The URL can be used to link to this page

03/09/2010 FILE COPY C,T,y, GRAND TEO March 9,2010 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace California 92313-5295 . Civic Center CITY OF GRAND TERRACE (909)824-6621 ., Fax(909)783=7629 Fax(909)783-2600 CRA/CITY, COUNCIL Maryetta Ferrf Mayor REGULAR MEETINGS ' Lee Ann Garcia 2ND AND 4TH Mayor Pro Tern Tuesday 6:00 p.mTern � ' Bea Cortes Jim Miller Walt Stanckiewitz Council Members - Betsy,M.Adams City Manager - Council Chahibers Grand Terrace Civic Center 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92M3-5295 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA AMENDED CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS March 9,2010 GRAND TERRACE CIVIC CENTER 6:00 p.m. 22795 Barton Road THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE COMPLIES WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT OF 1990. IF YOU REQUIRE SPECIAL ASSISTANCE TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING,PLEASE CALL THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE AT (909)824-6621 AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE MEETING. IF YOU DESIRE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL DURING THE MEETING,PLEASE COMPLETE A REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM AVAILABLE AT THE ENTRANCE AND PRESENT IT TO THE CITY CLERK. SPEAKERS WILL BE CALLED UPON BY THE MAYOR AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME. ANY DOCUMENTS PROVIDED TO A MAJORITY OF THE CITY COUNCIL REGARDING ANY ITEM ON THIS AGENDA WILL BE MADE AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE AT CITY HALL LOCATED AT 22795 BARTON ROAD DURING NORMAL BUSINESS HOURS. IN ADDITION,SUCH DOCUMENTS WILL BE POSTED ON THE CITY'S WEBSITE AT WWW.CITYOFGRANDTERRACE.ORG * Call to Order- * Invocation- * Pledge of Allegiance- * Roll Call- STAFF COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS RECOMMENDATION ACTION CONVENE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 1. Approval of 02=23-2010 Minutes Approve 2. Resolution Approving and Transmitting its Report to the City Approve Council for Amendment No.6 to the Redevelopment Plan for the Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Project and Consenting to a Joint Public Hearing ADJOURN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CONVENE CITY COUNCIL 1. Items to Delete 2. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS A. Proclamation-Boy Scouts of America 100`h Anniversary 3. CONSENT CALENDAR iThe following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and j noncontroversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time I without discussion. Any Council Member,Staff.Member,or Citizen , may request removal of an item from the Consent Calendar for discussion. A. Approve Check Register Dated 03-09-2010 Approve COUNCIL AGENDA 03-09-2010 PAGE 2 OF 2 AGENDA ITEMS STAFF COUNCIL RECOMMENDATIONS ACTION B. Waive Full Reading of Ordinances on Agenda C. Approval of 02-23-2010 Minutes Approve D. City Annual Financial Statement-FY 2008-09 Approve E. Fiscal Year 2009-10 Quarterly Financial Update-December 31, Approve 2009 F. Fiscal Year 2009-10 Grand Terrace CERT Grant Funds Authorize G. FY 2008 Homeland Security Grant Program Funds Authorize 4. PUBLIC COMMENT This is the opportunity for members of the public to comment on any items not appearing on the regular agenda. Because of restrictions contained in California Law,the City Council may not discuss or act on any item not on the agenda,but may briefly respond to statements made or ask a question for clarification. The Mayor may also request a brief response from staff to questions raised during public comment or may request a matter be agendized for a future meeting. 5. COUNCIL REPORTS 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS-None 7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS-None 8. NEW BUSINESS A. Resolution Accepting the City of Grand Terrace Community Approve Redevelopment Agency's Report to City Council for Amendment No. 6 to the Redevelopment Plan for the Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Project and Consenting to a Joint Public Hearing 9. CLOSED SESSION A. Closed Session-Labor Negotiations(GC 54957.6)Conference with Labor Negotiator - Betsy M. Adams Representing Unrepresented Employees B. Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation GC54956.9(a)-Michael Grove dba California Exteriors v.City of Grand Terrace(Case#809432) ADJOURN THE NEXT CRA/CITY COUNCIL MEETING WILL BE HELD ON TUESDAY, MARCH 23,2010,AT 6:00 P.M. ...... . ........................ .................. .................................................... ..... AGENDA ITEM REQUESTS. . . ..MUST BE. .SUBMITTED. . . . IN WRITIN. .. .G TO THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE NO LATER THAN 14 CALENDAR DAYS PRECEDING THE MEETING. PENDING CRA APPROVAL CITY OF GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES REGULAR MEETING -FEBRUARY 23,2010 A regular meeting of the Community Redevelopment Agency, City of Grand Terrace,was held in the Council Chambers,Grand Terrace Civic Center,22795 Barton Road,Grand Terrace,California, on February 23, 2010 at 4:00 p.m. PRESENT: Maryetta Ferre, Chairman Lee Ann Garcia, Vice-Chairman Bea Cortes, Agency Member Jim Miller, Agency Member Walt Stanckiewitz, Agency Member Betsy M. Adams, City Manager Brenda Mesa, City Clerk Bernie Simon, Finance Director Joyce Powers, Community&Economic Development Director Richard Shields, Building& Safety Director John Harper, City Attorney Sgt. Carlos Espinoza, Sheriff's Department John Salvate, San Bernardino County Fire Department ABSENT: None CONVENE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND CITY COUNCIL MEETING AT 4:00 P.M. 1. Mid Year Budget Workshop A Budget Workshop was held to discuss the current FY 2009/2010 Budget adjustments presented by City Manager Betsy M. Adams. Chairman Ferre adjourned the City Council and Community Redevelopment Mid-Year Budget Workshop at 5:30 p.m. CONVENE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AT 6:00 P.M. APPROVAL OF 02-09-2010 MINUTES CRA-2010-07 MOTION BY VICE-CHAIRMAN GARCIA, SECOND BY AGENCY MEMBER CORTES, CARRIED 5-0, to approve the February 9, 2010 Community Redevelopment Agency Minutes. CRA AGENDA ITEM NO. Community Redevelopment Agency Minutes February 23,2010 Page 2 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT CRA-2010-08 MOTION BY AGENCY MEMBER CORTES, SECOND BY VICE-CHAIRMAN GARCIA, CARRIED 5-0, to approve the Professional Consultant Services Agreement for up to $125,000 (through June 30, 2012) between the Agency and Albert A. Webb Associates, for project oriented Traffic Engineering Services and appropriate $25,000 to fund services fo the remainder of the fiscal year 2009-10. ANNUAL REPORTS TO THE LEGISLATIVE BODY CRA-2010-09 MOTION BY VICE-CHAIRMAN GARCIA, SECOND BY AGENCY MEMBER CORTES, CARRIED 5-0, to accept and file the 2008-2009 Annual Reports for the Community Redevelopment Agency. MID-YEAR BUDGET REVIEW Sylvia Robles,23008 Orangewood Court,stated that she has been following the problem of the State/Local fiscal relationship for a long time. She feels like it is a really sad time in America when there is no money for youth programs. The problem facing the City is RDA encompasses the entire City. The frozen base amount in 1979,when the RDA was created, _ 133 million dollars. The growth from that was 712 million. The RDA increment increased 36%this year yet the General Fund is in a deficit. There are pass through agreements and the pass through agreements are 0 for K12 education. The State took away what they call the Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund Money, from local government to pay for its obligation for schools. During the time that she worked for special districts, Joshua Tree Park and recreation became a CSA so fire could have their property tax revenues to expend on fire. There has been a de-leveraging of the public good by the needs of capital interest that should be doing private venture risk on their own. She feels that we have no business building shopping centers with property tax revenues. This does not net anything for us, if anything,we are down sales taxes in this City by 11.8%. We have 9.2 million in outstanding loans,bonds, and notes to pay for private venture enterprises that should be done by private citizens with their own money. She wants to sound the alarm that there 10 events that shape this, it should be read, we have the power to get rid of the RDA's or roll them back. We have debt to 2034 and this is not going to go away for ten years. We have a decade of fiscal instability facing us and she strongly urged the City to look at RDA's and stop talking about what the General Fund doesn't have. Property taxes belong to the citizens and should go back to the General Fund to pay for services for the citizens. Ann Wade Hornsby,22656 Brentwood Street, stated that she does not envy the Council for the next many years for the decisions that they are going to have to make. There is no one person to blame for where the City is financially. The Council is suppose to be given good advice and they have to believe staff and what they are reporting. When it comes to finances, Community Redevelopment Agency Minutes February 23,2010 Page 3 she doesn't feel that the Council was given all the information. She appreciates the honesty of Mr.Stanckiewitz in recognizing the citizens that have been trying to keep the policies and expenditures of Grand Terrace transparent when there were smoke screens. She referred to an article that was in the Press Enterprise and feels that it brings to light a huge problem which started years ago and is now biting us where it hurts and changing the quality of life in Grand Terrace. Grand Terrace has been affected by poor financial management in terms of the redevelopment and other areas. Residents are going to have to depend on the Council �- to be aware of their responsibilities with the financial handlers. They have a hard job and critical decisions to make about programs, etc. We aren't so big that we.can absorb more problems and poor decisions. When she looks at the budget,the city is in the red and it looks like it is going to be that way for a very long time. There are a lot of questions in the budget. She encouraged the Council to listen to the residents and consider what they have to say about the budget. Charles Hornsby,22656 Brentwood Street,something that the City Manager said caught his attention this evening. It doesn't make sense to him when you say you owe yourself money. What does the statement"we owe ourselves money" mean? How can a City this size owe itself money. There is either money there or there is not. Bernardo Sandoval,22950 DeBerry,questioned if money was taken from the Redevelopment Fund and moved into the General Fund. If money was moved was the Council aware of it and for what specific items was that money used for. City Manager Adams,responded that from research staff has been able to do,money went from the Agency to the General Fund. She doesn't know what it was used for. There are accounting records so the transactions can be traced but she is unsure that it can be tied to specific expenditures at this point in time. City Attorney H=er, stated that it was carried as reserves. CRA-2010-10 MOTION BY VICE-CHAIRMAN GARCIA, SECOND BY AGENCY MEMBER CORTES, CARRIED 5-0, to receive and file and approve the recommended Mid- Year Budget Appropriation Adjustments and approve the Changes to the Reserve Designations as follows: FY 2009/2010 General Fund Reserve Available Designated Total $19147,982 $2,630,745 $3,778.727 FY 2009/2010 CRA Reserve Community Redevelopment Agency Minutes February 23,2010 Page 4 Available Designated Total $2,872,632 $4,879,087 $7,751,719 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING("MOU")BETWEEN THE CITY AND SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS ("SANBAG")FOR THE GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY AND REDUCTION PLAN CRA-2010-11 MOTION BY VICE-CHAIRMAN GARCIA, SECOND BY AGENCY MEMBER CORTES, CARRIED 3-2-0-0 (AGENCY MEMBERS MILLER AND STANCKIEWITZ VOTED NO), to approve the MOU Between the City and SANBAG and appropriate$15,798.25 to an established project account for the City's share to complete the regional Greenhouse Gas Inventory and Gas Reduction Plan. PROPERTY TAX CONSULTING SERVICES - HdL COREN& CONE CC-2010-12 MOTION BY VICE-CHAIRMAN GARCIA, SECOND BY AGENCY MEMBER STANCKIEWITZ, CARRIED 5-0, to approve a Professional Consultant Services Agreement in the Amount of$2,500 per year between the Agency and HdL Coren & Cone, for Property Tax Consulting Services. RESOLUTION TO APPROPRIATE AND APPROVE FY 2009-10 SERAF PAYMENT AND PROTEST PAYMENT REQUIREMENT BY STATE CC-2010-13 MOTION BY VICE-CHAIRMAN GARCIA, SECOND BY AGENCY MEMBER STANCKIEWITZ, CARRIED 5-0, to adopt a Resolution to Appropriate, Approve and Reserve Right of Refund of State required SERAF payment forTY 2009-10. Chairman Ferre adjourned the Community Redevelopment Agency Meeting at 8:30 p.m.,until the next CRA/City Council Meeting that is scheduled to be held on Tuesday,February 23,2010 at 6:00 p.m. SECRETARY of the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Grand Terrace CHAIRMAN of the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Grand Terrace ' AGENDA REPORT CALIFORUTA MEETING DATE: March 9, 2010 Council Item (X) CRA Item ( X ) TITLE: A RESOLUTION OF THE GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPROVING AND TRANSMITTING ITS REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR AMENDMENT NO. 6 TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AND CONSENTING TO A JOINT PUBLIC HEARING A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE ACCEPTING THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY'S REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL FOR AMENDMENT NO. 6 TO, THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN , FOR THE GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AND CONSENTING TO A JOINT PUBLIC HEARING PRESENTED BY: Joyce Powers, Community and Economic Development Director RECOMMENDATION: Redevelopment Agency Staff recommends that the Redevelopment Agency approve and transmit its Report.to City Council for, and consent to a joint public hearing with the City Council on, Amendment No. 6 to the Redevelopment Plan for the Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Project City Council Staff recommends that the City Council accept the Redevelopment Agency's Report to City Council for, and consent to a joint public hearing with the Redevelopment Agency on, Amendment No. 6 to the Redevelopment Plan for the Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Project BACKGROUND: The City's Redevelopment Agency collects property tax increment revenue and directs it toward public improvements, economic development programs and affordable housing projects throughout the redevelopment project area, which is within the entire city limits. Pursuant to the financial limits in the existing Redevelopment Plan for the Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Project, as amended in 1981, the Agency will reach its $70 million revenue cap in approximately 3 years, or by 2012-2013, CRA AGENDA ITEM NO. 1 Agenda Report Page 2of8 and would no longer be able to fund capital projects, economic and community enhancement programs or housing projects and programs. To address these constraints, the Agency has prepared Amendment No. 6 to the Redevelopment Plan for the Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Project Area ("Amendment No. 6") which would accomplish the following changes in the Redevelopment Plan for the Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Project: 1. Increase the cumulative tax increment revenue limit in the Redevelopment Plan from $70 million (net of payments made pursuant to certain fiscal mitigation agreements with certain .-- taxing entities) to approximately $225 million (net of payments made pursuant to certain fiscal mitigation agreements with certain taxing entities); 1 \ 2. Increase the limit on the amount of bonded debt that may be outstanding at any one time in the redevelopment plan from $15 million to approximately$75 million; 3. Extend the effectiveness of the redevelopment plan and time limit to collect tax increment revenue by the following time frames: a. Original Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Project Area ("Original Area") — extend plan effectiveness from July 15, 2017, to September 27, 2022, and time limit to collect tax increment from July 15, 2027, to September 27, 2032; b. Area added by the first amendment to the Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Project Area("Added Area") —extend plan effectiveness from July 15, 2017, to July 15, 2024, and time limit to collect tax increment from July 15, 2027, to July 15, 2034; 4. Rescinding Agency's authority to commence eminent domain within the Project Area, effective immediately following the effectiveness of the ordinance adopting Amendment No. 6. Under the current Plan, the authority would expire in July 2011; 5. Replace the description of land uses in the redevelopment plan with language that directly refers to the City's General Plan, zoning ordinance, and other applicable land use policies and standards, as they exist today or are hereafter amended; and 6. Amend and restate the redevelopment plan to incorporate the prior amendments into a single document. Thus far, the Redevelopment Agency has approved and circulated several documents for public review, including the Draft Amended and Restated Redevelopment Plan ("Redevelopment Plan") prepared in connection with Amendment No. 6, the Preliminary Report, and the Draft Amended Owner Participation Rules for Property Owners, Owners of Businesses, and Business Tenants. DISCUSSION: Amendment No. 6 is necessary for the Agency to continue funding redevelopment projects in the City. The California Community Redevelopment Law, Health and Safety Code Section 33000, et. seq. ("Redevelopment Law") requires that redevelopment agencies must establish debt to collect !tax increment for redevelopment project areas. Additionally, the Redevelopment Law requires that the L Agenda Report Page 3 of 8 amount of tax increment a redevelopment agency can collect in a given year cannot exceed the amount necessary to pay established debt pursuant to the Agency's annual Statement of Indebtedness. Presently, the Agency's activities are constrained by both the relatively low current bonded indebtedness limit of$15 million and a $70 million limit on cumulative tax increment (over the life of the Redevelopment Agency). It is estimated that the Agency will reach the cumulative tax increment cap ($ 70 million) in less than three years, which would end all projects and programs in 2012-13. Agency activities that would be discontinued include community enhancement programs, housing programs, infrastructure projects, and economic development, planning and public works projects and programs. According to the Agency's fiscal year 2009-10 Statement of Indebtedness, redevelopment revenues are contributing approximately $800,000 that would- otherwise be General Fund expenses. These costs are primarily for design and construction of new facilities, infrastructure improvements and staff time as City staff spends a significant amount of time projects and programs that are related to redevelopment. If Amendment No. 6 is not adopted, the lack of these revenues will have a critical impact on the City's ability to offer such programs and facilities, such as road improvements, the new Little League field and the dog park. The table below presents projected City and Agency revenues with no amendment to permit the added revenue (on the left %2 of the table), and revenues projected if the new amendment is approved (the right '/2 of the table). Although the City's General Fund revenue increases when funds can no longer be collected by the Agency, beginning in year 2012-13, the combined total under the amendment is significantly higher. Clearly, the higher number would fund many capital improvements and facilities over the next 15 years. Please note below and on the following page that the projected cumulative totals of Agency plus City revenue are $57,427,852 without the amendment, and $154,141;596 after - the amendment extending the allowable limits.. Projected Property Tax Revenues with Existing Limits vs.Proposed Limits Table E-4 Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Project Year With Existing Limits No Amendment With Proposed Limits After Amendment To Agency/1 To Cit /2 Total To Agency To Ci Total 19.2558% 19.2558% 2009-10 $ 2,525,878 $ 301,068 $ 2,826,947 $ 2,525,878 $ 301,068 $2,826,947 2010-11 $ 2,330,965 $ 305,670 2,636,635 $ 2,330,965 $ 305,670 2,636,635 2011-12 $ 2,278,295 $ 310,432 2,588,727 $ 2,278,295 $ 310,432 2,588,727 2012-13 $ 500,733 $ 1,492,963 1,993,696 $ 4,482,595 $ 315,361 4,797,957 2013-14 $ (254,848) $ 1,774,796 1,519,948 $ 4,656,155 $ 320,463 4,976,618 2014-15 $ (254,848) $ 1,835,215 1,580,368 $ 4,820,026 $ 328,816 5,148,842 2015-16 $ (254,848) $ 1,897,749 1,642,902 $ 4,989,829 $ 337,461 5,327,290 2016-17 $ (254,848) $ 1,962,472 1,707,625 $ 5,165,776 $ 346,408 - 5,512,184 2017-18 $ (254,848) $ 2,029,460 1,774,613 $ 5,348,085 $ 355,669 5,703,754 2018-19 $ (254,848) $ 2,098,793 1,843,946 $, 5,536,984 $ 365,254 5,902,238 2019-20 ' $ (254,848) $ 2,170,553 1,915,705 $ 5,732,707 $ 375,174 6,107,881 2020-21 $ (127,424) $ 2,244,824 2,117,400 $ 6,062,921 $ 385,442 6,448,363 2021-22 $ - $ 2,321,694 2,321,694 $ 6:400,454 $ '396,069 6,796,523 2022-23 $ - $ 2,401,255 2,401,255 $ 6,618,143 $ 407,068 7,025,211 2023-24 $ - $ 2,483,600 2,483,600 $ 6,843,682 $ 418,452 7,262,133 2024-25 $ - $ 2.568,828 2,568,828 $ 7,077,349 $ 430,234 7,507,583 2025-26 $ - $ 2,657,039 2,657,039 $ 7,319,435 $ 442,428 7,761,863 2026-27 $ - 2,877,235 2,877,235 $ 7,570,237 $ 455,050 8,025,287 3 Agenda Report Page 4 of 8 Year With Existing Limits No Amendment With Proposed Limits After Amendment To Agency/1 To City /2 Total To Agency To City Total 19.2558% 19.2558% 2027-28 $ - 2,842,830 2,842,830 $ 7,830,068 $ 468,113 8,298,181 2028-29 $ - 2,940,631 2,940,631 $ 8,099,246 $ 481,633 8,580,880 2029-30 $ - 3,041,855 3,041,855 $ 8,378,105 $ 495,627 8,873,732 2030-31 $ - 3,146,621 3,146,621 $ 8,666,989 $ 510,111 9,177,100 2031-32 $ - 3,255,055 3,255,055 $ 8,966,254 $ 525,101 9,491,355 2032-33 $ - 2,477,286 2,477,286 $ 6,653,820 $ 445,079 7,098,900 2033-34 $ - 265,413 265,413 $ - $ 265,413 265,413 Cumulative 5,724,515 51,703,337 57,427,852 1 144,353,999 9,787,597 154,141,596 Notes: 1/ Consists of both housing set aside funds and nonhousing tax increment after taxing agency payments and bond debt service. Negative figures reflect scheduled bond debt service payments that must be accrued from remaining tax increment revenue unless plan is amended. 2/ Tax increment to City reflects:a)City's 19.2558%share of taxes from Project Area base year value, b)City's share of statutory payments from redevelopment tax increment revenue,and c)City's share of property taxes after existing limits expire. Report to City Council Attachment 4 is the Redevelopment Agency's Report to the City Council for Amendment No. 6 ("Report") and describes in detail the reasons for and implications of proposed Amendment No. 6. -- Sections 33352 and 33457.1 of the Redevelopment Law require that when the Redevelopment Agency submits Amendment No. 6 to the City Council, it must be accompanied by a report containing, to the extent warranted by Amendment No. 6, specific information regarding the amendments, as prescribed by Sections 33352 and 33457.1 of the Redevelopment Law. This Report is an informational document that provides analysis of some of the reasons for and impacts of Amendment No. 6. The Report provides information, documentation, and evidence to assist the City Council and Agency Board with their consideration of Amendment No. 6 and in making the various determinations in connection with its adoption. The general public and affected taxing entities may review this document to learn more about the intended purposes and implications of Amendment No. 6. The Report is presented before the joint public hearing and consists of 13 sections: • Reasons for the Amendment (Section 33352(a)). This section sets forth the reasons for Amendment No. 6, which includes existence of conditions in the Project Area that cannot be alleviated by the private sector and/or government assistance without redevelopment. This section also describes Agency's accomplishments and remaining projects and programs. ,The reasons for the two primary amendments, increasing the tax increment and bonded indebtedness limit, are summarized below. Further redevelopment is necessary to address significant remaining blight within the Project Area. A lack of necessary commercial facilities in the Project Area forces residents to travel outside the City to purchase needed goods and services. For example, there is currently only 4 Agenda Report Page 5 of 8 one grocery store, Stater Bros. market, to serve the entire City/Project Area. The lack of necessary businesses also has a negative effect on general fund revenues as very little sales tax is generated by existing businesses and the small amount of sales tax currently collected is declining, according to the City's current budget. Vacant and undeveloped property in the southwestern portion of the Project Area remain due to inadequate public infrastructure and physical conditions that hinder development, as well as the presence of obsolete buildings that must be demolished before the site can be reused. Also deterioration and dilapidation over time render some buildings in the Project Area unsafe or unfit for use. The presence of crime hotspots in the western portion of the Project Area creates a burden on the rest of the community by demanding a disproportionate share of public safety resources. A detailed description of remaining blight is contained in Section B of the Report. As previously discussed, it is estimated that subsequent to fiscal year 2012-13 the Agency will have no ability to collect additional tax increment without an amendment to the Redevelopment Plan. The costs for projects and programs to alleviate blighting conditions over the life of the Redevelopment Plan are estimated at $30.9 million. However, the Agency may only collect $7.6 million in tax increment between fiscal years 2009-10 and 2012-13, leaving a deficit of $23.3 million. Amendment No. 6 will raise the existing tax increment limit to $225 million and allow revenue collection until fiscal year 2033-34. Amendment No. 6 is necessary to secure the financial and administrative tools to carry out the established goals of the Redevelopment Plan. Another reason for amending the existing redevelopment plan is to increase the limit on bonded indebtedness that can be outstanding at one time. The Redevelopment Law requires that in order for an agency to collect tax increment revenues, the agency must establish debt to justify collection of such revenues. Bonds are a feasible method of funding needed projects because the Agency can receive a lump-sum of revenues at a low interest rate. Agency bonded debt does not represent a new burden on taxpayers or the City's general fund because it is based on existing revenues. Without issuing bonds, redevelopment projects and programs would take decades to fund as the stream of tax increment revenue would have to be amassed prior to commencing these projects and programs. The Agency needs to increase the Redevelopment Plan's bonded indebtedness limit in order to secure advanced funding to implement redevelopment projects in a timely manner. The current bonded indebtedness limit is $15 million. Amendment No. 6 would increase this limit to $75 million. However, the actual debt incurred would be tied to revenues at that time, so it is not currently known if the ceiling would actually be reached. Without the capacity to issue additional debt, the Agency's ability to eliminate remaining blight in the Project Area will be severely hindered. Bonds and all other forms of Project Area indebtedness are repaid with tax increment revenues generated from the Project Area up to ten years after the effectiveness of the Redevelopment Plan expires. • Description of the Physical and Economic Conditions in the Project Area (Section 33352(b)). As described to this section, the physical and economic blighting conditions in the Project Area include a lack of necessary commercial facilities, inadequate public improvements, obsolete design or construction, deteriorated and dilapidated buildings, and high crime rates. This section also includes a map depicting remaining blighting conditions in the Project Area and parcels that are necessary and essential for redevelopment, pursuant to Redevelopment Law requirements. • Five-Year Implementation Plan (Section 33352(c) — The Agency's recently adopted Five-Year Implementation Plan is contained in this section. The Implementation Plan describes the 5 Agenda Report Page 6 of 8 specific goals and objectives of the Agency, specific projects proposed by the Agency, including a program of actions and expenditures proposed to be made during years 2010-14. The plan also includes a description of how these projects will alleviate blighting conditions in the Project Area. • Why the Elimination of Blight Cannot be Accomplished by Private Enterprise Acting Alone or Other Financing Alternatives Other than Tax Increment Financing (Section 33352(d)). Redevelopment cannot be accomplished in the Project Area without Agency participation due to the prohibitive costs associated with completing redevelopment activities in the Project Area, a lack of private sector interest, and a lack of local and State public funds. It is important to note that the City's current revenue sources are not adequate to maintain a constant level of City-wide basic services much less fund public infrastructure, developmental remediation, revitalization or affordable housing programs in the Project Area. In fact, a portion of annual redevelopment revenues are currently used to assist with funding the City's community enhancement programs, housing programs, infrastructure projects, and economic development, planning and public works projects and programs. • Method of Financing Including the Economic Feasibility of the Plan Amendment (Section 33352(e)) — This section presents the Agency's proposed method of financing redevelopment activities and includes an analysis showing that the proposed redevelopment program is financially feasible. • Relocation Method (Section 33352(fl). In the event that relocation of residents is ever needed in the Project Area, the Agency will adhere to the State Relocation Guidelines, consisting of the State Relocation Law and the California Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Guidelines, as described in the Agency's Report. It is important to note that although this section is required by the Redevelopment Law, the Agency is rescinding its eminent domain authority and, therefore, does not anticipate any relocation of residents. • Analysis of the Preliminary Plan (Section 33352(g)) — This section is not required due to the fact that the Project Area boundaries are not being altered. • Report and Recommendations of the Planning Commission (Section 33352(h)) — On February 4, 2010, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution 10-01 finding that the Redevelopment Plan is in conformance with the City's General Plan. This section provides information regarding this action. • Report of the Project Area Committee (Section 33352(i))—This section was not required due to the fact that a project area committee ("PAC") was not formed in connection with Amendment No. 6 as the scope of Amendment No. 6 did not meet the criteria for the formation of a PAC. • Statement of Conformance to the General Plan (Section 33352(j)) — The above-mentioned Planning Commission action on February 4, 2010 is described in this section. • Environmental Review (Section 33352(k). An Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") was prepared in connection with the City's General Plan Update and Amendment No. 6. This section of the Report addresses any potential impacts of Amendment No. 6. As shown in this section, there are no additional impacts anticipated as a result of Amendment No. 6 that are not already anticipated and addressed by the General Plan update. The EIR is scheduled to be certified by the City Council in April 2010. Agenda Report Page 7 of 8 • Report of the County Fiscal Officer(Section 33352(1))—This section is not required because the Project Area boundaries were not altered in any way. • Neighborhood Impact Report (Section 33352(m). This section describes the impacts of Amendment No. 6 on low and moderate income persons or families in the Project Area. Issues discussed include relocation, traffic circulation, environmental quality, availability of community facilities and services, effect on school population and quality of education, property assessments and taxes, and other matters potentially affecting the physical and social quality of the neighborhood. • Summary of Agency's Consultation with Affected Taxing Entities (Section 33352(n)). The Agency's notifications and communications with affected taxing entities are outlined in this section of the Report. To date, the Agency'has not received any questions or comments from taxing entities. Joint Public Hearing Prior to the City Council's consideration of the ordinance approving Amendment No. 6, a joint public hearing will be held to hear all testimony for and against the proposed action. The Redevelopment Law requires public hearings by both the Agency and the City Council, which may be consolidated as a single joint hearing with each body's consent. The resolutions attached to this staff report provide for both the Agency and City Council's consent to a joint public hearing on Amendment No. 6, taken as separate actions with separate resolutions. The Redevelopment Law requires notice of the joint public hearing to be published in a newspaper of general circulation not less than once a week for three consecutive weeks prior to the hearing and mailed to all owners of property within the Project Area, residents and businesses in the Project Area to the extent possible, and affected taxing entities at least 30 days prior to the hearing. The joint public hearing on Amendment No. 6 would be scheduled for April 27, 2010. FISCAL IMPACT: Costs for Amendment No. 6 have been budgeted in the Agency's 2009-10 budget, and include redevelopment consultant services (contract amount of $70,860), legal services, and other incidental costs, such as noticing and staff time. More importantly, Amendment No. 6 modifies financial and time limitations to expand the Agency's capacity to collect tax increment revenue and fund additional projects. Section E of the Agency's Report includes projections of such revenues, and indicates that the Agency could generate approximately $95 million in. net funds for redevelopment/non-housing projects and another $49 million in affordable housing funds between 2009-10 and 2033-34. Respectfully submitted, Joyce Powers Community and Economic Development Director 7 Agenda Report Page 8 of 8 Manager Approval: Betsy kf Adams CRA Executive Director/City Manager ATTACHMENTS: 1. Redevelopment Agency Resolution 2. City Council Resolution 3. Draft Amended and Restated Redevelopment Plan for the Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Project 4. Report to City Council on Amendment No. 6 to the Redevelopment Plan for the Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Project i RESOLUTION NO. CRA-2010-0 A RESOLUTION OF THE GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPROVING AND TRANSMITTING ITS REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR AMENDMENT NO. 6 TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AND CONSENTING TO A JOINT PUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS, the City of Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") has prepared an Amended and Restated Plan in connection with Amendment No. 6 to the Redevelopment Plan for the Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Project ("Redevelopment Plan"); and WHEREAS, the purpose of the proposed Redevelopment Plan is to and to alleviate economic and physical blighting conditions in the Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Project and to promote economic development; and WHEREAS, the Agency has prepared a Report to the City Council ("Report") on the proposed Redevelopment Plan that includes all information' required by Sections 33352 and 33457.1 of California Community Redevelopment Law, Heath and Safety Code Section 33000, et. seq. ("Redevelopment Law"); and WHEREAS,pursuant to Section 33458 of Redevelopment Law, a joint public hearing on the Redevelopment Plan may be held with consent of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace ("City Council") and Agency. NOW, THEREFORE, THE GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Agency hereby approves and transmits to the City Council for their consideration the Report to the City Council for the proposed Redevelopment Plan, said Report together with the Redevelopment Plan, in the form enclosed herein as Attachments 3 and 4, respectively, to the staff report. SECTION 2. The Agency hereby consents to a joint public hearing with the City Council for the purpose of considering the Redevelopment Plan, and requests that the City Council call said joint public hearing of the Agency and City Council. I SECTION 3. Staff is authorized and directed to give notice of the joint public hearing and make such transmittals as may be required pursuant to Sections 33451.5 and 33452 of the Redevelopment Law. 1C Page 2 of 2 PASSED,APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 91h day of March, 2010. Chairperson of the Community Redevelopment Agency ATTEST: City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace I, BRENDA MESA, City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, do hereby certify that Resolution No. CRA-2010-0_was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Agency held on the 91h day of March, 2010, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: r ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Brenda Mesa, City Clerk Approved as to form: City Attorney 11 ATTACHMENT 2 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 12 RESOLUTION NO. CC-2010-0 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL'OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE ACCEPTING THE CITY • OF GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY'S REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL FOR AMENDMENT NO. 6 TO THE REDEVELOPMENT ,PLAN FOR THE GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AND CONSENTING TO A t JOINT PUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS, the City of Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment- Agency ("Agency") has prepared an Amended and Restated Plan in connection with Amendment No. 6 to the Redevelopment Plan for the Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Project ("Redevelopment Plan"); and WHEREAS, the purpose of the proposed Redevelopment Plan is to and to alleviate economic and physical blighting conditions in the Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Project and to promote economic development; and WHEREAS, the Agency has prepared a Report to the City Council ("Report") on the proposed Redevelopment Plan that includes all information required by Sections 33352 and 33457.1 of the California Community Redevelopment Law, Health and Safety Code Section 33000, et. seq. ("Redevelopment Law"); and WHEREAS, the Agency adopted Resolution No. CRA 2010- on March 9, 2010, approving the Agency's Report to City Council on the proposed Redevelopment Plan, and consented to and requested that the City Council call a joint public hearing of the Agency and the City Council to consider and act upon Amendment No. 6 to the Redevelopment Plan for the Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Project("Amendment No. 6"); and WHEREAS,pursuant to Section 33458 of Redevelopment Law, a joint public hearing on the Redevelopment Plan may be held with consent of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace ("City Council") and Agency. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council, hereby acknowledges receipt of the Agency's proposed Redevelopment Plan and the Agency's Report concerning Amendment No. 6. The Redevelopment Plan and the Agency's Report are attached as Attachments 3 and 4, respectively, to the staff report. 13 Page 2 of 2 SECTION 2. The City Council hereby consents to holding a joint public hearing with the Agency for the purpose of considering the proposed Sixth Amendment. SECTION 3. Staff is authorized and directed to give notice of the joint public hearing and make such transmittals as may be required pursuant to Sections 33451.5 and 33452 of the Redevelopment Law. PASSED,APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 91h day of March, 2010. Mayor City of Grand Terrace ATTEST: City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace I, BRENDA MESA, City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, do hereby certify that Resolution No. CC-2010-0_was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace held on the 9`h day of March, 2010, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Brenda Mesa, City Clerk Approved as to form: City Attorney T. ATTACHMENT 3 DRAFT AMENDED AND RESTATED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN 15 l ' I I CITY OF GRAND `TERRACE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 22795 BARTON ROAD, GRAND TERRACE, CA 92313 i I ' I i I i i .. i r i "DRAFJT AMENDED AND RESTATED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN _ � - Rs i � City,.-of Grand Terrace _ Redevelopment Agency 4 _n y Adopted September 27, 1979(Ordinance No. 25) Amendment No. 1-January 17, 1980 (Ordinance No. 31) Amendment No. 2-July 15, 1981 (Ordinance No. 52) T>, Amendment No. 3-July 22, 1999(Ordinance No. 187) Amendment No. 4-September 12, 2002 (Ordinance No.202) Amendment No. 5-July 22, 2004 (Ordinance No. 212) j Amendment No. 6- 2010 (Ordinance No._) l I I - I I I F ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. www.webrsg.com j 1� AMENDED AND RESTATED-REDEVELOPMENT PLAN GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION I. (100) INTRODUCTION 1 SECTION II. (200) GENERAL DEFINITIONS 2 SECTION III. (300) PROJECT AREA BOUNDARIES 3 SECTION IV. (4001 REDEVELOPMENT PLAN GOALS 3 SECTION V. (500) REDEVELOPMENT PLAN ACTIONS 4 (501) GENERAL 4 (502) PROPERTY ACQUISITION 5 (503) ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY 5 (504) ACQUISITION OF PERSONAL PROPERTY,ANY OTHER INTEREST IN REAL PROPERTY, OR ANY IMPROVEMENTS IN REAL PROPERTY 5 (505) PARTICIPATION BY OWNERS AND PERSONS ENGAGED IN.BUSINESS 6 (506) OWNER PARTICIPATION 6 (507) REENTRY PREFERENCES FOR PERSONS ENGAGED IN BUSINESS IN THE PROJECT AREA 7 (508) OWNER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENTS 7 (509) IMPLEMENTING RULES 7 (510) COOPERATION WITH PUBLIC BODIES 7 (511) PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 8 (512) PAYMENTS TO TAXING AGENCIES 8 (513) RELOCATION OF PERSONS DISPLACED BY A PROJECT 8 (514) RELOCATION PROGRAM 8 (515) RELOCATION BENEFITS AND ASSISTANCE 8 (516) DEMOLITION, CLEARANCE, PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS,SITE PREPARATION AND REMOVAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTE 8 (517) DEMOLITION AND CLEARANCE 8 (518) PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS 9 (519) PREPARATION OF BUILDING SITES 9 (520) REMOVAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTE 9 (521) REHABILITATION, MOVING OF STRUCTURES BY THE AGENCY,AND SEISMIC REPAIRS 9 (522) REHABILITATION AND CONSERVATION 9 (523) CLEARING OR MOVING STRUCTURES 10 (524) SEISMIC REPAIRS 10 (525) GRAFFITI REMOVAL 10 (526) PROPERTY DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT 10 (527) REAL PROPERTY DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT 10 (528) GENERAL 10 (529) PURCHASE AND DEVELOPMENT DOCUMENTS 11 (530) PERSONAL PROPERTY DISPOSITION 11 (531) PREVENTION OF DISCRIMINATION 12 17 i I AMENDED AND RESTATED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT (532) REDEVELOPMENT ;12 (533) DEEDS, LEASES,AND CONTRACTS l2 (534) Low-AND MODERATE-INCOME HOUSING i13 SECTION VI. (600)USES PERMITTED IN THE PROJECT AREA ;13 (601) MAPS AND USES PERMITTED 13 (602) PUBLIC USES 13 (603) PUBLIC STREET LAYOUT, RIGHTS-OF-WAY,AND EASEMENTS 13 (604) OTHER PUBLIC AND OPEN SPACE USES 14 (605) NONCONFORMING USES 14 (606) INTERIM USES i14 (607) GENERAL CONTROL AND LIMITATIONS 14 , (608) NEW CONSTRUCTION 14 (609) REHABILITATION �14 (610) NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS 15 (611) OPEN SPACE AND LANDSCAPING ;15 (612) LIMITATIONS ON TYPE, SIZE, HEIGHT, NUMBER,AND PROPOSED USE OF BUILDINGS �15 (613) SIGNS 115 (614) UTILITIES A 5 (615) SUBDIVISION OF PARCELS i15 (616) VARIATIONS 15 (617) DESIGN FOR DEVELOPMENT 16 (618) BUILDING PERMITS 16 j SECTION VII. (700).METHODS FOR FINANCING THE PROJECT 16 (701) GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED FINANCING METHODS 16 (702) TAX INCREMENT REVENUE 17 (703) AGENCY BONDS 'l 7 (704) OTHER LOANS AND GRANTS 18 (705) REHABILITATION LOANS, GRANTS,AND REBATES �18 SECTION VIII. (800) ACTIONS BY THE CITY 18 i SECTION IX. (900) ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT 19 i SECTION X. (1000) PLAN LIMITATIONS ;19 (1061) AMOUNT OF CUMULATIVE TAX INCREMENT REVENUE 19 (1002) AMOUNT OF BONDED INDEBTEDNESS OUTSTANDING AT ANY ONE TIME ,19 (1003) TIME FRAME TO INCUR INDEBTEDNESS i19 (1004) DURATION OF THIS PLAN ;19 (1005) TIME FRAME TO COLLECT TAX INCREMENT REVENUE 20 I SECTION XI. (1100) PROCEDURE OF AMENDMENT 20 i EXHIBIT A- PROJECT AREA MAP 21 I i I I AMENDED AND RESTATED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT EXHIBIT B- LEGAL DESCRIPTION 22 STATEMENT AND DESCRIPTION OF LAND WITHIN THE ORIGINAL AREA 22 AREA 1 23 AREA 2 23 AREA 3 24 AREA 4 24 AREA 5 24 AREA 6 25 AREA 7 25 EXHIBIT-C- LISTING OF PROPOSED PUBLIC FACILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS 26 PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS 26 COMMUNITY FACILITIES 28 EXHIBIT D-DIAGRAM OF CURRENT PERMITTED LAND USES 29 19 GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT SECTION I. (100) INTRODUCTION This is the Amended and Restated Redevelopment Plan for the Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Project ("Plan"), located in the city limits of the City of Grand Terrace, California. It consists of the text (Sections 100 through 1100); the Map of the Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Project Area ("Project Area") (Exhibit A), the legal description of the Project Area boundaries (Exhibit B), a listing of the proposed public facilities and infrastructure improvement projects (Exhibit C), and a diagram of current permitted land uses (Exhibit D). The Project Area consists of two constituent redevelopment project areas: • The original Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Project Area adopted by the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace on September 27, 1979 by Ordinance No. 25 (hereinafter defined as the "Original Area"); and • The territory added to the Original Area in 1981 by Ordinance No. 52 adopted on July 15, 1981 ("Added Area"). The Redevelopment Plan for the Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Project has previously been amended on five occasions since its adoption. Amendment No. 1 was adopted on March 20, 1980 by Ordinance No. 31, to authorize the Agency to collect tax increment revenue within the Project Area. Amendment No. 2 was adopted on July 15, 1981 by Ordinance No. 52 which added the rest of the City limits (approximately 1,615 acres) to the original Project Area boundaries, and adopted a new, amended Redevelopment Plan applicable to both the Original and Added Areas. Amendment No. 3 was adopted on July 22, 1999 by Ordinance No. 187 to authorize the use of eminent domain to acquire certain non-residential property for a 12 year period. To clarify the language and original intent of the Agency to make the limit net of pass through payments, the City Council adopted Amendment No.4 by Ordinance No. 202 on September 12, 2002. Most recently, Amendment No. 5 was adopted on July 22, 2004, by Ordinance No. 212, which rescinded the previous time limit to incur debt making it essentially the same as the duration of the Redevelopment Plan and is dependent on the Agency's ability to collect tax increment to repay any incurred debt. Amendment No. 5 also extended the time limit of the effectiveness of the Redevelopment Plan (to July 15, 2017), and extended the time limit for payment of indebtedness and receipt of taxes (to July 15, 2027)for both the Original and the Added Area. If adopted by the City Council,Amendment No. 6 to the Redevelopment Plan would result in the following: 1. Increase the cumulative tax increment revenue limit in the redevelopment plan from $70 million (net of taxing agency payments)to approximately$225 million (net of taxing agency payments); 2. Increase the limit on the amount of bonded debt that may be outstanding at any one time in the redevelopment plan from $15 million to approximately$75 million; 3. Pursuant to California Community Redevelopment Law, Health and Safety Code Section 33000, et. seq. ("CRL") Sections 33333.6(a), 33333.6(b), and 33333.6(e)(2)(C), extend the effectiveness of the redevelopment plan and time limit to collect tax increment revenue by the following time frames: a. Original Area — extend plan effectiveness from July 15, 2017, to September 27, 2022, and time limit to collect tax increment from July 15, 2027, to September 27, 2032; b. Added Area—extend plan effectiveness from July 15, 2017, to July 15, 2024, and time limit to collect tax increment from July 15, 2027, to July 15, 2034; 4. Rescind the Agency's authority to commence eminent domain within the Project Area, effective immediately following the effectiveness of the ordinance adopting the Amendment No. 6, 2C GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT 5 Replace the description of land uses in the redevelopment plan (as previously contained in Section IV. Uses Permitted in the Project Area, pp. 33-42) with language that directly refers to the City's General Plan, zoning ordinance, and other applicable land use policies and standards, as they exist today or are hereafter amended; and 6. Amend and restate the redevelopment plan to incorporate the prior amendments into a single document. This Plan has been prepared by the City of Grand Terrace Redevelopment Agency("Agency") pursuant to the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health and Safety Code Section 33000, et seq.), the California Constitution, and all applicable laws and ordinances. This Plan provides the Agency with powers, duties, and obligations to implement the program generally formulated in this Plan for the redevelopment, rehabilitation, and revitalization of the Project Area. This Plan does not present a specific plan or establish priorities for specific projects for the redevelopment, rehabilitation, and revitalization of any particular area.within the Project Area. Instead, this Plan presents a process and a basic framework within which specific development plans will be presented, priorities for specific projects will be established, and specific solutions will be proposed, and by which tools are provided to the Agency to fashion, develop, and proceed with such specific plans, projects, and solutions. Many of the requirements contained in this Plan are necessitated by and in accordance with statutory provisions in effect at the time of adoption of this Plan. Such statutory provisions may be changed from time to time. In the event that any such statutory changes affect this Plan's terms, and would be applicable to the Agency, the Project Area, or this Plan, the terms of this Plan that are so affected shall be automatically superseded by such statutory changes, to the extent necessary to be in conformity with such statutory changes(and all other terms of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect). SECTION II. (200) GENERAL DEFINITIONS The following definitions will be used generally in the context of this Plan unless otherwise specified herein: 1. "Added Area" means the territory added to the Project Area by Ordinance No. 52 adopted on July 15, 1981. 2. "Agency' means the City of Grand Terrace Redevelopment Agency. 3. Annual Work Program"means that portion of the Agency's annual budget that sets forth programs and goals to be accomplished by the Agency during the fiscal year. 4. "City" means the City of Grand Terrace, California. 5. "City Council"means the legislative body of the City. 6. "County" means the County of San Bernardino, California. 7. "Disposition and Development Agreement" means an agreement between a developer and the Agency that sets forth terms and conditions for improvement and redevelopment. 8. "General Plan" means the General Plan of the City, the comprehensive and long-term general plan for the physical development of the City, as it exists today or is hereafter amended. 9. "Legal Description" means the metes and bounds legal description of the Project Area attached hereto as Exhibit B. 10. "Map" means the map of the Project Area attached hereto as Exhibit A. ' e. 2 21 GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT 11. "Method of Relocation" means the methods or plans adopted by the Agency pursuant to Sections 33352(f)and 33411 of the Redevelopment Law for the relocation of families, persons, and businesses to be temporarily or permanently displaced by actions of the Agency. 12. "Original Area"means the original Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Project Area established on September 27, 1979 by City of Grand Terrace City Council Ordinance No. 25. 13. "Owner" means any person owning fee title to, or a long-term leasehold interest in, real property within the Project Area. 14. "Owner Participation Agreement' means an agreement between the Agency and an Owner, which sets forth terms and conditions for use of property, and/or its improvement and/or its redevelopment as to a specific property. 15. "Participant" means an Owner who has entered into a Participation Agreement with the Agency. 16. "Person"means an individual(s), or any public or private entities. 17. "Plan" means this Amended and Restated Redevelopment Plan for the Redevelopment Project, as amended by Amendment No. 6 adopted by City Council Ordinance No._on 2010. 18. "Project"means the Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Project. 19. "Project Area"means the Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Project Area, collectively the Original Area and the Added Area, which is the territory this Plan applies to, as shown on Exhibit A. 20. "Redevelopment Law" means the California Community Redevelopment Law(Health and Safety Code, Sections 33000, et seq.) as it now exists or may be hereafter amended. 21. "State"means the State of California. 