02/09/2010 FIEZOPY
IL\T y
GRAt1D`TERR CIE
9,2010
22795 Barton Road'
Grand Terrace
California 92313-5295
Civic Center .CITY. OF -GRAND TE_ RRACE ,
(909)824-6621
Fax(909)783-7629
Fax(909)783-2600
CRA/CITY COUNCIL
Maryetta Ferrk
Mayor - REGULAR MEETINGS.
Lee.AnnGarcia 2ND AND 4TH Tuesday - 6:00 p.m.,
- Mayor Pro Tem
Bea Co"rtes
t Jim Miller
Walt Stanckiewitz
Council Members
'Betsy M.Adams
'¢ City Manager
Council Chambers
Grand Terrace'Civic Center ;
s
22795 Barton-Road
Grand Terrace, CA 92313-5295
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
COUNCIL MEETING
AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS February 9,2010
GRAND TERRACE CIVIC CENTER 6:00 p.m.
22795 Barton Road
THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE COMPLIES WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT OF 1990. IF YOU
REQUIRE SPECIAL ASSISTANCE TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING,PLEASE CALL THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE AT
(909)824-6621 AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE MEETING.
IF YOU DESIRE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL DURING THE MEETING,PLEASE COMPLETE A REQUEST TO
SPEAK FORM AVAILABLE AT THE ENTRANCE AND PRESENT IT TO THE CITY CLERK. SPEAKERS WILL BE CALLED
UPON BY THE MAYOR AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME.
ANY DOCUMENTS PROVIDED TO A MAJORITY OF THE CITY COUNCIL REGARDING ANY ITEM ON THIS AGENDA
WILL BE MADE AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE AT CITY HALL LOCATED AT
22795 BARTON ROAD DURING NORMAL BUSINESS HOURS. IN ADDITION,SUCH DOCUMENTS WILL BE POSTED ON
THE CITY'S WEBSITE AT WWW.CITYOFGRANDTERRACE.ORG
* Call to Order-
* Invocation-
* Pledge of Allegiance-
* Roll Call-
"s STAFF COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEMS RECOMMENDATION ACTION
CONVENE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
1. Approval of 01-26-2010 Minutes Approve
ADJOURN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
CONVENE CITY COUNCIL
1. Items to Delete
2. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS-None
3. CONSENT CALENDAR
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and
noncontroversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time
without discussion. Any Council Member.Staff Member,or Citizen
may request removal of an item from the Consent Calendar for
discussion.
A. Approve Check Register Dated 02-09-2010 Approve
B. Waive Full Reading of Ordinances on Agenda
C. Approval of O1-26-2010 Minutes Approve
D. Treasurer's Report for Quarter Ending December 31,2009 Approve
COUNCIL AGENDA
02-09-2010 PAGE 2 OF 2
AGENDA ITEMS STAFF COUNCIL
RECOMMENDATIONS ACTION
E. Historical & Cultural Activities Committee Minutes of Accept
01/04/2010
4. PUBLIC COMMENT
This is the opportunity for members of the public to comment on any
items not appearing on the regular agenda. Because of restrictions
contained in California Law,the City Council may not discuss or act
on any item not on the agenda,but may briefly respond to statements
made or ask a question for clarification. The Mayor may also
request a brief response from staff to questions raised during public i
comment or may request a matter be agendized for a future meeting.
5. COUNCIL REPORTS
6. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace, Approve
California Rescinding the Traffic Signal Improvement and
Arterial Improvement Fee Schedules (4.104) and Replacing it
with a New Fee Structure
B. Community Development Block Grant(CDBG) Program Year Prioritize/Authorize
20 10-1 1 Prioritization of Funds
7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS-None
A. Second Reading of an Ordinance of the City Council of the City Approve
of Grand Terrace Adding Chapter 15.56 to Title 15 of the Grand
Terrace Municipal Code Establishing a Water Efficient
Landscape Ordinance.
8. NEW BUSINESS-None
9. CLOSED SESSION
A. Closed Session - Conference with Real Property Negotiators
(Government Code Section 54956.8)
Prove -APN 0275-231-17(21975 Grand Terrace Road)
Agency Negotiator-Betsy M. Adams
Under Neeotiation-Price and Terms of Payment
ADJOURN
THE NEXT CRA/CITY COUNCIL MEETING WILL BE HELD ON
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 23,2010,AT 6:00 P.M.
...........................................................................................................................
AGENDA ITEM REQUESTS MUST BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING
TO THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE NO LATER THAN 14
CALENDAR DAYS PRECEDING THE MEETING.
PENDING GRA APPROVAL
OF GRAND TERRACE
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING -JANUARY 26,2010
A regular meeting of the Community Redevelopment Agency, City of Grand Terrace,was held in
the Council Chambers,Grand Terrace Civic Center,22795 Barton Road,Grand Terrace,California,
on January 26, 2010 at 6:00 p.m.
PRESENT: Maryetta Ferre, Chairman
s Lee Ann Garcia, Vice-Chairman
Bea Cortes, Agency Member
Walt Stanckiewitz, Agency Member
Betsy M. Adams, City Manager
Brenda Mesa, City Clerk
Bernie Simon, Finance Director
Joyce Powers, Community&Economic Development Director
Richard Shields, Building& Safety Director
John Harper, City Attorney
Sgt. Carlos Espinoza, Sheriff's Department
John Salvate, San Bernardino County Fire Department
ABSENT: Jim Miller, Agency Member
CONVENE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AT 6.00 P.M.
APPROVAL OF 01-12-2010 MINUTES
CRA-2010-05 MOTION BY VICE-CHAIRMAN GARCIA, SECOND BY AGENCY MEMBER
CORTES,CARRIED 4-0-1-0(AGENCY MEMBER MILLER WAS ABSENT),to
approve the January 12, 2010 Community Redevelopment Agency Minutes.
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENTS -ALBERT A .WEBB
Chairman Ferrd announced that Item Number 2. Traffic Engineering Services Agreements-Albert
A. Webb was pulled from the Agenda and will come back to the Agency at their next meeting.
Chairman Ferre adjourned the Community Redevelopment Agency Meeting at 6:35'p.m., until the
next CRA/City Council Meeting that is scheduled to be held on Tuesday, February 9,2010 at 6:00
p.m.
SECRETARY of the Community Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Grand Terrace
CHAIRMAN of the Community Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Grand Terrace DRA AGENDA ITEM NO. ,
vchlist Voucher List Page: 1
02/03/2010 10:47:40AM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
Bank code. bofa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
64820 1/26/2010 011071 STANCKIEWITZ,W. 305119204-FEB HEALTH INS REINBURSEMENT-W. STANCKIEWITZ
10-110-142-000-000 343.94
Total: 343.94
64821 1/26/2010 010290 KAISER PERMANENTE 00-0005559630-FI HEALTH INS.-L. GARCIA
10-110-142-000-000 404.86
10-110-120-000-000 267.14
Total: 672.00
64822 1/26/2010 010996 CA PUB EMPLOYEES'RET. SYSTEM H2O10021493000 FEBRUARY EMPLOYEE HEALTH INS
10-120-142-000-000 717.71
10-125-142-000-000 552.10
10-140-142-000-000 828.15
10-172-142-000-000 184.04
10-175-142-000-000 147.22
10-180-142-000-000 1,159.39
10-370-142-000-000 625.70
10-380-142-000-000 36806
10-440-142-000-000 2,313.36
10-450-142-000-000 552.09
21-572-142-000-000 441.67
32-200-142-000-000 533.69
32-370-142-000-000 40487
34-400-142-000-000 515.25
10-190-265-000-000 8066
10-022-61-00 7,612.30
10-022-55-00 1,104.18
Total: 18,140.44
64823 1/26/2010 005702 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT PRend 1-22-10 Contributions for PRend 1-22-10
10-022-62-00 19,188.26
Total: 19,188.26
64824 2/2/2010 010998 AETNA AAkP PLANS 4710331002 HEALTH INS.-B. CORTES
10-110-142-000-000 440.15
10-110-120-000-000 100.85
J� Page: 1
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. �� 1
vchlist Voucher List Page: 2
02/03/2010 10:47:40AM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
Bank code: bofa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
64824 2/2/2010 010998 AETNA AARP PLANS (Continued) Total: 541.00
64825 2/3/2010 010737 WESTERN DENTAL SERVICES INC Feb 002484 FEBRUARY EMPLOYEE DENTAL INSURANCE
10-022-61-00 73.62
Total: 73.62
64826 2/3/2010 001206 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION DEC-JAN 2010 DEC/JAN Visa Usage Charges
10-120-210-000-000-City Manager Office Supplies 27.23
10-370-268-000-000-Community Development Training 175.00
10-440-225-000-000-Winter Break School Age Program 77.66
10-440-228-000-000-Winter Break Pre-School Program 4.48
23-200-14-00-Child Care Trust Account 39.56
Total: 323.93
64827 2/9/2010 010019 5 POINT AUTO SERVICE 14826 Maintenance Vehicle Svc-'00 Chevy
10-180-272-000-000 47.42
Total: 47.42
64828 2/9/2010 001024 ACCENT PRINT&DESIGN 254290 SR. CTR NEWSLETTER PRINTING
10-805-222-000-000 90.51
Total: 90.51
64829 2/9/2010 010678 ARCHIVE MANAGEMENT SERVICE 00887615 TAPE STORAGE
10-180-250-000-000 55.22
10-140-250-000-000 55.21
Total: 110.43
64830 2/9/2010 001213 AT&T 90982470137936- January dsl Service
10-440-235-000-000 80.89
Total: 80.89
64831 2/9/2010 010280 AVID IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMS 270641 Animal Clinic Chip Program
10-200-15 512.50
Total: 512.50
64832 2/9/2010 001694 CA DEPARTMENT OF, SOCIAL SERVICES 2009/10 3609084 Annual Licensing RO#09
- 10-440-228-000-000 2,640.00
Page: 2
vchlist 46ucher List Page: 3
02103/2010 10:47:40AM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
Bank code: bofa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
64832 2/9/2010 001694 CA DEPARTMENT OF, SOCIAL SERVICES (Continued) Total: 2,640.00
64833 2/9/2010 001713 CA.'DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION 187136 December 1-215 on/off ramp Maint.
16-510-238-000-000 35.40
Total: 35.40
64834 2/9/2010 011104 CHAMBERLAIN, KATHERINE 012010 Office Supplies Purch. Reimb.
10-370-210-000-000 68.59
Total: 68.59
64835 2/9/2010 010726 CHAMBERS GROUP INC. 24592 EIR.FOR GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
10-370-250-000-000 6,461.50
Total: 6,461.50
64836 2/9/2010 011031 CINTAS CORPORATION#150 150810341 C. CARE SUPPLIES
10-440-228-000-000 44.37
150819466 C. CARE SUPPLIES
10-440-228-000-000 68.03
Total: 112.40
64837 2/9/2010 001840 CITY OF COLTON 000974 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES
10-190-256-000-000 3,629.00
Total: 3,629.00
64838 2/9/2010 010403 CITY OF REDLANDS AR125851 Maint/Child Care CNG Fuel
10-180-272-000-000 11.00
10-440-272-000-000 9.50
Total: 20.50
64839 2/9/2010 010866 CIVIC PLUS 76802 WEBSITE MAINT FEE
10-125-250-000-000 615.00
Total: 615.00
64840 2/9/2010 001867 COMMERCIAL LANDSCAPE SUPPLY 165149 LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES
10-450-245-000-000 14.07
Total: 14.07
64841 2/9/2010 001907 COSTCO#478 2386 C. CARE SUPPLIES
Page: 3
vchlist Voucher List Page: 4
02/03/2010 10:47:40AM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
Bank code: bofa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
64841 2/9/2010 001907 COSTCO#478 (Continued)
10-440-228-000-000 129.24
10-440-220-000-000 43.08
2388 C. CARE SUPPLIES
10-440-228-000-000 10988
10-440-220-000-000 36.63
Total: 318.83
64842 2/9/2010 001930 DAILY JOURNAL CORPORATION B1773880 LEGAL ADVERTISING
10-125-230-000-000 83.60
B1773881 LEGAL ADVERTISING
10-125-230-000-000 198.00
Total: 281.60
64843 2/9/2010 002165 DRUG ALTERNATIVE PROGRAM 7750 January Park Maintenance
10-450-245-000-000 1,000.00
Total: 1,000.00
64844 2/9/2010 002187 DUNN-EDWARDS CORP. 2018075643 PAINT&SUPPLIES
10-180-245-000-000 26.82
Total: 26.82
64845 2/9/2010 002740 FRUIT GROWERS SUPPLY 90458226 MAINTENANCE AND SUPPLIES
10-450-246-000-000 4619
90461507 MAINTENANCE AND SUPPLIES
10-450-245-000-000 33.02
Total: 79.21
64846 2/9/2010 002901 G.T.AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 5833-M.NITE Market Night Ent/Lights/Restrooms
23-200-12-00 350.00
5892-AD CITY CONTRIBUTION TO JOINT NEWSLETTER
10-125-213-000-000 870.00
Total: 1,220.00
64847 2/9/2010 010258 GMAC PAYMENT PROCESSING CENTER 024910315936-FE LEASE GMAC TAHOE VIN#1GNFC130X7R248904
10-120-273-000-000 559.21
Total: 559.21
Page. 4
{
vchlist voucher List �_ Page: 5
02/03/2010 10:47:40AM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
Bank code: bofa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
64848 2/9/2010 002867 GOLDEN PROTECTIVE SERVICES 126334 RUBBER GLOVES
10-440-228-000-000 86.78
Total: 86.78
64849 2/9/2010 010181 GOPHER PATROL 194387 GOPHER CONTROL
10-450-245-000-000 525.00
Total: 525.00
64850 2/9/2010 010164 GREAT-WEST PPE 01/22/2010 Deferred Comp Contrib. PPE 1/22/10
10-022-63-00 6,035.34
10-022-64-00 1,498.90
Total: 7,534.24
64851 2/9/2010 010559 GST-JAGUAR JO1315145 Misc Toner Cartridges
10-180-210-000-000 258.09
JO1315187 Misc Printer Supplies
10-370-210-000-000 858.05
Total: 1,116.14
64852 2/9/2010 003152 HARPER&BURNS LLPN DECEMBER 2009 December Legal Services
10-160-250-000-000 6,941.25
32-200-251-000-000 6,941.25
Total: 13,882.50
64853 2/9/2010 011097 HARRIS TRANSFER 201001-59 Sand supply for erosion control
10-180-245-000-000 235.26
Total: 235.26
64854 2/9/2010 010632 HIGH TECH SECURITY SYSTEMS 90086 SECURITY CAMERA MAINT.AGREEMENT
10-180-246-000-000 20.00
10-450-246-000-000 60.00
Total: 80.00
64855 2/9/2010 011076 HOMAYOON SHAMOLIAN, DBA CONTINENTA 120901 Comm Improvmnt Program Reimb
32-600-304-000-000 9,000.00
Total: 9,000.00
64856 2/9/2010 003216 HOUSTON & HARRIS PCS, INC. 10-15743 HYDROWASHING
Page. 5
vchlist Voucher List Page: 6
02/03/2010 10:47:40AM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
Bank code: bofa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
64856 2/9/2010 003216 HOUSTON&HARRIS PCS, INC. (Continued)
21-573-602-000-000 850.00
Total: 850.00
64857 2/9/2010 003224 HYDRO-SCAPE PRODUCTS'INC. 06230510-00 LANDSCAPR/MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
10-180-245-000-000 16.35
06234385-00 LANDSCAPR/MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
10-450-245-000-000 270.97
06234421-00 LANDSCAPR/MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
10-450-245-000-000 29.23
Total: 316.55
64858 2/9/2010 011019 INFORMATION STATION SPECIALIST 207912 Radio Equip for EOC/CERT
10-808-701-000-000 353.44
Total: 353.44
64859 2/9/2010 003850 JANI-KING OF CA., INC. LAX02100038 CHILD CARE CLEANING SERVICES
10-440-244-000-000 975.00
Total: 975.00
64860 2/9/2010 011103 KARGER HOMES 16624 Street Cut Deposit Refund
23-302-10-00' 5,525.00
Total: 5,525.00
64861 2/9/2010 010812 - LOWE'S COMMERCIAL SERVICES 11708 MAINT. SUPPLIES
10-450-245-000-000 8.34
11708A Misc Maintenance Supplies
10-440-245-000-000 44.54
10-180-218-000-000 7.58
Total: 60.46
64862 2/9/2010 010690 LSA ASSOCIATES INC. 96409F TOWN SQUARE MASTER PLAN EIR
- 32-600-212-000-000 7,890.00
Total: 7,890.00
64863 2/9/2010 011089 MURPHY, MICHAEL J. 01202010 SR CTR KITCHEN CONST DRAWINGS/SPECS
32-600-311-000-000 2,540.00
Page: 6
vchlist voucher List Page: 7
02/0312010 10:47:40AM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
Bank code: bofa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
64863 2/9/2010 011089 MURPHY, MICHAEL J. (Continued) Total: 2,540.00
64864 2/9/2010 010097 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 410575025-088 Dec Nextel Service
10-180-240-000-000 375.02
10-440-235-000-000 53.18
Total: 428.20
64865 2/9/2010 011099 ORANGE COUNTY STRIPING SVC 0042808 Signs for Grand Terrace Road
13-445-710-000-000 223.00
Total: 223.00
64866 2/9/2010 005586 PETTY CASH 01282010 Child Care Petty Cash
10-440-223-000-000 10.31
10-440-210-000-000 55.50
10-440-228-000-000 75.74
Total: 141.55
64867 2/9/2010 011096 ROY O. HUFFM_AN ROOF COMPANY 6773 CITY HALL-REMOVE, FIX AND REPLACE TILE
10-180-706-000-000 8,940.00
Total: 8,940.00
64868 2/9/2010 006557 S.B. COUNTY DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS FC085/10 NPDES FLOOD AGREEMENT
12-903-701-000-000 2,645.00
Total: 2,645.00
64869 2/9/2010 006720 SO.CA.EDISON COMPANY 01282010 Dec/Jan Utility Service
10-172-238-000-000 38.63
10-175-238-000-000 30.90
34-400-238-000-000 84.99
10-190-238-000-000 2,216.05
10-440-238-000-000 538.86
10-450-238-000-000 1,036.31
16-510-238-000-000 403.31
Total: 4,439.05
64870 2/9/2010 006737 SPECTRATURF INC. DR104-2313 Playground surface maint/repairs
10-440-245-000-000 1,303.68
Page: 7
vchlist Voucher List Page: 8
02/0312010 10:47:40AM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
Bank code: bofa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
64870 2/9/2010 006737 SPECTRATURF INC. (Continued) Total: 1,303.68
64871 2/9/2010 006778 STAPLES 7059026422 Misc Office Supplies
10-180-210-000-000 7778
10-370-210-000-000 8.56
10-190-210-000-000 131.24
Total: 217.58
64872 2/9/2010 006898 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF L.A. 001201313 FOOD&SUPPLIES
10-440-220-000-000 464.91
001270382 FOOD&SUPPLIES
10-440-220-000-000 489.26
Total: 954.17
64873 2/9/2010 007102 T.Y.LIN INTERNATIONAL 1001044 CHG ORD#4 BARTON BRIDGE
47-100-250-001-000 760.54
Total: 760.54
64874 2/9/2010 010934 THE SATELLITE WORKS INC. 3008190035 MONTHLY PHONE SERVICE
10-808-235-000-000 46.66
Total: 46.66
64875 2/9/2010 007400 U. S. BANK TRUST N.A. 786694000 Int Due-'04 CRA TAB
33-300-208-000-000 93,487.50
Total: 93,487.60
64876 2/9/2010 007220 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT 120100277 January Dig Alert Tickets
16-900-220-000-000 18.00
Total: 18.00
64877 2/9/2010 001038 VERIZON WIRELESS-LA 0836891726 January Cell Service-Public Works
34-400-235-000-000 100.72
Total: 100.72
64878 2/9/2010 007843 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC 62543 CITY WIDE TREE SERVICE
16-900-260-000-000 968.00
63466 CITY WIDE TREE SERVICE
16-900-260-000-000 1,875.00
Page: 8
vchlist voucher List Page: 9
02/03/2010 10:47:40AM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
Bank code: bofa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
64878 2/9/2010 007843 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC (Continued) Total: 2,843.00
64879 2/9/2010 007880 WEST GROUP 819890999 CA CODE UPDATES
10-125-250-000-000 432.29
Total: 432.29
64880 2/9/2010 010993 WINZER CORPORATION 3625201 Graffitti Removal Chemical
10-180-255-000-000 219.80
Total: 219.80
64881 2/9/2010 007987 XEROX CORPORATION 045890772 CC55 COPIER LEASE
10-190-700-000-000 371.33
045890773 CC265 COPIER LEASE
10-190-700-000-000 294.34
Total: 665.67
64882 2/9/2010 007984 YOSEMITE WATERS 20935359 December Water Delivery Svcs
10-190-238-000-000 52.64
10-440-238-000-000 46.50
10-805-238-000-000 5.74
34-400-238-000-000 5.74
Total: 110.62
63 Vouchers for bank code: bofa Bank total: 226,154.47
63 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 226,154.47
Page: 9
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the afore-listed checks for payment of City and
Community Redevelopment Agency liabilities have been audited by me and are necessary and
appropriate for the operation of City and Agency.
A
Bernie Simon, Finance Director
City of Grand Terrace
Warrant Register Index
FD No. Fund Name Dept No. Department Name General Account Numbers
10 GENERAL FUND 110 CITY COUNCIL 110 SALARIESIWAGES
11 Street Fund 120 CITY MANAGER 139 EMPLOYEES'BENEFIT PLAN
12 Storm Drain Fund 125 CITY CLERK 140 RETIREMENT
13 Park Fund 140 FINANCE 142 HEALTH/LIFE INSURANCE
14 AB 3229 COPS Fund 160 CITY ATTORNEY 143 WORKERS'COMPENSATION
15 Air Quality Improvement Fund 172 BUILDING&SAFETY 138/141 MEDICARE/SUI
16 Gas Tax Fund 175 PUBLIC WORKS 210 OFFICE EXPENSE
17 Traffic Safety Fund/TDA Fund 180 COMMUNITY SERVICES 218-219 NON-CAPITAL FURN/SMALL TOOLS
19 Facilities Development Fund 185 RENTAL INSPECTION PROGRAM 220 SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL EXP
20 Measure I Fund 190 GENERAL GOVERNMENT(NON-DEPT) 230 .ADVERTISING
21 Waste Water Disposal Fund 370 COMMUNITY&ECONOMIC DEV 235 COMMUNICATIONS
26 LSCPG/LGHTG Assessment Dist 380 MGT INFORMATION SYSTEMS 238-239 UTILITIES
44 Bike Lane Capital Fund 410 LAW ENFORCEMENT 240-242 RENTS&LEASES
46 Street Improvement Projects 430 RECREATION SERVICES 245-246 MAINT BLDG GRNDS EQUIPMNT
47 Barton Rd. Bridge Project 440 CHILD CARE 250-251 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
32 CRA-CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND 450 PARKS MAINTENANCE 255-256 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
33 CRA-DEBT SERVICE FUND 631 STORM DRAIN MAINTENANCE 260 INSURANCE&SURETY BONDS
34 CRA-LOW&MOD HOUSING 801 PLANNING COMMISSION 265 MEMBERSHIPS&DUES
802 CRIME PREVENTION UNIT 268 TRAINING
804 HISTORICAL&CULTURAL COMM. 270 TRAVEUCONFERENCES/MTGS
805 SENIOR CITIZENS PROGRAM 272 FUEL&VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
807 PARKS&REC COMMITTEE 570 WASTEWATER TREATMENT
808 EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PROG. 33-300 DEBT SERVICE
7XX FACILITIES IMPRV(NO CIP)
700 COMPUTER-RELATED
701 VEHICLES& EQUIPMENT
PENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING -JANUARY 26,2010
A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace was called to order in-the Council
Chambers,Grand Terrace Civic Center,22795 Barton Road,Grand Terrace,California,on January
26, 2010 at 6:00 p.m.
PRESENT: Maryetta Ferre, Mayor
Lee Ann Garcia, Mayor Pro Tem
Bea Cortes, Councilmember
Jim Miller, Councilmember
Walt Stanckiewitz, Councilmember
Betsy M. Adams, City Manager
Brenda Mesa, City Clerk
Bernard Simon, Finance Director
Joyce Powers, Community&Economic Development Director
Richard Shields, Building& Safety Director
John Harper, City Attorney
Sgt. Carlos Espinoza, San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department
John Salvate, San Bernardino County Fire Department
ABSENT: None
CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
The City Council meeting was opened with Invocation by Mayor Pro Tem Lee Ann Garcia,
followed by the Pledge of Allegiance led by Councilwoman Bea Cortes.
ITEMS TO ADD/DELETE
City Manager Betsy M. Adams indicated that item 3E. Traffic. Engineering Services
Agreements-Transportation Engineering and Planning,Inc.will be pulled from the Agenda
and will come back to the Council at their next meeting.
SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
2A. Chamber of Commerce Buisness of the Month-Lion's Club
Sally McGuire, Grand Terrace Area Chamber of Commerce President, announced that the
Grand Terrace Lion's Club is the Business of the Month for the month of January. The
Lion's Club has been a member of the Chamber for many years and she thanked them for
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO.
i
7
Council Minutes
01/26/2010
Page 2
their many years of continued support. J!
I
Frank Tetley,thanked the Chamber for the recognition.
I
2B. Update on High School Construction-Jim Ayala, CJUSD
I
Jim Ayala, CJUSD,gave an update on the construction of the Grand Terrace Highs School
at the Ray Abril Jr. Educational Complex.
CONSENT CALENDAR
CC-2010-05 MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM GARCIA, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER
CORTES,CARRIED 4-0-1-0(COUNCILMEMBER MILLER WAS ABSENT),to
approve the following Consent Calendar Items with the removal of Item 3A and 3E.
3B. Waive.Full Reading of Ordinances on Agenda
3C. Approval of 01-12-2010 Minutes
3D. Professional Services Contract for Preparation of an Environmental Initial
Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Canal Village Project
3F. Crime Prevention Committee Minutes of 08-10-2009 & 09-14-2009
ITEM REMOVED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR
3A. ' Approve Check Register Dated 01-26-2010
CC-2010-06 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER STANCKIEWITZ, SECOND BY MAYOR
PRO TEM GARCIA, CARRIED 4-0-1-0 (COUNCILMEMBER MILLER WAS
ABSENT),to approve the Check Register Dated January 26,2010.
PUBLIC COMMENT
i
Bernardo-Sandoval,22950 De Berry,expressed his concern and frustration with the situation
that is going on with Councilmember Miller and the rule of law. It appears that the District
Attorney is out to have it for Jim Miller. In a County where hundreds.of thousands of dollars
are being submitted in campaign contributions and where favors are being extracted for those
specific developers, we have an individual who is concerned about our community, an'
individual that wants to make a difference in our community who is being railroaded by the
law. He is disappointed at the level of support that he is receiving from the members of the
City Council. He doesn't believe that we are a small City that can't fight outside of the
borders of Grand Terrace. The Council is aware of the things that are going on inside of the
County and inside of other Cities and areas. You don't have to be an expert to know that
what is going on with Mr. Miller is wrong.- He has lived in Grand Terrace most of his life
Council Minutes
01/26/2010
Page 3
and he would like to know that the current City Council has the courage to defend one of
their own and residents in Grand Terrace that would be railroaded by a District Attorney that
is trying to extract a political favor. A unified statement of support,for Jim Miller,which the
Council knows in your heart is the correct thing.
COUNCIL REPORTS
Mayor Pro Tem Lee Ann Garcia, reported that she attended the Chamber luncheon and
encouraged everyone to attend them. She reported that on Thursday,February 11 'there will
be a business open house at the Thai Kitchen from 5:30 to 7:30 p.m. On Monday,February
1"Market Night will be held and encouraged everyone to come out and to spread the word.
Councilmember Bea Cortes, thanked Building and Safety/Public Works Director Rich
Shields and the Maintenance Department for their quick response to the damage that took
place because of the storms.
Councilmember Walt Stanckiewitz, encouraged everyone to support Market Night.
Mayor Maryetta Ferrd, reported that every year, as Mayor, she attends the City Selection
Committee Meeting, which is in March. At that time they hold the elections for certain
offices. For this time it is LAFCO. She stated that if there is any Councilmember that is
interested in applying to be in a LAFCO position let her know.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
6A. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace,California,Adopting
Residential-and Commercial Solid Waste and Recycling Rates
Lynn Merrill, gave a presentation on the proposed Resolution.
Mayor Ferrel opened the Public Hearing for discussion, there being none, she returned
discussion to the Council.
CC-2010-07 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER CORTES, SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM
GARCIA, CARRIED 4-0-0-1 (COUNCILMEMBER MILLER ABSTAINED), to
approve a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace, California,
Adopting Residential and Commercial Solid Waste and Recycling Rates.
6B. First Reading of an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace
Adding Chapter 15.56 to Title 15 of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code Establishing
a Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance.
I
Council Minutes
01/26/2010
Page 4
Sandra Molina, Planner, gave a presentation on the proposed Water Efficient Landscape
Ordinance. -She stated that in 2006 the California State Legislature adopted the Water
Conservation in Landscaping Act of 2006("Act"), requiring the:California Department of
Resources to update the State Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. The purpose of
the Act is to promote the conservation and efficient use of water and to prevent water waste
as it relates to landscape design, installation, maintenance and management. The Act
requires all local agencies to adopt the model ordinance or develop an ordinance that is of
least as effective as the model ordinance by January 2010. In accordance with the Act;
.Chapter 15.56 Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance("Ordinance"),was developed from the
Staie's model ordinance.
Councilmember Stanckiewitz, questioned if this would impact current residents.
Planner Molina,responded that this would only affect current residents if they wanted to add
5,000 sq feet or greater of new landscaping.
Councilmember Stanckiewitz, questioned what organization within the City will be doing
the approval of the Certificate of Completion.
Planner Molina,responded that it would be the Planning Department.
Mayor Ferre opened the Public Hearing.
Doug Wilson, 12168 Observation Drive, stated that the proposed Ordinance is very strict;
It is a very important Ordinance. He feels that it is important for the City to know what the
local Water Agency can require because it could affect the existing homeowners.
i
Mayor Ferre closed the Public Hearing and returned discussion to the Council.
Mayor Pro Tern Garcia, questioned if Staff will be able to handle the extra time that it will
take to implement this ordinance.
i
Planner Molina,responded that Staff will have to establish some implementation guidelines
and once those are in place it will help. When the Development Code is updated they will
re-evaluate this ordinance again.
i
Mayor Ferr6, questioned again how this Ordinance can affect current residents that do new
landscaping under 5,000 sq.feet.
Planner Molina,responded that the way the Ordinance is written,it will apply to homeowner
provided landscaping that's 5,000 square feet or greater. It will apply to existing landscapes
i
Council Minutes
01/26/2010
Page 5
that are one acre or more and referred to section 15.50.220.
Councilmember Stanckiewitz,questioned if we draft our own Ordinance at a later date,will
we be able to mitigate some of these issues with the cooperation of the Water Agency.
- _ Planner Molina,responded in the affirmative: She stated that when the time comes they will
look at what other City's have done in an effort to simplify it.
CC-2010-08 MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM GARCIA, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER
CORTES, CARRIED 5-0,to approve.the first reading of an-Ordinance of the City
Council of the City of Grand Terrace Adding Chapter 15.56 to Title 15 of the Grand
Terrace Municipal Code Establishing a Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance.
6C. An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace, California,
Amending,Chapter 8.112 of the Grand Terrace.Municipal Code Regulating the Sale
and Discharge of Fireworks
Ci , Manager Betsy M.Adams,indicated that a proposed fireworks Ordinance was presented
to the City Council at their meeting of December 8,2009. At that meeting,the City Council
directed staff to bring back the Ordinance to the Meeting of January 12, 2010 along with
agreements with the Grand Terrace Little League and the Grand Terrace Community Soccer
Club. At the Meeting of January 12, 2010 staff requested that this,item be continued to the
Meeting of January 26, 2010. The Council.approve continuing the item and also requested
that information on the history of fireworks in Grand Terrace be provided. The History has
been provided to the Council as well as other information from the San Bernardino County
Sheriff's Department and the San Bernardino County Fire Department and TNT Fireworks.
She requested direction from the Council on how they would like staff to proceed.
Mayor Ferrd, stated that it indicated in the report that the sports groups have received
$7,000.00 to $7,500.00, each for fireworks sales in the past.
Cily Manager Adams, confirmed that that is the information staff has received from the
leagues.
Mayor Ferrel,also confirmed that the City has offered to waive fees which would be a savings
for each group that would be $3,000.00 to.$5,000.00 depending on the number of children
that signed up to play.
Ci y Manager Adams, responded in the affirmative.
Mayor Ferrd opened the Public Hearing.
Council Minutes
01/26/2010
Page 6
Ryan Beebe, 22646 Lark Street, stated that he does not believe that they would be helping
the youth and the future of Grand Terrace by banning fireworks. The Leagues need the sale
of fireworks to function. He feels that even if you ban the sale of fireworks, residents will
still buy them and use them in Grand Terrace. Fireworks are sold in Colton. He doesn't feel
that banning the sale of fireworks will solve the problem, it would just take the revenue out
of the sports of Grand Terrace. He feels that the local kids need to be supported and
encouraged the Council to allow the continuance of the sale of fireworks.
