prepare for the appeal is just over six weeks, and only two weeks from August 1 when the official numbers are to be provided by the Director of Finance. Such a short time period makes it difficult for smaller cities to prepare an appeal while at the same time starting a new fiscal year, closing out the ALE•I'' 8'-0* !..1..! ,4.17.",Of.191115011 Oarabedntor :LEVAT I ON ' , DATE June 28,2011 6e No:11-02 MP MVO by 0. . . . . . • MITTI..7 NC Tr..413‘..y10 1..0.0.B.P..00 0.1.Cif TK O....7/.0 r.f...”I.Ig...NOT 1.1 PM....t.521 pv 11,41,...I.lar.10,MI 0.114 COW-5,C.Tri•Ot...MCT ow...,.0.1(41,i.S.....t..-,Y...13 RC.. • 01ca.sucor . imUr Int cum.. Axu wows..am or n x anotrrcv ma ult SAC ISO!.1 Er 11,1.6•17.0 tan ca q.v..n,,uccu 1.e...n.cmu-,u,a-nrc AP,.ou,uuu,r,,T., 1..i'jU co., �- ®. EXISTING I I Z1 1 oaaenOn r�o,.wo�eiwa.u.w+o.ew - - .7. ,/ O/ + 1.h e" ®iiii4 RETAIL ft) OI d VICINITY MAP m I I �® I® *ADO 5F ...JCT.A ' ,1 1 LI �� OT NOT TO SCALE `` fe ,• -!fmm, 5..G-°TED COLOR r;1 A)T W 3 - S� &7'td 7--A.,-!W- .:.'xlmi :,`P ''t- 4 ADA PATH OF TRAVEL II IrT •-1 '�a V _ .':T , �,41 -� �,so 34:5 _� :rM'-r N."' 6'BENCH ~ �,, c W f1 A I 1, ' I : ir J =.J I I er s.iX 1•4 C'':4. �,•{, f5•r �I. Te • -ia„ .q •.. ' �a moo`R SEwTING I cp # I- I' +.. ,r.,✓N 'ill�Iq • �,!•t �ide___� - 1 r.�',.;.x�ttt^:r�•�tiP•-%• " � z• ' "S .*r 9 �>019 �..+. "1 ds3: • BICYCLE- F,•- -T a. -• ` o• DIRECTIONAL 516N MO. . SIGN (5)BIC,'. -— - 1i €.`'1-,--Y, '*',4,± ,1 l MPED CONCRETE♦W BARTON RTON ROAD -- -- ` "` f- ' ' Attachment 7 GRATED DOLOR jt T ROAD RAISED MEDIAN [r'' - r w -tr,,,,,-:',*4:I'lf Y w.g�;N�'KgNi{Ip,t+.�,;: ':P'7 •Ns u E,�''R .Y arF±l� T '-'• E (STING EGNALIZ;D ...,4;,,_kg',`"„ ;.° 2,BZERg/t-• :'lij; �;ry A„F, 1, ,., SITE PLAN INTERS GTION ,*.y"M`+J a'L?- -`i • f f.- ,4 •r C •- STA THERS I COMMERCIAL -, Wit. -„ - gg � .1' ° 1 1 I \1 �+.a q1;„ z-=' re`.,^y �# SCALE 1"=30'0" I]&1'-s• Yx." ,.1 .,:;sT '.L::ti;,F'<':-..F 1;;.4 s1`1-f4- ,72.. i.,00 DATE:June 28, 2011 holed TS1BSlm(o013.IIBBAU OnWQPoAbb Case No.: 11-02 G""D" A101 Chocbed by T.A.UNPDBUSMED WORK Of MB ARanECT Alm S D SAID BAY NOT BE DIRUUR➢.MO OR O5¢OSED KNEW ME 50 5FN CONSENT OF ME,RURTECI COBB...TIN CREW RENAL AU ARTS REBR.5O Wee.R>on ATDLLooRBA OT FISCAL IMPACT: The City will receive some revenue through the franchise fee when the delinquent accounts are paid through the County of San Bernardino property tax collection process. When liens are collected by the County Recorder's office, County Recorder's office will then provide the due payment to Burrtec. Burrtec will then provide the City of Grand Terrace with franchise fee portion of the collected lien amount. A processing fee will be collected in conjunction with this refuse lien for Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc. Respectfully submitted, att Wirz Manage - t An. ,st )2r Manager Approval: /1A d_47/ 7)(--) Y Bets 'M. Adams City Manager ATTACHMENTS: 1. A. Delinquent Refuse Users at 6/6/2011 B.Resolution No. 6 91,304 (862,016) CIRSG ,ple se oansut with the Cemrnm ty De.ecprrent Depattneri �i._1, 'n Page 11 of 11 RESOLUTION NO.2011- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE,COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,ADOPTING A REPORT OF DELIQUENT REFUSE USER FEE AND DIRECTING THAT SUCH DELIQUENT FEES BE COLLECTED ON THE TAX ROLL AND BE IMPOSED AS A LIEN UPON PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 5.42.120 of the City of Grand Terrace Municipal Code every person required to arrange for refuse collection or the collection of recyclable or compostables shall be liable for the service access fees and charges for such collection, whether or not collection services are utilized; and, WHEREAS,the owner, occupant or other person responsible for day-to-day operation of the premises shall make arrangements for collection of refuse to meet the requirements of this chapter. If service fees and charges are not paid as required, the owner,,and occupant each shall be jointly and severally liable for this payment. The City may collect the fees and charges plus any interest or penalties on the property tax roll for the property, NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace, does hereby resolve as follows: 1. The Delinquent Refuse User List (Exhibit"A" attached) filed with the City Clerk contains a description of each parcel of real property and the amount of the delinquent refuse service fees, for the fiscal year 2010-2011 and the,Delinquent Refuse User List is therefore approved and adopted. 2. The Delinquent Refuse User fees shall be forwarded to the San Bernardino County Auditor Controller and shall be collected on the tax toll for fiscal year 2010-2011 in the same manner, by the same person, at the same time, together with and not separately from, the general taxes. 3. The Finance Director shall file with the Auditor Controller a copy of the Delinquent Refuse User List, with a statement endorsing the signature of the City Clerk that it has been fully adopted by the City Council,together with a certified copy of this Resolution. PASSED,APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 26th day of July,2011 ATTEST: City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace erstated reports of actual receipts, for which the Agency is working with the affected parties to correct. Since the 2008-09 State Controller's Report provides the basis for computing the Agency's 2011-12 community remittance payment if the City Council enacts the continuing ordinance, REDEVELOPMENT PLANNING REAL ESTATE ECONOMICS HOUSING I FINANCING REAL ESTATE ACQUISITION MIDOCUME-11asmittlelLOCALS-1\TempOELF28Uuly5 fee estimatePoage 10 of 12 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT GOVERNMENT SERVICES d effect. Page 7 of 12 n ascertaining the work actually rendered through the termination date, City shall consider completed work, work in progress and complete and incomplete reports and other documents only after delivered to City. Page 6 of 12 clude the City and its officers, employees and agents, as additional insureds. Page 4 of 12 of the State Director of Finance to discuss our appeal. RSG has staff located in Sacramento who can be available for such a meeting, if required. It should be noted that time ABX1 27 allows to prepare for the appeal is just over six weeks, and only two weeks from August 1 when the official numbers are to be provided by the Director of Finance. Such a short time period makes it difficult for smaller cities to prepare an appeal while at the same time starting a new fiscal year, closing out the ALE•I'' 8'-0* !..1..! ,4.17.",Of.191115011 Oarabedntor :LEVAT I ON ' , DATE June 28,2011 6e No:11-02 MP MVO by 0. . . . . . • MITTI..7 NC Tr..413‘..y10 1..0.0.B.P..00 0.1.Cif TK O....7/.0 r.f...”I.Ig...NOT 1.1 PM....t.521 pv 11,41,...I.lar.10,MI 0.114 COW-5,C.Tri•Ot...MCT ow...,.0.1(41,i.S.....t..-,Y...13 RC.. • 01ca.sucor . imUr Int cum.. Axu wows..am or n x anotrrcv ma ult SAC ISO!.1 Er 11,1.6•17.0 tan ca q.v..n,,uccu 1.e...n.cmu-,u,a-nrc AP,.ou,uuu,r,,T., 1..i'jU co., �- ®. EXISTING I I Z1 1 oaaenOn r�o,.wo�eiwa.u.w+o.ew - - .7. ,/ O/ + 1.h e" ®iiii4 RETAIL ft) OI d VICINITY MAP m I I �® I® *ADO 5F ...JCT.A ' ,1 1 LI �� OT NOT TO SCALE `` fe ,• -!fmm, 5..G-°TED COLOR r;1 A)T W 3 - S� &7'td 7--A.,-!W- .:.'xlmi :,`P ''t- 4 ADA PATH OF TRAVEL II IrT •-1 '�a V _ .':T , �,41 -� �,so 34:5 _� :rM'-r N."' 6'BENCH ~ �,, c W f1 A I 1, ' I : ir J =.J I I er s.iX 1•4 C'':4. �,•{, f5•r �I. Te • -ia„ .q •.. ' �a moo`R SEwTING I cp # I- I' +.. ,r.,✓N 'ill�Iq • �,!•t �ide___� - 1 r.�',.;.x�ttt^:r�•�tiP•-%• " � z• ' "S .*r 9 �>019 �..+. "1 ds3: • BICYCLE- F,•- -T a. -• ` o• DIRECTIONAL 516N MO. . SIGN (5)BIC,'. -— - 1i €.`'1-,--Y, '*',4,± ,1 l MPED CONCRETE♦W BARTON RTON ROAD -- -- ` "` f- ' ' Attachment 7 GRATED DOLOR jt T ROAD RAISED MEDIAN [r'' - r w -tr,,,,,-:',*4:I'lf Y w.g�;N�'KgNi{Ip,t+.�,;: ':P'7 •Ns u E,�''R .Y arF±l� T '-'• E (STING EGNALIZ;D ...,4;,,_kg',`"„ ;.° 2,BZERg/t-• :'lij; �;ry A„F, 1, ,., SITE PLAN INTERS GTION ,*.y"M`+J a'L?- -`i • f f.