22. "State Law" means an enactment of State of California, and includes such regulations as have the force of law. SECTION III. (300) PROJECT AREA BOUNDARIES The boundaries of the Project Area are illustrated on the map attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A. The legal description of the boundaries of the Project Area is as described in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein. SECTION IV. (400) REDEVELOPMENT PLAN GOALS This Plan is intended to achieve the following goals: 1. Eliminate and prevent the spread of blight and deterioration and to conserve, rehabilitate, and redevelop the Project Area in accordance with this Plan and future Annual Work Programs. 2. Provide for the enhancement and renovation of businesses within the Project Area to promote their economic viability. 3 Stimulate investment of the private sector in the full development of the Project Area. �.' 3 22 GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT 4. Promote public improvement facilities; which are sensitive to the unique environmental qualities of the Project Area. 5. Provide adequate roadways to correct street alignment problems, to provide adequate circulation and access to highways. 6. Encourage cooperation and participation of property owners, business persons, public agencies, and community organizations in the revitalization of the Project Area. 7. Provide needed improvements to the community's recreational, cultural, and other community facilities to better serve the Project Area. 8. Expand the resource of developable land by making underutilized land available for development. 9. Renovate and restore sites characterized by deficiencies including, but without limitations, conditions of soil that render private development infeasible or impractical. 10. Achieve an environment reflecting a high level of concern for architectural, landscape, and urban design principles appropriate to the objectives of this Plan. 11. Create physical buffers,which ameliorate the adverse effects of changing land uses along interfaces. 12. Provide low and moderate income housing as is required to satisfy the needs and desires of the various age and income groups of the community, maximizing the opportunity for individual choice, and meeting the requirements of State Law. SECTION V. (500) REDEVELOPMENT PLAN ACTIONS r-- �" (501) GENERAL The Agency proposes to alleviate and prevent the spread of blight and deterioration in the Project Area through: 1. The acquisition, installation, construction, reconstruction, redesign, or reuse of streets, utilities, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, traffic control devices,flood control facilities, buildings, structures, parks, playgrounds,,and other public improvements. 2. The rehabilitation, remodeling, demolition, or removal of buildings, structures, and improvements. 3. The rehabilitation, development, preservation, provision, or construction of affordable housing in compliance with State Law. 4. Providing the opportunity for participation by owners and tenants presently located in the Project Area and the extension of preferences to persons engaged in business desiring to remain or relocate within the redeveloped Project Area. 5. Providing relocation assistance to displaced occupants in accordance with applicable State Law. 6. The development or redevelopment of land by private enterprise or public agencies for purposes and uses consistent with the objectives of this Plan. 7. The acquisition of real property, personal property, any interest in property, and improvements on the property by purchase, lease, option, grant, bequest, gift, devise, or any other lawful means. 4 23 i GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT 1 8. Site preparation and development and construction of necessary off-site improvements. 9. Improving open space. 10. Managing property acquired'by the Agency. 11. Providing financing for the assistance of commercial and industrial development that increases the i economic base of both the Project.Area and the City, and the number of temporary and permanent; jobs. 12. The disposition of real property, personal property, any interest in property, and improvements on the property through methods such as sale, lease, exchange, subdivision, transfer, assignment, pledge', encumbrance, or any other lawful means of disposition. 13. Recommending standards to ensure that property will continue to be used in accordance with this Plan. I 14. The closure or vacation of certain streets and the dedication of other areas for public purposes. 15. Providing replacement housing, as required. 16. Applying for, receiving, and utilizing grants and loans from federal or state governments or any other source. 17. Clearing or moving buildings, structures,or other improvements from any real property acquired by[ the Agency. i To accomplish these actions and to implement this Plan, the Agency is authorized to use the powers provided in this Plan, and the powers now or hereafter permitted by the Redevelopment Law and any other State Law. I' (502) PROPERTY ACQUISITION i I (503) Acquisition of Real Property j e Except as specifically prohibited by this Plan, the Agency may acquire real property by any means authorized by law, including by purchase, lease, obtain option upon, acquire by gift, grant,'bequest, devise, exchange, cooperative negotiations, or any other means authorized by law, except by eminent domain. The Agency rescinded eminent domain authority by the adoption of Amendment No. 6 adopting this Amended and Restated Redevelopment Plan. i (504) Acquisition of Personal Property, Any Other Interest in Real Property, or Any Improvements in Real Property Where necessary in the implementation of this Plan, the Agency is authorized to acquire personal.property, any other interest in real property, and any improvements on real property including repurchase of developed property previously owned by the Agency by any lawful means. I I I I i I' • I ` - I 5 r Zd GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT (505) PARTICIPATION BY OWNERS AND PERSONS ENGAGED IN BUSINESS (506) Owner Participation This Plan provides for opportunities for participation in the redevelopment of property in the Project Area by the owners of all or part of such property if the owners agree to participate in the redevelopment in conformity with this Plan. Participation methods include: (i) remaining in substantially the same location either by retaining all or portions of the property, or by retaining all or portions of the property and purchasing adjacent property from the Agency or joining with another person or entity for the rehabilitation or development of the Owner's property and, if appropriate, other property, or (ii) submitting to the Agency for its consideration another method of participation proposal pursuant to these Rules. An Owner who participates in the same location may be required, among other actions, to rehabilitate or demolish all or a part of his/her existing buildings. The Agency may also acquire the buildings only and then remove or demolish the buildings. Participation methods also include, but are not limited to, the Agency buying land and improvements at fair market value from Owners and offering other parcels for purchase and rehabilitation or development by such Owners, or offering an opportunity for such Owners to rehabilitate or develop property jointly with other persons or entities. Owner Participation opportunities shall be subject to and limited by factors and requirements including: The Participant must demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Agency that the Participant is financially capable and has the qualifications and experience to perform any and all development, construction, modification, rehabilitation, modernization, construction, land assembly, and/or acquisition of the subject property or properties in order that it will conform to the Plan, any specific plan or design guide, applicable zoning, building, and safety laws and regulations, and the redevelopment proposal, if any, contemplated by the Agency with respect to the subject property. The Participant's proposed improvements and/or redevelopment conform or will conform to: the goals and objectives established by the Agency; the Plan; any applicable specific plan or design guide; applicable zoning, building, and safety laws and regulations; and the redevelopment proposal for the development site approved by the Agency. The Agency retains its authority to determine in its sole discretion whether the Participant's proposed development conforms to and furthers the goals and objectives of the Plan and any specific redevelopment proposals on the basis of all the facts and circumstances pertaining to the Participant's proposed development. The Agency shall consider whether the proposed.,owner participant development necessitates that the Participant and/or the Agency shall remove, relocate, and/or install public utilities and public facilities determined necessary by the Agency for the proposed development. Consideration of the elimination and/or change of land uses, particularly nonconforming land uses as specified in City codes. The Agency shall consider the need to realign, abandon, vacate, widen, or open public rights-of-way and the indirect effects of such acts. Consideration of any reduction in the total number of individual parcels in the Project Area. Consideration of whether the proposal involves land assembly and development of areas for public and/or private development in accordance with the Plan. 6 25 Y - 4 I GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT - i (507) Reentry Preferences for Persons Engaged in Business in the Project Area The Agency shall extend reasonable preferences to persons who are engaged in business in the Project Area to relocate and reenter in business in the redeveloped area, if they otherwise meet the requirements prescribed by this Plan and the Agency's rules governing owner participation and re-entry. (508) Owner Participation Agreements l Under an Owner Participation Agreement, the participant shall agree to rehabilitate, `develop, or use the property in conformance with this Plan and be subject to the provisions hereof. In the Owner Participation Agreement, participants who retain real property shall be required to join in the recordation_ of such documents as are necessary to make the provisions of this Plan applicable to their properties.' Owner Participation Agreements shall include appropriate remedies such as the ability of the Agency, to declare the Owner Participation Agreement terminated and acquire the real property or any interest therein, and sell or lease such real property or interest therein for rehabilitation or development in accordance with this Plan in the event a participant breaches the terms of such Owner Participation Agreement. If conflicts develop between the desires of participants for particular sites�or land uses, the Agency, is authorized to establish reasonable priorities and preferences-to persons who are engaged in business in the Project Area re-entering in business within the redeveloped area if they otherwise meet the requirements prescribed by the Plan. Where the Agency determines that a proposal for participation is not feasible, is not in the best interests of the Agency or City, or that redevelopment can best be accomplished without affording a participant an opportuhity to execute-an Owner Participation Agreement, the Agency, shall not be required to execute an Owner Participation Agreement. (509) IMPLEMENTING RULES j i The provisions of Sections 505 through 508 of this Plan shall be implemented according to the rules adopted by the Agency prior to the approval of the Ordinance, which may be amended from time to time by the Agency. Such rules allow for Owner Participation Agreements with the Agency. i (510) COOPERATION WITH PUBLIC BODIES Certain public bodies are authorized by State Law,to aid and cooperate, with or without consideration, in the planning and implementation of activities authorized by this Plan. The Agency shall seek the aid and cooperation of such public bodies and shall attempt to coordinate the implementation of this Plan with ;the activities of such public bodies in order to accomplish the purposes of redevelopment and to achieve the highest public good. Property of a public body shall not be acquired without its consent in accordance with State.Law. The Agency shall seek the cooperation of all public bodies that own or intend to acquire property in the Project Area. i The Agency may impose on all public bodies the planning and design controls contained in and authorized,by this Plan to ensure that present uses and any future development by public bodies will conform to the requirements of this Plan. The Agency is authorized, to the extent permissible by law, to financially (and otherwise) assist public bodies in the cost of public land,, buildings, facilities,, structures, or other improvements (within or outside the Project Area) where such land, buildings, facilities, structures, or other improvements are of benefit to the Project Area. I 7 - i 2� GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT (511) PROPERTY MANAGEMENT During such time as property, if any, in the Project Area is owned by the Agency, such property shall be under the management and control of the Agency. Such properties may be rented or leased by the Agency pending their disposition. (512) PAYMENTS TO TAXING AGENCIES The Agency may pay, but is not required to pay, in any year during which it owns property in the Project Area directly to any City, County, or district, including, but not limited to, a school district, or other public corporation for whose benefit a tax would have been levied upon such property had it not been tax exempt, an amount of money in lieu of taxes. In addition, to the extent required by State Law, the,Agency shall remit payments to the affected taxing agencies in a manner consistent with Section 33607.5, Section 33676(b), and any other pertinent and applicable sections of the Redevelopment'Law. All such amounts shall be calculated after the amount required to be deposited in the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund has been deducted from the total amount of tax increment funds received by the Agency in the applicable fiscal year. Such payments shall be reduced in accordance with the provisions of Section 33607.5 of the Redevelopment Law or any other applicable statute. Such payments shall be the exclusive payments that are required to be made by the Agency to affected taxing entities for•the duration of this Plan. Such payments may be subordinated to loans, bonds, or other Agency'indebtedness as provided by the Redevelopment Law. The Agency may also pay to any affected taxing agency any amounts of money, which the Agency has found are necessary and appropriate to alleviate financial burden or detriment caused by the Project pursuant to an agreement executed prior to January 1, 1994. (513) RELOCATION OF PERSONS DISPLACED BY A PROJECT (514) Relocation Program In accordance with the provisions of the California Relocation Assistance Law (Government Code Section 7260, et seq.) ("Relocation Assistance Act"), the Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Guidelines adopted and promulgated by the California Department of Housing and Community Development ("Relocation Guidelines") and the Agency shall provide relocation benefits and assistance to all "displaced" persons (including families, business concerns, and others) as may be required by law. Such relocation assistance shall be provided in the manner required by the Method of Relocation. (515) Relocation Benefits and Assistance The Agency shall provide all relocation benefits required by law and in conformance with the Method of Relocation, Relocation Guidelines, Relocation Assistance Act,. the Redevelopment Law, and any other applicable rules and regulations. (516) DEMOLITION, CLEARANCE, PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS, SITE PREPARATION AND REMOVAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTE• (517) Demolition and Clearance The Agency is authorized, for property acquired by the Agency or pursuant to an agreement with the owner of property, to demolish, clear or move buildings, structures, or other improvements from any real property as necessary to carry out the purposes of this Plan a= 8 27 GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT f I (518) Public Improvements I To the greatest extent permitted by law, the Agency is authorized to install and construct, or to cause to be installed'and constructed, the public improvements and public utilities (within or outside the Project Area) necessary to carry out the purposes of this Plan. Specifically, the Agency may pay for, install, or construct the buildings, facilities, structures, and other improvements identified in Exhibit C, attached hereto, and may acquire or pay for land required therefore. Additionally, the Agency is authorized to install and construct, orlto cause to be installed and constructed, within or without the Project Area, for itself or for any public body!or entity-for the benefit of the Project Area, public improvements and public facilities, including, but not limited to: over or underpasses;,bridges; streets; bikeways; curbs; gutters; sidewalks;.street lights; sewers; storm drains; traffic signals; electrical distribution systems; natural gas distribution systems;,wastewater treatment facilities; cable TV and fiber optic communication systems;water distribution systems; parks;windbreaks; trails; plazas; playgrounds; motor vehicle parking facilities; landscaped areas; schools; civic, cultural and recreatio6al facilities; camping facilities; and pedestrian improvements. The Agency, as it deems necessary to carry out the Plan and subject to the consent of the City Council, 'as may be required by the Redevelopment Law, may pay all or part of the value of the land for and the cost;of the installation and construction of any building, facility, structure or other improvement that is publicly owned either within or outside the Project Area, upon both the Agency and the City Council making the applicable determinations required pursuant to the Redevelopment Law. When the value of.such land or the cost of the installation and construction of such building, facility, structure or other improvement, or both, has been, or will be, paid or provided for initially by the City or other public corporation, the Agency may enter into a contract with the City or other public corporation under which it agrees to reimburse the City or other public corporation for all or part of the value of such land or all or parti of the cost of such building,facility, structure or other improvements; or both, by periodic payments over a period of years. Any obligation of the Agency under such contract shall constitute an indebtedness of the Agency for the purposes of carrying out this Plan. (519) Preparation of Building Sites Any real property owned or acquired by the Agency may be developed as a building site. In connection wlith such development it may cause, provide, or undertake or make provisions with other agencies for the installation or construction of streets, utilities, parks, playgrounds, and other public improvements necessary for carrying out this Plan. i (520) ,Removal of Hazardous Waste _ I To the extent legally allowable, the Agency may, in its sole discretion, take'any actions, which the Agency determines are necessary, and which are consistent with other State and federal laws, to remedy or remove a release of hazardous substances on, under, or from property within the Project Area. i (521) REHABILITATION, MOVING OF STRUCTURES BY THE AGENCY,AND SEISMIC REPAIRS ' I (522) Rehabilitation and Conservation The Agency is authorized to rehabilitate and conserve, or to cause to.be rehabilitated and conserved, any property, building, or structure owned by the Agency. The Agency is also authorized to advise, encourage, and assist (through a loan program or otherwise) in the rehabilitation and conservation of property, buildings, or structures in the Project Area not owned by the Agency to the extent permitted by the Redevelopment Law. The Agency is authorized to acquire, restore, rehabilitate, move, and conserve buildings of historic'or architectural significance. I s, 9 4 2E^�Q GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT The Agency is authorized to conduct a program of assistance and enforcement to encourage owners of property within the Project Area to upgrade and maintain their property consistent with this Plan and such standards as may be developed for the Project Area. The extent of rehabilitation in the Project Area shall be subject to the discretion of the Agency based upon such objective factors as: Compatibility of rehabilitation with land uses as provided for in this Plan. Economic feasibility of proposed rehabilitation and conservation activity. Structural feasibility of proposed rehabilitation and conservational activity. The undertaking of rehabilitation and conservation activities in an expeditious manner and in conformance with the requirements of this Plan and such property rehabilitation standards as may be adopted by the Agency. The need for expansion of public improvements,facilities, and utilities. The assembly and development of properties in accordance with this Plan. The Agency may adopt property rehabilitation standards for the rehabilitation of properties in the Project Area. (523) Clearing or Moving Structures As necessary in carrying out this Plan, the Agency is authorized to move, or to cause to be moved, any building structures or other improvements from any real property acquired. (524) Seismic Repairs For any project undertaken by the Agency within the Project Area for building rehabilitation or alteration in construction, the Agency may, by following all applicable procedures that are consistent with local, State, and federal law, take those actions which the Agency determines are necessary to provide for seismic retrofits. (525) Graffiti Removal Within the Project Area, the Agency after making the required findings may take any actions that it determines are necessary to remove graffiti from public or private property. (526) PROPERTY DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT (527) Real Property Disposition and Development (528) General For the purposes of this Plan, the Agency is authorized to sell, lease for a period not to exceed 99 years, exchange, subdivide, transfer, assign, pledge, encumber by mortgage, deed of trust, or otherwise dispose of any interest in real property. To the extent permitted by law, the Agency is authorized to dispose of real property by negotiated lease or sale without public bidding after a noticed public hearing. Except as otherwise permitted by law, before any interest in property of the Agency acquired in whole or in part, directly or indirectly, with tax increment moneys is sold or leased for development pursuant to this Plan, such sale or lease shall be first approved by the City Council by resolution after a noticed public hearing, together with such findings as may then be required by State Law. 10 29 I GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT i The real property acquired b the Agency in the Project Area except property conveyed b it to the City.or P P Y q Y 9 Y � ,1 � P P P Y Y Y � Y� any other public body„ shall be sold or leased to public or private persons or entities for improvement and use of the property in conformance with this Plan. Real property may be conveyed by the Agency to the City, and where beneficial to the Project Area, to any other public body without charge or for an amount less than fair market value. All purchasers or lessees of property from the Agency shall be obligated to use the property for the purposes designated in this Plan, to begin and complete improvement of such property within a period of time which-the Agency fixes as reasonable, and to comply with other covenants, conditions, or restrictions to prevent speculation or excess profit taking in undeveloped land, including right of reverter to the Agency and to comply with other conditions which the Agency deems necessary to'carry out the purposes of this Plan. During the period of redevelopment in the Project Area, the Agency shall ensure,that all provisions of this Plan, and other documents formulated pursuant to this Plan, are being observed, and that development of the Project Area is proceeding in accordance with applicable development documents and time schedules. All development, whether public or private, must-conform to this Plan and all applicable federal, State, and local laws, including without limitation the General Plan and zoning ordinance, and all other state and local building codes, guidelines, or specific plans as they now exist or are hereafter amended. Such development must receive the approval of all appropriate public agencies. (529),Purchase and Development Documents To provide adequate safeguards to ensure that the provisions of this Plan will be carried out and to prevent the recurrence of blight, all real property sold, leased, or otherwise disposed of by the Agency, as well as jail property subject to Owner Participation Agreements and Disposition and Development Agreements, shall!be made subject to the provisions of this Plan by leases, deeds, contracts, agreements, declarations:of restrictions, provisions of the General Plan and zoning ordinance, and all other state and local building codes, guidelines, or master or specific plans as they now exist or are hereafter amended, conditional use permits,!or other means. Where appropriate, as determined by the Agency, such documents or portions thereof shall be recorded in the office of the Recorder of the County. Leases, deeds, contracts, agreements, and declarations-of restrictions of.the Agency may contain restrictions, covenants, covenants running with the land, rights of reverter, conditions subsequent, equitable servitudes,or any other provisions necessary to carry out this Plan. The Agency shall reserve such powers and controls in Disposition and Development Agreements or similar agreements as may be necessary to prevent transfer, retention, or use of property for speculative purposes and to ensure that redevelopment is carried out pursuant to this Plan. The Agency shall obligate lessees and purchasers of real property acquired in the Project Area and owners of property improved as part of a redevelopment project to refrain from restricting the rental, sale, or lease of the property on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, marital status, ancestry, or national origin of any person. All deeds, leases, or contracts for the sale, lease, sublease, or other transfer of land in the Project Area shall contain or be subject to such nondiscrimination and non-segregation clauses as are required ;by Redevelopment Law. (530) Personal Property Disposition f For the purposes of this Plan, the Agency is authorized to sell, lease for a period not to exceed 99 years, exchange, subdivide, transfer, assign, pledge, encumber, or otherwise dispose of personal property or any other interest in.property by any lawful means. ` i 3G GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT (531) PREVENTION OF DISCRIMINATION (532) Redevelopment The redeveloper shall comply with 'all State and local laws,` in effect from time to time, prohibiting discrimination or segregation by reason of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status,,national origin, or ancestry, in the sale, lease, or occupancy of the property.' Pursuant to the Redevelopment Law (Sections 33337 and 33435-33436), contracts entered into by the Agency relating to the sale, transfer, or leasing of land, or any interest therein acquired by the Agency within any survey area or redevelopment project, shall comply with the provisions of said sections in substantially the form set forth therein. All such contracts shall further provide that the provisions of said sections shall be -- binding upon and shall obligate the contracting party,or parties and any subcontracting party or parties, or other transferees under the instrument. (533) Deeds, Leases, and Contracts All deeds, leases, and contracts which the Agency proposes to enter into with respect to the sale, lease, sublease, transfer, use, occupancy, tenure, or enjoyment of any land in the Project Area shall,contain the following nondiscrimination and non-segregation clauses as prescribed by Redevelopment Law, Section 33436: In deeds the following language shall appear: "The grantee herein covenants by and for himself or herself, his or her heirs, executors, administrators and assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of any person .or group of persons on account of any basis listed in subdivision (a) or (d) of Section 12955 of the Government Code, as those bases are defined in Sections 12926, 12926.1, subdivision (m) and paragraph (1) of subdivision (p) of Section 12955, and Section 12955.2.of the Government Code, in the sale, lease, sublease, transfer, use, occupancy, tenure, or enjoyment of the premises herein conveyed, nor shall the grantee or any person claiming under or through him or her, establish or permit any practice or F practices of discrimination or segregation with reference to the selection, location, number, use, or occupancy of tenants, lessees, subtenants, sub-lessees, or vendees in the premises herein conveyed. The foregoing covenants shall run with the land." In leases, the following language shall appear:. "The lessee herein covenants by and for himself or herself, his or her heirs, executors, administrators, and assigns, and all persons claiming under or through him or her, and this lease is made and accepted upon and subject to the following conditions: "That there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of any person or group of persons, on account of any basis listed in subdivision (a) or (d) of.Section 12955 of the Government Code, as those bases are defined in Sections 12926, 12926.1, subdivision (m) and paragraph (1) of subdivision (p) of Section 12955, and Section 12955.2 of the Government Code, in the leasing, subleasing, transferring, use,, 'occupancy, tenure, or enjoyment of the premises herein leased nor shall the lessee himself or herself, or any person claiming under or through him or her, establish or permit any such practice or practices of discrimination or segregation with reference to the selection; location, number, use, or occupancy, of tenants, lessees, sub- ]essees, subtenants, or vendees in the premises herein leased." In contracts, the following language shall appear: "There shall be no discrimination against or segregation of any person or group of persons on account of any basis listed in subdivision-(a) or(d) of Section 12955 of the Government Code, as those bases are defined in Sections 12926, 12926.1', subdivision (m) and paragraph (1) of subdivision (p) of Section 12955, and Section 12955.2 of the Government Code, in the sale, lease, sublease, transfer, use, occupancy, tenure, or enjoyment of the land, nor shall the transferee itself or any person claiming under or through it, establish or permit any such practice or practice's of discrimination or segregation with reference to the selection, location, number, use, or occupancy of tenants, lessees, subtenants, sub-lessees, or vendees of the land. The 12 31 - f 1 1 GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT foregoing provision shall be binding upon and shall obligate the contracting party or parties and any subcontracting party or parties, or other transferees under the instrument." (534) LOW-AND MODERATE-INCOME HOUSING i The Agency shall comply with all of the low- and moderate-income housing requirements of the Redevelopment Law, which are applicable to this Plan, including applicable expenditure, replacement, and inclusionary'housing requirements, including but not limited to the following: i No less-than twenty percent of all tax increment funds allocated to the Agency shall be used for the purposes of increasing, improving, and preserving the supply of low- and moderate-income housing available 1 at affordable housing costs to persons _and families of low- or moderate-income and very low-income households that is occupied by these persons and families,, unless the Agency makes annual findings by resolution as required under Redevelopment Law. . I The tax increment funds that are required to be used for increasing and improving the supply of low- and moderate-income housing shall be held in a separate Low- and Moderate-Income Housing Fund until used. The moneys in the Low- and "Moderate-Income Housing Fund shall be used to increase, improve, and preserver the supply of low-and moderate-income housing. Whenever dwelling units housing persons and families of low-or moderate-income are destroyed or removed from the low- and moderate-income housing market as part of a redevelopment project,-the Agency shall within four years of such destruction or removal, rehabilitate, develop, or construct, or cause to be rehabilitated, developed, or constructed, for rental or sale to persons and families of low-or moderate-income an equal number of replacement dwelling units at'affordable housing costs within the Project Area or within the jurisdiction of the Agency in accordance with Redevelopment Law. i SECTION VI. (600) USES PERMITTED IN THE PROJECT AREA (601) MAPS AND USES PERMITTED The Map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein illustrates the location of the Project Area boundaries. The land uses permitted by this.Plan shall be those permitted by the General Plan and zoning ordinance,and all.other state and local building codes, guidelines, or specific plans as they now exist or are hereafter amended. A diagram of current permitted uses is presented on Exhibit D. (602) PUBLIC USES (603) Public Street Layout, Rights-of-Way, and Easements I The public street system and street layout for the Project Area is illustrated on the Map.identified as Exhibit A. The street system in the Project Area shall be developed in accordance with the General Plan, and all other state and local codes, guidelines, or master or specific plans as they now exist or are hereafter amended. Certain streets and rights-of-way may be widened, altered, realigned, abandoned, vacated, or closed by the City as necessary for proper development of the Project Area. Additional easements may be created by,the Agency and City in the Project Area as needed for proper development and circulation. The public rights-of-way shall be used for vehicular, bicycle, and/or pedestrian traffic as well as for public improvements, public and private utilities and activities typically found in public rights-of-way. In addition,j all necessary easements for public uses, public facilities, and public utilities maybe retained or created. f n • 13 - i 32 GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT (604) Other Public and Open Space Uses Both within and outside of the Project Area, where an appropriate finding has been determined, the Agency may take actions to establish or enlarge public, institutional, or non profit,uses, including, but not limited to, schools, community centers, auditorium and civic center facilities (except city halls), theatres and cultural facilities, criminal justice facilities, park and recreational facilities, parking facilities, transit facilities, libraries, hospitals, educational, fraternal, philanthropic and charitable institutions, or other similar associations or organizations. All such uses shall be deemed to conform to the provisions of this Plan provided that such uses conform to all other applicable laws and ordinances and that such uses are approved by the City. The Agency may impose such other reasonable restrictions as are necessary to protect development and uses in the Project Area. (605) NONCONFORMING USES The Agency is authorized, but not required, to permit an existing use to remain in an existing building in good condition if the use does not conform to the provisions of this Plan, provided that such use is generally compatible with existing and proposed developments and uses in the Project Area. The Agency may take actions, but is not required, to authorize additions, alterations, repairs or other improvements in the Project Area for buildings which do not conform to the provisions of this Plan where, in the determination of the Agency, such improvements would be compatible with surrounding Project Area uses and proposed development. (606) INTERIM USES Pending the ultimate development of land by developers and participants, the Agency is authorized to use or permit the use of any land in the Project Area for interim uses. Such interim use, however, shall conform to General Plan and zoning ordinance, and all other state and local,building-codes, guidelines, or specific plans as they now exist or are hereafter amended. (607) GENERAL CONTROL AND LIMITATIONS All real property in the Project Area is hereby made subject to the controls and requirements of this Plan. No real property shall be subdivided, developed, redeveloped, rehabilitated, or otherwise changed after the date of the adoption of this Plan except in conformance with the goals and provisions of this Plan and the regulations and requirements of the General Plan and zoning ordinance, and all other state and local building codes, guidelines, or master or specific plans as they now exist or are hereafter amended. The land use controls of this Plan shall apply for the periods set forth in Section 1000 below. The type, size, height, number, and use of buildings within the Project Area will be controlled by the General Plan and applicable zoning ordinance, and all other state and local building codes, guidelines, or master or specific plans as they now exist or are hereafter amended. (608) New Construction All construction in the Project Area shall comply with all applicable State and local laws in effect from time to time. In addition to the City land use regulations and requirements in the Project Area, additional specific performance and development standards may be adopted by the Agency to control and direct improvement activities in the Project Area. (609) Rehabilitation Any existing structure within the Project Area which the Agency enters into an agreement for retention and rehabilitation shall be repaired, altered, reconstructed, or rehabilitated in accordance with the applicable law s 14 33 GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT and in such a manner that it will meet the following requirements: be safe and sound in all physical respects, be attractive in appearance, and not detrimental to the surrounding uses. (610) Number of Dwelling Units The General Plan shall regulate the total number of dwelling units in the Project Area. As of the date of adoption of the Ordinance amending this Plan, there are approximately 4,458 dwelling units in the Project Area. (611) Open Space and Landscaping The approximate amount of open space to be provided in the Project Area is the total of all areas so designated in the General Plan and zoning ordinance, and all other state and local building codes, guidelines, or specific plans as they now exist or are hereafter amended, and those areas in the public rights-of-way or provided through site coverage limitations on new development as established by the City and this Plan. Landscaping shall be developed in the Project Area to ensure optimum use of living plant material in conformance with the standards of the City. (612) Limitations on Type, Size, Height, Number, and Proposed Use of Buildings The limits on building intensity, type, size, height, number, and proposed use shall be established in accordance with the provisions of the General Plan and zoning ordinance, and all other state and local building codes, guidelines, or master or specific plans as they now exist or are hereafter amended. (613) Signs All signs shall conform to the requirements of the City. Design of all proposed new signs shall be subject to the review of the City and any additional standards that may be adopted by the Agency to implement the goals of this Plan. (614) Utilities The Agency, in conformity with the City municipal code and City policies, shall require that all utilities be placed underground whenever physically possible and economically feasible. (615) Subdivision of Parcels No parcels in the Project Area, including any parcel retained by a participant, shall be consolidated, subdivided or re-subdivided without the approval of the City. (616) Variations The Agency is authorized to permit variations from the limits, restrictions, and controls established by this Plan. In order to permit any such variation, the Agency must determine all of the following: The application of certain provisions of this Plan would result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships inconsistent with the general purposes and intent of this Plan. There are exceptional circumstances or conditions applicable to the property or to the intended development of the property, which do not apply generally to other properties having the same standards, restrictions, and controls. Permitting a variation will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property or improvements in the area. 15 3Z GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT Permitting a variation will not be contrary to the objectives of this Plan. No such variation shall be granted other than a minor departure from the provisions of this Plan. In permitting any such variation, the Agency shall impose such conditions as are necessary to protect the public health, safety, and welfare, and to assure compliance with the purposes of this Plan. (617) DESIGN FOR DEVELOPMENT One of the objectives of this Plan is to create an attractive and pleasant environment in the Project Area. Therefore, such plans shall give consideration to good design, open space, and other amenities to enhance the aesthetic quality of the Project Area. The Agency shall not approve any plans that do not comply with this Plan except as permitted by Section 616 of this Plan. Within the limits, restrictions, and controls established in this Plan, and subject to the provisions of Sections 601 and 607 herein, the Agency is authorized to establish land use, heights of buildings, land coverage, setback requirements, design criteria, traffic circulation, traffic access, and other development and design controls necessary for proper development of both private and public areas within the Project Area. No new improvement shall be constructed and no existing improvement shall be substantially modified, altered, repaired, or rehabilitated except in accordance with this Plan and any such controls approved by the Agency. In the case of property, which is the subject of a Disposition and Development Agreement or an Owner Participation Agreement with the Agency, such property shall be developed in accordance with the provisions of such Agreement. (618) BUILDING PERMITS Any building permit that is issued for the rehabilitation or construction of any new building or any addition, construction, moving, conversion, or alteration to an existing building in the Project Area from the date of Jadoption of this Plan must be in conformance with the provisions of this Plan, any design for development adopted by the Agency, any restrictions or controls established .by resolution of the Agency, and any applicable participation or other agreements. SECTION VII. (700) METHODS FOR FINANCING THE PROJECT (701) GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED FINANCING METHODS Upon adoption of this Plan by the City Council, the Agency is authorized to finance implementation of this Plan with assistance from local sources, the State and/or the federal government, property tax increment, interest income, Agency bonds, donations, loans from private financial institutions, or any other legally available source. The Agency is also authorized to obtain advances, borrow funds, issue bonds or other obligations, and create indebtedness in carrying out this Plan. The principal and interest on such-indebtedness may be paid from tax increment revenue or any other funds available to the Agency. Advances and loans for survey and planning and for the operating capital for administration of this Plan may be provided by the City until adequate tax increment revenue or other funds are available to repay the advances and loans. The City or other public agency, as it is able, may also supply additional assistance through issuance of bonds, loans and grants, and in-kind assistance. Any assistance shall be subject to terms established by an agreement between the Agency, City, and/or other public agency providing such assistance. The Agency may issue bonds or other obligations and expend their proceeds to carry out this Plan. The Agency is authorized to issue bonds or other obligations as appropriate and feasible in an amount sufficient to Finance all or any part of Plan implementation activities. The Agency shall pay the principal and interest on bonds or other obligations of the Agency as they become due and payable. ®; w 16 35 GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT (702) TAX INCREMENT REVENUE For the purposes of the collection of property tax revenue pursuant to this Plan, the effective date of the ordinance shall mean and refer to: Original Area: October 27, 1979, which is 30 days following adoption of the Ordinance No. 25 on September 27, 1979 Added Area: August 15, 1981, which is 30 days following adoption of Ordinance No. 52 on July 15, 1981. All taxes levied upon taxable property within the Project Area each year by or for the benefit of the State, County, City, district, or other public corporation (hereinafter called "Taxing Agency" or"taxing agencies") after the effective date of the ordinance, shall be divided as follows: 1. That portion of the taxes which would be produced by the rate upon which the tax is levied each year by or for each of said Taxing Agencies upon the total sum of the assessed value of the taxable property in the Project Area as shown upon the assessment roll used in connection with the taxation of such property by such Taxing Agency, last equalized prior to the effective date of the ordinance, shall be allocated to and when collected shall be paid to the respective Taxing Agencies as taxes by or for said Taxing Agencies on all other property are paid (for the purpose of allocating taxes levied by or for any Taxing Agency or Agencies which did not include the territory in the Project Area on the effective date of the ordinance but to which such territory has been annexed or otherwise included after such effective date, the assessment roll of the County last equalized on the effective date of the ordinance shall be used in determining the assessed valuation of the taxable property in the Project Area on said effective date). 2. That portion of said levied taxes each year in excess of such amount shall be allocated to and when collected shall be paid into a special fund of the Agency to pay the principal of and interest on loans, monies advanced to, or indebtedness (whether funded, refunded, assumed, or otherwise) incurred by the Agency to finance or refinance, in whole or in part, the Project and this Plan. Unless and until the total assessed valuation of the taxable property in the Project Area exceeds the total assessed value of the taxable property in the Project Area as shown by the last equalized assessment roll referred to in paragraph (1.) hereof, all of the taxes levied and collected upon the taxable property in the Project Area shall be paid to the respective Taxing Agencies. When said loans, advances, and indebtedness, if any, and interest thereon, have been paid, all monies thereafter received from taxes upon the taxable property in the Project Area shall be paid to the respective Taxing Agencies as taxes on all other property are paid. 3. That portion of the taxes in excess of the amount identified in paragraph (1.) above which is attributable to a tax rate levied by a Taxing Agency for the purpose of producing revenues in an amount sufficient to make annual repayments of the principal of and interest on any bonded indebtedness for the acquisition or improvement of real property shall be allocated to, and when collected shall'be paid into, the fund of that Taxing Agency. This paragraph (3.) shall only apply to taxes levied to repay bonded indebtedness approved by the voters on or after January 1, 1989. The Agency is authorized to make pledges as to specific advances, loans and indebtedness as appropriate in carrying out the Project. The portion of taxes allocated and paid to the,Agency pursuant to subparagraph (2.) above is irrevocably pledged to pay the principal of and interest on loans, monies advanced to, or indebtedness (whether funded, refunded, assumed, or otherwise) incurred by the Agency to finance or refinance, in whole or in part, the redevelopment program for the Project Area. (703) AGENCY BONDS The Agency is authorized to issue bonds and other obligations from time to time, if it deems it appropriate to do so, in order to finance all or any part of Plan implementation activities. ey 17 3E GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT Neither the members of the Agency nor any persons executing the bonds are liable personally on the bonds or other obligations by reason of their issuance. The bonds and other obligations of the Agency are not a debt of the City, County, or the State; nor are any of its political subdivisions liable for them; nor in any event shall the bonds or obligations be payable out of any funds or properties other than those of the Agency; and such bonds and other obligations,shall so state on their face. The bonds and other obligations do not constitute an indebtedness within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory debt limitation or restriction. (704) OTHER LOANS AND GRANTS Any other loans, grants, guarantees, or financial assistance from the federal government, the State, or any other public or private source will be utilized, if available, as appropriate in carrying out this Plan. In addition, the Agency may make loans as permitted by law to public or private entities for any of its redevelopment purposes. (705) REHABILITATION LOANS, GRANTS,AND REBATES To the greatest extent allowed by State Law, the Agency and the City may commit funds from any source to rehabilitation programs for the purposes of loans, grants, or rebate payments for self-financed rehabilitation work. The rules and regulations for such programs shall be those which may already exist or which may be developed in the future. The Agency and the City shall seek to acquire grant funds and direct loan allocations from State and federal sources, as they may be available from time to time, for the carrying out of such programs. SECTION Vill. (800) ACTIONS BY THE CITY The City shall aid and cooperate with the Agency in carrying out this Plan and shall take all reasonable actions necessary to ensure the continued fulfillment of the purposes of this Plan and to prevent the recurrence or spread in the Project Area of conditions of blight. Actions by the City may include, but shall not be limited to, the following: 1. Institution and completion of proceedings for opening, closing, vacating, widening, or changing the grades of streets, alleys, and other public rights-of-way, and for other necessary modifications of the streets, the street layout, and other public rights-of-way in the Project Area. Such action by the City shall include the requirement of abandonment and relocation by the utility companies of their operations in public rights-of-way as appropriate to carry.out this Plan, provided that nothing in this Plan shall be deemed to require the cost of such abandonment, removal, and relocation to be borne by others than those legally required to bear such costs. 2. Institution and completion of proceedings necessary for changes and improvements to publicly- owned parcels and utilities in the Project Area. 3. Performance of the above and of all other functions and services relating to public health, safety, and physical development normally rendered in accordance with a schedule which will permit the redevelopment of the Project Area to be commenced and carried to completion without unnecessary delays. 4. Imposition, whenever necessary and applicable, of appropriate design controls within the limits of this Plan in the Project Area to ensure proper development and use of land. 5. Provisions for administration/enforcement of this Plan by the City after completion of development. " •r 18 37 GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT 6. The undertaking and completion of any other proceedings necessary to carry out the Project. 7. The expenditure of any City funds in connection with redevelopment of the Project Area pursuant to this Plan. 8. Revision of the City zoning ordinance, adoption of master or specific plans or execution of statutory development agreements to permit the land uses and facilitate the development authorized by this Plan. SECTION IX. (900) ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT Upon adoption, the administration and enforcement of this Plan or other documents implementing this Plan shall be performed by the City and/or the Agency, as appropriate. The provisions of this Plan or other documents entered into pursuant to this Plan may also be enforced by litigation or similar proceedings by either the Agency or the City. Such remedies may include, but are not limited to, specific performance, damages, re-entry onto property, power of termination, or injunctions. In addition, any recorded provisions, which are expressly for the benefit of owners of property in the Project Area, may be enforced by such owners. SECTION X. (1000) PLAN LIMITATIONS The following financial and time limitations shall apply to this Plan: (1001) AMOUNT OF CUMULATIVE TAX INCREMENT REVENUE The portion of taxes divided and allocated to the Agency for the Project Area pursuant Section 33670 of the Redevelopment Law shall not exceed a cumulative total of Two Hundred and Twenty Five Million Dollars ($225,000,000), net of payments made pursuant to fiscal mitigation agreements between the Agency and certain affected taxing entities. (1002) AMOUNT OF BONDED INDEBTEDNESS OUTSTANDING AT ANY ONE TIME The amount of bonded indebtedness, to be repaid in whole or in part from the taxes allocated to the Agency pursuant to Section 33670 of the Redevelopment Law, which can be outstanding at one time, shall hot exceed $75 million. (1003) TIME FRAME TO INCUR INDEBTEDNESS The previous time limits to incur debt in the Original Area and Added Area were rescinded by Ordinance No. 212 on July 22, 2004; as such there are no time limits for incurring debt. (1004) DURATION OF THIS PLAN Except for the nondiscrimination and non-segregation provisions of this Plan, and recorded covenants implementing the same, which shall remain in effect in perpetuity, and except as otherwise expressly provided herein, the provisions of this Plan shall be effective, and the provisions of other documents formulated pursuant to this Plan shall be effective until September 27, 2022 for the Original Area and July 15, 2024 for the Added Area. •. 