242 Ordinance No. 242
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND
TERRACE, CALIFORNIA RESCINDING THE TRAFFIC CIRCULATION FEE
SCHEDULE (4.104) AND REPLACING IT WITH A NEW FEE STRUCTURE.
WHEREAS, Grand Terrace is continuing to experience new development of its
vacant parcels as well as additions to and some replacement and remodeling of
existing buildings; and
WHEREAS, the rate of construction and growth continues to drive the demand
for municipal services which in turn generate the need for expansion of the City's
public facilities in order to provide these services; and
WHEREAS, the City of Grand Terrace master facilities plan indicates that in
order to accommodate future growth capital projects are needed including street
and traffic signal improvements; and
WHEREAS, the City of Grand Terrace in cooperation with San Bernardino
Associated Governments (SANBAG) has conducted an extensive analysis in
accordance with Chapter 5, Section 66000 of the California Government Code of
potential new development, identified anticipated capital improvements needed
to accommodate future growth, estimated the cost of these improvements, and
identified a potential beneficiaries of these improvements; and
WHEREAS, the City of Grand Terrace is required to update its circulation fees by
January 2009 to be eligible for supplemental funding for arterial infrastructure
that will become available under San Bernardino County's Measure I Program
starting in 2010; and
WHEREAS, notice of public hearing has been provided per Government Code
Section 6062a, oral and written presentation made and received, and the
required public hearing held; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to California Government Code Section 60623a, a general
explanation of the hereinafter contained in schedule of fees and charges has
been published as required; and
WHEREAS, all requirements of California Government Code Section 6600 et.
seq. are hereby found to have been complied with; and
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND
TERRACE DOES HEREBY ORDAINED AS FOLLOWS:
Rescinding the fees and Table "B" in Chapter 4.104.050 and replace with the
following:
ments of Section
15.58.090 (Reporting), or does not comply with any other requirements of this Chapter.
Section 15.58.110 Appeals
Any decision issued by the Waste Management Plan Compliance Official may be
appealed by submission of a written appeal to the City Manager within 10 calendar days
from the date of the decision.
First read at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City held on the 13th day of
January, 2009, and finally adopted and ordered posted at a regular meeting of said City
11 of 12
ll be used to verify whether waste generated from
the Covered Project has been or are to be recycled, reused, salvaged or disposed. The
applicant shall make reasonable efforts to ensure that all designated recyclable and reuse
waste salvaged or disposed are measured and recorded using the most accurate method of
measurement available.
To the extent practical, all construction and demolition waste shall be weighed in
compliance with all regulatory requirements for accuracy and maintenance. For
construction and demolition waste for which weighing is not practical due to small size or
other considerations, a volumetric measurement shall be used. For conversion of
volumetric measurements to weight, the applicant shall use the standardized conversion
rates approved by the City for this purpose.
10of12
Arterial Improvement Fee
Single-Family Homes and Multi-Family Homes (per Unit)
1. Detached Dwelling Units $4242.58
2. Attached Dwelling Units $2598.02
Retail
1. Retail (TSF-GLA) $9524.14
(per thousand square feet of gross leasable area)
Industrial/warehouse
1. Industrial/warehouse.(TSF-GFA) $3088.52
(per thousand square feet of gross floor area)
Office.
1. Office (TSF-GLA) $4884.17
(per thousand square feet of gross leasable area)
See attached new Table "B"
None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
renda Mesa, City Clerk
A.proved a to form.
John Harper, Cidy A orney
12 of 12
ATTEST:
Ote4-
City Clerk of the City of Mayor the City of Grand Terrace
Grand Terrace and of the and of the City Council thereof
City.Council thereof
I, BRENDA MESA, City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, California, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced and adopted at a regular
meeting of the City..Council of the City of Grand Terrace held on
January 13 • , 200,89 by e following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Cortes, Miller and Stanckiewitz; Mayor Pro Tem
Garcia and Mayor Ferre
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
! /�
City Clerk
Brenda e a
V
Approved a t form:
City Attorney
John Harper
12 of 12
i
TABLE B
ARTERIAL IMPROVEMENT COST ESTIMATES
Street: From: To: Estimated Cost Local Growth Fee
Component Chargeable
Barton Road 1-215 overcrossing $5,746,082.00 0.40 $2,298,433.00
Barton Road S.P.R.R. 1-215 overcrossing $1,796,485.00_ _ 0.40 $718,594.00
Barton Road (e.b.). Honey Hill Drive N.E. City Limits $1,013 642.00 0.40 $405,457.00
Barton Road (w.b.) Honey Hill Drive N.E. City Limits $1,520,462.00 0.40 . $608,185.00
Michigan.Street Barton Road Commerce Way $462,844.00 0.40 $185,138.00
Michigan Street Commerce Way De Berry Street $742,297.00 0.40 $296,919.00
Main Street S.F.R.R. S.P.R.R. $226,224.00 0.40 $90,490.00
Mt.Vernon Avenue Barton Road 700 ft. North of Minona Drive $616,294.00 0.40 $246,518.00
Mt.Vernon Avenue Canal Street N. City Limits $578,036.00 0.40 $231,214.00
Commerce Way 900 ft. North of De Berry St. Pico Street $10,820,161.00 1.00 $10,820,161.00
Commerce Way Pico Street Main Street $3,568,351.00 1.00 $3,568,351.00
TOTAL. $27,090,878.00 $19,469,460.00
mental funding for arterial infrastructure
that will become available under San Bernardino County's Measure I Program
starting in 2010; and
WHEREAS, notice of public hearing has been provided per Government Code
Section 6062a, oral and written presentation made and received, and the
required public hearing held; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to California Government Code Section 60623a, a general
explanation of the hereinafter contained in schedule of fees and charges has
been published as required; and
WHEREAS, all requirements of California Government Code Section 6600 et.
seq. are hereby found to have been complied with; and
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND
TERRACE DOES HEREBY ORDAINED AS FOLLOWS:
Rescinding the fees and Table "B" in Chapter 4.104.050 and replace with the
following:
ments of Section
15.58.090 (Reporting), or does not comply with any other requirements of this Chapter.
Section 15.58.110 Appeals
Any decision issued by the Waste Management Plan Compliance Official may be
appealed by submission of a written appeal to the City Manager within 10 calendar days
from the date of the decision.
First read at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City held on the 13th day of
January, 2009, and finally adopted and ordered posted at a regular meeting of said City
11 of 12
ll be used to verify whether waste generated from
the Covered Project has been or are to be recycled, reused, salvaged or disposed. The
applicant shall make reasonable efforts to ensure that all designated recyclable and reuse
waste salvaged or disposed are measured and recorded using the most accurate method of
measurement available.
To the extent practical, all construction and demolition waste shall be weighed in
compliance with all regulatory requirements for accuracy and maintenance. For
construction and demolition waste for which weighing is not practical due to small size or
other considerations, a volumetric measurement shall be used. For conversion of
volumetric measurements to weight, the applicant shall use the standardized conversion
rates approved by the City for this purpose.
10of12