- ,4 •r C •- STA THERS I COMMERCIAL -, Wit. -„ - gg � .1' ° 1 1 I \1 �+.a q1;„ z-=' re`.,^y �# SCALE 1"=30'0" I]&1'-s• Yx." ,.1 .,:;sT '.L::ti;,F'<':-..F 1;;.4 s1`1-f4- ,72.. i.,00 DATE:June 28, 2011 holed TS1BSlm(o013.IIBBAU OnWQPoAbb Case No.: 11-02 G""D" A101 Chocbed by T.A.UNPDBUSMED WORK Of MB ARanECT Alm S D SAID BAY NOT BE DIRUUR➢.MO OR O5¢OSED KNEW ME 50 5FN CONSENT OF ME,RURTECI COBB...TIN CREW RENAL AU ARTS REBR.5O Wee.R>on ATDLLooRBA OT RESOLUTION NO. Page 2 I, BRENDA MESA, City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, do hereby certify that Resolution No. was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace on the 26th day of July, 2011,by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: City Clerk Approved as to form: City Attorney essing fee will be collected in conjunction with this refuse lien for Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc. Respectfully submitted, att Wirz Manage - t An. ,st )2r Manager Approval: /1A d_47/ 7)(--) Y Bets 'M. Adams City Manager ATTACHMENTS: 1. A. Delinquent Refuse Users at 6/6/2011 B.Resolution No. 6 91,304 (862,016) CIRSG ,ple se oansut with the Cemrnm ty De.ecprrent Depattneri �i._1, 'n Page 11 of 11 Exhibit"A" Delinquent Refuse Users at 6/6/2011: 46;;;;:: 12451 VIVIENDA AV $238.61 1 1167 261 26 0000 12338 VIVIENDA AV $538.56 1 1167 251 64 0000 22151 RAVEN WA $286.48 I 1167 301 69 b000 22537 THRUSH ST $269.28 [ 1178 101 24 0000 22357 BLUE LUPINE CI $63.06 i 1167 322 21 0000 21944 VIVIENDA AV $134.64 1 0275 211 51 0000 __ --t- -- 22648 BRENTWOOD ST $341.84 ! 0276 291 06 0000 -1 < 12443 ORIOLE AV $269.28 . 1178 101 72 0000 1 12440 CARDINAL CT $139.88 1 1167 261 39 0000 12625 REED AV $129.41 i 1167 361 45 0000 i 22825 VISTA GRANDE WA $121.18 1 0276 451 30 0000 12311 MICHIGAN ST $131.65 1167 251 18 0000 i 22121 MAVIS ST $104.72 ; 1167 261 03 0000 22159 MAVIS ST I $118.71 1 1167 261 07 0000 21910 VIVIENDA AV $136.14 0275 211 58 0000 22609 CARDINAL ST $67.32 1178 101 42 0000 12742 GARDEN AV $55.58 , 1167 211 36 0000 -. 12709 ROYAL AV $134.64 ! 1167 211 31 0000 ' 22647 PICO ST $67.32 ! 1178 201 65 0000 12086 LA CADENA DR $269.28 0275 083 32 0000 , . 22668 TANAGER ST $231.60 , 1178 201 40 0000 -- - ; -1 11947 VIVIENDA CT $388.44 I 0275 271 09 0000 11840 DELLA LN $67.32 ' 0275 071 24 0000 , 22241 KENTFIELD ST $269.28 1167 271 54 0000 - r ----- --- - 22540 KENTFIELD ST $124.28 1178 151 07 0000 22245 LARK ST $269.28 1 1167 271 47 0000 I1 ----------------- - -- , 12512 WARBLER AV 1 $269.28 • 1178 151 23 0000 12244 MIRADO AV 1 $134.64 1 1167 321 19 0000 22656 LARK ST I $67.32 ; 1178 151 60 0000 ! < 22362 RAVEN WA $109.16 1 1167 381 42 0000 12346 VIVIENDA AV $134.64 1 1167 251 63 0000 22275 DOVE ST $269.28 < 1167 281 08 0000 21983 TANAGER ST _I $134.64 • 1167 211 18 0000 22005 TANAGER ST 1 $269.28 1167 211 47 0000 22032 TANAGER ST 1 $388.44 ' 1167 211 51 0000 1 , 21962 GRAND TERRACE RD I $69.15 0275 223 36 0000 22864 ARLISS DR ! ; $293.64 0276 343 23 0000 _ 1 L ESTATE ECONOMICS HOUSING I FINANCING REAL ESTATE ACQUISITION MIDOCUME-11asmittlelLOCALS-1\TempOELF28Uuly5 fee estimatePoage 10 of 12 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT GOVERNMENT SERVICES d effect. Page 7 of 12 n ascertaining the work actually rendered through the termination date, City shall consider completed work, work in progress and complete and incomplete reports and other documents only after delivered to City. Page 6 of 12 clude the City and its officers, employees and agents, as additional insureds. Page 4 of 12 of the State Director of Finance to discuss our appeal. RSG has staff located in Sacramento who can be available for such a meeting, if required. It should be noted that time ABX1 27 allows to prepare for the appeal is just over six weeks, and only two weeks from August 1 when the official numbers are to be provided by the Director of Finance. Such a short time period makes it difficult for smaller cities to prepare an appeal while at the same time starting a new fiscal year, closing out the ALE•I'' 8'-0* !..1..! ,4.17.",Of.191115011 Oarabedntor :LEVAT I ON ' , DATE June 28,2011 6e No:11-02 MP MVO by 0. . . . . . • MITTI..7 NC Tr..413‘..y10 1..0.0.B.P..00 0.1.Cif TK O....7/.0 r.f...”I.Ig...NOT 1.1 PM....t.521 pv 11,41,...I.lar.10,MI 0.114 COW-5,C.Tri•Ot...MCT ow...,.0.1(41,i.S.....t..-,Y...13 RC.. • 01ca.sucor . imUr Int cum.. Axu wows..am or n x anotrrcv ma ult SAC ISO!.1 Er 11,1.6•17.0 tan ca q.v..n,,uccu 1.e...n.cmu-,u,a-nrc AP,.ou,uuu,r,,T., 1..i'jU co., �- ®. EXISTING I I Z1 1 oaaenOn r�o,.wo�eiwa.u.w+o.ew - - .7. ,/ O/ + 1.h e" ®iiii4 RETAIL ft) OI d VICINITY MAP m I I �® I® *ADO 5F ...JCT.A ' ,1 1 LI �� OT NOT TO SCALE `` fe ,• -!fmm, 5..G-°TED COLOR r;1 A)T W 3 - S� &7'td 7--A.,-!W- .:.'xlmi :,`P ''t- 4 ADA PATH OF TRAVEL II IrT •-1 '�a V _ .':T , �,41 -� �,so 34:5 _� :rM'-r N."' 6'BENCH ~ �,, c W f1 A I 1, ' I : ir J =.J I I er s.iX 1•4 C'':4. �,•{, f5•r �I. Te • -ia„ .q •.. ' �a moo`R SEwTING I cp # I- I' +.. ,r.,✓N 'ill�Iq • �,!•t �ide___� - 1 r.�',.;.x�ttt^:r�•�tiP•-%• " � z• ' "S .*r 9 �>019 �..+. "1 ds3: • BICYCLE- F,•- -T a. -• ` o• DIRECTIONAL 516N MO. . SIGN (5)BIC,'. -— - 1i €.`'1-,--Y, '*',4,± ,1 l MPED CONCRETE♦W BARTON RTON ROAD -- -- ` "` f- ' ' Attachment 7 GRATED DOLOR jt T ROAD RAISED MEDIAN [r'' - r w -tr,,,,,-:',*4:I'lf Y w.g�;N�'KgNi{Ip,t+.�,;: ':P'7 •Ns u E,�''R .Y arF±l� T '-'• E (STING EGNALIZ;D ...,4;,,_kg',`"„ ;.° 2,BZERg/t-• :'lij; �;ry A„F, 1, ,., SITE PLAN INTERS GTION ,*.y"M`+J a'L?- -`i • f f.- ,4 •r C •- STA THERS I COMMERCIAL -, Wit. -„ - gg � .1' ° 1 1 I \1 �+.a q1;„ z-=' re`.,^y �# SCALE 1"=30'0" I]&1'-s• Yx." ,.1 .,:;sT '.L::ti;,F'<':-..F 1;;.4 s1`1-f4- ,72.. i.,00 DATE:June 28, 2011 holed TS1BSlm(o013.IIBBAU OnWQPoAbb Case No.: 11-02 G""D" A101 Chocbed by T.A.UNPDBUSMED WORK Of MB ARanECT Alm S D SAID BAY NOT BE DIRUUR➢.MO OR O5¢OSED KNEW ME 50 5FN CONSENT OF ME,RURTECI COBB...TIN CREW RENAL AU ARTS REBR.5O Wee.R>on ATDLLooRBA OT / 33144TVV|N ��NYOND� $134.64 0376261160000 __--_ _ _ ........ _- _ � _ ~ ' 12SS6REEDAV $269.2Q 116737131OOOO _ _ _ _ ! 119S1K0OU�TVER�O�A� $99.75 _ 1O27G1811OOOOO ' 23335CARHA0T/*J $134.64 | O2753�]O7OOOO __ - _........ 12668K4/CH|GAN5T $99.O0 | 11672O1OSOOOO � -- --- - f - - / 12��2REEDAV | �2 .4O 16�341S1OOOO ._ __ _ __ + � _�� 1 --_ _ - _ ------- 226]STANAGERST $224.4O 11782O133OOOO 22535FRANKL|NST ��G9.�8 | 1178171070000 / - -- - - - - | ----- i 13G4OGARDENAV �274.76 1167301240000 ___ _ - __ _ _ _ _ 12530M|RAD(3AV ��S.9O ' 11673S168O OOO ---------' --------------| - ----------- ------ ----- ---- - - � 1219GCOUNTRYCLUQL� | $12G.3� ! 1178O2111OOOO � - - -�- -- f - - - -- 11881ARUS8DR $G7.�� | O27626SO6OOOO --- T -- - ---- 32O65OEBERRY�T � $134.G4 1167171OSOOOO _ _ ____ _ �- _ _ -- -_ 12S32 PASCAL AV $I69.28 116� 27137OOOO / 222S4 LARK ST �44.8B ' 1167��149OOOO _- - __-- _ ~ 1238SVV|LLETAV $36928 - -- - - -- - - -- -'' - ------ 1167 33123 0000 ---- - 'i / 1262OSANDBURGVVA �33.91 ' � , 12770DARmNNAV __$134.64 1167 37176000O 22648[AND|NALST $269.ZB 117Q1O166OOOO � -- - - -- ---- .... - - - -- - -- - | 22539KENTF|ELDST �269.2Q | 117B1S118OOOO � - - -- ' � -- f--'--�-- -- ---- 2367O MAIN 5T | $67.32 117822182OOOO .3S1OKH|�H-- N [ --- -- 6�. -- '-� 1167 -- ---- --- ----------'- - .... - - � � 9 11 - -- - | � 1���� � .... O ] � - - --- - 32808 &4|R|AMVVA J6�23 �269.28 i O2O2OOOO � 23S79FLAKH|NGOST �6�.�2 1167371460000 ' 23OS4DE BERRY 8T_ _ $269.28 _ _ ' 116716127OOOO ____ / 226OSLAPA|X ST .O1 O3161OOOO __-_ - _ -- --- _ ' 23007RENELN ~ .88 161O7OOO__O . 3Z79OVANBURENST / �3OGOS | 11781114QOOOO _ - _ �__-_-. _ _ _- � 22Z08CARHARTAV $119.28 | O27S271OSOOOO - - --�� f - - --- - -- , 22396DESOTOOT ___ _ _ 1167331210000 J277SV|STAG0ANDE\�A | O�OOOO -__ 227SSM|R|A&1VVA 6 � 733 O27G223O9OOOO ---�^ - --- � � ..... - L --- - -- -- - Z3O44]EN�E� CT $116.72 1178OS1S�OOOO - ___. _ . Z26S1 ROBIN VVA ' $6� O8 117Q22165OOOO . _---___ Z3O4SPEA[OC�CT �2Z4.4O | O376S�1ZOOOOO . _ -__- ___ J2265 FULMAR PL | �1S�.O0 11672S14OUOOO -__ _- 326OSK8|R|AMVV/\ 16O.O� O3761�3O4OOOO ` -_ _ - - _ - _ _ - 12791REEOAV / 1167371090000 22673K8|R|AMVVA $S7.OQ O27G323O4OOOO - - ^ --- -- - 13Q71V|V|ENDAAV | $S9.8� | 1167�O1SOOOOO - - -r - - - - - - 3307000{|N [T | $243.80 / O276S31�OOOOO -- MVO by 0. . . . . . • MITTI..7 NC Tr..413‘..y10 1..0.0.B.P..00 0.1.Cif TK O....7/.0 r.f...”I.Ig...NOT 1.1 PM....t.521 pv 11,41,...I.lar.10,MI 0.114 COW-5,C.Tri•Ot...MCT ow...,.0.1(41,i.S.....t..