19 3E GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT After the expiration of the effective term of the Plan, the Agency shall have no authority to act pursuant to the Plan except to pay previously incurred indebtedness and to enforce existing covenants or contracts. However, if the Agency has not completed its housing obligations pursuant to Section 33333.8 of the Redevelopment Law, the Agency shall retain its authority to implement requirements under 33333.8, including the ability to incur and pay indebtedness for this purpose, and shall use this authority to complete these housing obligations as soon as is reasonably possible. (1005) TIME FRAME TO COLLECT TAX INCREMENT REVENUE Except as otherwise provided herein or by Redevelopment Law, the time limitation for the receipt of tax increment and the payment of indebtedness with the tax increment pursuant to Section 33670 of the Redevelopment Law, shall be September 27, 2032 for the Original Area and July 15, 2034 for the Added Area. SECTION XI. (1100) PROCEDURE OF AMENDMENT This Plan may be amended by means of the procedure established in Sections 33450-33458 of the Redevelopment Law or by any other procedure hereafter established by law. 20 39 GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT EXHIBIT A-PROJECT AREA MAP GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA EXHIBIT A �CENTE� • Legend �,•. ;i; iFi%u', -t'?•5, r' r N R QGrand Terrace Redevelopment Project Area .' - c:,,',<s"„,v ie•',' ,(� �^� ®Original Area ' Added Area / t ;,_y "[• S xr,': �j,,._. ..,t �' '9 SEA - 9�• "� .S.•�_ —.:Lax - 'Note. The Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Project Area boundary comprises the entire City boundary.xF. 0 0.125 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 Miles °`✓ Sources:City GIS Department and Melroscan •' 21 r ' n GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT EXHIBIT B—LEGAL DESCRIPTION As revised by Amendment No. 2 adopted by City Council Ordinance No. 52 on July 15, 1981, the boundaries of the Project Area are described as follows: That portion of Townships 1 and 2 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Meridian, in the County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the West line of Terrace Avenue with the Westerly prolongation of the center line of Walnut Avenue, said point being also in the existing city limits of Colton; Thence leaving said city limits Westerly along said prolongation of the center line of Walnut Avenue to the center line of the Atchison,Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad; Thence Northerly along said center line to the existing city limits of Colton; Thence Easterly along said city limits and continuing along said city limits following all of its various courses to the West line of Lot 2, Subdivision of the Poole Tract, as per map recorded in Book 11 of Maps, page 40, records of said County; Thence leaving said city limits Southerly along said West line of Lot 2 to the center line of the Gage Canal; Thence Easterly along said center line to the South line of said Poole Tract; Thence Easterly along said South line to the existing city limits of Colton; Thence Southwesterly along said city limits and continuing along said city limits, following all of its various courses to the San Bernardino and Riverside County line; Thence leaving said city limits Westerly along said county line to the existing city limits of Colton; Thence Northeasterly along said city limits and continuing along said city limits, following all of its various courses,to the POINT OF BEGINNING, and; r i That portion of Section 31, Township 1 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Meridian and Section 6, Township 2 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Meridian, in the County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as follows: Beginning at a point in the existing city limits of Grand Terrace, said point being the intersection of the West line of Terrace Avenue with the Westerly prolongation of the center line of Walnut Street, said point being also in the existing city limits of Colton; Thence Southerly along said city limits of Colton to the Easterly prolongation of the center line of Palm Avenue; Thence leaving the city limits of Colton Westerly along said prolongation and center line to a point which is Easterly 287.39 feet from the center tine intersection of Palm and Rosedale Avenues, said point being also the Northerly prolongation of the East line of Parcel Map No. 844, as per map recorded in Book 8 of Parcel Maps, page 86, records of said County; Thence South 100 50' 50" West, along said prolongation and East line, a distance of 313.72 feet to the Southeast corner of Parcel 2, said Parcel Map No. 844; Thence West 286.69 'feet along the South line of said Parcel 2 and its prolongation to the center line of Rosedale Avenue, said point being also in the existing city limits of Colton; Thence Northerly along said city limits and continuing along said city limits, following all of its various courses, to the center line intersection of Litton and Rosedale Avenues; Thence Easterly along said center line of Litton Avenue, a portion of which is in the city limits of Colton, and its prolongation to the existing city limits of Grand Terrace; Thence Southerly and Easterly along said city limits to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Contains approximately 2,255.66 acres. _ 22 41 F GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT STATEMENT AND DESCRIPTION OF LAND WITHIN THE ORIGINAL AREA i Within the Project Area as described above, the boundaries of the Original Area are described as follows: Area 1 i A ,portion of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 34, Township 1 .South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Meridian and a portion of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 3, Township 2 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Meridian, County of'San Bernardino, State of California, more particularly described as follows: i BEGINNING at the Southwest Corner of Lot 5, Tract 6311, as recorded in Map Book 94, Pages 18 and' 19 of Maps as recorded in the Office of the Recorder, County of San Bernardino, said point also being the Intersection of Sections 3 and 4, Township 2 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Meridian and Sections 33 and 34, Township 1 South, Range 4 West; thence South along the Easterly boundary of said Section 4 1530 feet to a point, said point being on the City boundary of.the City of Colton; thence East, North and West along the City limits of the City of Colton, through all its various courses to a point, such point also being the Northwest corner of Lot 37, Tract 6610, as recorded in Map Book 88, Pages 7 and 8 of Maps, County of San Bernardino; thence West 827.76 feet to a point; thence North 38.40 feet to a point; thence 556.50 feet to a point, said point also being on the Easterly line of Section 33, Township 1 South, Range 4 West; thence South 100 feet along said Easterly line to a point, said point being the most Northerly pointkof Lot 15, Tract 6311, as recorded in Map Book 94, Pages 18 and 19 of Maps, Office of County Recorder, San Bernardino County; thence Southeast, South and West along the Easterly and Southerly-limits of Tract 6311, to the point of beginning. Area 2 i That portion of Lots 1 to 6 inclusive and Lots 15 to 18 inclusive of Hermosa Rancho, in the County!of San Bernardino, State of California , as per map recorded in Book 13 of Maps, Page 25, Records of said County, and a portion of Lots 9 and 10, Dixon Tract, in the City of Grand Terrace, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 13 of Maps, Page 8, in the office of the County Recorder;of said County, and that portion of the West 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 4, Township 2 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Meridian according to the Official Plat there-of, described as follows: j i BEGINNING at the Northeast corner of Lot 19, Tract 5921, as per map recorded in Book 74, Pages 62 and 63 of Maps, Records of said County, such point also being the intersection of the Southerly right-of- way line of Palm Avenue, 66 feet wide, and the Westerly right-of-way line of Canal Drive, 48 feet wide; thence Southerly and Westerly along the Westerly right-of-way of said Canal Drive to the intersection of the Westerly right-of-way of Canal Drive and the Northerly right-of-way of DeBerry Street, said point also being the Southeasterly comer of Lot 10, Tract 9545, as per map recorded in Book 132, Pages 51 and 52 of Naps, Records of said County; thence Southeasterly to the Northeast corner of Lot 45, Tract 9625, as per map recorded in Book 145, Pages 94 and 95 of Maps, Records said County, said point also .being at the intersection of the Westerly right-of-way line of Canal Drive and the Southerly right-of-way line of DeBerry Street, 66 feet wide; thence West along said Southerly right-of-way line of DeBerry Street 796.45 feet to a point, said point also being the Westerly boundary of said Tract 9625; thence South along the West boundary of Tract 9625 on bearing of S 0° 12' 00" E a distance of 628.67 feet to a point; thence N 89° 46' 30'i E 1030.68 feet to a point, said point being on the North-South centerline of Section 4, Township 2 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Meridian; thence South along said centerline 661 feet to a point, said point being Ion the East-West centerline of Section 4, Township 2 South, Range 4 West; thence East along said centerline 1322 feet to a point, said point being on the East line of the Northeasterly Quarter of Section 4, Township,2 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Meridian;,thence North along said Easterly line of said Section 4 and its prolongation a distance of 2700 feet +/- to a point, said point being on the centerline of Palm Avenue,1166 feet wide, thence North and West along the Easterly and'Northerly boundaries and their prolongation of Tract 9483, as recorded in Map Book 135, Pages 80-82 of Maps, San Bernardino County, a distance of 1,659 feet, plus or minus to the centerline of Barton Road, 100 feet wide, thence Southerly and Westerly along said i •: 123 42 GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT centerline to its intersection with the centerline of Preston Street, 60 feet wide; thence Southerly along said centerline of Preston Street 890 feet, more or less, to a point, said point being the intersection of said centerline of Preston Street and the centerline of Palm Avenue, 66 feet wide; thence Easterly along said centerline of Palm Avenue 200 feet to a point; thence Southerly 33 feet to the point of beginning. Area 3 A portion of Lot 14,'Section 5, Township 2 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Meridian, according to Map Showing Lands of the East Riverside Land Company, as per plat recorded in Book 6 of Maps, Page 44, Records of County of San Bernardino, State of California, and more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the intersection of the East boundary of said Lot 14, and the Northerly right-of-way line of DeBerry Street, 66 feet wide; thence N 0° 07' 36"W along said East boundary of Lot 14 629.66 feet to a point, said point being the Northeast corner of said Lot 14; thence West along the Northerly boundary of said Lot 14 576.63 feet to a point, said point being the Northwesterly corner of said Lot 14; thence South along the West boundary of said Lot 14 629.76 feet to a point, said point being the intersection of the West boundary of Lot 14, and the Northerly right-of-way line of DeBerry Street, 66 feet wide; thence East along the Northerly right-of-way line of said DeBerry Street 577.47 feet to the point of beginning. Area 4 Being a portion o Lot 45, Section 5, Township 2 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Meridian, in the County of San Bernardino, State of California, Per Map of East Riverside Land Company, as Recorded in Book 6, Page 44 of Maps, Records of said County, and Parcel 2, of Parcel Map 3502 in the County of San Bernardino,,State of California, Per Map Recorded in Book 31, Page 43 of Parcel Maps, Records of said County, and more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the intersection of the Westerly line of Gage Canal right-of-way, 50 feet wide, and the Northerly right-of-way of Pico Street, 66 feet wide, thence N 43' 43' 57" E 197.41 feet; thence 117.94 feet through a curve concave Northwesterly and having a radius of 208.20 feet; thence N 11° 17' 03' E 390.51 feet, to a point, said point being at the intersection of the Southerly line of Tract 9251, as recorded in Map Book 129, Pages 59 and 60, of Maps, Records of San Bernardino County; thence West along said Southerly line of Tract 9251 and the Southerly line of Tract 9495, as recorded in Map Book 133, Pages 78 and 79 of Maps, Records of San Bernardino County, a distance of 1163.92 feet to a point; thence S 00° 03' 53" W 629.28 feet to a point, said point being on the Northerly right-of-way line of Pico Street, 66 feet wide; thence East along the Northerly right-of-way of said Pico Street 321.82 feet to a point; thence N 00' 00' 25" F 289.00 feet; thence S 89° 53' 02' E 139.00 feet; thence S 00' 00' 25"W 289.00 feet to the Northerly right-of-way line of Pico Street; thence East along the Northerly right-of-way line of Pico Street 436.98 feet to the point of beginning. Area 5 All that portion of Lot 29, East Riverside Land Company, in the County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per Map recorded in Book 6 of Maps, Page 44, Records of said County, described as follows: BEGINNING at the Southwest corner of said Lot 29, being the intersection of the North line of Van Buren Street, 66 feet wide, and the East line of Michigan Avenue, 66 feet wide; thence North 0° 00' 08" East along the East line of said Michigan Avenue a distance of 111.40 feet to the true point of beginning: thence North 89' 59' 08" East a distance of 355.0 feet; thence North 0° 00' 08" East a distance of 386.39 feet; thence North 890 59' 27" West a distance of 355.00 feet to the said East line of Michigan Avenue; thence South 0° 00' 08"West a distance of 386.54 feet to the true point of beginning. 24 43 GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT Area 6 A portion of Lot 3, Grand Terrace Tract, as recorded in Map, Book 11, Page 4 of Maps, San Bernardino County Recorder's Offices, and more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the intersection of tie Southerly lot line of said Lot 3, and the Easterly right-of-way of Gage Canal, 50 feet wide; thence East along said Southerly line of Lot 3, 1483 feet, more or less, to the Westerly right-of-way line of Mount Vernon Avenue, 66 feet wide; thence North, West and North along the Westerly right-of-way of Mount Vernon Avenue, 66 feet wide and 87 feet wide, 242.32 feet to a point; thence West along a line parallel to the Southerly lot line of said Lot 3, 612.20 feet to a point; thence North 190 50' 00"West 187.62 feet to a point; thence West along a line parallel to the Southerly lot line of Lot 3, 661.68 feet to the Easterly right-of-way of Gage Canal, 50 feet wide; thence South along the Easterly right-of-way line of Gage Canal 438.47 feet to the point of beginning. Area 7 A portion of the South 1/2 of Section 4, Township 2 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Meridian, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the intersection of the North - South centerline of Section 4, Township 2 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Meridian, and the dividing line between the Counties of Riverside and San Bernardino, thence North 0° 14' 41" East 810 feet to a point, said point being the true point of beginning; thence North 0° 14' 41" East 317.38 feet; thence South 89° 41' 32"West 239.00 feet to a point; thence North 0° 14' 41" East 227.65 feet; thence North 890 41' 32" East 295.3 feet; thence North 21' 04' 12" East 50.78 feet; thence North 100 04' 12" East 44.08 feet; thence North 29" 31'48"West 45.90 feet; thence North 32' 06' 48"West 295.63 feet; thence North 06" 56' 48"West 173.82 feet; thence North 29" 33' 49"West 120.25 feet; thence South 890 44' 12" West 488.5 feet.; thence South 00 15' 27' East 659.89 feet; thence South 0° 11' 02" West 683.10 feet; thence North 890 51' 42" East 260.33 feet; thence North 0° 08' 18" West 180.00 feet; thence North 30" 51' 23" East 122.53 feet; thence 96.89 feet through a curve concave Northeasterly end having a radius of 200 feet; thence 221.51 feet through a curve concave Southwesterly and having a radius 160 feet; thence North 790 33'22" East 83.46 feet to the point of beginning. 04 25 4� GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT EXHIBIT C—LISTING OF PROPOSED PUBLIC FACILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS Improvements to Project Area public infrastructure are intended to alleviate traffic congestion and improve public safety, remove costly impediments to development, and upgrade infrastructure to contemporary standards to stimulate private development. The proposed traffic/circulation improvement projects shall include, but are not limited to, roadways, landscape, street lights, pedestrian walkways, bridges, interchanges, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, parking, street widening, traffic signals, over or underpasses, utility undergrounding, bicycle paths, street medians,trails, and trolley crossings. The proposed sewer and drainage improvement projects shall include, but are not limited to, monitoring systems, sewer parallels, drainage, sewer lines, wastewater treatment facilities, flooding systems, floor control dikes, and sewer systems. The proposed utility and communication improvement projects shall include, but are not limited to, electrical distribution systems, natural gas distribution systems; cable TV and fiber optic communication systems,water distribution systems, and windbreaks. Further compliance with General Plan, zoning standards, and environmental review may be necessary for these proposals to come forward. Projects include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. Sanitary Sewer System Improvements: Regional Wastewater Control Facility Modification and Replacements Regional Wastewater Control Facility Plant Expansion Sanitary Pump Station Rehabilitation/Modification Sanitary Separation Sanitary System Deficiency Improvements Sanitary System Repairs Sanitary Telemetry Sludge Removal and Reuse/Disposal 2. Storm Drain Projects Storm Drain Alleviation-Repairs Storm Pump Station Rehabilitation Storm System Rehabilitation/Street Improvements Storm System Improvements Storm-water Telemetry 3. Street Projects Alley Abandonment 26 45 GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT Street Tree Planting Railroad Crossing Protection Street Construction and Replacement Sidewalk, Curb, and Gutter Steel Street Light Pole Replacement Street Light Installation Street Lighting Upgrade Street Name Sign Installation Street Repair Program Street Resurfacing Program Traffic Signal Control System Traffic Signals-Modification Traffic Signals-New Utility Underground Wheel Chair Ramps 4. Water Projects Central Control System Pipelines Project Service System Additions Service System Replacements Aqueducts Groundwater Monitoring Wells Water Supply-New Wells Water Supply Facilities-Well Rehab/Repair Water System Expansions Water Transmission Mains Water Treatment Equipment Well Replacement •; 27 4f GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT Well/Reservoir Site Improvements Minor Infrastructure Improvements 5. Public Facility Programs Roof Replacement Program Infrastructure Improvements Park Reconstruction and Construction Community Center Construction, Rehabilitation, and Expansion Pool Reconstruction and Construction Library Construction Repairs/Rehabilitation Play Equipment Replacements Recreational Facilities Construction and Reconstruction Tot Lots Full Replacements COMMUNITY FACILITIES The proposed community facilities, improvement projects shall include, but are not limited to, parks, open spaces, schools, school facilities, fire and police facilities, communication systems, libraries, fire protection, cultural centers, Community centers, city maintenance facilities, plazas, recreational facilities, playgrounds, and civic center (except city halls). Further compliance with General Plan, zoning standards, and environmental review may be necessary for these proposals to come forward. a 28 47 ... - - .- I M - 41 �j ..� � ::3111i.111i.".uw, ..r 51 \\Gji�i �p� {II�r: C-.Pr.■�i� `"�` Nlll,'C— ,��'� � �ii�i�i¢ii�it:. '�'w`s"•�iiix��''`�}�rl��l�� _ :i�Jtlli►✓a�� ,� � . p3'.F�� :3{' '""� Y:9� �� iC.r/��..x.► S/tl llil if �` a'/' ..r'.xS;S Pi E!�E:. xl�u, �'�'" 4as• i�.•r 1•r1.y•� �iaid�.L.►\Ila�ll�u::."u c;�' •„"' " .=,iiii::i::;�:11111r1xue.✓ �,rr L.L i �. � 7�V•.. ATTACHMENT 4 REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL 49 i -IT . CITY OF GRAND TERRACE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY o 22975 Barton Rd, Grand Terrace, CA RA i i i REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL On the proposed Amendment No. 6 to the • ` R'SG Redevelopment Plan for the Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Project March 9, 2010 ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP INC. www.webrsg.com 5( TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 PLAN AMENDMENT AND ADOPTION PROCESS 2 CONTENTS OF THIS REPORT 2 SECTION A: REASONS FOR AMENDING THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN 4 f PROJECT AREA LOCATION 4 Prior Amendments 4 Land Use 6 Urbanization Analysis 6 PROJECT AREA HISTORY&BACKGROUND 7 History 7 Current Conditions 7 REASONS FOR AMENDING THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN 7 Increasing The Tax Increment Limit g Increasing The Bonded Indebtedness Limit g Rescinding The Agency's Eminent Domain Authority 10 Extending The Duration Of The Redevelopment Plan 10 Replacing The Description Of Land Uses 11 Amended And Restated Redevelopment Plan 11 A DESCRIPTION OF SPECIFIC PROJECTS THE AGENCY MAY PURSUE&HOW POTENTIAL PROJECTS WILL ADDRESS CONTINUING REDEVELOPMENT OF THE PROJECT AREA 12 Non-Housing Fund 12 PROJECTS COSTS &OUTCOMES 15 SUMMARY 16 SECTION B: DESCRIPTION OF THE BLIGHTING CONDITIONS PRESENT IN THE PROJECT AREA, 17 INTRODUCTION 17 FINDINGS& METHODOLOGY 20 BLIGHTING CONDITIONS 23 Lack Of Necessary Commercial Facilities 23 Inadequate Public Improvements 25 Crime Rates 51 SECTION C: FIVE-YEAR IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 54 51 i I I TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION D: EXPLANATION OF WHY THE ELIMINATION OF BLIGHT IN THE PROJECT AREA CANNOT BE ACCOMPLISHED BY PRIVATE ENTERPRISE ACTING ALONE OR THROUGH OTHER FINANCING ALTERNATIVES OTHER THAN TAX INCREMENT FINANCING 55 SECTION E: f PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING, INCLUDING THE ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY OF THE PLAN AMENDMENT 58 ,INTRODUCTION 58 FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FROM CITY, STATE AND/OR THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT 58 LEASE OR SALE OF AGENCY-OWNED PROPERTY 59 I PARTICIPATION IN DEVELOPMENT 59 i PROPERTY TAX INCREMENT 59 BONDED DEBT, 60 OTHER AVAILABLE SOURCES 160 TAX INCREMENT REVENUE PROJECTIONS i60 Economic Feasibility Analysis 64 REASONS FOR THE ALLOCATION OF THE TAX INCREMENT '64 I - SUMMARY 66 SECTION F: METHOD OF RELOCATION .68 Statutory Requirements 68 Analysis 168 Relocation Policies And Procedures 168 Methods For Assuring Availability Of Relocation Housing 169 Relocation Payments J69 SECTION G: ANALYSIS OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAN i70 SECTION H: i i REPORT OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION 171 SECTION I: Y REPORT OF THE PROJECT AREA COMMITTEE 12 SECTION J: STATEMENT OF CONFORMANCE TO THE GENERAL PLAN 73 SECTION K: ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION �74 SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 74 I I I i - I I 5- TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION L: REPORT OF THE COUNTY FISCAL OFFICER 75 SECTION M: RELOCATION 76 Relocation 76 Traffic Circulation 76 Environmental Quality 76 Availability Of Community Facilities And Services 77 Effect On School Population And Quality Of Education 77 Property Taxes And Assessments 77 Low And Moderate Income Housing Program 77 SECTION N: SUMMARY OF AGENCY'S CONSULTATIONS WITH AFFECTED TAXING ENTITIES AND RESPONSE TO SAID ENTITIES CONCERNS REGARDING THE PLAN AMENDMENT 79 APPENDIX A: 80 FIVE-YEAR IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR THE GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA 53 INTRODUCTION The City of Grand Terrace Redevelopment Agency ("Agency') is proposing Amendment No. 6 to the Redevelopment Plan for the Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Project ("Amendment No. 6"). If adopted following a public hearing, Amendment No. 6 would modify time and financial limits in, as well as make modifications to, the Redevelopment Plan for the Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Project Area ("Redevelopment Plan") by: 1. Increasing the cumulative tax increment revenue limit in the Redevelopment Plan from $70 million to approximately $225 million (net of payments made pursuant to fiscal mitigation agreements between the Agency and certain taxing entities); 2. Increasing the limit on the amount of bonded debt that may be outstanding at any one time in the redevelopment plan from $15 million to approximately$75 million; 3. Extending, pursuant to California Community Redevelopment Law, Health and Safety Code Section 33000, et. seq. ("Redevelopment Law") Sections 33333.6(a), 33333.6(b), and 33333.6(e)(2)(C), the effectiveness of the Redevelopment Plan and time limit to collect tax increment revenue by the following time frames: a. Original Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Project Area ("Original Area")' — extending plan effectiveness from July 15, 2017, to September 27, 2022, and time limit to collect tax increment from July 15, 2027, to September 27, 2032; b. Area added by the first amendment to the Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Project Area ("Added Area")—extending plan effectiveness from July 15, 2017, to July 15, 2024, and time limit to collect tax increment from July 15, 2027,to July 15, 2034; 4. Rescinding the Agency's eminent domain authority within the Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Project Area ("Project Area"), effective immediately following the effectiveness of the ordinance adopting Amendment No. 6; 5. Replacing the description of land uses in the Redevelopment Plan (as previously contained in Section IV. Uses Permitted in the Project Area, pp. 33-42) with language that directly refers to the City's General Plan, zoning ordinances, and other applicable land use policies and standards, as they exist today or are hereafter amended; and 6. Amending and restating the Redevelopment Plan to incorporate the prior amendments into a single document. Amendment No. 6 is being proposed because the current time and financial limits will not allow the Agency to implement the projects and programs necessary to alleviate blight within the Project Area as described herein. It is estimated that the current financial limits of the Redevelopment Plan will only allow,the Agency to collect tax increment revenue until fiscal year 2021-13 (based on conservative projections of assessed value growth) and all of that revenue is already pledged to outstanding obligations. Without Amendment No. 6, the Agency will be unable to fund the projects and programs that are necessary to eliminate remaining blight. The increase in the bonded indebtedness limit and extension of the time limits for the Redevelopment Plan effectiveness and collection of tax increment are necessary to enable the Agency to issue bonds secured by future revenues to fund these projects and programs when they are needed, rather than waiting to collect sufficient revenue to fund them. Based on the revenue projections presented in Section D of this document, it would take the full duration of the extension of the time limits to the Redevelopment Plan, described above, for the Agency to collect sufficient revenue to complete the proposed projects listed in Section A of this document. The Redevelopment Plan will be changed by Amendment No. 6 to reflect the fact (qRSG - - SL REPORT T0 THE CITY COUNCIL A drnmNo0to ihe ... _ ��.. rrace�" .""""" that the Agency does not wish to retain its eminent domain authority and will rescind this authority via Amendment No. G. Rep|m�ngthe deourpUoncf land uses in the Redevelopment P|a-n' --aadeouhbedabove vioUmmdheRedevo|opmentP|anhoabyynunentw�hthe'Cih/m |onduoe policies and U need fbr�fudhor amendment of the Redevelopment Plan. - -'- ~ This document is the Report to Council ("Report"') on Amendment, No. G. It provides background on the Project Area and o comprehensive description of Amendment No. G. This Report is one of several documents prepared as popartofthe plan amendment pnooaum required by the Redevelopment Law. It is intended to provide the City of /�rnnd Terrace Redevelopment Agency's Board ("Agency Board") o'''d City [�ounoi| with inhznnoUonnonnemn|ngAmendment No. G. Pursuant Uo Sections 333- '- ond33457.1oftha -~_ Redevelopment Law, this Report has been prepared to accompany the proposed Amended —' ended and aototed with -- Redevelopment Plan prepared in connection �h Amendment No. S ("Amend and Rem Plan") aubmi�edbytheAgenoytothaCityCounoi|forconoidenoUonotthapub||nhearingondmentbd~~'^~ G. ` PLAN AMENDMENT AND ADOPTION PROCESS Throughout the plan amendment process, the City Council, the Agency Board. the Planning Commission of the City ofGrand Terrace ("Planning Commiooion^), the affected taxing agencies, State agencies, and the community are given enoppo�unih/tm study and comment on Amendment No.G. ' The Agency Board reviewed and adopted the Preliminary Rapbd . nd received the draft text of the Amended and Restated Plan on January 12. 2D1O. The Preliminary Report and draft Amended and Restated Plan were sent to affected taxing anUUem. the California Department ofHousing and Community Development, and the California Department of Finance. (The Preliminary Report was drafted to also act as the blight report by Section 33451.5(c) of the Redove|opmant Law, and was transmitted to these Gtobo Oap~dmanto on Jonuory21. 2010). The draft Amended and Restated k6deva|opment Plan' was also tnonomi°^~~~ to the Planning Commission. / ( ) Also, m Draft Environmental Impact Report has been prepared and circulated for revewin accordance with — the nuquiramna�oof the ��aiifomniaEnvironmental Quality A� m-. ThePnognamEnxinon ~nto| |mpact �{epo�for the City of Grand TennceGeneral Plan Update and Amendment No. Gbo the Redevelopment Plan for the Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Project was circulated on January 22 for - vv 45'daypub|ionevie period that expires on March 7. 2O1O. Amendment No. G and all supporting documents will,be considered by the Agency Board and City Council at aioint public hearing that is anticipated to occur in April 2010. All Project Area property owners and affectedtmxing agencies will receive notice of this public hearing-by mail and through the publication of public"notices in local newspapers. An ordinance adopting Amendment No. Gie anticipated boba considered in May uO1O. CONTENTS OF THIS REPORT The contents of this Report are presented in fourteen nocdono, which generally correspond to the subdivisions presented in Section 33352 of Redevelopment Law: The sections are as follows: Section A: Reasons for the Plan Amendment, Including a Description of the Proposed Projects and How Such Projects will Improve or Alleviate Blight in the Project Area Section B: A Description of the Physical and Economic Blighting Conditions Existing in the Project Area Section-C: Five-Year Implementation Plan Section }: Explanation of Why the Elimination of Blight in the Project Area Cannot be Accomplished by Private Enterprise Acting Alone or Through Other Financing Alternatives Other Than Tex Increment Financing Section1E: Proposed Method of Financing, Including the Economic Feasibility of the Plan Amendment RSG . -- - -_ - _- - _ - - - - _ - -- - 55 REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL :gym ndrrieni �G ri io+lu: F?edew:ir�prnent I'!tm for he r3rand T-)rrace(,ornm ;nity Redevelopment Prolpct Section F: Method of Relocation Section G: Analysis of the Preliminary Plan Section H: Report of the Planning Commission Section I: Report of Community Outreach Efforts Section J: Statement of Conformance to the General Plan Section K: Environmental Documentation Section L: Report of the County Fiscal Officer Section M: Neighborhood Impact Report Section N: Summary of the Agency's Consultations with Affected Taxing Entities and a Response to Said Entities' Concerns Regarding the Plan Appendix A: Five-Year Implementation Plan 5E SECTION A Reasons for Amending the Redevelopment Plan Redevelopment Law Section 33457.1 requires that when a redevelopment plan is amended, the reports and information required by Section 33352, to the extent,warranted by the amendment, shall be prepared and made available prior to the hearing. Section 33352 of the Redevelopment Law requires this Report describe the reasons for Amendment No. 6, a description of the specific projects proposed by the Agency, and a description of how these projects will improve or alleviate the persisting blighting 'conditions described in Section B of this Report. PROJECT AREA LOCATION The Project Area includes the entire city limits of the City of Grand Terrace. A map of the Project Area is provided as Exhibit A-1 on the following page. According to the City's General Plan, the Project Area is approximately 2,255 acres and is comprised of two parts: the 640-acre Original Area composed of seven non- contiguous areas established by City Council on September 27, 1979, by Ordinance No. 25, and the 1,615 acre Added Area which added the remainder of the City into the Project Area by an amendment adopted on July 15, 1981 by Ordinance No. 52. PRIOR AMENDMENTS The Redevelopment Plan for'the Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Project has previously been amended on five occasions since its adoption. Amendment No. 1 was adopted on March 20, 1980 by Ordinance No. 31, .to authorize the Agency to collect tax increment .revenue within the Project Area. Amendment No. 2 was adopted on July 15, 1981 by Ordinance No. 52 which added the rest of the City limits (approximately 1,615 acres) to the original Project Area boundaries, and adopted a new, amended Redevelopment Plan applicable to both the Original and Added Areas. Amendment No. 3 was adopted on July 22, 1999 by Ordinance No. 187 to authorize the use of eminent domain to acquire certain non-residential property for a 12 year period. To clarify the language and original intent of the Agency to make the tax increment,limit net of pass through payments, the-City Council adopted Amendment No. 4 by Ordinance No. 202 on September 12; 2002. Most recently, Amendment No. 5 was adopted on July 22, 2004, by Ordinance No. 212, which rescinded the previous time limit to incur debt making it essentially the same as the duration of the Redevelopment Plan and is dependent on the Agency's ability to collect tax increment to repay any incurred debt. Amendment No. 5 also extended the time limit of the effectiveness of the Redevelopment Plan (to July 15, 2017), and extended the time limit for payment of indebtedness and receipt of taxes (to July 15, 2027)for both the Original and the Added Areas. The current time and financial limits as contained in the existing Redevelopment Plan are shown on Table A-1 on the following page. 0 RSG 4 57 REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL Amenument No o to the Redevelopment Pion for Vir; Grand Terrace Community Recieve o.pi-rleni,P Ujoct GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA EXHIBIT A-1- r �� I VCEt" - }"i-e' '�:tT': ?•S.` �e Fwi:l";e�. .:..i:.:C..'`.;»Wiwi ,i kir Y vis =E "1 .5.l sr' t �yac Legend Gr nd Terrace Redeveloprmnt Proect Area OngirialAtea Added Area - •\_, V.t'. `r.. ��.• ,•k•-• .k.n".r e:tu 'r to .. '�"�'•' .otx� '�i:�� `G}}t - tvr!L',.'r.��. i -54,{"'- "`.y;°":' '�I`' "."p= . . .5� r,5" s •+I '•'1 a �fri: .,i • >' ;. .!0.;, t:.F" l::'' 'rat• :1•.E,•Sit'"fV ` �_ 1A IV Y._ •i; z` 'S'�' qt:.^' a t•^w !Y� +L _ e_ N Community Redevelopment boundary comprises the entire CI boundary.5 r 'Note The Grand Terrace C - Ry p ) y P City 0 0.125 0.25 0.5 0.75 1- '; Miles Sources:City G!S Department and Metroscan V M REPORT TO THE CITY COUNC0L .tnendnemNo 8uz /xoRedeveioon-eo F,ao for the ______ ___ __ � _ ��m��R�e��ouP , Current Time and Financial Limits Tau|ex-1 Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Project Area Type Original Area Added Area Plan Duration 7n5/20171 Establish Indebtedness Eliminated (' Receive Tax mnmmonVnopoyIndebtedness 7U5/2027/ EminontDomain 8/22/2011 Amount uf Bonded Indebtedness $15miUinn Amount of Net Tax Increment 1 CityCouncil and Redevelopment Agency approved Ordinance No.212 on July22,2004,in connection with Amendment No.5. Pursuant to SB 1045,(Statutes of 2003)the City Council mayextend byone year the term-of the Redevelopment and period to collect tax increment in return for making oo03'2OO4smAFpayment. Ordinance No.o1u also eliminated the time limit mincur debt. LAND USE The Project Area is primarily residential and undeveloped property. Table A-2 shows the types of land uses within the Project Area byaoreoge.' Land U Within Grand,Terrace Comm unity Redevelopment Project Area � \ Land U Single Family Residential 838.8 372% Multiple Family Residential 113.1 5.0Y6 Commercial 67.2 3oY6 |nduouio| 144.0 6.4% |nuWmduno| 322 1.4Y& Public 103.3 *.6Y6 OponGpouoxaoom 004.0 26.8Y6 Streets and Railroad Right-nf-vYay 353.0 15.O0/6 Total 22e56 1000Y6 Source:Administrative Draft Grand Terrace General Plan,1/17/2008. URBANIZATION ANALYSIS Because Amendment No. 8io not changing th� boundoheocf the Pr�e�Area, adeterminaUon as-to whe�ar the Project Area is predominantly urbanized is not required at this time. Such determinations were mode by the Agency when the Original Project Area and Added Project Area were established in 1979 and 1981. respectively. RSG ' 59 REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL No O to the fRedpvelonnlent�!nn kx iho i:rii :?fr8C8 Conur�.,nty i�^:C�?;E;iC':;it'8f1t Pr?-ject PROJECT AREA HISTORY & BACKGROUND HISTORY Development of Grand Terrace began with the construction of the Gage Canal in 1896 (the area was known as East Riverside at the time). This 22-1/2 mile canal, built at a cost of $2 million, brought water from the Santa Ana River marshlands below The Terrace. With plenty of irrigation water, Grand Terrace rapidly became an agricultural community featuring fine, quality citrus. However, the severe freeze of 1913 destroyed many groves. Walnuts, a hardier tree, were planted as replacements along with peaches as a quick-profit crop. In 1962, the Grand Terrace Chamber of Commerce was organized. From the very beginning, the Chamber was interested in preserving the local identity of the area, and therefore, was a strong supporter of cityhood. The city was officially formed November 30, 1978, when the City Council had its first meeting at Terrace Hills Middle School and became the 16th city in San Bernardino County. The 2,255-acre Project Area is comprised of two parts: an initial 640-acre Project Area established by City Council Ordinance No. 25 on September 27, 1979, and the remainder of the City which was placed into the Project Area by an amendment to the Redevelopment Plan, enacted by Ordinance No. 52, on July 15, 1981. As the entire City limits are located within the Project Area, the Agency can embark on infrastructure, economic development, affordable housing, and other initiatives to mitigate blight in the community. Redevelopment in the Project Area has assisted in the development of much of the City's public infrastructure, preservation of the community's supply of affordable housing and development of new affordable residential properties, and expansion of recreational and community facilities. The Agency provided funding for the renovation of Rollins Park, realignment and a traffic signal for the intersection of Iowa Avenue and Main Street, city street sign replacement, and acquisition of 60 acres of land for construction of a high school and commercial retail development. A description of additional Agency accomplishments is included in the Implementation Plan in Section C of this Report. CURRENT CONDITIONS Despite the Agency's efforts, the Project Area continues to suffer from physical and economic blighting conditions, including: ■ Lack of Necessary Commercial Facilities ■ Inadequate Public Improvements ■ Obsolete Design or Construction ■ Deteriorated and Dilapidated Buildings ■ High Crime Rate These blighting conditions are described in detail in Section B of this Report. Redevelopment is necessary to alleviate these blighting conditions. REASONS FOR AMENDING THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN Further redevelopment is necessary to address significant remaining blight within the Project Area. A lack of necessary commercial facilities in the Project Area force residents to travel outside the City to purchase needed goods and services. For example, there is currently only one grocery store, Stater Bros market, to serve the entire City/Project Area. The lack of necessary businesses also has a negative effect on general fund revenues as very little sales tax is generated by existing businesses and the small amount of sales tax currently collected is declining, according to the City's current budget. Vacant and undeveloped property in the southwestern portion of the Project Area remains due to inadequate public infrastructure and physical 6C ` REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL �nonUoeoNo0iu`*eRedave/opmentF"�nm,�te ................. - __ ______ �r�x Te Co Re conditions that hinder development, as well as the presence ofobsolete buildings that must be demolished Uefbno the,site can be reused. Deterioration-and dilapidation have rendered 'some buildings in the Project Area unsafe or unfit for use. The presence of numerous crime hobepobo in the western portion of the Project ' Area creates o burden on the rest of the community by demanding o disproportionate share of police and code enforcement resources. A detailed description of remaining blight is contained in Section B of this Report. AddiUono||y, it is anUmabod that the Agency will reach the current tax increment limit contained in the existing Redevelopment Plan in fiana| year 2012-13. After that point,the Agency will have no ability to collect additional box increment without an'omandmant to the Rodmve|o`' ent Plan. As shown in Exhibit A+2 on the \ following paga, the noobo'forpnojectm'ond programs to alleviate and/or alleviate blighting conditions over the life of the Redevelopment are eaUmotedot $30.9miU|on. However, the Agency may only collect $7G million in tax increment bebwaen,fiooa| years 2009-10 and 2012-13. leaving a deficit ofQ23.3 million. Amendment No. GwiU raise the exioUngtax increment limit bm $225 / iUionondenab|a the Agency bmcoUecd'tax increment ~~ revenues until Oaoo| year 2033-34. Amendment No. G is necessary to secure the financial as ~ oo the administrative tools that wiUenable the Agency bo implement proposed pn�eutonecessary for the ~ ~'''inedion of blight and carrying out the established goals of the Redevelopment Plan. ^ INCREASING THE TAX INCREMENT LIMIT The current limitation on the amount of tax increment revenue that may be allocated to the Agency |ooveo virtually no revenue for additional pnojecta and programs. The Agency will be unable to undertake any redevelopment activities unless this limit is increased. The coat of proposed projects, which total approximately o30.8 million (when 000to� for ongoing pn�e�a and programs are included), the ovoi|ob|a revenue (estimated ot '$7.G million) within the Redevelopment P|an'a current financial.limits, by approximately $23.3 million (not accounting for inOadon, financing or administration costs). --he' finaning ._ and adr�|niot�tioh,co�oare oppUad. the total cost ofremaining �n�o�e im estimated ot$44m'|�on''aee~~b|e /�4 ofdh� Repod). The exioUng Redeve|opment P1on pe- 'da theAoency bo coUant �'-'mi|`ion i'~bx - mcrommntgenen�edby the Pn�ectArea, net ofpoao1hnoughpoyme�e -mfectedb*xing - - i ''pursuant to reimbursement agreements. The existing Redevelopment,Plan also-establishestheUm -"-'/--~ increment (July 16. 2027 for both the,Original and Added Anoao, pursuant to - '''~ ~ ~~^~~^ ~~ described in Section E of this Report, � � aoUmobyd dh*� cumulative b�u increment �v Amendment '-'' ~/� ^~ � . e the Project �\rao voiU reach Mhie�7O million cap in fiscal yeor2U12-13, which is approximately 14 yea-- for to the time limit to ooUectax increment pursuant bo the existing Redevelopment Plan. -- '�� ExhibbA-2 on the following page iUuotrob*o this shortfall in revenue available to fund proposed projects and . on-going programs based onounert Redevelopment Plan Umitmand theestimated cost of proposed projects -and programs that will help eliminate blight. ' ' ` . . RSG _ - - - _ 8 61 REPORT TOTHE CITY COUNCIL \rrendn`anuNo 0/o die Redevo|upmont Plan bri|`e n dTo Co Reg | praject �� `�� `��` � " ""~~ ` A more detailed financial analysis is included in Section E of this Report. Increasing the limit on the amount'of tax increment the Agency may mdinct to $225 miUion, net of payments pursuant to fiscal mitigation agreements with affected taxing ogencieo, will ensure that mufficinrd funding may be received to fund proposed projects. � As described in Sections D and E of this Roport, the Agency will reach its current $TU million tax increment limit in fiaua| yeor2O12-13. Without Amendment No. G. the Agency can no longer collect tax increment from this point on. It is important to note that the Cib/o current revenue sources are not adequate to maintain o constant level of City-wide basic aen/ineo much ieoa fund public infrnotnuctune, developmental remediation, revitalization or affordable housing programs in the Project Area. In fact, o portion of annual redevelopment revenues are currently used to assist with funding the City'o community enhancement pnognomo, housing pnogromo, infrastructure pnojectm, and economic devo|opmant, planning and public works projects and programs. According to the Agency's fiscal year 2009-10 Statement of |ndebbadneuo, redevelopment revenues are contributing to approximately $800.000 to general fund costs. These costs are phmoh|yfor infrastructure improvements and staff time as City staff spends o significant amount of time on economic development and other programs that are related to redevelopment. If Amendment No. 6 is not adopted, the tax increment revenues, which act as an ongoing funding source that contributes to the costs-of many City promects and programs that assist in blight remediation,will cease to be collected, having a critical and significant impact on current City staffing levels and the continuation of many City services. INCREASING THE BONDED INDEBTEDNESS L|K4|T The Redevelopment Law requires that in order for on agency to collect tax increment revanuea, the agency must establish debt 0o justify to collection of such revenues. Bonds are nn economical method for the Agency to fund needed projects because the Agency can receive a lump-sum of revenues at o low interest nate'to fund needed projects. In oddiUon, bonded debt does not represent an additional burden on taxpayers orthe Qh/'n general fund. Without issuing bondn, redevelopment projects and programs would take decades to fund as the stream of tax increment revenue would have to be amassed prior to commencing these projects and programs. The Agency needs to increase the Redevelopment P|an'a bonded indebtedness limit in order to oouuro advanced funding to implement redevelopment projects in a timely manner. The current bonded RSG --- - - - - - '� — - 62 REPORT T0 THE CITY COUNCIL Aoxn ,jnemHo Gv:�epodo:aopment Plan for.he �rand �cnoo+ Cuonm on P 6, Project indebtedness limit is $15 million. Amendment No. Gwmu|d increase this limit to $75 million, commensurate with the increase /n the amount oftax increment that may be received.. Bonds give the '`enoymoximum financial capacity and flexibility to fund redevelopment projects at the time they are needed, rather than wait d ' for tax increment revenue to oonumu|ota over long period of time. Without uopocih/ — --ua additional debt, the Agency's ability to eliminate remaining blight in the Project Area will be aeveno|` hindered. Bonds and all other forms of Project ~--ec�Aooa indebtedness ono repaid with tax increment revenues n'---bed 'from the Project Area upto ten years after the effectiveness cf the Redevelopment Plan expires. The A"—ncy--''~nUy has$8.8 million cf outstanding bonded indebtedness. RESCINDING THE AGENCY'S EMINENT DOMAIN AUTHORITY As obybad previously, Amendment No. 3, adopted on July 22. 1999 by Ordinance No. 187, authorized the Agency's use of eminent domain to acquire certain non-residential property for a 12 year period The Agency's eminent domain authority is due to expire on Augunt22. 2011. Amendment No. G would also rescind and eliminate the current authority nfthe Agency to commence eminent domain within the Project Area. The Agency does not foresee the need to retain eminent domain in the Project Area as there are no plans to condemn property for redevelopment purposes at this time. The rescinding of this authority would be effective immediately following the effectiveness of the ordinance adopting Amendment No. 6. EXTENDING THE DURATION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN The Agency is proposing to extend the effectiveness of the Redevelopment Plan in the Original and Added Areas by the following time periods: ° Original Anee — Extend Plan effectiveness by five years from July 15. 2017 to Sopbomber27 2022, ~ ° Added Area— Extend Plan effectiveness by seven years from July 15, 2017 to July 15, 2024, and the duration to collect tax increment revenue within the Added Area to July 15, 2034. The existing Redevelopment Plan duration for both the Original and Added Areas is July 15. 2017 as established by Amendment No. 2. adopted on July 15. 1081. by Ordinance No. 52. Thioomendmentn'--dod the rest of the City limits (approximately 1,615 acres) to the original Project Area boundaries, and adopteda new, amended Redevelopment Plan applicable to both the Original and Added Areas. In 1993. the Redevelopment Lom/ was amended to oUovv existing redevelopment plans to have duration nf4O years from the do0o the project area (or added area) was edopbed, which would have allowed the Agency 0o amend the then-Redevelopment Plan to allow for a plan duration of September27. 2019. for the Original Area and July 15, 2021. Stabevvide, many redevelopment plans were amended to this longer duration, but in the Agency's oaoe, the constraining tax increment limit made such time limit extensions virtually uoe|000 without on increase in financial limits as proposed now with Amendment No. 6. Additionally, further changes to Section 33333.6of the Redevelopment Law in 2003 state that when a redevelopment agency makes payments to the county auditor for the oounh/e Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund, the redevelopment agency may amend o redevelopment plan to extend the time limit for the effectiveness of the redevelopment plan by one year for each annual payment that is made. The Agency has made such on 'un| poymento, but has only taken advantage of the first one-year extension with Amendment No. S. adopted by Ordinance No. 212 on July 22, 2004. ConoequenUy, the duration of the existing Redevelopment P|an'o effectiveness may be amended o second time for the Sbote'o taking of redevelopment funds by two additional years for both the Original and Added Areas. The effectiveness of the Amended Plan would therefore be o total of 43 years from the date the Original Area and Added Area were established, orto September 27. 2022. and July 14 2024. respectively. Redevelopment Low also allows redevelopment agencies to collect tax increment ' revenue for ten additional years beyond the effectiveness of redevelopment plan. With the extensions to the Plan effectiveness described above. Amendment No O establishes longer periods to collect tax increment R��(� - _ _ 1O 63 REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL Arnencirnent No 6 to the R_edeeaiopment P!an for the ;rar?d-Terrace C<)rniruniij f�!:deveioprnent Project revenue for the Original and Added Areas, to September 27, 2032 and July 14, 2034, respectively. Exhibit A- 3 below provides a visual representation of the methodology used to calculate the proposed amended Redevelopment Plan effectiveness time limits. Grand Terrace Project Area ExhibitA3 i Redevelopment Plan Duration Timellne 43YEAR DURATION j--} OriginalArea i P I 43 YEAR'DURATION j Added Area71 fr kti Y Time Limit per Amendment No.2,7/15/1981 W Time limit allowed under CRL Section 33333.6 for ERAF payments td Plan Duration after Amendment No.6 for Original Area Y Plan Duration after Amendment No.6 for Added Area I I Without the extension of the Redevelopment Plan duration described above, the Agency will not be able to undertake any of the proiects planned to eliminate blight in the Proiect Area (as described later in this Section A) that have`not already been completed. Additionally, the Agency's ongoing programs will cease and any City programs that rely on Agency funding (such as code enforcement and economic development) will lose that funding. Any blight in the Project Area as of the expiration date will remain until the City can-generate the necessary funds through other revenue sources. REPLACING THE DESCRIPTION OF LAND USES i The Agency needs to modify the description of land uses in the Redevelopment Plan to eliminate any conflicts between the Redevelopment Plan and the City's General Plan, zoning ordinance, or other applicable land use policies and standards. Currently, the Redevelopment Plan includes a list of the land uses allowed in the Project Area and the development standards associated with each land use. Any changes to the City's General Plan, zoning ordinance, or other applicable land use policies and standards could result in a conflict between the land uses and standards allowed by the City and the land uses and standards allowed by the Redevelopment Plan. The only way to change the land uses and standards allowed by the Redevelopment Plan is to amend it. By directly referring to the City's General Plan and land use policies and standards within the Redevelopment Plan, as they exist today or are hereafter amended, the Agency can eliminate the potential need to further amend the Redevelopment Plan to comply with the City's General Plan. AMENDED AND RESTATED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN The Agency is proposing an Amended and Restated Redevelopment Plan in order to incorporate the original Redevelopment Plan and all subsequent amendments into one document. All of the previous redevelopment plans and amendments will be amended and superseded by the proposed Amended and Restated Redevelopment Plan. RSG 64 REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL �vv�o^aotno6mmuRe�^�o;m:ntp� �o /t�a ' Gnond7eneceCumm m �� | a o, _� __-_______'_ _ _____ ______ w!