Teresa Gray,22819 DeBerry Street,as the treasurer of the Grand Terrace Community Soccer
Club,she stated that the fireworks booth is a big fundraiser for the club and they raised over
$6,000.00 last year for their organization. The Little League received the same amount.
These funds help them to pay for everything from uniforms, trophies, tournament plays;
supplies to keep the fields painted as well as scholarships. She encouraged the Council to
consider their request to keep their stand to ensure that the league is able to provide valuable
services to the community and to their kids.
Denis Kidd, 22874 Pico Street, stated that he is in favor of banning fireworks. He realizes
that they are lots of fun and the money supports worthy causes, however,he feels that they
are dangerous. There was a big fire three years ago that was caused by fireworks. He
questioned what it will take to ban fireworks, his house burning down?
Doug Wilson, 12168 Observation, stated that the right to enjoy fireworks in celebration of
their freedom goes back to the very formation of the United States. John Adams and many
of his countryman adopted the practice of celebrating our independence from tyranny in
1777,six years before Americans even knew whether the new nation would ever survive the
war. Last time he stood at the podium he informed the body that his great,great,great,great
grandfather purchased his individual right to celebrate independence by serving the
revolutionary war. He feels that all of the Wilsons that followed suit by defending our
freedom would caution not to discard any of our rights so casually. He stands before the
Council on behalf of his grand daughter, in her ten years on this earth she has been careful
not to abuse the privilege and responsibility granted by the City of Grand Terrace to celebrate
freedom individually. He questioned if the Council really believes that outlawing the use of
safe and sane fireworks will protect people from being stupid. How far do we go to that
effort? He stated that there is no agreement to replace loss revenue to fund sports teams if
it is legislate it away. The loss will be significant and where will they go with their hand out?
Frankly, if it is not broken why are we fixing it? He encouraged the Council to put their
efforts to better use. Solve some real issues and leave fireworks to be the way it has been for
223 years.
Josie Johnson, 12657 Reed Avenue,expressed her concern with the irresponsible people that
use fireworks in the community. She realizes that the youth organizations need the money
but feels that there are other ways for the organizations to generate money. Riverside County
Council Minutes
01/26/2010
Page 7
provides public displays of fireworks and it works out just fine. She would like to see
fireworks banned in Grand Terrace.
Paul Darr, 1043 Santo Antonio Drive, Colton, stated that he is the Chair for the San
Bernardino County Libertarian Party and currently he is a Staff Sgt. in the United States
Army Reserve and an Iraq War Veteran. He is speaking as a Libertarian Representative and
as a Veteran. He feels that there are many reasons to not ban the sale of safe and sane
fireworks. There is the fiscal impact, which will be deeply felt especially during these
economic times. Many would call this fiscally irresponsible. Most importantly this
represents a further encroachment on personal liberties of those residing in this beautiful city.
He feels that this is greatly disturbing, every day liberties are limited by the government.
Please don't limit liberties at the City level. He feels that surrendering freedom for hopes of
safety that can't be ensured is the wrong decision. He feels that as a Veteran this is also
disturbing as he has signed up to put his life on the line to protect liberties of people. This
is just one small liberty being taken away, piece by piece. He asked the Council to oppose
the Ordinance.
JoAnn Johnson, 12723 Mt. Vernon Avenue, stated that she has been listening to both sides
and she can honestly understand and feel for both sides, however, she has been opposed to
fireworks in Grand Terrace since day one and she voiced her opinion at that time. Since then
she has relented,and every year on 41h of July her family from Riverside comes to her house
and has a blast. She has been lucky enough to have a tennis court in her back yard which is
perfect for doing fireworks. She is still very much opposed to fireworks in Grand Terrace
for the following reasons, it frightens the pets and fire danger. She feels that people would
come forward to help with the financing of the sports organizations if the request was put out
there. She counts herself as one of the very first to step forward should that happen.
Ken Boardman, Grand Terrace Little League,22022 Tanager, stated that it feels like he has
been speaking about fireworks for the past two years. He stated that he is starting to realize
that he is naive about a few things. When he first heard that the City wanted to ban
fireworks,the first thing that went through his mind was the citizens of Grand Terrace must
want to get rid of fireworks. He has always preached to his board that they need to be good
neighbors. They all live in Grand Terrace and if their neighbors want to get rid of fireworks
then that is what they need to do. Not a day goes by that he doesn't hear "why are you
getting rid of fireworks?" and now he wants to ask the City Council to react to their
constituents. If their constituents are asking them to get rid of fireworks then by all means
get rid of them but if one person on.the Council has an axe to grind with fireworks take that
axe somewhere else. If your constituents want fireworks then represent them. You can't ban
people from being stupid, where does it end. He is asking the City Council to do what their
constituents want them to do.
John Kelly, 555 N. Gilbert Street, Fullerton, representing TNT fireworks, stated that their
Council Minutes
01/26/2010
Page 8
position is to continue doing business in Grand Terrace. They read the entire staff report that
was provided by the City Manager. He referred to the memo that was provided by the fire
department and provided some clarification. He wanted to make sure that the Council
realizes the difference between legal and illegal fireworks. Legal fireworks are approved for
use by consumers in California by the State Fire Marshall's Office between June 28`h and
July 61h. City has the ability to operate within those constraints. He referred to a report that
was done by the Sheriff's Department and stated that statistics aren't pointing out that
fireworks is a problem. They have been working with the organizations and the City since
1998 and they actively participated in the City's Ad-hoc Committee and several
recommendations were made through that Committee and they reviewed all of those and feel
that they all worked and were continuing to work. They believe in education in an effort to
minimize stupidity. He urged the Council to make a decision tonight.
Tom Schwab,22687 Lark Street, indicated that he is very familiar with the fireworks issue.-
Originally Grand Terrace and Colton Little Leagues were together and they sold fireworks
together. When they split off and made Grand Terrace their own, Grand Terrace no longer
had access to those fireworks and it was at that time that the Council changed the law to
allow fireworks to be sold and used in Grand Terrace. If the question tonight is should we
have fireworks in Grand Terrace or not is really not something that the Council can decide;
You can ban fireworks in Grand Terrace and make them illegal for them to be sold but
regardless of what you do those fireworks will be here in Grand Terrace. They are illegal in.
Loma Linda and if you go there, there are just as many fireworks as there are in Grand
Terrace. The only thing you are doing is taking away the ability of the sports organizations
to sell fireworks and to be able to fund the sports leagues. The City does not have a
recreation program and we depend on these groups to provide for the children what the City
doesn't.
Mayor Ferre closed the public hearing and returned discussion to the Council.
Councilmember Stanckiewitz, referred to the recommendations of the Ad-Hoc Committee
#5 -Maintain the current ordinance that allows only youth sports groups to participate in the
sale and continue to limit it to one location. He stated that any other sports group that meets
the requirements can participate also and it would dilute the monies made by the two
organizations that this particular ordinance was fashioned for.
City Manager Adams,stated that as the ordinance was written it does not list the two groups:
It talks about requirements that you need to meet, etc. It so happens that the Soccer League
and Little League are the only two groups that meet the criteria. If you are asking if another
sports group became large enough that it also met the criteria would they be allowed to join;
the ordinance would not preclude that.
Mayor Pro Tern Garcia, stated that this is a very difficult issue and it is one that she has been
Council Minutes
01/26/2010
Page 9
around for since the beginning. She thanked the City Manager for a very thorough report and
is glad the past City Manager was able to refresh her memory. When she got elected in 1996
she wanted to say no to fireworks because of the safety issues and she was very concerned
about that. There was a test from 1997 to 1998 and there was nothing that happened and
every year she asks the Fire Department and Police Department is there anything that the City
needs to be concerned about. The fire that Mr. Kidd spoke about happened two days after
the 41h of July in 2006 and it was devastating. When the fire department talked about that
they said it was not conclusive but there was some evidence that showed it could have been
fireworks. The other thing they said was that there is a cycle of blue mountain burning. She
indicated that she sat on the AD-Hoc Committee and was able to .talk about the issue and
received an education on if you ban it, it doesn't make it go away. She whole heartedly
agrees with the safety issue but what she learned is the reality is the fireworks will continue
to be used in the City. When the issue of banning fireworks started-she stated that she would
not support banning fireworks without the support of the two sports leagues. She feels that
the youth is the future of the City and she feels that it is very important to support them.
Councilmember Miller, feels that there are a lot of issues to look at and it is a very
complicated decision to make. You can look at both sides and find ways to support each
side. He thanked the City Manager for the report and feels that it was very complete. He
realizes that safety is a big issue but he feels that we need to look at the financial side of this
LJ` as well. If the Council bans fireworks and the Leagues don't agree then they are going to
come to the City for financial assistance. It could be a loss to the City for up to $24,000.00.
As others have stated even if we ban the sale of fireworks,people.will still purchased them
elsewhere and use them in Grand Terrace. The real question is if they purchase fireworks
elsewhere and shoot them off in Grand Terrace do we have the resources to police it. In the
past the fireworks company donated money to help with that effort and if it is banned we
won't have those funds available. His real concern is that right now we don't know where
we are with the City on finances. He would like to know if we can sustain the cost of this.
He would also like to know if the Leagues themselves provided the City with any financial
information of what they may currently have if they in fact need the money from the
fireworks sales. He would like to have more information before he makes this decision. He
would like to see something from the Leagues that shows other sources of funding should
the fireworks sales go away.
Councilmember Cortes, stated that this is a difficult decision to make and feels that it is a
fiscal issue. She feels that it is their responsibility to protect the citizens but also provide
some type of funding for the sports organizations. She questioned if the Leagues did any
other types of fundraising or sponsorships.
Councilmember Stanckiewitz, stated that it appears to be a financial versus a safety issue.
He realizes that these are tough times for everyone. Is this something that the Council is
comfortable legislating. He questioned what the financial ramifications would be to go to
Council Minutes
01/26/2010
Page 10
the residents and asking what they want the City to do.
Ci , Manager Adams,responded that this is an item that can go before the voters. If we were
to do this at the next election the preliminary estimate is that it would be an additional$1,700
to $1,900 in cost to the City.
Mayor Ferre, stated that she doesn't think that there is any question that fireworks are a
serious public safety risk. The priority of the Council is public safety. When this item came
before the Council she voted to go along with the Ad-Hoc Committee. She stated that she
stated this back then that she would like to eventually see that fireworks were no longer in
Grand Terrace and to see the City come up with some type of financial support to help the
leagues and see what the leagues could come up with. At this time that has not been done.
The only way that we are going to solve this problem is for the leagues and the City Council
to work together. Obviously this Council is not ready to take a vote and she knows that
fireworks is a safety risk and weighs heavily on her.
CC-2010-09 MOTION BY COUCNILMEMBER STANCKIEWITZ, SECOND BY
COUNCILMEMBER MILLER, to table this ordinance and further investigate
placing this decision on the ballot for the next election so the voters can tell the
Council what they want.
Mayor Pro Tem Garcia,requested clarification on whether or not the Leagues will be coming
before the Council to ask for the sale of fireworks this year.
Ci . Manager Adams,responded that she has not heard that from the Leagues,however,she
heard that information from TNT. She stated that if they want to sell fireworks this summer
they have a time line that they need to comply with in order to get their permits from the
State.
Mayor Pro Tem Garcia,questioned if the City Manager felt that the Leagues would be open
to discussing some of the questions that the Council has brought up with regards to
fundraising,etc. She stated that she is very cautious about over-regulating. She believes that
residents want Council to make sure that they are safe,however,they don't want Council to
over-regulate. She feels that if there is a way that Council can come to a conclusion that is
good for the Leagues and the City, she would like to see that happen but wonders if that is
even a possibility.
Cily Manager Adams, stated that Staff can go back and attempt to meet with the sports
groups again. She stated that she will ask them the questions that the Council has brought
up this evening. She feels that there has been a lot of discussion regarding fireworks and an
agreement still has not been produced and she feels that it is not for a lack of discussion.
Council Minutes
01/26/2010
Page 11
Mayor Pro Tern Garcia, stated that having the fireworks issue go to the vote of the people
does not answer the question of fireworks for July 2010.
Councilmember Stanckiewitz,responded that if taking this item to the vote of the people is
the direction that the Council goes then he would support making an exception this year and
then see what happens.
\ Mayor Pro Tem Garcia,requested more information regarding the finances and how it will
affect the budget and questioned if it could come back to the Council on February 23,2010.
Mayor Ferre, requested clarification on what is on the table as far as a motion.
Councilmember Stanckiewitz, questioned what the deadline is for permits for the sale of
fireworks.
John Kelly, TNT Fireworks, stated that currently they use City property to place the booth
on. If the City is not going to allow them to do that this year then they will need to find
someplace in town and negotiate a lease agreement. He stated that March 31, 2010 would
be the deadline according to the Ordinance.
+� Councilmember Stanckiewitz withdrew his motion and Councilmember Miller concurred.
CC-2010-09 MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM GARCIA, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER
MILLER, CARRIED 5-0, to continue an Ordinance of the City Council of the City
of Grand Terrace, California, Amending Chapter 8.112 of the Grand Terrace
Municipal Code Regulating the Sale and Discharge of Fireworks to February 23,
2010 and direct staff to bring back more information and answers to the Council with
regards to the financial information and fundraising efforts of the Leagues.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS -None
NEW BUSINESS -None
CLOSED SESSION
9A. Closed Session - Conference with Real Property Negotiators (Government Code
Section 54956.8)
Property - APN 0275-231-48 through 0275-231-66 (Parcel South of 21945 Grand
Terrace Road/North of 21845 Grand Terrace Road)
Property-APN 0276-213-47(Parcel South of 11891 Preston Street/North of 11971
Preston Street)
Council Minutes
01/26/2010
Page 12
Agency Ne otiator- Betsy M. Adams
Under Negotiation - Price and Terms of Payment
Mayor Ferre announced that the Council met in Closed Session to have a conference with
Real Property Negotiators for properties APN 0275-231-48 and APN 0276-213-47 and that
there was no reportable action taken.
Mayor Ferr6 adjourned the meeting at 8:05 p.m., until the next City Council Meeting which is
scheduled to be held on Tuesday, February 9, 2010 at 6:00 p.m.
CITY CLERK of the City of Grand Terrace
MAYOR of the City of Grand Terrace
3
E
�LIFOKVI.a
AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: February 9, 2010 Council Item( X)` CRA Item ( )
- TITLE: Treasurer's Report for Quarter Ending December 31, 2009
PRESENTED BY: Bernie Simon, Finance Director
RECOMMENDATION: Approve
BACKGROUND:
Treasurer's Report of Cash and Investments should be presented to the governing body quarterly. This
reports all cash held and invested by the city. All fiscal agent funds are related to bond issues for which
the city has limited authority to access and invest funds as controlled by the.bond indenture.
DISCUSSION:
HIGHLIGHTS
Quarter-to-Date
Total,'cash and investments increased$2,224,178 or 13.53%over the previous quarter end with a total of
$18,658,490. The majority of the cash increase is attributable to the normal influx of revenue receipts in
the second quarter of the fiscal year.The average yield continues to decline as investment income yields
continue to decline. LAIF net yield is now approximately .56%in December 2009 compared to 1.51%in
June 2009.
Overall cash and investments, including cash with fiscal agent,increased 12.52%for the quarter for a
total of$19,958,576.The 1997 COP was refinanced through a private placement with Zion's Bank on
September 1,2009, in which a reserve deposit requirement was no longer required.
Fiscal Year-to-Date Compared to Previous Ouarter
Change in Treasury Position
Dec. 31A Sept. 30`h
2009 2009 Change %
Investment Pools 16,982,992 $14,769,278 2,213,714 14.98
Investment Instruments 1,081,038 1,081,038 0 0.00
Funds with Institutions 594,460 583,996 10,464 1 79
Total Cash and Investments $18,658,490 $16,434,312 -2,224,178 13 53
Funds with Fiscal Agent 1,300,086 1,302,464 (2,378) ( 182)
Total $19,958,576 $17,736,776 $2,221,800 1 1252
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO.
1
{
i
INFORMATION
I have attached the Quarterly Cash and Investments Report as of December 31, 2009.
1. I hereby certify that the investments are in compliance with the investment
policy adopted by the City Council.
2. The City has the ability to meet its budgeted expenditures for the next six months.
3. The market values for funds held in money market funds and banking institutions do not
change.The amounts listed as market value for these items are the same as the book value.
4. The book value for the LAIF Pool is the withdrawal value provided by the State Treasurer.
5. The market value of the funds held by the State LAIF Pool equates to the City's pro-rata share of
the market value of the entire LAIF investment pool.
6. The fiscal agent provided the market values for investments held in their accounts.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None by this report.
Respectfully submitted,
i
Bernie Simon
Finance Director
Manager Approval:
Betsy 'Adanls
City Manager
,
ATTACHMENTS:
Treasurer's Report December 31, 2009
i
City of Grand Terrace
CRA of Grand Terrace
Cash&Investment Report
December 31,2009
FUNDS IN INVESTMENT POOLS Book Par Market Yield Maturity
California Asset Management Program 3,857,671 3,857,671 3,857,671 0.250% n/a
State Treasurer-LAIF:
City Account 52,743 52,743 52,793 0.560% n/a
CRA Account 13,072,578 13,072,578 13,084,969 0.560% n/a
TOTAL 16,982,992 16,982,992 16,995,433
INDMDUAL INVESTMENT INSTRUMENTS
US Bank Safekeeping:
First American Treas Oblig Fnd 1,071,771 1,071,771 1,071,.771 0.000% n/a
First Financial Equity-Money Market 9,267 9,267 9,267 0.050% n/a
TOTAL 1,081,038 1,081,038 1,081,038
Account Insured Other Total
FUNDS WITH BANK INSTITUTIONS Name Deposits Deposits Deposits Yield Maturity
Bank of America General 0 233,822 233,822 0.000% n/a
Bank of America Savings 250,000 70 250,070 0.330% n/a
Bank of America Payroll 0 16,568 16,568 0.000% n/a
Bancomer CD 94,000 0 94,000 3.200% 6/8/10
TOTAL 344,000 250,460 694,460
Duration
GRAND TOTAL Book Market Ave Days Ave Rate
INVESTMENTS 18,408,100 18,420,541 2.30 0.473%
CASH 250,390 250,390
GRAND TOTAL 18,658,490 18,670,931
Financing
FUNDS WITH FISCAL AGENT Issue Book Par Market Yield Maturity
First American Treasury Obligations 1997 COPS 86 86 86 0.000% n/a
First American Treasury Obligations 2004 TAB 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 0.000% n/a
TOTAL FISCAL AGENT 1,30006 1,300,086 1,300,086
3
RECEIVED
Historical & Cultural Activities Committee 2010
Minutes for January 4,2010
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
The meeting was called to order at 7:05 P.M. by Chairperson Pauline Grant.aYOS, 'ERK'S DEPARTMENT
present were Pauline Grant, Frances Carter, City Clerk Brenda Mesa, Masako Gifford,
Peggy Reagan, Shelly Rosenkild, Ann Petta and Gloria Ybarra.
Secretary's Report: The minutes for December 7, 2009 were read and approved on a
motion by Frances, seconded by Ann. All in favor. Motion carried.
Treasurer's Report: The budget shows a balance of$ 936.16. The Petty Cash balance is
$228.27. Frances was reimbursed $ 20.46 for items purchased for the Potluck which
included punch, ice and water. Masako was reimbursed$ 7.00 for the cleaning of the
tablecloth and $ 7.40 for storage boxes.
Historical Report: A 4-H Club hat contributed by Frank Tetley will be.put on display in
the glass display case by Ann,assisted by Shelly.
Old Business: Report on the Anniversary Potluck Dinner
The committee agreed that the Potluck went very well with plenty of food enjoyed by all.
`The only flaw was the microphone not working properly which our honorable mayor
handled very well.
Gloria will send thank you cards to Burrtec Industries, Inc. for their generous donation of
the delicious ham and to the volunteers whose help was greatly appreciated.
New Business: 2010 Calendar
The committee agreed on the following dates for the calendar:
Art Show Sunday, May 2, 2010
Country Fair Saturday,November 6, 2010
Anniversary Potluck Tuesday, December 14, 2010
Each committee member received a current committee roster from Brenda.
The meeting was adjourned at 7:45 P.M . The next committee meeting is scheduled for
February 1, 2010.
Respectfully Submitted,
Gloria,Ybarr
Secretary
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO.
CALIIFORYIA AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: February 9, 2010 Council Item( CRA Item ( )
TITLE: Proposed Modifications to Traffic Signal and Arterial
Improvement Fees
PRESENTED BY: Joyce Powers, Community and Economic Development Director
RECOMMENDATION: Approve a draft ordinance amending Chapter 4.104.050 (Traffic
Signal Improvement Fees) and 4.106.060 (Arterial Improvement
Fees)
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION:
State Assembly Bill 1600(Government Code Section 66000)requires that development impact
fees not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of public facility improvements required by the
j new development. Traffic circulation fees are based on the estimated costs of constructing
infrastructure required for proposed projects and city build-out.
The City's Development Impact Fees are administered by Chapter 4 of the Grand Terrace
Municipal Code. The traffic circulation fees charged to builders include both a Traffic Signal
Improvement Fee and an Arterial Improvement Fee, which are based on proposed infrastructure
improvements and new square feet being constructed.
Traffic Signal Improvement Fee
On April 27, 2006, the City Council adopted Ordinance 222 establishing a new fee schedule,
which is attached as Attachment 1. The fees were based on nine proposed traffic signals, as
follows:
1. Barton Road and Grand Terrace Road (signal and funds still required)
2. Barton and Palm (light may not be installed)
3. Barton and Honey Hill (completed)
4. Michigan and Commerce Way(SANBAG interchange project)
5. Mt. Vernon and Canal (signal and funds required)
6. Mt. Vernon and Van Buren (signal and funds required)
7. Mt. Vernon and Pico (signal and funds required)
8. Main and Mt. Vernon (signal and funds needed for 50% of costs)
9. Main and Michigan (CJUSD project, City/Agency responsible for 25% of costs; currently
shown as 50% City-funded)
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. (�
1
Over the past four years, circumstances affecting a number of the proposed projects and funding
have changed. Therefore, staff is recommending a modification of the Traffic Signal
Improvement Fee for a period not to exceed 24 months, during which time the projects and
related fees would be re-evaluated. A minimum of four projects are proposed to be funded as
noted above. The remaining five projects would be funded through development impact fee
collection. Based on this estimate, staff proposes that the fees be temporarily reduced to 56% of
the current fees in proportion with five of nine (56%) projects requiring local funding. The table
below compares the existing traffic signal fees to the proposed fees.
Current Fee Proposed Fee (56%)
Single Family Dwelling, per unit $666.36 $373.16
Attached Dwelling, per unit $408.06 $228.51
Retail, per 1,000 sq ft of gross $1,500 $840
leaseable area(GLA)
Industrial, per 1,000 sq ft of GLA $490 $274.40
Office, per 1,000 sq ft of GLA $770 $431.20
As an example, for a 50,000 square foot building, the traffic signal fee would be reduced from
$75,000 to $42,500, thereby making project development more feasible in this difficult economic
environment. In some cases, the higher fees may negatively impact the financially feasibility of
the project to the point at which it would not be constructed.
Any loss of fees would be offset by new sales tax and increased property taxes. The estimated
increase in property taxes alone to the City and Agency from development of a 50,000 square
foot building, is estimated to be $44,520 annually, and based on a building valuation of$5.3
million.
Arterial Improvement Fees
Ordinance 242, adopted on January 13, 2009, established new Arterial Improvement Fees to
meet SANBAG requirements to be eligible for Measure I funding. On January 27, 2009, the
Council adopted Ordinance 244, which added a City Operational Improvement Program Fee to
the Arterial Fees required by SANBAG. The Operational Improvement Fees (not SANBAG
required) were based on the projects below.
1. Barton Road median (recommended to be funded by the Agency)
2. Barton at Mt. Vernon right turn lanes (recommended to be funded by the Agency)
3. Mt Vernon at Pico, for additional identified improvements
The following table summarizes Arterial Improvement Fees established by Ordinance 242 and
the added Operation Improvement Fees. Staff is recommending that the Operational Fees added
by Ordinance 244 be rescinded for up to two years pending a new study.
Arterial Improvement Fee Added Operational Fee
Detached Dwelling Unit $4,242.58 $269.12
Attached Dwelling Unit $2,598.02 $164.80
Arterial Improvement Fee Added Operational Fee
Retail per 1,000 sq ft GLA $9,524.14 $603.79
Industrial per 1,000 sq ft GLA $3,088.52 $196.02
Office per 1,000 sq ft GLA $4,884.17 $309.63
The Arterial Improvement fee for a 50,000 square foot building would be reduced from
$506,396.50 to$476,207.00.
Based on the information presented above, staff recommends that the City Council adopt the
attached Ordinance amending the Traffic Signal Improvement Fee and the Arterial Improvement
Fee for up to two years. Staff would later return to the Council when future economic conditions
appear more stable to recommend an update of the fee studies. All other Development Impact
Fees, such.as Parks, Sewer, and Drainage would remain the same pending additional study,
unless justified project reductions are approved by the Council. The new fees would apply to
any new project that has not yet received a building permit.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The City's fee revenue may be reduced for a period of up to two years. Any new sales tax and
property tax collected would more than compensate for any reduction in Development Impact
Fees, which would not be collected if a proposed project is not financially feasible.
Respectfully submitted,
ti J yce 0owers
Community and Economic Development Director
Concurs:
�1
Richard Shields
Building and Safety/Public Works Director
Manager Approval: ;! :7 '�
Betsy . Adams
City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Proposed Ordinance establishing new traffic circulation fees
2. Ordinance 222, adopted April 27, 2006
3. Ordinance 242, adopted January 13, 2009
4. Ordinance 244, adopted January 27, 2009
3
Ordinance No.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND
TERRACE, CALIFORNIA RESCINDING THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVMENT
AND ARTERIAL IMPROVEMENT FEE SCHEDULES (4.104) AND REPLACING
IT WITH A NEW FEE STRUCTURE.
WHEREAS, Grand Terrace continues to encourage new development of its
vacant parcels as well as additions to and some replacement and remodeling of
existing buildings; and
WHEREAS, proposed projects,continue to drive the demand for municipal
services which in turn generate the need for expansion of the City's public
facilities in order to provide these services; and
WHEREAS, the City of Grand Terrace master facilities plan indicates that in
order to accommodate future growth capital projects are needed including street
and traffic signal improvements; and
WHEREAS, the City of Grand Terrace in cooperation with San Bernardino
Associated Governments (SANBAG) has conducted an extensive analysis in
accordance with Chapter 5, Section 66000 of the California Government Code of
potential new development, identified anticipated capital improvements needed
to accommodate future growth, estimated the cost of these improvements, and
identified a potential beneficiaries of these improvements; and
WHEREAS, the City of Grand Terrace updated its Arterial Improvement Fees by
adopting Ordinance 242 on January 13, 2008 to be eligible for supplemental
funding for arterial infrastructure that will become available under San Bernardino
County's Measure I Program starting in 2010; and
WHEREAS, on January 27, 2009, the City of Grand Terrace adopted Ordinance
244 to add an Operational Improvement Fee to the Arterial Improvement Fees
due to additional infrastructure improvements identified; and
WHEREAS, previously projected infrastructure projects, project costs, and
funding sources may have changed and the City of Grand Terrace desires to re-
evaluate previous studies made in accordance with Chapter 5, Section 66000 of
the California Government Code; and
WHEREAS, notice of public hearing has been provided per Government Code
Section 6062a, oral and written presentation made and received, and the
required public hearing held; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to California Government Code Section 60623a, a general
explanation of the recommendation to review the fees included in Chapter 4.104
5
i
of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code and consider modifications to the schedule
of fees and charges has been published as required; and
WHEREAS, all requirements of California Government Code Section 6600 et.
seq. are hereby found to have been complied with; and
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND
TERRACE DOES HEREBY ORDAINED AS FOLLOWS:
Rescinding the tables of fees, Chapter 4.104.050 and 4.104.00, and replace with
the following fees for a period not to exceed 24 months:
Traffic Signal Improvement Fees
Single-Family Homes and Multi-Family Homes (per Unit)
1. Detached Dwelling Units $ 373.16
2. Attached Dwelling Units $ 228.51
Retail
1. Retail (TSF-GLA) $ 840.00
(per thousand square feet of gross leasable area)
Industrial/warehouse
1. Industrial/warehouse (TSF-GFA) $274.40 r
(per thousand square feet of gross floor area)
Office
1. Office (TSF-GLA) $431.20
(per thousand square feet of gross leasable area) -
Arterial Improvement Fee
Single-Family Homes and Multi-Family Homes (per Unit)
1. Detached Dwelling Units $4242.58
2. Attached Dwelling Units $2598.02
Retail
1. Retail (TSF-GLA) $9524.14
(per thousand square feet of gross leasable area)
Industrial/warehouse
1. Industrial/warehouse (TSF-GFA) $3088.52
(per thousand square feet of gross floor area)
Office
1. Office (TSF-GLA) $4884.17
(per thousand square feet of gross leasable area)
7
ATTEST:
City Clerk of the City of Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace
Grand Terrace and of the and of the City Council thereof
City Council thereof
I, BRENDA MESA, City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, California, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced and adopted at a regular
meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace held on
2010 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
City Clerk
Brenda Mesa
Approved as to form:
City Attorney
John Harper
i
' Ordinance No. 222
AN ORDINANCE'OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE,
CALIFORNIA RECINDING THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENT FEE
SCHEDULE AND CIRCULATION FEE SCHEDULE(4.104)AND REPLACING IT
WITH A NEW FEE STRUCTURE AND RECINDING THE CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT AND MAINTENANCE FEE SCHEDULE (4.80)AND REPLACING
IT WITH A NEW FEE STRUCTURE
WHEREAS, Grand Terrace is continuing to experience new development of its vacant
parcels as well as additions to and some replacement and remodeling of existing
buildings; and
WHEREAS, the rate of construction and growth continues to drive the demand for
municipal services which in turn generate the need for expansion of the City's public
facilities in order to provide those services; and
WHEREAS, the City of Grand Terrace master facilities plan indicates that in order to in
accommodate future growth capital projects are needed including general government
facilities, parklands and open space,public meeting facilities, storm drainage facilities,
street and traffic signal improvements; and
WHEREAS, the City of Grand Terrace has conducted an extensive analysis in
accordance with Chapter 5, Section 66000 Of the California Government Code of
potential new development,identified anticipated capital improvements needed to
accommodate future growth, estimated the costs of these improvements, and identified
the potential beneficiaries of these improvements; and
WHEREAS, the City of Grand Terrace is required to update its Circulation Fees by
November 2006 to be eligible for supplemental funding that will become available under
San Bernardino County's Measure I Program starting in 2010; and
WHEREAS, notice of public hearing has been provided per Government Code Section
6062a, oral and written presentation made and received, and the required pubic hearing
held; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to California Government code Section 60623a, a general
explanation of the hereinafter contained schedule of fees and charges has been published
as required; and
_ f
WHEREAS, all requirement of California Government Code Section 6600 et seq. are
hereby found to have been complied with; and
1r
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND
TERRACE DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Rescinding the heading and fees in Chapter 4.80 and replace with the
following:
Developer Impact Fees
A. Storm Drainage Facilities Fund
1. Detached Dwelling Unit $2,234
2. Attached Dwelling Units $429
3. Mobile Home Units $679
4. Commercial/Offices (Units = SF) $0.353
5. Industrial Uses (Units = SF) $0.337
B. General Facilities Fund
1. Detached Dwelling Unit $1,102
2. Attached Dwelling Units $1,102
3. Mobile Home Units $1,102
4. Commercial/Offices (Units = SF) $0.208
5. Industrial Uses (Units = SF) $0.208
C. Public Use Facilities Fund
1. Detached Dwelling Unit $674
2. Attached Dwelling Units $422
3. Mobile Home Units $515
4. Commercial/Offices (Units = SF) NO FEE
5. Industrial Uses (Units = SF) NO FEE
D. Parkland and.Open Space Acquisition Fund
1. Detached Dwelling Unit $7,241
2. Attached Dwelling Units $4,534
3. - Mobile Home Units $5,540
4. Commercial/Offices (Units = SF) $0.051
5. Industrial Uses (Units = SF) $0.046
11
Circulation Impact Fees
Rescinding the fees and Table "A" in Chapter 4.104.050 and replace with
th�e- ollowing:
Traffic Signal Improvement Fees
Single-Family Homes and Multi-Family Homes (per Unit)
1. Detached Dwelling Unit $666.36
2. Attached Dwelling Units $408.06
Retail
1. Retail (TSF-GLA) $1,500
(per thousand square feet of gross lease-able area)
1 nd u striallwarehouse
1. Industrial/warehouse(TSF-GFA) $490
(per thousand square feet of gross floor area)
Office
1. Office (TSF-GLA) $770
(per thousand square feet of gross lease-able area)
See attached new Table"A"
Delete 4.104.040 "B"
Two circulation improvement fee districts are established. District A shall
encompass the portion of the city bounded by I-215 on the west,Barton Road on the
north,Michigan on the east and Main Street on the south. District B shall
encompass all other areas of the city.
Delete 4.104.090"Fee adjustments"
From time to time the city shall review the fee schedule and make
adjustments, as appropriate, in consideration of changes in construction and right-
of-way costs.
Replace 4.104.090 with "Fee adjustments"
On an annual basis, the city will review the Circulation and Traffic Signal
component of the fee schedule and make adjustments to it pursuant to the
construction cost index provided by SANBAG.