-,Y...13 RC.. • 01ca.sucor . imUr Int cum.. Axu wows..am or n x anotrrcv ma ult SAC ISO!.1 Er 11,1.6•17.0 tan ca q.v..n,,uccu 1.e...n.cmu-,u,a-nrc AP,.ou,uuu,r,,T., 1..i'jU co., �- ®. EXISTING I I Z1 1 oaaenOn r�o,.wo�eiwa.u.w+o.ew - - .7. ,/ O/ + 1.h e" ®iiii4 RETAIL ft) OI d VICINITY MAP m I I �® I® *ADO 5F ...JCT.A ' ,1 1 LI �� OT NOT TO SCALE `` fe ,• -!fmm, 5..G-°TED COLOR r;1 A)T W 3 - S� &7'td 7--A.,-!W- .:.'xlmi :,`P ''t- 4 ADA PATH OF TRAVEL II IrT •-1 '�a V _ .':T , �,41 -� �,so 34:5 _� :rM'-r N."' 6'BENCH ~ �,, c W f1 A I 1, ' I : ir J =.J I I er s.iX 1•4 C'':4. �,•{, f5•r �I. Te • -ia„ .q •.. ' �a moo`R SEwTING I cp # I- I' +.. ,r.,✓N 'ill�Iq • �,!•t �ide___� - 1 r.�',.;.x�ttt^:r�•�tiP•-%• " � z• ' "S .*r 9 �>019 �..+. "1 ds3: • BICYCLE- F,•- -T a. -• ` o• DIRECTIONAL 516N MO. . SIGN (5)BIC,'. -— - 1i €.`'1-,--Y, '*',4,± ,1 l MPED CONCRETE♦W BARTON RTON ROAD -- -- ` "` f- ' ' Attachment 7 GRATED DOLOR jt T ROAD RAISED MEDIAN [r'' - r w -tr,,,,,-:',*4:I'lf Y w.g�;N�'KgNi{Ip,t+.�,;: ':P'7 •Ns u E,�''R .Y arF±l� T '-'• E (STING EGNALIZ;D ...,4;,,_kg',`"„ ;.° 2,BZERg/t-• :'lij; �;ry A„F, 1, ,., SITE PLAN INTERS GTION ,*.y"M`+J a'L?- -`i • f f.- ,4 •r C •- STA THERS I COMMERCIAL -, Wit. -„ - gg � .1' ° 1 1 I \1 �+.a q1;„ z-=' re`.,^y �# SCALE 1"=30'0" I]&1'-s• Yx." ,.1 .,:;sT '.L::ti;,F'<':-..F 1;;.4 s1`1-f4- ,72.. i.,00 DATE:June 28, 2011 holed TS1BSlm(o013.IIBBAU OnWQPoAbb Case No.: 11-02 G""D" A101 Chocbed by T.A.UNPDBUSMED WORK Of MB ARanECT Alm S D SAID BAY NOT BE DIRUUR➢.MO OR O5¢OSED KNEW ME 50 5FN CONSENT OF ME,RURTECI COBB...TIN CREW RENAL AU ARTS REBR.5O Wee.R>on ATDLLooRBA OT 22706 ARLISS DR $17184 0276 27102 0000 22149 MAVIS ST 11-$-24-6.84 1167 26106 0000 .. ................ .......... .............. $195.76 1 1178 05134 0000 22994 HAMPTON CT 22347 FRANKLIN ST $40.39 ; 0277 25113 0000 ----------- ------------ .... ....... 22159 MAVIS ST $204.01 1167 26107 0000 .... .................. ........ ............... .......... .. ..... ........... 22594 ETON DR $246.84 0276 282 010000 .... ........... ............................ 22730 RAVEN WA $199.50 1178 231410000 22120 TANAGER ST $210.19 1167 29122 0000 .. ........ .... .... ....... 23023 DE BERRY ST $246.84 1178 12118 0000 ................... ...... .. ..... .... ......... 22568 ROBIN WA $269.28 1178 22138 0000 12572 MIRADO AV $367.07 1167 35118 0000 ............ ................... 1651 BOSTICK AV $32.68 0163 48113 0000 .............- ---------------- ........... 122275 .... .......... $.67....3.2 1167 25122 0000 f - ......... -------------- ... ............. 12827 REED AV .$157.83 1 1167 38106 0000 112749..R-0YAL AV -..$.246-.84 ....... 1167 21127 0000 ............... 1 12580 M I RADO AV $246.84 1167 35117 0000 ............. ............. .. ....................- 11839 ETON DR $179.52 0276 23104 0000 12535 CRANE ST $246.84 1178 16168 0000 ........... 11.2113 PALM CT............. ...... $246.84 1 1178 02128 0000 ...... .............. .1 ............... ...... .... 12247 PASCAL AV $246.84 1167 24133 0000 ............ ;__22381 PICO ST $146.84 167 37124 0000 21899 VIVIENDA AV $246.84 1 0275 223 49 0000 ...................................... ......... ......------------------ 22233 LADERA ST $246.84 1167 30124 0000 $246.84 ,-" ---------- 22356 BLUE LUPINE Cl 1167 322 24 0000 22425 TANAGER ST $1.69.80 1167 37178 0000 12629 EAGLE CT $246.84 1178 17148 0000 -- ----------- ............... ...... ....... ....... ........... ... .......... ...... 12451 VIVI E N DA AV $67.32 1167 26126 0000 .............. 22313 MCCLARREN ST $106.96 ---- 0275 242 010000 22606 KENTFIELD ST $171.84 1178 151510000 ........... ...... 12718 SANDBURG WA $67.32 ........... 1167 21166 0000 ... ............ 22371 PICO ST $246.84 1167 37125 0000 12420 QUAIL LN $99.75 1178 Ill 79 0000 ------- -------- ......... ...... ................ .......... 22463 KENTFIELD ST $35.05 1167 35109 0000 ............ ........... ............ .... ......... 22359 FLAMINGO ST $369.43 1167 37148 0000 2.2.444 D E B E R RY ST $269.28 1167 32177 0000 ........... i-1.2671.THOMAS CT---.. ............. ---.-$269.28 1167 28144 0000 ................. 12804 REED AV $388.44 1167 30125 0000 22176 CARHART AV $269.28 i 0275 27108 0000 22141 RAVEN WA $67.32 1167 30168 0000 22139 TANAGER ST $269.28 .... ..... ... ........... 1167 29117 0000 12270 MICHIGAN ST $269.28 1167 16123 0000 0.1.Cif TK O....7/.0 r.f...”I.Ig...NOT 1.1 PM....t.521 pv 11,41,...I.lar.10,MI 0.114 COW-5,C.Tri•Ot...MCT ow...,.0.1(41,i.S.....t..-,Y...13 RC.. • 01ca.sucor . imUr Int cum.. Axu wows..am or n x anotrrcv ma ult SAC ISO!.1 Er 11,1.6•17.0 tan ca q.v..n,,uccu 1.e...n.cmu-,u,a-nrc AP,.ou,uuu,r,,T., 1..i'jU co., �- ®. EXISTING I I Z1 1 oaaenOn r�o,.wo�eiwa.u.w+o.ew - - .7. ,/ O/ + 1.h e" ®iiii4 RETAIL ft) OI d VICINITY MAP m I I �® I® *ADO 5F ...JCT.A ' ,1 1 LI �� OT NOT TO SCALE `` fe ,• -!fmm, 5..G-°TED COLOR r;1 A)T W 3 - S� &7'td 7--A.,-!W- .:.'xlmi :,`P ''t- 4 ADA PATH OF TRAVEL II IrT •-1 '�a V _ .':T , �,41 -� �,so 34:5 _� :rM'-r N."' 6'BENCH ~ �,, c W f1 A I 1, ' I : ir J =.J I I er s.iX 1•4 C'':4. �,•{, f5•r �I. Te • -ia„ .q •.. ' �a moo`R SEwTING I cp # I- I' +.. ,r.,✓N 'ill�Iq • �,!•t �ide___� - 1 r.�',.;.x�ttt^:r�•�tiP•-%• " � z• ' "S .*r 9 �>019 �..+. "1 ds3: • BICYCLE- F,•- -T a. -• ` o• DIRECTIONAL 516N MO. . SIGN (5)BIC,'. -— - 1i €.`'1-,--Y, '*',4,± ,1 l MPED CONCRETE♦W BARTON RTON ROAD -- -- ` "` f- ' ' Attachment 7 GRATED DOLOR jt T ROAD RAISED MEDIAN [r'' - r w -tr,,,,,-:',*4:I'lf Y w.g�;N�'KgNi{Ip,t+.�,;: ':P'7 •Ns u E,�''R .Y arF±l� T '-'• E (STING EGNALIZ;D ...,4;,,_kg',`"„ ;.° 2,BZERg/t-• :'lij; �;ry A„F, 1, ,., SITE PLAN INTERS GTION ,*.y"M`+J a'L?- -`i • f f.- ,4 •r C •- STA THERS I COMMERCIAL -, Wit. -„ - gg � .1' ° 1 1 I \1 �+.a q1;„ z-=' re`.,^y �# SCALE 1"=30'0" I]&1'-s• Yx." ,.1 .,:;sT '.L::ti;,F'<':-..F 1;;.4 s1`1-f4- ,72.. i.,00 DATE:June 28, 2011 holed TS1BSlm(o013.IIBBAU OnWQPoAbb Case No.: 11-02 G""D" A101 Chocbed by T.A.UNPDBUSMED WORK Of MB ARanECT Alm S D SAID BAY NOT BE DIRUUR➢.MO OR O5¢OSED KNEW ME 50 5FN CONSENT OF ME,RURTECI COBB...TIN CREW RENAL AU ARTS REBR.5O Wee.R>on ATDLLooRBA OT ' 1265OVV�RBLERAV ' 1178171O5OOOO -_ - -_ _ - - - ' 3373O LARK ST Q 11781G1 �SOOOD _ ___- _____' Z277O VAN BURENST | $3O7.2O 117811127OOOO _ - - - _ - - / / 3272SBLUEB|RDLN �l8Q.44 1178 Ill ]4OOOO _ _ � ! 13742 REED AV _ | $67.32 1167 291 52OOOO_ / 32442P|CQST �ZG928 116�361O4OOOO ' _ _-_-_ __ __ - --_- _ 2311S VISTA GRANDEVVA $182.51 431O7OO�O / \ ------------- --------------- -------------- ---- ---- ---'--- ' ' / I32QSVVEST\�000�T $269.28 / O3764Q2O1OOOO __- --__- ____ __ _�_- _ _-_'_- / ' 118708URNS AV 369.28 O27S2821 70000 __- ��_-____ Z3O81OE8ERRYST ' �4O3.B2 116� 171OGOOOO ! _ _ _-_____ ' 33636 FLAMINGO ST $346.96 11783O16OOOOO | _ _ _-__- _ - - - - / 23015VVRENST �l17.44 / 11781213�OOOO ' _ - _ | L12454V|VIEN AA 1�4.64 116��611�OOOO DV _____ ' � ___ _ | ' 12G2SPRU|TT[T $12G.41 117818127OOOO - - --- ----- ----- -----'--- f- --'-'----'----'-- - - '' 12621FRANQUN \NA $134.64 | 1178171310000 ----------- ���' ! 1241O[�UAJLLN 64 ' 117Q1117QOODO - _ --- __ __ _^_ __ _ - i 22S48DE8ERRYST �269.38 1178O3135ODDO | _--' 236O6P|CO�T $67.�3 117Q1716OOOOO - _- _---_- / 1I232K|NWSTQN5| $67.32 1178O411QOOOO f - - 12033PRES|QN S| $269.28 O27621317OOOO ' ' T ----- - - - - - - IlU/5 MOUNT VERNON AV | 0276385030000 IZ248 WARBLER AV 1178O�1�SOODO � -- _ -_ ' - -'-- Z3254 LARK 5T ------ - ` . 23O31DE8ERQYST � 1167171O4OOOO / ' ------ --- - - -- --- --� --- r - - - --- ' 12751VV|LK8A[AV / 117Q2O117OOOO � - -- - ................... ----- - --- i _ 1I21SM|[H|GANST 8 1167241O2OOOO ' r - - � --' -- 22142RAVENVVA | $2GS.3O | 11673O161OOOU ' / - _ - / 13434P/\L|KAVVA 1167Z6169OOOO _ ____- __. _ _ ' 33999DEBERRYST �2O1.96 11781212OOOOO ' _ ____� _ -__. _ _-___ �_- _____-_ _ - 32321KENTF|EL0ST �1O8.S6 . 1167351540000 _ 13466K0|CH|8ANST ��QQ/�4 11G71D1O8OOOO ___- _ _. _----- / z2u55numEY HILL uK O376�22O6OOOO - --T----- - .............. ------ !_12841oxuxv|mum | 1167 3Q114OOOO | | � �-------' ----' -----'-` ------- - ------ '- ' . ����� �m�wnumvv� / 1178171330000 - - ! | 12S34 REED AV / 11672712OOOOO _ | 328S9 ��|R|AK� VVA O2762�4O4OOOO _ - _^ ___ _ - __ 124OQVVARBLERAV 6 ' 11781O14SOOOO � _ . 12026PRESTON ST _ $239.87 L0276303450000 2267OBRE�TVVOODST .28 O276391O4DOOO �� 22350P|[O5T ' $496.24 1167361100000 28144 0000 ................. 12804 REED AV $388.44 1167 30125 0000 22176 CARHART AV $269.28 i 0275 27108 0000 22141 RAVEN WA $67.32 1167 30168 0000 22139 TANAGER ST $269.28 .... ..... ... ........... 