�x «v�»p�*/o�v� _ Tob|eA+3 below shows the current time and financial limits of the existing Redevelopment P|on, as well as the limits proposed oo part of Amendment No. G. Current and Proposed Time and Financial Limits Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment ProjectArea Current Limit Type Original Area Added Area Plan Duration 7/15/2017 Establish Indebtedness Eliminated Amount of Bonded Indebtedness $15 million 11110 Amount of Net Tax Increment(i.e.,Tax Increment Cap) $70 million _ 'CityCoumd|nndRedevaopmentA0nnnyappmvadOrdinononNo212onJu|y22.2OO4.inconnnctionwdhAmondmerd No.5. Pursuant to SB 1045,(Statutes of 2003)the City Council may extend by one year the term of the Redevelopment and period to collect tax increment in return for making 2003-2004 ERAF payment Ordinance No.212 also eliminated the time limit uv incur debt. A DESCRIPTION OPSPECIFIC PROJECTS THE AGENCY MAY PURSUE&HOW POTENTIAL PROJECTS WILL ADDRESS CONTINUING REDEVELOPMENT OFTHE PROJECT AREA ' . The following identifies and dioouuuao unfunded projects the Agency may consider bo complete an o part of the revitalization eMbdo of the Project Area. Specific projects and programs anticipated from 2010 to 2014 are also identified in the Five Year Implementation Plan contained in Section C of this Report. NON-HOUSING FUND Proposed projects and programs require $25.3 million in funding from the non-housing fund, ors44 million after accounting for interest and administrative costs. These projects will provide,needed public improvements ' and infrastructure impnovemante, remadiabe physical characteristics impeding deve|opment, assemble inadequately-sized lots and encourage economic development in the Project Area. Proposed projects one described below; the cost |iubod next to each project is the amount anticipated before interest and administrative costs are added. Lack mf Necessary Commercial Facilities The following project is proposed to address this condition of blight in the Project Area. Commercial and Economic Development Program (s3million) In order to address the lack of necessary commercial facilities in the Project Area, the Agency will implement a Commercial and Economic Development Program to attract needed businesses to the Project Area, such aa grocery and drug stores. Specific Agency activities may include marketing existing properties to bring new businesses to Grand Tarneom, completing site improvements needed to attract appropriate businesses tothe Project Area and financial assistance to developers for site preparation. The majority of these activities will ba focused on the planned Town Center project along Barton Road. �� - ' `~`~ 12 65 REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL ananunemNu 6 Pww kx�ho ��ndT� �ceCom ��e�! ��P t _ ______ _-.... ____ ___ __- _ _-_-_-_ _ _��_-__ r�� _�2r�y��!ec- PubUcFmd|itiaaand |nfoaatruc±unm The following projects one proposed to remedy conditions of inadequate public improvements and infrastructure identified inSection B. Southwest Commercial Site ($7.4 million) In order for development of this vacant site to be economically feasible for private sector development, the City must undertake o number ofoff-site improvements adjacent to the site. These improvements include improving Von Buren Street and Pico Street to their full cross oaotiona, the extension of Commerce VVoy to Main Strnet, the installation of two tnsfOn signals where Michigan Street intersects with Von Buren Street and Pico Stnaot, the installation of storm drains along De Barry, Van Buren, and Pico Stneato, and the construction of retention basins adjacent to the site. |n addition tu the infrastructure needs, the wetland areas also act oao physical constrain to redeveloping the property. The wetlands areas will need to be retained onnite which limits the development area and potential of the Southwest Commercial Site. Without redevelopment invemtment, the residual value of the land after development would be much |aoo than half the cost of purchasing the land in the current real estate market(based on a comparison of estimated development costs and capitalized project value as shown in Exhibit B-3 and Exhibit B-4 to current market prices for undeveloped netai|, nommenoia|, and industrial land within the City). Development of this site will provide the City with additional sales and property tax revenue Uo fund essential City services. Main Street and Michigan Street Widening and Improvements (u4.6 million) When the Grand Terrace High School at the RayAbh| Jr. Educational Complex on Main Street near Taylor Street is complete the vehicle and traffic volume will increase significantly. To accommodate the increase in vehicular traffic and to provide safe and adequate pedestrian routes to the school site,the City plans to widen Michigan Street from Barton Rood to Main Street to its full cross-section, widen Main Street from Michigan Street to Taylor Street to its full cross section, and install a traffic signal at the intersection of Main Street and Michigan Street. The $4.6 million project cost is the funding gap remaining after the Colton Joint Unified School District (^CJUSD^) contribution to mitigate the infrastructure impact of the new school. Without redevelopment contribution, the City lacks the funds necessary to finance these improvements. Barton Road/Union Pacific Overhead Bridge ($5OU.0OO) This bridge immediately adjacent to the Project Area, while unnofe, is currently in use. Although the improvements are currently partially funded, this project requires a redevelopment contribution of$500,000 to close the funding gap. Additional Public Facilities and Infrastructure ($5million) Additional public improvement projects may be implemented that would aid current revitalization efforts and eliminate deficiencies in the existing infrastructure oyohoma in the Project Area. These improvements may inn|ude, but are not limited to, otreet, wmter, ubUty, uewar, porking, public facilities and other improvements to improve traffic flow, provide better access, increase public safety, and improve surrounding property values and attract investment from the private sector. By implementing this and other types of programs to address blighting conditions affecting the Project Area, the public sector will signal its confidence in the area and will provide a springboard for private investment and reinvestment. O600|atm Design or Construction The following project is proposed to remedy conditions of obsolete design or construction. [�� -- -- - - ------ -- - - - --- - - - - ' '- - . ..'^, 13 6E REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL Amendmeo/Nu6 tome Redo^elopmt.!ntPhnk`,,i`o _ ''rordTo a� Co«nn�� m 'P'�e��__-_ ___ - � �_ Highgnove Generation Station Demolition (cost bobadetermined) The Highgrove Generation Station in an obsolete power plant in the Project Area. It will, need to be demolished and any contaminants on the site will need to be namodiob*d before this property can be redeveloped. The DT8C in expected to close their investigation into the pnooenon cf any soil contamination in the near future, ooan estimate of the cost of this project/o unavailable at this time. Deterioration and Dilapidation Puruhomo/Rohobi|itato/Rena|e Program ($2.5million) ' The Agency will continue this ongoing program to acquire and rehabilitate dilapidated homes throughout the community. Once rehabilitation is complete, homes are sold to eligible low and moderate income households. The projected cost is based on using this program to rehabilitate approximately 15 homes during the remaining duration of the Redevelopment Plan. Home Improvement Loan Program ($3.1 million) This ongoing program provides low interest loans to fund minor rehabilitation expenses. It provides incentive for homeowners to repair damage or deterioration by providing |nvv interest loans to fund the repairs. The projected cost io based on providing loans to approximately 100 households during the remaining duration of the Redevelopment Plan. Commercial Improvement Grant Program (cost based on level of participation each year) This ongoing program io available bu property owners and/or business owners oaan economic incentive bo rehabilitate existing commercial structures. Implementation of the program is expected to eliminate blight, yield a stronger commercial pneoenue, and incn000a the likelihood of new business development. The program focuses on the exterior improvement of commercial bui/dinga, including new paint/stucco, new doors and windows, decorative awnings, nignage. landscaping and lighting. Commercial and Economic Development Program ($4.5million) This program is designed to encourage improvement ofcommercial properties and to encourage economic development throughout the Project Area. This program will include Agency assistance to property owners and businesses to upgrade properties and facilitate the redevelopment of blighted properties. These programs will address and/or eliminate blighting conditions such as deterioration and dilapidation. |noddiUon rehabilitating and modernizing the building stock in this area will also positively effect property values t- ` enhance the economic viability of commercial properties. Neighborhood Improvement Grant Program (cost booed on level of participation each year) The ongoing program grants upto $1.00O per household to purchase landscaping and irrigation materials for front yard improvements and exterior paint. The goal of this program in to reduce blight and property depreciation caused by deteriorated exterior point, poor front yard maintenance and the |onk of front yard landscaping. Though this program would not result in substantial rehabilitation to assist in meeting long-term affordable housing production goa|o, these efforts are critical to reducing the number nfdeteriorating and/or at-risk housing units in the City. Crime Rates Town Center Land Assembly($30O.O0O) The City has o 20-oore retail project planned on Barton Road that would provide o grocery store, reotounontm City |ibnory, and other retail uses in an area with a high crime rate. However, the project cannot proceed ` without Agency assistance to assemble all the land for the project.project. Completionvv Completion of this project would assemble R��[� - - - - --' - -- - - - - — - - 14 67 REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL ,Arne ndnient No v to?ne Rtidvvelopinent Flia? (or the Gr:f?d !`;i1 Ct',i.O R?(i Lf nlitf f?f,�.1PVeiC^n'21'lt �';()jac,t 14 vacant or under-utilized parcels into a coordinated retail commercial center which provides retail sales opportunities, and jobs. Bringing businesses and resources to the area would reduce vacancies and stimulate the local economy. HOUSING FUND The Agency's continuing housing fund projects require an estimated $216,000 annually. These projects include a home improvement loan program and the purchase, rehabilitation, and sale of homes to qualified low- and moderate-income households. Additionally, Amendment No. 6 would give the Agency the ability to fund additional housing projects to meet its inclusionary housing requirements. PROJECTS COSTS &OUTCOMES As shown previously in Exhibit A-2, Agency resources under current Redevelopment Plan limits are significantly less than the costs for projects and programs to remediate blight in the Project Area. It is estimated that the Agency will collect approximately $7 6 million in tax increment revenue until fiscal year 2012-13 when it is estimated that the cumulative tax increment limit of$70 million will be reached. However, as shown in Table A-4 below, after applying inflationary factors such as financing and administrative costs, the total non-housing cost of the redevelopment projects and programs needed to remediate blighting conditions is estimated at$44 million, and the total housing costs are $5.6 million, resulting in a grand total of $49.6 million in project and program costs. After applying the $7.6 million in tax increment revenues that may be collected until fiscal year 2012-13, the Agency will be left with a $42 million shortfall for funding the remaining project costs without Amendment No. 6. Unfunded Projects TableA-4 Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Project Area Direct Financing Administrative Total Project Cost Interest' Cost Cost Non-Housing Funds $ 25,264,936 $ 17,010,890 $ 1,780,000 $ 44,055,826 Public Infrastructure Southwest Commercial Site Improvements 7,400,000 7,071,943 740,000 15,211,943 Main Street widening and Improvements 1,600,000 1,529,069 160,000 3,289,069 Ntichigan Street Widening and Improvements 3,000,000 2,867.004 300.000 6,167,004 Barton Road/Union Pacific Overhead Bridge Improvements 500,000 477,834 50,000 1,027,834 Additional Public Infrastructure Projects 5,000,000 4,778,340 500,000 10,278,340 A6scellaneous Revitalization Programs Town Center Land Assembly 300,000 286,700 30,000 616,700 Highgrove Generation Station Demolition 2 - - - - Commercial Improvement Grant Program 2 - - Additional Commercial and Economic Development Programs 7,464,936 7,464,936 HousIngRinds $ 5,616,000 5,616,000 Ongoing Programs Purchase/Rehabilltate/Resale Program 2,496,000 Home Improvement Loan Program 3,120.000 Neighborhood Improvement Grant Program 2 - Total Costs(Housing and Non-Housing 49,671,826 Total Revenues through 2012-13(without Amendment No.6) (7,635,872) Total Unfunded Projects $ 42,035,954 $ 42,035,954 1 Pssurvs 25}ear fling w W p,r .ga rage. 2 Cons to to aeiermriea. RSG 15 6F REPORT TOTHE CITY COUNCIL Annenmnv,ntMo 6varhe Redevelopment Plan for mo _____ ___.........................._.....____.............______Gm rid ren�u*Co��num«yRese,ompmeo �n*m SUMMARY Proposed non-housing projects require $44 million in funding, after accounting for financing interest and administrative costs, and housing projects require $5.Gmillion (because the housing projects are ongoing pvognamm, no financing is assumed). The proposed projects will alleviate blight by providing public infrastructure improvemento, nemedioUng physical conditions that hinder development, and improving commercial and neoidenUa| prope�iem . \ RS[� --- -- - - — - - - - -- ' � ' 18 69 SECTION B Description of the Blighting Conditions Present in the Project Area INTRODUCTION Over the past 30 years, the Agency has implemented a number of projects and programs to alleviate and address blighting conditions identified at the time the redevelopment plans for the Original and Added Areas were adopted. These projects have remediated infrastructure deficiencies, improved or removed dilapidated, deteriorated, and substandard structures, and implemented housing programs to improve, preserve and increase the supply of affordable housing in the Project Area. During the last five years, specific projects that have been completed in the Project Area included the following: • High School and Public Infrastructure Improvements. Through a partnership with the CJUSD, property was assembled for the new Grand Terrace High School at the Ray Abril Jr. Educational Complex. A water line was also relocated and water line easements were transferred to the City of Riverside for maintenance. • Property Acquisition for Project Site Assembly. Property acquisition for both the freeway-oriented 100-acre project (former Outdoor Adventure Center) and the Town Square commercial project have been underway in partnership with private development partners. • Commercial Improvement Grant Program. This program is available to property owners and/or business owners as an economic incentive to rehabilitate existing commercial structures. Two shopping center rehabilitation projects are anticipated for fiscal year 2009-10. • Design plans to underground overhead utility lines along a segment of Barton Road. • Design of community signs to strengthen civic and cultural functions. • Property acquisition along Barton Road and demolished abandoned on-site structures. • Property acquisition along Vista Grande Avenue and demolished abandoned on-site structures for a future park facility. • Updated the Barton Road Specific Plan design policies. • Initiated design to reconstruct Grand Terrace Road,west of the 1-215. • Preliminary design activities for a new baseball field. • Blue Mountain Senior Villas and Senior Center. This project includes the construction of 120 affordable rental apartment units, a 7,000 square foot senior center, and a 2-acre passive park. The project will house 72 very low income, 36 low income, and 12 moderate income senior households. • Neighborhood Improvement Grant Program. Forty-five grants of up to $1,000 per household have been made to purchase landscaping and irrigation materials for front yard improvements and exterior paint. • Canal Street Project. The Agency is continuing to work with a developer to construct approximately 23 rental units affordable to low income families, and purchased property in the R3 (Medium Density) zoning district. RSG _.. _. _. 17 70 REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL ',r,endlnent No 6 to die flan for the C;r,ind errace(',omrnundy 2edeveloprnen'Pro: e:ct As a result of the previous projects and programs, including those recent projects shown above, many properties in the Project Area are no longer blighted. These non-blighted parcels are still necessary to be included in the Project Area because the blighted areas alone do not generate sufficient revenue to fund the projects and programs necessary to eliminate the remaining blight in the Project Area. The entire Project Area will benefit from the removal of the remaining blight. While the Agency has successfully alleviated blight in much of the Project Area, physical and economic blighting conditions still exist—primarily concentrated in the western portion of the Project Area. A lack of necessary commercial facilities, such as grocery stores, plagues the Project Area and the City. Inadequate public streets and storm drain improvements impair the development of the Southwest Commercial Site (described later in this report)and will lead to high traffic volume and unsafe pedestrian access when the new high school is completed on Main Street. Obsolete design and construction is most evident in the closed Highgrove Generation Station but is also present in other buildings in the western portion of the Project Area. There are deteriorated and dilapidated buildings in the western portion of the Project Area that are unfit or unsafe for use. In addition, certain hotspots of crime in the Project Area are a burden on the City by demanding a disproportionately large portion of public safety resources. The blighting conditions remaining in the Project Area include: • Lack of Necessary Commercial Facilities • Inadequate Public Improvements • Obsolete Design or Construction • Deteriorated and Dilapidated Buildings • High Crime Rates The Redevelopment Plan was adopted in 1979 to address the blighting conditions present in the Project Area as defined by Redevelopment Law at that time. The Redevelopment Plan was amended in 1981 to add the remainder of the City to the Project Area. The definition of a blighted area at the time the Redevelopment Plan was adopted was as follows (Redevelopment Law Section numbers provided): 33031. A blighted area is characterized by the existence of buildings and structures, used or intended to be used for living, commercial, industrial, or other purposes, or any combination of such uses, which are unfit or unsafe to occupy for such purposes and are conducive to ill health, transmission of disease, infant mortality,juvenile delinquency, and crime because of any one or a combination of the following factors: (a) Defective design and character of physical construction. (b) Faulty interior arrangement and exterior spacing. (c) High density of population and overcrowding. (d) Inadequate provision for ventilation, light, sanitation, open spaces, and recreation facilities. (e) Age, obsolescence, deterioration, dilapidation, mixed character, or shifting of uses. 9RSG 71 REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL "tt'?lf n]A[il8nt NO U 'o !.he Red@VeJlor)n-,ent l'"an for;hn. �., _ rxJ terrace L011ln'1!1t?!1j it'i. VEIO[:fCctl. , rra,r?(( 33032. A blighted area is characterized by properties which suffer from economic dislocation, deterioration, or disuse because of one or more of the following factors which cause a reduction of, or lack of, proper utilization of the area to such an extent that it constitutes a serious physical, social, or economic burden on the community which cannot reasonably be expected to be reversed or alleviated by private enterprise action alone: (a) The subdividing and sale of lots of irregular form and shape and inadequate size for proper usefulness and development. (b) The laying out of lots in disregard of the contours and other topography or physical characteristics of the ground and surrounding conditions. (c) The existence of inadequate public improvements, public facilities, open spaces, and utilities which cannot be remedied by private or governmental action without redevelopment. (d) A prevalence of depreciated values, impaired investments, and social and economic maladjustment. Article 12 of the Redevelopment Law, which grants the Agency authority to amend its Redevelopment Plan, requires a description of the blight remaining in the Project Area. Blight findings may be made pursuant to the Redevelopment Law as it read when the Redevelopment Plan was adopted (described above) or based on the current definition of blight.The current definition of blight is as follows: 33031. Physical and economic blight. This subdivision describes physical conditions that cause blight: 1. Buildings in which it is unsafe or unhealthy for persons to live or work. These conditions may be caused by serious building code violations, serious dilapidation and deterioration caused by long- term neglect, construction that is vulnerable to serious damage from seismic or geologic hazards, and faulty or inadequate water or sewer utilities. 2. Conditions that prevent or substantially hinder the viable use or capacity of buildings or lots. These conditions may be caused by buildings of substandard, defective, or obsolete design or construction given the present general plan, zoning, or other development standards. 3. Adjacent or nearby incompatible land uses that prevent the development of those parcels or other portions of the project area. 4. The existence of subdivided lots that are in multiple ownership and whose physical development has been impaired by their irregular shapes and inadequate sizes, given present general plan and zoning standards and present market conditions. This subdivision describes economic conditions that cause blight: 1. Depreciated or stagnant property values. 2. Impaired property values, due in significant part, to hazardous wastes on property where the agency may be eligible to use its authority as specified in Article 12.5 (commencing with Section 33459). 3. Abnormally high business vacancies, abnormally low lease rates, or an abnormally high number of abandoned buildings. 9RSG 7, REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL '.rne1 drnent No U fo the f'ed(welor,ment P!an fol tl'e Grand Terrace COPIML111!tV::C'fl?YNIOp(ilf?Il?i'f;:);eGi 4. A serious lack of necessary commercial facilities that are normally found in neighborhoods, including grocery stores, drug stores, and banks and other lending institutions. 5. Serious residential overcrowding that has resulted in significant public health or safety problems. As used in this paragraph, 'overcrowding" means exceeding the standard referenced in Article 5 (commencing with Section 32)of Chapter 1 of Title 25 of the California Code of Regulations. 6. An excess of bars, liquor stores, or adult-oriented businesses that has resulted in significant public health, safety, or welfare problems. 7. A high crime rate that constitutes a serious threat to the public safety and welfare. Pursuant to Section 33368 of the Redevelopment Law, the decision of the City Council to pass the Ordinances adopting and amending the Redevelopment Plan was final and conclusive and thereafter the Project Area shall be conclusively presumed to be a blighted area as defined by Section 33031 or Section 33032. FINDINGS & METHODOLOGY Blighting conditions that were originally identified at the time of the adoption of the Redevelopment Plan for the Original and Added Areas continue to persist in the Project Area at the time of this Amendment No. 6. Pursuant to the Redevelopment Law, the location of these conditions is illustrated in Exhibit B-1 on the following page. Exhibit B-1 also depicts parcels within the Project Area that are no longer blighted and necessary and essential parcels for the elimination of the remaining blight. Parcels identified as necessary and essential for the elimination of remaining blight include non-blighted parcels already owned by the Agency or private entities partnering with the Agency on projects that are slated for redevelopment, or vacant parcels within the Project Area. Inclusion of these vacant parcels is necessary and appropriate because they are negatively impacted by the economic blighting conditions described later in this Section, and are located adjacent to or in the vicinity of other blighted parcels. These vacant parcels are underutilized and, because of their proximity to other blighted parcels, are unlikely to be developed without redevelopment assistance. Furthermore, the elimination of blight on adjacent parcels may require the development or use of these vacant lots, making them both necessary and essential for the elimination of remaining blight. _ _. 2'0 73 REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL Amendment No 6 to the Redevelopment Plan. for Grand Terrace C ornmunity Redeveiapmen! Project ................. .........---................ Location of Remaining Blight Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Project Area EXHIBIT B-1 NOE HIP L G ST 0 A 0 z 15 GRA AND 7-E AL RZACe CE 13RENIWOOD FTON VV 00 1 ITTON W 1 z n U) UJ LL W I 1< jRIAM UJ 0, LAI W ARTON co NSEN < IX L F a TO 11 N,l k--- -17 :1 WREN FINCH a Q CA DINA Project Area Boundary' r THRUSH it M inadequate infrastructure2 NTFIEL LU Physical Bight LAAK K ELLE/W a: I-D Necessary&Essential Parcels LU RY K LL M D VE No Longer Blighted 0 0 PICO"w 0 Moderate Concentration of Crime Incidents CD NA 0 High Concentration of > 1z UJ RAVEN RAVEN JW it Crime Incidents N ROBIN ROBIN AIM N I The Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Project Area boundary comprises the entire City boundary. 2 Includes parcels adjacent to roadways requiring improvements for streets,curbs,gutters,and sidewalks. 0 0A 0.2 0.3 0.4 H H P�-- Miles (0D- Sources:City Staff,County Sheriffs Department, RSG Field reconnaissance 21 R S G ----------------------- REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL Arr;eodrrent No a to, i;e i,d0belufiwent 1-11an for�ho ,. ..ran.d rBCCuCQ C•+:7,_: t`i7.171It:7C:fie-vf',Il)vn?+;nl Jr+%'t'S;t Several data sources were used to determine whether blight remains in the Project Area. This Report utilizes many quantitative and qualitative research tools developed by RSG to make determinations for the formation of, and amendments to, redevelopment project areas throughout the state. Specifically, the data sources and methodology used to identify remaining blighting conditions in the Project Area are as follows: ■ Field Reconnaissance: Trained staff conducted a parcel-by-parcel field survey of the Project Area on January 14, 2009 and subsequently on January 13 and February 1, 2010, documenting and photographing examples of blighting conditions that could be observed from the public right-of-way. Field reconnaissance revealed that blighting conditions identified for most properties in early 2009 continued to exist one year later. Both physical and economic indicators of blight were noted, such as deterioration and dilapidation, obsolete design or construction, possible abandoned buildings, and crime such as vandalism and graffiti. ■ Property Tax Research: RSG searched the County Department of Tax Collection and Licensing's Property Tax Bill Information System to use as an indicator that a vacant and neglected building is abandoned. ■ Investigation of Development Standards: RSG reviewed the City's General Plan and Zoning Code to identify development standards. This information was used as a basis to determine whether properties have conditions that hinder economically viable use or have irregular shapes and sizes for proper usefulness and development. • Investigation of Infrastructure Deficiencies: RSG met with City and Building and Safety Department staff to determine if any infrastructure deficiencies or other conditions are hindering development in the Project Area. The General Plan and the Environmental Impact Report for the General Plan were also reviewed to determine if any significant infrastructure deficiencies exist in the Project Area. ■ Analysis of Property Information: RSG used First American Title Metroscan Information Service to obtain County Assessor's data on property information such as parcel shape, size, ownership, assessed value, sale price, and land use. Parcel location, shapes, sizes and other information was also available from GIS files provided by the City. RSG utilized this information in the analysis of existing Project Area conditions. ■ Land Use Analysis:RSG analyzed existing land uses and spoke to local real estate brokers to identify adjacent or nearby incompatible land uses within the Project Area that prevent economic development. • Crime Analysis: RSG collected information from the San Bernardino County Sheriffs Department ("Sheriff") and interviewed Sergeant Espinoza of the Sheriffs Department to assess how crime may be affecting the Project Area. ■ Commercial Facilities Analysis: RSG used data from InfoLISA®and ESRI Business Analyst Online to ascertain the availability, size, and location of vital commercial facilities within the Project Area and surrounding communities. Particular attention was paid to facilities providing grocery, pharmaceutical, bank and lending, and medical services. O RSG - - 22 75 i REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL i Arnendnlent Nlo 6 to _he Red^ve'!(.)p(,ent Pl:;n for iho (ier( I rrCd�.Cl(117)t:ntty i7E:?CI@bE?Hn ,E:nt SIC;jC;Ct i j BLIGHTING CONDITIONS Remaining blighting conditions within the Project Area are described in detail below. i LACK OF NECESSARY COMMERCIAL FACILITIES A serious lack of necessary commercial facilities that are normally found in neighborhoods is an economic condition that causes blight. An analysis of commercial facilities indicates that there is a significant lack of i necessary commercial establishments in the Project Area. As described earlier in this Report, the development of Grand Terrace began with the construction of the Gage Canal in 1896 which brought water from the Santa Ana River marshland below The Terrace. Due to the area's access to irrigation water, Grand Terrace became an agricultural community. Since the waning of agricultural uses in Grand Terrace and the City's incorporation in 1978, the community continued to develop with more and more residential uses (42 percent) without necessary commercial uses (3 percent) to support I the needs of the local residents. The following discussion identifies and analyzes the Project Area's deficiencies in grocery stores, pharmacies, medical facilities, and other commercial uses. Due to the fact that the Redevelopment Law is silent as to what constitutes a`serious lack" of commercial facilities, and without a standard measure regarding an adequate number of grocery stores, drug stores, and medical facilities i typically serving neighborhoods, an analysis of existing uses in the Project Area was performed and compared to neighboring jurisdictions. As a general note, the following analysis is primarily based upon data collected from Info USA®, a trusted source and leading provider of business data. Grocery Stores The Project Area lacks necessary grocery facilities as there is just one grocery store, a Stater Brothers i Market, serving the entire City. The Stater Brothers Market is located in an outdated shopping center at the southwest corner of Barton Road and Mt. Vernon Avenue. Additionally, four convenience store or mini- markets, ranging in size from 0 to 2,500 square feet, are located in the Project Area which may also provide limited grocery products to the community. The amount of existing grocery space available in the Project Area was calculated on a per capita basis and compared to that of surrounding Inland Empire communities. The Project Area contains just 0.88 square feet of grocery space per person residing in the community which is significantly less than the amount of grocery space per capita in the surrounding Cities of Colton, Riverside, and San Bernardino. The City of Loma Linda had a square feet per capita rate of 0.91, which also exceeds that of Grand Terrace. Table B-1 below summarizes the amount of grocery space per capita for the Project j Area and neighboring communities. i Comparison of Grocery Stores Table B-1 Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Project Area City Grand Terrace Colton Loma Linda Riverside San Bernardino Population 12,759 53,073 21,981 300,096 208,335 I Total Sq. Ft.' 11,248 94,990 19,996 659,940 389,948 Sq. Ft. Per Capita 0.88 1.79 0.91 2.20 1.87 % of Grand Terrace 100% 203% 103% 249% 212% Includes convenience stores,food markets,food products-retail,gourmet shops,grocers-retail,and health&diet foods- retail as defined by the NAIL. Sources.Esri Business Analyst Online and InfoUSA.com i ; r • RSG 23 i 76 REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL Arnendnient No 6 io the Redevelopni.�ni Plan for:he Grand Terrace G;oji-iniunity t ediiVe100rrl?nt ProlE;'ct The fact that the Project Area provides less than half the amount of grocery space as three out of four of the surrounding cities suggests that the Project Area not only lacks grocery facilities but that it is seriously lacking a necessary commercial facility normally found in neighborhoods as provided in the Redevelopment Law. The following exhibit illustrates the amount of grocery space per capita provided by each of the previously mentioned communities. Square Feet of Exhibit B-2 Grocery Space Per Capita I _ 2.50 2.00 1.50 A� 1.00 0.50. 0.00 Grande Colton Loma Linda. Riverside' _ Sane Terrace Bernardino Drug Stores Only one pharmacy, a CVS, is located within the City and the Project Area(as stated previously, the City and Project Area boundaries are the same), to meet the community's prescription drug needs. This CVS is located at the northeast comer of Barton Road and Mt. Vernon Avenue. When compared to neighboring jurisdictions, the Project Area provides far fewer pharmacies per capita.' As shown in Table B-2 on the following page, there is one just one pharmacy per 12,759 residents in the City of Grand Terrace but there is one pharmacy per: 10,615 residents; 4,396 residents; 8,574 residents; and 7,716 residents for the Cities of Colton, Loma Linda, Riverside, and San Bernardino, respectively. These comparable cities are providing 120 percent to 290 percent more pharmacies per capita,which indicates that the Project Area is underserved. 'A lack of quality data made it impractical to base the comparison of pharmacies on a per square foot basis.This was due to the fact that pharmacies are often located within supermarkets or medical facilities which using square foot data provided by InfoUSA®would have overstated pharmacy sizes in certain cases. _ _ _ _ _ _._ _._. 24 77 REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL I , , , i n n :if, , A i�.ncfinent `O 6 1.o Iltc•, l=Rodevelup..ont I m ?or m . :rand._@rr_ce,C omrn unit j Project i Comparison of Pharmacies Table B-2 Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Project Area City Grand Terrace Colton Loma Linda Riverside San Bernardino Population 12,759 53,073 21,981 300,096 208,335 No. of Pharmacies 1 5 5 35 27 Pharmacies i Per Capita 12,759 10,615 4,396 8,574 7,716 % of Grand I Terrace 100% 120% 290% 149% 165% Sources:Esri Business Analyst Online and Info USA.com i Medical Facilities Although not specifically identified by Redevelopment Law, medical facilities are a necessary facility typically found in communities. The Project Area seriously lacks medical facilities and doctor's offices. According to InfoUSA® and other verifiable data sources, the City has just one physician's office which is less than 2,500 square feet in size. Although no appointment is necessary for urgent care situations, the facility has limited hours of operation (3pm to 7pm)which significantly hinders its accessibility to area residents. Apart from this family practice/urgent care clinic, the City has no other medical facility. Although Project Area residents may - access primary care, hospital and emergency medical services, and other healthcare facilities in nearby cities, there is still a serious lack of medical facilities within the City of Grand Terrace. Given the fact that the Project Area has nearly 13,000 residents and just one physician's office/clinic it is clear that the Project Area is seriously underserved by necessary medical facilities and doctor's offices. Other Commercial Uses Residential uses have developed disproportionately more compared to commercial uses in the Project Area. Therefore, the Project Area is underserved by commercial establishments resulting in a significant leakage of disposable income dollars being spent by residents outside of the Project Area for common items such as clothing, full-service dinning, general merchandise, auto parts and accessories, etc.z The leakage of disposable income for a variety of industry sectors, such as those described above, provides further evidence of the overall general lack of commercial uses in the Project Area. Although a lack of commercial retail is not i specifically identified in Redevelopment Law as "necessary commercial facilities that are normally found in neighborhoods", it does suggest that the community could support additional retail and dinning uses which would generate needed sales tax dollars- an important source of general fund revenues in many communities. The addition of such revenues could be utilized for increasing and expanding the Project Area's currently limited public services further protecting the health and safety of residents and workers. INADEQUATE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS The existence of inadequate public improvements, public facilities, open spaces, and utilities which cannot be remedied by private or government action without redevelopment is a condition of economic blight per Redevelopment Law Section 33032(c) as it read in 1979 and in 1981, when the Original and Added Areas `ESRI Business Analyst Online,Retail Market Place Profile,City of Grand Terrace,January 22,2010 i • ;I 1 7E REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL �x�nUm*o N: 8m/heRedorn|oonov|P�nnkn:ha ................___ _ ___ '�,rnno�nn�Commv R� �__- _ _ - were adopted. The southwest portion-of the Project Area has numerous properties that are unlikely to see development without the Agency investing in public improvements. Southwest Commercial Site For more than two decades, the City has been trying' to develop ` number ofvacant p~ partieo in the southwestern portion of the Project Area adjacent to |nbarobobo 215 ("Southwest Commercial ~ ^e^) However, significant infrastructure needs have contributed b»d to the |ouk of development. the Cit/o~1988G~nanm| Plan update changed the land use designations of the site to allow a large portion of the Southwest-Commercial Site tobe developed with light industrial uses. This change from the 1083 General Plan was ' ~~a becauseUhe shopping center project originally considered for this area did not prove to be o viable project as it washamponed by market and access deficiencies. Within the past eight years, the C|h/ tried to implement the Outdoors Adventure Center specific plan on this site. The City Council approved the specific plan but the developer withdrew from the project because the freeway uoceoo to the site was insufficient. Exhibit 8-2idanUfieo the location of the Southwest Commercial Site. Southwest Commercial Site sow|orra'm Southwest commercial Site RSG --- -- ------- --------- - ---� - ----'- - --' -- - ------ _ --------_26 _ 79 i 1 . REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL Vnendrnfm No O to the 1:"911 f".)r!ho Cr rd'I orrace LQII'R1uimy;-,1-Ki velop f':ent PI'nject According to the City's Building and Safety department, the Southwest Commercial Site contains approximately 4 acres of wetlands that will need to be maintained onsite. In addition, development of the Southwest Commercial Site will require retention basins on the site and significant storm drain improvements along De Berry, Van Buren, and Pico Streets. The retention basins and wetlands areas will reduce the amount of developable land on the site by approximately four acres; land which must be purchased but which cannot be resold. A private developer would be unlikely to assume this loss and therefore public investment would likely be required. However, the City does not have the financial capacity to purchase these undevelopable areas or to provide developer subsidies to make the site viable and therefore, redevelopment assistance is vital.While the storms drain improvements would be constructed underneath roadways, the cost of the improvements would need to be funded by the Agency. Another infrastructure need impeding the development of the Southwest Commercial Site is lack of access. San Bernardino Association of Governments, Caltrans, and the City are working to replace the Interstate 215 interchange at Barton Road, but the local streets that would provide access to the site are inadequate to i accommodate the increased traffic volume that would result from the development of the site. Van Buren Street and Pico Street are both currently two lane roadways and, according to the City's Building and Safety Director, would need to be upgraded to their ultimate cross section, which includes curb, gutter and storm drain improvements to accommodate the increased traffic volume that would result from development of the Southwest Commercial Site. Traffic signals would be required where Van Buren Street and Pico Street intersect Michigan Street. Additionally, primary access to the Southwest Commercial Site is proposed to be an extension of Commerce Way from its current terminus to Main Street. These infrastructure deficiencies result in a significant deterrent to development. According to an analysis performed by RSG, there is a significant funding gap between the actual cost of developing the Southwest Commercial Site and the expected return on investment to a private developer. To assess the likely funding gap, RSG conducted a pro forma analysis of building costs and project value under two hypothetical development scenarios: a regional shopping center and an industrial flex development. In both scenarios, a 60-acre site was identified for the development. Access to the site was assumed to be along Van Buren Street and Pico Street from within the City and along the proposed extension of Commerce Way to Main Street from Interstate 215. Off-site improvements include widening and improving Van Buren and Pico Streets, the Commerce Way extension, traffic signals where Michigan Street intersects Van Buren Street and Pico Street, storm drains and retention basins to mange the flow of runoff, and wetlands mitigation. On-site improvements include parking, landscaping, and loading areas, and the cost is based on Marshall & Swift average construction costs in San Bernardino County. Direct construction costs are also based on Marshall & Swift costs. Market value of land and gross scheduled rents are based on lease rates for comparable properties listed on Loopnet. The site design is hypothetical and not based on any City or developer plan or document. i Exhibit B-3 on the following page provides a summary of assumed development standards and costs. i i RSG ._. ._ 27 ' 8c REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL Awe da.), nt i,!o o to the Rk'devolopment Plan ter:he ("rand Terrace C,'ommurit.y Redevelopment Pro,ec:t Exhibit B-3• 11ILW91WEIN Loll • • Regional Shopping Center PROJECT DESCRIPTION Gross Site Area.Square Feet 2,623,183 Gross Site Area Acres (excluding right-of-way) 60.22 Nonbuildable Square Feet 418,612 Nonbuildable Acres 9.61 Developable Site Area (Square Feet) 2,204,572 Developable Site Area (Acres) 50.61 Lot Coverage 0.25 Gross Building Area(GSF) 551,143 Net Building Area 551,143 On Site Landscaping, Parking & Loading Area 1,653,429 Landscaping Area 0 RESIDUAL LAND VALUE Assumptions Totals $ Per GSF Development Costs Direct Construction $100.12/gsf $ 55,178,663 $ 100.12 On-Site Improvements $4.44/sf 7,332,993 13.31 Off-Site Improvements $3.33/sf 7,340,000 13.32 Indirect Costs (including Financing)@15% $17.01/gsf 9,376,748 17.01 Total Development Costs Excluding Land $ 79,228,405 $ 143.75 Capitalized Project Value Gross Scheduled Rents $1.80/sf(nnn) $ 11,904,687 $ 21.60 (Less)Vacancy and Bad Debt 8.50% (1,011,898) (1.84) Effective Gross Income (EGI) $ 10,892,788 $ 19.76 (Less)Operating Expenses Management Expense& Fees 4.50% EGI $ (490,175) $ (0.89) Reserves $0.15/gsf (82,671) (0.15) Total Operating Expenses (572,847) (1.04) Net Operating Income(NOI) $ 10,319,941 $ 18.72 Capitalized Project Value 11% Cap Rate $ 93,817,649 $ 170.22 (Less)Cost of Sale 3% Value (2,814,529) (5.11) (Less) Developer Profit 10% Value (9,381,765) (17.02) Total Warranted Investment 81,621,354 148.09 (Less)Development Costs $ (79,228,405) $ (143.75) Residual Warranted Investment $ 2,392,949 $ 4.34 Residual Value per SF Land $ 0.91 Source: Marshall& Swift, City of Grand Terrace, Loopnet R S G -- -_. 28 81 ,k REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCI'IL nondmr:nt No Ei to the Pedeveiaoin.ent Plan for the Grand T-.rr,ace Cotnmurnt,, fe." 'e I,et, opn?ent Project l The residual land value per square foot shown at the bottom of Exhibit B-3 is the projected value of the underlying land after the proposed project is complete. This is well below the market value of the land based i on real estate listings in the City (approximately $14 per square foot according to comparable real estate listings on Loopnet.com as of January 29, 2010). As a result, this project is likely not economically feasible without Agency assistance. f ' k Exhibit B-4 on the following page provides a summary of assumed development standards and costs of an alternate development scenario on the Southwest Commercial Site. This second scenario includes the development of industrial flex space. �I it I � o r I � i llil i II' a ' i I i G , l r y d a f" i" r +I i 82 REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL r'S(w?I)d1T;Pr;L N0 CI 1,0 11iC: R::i:!C:V!?li)(.ifilE;ilt !flll for i.t)e i z^ipt + �(anl terrace Conimuni.y Read 1eloprTient Pro;ect Exhibit B-4: • eilil Industrial Flex Buildings PROJECT DESCRIPTION Gross Site Area Square Feet 2,623,183 Gross Site Area Acres (excluding right-of-way) 60.22 Nonbuildable Square Feet 418,612 Nonbuildable Acres 9.61 Developable Site Area (Square Feet) 2,204,572 Developable Site Area (Acres) 50.61 Lot Coverage 0.40 Gross Building Area (GSF) 881,829 Net Building Area 881,829 On Site Landscaping, Parking & Loading Area 1,322,743 Landscaping Area 0 RESIDUAL LAND VALUE Assumptions Totals $ Per GSF Development Costs Direct Construction $47.71/gsf $ 42,073,808 $ 47.71 On-Site Improvements $4.44/sf 5,866,394 6.65 Off-Site Improvements $3.33/sf 7,340,000 8.32 Indirect Costs (including Financing)@15% $8.15/gsf 7,191,030 8.15 Total Development Costs Excluding Land $ 62,471,233 $ 70.84 Capitalized Project Value Gross Scheduled Rents $0.90/sf(nnn) $ 9,523,749 $ 10.80 (Less)Vacancy and Bad Debt 8.50% (809,519) (0.92) Effective Gross Income(EGI) $ 8,714,231 $ 9.88 (Less)Operating Expenses Management Expense& Fees 4.50% EGI $ (392,140) $ (0.44) Reserves $0.15/gsf (132,274) (0.15) Total Operating Expenses (524,415) (0.59) Net Operating Income(NOI) $ 8,189,816 $ 9.29 Capitalized Project Value 11% Cap Rate $ 74,452,872 $ 84.43 (Less)Cost of Sale. 3% Value (2,233,586) (2.53) (Less) Developer Profit 10% Value (7,445,287) (8.44) Total Warranted Investment 64,773,999 r 73.45 (Less) Development Costs $ (62,471,233) $ (70.84) Residual Warranted Investment $ 2,302,766 $ 2.61 Residual Value per SF Land $ 088 Source: Marshall & Swift, City of Grand Terrace, Loopnet o _ RSA _.30_. 83 II REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL Amendment No 6 in the'edeveiopment Finn for+he Grand T em.we Community Rpdeveiorment Pir,;act i The residual land value in Exhibit B-4 is slightly less than in Exhibit B-3 and therefore significantly below the market value for land in Grand Terrace. Without redevelopment investment, this land is likely to remain undeveloped. In addition to the infrastructure deficiencies of the Southwest Commercial Site, portions of the site contain wetlands. According to the Building and Safety Department, the wetlands would require mitigation that would increase the costs of developing the site and therefore be a disincentive to prospective developers and contribute to the lack of development of the property. The City has been encouraging development on the Southwest Commercial Site for more than twenty years, but market conditions and insufficient site access have made all previous projects non-viable. Without the ability to invest redevelopment funds to facilitate the development of the site, it is likely to remain vacant and underutilized. Main Street and Michigan Street Improvements The current condition of Main and Michigan Streets presents a safety hazard to pedestrians walking alongside or crossing Main Street and Michigan Street. Currently, both streets are two lane roadways with intermittent sidewalks. There is not sufficient separation between vehicular traffic and pedestrians along the roadway except in the few sections with sidewalks, and there are no crosswalks where Main Street and Michigan Street intersect with each other and with other local roads. The CJUSD has begun grading for and construction of a new high school on Main Street near Taylor Street I with a planned enrollment capacity of 2,500 students. When complete, the school will exacerbate a number of traffic concerns with both increased vehicle traffic and problems caused by intermittent curbs, gutters and sidewalks. CJUSD will fund a portion of the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Main Street and Michigan Street but all other street improvements will be the responsibility of the Agency because the City does not have the financial capacity to fund these improvements. Improvements to Main Street and Michigan Street (from Barton Road to Van Buren Street) to secondary !' highways (four lanes, undivided) with curbs, gutters, and sidewalks on both sides of each are needed to accommodate the increased volume of vehicle traffic and to provide safe pedestrian access to the new school. In addition, full installation of right of way, curbs, gutters and sidewalks are still needed on Michigan Street between Van Buren and Main Streets. The City's Building and Safety Department estimates the need for$3 million of Agency investment to fund the necessary improvements. The City does not have the revenue necessary to fund these improvements without redevelopment and it does not have the authority to obligate CJUSD to provide any assistance. 4 i ® RSG ---- ...-.------ ._. ._-_.. 31 • REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL �lnndmaouHo 0 Plan kx he G�ndTormooCo �� e� mP , ________ _ __ _____'_ _ ______ __ ��v_��~��- - . _ Photo 8-1' Northwestof Main Street and Michigan Avenue. Depicts the lack of curbs, sidewalks and gutters. The o�ocunendyhas poor pedestrian access and there is not safe separation between motorists and pedestrians. The Agency willneed to fund these vital infrastructure improvements prior to opening of the new CJU8O high school. Barton Road/Union Pacific Overhead Bridge The Building and Safety Department identified the Barton Road/Union Pacific Overhead Bridge as another infrastructure project requiring Agency 000ioton While currently in use, the bridge im structurally deficient and seismically unoafe, requiring approximately $500,000 of Agency investment to match the contribution homtheQb/ofCo|bonbonep|acethebhdgewithonethatioupbonunantdeva|opmentabondando. Thiobhdga is outside but immediately adjacent to the City and Project Area and therefore provides a direct benefit to the Project Area. Approximately ten years ago, the City approached the California Department of Transportation (^Co|tnono'') requesting m contribution for retrofitting the bhdge, butCo|tnono preferred to replace the bhdge. Agency investment would cover the acquisition right of way and a hazardous materials study along with any other identified namedioUonneeds. Infrastructure Improvements West mf the U'315Freeway In gonara|, properties in the Project Area and west of the 1'215 Freeway look public improvements such as oidewo|he, curbs and gutters. Auoresult, the area has poor pedestrian onoeem and certain portions are subject to flooding. In padiuu|ar, the streets most adversely affected are Terrace Avenue, Grand Tonoue Road, and ViviendoAvenue, and La Crosse Avenue. During Field Renonnaiooanoe, children were observed walking in the street along Terrace Avenue because the area did not have sidewalks available for safe pedestrian access. [��[� --- ----- ---- - -- --- -- — ----- - — -- ------- ----- -- --- ' `~^^ 32 85 �- /►.. ill �,fh �.�.••' r,�yrp."� a#s-,��ate tsx y _- "".r't..4'.4SzXYe.e`, '�i t' ...... �.::c '� `' r,�E•i ,f4 :- REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL Ar?endm,,},nt No O t.o the Re•d&,t!opr?l-,nt Pan for Inn ( rand Terrace Canlmur?it, to "Y:• . ._ �, .,acr _ .��.� ., s�au ws�,�";.., .tea`:.., .s.. ... � �� ,�..':,r. „°tire- Lr "`f� ,�� •r-` ,.gta.,'�„�.St �'•iu. 3^"Y?. ;S 4`s, a^3— f'�i:' -A,.,y'�O• ;,,T...��,��,y.�:n...s time'-,mod'<� A:S.:;:at' ,.r�„�.v`i�'.r;'�,!� � ,w�,�K'_ L� � �,rC �.' '.="�' �, e1y_..�"' ��.3'' a .e."r6'•e9.fa ,�,.: N'"'`�e�;"`.=3=', ,y -hJtjx+e-' 3>• �`� �`,.5:' rai.*...i°�"r.,.^^i '.. c �a R� 'b'' Y,n:?K�.