1�'
Rescinding the heading and fees and Table "B" in Chapter 4.104.060 and
( replace with the following:
Arterial Improvement Fees
Single-Family Homes and Multi-Family Homes (per Unit)
1. Detached Dwelling Unit $2953.37
2. Attached Dwelling Units $1808.55
Retail
�1 1. Retail (TSF-GLA) $6630.00
(per thousand square feet of gross lease-able area)
Industrial/warehouse
1. Industrial/warehouse(TSF-GFA) $2,150.00
(per thousand square feet of gross floor area)
Office
1. Office (TSF-GLA) $3,400.00
(per thousand square feet of gross lease-able area)
See attached new Table"B"
ATTEST:
r
City Clerk of the City of Mayor of t City of Gran errace
Grand Terrace and of the and of the ity Council thereof
City Council thereof
I, BRENDA MESA, City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, California, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced and adopted at a
regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace held on the
27th-day of April, 2006 by the following vote:
AYES: CounclUlmembers Hilkey, Garcia, and Miller; Mayor Pro Ten Cortes and
Mayor Ferre
13
i
. I
NOES: None I
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None r
City Clerk
Brenda Mesa
i
Approved a t form: i
City Attorne
John Harper
3.1
i
I
I
f
' �~r
i
i
{
i
I
I
I
i
i
i
i
- I
i
i
•
TABLE A
COST TO CONSTRUCT TRAFFIC SIGNALS
City Responsibility Dollar':
1 Barton @ Grand Terrace 1.00 $250,000 u z
2 Barton @ Palm 1.00 $260 000 �z � hT
3 Barton Q Honey Hill 1.00 $250,000 61 v Nz
4 Michigan @ Commerce Way 1.00 $250,000 t e.+r tan e,
5 Mt.Vernon @ Canal 1.00 $250 000
6 Mt.Vernon in Van Buren 1.00 $250,000 e5
7 Mt. Vernon 0 Pico 1.00 $250,000 �S
8 Main 0 Mt.Vernon 0.50 $125 000 6 vd,6 ►r
9 Main 0 Michigan 0.50 $125,000
Subtotal ;2,000 000
"25% Design&contingencies $500,000 .
Grand Total $2 500,000
TABLE B
ARTERIAL IMPROVEMENT COST ESTIMATES
Street: From: To: Estimated Cost Local growth Fee
component Chargeable
Barton Rd. 1-215 overcrossing $4 000,000.00 0.40 $1,600 000.00
Barton Rd. S.P.R.R. 1-215 Overcrossin $1.252 800.00 0.40 $501 120.00
Barton Rd. (e.b.) Honey Hill Dr. N.E. Ckv Limits $706,875.00 0.40 $282 750.00
Barton Rd. (w.b.) Honey Hill Dr. N.E. CRY Limits $1,060 312.50 0.40 $424125.00
Michigan St. Barton Rd. Commerce Way $322.770.00 0.40 $129,108.00
Michigan St. Comrnercy Way De Berry St. $517 650.00 0.40 $207 060.00
Main St. S.F.R.R. S.P.R.R. $157 760.00 0.40 $63,104.00
'7 Mt. Vernon Ave. Barton Rd. 700 ft. north of Minona $429 780.00 0.40 $1.71 912.00
Mt.Vernon Ave. Canal St. N. Cky Limit $403100.00 0.40 $161,240.00
Commerce Way 900 fL North of De Berry Pico $7,545,568.00 1.00 $7,545 568.00
'? Commerce Wa Pico IMain St. $2,488,432.00i 1fit$13.574.419.001
00 $2,488 432.00
$18,885 047.50
Un
Attachment 3
Ordinance 242
1r
Ordinance No. 242
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND
TERRACE, CALIFORNIA RESCINDING THE TRAFFIC CIRCULATION FEE
SCHEDULE (4.104) AND REPLACING IT WITH A NEW FEE STRUCTURE.
WHEREAS, Grand Terrace is continuing to experience new development of its
vacant parcels as well as additions to and some replacement and remodeling of
existing buildings; and
WHEREAS, the rate of construction and growth continues to drive the demand
for municipal services which in turn generate the need for expansion of the City's
public facilities in order to provide these services; and
WHEREAS, the City of Grand Terrace master facilities plan indicates that in
order to accommodate future growth capital projects are needed including street
and traffic signal improvements; and
WHEREAS, the City of Grand Terrace in cooperation with San Bernardino
Associated Governments (SANBAG) has conducted an extensive analysis in
accordance with Chapter 5, Section 66000 of the California Government Code of
potential new development, identified anticipated capital improvements needed
to accommodate future growth, estimated the cost of these improvements, and
identified a potential beneficiaries of these improvements; and
WHEREAS, the City of Grand Terrace is required to update its circulation fees by
January 2009 to be eligible for supplemental funding for arterial infrastructure
that will become available under San Bernardino County's Measure I Program
starting in 2010; and
WHEREAS, notice of public hearing has been provided per Government Code
Section 6062a, oral and written presentation made and received, and the
required public hearing held; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to California Government Code Section 60623a, a general
explanation of the hereinafter contained in schedule of fees and charges has
been published as required; and
WHEREAS, all requirements of California Government Code Section 6600 et.
seq. are hereby found to have been complied with; and
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND
TERRACE DOES HEREBY ORDAINED AS FOLLOWS:
Rescinding the fees and Table "B" in Chapter 4.104.050 and replace with the
following:
17
C
Arterial Improvement Fee
Single-Family Homes and Multi-Family Homes (per Unit)
1. Detached Dwelling Units $4242.58 -
2. Attached Dwelling Units $2598.02
Retail
1. Retail (TSF-GLA) $9524.14
(per thousand square feet of gross leasable area)
Industrial/warehouse
1. Industrial/warehouse (TSF-GFA) $3088.52 j
(per thousand square feet of gross floor area)
Office
1. Office (TSF-GLA) $4884.17
(per thousand square feet of gross leasable area)
See attached new Table "B"_
- i
i
1�
ATTEST:
City Clerk of the City of Mayor 41the City of Grand Terrace
Grand Terrace and of the and of the City Council thereof
City Council thereof
I, BRENDA MESA, City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, California, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced and adopted at a regular
meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace held on
January 13' , 2008 by the following vote:
AYES: Councilaenbers Cortes, Miller and Stanchiewitz; Mayor Pro Tea
Garcia and Mayor Ferre
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
City Clerk
Brenda e a
V
Approved'a t form:
City Attorney
John Harper
19
TABLE B
ARTERIAL IMPROVEMENT COST ESTIMATES
Street: From: To: Estimated Cost Local Growth Fee
Component Chargeable
Barton Road 1-215 overcrossing $5,746,082.00 0.40 $2,298,433.00
Barton Road S.P.R.R: 1-215 overcrossing $1,796,485.00 0.40 $718,594.00
Barton Road(e.b.) Honey Hill Drive N.E.City Limits $1,013,642.00 0.40 $405,457.00
Barton Road(w.b.) Honey Hill Drive N.E.City Limits $1,520,462.00 0.40- $608,185.00
Michigan Street - Barton Road Commerce Way $462,844.00 0.40 $185,138.00
Michigan Street Commerce Way De Berry Street $742,297.00 0.40 $296,919.00
Main Street S.F.R.R. S.P.R.R. $226,224.00 0.40 $90,490.00
Mt. Vernon Avenue Barton Road 700 ft. North of Minona Drive $616,294.00 0.40 $246,518.00
Mt. Vernon Avenue Canal Street N.City.Limits $578,036.00 0.40 $231,214.00
Commerce Way 900 ft. North of De Berry St. Pico Street $10,820,161.00 1.00 $10,820,161.00
Commerce Way 1pico Street Main Street $3,568,351.00 1.00 $3,568,351.00
TOTAL $27,090,878.00 $19,469,460.00
v
i
Attachment 4
Ordinance 244
21
Ordinance No. ?4,14
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND
TERRACE, CALIFORNIA RESCINDING THE TRAFFIC CIRCULATION FEE
SCHEDULE (4.104) AND REPLACING IT WITH A NEW FEE STRUCTURE.
WHEREAS, Grand Terrace is continuing to experience new development of its
vacant parcels as well as additions to and some replacement and remodeling of
existing buildings, and
WHEREAS, the rate of construction and growth continues to drive the demand
for municipal services which in turn generate the need for expansion of the City's
public facilities in order to provide these services; and
WHEREAS, the City of Grand Terrace master facilities plan indicates that in
order to accommodate future growth capital projects are needed including street
and traffic signal improvements; and
WHEREAS, the City of Grand Terrace in cooperation with San Bernardino
Associated Governments (SANBAG) has conducted an extensive analysis in
accordance with Chapter 5, Section 66000 of the California Government Code of
potential new development, identified anticipated capital improvements needed
to accommodate future growth, estimated the cost of these improvements, and
identified a potential beneficiaries of these improvements; and
WHEREAS, the City of Grand Terrace wishes to supplement the current Arterial ,
Improvement Fee to fund additional operational improvements not identified in,
the original SANBAG Nexus Study; and
WHEREAS, notice of public hearing has been provided per Government Code
Section 6062a, oral and written presentation made and received, and the
required public,hearing held; and
'WHEREAS, pursuant to California Government Code Section 60623a, a general
explanation of the hereinafter contained in schedule of fees and charges has
been published as required; and
WHEREAS, all requirements of California Government Code Section 6600 et.
seq. are hereby found to have been complied with, and
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND
TERRACE DOES HEREBY ORDAINED AS FOLLOWS
Rescinding the fees and Table "B" in Chapter 4 104.050 and replace with the
following:
2
Arterial Improvement Fee
Single-Family Homes and Multi-Family Homes (per Unit)
1. Detached Dwelling Units S4511.70
2. Attached Dwelling Units S2762.82
Retail
i 1 Retail (TSF-GLA) 510127 93
(per thousand square feet of gross leasable area)
Ind ustrial/warehouse
1. Industrial/warehouse (TSF-GFA) $3284 54
(per thousand square feet of gross floor area)
Office
1. Office (TSF-GLA) $5193.80
(per thousand square feet of gross leasable area)
See attached new Table "B"
23
ATTEST: IX-
1
r
City Clerk of the City of Mayor of ire City of Grand Terrace
Grand Terrace and of the and of the City Council thereof
City. Council thereof
I, BRENDA MESA, City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, California, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced and adopted at a regular
meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace held on January 27 ,
2009 by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers tortes, ?tiller and Stanckiewitz; Mayor Pro 'Tem
Garcia and Mayor Ferre
NOES: None
ABSENT- None
ABSTAIN: None
City Clerk
Brenda M;�as
Approved
City Attorne�
John Harper
i
' 4
24
CALIIFORYIA AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: February 9, 2010 Council Item(X ) CRA Item ( )
TITLE: Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program Year
2010-11 Prioritization of Funds
PRESENTED BY: Joyce Powers, Community and Economic Development Director
RECOMMENDATION: 1. Conduct a Public Hearing on the prioritization of eligible
applications for CDBG Funds for the 2010-11 Program Year.
2. Prioritize funding allocation and authorize staff to submit the
Funding List to the County of San Bernardino, Department of
Economic and Community Development.
BACKGROUND:
The City of Grand Terrace is under contract with County of San Bernardino Department of
Economic and Community Development (ECD) for implementation of the Community
Development Block Grant Program (CDBG). ECD is responsible for the review and compliance
of programs conducted within Grand Terrace.
The City of Grand Terrace is required to conduct a public hearing on eligible applications for the
2010-11 program year and forward a funding prioritization list to ECD. The City has been
notified by the County to expect a total of $74,379 for fiscal year 2010-11, which is a 9%
increase over last year. The City is required to set aside a minimum of$16,281 for the Senior
Home Repair Program. The remaining funds of $58,098 are available for prioritization by the
City Council.
The County has completed the application process and has provided staff with the applications,
which are attached, as follows:
1. Family Service Association, Grand Terrace—requesting$3,000
2. City of Grand Terrace, Grand Terrace—requesting$33,300
3. San Bernardino County Library, Grand Terrace - $10,000
4. Lighthouse Learning Resource Center, Colton—requesting $10,000
5. Testing Made Simple(dba The Institute of MATT), Chino Hills—requesting $15,151
6. Ontario Christian Center(Drug Prevention), Ontario—requesting $23,928
7. Ontario Christian Center(At-Risk Youth Services), Ontario—requesting $50,000
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO.
1
DISCUSSION:
Public Service Activity Funding
There is a funding limit for public service activities of $14,602. The San Bernardino County
Library Literacy Program has requested $10,000, and staff recommends allocating the requested
amount. The Family Service Association has requested $3,000 for the Senior Center Nutrition
Program, which staff recommends approving. Staff proposes allocating the remaining $1,602 to
the Senior Home Repair Program, for a total of$17,883.
Capital Projects Funding ;
Forty-three thousand four hundred ninety-six dollars ($43,496) is available for capital projects.
The City's Building & Safety/Public Works Department has applied for $33,300 to update the
disabled access at City Hall, including access to the public counter and handicap accessible
parking. Staff is recommending allocating the requested amount along with the remaining
available construction funding of$10,196. The additional funding would be contributed toward
making the south main entry doors accessible to disabled persons.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no cost for the prioritization of funding other than for staff time.
Respectfully submitted, l
J ce P6wers
Community and Economic Development Director
i
Manager Approval:
Betsy . Adams
City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Eligible Projects List
B. Copies of Submitted Applications
a
ATTACHMENT A
ELIGIBLE PROJECTS LIST
3
1•tit 1u1u San Bernardino County Page z'
ELIGIBLE Proposals Department of Community Development and Housing ELIGIBLE Proposals
Grand Terrace 2010-2011 CDBG Proposals by Benefit Area
Applicant: Project/
Lug Primary Benefit Area/ Activity Eligibility M&O Request/ Community Request Dist Comments
No Description- Benefit Eligibility Commit Percent
36013 Multi-District Family Service Association N $1,301,841 Morongo Basin(Multi $6,000 . 6 CDH#300-34127/3194 Public
Expand Senior Nutrition David Renno, Senior Nutrition Program $30,000 North Norton $6,000 Service. Services limited to
Services for Seniors at North Dir 2.0% Yucaipa $5,000 elderly persons.Cumulative
Norton Community Center, (951)342-3057 Highland $3,000 allocation:$24,250;FY 2008-
Yucaipa,Grand Terrace and 21250 Box Springs'Rd Ste. 101 Grand Terrace S3,000 09 CDBG allocation$24,250.
Yucca Valley Senior Centers. Moreno Valley,CA 92557 Mentone $2,000 Balance of unspent funds-0-.
24 CFR 201(e) Yucca Valley(Unincor $2,000
24 CFR 208(a)(2)(i)(A) Joshua Tree $1,000
Twentynine Palms $1,000
Loma Linda $1,000
Total $30,000
;0U 10 Grand•Terrace City of Grand Terrace y $333,300 Grand Terrace 533,300 3 Construction Eligible-would
New-Handicap Accessible Richard Shields, Director of Building& $33,300 Total $33,300 benefit handicapped persons.
Improvements to Include a Safety 100.0% Davis-Bacon Wage Rate
Handicap Parking Space,Curb (909)825-3825- Requirements may increase
Cuts and Handicap Ramp- 22795 Barton Road costs. Only proposed ADA
Grand rerrace City Hall, Grand Terrace,CA 92313 compliant items are eligible.
Grand Terrace 24 CFR 20I(c)
24 CFR 208(a)(2)(ii)
16053 Grand Terrace San Bernardino County Library n $19,909 Grand Terrace $10,000 3 Public Service. Would be
Continuation of Literacy Ed Kieczykowski,County Librarian $10,000 Total S10,000 limited to illiterate persons.
Education at Grand,rerrace (909)387-5721 50.0% Cumulative CDBG Allocation:
Branch Library 104 West Fourth Street $91,989.13;Current CDBG
San Bernardino,CA 92415-0035 Funding:$7,445,CDBG
24 CFR 201(e) Balance(as of 8/31/09):
24 CFR 208(a)(2)(i)(A) - - $9,236.38(#106-2232711532)
-0161 Colton Lighthouse Learning Resource Center n $60,000 Colton $10,000 5 Public Service. Would require
New-Lighthouse Learning 'Sally Alvarado,Executive Director $b0,000 Fifth District $10,000 documentation of at least 51%
Resource Center-SAT Prep (951)536-1794 100.0% Loina Linda $10,000 low/mod income clientele or
Classes, LUItUn 22421 Barton Road, PMB 355 Highland $10,000 households.
Colton,CA 92313 Grand Terrace S101000
24 CFR 201(ey 'third District $5,000
•24 CFR 208(a)(2)(i)(B) Second District $5,000
- - - - - - — — Total $60,000
- - --- --- - --- - - ---
8/20Io U.i i J9 Ptvt San Bernardino County Page 26
,LIGIBLE Proposals Department of Community Development and Housing ELIGIBLE Proposals
rand Terrace 2010-2011 CDBG Proposals by Benefit Area
Applicant: Project/
-og Primary Benefit Area/ Activity Eligibility M&O Request/ Community Request Dist Comments
No Description- Benefit Eligibility Commit Percent
b194 Multi-District Testing Made Simple(dba The Institute N $399,220 Fourth District $30,302 6 Public Service. Would require
New-SAT Prep Workshop of MAAT) $303,020 North Norton $30,302 documentation of at least 51%
and Substance Abuse Khalif Rasshan, President/CEO 75.0% Needles $15.151 low/mod clientele.
Awareness Program-Testing (951)415-9207 Adelanto $15.151
Made Simple,Chino Hills 15208 Green Valley Drive Barstow 515,151
Chino Hills,CA 91709 Big Bear Lake $15,151
24 CFR 201(e) Colton $15.151
24 CFR 208(a)(2)(i)(B) Grand Terrace $15,151
Highland $15,151
Montclair $15.151
Twentynine Palms $15,151
Yucaipa $15,151
Town of Yucca Valley $15,151
West Fontana S 15,151
Morongo Valley $15,151
Morongo Basin(Multi 515,151
Mentone $15,151
Loma Linda $15,151
Total $303,020
6202 Multi-District Ontario Christian Center n $342,136 Montclair $25,928 6 Public Service. Would require
New-'Drug Prevention Tenicia Newton,Grant Coordinator $297,136 Loma Linda $25,928 documentation of at least 51%
Program at Ontario Christian (909)983-5269 x220 86.0% Fifth District 525,928 low/mod income clientele or
Center,Ontario 1336 N. Baker Avenue Fourth District $25,928 households.
Ontario,CA 91764 Third District $25,928
24 CFR 201(e) Yucaipa S23.928
24 CFR 208(a)(2)(i)(C) Highland 523,928
Grand Terrace S23,928
Colton $23.928
Big Bear Lake 523,928
Barstow $23.928
West Fontana $23,928
Total $207,136
Un
/8/2010 12 11 34 PM San Bernardino County Peg` 27
;LIGIBLE Proposals Department of Community Development and Housing ELIGIBLE Proposals
rand Terrace 2010-2011 CDBG Proposals by Benefit Area
Applicant: Project/
Log Primary Benefit Area/ Activity Eligibility M&O Request/ Community Request Dist Comments
No. Description- Benefit Eligibility Commit Percent
6205 Multi-District Ontario Christian Center n $300,000 Colton $50,000 6 Public Service. Would require
New-Youth Services Tenicia Newton,Grant Coordinator $200,000 Montclair $50.000 documentation of at least 51%
Program for At-Risk (909)983-5269 x220 66.0% Grand Terrace $50,000 low/mod income clientele or
Teenagers at Ontario Christian 1336 N. Baker Avenue Bloomington $25,000 households.
Center,Ontario Ontario,CA 91764 West Fontana $25,000
24 CFR 201(e) Total $200,000
24 CFR 208(a)(2)(i)(B)
Totals for Grand Terrace Count: 7 Amount: $145,379 Proj Tot $933,456
a
ATTACHMENT B
ELIGIBLE APPLICATIONS
COMM OEV & MUSING V " " "
RECEIVED COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO (Office Use Only)
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING J14115
09Nay 18 �N 9 3 ] P//�J
2010-2011 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT(CDBG) PROGRAM
PUBLIC SERVICE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM PROPOSAL-
Public service and economic development programs involve the use of CDBG funds to pay the non-construction costs of
providing new or expanded services such as: graffiti removal, social services, transportation services (in support of
qualified social services); employment, housing, legal, health and education services; blight abatement; and economic
development activities that create new jobs. Please note that federal regulations limit the use of CDBG funds for all
public services to 15 percent of the County's annual grant.
-naortant: According to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), a minimum grant award
-,mount if necessary to justify the cost of administrating CDBG funded projects and programs. Consequently, CDH
believes that minimum CDBG awards of $10,000 will satisfy HUD's directive and this grant minimum will be
taken into account in making recommendations for approved projects. A minimum amount of $5,000 may be
considered on an exception basis. See page 4 for more details.
All Community Based Organizations are required to attend a 2010-11 CDBG Application
Training Session before the application will be accepted. See page 7 for the schedule.
Carefully read through the instructions and proposal forms. Answer all questions as specifically and completely as
possible. If more space is needed, attach separate sheets. Submit one(1)signed paper copy.
TYPE OR PRINT
A. Applicant Information
;+ Name of Applicant Organization: Family Service Association
Mailing Address: 21250 Box Spings Rd. Suite#101
z . City: Moreno Valley State: CA Zip: 92557
-Contact Person- Dave Reiino'
• Title: Senior Nutrition Director
Phone: 951 342-3057 ext.253 Fax: 951 342-3055
6
E-mail Address: dreno@familyservicerivca.org
B. Project Description
Using.25 words or less, provide<a.concisla.descriptiorrol they pro posed*prograrr!t .TirT 25 word deacriptioirt is requi101
re
In. order for this application to:-be'con d`sidere complete::: Consldec•items addressed undei the:,Gener'ai Ptojecf+
Eligibility section of the Project.ProposalAnstructions:- A•'detailed proje4description.ist also required to be.provided'on.
page 5.
CDBG funds will be used to purchase equipment and supplies at sites due to the expanding service needs.
I
I
i
f
i
I �
I
j
9
r Z010-11 1'UI31-1t: ,tKVIUM rKUUKAM rKVrUOAL
ProjectC.
Street address and nearest cross streets of the site or office where the program will be carried out:
•► North Norton-24424 Monterey San Bernardino, CA 92410 X Street: Palm Lane
Yucaipa-12202 First St. Yucaipa, CA 92399 X Street: Ave. B
Yucca Valley-57088 Twentynine Palms Hwy. Yucca Valley, CA 92284
Le al rocertv owner. San Bernardino/Yucaipa/Yucca Valle
What is the current zoning? na
Is this use permitted in this zoning? Yes ® No❑
If no, explain why:
4.4
Is a conditional use oermit required? Yes ® No ❑ If yes, attach a copy of thepermit.)
This community service would address the following community need(s): (Please check all that apply)
Public Service Needs:
Economic Development Needs: t,
®Senior Services ❑Assistance to for-Profit Businesses
❑ Handicapped Services
❑Youth Services ❑ Business Technical Assistance
❑ Child Care Services ❑ Micro-Enterprise Business Assistance
❑ Commercial/Industrial Rehabilitation
❑Transportation Services ❑ Commercial/Industrial Infrastructure Development ;
❑ Substance Abuse Services
❑ Employment Training
_ 0 Health Services Planning Needs:
❑ Lead Hazard Screening ❑ Planning
❑Crime Awareness
❑ Other Please describe
Describe the geographic boundaries of the neighborhood, community or area in which clients of the pro --Ed
program reside(attach a map if needed):
North Norton-City of San Bernardino
Yucaipa-City of Yucaipa
Yucca Valley-City of Yucca Valley
The proposed community service would be provided to: (Please check all that apply)
® Low-and-moderate-income persons or households ❑ Battered spouses
persons
ersons
ti ❑Abused children ❑
❑ Handicapped persons ❑ Migrant farm workers
❑ Elden Illiterate persons � ® y persons
,
Estimated unduplicated number of clients/persons projected to be served during the program year
e. . 25 clients, 50 seniors): 1,200
9 " Estimated veariv units of service du licated, e . 25 clients x 10 visits=250 units of service: 300,000
1a
For economic develo ment activities, estimate the number of new,full time 'obs to be created: none
1C
D Project Budget
c
Personnel
E ui ment Rental, Lease or Purchase $30,000 $
Consultant Services(Auditing,Accounting or
Payroll Services), $ $
Space Rent $ $
Insurance $ $
Consumable Supplies $ $
Other $ $
Total Costs $30,000 $ / 8 Y
Grand Total CDBG&Other $30,000
Estimator name and title): Dave Renno-Senior Nutrition Director
E. Amount of CDBG Funds Requested
Amount of CDBG funds requested in this application (must equal Section D CDBG Share
[$30,000
•dim Additional funds to be provided by Other Source(s l for this project The date that the Other Source(sl of
,;fflm
funds have been or will be awarded and available, must be stated below:
Source(s)County of San Bernardino
Award Date 7/l/2010 Date Available 7/l/2010 $1 251,841
Source(s) California Wellness Foundation
Award Date 10/1/2010 Date Available 10/1/2010 $50 000
Source(s)
Award Date / / Date Available I I $
Source(s)
Award Date / / Date Available / / $
Total of Other Sources
Should equal"Total costs, Other Sources" in section D above $1,301 841
Please note: If this project also benefits residents of non-participating jurisdictions, matching funds in
proportion to the percentage of non-cooperating residents to be served must be provided by other funding
sources.
11
r
F. Benefit Areas
This section requires a break down of the requested CDBG funds according to the geographic area to be covered
by the proposed public service. Only enter amounts for communities where you intend to provide primary service.
Partial funding of a project proposal may occur and must be considered when calculating a requested amount for
more than one area. The total amount must be $10,000 or greater and must be sufficient to provide the
service within the identified city or unincorporated region. A $5,000 minimum may be considered as an
exception.
1) Cooperating Cities: The following cities participate as cooperating cities in the County's CDBG program. Please
determine if the primary service area for your proposed service would include one or more of the following cities. If
the service would provide predominate or partial benefit to city residents, the County will request a ;funding
recommendation from the benefiting city or cities. Enter the requested amount of CDBG funds needed to provide
the proposed service to each applicable city. Sub-total your entries below. V
A u u te' :t , ,J...,- :s,r. ' : . ^�" oil
:5 .
Adelanto $ Loma Linda $1,000
Barstow $ Montclair $
Big Bear Lake $ Needles $
Colton $ Twentfnine Palms $1,000
Grand Terrace $3,000 Yucaipa $5,000
Highland $3,000 Town of Yucca Valley $2,000
Sub-total of Funds Benefiting Coo erat ng Cities: $15,000
2) Unincorporated Regions: The following regions contain unincorporated areas covered by the County CDBG
program. Please determine if the primary service area for your proposed project includes one or more of the
following unincorporated areas. Check off the applicable community or communities. Prorate the amount of funds
needed for each area served based on the proportion of residents served by your program from each area. Enter the
requested amount of CDBG funds needed to provide the proposed project to each applicable unincorporated area.
Sub-total your entries below.
d
[rHinkley
lesllal6e .and.Vi th&EirsLDi"stric _ -
/Lenwood Newberry Springs BakerNicini in the First District $
der Valle Colorado River areas in the First District $
Grande Other unincorporated Victor Valle areas in the First District $
Phelan/Pinon Hills LJ El Mirage LJ Wri htwood/Vicini in the First District $
UIB3n
Valle and vicini in the First District $
/Ceda ines Park in the Second District $
ntana Lytle Creek Devore in the Second District $
Valle Landers Moron o Valle /vicini in the Third District $
Moron go Basin in the First and Third District $6,000
Tree and areas to the north and east in the Third District $1000
rowhead RunningSprings BigBear Valle in the Third District $
wr Del Rosa Mentone In the Third District $2,000
ontclair Northwest Chino in the Fourth District $
"Arrowhead
orth Norton Bloomington in the Fifth District $6,000
uburban Farms in the Fifth District $
especify) $
Sub-total of Funds Benefiting Cooperating Cities 1 $J15.COO
3)Total Funds: The total amount of CDBG funds requested in Section E, (Cooperating Cities + Unincorporated
Regions) This amount must -equal the amount of CDBG funds requested in this application on Line 1, in Section F
j Total Funds Requested $,iQ OCR _
' 1�
G. Organizational Information
1) Organizational History: (This is applicable oniv if you are a non-profit organization).
a. Date Organization founded: / / 1953
b. Date Organization incorporated as a non-profit organization: / / 1953
c. Federal identification number: 95-1803694 State identification number. 91-018580
d. Number of paid staff:26 1 Number of volunteers: 83
2) Is this a"faith-based' organization? "Yes[] No®
"Generally, a faith-based organization was founded or is inspired by faith or religion. Such organizations often choose
to demonstrate that faith by carrying out one or more activities that assist persons who are less fortunate.
DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION
(Continuation of Section B, Project Description, Page 1)
Family Service currently operates a senior nutrition program that distributes home delivered and congregate. meals
through 13 San Bernardino kitchens. Home delivered meals provide isolated, frail seniors with a daily meal which meets
1/3 of their daily nutritional requirement In addition, the delivery driver provides many the only daily contact with another
human being. This contact is important to allowing the senior to remain in their independently because the driver can
monitor the home environment for safety concerns and the senior's health and wellbeing for new or changing health
issues. Case managers also remain in regular contact with the clients to ensure that individual senior's needs are being
met Congregate meals provided at the local community centers give the senior the opportunity to interact with their peers
wile enjoying a hot, nutritious meal. For seniors that have difficulty cooking or shopping, both congregate and home
delivered meals help them to remian in their home and stay healthy. CDBG funds will allow Family Service to purchase
consumable (food) supplies that will be used in the preperation of the meals. Grant funds would allow Program Directors
to offer more variety, higher quality, better tasting foods as well as meals for special occasions such as holidays and
cultural celebrations. Funds would also be used to cover transportation expenses such as car leases and expenses.
Family Service will also purchase minor equipment such as padded chairs, round tables, ice makers and refrigerators that
would enhance the congregate community center sites. Padded chair would increase comfort while round tables would
encourage socialization. Other equipment purchases would allow the agency to replace old, inefficient equipment that
would Increase the qualttq of the program: There-ts T grovAng demand-of senivra requesting mean service.&For the areas
we serve.
13
✓G I MILG✓ r 1�VJ G�+1 ✓GJ�+f�lr I 1V11 w%il lullucVl
a
it
Authorized Signature: To the best of my knowledge, the information provided on this application is true and I am
authorized to submit this application on behalf of the applicant agency. Also, I acknowledge that insurance
coverage including, bu t limited to, Com hensive General Liability and Automobile Liability, and Professional
Liability will be requir b ore CDBG made available to approved projects.
Signature: Title: CEO
Print Name: Dom Betro Date: 11 /16/2009
PLEASE SUBMIT ONE SIGNED PAPER COPY OF EACH COMPLETED AND SIGNED PROJECT PROPOSAL TO:
County of San Bernardino, Department of Community Development and Housing, 290 North "D" Street, Sixth Floor, San
Bernardino, CA 92415-0040, Attention: Program and Compliance Section
For assistance or information regarding the completion of this proposal, call (909) 388-0800 or FAX (909) 388-0929
This application form can be accessed on CDH's Web Page at:
ntto://www.sbcounty-gov/eda/cdh/community dev/cdbq prolect.asp
1�"
CDBG Application Checklist Attachment A
Community-based organizations are required to include one copy of the items listed below. If you are not submitting
these items at this, time, please notify the Department of Community Development at (909) 388-0800 to make other
arrangements. The following information is required before any contract or reimbursement can be completed.
® Summary of agency's current year General Operating Budget
® List of Agency's Board of Directors, including names and addresses
❑ Proof of existing non-profit/tax-exempt status (Letters from the Federal Internal Revenue Service and State
Franchise Tax Board)
® Current certificate of insurance and amounts covered
® Organizational Chart
® Minutes of last Board meeting
If your application is funded you will be required to provide a copy of you last audit and your Articles of Incorporation and
Bylaws must be on file.
All Community Based Organizations are required to attend a 2010-11 CDBG Application Training Session before
the application will be accepted. See the 2010-11 CDBG Application Training Schedule below.
CIDBG Application Traini • Schedule
Wednesday, 10/28/09 2:00 PM-4:00 PM High Desert Victor Valley Area
County of San Bernardino Department of Children's Services,
Conf. Rm.#1
.154.811Ramoaa.Ave_.Vctorville.CA
Thursday, 10/29/09 10:00 AM-12:00 PM Big Bear Lake-Area
City of Big Bear Lake
City Hall Training Room
39707 Big Bear,Blvd., Big Bear Lake, CA
Monday, 11/02/09 10:00 AM=12.00 PM East Valley Desert Area
Joshua Tree Parks and Recreation
Community Center, Elliot Hall
6171 Sunburst Street, Joshua Tree, CA
Monday, 11/16/09 2:00 PM-4.00 PM Central Valley'Area
County of San Bemardino Child Protective Services
Carousel Mall Conference Center
128 Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, CA,
Parking Area C located at the Second St. entrance Mall lower level
15
co
CBO Proposal hating System Dale
Lug H LC
�-
Proposed PrujectlPrugranl Docripliuu:
-- -- -- Circle one(1)slulemeul Jar each criteria and enter the number larder Points jar each criterion
— - - -- - ---- - CONSTRUCTION PC
l It I LRIA
AND _ PUBLIC SERVICES
_ CONINIUNITY INIPROVLNIENTS
APPLII'A'1 FUN l UN1 PLl'1'L NLSS U. bllno of the application was complecd while Consistently Go,yo of the application was con►pleted while consistently relcn ing to
rele'riug Lo supporting documents(i.e.business plan).Also dill supporting ducumeus(i.e.business plan).Also did not supply any of the six
nut supply airy of the six requested supporting documents(i.e. requested supporting documeus(i.e.budget info,list of board,proof of nun
hudgcl inlil,list of board,proof of non prolil status,proof Of prulil status,proof of insurance,organiLalion chart,and last Board minutes.)
ulsul'auce,urganimholl chart,and last Board ulinuteS.) I. 70%of the application was completed and two of dle six requested suppul ling
1 70'!a of lllc aplillcation was eunlpiletcd and two of the six ducunlents were submittal.