1167 29117 0000 12270 MICHIGAN ST $269.28 1167 16123 0000 0.1.Cif TK O....7/.0 r.f...”I.Ig...NOT 1.1 PM....t.521 pv 11,41,...I.lar.10,MI 0.114 COW-5,C.Tri•Ot...MCT ow...,.0.1(41,i.S.....t..-,Y...13 RC.. • 01ca.sucor . imUr Int cum.. Axu wows..am or n x anotrrcv ma ult SAC ISO!.1 Er 11,1.6•17.0 tan ca q.v..n,,uccu 1.e...n.cmu-,u,a-nrc AP,.ou,uuu,r,,T., 1..i'jU co., �- ®. EXISTING I I Z1 1 oaaenOn r�o,.wo�eiwa.u.w+o.ew - - .7. ,/ O/ + 1.h e" ®iiii4 RETAIL ft) OI d VICINITY MAP m I I �® I® *ADO 5F ...JCT.A ' ,1 1 LI �� OT NOT TO SCALE `` fe ,• -!fmm, 5..G-°TED COLOR r;1 A)T W 3 - S� &7'td 7--A.,-!W- .:.'xlmi :,`P ''t- 4 ADA PATH OF TRAVEL II IrT •-1 '�a V _ .':T , �,41 -� �,so 34:5 _� :rM'-r N."' 6'BENCH ~ �,, c W f1 A I 1, ' I : ir J =.J I I er s.iX 1•4 C'':4. �,•{, f5•r �I. Te • -ia„ .q •.. ' �a moo`R SEwTING I cp # I- I' +.. ,r.,✓N 'ill�Iq • �,!•t �ide___� - 1 r.�',.;.x�ttt^:r�•�tiP•-%• " � z• ' "S .*r 9 �>019 �..+. "1 ds3: • BICYCLE- F,•- -T a. -• ` o• DIRECTIONAL 516N MO. . SIGN (5)BIC,'. -— - 1i €.`'1-,--Y, '*',4,± ,1 l MPED CONCRETE♦W BARTON RTON ROAD -- -- ` "` f- ' ' Attachment 7 GRATED DOLOR jt T ROAD RAISED MEDIAN [r'' - r w -tr,,,,,-:',*4:I'lf Y w.g�;N�'KgNi{Ip,t+.�,;: ':P'7 •Ns u E,�''R .Y arF±l� T '-'• E (STING EGNALIZ;D ...,4;,,_kg',`"„ ;.° 2,BZERg/t-• :'lij; �;ry A„F, 1, ,., SITE PLAN INTERS GTION ,*.y"M`+J a'L?- -`i • f f.- ,4 •r C •- STA THERS I COMMERCIAL -, Wit. -„ - gg � .1' ° 1 1 I \1 �+.a q1;„ z-=' re`.,^y �# SCALE 1"=30'0" I]&1'-s• Yx." ,.1 .,:;sT '.L::ti;,F'<':-..F 1;;.4 s1`1-f4- ,72.. i.,00 DATE:June 28, 2011 holed TS1BSlm(o013.IIBBAU OnWQPoAbb Case No.: 11-02 G""D" A101 Chocbed by T.A.UNPDBUSMED WORK Of MB ARanECT Alm S D SAID BAY NOT BE DIRUUR➢.MO OR O5¢OSED KNEW ME 50 5FN CONSENT OF ME,RURTECI COBB...TIN CREW RENAL AU ARTS REBR.5O Wee.R>on ATDLLooRBA OT / 33262&8CCU\RRENST 380000 _ _ _ __'������ 22SS4K8A|NST $26928 1178221710000 ' ---- -------- - ----- - --- -T -.............. ----------- ----- -� | 11734ETONOR | $�-344O 27G344O3DOOO . -....... - _ _ _ ' O - -- - -- -- - - - ! $I0196 1167291150000 ^2'5^ OOOO ...^.,.'`~'`. -- - --- 1�-_____ .......... ___ � / 33S77DESOT�ST 1178031I90000 | 12740 SANDBURG WA $169.28 1167 211630000 �G3 040000 iZ237OFLAK8UVGOST ________ _____ 14 11G73�128O�OO ___ 22196KnCCLARRENST $2G9.38 0275341050000 r ----'------- ------'----- ----------- ----- 22664KH|N<�N/\OR $3O1.96 120000 / | - -- - ----- - - ` 2278OK8|R|AK8VVA $67.32 040000 - -__ _ _ _ - -___ | 32J9QK�[[LANREN�T 3 1310000 ' ----- -'-- ---- - -----^---- - ----- -r------- - ----- -- - ` 12476 WARBLER/V $209.44 1178101500000 32353 VAN BURENST $116.69 1167351650000 /_ _ __ _ �����_ ���,���.�� ' $134.64 | 1178171310000 ----------- ���' ! 1241O[�UAJLLN 64 ' 117Q1117QOODO - _ --- __ __ _^_ __ _ - i 22S48DE8ERRYST �269.38 1178O3135ODDO | _--' 236O6P|CO�T $67.�3 117Q1716OOOOO - _- _---_- / 1I232K|NWSTQN5| $67.32 1178O411QOOOO f - - 12033PRES|QN S| $269.28 O27621317OOOO ' ' T ----- - - - - - - IlU/5 MOUNT VERNON AV | 0276385030000 IZ248 WARBLER AV 1178O�1�SOODO � -- _ -_ ' - -'-- Z3254 LARK 5T ------ - ` . 23O31DE8ERQYST � 1167171O4OOOO / ' ------ --- - - -- --- --� --- r - - - --- ' 12751VV|LK8A[AV / 117Q2O117OOOO � - -- - ................... ----- - --- i _ 1I21SM|[H|GANST 8 1167241O2OOOO ' r - - � --' -- 22142RAVENVVA | $2GS.3O | 11673O161OOOU ' / - _ - / 13434P/\L|KAVVA 1167Z6169OOOO _ ____- __. _ _ ' 33999DEBERRYST �2O1.96 11781212OOOOO ' _ ____� _ -__. _ _-___ �_- _____-_ _ - 32321KENTF|EL0ST �1O8.S6 . 1167351540000 _ 13466K0|CH|8ANST ��QQ/�4 11G71D1O8OOOO ___- _ _. _----- / z2u55numEY HILL uK O376�22O6OOOO - --T----- - .............. ------ !_12841oxuxv|mum | 1167 3Q114OOOO | | � �-------' ----' -----'-` ------- - ------ '- ' . ����� �m�wnumvv� / 1178171330000 - - ! | 12S34 REED AV / 11672712OOOOO _ | 328S9 ��|R|AK� VVA O2762�4O4OOOO _ - _^ ___ _ - __ 124OQVVARBLERAV 6 ' 11781O14SOOOO � _ . 12026PRESTON ST _ $239.87 L0276303450000 2267OBRE�TVVOODST .28 O276391O4DOOO �� 22350P|[O5T ' $496.24 1167361100000 28144 0000 ................. 12804 REED AV $388.44 1167 30125 0000 22176 CARHART AV $269.28 i 0275 27108 0000 22141 RAVEN WA $67.32 1167 30168 0000 22139 TANAGER ST $269.28 .... ..... ... ........... 1167 29117 0000 12270 MICHIGAN ST $269.28 1167 16123 0000 0.1.Cif TK O....7/.0 r.f...”I.Ig...NOT 1.1 PM....t.521 pv 11,41,...I.lar.10,MI 0.114 COW-5,C.Tri•Ot...MCT ow...,.0.1(41,i.S.....t..-,Y...13 RC.. • 01ca.sucor . imUr Int cum.. Axu wows..am or n x anotrrcv ma ult SAC ISO!.1 Er 11,1.6•17.0 tan ca q.v..n,,uccu 1.e...n.cmu-,u,a-nrc AP,.ou,uuu,r,,T., 1..i'jU co., �- ®. EXISTING I I Z1 1 oaaenOn r�o,.wo�eiwa.u.w+o.ew - - .7. ,/ O/ + 1.h e" ®iiii4 RETAIL ft) OI d VICINITY MAP m I I �® I® *ADO 5F ...JCT.A ' ,1 1 LI �� OT NOT TO SCALE `` fe ,• -!fmm, 5..G-°TED COLOR r;1 A)T W 3 - S� &7'td 7--A.,-!W- .:.'xlmi :,`P ''t- 4 ADA PATH OF TRAVEL II IrT •-1 '�a V _ .':T , �,41 -� �,so 34:5 _� :rM'-r N."' 6'BENCH ~ �,, c W f1 A I 1, ' I : ir J =.J I I er s.iX 1•4 C'':4. �,•{, f5•r �I. Te • -ia„ .q •.. ' �a moo`R SEwTING I cp # I- I' +.. ,r.,✓N 'ill�Iq • �,!•t �ide___� - 1 r.�',.;.x�ttt^:r�•�tiP•-%• " � z• ' "S .*r 9 �>019 �..+. "1 ds3: • BICYCLE- F,•- -T a. -• ` o• DIRECTIONAL 516N MO. . SIGN (5)BIC,'. -— - 1i €.`'1-,--Y, '*',4,± ,1 l MPED CONCRETE♦W BARTON RTON ROAD -- -- ` "` f- ' ' Attachment 7 GRATED DOLOR jt T ROAD RAISED MEDIAN [r'' - r w -tr,,,,,-:',*4:I'lf Y w.g�;N�'KgNi{Ip,t+.�,;: ':P'7 •Ns u E,�''R .Y arF±l� T '-'• E (STING EGNALIZ;D ...,4;,,_kg',`"„ ;.° 2,BZERg/t-• :'lij; �;ry A„F, 1, ,., SITE PLAN INTERS GTION ,*.y"M`+J a'L?- -`i • f f.- ,4 •r C •- STA THERS I COMMERCIAL -, Wit. -„ - gg � .1' ° 1 1 I \1 �+.a q1;„ z-=' re`.,^y �# SCALE 1"=30'0" I]&1'-s• Yx." ,.1 .,:;sT '.L::ti;,F'<':-..F 1;;.4 s1`1-f4- ,72.. i.,00 DATE:June 28, 2011 holed TS1BSlm(o013.IIBBAU OnWQPoAbb Case No.: 11-02 G""D" A101 Chocbed by T.A.UNPDBUSMED WORK Of MB ARanECT Alm S D SAID BAY NOT BE DIRUUR➢.MO OR O5¢OSED KNEW ME 50 5FN CONSENT OF ME,RURTECI COBB...TIN CREW RENAL AU ARTS REBR.5O Wee.R>on ATDLLooRBA OT The Blue Mountain Ltilr Grand Terrace AGENDA REPORT CALIFORNIA MEETING DATE: - July 26, 2011 Council Item ( X ) CRA Item ( ) TITLE: Seventeenth Amendment to Law Enforcement Services Contract No. 94-797 with the County of San Bernardino and Update on Local. Government Vehicle License, Fee Funds, SEBA Membership Vote and Corresponding. Impacts to Half Funded Patrol Deputy Position PRESENTED BY: Betsy M.'Adams, City Manager RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Seventeenth Amendment to Law Enforcement Services Contract No. 94-797 with the County of San Bernardino, which restores the half .funded Patrol Deputy position to a fully funded position, and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement. BACKGROUND: When the City Council adopted:the Fiscal Year (FY) 2011-12 budget on June 28, 2011, the following two issues existed Which could impact restoring the half funded Patrol Deputy position to a fully funded Patrol Deputy: Status of the Citizens Option: for Public Safety (COPS) grants and booking fees subventions after June 30, 2011 when the 0.15 percent Vehicle License Fees (VLF) increase sunsets. ■ Status of the San Bernardino County Safety Employee Benefit Association (SEBA) - membership vote on contract concessions proposed by the County of San Bernardino.. The final outcome on each of these issues was mixed, trough favorable enough for the Council to consider restoring the half funded Patrol Deputy position to a fully funded position. DISCUSSION: On June 30, 2011, the Governor signed Senate. Bill (SB) 89 as part of the budget legislation. SB 89 restored funding for the COPS grants and. booking fee subventions by diverting the local government VLF revenue (general fund per capita allocation) to COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. Fp 1178O�1�SOODO � -- _ -_ ' - -'-- Z3254 LARK 5T ------ - ` . 23O31DE8ERQYST � 1167171O4OOOO / ' ------ --- - - -- --- --� --- r - - - --- ' 12751VV|LK8A[AV / 117Q2O117OOOO � - -- - ................... ----- - --- i _ 1I21SM|[H|GANST 8 1167241O2OOOO ' r - - � --' -- 22142RAVENVVA | $2GS.3O | 11673O161OOOU ' / - _ - / 13434P/\L|KAVVA 1167Z6169OOOO _ ____- __. _ _ ' 33999DEBERRYST �2O1.96 11781212OOOOO ' _ ____� _ -__. _ _-___ �_- _____-_ _ - 32321KENTF|EL0ST �1O8.S6 . 1167351540000 _ 13466K0|CH|8ANST ��QQ/�4 11G71D1O8OOOO ___- _ _. _----- / z2u55numEY HILL uK O376�22O6OOOO - --T----- - .............. ------ !