�:�'F.w--�>� tom`;R+'�>3+�;�,�y�F ,+'�,�+,`5T�s'_�'`✓ .3. w„ ,7�,, 1101 Photo B-3: Railroad overpass at Terrace Avenue. This photograph depicts access issues confronting development of the Project Area north of Vivienda Avenue. The roadway is extremely narrow and experiencing significant flooding and mud conditions. The area has been vandalized as indicated by the visible tagging of the overpass structure. qRSG34 87 | � ! REPORT TOTHE CITY COUNCIL | | Amanameo/NoG`umoRrdavu/oomont Plan tor oo ______ _ __ ____ �nnd TenaceCnm�u:uyRo�*,�o»n,a�Pn�oct / Obsolete Design or Construction | Conditions that prevent or substantially hinder the viable use or capacity of buildings or lots are a condition of � physical blight as defined by the current Redevelopment Law 3ouUon 33031(a)(2). These conditions may be � caused by buildings of obsolete design or construction. VVhi|a not prevalent throughout the entire Project ` Area, this condition io evident in the western podionof the Pn�eutArea oo described below. | � Highgrpve Generation Station � This power plant located on Taylor Street in the southwest portion cf the Project Area has been closed since 2001 due to o lack of environmental controls. Built in the 1950o. the plant is not up to current electricity production standards. The gas-fired plant generates more pollutants and is not as efficient as modern power generation facilities. The coot required to upgrade the plant to current environmental regulations would most likely significantly outweigh the revenue that would be generated by reopening the retrofitted plant. / AddidonoUy, the plont'o proximity to o sensitive land use (the new CJUSO high school described previously) � would likely prevent the plant from reopening. / ' |n2OUG. on application was filed with the California Energy Commission ("CEC^) to reuse the site for a new � power plant (docket number 08+AFC-02). This project included the demolition of the old gasoline-powered ' plant in favor of o modern, natural gas-powered plant. However. the California Department of Toxic / Substance Control (^DTSC^) concluded that the investigation into hazardous nnoheha| on the site was ! insufficient and that further investigation was needed to determine the nature and extent ofany no|aaoe of } hazardous waste or hazardous vvoobo constituents at the project site. According to the CEC, the project / remains on hold due bo environmental concerns. There io currently no schedule for completing the application � process for this project. ! Due to long term vacancy resulting from the plant's obsolescence, the site appears unmaintained and shows signs of deterioration and vandalism. The photographs on the following pages depict examples of these / conditions. ! } � � | / | . . � / [ / / ' � � ' � ! | � / ��(� 35 ' `~`~ | i REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL .Amer•1 ment�Jo 6:a the Redevelopmont i=';:n for!fie Gr<:nd Terrace Community'Redevelopment?roiect � 1 Pq Photo B-4: 12700 Block of Taylor Street,APN 1167 151 66. This is the closed Highgrove Generation Station. • RSG 3s 89 | REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCI L ------'- Griind orrace Communitv Redeveloornent--------r- | / . , � L � � ' � � � ' | � . . '-. ! � | ( | � \ >� | / . ' � / � | ' . �/ ' � PhotoB-5 127OD Block of Taylor Streat APN11G7151 GG The �d�Qoft�o structure on the p�ntahe iis ' ' , falling away, reveaUngbana�am�0mateha�undernea�� 6 ' ' / | ./ ' | / | ' | . � ! ( ! � � ' | /; > _- - -- . � �S[� 37 --~- / \ | � \ REPORT TOTHE CITY COUNCIL AniaomnemNo G1u/hnRade.a|opmnn'P|uo for the Gran,dTo Cu �e om� Prnject W. WIN PhotmB-G 127OO Block ofTaylor Street, APN1iG7161GG Another structure on the plant-site with damaged building materials. . It is unlikely that this obsolete bnc|ity.wW| be reused due to the fact-that it has been dormant for over B years. Attempts to reuse the facility have been unable to' secure the necessarynecessaryomimnmmnta clearance and permits. The high cost of �arngthm site end potentially any -'U Uke|yrequire Agency involvement for this site to be,redeveloped. Several environmental investigations were conducted incorporating the plant between 1996 and 2004 revealing low |ava|o of contamination in localized ovono. contamination included elevated concentrations of cadmium and arsenic in some soil oomp|ao, o minor� --- concentration of total petroleum hydrocarbons adjacent to an oil/water separator pond, and areas of soil with containing low orhigh pH. Some of the studies also concluded that the demolition of the structures onthe could noveo| additional contamination. The OTSC concluded in 2006 that further investigation into ponn-- -- hazardous material on the site was required. ' DETERIORATED AND DILAPIDATED BUILDINGS Buildings that are unsafe or unfit for use duo to oge, detehoroUon, di|apidaUon, mixed chmnoob*r, or shifting of uoao are blighted per Redevelopment Law Section 33031(e) as it read when the Project Area was adopbod Only o few properties in the Project Area exhibit this condition but multiple properties in the western portion - of the Project Area are deteriorated or dilapidated enough as to pose o health and oahob/ hazard. Conditions, include: ° Roofs, eaves and overhangs that are oogging, bnoken, ononking, nobed, poo|ing, and/or otherwise deteriorated too point of endangering the health and safety ofoccupants. Rc�[� '--- '--'---- ---- - - ---- - ---------'- ------- -- - ---- --- ---- - - - 38 91 }!1 I I, it REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL ''mendment No 6 to the Redevt:aiaornent Pl,)n for the Grand-T(errice CC)r11rnU1ltty Redevelopment Project t ..__.__.___..._..__..._....--'-`--------------._------___._._..__.....__...._....____.._.�._.__.-__._.._....... ..-..._-_._"_.__._. __....-_.-...._.._._.._.._.. ._.-...__.. .._-----------------._.. ..-_ �i 1i Damaged exterior building materials such as cracking and chipped walls, rotting wood, buckling 1 columns, wood panels out of alignment, rusting metal roofs and walls, and other conditions that endanger health and safety of building occupants. t Substandard building materials and poorly constructed additions that do not comply with current building standards. • Faulty weather protection that could accelerate the deterioration of the building or pose a health and i safety hazard. I I ' - t, The following photographs illustrate these conditions of deterioration and dilapidation.The photographs depict both residential and non-residential properties. Is I aNf "i ',Y,..i: .� ,..tip, �.;- -';^=.—.. s'' `^`r•.:�'i;.;.. _ i'G, I Ip' �a �.-;` .:`.' :Ir:.:•,`' ,c ; ,,,..,.. :5$,.s:rg!_,i2_: :t:. -"'t '<:_^`?-E^"' 2_ .ef�v'Y �1 ' ti''�"d�t�:'.,.•�3j,r% r i.k:�t .(„� -'c»1ty Y' `i _r'&��q tic • ,d_°'-` �'rry�:;..� #, " +a., �Y'' t '"t'rr. -tJ�. s I uTi f Photo B-7: 12600 Block of Sandburg Way, APN 1167 201 103. This dilapidated structure on a vacant lot adjacent to residential properties has collapsed and presents a safety hazard. A gap in the fence around the property makes it ineffective at preventing access to a structure clearly unsafe for use. i 'I 0 RSG 3s 92 REPORT TOTHE CITY COUNCIL xmen�n*o Nu0iui.heRudevelopinmo|P|on for the Cam RedevelopmeniP , � ) Photo B-8: 12600 Block of Sandburg Way, APN 116 7 201 103.This dilapidated structure appears to be at risk --' of collapsing. �� -_ ______' '— - 40 `~~ 93 41. 04 UjR tVr- _W, malbi.11 - I v G A. A, 44)31, 4 ti, _7T 41 tau CA 4kZ.. REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL Arnendn'%nt No 6 io:he Redeweiqnment Plan for"he Grarid'rerrace Con-1munity Redevelopment Pro;ect ................ .............. ....... ........ F"W' ,MVI-twAA ui V 5, Photo B-10: 21700 Block of Vivienda Avenue, APN 275 191 02. Portions of the roof of this building have collapsed and the remaining roofing material is significantly deteriorated. RSG 42 95 i REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL \I'1'i@:I)G�ITI(,'flt No 'r')jO i�)E; ;':CCIG'4C;iQO!;^:Clli 'till' t„rand I @ff9C8 COI)Irnun;'iy Rradevei�`.m-retil protect _��. .. ._.__.. ..._.__.._.__. _._._. ..------..._..... ............... ----.__...._.. .._._....___.. _._...__.—._..._..__.._...._____.................... _._.._._ _.____...__...__.. .._._ „;aF^�"„3- e, 'c' .��•• ; _Mw.a, �-.• L t ': s`rT'7"*'F�'_RTq"8•l;ais''w�tS.' .. "",,' 3�5 yt, r� 3 ! ` h. ��'. �:'��,;:�,•F=__ •t.L �^µ=�, it ''�rtax,..*M.;s?`»[--e""-'. ,'sr "'"t1?' .,_ ,;Y, ,ate,«><.••.� � 7�'-.a. -�w,• t:'=1 �"'• -tl�"c' y�� _^u?>"•' `�,_,'I fly.. i�7�%d . _ Id � � r'�.rX, .,kf%:', � zt;:N�`:,;''S��r: � �;.r:, rti.;;�. ,,.�,•,•�:.,`;.�(:gs;l :r�+• -T�rs�:+awrr:�� :�.ti;�W:�r'� :`{.I �•o,,,'``'"s'rdCT« „s3�,�{'•'�'z'�`';�.t:`.t: ,�C'1��y� �r,::fit:'. ..:�-x•�m. ;Faht4;'': �» '"i.'..L`,.�h �,a;Y "•,,.fir..'-.'... : w�r.'t4t ,,�F.�!':`-.,Y s�.; s;� �y.: �-~''-M 'h:?•^rk 1 gp�„_,�.. b 't:; "!y:.pt,...�gJ:iCz::,c"r�ja`>��`ttt�„ti ti�,:'�.:',.`�;..� -� •. �i�:' .:f�;-.:, ��'�+ _ ..•,oRy...ei,",:. '1�_ 73�:5�^ .;ey.n'i.f.�.i: ;:� 't9��?,t�tie`f:�`f:,Y'�^ T:+:�:'�,'�•+�.ty=,. -.; �{. ..f.\",��.s sf"y`5.:n�.• :� ,t itr. 'bv=`'Y',:t:..�"�� .lj`~'yr ��^j^'fi.. + :-t.� tiS:'14�'t.:'x�' ''��4 j;;;�� `",�if,•�.� _�',i�t;yi.;£s`�z,'�.;4; "�.',<3:�r 5a:e��,}s,.'h`„.z S..�' u..". 'Cf.�,^r, C t ,�{.�1�`,'yt_ i. ,. ''h��tu' c•'r'� �t-��.�r•>.p•�';�z,:::I`'•° 'aX t'�' ",'.'.. ".•Fy":.i^"" ;,ram'.k-t � ��,t,�±+' +� � �..: �i ��F�q�t tj - 4 '�I'c�. 1! �St �v�'°j!.w'��p�� (. .. •�'F µ' .��6�'�. t ,c.?.. j�+y+, h,�i l �af.P ` �' �• ,•s�� ,*��. '� ,'i , ale• ro w.tt a ! Photo B-11: 21700 Block of Vivienda Avenue, APN 275 191 02. The roof of one of these buildings is partially collapsed and all three show significant signs of deterioration. i i i O RSG 43 n 7 4 REPORT TOTHE CITY COUNCIL Hc Go» /heRodeveomoewP!an {urno _____________ ��nd �xn Community t,t5l Photo B-12: 12500 Block ofMichigan Street, APN 1187 191 04 This residence has o poorly constructed `-' second story addition and damaged exterior building materials. The unfinished portions of the wood siding are showing ok]no of deterioration. According to City obuff, the deterioration is caused by termites. The City has repeatedly encouraged the owner to replace the siding but the owner has refused. ��[� _..... --__ ' '—`^ 44 97 REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL ArnendrnentNla 6) to the Redeveloomient 1`1.rin for one m-,d'i orrace('om.rnLlnity Redevelopmont Projiect ..................... ......................... ......... ........ .......... -------- ......... .......... Photo B-13: 12500 Block of Michigan Street, APN 1167 191 04. The damaged roof of this garage appears to have been temporarily patched with a tarp that has also deteriorated. Inadequate weather proofing on the side of the building will accelerate the deterioration already evident. • RSG 45 91 REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL . AonendmootNo,8uo"he RmdovewpnwotP/on for om ______ __________ ___ G�ndTe `oniniuniiy Re� 10 0 MR - Photo B-14: 11OOO Block of Bums Avenue, APN 2T528214. The damage bothe left side and back ofthe --' chimney of this residence poses a safety risk as it appears to be breaking apart. ' ��[� __ _ . `~'^' 4O 99 I a f li REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL Arno.ndment No 6+o the Rede%wflopnient Plan for;he "rind• Terrace Communiiy Rec'evelopment P,oiect .._....... ...._..... ._._.. ..__.—__.._.___._._.._._____._____.....-.._....-.___._._._...._.___.__..._..._._.. ..-.---.___..._.._..._.._...._.. _._....____ —___.. .._. ......_.__..__.�___...__. ..-�-- I '�`. >F,s%'.-a<.i"";' =,;:st';s,'r '::°;^Ei�>1'E"`"t"':°Y%"=w'3?s,ix,,. 'a,';;,:< •,.,/,� `,t`ii;n�`i°;i,r:rsY„;E: m.;.za:<•a��.;,%:.., "%,i:' =.xds"' a:<'�e<', w<',z`x':7:' s s ,.✓."- .z,,,e,i;-.'t`, 't'x,:. .v;.�'r'^'.a.�,:y.,. *<.;i,<a.:.. .,,*,; F:!f.-�v<•>�'.s.''.'s• :�;:U'.'..,.§.f•;y. - �:� 'r:.'•Ji.__ ..x.Y!'i�'�i.,�`v_';S: r.F�f _�. h`e''.�: fi:«,x_..sT.;l�{.',; ,:rt.` tr', s�F.� .&. �r�:;;`�'.;;fi F•ar.�1_.-�» S.. 7�`•..s,. <�,C,'`:'h9., { Ss'3;A, wt `5.�,'F�.-i.i,:i•,Y;`. .{ "1 ,�;+z:;..7,yv r ....�5,, rs .5,,,.»,s` r...#�l,• cw,'., -e: 'sx'^-.,t,-r c.<..�« s. ,-. ,»x:"Sr ..c a��ztt: t. ,.rr•:,`'re`"iJ. .>t �..<�s,�r., o:>. s'vt1<<r .�'yd�i..r- :�x; e+ � •�'_.:,i� ,,,?,°.:�, ,', .4:�.."..�..+.: .w,x,. ='r^'/`^`t•i '- ="i:'>�:' `S 'A..u. ,< :,�.. :,1r', 'Yt< .a.' -3:� .$,^-,'''":-". J•s.` %.r�.eY:i•' "i'sr3:e"�"-' .n';v ..rr ..i<.y,,: .�• ».?'�z*�v�' ;.,.r! ;,. F:7., a..5... '•r:i _'�.�...•'«�s,<.C' :>,'(-, ..f'Fi�.if:•,,;, .F,..ka,�r%., �.3.',.�u , ;,•rk<• ,,.in.:rr,: �.f:`.,..Y''•:%`;,t:+;�i:� :��.: ,,.:<,;,, ,:.;s.a...;y°:!','''"""":x>::s-:::;:., b,.::Y't;,. .vrin;•. �,g ;'sn,:',. .��.. i ,'$ ms ..t4;":.7is� '�5.`";X':.'.1.' :E.;.,t:'to >3:".• "?xr �r ,.. `5Y :«r°(a?i7?'�',.. i r.. K;��-r".:S-�,. •7;a _c 'a�' ./.,,,{'-�e.'.;�.�..:. :Yrn`',�•.. { ';(:, :v"k'^.°Y3";'r •.�;., �� :W:. ..,i, .1,i .y.. E•..l". r«ps '�CSs°:' _ <�i,H..�..a .i..Yi."�:',"',,, Y<MZ.. `1»#i?T� '�?;;itr'1•r ''t.>v ,k" ,fir ?�s'..».:,.,.�+ .,�� ,sX,9•:�^F �+,, •>� �> ^.,�.:�i;' s-vau:.n.r�-" •.`:7' Y:.i j ;',Y:, *,;�" S:9=v •..'.k'>v. �4'. "AR—�:R., - �i57.`:;� .{>:,,.,,�. .n Hs.. u �K.':',?'.�''� .'.-sy�{7,,./.':::Y;.k`, 7{ �-`'L':p; jt::`,'.;>.p;.�.'�Y _f a�f%>.�"" vj:• , ate; I 14 { M1 4}s�"4'.'tia� *'� .!"ir♦ '�.'i1(�ii:�`., � - .',^ f � •,rJ�". �4 •I i� .-uc r:<�;-, �,n ,.n i"- ;r:'�"tt!A`v"�z" �arF?'r%r�.e��;�,T„ ��" _ N Photo B-15: 12700 Block of Taylor Street, APN 1167 151 41. The roofing materials on this structure are damaged and do not appear to adequately protect the interior against the elements. The sides of the building show signs.of past vandalism. f Ip I G u , r i u • 8 � E i u i 4 I. u f i { I i w ` i !r RSG 147 { r I r { 10( REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL Amendment No 8*o1heReeveopmootPhnk`r/:o _______ ______________ S dTom� Co ecr - --------_____ AA 4 � ) Photo B'18: 21893 Barton Road, APN 1167 121 01. This vacant, neglected structure shows severe signs of dilapidation and deteriorating building materials. ��[� - - - - — - -- -- - -- ---- �- - - ' `~`~ 48 101 ' | ]REPORT TOTHE CITY COUNCIL Amendment Ho.6/u the Redowe|opmeoLpbn for!he Redevelo.ornent Proj6ct � . _ � | ! ^ i � 4w, i . i � / - ' ` , . } | ( � | ' 4.1 4.1 LF | Photo B-17: 12559 Michigan Street, APN 1187 271 10. This vacant residential unit suffers from exposed � wiring, deteriorated building materials, unfinished roof, and trash and debris. � | } | � � . � } � � � ' � / / / . " . � i � --'--'--------'-- - -- --- - --- --- - -- --� - ---i -- / R�� 40 - - . ' ^ / [ 10: / , REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL Am(�ndrrwnt'No 6 to!.hf-,Redeve!oPn)(-,nt P-knn lor the Grand T�-,,rrace Conn rn:,AnAy'RedevoicPment Prqiect ........... ..........................------- ...... ........................... ........... 7 *4-w Photo B-1 8: 21842 Palm Avenue, APN 0275 223 27. This ancillary structure located on a residential property is unsafe. The structure is dilapidated and the roof is severely sagging. O PSG 50 103 i i' i 1 REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL a \ to 1 ��] i "o�r i)I i� 1 I �1(llcIl(jillt„iiC i3O C7 1,i1C; i1c1GE,Yt::.(i.l'.Ilt r .t211 Jf (X i i'-ra d I errace\iornrrun;t,; f' is 'V'i6CC%i,',tY �rC 1f i;t CRIME RATES An area with a high crime rate that constitutes a serious threat to the public safety and welfare of a community is an economic condition that causes blight according to current statutes of the Redevelopment Law (Section {' 33031(b)(7)). In order to assess how crime may be affecting the Project Area, information was collected from the San Bernardino Sheriff's Department who provides police services to the Project Area. { Certain areas in the Project Area experience a much greater volume of service calls compared to the rest'of the City. Criminal activity hotspots are concentrated in the western portions of the Project Area where the I Agency has identified the greatest need for redevelopment. More specifically, these areas of heightened criminal activity in the Project Area are located primarily around the City's commercial establishments along I Barton Road, areas containing high density housing, and property adjacent to the railroad tracks . Exhibit B-5 on the following page clearly indicates areas of higher and lower concentrations of criminal activity which is primarily consistent with the location of criminal activity hotspots in 2008. Exhibit B-5 references calls-for- service during calendar year 2009 for Uniform Crime Reporting ("UCR") Part I and Part II crimes as well�as other less severe types of activity. i } I ' I I i i I i' I' 1 I ' i i. O PSG 51 i i 4 10' REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL Amendment No o to the Redevelopment Plan for in ; Grand Terrace Community Redeveiopment Pico ect Exhibit B-5: 2009 Calls for Service CITY OF GRAND TERRACE NN ERIFFCORONtiR 2009 Calls for Service A '^:.'A»s`�` �w'^••',i '•(.d, " �..'�p`L T; , fir' w �$"•' > � '°rGti`', 'M' A;`...p..�i 5wa:..�.. � . . a.:` r "w7` '*ti(.'*9�:'•'a.,"�•. �-„ ,"� �a„,.��..:�<' - •��i.. ._ '% tip; w.y ....,.... `'4.S' sF «�„^ S,re.. a ._9` .y�3' a_..r d.• Hot Spot of Concentration of Incidents Very High J High Moderate Low None 6: Clam V.1.1 Bugar.Crime Analyst y \ L (909)387-3542 Created On: 1/2 512 0 1 0 Miles F9r Law EnAwcement Use Orny 0 0125 025 0.5 075 1 o RSA __......._______ ._____ 52 0 Ln � | , | � ' | � / �G��F�� T�� TH2 �|T� ��U��L � , d N d 1 Red \ Arne ne/� .o to :.he �^empm�o� ^ Grand Terrace Coonn /eu -_�_-______ ______ � . � � i Section * of this Report mmuoeo a /ua of projects and programs that may be undertaken by the Ag,* cv|m order` to eliminate remaining blight from the Project Area. Projects such as Town Center, which is planned for the mouth east corner of Barton Road and Michigan Streat, would serve to alleviate crime. This project! is � located in the hearfof a cluster area for high service oaUa and bringing business and resources to the area | would reduce vacant properties and provide on economic boost. This area is currently characterized :by mivad-ohanocber, and without redevelopment Will likely continue to experience higher levels of crime as City resources are not available bo address this problem. ! ' ' / / | / i ( | ' � ` | | / ` | � ! � | ' | | ! ! � | � | | . i � . � � ; / � � | � | � ' � | � | ' | / | i | [ � ` | � i | ' | / P�� / 53 > - - | \ h | 10, |. SECTION C Five-Year Implementation Plan Implementation Plans contain 1) specific goals and objectives for the Project Area, 2) the specific projects to be completed in the Project Area, 3) expenditures to be made during the five-year planning period, and 4) an explanation of how these goals, objectives, and expenditures will eliminate blight within the Project Area. The Five Year Implementation Plan for the Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Project Area, describing proposed projects from 2010 to 2014, is attached to this document as Appendix A. 107 ` SECTION D i Explanation of Why the Elimination of Blight in the Project Area Cannot be Accomplished by Private Enterprise Acting Alone or Through Other Financing Alternatives Other Than Tax Increment Financing Section 33352(d) of Redevelopment Law requires an explanation of why the elimination of blight cannot'be - accomplished by private enterprise alone, or by the City Council's use of financing alternatives other than tax increment financing. Section B provides evidence that significant blight remains in the Project Area despite I! redevelopment activities completed to date. Tax increment is necessary to fund redevelopment projects'to address blight because the public and private sector cannot be expected to alleviate blighting conditions;on their own. G At the time the Project Area was adopted and subsequently amended, the documents and reports prepared in connection with the Project Area established the need for tax increment revenue to address the blighting fconditions present at that time. Funding sources other than tax.increment that are typically utilized, to implement redevelopment typically include Community Development Block Grant ("CDBG") Funds; City capital improvement funds; assessment districts; developer participation; and other private sources. The Agency and City have used other funding sources when available but these other funding sources have historically been inadequate and continue to be inadequate, especially in light of the State-wide general economic downturn. For example, according to the Finance_Department, the City receives less than $30,000 per year in CDBG Funds. The City has also not been eligible for grants due to the low population of the City (less than 13,000 residents) and median income levels in the City are not significantly below the County median income ranges. City resources are insufficient to fund the breadth and scale of redevelopment efforts that would alleviate and ' i reverse the blighting conditions enumerated in Section B of this Report and lift the burden placed on the community without the assistance of redevelopment. As described in Section A of this Report, the total estimated cost of blight remediation activities totals over$36 million. It is impractical for the City to bear these excessive costs because of the lack of sufficient revenues the City is already experiencing. The City's current fiscal year 2009-10 budget shows that in the previous fiscal year, 2008-09, total expenditures exceeded total revenues by over $3 million. More specifically, general fund expenditures exceeded revenues by almostl$1 million in that year alone. The City's Finance Department has confirmed that $900,000 of reserve fund revenues had to be used to fill this funding gap. Additionally, the Finance Department has indicated that available General Fund Reserves are currently $0, while $3.9 million in designated reserve funds have been restricted and set aside to pay existing debt obligations to the Agency. The current fiscal year 2009-10 budget shows revenues exceeding expenditures, this is only the case after three employees were laid off in January 2009 and additional cuts to existing costs were made. The budget states that nearly all sources of revenue are either decreasing or remaining the same, while costs have increased. In total, it is expected that general fund revenues for the current budget year will decrease by $206,709. The revenues that are expected to decrease include those listed in Exhibit D-1 on the following page. �t � I f RSG 55 i 10E REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL \mendmaw 'Nu6 |u'he -'�-mueva!apmm`tFqao for mo ______ (�nd ��m�m �� , �� Exhibit D-1 FY 2009-10 Reduction in General Fund -5.00% Prope=rtytaxes ::Lice Sa I es Taxes Char S Inv - / _ The historic and current lack of City funding for,redevelopment activities and improvements is expected to ' continue into the indefinite future,— especially'given the potential upcoming additional adverse impacts unCity funding sources and expenditure obligations resulting from the State budget shortfall-in FY 2009-10. These demonstrate the City'm inability to fund redevelopment projects and programs required to eliminate blight and the need for continued allocation of tax increment revenues to the Agency as a means to fund redevelopment in the Project Area. In summary, the Cih/o revenue sources are not adequate to maintain o constant level of City-wide basic services much less fund public infrastructure, developmental remmdiaUon, revitalization or affordable housing programs in the Project Area. In foct, a portion of annual redevelopment revenues are currently used to assist with funding the City'n community,enhancement pnogrome, housing programs, infrastructure projects, ' and economic development, planning and public works projects and programs. According to the Agency's fioco| year 2009'10 Statement of |ndabtedneom, redevelopment revenues are contributing to approximately $8OO.00O per year bz general fund costs. These costs are primarily for infrastructure improvements and staff time as City staff spends a significant amount of time,on economic development and other programs that are related Uoredevelopment. |f Amend mant No. Gie not adopted, the tax increment revenues, vvbiohact 000n ongoing funding source that nontribubuotu the costs of many City projects and progoama, will cease to be uoUented, having a ohdoo| and significant impact on current City staffing levels and the continuation of many City services. Tax increment is a financial bno| that enables the government to 000iot residents with property impmovemonto, as well as provide more opportunities for homeownership to innr000a the number of owner occupied homes and encourage neighborhood pride. Tax increment io also used to provide incentives for the private sector ho invest in the area and revitalize the local economy. According to information from Qh/otoft developers and businesses currently have minimal interest in locating in the Project Area. The'City and Agency have unsuccessfully attempted to implement the Outdoors Adventure Center pursuant to a specific plan adopted some years ago due to a lack of private sector interest. Amendment No. 8 will provide sufficient tax R��[� _ - - - _ _ _--_____ - - - 56 � � � . | ' � REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL . � � . Arnon mootNo 0 ILO the Rodc � �weopmm �P � . ^^= y Redevelopment Pi,oi6ct . ___-_____ � . / i increment funding for the Agency to provide developer assistance as well as public facilities and infrastructune � , improvements that will create more attractive and desirable naighborhoodo.. � OvenoU, tax increment gives the Agency the financial resources to foster new development by improving / infrastructure, reconfiguring |oto, negotiating with property owhero, providing assistance to devm|op / developing and rehabilitating property, and soliciting new development. The current financial limits of the / Redevelopment Plan result in a shortfall in revenue that leaves the Agency without the financial resources io ` fund the pn�a�� listed in 8ection A totaling �308 million (excluding financing and administrative 000to� � . . ` '. which are necessary to continue the Agency's redevelopment of the Project Area. Amendment No. G |io _ � necessary, to collect enough box increment bofund these projects. Without Amendment No. G the Agen6 I y � mmu|dneochthehobo|cumu|mtivaamountoftauinonamontthsdmaybacoUected14yearophortothaUme |i - � ' on when the Agency may collectbax increment pursuant to the existing Redevelopment Plan. This mm ( restrict the Agency to collecting tax increment for just 3 additional fiscal years. Amendment No. G will anable � the Agency to collect tax increment up to fiano| year 2033-34, resulting in an additional $137 million in tax y | . | increment over the duration of the Amended Plan. / L Other public funds are unavailable for funding redevelopment ofthe Project Area. The Cib/'s Genemo| Fund ' experienced a $1 million' deficit for fioco| year 2008-00. and the Qh/ had to close this gap by reducing � expenditures(including employee lay-offs)and tapping into reserve funds. State and Federal funding sources � are contingent upon State and Federal Budget constraints and political willingness, and are not oaeou'ra � source of funding for future projects. Amendment No. Gio necessary bo fund redevelopment projects that the \ City cannot fund without tax increment. ! / | . � � | � � | � ! ^ . � ` ! � | ` � | ' | � y | � | � | � | / | ^ ! � | i ' | � . , �J�� 57 ` . `~^^' ! ' )i | SECTION E Proposed Method of Financing, Including the Economic Feasibility of the Plan Amendment Section 33352(e) of Redevelopment- Law requires-'that a report of an agency-to a legislative body include information on the proposed method of financing, including information on the economic feasibility of the proposed Amendment No. 6. INTRODUCTION The current financial limits of the Redevelopment Plan result in a shortfall in revenue that leaves the Agency without the financial resources to fund proposed projects necessary to alleviate blight. Amendment No. 6 will increase the cumulative limit on net tax increment that may be collected by the Agency from $70 million to $225 million, net of pass through payments to affected taxing agencies pursuant to reimbursement agreements, to address this shortfall. Without Amendment No. 6,.it is projected that the Agency would reach its tax in limit in fiscal year 2012-13 and have no further ability to collect tax increment revenue after this time. However, the current Redevelopment Plan time limits, established by Amendment No. 5, allow the Agency to continue to collect tax increment revenue, if the cap has not been reached, until July 15, 2027 . In addition to raising the tax increment cap to $225 million, Amendment No. 6 would also extend the effectiveness of the Plan and the time limit on collecting tax increment revenue from July 15, 2027 for both the Original and Added Areas,to September 27, 2032 for the Original Area and July 15,2034 for the Added Area. Amendment No. 6 also increases the limit on amount of bonded indebtedness that may be collected from $15 million to $75 million in order to ensure that advanced funding can be secured to implement redevelopment projects in a timely manner. Amendment No. 6 will allow taxes attributable to the Project Area,which are allocated to the Agency pursuant to Section.33670(b)of Redevelopment,Law,to be used within the Project Area. The Agency intends to finance redevelopment of the Project Area from the following resources: • Tax Increment Revenues; • Bonded Debt; , • Financial Assistance from the City, County, State of California and/or Federal Government; • Proceeds from lease or sale of Agency-owned property; • Loans from private financial'institutions; and • Any other legally available source. The more typical sources of redevelopment financing maybe employed as described below. FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FROM CITY,.STATE AND/OR THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT The Agency may obtain loans and advances from the City for planning, construction, and operating capital. The City may also defer payments on the Agency loans for land purchases, benefiting the Agency's cash flow. Such assistance may be employed to meet short term cash flow needs. RSG _---- ._-._.__ ...___ :.._. ._.._---..___._ -. -- .--___-._ ss 111 ff li I (i REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL `nE3ndr?ent h'lo. 6 to the Redeveiar)ment !in for",he i r.:rand Terrace Conxruiiity Redeve!oprnent Pratt t -----_-_..._.---.__.-...-----_-.__.._...__....___._-__._.__._�...._..._._.-..___....___�....__.._.___._...._.._.------____.._.__...__.._--------._....----.-------.__.__...._._..�._.__....___..._._:__-. � I ` As available, other funds such as state-apportioned road funds, state housing and infrastructure bond funds, ' state and federal transportation funds, and federal Community Development Block Grants will be u appropriately utilized in conjunction with:the Agency funds for costs of project implementation. l LEASE OR SALE OF AGENCY-OWNED PROPERTY Under the proposed Redevelopment Plan, the Agency may sell, lease, or otherwise encumber its ro ert l; P P P 9 Y Y P P ; Y {G holdings to pay the costs of project implementation.: i PARTICIPATION IN.DEVELOPMENT p If the Agency enters into agreements with property owners, tenants, and/or other developers that provide for revenues to be paid or repaid to the Agency, such revenues may be used to pay project implementation costs. 1 f PROPERTY TAX INCREMENT The Agency will continue to collect property tax increment as provided for in Section 33670(b) of Redevelopment Law, and as authorized in the Redevelopment Plan, to employ tax increment financing Ito fund redevelopment activities. Tax increment revenue is intended to fund ongoing redevelopment activities and,to pay indebtedness incurred by the Agency. Indebtedness includes principal and interest on loans, !° monies advanced, or debts (whether funded, refunded, assumed, or otherwise) incurred by the Agency ito finance or refinance, in whole or in part, redevelopment activities. r The current Redevelopment Plan allows the Agency to cumulatively collect$70 million in net tax increment for the Project Area, net of pass through payments to affected taxing entities. Based on revenue projections provided in Table E-1, this cumulative limit will be reached in approximately 3 years (14 years,prior to the' { expiration of the Agency's authority collect tax increment), which will preclude the Agency from funding proposed projects necessary for the elimination of blight and preventing it from implementing-any new projects at this time. Amendment No. 6 would increase the cumulative tax increment collection limit to $225 million, net of pass through payments to affected taxing entities. Consistent with Redevelopment Law, the-Redevelopment Plan incorporates certain time limits that affect the Agency's ability to use and collect tax increment revenue. The time limit regulating how long the Agency may i; collect tax increment revenue is currently 10 years after the termination of the effectiveness of the redevelopment plan, or July 15, 2027 for both the Original and Added Areas. However, Amendment Noi 6 would alter the effectiveness of the Redevelopment Plan and therefore the time limit on collecting t`ax' increment revenue. Pursuant to Amendment No. 6, the Agency's time limit to collect tax increment would change to 10 years after the new plan effectiveness dates (September 27, 2032 for the Original Area and July f, 15, 2034 for the Added Area). ! l (i Tax increment revenues are distributed to address an array of obligations. As required by Section 33334.2'of Redevelopment Law, a minimum of 20.percent of the Project Area's tax increment revenue will be deposited into the Agency's Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund for the purposes of increasing, improving, and l preserving the community's supply of.low and moderate income housing and debt service related to funding housing projects. I The remaining 80 percent of the tax increment revenue will be used to pay for pre-existing and future Agency obligations to taxing entities, debt service related to funding non-housing projects, and other program expenditures such as infrastructure,,capital facilities, and economic development programs within the Project f Area. Ih j RSG 159 ' I - i { ; 112 REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL Amendment No o io .he i;edrevr lonni�r;t Plan for the rind Terrace%osr,rrunity;?edevelo.ornent Protect BONDED DEBT Under the proposed Redevelopment Plan, the Agency would continue to have the capacity to issue bonds and/or notes for any of its corporate purposes, payable in whole or in part from tax increment revenue generated from the Project Area. Any bonds issued by the Agency are the responsibility of the Agency, and neither the City nor its taxpayers are liable for debt service on the bonds. Redevelopment bonds are typically issued based on current cash flows,without regard to the potential increase in revenues that may lie ahead. The current Redevelopment Plan includes a $15 million limit on the amount of bonded debt that may be outstanding at any one time. The Agency currently has $8.8 million of bonded debt outstanding, leaving only $6.2 million available for additional financing. The Redevelopment Plan's previous time limit to incur bonded debt was rescinded in 2004 so the Agency has the authority-to issue bonded debt throughout the duration of the Redevelopment Plan's effectiveness. However, without Amendment No. 6, the Agency has very little financial capacity to issue new debt to finance the projects and programs necessary to eliminate the remaining blight in the Project Area. Amendment No. 6 proposes increasing this limit to. $75 million, net of payments to affected taxing agencies pursuant to reimbursement agreements, to increase the Agency's financial capacity to fund redevelopment projects in a timely matter. OTHER AVAILABLE SOURCES Any other loans, grants, or financial assistance from the federal government, or any other public or,private source will be utilized, as available and appropriate. The Agency will also consider use of the powers provided by Redevelopment Law to provide construction and other funds for appropriate,projects. Where feasible and appropriate,the Agency may use assessment district and/or Mello-Roos bond financing to pay for the costs of public infrastructure, facilities, and operations. TAX INCREMENT REVENUE PROJECTIONS The primary source of project financing for the Project Area is the collection of tax increment revenues. Table E-1 presents a detailed preliminary forecast of tax increment revenues for the Project Area based on the assumptions noted below: Base Year Values: the Agency receives property tax increment revenue from the Original Area assessed value growth in excess of the 1979-80 base year value of $5,729,360 and from the Added Area assessed value growth in excess of the 1980-81 base year value of$132,105,951. Amendment No. 6 does not alter the base year values of the component areas. Assessed Value Growth Rates: Projections prepared for the Project Area incorporate a 3.5 percent annual growth rate on secured assessed values within the Project Area. Taxing Agency Payments: Pursuant to Section 33401 of Redevelopment Law (as it read when the Project Area was adopted),the Agency entered into pass through agreements with the following taxing agencies: San Bernardino County (including the Free Library, Flood Control, Superintendent of Schools, and CSA 38 Fire), Riverside-Corona Resource Conservation District, San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District, and CJUSD. Additionally, the Fifth Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan obligated the Agency to make payments pursuant to Section 33607.7 of the Redevelopment Law("Statutory Payments')to the City of Grand Terrace, the San Bernardino County Community College District, and the Education Revenue Augmentation Fund. For the first ten years since the Statutory Payments commenced (fiscal years 2004-05 to 2013-14), the Statutory Payments are equal to 25 percent of the Project Area's annual non-housing tax increment revenue (for only the tax increment generated above the 2003-04 adjusted base year). Beginning in the eleventh year (2014-15), in addition to the first 25 percent share, the Agency would be required to pay an additional 21 percent of the incremental increase in non-housing tax increment revenues exceeding amounts in the tenth payment year(2013-14). p RSG - 60 REPORT TOTHE CITY COUNCIL Arno,ndinem>o 6�1hmRodz�veiopmant 'Plamkvho _ ________ Go�dTo�o�o� /m�yRe��2�000~'qacr [ A��nam of Payments h been Should actual( � �y��v , =`= �" � . | revenues exceed or fall below these projections, actual Taxing Agency Payments would bohigher or ( lower. Housing Set-Aside Revenues: As required by Section 23334.2 of Redevelopment Law. the Agency would / deposit not less than 28 percent of Project Area tax increment revenues into the Agency's Housing Fund for the purposes of increasing, improving, and preserving the community's supply of affordable housing. Nonhouoing Revenueo: FinoUy. theboxincrementrevanuenemoiningafterCounb/ adminiotnativehaeo. baxipg agency poymento, existing debt oan/ioe, and housing oat aside depooite, would be available for eligible redevelopment projects, such aainfrastructure impnovementm, seismic retrofitting, development incentives, nemed\adon costs, and other non-housing uses. � � ` |' |' | !` � ' / . � / � ! | - - - - - ( RSG 01 ' P [ Ln REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL Amendment No f)to the Redeveloprnent Plm-i Grand Terrace Community 2009-10 TAX INCREMENT PROJECTIONS(WITH PROPOSED AMENDMENT) Limit Is: TABLE E-1 GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY RED EVELOPIVENT PROJECT $ 225000,000 SUAINV\RY Fiscal Year Total Pass Through Payments by Agency Cumulative Housing Housing Net Nonhousing Bond Debt Service Net Tax Tax Increment Set Bond DS Housing Nonhousing Increment County CJUSD Statutory Pmt Total Net of Pass Aside 2004 TA Revenue 2004 TA Zion Bank Loan Total Revenue (pd by County) (pd by Agency) (pd byAgency) Through Payments 33.35% 66.65% (1997 COP) As of6/30/09: <-RSG estimate 55,755.937 1 2009-10 6,686,075 1.990,630 - 185,168 1.990,630 60,451,382 1,337.215 619,301 717.914 1.237,674 127,424 1.365.098 1.807.965 '2 2010-11 6.959,510 2.072,039 235.719 209.064 2.307,758 65,103,134 1,391,902 619,268 772.634 1,237,607 254,848 1,492,455 1,558.331 3 2011-12 7,242,515 2,156.297 316,904 233,796 2,473,201 69,872,448 1,448,503 667,792 r 780,711 1,334,583 254,848 1,589.430 1.497.584 4 2012-13 7.535.425 2,243,505 295,083 259,395 2,538.588 74,869,285 1.507,085 1,507,085 254,848 254.848 2.975,510 5 2013-14 7,838.588 2,333,764 307,932 285.889 2,641,696 80,066,176 1,567,718 1,567,718 254,848 254.848 3,088,437 6 2014-15 8.152.360 2,427,183 321,038 329,266 2,748.221 65,470,316 1,630,472 1,630.472 254,848 254,848 3.189.554 17 2015-16 8.477115 2,523,871 334,406 374.162 2,858,277 91,01 154 1,695,423 1,695,423 254,848 254,848 3.294,406 8 2016-17 8,813.237 2,623,944 348,041 420.629 2,971,985 96,930,406 1,762,647 1,762.647 254,848 254,848 3,403.128 9 2017-18 9,161123 2.727,519 361.949 468.722 3.089,468 103,002,061 1.832,225 1,832,225 254.848 254,848 3.515.860 10 2018-19 9,521.184 2,834.719 376,135 518,499 3,210,854 109,312,391 1.604,237 1,904,237 254,848 254.848 3.632.747 11 2019-20 9,893,848 2.945,671 390,605 570,017 3,336,276 116.869,963 1.978.770 1.978.770 254,848 254.848 3,753,937 12 2020-21 10.279.555 3,060,507 405,364 623.339 3,465.871 122,683,647 2,055,911 2.055,911 127,424 127.424 4,007 010 13 2021-22 10,678.762 3.179,362 420,418 678.528 3,599,780 129,762,629 2,135.752 2,135.752 - - 4.264.702 14 2022.23 11,091,941 3,302.377 435,774 735.647 3.738.150 137,116,420 2,218.388 2,218,388 - - 4.399.755 ,15 2023-24 11.519.581 3A29,697 451,437 794.766 3.881,133 144,754.868 2,303,91E 2,303,916 - - 4.539,766 16 2024-25 11.962.189 3,561473 467412 855,954 4,028,886 152,688,171 2,392,438 2,392,438 - - 4,684.911 17 2025-26 12,420,288 3.697,862 483.708 919,284 4,181,569 160,926,890 2.484,058 2.484.058 - - 4.835.377 18 2026-27 12.894.421 3,839,024 500.329 984,830 4.339,353 '169,481,958 2.578.884 2,578.884 - - 4.991.353 19 2027-28 13,385,148 3,985,127 517,283 1.052,671 4,502,410 178,364,696 2,677,030 2,677,030 - - 5,153.038 20 2028-29 13.893.050 4,136.343 534,576 1,122,885 4,670,919 187,586,827 2.778.610 2.778,610 - - 5.320.636 21 2029-30 14,418,729 4,292,852 552.214 1.195,558 4,845,067 197,160,490 2,883,746 2,883,746 - - 5,494.359 22 2030-31 14,962,807 4,454,839 570.206 1,270.774 5,025,045 207,098,253 2.992,561 2,992.561 - - 5.674.428 23 2031.32 15.525,928 4.622,496 588.557 1.348,622 5.211,052 217,413,129 3.105,186 3,105,186 - - 5,861,068 24 2032-33 11486,789 3.419.890 480.028 933.051 3,899,918 225,000,000 2,297,358 2,297.358 - - 4.356:163 25 2033-34 225.000,000 Total 254,800.170 75.860,991 9,695,116 16,370,516 85,556,107 50,960,034 1,906.361 49.053.673 3.809,864 2,803,323 6,613,187 95.300,326 • RSG 62 I i REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL ! Annendiment No,6 to the Redevelor )ent Plan for the I ' rand err.-.ice Community Reu'evr lo,r m2nt Fro;ect Table E-1 presents annual estimates of assessed values, new development, gross tax increment revenue, taxing agency payments, and net revenues to the Agency's housing and non-housing funds. A summary of these annual projections delineating the cumulative total of these figures is presented in Table E-2 below. Summary of Project Tax Increment Revenues Table E-2 Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Project Area i Assumptions Current Year Assessed Value(2009-10) $ 806,442,769 Annual Assessed Value Growth Rate 3.5% Time Limit on Receipt of Tax Increment 7/15/2034 i Forecast Cumulative Gross Tax Increment Revenue $ 254,800,170 Less:20%Gross Tax Increment Revenue to Housing Fund 50,960,034 Non-Housing Fund Total Revenue to be Deposited into the Non-housing Fund 203,840,136 Less:Taxing Agency Payments (per Agreements) 9,695,116 Less:County Administered Agreements 75,860,991 Less:Statutory Payments (per HSC 33607.7) 16,370,616 Less:Non-housing Debt Service 6,613,187 171,161,317 Housing Fund Total Revenue to be Deposited into the Housing Fund 50,960,034 i Less:Housing Debt Service 1,906,361 49,053,673 1 Total to Agency for Future Projects 220,214,990 I Non-Housing Fund 171,161,317 i Housing Fund 49,053,673 Net Present Value of Non-Housing Fund 44,059,473 The total projected revenue that may be available to the Agency to fund project costs is approximately$220.2 million, consisting of $49 million for affordable housing purposes and $171.2 million for non-housing purposes. As shown above, the net present value of the non-housing fund as a result of Amendment No. 6, or the value of these future revenues in 2010 dollars, has been estimated at $44 million. These projected revenues are compared to total project costs in the following section. i i, O PSG 63 i f 11E REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL .`wl'enda enit No 6"•.a the n'edevelonwent i=isn for,hc3 rar?d Terrorp Comm.-ii.if,fiy idP,Cle elop ment Pfoiect ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS Redevelopment of the Project Area may involve hundreds of millions'of dollars of public investment in order to stimulate private investment and remove blight in the Project Area. Section A of this Report includes a proposed list of the potential range of projects associated with this effort, based on the information available at this time. Table E-3 below documents the projected sources and uses of tax increment revenue projected from the Project Area without Amendment No. 6 and illustrates the Agency's need to extend and increase financial limits in the Redevelopment Plan. Sources and Uses Table E-3 Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Project Area Housing Non-Housing Total Sources1 Tax Increment Revenue' 2,511,626 5,124,246 7,635,872 Total Sources 2,511,626 5,124,246 7,635,872 Uses Affordable Housing Programs 5,616,000 5,616,000 Public InfrastructureMletlands Remediation 17,500,000 17,500,000 Miscellaneous Revitalization Programs 300,000 300,000 Ongoing Project and Program Costs 2 7,464,936 7,464,936 Total Uses 5,616,000 25,264,936 30,880,936 1 curulatiee tax incrErrent revenue projected to be received betmen fy2009-10 and fy2011-12 based on current Redevelopment Plan lints. 2 These costs include capital projects and eccnornc development amhead and administrative costs over the life of Plan,net present valued at 61/6. The amount of funds expended on projects would exceed the $7.6 million of revenue expected to be generated by the Project Area under the current Redevelopment Plan limits, but would not exceed the amount of revenue generated if the Redevelopment Plan limits were amended to allow the Agency to collect net tax increment revenue up to the proposed cumulative $225 million tax increment limit and extension of the time period for the Agency to collect tax increment. As described in Section A, when inflation, interest and administration costs to implement proposed projects are applied to the $25.3 million in non-housing costs above, the total cost for non-housing projects and programs to remediate remaining blighting in the Proiect Area is approximately $44 million (Table A-4), which is very close to the net present value of tax increment revenues received under the amended time and financial limits. When housing costs are added to this figure, total project and program costs increase to $49.6 million including these extra cost factors. Project costs will be adjusted depending on available revenue over time. REASONS FOR THE ALLOCATION OF THE TAX INCREMENT Section B provides evidence that significant blight remains in the Project Area. Tax increment is necessary to fund redevelopment projects to address blight because the government and private sector cannot be expected to alleviate blighting conditions on their own. Tax increment is a financial tool that enables the 0 RSG - - 64 117 i i' REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL Arnandr*ieni No 6:o r.he Redeve!opnnent P!,-nn for=he '.nand terrace Community Red vP,lop-ll@;lt Prr �:CI f _._.._._.. -—..._._.. ------------ .. - ---.. .._..._.._..._._..._—__..._...- ..._...._. ..-----._.._.__..__..._....-- ...—_. _..-.. i government to assist residents with property improvements. Tax increment is also used to provide incentives for the private sector to invest in the area and revitalize the local economy. The physical and economic ! impairments on the Southwest Commercial Site have prevented the development of the property. The City's General Fund revenue is insufficient to alleviate the blight within the Project Area. Amendment No. 6 is necessary to fund redevelopment projects that the City cannot fund without tax increment. Tax increment gives the Agency the financial resources to foster new development by improving infrastructure, reconfiguring lots, negotiating with property owners, providing assistance to developers, building and rehabilitating property, and soliciting new development. The projects proposed to alleviate blight within the Project Area are discussed in the next section. Table E-4 on the following page presents a comparison of the funds that could be available to the City and Agency, with and without Amendment No. 6. i I i I I i i r I' i i I, i; O RSG 65 i' I 11! REPOR T TO THE CITY COUNCIL Projected Property Tax Revenues with Existing Limits vs.Proposed Limits Table E-4 Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Project Year With With Proposed Limits(After Amendment) To Agency /1 To City /2 Total To Agency To City Total 2009'10 $ 2.525,878 $ 301/068 $ 2.828.947 $ 2,525,878 $ 301,068 $ 2,820,947 2010'11 $ 2.330,965 $ 306,670 2,638,635 $ 2,330,985 $ 305,670 2,638,635 . - 201142 $ 2,278,205 $ 310,432 2,588,727 o 2,278,295 $ 310/432 2,588,727 2012-13 $ 500.733 $ 1,492,983 1,993,698 o 4,482,595 $ 315,381 4.797.957 ' 2013714 $ (354,848) $ 1.774,798 1,519,948 $ 4,658.155 $ 320/463 4.976,618 201445 $ (354.848) $ 1.835,215 1.580.388 $ 4.820.028 n 328.818 5.140.842 2015'18 $ (254.848) $ 1.897.740 1.642.902 * 4.989.828 $ 337,481 5.327.290 2010'17 * (254.848) $ 1.902,472 1.707.625 $ 5.165,778 $ 346/400 5.512.184 2017'18 * (254.848) $ 2.029,460 1^774,613 $ 5.348.085 $ 355.669 5.703.754 201849 $ (254.848) * 2.098,793 1.843.946 $ 5.536.984 $ 385.254 5.902.238 � 3019'20 $ (254.848) '$ �,170.553 1.916.705 o 5.732.707 $ 375.174 8.107,881 2020'21 $ (127,424) $ 2,244.824 2.117,400 $ 8.062.921 $ 885/442 8,448.363 2021-22 $ - $ 2.321,694 2.321.694 $ 8/400,454 $ 396.069 6.798.523 2022-23 * ' $ 3/401.255 2,401,255 $ 8.618.143 $ 407.068 7.025,311 2023-24 * ' $ 2.483.800 2,483.800 n 6.843.882 $ 418/452 7.262.133 2024'25 $ ' $ 2.588.828 2.508.828 $ 7.077.349 $ 430.234 7.507.583 2025'26 * ' $ 2.657,039 2.857,038 $ 7.319,435 $ 442/428 7.781.883 2028'27 $ ' 3.877,235 2.877,235 $ 7.570,237 $ 455.050 8.025,287 2027'28 $ - 2.842.830 2.842.830 $ 7,930.088 $ 460.113 8.298.181 . 2028'29 $ ' 3.940.631 2.940,631 $ 8.099,246 o 481.633 8.580.880 ` - 2029-30 $ ' 3.041.855 3.041,855 * 8.378.105 m 495.827 8.873.732 2030'31 $ ' 3.148,621 3.146.621 n 8,686.989 $ 510.111 9.177.100 2031-32 $ ' 3,255.055 3,265,055 $ 8.968,254 $ 525.101 9/491.355 2032-33 $ - 2/477,288 2,477,288 $ 6.853,820 $ 445.079 7.098.900 203334 $ 265 $ $ 265413 265 ,413 C"...".a"°w 5 /2*5/5 51,703,337 144353999 9787597 154141596 Notes: 1/ Consists of both housing set aside funds and nonhousing tax increment after taxing agency payments and bond debt service. Negative figures reflect scheduled bond debt service payments that moot be accrued from remaining tax increment revenue unless plan amendment is approved. 2/ Tax increment to City reflects:a)City's 19.2558%share of taxes from Project Area base year value, b)Citys share of statutory payments from redevelopment tax increment revenue,and n)Cityshmrmof property taxes after existing limits expire. ' SUMMARY The current financial limits of the Redevelopment Plan result in m shortfall in revenue that |aavmo the Agency without the financial resources to fund proposed projects necessary boalleviate blight. Amendment No. G will increase the limit on tax increment that may be collected by the Agency from $70 million to $225 million to address this shortfall. Without Amendment No. 6, the Agency would reach its tax increment limit in fiscal year 2012'13 instead of2O32'33 for the [)hQino| Area and 2033-34 for the Added Area. Amendment No. 8 also increases the limit on amount ofbonded indebtedness that may becollected from $15 million to $76 million P�(� _ _ ' SG 119 I, I ' REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL Arnendi ont.No 6,o the Redevelopment P!'an for tI e, ;grand i errace Cowm amity'Redevelopment Prof?ct ..............__.__.--.-....___._. ...... ..__.._...____._.__..._...._....__.. .._..--__-___..__..._...-.-----..__._..__...._.._..-- and repeals the time limit to incur debt in order to ensure that advanced funding can be secured to implement iredevelopment projects in a timely matter. 4, 1 ' I, I i� i� I I i I fI ' f t 1 ' 1 i I RSG 67 I' I 12( SECTION F Method of. Relocation This Section sets forth the general policies for the administration of the relocation program and the provision of services and benefits to displaced families, individuals, businesses, and community institutions. This document should be considered as only a general plan. As recommended in an October 1982 State Department of Housing and Community Development study entitled "A Study. of Relocation and Housing Development in California Redevelopment Agencies," a comprehensive and detailed plan need not be developed until relocation is imminent. At that time, a more specific analysis will be prepared, pursuant to Title 25, Section 6038 of the California Administrative Code. STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS Section 33352(f)of the Redevelopment Law requires that this Report contain: A method or plan for the relocation-of families and persons to be temporarily or permanently.displaced from housing facilities in the project area, which method or plan shall include the provision required by Section 33411.1 of the Redevelopment Law that no persons or families of low or moderate income shall be displaced unless and until there is a suitable housing unit available and ready for occupancy by the displaced person or family at rents comparable to those at the time of their displacement. ANALYSIS It should be noted at the outset that the Amended and Restated Redevelopment Plan does not contemplate the imminent relocation of any households or businesses to accomplish its goals. Furthermore, relocation will _ only be used if it is reasonably necessary to redevelop a property. The Agency would not commence any relocation until it has firm commitments from public funding sources or competent developers that the desired redevelopment of the area will take place in a timely manner and with the least disruption to existing homes and businesses reasonably necessary. The Agency has established a method and plan for relocation of families and persons to be displaced in connection with any Agency project. The adopted Agency relocation policy complies with Section 33367(d)(7) of the Redevelopment Law, requiring that redevelopment agencies have a feasible relocation method or plan if the Agency's plans for redevelopment are to result in the displacement of any occupants 'of housing or businesses in the Project Area. If relocation becomes necessary, specific relocation plans containing detailed household and housing availability surveys, will be prepared at the initiation of each particular land assembly,or development project to ensure that such conditions prevail at that time as well. Projects involving relocation will be authorized by the Agency only if the'specific relocation can ensure the availability of sufficient suitable and affordable housing to meet the specific relocation needs created by the land assembly project. In summary, it is reasonable to conclude that at the time of adoption of the Amended and Redevelopment Restated Plan, the Agency will have a feasible method of meeting-the maximum foreseeable relocation needs that may result from implementation of the Amended and Restated Redevelopment Plan. RELOCATION POLICIES AND PROCEDURES In order to implement the California Relocation Assistance Act in the Project Area, the Agency has adopted for local use the relocation guidelines issued by the State of California, Department of Housing and Community Development, pursuant to Government Code Section 7260 et seq and Health and Safety Code Section 50460. These relocation guidelines are set forth in the California Administrative Code, Title 25, Chapter 6 Subchapter 1 (Section 6000 et seq.), and are incorporated fully herein by this reference. • R S G -. 