IcgUeSled Supporting documents were submitted. 2. So%of the application completed and three of the six requested SUpporumb
2. Sono ell the application completed and three of file six requested documents were submittal.
supPurliug ducunlents were subnmlted. 3. 90%of file application completed and IUUr oI the Six 1-Cqueslcd--uppol-Ling
3 go%of the application completed and lour elf the six requested documents were sublrlitled.
supporting docluments were submitted. 4 All areas of application are cumplec and aL least five of the SIX rapUcslcd
4 All areas of applicutiun lire cumplelc and al least live of the six supporting documents were submitted.
re.puesLcd supporting documents were submitted. 5. All areas of application are complete and received all of the supPul tulg
5 All areas uI applicaiion are complew and received ail of Lhe documents.
suppolt!!!j .lucu1llc1l1s.
LL•%LRAGING O-HiLlt I;UNDS L CDBG lmided only I. CDBG funded only
2. 900,,.+CDBG funded 2. 90%+CDBG funded
3. W% i CDBG funded 3. 60%+CDBG funded —
4. 30% 1 CDBG Funded 4. 30%t CDBG funded
5. 1 U'!•u i-CDBG funded 5. 10%+CDBG funded
-- - - M LL'1'� I l lea I — 1. Need['Or the project is nut ideuilicd in Consolidated Plan. I.Need for the program is not identified in Consolidated Plan.
11HIURI l'1 l ONIM UNITY NEED 2. Need lily the project is marginal or covered by another project. 2.Need for die program is marginal or covered by another program.
3. I'iuleet partially meets a priority need. 3.Program partially meets a priority need. —
4. Project increases capacity of the facility which will increase 4.Program will expand or increase a public service that nlccL..a priority need.
crvices that are identificd in the Consolidated Plun. 5.Program would provide a public service that uleeLS a priority noel but Is
,
S. Protect would provide a missing community flicilily that is currently not provided.
identified in the Cunsulidaled Plan.
- AGL•NC S FABILI'1'N' U.Non-profit has been incorporated less thun I year. U.Non-profit has bun ineoipuratul and providing services less than I year
1.Nun-profit has been incotporated 1 i--3 years. 1.Nun-prolil has been incorporated and providing services I+-3 years.
2.Nun-profit has been incorporated 31--5 years. 2.Non-profit has been incorporated and providing services 3+-5 years.
3.Nun-prulil has been incorporated 5+-7 years. 3.Nun-profit has becn incorporated and providing services 5+-7 years.
4.Nun-prulit has been incuipuraled 7+-I0 years. 4.Nun-prulit has been incorporated and providing services 7+-I0 years.
5. Nun- iutit has becn incl poraled umre than Ill years. 5.Non-profit has been incorporated and providing services more than IU e,11-,.
Tuwl all nlial►1rum edich eriteriou and pluce sure in TOTAL POINTS TOTAL POINTS —
radilig D11 ecilulls
_c(1 I •t ll c1c ltdtlrlg bur cacll yl'lLer 1,()Illy l;ll cle Ulle 1'illlllg -
cp-' fhcli enter rauug nwuber bur cash ci'ueriun under POINTS.
cll 1 1 lien,um POINTS,dud place total,um m tidal POINTS.
GRADE ONLY'rim EXISTING C\DO WHO PARTCIPATED IN COUNTY'S FY 08-hy
CDBG PROGRAM- PAST PERFORMANCE REVIEW)
- - - --- ---- ------ 1.(1-50%public service goals mtd
bLlt�It'L What percentage of their moodily public service goals did die CBO nieet fur pruglimt 1.0-50% °io public ice goals
goals lust _
FY'2U118 U9? r /y p < <�da,,. P Q� So v S.GI'eater than NU%public service goals ulct
- - - - - -- -- 1 0-50%utilitcd
U FILIZA 1 ION OI• C'DIJG FUNDING What perccutagc of funding was uiillicd by the CBO fur program FY 2008-09'! 3.51%90%and above uuhzcd _
S.Greater than 90%utilized
final all ruials ruin each crileriuu and place sum in TOTAL POINTS TOTAL POINTS —
railing Directions
.ell I CiiLlc Itauug lur cacll uAcrlu. 0111y ulcle uue rating I%rr each criterion.
,ell 2. 1 lieu eater ruluig number for each cruuuxt under POINTS.
.ep 3 1 lieu bunt POINTS,and place tutal sum in total POINTS.
ADDITIONAL REVIEW
Il any No ausuers are crrcled explain hue-prujecl mill still be eligible in comments secduu.
See secauu "C" -H" and rue 'u 'lnsurauce from CBOlorscoring.
I'ROJEC"r/PROGRADI Is this use Iwi-milled in this wniug? Yes or No
VIABILITY Dues the applicant have insurance? Yes or No
Does the applicant have their 50 1 C3? Yes or No
Circle Yes or Nu
uumeuta.
n (j
r1e„edb LL�'ilCl T, !/Zoo/
V
II .
City ADA Application
1�'
COMM UEV & H0('QQlri � Log Number
RECEIVED (Office Use Only)
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
09 NOV 19 ;;}! 9: '(,DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING
2010-2011 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM
-CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT PROPOSAL—
Construction and other community improvement projects include construction or rehabilitation of public facilities, parks,
roads, water and sewer facilities; acquisition of real property for eligible public purposes; demolition and clearance of
deteriorated buildings; code enforcement; and removal of architectural barriers. Please use the "Public Service
Program Proposal" fortes, rather than this set of forms, for any activities to provide services to clients not involving
construction of buildings or facilities.
-..iiaortant: According to The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) a minimum grant award
amount is necessary to justify the cost of administering CDBG funded projects and program. Consequently, CDH
believes that minimum CDBG awards of $30,000 will satisfy HUD's directive and this grant minimum will be
taken into account in making recommendations for approved projects. A minimum amount of $5,000 may be
considered on an exception basis. See page 4 for more details.
All Community Based Organizations are required to attend a 2010-11 CDBG Application
Training Session before the application will be accepted. See page 10 for the schedule.
Carefully read through the instructions and proposal forms. Answer all questions as specifically and completely as
possible. If more space is needed, attach separate sheets. Submit one(1) signed paper copy.
TYPE OR PRINT
A. Applicant Information
Name of Applicant Organization: City of Grand Terrace
2- Mailing Address: 22795 Barton Road
Citr Grand Terrace- State: CA Zip, 92313
3
Contact Person: Richard Shields
4
Title: Director of Building &Safety/Public Works
5
Phone: 909 825-3825 ext. Fax: 909 825-7506
6
E-mail Address: rshields@cityofgrandterrace.org
B. Project Description.
Us 25 words or less, provide a concise description of the proposed project This 25 word description is
required in order for this application to be considered complete. Consider items addressed under the General
Project Eligibility section of the Project Proposal Instructions. A detailed project description is also required to be
provided on page 7.
Alterations solely for the purpose of removing barriers pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act and the C B.C.
enabling improved access to city hall facilities.
C'
i
i
i
i
19
C. Project Characteristfics
I Street address and nearest cross streets of the site or office where the program will be carried out:
22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92313
Legal property owner. City of Grand Terrace
What is the current zoning? BRSP-Office Professional
Is this use permitted in this zoning? Yes® No❑
If no, explain why:
4 Is a conditional use permit required? Yes❑ No If yes, attach a copy of thepermit.) :
5 Complete applicable items for all construction projects (including rehabilitation, acquisition and demolition).
Assessor's parcel number: 0276-202-82
Square footage of proposed building or building addition:
Square footage of construction site parcel:
Length of improvements if street, water or sewer project:
Service,capacity of existing facility:
Improved service capacity of the facility:
Age of structure:
Is the structure registered as a historic landmark under: State❑ Federal ❑ Local law❑
(If registered, attach,a copy of the registration)
6 Check the community need that will be addressed by this proposal: -
Public Facility Needs: Infrastructure Needs:
Senior Center Improvements❑ Water and Sewer Improvements❑
Community Center Improvements❑ Drainage Improvements❑
Child Care Center Improvements❑ Streatimprovements.Q
- - Youth Center Improvements❑ Sidewalk Improvements ❑
Park&Recreation Improvements❑ Commercial/Industrial Infrastructure Development❑
Fire Station Improvements❑
Social Care Facility Improvements❑ Accessibility Needs:
Removal of Architectural Barriers
Code Enforcement Needs:
Code Enforcement LJ Historic Preservation Needs:
Demolition and Clearance❑ Historic Preservation Improvements❑
Blight Abatement❑
7 Describe the geographic boundaries of the neighborhood, community, or region to be served by this project.
This description must include service area boundaries if land acquisition or structural improvements are
proposed (attach a map):
The proposed improvements are located at 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92313 at the existing city
hall facility.
20
D. Project Budget
Provide the estimated financial data for the project as requested below for the appropriate project group. Costs
should be based on the best information available. When preparing this data, consider the following factors: (a)
project should be completed in one phase if possible, or if phased, operational capability of the phases should
be independent of each other (b) a phased project should be prioritized and broken into distinct parts, with
estimated cost and priority for each part; (c) apply federal prevailing wage rates to construction projects
over$2,000. See Attachment A"Highlights of Federal Standards Provisions"page 9.
Architectural and engineering CDBG Share services $5,000 $ Other Source
Site acquisition $0 $
Local Review application $ $
Construction $28.300 $
Other $ $
Total Costs $33 30a $ 0
Grand Total CDBG &,Other $33 300
Estimator name and title): Richard Shields, Director of Public Works
E. AMOL111t of CDBG Funds Requested
1 Amount of CDBG funds requested in this application (must equal Section D CDBG Share)
$33 300
2 Additional funds to be provided by Other Source(s)for this project The date that the Other Source(s),of
funds have been or will be awarded and available, must be stated below:
Source(s)
Award Date / / Date Available / / $
Source(s)
Award Date / / Date Available / / $
Source(s)
Award Date / / Date Available / / $
Source(s)
Award Date / / Date Available / / $
Total of Other Sources
Should equal "Total costs, Other Sources" in section D above $ 0
Please note: If this project also benefits residents of non-participating jurisdictions, matching funds in proportion
to the percentage of non-cooperating residents to be served must be provided by other funding sources.
21
i
F. Benefit Areas
This section requires a break down of the requested CDBG funds according to the proposed projects benefit
area. Only enter amounts for communities where the project will provide a primary benefit. Partial funding of a
project proposal may occur and must be considered when calculating a requested amount for more than .one
area. The total amount must be$30,000 or greater and must be sufficient to complete the project for the.
identified city or unincorporated region. A $5,000 minimum may be considered on an exception basis.;
1) Cooperating Cities: The following cities participate as cooperating cities in the County's CDBG program. Please
determine if the primary service area for your proposed project would include one or more of the following cities.
If the project would provide predominate or partial benefit to city residents. the County will request a funding
recommendation from the benefiting city or cities. Enter the requested amount of CDBG funds needed to provide
the proposed project to each applicable city. Sub-total your entries below.
Amount Requested Amount Requested
Adelanto $ Loma Linda $
Barstow $ Montclair $
Big Bear Lake $ Needles $
Colton $ Twentynine Palms $
Grand Terrace $33 300 Yucaipa $
Highland $ Town of Yucca Valle $ j
Sub-total of Funds Benefiting Cooperating Cities: $33,300
2) Unincorporated Regions: The following regions contain unincorporated areas covered by the County CDBG
program. Please determine if the primary service area for your proposed project includes one or more!of the
following unincorporated areas. Check off the applicable community or communities. Prorate the amount of
funds needed for each area served based on the proportion of residents served by your program from each area.
Enter the requested amount of CDBG funds needed to provide the proposed project to each applicable
unincorporated area. Sub-total your entries below.
Amount
Requested
Searles V and Viciai is the First District $
Hinkle /Lenwood U Newberry Springs Baker/Vicinity in the First District $
Wonder Vallev LJ Colorado River areas in the First District $
Oro Grande Other Unincorporated Victor Valley areas in the First District $
Phelan/Pinon Hills I I El Mirage LJ Wri htwood/Vicini in the First District $
.Lucerne Valley and vicinity in the First District $
` Crestline/Cella ines Park in the Second District $
West Fontana Lytle Creek Devore in the Second District $
Johnson Valle Landers Moron o Valle /vicini in the Third District $
Moron o Basin in the First and Third District $-
Joshua Tree and areas to the north and east in the Third District $
Lake Arrowhead LJ Running Springs Big Bear Valle in the Third District $
B n Mawr oDel Rosa LJMentone Onthe Thins District $
South Montclair LJNorthwest Chino in the Fourth District $
Musco North Norton U13loomington in the Fifth District $
Arrowhead Suburban Farms in the Fifth District $
Other PleaseSpecify)
eci $
Sub-total of Funds Benefiting Cooperating Cities: $ 0
I
3) Total Funds: The total amount of CDBG funds requested in Section E, (Cooperating Cities + Unincorporated
Regions). This amount must equal the amount,of CDBG funds requested in this application on Line 1, in Section F'
Total Funds Requested $33,300 I
_ I
I
22
G. Maintenance • Operation
All capital improvements or facilities will require a Maintenance and Operation (M & 0) contract between the County
and an M & O Entity. The MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION COMMITMENT must be signed by a representative of
the M &0 entity with authority to obligate the organization.
1) MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION COMMITMENT: The governing body of the below named public, quasi-
public, or non-profit entity has the financial capacity and is willing to assume the Maintenance and Operation (M & 0),
responsibility and costs associated with the indicated community development project This body has reviewed the
"Estimated Annual Maintenance and Operation Budget".part of this section. To the best of this body's ability, it has
determined this budget to be a true and accurate estimate of the annual M &0 costs for the proposed project.
It is understood that without a commitment for maintenance and operation, the indicated- project may not be
considered for funding under the Community Development Block Grant program. Should this project be funded, a
formal M & 0 contract between the County and the M & 0 entity shall be written and signed before any funds can be
released.
NOTE: The Maintenance and Operation cost for capital improvements and facilities are not eligible for CDBG funding.
Proposed Project: Remove barriers enabling improved disabled access to city
hall facilities.
Legal/Incorporated Name-of Prospective M&O Entity: City of Grand Terrace
Address: 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace CA 92313
Federal I.D. Number of M&O Entity: 95-3316135
Dir. of Building &Safety/Public
Signature: Title: Works
'iPrint Name: Richard Shields Date: 7/076yf
23
Organizational Information
1) Organizational History: (This is applicable only if you are a non-profit organization).
a. Date Organization founded: / /
b. Date Organization incorporated as a non-profit organization:
c. Federal identification number. State identification number.
d. Number of paid staff: Number of volunteers:
2) Is this a"faith-based" organization? "Yes❑ No®
'Generally, a faith-based organization was founded or is inspired by faith or religion. Such organizations often choos9I"
demonstrate that faith by carrying out one or more activities that assist persons who are less fortunate.
DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION
(Continuation of Section B, Project Description, Page 2)
Within the space provided on this page, provide detailed information,on the construction project to be completed, its
purpose and its beneficiaries. Include professional-estimates for.material and labor costs, the square footage of the
proposed project and ani"pertinent construction related information. Also, include.the cost of any required permitting
for the proposed project,.such as building.permits.. Please attach applicable maps, plans and brochures-
The City of Grand Terrace is proposing an.alteration solely for the purpose of.removing barriers undertaken pursuant to
the requirements of Sections 36.402 and 36.404 through 36.406 of Title III of the Department of Justice regulations
promulgated pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act and Chapter 11 B of the 2007 California Building Code.
The proposed alterations would significantly improve the usability and/or access, to the maximum extent feasible, to ttl
city hall facility by altering the existing parking area and path of travel to accomodate those individuals with disabilities
including individuals in wheelchairs or using other mobility aids.The improvements would provide for a path of travel
including a continuous, unobstructed way of pedestrian passage by means of which the altered area may be
approached, entered, and exited, and which connects the altered area with an exterior approach(Including sidewalks,
streets, and parking areas), to an entrance into the facility, and access to other parts of the facility.
The scope of work will consist of resurfacing a portion of the existing parking lot to create the required 2%maximum
slope, installation of a van accessible.handicapped parking space, curb cut and installation of a handicaR ramp;,
installation of truncated domes, installation of signs providing direction for handicap accessible access into the city hall
facility, upgrade of existing audible entrance device and renovation of existing public counter to a handicap accessible
height
24.
2) ESTIMATED ANNUAL MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION BUDGET
M&O Annual Expenses
Estimated Dollar Value
Utilities
Electric $
Water $
Gas $
Telephone $
Disposal Service $
•Other( ) $
Sub-total $ 0
Materials
` Janitorial Supplies' $
Office-Supplies $
Recreational Supplies $
Ground Supplies $
Other( ) $
Sub-total $ 0
Maintenance—Capitol Improvements
Building Repair $
Maintenance of Equipment $
Improvements to Property $
Other( ) $
Sub-total $ 0
Insurance
Liability $
} Fire $
Other( ) $
Sub-total $ 0
`Personnel
#Of People Man-Hours
Maintenance $
Secrete $
Administrator $
Program Staff $
Other $
Sub-total $ 0
'List a of people and man hours based on 2080 Hours per year.
Dollar value must include salaries and benefits.
MHO Annual Expense Total $ 0
Revenue Sources (List out all sources such as budget sources,memberships,user
fees,etc.)
Budgeted Revenue Total $ 0
Assets/Liabilities Budgeted Revenue minus M&O Expense $ 0
25
,yL
s-- "
Parking lot and walkway will be reconstructed Walkway continues to accessible City
to meet the 2"/o slope requirement for wall entrance. Audible assistance device
handicap accessibility. Directional signs will at entrance will be upgraded.
be posted in planter area facing the parking lot.
Convert existing man door at
City Hail pullic counter into
_•. - i handicap accessible counter.
DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION (Continued)
Authorized Signature: To the best of my knowledge, the information provided on this application is true and I am
authorized to submit this application on behalf of the applicant organization. Also, I acknowledge that insurance
coverage including, but not limited to, Comprehensive General Liability, Automobile Liability, and Professional
Liability (or Errors and Omissions Liability) will be required before CDBG funds can be made available to approved
projects.
Signature: Title: Director,of Building r3<Safety/Public
orks
Print Name: Richard Shields Date: ///c#/ 200p
PLEASE SUBMIT ONE SIGNED PAPER COPY OF EACH COMPLETED AND SIGNED PROJECT PROPOSAL TO:
County of San Bernardino, Department of Community Development and Housing, 290 North "D" Street, Sixth Floor, San
Bernardino, CA 92415-0040, Attention: Program and Compliance Section.
For assistance or information regarding the completion of this proposal, call (909) 388-0800 or FAX (909) 388-0929.
This application form can be accessed on CDH's Web Page at:
http.//www.sbcounty gov/eda/cdh/community dev/cdbg project asp
27
Q
County Library Application
4�
28
� 4- vv`
COMM DEV & HOUSING Log Number
REIVED COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO (Office Use Only)
EC
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING
09 NOV 24 FH 4: c,2�10-2011 COMMUNITY'DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT(CDBG) PROGRAM,
A /i -PUBLIC SERVICE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM PROPOSAL-
Public service and economic development programs involve the use of CDBG funds to pay the non-construction costs of
providing new or expanded services such as: graffiti removal, social services, transportation services (in support of
qualified social services); employment, housing, legal, health and education services; blight abatement; and economic
development activities that create new jobs. Please note that federal regulations limit the use of CDBG funds for all
public services to 15 percent of the County's annual grant.
-,naortant: According to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), a minimum grant award
amount if necessary to justify the cost of administrating CDBG funded projects and programs. Consequently, CDH
believes that minimum CDBG awards of $10,000 will satisfy HUD's directive and this grant minimum will be
taken into account in making recommendations for approved projects. A minimum amount of $5,000 may be
considered on an exception basis. See page 4 for more details.
All Community Based Organizations are required to attend a 2010-11 CDBG Application
TrainingSession before the application will be accepted. See a e 7 for the schedule.
Carefully read through the instructions and proposal forms. Answer all questions as specifically and completely as
possible. If more space is needed, attach separate sheets. Submit one(1) signed paper copy.
TYPE OR PRINT
A. Applicant Information
Name of Applicant Organization: San Bernardino County Library
2 Mailing Address: 104 West 4 Street
3 City: San Bernardino State: CA Zip: 92415
Contact Person: Ed Kiecz kowski
4
Title: County Librarian
5
Phone: 909 387-5721 ext. Fax: 909 387-5724
6
E-mail Address: ekieczykowski@lib.sbcounty. ov
B. Project Description
Using 25 words or less, provide a concise description of the proposed program. This 25-word description is required
in order for this application to be considered complete. Consider items addressed under the General Project
Eligibility section of the Project Proposal Instructions. A detailed project description is also required to be provided on
page 5.
The San Bernardino County Library/Grand Terrace Branch will provide direct service to illiterate adults in
Grand Terrace through weekly"Literacy Day" Program and Services.
I
I
29
i
I
2010-11 PUBLIC SERVICE PROGRAM PROPOSAL
C. Project Characteristics
1 Street address and nearest cross streets of the site or office where the program will be carried out: if
22795 Barton Road
Grand Terrace, CA 92313
Located on Barton Rd. between Preston and Mt. Vernon
2
Legal property owner:
3 What is the current zoning? I
Is this use permitted in this zoning? Yes ® No ❑
If no, explain why:
4 is a conditional use permit required? Yes ❑ No® If yes, attach a copy of thepermit.)
I
5 This community service would address the following community need(s): (Please check all that apply) '
Public Service Needs: Economic Development Needs:
❑ Senior Services
❑ Handicapped Services ❑Assistance to for-Profit Businesses
❑Youth Services ❑ Business Technical Assistance
❑ Child Care Services ❑ Micro-Enterprise Business Assistance
❑Transportation Services El commercial/Industrial Rehabilitation
❑ Substance Abuse Services
❑ Commercial/Industrial Infrastructure Development
❑ Employment Training
❑ Health Services Planning Needs:
❑ Lead Hazard Screening ❑ Planning
❑ Crime Awareness
® Other: Please describe): Adult Literacy Education Services
6 Describe the geographic boundaries of the neighborhood, community or area in which clients of the props °i
program reside(attach a map if needed):
Grand Terrace
- 1
7 The proposed community service would be provided to: (Please check all that apply)
® Low-and-moderate-income persons or households ❑ Battered spouses
❑Abused children ❑ Homeless persons
❑ Handicapped persons ❑ Migrant farm workers
® Illiterate persons ❑ Elderly persons
8 Estimated unduplicated number of clients/persons projected to be served during the program year
e a. 25 clients, 50 seniors):_ 60
Estimated yearly units of service (duplicated, e g. 25 clients x 10 visits=250,units of service: 600
10
For economic development activities, estimate the number of new full time jobs to be created: i
f
i
i
I
30
Fl. Project Budget
CDBG Share Other Source
Personnel $10,000 $8,209
Equipment Rental, Lease or Purchase $ $
Consultant Services(Auditing, Accounting or
Payroll Services) $ $
Space Rent $ $
Insurance $ $
Consumable Supplies $ $1,700
Other $ $
Total Costs $10,000 $9.909
Grand Total CDBG&Other $19,909
Estimator name and title): Michael Coffey, Fiscal Analyst
Amountof . Requested
1 Amount of CDBG funds requested in this application (must equal Section D CDBG Share
$10,000
2 Additional funds to be provided by Other Source(s)for this project. The date that the Other Source(s)of
funds have been or will be awarded and available, must be stated below:
Source(s) CA State Library Literacy Grant
Award Date 09/01/2010 Date Available 09/15/2010 $9,909
Source(s)
Award Date / / Date Available / / $
Source(s)
Award Date / / Date Available / / $
Source(s)
Award Date / / Date Available / / $
Total of Other Sources
Should equal"Total costs, Other Sources" in section D above to Ono
Please note: If this project also benefits residents of non-participating jurisdictions, matching funds in
proportion to the percentage of non-cooperating residents to be served must be provided by other funding
sources.
31
F. Benefit Areas
This section requires a break down of the requested CDBG funds according to the geographic area to be covered
by the proposed public service. Only enter amounts for communities where you intend to provide primary'service.
Partial funding of a project proposal may occur and must be considered when calculating a requested amount for
more than one area. The total amount must be $10,000 or greater and must be sufficient to provide the
service within the identified city or, unincorporated region. A $5,000 minimum may be considered as an
exception.
1) Cooperating Cities: The following cities participate as cooperating cities in the County's CDBG program. Please
determine if the primary service area for your proposed service would include one or more of the following cities. If
the service would provide predominate or partial benefit to city residents, the County will request a funding
recommendation from the benefiting city or cities. Enter the requested amount of CDBG funds needed to'provijl
the proposed service to each.applicable city. Sub-total your entries below. _ .
Amount Requested Amount Re uested
Adelanto $ Loma Linda $
Barstow $ Montclair $
Big Bear-Lake $ Needles $
Colton $ Twentynine Palms. $
Grand Terrace 110,000 Yucaipa $
Highland $ Town of Yucca Valle $ '
Sub-total of Funds Benefiting Cooperating Cities: $10,000
2) Unincorporated Regions: The following regions contain unincorporated areas covered by the County CDBG
program. Please determine if the primary service area for your proposed project includes one or more of the
following unincorporated areas. Check off the applicable community or communities. Prorate the amount of funds
needed for each area served based on the proportion of residents served by your program from each area. Enter the
requested amount of CDBG funds needed to provide the proposed project to each applicable unincorporated area.
Sub-total your entries below.
Amount Re uested
❑ Searles Valley and Vicinity in the First District $
❑ Hinkle -/Lenwood LJ Newberry Springs❑ BakerNicini in the First District $
❑Wonder Valle Colorado River areas in the First District $
171 Oro Grande 0 Other Unincorporated Victor Valley areas in the First District $
Phelan/Pinon Hills El El Mirage LJ Wri htwood/Vicini in the First District $
Lucerne-Valley and vicinity in the First District $
Crestline/Cedar ines Park in the Second District $
West Fontana LJLytIe Creek LJ Devore in the Second District $
El Johnson Valley LJ Landers LJ Moron go Valle /vicini in the Third District $
Moron go Basin in the First and Third District $
❑ Joshua Tree and areas to the north and east in the Third District $
Lake Arrowhead 0 Running Spring sZ Big Bear Valle in the Third District $
❑ Bryn Mawr DDel Rosa ElMentone On the Third District $
❑ South Montclair ONorthwest Chino in the Fourth District $
Muscoy LJNorth Norton Bloomington (in the Fifth District) $
❑Arrowhead Suburban Farms(in the Fifth District) $
❑ Other(Please specify) $
r Sub-total of Funds Benefiting Cooperating Cities $ 0.
3)Total Funds: The total amount of CDBG funds requested in Section E. (Cooperating Cities + Unincorporated
Regions). This amount must equal the amount of CDBG funds requested in this application on Line 1, in Section F
Total Funds Requested $10 000
32
G. Organizational Inf• •
1) Organizational History: (This is applicable only if you are a non-profit'organization).
a. Date Organization founded:.
b. Date Organization incorporated as a non-profit organization:
c. Federal identification number: 95 600 2748 State identification number:
d. Number of paid staff: 2 Number of volunteers: 7
2) Is this a"faith-based"organization? **Yes[] No®
"Generally, a faith-based organization was founded or is inspired by faith or religion. Such organizations often choose
to demonstrate that faith by carrying out one or more activities that assist persons who are less fortunate.
DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION
(Continuation of Section B, Project Description, Page 1)
Provide detailed information needed to fully describe the proposed public service, its purpose and its beneficiaries.
Please attach applicable maps, plans and brochures.
In 2005, the National Center for Education Statistics issued the National Assessment of Adult Literacy (the NAAL): "A
first look at the literacy of America's adults in the 21st century;" the only national portrait of literacy skills in the U.S. since
1992. The report determined that 93 million people struggle with their basic literacy skills. Thirty million of these are at the
lowest literacy levels — unable to read the newspaper or an explanation of how they were selected for a jury pool —
according to the report. While one-third of these segments are not native English speakers, the remaining two-thirds are
adults who speak English but never acquired basic reading and writing skills. Utilizing the national statistics, the need in
California can be projected at 10.5 million adults who lack basic literacy skills and are in need of adult basic literacy
services. The U.S Department of Education, office of Educational Research estimates that one in every five adults is
functionally illiterate. The Department of Census in 2008 estimated the population for Grand Terrace to be 12,543 .
Therefore, the target group for Grand Terrace could be as high as 2,508. CDBG grant funds would allow the County
Library to continue to provide, as well as expand direct service, benefitting an increased number of illiterate adults within
the community. Literacy Day includes a trained Literacy Specialist on-site to assess reading skills, match students with
trained volunteers and monitor student progress according to California State Library Literacy guidelines.
The County Library Adult Literacy Program/Grand Terrace Branch provides free one-on-one tutoring and Literacy
Services to low and moderate income persons. Countywide, the Adult Literacy Program in fiscal year 2008-2009 was
able to assist 1,022 illiterate adults in achieving,1,634 personal literacy goals via 324 volunteer tutors.
During the past 25 years, the County Library Literacy Program has identified that adults who lack literacy skills want to
learn to read to: improve their lives, obtain jobs or promotions, not be dependant upon public financial assistance, and
want to be able to assist their children with homework.To aid adult learners in their quest to become literate, the Grand
Terrace Library provides books and resources which include, resume and career materials, computer and math books,
beginning readers and books that deal with other life skills including parenting.
I
I
i
33
j
I
i
� •.v rv—r r r aiv�ry ��Y��rvr r rwvr�r�r�i r rwr vvr� I
DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION (Continued)
The County Library will provide-publicity for the Grand Terrace Branch Adult Literacy Services. Announcements to recrui
potential students and tutors would be sent to local newspapers, EDD, the County DPSS,and GAIN. Library staff woul
recruit utilizing local service organizations, area churches and library outreach events. The County Library;would als
provide space, utilities, and training for volunteer tutors, administrative support and all other related costs. i
Anticipated quantifiable results for Adult Literacy Program participants at the Grand Terrace Branch.Library include:
i
- 80%of leaners will complete one or more of their personal Literacy Program goals. Examples of these goals are: ,
-Obtain a library card and learn how to check out materials necessary for tutoring sessions
- Read directions for making a computer reservation at the Library
- Learn to read, search, and understand resources available on the Internet
-Attain job seeking skills; apply for jobs online and write a resume, read a work-related manual
- Read book to their child for the first time; assist with school work i I�
- Become more involved as a community member, register to vote, vote,-become a U.S. citizen, etc. j
Funding for this proposal will provide for, as well as sustain affordability (free services) to qualified participant's, within the
community of Grand Terrace.
i
f
- II
I
I
i
I
r
I
I
' I
I
Authorized Signature: To'the best of my knowledge, the information provided on this application is true and I am
authorized to submit this application on behalf of the applicant agency. Also, I acknowledge that insurance
coverage including, but not limited to, Comprehensive General Liability and Automobile Liability, and Professional
Liability will be required before CDBG funds can be made available to approved projects.
Signature: Title: County Librarian
i
Print Name: Ed Kieczykowski Date: 11 /18/2009
PLEASE SUBMIT ONE SIGNED PAPER COPY OF EACH COMPLETED AND SIGNED PROJECT PROPOSAL TO-
County of San Bernardino, Department of Community Development and Housing, 290 North "D" Street, Sixth Floor, San
Bernardino. CA 92415-0040, Attention: Program and Compliance Section.
For assistance or Information regarding the completion of this proposal, call (909) 388-0800 or FAX �909) 388-0929
I
This application form can be accessed on CDH's Web Page at:
,ittp/rwww sbcounty.gov/eda/cdh/community dev/cdbq proiect.asp
r
. i
r
34
CDBG Application Checklist Attachment A
Community-based organizations are required to include one copy of the items listed below. If you are not submitting
these items at this time, please notify the Department of Community Development at (909) 388-0800 to make other
arrangements. The following information is required before any contract or reimbursement can be completed.
❑ Summary of agency's current year General Operating Budget
❑ List of Agency's Board of Directors, including names and addresses
❑ Proof of existing non-profit/tax-exempt status (Letters from the Federal Internal Revenue Service and State
Franchise Tax Board)
❑ Current certificate of insurance and amounts covered
❑ Organizational Chart
❑ Minutes of last Board meeting
If your application is funded you will be required to provide a copy of you last audit and your Articles of Incorporation and
Bylaws must be on file.
All Community Based Organizations are required to attend a 2010-11 CDBG Application Training Session before
the application will be accepted. See the 2010-11 CDBG Application Training Schedule below.