_12841oxuxv|mum | 1167 3Q114OOOO | | � �-------' ----' -----'-` ------- - ------ '- ' . ����� �m�wnumvv� / 1178171330000 - - ! | 12S34 REED AV / 11672712OOOOO _ | 328S9 ��|R|AK� VVA O2762�4O4OOOO _ - _^ ___ _ - __ 124OQVVARBLERAV 6 ' 11781O14SOOOO � _ . 12026PRESTON ST _ $239.87 L0276303450000 2267OBRE�TVVOODST .28 O276391O4DOOO �� 22350P|[O5T ' $496.24 1167361100000 28144 0000 ................. 12804 REED AV $388.44 1167 30125 0000 22176 CARHART AV $269.28 i 0275 27108 0000 22141 RAVEN WA $67.32 1167 30168 0000 22139 TANAGER ST $269.28 .... ..... ... ........... 1167 29117 0000 12270 MICHIGAN ST $269.28 1167 16123 0000 0.1.Cif TK O....7/.0 r.f...”I.Ig...NOT 1.1 PM....t.521 pv 11,41,...I.lar.10,MI 0.114 COW-5,C.Tri•Ot...MCT ow...,.0.1(41,i.S.....t..-,Y...13 RC.. • 01ca.sucor . imUr Int cum.. Axu wows..am or n x anotrrcv ma ult SAC ISO!.1 Er 11,1.6•17.0 tan ca q.v..n,,uccu 1.e...n.cmu-,u,a-nrc AP,.ou,uuu,r,,T., 1..i'jU co., �- ®. EXISTING I I Z1 1 oaaenOn r�o,.wo�eiwa.u.w+o.ew - - .7. ,/ O/ + 1.h e" ®iiii4 RETAIL ft) OI d VICINITY MAP m I I �® I® *ADO 5F ...JCT.A ' ,1 1 LI �� OT NOT TO SCALE `` fe ,• -!fmm, 5..G-°TED COLOR r;1 A)T W 3 - S� &7'td 7--A.,-!W- .:.'xlmi :,`P ''t- 4 ADA PATH OF TRAVEL II IrT •-1 '�a V _ .':T , �,41 -� �,so 34:5 _� :rM'-r N."' 6'BENCH ~ �,, c W f1 A I 1, ' I : ir J =.J I I er s.iX 1•4 C'':4. �,•{, f5•r �I. Te • -ia„ .q •.. ' �a moo`R SEwTING I cp # I- I' +.. ,r.,✓N 'ill�Iq • �,!•t �ide___� - 1 r.�',.;.x�ttt^:r�•�tiP•-%• " � z• ' "S .*r 9 �>019 �..+. "1 ds3: • BICYCLE- F,•- -T a. -• ` o• DIRECTIONAL 516N MO. . SIGN (5)BIC,'. -— - 1i €.`'1-,--Y, '*',4,± ,1 l MPED CONCRETE♦W BARTON RTON ROAD -- -- ` "` f- ' ' Attachment 7 GRATED DOLOR jt T ROAD RAISED MEDIAN [r'' - r w -tr,,,,,-:',*4:I'lf Y w.g�;N�'KgNi{Ip,t+.�,;: ':P'7 •Ns u E,�''R .Y arF±l� T '-'• E (STING EGNALIZ;D ...,4;,,_kg',`"„ ;.° 2,BZERg/t-• :'lij; �;ry A„F, 1, ,., SITE PLAN INTERS GTION ,*.y"M`+J a'L?- -`i • f f.- ,4 •r C •- STA THERS I COMMERCIAL -, Wit. -„ - gg � .1' ° 1 1 I \1 �+.a q1;„ z-=' re`.,^y �# SCALE 1"=30'0" I]&1'-s• Yx." ,.1 .,:;sT '.L::ti;,F'<':-..F 1;;.4 s1`1-f4- ,72.. i.,00 DATE:June 28, 2011 holed TS1BSlm(o013.IIBBAU OnWQPoAbb Case No.: 11-02 G""D" A101 Chocbed by T.A.UNPDBUSMED WORK Of MB ARanECT Alm S D SAID BAY NOT BE DIRUUR➢.MO OR O5¢OSED KNEW ME 50 5FN CONSENT OF ME,RURTECI COBB...TIN CREW RENAL AU ARTS REBR.5O Wee.R>on ATDLLooRBA OT Seventeenth Amendment to Law Enforcement Services Contract No. 94-797 with the County of San Bernardino & Update on Local Government VLF Funds, SEBA Membership Vote & Corresponding Impacts to Half Funded Patrol Deputy Position Page 2 fund these local government law enforcement programs. The net result of the State's VLF actions for Grand Terrace is shown in the following table: Description $ Restore COPS Grant 100,000 Restore Booking Fee Subventions 20,000 Loose VLF Per Capita -44,510 Net General Fund Impact 75,490 The $100,000 COPS grant must be used for frontline law enforcement and therefore should be applied toward restoring the half funded Patrol Deputy position to a fully funded position. A total of$118,404 is needed. The outcome of the SEBA membership vote was disappointing. The management employees represented by SEBA voted in favor the County's proposal with the balance of the membership voting against it. The concessions were implemented for the management employees, which provided minimal savings for Grand Terrace because the vast majority of the City's contract for law enforcement services is comprised of non management positions. Knowing that additional savings were needed to restore the funding of the Patrol Deputy position, our Lieutenant proposed a reallocation of the cost of his vehicle which has been incorporated into the contract cost (Schedule A). This and the concessions accepted by the management employees result in addition savings of $9,893 which leaves $8,511 in funding needed for the Patrol Deputy position. Staff believes, based on actual costs in prior fiscal years, that there may be budget savings in either overtime or fuel and maintenance costs available to cover this amount and therefore recommend that the half funded Patrol Deputy position be restored to full funding. The Seventeenth Amendment to Law Enforcement Services Contract No. 94- 797 with the County of San Bernardino included this Patrol Deputy position as being fully funded. With regard to the contract, there is an outstanding policy issue identified during the FY 2011-12 budget process for which staff needs direction. The question of whether or not the City should explore alternatives to the Sheriff's Department for law enforcement services has not been addressed. Some members of the Council have individually expressed a desire to do this but Council as a body has not provided such direction. The City's contract for law enforcement services with the County requires the City to provide written notice "at least one (1) year before the date specified for such termination," which would need to be considered if the City were to provide direction to staff to look for alternative service providers. O376�22O6OOOO - --T----- - .............. ------ !_12841oxuxv|mum | 1167 3Q114OOOO | | � �-------' ----' -----'-` ------- - ------ '- ' . ����� �m�wnumvv� / 1178171330000 - - ! | 12S34 REED AV / 11672712OOOOO _ | 328S9 ��|R|AK� VVA O2762�4O4OOOO _ - _^ ___ _ - __ 124OQVVARBLERAV 6 ' 11781O14SOOOO � _ . 12026PRESTON ST _ $239.87 L0276303450000 2267OBRE�TVVOODST .28 O276391O4DOOO �� 22350P|[O5T ' $496.24 1167361100000 28144 0000 ................. 12804 REED AV $388.44 1167 30125 0000 22176 CARHART AV $269.28 i 0275 27108 0000 22141 RAVEN WA $67.32 1167 30168 0000 22139 TANAGER ST $269.28 .... ..... ... ........... 1167 29117 0000 12270 MICHIGAN ST $269.28 1167 16123 0000 0.1.Cif TK O....7/.0 r.f...”I.Ig...NOT 1.1 PM....t.521 pv 11,41,...I.lar.10,MI 0.114 COW-5,C.Tri•Ot...MCT ow...,.0.1(41,i.S.....t..-,Y...13 RC.. • 01ca.sucor . imUr Int cum.. Axu wows..am or n x anotrrcv ma ult SAC ISO!.1 Er 11,1.6•17.0 tan ca q.v..n,,uccu 1.e...n.cmu-,u,a-nrc AP,.ou,uuu,r,,T., 1..i'jU co., �- ®. EXISTING I I Z1 1 oaaenOn r�o,.wo�eiwa.u.w+o.ew - - .7. ,/ O/ + 1.h e" ®iiii4 RETAIL ft) OI d VICINITY MAP m I I �® I® *ADO 5F ...JCT.A ' ,1 1 LI �� OT NOT TO SCALE `` fe ,• -!fmm, 5..G-°TED COLOR r;1 A)T W 3 - S� &7'td 7--A.,-!W- .:.'xlmi :,`P ''t- 4 ADA PATH OF TRAVEL II IrT •-1 '�a V _ .':T , �,41 -� �,so 34:5 _� :rM'-r N."' 6'BENCH ~ �,, c W f1 A I 1, ' I : ir J =.J I I er s.iX 1•4 C'':4. �,•{, f5•r �I. Te • -ia„ .q •.. ' �a moo`R SEwTING I cp # I- I' +.. ,r.,✓N 'ill�Iq • �,!•t �ide___� - 1 r.�',.;.x�ttt^:r�•�tiP•-%• " � z• ' "S .*r 9 �>019 �..+. "1 ds3: • BICYCLE- F,•- -T a. -• ` o• DIRECTIONAL 516N MO. . SIGN (5)BIC,'. -— - 1i €.`'1-,--Y, '*',4,± ,1 l MPED CONCRETE♦W BARTON RTON ROAD -- -- ` "` f- ' ' Attachment 7 GRATED DOLOR jt T ROAD RAISED MEDIAN [r'' - r w -tr,,,,,-:',*4:I'lf Y w.g�;N�'KgNi{Ip,t+.�,;: ':P'7 •Ns u E,�''R .Y arF±l� T '-'• E (STING EGNALIZ;D ...,4;,,_kg',`"„ ;.° 2,BZERg/t-• :'lij; �;ry A„F, 1, ,., SITE PLAN INTERS GTION ,*.y"M`+J a'L?- -`i • f f.