68 121 i I Relocation of displaced persons, families, and businesses within the Project Area will be accomplished in full compliance with the State guidelines as they currently exist or as they may be amended from time to time. It is the policy of the City Council and the Agency that: A. Redevelopment activities will be carried out in a manner which minimizes relocation and hardship. i' B. No persons or families of low-and moderate-income shall be displaced unless and until there is a suitable housing unit available and ready for occupancy by such persons that is safe, decent and sanitary and available at comparable rents. C. All displaced families and individuals will be afforded the opportunity to live in a decent, safe and sanitary dwelling without overcrowding. D. The cost of such housing shall be reasonable relative to family income. i E. There will be no discrimination based upon race, color, creed, religion, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin or ancestry in relocation activities. F. Displaced households will be offered the opportunity to occupy housing that is reasonably accessible to their places of employment,public transportation, shopping and public facilities. G. Business concerns and nonprofit organizations to be displaced will be provided assistance to aid in their satisfactory re-establishment with a minimum of delay and loss of earnings. H. Each eligible person and business will be provided information on availability and prices of comparable ' sales and rental housing and commercial properties. When necessary, counseling and referral service f will be provided. Rules and regulations detailing procedures for providing services and making payments will be made in ' accordance with the above-mentioned guidelines and applicable state law. METHODS FOR ASSURING AVAILABILITY OF RELOCATION HOUSING The Agency will work with local housing authorities and nonprofit sponsors of other subsidized housing.to assist eligible persons in applying for priority placement in affordable housing within the City. ! If, during the course of program implementation, it is determined that adequate relocation housing is not available and cannot otherwise be made available, the Agency shall take action to develop such housing in accordance with State guidelines. RELOCATION PAYMENTS Relocation payments will be made to all eligible displaced persons, businesses and nonprofit organizations pursuant to Section 7260 et seq. of the Government Code i i RSG - _ 69 i 12; SECTION G Analysis of the Preliminary Plan Section 33352(g) of Redevelopment Law requires the inclusion of an analysis,of the Preliminary Plan for the Project Area. Amendment No. 6 does not alter the boundaries of the Project Area, thus a Preliminary Plan is not required and was not prepared for Amendment No. 6. • RSG - _ 70 123 fir I I 1 1 I Ih 4 " I SECTION H I, r j! Report of the Planning Commission Section 33352(h)of Redevelopment Law requires inclusion of a report of the Planning Commission of the City t, of Grand Terrace ("Planning Commission"). The Planning Commission adopted its report on the conformityiof i+ the Amendment No. 6 with the City's General Plan on February 4, 2010, by Resolution No. 10-01 which is incorporated herein by reference. Pursuant to the Planning Commission's action, the Amendment No.; 6 conforms to the General Plan of the City of Grand Terrace, as it exists today or is hereafter amended: f+I I • I 14 � I I ,I i r. N _ 0 n RSG i 71 I - a 124 SECTION Report of the Project Area Committee A Project Area Committee ("PAC") does not exist for Amendment No. 6. Pursuant to Section 33385.3 of Redevelopment Law, a Project Area Committee ("PAC") is required if the Agency proposes to amend a redevelopment plan to:, (1) grant the authority to the Agency to acquire by eminent domain property on which persons reside in a project area in which a substantial number of low- and moderate-income persons reside; or(2) add territory in which a substantial number of low-and moderate-income persons reside and grant the authority to the Agency to acquire, by eminent domain, property on which persons reside in the added territory. Amendment No. 6 does not grant the Agency eminent domain authority to acquire property and thus does not require the formation of a PAC. In fact, one of the purposes of Amendment No. 6 is to rescind and terminate the Agency's current eminent domain authority that would have expired on August 22, 2011. However, City staff will be conducting,a public information meeting as part of a City Council workshop to discuss the Amendment No. 6 with property owners,,residents, businesses and other interested parties. This workshop has been tentatively scheduled for March 9, 2010. Notice of the workshop will be provided via published notice in the San Bernardino County Sun and will be posted in several locations within the Project Area. RSG 72 125 i f SECTION J Statement of Conformance to the General Plan i' i, Section 333520)of Redevelopment Law requires a report of General Plan conformance per Section 65402.of the Government Code. As set forth in Section H, on February 4, 2010, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 10-01 finding that Amendment No. 6 is in conformity with the City's General Plan, as it exists now or is hereafter amended. I, i� i I r k i i { I I f 1 i� i _. ._............ O RSG 173 i i 12E SECTION K Environmental Documentation Section 33352(k) of the Redevelopment Law requires the inclusion of the report prepared pursuant to Section 21151 of the Public Resources Code. An Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") is being prepared in connection with the Amended and Restated Redevelopment Plan for Amendment No. 6 and also for the City's General ,Plan Update by the Chamber Group, pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq., "CEQA") guidelines. The Draft EIR is incorporated herein by reference. A Final EIR will be completed in March 2010 and presented for Agency certification in April 2010. The Draft EIR reviewed all potential environmental impacts associated with the City's General Plan Update and the implementation of the Amended Redevelopment Plan. Topics addressed in the Draft EIR include: air quality; biological resources; cultural and historic resources; hazards and hazardous materials; hydrology and water quality; noise; public services, and utilities; and transportation and circulation. The Draft EIR also addresses all other topics and sections as required by CEQA. The Draft EIR analyzes the significant short- and long-term impacts related to the General Plan Update and the adoption of the Amended Plan. The Draft EIR includes information gathered from a Notice of Preparation released on January 22, 2010, consultation with potentially affected entities, and available literature and reference documents. The Draft EIR was completed and circulated for public review on January 22, 2010. Comments on the Draft EIR will be due on March 7, 2010. In accordance with the Agency's environmental review procedures, the Agency will consider certifying the EIR at a joint public hearing in April 2010. SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS In general, the Draft EIR determines that Amendment No. 6 is fiscal and administrative in character and will, in and of itself, have no physical impacts in the Project Area. The Draft EIR also states that because any future programs or projects proposed to be undertaken by the Agency must be consistent with the City's General Plan, the environmental analysis contained in the Draft EIR with regard to the General Plan update adequately considers potential impacts related to the redevelopment plan amendment component of the project. The Final EIR will include responses to comments received during the 45-day review period. It will be considered by the City Council and Agency Board for certification prior to the joint public hearing scheduled for April 2010. RSG 74 127 � ' ' «��l7UU�� U � SECTION n��x� �~ � / | Report of the County Fiscal [lff'CB[ ! | A report of the San Bernardino County Auditor-Controller prepared in accordance with Section 33328,cf ' Redevelopment Law is not required for Amendment No. 6 because the boundaries of the Project Area are not � being altered. � ' � ( � � � . i � , � / / \ � < / | ` [ ! | � i [ \ � ` / !` � � � \ / � ' - — ___ \ RSG 75 \ -- \ � � . 1Z SECTION M Neighborhood Impact Report Redevelopment Law requires that a Neighborhood Impact Report discuss the impact Amendment No. 6 will have on low and moderate persons or families in the following areas: relocation, traffic circulation, environmental quality, availability of community facilities and services, effect on school population and quality of education, property assessments and taxes, and other matters affecting the physical and social quality of the neighborhood. Additional issues that the neighborhood impact report must address include: the number of low or moderate- income dwelling units to be removed or destroyed; the number of low or moderate income persons or families expected to be displaced; the general location of housing to be rehabilitated, developed or constructed; the number of dwelling units planned for construction or rehabilitation to house persons and families of low or moderate income (other than replacement housing); the projected means of financing the aforementioned dwelling units; and the projected timetable for meeting a redevelopment plan's relocation, rehabilitation, and replacement housing objectives. RELOCATION The Redevelopment Plan authorizes the Agency to acquire certain non-residential property using eminent domain before July 22, 2011. However, Amendment No. 6 will rescind the Agency's eminent domain authority. If relocation is required in connection with redevelopment activities, the Agency will adhere to and follow the Method of Relocation referenced in Section F of this Report. TRAFFIC CIRCULATION The Redevelopment Plan permits the Agency to implement projects to improve traffic circulation, some of which are mentioned in Section A of this Report. Amendment No. 6 will allow the Agency to fund improvements such as widening roads, adding parking, completing bridge improvements, and creating roads and sidewalks, among other things. The projects proposed by the Agency will improve circulation, mitigate traffic deficiencies, and provide general benefits to the Project Area consistent with the circulation element of the General Plan and other related documents. An Environmental Impact Report for the General Plan Update and Amendment No. 6 has been prepared and will be reviewed by the Agency and City Council in April 2010. It will explain traffic circulation impacts in more detail. ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Amendment No. 6 will modify the Redevelopment Plan to comply with the General Plan or other related land use policy documents. Adherence to adopted land use policies will ensure that implementation of the Redevelopment Plan will lessen or avoid potential impacts. Future development will be reviewed by the City and the Agency to ensure that architectural, landscaping, and urban design principles are adhered to and that compatibility in land uses is maintained. If required, more specific environmental analysis will take place for future development as required by the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA"). As stated in Section K of this Report, the Draft EIR determines that Amendment No. 6 is fiscal and administrative in character and will, in and of itself, have no physical impacts in the Project Area. The Draft EIR also states that because any future programs or projects proposed to be undertaken by the Agency must be consistent with the City's General Plan, the environmental analysis contained in the Draft EIR with regard to the General Plan update adequately considers potential impacts related to the redevelopment plan amendment component of the project RSG 76 129 REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL Amendment No.6 to the Redevelopment Plan for the Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Project i AVAILABILITY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES AND SERVICES Amendment No 6 will modify the Redevelopment Plan to provide that any redevelopment activity shall be subject to, and consistent with, the policies set forth in the City's General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and local codes and ordinances, as they now exist or are hereafter amended. The General Plan incorporates policies to mitigate impacts on public services and facilities. Implementation of the Redevelopment Plan and its proposed projects are expected to improve the City's existing community facilities and services. Amendment No. 6 will allow the Agency to utilize increased tax increment revenues to provide for the upgrading of i existing, and construction of new, community facilities, which will be of benefit to the Project Area. EFFECT ON SCHOOL POPULATION AND QUALITY OF EDUCATION I The Project Area is served by the Colton Joint Unified School District("District"). Future redevelopment in the Project Area would be consistent with the City's General Plan and could result in the generation of additional school-age children and raise demand for educational services. Pursuant to existing California law, any future development, including non-residential uses, will be required to pay statutory fees, which fully mitigate potential impacts on school facilities. Therefore, no significant impacts are anticipated and no mitigation measures are required. The District receives pass through payments pursuant to an existing fiscal mitigation agreement that provides for a full (100 percent) pass through of the tax increment revenue generated from inflationary adjustments to the Project Area's base year value. The supplemental tax increment agreement between the Agency and the District provides that the Agency will use tax increment revenues generated in the Project Area for park improvements to Richard Rollins Park and athletic field improvements for Terrace Hills Middle School. i PROPERTY TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS The Redevelopment Plan calls for various methods of financing its implementation. Because redevelopment agencies do not have the constitutional authority to impose taxes, implementation of the Redevelopment Plan does not cause an increase in property tax rates. Rather, the principal method of financing redevelopment is i the utilization of tax increment revenues generated by the Project Area. Tax increment financing reallocates property tax revenues generated by increases in the assessed value of property in the Project Area. Improvement to Project Area property may result in higher assessed valuation in the same way that improving property in any area may result in increased assessed value. i LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSING PROGRAM A. Number of Dwelling Units Housing Low and Moderate Income Households Expected to be Destroyed or Removed Over the Remaining Life of the Redevelopment Plan The Agency currently does not have any plans to destroy or remove dwelling units housing low and moderate income households over the remaining life of the Redevelopment Plan. B. Number of Persons and Families of Low and Moderate Income Expected to be Displaced Over the Remaining Life of the Redevelopment Plan The Agency currently does not have any plans to displace low and moderate income individuals over the remaining life of the Redevelopment Plan. C General Location of Replacement Low and Moderate Income Housing to be Rehabilitated, Developed and Constructed PSG 77 13( REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL Amendment No.6 to the Redevelopment Plan for the Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Project The Agency currently does not have any plans that would remove or destroy any housing units as a result of implementation of the Redevelopment Plan. It is important to note that the Agency is rescinding its eminent domain authority as part of Amendment No. 6. However, if any destruction or removal occurs as a result of an Agency project pursuant to applicable sections of Redevelopment Law, it is the Agency's intention that any replacement housing units be located within the Project Area that permit residential uses and any new units may be constructed in areas within the Project Area where such uses are permitted. D. Number of Dwelling Units Housing Persons of Low and Moderate Income Planned for Construction or Rehabilitation Other than Replacement Housing The Agency is required to allocate 20 percent of the tax increment generated by the Project Area to increase, improve and preserve the community's supply of low and moderate income housing. The Agency intends to use these funds to construct, rehabilitate and improve low and moderate income housing within the Project Area. The exact number of dwelling units that will be constructed or rehabilitated cannot be estimated at this time; however,the Agency will implement a housing program that addresses the housing needs and problems of the Project Area pursuant to the Housing Element of the City's General Plan. The Implementation Plan contained in Section C of this Report lists specific affordable housing activities proposed from 2010 - 2014. According to the 2010-2014 Implementation Plan, included in Section C of this Report, 45 housing units are projected to be constructed or substantially within the Project Area between 2010 and 2014. Of this amount, 7 units are expected to be available for low income households, and 3 units would be available to very low income households during the next five years. E. Projected Means of Financing Rehabilitation and New Construction of Housing for Low and Moderate Income Households The Agency intends to utilize not less than 20 percent of its tax increment revenues to finance the rehabilitation, construction and purchase of, and mortgage assistance to, housing for low and moderate - . income households, in accordance with the provisions of Redevelopment Law as it now exists or may �! hereafter be amended. The Agency will also cooperate with the City,to pool funds and resources beyond the tax increment set aside funds if it is determined to be necessary by both legislative bodies in order to improve the City's affordable housing stock. F. Projected Timetable for Meeting the Redevelopment Plans'Relocation, Rehabilitation and Replacement Housing Objectives The Agency has no plans to remove any housing units at this time. As stated previously, Amendment No. 6 includes the removal and elimination of the Agency's eminent domain authority in the Project Area. However, if any units are destroyed or removed as a result of an Agency project, pursuant to applicable sections of Redevelopment Law, replacement housing would be completed within four years following the demolition of any occupied affordable unit. The time frame for rehabilitating units pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan will be subject to the availability of housing fund revenues. Rehabilitation activities will be gradually phased over the duration of the Redevelopment Plan. aRSG - 78 131 IY� � 'r, I a - I 1 I P 4 I SECTION N 1 Summary of Agency's Consultations with Affected Taxing Entities and Response to Said Entities Concerns Regarding the Plan a Amendment r N According to reports obtained from the County of San Bernardino Auditor-Controller's Office, the following 1; taxing agencies are affected by the proposed Amendment No. 6: i � 1 ■ Colton Joint Unified School.District - Y i ■ San Bernardino Community College ■ San Bernardino County Superintendent of Schools � I I ■ San Bernardino County Fire Protection District I ■ Riverside Corona Resource Conservation District a ■, San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District p ■ San Bernardino County Library j ■ San Bernardino County Flood Control District ■ County of San.Bernardino I M ■ City of Grand Terrace On January 21, 2010, the affected taxing agencies shown above were sent a copy of both the Preliminary Report and the Draft Amended and Restated Redevelopment. As a part of each of these mailings, the ` Agency offered to consult with the affected taxing agencies pursuant to Section 33328 of Redevelopment �u Law. No responses were received as of February 1, 2010. If the Agency receives a response in the future, Agency staff will notify the City Council and the Agency Board. The State Department of Housing and Urban Development and Department of Finance were also sent ion January 21, 2010 a copy of the Preliminary Report (also acting as the report required by Redevelopment.Law Section 33451.5 (c), the Draft Amended and Restated Redevelopment Plan, and a notice of the joint public hearing.' No responses were received as of February 23, 2010. If the Agency receives a response in the future,Agency staff will notify the City Council and Agency Board. The Agency will transmit a notice of the April 27, 2010 joint public,hearing to all affected taxing agencies'on a March 4, 2010. The Agency will again offer to consult with the affected taxing agencies. f I;I 1 p I fY , h .4 1 R - f i 4 I 1 r ; C I h a i i Y ' I � I 0 f O RSG 79 I,t - i i 13: I APPENDIX A Five-Year Implementation Plan For The Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Project Area • RSG _ so 133 f j Grand Terrace Redevelopment Project Area I Five-Year Implementation Plan 2010 through 2014 i I Y INTRODUCTION I f This document is the Five-Year Implementation Plan for the Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Project of the City of Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Agency (Agency)., In fulfillment of Article 16.5 of California Community Redevelopment Law (CRL), the Agency has prepared the Implementation Plan for the Grand Terrace Redevelopment Project Area, and this ' Implementation Plan was adopted by the Agency following a duly noticed public hearing held on December 8, 2009. The Implementation Plan presents the Agency's goals and objectives, anticipated projects and f programs, and estimated expenditures for the five-year planning period, 2010 to 2014. It also addresses the Agency's affordable housing production and replacement housing needs and achievements. i The Implementation Plan conforms to the City's General Plan and has been prepared according to guidelines established in the programs and goals outlined in the Housing Element of the General Plan. i f I i f f 4 i I Page 1 of 22 December 8, 2009 i I 13. Grand Terrace Redevelopment Project Area Five-Year Implementation Plan 2010 through 2014 ABOUT THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PROJECT AREA The Redevelopment Plan for the Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Project was originally adopted by the City Council in 1979 via Ordinance No.25 and comprised a 640-acre Project Area. In accordance with California Community Redevelopment Law (CCRL; California Health and Safety Code Section 33000, et seq.), it provides the Agency of the City of Grand Terrace with powers, duties and obligations to implement a program for the redevelopment, rehabilitation, and revitalization of areas within the Redevelopment Plan boundaries. The Redevelopment Plan has since undergone additional amendments. Ordinance No. 31 was adopted on March 20, 1980 and it provided for allocations to affected taxing agencies. Ordinance No. 52 was adopted on July 16, 1981, which expanded the Project Area to include ail lands within the City thereby increasing the limits of the Project Area. City Council approval of Ordinance No. 187 in 1999 authorized the use of eminent domain to acquire non-residentially zoned property, or with the owner's consent. A fourth amendment was adopted via Ordinance;.No. 202 in September 2002 to clarify the description of the Redevelopment Plan's dollar limit on tax revenue. The fifth and most recent amendment occurred in 2004 when the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 212 to extend the duration of the Redevelopment Plan and the time limit on paying indebtedness or receiving property taxes pursuant to the Plan to July 15, 2027. Table 1: Revised Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Project Adoption date 1979, amended 1981 Expiration of Plan 2017 No time limit for non-residentially Time Limit for Use of Eminent Domain zoned properties, no authority for residentially zoned properties _ Time Limit to Incur Debt 2017 Time Limit to Repay Debt 2027 The entire City limits are located within the Project Area, which allows the Agency to embark on infrastructure, economic development, affordable housing, and other initiatives to mitigate blight in the community. Redevelopment in the Project Area has been responsible for development of much of the City's public infrastructure, preservation of the community's supply of affordable housing and development of new affordable residential properties, and expansion of recreational and community facilities. The Redevelopment Plan provides the Agency the resources to finance and complete these projects without burdening property owners. The Agency has the authority to complete redevelopment projects for the next seven and one-half(7'/2) years, until the Redevelopment Plan's effectiveness expires in July of 2017. Page 2 of 22 December 8, 2009 135 I Grand Terrace Redevelopment Project Area Five-Year Implementation Plan 2010 through 2014 PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN i An amendment to the Redevelopment Plan is currently underway, and is expected to be j considered for adoption in 2010, subsequent to the adoption of this Implementation Plan. The proposed amendments to the Redevelopment Plan include: • Extending the duration of the Redevelopment Plan and time limit to collect tax increment revenue by seven years, pursuant to Section 33333.6 of Community Redevelopment Law; ti Increasing the limitation on the amount of tax increment that can be allocated to the Agency from the Project Area from $70 Million to $225,000 Million; II,, { Increasing the limitation on the amount of bonded indebtedness that can be outstanding at one time from $15 Million to $65 Million; I' Replacing the description of land uses in the Redevelopment Plan with language that directly refers to the City's General Plan, Zoning Code, and other applicable land use ` policies and standards, as they currently exists and may be hereafter amended; and r • Amending and restating the-Redevelopment Plan to incorporate prior amendments into a single document. I. If approved, the amendment will modify time and financial limits on the Redevelopment Plan for the 1 G Project Area. The amendment is being proposed because the current limits will not allow the Agency to implement projects and programs necessary to alleviate blight and provide affordable housing within the Project Area. The current financial cap of$70 Million over the life of the Plan r will only allow the Agency to collect tax increment revenue approximately through fiscal year 2011-2012, at which time the Agency's debt will not have been completely paid off and the Agency's housing obligations will not have been completed. The Agency will not have revenue to implement any programs or projects beyond the 2011-12 fiscal year. I If the amendment is approved, it is anticipated that the mid-term review of this Implementation Plan will be updated to reflect the Redevelopment Plan Amendment. 3 IF p 1 f, I. ' f Page 3 of 22 Ip December 8, 2009 13E Grand Terrace Redevelopment Project Area Five-Year Implementation Plan 2010 through 2014 RECENT ACCOMPLISHMENTS In the last five years, the Agency has championed many successful projects and programs in the Project Area. Public Infrastructure • High School and Public Infrastructure Improvements. Through a partnership with the Colton Joint Unified School District, property was assembled for the new high school and businesses were relocated. A City of Riverside 48-inch water line was relocated and water line easements were transferred to the City of Riverside for maintenance. Negotiations continue with Riverside County Transportation Agency and Union Pacific Railroad to complete improvements to Main Street. • Property Acquisition for Project Site Assembly. Property acquisition for both the freeway- oriented 100-acre project (former Outdoor Adventure Center) and the Town Square Commercial Project has been underway in partnership with private development partners. In addition, the Agency is pursuing additional opportunities while sales prices are low to assemble property for projects at other locations that will provide new jobs and services for residents. • Commercial Improvement Grant Program. This program is available to property owners and/or business owners as an economic incentive to rehabilitate existing commercial structures. Implementation of the program is expected to eliminate blight, yield a stronger commercial presence, and increase the likelihood of new business development. The program focuses on the exterior improvement of commercial buildings, including new paint/stucco, new doors and windows, decorative awnings, signage, landscaping and lighting. One major project is underway and a second has been submitted. Both are shopping center rehabilitations. • Completed design plans to underground overhead utility lines along a segment of Barton Road. • Completed design of community signs to strengthen civic and cultural functions. • Acquired property along Barton Road and demolished abandoned on-site structures. • Acquired property along Vista Grande Avenue and demolished abandoned on-site structures for a future park facility. • Updated the BRSP design policies. • Initiated design to reconstruct Grand Terrace Road, west of the 1-215. • Started the preliminary design for a new baseball field. Housing Page 4 of 22 December 8, 2009 137 i Grand Terrace Redevelopment Project Area Five-Year Implementation Plan 2010 through 2014 • Blue Mountain Senior Villas and Senior Center. This project includes the construction of 120 affordable rental apartment units, a 7,000 square foot senior center, and a 2-acre passive park. The project will house 72 very low income, 36 low income, and 12 moderate income senior households. • Neighborhood Improvement Grant Program. The program grants up to $1,000 per household to purchase landscaping and irrigation materials for front yard improvements and exterior paint. The goal of this program is to reduce blight and property depreciation ! caused by deteriorated exterior paint, poor front yard maintenance and the lack of front yard landscaping. Though this program would not result in substantial rehabilitation to assist in meeting long-term affordable housing production goals, these efforts are critical to reducing the number of deteriorating and/or at-risk housing units in the City. Forty-five projects have been completed. • Canal Street Project. The Agency is continuing to work with a developer to construct approximately 23 rental units affordable to low income families, and purchased property in the R3 (Medium Density) zoning district. i I ' I I i I E I f I Page 5 of 22 December 8, 2009 i 13E Grand Terrace Redevelopment Project Area Five-Year Implementation Plan 2010 through 2014 REDEVELOPMENT PLAN GOALS Adopted,in 1979 and amended in 1981, the Redevelopment Plan establishes a variety of goals for redevelopment of the Project Area. These goals frame the near term redevelopment objectives for the 2010-2014 Implementation Plan period. 1. Eliminate Blight: The elimination of blighting influences and the correction of environmental ^Y' deficiencies in the Project Area. 2. Strengthen Commercial Use: Strengthen retail and other commercial functions. 3. Strengthen Economic Base: The strengthening of the economic base of the Project Area and the community by the installation of needed site improvements. 4. Improve Parking and Open Space: The provision of adequate land for parking and open spaces. 5. Civic and Cultural Enhancement: Enhance the role of the City by strengthening civic, community and cultural functions. 6. Historical Preservation: Preserve artistically, architecturally, and historically worthwhile structures and sites. 7. Design Criteria: The establishment and implementation-of performance criteria to assure high site design standards and environmental quality and other design elements that provide unity and integrity to the entire Project. 8. Strengthening Existing Housing: Strengthen and upgrade existing residential uses. 9. Improve Utilities: Provide adequate streets, curbs, gutters, drainage facilities, and street lights and permit improved pedestrian and/or vehicular circulation in the Project Area. Cause the undergrounding of unsightly overhead utility lines. Page 6 of 22 December 8, 2009 139 I !: Grand Terrace Redevelopment Project Area Five-Year Implementation Plan 1' 2010 through 2014 PROJECTED TAX INCREMENT REVENUES iTable 2, below, reflects projected gross tax increment revenues that are anticipated during the 2010-2014 Implementation Plan period, which does not include deductions for pass through payments, debt services or administrative costs. As previously indicated, the Redevelopment Area is expected to reach its limit on the amount of tax increment during the Implementation Plan period and no tax increment will be generated in the last two years of the Implementation Plan planning period. This will limit the Agency's ability to reach the goals established when the Redevelopment i Plan was adopted. i i Table 2: Projected Tax Increment Revenues 2010-2014 (Without Amendment) 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Tax Increment $7 288,333 $7,457,636 $4,486,796 $0 $0 f Revenue Non-Housing $5,830,656 $5,966,109 $3,589,437 $0 $0 Revenue(Gross) Housing Set-Aside $1,457,667 $1,491,527 $897,359 $0 $0 Revenue(Gross) The Agency is currently processing an amendment to the Redevelopment Plan that would, among ! other things, increase the amount of tax increment revenue that could be collected during the life of the Redevelopment Plan. Provided that the amendment to the Redevelopment Plan is adopted, ftax increment revenues could be collected during the life of the Implementation Plan to allow the Agency to address the goals of the Redevelopment Plan. Table 3 reflects projected tax increment revenues that could be collected during the 2010-2014 Implementation Plan period with the adoption of the amendment to the Redevelopment Plan. l f Table 3: Projected Tax Increment Revenues 2010-2104 (With Amendment) i� - j 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 f Tax Increment $7,371,325 $7,62„770 $7,891,908 $8,163,971 $8,444,195 Revenue Non-Housing $5,897,060 $6,102,216 $6,313,556 $6,532,794 $6,755,356 _Revenue (Gross) _ Housing Set-Aside Revenue Gross) $,147,4265 $1,525,554 $1,578,382 $1,63,2794 $1,688,839 1 c Page 7 of 22 I December 8, 2009 i I, i 14( Grand Terrace Redevelopment Project Area Five-Year Implementation Plan 2010 through 2014 PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PROGRAM The list of potential non-housing redevelopment program activities scheduled for the next five years is shown in Table 4 below. The purpose of this list is to identify which blighting condition(s) a particular project is expected to address and is not intended as a complete or final list of needed improvements within the Project Area. The completion of identified redevelopment program activities will ensure continued progress toward the alleviation of existing blighting conditions by: Table 4: Proposed 2010-2014 Non-housing Redevelopment Projects Project Description Preliminary Cost Estimate Goals Achieved Mixed Use Specific Plan-Continue land assembly $2,000,000 1, 2, 3, 9 Barton Road Infrastructure Improvements $500,000 1, 2, 3, 5 High School Storm and Signal Improvements $230,000 1 5, 9 Senior Center Commercial Kitchen $80,000 5 Improvements Grand Terrace Road Reconstruction $150,000 1, 3, 9 Grand Terrace Road Landscaping $40,000 1, 3 Land Assembly on Barton Road $500,000 1, 2, 3, 7 Barton Road Utility Undergrounding $275,000 1,2, 3, 7, 9 Michigan Street Improvements $400,000 1, 2, 9 Update of the BRSP $150,000 1,2, 4, 6, 9 Commercial Improvement Grant Projects $300,000 1,2, 3, 7 Public Message Sign Project $70,000 2, 3, 5 Baseball Park Project $175,000 4, 5 Vista Grande Park Project $70,000 4, 5 Page 8 of 22 December 8, 2009 141 Grand Terrace Redevelopment Project Area Five-Year Implementation Plan 2010 through 2014 HOUSING i SET-ASIDE REQUIREMENTS � The Grand Terrace Redevelopment Agency is required to set-aside twenty percent(20%) of its annual tax increment into a low- and moderate-income housing fund. This set-aside is referred to as the Low/Mod Housing Fund within the Implementation Plan. The purpose of the Low/Mod Housing Fund is to produce, increase, improve and preserve the community's supply of low-and moderate-income housing. In carrying out the annual housing set-aside requirements, the Agency may exercise any or all of its powers, including the following: r • Acquire real property or building sites subject to the provisions of H&S Code § 33334.16. I • Improve real property or building sites with on-site or off-site improvements, but only if the improvements directly and specifically improve or increase the community's supply of low or moderate income housing. • Donate real property to private or public persons or entities. Finance insurance premiums. N , 0 Construct buildings or structures. Acquire buildings or structures. Rehabilitate buildings or structures. • Provide subsidies to, or for the benefit of, very low-income households, as defined by H&S Code § 50105, lower income households, as defined by H&S Code § 50079.5, or persons and families or low or moderate income, as defined by H&S Code § 50093, to the extent those ' i households cannot obtain housing at affordable costs on the open market. (Housing units l available on the open market are those units developed without direct government subsidies.), • Develop plans; pay principal and interest on bonds, loans, advance, or other indebtedness or, pay financing or carrying charges. } I • Maintain the community's supply of mobile homes. • Preserve the availability to lower income households of affordable housing units in housing developments which are assisted or subsidized by public entities and which are threatened I with imminent conversion to market rates. • The agency may use these funds to meet, in whole or in part, the replacement housing provisions of state redevelopment law. } The Low/Mod Housing Fund can also be used for planning and general administrative costs, kr when directly related to programs and activities associated with H&S Code § 33334.2(e). This includes the following activities: f _..._,_..._.�_..__.._.a____.w__._w._._..�..�.._............_.._.._. _.._��_ .__.._..._._....__.._._...._.. Page 9 of 22 December 8, 2009 f '� 142 Grand Terrace Redevelopment Project Area Five-Year Implementation Plan 2010 through 2014 o Costs incurred for salaries, wages, and related costs of the Agency's staff or for services provided through inter-agency agreements, and agreements with contractors, including usual indirect related costs. o Costs incurred by a non-profit corporation, which are not directly attributable to a special project. o Legal, architectural, and engineering costs and other salaries, wages, and costs directly related to the planning and execution of a specific project which are authorized under subdivision (3) of H&S Code § 33334.2 and which are incurred by a non-profit housing sponsor and are not planning and administrative costs for the purpose of this Section, but are, instead, project costs. r � Page 10 of 22 December 8, 2009 143 ! I I Grand Terrace Redevelopment Project Area Five-Year Implementation Plan 2010 through 2014 I' I PROPOSED AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROGRAM The list of potential affordable housing program activities scheduled for the next five years is f shown in Table 5, below. The purpose of this list is to identify which blighting conditions) a particular project is expected to address and is not intended as a complete or final list of needed improvements within the Project Area. i Table 5: Proposed 2010-2014 Affordable Housing Program Project Description Preliminary Cost Estimate Goals Achieved i Canal Street Rental Housing $1,000,000 8 f Neighborhood Improvement Grant Program $150,000 8 Purchase, Rehab and Re-sell Program $400,000 8 Home Improvement Loan Program $150,000 8 Mobile Home Park Upgrade and/or $150,000 8 1' Expansion Program I Senior Home Repair Program $100,000 8 S ! f I i i, I I� I I i I i I I Page 11 of 22 December 8, 2009 14' 's Grand Terrace Redevelopment Project Area Five-Year Implementation Plan 2010 through 2014 HOUSING PROGRAM COMPLIANCE OBJECTIVES This section of the Implementation Plan addresses specific requirements in State law with respect to prior affordable housing activities and the anticipated housing program in the future. Redevelopment agencies use implementation plans to establish ten-year objectives to achieve compliance with State law in its affordable housing programs. These housing goals generally fall l into three categories: ~. - Housing Production—based on the number of housing units constructed or substantially rehabilitated over a ten year period, a redevelopment agency is to ensure that a percentage of these units are affordable to very low, low and moderate income households. Replacement Housing —another legal obligation for redevelopment agencies is to ensure that any housing units destroyed or removed as a result of an Agency redevelopment project that housed low to moderate income households be replaced within four years at the same household income levels. Expenditures by Household Types—specific requirements on the amount of housing set-aside funds an agency must spend over a 10-year period on housing affordable to,very low income households, low income households, and housing for residents under the age of 65. Household Income Limits -Area median income is established by the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, and.adopted by the California Department of Housing. The Income limits are generally adjusted annually, and are based on the Section 8 income limits for the Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA SMA. Extremely low income households are defined as families and persons whose income does not exceed 30% of area median income. Very low income households are defined as families and persons whose income does not exceed 50% of area median income. While low income households are defined as families and persons whose income does not exceed 80% of area median income. Lastly, moderate income households are defined as families and persons whose income does not exceed 120% of area median income. Page 12 of 22 December 8, 2009 145 Grand Terrace Redevelopment Project Area !' Five-Year Implementation Plan 2010 through 2014 iTable 6 represents the 2009 income thresholds for the various target housing populations in the City. i Table 6: Income Table* Extremely Low Very Low Moderate Household Income Income Low Income Income Size (30% of Area (50% of Area (80% of Area (120% of Area I Median Income) iMedian Income) Median Income) Median Income) 1 14,000 23,300 37,300 54,200 I 2 16,000 26,650 42,650 61,900 3 18,000 29,950 47,950 69,650 4 20,000 33,300 53,300 77,400 j 5 21,600 35,950 57,550 83,600 i 6 23,200 38,650 61,850 89,800 i 7 24,800 41,300 66,100 96,000 8 26,400 43,950 70,350 1,02,150 *2009 Median Income$64,500 for a household size of four persons. Source: California Department of Housing I i I I I I ; i r i I I I I Page 13 of 22 December 8, 2009 k i { 14F Grand Terrace Redevelopment Project Area Five-Year Implementation Plan 2010 through 2014 HOUSING COMPLIANCE PLAN Health and Safety Code § 33490(a)(2)(A) requires that the Agency develop a Compliance Plan to ensure that the required number of very low, low and moderate income housing units will be produced or substantially rehabilitated within the Project Area. Available Low/Mod Housing Funds As of July 1, 2009, the Agency had approximately$998,000 available in its Low/Mod Housing Fund. To estimate the Agency's ability to develop and preserve low and moderate income housing, a projection of Housing set-aside revenue was developed for the Five-Year Implementation Plan planning period (Table 7). Projections were based on anticipated tax increment revenue and known fixed fund obligations. These monies are allocated towards the preservation, development and/or rehabilitation of very low, low and moderate income housing units Table 7: Projected Net Annual Low/Mod Housing Fund Revenue 2010-2014 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Gross Set-aside $1,457,667 $1,491,527 $897,359 $0 $0 Estimated Debt $619,301 $619,268 $667,792 $0 $0 Service Estimated Residual for Administration and $838,365 $872,259 $229,567 $0 $0 Programs Based on the above income projection table, and the current balance of$998,000 in the Low/Mod Housing Fund, the Agency anticipates that it will have approximately$2,938,191 in Low/Mod Housing Funds available during the planning period. This amount is net of anticipated debt service, and prior to consideration of operational and personnel expenses. However, as indicated the Agency will no longer be able to collect tax increment revenue beyond 2012, and no housing set aside revenue will be collected to implement housing programs and meet the Agency's housing obligations within the last two years of the planning period. This $2,938,191 constitutes the funds that are available to provide housing program and assist the City in meeting its inclusionary housing requirements. Although it would be difficult to meet its housing obligations with less than $3 Million for program funding, the Agency is still expected to meet its housing obligation throughout the planning period and the life of the Redevelopment Plan. The Agency would need to seek other funding sources to produce affordable housing units, such as, but not limited to, Federal HOME Funds, State Low Income Housing Tax Credits, Multi-Family Mortgage Revenue Bonds. Page 14 of 22 December 8, 2009 147 i Grand Terrace Redevelopment Project Area I Five-Year Implementation Plan 2010 through 2014 Housing Production I { To estimate the number of housing units that need to be affordable to very low, low and moderate income households the Agency estimated the total number of units to be constructed or substantially rehabilitated in the Project Area and applied formulas established in State law. Prior to the time limit on the effectiveness of the redevelopment plan, at least 15 percent of all new and substantially rehabilitated units developed within a project area under the jurisdiction of an Agency, by public or private entities or persons other than the Agency, shall be available at affordable housing cost to households of low or moderate income. Not less than 40 percent of the 15 percent the dwelling units must be affordable to very low income households. Table 8 summarizes the production goals over various time periods as required by Redevelopment Law. The number of affordable units required is based on statutory thresholds, and the Agency is I responsible for ensuring that the appropriate number of affordable units is created during a ten-year period. Table 8: Actual and Projected Housing Production Needs by Time Period IActual/Assumed Housing Units Required Affordable Units I Time Period Constructed and Substantially Rehabilitated in Project Area Total Very Low Plan Adoption to 1995 1,336 200 80 Previous 10-Year Period' 1995 to 2004 123 18 7 I i 10-Year Planning Period { 2005 to 2009 (Actual)2 172 26 10 j 2010 to 2014 (Forecast)3 45 7 3 2015 to 2017 (Forecast)3 25 4 2 i Redevelopment Plan Duration i 1981-20174 1,701 255 102 i I Notes: ' All required units based on 15 percent of actual/assumed units developed by entities other than the { Agency. No units developed by the Agency. z Total units produced within the Project Area based on actual units per City planning department or i projections by Agency Staff. Includes 120 units at the Blue mountain Senior Villas. ! 3 Affordable units produced based on estimated affordable units produced (or covenants purchased) during each planning period inside or outside the Project Area. ° The surplus affordable units in a ten year period may be applied against the unit production requirements during the following ten-year compliance period,while any deficit affordable units must be first produced during the following ten-year compliance period. As shown above, based on actual housing production from adoption of the Redevelopment Plan to 2009, the Agency has an affordable housing production need of 244 affordable housing units, including 97 low income units. It is also forecasted that within this Five-year Implementation Plan planning cycle (2010 to 2014) another 4 affordable units (including two 2 low income units) will be Page 15 of 22 December 8, 2009 i I j 14f- Grand Terrace Redevelopment Project Area Five-Year Implementation Plan 2010 through 2014 required. In total, the Agency's inclusionary housing obligation over the life of the Redevelopment Plan is 255 affordable housing units with at least 102 of those units affordable to low income households. Fulfillment of these production goals is shown in Table 9. Table 9: Fulfillment of Affordable Housing Production Requirements by Time Period Time Period Units Required Units Produced Additional Units Net Surplus (see Table 8) Required Units Produced Total VL' Total VL Total VL Total VL Plan Adoption to 1995 200 80 0 0 200 80 0 0 Previous 10 Year Period 18 7 118 7 0 0 100 0 1995 to 20042 10-Year Planning Period 2005 to 2009 (Actual)4 26 10 113 29 0 0 87 19 2010 to 2014(Projected) 7 3 15 8 0 0 8 5 2015 to 2017 4 2 Redevelopment Plan 255 102 246 44 9 58 Duration (1981-2017)5 Notes: VL=Very low income z Affordable Units Required based on actual total Units Produced duringthe planning p g period and includes 111 units produced at Highland Apartments and 7 units produced from Blue Mountain Senior Apartments. 3 The surplus affordable units in a ten-year period may be applied against the unit production requirements during the following ten-year compliance period, while any deficit affordable units must be first produced during the following ten-year compliance period. 4 Affordable units required based on actual total units produced during the plannin g period and includes 113 units produced at Blue Mountain Senior Apartments. 5 The Redevelopment Plan's effectiveness currently expires July 15,2017. As shown in Table 9, the Agency has been able to fulfill the majority of its obligation through the construction of the Blue Mountain Senior Villas. However, it is also anticipated that at the end of the term of the Redevelopment Plan there is the potential for a deficiency of 9 low income units, and 58 very low income units. As described earlier in this Implementation Plan, the Agency is actively engaged in programs to provide additional affordable units in the Project Area. At present, the Canal Street Rental Housing project is expected to be constructed within this Implementation Plan period and will fulfill the Agency's affordable housing obligation during the Five-Year planning period, as well as provide a surplus of 13 affordable units. However, as indicated, at the end of the Redevelopment Plan (2017) the Agency may still have an outstanding housing production obligation of 67 units. Therefore, the Agency will continue to work diligently to fulfill the remaining affordable housing production deficit on an annual basis by facilitating the creation of projects that feature long-term affordability covenants. Page 16 of 22 December 8, 2009 149 1 i I r Grand Terrace Redevelopment Project Area Five-Year Implementation Plan 2010 through 2014 I i Replacement Housing I Pursuant to Section 33413 of CRL, whenever dwelling units for persons or families of low or moderate income are displaced or removed from the low and moderate income housing market as part of an Agency assisted redevelopment project, the Agency must replace the same number of I' units affordable to the same income levels of those removed within four years of their removal. V During the Implementation Plan period, the Agency does not anticipate that any Agency-assisted projects will result in the displacement or removal of affordable housing units. Consequently, the Agency does not anticipate that any housing will need to be replaced. Proportionality Requirements At the beginning of the Implementation Plan period on July 1, 2009, the Agency's Low/Mod I Housing Fund had an available balance of$998,000. Over the five-year period ending on June 30, 2014, staff conservatively estimates that the Project Area will generate approximately$1,940,181 in 20-percent housing set aside revenue. Pursuant to Section 33334.4(a) of the Law, Low/Mod Housing Fund expenditures on low and very low income housing projects must be at least in proportion to the City's fair share of the Regional Housing Need Assessment(RHNA). The number of units required in each income category may be adjusted for units not assisted by the Agency that feature 55 year(for tenant-occupied units) or 45 year (for owner-occupied units) covenants. According to the City's 2006-2014 Draft Housing Element, the current RHNA figures for the City indicate a Citywide need for 80 very low income units, 55 low income units, and 63 moderate income units. Based on these figures and the proportionality requirements of CRL, at least 40% of Agency's Low/Mod Housing Fund expenditures must target very low income households, 20% must target low income households, and at least 32% must target moderate income households. Section 33334.4(b) requires that Low/Mod Housing Fund expenditures for senior housing also be ' in proportion to the community's population of seniors according to the most recent Census. Based on the 2000 Census, 1,245 (10.7%) of the City's 11,626 residents were over the age of 65. As such, not more than 10.7% of the Agency's available Low/Mod Housing Fund revenues may be expended on senior housing projects. The remaining 89.2% must be expended on non-senior housing projects. i I I' I .u.�_.,__....__.._._.._..---.---.��..__._._..._._...._..-...___.____.,.._..�.__r___.�___._.__._.....�...�,...___._...w_.�.._.._.._._..__.-Page 17 of 22 December 8, 2009 i I 1 5( Grand Terrace Redevelopment Project Area Five-Year Implementation Plan 2010 through 2014 Proportionality Expenditures based on Household Income Groups Table 10 presents the expenditure requirements based on proportionality requirements for the 2010 to 2014 Implementation Plan period. Table 10: Thresholds for Housing Program Expenditures Household Type Census/RHNA Allocation Minimum Percentage of Housing Set- Household Aside Expenditures over _ Implementation Plan period Total Population of the City 11,626 Total Population Under Age 65' 10,381 89.3% Total Population Over Age 65 1,245 10.7% Very Low Income Households 80 40p2 Low Income Households 55 20%2 Moderate Income Households 63 32%2 Total 198 100% Notes: ' Percentage of total households under the age of 65 based on the 2000 census data (www.census.gov). 