CDBG Application Training Schedule
I
Wednesday, 10/28/09 2:00 PM-4:00 PM High Desert Victor Valley Area
County of San Bernardino Department of Children's Services,
Conf. Rm. #1
15480 Ramona Ave., Victorville, CA
Thursday, 10/29/09 10:00 AM-12:00 PM Big Bear Lake Area
City of Big Bear Lake
City Hall Training Room
39707 Big Bear Blvd., Big Bear Lake, CA
Monday, 11/02/09 10:00 AM-12:00 PM East Valley Desert Area
Joshua Tree Parks and Recreation
Community Center, Elliot Hall
6171 Sunburst Street, Joshua Tree, CA
Monday, 11/16/09 2:00 PM-4.00 PM Central Valley Area
County of San Bernardino Child Protective Services
Carousel Mall Conference'Center
128 Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, CA
Parking Area C located at the Second St. entrance Mall lower level
35
I)
Lighthouse Learning Center Application
36
)Log Number
J- ! ,, (Office Use Only
RECEj`i cD COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING
2010-2011 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT(CDBG)PROGRAM
PUBLIC SERVICE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM PROPOSAL-
Public service and economic development programs involve the use of CDBG funds to pay the non-construction costs of
providing new or expanded services such as: graffiti removal, social services, transportation services (in support of
qualified social services); employment, housing, legal, health and education services; blight abatement; and economic
development activities that create new jobs. Please note that federal regulations limit the use of CDBG funds for all
public services to 15 percent of the County's annual grant
op rtant: According to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), a minimum grant award
amount if necessary to justify the cost of administrating CDBG funded projects and programs. Consequently, CDH
believes that minimum CDBG awards of $10,000 will satisfy HUD's directive and this grant minimum will be
taken into account in making recommendations for approved projects. A minimum amount of $5,000 may be
considered on an exception basis. See page 4 for more details.
All Community Based Organizations are required to attend a 2010-11 CDBG Application
Training Session before the application will be accepted. See Page 7 for the schedule.
Carefully read through the instructions and proposal forms. Answer all questions as specifically and completely as
possible. If more space is needed, attach separate sheets. Submit one (1)signed paper copy.
TYPE OR PRINT
A. Applicant Information
- Name of Applicant Organization: Lighthouse Leaming Resource Center
Mailing Address: 22421 Barton Road, PMB 355
City: Colton State: CA Zip: 92313
Contact Person: Sally Alvarado
4 Title: Executive Director
5. =
Phone: 951 536-1794 ext. Fax:6, 11
E-mail Address: s alvaradoO982@_sbcqlobal.net
ProjectB. • •
Using 25 words or less,-provide a concise description of the proposed program; This 25-word description,,ts required_
In order for this application to be considered complete. Corisider,items addressed under the Gerierai-'Project-
Elig'ibility section.of the Project P�oposat Instructions: A detailed liiiject description is afso required to be "rovided on
page S.
The "National and State Standardized Test Improvement Initiative" is a 20-week program providing free SAT preparatory
classes for 45 County of San Bernardino students.
I
I
37
2010-11 PUBLIC SERVICE PROGRAM PROPOSAL
C. Project Characteristics
1 Street address and nearest cross streets of the site or office where the program will be carried out:
Three locations: Muscoy, Highland and Colton
"
i
2
Legal prope owner. N/A
3 What is the current zoning? Business
Is this use permitted in this zoning? Yes® No ❑
If no, explain why:
4
Is a conditional use permit required? Yes❑ No ® If yes, attach a copy of thepermit.)
5 This community service would address the following community need(s): (Please check all that apply)
. i
Public Service Needs: Economic Development Needs:
❑ Senior Services
❑ Handicapped Services [I Assistance to for-Profit Businesses
❑ Business Technical Assistance
® Youth Services_ ❑ Micrd-Enterprise Business Assistance
❑ Child Care Services ❑ Commercial/Industrial Rehabilitation
❑Transportation Services
❑ Substance Abuse Services ❑Commercial/ Industrial Infrastructure Development
❑ Employment Training
�.;' ❑ Health Services Plannin4 Needs:
;�, ❑ Lead Hazard Screening ❑ Planning
❑ Crime Awareness i
r; Other. Please describe):
61" Describe the geographic boundaries of the neighborhood, community or area in which clients of the p oposlr-
program reside(attach a map if needed):
S Three locations: Muscoy, Highland and Colton
. r
7 The proposed community service would be provided to:,(Please check all that apply)
f ® Low-and-moderate-income persons,or households ❑ Battered spouses
❑Abused children ❑ Homeless persons
❑ Handicapped persons ❑ Migrant farm workers
❑ Illiterate persons ❑ Elderly persons
8 Estimated unduplicated number of clients/persons projected to be served during the program year
(e.g. 25 clients, 50 seniors): 45
Estimated yearly units of service(duplicated, e g. 25 clients x 10 visits=250 units of service: 45
10
For economic development-activities, estimate the number of new full time jobs to be created:0
I
I
I'
I
rilroject Budget
CDBG Share Other Source
Personnel $12,860 $
Equipment Rental, Lease or Purchase $5,000 $
Consultant Services (Auditing, Accounting or
Payroll Services) $10,000 $
Space Rent $5,000 $
Insurance $0 $
Consumable Supplies $23,844- $
Other $3,296 $
Total Costs $60,000, $ 0
Grand Total CDBG &Other $60,000
~f Estimator name and title):
Amount of CIDBG Funds Requested
Amount of CDBG funds requested in this application (must equal Section D CDBG Share
[ $60,000
2 Additional funds to be provided by Other Source(s) for this project. The date that the Other Source(s)of
?+ funds have been or will be awarded and available, must be stated.below:
Source(s)
Award Date / / Date Available / / $0
Source(s)
Award Date / / Date Available / / $0
Source(s)
Award Date 1. / Date Available / / $0
Source(s)
Award Date I / Date Available / / $0
Total of Other Sources
Should equal"Total costs, Other Sources" in section D above $ 0
Please note: If this project also benefits residents-of non-participating jurisdictions, matching funds in
proportion to the percentage of non-cooperating. residents to be served must be.provided by other funding
sources.
39
F. Benefit Areas
This section requires a break down of the requested CDBG funds according to the geographic area to be covered
by the proposed public service. Only enter amounts for communities where you intend to provide primary service.
Partial funding of a project proposal may occur and must be considered when calculating a requested amount for
more than one area. The total amount must be $10,000 or greater and must be sufficient to provide the
service within the identified city or unincorporated region. A $5,000 minimum may be considered-as an
exception.
1) Cooperating Cities: The following cities participate as cooperating cities in the County's CDBG program. Please
determine if the primary service area for your proposed service would include one or more of the following cities. If
the service would provide predominate or partial benefit to city residents, the County will request a funding
recommendation from the benefiting city or cities. Enter the requested amount of CDBG funds needed to.provid�I' ~.
the proposed service to each applicable city. Sub-total your entries below.
Amount Requested Amount Requested
Adelanto $0 Loma Linda $10,000
Barstow $0 Montclair $0
Big Bear Lake $0 Needles $0
Colton $10,000 Twentvnine Palms $0
Grand Terrace $10,000 Yucaipa $0
Highland $10,000 Town of Yucca Valle $0
Sub-total of Funds Benefiting Cooperating Cities: $40.000 i
2) Unincorporated Regions: The following regions contain unincorporated areas covered by the County CDBG
program. Please determine if the primary service area for your proposed project includes one or more of the
following unincorporated areas. Check off the applicable community or communities. Prorate the amount'of funds
needed for each area served based on the proportion of residents served by your program from each area. Enter the
requested amount of CDBG funds needed to provide the proposed project to each applicable unincorporated area-
Sub-total your-entries below. l�
- i
r -
' n,:�,-.r ii'an.:=a?K.�...p'JJ.�: .,c .dn;:itr%,.r.:3 C.i. �.Yr- .y,.;,',::,�,i�• km�"es;. .t..'az:. ✓,ii:4ct:'i +b-:' .,w.-c=
Am
bunt'Re4u6sted
Searles Valley and Vicinity in the First District $0
Hinkle /Lenwood Newberry Springs BakerNicini in the First District $0 i
Wonder Valley Ll Colorado River areas in the First District $0
Oro Grande L1 Other Unincorporated Victor Valley areas in the First District $0
•Phelan/Pinon Hills LJ El Mirage Ll Wri htwood/Vicini in the First District $0
Lucerne Valley and vicinity in the First District $0
Crestline/Ceda ines Park in the Second District $0
West Fontana N Lytle Creek N Devore in the Second District $5,000 1
Johnson Valley U Landers Moron o Valle /vicini in the Third District $0
Moron go Basin in the First and Third District $0
Joshua Tree and areas to the north and east in the Third District $0
Lake Arrowhead Running Springs Big Bear Valle in the Third District $0 00
Bryn Mawr Mel Rosa NMentone in the Third District $5,000
South Montclair LJNorthwest Chino in the Fourth District $0
Muscoy ZNorth Norton Bloomington in the Fifth District $5,000 i
Arrowhead Suburban Farms in the Fifth District $5,000
❑ Other Pleasespecify) $0
Sub-total of Funds Benefiting Coo era ing Cities 1 $20,000 {
3)Total Funds: The total amount of CDBG funds requested in Section E, (Cooperating Cities + Unincorporated
Regions). This amount must equal the amount of CDBG funds requested in this application on Line 1, in Section F.
Total Funds Requested $60,000
f
are
G. Organizational Inf• •
1) Organizational History: (This is applicable only if you are a non-profit organization).
a. Date Organization founded: 1 /5/2006
b. Date Organization incorporated as a non-profit organization: 10 l24/2007
c. Federal identification number. 38-3768886 State identification number: 3051645
d. Number of paid staff: 0 Number of volunteers: 8
2) Is this a"faith-based'organization? "Yes® No❑
"Generally, a faith-based organization was founded or is inspired by faith or religion. Such organizations often choose
}^demonstrate that faith by carrying out one or more activities that assist persons who are less fortunate.
DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION
(Continuation of Section B, Project Description, Page 1)
Provide detailed inkhriatioq_ needed to fully describe the: proposed public service; its Purpose,and its, beneficWe&
Please attach applle.rnaRs;pans and'tirochures.
icab ;v f:k,., o. s f r:re -k,y ;) �; '` '• ;
The "National and State Standardized Test Improvement Initiative' (NSSTII) is a 20-week program designed to provide
free SAT preparatory classes for 45 County of San Bernardino students in the cooperating cities of Colton, Grand
Terrace, Highland and Loma Linda as well as unincorporated regions in the Second District (Lytle Creek and Devore),
Third District (Byrn Mawr/Del Rosa/Mentone), and two areas of the Fifth District (Muscoy/Bloomington/North Norton) and
(Arrowhead Suburban Farms). State and federal departments of education are charged with improving schools, and so
devise methods of measuring success in order to create plans for improvement. Sadly, when it comes to San Bernardino
County school districts, many have yet to meet the California Department of Education Academic Performance Index
(API) scoring standards. The State of California API is based on.results of the California Standards tests, the California
Modified Assessment and the California Alternate Performance Assessments. Results for each school are converted into
a number ranging from 200 to 1,000 with 806being the statewide target. Here are the 2009 API scores released by the
J�alifomia Department of Education.for some of the more high profile public high schools in the County of San Bernardino
school districts: Bloomington 661; Colton 653; Redlands East Valley 778; Redlands Senior 740; Arroyo Valley 615; Cajon
'692; Pacific 595; San Bernardino 611; San Gorgonio 647; and Yucaipa 763. Not one of the 10 schools has met the
state's average target of 800. In statistics released in 2007 by the nation's Department of Education, the average SAT
score in Verbal tests was 502 while in Math it was 515. Here are the 2006—2007 SAT scores of the same 10 high profile
schools in the County of San Bernardino school districts: Bloomington — V 430 & M 425; Colton — V 442 & M 453;
Redlands East Valley —V 493 & M 512; Redlands Senior—V 513 & M 535; Arroyo Valley—V 407 & M 412; Cajon V
469 &M 484; Pacific—V 406 & M 418; San Bernardino—V 388 &M 403; San Gorgonio—V 447& M 452'; and Yucaipa—
V 480 & M 475. Based on those statistics, only one of the 10 schools (Redlands Senior) beat the Verbal national average
score while the remaining nine schools had scores below 500. Likewise, in comparison to the national average Math SAT
score, one of 10 schools (Redlands Senior again) exceeded the national score while Redlands East Valley scored just
three points below the national Math score.
41
i
i
i
Attachment A
CDBG Application Checklist 1
Community-based organizations are required to include one copy of the items listed below. If you are not submitting
these'items at this time, please notify the Department of Community Development at (909) 388-0800 to make other
arrangements. The following information is required before any contract or reimbursement can be completed.
® Summary of agency's current year General Operating Budget
® List of Agency's Board of Directors, including names and addresses
® Proof of existing non-profit/tax-exempt status (Letters from-the Federal Internal Revenue Service and State
Franchise Tax Board)
® Current certificate of insurance and amounts covered
t
®Organizational Chart
Minutes of last Board meeting
If your application is funded you will be required to provide a copy of you last audit and your Articles of Incorporation and
Bylaws must be on file.
All Community Based Organizations are required to attend a 2010-11 CDBG Application Training Session before
the application will be accepted. See the 2010-11 CDBG Application Training Schedule below.
CDBG Application • Schedule
Wednesday, 10/28/09 2:00 PM-4:00 PM High Desert Victor Valley Area
County of San Bernardino Department of Children's Services,
Conf. Rm.#1
15480 Ramona Ave. Victorville, CA i
Thursday, 10/29/09 10:00 AM-12:00 PM Big Bear Lake Area
City of Big Bear Lake
City Hall Training Room
39707 Big Bear Blvd., Big Bear Lake, CA
Monday, 11/02/09 10:00 AM-12:00 PM East Valley Desert Area
Joshua Tree Parks and Recreation
Community Center, Elliot Hall
6171 Sunburst Street, Joshua Tree, CA
Monday, 11/16/09 2:00'PM-4.00 PM Central Valley Area
County of San Bernardino Child Protective Services
Carousel Mall Conference Center
128 Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, CA
Parking Area C located at the Second St. entrance Mall lower level
I
I
- 4
i
I
47
Lug 9 CBO Proposal Rating System J _ Date
Proposed Project/Program Descriptiun: FIX 11
.y
It
--- Circle one(1)statement fur each criteria and enter the number under Paints for each criterion
CUNSTRUC"PION
C RITLRIA AND PUBLIC SERVICES PO1l'
CUNIM1IUNITY 1111P1t01'EMENTS
LIC,%'I ION COMPLE IFENESS 0. uu".a of the application was completed while consistently U. .GU%of the application was completed while consistently referring to
referring to suppuning documents(i.e.business plan).Also did supporting documents(i.e.business plan).Also did not supply any of the six
not supply any of the six requested supporting documents(i.e. requested supporting documents(i.e.budget info,list of board,proof of non
hudget ink),list of board,proof of nun profit status,proof of profit status,proofol'insurance,organization chart,and last Board nlinuiLs.)
insurance,organization chars,and last Board minutes.) I. 70%of the application was completed and two of the six requested suppuning
1 70%of the application was completer)and two of the six documents were submitted.
requested suplwrling documents were submitted. 2. 80%of the application completed and three of the six requested suppuning
?. 80%of the applicatiun complctcd and three of the six requested documents were submitted.
supporting documents were submitted. 3. 9U%of the application completed and four of the six requested supporting
3. 90"6 of the application completed and four of the six requested documents were submitted.
supporting documents were submitted. 4 All areas of application are complete and at least live of the six ncquestcd
4 All areas of application are complete and at least live of the six supporting documents were submitted.
requested supporting documents were submitted. 5. All areas of application are complete and received all of the supporting
5. All areas of application are complete and received all of the documents.
supporting documents.
-Ll LRAGING O'HILR FUNDS 1. CDBG lundexd only 1. CDBG fuided only
2. 90%+CDBG funded 2. 90%+CDBG funded
3. OW6+CDBG funded 3. 60%+CDBG funded
4. 301%+CDBG funded 4. 301%+CDBG funded
_ 5. I U"6+CDBG lunded 5. 10`6+CDBG funded
- - M1I L•IA S-IIIGI1 1. Need for the prgiec:l is not identified in Consolidaed Plan. 1.Need for the program is not identified in Consolidated plan.
MORI I 1 l OMM UNIT 1 NELD 2. Need for the project is marginal or covered by another project. 2.Need Ibr the program is marginal or covered by another program.
3. Proicct partially meets a priority need. 3.Program partially mews a priority need.
4. Project increases capacity of the lacility which will increase 4.Program will expand or increase a public service that mceb,a priority need.
services that are idenlilied in the Consolidated Plan. 5.Program would provide a public service that niccls a priority need but is
5. Project would provide a umssing community lucilily that is currently not provided.
_jdcnulicd ill Ilic Consolidated I'lan,
•kGI,Nt'1 ST'ABILI I'l 0.Nun-profit has been incorporated less than I year. 0.Nun-prolit has been incorporated and providing services less than I year.
A.Non-profit has been'incorj)orawd I+-3 years. 1.Nun-prolit has been incorporated and providing services 1+-3 years.
2.Nun-profit has been incorporated 3 r--5 years. 2.Nun-prolit has been incorporated and providing services 3+-5 years.
3.Non-prolit has been incurporiiled 5 f-7%ears. 3.Nun-prolit has been incorporated and providing services 5+-7 years.
4.' Nun-prolit has been incorporated 7+-I0 years. 4-,Non-prolit has been incorporated and providjng'services 7+-10 years.
__ ____ _•_ _-____ _._ 5.Nun-prolit has been into uiraied more than IU year.i. S.Non-profit hus been incur oratcd and providing services more than 10 years.
lulu/ull )uint� tour ouch rrite►ruu run! place sruu in TU7A1_PUlNTS TOTAL POINT'S
erg Diieclious
( 11114- ItaUiie for each ca'ne'ia.Only circle one rating bur cacti criterion.
I hen mice i sting nunnhUr for each criterion under POINT'S.
I hen auai POINTS,and piac:e total sum in tidal POINTS.
w
Log ff
GRAUE UNLI •1'l1E EXISTING CBO WIIO PARTCIPATED IN COUNTY'S FY 08-09
CUBG PROG RAM-j PAST PERFORMANCE REVIEW -
---- I 0-511°o tic service gnats ntet
- -- W hat percentage of their monthly public service goals did the CBO meet ror program 3. o- U%public set-vice goads met _—
Nl.li1 IL L F)'?(IU8-09Y 5.Greater than 90"'a public service Ovals tnct
-- - -- — -----_—._— 1.()-50%utilized
l 1 ILIGA 1 MN OF Ul3(, FUNDING percentage of funding was utilized by the CBO bur program FY') 0 -U9? 3.51%-90%and above utilized S.Greater than 901i6 utilized
--- - - -------7'01ul ell wines runt each crireriun tied duce sums in TOTAL PU/N7S TOTAL POINTS - -
a(; Uirecuoua
(lt.lc Kdllnl lul'cdcll cl'llerlit. OI11)'cncle mic rating hlr each 11'llerllln.
lltet enc� ruing uuinitci bur each cntcnun under POINTS.
iThcn sum POIN'l S.and place betel sum tin total POINTS.
ADDITIONAL REVIEW
I/uni�r Nei ausuers are circled explain hotr project trill still be eligible in continents secuun.
See sectiun "C 'H" and roe •u htsurunce runt CBO or scurie
PItUJEC"17PRUGltAh1 Is this use permitted in this zoning? Y or No
VIABILITY Dues the applicant have insurance? or No
Does the applicant have their 501 C3? Esr No
('u-,le 1'r.%or No
erns:
ed b%.-- - -- - Date:_
A
It
Log Number
COMM UEV ° HOUSik'C (Office Use only)
RECEIVED COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING
09 DEC - I AWo mi COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT(CDBG)PROGRAM
PUBLIC SERVICE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM PROPOSAL-
Public service and economic development programs involve the use of CDBG funds to pay the non-construction costs of
providing new or expanded services such as: graffiti removal, social services, transportation services (in .support of
qualified social services); employment, housing, legal, health and education services; blight abatement; and economic
development activities that create new jobs. Please note that federal regulations limit the use of CDBG funds for all
public services to 15 percent of the County's annual grant.
Important: According to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), a minimum grant awaVl-
amount if necessary to justify the cost of administrating CDBG funded projects and programs. Consequently, CDH
believes that minimum CDBG awards of $10,000 will satisfy HUD's directive and this grant minimum will be
taken Into account In making recommendations for approved projects. A minimum amount of $5,000 may be
considered on an exception basis. See page 4 for more details.
All Community Based Organizations are required to attend a .2010-11 CDBG Application
Training Session before the application will be accepted.See page 7 for the schedule.
Carefully read through the instructions and proposal forms. Answer all questions as specifically and completely as
possible. If more space is needed, attach separate sheets. Submit one(1) signed paper copy.
TYPE OR PRINT
[Applicant Inf• •
1 Name of Applicant Organization: Testing Made Simple
THE
INSTITUTE OFMAAT (1) S A) I
2 Mailing Address:
City: Chino Hills State: CA Zip: 91709
3
Contact Person: Khalif Rasshan
4
Title: President/CEO
5
Phone: 951 415-9207 ext.- Fax: 909 606-0801
6
E-mail Address: krasshan@yahoo.com
Froject i
Description
Using 25 words or less, provide a concise description of the proposed program. Thls 25-word description Is required
in order for this application to be considered complete. Consider items addressed under the General Project
Eligibility section of the Project Proposal Instructions. A detailed project description is also required to be provided on
page 5.
46
awareness to youth from low to moderate-income households:
47
2010-11 PUBLIC SERVICE PROGRAM PROPOSAL j
C. Project Characteristics
1 Street address and nearest cross streets of the site or office where the program will be carried out
Typically the high school site will provide our program with facilities for a reduced fee w/proof of insurance. For
names and addresses of sites see attachments.
r
2
Legal property owner. N/A
3 What is the current zoning? NA
i
Is this use permitted in this zoning? Yes❑ No❑
If no, explain why: 4
i
4 Is a conditional use permit required? Yes ❑ No❑ If yes, attach a copy of thepermit)
5
This community service would.address the following community need(s): (Please check all that apply)
Public Service Needs: Economic Development Needs:
❑ Senior Services ❑Assistance to for-Profit Businesses
❑ Handicapped Services ❑ Business Technical Assistance
® Youth Services ❑ Mlrr Enterprise Business Assistance
❑ Child Care Services ❑Commercial/Industrial Rehabilitation
❑Transportation Services ❑Commercial/Industrial Infrastructure Development
® Substance Abuse Services
❑ Employment Training
❑ Health Services Planning Needs:
❑ Lead Hazard Screening ❑ Planning
❑ Crime Awareness
Other. Please describe): SAT preparation; Tobacco and drug abuse diversion
6 Describe the geographic boundaries of the neighborhood, community or area in which clients of the proposAMA
program reside(attach a map if needed):
Our goal is to service all of the cooperating cities as well as Baker, Fontana, Montclair, chino and other surroundir,9
cities
7
The proposed community service would be provided to: (Please check all that apply)
® Low-and-moderate-income persons or households ❑Battered spouses
❑Abused children ❑Homeless persons
® Handicapped persons ®Migrant farm workers
❑ Illiterate persons ❑ Elderly persons
8 Estimated unduplicated number,of clients/persons projected to be served during the program year i
(e.g. 25 clients, 50 seniors): 2,800.00
Estimated yearly units of service(duplicated, e.g. 25 clients x 10 visits=250 units of service:-180
10
For economic development activities, estimate the number of new full time jobs to be created: 0
i
I
i
i
Y
48
D. Project Budget
CDBG Share Other Source
Personnel $161 000 $43 000
Equipment Rental Lease or Purchase $10,820 $3 600
Consultant Services(Auditing, Accounting or
Payroll Services) $12,600 $17,000
Space Rent $28 000 $7 000
Insurance $10,000 $0
Consumable Supplies $12,600 $3,600
Other ser,000 1 $�
- Total Costs $303,020 06,200
Grand Total CDBG 8 Other $399,22
Estimator name and title): C MILLER VIC PRESIDENT
E. Amount of CDBG Funds Requested
1 Amount of CDBG funds requested in this application (must equal Section D CDBG Share
[V03,020
2 1 Additional funds to be provided by Other Source(s)for this project The date that the Other Source(s)of
funds have been or will be awarded and available must be stated below:
Source(s)VOLENTEERS AS NEEDED
Award Date / / Date Available / / $40 000
Source(s) DONATIONS
Award Date / / Date Available 7/l/09
Source(s)LOAN
Award Date / / Date Available 8/l/09 $19,900
Source(s)
Award Date / / Date Available / / $
Total of Other Sources
Should equal"Total costs, Other Sources"in section D above $
Please note: If this project also benefits residents of non-participating juri " ns _matching funds in
proportion to the percentage of non-cooperating residents to be served must be provided by other funding
sources.
c
49
F. Betiefit Areas
This section requires a break down of the requested CDBG funds according to the geographic area to be covered
by the proposed public service. Only enter amounts for communities where you intend to provide primary service.
Partial funding of a project proposal may occur and must be considered when calculating a requested amount for
more than one area. The total amount must be $10,000 or greater and must be suRlcient to provide the
service within the identified city or unincorporated region. A $5,0W minimum may be considered as an
exception.
1) Cooperating Cities: The following cities participate as cooperating cities in the County's CDBG program. Please
determine if the primary service area for your proposed service would include one or more of the following cities. If
the service would provide predominate or partial benefit to city residents, the County will request a funding
recommendation from the benefiting city or cities. Enter the requested amount of CDBG funds needed to provide,
the proposed service to each applicable city. Sub-total your entries below.
Amount Requested Amount Requested
Adelanto $15,151 Loma Linda $15,151
Barstow .$15,151 Montclair $15,151
Big Bear Lake $15,151 Needles $15,151
Colton $15,151 Twentvnine Palms $15,151
Grand Terrace $15,151 Yucaipa $15,151
Highland $15,151 Town of Yucca Valley $15,151
Sub-total of Funds Benefiting Cooperating Cities: $181 812
2) Unincorporated Reglons: The following regions contain unincorporated areas covered by the County CDBG
program. Please determine if the primary service area for your proposed project includes one or more of the
following unincorporated areas. Check off the applicable community or communities. Prorate the amount of funds
needed for each area served based on the proportion of residents served by your program from each area. Enter the
requested amount of CDBG funds needed to provide the proposed project to each applicable unincorporated area.
Sub-total your entries below.
Searles Valley and Vicinity in the First District $ Amount Requested
Hinkle /Lenwood Ll Newberry Springs Baker/Vicinity in the First District
Wonder ValleeEl Colorado River areas in the First District $
Oro Grande Other Unincorporated Victor Valley areas in the First District $
Phelari/Pinon Hills El Mirage LJ Wri htwood/Vcin' in the First District $
Lucerne Valle and vicinityin the First District $
Crestline/Ceda ines Park in the Second District $
West Fontana LJ Lytle Creek IJ Devore in the Second District $15 151
Johnson Valle Landers LHMorongn Valle /vicini in the Third District $15,151
Moron go Basin in the First and Third District $15,151
Joshua Tree and areas to the north and east in the Third District $
Lake Arrowhead El Running SprinQs.Q Big Bear Valle in the Third District $
Bryn Mawr Del Rosa OMentone In the Third District $15,151
South Montclair LANorthwest Chino in the Fourth District $$6.464
Musco orth Norton UBloomington in the Fifth District
Arrowhead Suburban Farms in the Fifth District
LJ Other Pleasespecify) $
Sub-total of Funds Benefiting Cooperating Cities /
3)Total Funds: The total amount of CDBG funds requested in Section E, (Cooperating Cities + Unincorporated
Regions). This amount must equal the amount of CDBG funds requested in this application on Line 1, in Section F.
Total Funds Requested
IJ �
5C
OrganizationalG. • •
1) Organizational History: (This is applicable only if you are a non-profit organization).
a. Date Organization founded: 05119/ 1995
b. Date Organization incorporated as a non-profit organization:
c. Federal identification number. 954532469 State identification number cl763900
d. Number of paid staff: 4 Number of volunteers: 13
2) Is this a"faith-based'organization? "'Yes No®
"Generally, a faith-based organization was founded or is inspired by faith or religion. Such organizations often choose
;demonstrate that faith by carrying out one or more activities that assist persons who are less fortunate.
DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION
(Continuation of Section B, Project Description, Page 1)
Provide detailed information needed to fully describe the proposed public service, its purpose and its beneficiaries.
Please attach applicable maps, plans and brochures.
Description and needs assessment
Testing Made Simple provides free to reduced SAT preparation workshops and youth Tobacco and Substance Abuse
awareness to youth from low to moderate-income households. Our SAT tutorials are taught by California certified
teachers and assisted by top college and high school students. TMS helps students to maximize their SAT test taking
skills.Tms also assisst students to be more aware of the dangers of tobacco usage and substance abuse.We also stress
the rewards of remaining drug free.
Our purpose as it meets the national objective of CDBG:
-As we, the management of TMS are aware of the challenges our youth face, some of which are: under representation in
,`^^.oileges and universities, high unemployment and tobacco and drug dependency. We are also aware that there is hope
for our youth when responsible adults provide solutions for their challenges. We at TMS offer our expertise and
leadership for our youth from low-to-moderate income households. We at TMS offer through our educational program the
opportunity for cooperating cities of San Bemadino County to partner with us as we eliminate slums and blight, by guiding
our youth to higher education and preventing tobacco and substance abuse.
Expected benefits outcome, relevant aspects of the project and beneficiary eligibility:
As our program meets CDBG guideline requirements for community services for low-to-moderate income persons or
households, we intend to aid the transformation of our youth from low-to moderate households through high quality SAT
instruction and Tobacco and drug awareness workshops. In addition we will also provide part-time employment
opportunities for the youth that complete our workshop and other qualified members of cooperating cities and
unincorporated regions of San Bemadino County.
I '
i
51
Ur,r AILtU MU%Mi-r UtZl:Klr I IUN it;onanueo)
I
i
Authorized SianatuEtL To the best of my knowledge, the information provided on this application is true and I am
authorized to, submit this application on behalf of the applicant agency. Also, I acknowledge that insurance
coverage including, but not limited to, Comprehensive General Liability and Automobile Liability, and Professional
Liability will be r uired before CDW.A funds can be ma a available to approved projects.
Signature: Title: PRESIDENT/CEO
Print Name: Khalif Rasshan Date: 11 /24/2009
PLEASE SUBMIT ONE SIGNED PAPER COPY OF EACH COMPLETED AND SIGNED PROJECT PROPOSAL TO:
County of San Bernardino, Department of Community Development and Housing, 290 North "D' Street, Sixth Floor, San
Bernardino, CA 92415-0040, Attention: Program and Compliance Section.
For assistance or information regarding the completion of this proposal, call (909) 388-0800 or FAX (909) 388-0929.
This application form can be accessed on CDH's Web Page at:
Testing Made Simple
15208 Green Valley Drive
Chino Hills, California 91709
November 25,2009
County of San Bernardino,
Department of Community Development and Housing
290 North"D"Street, Sixth Floor,
San Bernardino, CA 92415-0040
Attention: Program and Compliance Section.
Dear Mr. Dixon,
My name is Khalif Rasshan and I have submitted a public service proposal to San
Bernardino County for 2010-11. As you may recall we had a conversation as to the
logistics of submitting a proposal.
The main reason for this letter is to thank you and each of the people that work the
downtown site. Without exception everyone.that I spoke to made me feel that they were
working not only on my behalf but for me personally.
My other reason for this litter is to re-inform the staff in your office that I was not able to
include the items on the chick list on page 7. I will call on Monday November 30'h 2009
to set up a time to bring those items to complete our application.
EncerelRass President
53
Attachment A
CDBG Application Checklist
Community-based organizations are required to include one copy of the items listed below. If you are not submitting
these items at this time, please notify the Department of Community Development at (909) 388-0800 to make other
arrangements. The following information is required before any contract or reimbursement can be completed.
❑ Summary of agency's current year General Operating Budget
❑ List of Agency's Board of Directors, including names and addresses
❑ Proof of existing non-profit/tax-exempt status (Letters from the Federal Internal Revenue Service and State
Franchise Tax Board) "
❑ Current certificate of insurance and amounts covered
❑ Organizational Chart
❑ Minutes of last Board meeting
If your application is funded you will be required to provide a copy of you last audit and your Articles of Incorporation and
Bylaws must be on file.
All Community Based Organizations are required to attend a 201041 CDBG Application Training Session before
the application will be accepted. See the 2010-11 CDBG Application Training Schedule below.
CDBG Application Training Schedule
Date Time Location
Wednesday, 10/28/09 2:00 PM--4:00 PM High Desert Victor Valley Area
County of San Bemardino Department of Children's Services,
Conf. Rm. #1
15480 Ramona Ave. Victorville CA
Thursday, 10/29/09 10:00 AM-1 2:00 PM Big Bear Lake Area
City of Big Bear Lake
City Hall Training Room
39707 Big Bear Blvd., Big Bear Lake, CA
Monday, 11/02/09 10:00 AM-12:00 PM East Valley Desert Area
Joshua Tree Parks and Recreation
Community Center, Elliot Hall
6171 Sunburst Street, Joshua Tree, CA
Monday, 11/16/09 2:00 PM-4:00 PM Central Valley Area
County of San Bernardino Child Protective Services
Carousel Mall Conference Center
128 Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, CA
Parking Area C located at the Second St entrance Mall lower level
r
Lug" J9 V CBO Proposal Rating System Date 2-
Prupwed Project/Prugrant Description:_ 1 -'�� t..* �✓� !1 F� I u V�S�'�}��'�`"f�
C.