- ,4 •r C •- STA THERS I COMMERCIAL -, Wit. -„ - gg � .1' ° 1 1 I \1 �+.a q1;„ z-=' re`.,^y �# SCALE 1"=30'0" I]&1'-s• Yx." ,.1 .,:;sT '.L::ti;,F'<':-..F 1;;.4 s1`1-f4- ,72.. i.,00 DATE:June 28, 2011 holed TS1BSlm(o013.IIBBAU OnWQPoAbb Case No.: 11-02 G""D" A101 Chocbed by T.A.UNPDBUSMED WORK Of MB ARanECT Alm S D SAID BAY NOT BE DIRUUR➢.MO OR O5¢OSED KNEW ME 50 5FN CONSENT OF ME,RURTECI COBB...TIN CREW RENAL AU ARTS REBR.5O Wee.R>on ATDLLooRBA OT Seventeenth Amendment to Law Enforcement Services Contract No. 94-797 with the County of San Bernardino & Update on Local Government VLF Funds, SEBA Membership Vote & Corresponding Impacts to Half Funded Patrol Deputy Position Page 3 FISCAL IMPACT:, The funding needed to restore the half funded Patrol Deputy position to full funding will come from the COPS grant ($100,000), management and Lieutenant vehicle savings ($9,893) and.anticipated budget savings for law enforcement services ($8,511). The City will also need to address the loss of $44,510 in General Fund revenue due to SB 89's elimination of the VLF per capita revenue for local governments. The restoration of the booking fee subventions ($20,000 in the FY 2011-12 budget) is not. mandated for frontline law enforcement and can be applied toward the VLF per capita loss. The remaining $24,51,0 will be addressed in the mid year budget, or sooner if additional savings or revenue are identified to offset the VLF per capita revenue loss. Respectfully submitted: ,A V-)31 ‘5. C Betsy EVr Adams, City Manager ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A: Seventeenth Amendment to Law Enforcement Services Contract No. 94-797 with the County of San Bernardino l savings were needed to restore the funding of the Patrol Deputy position, our Lieutenant proposed a reallocation of the cost of his vehicle which has been incorporated into the contract cost (Schedule A). This and the concessions accepted by the management employees result in addition savings of $9,893 which leaves $8,511 in funding needed for the Patrol Deputy position. Staff believes, based on actual costs in prior fiscal years, that there may be budget savings in either overtime or fuel and maintenance costs available to cover this amount and therefore recommend that the half funded Patrol Deputy position be restored to full funding. The Seventeenth Amendment to Law Enforcement Services Contract No. 94- 797 with the County of San Bernardino included this Patrol Deputy position as being fully funded. With regard to the contract, there is an outstanding policy issue identified during the FY 2011-12 budget process for which staff needs direction. The question of whether or not the City should explore alternatives to the Sheriff's Department for law enforcement services has not been addressed. Some members of the Council have individually expressed a desire to do this but Council as a body has not provided such direction. The City's contract for law enforcement services with the County requires the City to provide written notice "at least one (1) year before the date specified for such termination," which would need to be considered if the City were to provide direction to staff to look for alternative service providers. O376�22O6OOOO - --T----- - .............. ------ !_12841oxuxv|mum | 1167 3Q114OOOO | | � �-------' ----' -----'-` ------- - ------ '- ' . ����� �m�wnumvv� / 1178171330000 - - ! | 12S34 REED AV / 11672712OOOOO _ | 328S9 ��|R|AK� VVA O2762�4O4OOOO _ - _^ ___ _ - __ 124OQVVARBLERAV 6 ' 11781O14SOOOO � _ . 12026PRESTON ST _ $239.87 L0276303450000 2267OBRE�TVVOODST .28 O276391O4DOOO �� 22350P|[O5T ' $496.24 1167361100000 28144 0000 ................. 12804 REED AV $388.44 1167 30125 0000 22176 CARHART AV $269.28 i 0275 27108 0000 22141 RAVEN WA $67.32 1167 30168 0000 22139 TANAGER ST $269.28 .... ..... ... ........... 1167 29117 0000 12270 MICHIGAN ST $269.28 1167 16123 0000 0.1.Cif TK O....7/.0 r.f...”I.Ig...NOT 1.1 PM....t.521 pv 11,41,...I.lar.10,MI 0.114 COW-5,C.Tri•Ot...MCT ow...,.0.1(41,i.S.....t..-,Y...13 RC.. • 01ca.sucor . imUr Int cum.. Axu wows..am or n x anotrrcv ma ult SAC ISO!.1 Er 11,1.6•17.0 tan ca q.v..n,,uccu 1.e...n.cmu-,u,a-nrc AP,.ou,uuu,r,,T., 1..i'jU co., �- ®. EXISTING I I Z1 1 oaaenOn r�o,.wo�eiwa.u.w+o.ew - - .7. ,/ O/ + 1.h e" ®iiii4 RETAIL ft) OI d VICINITY MAP m I I �® I® *ADO 5F ...JCT.A ' ,1 1 LI �� OT NOT TO SCALE `` fe ,• -!fmm, 5..G-°TED COLOR r;1 A)T W 3 - S� &7'td 7--A.,-!W- .:.'xlmi :,`P ''t- 4 ADA PATH OF TRAVEL II IrT •-1 '�a V _ .':T , �,41 -� �,so 34:5 _� :rM'-r N."' 6'BENCH ~ �,, c W f1 A I 1, ' I : ir J =.J I I er s.iX 1•4 C'':4. �,•{, f5•r �I. Te • -ia„ .q •.. ' �a moo`R SEwTING I cp # I- I' +.. ,r.,✓N 'ill�Iq • �,!•t �ide___� - 1 r.�',.;.x�ttt^:r�•�tiP•-%• " � z• ' "S .*r 9 �>019 �..+. "1 ds3: • BICYCLE- F,•- -T a. -• ` o• DIRECTIONAL 516N MO. . SIGN (5)BIC,'. -— - 1i €.`'1-,--Y, '*',4,± ,1 l MPED CONCRETE♦W BARTON RTON ROAD -- -- ` "` f- ' ' Attachment 7 GRATED DOLOR jt T ROAD RAISED MEDIAN [r'' - r w -tr,,,,,-:',*4:I'lf Y w.g�;N�'KgNi{Ip,t+.�,;: ':P'7 •Ns u E,�''R .Y arF±l� T '-'• E (STING EGNALIZ;D ...,4;,,_kg',`"„ ;.° 2,BZERg/t-• :'lij; �;ry A„F, 1, ,., SITE PLAN INTERS GTION ,*.y"M`+J a'L?- -`i • f f.- ,4 •r C •- STA THERS I COMMERCIAL -, Wit. -„ - gg � .1' ° 1 1 I \1 �+.a q1;„ z-=' re`.,^y �# SCALE 1"=30'0" I]&1'-s• Yx." ,.1 .,:;sT '.L::ti;,F'<':-..F 1;;.4 s1`1-f4- ,72.. i.,00 DATE:June 28, 2011 holed TS1BSlm(o013.IIBBAU OnWQPoAbb Case No.: 11-02 G""D" A101 Chocbed by T.A.UNPDBUSMED WORK Of MB ARanECT Alm S D SAID BAY NOT BE DIRUUR➢.MO OR O5¢OSED KNEW ME 50 5FN CONSENT OF ME,RURTECI COBB...TIN CREW RENAL AU ARTS REBR.5O Wee.R>on ATDLLooRBA OT Attachment A Seventeenth Amendment to Law Enforcement Services Contract No. 94-797 with the County of San Bernardino Resolution No. was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace on the 26th day of July, 2011,by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: City Clerk Approved as to form: City Attorney essing fee will be collected in conjunction with this refuse lien for Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc. Respectfully submitted, att Wirz Manage - t An. ,st )2r Manager Approval: /1A d_47/ 7)(--) Y Bets 'M. Adams City Manager ATTACHMENTS: 1. A. Delinquent Refuse Users at 6/6/2011 B.Resolution No. 6 91,304 (862,016) CIRSG ,ple se oansut with the Cemrnm ty De.ecprrent Depattneri �i._1, 'n Page 11 of 11 FOR COUNTY USE ONLY \sei71 ❑ New Vendor Code Dept. Contract Number atEe."`:":7e ® ChangeASC�� =� SHR 94-797 A-17 `- ❑ Cancel "`` y County Department Dept. Orgn. Contractor's License No. Sheriff SHR SHR County Department Contract Representative Telephone Total Contract Amount County of San Bernardino Greg Garland, Captain (909)387-3649 $ 1,877,107 F A S Contract Type ® (Revenue fl Encumbered fl Unencumbered fl Other: STANDARD CONTRACT If not encumbered or revenue contract type,provide reason: Commodity Code Contract Start Date Contract End Date Original Amount Amendment Amount 07/01/11 06/30/12 $ $1,877,107 Fund Dept. Organization Appr. Obj/Rev Source GRC/PROJ/JOB No Amount' AAA SHR SHR 9565 GRANDT $ 1,877,107 Fund Dept. Organization Appr. Obj/Rev Source GRC/PROJ/JOB No. Amount Fund Dept. Organization Appr. Obj/Rev Source GRC/PROJ/JOB No. Amount Project Name Estimated Payment Total by Fiscal Year Contract Law Enforcement FY Amount I/D FY Amount I/D 2011-12 THIS CONTRACT is entered into in the State of California by and between the County of San Bernardino, hereinafter called the County, and Name City of Grand Terrace hereinafter called CITY Address 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92313-5207 Telephone Federal ID No.or Social Security No. (909) 824-6621 IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: (Use space below and additional bond sheets. Set forth service to be rendered,amount to be paid,manner of payment, time for performance or completion, determination of satisfactory performance and cause for termination,other terms and conditions,and attach plans,specifications, and addenda,if any.) SEVENTEENTH AMENDMENT Contract No. 94-797 providing law enforcement service to the City of Grand Terrace is hereby amended, effective July 1, 2011, by replacing Schedule A, referred to in paragraph IV, with the Schedule A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Except as amended, all other terms and conditions remain as stated therein. Auditor/Controller-Recorder Use Only ❑Contract Database 0 FAS Input Date Keyed By Page 1 of 2 ent services has not been addressed. Some members of the Council have individually expressed a desire to do this but Council as a body has not provided such direction. The City's contract for law enforcement services with the County requires the City to provide written notice "at least one (1) year before the date specified for such termination," which would need to be considered if the City were to provide direction to staff to look for alternative service providers. O376�22O6OOOO - --T----- - .............. ------ !_12841oxuxv|mum | 1167 3Q114OOOO | | � �-------' ----' -----'-` ------- - ------ '- ' . ����� �m�wnumvv� / 1178171330000 - - ! | 12S34 REED AV / 11672712OOOOO _ | 328S9 ��|R|AK� VVA O2762�4O4OOOO _ - _^ ___ _ - __ 124OQVVARBLERAV 6 ' 11781O14SOOOO � _ . 12026PRESTON ST _ $239.87 L0276303450000 2267OBRE�TVVOODST .28 O276391O4DOOO �� 22350P|[O5T ' $496.24 1167361100000 28144 0000 ................. 12804 REED AV $388.44 1167 30125 0000 22176 CARHART AV $269.28 i 0275 27108 0000 22141 RAVEN WA $67.32 1167 30168 0000 22139 TANAGER ST $269.28 .... ..... ... ........... 