2 Percentage of households in each income-level based on the City of Grand Terrace Regional Housing Needs Assessment for 2007 through 2014. Expenditures after 2006 are subject to new RHNA numbers as shown above.Targeting requirements prior to 2006 based on prior RHNA Housing Needs Allocation(31%for Very low-income and 24%for Low-income Housing Units). Using the data in Table 10, Table 11 reflects the established thresholds for the use of Low/Mod Housing Funds for programs and capital expenditures based on the Agency's estimated $2,938,191 in the Low/Mod Housing Fund through the Implementation Plan planning period, and based on the City's RHNA allocation for affordable housing units. Table 11: Low Mod Housing Fund Expenditures Based on Income Category Income Category RHNA Allocation Minimum Projected Expenditure Required Very Low Income 80 $1,175,276 Low Income 55 $587,638 A� Moderate Income 63 —` $940,221 Above Moderate Income 131 N/A Total 329 $2,703,135 Page 18 of 22 December 8, 2009 151 i Grand Terrace Redevelopment Project Area Five-Year Implementation Plan 2010 through 2014 These proportionality requirements affect expenditures over a ten-year period, although the law permits the compliance initially for a period beginning in January 2002 and ending in June 2014. Table 12 documents the amount of low and moderate income housing fund revenue used since January 2002 for these income categories. Table 12: Housing Expenditures and Proportionality since 2002 Time Household Income Category Period Very Low Low Moderate Total } Expenditures I 2002 through $4,125 0.7% $3,975 0.7% $600,204 98.7% $608.304 20004 2005 $176,964 40.5% $170,529 39.5% $89,244 20.4% $436,738 l 2006 $1,128,155 45.8% $1,087,132 44.2% $246,143 10.0% $2,461,430 2007 $410,543 45.8% $395,614 44.2% $89,573 10.0% $895,730 i 2008 $1,561,742 45.8% $1,504,951 44.2% $340,744 10.0% $3,407,436 2009 $1,171,313 45.8% $1,128,720 44.2% $255,559 10.0% $2,555,593 Total $4,452,843 43% $4,290,921 41% $1,621,467 16% $10,365,231 i Notes: i ' Based on Agency's Annual Housing and Community Development Reports. z Targeting requirements prior to 2006 based on prior RHNA Housing Needs Allocation (31%for Very low- income and 24%for Low-income Housing Units). Expenditures after 2006 subject to new RHNA numbers as shown in prior table. Proportionality Expenditures based on Senior and Non-Senior Population Based on the distribution of the City's senior and non-senior population, a minimum of$2,623,805 (89.3%) of the estimated Low/Mod Housing Fund available for housing programs and capital expenditures must benefit persons and households under the age of 65. Table 13: Proportionality Expenditure for Senior and Non-Senior Population Age Category % of Total Population Minimum Projected Expenditure Required Under 65 89.3% $2,623,805 65 and Over 10.7% $314,386 ,I Page 19 of 22 December 8, 2009 i 152 Grand Terrace Redevelopment Project Area Five-Year Implementation Plan 2010 through 2014 State law also requires a recap of the number of projects assisted by the Low/Mod Housing Fund over the past implementation period, divided by family projects (under age 65) and senior projects (restricted to residents age 65 and older). Table 14 summaries these statistics from the last planning period (2005 to 2009). This Table shows that 100% of the Low/Mod Housing Funds expended by the Agency during the previous Implementation Plan were used for senior housing. Table 14: Proportionality Expenditures Based on Senior and Non-senior Population Housing Units Assisted by Housing Set-Aside Fund Set-Aside (July 2005 to June 2009) Expenditures Extremely Very Low Low Moderate Total Low Family Projects $0 0 0 0 0 0 (Non-Senior) 0% Senior Projects $9,320,189 0 55 53 12 120 Total $9,320,189 0 55 53 12 120 (100%) Housing Units Constructed Without Low/Mod Housing Funds No other funding source was used by the Agency to construct affordable units featuring long-term covenant restricted units (affordable units with covenants of at 45 years for ownership housing or 55 years for rental housing) during the 2005-2009 Implementation Plan. However, because the Agency will not generate any revenue past 2012, it is likely that the Agency will need to seek other funding sources to meets is affordable housing obligation. Page 20 of 22 December 8, 2009 153 I i Grand Terrace Redevelopment Project Area Five-Year Implementation Plan i 2010 through 2014 i HOUSING PRODUCTION GOALS 1 CRL requires that the Agency provide a Ten-Year Housing Compliance Plan that depicts the j Agency's housing production goals. The Ten-Year Compliance Plan began with the previous 2005 to 2009 Implementation Plan and continues through to 2014. Table 15 shows the actual number of affordable housing units developed, rehabilitated, or assisted by the Agency between 2005-2009, while Table 16 represents a projection of the housing units to be developed, rehabilitated, or assisted by the Agency over the five-year period of the 2010-2014 Implementation Plan. i Table 15: 2005-2009 Housing Production Housing Units Year Low/Mod Income Very Low Income 2005 0 0 j 2006 0 0 2007 0 0 2008 0 0 2009 65 55 Total 65 55 I I Table 16: 2010-2014 Production Goals' Housing Units i Year Low/Mod Income Very Low Income 2010 0 0 { 2011 7 5 2012 8 3 2013 2 1 I _ 2014 2 1 Total 19 10 'Notes. ' The degree to which the stated five-year housing production goals can be met is dependent on market conditions and the availability of supplemental funding from identified resources. I I 1 l Page 21 of 22 December 8, 2009 i I I 151 Grand Terrace Redevelopment Project Area Five-Year Implementation Plan 2010 through 2014 PLAN ADMINISTRATION The Agency of the City of Grand Terrace shall be responsible for administering this Implementation Plan and for monitoring redevelopment activities or programs undertaken pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan and this Implementation Plan. PLAN REVIEW At least once during the five-year term of this Implementation Plan, the Agency shall conduct a public hearing and hear testimony of all interested parties for the purpose of reviewing the Implementation Plan, and evaluating the progress of Agency Activities. The public hearing shall be held no earlier than two years and no later than three years after the date of adoption of this Implementation Plan. Notice of the public hearing to review the Redevelopment Plan and Implementation Plan shall be published pursuant to Section 6063 of the Government Code and posted in at least four permanent places within the Merged Project Area for a period of at least three weeks. Publication and posting of the notice shall be completed not less than 10 days prior to the date set for hearing. Pursuant to Article 16.5, this Implementation Plan may from time to time be amended after holding a public hearing on the proposed amendment. 4 Page 22 of 22 December 8, 2009 155 BOYSCOUTS OFAMERICA 100THANNIVERSARY WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts ofAmerica was established in 1910 to teach patriotism, courage,self-reliance and kindred values; and WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts ofAmerica today is the largest youth service organization in America, with nearly 3 million members learning responsible citizenship, character development, and self-reliance through participation in a xj wide range of outdoor activities, educational programs and career-oriented programs in partnership with community organizations;and WHEREAS,the Boy Scouts ofAmerica will celebrate its 100'Anniversary in 2010, and WHEREAS,a core value of the Boy Scouts ofAmerica is service to others; NOW, THEREFORE, I, Maryetta Ferri, Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace, on behalf of the City Council, do hereby recognize the impact of this great organization and the importance of its 100 years of service to the citizens of this community and communities across America. Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace and of the City Council thereof. This -Wh day of March, 2010. COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. r vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 03/02/2010 5:17:14PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code: bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 64946 2/18/2010 011007 BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA March J0436557 March COBRA-S. Berry Family 10-180-142-000-000 83655 Total : 836.55 64947 2/18/2010 006498 S.B. COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL 02182010 SENIOR CTR KITCHEN PLANCHECK FEES 32-600-311-000-000 92800 Total : 928.00 64948 2/18/2010 001907 COSTCO#478 047808 0125 19 C. CARE SUPPLIES 10-440-220-000-000 112.62 Total : 112.62 64949 2/22/2010 011092 METLIFE SBC Feb KM0575403 Feb Employee Dental Ins 10-022-61-00 221.44 10-180-142-000-000 50.00 Total : 271.44 64950 2/22/2010 005702 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT PRend 2-19-10 Contributions for PRend 2-19-10 10-022-62-00 18,753.38 Total : 18,753.38 64951 2/23/2010 011071 STANCKIEWITZ, W. Mar 305119204 HEALTH INS REINBURSEMENT-W. STANCKIEWII 10-110-142-000-000 356.00 Total : 356.00 64952 2/23/2010 010290 KAISER PERMANENTE Mar 264428204 HEALTH INS.-L. GARCIA 10-110-142-000-000 29446 10-110-120-000-000 215.72 10-110-273-000-000 161.82 Total : 672.00 64953 2/24/2010 010697 ZIONS BANK 00100539-8868,e Principal/Int Refi of'97 COP 33-300-206-000-000 127,423 78 Total : 127,423.78 64954 2/25/2010 010998 AETNA AARP PLANS 4710331003 MARCH HEALTH INS.-B. CORTES Page: 1 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO.�a ---Page: ---- 2- - -------vcHlisf" --" -- --"--.-_--_----- - -- ----- --� - Voucher List 03/02/2010 5:17:14PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code : bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 64954 2/25/2010 010998 AETNA AARP PLANS (Continued) 10-110-142-000-000 368.06 10-110-120-000-000 172.94 Total : 541.00 64955 2/27/2010 004587 MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK 3200014626 MARCH MHN INSURANCE 10-120-142-000-000 2336 10-125-142-000-000 9.60 10-140-142-000-000 9.60 10-172-142-000-000 3.20 10-175-142-000-000 256 10-180-142-000-000 23.68 10-370-142-000-000 10.88 10-380-142-000-000 6.40 10-440-142-000-000 13440 10-450-142-000-000 16.00 21-572-142-000-000 7.68 32-370-142-000-000 9.60 34-400-142-000-000 8.96 34-800-142-000-000 2.56 10-180-142-000-000 6.40 10-185-142-000-000 640 32-200-142-000-000 672 Total : 288.00 64956 2/27/2010 006772 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY Mar 160513170- PRODENT DENTAL INSURANCE 10-022-61-00 1,27300 10-180-142-000-000 44.08 10-370-142-000-000 4408 Total : 1,361.16 64957 2/27/2010 010737 WESTERN DENTAL SERVICES INC Mar 002484 773 MARCH EMPLOYEE DENTAL INSURANCE 10-022-61-00 7362 Total : 73.62 64958 2/27/2010 011092 METLIFE SBC Mar KMO57540: March Employee Dental Insurance 10-022-61-00 27144 Page: 2 vchlist -,,ucher List Page: 3 03/02/2010 5:17:14PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code : bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 64958 2/27/2010 011092 METLIFE SBC (Continued) Total : 271.44 64959 2/27/2010 006772 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY Mar 00607869 0 MARCH LIFE AND DISABILITY INSURANCE 21-572-142-000-000 7.71 32-370-142-000-000 6.77 34-400-142-000-000 963 34-800-142-000-000 2.78 32-200-142-000-000 10.06 10-185-142-000-000 6.95 10-022-66-00 1,193 78 10-120-142-000-000 1842 10-125-142-000-000 1042 10-140-142-000-000 10.42 10-172-142-000-000 348 10-175-142-000-000 2.78 10-180-142-000-000 2509 10-370-142-000-000 1031 10-380-142-000-000 6.95 10-440-142-000-000 54.35 10-450-142-000-000 10.43 Total : 1,390.33 64960 2/27/2010 010996 CA PUB EMPLOYEES' RET. SYSTEM H20100314930C MARCH EMPLOYEE/DEPENDENT HEALTH INS Page: 3 �- —vchlist Voucher List Page: 4 03/02/2010 5:17:14PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code : bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 64960 2/27/2010 010996 CA PUB EMPLOYEES' RET SYSTEM (Continued) 10-190-265-000-000 68.86 10-022-61-00 7,443.60 10-120-142-000-000 71771 10-125-142-000-000 552 10 10-140-142-000-000 276.05 10-172-142-000-000 184.04 10-175-142-000-000 147.22 10-180-142-000-000 1,159.39 10-370-142-000-000 625.70 10-380-142-000-000 36806 10-440-142-000-000 2,31336 21-572-142-000-000 441 67 32-200-142-000-000 423.27 32-370-142-000-000 40487 34-400-142-000-000 44165 10-450-142-000-000 552.09 Mar H201003141 JAN/FEB DUENES ADJUSTMENT 10-022-55-00 -736.12 Total : 15,383.52 64961 3/1/2010 006285 RIVERSIDE HIGHLAND WATER CO Dec-Jan 2010 WATER USAGE/FEES 10-190-238-000-000 28561 10-440-238-000-000 132.25 10-450-238-000-000 1,680.25 10-805-238-000-000 45993 26-600-239-000-000 61 97 32-600-214-000-000 24.28 32-600-307-000-000 19.60 34-700-767-000-000 980 26-601-239-000-000 3964 34-700-709-000-000 980 34-700-710-000-000 9 80 Total : 2,732.93 64962 3/9/2010 001040 ADDINGTON, MATTHEW Feb 2010 February Stipend 10-801-120-000-000 5000 Page: 4 vchlist aiucher List Page: 5 03/02/2010 5:17:14PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code : bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 64962 3/9/2010 001040 ADDINGTON, MATTHEW (Continued) Jan 2010 January Stipend 10-801-120-000-000 50.00 Total : 100.00 64963 3/9/2010 001213 AT&T 909 824 7013 7� Feb/Mar DSL Service 10-440-235-000-000 79.68 Total : 79.68 64964 3/9/2010 010293 AVAYA, INC 2729727366 PHONE &VOICEMAIL MAINTENANCE 10-190-246-000-000 183.46 Total : 183.46 64965 3/9/2010 011082 BAILES, ROBERT Feb 2010 February Stipend 10-801-120-000-000 50.00 Jan 2010 January Stipend 10-801-120-000-000 50.00 Total : 100.00 64966 3/9/2010 001498 CALBO 02172010 Annual Membership-R. Shields 10-172-265-000-000 215.00 Total : 215.00 64967 3/9/2010 011031 CINTAS CORPORATION#150 150828595 C CARE SUPPLIES 10-440-228-000-000 68.03 150837727 C. CARE SUPPLIES 10-440-228-000-000 139.08 Total : 207.11 '64968 3/9/2010 010403 CITY OF REDLANDS AR126238 January CNG Fuel 10-180-272-000-000 31.50 34-800-272-000-000 26.10 Total : 57.60 64969 3/9/2010 010866 CIVIC PLUS 77980 WEBSITE MAINT FEE 10-125-250-000-000 615.00 Total : 615.00 Page: 5 Page: 6 03/02/2010 5:17:14PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code : bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 64970 3/9/2010 001867 COMMERCIAL LANDSCAPE SUPPLY 165598 LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES 10-450-245-000-000 44.23 Total : 44.23 64971 3/9/2010 010086 COMSTOCK, TOM Feb 2010 February Stipend 10-801-120-000-000 5000 Jan 2010 January Stipend 10-801-120-000-000 50.00 Total : 100.00 64972 3/9/2010 010972 CONSOLIDATED REPROGRAPHICS 107526 Feb Website Monthly Fee 10-175-246-000-000 1082 Total : 10.82 64973 3/9/2010 001907 COSTCO#478 47813 0090 112 C CARE SUPPLIES 10-440-220-000-000 157.44 Total : 157.44 64974 3/9/2010 001930 DAILY JOURNAL CORPORATION B1790647 LEGAL ADVERTISING 10-125-230-000-000 114.40 Total : 114.40 64975 3/9/2010 010711 DANKA FINANCIAL SERVICES 71501907 TOSHIBA COPIER LEASE E-STUDIO 310 10-172-246-000-000 6383 10-175-246-000-000 31.91 34-400-246-000-000 6383 Total : 159.57 64976 3/9/2010 001942 DATA TICKET INC. 30505 PARKING CITE PROCESSING SERVICES 10-140-255-000-000 100.00 Total : 100.00 64977 3/9/2010 003210 DEPT 32-2500233683 09037/0022263 2 gal. paint 10-808-246-000-000 79 47 3128/6036004 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 10-180-218-000-000 43.88 Total : 123.35 Page: 6 vchlist voucher List Page: 7 03/02/2010 5:17:14PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code : bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 64978 3/9/2010 002082 DISCOUNT SCHOOL SUPPLIES D11931430001 TINY TOT SUPPLIES 23-200-14-00 356.31 Total : 356.31 64979 3/9/2010 002187 DUNN-EDWARDS CORP 2018078547 PAINT& SUPPLIES 10-450-245-000-000 11 65 Total : 11.65 64980 3/9/2010 002280 EVER READY EMBROIDERY, BRIAN HAL12640 Embroidery on Uniforms 10-180-218-000-000 51 30 Total : 51.30 64981 3/9/2010 002301 FEDEX 9-499-25238 Document Delivery Services - 10-175-210-000-000 104.01 10-370-210-000-000 4537 32-370-210-000-000 20.01 47-100-250-001-000 22.37 Total : 191.76 64982 3/9/2010 002740 FRUIT GROWERS SUPPLY 90474642 MAINTENANCE AND SUPPLIES 10-450-245-000-000 81.12 90480589 MAINTENANCE AND SUPPLIES 10-450-245-000-000 17.15 Total : 98.27 64983 3/9/2010 002930 GRAINGER 9174257445 Batteries 10-808-246-000-000 130.15 Total : 130.15 64984 3/9/2010 010164 GREAT-WEST 03022010 Feb Def Comp & Loan Payments 10-022-63-00 6,037.31 10-022-64-00 1,460.14 - Total : 7,497.45 64985 3/9/2010 010691 HDL SOFTWARE LLC 0007893-IN Annual Maint Fee 3/10-2/11 Page: 7 --------- - - --------------- ---------------- ---------------------------------------------------- - -- --------- ------ - - - - vchlisf Voucher List Page: 8 03/02/2010 5:17:14PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code : bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 64985 3/9/2010 010691 HDL SOFTWARE LLC (Continued) 10-172-219-000-000 436.34 10-172-220-000-000 436.34 10-175-219-000-000 436.34 10-175-220-000-000 436.34 Total : 1,745.36 64986 3/9/2010 003224 HYDRO-SCAPE PRODUCTS INC. 06258345-00 LAN DSCAPR/MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 10-450-245-000-000 42.99 Total : 42.99 64987 3/9/2010 011108 INT'L ASSN OF PLUMBING/MECHANI 0116170-IN 2009 Uniform Plumbinq Code 10-172-210-000-000 120.26 Total : 120.26 64988 3/9/2010 004320 LAWNMOWER CENTER 4749 MOWER/BLOWER REPAIRS 10-450-246-000-000 17.39 Total : 17.39 64989 3/9/2010 010611 MCNABOE, DARCY Feb 2010 February Stipend 10-801-120-000-000 50.00 Jan 2010 January Stipend 10-801-120-000-000 50.00 Total : 100.00 64990 3/9/2010 010984 MERRILL, LYNN 02032010 SOLID WASTE/RECYCLING CONSULTING 10-180-255-000-000 2,02500 Total : 2,025.00 64991 3/9/2010 004763 MONROE SYSTEMS INC. 38149A CALCULATOR 10-140-219-000-000 83.78 Total : 83.78 64992 3/9/2010 010546 MPOWER COMMUNICATIONS Mar 387767 March Phone Service 10-440-235-000-000 29702 10-805-235-000-000 67.75 10-450-235-000-000 64.08 Page. 8 vchlist voucher List Page: 9 03/02/2010 5:17:14PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code : bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 64992 3/9/2010 010546 MPOWER COMMUNICATIONS (Continued) Mar 387798 March Phone Service 10-808-235-000-000 66.11 10-380-235-000-000 200.00 10-190-235-000-000 1,033.20 Total : 1,728.16 64993 3/9/2010 004989 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION 02222010 E & O Ins Policy 1 yr.-T. Martinez 10-125-265-000-000 33.00 15806118 Annual 1-Yr Membership-T. Martinez 10-125-265-000-000 5200 Total : 85.00 64994 3/9/2010 010097 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 410575025-089 Dec/Jan Phone/Radio Services 10-180-240-000-000 458.05 10-440-235-000-000 50.04 Total : 508.09 64995 3/9/2010 001456 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC. 190963 Misc Office Supplies Return 10-440-210-000-000 -36.85 403403 C. Care Office Supplies 10-440-210-000-000 377.68 Total : 340.83 64996 3/9/2010 011105 PARKHOUSE TIRE, INC 2010218822 2 LOADER TIRES 12.5/80X18 PLUS 2 HRS. 10-180-272-000-000 80903 Total : 809.03 64997 3/9/2010 010171 REPUBLIC ELECTRIC 110111 January Call Out Signal Repairs 16-510-255-000-000 43017 110112 SIGNAL MAINT/REPAIRS 16-510-255-000-000 451 68 17200 Repaired Dimensions Inverter 16-510-255-000-000 35650 Total : 1,238.35 64998 3/9/2010 006310 ROADRUNNER SELF STORAGE INC Mar 2009#393 STORAGE SERVICES Page: 9 - vchlist T - Voucher List Page: 10 03/02/2010 5:17:14PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code : bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 64998 3/9/2010 006310 ROADRUNNER SELF STORAGE INC. (Continued) 10-140-241-000-000 11900 Total : 119.00 64999 3/9/2010 006681 SMART& FINAL 4010318462 18'. SCHOOL AGE &TINY TOT SUPPLIES 10-440-223-000-000 21.99 10-440-221-000-000 43.42 Total : 65.41 65000 3/9/2010 006720 SO CA.EDISON COMPANY Feb 2010 February Electricity 10-450-238-000-000 405.24 16-510-238-000-000 93.10 Total : 498.34 65001 3/9/2010 006778 STAPLES 3132136973 #135848 5 cases copy paper 10-190-212-000-000 173.95 Total : 173.95 65002 3/9/2010 006898 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF L.A. 0021007943 FOOD & SUPPLIES 10-440-220-000-000 500.19 0021702147 FOOD & SUPPLIES 10-440-220-000-000 384.30 0022521256 FOOD & SUPPLIES 10-440-220-000-000 5056 Total : 936.05 65003 3/9/2010 001038 VERIZON WIRELESS-LA 0845920386 Jan/Feb Mobile Service-Housing 34-400-235-000-000 103.87 Total : 103.87 65004 3/9/2010 007920 WILLDAN 002-10016 PLAN CHECK SERVICES 10-175-255-000-000 1,820.00 007-10013 Jan Srvs-DBE Program Update 47-100-250-001-000 1,92000 Total : 3,740.00 65005 3/9/2010 007925 WILSON, DOUG Feb 2010 February Stipend - 10-801-120-000-000 5000 Page 10 vchlist voucher List Page: 11 03/02/2010 5:17:14PM CITY OF GRAND TERRACE Bank code : bofa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 65005 3/9/2010 007925 WILSON, DOUG (Continued) Total : 50.00 65006 3/9/2010 007987 XEROX CORPORATION 046422874 CC55 COPIER LEASE 10-190-700-000-000 371.33 046422875 CC265 COPIER LEASE 10-190-700-000-000 294.34 Total : 665.67 61 Vouchers for bank code: bofa Bank total : 197,295.85 61 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 197,295.85 Page: 11 I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the afore-listed checks for payment of City and Community Redevelopment Agency liabilities have been audited by me and are necessary and appropriate for the operation of City and Agency. Bernie Simon, Finance Director City of Grand Terrace Warrant Register Index FD No. Fund Name Deat No. Deaartment Name General Account Numbers 10 GENERAL FUND 110 CITY COUNCIL 110 SALARIESIWAGES 11 Street Fund 120 CITY MANAGER 139 EMPLOYEES'BENEFIT PLAN 12 Storm Drain Fund 125 CITY CLERK 140 RETIREMENT 13 Park Fund 140 FINANCE 142 HEALTH/LIFE INSURANCE 14 AB 3229 COPS Fund 160 CITY ATTORNEY 143 WORKERS'COMPENSATION 15 Air Quality Improvement Fund 172 BUILDING&SAFETY 138/141 MEDICARE/SUI 16 Gas Tax Fund 175 PUBLIC WORKS 210 OFFICE EXPENSE 17 Traffic Safety Fund/TDA Fund 180 COMMUNITY SERVICES 218-219 NON-CAPITAL FURN/SMALL TOOLS 19 Facilities Development Fund 185 RENTAL INSPECTION PROGRAM 220 SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL EXP 20 Measure I Fund 190 GENERAL GOVERNMENT(NON-DEPT) 230 ADVERTISING 21 Waste Water Disposal Fund 370 COMMUNITY&ECONOMIC DEV 235 COMMUNICATIONS 26 LSCPG/LGHTG Assessment Dist 380 MGT INFORMATION SYSTEMS 238-239 UTILITIES 44 Bike Lane Capital Fund 410 LAW ENFORCEMENT 240-242 RENTS&LEASES 46 Street Improvement Projects 430 RECREATION SERVICES 245-246 MAINT BLDG GRNDS EQUIPMNT 47 Barton Rd. Bridge Project 440 CHILD CARE 250-251 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 32 CRA-CAPITAL'PROJECTS FUND 450 PARKS MAINTENANCE 255-256 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 33 CRA-DEBT SERVICE FUND 631 STORM DRAIN MAINTENANCE 260 INSURANCE&SURETY BONDS 34 CRA-LOW&MOD HOUSING 801 PLANNING COMMISSION 265 MEMBERSHIPS&DUES 802 CRIME PREVENTION UNIT 268 TRAINING 804 HISTORICAL&CULTURAL COMM. 270 TRAVEUCONFERENCES/MTGS 805 SENIOR CITIZENS PROGRAM 272 FUEL&VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 807 PARKS&REC COMMITTEE 570 WASTEWATER TREATMENT 808 EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PROG. 33-300 DEBT SERVICE 7XX FACILITIES IMPRV(NO CIP) 700 COMPUTER-RELATED 701 VEHICLES&EQUIPMENT CITY OF GRAND TERRACE PENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MEETING -FEBRUARY 23, 2010 A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace was called to order in the Council Chambers,Grand Terrace Civic Center,22795 Barton Road,Grand Terrace,California,on February 23, 2010 at 4:00 p.m. ` PRESENT: Maryetta Ferre, Mayor Lee Ann Garcia, Mayor Pro Tem Bea Cortes, Councilmember Jim Miller, Councilmember Walt Stanckiewitz, Councilmember Betsy M. Adams, City Manager Brenda Mesa, City Clerk Bernard Simon, Finance Director Joyce Powers, Community&Economic Development Director Richard Shields, Building& Safety Director John Harper, City Attorney Sgt. Carlos Espinoza, San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department John Salvate, San Bernardino County Fire Department ABSENT: None CONVENE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND CITY COUNCIL MEETING AT 4:00 P.M. 1. Mid Year Budget Workshop A Budget Workshop was held to discuss the current FY 2009/2010 Budget adjustments presented by City Manager Betsy M. Adams. Chairman Ferre adjourned the City Council and Community Redevelopment Mid-Year Budget Workshop at 5:30 p.m. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING 6:00 P.M. The City Council meeting was opened with Invocation by Mayor Pro Tem Lee Ann Garcia, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance led by Councilman Jim Miller. ITEMS TO ADD/DELETE -None SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. �C t i Council Minutes 02/23/2010 Page 2 A. Chamber of Commerce Business of the Month Sally McGuire,Grand Terrace Area Chamber of Commerce,introduced Maria Frasier,from Fraco Enterprises which is the February 2010 Business of the Month. She reported that Market Night will not be held until May 3,2010. A Mixer will be held at Emeritus on March 11,2010 which is open to the public. A tri-City mixer that will include Colton,Loma Linda and Grand Terrace will be held at Ashley Furniture on March 18, 2010. She reported that the Colton School Board will be the speaker at this months luncheon which is held on the third Tuesday of each month. Mayor Ferre presented Elvera Elmlund with a certificate honoring and congratulating her on her 100`h Birthday. i CONSENT CALENDAR CC-2010-14 MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM GARCIA, SECOND BY MAYOR FERRE, CARRIED 5-0,to approve the following Consent Calendar Items with the removal of item 3A: 3B. Waive Full Reading of Ordinances on Agenda 3C. Approval of 02-09-2010 Minutes 3D. Traffic Engineering Services Agreements 3E. Emergency Operations Committee Minutes of 12-01-2009 and 01-05-2010 3F. Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU") Between the City and San Bernardino Association of Governments ("SANBAG") for the Greenhouse Gas Inventory and Reduction Plan 3G. Sales,Use and Transactions Tax Audit Services-Hinderliter,de Lamas and Associates i 3H. Second Amendment to Purchase Order No. 2234, for Lynn Merrill, Consulting to Municipal Governments, for Technical Support for the City's Solid Waste and Recycling Programs ITEM REMOVED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR I 3A. Approve Check Register Dated 02-23-2010 CC-2010-15 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER STANCKIEWITZ, SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM GARCIA, CARRIED 5-0, to approved Check Register Dated February i 23, 2010. PUBLIC COMMENT i Council Minutes 02/23/2010 Page 3 Debra Hurst,22950 Orangewood Court,indicated that she has a petition to have Jim Miller's charges dismissed which reads, "We the people present this petition in support of City Councilmember Jim Miller. We believe the District Attorney has had sufficient time to review the case against.Jim Miller and believe the allegations to be unfair and unjust to our community and the Miller family. At no time has the ownership of the City News been hidden from our community or City Officials. We believe The City News to be a wonderful communication tool and an asset to our community as a public service that provides community information. We,the undersigned,are concerned citizens who urge the District Attorney to dismiss the charges brought against our City Official Jim Miller,we believe in his integrity and honor." Thomas Schwab,22687 Lark Street,stated that he was surprised to see an article in the paper that seemed to infer that the City Council was unaware that the Agency was making loans to the City. I refuse to believe that none of the City Council Members during the.last 10 years recognize the fact that we used the Redevelopment Agency to balance the budget. In fact the current budget that was adopted last year by the entire Council, including Councilmember Stanckiewitz,included the same transfer that they did the last 10 years. Last year there was hundreds of thousands of dollars transferred from the Agency to the City and it was called overhead. He feels that people need to realize that the Redevelopment Agency is kinda like global warming if you believe in it,I can make arguments either way,whether is great or terrible. The one thing that you need to remember when you talk about right pocket and left pocket is that we are both pockets. The City is the Redevelopment Agency, and the City Council is the Board for the Agency. The City Manager is also the executive director of the Redevelopment Agency and the same is true for the City Attorney, Finance Director and City Clerk. That borrowing has been going on for many years, every single budget and every single financial statement,if you know how to read it,shows you that those transfers were going and will continue to go on. He challenged the Council to adopt a budget that does not take any money from the Redevelopment Agency. Laura Taylor,22225 Lark Street,thanked Councilmembers Jim Miller and Walt Stanckiewitz for attending the Colton School Board Meeting to support the teachers. William Pereira,27460141h Street,Highland,thanked Councilmembers Jim Miller and Walt Stanckiewitz for attending the Colton School Board Meeting to support the teachers. Bernardo Sandoval,22950 De Berry,questioned who supports Jim Miller. He believes that to be able to support Jim Miller it takes more than a signature on a petition. That's a good start and this town will have the ability to show support of Jim Miller. He questioned if Jim Miller is guilty of the charges that he is being accused of. He questioned Councilmember Cortes if she is guilty when she receives payment from her employment, is she guilty of a felony worthy of being arrested at 6:00 a.m. putting your mug shot across every newspaper nationally. Maryetta voted for payment to a water board that your husband sits on. Is there i i I Council Minutes 02/23/2010 Page 4 I i, criminal intent on your part is there criminal on Bea Cortes' part, absolutely not. You need to follow the same measure and same logic. Is Jim Miller guilty of the charges that are being j pursued against him? It is no longer acceptable to simply pretend that this has not happened. This Council has the ability to pass a non-binding resolution in support of Jim Miller asking I Ramos to drop these charges. He is asking the Council to protect one of their own and no longer allow the City to be trampled by the Colton School Board or any other organization including Mike Ramos. Jim Miller deserves better than this and we the people of Grand Terrace support Jim Miller and this issue will not go away. Patricia Farley, 12513 Michigan Street, it is very clear that a malicious prosecution of Councilmember Jim Miller was sought as a retaliatory measure rather than concern for the public interest or the intent of the law. Everyone should be concerned about why District Attorney Mike Ramos is allowing this prosecution to go forward when it is not in the public interest. Current and former members of the City Council should be very concerned about Jim Miller's case in view of the standard practices that have been occurring in this city for years. Consider the following examples for which there is clear documentation. On August 28, 1997,Byron Matteson,Dan Buchanan,Herman,Jim Singley,and Lee Ann Garcia were on the Grand Terrace City Council when they all approved Check Register No.CRA 091197 which included a voucher for$7,500 paid to the Grand Terrace Chamber of Commerce. It was for fiscal year 1997/1998, and it was not designated for any particular thing. Bernie Simon was the Finance Director for the City of Grand Terrace, and Frank Ferre was the i Treasurer of the Grand Terrace Chamber of Commerce. At that time, a Community and Business Directory for 1997/1998 was printed by Allstate Instant printing for the Grand Terrace Chamber of Commerce. According to a newspaper article in 1997,Allstate Printing was owned by Byron Matteson. In the same article, it was also stated that Byron Matteson was the founding director of Inland Community Bank which appears to be the same bank that later gave construction loans for a project that is really in question right now. Some people feel that this project should have never been approved where it is located,right across from residential. An important Public Hearing at City Hall is going to be held on March 4, 2010 at 6:30 p.m.on the CUP for this business. Jim Miller had every reason to believe that he was doing nothing wrong. I believe that he acted in good faith and was ill-advised. I think that the citizens of Grand Terrace have a right to expect our City Attorney and our City Manager to properly advise and support our City Council on matters so that competent and honest } people are willing to serve in our City Council. Why aren't all past and present members of our City Council supporting Jim Miller and speaking out right now? It is absolutely disgusting how people are targeted in this city for just being ill-advised or for just trying to bring out the truth. No one ever seems to be holding the right people accountable for their, actions. Anyone who really cares about protecting the public from true corruption needs to' demand that the malicious prosecution of Jim Miller be stopped immediately. i Sylvia Robles,23008 Orangewood Court,is opposed to Redevelopment Agencies. She feels that Redevelopment debt is not good and urged the Council to abolish the agency. i Council Minutes 02/23/2010 Page 5 COUNCIL REPORTS Maryetta Ferre, announced that a free HIN1 Vaccine is being offered at the Grand Terrace Senior Center on Monday, March 8, 2010 from 1:00 to 6:00 p.m. This is available for anyone over the age of six months. Mayor Pro Tern Garcia,reported that transit is becoming an issue in our community and that the funds are going away from public transit which is a serious issue for us. The Mayor has been contacted by several residents related to transit options for the senior center. She reported that she and City Manager Adams met with the Director of Planning for Omnitrans and a Planner. They discussed options and decided that a survey will be done and a public information meeting will be held on March 16, 2010 at 1:00 p.m. They will look at the survey and decide what type of services are really needed. It is being recommended that Grand Terrace be taken out of Route 25 so they are working at trying to keep this from happening. She stated that they will do their best to keep.the residents informed. Councilmember Cortes, expressed the importance for all of us to work together especially with SANBAG. Grand Terrace is the smallest City and we don't have a lot of clout or power and it is so important that we stay on track with SANBAG. A year and a half ago the City applied for a grant for Mt. Vernon, which we-did not qualify for and we did not get it. All cities applied for this grant. Director of Building and Safety and Public Works Director Shields went to Councilmember Cortes and indicated that we needed the funding and asked if there was anything that she could do. She went and met with a couple of the Board Members and staff and they tweaked the grant so that Grand Terrace could receive the funding. That is how important it is for us to work with SANBAG. Councilmember Miller,reported that there is graffiti written on one of the slides at Rollins Park. He thanked everyone for all of their support. Councilmember Stanckiewitz,stated that he feels that appropriate cost shifting for legitimate expenses, i.e. staff salaries and benefits who work on Redevelopment Programs is different than j ust balancing the General Fund and feels that it is not managing a budget properly. He questioned if what was done was wrong. He accepted the challenge that the Council will have a balanced budget without raiding the Redevelopment Fund. PUBLIC HEARINGS 6A. An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace, California, Amending Chapter 8.112 of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code Regulating the Sale and Discharge of Fireworks Mayor Ferrd opened the Public Hearing for discussion. i Council Minutes 02/23/2010 Page 6 Ryan Beebe, 22646 Lark Street, feels that it is always important to take care of the youth, i they are the future of the City. He feels that the City has not been taking care of the youth and that they have been focusing more on the senior citizens,which are also important. He feels that nothing positive has been done for the youth in the recent years. He feels that even if fireworks are banned in Grand Terrace,people will still discharge them in town. He urged the Council to allow the sale and discharge of fireworks in Grand Terrace to help support the youth leagues and look to ways to serve the youth in the future. He feels that placing this item on the next ballot is a good idea. John Kelly,Vice-President T N T Fireworks, 555 N. Gilbert Street,Fullerton, stated that he has spoken before the Council other times regarding this issue and feels that everything has been said,however,he gave the Council a couple of questions to ponder should they decide to place this item on the ballot: will the election be an advisory or binding election,will we continue to say all fireworks and really what we are talking about is safe and sane, the dangerous and illegal fireworks are already illegal in Grand Terrace. Will the Council all or I in part participate in the ballot argument and will the groups and TNT Fireworks be allowed to sell fireworks in July 2010. He reminded the Council that one of the recommendations of the sub-committee was through the surcharge of the groups as well as participation by TNT Fireworks, there is money coming in for use for patrols on two nights, the Yd and 4`h of July. Teresa Gray,22819 DeBerry Street,at the last meeting the Council indicated that they want to ban fireworks in Grand Terrace due to safety concerns. You can not protect people who choose to make bad decisions. These types of people will make these decisions whether you try to protect them or not. They have outlawed using your cell while driving but people do it anyway. She use to be a firefighter a number of years ago and she can assure you that people do stupid things no matter how many laws are in place to try to protect them and those around them. They drive without seatbelts, they leave their animals and children in cars in hot weather. They drive without placing children in car seats and they throw cigarettes out of their windows,which could easily cause a fire. You can not protect people from their own stupidity. As a member of the community she asked that they not take away their right to safe and sane fireworks just because a few people may act irresponsible. As elected officials it is your duty to listen to the voice of the people of Grand Terrace. If you choose to rule against her request to keep safe and sane fireworks in our City then she asks that the Council let the citizens of the City vote and decide if they should be banned not just impose your personal opinions on the City and everyone within it. She feels that it is not that easy to find sponsorships for families that can't afford to pay the registration fee especially when it is difficult to sell a$1.00 candy bar in front of Stater Bros. Anja Wood, 12168 Observation Drive, every year I enjoy going out in the front yard and watching fireworks. If the topic of not allowing fireworks goes through, she will not have that privilege anymore,in fact I won't have it anywhere. Her dad lives in Riverside and they i Council Minutes 02/23/2010 Page 7 don't allow fireworks. Never once has she hurt herself with fireworks, she is very careful and aware of the fragileness of them. Going to a ball park is fun but not nearly as fun asdoing them in your front yard at home. Even if fireworks are outlawed in Grand Terrace the same people that caught something on fire are going to go somewhere else and buy fireworks and shoot them off. She enjoys, and is careful and respect her privilege of fireworks. Thomas Schwab,22687 Lark Street,indicated that there was an article in the paper that was saying that there is no funding available for special fire patrols for the fireworks. He pointed out that the fireworks committee, which worked for several months on this issue, got the Little League to agree that they would put 6% surcharge on all the fireworks sales which would fund one day of special patrol for the Sheriff's Department. The Sheriff's Department bomb squad unit would go out and do special patrol with that 6%and TNT Fireworks agreed to fund the second day. If he thought that by the Council banning fireworks they would actually go away,he might agree with banning them. Personally he doesn't like fireworks, especially the illegal variety. The truth of the matter is regardless of what the Council does tonight, the fireworks will still exist in Grand Terrace. The only difference is we will no longer be able to buy them in town and support our youth. He urged the Council to do research before they place this item on the ballot. When this goes on the ballot no one will fund a effort to make fireworks away but I guarantee that someone will fund an effort to keep fireworks. He encourage them to go back and look at the history of every fireworks election that has been done by a City to outlaw fireworks in their community and feels that they will find that it is close to 100% of those elections go in favor of keeping fireworks. Ballot measures don't get rid of fireworks. Patricia Farley, 12513 Michigan Street, indicated that she is sympathetic to the children, however,we have to also teach them that we all loose privileges when we have irresponsible children and adults that nobody can control. Year after year,holiday after holiday,recently it seems like it has been every month,we have fireworks,major ones going up over the huge pine trees right near her home. No matter how many times you tell the fire department,the only people that they leave it up to, to report it is me. She indicated that even though she knows who is setting off the fireworks the department won't do anything about it because they didn't see it. If we can't take care of this problem, we have to help the department by not allowing fireworks on every corner in Grand Terrace. She is tired of the fireworks. The people that are promoting fireworks maybe should have a higher tax to help put a stop to this. JoAnn Johnson, 12723 Mt. Vernon Avenue, stated that her major concern with fireworks is the pets that are traumatized every year. She is opposed to continuing fireworks in Grand Terrace. She would be in favor of placing it on the ballot. She renewed her suggestion,that an honest effort be made to solicit funds from the public, she will be in the front of the line when a sincere effort is made to raise funds through the public. Option number 2 or 3 would be acceptable to her. t Council Minutes j 02/23/2010 Page 8 ' Valentine Douglas,22210 Emerald Street,every year on 4`'of July he enjoys fireworks and it is a good time to spend with family and friends. He realizes that there is a lot of irresponsible people out there and feels that taking it away from the entire City is not right. 4 1 i Eileen Garza, 22210 Emerald Street, she indicated that she was the fundraiser coordinator for Grand Terrace Little League and presented some of their sincere efforts of fund raising. f She read a list of team sponsors that they received from businesses in the amount of $150.00. There were numerous businesses that were asked in Grand Terrace and surrounding cities but could not commit. Their player sponsorship fee is $65.00. Little League regulations state that the players are only allowed to participate in one fundraiser per year. The fireworks is their major fund raiser. Even with all of these sincere efforts they still need the sale of the fireworks to help support the league. The fireworks funds help reimburse two of the girls softball teams for their airline tickets to the World Series in Washington and Oregon. They also had a year book with other businesses that purchased ads. i Anne Wade Hornsby,22656 Brentwood Street,stated that she has heard all the various sides of the fireworks issue. A long time ago even in Grand Terrace, they were allowed to have incinerators to burn their own garbage. This became dangerous and was something that the City did not want to continue. It was abolished. Conditions changed and fire danger was something that needed to be considered. Her first thought when she thinks of fireworks is the fire danger. Her dogs are traumatized, not just on July 4'h but on New Years and other holidays as well. Her basic concern is the fire danger,not just in Grand Terrace but all over. j She feels that the residents should be allowed to vote on a ballot whether or not that is something that they want to continue. Fireworks that are available now are very potent. Public displays of fireworks are something that can be enjoyed by families in a safe ' environment. Doug Wilson, 12168 Observation Drive,when it comes to the topic at hand or any other for that matter,the Council is under no obligation to expand the local government to undermine his liberty after all, are we not of people who collectively believe in the power of the individual and as such must avoid the imposition of our personal bias' in order to preserve the spirit of that sacred trust. His cousin, President Woodrow Wilson said a leader's ear should ring with the voice of the people. If he were in Council's shoes his ears would be ringing not with whether or not a replacement funding mechanism exists but with why a generation so concerned with personal liberty over the course of four decades can grow numb to the symbolism that personal celebration of independence so richly represents. We have so few traditions of our own that mirrored our reverened observance can we honestly afford to affix a price tag to this one. Your own staff recommends that the residents of Grand Terrace be allowed to exercise its constitutionally guaranteed free agency by voting this November whether or not to continue the sale and discharge of fireworks within the city limits. Contained within the body of the recommendation is a history on the subject and he, questioned when did this decision degrade from an issue of personal liberty to an exercise i I ', Council Minutes 02/23/2010 Page 9 of pin the tale on the donkey. Your own staff acknowledges the need for enhanced law enforcement whether or not fireworks are banned within the City limits. Common sense dictates that banning legal fireworks will not alleviate the use of illegal fireworks obtained from outside sources and alike application of common sense shouts if you ban the legal what is to stop the void from being filled with the importation of more illegal fireworks. He questioned if there is a reason why M80's , cannons,roman candles are illegal. Isn't it true that the coalary of freedom is responsibility and someone who chooses to ignore the responsibility inherent with that freedom will undoubtably disregard any attempt to legislate it. Otherwise what are we teaching our children,that we are not capable and by association our children are equally incapable of the minimal government envisioned by our forefathers. He challenged the Council to follow staff s recommendations and put the matter to a vote, especially if you are not in touch with the will of your constituency sufficient that you are uncomfortable with representing that will. He cautioned them to magnify their credibility to an elevated level of mutual confidence. You are the gate keepers of freedom and liberty and if it is the will of the people he will celebrate your allegiance to correct principles with the same ferocity he would choose to celebrate his forefathers courage. Virginia Harford, 11825 Arliss Way, suggested that people get on the internet and put in fireworks, deaths and injuries and see what you come up with for one 4th of July. Mayor Ferre Closed the Public hearing and returned discussion to the Council. Councilmember Jim Miller,appreciates all the comments that he has heard this evening. He realizes that this has been one of the harder discussions that we have had in Grand Terrace for a long time. He would Pike to put this issue to rest and come up with a good decision. Last time the Council discussed this they came up with a couple of ideas and he feels that what has been brought up by some of the people that have spoke is that maybe this issue needs to be brought to a vote of the people and find out what they really think. Each of the Council probably has an opinion one way or another and it probably would be a balanced one, however, he feels that it really needs to go to the people and allow them to make the decision and feels that this November would be a good time to do that. He is in support of option number 3. He feels that this does not answer all of the questions. He questioned what is going to be done about this July 4`h. He brought up the last time this was discussed that he would like the leagues to bring something to show where they are financially and if they had any ideas where they could make some fund raising opportunities available to the community so maybe they wouldn't have to have the fireworks booth. So far the Grand Terrace Little League is the only one that has responded. He questioned if the City has the funds to pay for the lighting at the baseball and soccer fields. City Manager Adams,there are light fees and a$5.00 per player fee so it depends upon each sports group enrollment. It could be $3,000.00 to $4,000.00 per league depending on the number of children involved each year. There are other costs if we were to not allow y - Council Minutes ' 02/23/2010 Page 10 fireworks because of the surcharge and a cash contribution from TNT Fireworks. If you factor everything together it gets close to the $25,000.00. She stated that their earnings are ,f a lot more than what the waiving of fees would save them. Councilmember Miller,stated that he would support the sale of fireworks for this July 41''and f take it to the voters in November 2010 to see which way it will be for future years. I Mayor Pro Tem Lee Ann Garcia, stated that the Council desperately wants to do something for the youth and to figure out what is the appropriate level of support. Council has always liked the efforts of Little League and Soccer. She feels that it is very important for the City as a whole to come together and support the youth. She is in full agreement with Councilmember Miller this evening. She stated that based on the speakers it appears that the majority would like to see this issue go to the vote of the people and that is what she will support. She supports option 3 and supports the sale of fireworks this July 41''2010. Mavor Maryetta Ferrd, stated that she would support option 3. She questioned if the City would be able to write the ballot measure. City Attorney Harper,responded that it would depend on the source. If the Council chooses to place this item on the ballot then the Council can prepare the language for the ballot. Mayor Ferrd, stated that she is in favor of the youth groups selling fireworks this July. She questioned if it would be possible to have a safe zone around the base of Blue Mountain I where there would be no fireworks allowed. City Attorney Harper, stated that an ordinance could be drafted and brought back to the Council to adopt. I John Salvate, San Bernardino County Fire, stated that there is a high fire hazard severities zone designation from the State that includes the area surrounding Blue Mountain and also the La Loma Hills area on the west side of the City. The only caution that he would recommend of the Council is that they will have to look at the enforcement potential and things of that nature. Those things come with a cost. There is a special surcharge for law !' enforcement but it does not cover fire. Councilmember Bea Cortes,referred to a letter that was done by Chief Dennen and requested that Battalion Chief Salvate read it for the record. i' I John Salvate, San Bernardino County Fire, stated that this information has come before the Council previously and read it for the record: Permanent scarring, loss of vision, dismemberment- these are too often the harsh realities i f E Council Minutes 02/23/2010 Page 11 of amateur fireworks use. According to NFPA, amateur fireworks use endangers not only the users,but also bystanders and surrounding property and structures. Pyrotechnic devices including sparklers and Safe & Sane fireworks can cause thousands of fires and serious injuries each year,Nationally. Safe and Sane fireworks don't exist according to the NFPA's Fire Analysis and Research Branch. "When things go wrong with fireworks, they go very wrong, very fast, far faster than any fire protection provisions can reliably respond." In recent years,fireworks have been one of the leading causes of injuries serious enough to require hospital emergency room treatment. Fireworks can result in severe burns, scars' or even death or disfigurement that can last a lifetime. The thousands of serious injuries each year typically harm the eyes, head, or hands, and are mostly reported in states where fireworks are legal. Even sparklers, which are considered by many to be harmless, reach temperatures of more than 1,000 ° F. "Fireworks are dangerous and unpredictable. The few seconds of pleasure those fireworks may bring are not worth the risk of injury, permanent scarring, or even death. San Bernardino County has been the site of some of the Nations most devastating fires. We have witnessed thousands of homes burned. Countless lives lost, and even firefighters killed because of fireworks. Why would we want to continue making flammable explosives available in such a fire prone region? Wooded area, homes, and even automobiles have become engulfed in flames because of fireworks. Fireworks-related fires have typically caused at least$20 million in property loss Nationally. For most people, their family and their home represent the hard work of a lifetime and their hopes for the future. No one would risk losing what's most important to him or her if they understood the dangers,of fireworks. There are safer alternatives to using fireworks on the Fourth of July. Public fireworks displays are one of those alternatives. Conducted by trained professional,these displays are the smartest and safest fireworks alternative for anyone because they are established under controlled settings and regulations. Clearly,fireworks are capable of devastating and fatal injuries. According to the American Pyrotechnics Association,there are currently six states that ban all consumer fireworks(AZ, DE, MA,NJ,NY, and RI). The fireworks banned in these states don't become safer when used in others. Remember, all fireworks should be left to professional and youth sports are still available to our children in communities where fireworks are banned, without the sale of fireworks. The San Bernardino County Fire Department supports a ban on the sale of Safe and Sane fireworks everywhere in our county, including the City of Grand Terrace. i f Council Minutes 02/23/2010 Page 12 I f He stated that the position of Chief Dennen still stands. They support whatever decision that i the City Council makes and will do their best to remain good partners with the City. �I Councilmember Cortes,stated that she received a petition with several signatures that are in ! favor of banning the sale and use of fireworks in Grand Terrace. She supports the youth groups unfortunately,the City can not financially support them. She has contributed to the organizations in the past. She supports option 3 for this to go to a vote of the people. Councilmember Walt Stanckiewitz, stated that the City has been dealing with this issue for many years. He had an opportunity to review the fireworks committee votes which were eye 1 opening. It was a split vote with those in favor being the youth groups, the fireworks company and the City Manager and those opposed were residents. He was disappointed that the committee Chairperson abstained. We have not looked for alternatives in 13 years and he feels that this issue needs to be taken to the vote of the people. He supports option 3 to compose an ordinance that would be a ban on all fireworks in the City of Grand Terrace and put it to the voters in November. He supports that the Leagues be allowed to sell fireworks 4 this year and that the City negotiates with TNT Fireworks a fair market rent if they wish to use City Property. CC-2010-16 MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM GARCIA, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER STANCKIEWITZ, CARRIED 4-0-0-1 (COUNCILMEMBER MILLER ABSTAINED), to direct staff to come up with ballot language for the November Election allowing the residents to vote on whether or not the sale and discharge of all fireworks shall be prohibited in Grand Terrace;and allow the youth leagues to sell fireworks for the year 2010. i CC-2010-17 MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM GARCIA, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER CORTES, CARRIED 4-1-0-0 (COUNCILMEMBER STANCKIEWITZ VOTED NO),to direct staff to bring back the appropriate documents to allow a safe zone per the Fire Department to be implemented this July 4, 2010. i UNFINISHED BUSINESS 7A. Second Reading of an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace, California Rescinding the Traffic Signal Improvement and Arterial Improvement Fee Schedules (4.104) and Replacing it with a New Fee Structure I CC-2010-18 MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM GARCIA, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER I CORTES, CARRIED 5-0, to approve the Second Reading of an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace, California Rescinding the Traffic Signal Improvement and Arterial Improvement Fee Schedules(4.104)and Replacing it with a New Fee Structure i i I Council Minutes 02/23/2010 Page 13 NEW BUSINESS 8A. Resolution to Support a Grant Proposal to the State Department of Parks and Recreation for a New Park Rita Schwark, 21952 Grand Terrace Road, stated that she is not for or against a park. She feels that if there is an overflow of people at that park they are going to park in front of her house that she is responsible for maintaining. She questioned how many parking spaces will be at the park. She indicated that she did not receive a notice regarding this project nor did her neighbors. She feels that there will be a lot ofpeople utilizing the park and that there will be a significant amount of traffic increase. She feels that this park will affect her property value. She stated that there is no code enforcement after 5:00 p.m.on Thursday evenings and that the City does not operate on weekends. Who will maintain this property during the time that the City does not operate. She expressed her concern that the truck drivers will use the restrooms. Charles Hornsby, 22656 Brentwood Street, stated that the State of California is in debt and they are telling you that they are going to give you money that they don't have. The City needs to think about the financial state of California when considering this grant proposal. CC-2010-19 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER MILLER,SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER STANCKIEWITZ, CARRIED 5-0, to approve a Resolution to Support a Grant Proposal to the State Department of Parks and Recreation for a New Park. 8B. Mid-Year Budget Review for FY 2009-2010 CC-2010-20 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER CORTES, SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM GARCIA, CARRIED 5-0, to receive and file and.approve the recommended Mid- Year Budget Appropriation Adjustments and approve the Changes to the Reserve Designations as follows: FY 2009/2010 General Fund Reserve Available Designated Total $1,147,982 $2,630,745 $3,778.727 FY 2009/2010 CRA Reserve Available Designated Total $2,872,632 $4,879,087 $7,751,719 i i Council Minutes { 02/23/2010 Page 14 i CLOSED SESSION -None I Mayor Ferre adjourned the meeting at 9:20 p.m., until the next City Council Meeting which is scheduled to be held on Tuesday, March 9, 2010 at 6:00 p.m. V CITY CLERK of the City of Grand Terrace 'I MAYOR of the City of Grand Terrace i i i I i i, r i i i i .4LIFORNIA AGENDA REPORT MEETING DATE: March 9, 2010 Council Item(X) CRA Item ( ) TITLE: CITY ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENT-FY 2008-09 PRESENTED BY: Bernie Simon, Finance Director RECOMMENDATION: Approve BACKGROUND: The City's Annual Audit and Financial Report is required under the municipal code and is required for reporting to the State Controller, grant reporting, if any, bond trustees and other financial reporting requirements. The City received an unqualified opinion for the fiscal year 2008-09 audit. An unqualified opinion is the highest opinion that can be achieved. The City is audited by the CPA firm of Rogers, Anderson Malody and Scott from San Bernardino. f - DISCUSSION: Net assets of the city, on the Government-Wide Statement of Net Assets, decreased approximately 18% to $30 million primarily due to use of redevelopment tax increment and debt used to assist the building of the senior housing project center for which no asset is recorded in capital assets. Overall revenues decreased 8% to $16.5 million while expenditures, capital costs and debt service increased 85% to $23 million. The increase in overall expenditures is again primarily due to the senior housing project. Overall Fund Balance Reserve is $21 million, however the General Fund Balance Reserve has a deficit of($507,015) at fiscal year end. FISCAL IMPACT: None by this action. Respectfully submitted, Bernie Simon Finance Director COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. 