Circle one(1)statement fur each criteria and enter the number under Points fur each criterion
- - - ----- CONSTRUCTION
KI I LKI:� AND PUBLIC SERVICES POINTS
COMMUNITY IhIPROVEINENTS
LIC ATION C UN1 PLETEN ESS 0. 60go of the application was completed while consistently 0. 60%of the application was completed while consistently referring to
relerring to supporting documents(i.e.business plan).Also did supporting documents(i.e.business plan).Also did not supply any of the six
not supply any of the six requested supporting documents(i.e. requested supporting documents(i.e.budget info,list of board,proof of non
budget into,list of board,proof of non profit status,proof of profit status,proof of insurance,organization chart,and last Board minutia.)
insurance,organization chart,and last Board minutes.) I. 701/9 of the application was completed and two of the six requested supporting
1 70%ut the application was completed and two of the six documents were submitted.
requested supporting documents were submitted. 2. 80%of the application completed and three of the six requested supporting
2. 80%of the application completed and three of the six requested documents were submitted.
supporting documents were submitted. 3. 90%of the application completed and four of the six requested suppurtmg
3 90%of the application completed and four of the six requested documents were submitted.
supporting documents were submitted. 4 All areas of application are complete and at least five of the six requested
4 All areas of applicatiun are complete and at least five of the six supporting documents were submitted.
requested supporting documents were submitted. 5. All areas of application are complete and received all of the supporting
5 All areas of applicatiun are complete and received all of the documents.
supporting documents.
LRMANU U I HER FUNDS 1. CDBG funded only 1. CDBG funded only
2. 901.+ CDBG funded 2. 90%+CDBG funded
3. 60%+ CDBG funded 3. 60% f CDBG funded
4. 30% CDBG funded 4. 30%+CDBG funded
S. 109L, t CDBG funded S. IU%+CDBG funded ___L._
11 F'F US I I I(A I 1. Need tier the project is not identified in Consolidated Plan. 1.Need for the program is not identified in COr S_o d Plan.
JRI IA C'OMM UN1 IA NLED 2. Need tier the project is marginal or covered by another project. 2.Need for the program is marginal or covered by another program.
3. Project partially meets a priority need. 3.Program partially meets a priority need. _
4. Pngect increases capacity of the facility which will increase 4.Program will expand or increase a public service that meets a priority need.
services that are identified in the Consolidated Plan. S.Program would provide a public service that meets a priority need but is
5. Prvlect would provide a missing community facility that is currently not provided. I
identified in the Consolidated Plan.
AGIENt A >'f AB11,ITN 0.Nun-profit has been incorporated less than I year. 0.Non-profit has been incorporated and providing services less than I year.
1.Nun-profit has been incorporated I F-3 years. 1.Non-profit has been incorporated and providing services I-t-3 years.
2.Nun-profit has been incorporated 31-5 years. 2.Non-profit has been incorporated and providing services 3+-5 years.
3.Nun-profit has been incorporated 5+-7 years. 3.Non-profit has been incorporated and providing services 5+-7 years.
4. Nun-profil has been incorporated 7+-10 years. 4.Nun-prufit has been incorporated and providing services 7+-10 years.
5.Non-profit has been incorporated more than IU years. 5.Non-profit has been incorporated and providing services more than I �,:ars. _
7ural all points ran each criterion and lace sunr in TOT-11.POINTS TOTAL POINTS -�
Directions
'ircic RaunE lui each Criteria. Only circle one rating tin•each criterion.
I hen cntei i;iUur nuniher lur each criterion under POINTS.
Hicn.un, PAINTS, and place total sum in total POINTS.
s
J1
Lug M- -- -
GRADE ONLY THE EXISTING CBO WHO PARTICIPATED IN COUNTY'S FY 08-09
CDBG PROGRAM- PAST PERFORMANCE REVIEW)
What percentage of their monthly public service goals did the CBO meet for program 1.0-50'/o public service goals met
St Its IG E F1'20US-09? 3.51.0-90%public service goals met
5.Greater than 90%public service s met
1.0-50%utilized
U TILIZATION OF CDBG FUNDING: What percentage of funding was utilized by the CBO for program FY 2008-09'1 3.51%-90%and abo� tzed
5"Greater titan 90' utilized
_ Total all uints i*oni each criterion and lace sins is TOTAL POINTS TOTAL POINTS —
Dtrectium,
'ircle Rating for each criteria.Only circle one rating for each criterion.
hen rnten rating nunnbcr tar each criterion under POINTS.
hen sum POINTS•and place total sum in total POINTS.
ADDITIONAL REVIEW
Il an11 No ansirets are circled explain how project will still be eligible is comments section.
!�
See section "C", "H" and proofofinsurancefrom CBO or scoring.
PROJECUPROGRAM Is this use permitted in this zoning? or No
VIABILITY Does the applicant have insurance? Yes or No
Does the applicant have their SU I C3? (Qe�ur No `Y -
Circle }'es or Ao `�
•"ram- �
��'— --- Date: 1
.n
31 _
Ontario Christian Center Application
Drug Prevention
57
Log Number
COMM ECEIYED (office use only
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING �,� Fq
09 Nov JU P��j G' i010-2011 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT(CDBG) PROGRAM
UBLIC SERVICE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM PROPOSAL-
Public service and economic development programs involve the use of CDBG funds to pay the non-construction costs of
providing new or expanded services such as: graffiti removal, social services, transportation services (in support of
qualified social services); employment, housing, legal, health and education services; blight abatement; and economic
development activities that create new jobs. Please note that federal regulations limit the use of CDBG funds for all
public services to 15 percent of the County's annual grant
Important; According to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), a minimum grant award
amount if necessary to justify the cost of administrating CDBG funded projects and programs. Consequently, CDH
believes that minimum CDBG awards of $10,000 will satisfy HUD's directive and this grant minimum will be
taken into account In making recommendations for approved projects. A minimum amount of $5,000 may be
considered on an exception basis. See page 4 for more details.
All Community Based Organizations are required to attend a 2010-11 CDBG Application
Training Session before the application will be accepted. See page 7 for the schedule.
Carefully read through the instructions and proposal forms. Answer all questions as specifically and completely as
possible. If more space is needed, attach separate sheets. Submit one(1)signed paper copy.
TYPE OR PRINT
A. Applicant Information
Name of Applicant Organization: Ontario Christian Centetr
2 Mailing Address: 1336 N. Baker Avenue
City: Ontario State: CA Zip: 91764
3
Contact Person: Tenicia Newton
4
Title: Grant Coordinator
5 Phone: 909 983-5269 ext.220 Fax: 909 983-9108
6
E-mail Address: financeflontariochristiancenter.org
DescriptionB. Project
Using 25 words or less, provide a concise description of the proposed program. This 25-word description Is required
in order for this application to be considered complete. Consider items addressed under the General Project
Eligibility section of the Project Proposal Instructions. A detailed project description is also required to be provided on
page 5.
The Ontario Christian Center will incorporate a prevention program which will be utilized to reduce dependency of
alchohol, drugs, and underage use of legal drugs.
II
P
I,
t
�iF
J
2010-11-PUBLIC SERVICE PROGRAM PROPOSAL
C. Project Characteristics
1 Street address and nearest cross streets of the site or office where the program will be carried out:
1336 N.Baker Avenue. Ontario, CA. 91764: Central Area and will service surrounding areas.
2
Legal property owner. Ontario Christian Center
3 What is the current zoning? R2
Is this use permitted in this zoning? Yes® No❑
If no, explain why:
4
Is a conditional use permit required? Yes❑ No ® If yes, attach a copy of thepermit.)
5
This community service would address the following community need(s): (Please check all that apply)
Public Service Needs: Economic Development Needs:
❑Senior Services
❑ Handicapped Services ❑Assistance to for-Profit Businesses
❑Youth Services ❑ Business Technical Assistance
❑Child Care Services El Micro-EnterpriseBusiness Assistance
❑Transportation Services ❑Commercial/Industrial Rehabilitation
®Substance Abuse Services ❑ Commercial/Industrial Infrastructure Development
❑ Employment Training
❑ Health Services Planning Needs:
❑ Lead Hazard Screening ❑ Planning
❑Crime Awareness
❑ Other. Please describe):
6 Describe the geographic boundaries of the neighborhood, community or area in which clients of the proposed
�,. program reside(attach a map if needed):
Central location is 1336 Baker Avenue: Located on th comer of Bonnie Brae and Baker Avenue
7
The proposed community service would be provided to: (Please check all that apply)
® Low-and-moderate-income persons or households ® Battered spouses
®Abused children ®Homeless persons
® Handicapped persons ❑Migrant farm workers
® Illiterate persons ❑ Elderly persons
S Estimated unduplicated number of clients/persons projected to be served during the program year
(e.g. 25 clients, 50 seniors): 75
9
Estimated yearly units of service(duplicated, e.g. 25 clients x 10 visits=250 units of service: 300
10
For economic development activities, estimate the number of new full time jobs to be created: 15
59
LV IY-1 1 ruma%& rRVruaA1.
ProjectD. •
CDBG Share Other Source
Personnel $75,000 $10,000
Equipment Rental, Lease or Purchase $50.000 $5 000
Consultant Services(Auditing, Accounting or
Pa roll Services) $3 000 $5 000
Space Rent $100 000 $5 000
Insurance $10,000 $5 000
Consumable Supplies $50 000 $10,000
Other Ste ' $5 000
Total Costs -`6g9a'9AC• $45 000
Grand Total CDBG &Other $325�J0(T
Estimator name and title):
AmountE. of D: Requested
1 Amount of CDBG funds requested in this application(must equal Section D CDBG Share
w , 0
2 Additional funds to be provided by Other Source(s)for this project The date that the Other Source(s)of
funds have been or will be awarded and available must be stated below:
Source(s)Volunteer
Award Date / / Date Available 3/15/2011 0
Sources)volunteer
Award Date / / Date Availab 15/2010 $5,000
Source(s)volunteer
Award Date 1 I Date Available 11 2010 $10,000
Source(s)Volunteer '
Award Date / / Da ailable 12/15/2010 25,000
Total of Other Sources
Should equal"Total costs Other Sources"in section D above $45 000
Please note: If this project also benefits residents of non-participating jurisdictions, matchin rids in
proportion to the percentage of non-cooperating residents to be served must be provided y o r ding
sources.
y a
60
• ZUIU-11 F'.UDLIG ,tKV1Gt F'KUIUKArd F'KUNUbAL
F. Benefit Areas
This section requires a break down of the requested CDBG funds according to the geographic area to be covered
by the proposed public service. Only enter amounts for communities where you intend to provide primary service.
Partial funding of a project proposal may occur and must be considered when calculating a requested amount for
more than one area. The total amount must be $10,000 or greater and must be suRlclent to provide the
service within the identiffed city or unincorporated region. A $5,000 minimum may be considered as an
oxcepdon.
1) Cooperating Cities: The following cities participate as cooperating cities in the County's CDBG program. Please
determine if the primary service area for your proposed service would include one or more of the following cities. If
the service would provide predominate or partial benefit to city residents, the County will request a funding
recommendation from the benefiting city or cities. Enter the requested amount of CDBG funds needed to provide
the proposed service to each applicable city. Sub-total your entries below.
Amount Requested Amount Requested
Adelanto $ Loma Linda $25,928
Barstow $23,928 Montclair $25,928
Big Bear Lake $23,928 Needles $
Colton $23,928 Twentynine Palms $
Grand Terrace $23,928 Yucaipa $23,928
Highland $23,928 Town of Yucca Valle $
Sub-total of Funds Benefiting Cooperating Cities: $195 424
2) Unincorporated Regions: The following regions contain unincorporated areas covered by the County CDBG
program. Please determine if the primary service area for your proposed project includes one or more of the
following unincorporated areas. Check off the applicable community or communities. Prorate the amount of funds
needed for each area served based on the proportion of residents served by your program from each area. Enter the
requested amount of CDBG funds needed to provide the proposed project to each applicable unincorporated area.
Sub-total your entries below.
Amount Requested
Searles Valley and Vicinity in the First District $
Hinkle /Lenwood Newberry Springs Baker/Vicinity in the First District $
Wonder Valley Ll Colorado River areas in the First District $
Oro Grande El Other Unincorporated Victor Valley areas in the First District $
-0Phelan/Pinon Hills LJ El Mirage LJ Wri htwood/Vicini in the First District $
Lucerne Valley and vicinity in the First District $
Crestline/Ceda ines Park in the Second District $
West Fontana LJ Lytle Creek LJ Devore in the Second District $23,928
0 Johnson Valley LJ Landers LJ Moron go Valle lvicini in the Third District $
Moron o Basin in the First and Third District $
Joshua Tree and areas to the north and east in the Third District $
Lake Arrowhead LJ Running Springs Big Bear Valle in the Third District $
Bryn Mawr ODel Rosa Mentone In the Third District $25,928
South Montclair NNorthwest Chino in the Fourth District $25,928
Musco North Norton Bloomington in the Fifth District $25,928
Arrowhead Suburban Farms in the Fifth District $
Other Pleasespecify)
$
Sub-total of Funds Benefiting Cooperating Cities I $77L,
3)Total Funds: The total amount of CDBG funds requested in Section E, (Cooperating Cities + Unincorporated
Regions). This amount must equal the amount of CDBG funds requested in this application on Line 1, in Section F.
Total Funds Requested 2 08
61
vV IV-I 1 • v6lv1%V • 11%%or vvnL.
G. organizational I • •
1) Organizational History: (This is applicable only if you are a non-profit organization).
a. Date Organization founded: 02/091 1 99&
b. Date Organization incorporated as a non-profit organization: 02/09/ 1998.
c. Federal identification number. 33-0592428 State identification number. _
d. Number of paid staff. 10 Number of volunteers: 10
2) Is this a"faith-based'organization? "Yes® No❑
"Generally, a faith-based organization was founded or is inspired by faith or religion. Such organizations often choose
to demonstrate that faith by carrying out one or more activities that assist persons who are less fortunate.
DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION
(Continuation of Section B, Project Description, Page 1)
Provide detailed information needed to fully describe the proposed public service, its purpose and its beneficiaries.
Please attach applicable maps, plans and brochures.
To provide satelite Prevention Programs for low and moderate income families. The program will cater to families that
are located in the specified communities. This program is designed to to focus on everyone that are at a greater risk and
for those that are at a greater risk and for those already involved with drugs or other problematic behaviors. The purpose
of the program is to reverse or reduce the risk of indivivals becoming a drug abuser, conduct early interventions that
address deviant behaviors. The service-will be.synonymous with'-a group couselling session coupled with education,
training, and counseling.The counselors will partner with the serviced cities, and will provide scheduled interventions on a
monthly basis. The serviced will be offered for a minimal cost and if possible free.
l
67
ZUIU-11 rUtiLlt. ,CKvls, C rmut3 Am rmwrwomi-
DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION (Continued)
Authorized Signature: To the best of my knowledge, the information provided on this application is true and 1 am
authorized to' submit this application on behalf of the applicant agency. Also, I acknowledge that insurance
coverage including but not limited to, omprehensive General Liability and Automobile Liability, and Professional
Liability will be r ui d before CDB rids can be made available to approved projects.
Signature: Title:
Print Name: Drina Brown Date: �ZC�
PLEASE SUBMIT ONE SIGNED PAPER COPY OF EACH COMPLETED AND SIGNED PROJECT PROPOSAL TO:
County of San Bernardino, Department of Community Development and Housing, 290 North "D" Street, Sixth Floor, San
Bernardino, CA 92415-0040, Attention: Program and Compliance Section.
For assistance or information regarding the completion of this proposal, call(909) 388-0800 or FAX (909) 388-0929.
This application form can be accessed on CDH's Web Page at:
1ttp I/www.sbcountV,qov/eda/cdhicommunity dev/cdbq proiect.aso
63
Attachment A
CDBG Application Checklist
Community-based organizations are required to include one copy of the items listed below. If you are not submitting
these items at this time, please notify the Department of Community Development at (909) 388-0800 to make other
arrangements. The following information is required before any contract or reimbursement can be completed.
❑ Summary of agency's current year General Operating Budget
❑ List of Agency's Board of Directors, including names and addresses
❑ Proof of existing non-profit/tax-exempt status (Letters from the Federal Internal Revenue Service and State
Franchise Tax Board)
❑ Current certificate of insurance and amounts covered
i
❑ Organizational Chart
❑ Minutes of last Board meeting
If your application is funded you will be required to provide a copy of you last audit and your Articles of Incorporation and
Bylaws must be on file.
All Community Based Organizations are required to attend a 2010-11 CDBG Application Training Session before
the application will be accepted. See the 2010-11 CDBG Application Training Schedule below.
CDBG Application
Da `' F 4ti7` i ar`�Fi Ti•: ��F: cS�w•z C. %t ." •1r ;)
Wednesday, 10/28/09 2:00 PM-4:00 PM High Desert Victor Valley Area
County of San Bernardino Department of Children's Services;
Conf. Rm. #1
15480 Ramona Ave., Vctorville, CA
Thursday, 10/29/09 10:00 AM-12:00 PM Big Bear Lake Area
City of Big Bear Lake
City Hall Training Room
39707 Big Bear Blvd., Big Bear Lake, CA
Monday, 11/02/09 10:00 AM-12:00 PM- East Valley Desert Area
Joshua Tree Parks and Recreation
Community Center, Elliot Hall
6171 Sunburst Street, Joshua Tree CA
Monday, 11/16/09 2:00 PM-4:00 PM Central Valley Area
County of San Bernardino Child Protective Services
Carousel Mall Conference Center
128 Carousel Mall, San Bernardino, CA
Parking Area C located at the Second St entrance Mall lower level
64
Dale
CBO Propos::s-_:sting System r
Prupused PrujecdPrubram Description:
?•, ,-- _.ilk �,����.5�-`.Pv'tir�. �i.•.�`--�=�
12
1:
----"-- ---" Circle are(1)statement for each criteria and ender the number antler Points for each criterion
---- - CONSTRUCTION PU
CRI l'LRIA AND
PUBLIC SERVICES
COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENTS
xPI'Llt A 1'lUh C'U111'LE'l'L NESS U. bU°ill ul'the application was completed while a lisistell0y 0. 6U%of the application was completed while consistently relernng to
rafeTing It,supporting documents(i.e.business plan).Also did supporting documents(i.e.business plan).Also did not supply any of the six
nut supply ally of the six requested supporting documents(i.e. requested supporting documents(i.e.budget info,list of board,proof of nun
budget info,list of board,proof of nun profit status,proof of profit status,proof of insurance,organization chart,and last Board minutes.)
insurance,Organization chart,and last Board minutes.) I. 70%of the application was completed and two of flu;six requested supporting
1 70%of the application was completed and two of the six documents were submitted.
requested supporting documents were submitted. 2. so%of the application completed and three of the sax requested supporting
2. soolu of the application completed and three of the six requested documents were submitted. --
supporting documents were submitted. 3. 90%of the application complete!and luur of the six requested suppol uug /
3 90%of the application completed and four of the six requested documents were submitted.
supporting documents were submitted. 4 All areas of application are complete and at Icaal live of the six requested f
4 All areas of application are complete and at least five of the six suPporting documents were submitted. /
requested supp of ting documents were submitted. 5. All areas of application are 4:01111)ICIC and received all of llle-supporling
5 All areas ul'applicatiou are complete and received all of the documents.
_ supporting documents.
LL%ERALANG UTIILR HUNDs 1. CDBG funded only 1. CDBG funded only
2. 90%+ CDBG funded 2. 90%+CDBG funded '+
3. 60% +-CDBG funded 3. GU%+CDBG funded �.
4. 3011,. F CDBG I'uidcd 4. 30%+CDBG funded
5. 10% +-CDBG funded S. 10%+CDBG funded
NI LLTb I IIGII L Need lOr the project is not identified in Consolidalal Plan. 1.Need for the program is not identified in CUn5olidaLed Plan.
PRIORITY C•UMnIUNITY NEED 2. Need liar the project is marginal or covered by another project. 2.Need for the progra in is marginal or covered by another program.
3. Project partially meets a priority need. 3.Program partially nncets a priority need.
4. Project increases capacity Of the facility which will increase 4.Program will expand or increase a public service that meets a priority need.
services that are identified Ili the Consolidated Plan. 5.Program would provide a public service that elects a priority need but is
5. Project would provide a missing communily facility that is currently not provided. t
_identified in the Consolidated Plan.
-IL GL NC'Y STABILITY U.Non-profit has been incorporated less than I year. 0.Non-profit has been incorporated and providing services less than I year.
I.Nun-profit has been incorporated I+-3 years. I.Nun-profit has been incorporated and providing service I+-3 years.
2.Nun-profil has been incorporated 3+-5 years. 2.Nun-profit has been incorporated aid providing services 3-r-5 years.
3.Nun-prolit has been incorpuialed 5+-7 years. 3.Noll-prolit has been incorporated and providing services 5+-7 ycars.
4.Nun-profit has been incorporated 7+-10 years. 4.Non-profit has been incorporated and providing services 7+-I0 years.
5.Non-profit has been incorporated inure than Ill years. 1 5.Nun-profit has been incu noraied and providing services more than Ill years.
- -- fora/all pumm&um each criterion and place satin in TOT-1 1.POINTS 'roTAL POINTS
adiOg LJu ecuuua
p 1 ('ucle Raillir;lur a adi crllerni Only circle One rating for each criterion.
p 1 I hen nine rauu� nunahcr li,r cash cruenuu under POINTS.
p 3 I'hcu suer POIN I'S,and place total sun)m)total POINTS.
Ln
Loh N
GRADE ONLY TIIE EXISTING CBO WHO PARTCIPATED IN COUNTY'S FY 08-09
CDBG PROGRAM- PAST PERFORMANCE REVIEW
._---- - . ------- - 1.U- O public service goals Illet
What percentage of their monthly public service goals did the CBO lace[Cur program' ;-51%-90%public service goals Inc[
SLIt1`Il l: FY 2UU8-09? 5.Grauer than 90%public service 'uJIS mCt
----.--- ----- 1.0-50%utilized
I,1 IIALA 1 ION OF CDBG FUNDING What perceluage uC funding was utilized by the CBO for program F�UUS-09? 3.51%-90%and above utilized
Led
Greater than 9056 utilized
Total all paints from each criterion curd place sum in TOTAL POINTS TOTAL POINTS
adint;Directions
p I lllcic Itaun�,din•each Cl llel'I:1.OIlly Clfl'IC UIIC IJUIIg Iul"Cae11(:rllCl'IUm.
I,2 then enter raunb nun)bcr fur each criterion under POINTS.
p_i Then sue, POINTS,and place tutal Burn in total POINTS.
ADDITIONAL REVIEW
l%ua}•No answers are circled et plain hou-project will still be eligible in commerus section.
See section "C "N" and proof a'Insurunce i•om CBO i)i-scoi-imiz.
.r.
PROJECT/PROGRAl1I Is this use permitted in this caning'? Vei:ur No
VIABILITY Dues the applicant have insurance? Nji or No
Dues the applicant have their 501 CP `1'e or No
Circle Yes ar No
uurul�.
r))cd 1)). Date:
;l
Log Number
COMM RECE VED�J���d� (Office Use Only)
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING Ali //w�09 Nov 3G ►l� ' y J 2010-2011 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT(CDBG)PROGRAM
3�uDff -PUBLIC SERVICE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM PROPOSAL-
Public service and economic development programs involve the use of CDBG funds to pay the non-construction costs of
providing new or expanded services such. as: graffiti removal, social services, transportation services (in support of
qualified social services); employment, housing, legal, health and education services; blight abatement; and economic
development activities that create new jobs. Please note that federal regulations limit the use of CDBG funds for all
public services to 15 percent of the County's annual grant
+1.
Important: According to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), a minimum grant awara
amount if necessary to justify the cost of administrating CDBG funded projects and programs. Consequently, CDH
believes that minimum CDBG awards of $10,000 will satisfy HUD's directive and this grant minimum will be
taken into account in making recommendations for approved projects. A minimum amount of $5,000 may be
considered on an exception basis. See page 4 for more details.
All Community Based Organizations are required to attend a 2010-11 CDBG Application
Training Session before the application will be accepted.See page 7 for the schedule.
Carefully read through the instructions and proposal forms. Answer all questions as specifically and completely as
possible. If more space is needed, attach separate sheets. Submit one(1)signed paper copy.
TYPE OR PRINT
A. Applicant Information
Name of A plicant Organization: Ontario Christian Center
2 Mailing Address: 1336 N. Baker Avenue
City: Ontario State: CA Zip: 91764
3
Contact Person: Tenicia Newton
4
Title: Grant Coordinator
5 Phone: 909 983-5269 ext. Fax: 909 983-9108
6
E-mail Address: finance@ontariochristiancenter.org
ProjectB.
Using 25 words or less, provide a concise description of the proposed program. This 25-turd description Is required
In order for this application to be considered complete- Consider items addressed under the General Project
Eligibility section of the Project Proposal Instructions. A detailed project description is also required to be provided on
page 5.
The Ontario Christian center will adopt a youth program designed to educate at risk teenagers on problematic issues that
are affecting them today.
is
I '-
2010-11 PUBLIC SERVICE PROGRAM PROPOSAL
C. Project Characteristics
1 Street address and nearest cross streets of the site or office where the program will be carried out:
1336 N. Baker Avenue, Ontario, Ca. 91764
2 Legal property owner. Ontario Christian Center Where Jesus is the Word o
3 What is the current zoning? R2
Is this use permitted in this zoning? Yes ® No❑
If no, explain why:
4
% Is a conditional use permit required? Yes No❑ If yes, attach a copy of thepermit.)
5
This community service would address the following community need(s): (Please check all that apply)
Public Service Needs: Economic Development Needs:
❑ Senior Services
❑ Handicapped Services El Assistance to for-Profit Businesses
®Youth Services ❑ Business Technical Assistance
❑Child Care Services ❑Micro-Enterprise Business Assistance
❑Transportation Services El Commercial/Industrial Rehabilitation
❑ Substance Abuse Services ElCommercial/Industrial Infrastructure Development
❑ Employment Training
❑ Health Services Planning Needs:
❑ Lead Hazard Screening ❑ Planning
❑ Crime Awareness
❑ Other. Please describe):
6 Describe the geographic boundaries of the neighborhood, community or area in which clients of the proposed
y program reside(attach a map if needed):
Satellite Locations will be locate in Colton, Blooimington, Montclair, and Chino
7
The proposed community service would be provided to: (Please check all that apply)
®Low-and-moderate-income persons or households ❑ Battered spouses
®Abused children ❑ Homeless persons
❑ Handicapped persons ❑Migrant farm workers
® Illiterate persons ❑.Elderly persons
S Estimated unduplicated number of clients/persons projected to be served during the program year
clients 50 seniors): 25
9
Estimated yearly units of service(duplicated, e.g. 25 clients x 10 visits=250 units of service: 250
10
For economic development activities, estimate the number of new full time jobs to be created: 3
69
r LV Iv-.i rViaL.V JGnw.%+G rnVVRMgI rmirycon.
D. Project Budget
CDBG Share Other Source
Personnel $65 000 $20 500
Equipment Rental Lease or Purchase $50 000 $25,000
Consultant Services(Auditing, Accounting or
Payroll Services) $15,000 $12 000
Space Rent $10 000 $10 000
Insurance $10,000 $2,000
Consumable Supplies $25,000 $15 000
Other $25,000 1 $15 500
Total Costs $200,000 1 $100, 00
Grand Total CDBG &Other $300 000 -
Estimator name and title):
E. Amourit of CDBG FUnds ReqUested
1 Amount of CDBG funds requested in this application (must equal Section D CDBG Share
$200 000 /
2 Additional funds to be provided by Other Source(s)for this project The date that the Other Source(s)of
funds have been or will be awarded and available, must be stated below.
Source(s)volunteer
Award Date / / Date Available 03/10/2010 $50 000
Source(s)Volunteer
Award Date / / Date Available 06/10/2010 $25,000
Source(s)Volunteer
Award Date / / Date Available 11 /10/2010 $25,000
Source(s)
Award Date / / Date Available / / $
i
Total of Other Sources
Should equal"Total costs Other Sources"in section D above $100 000
Please note: If this project also benefits residents of non-participating jurisdictions, matching funds in
proportion to the percentage of non-cooperating residents to be served must be provided by other funding
sources.
i
7G
F. Benefit Areas
This section,requires a break down of the requested CDBG funds according to the geographic area to be covered
by the proposed public service. Only enter amounts for communities where you intend to provide primary service.
Partial funding of a project proposal may occur and must be considered when calculating a requested amount for
more than one area. The total amount must be $10,000 or greater and must be sufficient to provide the
service within the identified city or unincorporated region. A $5,000 minimum may be considered as an
exception.
1) Cooperating Cities: The following cities participate as cooperating cities in the County's CDBG program. Please
determine if the primary service area for your proposed service would include one or more of the following cities. If
the service would provide predominate or partial benefit to city residents, the County will request a funding
recommendation from the benefiting city or cities. Enter the requested amount of CDBG funds needed to provide
the proposed service to each applicable city. Sub-total your entries below.
Amount Requested Amount Recluested
Adelanto $ Loma Linda $
Barstow $ Montclair $50,000
Big Bear Lake $ Needles I
Colton $50,000 Twentynine Palms $
Grand Terrace $50,000 Yucaipa $
Highland $ Town of Yucca Valle $
Sub-total of Funds Benefiting Cooperating Cities: $150 000
2) Unincorporated Regions: The following regions contain unincorporated areas covered by the County CDBG
program. Please determine if the primary service area for your proposed project includes one or more of the
following unincorporated areas. Check off the applicable community or communities. Prorate the amount of funds
needed for each area served based on the proportion of residents served by your program from each area. Enter the
requested amount of CDBG funds needed to provide the proposed project to each applicable unincorporated area.
Sub-total your entries below.
Searles Valley and Vicinity in the First District $ Amount Requested
Hinkle /Lenwood U Newberry Springs Baker/Vicinity in the First District $
Wonder Valley LJ Colorado River areas in the First District $
Oro Grande Ll Other Unincorporated Victor Valley areas in the First District $
Phelan/Pinon Hills LJ El Mirage U Wri htwood/Vicini in the First District $
-ElLuceme Valley and vicinity in the First District $
Crestline/Ceda Ines Park in the Second District $
West Fontana LJ Lyde Creek LJ Devore in the Second District $25 000
Johnson Valley LJ Landers Moron go Valle /vicini in the Third District $
Moron o Basin in the First and Thins District $
Joshua Tree and areas to the north and east in the Third District $
LJ Lake Arrowhead LJ Running Springs Big Bear Valle in the Third District $
El Bryn Mawr 0Del Rosa DMentone In the Third District $
South Montclair LJNorthwest Chino in the Fourth District $
Musco North Norton Bloomington in the Fifth District .$25,000
Arrowhead Suburban Farms in the Fifth District $
Other Pleasespecify) $
Sub-total of Funds Benefiting Cooperating Cities $
3)Total Funds: The total amount of CDBG funds requested in Section E, (Cooperating Cities + Unincorporated
Regions). This amount must equal the amount of CDBG funds requested in this application on Line 1, in Sectio F
Total Funds Requested 0
71
Organizational • •
1) Organizational History: (This is applicable only if you are a non-profit organization).
a. Date Organization founded: 11 /04/ 1988
b. Date Organization incorporated as a non- rofit organization:anization: 1110411988
c. Federal identification number. 33-0592428 State identification number. A0598604
d. Number of paid staff: 0 Number of volunteers: 10
2) Is this a"faith-based' organization? "Yes® No❑
"Generally, a faith-based organization was founded or is inspired by faith or religion. Such organizations often choose
to demonstrate that faith by carrying out one or more activities that assist persons who are less fortunate.
DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION
(Continuation of Section B, Project Description, Page 1)
I
Provide detailed information needed to fully describe the proposed public service, its purpose and its be
Please attach applicable maps, plans and brochures.
The community Program will consist of 24 bi- monthly meetings designed to educate thre youth in the area about
problematic areas. Each meeting will be held for 2 hours each and would begin promptly at 7:00 P.M. and will end
promptly at 9:00 P.M. The neighboring communities will receive marketing materials as informational tools and will be
given the opportuntiy to attend on a first come first come basis. Transportation will be included if needed, as well as a
bilingual instructor to assist the youth that are Spanish speaking. The ages that will be invited will range from 15yrs..til 18
yrs of age. The youth that are below the age of 18 will be required to submit a parent consent form.
The sessions will,be centered around a.round table format which will enable the youth to feel apart of the group as well
as give them the oportunity to share their feelings about particular topics. j
i
i
f
i
72
DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION (Continued)
Authorized Sionature: To the best of my knowledge, the information provided on this application is true and I am
authorized to submit this application on behalf of the applicant agency. Also, I acknowledge that insurance
coverage including t not limited to, Com rehensive General Liability and Automobile Liability, and Professional
Liability will be r it before CDBG fu can be made available to approved projects.
WSignature: Title:
U
Print Name: Date: �/!/ 11-40 ---7
PLEASE SUBMIT ONE SIGNED PAPER COPY OF EACH COMPLETED AND SIGNED PROJECT PROPOSAL TO:
County of San Bernardino, Department of Community Development and Housing, 290 North "D" Street, Sixth Floor, San
Bernardino, CA 92415-0040, Attention: Program and Compliance Section.