1167 29117 0000 12270 MICHIGAN ST $269.28 1167 16123 0000 0.1.Cif TK O....7/.0 r.f...”I.Ig...NOT 1.1 PM....t.521 pv 11,41,...I.lar.10,MI 0.114 COW-5,C.Tri•Ot...MCT ow...,.0.1(41,i.S.....t..-,Y...13 RC.. • 01ca.sucor . imUr Int cum.. Axu wows..am or n x anotrrcv ma ult SAC ISO!.1 Er 11,1.6•17.0 tan ca q.v..n,,uccu 1.e...n.cmu-,u,a-nrc AP,.ou,uuu,r,,T., 1..i'jU co., �- ®. EXISTING I I Z1 1 oaaenOn r�o,.wo�eiwa.u.w+o.ew - - .7. ,/ O/ + 1.h e" ®iiii4 RETAIL ft) OI d VICINITY MAP m I I �® I® *ADO 5F ...JCT.A ' ,1 1 LI �� OT NOT TO SCALE `` fe ,• -!fmm, 5..G-°TED COLOR r;1 A)T W 3 - S� &7'td 7--A.,-!W- .:.'xlmi :,`P ''t- 4 ADA PATH OF TRAVEL II IrT •-1 '�a V _ .':T , �,41 -� �,so 34:5 _� :rM'-r N."' 6'BENCH ~ �,, c W f1 A I 1, ' I : ir J =.J I I er s.iX 1•4 C'':4. �,•{, f5•r �I. Te • -ia„ .q •.. ' �a moo`R SEwTING I cp # I- I' +.. ,r.,✓N 'ill�Iq • �,!•t �ide___� - 1 r.�',.;.x�ttt^:r�•�tiP•-%• " � z• ' "S .*r 9 �>019 �..+. "1 ds3: • BICYCLE- F,•- -T a. -• ` o• DIRECTIONAL 516N MO. . SIGN (5)BIC,'. -— - 1i €.`'1-,--Y, '*',4,± ,1 l MPED CONCRETE♦W BARTON RTON ROAD -- -- ` "` f- ' ' Attachment 7 GRATED DOLOR jt T ROAD RAISED MEDIAN [r'' - r w -tr,,,,,-:',*4:I'lf Y w.g�;N�'KgNi{Ip,t+.�,;: ':P'7 •Ns u E,�''R .Y arF±l� T '-'• E (STING EGNALIZ;D ...,4;,,_kg',`"„ ;.° 2,BZERg/t-• :'lij; �;ry A„F, 1, ,., SITE PLAN INTERS GTION ,*.y"M`+J a'L?- -`i • f f.- ,4 •r C •- STA THERS I COMMERCIAL -, Wit. -„ - gg � .1' ° 1 1 I \1 �+.a q1;„ z-=' re`.,^y �# SCALE 1"=30'0" I]&1'-s• Yx." ,.1 .,:;sT '.L::ti;,F'<':-..F 1;;.4 s1`1-f4- ,72.. i.,00 DATE:June 28, 2011 holed TS1BSlm(o013.IIBBAU OnWQPoAbb Case No.: 11-02 G""D" A101 Chocbed by T.A.UNPDBUSMED WORK Of MB ARanECT Alm S D SAID BAY NOT BE DIRUUR➢.MO OR O5¢OSED KNEW ME 50 5FN CONSENT OF ME,RURTECI COBB...TIN CREW RENAL AU ARTS REBR.5O Wee.R>on ATDLLooRBA OT [This page intentionally left blank] COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO City of Grand Terrace (Print or type name of corporation,company,contractor,etc.) ► By ► Josie Gonzales, Chair, Board of Supervisors (Authorized signature-sign in blue ink) Dated: Name (Print or type name of person signing contract) SIGNED AND CERTIFIED THAT A COPY OF THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN DELIVERED TO THE Title CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD (Print or Type) Laura H. Welch Dated: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino By Address 22795 Barton Road Deputy Grand Terrace, CA 92313-5207 Approved a al Form Reviewed by Contract Compliance Presented... BOS for Si ature County Counsel,by tev ingley uty Departure Head-�Date ` /3 1 Date Date —1 1 4`r (t Revised 1/11/2011 Page 2 of 2 d Dept. Organization Appr. Obj/Rev Source GRC/PROJ/JOB No. Amount Fund Dept. Organization Appr. Obj/Rev Source GRC/PROJ/JOB No. Amount Project Name Estimated Payment Total by Fiscal Year Contract Law Enforcement FY Amount I/D FY Amount I/D 2011-12 THIS CONTRACT is entered into in the State of California by and between the County of San Bernardino, hereinafter called the County, and Name City of Grand Terrace hereinafter called CITY Address 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92313-5207 Telephone Federal ID No.or Social Security No. (909) 824-6621 IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: (Use space below and additional bond sheets. Set forth service to be rendered,amount to be paid,manner of payment, time for performance or completion, determination of satisfactory performance and cause for termination,other terms and conditions,and attach plans,specifications, and addenda,if any.) SEVENTEENTH AMENDMENT Contract No. 94-797 providing law enforcement service to the City of Grand Terrace is hereby amended, effective July 1, 2011, by replacing Schedule A, referred to in paragraph IV, with the Schedule A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Except as amended, all other terms and conditions remain as stated therein. Auditor/Controller-Recorder Use Only ❑Contract Database 0 FAS Input Date Keyed By Page 1 of 2 ent services has not been addressed. Some members of the Council have individually expressed a desire to do this but Council as a body has not provided such direction. The City's contract for law enforcement services with the County requires the City to provide written notice "at least one (1) year before the date specified for such termination," which would need to be considered if the City were to provide direction to staff to look for alternative service providers. O376�22O6OOOO - --T----- - .............. ------ !_12841oxuxv|mum | 1167 3Q114OOOO | | � �-------' ----' -----'-` ------- - ------ '- ' . ����� �m�wnumvv� / 1178171330000 - - ! | 12S34 REED AV / 11672712OOOOO _ | 328S9 ��|R|AK� VVA O2762�4O4OOOO _ - _^ ___ _ - __ 124OQVVARBLERAV 6 ' 11781O14SOOOO � _ . 12026PRESTON ST _ $239.87 L0276303450000 2267OBRE�TVVOODST .28 O276391O4DOOO �� 22350P|[O5T ' $496.24 1167361100000 28144 0000 ................. 12804 REED AV $388.44 1167 30125 0000 22176 CARHART AV $269.28 i 0275 27108 0000 22141 RAVEN WA $67.32 1167 30168 0000 22139 TANAGER ST $269.28 .... ..... ... ........... 1167 29117 0000 12270 MICHIGAN ST $269.28 1167 16123 0000 0.1.Cif TK O....7/.0 r.f...”I.Ig...NOT 1.1 PM....t.521 pv 11,41,...I.lar.10,MI 0.114 COW-5,C.Tri•Ot...MCT ow...,.0.1(41,i.S.....t..-,Y...13 RC.. • 01ca.sucor . imUr Int cum.. Axu wows..am or n x anotrrcv ma ult SAC ISO!.1 Er 11,1.6•17.0 tan ca q.v..n,,uccu 1.e...n.cmu-,u,a-nrc AP,.ou,uuu,r,,T., 1..i'jU co., �- ®. EXISTING I I Z1 1 oaaenOn r�o,.wo�eiwa.u.w+o.ew - - .7. ,/ O/ + 1.h e" ®iiii4 RETAIL ft) OI d VICINITY MAP m I I �® I® *ADO 5F ...JCT.A ' ,1 1 LI �� OT NOT TO SCALE `` fe ,• -!fmm, 5..G-°TED COLOR r;1 A)T W 3 - S� &7'td 7--A.,-!W- .:.'xlmi :,`P ''t- 4 ADA PATH OF TRAVEL II IrT •-1 '�a V _ .':T , �,41 -� �,so 34:5 _� :rM'-r N."' 6'BENCH ~ �,, c W f1 A I 1, ' I : ir J =.J I I er s.iX 1•4 C'':4. �,•{, f5•r �I. Te • -ia„ .q •.. ' �a moo`R SEwTING I cp # I- I' +.. ,r.,✓N 'ill�Iq • �,!•t �ide___� - 1 r.�',.;.x�ttt^:r�•�tiP•-%• " � z• ' "S .*r 9 �>019 �..+. "1 ds3: • BICYCLE- F,•- -T a. -• ` o• DIRECTIONAL 516N MO. . SIGN (5)BIC,'. -— - 1i €.`'1-,--Y, '*',4,± ,1 l MPED CONCRETE♦W BARTON RTON ROAD -- -- ` "` f- ' ' Attachment 7 GRATED DOLOR jt T ROAD RAISED MEDIAN [r'' - r w -tr,,,,,-:',*4:I'lf Y w.g�;N�'KgNi{Ip,t+.�,;: ':P'7 •Ns u E,�''R .Y arF±l� T '-'• E (STING EGNALIZ;D ...,4;,,_kg',`"„ ;.° 2,BZERg/t-• :'lij; �;ry A„F, 1, ,., SITE PLAN INTERS GTION ,*.y"M`+J a'L?- -`i • f f.- ,4 •r C •- STA THERS I COMMERCIAL -, Wit. -„ - gg � .1' ° 1 1 I \1 �+.a q1;„ z-=' re`.,^y �# SCALE 1"=30'0" I]&1'-s• Yx." ,.1 .,:;sT '.L::ti;,F'<':-..F 1;;.4 s1`1-f4- ,72.. i.,00 DATE:June 28, 2011 holed TS1BSlm(o013.IIBBAU OnWQPoAbb Case No.: 11-02 G""D" A101 Chocbed by T.A.UNPDBUSMED WORK Of MB ARanECT Alm S D SAID BAY NOT BE DIRUUR➢.MO OR O5¢OSED KNEW ME 50 5FN CONSENT OF ME,RURTECI COBB...TIN CREW RENAL AU ARTS REBR.5O Wee.R>on ATDLLooRBA OT SCHEDULE A Law Enforcement Services Contract City of Grand Terrace 2011-12 Deletions: 1-Traffic Deputy, 1-marked unit, .5-unmarked unit FY 2011-12 LEVEL OF SERVICE COST 0.27 - Lieutenant 55,848 1 1.14 - Sergeant 208,540 1 1.11 - Detective/Corporal (40 hours/week) 173,155 1 6.87 - Deputy Sheriff(248 hours/weeek) 976,717 1 1.00 - Sheriffs Service Specialist 66,885 1 1.60 - Office Specialist 100,382 1 0.18 - Motor Pool Services Assistant 11,282 1 2.50 - Marked Unit 30,470 2 1.50 - Unmarked Unit 11,216 2 1.00 - Ford Explorer 5,938 2 1.00 - Citizen Patrol 1,271 3 Dispatch Services 96,430 1 9 - HTs (Amortized over 7-years) 4,097 11 - HTs (Access&Maint Only) 6,552 1 - Additional MDCs 2,710 11 - Taser Replacement(Amortized over 4-years) 3,124 Administrative Support 7,916 Facility Costs 2,637 Office Automation 10,877 Services&Supplies 14,364 Vehicle Insurance 5,512 Personnel Liability& Bonding 30,269 County Administrative Cost 50,915 TOTAL COST: $ 1,877,107 1 Monthly Payment Schedule 1st payment due July 15, 2011: $136,513 2nd through 12th payments due the 5th of each month: $136,513 Grant Funded Deputy's 1st payment due July 15, 2011: $19,919 2nd through 12th payments due the 5th of each month: $19,912 1 Personnel costs include salary and benefits and are subject to change by Board of Supervisors'action. 