For assistance or information regarding the completion of this proposal, call (909) 388-0800 or FAX (909) 388-0929.
This application form can be accessed on CDH's Web Page at:
nttp.//yvww sbcounty.Qov/eda/cdh/community dev/cdbq proiect.asp
73
Attachment A
CDBG Application Checklist
Community-based organizations are required to include one copy of the items listed below. If you are not submitting
these items at this time, please notify the Department of Community Development at (909) 388-0800 to make other
arrangements. The following information is required before any contract or reimbursement can be completed.
❑ Summary of agency's current year General Operating Budget
❑ List of Agency's Board of Directors, including names and addresses
❑ Proof of existing non-profit/tax-exempt status (Letters from the Federal Internal Revenue Service and State
Franchise Tax Board)
❑ Current certificate of insurance and amounts covered
❑ Organizational Chart
❑ Minutes of last Board meeting
If your application is funded you will be required to provide a copy of you last audit and your Articles of Incorporation and
Bylaws must be on file.
All Community Based Organizations are required to attend a 2010-11 CDBG Application Training Session before
the application will be accepted. See the 2010-11 CDBG Application Training Schedule below.
Det� �� � ��ATliri�;� ;;�.��:1��:�=-'£fE.`o"�ii�W '��''��;�.�: �. ;�:��:�;�:' k:'i"�' �,• �� �:��'i��` �`
Wednesday, 10/28/09 2:00 PM-4:00 PM High Desert Victor Valley Area
County of San Bernardino Department of Children's Services,
Conf. Rm.#1
15480 Ramona Ave., Victorville, CA
Thursday, 10/29/09 10:00 AM-1 2:00 PM Big Bear Lake Area
City of Big Bear Lake
City Hall Training Room
39707 Big Bear Blvd., Big Bear Lake CA
Monday, 11/02/09 10:00 AM-12:00 PM East Valley Desert Area
Joshua Tree Parks and Recreation
Community Center, Elliot Hall
6171 Sunburst Street, Joshua Tree CA
Monday, 11/16/09 2:00 PM--4.00 PM Central Valley Area
County of San Bernardino Child Protective Services
Carousel Mail Conference Center
128 Carousel Mail, San Bernardino, CA
Parking Area C located at the Second St. entrance Mail lower level
74
Ln
CBO Proposal_Rating System Mile !
Propoced Project/Program Description: V\V I ,
J
Circle one(1)statement for each criteria and enter the number finder Points jar each criterion
CONSTRUCTION ---_- .------ - - --
CRITERIA AND PUBLIC SERVICES 11011N-
_ COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENTS
"LICATION C0NIPLF7'ENFSS 0. 61WI;,of the application was completed while consistently 0. 600/6 of the application was completed while consistently referring to
referring to supporting documents(i.e.business plan).Also did supporting documents(i.e.business plan). Also did not supply anv nl-thc six
not supply any of the six requested supporting documents(i.e. requested supporting documents(i.e.budget info,list ol'board,pronfol'non
budget info,list of board,proof of non profit status,proof of profit status,proof of insurance,organization chart,and last Board minutes.)
insurance,organization chart,and(nst Board ninules.) 1. 70%of the application was completed and two ol'the sir requested supp„rtine
1 70'%of the application was completed and two of the six documents were suhmitled.
requested supporting documents were submitted. 2. 80%of the application completed and Ihrce of the sir rcquc-,ztcd sul.poi IinL
2. SO"%of the application completed and three of the six requested documents were sulnnitled.
supporting documents were submitted. 3 9O%of the application completed and liver ol'Ihc sir requested supporrinc
3 9111.of the application completed anti four of the six requested documents were submitted.
supporting documents were submitted. 4 All areas of application arc complete anti at (cast five of the cix requesle d r,
4 All areas of appiication are complete and at least live of the six supi-lorting documents were submitted.
requested supporting documents were submitted. 5. All areas of application arc complete and received all of the sul,pnrting /
5. All areas of application arc complete and received all of the documents.
supporting documents.
-VERAGINC, OTIIER FUNDS I. CDBG funded only I. CDBG Ibnded only
2. 90 +CDBG Bided 2. 901"+CDBG funded
3. 60 o+CDBG funded 3. 00%+CDBG funded
4. 30%+CDBG funded 4. 30"X6+CDBG funaiecl
5. 10%+CDBG funded 5. 1051,+CDBG funded
MEETS NIGII 1. Need for the project is not identified in Consolidated Plan. 1.Need for the program is not identified in Consolidated Plan.
I011rrY CONIM1iUNITV NEED 2. Need tiff the project is marginal or covered by another project. 2.Need for the program is marginal or covered hv another pror;ram
3. Project partially meets a priority need. 3.Program partially meets a priority need.
4. Project increases capacity of the facility which will increase 4.Program will expand or increase a publie scrice that meets a priorih need.
services that are identified in the Consolidated Plan. 5.Program would provide a public service that meets a prim ih ncr:l bur is 1 l
5. Project would provide a missing community facility that is currently not provided. a
identified in the Consolidated Plan. ---- - - -
V;ENCY STABILITY 0.Non-prolil has been incorporated less than I year. 0.Non-profit has been incorporated and providing services less Ilran I
1.Non-profit has been incorporated I+-3 years. 1.Non-profit has been incorporated and providing services I+-3 vears.
2.Non-profit has been incorporated 3+-5 years. 2.Non-profit has been incorporated and providing service'; 1+-5 veers- _
3.Non-profit has been incorporated 5+-7 years. 3.Non-profit has been incorporated and providing services 5 F- 7 year%.
4.Non-profit has bccn incorporated 7+-10 years. 4.Non-prolit has been incorporated and providing services 7+-1()veers +
$.Nam- fit has been incorporated more than 10 ears. 5.Nan--profit has been into prated and providingservices more thnn_I(I wars_ /
TOTAL POINTS
Totol all paints front each criterion anr�lrrce snm ire TOTAL POINTS ___
ng Directions
Circle Rating for each criteria.Only circle one sling lift each criterion.
-then enter rating number iOr each criterion under POINTS.
Then cum POINTS,and place total sum in total POINTS.
GRADE ONLY THE EXISTING CBO WII_ LRTCIPATED IN COUNTY'S FV 08-09
CDBG PROGRAM-(PAST PERFORMANCE REV1ENN
What percentage of their monthly public service goals did the CBO meet for program 1.0-5(1"/o public service gnats met
SERVICE ( 3.51%-90%public service goals mct
FY 2003-0)? p t- _—
5.Greater than 90"i"pullf e service goals mo-
1 0-50%utilized
UTILIZATION OF CDBG FUNDING What percentage of lunding was utilized by the CBO for program FY 2008-09? 3. 5 1%-90%and ahovc_utili cd
5 Greater Ilmn 9(1"•o irtiliicd
Teral ulloirNsfrorn errclr criterion and place stint br TOTAL POINTS TOTA1, POINT;C ---
ingr Directions
Circle Raling for each criteria.Only circle one rating l"or each criterion.
:. Then eider rating numher lift each criterion under POINTS.
Then aum 1'OINI:S,and place total sum in total POINTS.
ADDITIONAL REVIEW
lj'ant•No ansn•ers are chrled erplain how pi-gject(rill still be eligible is comments secrian.
See section "C", "H" rind proofof hrsurance tom CBO or scoria .
PROJECT/PROGRAM Is this use pcnnittcd in this zoning? es or No
VIABILITY Does the applicant have insurance? `.yes or No
Does the applicant have their 50IC3? -Yes-or No
Circle Yes or No
'nt5:
!!(I Itt•: Date:
6
C':.a�r''•.
4
CALIFORNIA
AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: February 9, 2010 Council Item ( X ) CRA Item ( )
TITLE: Chapter 15.56 Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance
PRESENTED BY: Sandra Molina, Community and Economic Development
Department
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt an Ordinance adding Chapter 15.56 Water Efficient
Landscape Ordinance to Title 15 of the Grand Terrace Municipal
Code.
BACKGROUND:
On January 26, 2010 the City Council conducted a public hearing on the above-referenced draft
Ordinance, and moved the proposed Ordinance over for second reading.
DISCUSSION:
In compliance with the State Legislature's Water Conservation in Landscaping Act, staff
recommends adoption of Chapter 15.56 Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Implementation of the Ordinance will create additional staff duties and responsibilities; however,
no impact to the City's General Fund beyond normal operating expenses is expected.
Respectfully submitted,
Sandra Molina
Senior Planner
COUNCIL.AGENDA ITEM NO. 7}=�
1
Manager Apprc it: 2
Betsy Nf. Ada s
City Manager
ATTACHMEN' . ,S:
Chapter 5.56 Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance
i
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND
TERRACE ADDING CHAPTER 15.56 TO TITLE 15 OF THE GRAND
TERRACE MUNICPAL CODE ESTABLISHING A WATER EFFICIENT
LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Chapter 15.56 is added to Title 15 of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code to
read as follows:
"Chapter 15.56
Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance
Sections:
15.56.010 Purpose.
15.56.020 Applicability
15.56.030 Provisions for New Construction or Rehabilitated Landscapes.
15.56.040 Compliance with Landscape Documentation Package.
15.56.050 Penalties.
15.56.060 Elements of the Landscape Documentation Package.
15.56.070 Water Efficient Landscape Worksheet.
15.56.080 Soil Management Report.
15.56.090 Landscape Design Plan.
15.56.100 Irrigation Design Plan.
15.56.110 Grading Design Plan.
15.56.120 Certificate of Completion.
15.56.130 Irrigation Scheduling.
15.56.140 Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Schedule
15.56.150 Irrigation Audit, Irrigation Survey, and Irrigation Water Use Analysis.
15.56.160 Irrigation Efficiency.
15.56.170 Recycled Water.
15.56.180 Stormwater Management.
15.56.190 Public Education.
15.56.200 Environmental Review.
15.56.210 Provisions for Existing Landscapes.
15.56.220 Irrigation Audit, Irrigation Survey, and Irrigation Water Use Analysis.
15.56.230 Water Waste Prevention.
15.56.240 Effective Precipitation.
15.56.250 Definitions
Appendix A. Reference Evapotranspiration (ETo) Table.
Appendix B— Sample Water Efficient Landscape Worksheet.
Appendix C— Certificate of Completion.
Pagel of 36
3
15.56.010 Purpose.
A. The State Legislature has found:
1. That the waters of the state are of limited supply and are subject to ever increasing
demands;
2. That the continuation of California's economic prosperity is dependent on the
availability of adequate supplies of water for future uses;
3. That it is the policy of the State to promote the conservation and efficient use of
water and to prevent the waste of this valuable resource;
4. That landscapes are essential to the quality of life in California by providing areas
for active and passive recreation and as an enhancement to the environment by
cleaning air and water, preventing erosion, offering fire protection, and replacing
ecosystems lost to development; and
5. That landscape design, installation, maintenance and management can and should
be water efficient; and
6. That Section 2 of Article X of the California Constitution specifies that the right
to use water is limited to the amount reasonably required for the beneficial use to
be served and the right does not and shall not extend to waste or unreasonable
method of use.
B. Consistent with these legislative findings, the purpose of this ordinance is to:
1. Promote the values and benefits of landscapes while recognizing the need to
invest water and other resources as efficiently as possible;
2. Establish a structure for planning, designing, installing, maintaining and
managing water efficient landscapes in new construction and rehabilitated
proj ects;
3. Establish provisions for water management practices and water waste prevention
for existing landscapes;
4. Use water efficiently without waste by setting a Maximum Applied Water
Allowance as an upper limit for water use and reduce water use to the lowest
practical amount;
5. Promote the benefits of consistent landscape ordinances with neighboring local
and regional agencies;
6. Encourage local agencies and water purveyors to use economic incentives that
promote the efficient use of water, such as implementing a tiered-rate stricture;
and
Page 2 of 36
d
7. Encourage cooperation between the City and other local agencies, as applicable,
to implement and enforce this ordinance.
15.56.020 Applicability
A. This ordinance shall apply to all of the following landscape projects:
1. New construction and rehabilitated landscapes for public and private development
projects with a landscape area equal to or greater than 2,500 square feet subject to
discretionary permits, plan checks, land use reviews, and approvals;
2. New construction and rehabilitated landscapes which are developer-installed in
single-family and multi-family projects with a landscape area equal to or greater
than 2,500 square feet subject to discretionary permits, plan checks, land use
reviews, and approvals;
3. New construction landscapes which are homeowner-provided and/or homeowner-
hired in single-family and multi-family residential projects with a total project
landscape area equal to or greater than 5,000 square feet subject to discretionary
permits, plan checks, land use reviews, and approvals; and
4. Existing landscapes limited to Section 15.56.210, Section 15.56.220, and Section
15.56.230.
B. This ordinance does not apply to:
1. Any project with a total landscaped area of less than 2,500 square feet;
2. Registered local, state or federal historical sites;
3. Ecological restoration projects that do not require a permanent irrigation system;
and
4. Plant collections, as part of botanical gardens and arboretums open to the public.
15.56.030 Provisions for New Construction or Rehabilitated Landscapes.
A. The City may designate another agency, such as a water purveyor, to implement some or
all of the requirements contained in this ordinance. The City may collaborate with water
purveyors to define each entity's specific responsibilities relating to this ordinance.
15.56.040 Compliance with Landscape Documentation Package.
A. Prior to construction, the Director shall:
1. Provide the project applicant with the ordinance and procedures for permits, plan
checks, or design reviews;
Page 3 of 36
5
2. Review the Landscape Documentation Package submitted by the project
applicant;
3. Approve or deny the Landscape Documentation Package;
4. Issue a permit or approve the plan check or design review for the project
applicant; and
5. Upon approval of the Landscape Documentation Package, submit a copy of the
Water Efficient Landscape Worksheet to the local water purveyor.
B. Prior to construction, the project applicant shall:
1. Submit a Landscape Documentation Package to the Director.
C. Upon approval of the Landscape Documentation Package by the Director', the project
applicant shall:
l. Receive a permit or approval of the plan check or design review and record the
date of the permit in the Certificate of Completion;
2. Submit a copy of the approved Landscape Documentation Package along with the
record drawings, and any other information to the property owner or his/her
designee; and
3. Submit a copy of the Water Efficient Landscape Worksheet to the local water
purveyor.
15.56.050 Penalties.
A. The City may establish and administer penalties to the project applicant for non-
compliance with the ordinance to the extent permitted by law.
15.56.060 Elements of the Landscape Documentation Package.
A. The Landscape Documentation Package shall include the following six (6) elements:
1. Project information with the following;
a. Date
b. Project applicant and contact information
C. Project owner and contact information
d. Project address (parcel and/or lot number(s) if available)
C. Total landscape area (square feet)
Page 4 of 36
E
f. Project type (e.g., new, rehabilitated, public, private, homeowner-
installed)
g. Water supply type (e.g., potable, recycled, well) and identify the local
retail water purveyor if the applicant is not served by a private well
h. Checklist of all documents in Landscape Documentation Package
i. Project contacts to include contact information for the project applicant
and property owner
j. Applicant signature and date with statement, "I agree to comply with the
requirements of the water efficient landscape ordinance and submit a
complete Landscape Documentation Package"
2. Water Efficient Landscape Worksheet with the following:
a. Hydrozone information table;
b. Water budget calculations;
(i) Maximum Applied Water Allowance (MAWA)
(ii) Estimated Total Water Use(ETWU)
3. Soil management report;
4. Landscape design plan;
5. Irrigation design plan, and
6. Grading design plan.
15.56.070 Water Efficient Landscape Worksheet.
A. A project applicant shall complete the Water Efficient Landscape Worksheet which is
made up of two sections, and contained in Appendix B:
1. A hydrozone information table(see Section A of Appendix B) for the landscape
project; and
2. A water budget calculation (see Section B of Appendix B) for the landscape
project. For the calculation of the Maximum Applied Water Allowance and
Estimated Total Water Use, a project applicant shall use the ETo values from the
Reference Evapotranspiration Table in Appendix A. For geographic areas not
covered in Appendix A, use data from other cities located nearby in the same
reference evapotranspiration zone, as found in the CIMIS Reference
Evapotranspiration Zones Map, Department of Water Resources, 1999.
Page 5 of 36
7
B. Water budget calculations shall adhere to the following requirements:
1. The plant factor used shall be from WUCOLS. The plant factor ranges from 0 to
0.3 for low water use plants, from 0.4 to 0.6 for moderate water use plants, and
from 0.7 to 1.0 for high water use plants;
2. All water features shall be included in the high water use hydrozone and
temporarily irrigated areas shall be included in the low water use hydrozone;
3. All Special Landscape Areas shall be identified and their water use calculated as "
described below; and
4. ETAF for Special Landscape Areas shall not exceed 1.0.
C. Maximum Applied Water Allowance
The Maximum Applied Water Allowance shall be calculated using the equation:
MAWA=(ETo) (0.62) [(0.7 x LA) + (0.3 x SLA)]
The example calculations below are hypothetical to demonstrate proper use of the
equations and do not represent an existing and/or planned landscape project. The ETo
values used in these calculations are from the Reference Evapotranspiration Table in
Appendix A, for planning purposes only. For actual irrigation scheduling, automatic
irrigation controllers are required and shall use current reference evapotranspiration data,
such as from the California Irrigation Management Information System(CIMIS), other
equivalent data, or soil moisture sensor data.
1. Example MAWA calculation: a hypothetical landscape project in Fresno, CA
with an irrigated landscape area of 50,000 square feet without any Special
Landscape Area(SLA= 0, no edible plants, recreational areas, or use of recycled
water). To calculate MAWA, the annual reference evapotranspiration value for
Fresno is 5 1.1 inches.
MAWA= (ETo) (0.62) [(0.7 x LA) + (0.3 x SLA)]
MAWA=Maximum Applied Water Allowance (gallons per year)
ETo =Reference Evapotranspiration (inches per year)
0.62 = Conversion Factor(to gallons)
0.7 = ET Adjustment Factor (ETAF)
LA = Landscape Area including SLA (square feet)
0.3 = Additional Water Allowance for SLA
SLA = Special Landscape Area (square feet)
Page 6 of 36
MAWA=(51.1 inches) (0.62) [(0.7 x 50,000 square feet) + (0.3 x 0):
= 1,108,870 gallons per year
To convert from gallons per year to hundred-cubic-feet per year:
= 1,108,870/748 = 1,482 hundred-cubic-feet per year
(100 cubic feet= 748 gallons)
l 2. In this next hypothetical example, the landscape project in Fresno, CA has the
same ETo value of 51.1 inches and a total landscape area of 50,000 square feet.
Within the 50,000 square foot project, there is now a 2,000 square foot area
planted with edible plants. This 2,000 square foot area is considered to be a
Special Landscape Area.
MAWA=(ETo) (0.62) [(0.7 x LA)+ (0.3 x SLA)]
MAWA=(51.1 inches) (0.62) [(0.7 x 50,000 square feet) + (0.3 x 2,000 square
feet)]
= 31.68 x [35,000+ 600] gallons per year
= 31.68 x 35,600 gallons per year
=1,127,808 gallons per year or 1,508 hundred-cubic-feet per year
D. Estimated Total Water Use.
The Estimated Total Water Use shall be calculated using the equation below. The sum of
the Estimated Total Water Use calculated for all hydrozones shall not exceed MAWA.
ETWU =(ETo)(0.62) P x A +SLAIE
Where:
ETWU=Estimated Total Water Use per year(gallons)
ETo =Reference Evapotranspiration(inches)
PF =Plant Factor from WUCOLS (see Section 15.56.250)
HA = Hydrozone Area [high, medium, and low water use areas] (square feet)
SLA =Special Landscape Area (square feet)
0.62 =Conversion Factor
Page 7 of 36
9
IE = Irrigation Efficiency(minimum 0.71)
1. Example ETWU calculation: landscape area is 50,000 square feet; plant water use
type, plant factor, and hydrozone area are shown in the table below. The ETo
value is 51.1 inches per year. There are no Special Landscape Areas (recreational
area, area permanently and solely dedicated to edible plants, and area irrigated
with recycled water) in this example.
Plant Hydrozone r
Plant Water Factor Area (HA) PF x HA �I
Hydrozone Use Type(s) (PF)* (square feet) (square feet)
1 High 0.8 7,000 5,600
2 High 0.7 10,000 7,000
3 Medium 0.5 16,000 8,000
4 Low 0.3 7,000 2,100
5 Low 0.2 10,000 2,000
Sum 24,700
*Plant Factor from WUCOLS
ETWU=(51.1)(0.62) 24,700+0
0.71
= 1,102,116 gallons per year
Compare ETWU with MAWA: For this example MAWA=(51.1) (0.62) [(0.7 x
50,000) + (0.3 x 0)] = 1,108,870 gallons per year. The ETWU (1,102,116 gallons
per year) is less than MAWA (1,108,870 gallons per year). In this example, the
water budget complies with the MAWA.
2. Example ETWU calculation: total landscape area is 50,000 square feet, 2,000
square feet of which is planted with edible plants. The edible plant area is
considered a Special Landscape Area (SLA). The reference evapotranspiration
value is 51.1 inches per year. The plant type, plant factor, and hydrozone area are
shown in the table below.
Page 8 of 36
1 C!
Plant Hydrozone
Plant Water Factor Area(HA) PF x HA
Hydrozone Use Type(s) (PF)* (square feet) (square feet)
1 High 0.8 7,000 5,600
2 High 0.7 9,000 6,300
3 Medium 0.5 15,000 7,500
4 Low 0.3 7,000 2,100
5 Low 0.2 10,000 2,000
6 SLA 1.0 2,000 2,000
Sum 23,500
*Plant Factor from WUCOLS
ETWU = (51.1)(0.62) 23,500 +2,000
0.71
_ (31.68) (33,099 +2,000)
= 1,111,936 gallons per year
Compare ETWU with MAWA. For this example:
MAWA=(51.1) (0.62) [(0.7 x 50,000)+ (0.3 x 2,000)]
=31.68 x [35,000 + 600]
=31.68 x 35,600
=1,127,808 gallons per year
The ETWU(1,111,936 gallons per year) is less than MAWA (1,127,808 gallons
per year). For this example, the water budget complies with the MAWA.
15.56.080 Soil Management Report.
A. In order to reduce runoff and encourage healthy plant growth, a soil management report
shall be completed by the project applicant, or his/her designee, as follows:
1. Submit soil samples to a laboratory for analysis and recommendations.
Page 9 of 36
11
a. Soil sampling shall be conducted in accordance with laboratory protocol,
including protocols regarding adequate sampling depth for the intended
plants.
b. The soil analysis may include:
i. soil texture;
ii. infiltration rate determined by laboratory test or soil texture
infiltration rate table; Q
iii. pH;
iv. total soluble salts;
V. sodium;
vi. percent organic matter; and
vii. recommendations.
2. The project applicant, or his/her designee, shall comply with one of the following:
a. If significant mass grading is not planned, the soil analysis report shall be
submitted to the local agency as part of the Landscape Documentation
Package; or
b. If significant mass grading is planned, the soil analysis report shall be
submitted to the City as part of the Certificate of Completion.
3. The soil analysis report shall be made available, in a timely manner, to the
professionals preparing the landscape design plans and irrigation design plans to
make any necessary adjustments to the design plans.
4. The project applicant, or his/her designee, shall submit documentation verifying
implementation of soil analysis report recommendations to the City with
Certificate of Completion.
15.56.090 Landscape Design Plan.
A. For the efficient use of water, a landscape shall be carefully designed and planned for the
intended function of the project. A landscape design plan meeting the following design
criteria shall be submitted as part of the Landscape Documentation Package.
1. Plant Material
a. Any plant may be selected for the landscape, providing the Estimated
Total Water Use in the landscape area does not exceed the Maximum
Page 10 of 36
1�
Applied Water Allowance. To encourage the efficient use of water, the
following is highly recommended:
i. protection and preservation of native species and natural
vegetation;
ii. selection of water-conserving plant and turf species;
iii. selection of plants based on disease and pest resistance;
iv. selection of trees based on applicable City tree ordinances or tree
shading guidelines; and
V. selection of plants from local and regional landscape program plant
lists.
b. Each hydrozone shall have plant materials with similar water use, with the
exception of hydrozones with plants of mixed water use, as specified in
Section 15.56.100.A.2.d.
C. Plants shall be selected and planted appropriately based upon their
adaptability to the climatic, geologic, and topographical conditions of the
project site. To encourage the efficient use of water, the following is
highly recommended:
i. use the Sunset Western Climate Zone System which takes into
account temperature, humidity, elevation, terrain, latitude, and
varying degrees of continental and marine influence on local
climate;
ii. recognize the horticultural attributes of plants (i.e., mature plant
size, invasive surface roots) to minimize damage to property or
infrastructure [e.g.,buildings, sidewalks, power lines]; and
iii. consider the solar orientation for plant placement to maximize
summer shade and winter solar gain.
d. Turf is not allowed on slopes greater than 25% where the toe of the slope
is adjacent to an impermeable hardscape and where 25% means 1 foot of
vertical elevation change for every 4 feet of horizontal length(rise divided
by run x 100=slope percent).
e. A landscape design plan for projects in fire-prone areas shall address fire
safety and prevention. A defensible space or zone around a building or
stricture is required per Public Resources Code Section 4291(a) and (b).
Avoid fire-prone plant materials and highly flammable mulches.
F. The use of invasive and/or noxious plant species is strongly discouraged.
Page 11 of 36
13
g. The architectural guidelines of a common interest development, which
include community apartment projects, condominiums,planned
developments, and stock cooperatives, shall not prohibit or include
conditions that have the effect of prohibiting the use of low-water use
plants as a group.
2. Water Features
a. Recirculating water systems shall be used for water features.
I)
b. Where available, recycled water shall be used as a source for decorative
water features.
C. Surface area of a water feature shall be included in the high water use
hydrozone area of the water budget calculation.
d. Pool and spa covers are highly recommended.
3. Mulch and Amendments
a. A minimum two inch (2") layer of mulch shall be applied on all exposed
soil surfaces of planting areas except in turf areas, creeping or rooting
groundcovers, or direct seeding applications where mulch is
contraindicated.
b. Stabilizing mulching products shall be used on slopes.
C. The mulching portion of the seed/mulch slurry in hydro-seeded
applications shall meet the mulching requirement.
d. Soil amendments shall be incorporated according to recommendations of
the soil report and what is appropriate for the plants selected (see Section
15.56.080).
B. The landscape design plan, at a minimum, shall identify and site the following:
1. New and existing trees, shrubs, ground covers, and turf areas within the proposed
landscape area;
2. Planting legend indicting all plant species by botanical and common name,
spacing and quantities of each type of plant by container size;
3. Area, in square feet, devoted to landscaping and a breakdown of the total area by
landscape hydrozones;
4. Property line streets and street names;
5. Building locations, driveways, sidewalks, retaining walls, and any other
hardscape (pervious and non-pervious) features;
Page 12 of 36
1L-
6. Appropriate scale and north arrow (planting and irrigation plans shall be drawn at
the same scale);
7.. Any special landscape areas;
8. Type of mulch and application depth;
9. Planting specifications and details;
10. The MAWA and EAWU;
11. Delineate and label each hydrozone by number, letter, or other method;
12. Each hydrozone as low, moderate, high, or mixed water use. Temporarily
irrigated areas of the landscape shall be included in the low water use hydrozone
for the water budget calculation;
13. Recreational areas;
14. Areas permanently and solely dedicated to edible plants;
15. Areas irrigated with recycled water;
16. Soil amendments, type, and quantity;
17. Type and surface area of water features;
18. Location and installation details of any applicable stormwater best management
practices that encourage on-site retention and infiltration of stormwater.
Stormwater best management practices are encouraged in the landscape design
plan and examples include, but are not limited to:
a. Infiltration beds, swales, and basins that allow water to collect and soak
into the ground;
b. Constructed wetlands and retention ponds that retain water, handle excess
flow, and filter pollutants; and
C. Pervious or porous surfaces (e.g.,permeable pavers or blocks,pervious or
porous concrete, etc.) that minimize runoff.
19. Any applicable rain harvesting or catchment technologies (e.g., rain gardens,
cisterns, etc.);
20. Contain the following statement: "I have complied with the criteria of the
ordinance and applied them for the efficient use of water in the landscape design
plan"; and
Page 13 of 36
15
21. Bear the signature of a licensed landscape architect, licensed landscape contractor,
or any other person authorized to design a landscape. (See Sections 5500.1, 5615,
5641, 5641.1, 5641.2, 5641.3, 5641.4, 5641.5, 5641.6, 6701, 7027.5 of the
Business and Professions Code, Section 832.27 of Titlel6 of the California Code
of Regulations, and Section 6721 of the Food and Agriculture Code.)
15.56.100 Irrigation Design Plan.
A. For the efficient use of water, an irrigation system shall meet all the requirements listed in
this section and the manufacturers' recommendations. The irrigation system and its
related components shall be planned and designed to allow for proper installation,
management, and maintenance. An irrigation design plan meeting the following design
criteria shall be submitted as part of the Landscape Documentation Package.
1. System
a. Dedicated landscape water meters are highly recommended on landscape
areas smaller than 5,000 square feet to facilitate water management.
b. Automatic irrigation controllers utilizing either evapotranspiration or soil
moisture sensor data shall be required for irrigation scheduling in all
irrigation systems.
C. The irrigation system shall be designed to ensure that the dynamic
pressure at each emission device is within the manufacturer's
recommended pressure range for optimal performance.
i. If the static pressure is above or below the required dynamic
pressure of the irrigation system, pressure-regulating devices such
as inline pressure regulators,booster pumps, or other devices shall
be installed to meet the required dynamic pressure of the irrigation
system.
ii. Static water pressure, dynamic or operating pressure, and flow
reading of the water supply shall be measured at the point of
connection. These pressure and flow measurements shall be
conducted at the design stage. If the measurements are not
available at the design stage, the measurements shall be conducted
at installation.
d. Sensors (rain, freeze, wind, etc.), either integral or auxiliary, that suspend
or alter irrigation operation during unfavorable weather conditions shall be
required on all irrigation systems, as appropriate for local climatic
conditions. Irrigation should be avoided during windy or freezing weather
or during rain.
e. Manual shut-off valves (such as a gate valve, ball valve, or butterfly valve)
shall be required, as close as possible to the point of connection of the
Page 14 of 36
1 F.
water supply, to minimize water loss in case of an emergency(such as a
main line break) or routine repair.
f. Backflow prevention devices shall be required to protect the water supply
from contamination by the irrigation system. A project applicant shall
refer to the applicable local agency code (i.e., public health) for additional
backflow prevention requirements.
g. High flow sensors that detect and report high flow conditions created by
system damage or malfunction are recommended.
h. The irrigation system shall be designed to prevent runoff, low head
drainage, overspray, or other similar conditions where irrigation water
flows onto non-targeted areas, such as adjacent property, non-irrigated
areas, hardscapes, roadways, or structures.
i. Relevant information from the soil management plan, such as soil type and
infiltration rate, shall be utilized when designing irrigation systems.
j. The design of the irrigation system shall conform to the hydrozones of the
landscape design plan.
k. The irrigation system must be designed and installed to meet, at a
minimum, the irrigation efficiency criteria as described in Section
15.56.070 regarding the Maximum Applied Water Allowance.
1. It is highly recommended that the project applicant inquire with the local
water purveyor about peak water operating demands (on the water supply
system) or water restrictions that may impact the effectiveness of the
irrigation system.
M. In mulched planting areas, the use of low volume irrigation is required to
maximize water infiltration into the root zone.
n. Sprinkler heads and other emission devices shall have matched
precipitation rates, unless otherwise directed by the manufacturer's
recommendations.
o. Head to head coverage is recommended. However, sprinkler spacing shall
be designed to achieve the highest possible distribution uniformity using
the manufacturer's recommendations.
P. Swing joints or other riser-protection components are required on all risers
subject to damage that are adjacent to high traffic areas.
q. Check valves or anti-drain valves are required for all irrigation systems.
Page 15 of 36
17
r. Narrow or irregularly shaped areas, including turf, less than eight (8) feet
in width in any direction shall be irrigated with subsurface irrigation or
low volume irrigation system.
S. Overhead irrigation shall not be permitted within 24 inches of any non-
permeable surface. Allowable irrigation within the setback from non-
permeable surfaces may include drip, drip line, or other low flow non-
spray technology. The setback area may be planted or unplanted. The
surfacing of the setback may be mulch, gravel, or other porous material.
These restrictions may be modified if.
i. the landscape area is adjacent to permeable surfacing and no runoff
occurs; or
ii. the adjacent non-permeable surfaces are designed and constructed
to drain entirely to landscaping; or
iii. the irrigation designer specifies an alternative design or
technology, as part of the Landscape Documentation Package and
clearly demonstrates strict adherence to irrigation system design
criteria in Section 15.56.100.A.1.h. Prevention of overspray and
runoff must be confirmed during the irrigation audit.
t. Slopes greater than 25% shall not be irrigated with an irrigation system
with a precipitation rate exceeding 0.75 inches per hour. This restriction
may be modified if the landscape designer specifies an alternative design
or technology, as part of the Landscape Documentation Package, and
clearly demonstrates no runoff or erosion will occur. Prevention of runoff
and erosion must be confirmed during the irrigation audit.
2. Hydrozone
a. Each valve shall irrigate a hydrozone with similar site, slope, sun
exposure, soil conditions, and plant materials with similar water use.
b. Sprinkler heads and other emission devices shall be selected based on
what is appropriate for the plant type within that hydrozone.