2 Vehicle costs do not include fuel and maintenance. The city is responsible for fuel and maintenance of all contract vehicles. Any fuel and maintenance costs charged to the county will be billed to the city on a quarterly invoice. 3 No replacement cost is included for donated and grant-funded vehicles. 4 Cost of grant-funded deputy for 2011-12 is$238,951,which includes relief factor,support,supervision and all related costs.The grant funded deputy is reflected in the total contract amount(TOTAL COST). Page 1 of 2 Page 1 of 2 ent services has not been addressed. Some members of the Council have individually expressed a desire to do this but Council as a body has not provided such direction. The City's contract for law enforcement services with the County requires the City to provide written notice "at least one (1) year before the date specified for such termination," which would need to be considered if the City were to provide direction to staff to look for alternative service providers. O376�22O6OOOO - --T----- - .............. ------ !_12841oxuxv|mum | 1167 3Q114OOOO | | � �-------' ----' -----'-` ------- - ------ '- ' . ����� �m�wnumvv� / 1178171330000 - - ! | 12S34 REED AV / 11672712OOOOO _ | 328S9 ��|R|AK� VVA O2762�4O4OOOO _ - _^ ___ _ - __ 124OQVVARBLERAV 6 ' 11781O14SOOOO � _ . 12026PRESTON ST _ $239.87 L0276303450000 2267OBRE�TVVOODST .28 O276391O4DOOO �� 22350P|[O5T ' $496.24 1167361100000 28144 0000 ................. 12804 REED AV $388.44 1167 30125 0000 22176 CARHART AV $269.28 i 0275 27108 0000 22141 RAVEN WA $67.32 1167 30168 0000 22139 TANAGER ST $269.28 .... ..... ... ........... 1167 29117 0000 12270 MICHIGAN ST $269.28 1167 16123 0000 0.1.Cif TK O....7/.0 r.f...”I.Ig...NOT 1.1 PM....t.521 pv 11,41,...I.lar.10,MI 0.114 COW-5,C.Tri•Ot...MCT ow...,.0.1(41,i.S.....t..-,Y...13 RC.. • 01ca.sucor . imUr Int cum.. Axu wows..am or n x anotrrcv ma ult SAC ISO!.1 Er 11,1.6•17.0 tan ca q.v..n,,uccu 1.e...n.cmu-,u,a-nrc AP,.ou,uuu,r,,T., 1..i'jU co., �- ®. EXISTING I I Z1 1 oaaenOn r�o,.wo�eiwa.u.w+o.ew - - .7. ,/ O/ + 1.h e" ®iiii4 RETAIL ft) OI d VICINITY MAP m I I �® I® *ADO 5F ...JCT.A ' ,1 1 LI �� OT NOT TO SCALE `` fe ,• -!fmm, 5..G-°TED COLOR r;1 A)T W 3 - S� &7'td 7--A.,-!W- .:.'xlmi :,`P ''t- 4 ADA PATH OF TRAVEL II IrT •-1 '�a V _ .':T , �,41 -� �,so 34:5 _� :rM'-r N."' 6'BENCH ~ �,, c W f1 A I 1, ' I : ir J =.J I I er s.iX 1•4 C'':4. �,•{, f5•r �I. Te • -ia„ .q •.. ' �a moo`R SEwTING I cp # I- I' +.. ,r.,✓N 'ill�Iq • �,!•t �ide___� - 1 r.�',.;.x�ttt^:r�•�tiP•-%• " � z• ' "S .*r 9 �>019 �..+. "1 ds3: • BICYCLE- F,•- -T a. -• ` o• DIRECTIONAL 516N MO. . SIGN (5)BIC,'. -— - 1i €.`'1-,--Y, '*',4,± ,1 l MPED CONCRETE♦W BARTON RTON ROAD -- -- ` "` f- ' ' Attachment 7 GRATED DOLOR jt T ROAD RAISED MEDIAN [r'' - r w -tr,,,,,-:',*4:I'lf Y w.g�;N�'KgNi{Ip,t+.�,;: ':P'7 •Ns u E,�''R .Y arF±l� T '-'• E (STING EGNALIZ;D ...,4;,,_kg',`"„ ;.° 2,BZERg/t-• :'lij; �;ry A„F, 1, ,., SITE PLAN INTERS GTION ,*.y"M`+J a'L?- -`i • f f.- ,4 •r C •- STA THERS I COMMERCIAL -, Wit. -„ - gg � .1' ° 1 1 I \1 �+.a q1;„ z-=' re`.,^y �# SCALE 1"=30'0" I]&1'-s• Yx." ,.1 .,:;sT '.L::ti;,F'<':-..F 1;;.4 s1`1-f4- ,72.. i.,00 DATE:June 28, 2011 holed TS1BSlm(o013.IIBBAU OnWQPoAbb Case No.: 11-02 G""D" A101 Chocbed by T.A.UNPDBUSMED WORK Of MB ARanECT Alm S D SAID BAY NOT BE DIRUUR➢.MO OR O5¢OSED KNEW ME 50 5FN CONSENT OF ME,RURTECI COBB...TIN CREW RENAL AU ARTS REBR.5O Wee.R>on ATDLLooRBA OT SCHEDULE A Law Enforcement Services Contract City of Grand Terrace 2011-12 Additional Costs Billed Quarterly: The City will be billed on a quarterly basis for the following items: • Actual overtime cost. • Actual on-call cost (on-call pay for safety employees for FY2011-12 is $185 per week). • Actual cost of vehicle fuel and maintenance. • Professional services from private vendors and other services, supplies and personnel costs above the contract formula. LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY SAFETY: GENERAL: Lieutenant - 0.27 Sheriffs Service Specialist - 1.00 Sergeant - 1.14 Office Specialist - 1.60 Detective/Corporal - 1.11 Motor Pool Services Asst - 0.18 Deputy Sheriff - 6.87 Dispatchers - 1.18 9.39 3.96 VEHICLES: MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT: Marked Patrol Units - 2.5 Radar Trailer - 1 * Unmarked Units Code 3 - 1.5 Pickup Trucks - 1.0 Citizen Patrol - 1.0 Donated Vehicles-Ins Only - 1.0 * * (Included for insurance costs only) 7.0 Page 2 of 2 ,877 Services&Supplies 14,364 Vehicle Insurance 5,512 Personnel Liability& Bonding 30,269 County Administrative Cost 50,915 TOTAL COST: $ 1,877,107 1 Monthly Payment Schedule 1st payment due July 15, 2011: $136,513 2nd through 12th payments due the 5th of each month: $136,513 Grant Funded Deputy's 1st payment due July 15, 2011: $19,919 2nd through 12th payments due the 5th of each month: $19,912 1 Personnel costs include salary and benefits and are subject to change by Board of Supervisors'action. 2 Vehicle costs do not include fuel and maintenance. The city is responsible for fuel and maintenance of all contract vehicles. Any fuel and maintenance costs charged to the county will be billed to the city on a quarterly invoice. 3 No replacement cost is included for donated and grant-funded vehicles. 4 Cost of grant-funded deputy for 2011-12 is$238,951,which includes relief factor,support,supervision and all related costs.The grant funded deputy is reflected in the total contract amount(TOTAL COST). Page 1 of 2 Page 1 of 2 ent services has not been addressed. Some members of the Council have individually expressed a desire to do this but Council as a body has not provided such direction. The City's contract for law enforcement services with the County requires the City to provide written notice "at least one (1) year before the date specified for such termination," which would need to be considered if the City were to provide direction to staff to look for alternative service providers. O376�22O6OOOO - --T----- - .............. ------ !_12841oxuxv|mum | 1167 3Q114OOOO | | � �-------' ----' -----'-` ------- - ------ '- ' . ����� �m�wnumvv� / 1178171330000 - - ! | 12S34 REED AV / 11672712OOOOO _ | 328S9 ��|R|AK� VVA O2762�4O4OOOO _ - _^ ___ _ - __ 124OQVVARBLERAV 6 ' 11781O14SOOOO � _ . 12026PRESTON ST _ $239.87 L0276303450000 2267OBRE�TVVOODST .28 O276391O4DOOO �� 22350P|[O5T ' $496.24 1167361100000 28144 0000 ................. 12804 REED AV $388.44 1167 30125 0000 22176 CARHART AV $269.28 i 0275 27108 0000 22141 RAVEN WA $67.32 1167 30168 0000 22139 TANAGER ST $269.28 .... ..... ... ........... 1167 29117 0000 12270 MICHIGAN ST $269.28 1167 16123 0000 0.1.Cif TK O....7/.0 r.f...”I.Ig...NOT 1.1 PM....t.521 pv 11,41,...I.lar.10,MI 0.114 COW-5,C.Tri•Ot...MCT ow...,.0.1(41,i.S.....t..-,Y...13 RC.. • 01ca.sucor . imUr Int cum.. Axu wows..am or n x anotrrcv ma ult SAC ISO!.1 Er 11,1.6•17.0 tan ca q.v..n,,uccu 1.e...n.cmu-,u,a-nrc AP,.ou,uuu,r,,T., 1..i'jU co., �- ®. EXISTING I I Z1 1 oaaenOn r�o,.wo�eiwa.u.w+o.ew - - .7. ,/ O/ + 1.h e" ®iiii4 RETAIL ft) OI d VICINITY MAP m I I �® I® *ADO 5F ...JCT.A ' ,1 1 LI �� OT NOT TO SCALE `` fe ,• -!fmm, 5..G-°TED COLOR r;1 A)T W 3 - S� &7'td 7--A.,-!W- .:.'xlmi :,`P ''t- 4 ADA PATH OF TRAVEL II IrT •-1 '�a V _ .':T , �,41 -� �,so 34:5 _� :rM'-r N."' 6'BENCH ~ �,, c W f1 A I 1, ' I : ir J =.J I I er s.iX 1•4 C'':4. �,•{, f5•r �I. Te • -ia„ .q •.. ' �a moo`R SEwTING I cp # I- I' +.. ,r.,✓N 'ill�Iq • �,!•t �ide___� - 1 r.�',.;.x�ttt^:r�•�tiP•-%• " � z• ' "S .*r 9 �>019 �..+. "1 ds3: • BICYCLE- F,•- -T a. -• ` o• DIRECTIONAL 516N MO. . SIGN (5)BIC,'. -— - 1i €.`'1-,--Y, '*',4,± ,1 l MPED CONCRETE♦W BARTON RTON ROAD -- -- ` "` f- ' ' Attachment 7 GRATED DOLOR jt T ROAD RAISED MEDIAN [r'' - r w -tr,,,,,-:',*4:I'lf Y w.g�;N�'KgNi{Ip,t+.�,;: ':P'7 •Ns u E,�''R .Y arF±l� T '-'• E (STING EGNALIZ;D ...,4;,,_kg',`"„ ;.° 2,BZERg/t-• :'lij; �;ry A„F, 1, ,., SITE PLAN INTERS GTION ,*.y"M`+J a'L?- -`i • f f.- ,4 •r C •- STA THERS I COMMERCIAL -, Wit. -„ - gg � .1' ° 1 1 I \1 �+.a q1;„ z-=' re`.,^y �# SCALE 1"=30'0" I]&1'-s• Yx." ,.1 .,:;sT '.L::ti;,F'<':-..F 1;;.4 s1`1-f4- ,72.. i.,00 DATE:June 28, 2011 holed TS1BSlm(o013.IIBBAU OnWQPoAbb Case No.: 11-02 G""D" A101 Chocbed by T.A.UNPDBUSMED WORK Of MB ARanECT Alm S D SAID BAY NOT BE DIRUUR➢.MO OR O5¢OSED KNEW ME 50 5FN CONSENT OF ME,RURTECI COBB...TIN CREW RENAL AU ARTS REBR.5O Wee.R>on ATDLLooRBA OT