C. Where feasible, trees shall be placed on separate valves from shrubs,
groundcovers, and turf.
d. Individual hydrozones that mix plants of moderate and low water use, or
moderate and high water use, may be allowed if:
i. plant factor calculation is based on the proportions of the
respective plant water uses and their plant factor; or
Page 16 of 36
1 S:
ii. the plant factor of the higher water using plant is used for
calculations.
e. Individual hydrozones that mix high and low water use plants shall not be
permitted.
f. On the landscape design plan and irrigation design plan, hydrozone areas
shall be designated by number, letter, or other designation. On the
irrigation design plan, designate the areas irrigated by each valve, and
assign a number to each valve. Use this valve number in the Hydrozone
Information Table (see Appendix B Section A). This table,can also assist
with the irrigation audit and programming the controller.
B. The irrigation design plan, at a minimum, shall contain:
1. location and size of separate water meters for landscape;
2. location, type and size of all components of the irrigation system, including
controllers, main and lateral lines, valves, sprinkler heads, moisture sensing
devices, rain switches, quick couplers, pressure regulators, and backflow
prevention devices;
3. static water pressure at the point of connection to the public water supply;
4. flow rate (gallons per minute), application rate (inches per hour), and design
operating pressure (pressure per square inch) for each station;
5. recycled water irrigation systems as specified in Section 15.56.170;
6. the following statement: "I have complied with the criteria of the ordinance and
applied them accordingly for the efficient use of water in the irrigation design
plan"; and
7. the signature of a licensed landscape architect, certified irrigation designer,
licensed landscape contractor, or any other person authorized to design an
irrigation system. (See Sections 5500.1, 5615, 5641, 5641.1, 5641.2, 5641.3,
5641.4, 5641.5, 5641.6, 6701, 7027.5 of the Business and Professions Code,
Section 832.27 of Title 16 of the California Code of Regulations, and Section
6721 of the Food and Agricultural Code.)
C. Irrigation and Planting Plan shall be drawn at the same size and scale.
15.56.110 Grading Design Plan.
A. For the efficient use of water, grading of a project site shall be designed to minimize soil
erosion, runoff, and water waste. A grading plan shall be submitted as part of the
Landscape Documentation Package. A comprehensive grading plan prepared by a civil
engineer for other City permits satisfies this requirement.
Page 17 of 36
19
i
1. The project applicant shall submit a landscape grading plan that indicates finished
configurations and elevations of the landscape area including:
a. Height of graded slopes
b. Drainage patterns
C. Pad elevations
d. Finish grade, and
e. Stormwater retention improvements, if applicable.
2. To prevent excessive erosion and runoff, it is highly recommended that project
applicants:
a. Grade so that all irrigation and normal rainfall remains within property
lines and does not drain on to non-permeable hardscapes
b. Avoid disruption of natural drainage patterns and undisturbed soil, and
C. Avoid soil compaction in landscape areas.
3. The grading design plan shall contain the following statement: "I have complied
with the criteria of the ordinance and applied them accordingly for the efficient
use of water in the grading design plan" and shall bear the signature of a licensed V
professional as authorized by law.
15.56.120 Certificate of Completion.
A. The Certificate of Completion(see Appendix C for a sample certificate) shall include the
following six (6) elements:
1. Project information sheet that contains the following:
a. Date
b. Project name
C. Project applicant name, telephone, and mailing address
d. Project address and location, and
e. Property owner name, telephone, and mailing address.
2. Certification by either the signer of the landscape design plan, the signer of the
irrigation design plan, or the licensed landscape contractor that the landscape
project has been installed per the approved Landscape Documentation Package;
Page 18 of 36
a. Where there have been significant changes made in the field during
construction, these "as-built"or record drawings shall be included with the
certification;
3. Scheduling parameters used to set the controller(see Section 15.56.130);
4. Landscape and irrigation maintenance schedule (see Section 15.56.140);
5. Irrigation audit report (see Section 15.56.150); and
6. Soil analysis report, if not submitted with Landscape Documentation Package,
and documentation verifying implementation of soil report recommendations (see
Section 15.56.080).
B. The project applicant shall:
1. Submit the signed Certificate of Completion to the City for review;
2. Ensure that copies of the approved Certificate of Completion are submitted to the
local water purveyor and property owner or his or her designee.
C. The City shall:
1. Receive the signed Certificate of Completion from the project applicant;
2. Approve or deny the Certificate of Completion. If the Certificate of Completion is
denied, the City shall provide information to the project applicant regarding
reapplication, appeal, or other assistance.
15.56.130 Irrigation Scheduling.
A. For the efficient use of water, all irrigation schedules shall be developed, managed, and
evaluated to utilize the minimum amount of water required to maintain plant health.
Irrigation schedules shall meet the following criteria:
1. Irrigation scheduling shall be regulated by automatic irrigation controllers.
2. Overhead irrigation shall be scheduled between 8:00 p.m. and 10:00 a.m. unless
weather conditions prevent it. If allowable hours of irrigation differ from the local
water purveyor, the stricter of the two shall apply. Operation of the irrigation
system outside the normal watering window is allowed for auditing and system
maintenance.
3. For implementation of the irrigation schedule, particular attention must be paid to
irrigation run times, emission device, flow rate, and current reference
evapotranspiration, so that applied water meets the Estimated Total Water Use.
Total annual applied water shall be less than or equal to Maximum Applied Water
Allowance (MAWA). Actual irrigation schedules shall be regulated by automatic
Page 19 of 36
21
irrigation controllers using current reference evapotranspiration data(e.g., CIMIS)
or soil moisture sensor data.
4. Parameters used to set the automatic controller shall be developed and submitted
for each of the following:
a. The plant establishment period;
b. The established landscape; and
C. Temporarily irrigated areas.
B. Each irrigation schedule shall consider for each station all of the following that apply:
a. Irrigation interval (days between irrigation);
b. Irrigation run times (hours or minutes per irrigation event to avoid runoff);
C. Number of cycle starts required for each irrigation event to avoid runoff;
d. Amount of applied water scheduled to be applied on a monthly basis;
e. Application rate setting;
f. Root depth setting;
4
g. Plant type setting;
h. Soil type;
i. Slope factor setting;
j. Shade factor setting; and
k. Irrigation uniformity or efficiency setting.
15.56.140 Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Schedule
A. Landscapes shall be maintained to ensure water use efficiency. A regular maintenance
schedule shall be submitted with the Certificate of Completion.
B. A regular maintenance schedule shall include, but not be limited to, routine inspection;
adjustment and repair of the irrigation system and its components; aerating and
dethatching turf areas; replenishing mulch; fertilizing; pruning; weeding in all landscape
areas, and removing and obstruction to emission devices. Operation of the irrigation
system outside the normal watering window is allowed for auditing and system
maintenance.
Page 20 of 36
270
C. Repair of all irrigation equipment shall be done with the originally installed components
or their equivalents.
D. A project applicant is encouraged to implement sustainable or environmentally-friendly
practices for overall landscape maintenance.
15.56.150 Irrigation Audit, Irrigation Survey, and Irrigation Water Use Analysis.
A. All landscape irrigation audits shall be conducted by a certified landscape irrigation
auditor.
B. For new construction and rehabilitated landscape projects installed after January 1, 2010,
as described in Section 15.56.020:
1. The project applicant shall submit an irrigation audit report with the Certificate of
Completion to the City that may include, but is not limited to: inspection, system
tune-up, system test with distribution uniformity, reporting overspray or run off
that causes overland flow, and preparation of an irrigation schedule;
2. The City shall administer programs that may include, but not be limited to,
irrigation water use analysis, irrigation audits, and irrigation surveys for
compliance with the Maximum Applied Water Allowance.
15.56.160 Irrigation Efficiency.
A. For the purpose of determining Maximum Applied Water Allowance, average irrigation
efficiency is assumed to be 0.71. Irrigation systems shall be designed, maintained, and
managed to meet or exceed an average landscape irrigation efficiency of 0.71.
15.56.170 Recycled Water.
A. The installation of recycled water irrigation systems shall allow for the current and future
use of recycled water, unless a written exemption has been granted as described in
Section 15.56.180.B.
B. Irrigation systems and decorative water features shall use recycled water unless a written
exemption has been granted by the local water purveyor stating that recycled water
meeting all public health codes and standards is not available and will not be available for
the foreseeable future.
C. All recycled water irrigation systems shall be designed and operated in accordance with
all applicable local and State laws.
D. Landscapes using recycled water are considered Special Landscape Areas. The ET
Adjustment Factor for Special Landscape Areas shall not exceed 1.0.
Page 21 of 36
23
15.56.180 Stormwater Management.
A. Stormwater management practices minimize runoff and increase infiltration which
recharges groundwater and improves water quality. Implementing stormwater best
management practices into the landscape and grading design plans to minimize runoff
and to increase on-site retention and infiltration are encouraged.
B. Project applicants shall refer to the City or Regional Water Quality Control Board for
information on any applicable stormwater ordinances and stormwater management plans.
C. Rain gardens, cisterns, and other landscapes features and practices that increase rainwater V
capture and create opportunities for infiltration and/or onsite storage are recommended.
15.56.190 Public Education.
A. Publications. Education is a critical component to promote the efficient use of water in
landscapes. The use of appropriate principles of design, installation, management and
maintenance that save water is encouraged in the community.
1. The City shall provide information to owners of new, single-family residential
homes regarding the design, installation, management, and maintenance of water.
efficient landscapes.
B. Model Homes. All model homes that are landscaped shall use signs and written
information to demonstrate the principles of water efficient landscapes described in this G
ordinance.
1. Signs shall be used to identify the model as an example of a water efficient
landscape featuring elements such as hydrozones, irrigation equipment, and other's
that contribute to the overall water efficient theme.
2. Information shall be provided about designing, installing, managing, and
maintaining water efficient landscapes.
15.56.200 Environmental Review.
A. The City must comply with the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA), as
appropriate, in implementing this ordinance.
15.56.210 Provisions for Existing Landscapes.
A. The City may designate another agency, such as a water purveyor, to implement some or
all of the requirements contained in this ordinance, and/or collaborate with water
purveyors to define each entity's responsibilities relating to this ordinance.
Page 22 of 36
24
15.56.220 Irrigation Audit, Irrigation Survey, and Irrigation Water Use Analysis.
A. This section shall apply to all existing landscapes that were installed before January 1,
2010 and are over one acre in size.
1. For all landscapes in subject to Section 15.56.230.A that have a water meter, the
City shall administer programs that may include, but not be limited to, irrigation
water use analyses, irrigation surveys, and irrigation audits to evaluate water use
and provide recommendations as necessary to reduce landscape water use to a
level that does not exceed the Maximum Applied Water Allowance for existing
landscapes. The Maximum Applied Water Allowance for existing landscapes
shall be calculated as: MAWA=(0.8) (ETo)(LA)(0.62).
2. For all landscapes subject to Section 15.56.220.A, that do not have a meter, the
City shall administer programs that may include, but not be limited to, irrigation
surveys and irrigation audits to evaluate water use and provide recommendations
as necessary in order to prevent water waste.
B. All landscape irrigation audits shall be conducted by a certified landscape irrigation
auditor.
15.56.230 Water Waste Prevention.
A. The City shall prevent water waste resulting from inefficient landscape irrigation by
prohibiting runoff from leaving the target landscape due to low head drainage, overspray,
or other similar conditions where water flows onto adjacent property, non-irrigated areas,
walks, roadways, parking lots, or structures. Penalties for violation of these prohibitions
shall be established locally.
B. Restrictions regarding overspray and runoff may be modified if-
1. The landscape area is adjacent to permeable surfacing and no runoff occurs; or
2. The adjacent non-permeable surfaces are designed and constructed to drain
entirely to landscaping.
15.56.240 Effective Precipitation.
A. The City may consider Effective Precipitation (25% of annual precipitation) in tracking
water use and may use the following equation to calculate Maximum Applied Water
Allowance:
MAWA= (ETo— Eppt) (0.62) [(0.7 x LA) + ((0.3 x SLA)).
Page 23 of 36
25
15.56.250 Definitions.
The terms used in this ordinance have the meaning set forth below:
A. "Applied water" means the portion of water supplied by the irrigation system to the
landscape.
B. "Automatic irrigation controller" means an automatic timing device used to remotely
control valves that operate an irrigation system. Automatic irrigation controllers schedule
irrigation events using either evapotranspiration(weather-based) or soil moisture data.
C. `Backflow prevention device" means a safety device used to prevent pollution or
contamination of the water supply due to the reverse flow of water from the irrigation
system.
D. "Certificate of Completion"means the document required under Section 15.56.120.
E. "Certified irrigation designer" means a person certified to design irrigation systems by an
accredited academic institution a professional trade organization or other program such as
the US Environmental Protection Agency's WaterSense irrigation designer certification
program and Irrigation Association's Certified Irrigation Designer program.
F. "Certified landscape irrigation auditor" means a person certified to perform landscape
irrigation audits by an accredited academic institution, a professional trade organization
or other program such as the US Environmental Protection Agency's WaterSense
irrigation auditor certification program and Irrigation Association's Certified Landscape
Irrigation Auditor program.
G. "Check valve" or "anti-drain valve" means a valve located under a sprinkler head, or
other location in the irrigation system, to hold water in the system to prevent drainage
from sprinkler heads when the sprinkler is off.
H. "Common interest developments" means community apartment projects, condominium
projects, planned developments, and stock cooperatives per Civil Code Section 1351.
I. "Director" means the Community and Economic Development Director of the City of
Grand Terrace.
J. "Conversion factor (0.62)" means the number that converts acre-inches per acre per year
to gallons per square foot per year.
K. "Drip irrigation" means any non-spray low volume irrigation system utilizing emission
devices with a flow rate measured in gallons per hour. Low volume irrigation systems are
specifically designed to apply small volumes of water slowly at or near the root zone of
plants.
L. "Ecological restoration project" means a project where the site is intentionally altered to
establish a defined, indigenous, historic ecosystem.
Page 24 of 36
26
M. "Effective precipitation" or "usable rainfall" (Eppt) means the portion of total
precipitation which becomes available for plant growth.
N. "Emitter" means a drip irrigation emission device that delivers water slowly from the
system to the soil.
O. "Established landscape" means the point at which plants in the landscape have developed
significant root growth into the soil. Typically, most plants are established after one or
two years of growth.
�i P. "Establishment period of the plants" means the first year after installing the plant in the
landscape or the first two years if irrigation will be terminated after establishment.
Typically, most plants are established after one or two years of growth.
Q. "Estimated Total Water Use" (ETWU) means the total water used for the landscape as
described in Section 15.56.070.
R. "ET adjustment factor" (ETAF) means a factor of 0.7, that, when applied to reference
evapotranspiration, adjusts for plant factors and irrigation efficiency, two major
influences upon the amount of water that needs to be applied to the landscape.
A combined plant mix with a site-wide average of 0.5 is the basis of the plant factor portion of
this calculation. For purposes of the ETAF, the average irrigation efficiency is 0.71.
Therefore, the ET Adjustment Factor is (0.7)=(0.5/0.71). ETAF for a Special Landscape
Area shall not exceed 1.0. ETAF for existing non-rehabilitated landscapes is 0.8.
S. "Evapotranspiration rate" means the quantity of water evaporated from adjacent soil and
other surfaces and transpired by plants during a specified time.
T. "Flow rate" means the rate at which water flows through pipes, valves and emission
devices, measured in gallons per minute, gallons per hour, or cubic feet per second.
U. "Hardscapes"means any durable material (pervious and non-pervious).
V. "Homeowner-provided landscaping" means any landscaping either installed by a private
individual for a single family residence or installed by a licensed contractor hired by a
homeowner. A homeowner, for purposes of this ordinance, is a person who occupies the
dwelling he or she owns. This excludes speculative homes, which are not owner-occupied
dwellings.
W. "Hydrozone" means a portion of the landscaped area having plants with similar water
needs. A hydrozone may be irrigated or non-irrigated.
X. "Infiltration rate" means the rate of water entry into the soil expressed as a depth of water
per unit of time (e.g., inches per hour).
Y. "Invasive plant species" means species of plants not historically found in California that
spread outside cultivated areas and can damage environmental or economic resources.
Page 25 of 36
27
Invasive species may be regulated by county agricultural agencies as noxious species.
"Noxious weeds" means any weed designated by the Weed Control Regulations in the
Weed Control Act and identified on a Regional District noxious weed control list. Lists
of invasive plants are maintained at the California Invasive Plant Inventory and USDA
invasive and noxious weeds database.
Z. "Irrigation audit" means an in-depth evaluation of the performance of an irrigation system
conducted by a Certified Landscape Irrigation Auditor. An irrigation audit includes, but is
not limited to: inspection, system tune-up, system test with distribution uniformity or
emission uniformity, reporting overspray or runoff that causes overland flow, and
preparation of an irrigation schedule.
A.A. "Irrigation efficiency" (IE) means the measurement of the amount of water beneficially
used divided by the amount of water applied. Irrigation efficiency is derived from
measurements and estimates of irrigation system characteristics and management practices.
The minimum average irrigation efficiency for purposes of this ordinance is 0.71. Greater
irrigation efficiency can be expected from well designed and maintained systems.
BB. "Irrigation survey" means an evaluation of an irrigation system that is less detailed than
an irrigation audit. An irrigation survey includes, but is not limited to: inspection, system
test, and written recommendations to improve performance of the irrigation system.
CC. "Irrigation water use analysis" means an analysis of water use data based on meter
readings and billing data.
DD. "Landscape architect" means a person who holds a license to practice landscape
architecture in the state of California Business and Professions Code, Section 5615.
EE. "Landscape area" means all the planting areas, turf areas, and water features in a
landscape design plan subject to the Maximum Applied Water Allowance calculation.
The landscape area does not include footprints of buildings or structures, sidewalks,
driveways, parking lots, decks, patios, gravel or stone walks, other pervious or non-
pervious hardscapes, and other non-irrigated areas designated for non-development (e.g.,
open spaces and existing native vegetation).
FF. "Landscape contractor" means a person licensed by the state of California to construct,
maintain, repair, install, or subcontract the development of landscape systems.
GG. "Landscape Documentation Package" means the documents required under Section
15.56.060.
HH. "Landscape project" means total area of landscape in a project as defined in "landscape
area" for the purposes of this ordinance, meeting requirements under Section 165.56.020.
it. "Lateral line" means the water delivery pipeline that supplies water to the emitters or
spnnklers from the valve.
Page 26 of 36
�Q
JJ. "Local water purveyor" means any entity, including a public agency, city, county, or
private water company that provides retail water service.
KK. "Low volume irrigation"means the application of irrigation water at low pressure
through a system of tubing or lateral lines and low-volume emitters such as drip, drip
lines, and bubblers. Low volume irrigation systems are specifically designed to apply
small volumes of water slowly at or near the root zone of plants.
LL. "Main line" means the pressurized pipeline that delivers water from the water source to
the valve or outlet.
t
MM. "Maximum Applied Water Allowance" (MAWA)means the upper limit of annual
applied water for the established landscaped area as specified in Section 15.56.070. It is
based upon the area's reference evapotranspiration, the ET Adjustment Factor, and the
size of the landscape area. The Estimated Total Water Use shall not exceed the Maximum
Applied Water Allowance. Special Landscape Areas, including recreation areas, areas
permanently and solely dedicated to edible plants such as orchards and vegetable
gardens, and areas irrigated with recycled water are subject to the MAWA with an ETAF
not to exceed 1.0.
NN. "Microclimate"means the climate of a small, specific area that may contrast with the
climate of the overall landscape area due to factors such as wind, sun exposure, plant
density, or proximity to reflective surfaces.
00. "Mulch" means any organic material such as leaves, bark, straw, compost, or inorganic
mineral materials such as rocks, gravel, and decomposed granite left loose and applied to
the soil surface for the beneficial purposes of reducing evaporation, suppressing weeds,
moderating soil temperature, and preventing soil erosion.
PP. "New construction" means, for the purposes of this ordinance, a new building with a
landscape or other new landscape, such as a park, playground, or greenbelt without an
associated building.
QQ. "Operating pressure" means the pressure at which the parts of an irrigation system are
designed by the manufacturer to operate.
RR. "Overhead sprinkler irrigation systems" means systems that deliver water through the air
(e.g., spray heads and rotors).
SS. "Overspray" means the irrigation water which is delivered beyond the target area.
TT. "Permit"means an authorizing document issued by local agencies for new construction
or rehabilitated landscapes.
UU. "Pervious" means any surface or material that allows the passage of water through the
material and into the underlying soil.
Page 27 of 36
29
VV. "Plant factor" or "plant water use factor" is a factor , when multiplied by ETo, estimates
the amount of water needed by plants. For purposes of this ordinance, the plant factor
range for low water use plants is 0 to 0.3, the plant factor range for moderate water use
plants is 0.4 to 0.6, and the plant factor range for high water use plants is 0.7 to 1.0. Plant
factors cited in this ordinance are derived from the Department of Water Resources 2000
publication"Water Use Classification of Landscape Species".
WW. "Precipitation rate"means the rate of application of water measured in inches per hour.
XX. "Project applicant"means the individual or entity submitting a Landscape Documentation
Package required under Section 15.56.060, to request a permit, plan check, or land use
review from the City. A project applicant may be the property owner or his or her
designee.
YY. "Rain sensor" or "rain sensing shutoff device" means a component which automatically
suspends an irrigation event when it rains.
ZZ. "Record drawing" or "as-builts" means a set of reproducible drawings which show
significant changes in the work made during construction and which are usually based on
drawings marked up in the field and other data furnished by the contractor.
AAA. "Recreational area" means areas dedicated to active play such as parks, sports fields, and
golf courses where turf provides a playing surface.
BBB. "Recycled water", "reclaimed water", or"treated sewage effluent water" means treated or
recycled waste water of a quality suitable for non-potable uses such as landscape
irrigation and water features. This water is not intended for human consumption.
CCC. "Reference evapotranspiration" or `ETo" means a standard measurement of
environmental parameters which affect the water use of plants. ETo is expressed in
inches per day, month, or year as represented in Appendix A, and is an estimate of the
evapotranspiration of a large field of four- to seven-inch tall, cool-season grass that is
well watered. Reference evapotranspiration is used as the basis of determining the
Maximum Applied Water Allowance so that regional differences in climate can be
accommodated.
DDD. "Rehabilitated landscape"means any re-landscaping project that requires a permit , plan
check, or design review, meets the requirements of Section 15.56.020, and the modified
landscape area is equal to or greater than 2,500 square feet, is 50% of the total landscape
area, and the modifications are completed within one year.
EEE. "Runoff' means water which is not absorbed by the soil or landscape to which it is
applied and flows from the landscape area. For example, runoff may result from water
that is applied at too great a rate (application rate exceeds infiltration rate) or when there
is a slope.
Page 28 of 36
3C
FFF. "Soil moisture sensing device" or "soil moisture sensor" means a device that measures
the amount of water in the soil. The device may also suspend or initiate an irrigation
event.
GGG. "Soil texture" means the classification of soil based on its percentage of sand, silt, and
clay.
HHH. "Special Landscape Area" (SLA) means an area of the landscape dedicated solely to
edible plants, areas irrigated with recycled water, water features using recycled water and
areas dedicated to active play such as parks, sports fields, golf courses, and where turf
provides a playing surface.
III. "Sprinkler head" means a device which delivers water through a nozzle.
JJJ. "Static water pressure" means the pipeline or municipal water supply pressure when
water is not flowing.
KKK. "Station" means an area served by one valve or by a set of valves that operate
simultaneously.
LLL. "Swing joint"means an irrigation component that provides a flexible, leak-free
connection between the emission device and lateral pipeline to allow movement in any
direction and to prevent equipment damage.
MMM."Turf' means a ground cover surface of mowed grass. Annual bluegrass, Kentucky
bluegrass, Perennial ryegrass, Red fescue, and Tall fescue are cool-season grasses.
Bermudagrass, Kikuyugrass, Seashore Paspalum, St. Augustinegrass, Zoysiagrass, and
Buffalo grass are warm-season grasses.
NNN. "Valve" means a device used to control the flow of water in the irrigation system.
000. "Water conserving plant species" means a plant species identified as having a low plant
factor.
PPP. "Water feature"means a design element where open water performs an aesthetic or
recreational function. Water features include ponds, lakes, waterfalls, fountains, artificial
streams, spas, and swimming pools (where water is artificially supplied). The surface
area of water features is included in the high water use hydrozone of the landscape area.
Constructed wetlands used for on-site wastewater treatment or stormwater best
management practices that are not irrigated and used solely for water treatment or
stormwater retention are not water features and, therefore, are not subject to the water
budget calculation.
QQQ. "Watering window" means the time of day irrigation is allowed.
RRR. "WUCOLS" means the Water Use Classification of Landscape Species published by the
University of California Cooperative Extension, the Department of Water Resources and
the Bureau of Reclamation, 2000.
Page 29 of 36
31
Appendix A. Reference Evapotranspiration (ETo) Table.
Appendix A-Reference Evapotranspiration(ETo)
Table*
Annual
County and City Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ETo
Appendix A-Reference Evapotranspiration(ETo)Table*
SAN
BERNARDINO
Baker 2.7 3.9 6.1 8.3 10.4 11.8 12.2 11.0 8.9 6.1 3.3 2.1 86.6
Barstow NE 2.2 2.9 5.3 6.9 9.0 10.1 9.9 8.9 6.8 4.8 2.7 2.1 71.7
Big Bear Lake 18 2.6 4.6 6.0 7.0 7.6 8.1 7.4 5.4 4.1 2.4 1.8 58.6
Chino 2.1 2.9 3.9 4.5 5.7 6.5 7.3 7.1 5.9 4.2 2.6 2.0 54.6
Crestline 1.5 1.9 3.3 4.4 5.5 6.6 7.8 7.1 5.4 3.5 2.2 1.6 50.8
Lake Arrowhead 1.8 2.6 4.6 6.0 7.0 7.6 8.1 7.4 5.4 4.1 2.4 1.8 58.6
Lucerne Valley 2.2 2.9 5.1 6.5 9.1 11.0 11.4 9.9 7.4 5.0 3.0 1.8 75.3
Needles 3.2 4.2 6.6 8.9 11.0 12.4 12.8 11.0 8.9 6.6 4.0 2.7 92.1
Newberry Springs 2.1 2.9 5.3 8.4 9.8 10.9 11.1 9.9 7.6 5.2 3.1 2.0 78.2
San Bernardino 2.0 2.7 3.8 4.6 5.7 6.9 7.9 7.4 5.9 4.2 2.6 2.0 55.6
Twentynine Palms 2.6 3.6 5.9 7.9 10.1 11.2 11.2 10.3 8.6 5.9 3.4 2.2 82.9
Victorville 2.0 2.6 4.6 6.2 7.3 8.9 9.8 9.0 6.5 4.7 2.7 2.1 66.2
*The values in this table were derived from:
1)California Irrigation Management Information System(CIMIS);
2)Reference EvapoTranspiration Zones Map,UC Dept.of Land,Air&Water Resources and California Dept of
Water Resources 1999;and
3)Reference Evapotranspiration for California,University of California,Department of Agriculture and Natural
Resources
(1987)Bulletin 1922,4)Determining Daily Reference Evapotranspiration,Cooperative Extension UC Division of
Agriculture and Natural Resources(1987),Publication Leaflet 21426
'1
Appendix B—Sample Water Efficient Landscape Worksheet.
WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE WORKSHEET
This worksheet is filled out by the project applicant and it is a required element of the Landscape
Documentation Package.
Please complete all sections (A and B) of the worksheet.
SECTION A. HYDROZONE INFORMATION TABLE
L- Please complete the hydrozone table(s) for each hydrozone. Use as many tables as necessary to provide the
square footage of landscape area per hydrozone.
Hydrozone* Zone or Irrigation Area % of
Valve Method** (Sq.Ft.) Landscape
Area
Total 100%
*Hydrozone **Irrigation Method
HW=High Water Use Plants MS=Micro-spray
MW=Moderate Water Use Plants S=Spray
LW=Low Water Use Plants R =Rotor
B=Bubbler
D=Drip
O=Other
Page 31 of 36
33
SECTION B.WATER BUDGET CALCULATIONS
Section B 1. Maximum Applied Water Allowance(MAWA)
The project's Maximum Applied Water Allowance shall be calculated using this equation:
MAWA=(ETo)(0.62) [(0.7 x LA)+(0.3 x SLA)]
where:
MAWA = Maximum Applied Water Allowance(gallons per year)
ETo =Reference Evapotranspiration from Appendix A(inches per year)
0.7 =ET Adjustment Factor(ETAF)
LA = Landscaped Area includes Special Landscape Area(square feet)
0.62 =Conversion factor(to gallons per square foot)
SLA =Portion of the landscape area identified as Special Landscape Area(square feet)
0.3 =the additional ET Adjustment Factor for Special Landscape Area(1.0-0.7=0.3)
Maximum Applied Water Allowance= gallons per year
Show calculations.
Effective Precipitation(Eppt)
If considering Effective Precipitation, use 25% of annual precipitation. Use the following equation to calculate
Maximum Applied Water Allowance:
MAWA=(ETo—Eppt) (0.62) [(0.7 x LA)+(0.3 x SLA)]
Maximum Applied Water Allowance= gallons per year
Show calculations.
Page 32 of 36
3�
Section B2. Estimated Total Water Use(ETWU)
The project's Estimated Total Water Use is calculated using the following formula:
ETWU=(ETo)(0.62) PF A +SLA
IE
where:
ETWU =Estimated total water use per year(gallons per year)
ETo =Reference Evapotranspiration(inches per year)
PF =Plant Factor from WUCOLS (see Definitions)
HA =Hydrozone Area [high, medium, and low water use areas] (square feet)
SLA = Special Landscape Area(square feet)
0.62 =Conversion Factor(to gallons per square foot)
IE =Irrigation Efficiency(minimum 0.71)
Hydrozone Table for Calculating ETWU
Please complete the hydrozone table(s). Use as many tables as necessary.
Plant Water Plant Area(HA) PF x HA
Hydrozone Use Type(s) Factor(PF) (square feet) (square feet)
Sum
SLA
Estimated Total Water Use= gallons
Show calculations.
Page 33 of 36
35
Appendix C—Certificate of Completion.
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION
This certificate is filled out by the project applicant upon completion of the landscape project.
PART 1. PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET
Date
Project Name
Name of Project Applicant Telephone No.
Fax No.
Title Email Address
Company Street Address
City State Zip Code
Project Address and Location:
Street Address Parcel, tract or lot number, if available.
City Latitude/Longitude(optional)
State Zip Code
Property Owner or his/her designee:
Name Telephone No.
Fax No.
Title Email Address
Company Street Address
City State -7Zip Code
Property Owner
"Uwe certify that Uwe have received copies of all the documents within the Landscape Documentation Package
and the Certificate of Completion and that it is our responsibility to see that the project is maintained in
accordance with the Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Schedule."
Property Owner Signature Date
Page 34 of 36
3E
Please answer the questions below:
1. Date the Landscape Documentation Package was submitted to the local agency
2. Date the Landscape Documentation Package was approved by the local agency
3. Date that a copy of the Water Efficient Landscape Worksheet(including the Water Budget Calculation) was
submitted to the local water purveyor
PART 2. CERTIFICATION OF INSTALLATION ACCORDING TO THE LANDSCAPE
DOCUMENTATION PACKAGE
"Uwe certify that based upon periodic site observations, the work has been substantially completed in
accordance with the ordinance and that the landscape planting and irrigation installation conform with the
criteria and specifications of the approved Landscape Documentation Package."
Signature* Date
Name (print) Telephone No.
Fax No.
Title Email Address
License No. or Certification No.
Company Street Address
City State Zip Code
*Signer of the landscape design plan,signer of the irrigation plan,or a licensed landscape contractor.
PART 3.IRRIGATION SCHEDULING
Attach parameters for setting the irrigation schedule on controller per Ordinance Section 15.56.130.
PART 4. SCHEDULE OF LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE
Attach schedule of Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance per Ordinance Section 15.56.140.
PART 5. LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION AUDIT REPORT
Attach Landscape Irrigation Audit Report per Ordinance Section 15.56.150.
PART 6. SOIL MANAGEMENT REPORT
Attach soil analysis report, if not previously submitted with the Landscape Documentation Package per
Ordinance Section 15.56.080.
Attach documentation verifying implementation of recommendations from soil analysis report per Ordinance
Section 15.56.080."
Page 35 of 36
47
SECTION 2. The City Council finds that this ordinance is exempt from the provisions of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)pursuant to Section 15308 which exempts actions taken
by regulatory agencies, as authorized by state law, to assure the maintenance of a natural resource
where the regulatory process involves procedures for the protection of the environment because the
ordinance will protect the natural water resources of the state and local agency through the adoption of
landscaping and irrigation regulations.
SECTION 3. The City Council declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each
section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of it irrespective of the fact that any one or
more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases or portions of it be declared invalid or
unconstitutional. If for any reason any portion of this ordinance is declared invalid or unconstitutional,
then all other provisions shall remain valid and enforceable.
SECTION 4. This ordinance shall take effect thirty days from the date of adoption.
SECTION 5. First read at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 261h day of
January, 2010 and finally adopted and ordered posted at a regular meeting of said City Council on the
91h day of February, 2010.
ATTEST:
City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace and of
and of the City Council thereof. the City Council thereof.
I, Brenda Mesa, City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Ordinance was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand
Terrace held on the 91h day of February, 2010, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
City Clerk
Approved as to form:
City Attorney
Page 36 of 36