1 Manager Approval: Betsy . Adam� City Manager ATTACHMENTS: City of Grand Terrace Annual Financial Report (under separate cover) `•i� •3 i�LIFORVl1 AGENDA REPORT MEETING DATE: March 9,.2010 Council Item(X) CRA Item ( ) TITLE: FY 2009-10 Quarterly Financial Update—Dec. 31, 2009 PRESENTED BY: Bernie Simon, Finance Director RECOMMENDATION: Approve BACKGROUND: Council has requested staff to provide a quarterly financial update. Fiscal year quarter to date for the current fiscal year 2009-10 was compiled for the six months ending December 31, 2009 and the results are presented for review. DISCUSSION: Total Revenue by Fund and Total Expenditures by Fund are presented as of December 31, 2009. The financial data of Revenue and Expenditures has been summarized and categorized for your convenience due to the large amount of raw data. An additional schedule has been included for to compare the current FYTD revenues and expenditures to the prior FYTD revenues and expenditures to review some of the seasonal nature of cash inflows and outflows. For example, property tax revenues are primarily received in two large portions coinciding with a month or so after'the semi-annual property tax payment due. Another example is that CRA pass-through payments are not calculated and recorded until the very end of the fiscal year. The analysis page of the Fund Balance Reserves has also. been changed to show current Fund Balance Reserves after revenues are received and expenditures made but before the encumbrances are deducted from Fund Balance Reserves. Encumbrances are a commitment against budgeted expenditures and should reduce the available budgeted line item but are only a reservation against fund balance reserves. Revenues Total revenues and transfers for all funds amounted to $5,560,128, FYTD compared to $5,541,474 in the previous FYTD. General Fund revenues through December 31, 2009 amounted to $1,266,135 representing about 23% of the total budgeted estimated revenue fiscal year-to-date. Compared to December 31, 2008 and excluding the revenue from the residual receipts agreement between the City and the CRA, revenues are down 20% FYTD. The decrease is a combination of timing differences, lower revenue receipts for taxes, fees and interest earnings. Timing differences are a result of the state lowering the monthly sales tax advances, COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 1 �i delaying payments and, in the case of motor vehicle in lieu fees, deducting their costs up fro',nt before subventions to the counties and cities are remitted. The estimated revenues shown as budget do not include any Mid-Year Budget adjustments as presented by staff on Feb. 23, 2010. The Mid-Year revenue projection reduced General Fund Revenues from $5,280,674 to $4,796,933, a decrease of$483,741 for the reasons cited above. One correction that was made after the Mid-Year revenue review was the Federal Stimulus Funding and related projects approved by SANBAG in November. An additional revenue I estimate of$100,000 was posted retroactively to October to reflect the approval of the Stimulus Funds and proposed projects approved by the City Council in October. The Mid-Year Revenue estimates are to shown below to see what the changes will be made to the amended budget after ' Dec. 31, 2009. Based on the Mid-Year review, revenues are anticipated to be $483,741 below i that of the amended FY 2009-10 revenue estimates used for the budget. Analysis of General Fund Revenues Revenue ** Budget Est. Budget Received MIDYEAR" Revenue Est. Through REV EST FY 09-10 , Rev % 12-31-09 Budget Property Taxes 19525,850 1,481,500 7.7% 114,396 Franchise Fees 400,000 400,000 15.9% 63,625 I Sales Tax/Triple Flip 751,920 930,845 19.7% 183,665 !1 MVLF 56,060 56,060 14.9% 8,393 Child Care 1,001,000 1,042,017 43.3% 451,672 Bldg/Plan Fees 59,900 160,800 21.8% 35,133 Use of Money Property 50,000 98,500 22.2% 21,910 Other Fees 164,300 267,550 16.2% 43,372 Sr Housing Residual 600,000 600,000 50.0% 300,000 II Other 187,903 243,402 18.1% 43,969 Total 4,796,933 5,280,6741 23.9% 1 1,266,134 i ** Mid-Year revenue estimates to be posted I General Fund Revenue has been summarized above by major types. Because of the ongoing economic recession, most economy-based, development and interest-related revenues continue to decline from prior year levels. Revenues from state subventions continue to come in very slowly. The majority of the property tax revenue will not be received until January and the beginning of f 4' June. Historically, most general revenues are received in the last six months of the fiscal year. Expenditures I. Total expenditures and transfers for all funds amounted to $6,352,139 FYTD. Another $1,624,731 of goods and services were committed through purchase orders FYTD for a total of $7,976,870 compared to $10,249,075 the previous FYTD. Last year's total FYTD was higher r}'.�s ;�s ?t t.Y..i I`t��{�e ...t''i .:'d`'^i�#�•a , i i primarily due to the contribution of project costs to the Senior Center project which is now complete. General Fund expenditures through December 31, 2009 amounted to $2,462,404. Another $1,149,900 of goods and services were committed through purchase orders FYTD for a total of$3,612,304 compared to $3,652,467 the previous FYTD. Law Enforcement expenditures and encumbrances represent 44% of the total General Fund expenditures and encumbrances FYTD. Expenditures on an annualized basis appear to be in line FY budget. However, in view of the previously reported revenue shortfalls in the Mid-Year budget review, a number of expenditure reductions were recommended to Council. The City Manager outlined net budget savings as follows in the Mid-Year budget review on - February 23, 2010: General Fund $ (259,663) CRA Cap Proj Fund $ +8,777 CRA LM Fund $ 13 900 Total Net Reductions $ (264,786) The Mid-Year expenditure adjustments are included below in the second column to show what changes will be made to the overall budget after Dec. 31, 2009. Expenditures and ** Amend Budget Budget Committed Encumbrances DMYEAR* Expenditures Expend Through Expenditures Encumb. Encmb 12-31-09 Budget FY 09-10 % General Fund 5,222,973 5,482,636 65.8% 3,612,304 Other Funds 5,023,670 5,023,670 26.3% 1,323,972 CRA Funds 9,206,656 9,211,779 33.0% 3,040,594 Total 19,453,299 19,718,085 40.5% 7,976,870 ** Mid-Year expenditures adjustments to be posted 3 �i 1I Fund Balance Overall Fund Balance Reserves are indicated below as of December 31, 2009. A fund balance reserve total is calculated which includes revenues received and deducts expenditures FYTD. Encumbrances are then deducted from the Fund Balance Reserve amount column to arrive at the "Fund Balance Incl. Encumb" to see the available or designated fund balance reserve at December 31, 2009. The Mi&Year review on Feb. 23, 2010 proposed a designated reserve of$2,630,745 to show the p net amount owing from the City to the CRA and not currently available. Fund Beg Fund Revenues Expenditures Fund Encumb Fund Balance FYTD FYTD Balance &Reser Balance Total 112/31/09 Incl. Encumb General Fund 4,060,385 1,266,134 2,462,404 2,864,115 1,149,900 916,530 GF-Desig— ** 2,630,7415 Debt - �,; Total Gen. 4,060,385 1,266,134 2,462,404 2,864,115 1,149,900 1,714,215 i Fund !' Other Funds 3,072,426 1,000,312 1,062,237 3,010,501 261,735 2,748,766 CRA Funds 7,137,380 3,293,681 2,827,498 7,603,563 213,096 7,390;46;7 II CRA 2;700,000 2,700,000 2,700,000 Desig.Debt Total 16,970,191 5,560,128 6,352,139 16,178,179 1,624,731 14,553,449 ** Mid-Year expenditures adjustments to be posted I! i i� L The financial information was compiled from the EDEN financial accounting system at December 31, 2009 and is believed to accurate but has not been audited or reconciled. FISCAL IMPACT: None by this report Respectfully submitted, Bernie Simon Finance Director Manager Approval: Betsy . Adams City Manager ATTACHMENTS: FY 2009-10 Quarterly Financial Update— 12-31-09 SUMMARY FY 2009-10 Quarterly Financial Update— 12-31-09 by Fund Revised Budget Update: Projected Fund Balance to 6-30-2010(prior to midyear adjustments), Revenue adjustments through 1/26/10; Expenditure adjustments through 1/26/10 5 City of Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Agency of Grand Terrace Fiscal Year 2009-10 QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORTS December 31, 2009 SUMMARY City and CRA of Grand Terrace FY 2009-10 Fund Balance Reserves July 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009 Fiscal Year to Date Expenditure Analysis by Quarter Fund Audited Dec.31,09 Dec.31,09 Dec.31,09 Dec.31,09 Dec 31,09 Revised Available REVENUES EXPENDI- FY-to-date ENCUMB 6 Fy-to-date Budget Fund Balance TURES Fund RESERVA- Fund FY2009.10 06.30-09 Balance TINS Balance ACTUAL AVAILABLE TOTAL GENERAL FUND 4,060,385 1,266,135 2,462,404 2,864,116 1,149,900 1,714,216 3,858,423 TOTAL OTHER CITY FUNDS 3,072,426 1,000,312 1,062,237 3,010,501 261,735 2,748,766 3,313,051 TOTAL CRA FUNDS 9,837,380 3,293,681 2,827,498 10,303,563 213,096 10,090,467 9,695,687 Grand Total-ALL FUNDS 16,970,191 5,560,128 6,352,139 16,178,180 1,624,731 14,553,449 16,867,161 SUMMARY FUND BALANCE RESERVES 7 i City and CRA of Grand Terrace Budget: FY 2009-10 Revenue Report for First Six Months l; July 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009 i' Fiscal Yearto Date Revenue Analysis by Quarter REVENUES 10-GENERAL FUND Sept30,09 % Dec.31,09 % Mar.31, 10 % Jun.30, 10 % Revised FY-to-date 15% FY-to-date M FY-to-date 75% FY-to-date 1w% Budget Revenue Revenue Revenue Revenue PY20MIO Revenue TOTAL GENERAL FUND 522,522 9.9% 1,266,135 24.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5,280,674 �f TOTAL OTHER CITY FUNDS 288,517 5.5% 1,000,312 19.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5,264,295 "'TOTAL CRA FUNDS 52,284 0.6% 3,293,681 36.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 9,073,0bo Grand Total-ALL FUNDS 863,322 4.4% 5,560,128 28.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 19,618,055 �I Ii I1! �F I+ I I' I i' 4 i ;+ SUMMARY ! Revenues by Quarter FYTD FY 2009-10 1r 'I City and CRA of Grand Terrace Budget: FY 2009-10 Revenue Report for First Six Months Fiscal Year to Date Revenue Analysis by Quarter FYTD by Quarter-FY 2009-10 Comparison to Prior Fiscal Year Quarter REVENUES 10-GENERAL FUND Sept 30,09 % Sept30,08 % Dec.31,09 % Dec.31,08 % FY-to-date 1b% FY-to-date 25% FY-to-date 50% - FY-to-date W% Revenue Revenue Revenue Revenue TOTAL GENERAL FUND 522,522 9.9% 466,788 8.8% 1,266,135 24.0% 1,216,943 22.9% TOTAL OTHER CITY FUNDS 288,517 5.9% 364,753 7.9% 1,000,312 19.6% 842,454 18.1% TOTAL CRA FUNDS 52,284 0.6% 86,802 0.9% 3,293,681 36.3% 3,482,077 35.5% Grand Total-ALL FUNDS 863,322 4.5% 918,343 4.6% 5,560,128 28 7% 5.541.474 28 0% 8-09 Notes:Revenues include Transfers-In FY09-10 FY0 FY0940 FY08-09 SUMMARY Revenues by FYTD Quarter Comparison to Prior FY 9 'I Budget : FY 2009-10 Expenditure Report by Category - Fiscal Year- to - Date July 1, 2009 through December 31,2009 60%of FY Completed With Breakdown by Category CATEGORY j 10-GENERAL FUND FYTD FYTD TOTAL salaries Maint capital Expendi'- Encumb- FYTD do contracts do tunes /ances Expend Benefits de Other { EIICumb. Operations TOTAL GENERAL FUND 2,462,404 1 149 900 3 612 304 1 189 93271,065,4"41 2443914 -21 542 j 68.2% 31.8% 100.0% 32.9% 7% -0.6% TOTAL OTHER CITY FUNDS 1,062,237 261,735 1,323,972 50 785 207746 80.2% 19.8% 100.0% 3.8% .5% 15.7% TOTAL CRA FUNDS 2,827,498 213,096 3,040,594 236 745 367,865 2 435 98, _ 93.0% 7.0% 100.0% 7.8% 12.1% 80.104 Grand Total-ALL FUNDS 6,352,1391 1,624,731 7 976 870 1,477,462 3,877,221, 2,622,1881 79.6% 20.4% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% I i i 1 l f i i' , i i I f SUMMARY Expenditures by Category FY 2009-10 I City and CRA of Grand Terrace FY 2009.10 - . Expenditure Report for Six Months July 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009 Fiscal Year to Date Expenditure Analysis by Quarter EXPENDITURES AND ENCUMBRANCES 10-GENERAL FUND Sept30,09 96 Dec.31,09 96 Mar.31, 10 % Jun.30,10 % Revised FY-to-date 25% FY-fo-date 50% FY-to-date 75% FY-to-date iw% Budget Expend Expend. Expend. Expend. FY 2009-10 Encumb. Encumb. Encumb. Encumb TOTAL GENERAL FUND 2,988,211 54.5% 3,612,304 65.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5,482,636 TOTAL OTHER CITY FUNDS 782,838 16.9% 1,323,972 28.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4,623,670 TOTAL CRA FUNDS 4,926,179 53.8% 3,040,594 33.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 9,160,365 Grand Total-ALL FUNDS 8,697,228 45.1% 7,976 870 41.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 19,266,671 Notes: Expenditures include Transfers-Out SUMMARY Expenditures by Quarter FYTD FY 2009-10 11 I FY 2009-10 i Expenditure Report for Six Months j July 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009 FYTD by Quarter-FY 2009-10 Comparison to Prior Fiscal Year Quarter i EXPENDITURES AND ENCUMBRANCES 10-GENERAL FUND Sept30,09 % Sept 30,08 % Dec.31,09 % Dec.31,08 96 r FY-to-date 25% FY-to-date 25% FY-to-date 50% FY-to-date 5" Expend. Expend. Expend Expend. Encumb. Encumb. Encumb. Encumb. i ? TOTAL GENERAL FUND 2,988,211 54.5% 3,013,064 47.2% 3,612,304 65.7% 3,652,467 57.2% TOTAL OTHER CITY FUNDS 782,838 16.9% 814,602 19.2% 1,323,972 27.9% 1,347,430 31.7% TOTAL CRA FUNDS 4,926,179 53.8% 4,164,868 32.6% 3,040,594 33.2% 5,249,178 41.1% Grand Total-ALL FUNDS 8,697,228 45.2% 7,992,534 34.2% 7,976,870 41.2% 10,249,075 43.8% FY0940 FY08-09 FY0940 FY08-09 Notes: Expenditures include Transfers-Out I l i k i i I j1 i f SUMMARY Expenditures by FYTD Quarter Comparison to Prior FY I T ILR\It City of Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Agency of Grand Terrace Fiscal Year 2009-10 QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORTS December 31, 2009 DETAIL BY FUND 13 l City and CRA of Grand Terrace FY 2009-10 r Fund Balance Reserves r July 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009 ; Fiscal Year to Date Expenditure Analysis by Quarter Fund Audited Dec.31,09 Dec.31,09 Dec.31,09 Dw.31,09 Dec.31,09 Revised Available REVENUES EXPENDI- FY-to-date ENCUMB& FY to-dste Budget Fund Balance TURES Fund RESERVA- Fund FY2009-10 06.30.08 Balance 77ONS Balance ACTUAL AVAILABLE GENERAL FUND,UNDESIGNATED 3,101,141 1,266,135 2,462,404 1,904,872 1,149,900 754,972 1,252,364 GENERAL FUND,DESIGNATED OTHER 959,244 0 0 959,244 0 959,244 0 GENERAL FUND,DESIG-CRA DEBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,606,059 TOTAL GENERAL FUND -4,060,385 1,266,135 2,462,404 2,864,116 1,149,900 1,714,216 3,858,423 i 11-STREET FUND 789,590 2,463 3,214 788,939 0 788,839 1,545,172 12-STORM DRAIN FUND 74,599 224 6,138 68,685 4,710 63,975 94,123 13-PARK FUND 273,532 751 45,704 228,579 3,414 225,165 152,503 14-SLESF(AB3229 COPS) 0 2 119,268 (119,286) 166,626 (285,892) 0 I 15-AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT FUND 60,174 3,824 488 63,510 0 63,510 34,804 16-GAS TAX FUND 44,537 54,789 94,557 4,769 40,443 (35,674) 65,987 f" 17-TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND (109,430) 25,645 33,029 (116,814) 0 (116,814) (96,780) 19-FACILITIES FUND 202,423 446 4,408 198,461 0 198,461 161,609 20-MEASURE"1"FUND 81,343 45,657 54,962 72,038 0 72,038 66,888 21-WASTE WATER DISPOSAL FUND 1,757,882 655,423 458,492 1,954,813 17,933 1,936,880 1,390,699 26-LNDSCP&LGTG ASSESSMENT DIST 14,223 5,586 6,048 13,761 0 13,761 14,493 1' j 41-PUB FIN AUTH DEBT SERVICE FUND 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44-CAPITAL PROJECT-BIKE LANE (42,025) 145,385 103,305 55 0 55 (42,025) 46-CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS-STREET 2,655 0 68,113 (65,458) 7,764 (739222) 2,655 47-CAP.PRJ.BARTOWCOLTON BRIDGE (77,077) 60,117 64,511 (81,471) 20,845 (102,316) (77,077) TOTAL OTHER CITY FUNDS 3,072,426 1,000,312 1,062,237 3,010,501 261,735 2,748,766 3,313,051 i 32-CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND 142,298 31,742 455,813 (281,773) 200,888 (482,659) (464,134) 33-DEBT SERVICE FUND 5,589,357 2,593,745 1,889,212 6,293,890 604 6,293,286 6,478,071 j 34-DEBT SERVICE FUND-RESERVATIO 2,700,000 0 0 2,700,000 0 2,700,000 2,700,000 `M1 34-LOW INCOME HOUSING FUND 1,405,725 668,194 482,473 1,591,446 11,606 1,579,840 981,750 TOTAL CRA FUNDS 9,837,380 3,293,681 2,827,498 10,303,563 213,096 10,090,467 9,695,687 E, Grand Total-ALL FUNDS 16,970,191 5,560,128 6,352,139 16,178,180 1,624,731 14,553,449 16,867,161 I I 'I �I ! ! FUND BALANCE RESERVES I ! 1 Al City and CRA of Grand Terrace Budget: FY 2009-10 Revenue Report for First Six Months July 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009 Fiscal Year to Date Revenue Analysis by Quarter REVENUES 10-GENERAL FUND Sept30,09 % Der.31,09 % Mar.31, 10 Jun.30, 10 % Revised FY-to-date 25% FY-to-date 50% FY_to-date 75% FY-to-date MOM Budget Revenue Revenue Revenue Revenue FY2009-10 Revenue PROPERTYTAXES 2,619 0.2%1 114,396 7.7% 0.0% 0.0% 1,481,500 LICENSES AND PERMITS 7,542 1.2% , 97,137 14.8% 0.0% 0.0% 654,800 SALES TAX/SALES TAX-IN LIEU 87,034 9.4%1 183,665 19.7% 0.0% 0.0% 930,845 NT'ERGOVERNMENTAL 7,111 5.9%1 41,204 34.4% 0.0% 0.0% 119,737 .:HARGES FOR SERVICES 15,308 14.4%1 24,691 23.3% 0.0% 0.0% 106,100 PLANNING FEES 2,675 11.7%1 15,075 65.8%1 0.0% 0.0% 1 22,900 RECREATION FEES 2,739 24.2%1 2,981 26.4%1 0.0% 0.0% 1 11,300 CHILD CARE FEES 224,954 21.6%1 451,672 43.3%1 0.0% 0.0% 1 1,042,017 PARKFEES 740 29.6% 1,050 42.0%1 0.0% 0.0% 1 2,500 FINES&FORFEITURES 6,724 21.9%1 12,021 39.1% 0.0% 0.0% 1 30,750 USE OF MONEY&PROPERTY 14,939 15.2% 21,911 22.2% 1 0.0% 0.0% 1 98,500 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 138 0.6% 332 1.4% 0.0% 0.0% 24,000 TRANSFERS 150,000 19.8% 300,000 39.7% 0.0% 0.0% 755,725 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 522 522 9.9% 1,266,1351 24.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5280,674 11-STREET FUND 1,406 0A%j 2,463 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 1,003,082 12-STORM DRAIN FUND 134 0.4%1 224 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% 31,800 13-PARK FUND 485 3.5%1 751 5.4% 0.0% 0.0% 13,965 14-SLESF(AB3229 COPS) 8 0.0%1 2 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 298,418 15-AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT FUND 105 0.7%1 3,824 24.3% 0.0% 0.0% 15,730 16-GAS TAX FUND 25,037 7.0%1 54,789 15.49% . 0.0% 0.0%11 356,765 �17-TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND 7,216 10.9%1 25,645 38.6% 0.0% 0.0%11 66,400 `'19-FACILITIES FUND 370 1.6%1 446 1.9% 0.0% 0.0% 23,000 20-MEASURE"I"FUND 10,867 2.3%1 45,657 9.5% 0.0% 0.0% 1 480,500 21-WASTE WATER DISPOSAL FUND 242,686 15.6%1 655,423 42.2% 0.0% 0.0% 1 1,552,800 26-LNDSCP&LGTG ASSESSMENT DIST 0 0.0%1 5,586 39.0%1 0.0% 0.0% 1 14,335 41-PUB FIN AUTH DEBT SERVICE FUND 0 0:0%1 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0 44-CAPITAL PROJECT-BIKE LANE 0 0.0% 145,385 72.7% 0.0% 0.0% 200,000 46-CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS-STREETS 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 627,500 47-CAP.PRJ.BARTONICOLTON BRIDGE 200 0.0% 60,117 10.40/6 0.0%1 0.0% 580,000 TOTAL OTHER CITY FUNDS 288,517 5.5% 1 000 3121 19.0% 0 0.0%1 01 0.0% 5 264 295 32-CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND 1 15,624 1.7%1 31.742 3.40/a 1 0.0% 0.0% 946,000 33-DEBT SERVICE FUND 14,62 if 0.2% 2,593,745 39.6% 0.0% 0.0% 6,547,487 34-LOW INCOME HOUSING FUND 22,038 1.40A 668,194 42.3% 0.0% 0.0% 1,579,599 TOTAL CRA FUNDS 52 284 0.60A 3 293 661 36.3% -0-0.0% 0 0.0% 9,073086 Grand Total-ALL FUNDS 863,322 4.4% 5,560,128 28.3% 0 0.0% 0 0 0% 19,618,055 Revenues by Quarter FYTD FY 2009-10 15 �4 1 City and CRA of Grand Terrace k Budget: FY 2009-10 Revenue Report for First Six Months Fiscal Year to Date Revenue Analysis by Quarter FYTD by Quarter-FY 200940 Comparison to Prior Fiscal Year Quarter REVENUES I , 10-GENERAL FUND Sept30,08 % Sept30,08 % Dec.31,00 % Dec.31,08 % FY-to-date 25% Fy-to-date 25% FY-to-date M FY-to-date W Revenue Revenue Revenue Revenue PROPERTY TAXES 2,619. 0.2% 3,423 0.2% 114,396 7.7% 180,382 12.1% LICENSES AND PERMITS 7,542 1.2% 10,540 1.5% 97,137 14.80A 119,685 16.5% SALES TAX/SALES TAX-IN LIEU 87,034 9.4% 137,757 14.2% 183,665 19.7% 137,757 14.2% INTERGOVERNMENTAL 7,111 5.9% 14,731 9.9% 41,204 34.4% 185,935 124.7% CHARGES FOR SERVICES 15,308 14.4% 19,660 15.5% 24,691 23.3% 35,861 28.3% PLANNING FEES 2,675 11.7%1 10,500 46.1% 15,075 65.80A 9,250 40.6% RECREATION FEES 2,739 24.2%1 3,418 30.2% 1 2,981 26.49A 4,421 39.1% CHILD CARE FEES 224,954 21.6% 216,775 19.2% 451,672 43.3% 442,283 39.3% PARK FEES 740 29.6% 5,472 51.3% 1,050 42.0% 6,402 ' 60.1% FINES&FORFEITURES 6,724 21.9% 4,665 15.0% 12,021 39.1% 10,501 33.7% USE OF MONEY&PROPERTY 14,939 15.2% 38,330 11.2% 21,911 22.2% 82,841 24.1% MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 1 138 0.6% 1,517 10.6%1 11 1.4% 1,625 11.3%11 TRANSFERS 150,000 19.8% 0 0.0% 1 300,0001 39.7%1 0 0.0% TOTAL GENERAL FUND 522 5221 9.9%1 466 788 88%1 1 1,266,1351 24.0%1 1.216 943 22.9% 11-STREET FUND 1,406 0.1% 5,628 0.7% 2,463 0.2% 44,250 5.4% 12-STORM DRAIN FUND 134 0.4% 644 1.7% 224 0.7% 1,490 4.0% 13-PARK FUND 485 3.5% 2,614 7.3% 751 5.4% 8,285 23.1% 14-SLESF(AB3229 COPS) 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 15-AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT FUND 105 0.7% 339 2.1% 3,824 24.3% 834 5.1% 16-GAS TAX FUND 25,037 7.0%1 35,286 7.5% 1 54,789 15.4%1 86,845 18.6% 17-TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND 7,216 10.9%1 13,594 23.8% 25,645 38.6% 25,608 44.9% 19-FACILITIES FUND 370 1.6%1 1,485 5.2% 446 1.9% 3,530 12.3% 20-MEASURE'S"FUND 10,867 2.9% 32,801 16.7% 45,657 12.0% 75,945 38.7% 121-WASTE WATER DISPOSAL FUND 242,686 15.6% 272,362 16.7% 655,423 42.2°,6 589,922 36.2% 26-LNDSCP&LGTG ASSESSMENT DIST 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5,586 39.0% 5,745 46.6% 41-PUB FIN AUTH DEBT SERVICE FUND 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 01 0.0% 0 0.0% 44-CAPITAL PROJECT-BIKE LANE 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 145,385 49.1% 0 0.0% 146-CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS-STREETS 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 147-CAP.PRJ.BARTON/COLTON BRIDGE 200 0.0% 0 0.0% 60,117 10.4% 0 0.0% ' S!TOTAL OTHER CITY FUNDS 288 517 5.9%1 364,753, 7.9% 1,000.312 19.6% 842,464 18.1% 32-CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND 15,6241 1.7%1 12,294 0.7% 31,742 3.4% 25,020 1.3% 33-DEBT SERVICE FUND 14,6211 0.2%1 50,595 0.8% 2,593,745 39.6% 2,729,488 42.7% 34-LOW INCOME HOUSING FUND 22,0381 1.4%1 23,913 1.5% 668,194 42.3% 727,569 46.9% ,TOTAL CRA FUNDS 52 2841 0.6%1 86 802 na%I 3,293 681 36.3% 3,92077 35.5% ;;Grand Total-ALL FUNDS 863,322 4.50A 918,343 4.6% 5,560,128 28.7% 5,541,474 28.0% v FY0940 FY08-09 FY0940 FY08-09 ;Notes: Revenues include Transfers-in fi i i I , Revenues by FYTD Quarter Comparison to Prior FY i 4 1E it ' Budget : FY 2009-10 Expenditure Report by Category - Fiscal Year- to - Date July 1, 2009 through December 31,2009 50%of FY Completed With Breakdown by Category CATEGORY 10-GENERAL FUND FYTD FYTD TOTAL Salaries Maim Capital Expend~ Encumb- FYTD & Contracts do lures rances Expend. Benefits & Other Encumb. Operations 110 CITY COUNCIL 22,206 8,600 30 806 24,282 6,524 0 120 CITY MANAGER 101 779 3,355 105,134 94 012 11,122 0 125 CITY CLERK 96,039 12,268 108 307 75 798 32 509 0 140 FINANCE 180 730 7 599 188 329 134,432 53,897 0 160 CITY ATTORNEY 34,914 0 34,914 0 34,914 0 172 BUILDING AND SAFETY 62,096 13,449 75,545 30120 45,425 0 175 PUBLIC WORKS 63,523 28,034 91 557 23,763 67,794 0 180 COMMUNITY SERVICES 306,789 31,877 338,666 205,755 126,649 6,262 185 RENTAL INSPECTION PROG 27,537 0 27,537 23,587 3,950 0 190 NON=DEPARTMENTAL 437,398 58,921 496 319 0 240,416 255 903 370 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT/PLANN 121 956 9,409 131365 104,383 26,613 369 380 GIS(GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATIONS) 48,743 0 48,743 38,186 10,557 0 410 LAW ENFORCEMENT 694,398 929,595 1623993 0 1,623,993 0 440 CHILD CARE SERVICES 418 539 33,113 451,652 370,380 81 272 0 450 PARK MAINTENANCE 106,066 12 300 118,366 56,212 62154 0 631 STORM DRAIN MAINTENANCE 5,400 0 5,400 01 5,400 0 801 PLANNING COMMISSION 667 0 667 600 67 0 804 HISTORICAUCULTURAL COMMITTEE 291 0 291 0 291 0 805 SENIOR CITIZENS PROGRAM 14,813 953 15,766 8,422 7,344 0 808 EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER 2,596 427 3,023 0 3,023 0 999 COST ALLOCATION (284,076) 0 (284,076) 0 0 284,076 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 2,462,404 12149,900 3.612.304 1,189,932 2,443.914 21542 r 68.20A 311% 100.0;A 32.9% 67.7% -0.6% 91 -STREET FUND 3 214 0 3,214 0 F21 012-STORM DRAIN FUND 6138 4710 10848 0 1 0 13-PARKFUND 45 704 3414 49118 0 1 3445614-SLESF(AB3229 COPS) 119 268 166626 285894 0 28 0 15-AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT FUND 488 0 488 0 488 0 16-GAS TAX FUND 94,557 40 443 135 000 0 135,000 0 17-TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND 33,029 0 33,029 3,641 29,388 .0 19-FACILITIES FUND 4,408 0 4,408 0 4,408 0 20-MEASURE'S"FUND 54,962 0 54,962 0 54,962 0 21 -WASTE WATER DISPOSAL FUND 458,492 17,9133 476,425 47144 429,281 0 26-LNDSCP&LGTG ASSESSMENT DIST 6 048 0 6,048 0 6,048 0 41 -PUB FIN AUTH DEBT SERVICE FUND 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 44-CAPITAL PROJECT-BIKE LANE 103,305 0 103,305 0 42 379 60,926 46-CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS-STREETS 68,113 7,764 75,877 0 16 194 -59 683 47-CAP.PRJ. BARYON/COLTON BRIDGE 64,511 20,845 85,356 0 �32 675 52,681 TOTAL OTHER CITY FUNDS 1 062 237 261 735 1323972 50785 15"1 57,746 80.2% 19.8% 100.0% 3.8% 80.50/6 15.7% 32-CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND 455,813 200 886 656,699 141,537 39,231 475,931 33-DEBT SERVICE FUND 1 889uzzz-,212 604 1,889,816 0 605 1,889,211 34-LOW INCOME HOUSING FUND 482,473 11,606 494,079 95,208 328,029 70,842 TOTAL CRA FUNDS 2,827,498 213,096 3 040 594 236,745 367 865 2 435 984 93.0% 7.0% 100.0% 7.80/. 12.10/. 80.1% Grand Total-ALL FUNDS 6 352139 1 624 731 7,976,870 1,477,4621 3,877,2211 2,622,188 79.6%1 20.4%1 100.0%1 18.5%1 48.6%1 32.9% Expenditures by Category FY 2009-10 17 i City and CRA of Grand Terrace FY 2009-10 Expenditure Report for Six Months July 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009 Fiscal Year to Date Expenditure Analysis by Quarter EXPENDITURES AND ENCUMBRANCES 10-GENERAL FUND Sept 30,09 % Der-31,09 % Mar.31, 10 % Jun.30, 10 % Revised l FY-to-date 25% FY-to-date 50% FY-to-date 75% FY-to-date fw% Budget Expend. Expend. Expend. Expend. FY2009-10 Encumb. Encumb. Encumb. Encumb 110 CITY COUNCIL 22,7531 47.4% 30,806 64.2%1 0.0% 1 0.0% 1 48,000 120 CITY MANAGER 177,715 40.3% 105,134 23.80A 0.0% 1 0.0% 441,155 125 CITY CLERK 62,656 30.1% 108,307 52.0% 0.0% 0.0% 208,090 140 FINANCE 88,589 25.7% 188,329 54.6% 0.0% 0.0% 344,734, " ++ 160 CITY ATTORNEY 16,324 40.8% 34,914 87.3% 0.0% 0.0% 40,0001, I' 172 BUILDING AND SAFETY 45,774 36.8% 75,545 60.8% 0.0% 0.0% 124,310 175 PUBLIC WORKS 73,7181 57.5% 91,557 71.5%1 0.0% 0.0°,6 128,120 ` 180 COMMUNITY SERVICES 184,663 33.7% 338,666 61.8% 0.0%1 0.0% 547,835 185 RENTAL INSPECTION PROG 14,078 23.7% 27,537 46.3% 0.0% 0.0% :59,430 190 NON-DEPARTMENTAL 457,257 63.0% 496,319 68.3% 0.0% 0.0% 1 726,328 370 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT/F 67,301 21.0%1 131,365 40.9% 0.0% 0.0% 320,917 380 GIS(GEOGRAPHIC INFORMA 17,895 16.6%1 48,743 45.3% 0.0% 0.0% 107,640 410 LAW ENFORCEMENT 1,593,592 89.8% 1,623,993 91.6%1 0.0% 0.0% 1,773,731 440 CHILD CARE SERVICES 235,574 26.6%A, 451,652 51.1% 0.0%1 0.0% 884,440 C450 PARK MAINTENANCE 59,483 28.2% 118,366 56.1% 0.0% 0.0% 210,980 631. STORM DRAIN MAINTENANCE 4,500 100.0% 5,400 120.0% 0.0% 0.0%11 4,500 801 PLANNING COMMISSION 356 9.0% 667 16.9% 0.0% 0.0% 3,950 R 804 HISTORICAUCULTURALCOM ' 0 0.0% 291 24.3% 0.0% 0.0% 1,200 805 SENIOR CITIZENS PROGRAM 6,366 10.9% 15,766 270%1 1 0.0% 0.0% '58,350 808 EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CE 1,656 9.7% 31023 17.7%1 0.0%j 17,077 999 COST ALLOCATION (142,038) 25.0% (284.076)1 50.0%1 1 0.0% (568,151) TOTAL GENERAL FUND 2,988,211 54.5% 3,612,304 65.9%- 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5,482,636 11-STREET FUND 0 0.0% 3,214 1.3% 0.0% 0.0% 247,500 12-STORM DRAIN FUND 10,424 84.9% 10,848 88.4% 0.0% 0.0% 12,276 13-PARK FUND 44,851 33.2% 49,118 36.4% 0.0% 0.0% 134,994 14-SLESF(AB3229 COPS) 285,769 95.8% 285,894 95.8% 0.0% 0.0% 298,418 15-AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT Ft 234 0.6% 488 1.2% 0.0% 0.0% 41,100 16-GAS TAX FUND 89,8091 26.8% 135,000 40.3%1 0.0% 1 0.0% 1 335,315 17-TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND 30,5801 56.9% 33,029 61.4% 0.0% 0.0% 53,750 19-FACILITIES FUND 2,204 3.5% 4,408 6.9% 0.0% 0.0% 63,814 20-MEASURE"I"FUND 5,489 1.4% 54,962 13.9% 0.0% 0.0% 394,955 21-WASTE WATER DISPOSAL FUN 102,938 5.4% 476,425 24.8% 0.0% 0.0% 1,919,983 26-LNDSCP 8 LGTG ASSESSMENT 4,323 30.7% 6,048 43.0% 0.0% 0.0% 14,065 (r 44-CAPITAL-PROJECT-BIKE LANE 60,926 30.5% 103,305 51.7%1 0.0% 0.0% 200,000 ! 46-CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS-ST 59,683 18.2% 75,877 23.2°,6 0.0% 0.0% 327,500 - 47-CAP.PRJ.BARTON/COLTON BRq 85,6C)91 14.80% 85,356 14.7%1 0.0% 1 0.0%11 580,000 k TOTAL OTHER CITY FUNDS 782,838 16.9% 1,323,972 28.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4,623,670 u 32-CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND I 278,7T71 18.6%1 656,6991 43.8%1 1 0.0%1 1 0.0%11 1,498,018 33-DEBT SERVICE FUND 1 4,532,9781 80.1%1 1,889,8161 33.4%1 1 0.0%1 1 0.0%11 5658,773 34-LOW INCOME HOUSING FUND 1 114,4241 5.7%1 494,0791 24.7%1 1 0.0%1 1 0.0% 2:003,574 i TOTAL CRA FUNDS 4,926,179 53.8% 3,040,594 33.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 9,160,365 Grand Total-ALL FUNDS 8,697,228 45.1% 7,976,870 41.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 19,266,671 I: k' " � Notes: Expenditures include Transfers-Out i. V � i { Expenditures by Quarter FYTD i FY 2009-10 f 1€ FY 2009-10 Expenditure Report for Six Months July 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009 FYTD by Quarter-FY 2009-10 Comparison to Prior Fiscal Year Quarter EXPENDITURES AND ENCUMBRANCES 10-GENERAL FUND Sept 30,09 % Sept 30,09 % Dec.31,09 % Dec.31,08 % FY-to-date 2596 FY-to-date 25% FY-to-date SM FY to-date W% Expend. Expend. Expend. Expend. Encumb. Encumb. Encumb. Encumb. 110 CITY COUNCIL 22,753 47.4%1 13,626 24.2% 30,806 64.2% 21,905 38.8% 120 CITY MANAGER 177,715 40.3%1 104,049 22.2% 105,134 23.8% 224,636 48.0% 125 CITY CLERK 62,656 30.1%1 74,943 28.3% 108,307 52.0% 137,874 52.1% 140 FINANCE 88,589 25.7%1 99,879 22.4% 188,329 54.6% 246,320 55.2% - 160 CITY ATTORNEY 16,324 40.8%1 15,356 19.2% 34,914 87.3% 81,669 102.1% 172 BUILDING AND SAFETY 45,774 36.8% 81,937 57.0% 75,545 54.3% 101,365 70.5% 175 PUBLIC WORKS 73,718 57.5% 50,191 52.2% 91,557 71.5% 61,060 63.5% 180 COMMUNITY SERVICES 184,663 33.9% 198,493 24.4% 338,666 61.80/6 423,108 51.9% 185 RENTAL INSPECTION PROG 14,078 23.7% 14,087 31.9% 27,537 46.3% 26,683 60.5% 190 NON-DEPARTMENTAL 457,257 63.0% 173,887 14.3% 496,319 68.3% 197,266 16.2% 370 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTIF 67,301 21.0% 171,617 43.6% 131,365 40.9% 174.031 44.2% 11 380 GIS(GEOGRAPHIC INFORMAT 17,80 16.6% 31,909 25.6% 48,743 45.3% 56,125 44.9% 410 LAW ENFORCEMENT 1,593,592 89.8% 1,623,878 92.9% 1,623,993 91.6% 1,671,121 95.7% 440 CHILD CARE SERVICES 235,574 26.6% 264,931 26.0% 451,652 51.1% 485,421 47.6% 450 PARK MAINTENANCE 59,483 28.2%1 80,887 35.2% 118,366 56.1%1 127,336 55.4% 631 STORM DRAIN MAINTENANCE 4,500 100.0%1 4,500 100.0% 5,400 120.0% 4,500 100.0% 801 PLANNING COMMISSION 356 9.0%1 447 7.8% 667 16.9% 1,207 21.2% 804 HISTORICAL/CULTURAL COM 0 0.0% 20 1.7% 291 24.3% 176 14.6% 805 SENIOR CITIZENS PROGRAM 6.366 10.9% 2,751 25.7% 15,766 27.0% 3,292 30.8% 808 EMERGENCYOPERATIONSC 1,656 9.7°,6 5,676 41.6°.6 3,023 17.7% 6,530 47.8% 999 COST ALLOCATION (142,038) 25.0% 0 0.0% (284,076) 50.0% (399,157) 50.0°6 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 2,988,211 54.5% 3 013 064 47.2% 3,612,304 65 7% 3,652467 57 2% 11-STREET FUND 0 0.0%1 0 0.0% 3,214 0.0% 5,514 4.3% 12-STORM DRAIN FUND 10,424 84.9% 13,750 80.1% 10,848 88.4% 18,041 105.1% 13-PARK FUND 44,851 33.2% 4,991 4.4% 49,118 36.4% 30,136 26.8% 14-SLESF(AB3229 COPS) 285,769 95.8% 289,241 96.7% 285,894 95.8% 289,491 96.8% 15-AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT FL 234 0.6% 56 0.2% 488 1.2% 491 1.7% 16-GAS TAX FUND 89,809 26.8% 202,638 40.0% 135,000 40.3% 274,964 54.3% 17-TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND 30,580 56.9%1 1,611 2.8% 33,029 61.4% 4,184 7.3% 11 19-FACILITIES FUND 2,204 3.5% 0 0.0% 4,408 6.9% 1,378 7.8% 20-MEASURE"I"FUND 5,489 1.40A 121,200 42.4% 54,962 2.8% 143,033 50.0% 21-WASTE WATER DISPOSAL FUN 102,938 5.40A 52,912 3.0%1 476,425 24.8%1 383,580 22.1% 26-LNDSCP 8 LGTG ASSESSMENT 4,323 30.7% 3,077 21.4% 6,048 43:0% 5,030 35.1% 44-CAPITAL PROJECT-BIKE LANE 60,926 30-5%1 0 0.0% 103,305 58.8% 66,462 52.3% 46-CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS-STA 59,683 18.2% 0 0.0% 75,877 23.2% 0 0.0% 47-CAP.PRJ.BARTON/COLTON BR 85,609 14.8% 125,126 21.6% 85,356 14.7% 125,125 21.6% 11 TOTAL OTHER CITY FUNDS 782,838 16.9% 814,602 19.2% 1.323.972 27.9% 1 347 430 31.7% 32-CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND 278,7T71 18.7%1 364.6121 22.0% I 656,699 I 43.9%I436,258 26.3% 33-DEBT SERVICE FUND 4,532,9781 80.1%1 1,990,528 29.3% 1 1,889,8161133.4%1 2,103,475 30.9% 34-LOW INCOME HOUSING FUND 114,4241 5.7% 1,809,728 42.1% 494,079 24.7% 2,709,445 63.0%11 TOTAL CRA FUNDS 4,926,179 53.80/6 4164 868 32.6% 3,040.594 33 2% 5.249.178 41 1% Grand Total-ALL FUNDS 8,697,228 45.2% 7.992.534 34.2% 7,976.870 41.2% 10.249.075 43.a% FY09-10 FY08-09 FY09-10 FY08-09 Notes: Expenditures include Transfers-Out Expenditures by FYTD Quarter Comparison to Prior FY 19 �I i, ; I. I I� r" "I H ()K\].\ City of Grand Terrace " Community Redevelopment Agency of Grand Terrace :i Fiscal Year 2009-10 4 REVISED BUDGET Through January 26, 2010 I i. i I I i i t I ' I zC r CITY AND CPA OF GRAND TERRACE REVISED BUDGET FY 2009-10 ANALYSIS OF AVAILABLE FUND BALANCE PROJECTED THROUGH 6/30110 Revised Actual REVISED REVISED Budget Available BUDGET BUDGET Projected FUND FY 2009-10 FY 2009-10 Available FUND REVENUES& APPROPRIATIONS FUND BALANCE TRANSFERS &TRANSFERS BALANCE 6/30/2009 IN OUT 6/30/2010 10'GENERAL FUND-Undesignated 3,101,141 5,280,674 (5,482,636) 1,252,364 10 GENERAL FUND-Designated/Othe 959,244 0 0 0 10 GENERAL FUND-Desig.CRA Debt 2,606 059 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 4,060,385 5.280 674 5,482 636 3,858,423 11 Street Fund 789,590 1,003,082 (247,500) 1,645,172 12 Storm Drain Fund 74,599 31,800 (12,276) 94,123 13 Park Fund 273,532 13,965 (134,994) 152,503 14 AB 3229 COPS Fund 0 298,418 (298,418) 0 15 Air Quality Improvement Fund 60,174 15,730 (41,100) 34,804 16 Gas Tax Fund 44,537 356,765 (335,315) 65,987 17 Traffic Safety Fund (109,430) 66,400 (63,756) (96,780) 19 Facilities Development Fund 202,423 23,000 (63,814) 161,609 20 Measure I Fund 81,343 480,500 (494,955) 66,888 21 Waste Water Disposal Fund 1,757,882 1,552,800 (1,919,983) 1,390,699 26 LSCPG/LGHTG Assessment Dist 14,223 14,335 (14,065) - 14,493 44 Bike Lane Capital Fund (42,025) 200,000 (200,000) (42,025) 46 Street Improvement Projects 2,655 627,500 (627,500) 2,655 47 Barton Rd. Bridge Project (77,077) 580,000 (580,000) (77,077) TOTAL OTHER FUNDS 3,072 426 5 264 295 (5,023,670) 3,313,051 32 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND 142,298 946,000 (1,549,432) (461,134) 33 DEBT SERVICE FUND 8,289,357 6,547,487 (5,658,773) 9,178,071 34 LOW&MODERATE HOUSING 1,405,725 1,579,599 (2,003,574) 981,750 TOTAL CRA FUNDS 9,837 380 9,073 086 9"211 779 9,698,687 TOTAL-ALL FUNDS 16,970,191 19,618.055 1 (19,718,085) 16,870,161 N Current Revised Budget Fund Balances 05-05-09 CITY AND CRA OF GRAND TERRACE REVISED BUDGET FY 200940 ANALYSIS OF REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES PROJECTED THROUGH 6130110 REVENUES REVENUE& APPROPRIATIONS over ) TRANSFERS IN &TRANSFERS OUT EXPENDDITUITU RES CITY AND CRA OF GRAND TERRACE FY 200940 FY 2009-10 FY 200940 FY 200940 FY 200940 FY 200940 Adopted (Deletions) REVISED ADOPTED Deletions REVISED BUDGET Additions BUDGET BUDGET (Additions) BUDGET ORIGINAL ORIGINAL 10 GENERAL FUND--Undesignated 5,280,674 0 5,280,674 (5,222,845) (259,791) (5,482,636) 10 GENERAL FUND-Designated&Ott 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 5 280,674 0 5,280 674 5,222,845 (259,791) (5,482,636 201,962 11 Street Fund 1,003,082 0 1,003,082 (247,500) 0 (247,500) 75.5,582 12 Storm Drain Fund 31,800 0 31,800 (12,276) 0 (12,276) 19,524 13 Park Fund 13,965 0 13,965 (92,821) (42,173) (134,994) (121,029) 14 AB 3229 COPS Fund 298,418 0 298,418 (298,418) 0 (298,418) 0 15 Air Quality Improvement Fund 15,730 0 15,730 (41,100) 0 -(41,100) (25,370) 16 Gas Tax Fund 356,765 0 356,765 (335,315) 0 (335,315) 21,450 17 Traffic Safety Fund 66,400 0 66,400 (53,750) 0 (53,750) 12,650 19 Facilities Development Fund 23,000 0 23,000 (63,814) 0 (63,814) (40,814) 20 Measure I Fund 380,500 100,000 480,500 (394,955) (100,000) (494,955) (14,455) 21 Waste Water Disposal Fund 1,552,800 0 1,552,800 (1,918,917) (1,066) (1,919,983) (367,183) 26 LSCPGI LGHTG Assessment Dist 14,335 0 14,335 (14,065) 0 (14,065) 270 44 Bike Lane Capital Fund 200,000 0 200,000 (200,000) 0 (200,000) 0 46 Street Improvement Projects 327,500 300,000 627,500 (327,500) (300,000) (627,500) 0 47 Barton Rd.Bridge Project 580,000 0 580,000 (580,000) 0 (580,000) 0 TOTAL OTHER FUNDS 4,864,295 400,000 5,264,295 (4,580,431) (443,239) 5,023,670 240,625 32 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND 946,000 0 946,000 (653,271) (896,161) (1,549,432) (603,432) 33 DEBT SERVICE FUND 6,547,487 : 0 6,547,487 (5,658,364) (409) (5,658,773) 888,714 34 LOW& MODERATE HOUSING 1,579,599 0 1,579,599 (2,003,166) (408) (2,003,574) (423,975) 0 TOTAL CRA FUNDS 9,073 086 0 9,073 086 8 314 801 896,978 9,211,779 138,693 - -- -- -- -- -- - - -- -- -- -- - ---- - --- -- - - - - TOTAL-ALL FUNDS 19,218,055 400,000 19 618,055 (18,118,077) (1,600,008) 19,718,085 100,030 1126110 1126110 N ANALYSIS OF BUDGET REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES N City and CRA of Grand Terrace Schedule of REVENUE Budget Adjustments Fiscal Year 200940 REVENUES COPS Agenda General Streets SLESF GAS TAX Measure I CRA CRA Sts Cap Prj Date Item Description Total 10 11 14 16 20 32 33 46 10/13/2009 CITY aC Correct Final Stimulus Funding $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $100,000 $ - $ - $ - 10/13/2009 CITY eC TSF Final Stimulus Funding to Streets Cap Proj Furn $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 300.000 Total Additional Revenue Adjustments made through January 26,2010 $ 400.000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $100,000 $ - $ - $. 300,000 Adopted Increases to Estimated Revenues 1 iV W - Ity and CRA of Grand Terrace chedule of EXPENDITURE Budget Adjustments iscal Year 2009-10 EXPENDITURES Agenda General Park Measure I Sewer CRA CRA CRA Strt Cap Prj ate Item Description Total 10 13 20 21 32 33 34 46 7/28/2009 3D BA JUL09-02 Cant Appropriation-Fire Station Imprvmnts $ 238,753 $238,753 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 7/28/2009 30 BA JULo9-02 Cant Appropriation-Orange Grove Parkway $ 42,173 $ - $42,173 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 7/28/2009 3D BA JUL09-02 Cant Appropriation-Chambers Group PO 18 $ 2,897 $ 2,897 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 7/28/2009 3D BA JUL09-02 Cant Appropriation-G&G Env PO 2233 $ 1,066 $ - $ - $ - $1,066 $ - $ - $ - $ - 7/28/2009 3D BA JUL09-02 Cant Appropriation-Lynn Merrill PO 2234 $ 2,475 $ 2,475 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 7/28/2009 30 BA JULO9-02 Cant Appropriation-RAMS PO 2174 $ 3,539 $ 3,539 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 7/28/2009 CRA 2 BA JUL09-01 Cant Appropriation-Purchase/Demo Old Cin $ 26,867 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 26,867 $ - $ - $ - 7/28/2009 CRA 2 BA JUL09-01 Cant Appropriation-Comm Ext Imp Prg 08-0 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - 7/28/2009 CRA 2 BA JUL09-01 Cant Appropriation-Comm Ext Imp Prg 09-1, $ 125,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 125,000 $ - $ - $ - 7/28/2009 CRA 2 BA JUL09-01 Cant Appropriation-Neighborhood Imp Grant $ 6,809 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 6,809 $ - $ - $ - 7/28/2009 CRA 2 BA JUL09-01 Cant Appropriation-Neighborhood Imp Gran) $ 30,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 30,000 $ - $ - $ - 7/28/2009 CRA 2 BA JUL09-01 Cant Appropriation-Purch/Demo Vista Gram $ 22,515 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 22,515 $ - $ - $ - 7/28/2009 CRA 2 BA JUL09-01 Cant Appropriation-LSA EIR PO 1933 $ 52,973 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 52,973 $ - $ - $ - 1/28/2009 CRA 2 BA JULo9-01 Cant Appropriation-KSA Engineering PO 19 $ 10,361 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 10,361 $ - $ - $ - 1/28/2009 CRA 2 BA JUL09-01 Cant Appropriation-K&A Engineering PO 19 $ 20,083 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 20,083 $ - $ - $ - 1/2812009 CRA 2 BA JULo9-01 Cant Appropriation-RSG PO 1960 $ 639 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 639 $ - $ - $ - 1/28/2009 CRA 2 BA JUL09-01 Cant Appropriation-Brandman PO 1991 $ 82,170 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 82,170 $ - $ - $ - 1/28/2009 CRA 2 BA JULO9-01 Cant Appropriation-Smothers Appraisal PO $ 13,400 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 13,400 $ - $ - $ - 1/28/2009 CRA 2 BA JUL09-01 Cant Appropriation-STANTEC EIR PO 199: $ 20,746 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 20,746 $ - $ - $ - 1/28/2009 CRA 2 BA JUL09-01 Cant Appropriation-RAMS PO 2174 $ 409 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 409 $ - $ - $ - 1/28/2009 CRA 2 BA JUL09-01 Cant Appropriation-RAMS PO 2174 $ 409 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 409 $ - $ - 1/28/2009 CRA 2 BA JULO9-Ot Cant Appropriation-RAMS PO 2174 $ 408 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $408 $ - 1/11/2009 CRA 2 BA AUG09-01 Community Message Sign $ 72,435 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 72,435 $ - $ - $ - 1/11/2009 CRA 2 BA AUGW01 Purchase Barton Rd 0275-242-10 $ 210,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 210,000 $ - $ - $ - 1/25/2009 None None None $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 9/8/2009 CRA 2 BA SEP09-01 Professional Svs-Chambers Group $ 16,100 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 16,100 $ - $ - $ - 9/8/2009 CITY 8B BA SEP09-01 Crime Prevention Uniforms $ 800 $ 800 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 1/22/2009 CRA 2 BA SEP09-02 Grand Terrace Road Rehab $ 25,100 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 25,100 $ - $ - $ - 1/22/2009 CRA 3 BA SEP09-02 Senior Center Kitchen Design $ 3,600 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,600 $ - $ - $ - 1/22/2009 CITY 7A BA SEP09-o4 Emergency Equipment- EMP Grant funded $ 4,427 $ 4,427 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 1/13/2009 CITY 8C BA OCT09-03 Stimulus Funds-Sanbag approved $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 1/13/2009 CITY 8C BA OCT09-03 Account for Stimulus Proj in Streets Cap Proj $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 1/13/2009 CITY 8C BA ocTo9.03 Rev Orig Budget Stimulus projects not Appra $ (200,000) $ - $ - $(200,000) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 1/13/2009 CITY 8A BA SEPO9-03 Temp Help-Senior Center Community Gard( $ 1,200 $ 1,200 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - )/13/2009 CITY 8A BA SEP09M Start Up-Senior Center Community Garden* $ 3,000 $ 3,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 1/13/2009 CITY3J BAOCT09-ol Engineedng/Consufting-L.Merrill _ $- _2,700_ $_ 2,700__$ _ - - $ .__ ___- .$ -_ $ -- - ---$ - - --- $ -- $ - Adopted r-enditure Increases 1 N ity and CRA of Grand Terrace .hedule of EXPENDITURE Budget Adjustments scat Year 2009-10 EXPENDITURES Agenda General Park Measure I Sewer CRA CRA CRA Strt Cap Prj ate Item Description Total 10 13 20 21 32 33 34 46 )/27/2009 CRA 3 BA ocr09-02 Senior Center Kitchen Design $ 5,540 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 5,540 $ - $ - $ - 1/10/2009 None None None $ _ $ _ $ _ $ _ $ _ $ _ $ _ $ _ $ _ 1/24/2009 None None No Meeting $ - $ - $ _ $ _ $ _ $ _ $ _ $ _ $ _ 1218/2009 None None None $ _ $ _ $ _ $ _ $ _ $ _ $ _ $ _ $ _ 2/22/2009 None None No Meeting $ - $ _ $ _ $ _ $ _ $ _ $ _ $ _ $ _ 1/12/2010 CRA 2 BAJANIO-02 Engineering/Design new Ballfield $ 51,414 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 51,414 $ - $ - $ - 1/26/2010 None None None A. Total Additional Appropriations made through January 26, 2010 $1,600,008 $259,791 $42,173 $ 100,000 $1,066 $ 896,161 $ 409 $408 $ 300,000 Less: Transfers to Capital Projects $ (300,000) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ (300,000) B. NET Additional Appropriations made through January 26, 2010 $1,300,008 $259,791 $42,173 $ 100,000 $1,066 $ 896,161 $ 409 $408 $ - Adopted.Expenditure Increases 2 N Ln MEMORANDUM CALIFORNIA Date: March 4,2010 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Bernie Simon, Finance Director RE: Supplemental Information for City Council Agenda Item 3E Staff is providing some supplemental information to clarify the fund balance position and the current estimated revenues and amended expenditures for the FY 2009-10 Budget. ❖ Schedule or Original—Actual at 12/31/09 and Projected FYE Fund Balances—6/30/2010 ➢ Projected FYE 6-30-2010 Fund Balances from the original adopted,budget ➢ Revised Projected FYE 6-30-2010 Fund Balances from the original adopted budget ■ Rolls in changes to Fund Balances as a result of the FYE 6-30-08 audit ➢ Amended FYE 6-30-2010 Fund Balances from the original adopted budget ■ Rolls in changes to Fund Balances as a result of the FYE 6-30-08 audit and council approved budget additions or deletions to revenues and expenditures ➢ Actual 12-31-09 FYTD Fund-Balances ■ Shows actual fund balance after six months of fiscal results ■ Fund Balances will be change as fiscal year progresses ➢ Actual"Restated" 12-31-09 FYTD Fund Balances ■ This shows how designation of the CRA to City Loan would be done. ■ Fund Balances will be change as fiscal year progresses. ➢ Projected FYE 6-30-2010 Fund Balances with Mid-Year Adjustments ■ Rolls in changes to Fund Balances as a result of the FYE 6-30-08 audit and council approved budget additions or deletions to revenues and expenditures 0 Adds Mid-Year adjustments as presented on Feb. 23,2010. ❖ Analysis of Budgeted Revenues and Expenditures through June 30,2010 If you have any questions,please let me know. 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California 92313 9091824-6621 9091783-2600 fax i ': I� _ � � � , . �' _. � - ,. � , � - � � � , � , ., '� � � �� I f i r r/ � � '� � � � , I 3/4/ZP1 0 CITY AND CRA OF CffAND TERRACE ORIGINAL -ACTUAL AT 12/31109 AND PROJECTED FUND BALANCES THROUGH 6130/2010 With MID- From YEAR Original Revised Revised ACTUAL ACTUAL Adjustments Budget "RESTATED" BUDGET FY 2009-10 FY 2009-10 FY 2009-10 FY 2009-10 FY 2009-10 FY 2009-10 PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED AVAILABL E AVAILABLE AVAILABLE AVAILABLE AVAILABLE AVAILABLE FUND FUND FUND FUND FUND FUND E BALANCE E BALANCE BALANCE BALANCE BALANCE BALANCE AT 06/30/201 AT AT 06/30/10 0 A AT 06130/2010 6/30/2010 AT 12/31/09 AT 12/3i/og (After Audit& (W/O City/CRA (With City/CRA (After Audit Only) Loan FYTD Adj)n Loan) 530) 10 GENERAL FUND -Undesignatec 2,889,313 -Designated 947,244 959,244 3,158,971 1,227,678 754,972 1,003,600 10 10 GENERAL FUND (916,530" 0 959,244 0 0 10 0 0 :: :: 0 . :: 2,630,745 2,630,745 10 10 GENERAL FUND-Desig-CRA 0 0 2,630,745 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 3,836,557 4.118,215 3,858,423 1,714,216 1,714215 3,634,345 10 83 11 1,545,172 788,839 88,839 1,545,172 11 Street Fund 1,521,243 1,545,172 7 9 94,123 12 12 Storm Drain Fund 97,183 94,123 94,123 63,975 63,975,975 152,503 152,503 13 13 Park Fund 124,919 194,676 225,165 225,165 14 AB 3229 COPS Fund (0) (0 0 (285,892) (285,892) 0 14 34,804 63,510 63,51 15 Air Quality Improvement Fund 10,707 34,804 34,804 16 0 16 Gas Tax Fund 21,454 65,987 65,987 (35,674) (35,674) 65,987 16 : 17 Traffic Safety Fund 25,465 (96,780) , (96,780) :. (116,814) . (116,814) . (96,780) 17 19 Facilities Development Fund 148,080 161,609 161,609 198,461 198,461 161,609 19 20 Measure I Fund (6,608)... 72,038' 66,888 66,888 72038 66,888 20 1,936,880 21 21 Waste Water Disposal Fund 1,346,369 1,391,765 1,390699 1,936:880 1,390,699 26 LSCPG/LGHTG Assessment Di 13,779 14,493 14:493 13,761 13,761 14,493 26 44 Bike Lane Capital Fund (1,163):: (42,025) (42,025) 55 55 (42,025) 44 (73,222 2,655 46 2,655 ::: .:` 2,655 (73 222) 46 Street Improvement Projects (1,182):: 10 (77,07 23 (77,077) (102,316) - 47 Barton Rd. Bridge Project (166,262) (77,077) .. 16) :i 7) 47 3,3 3,313,051 2,748,766 2,748,766 13,051 TOTAL OTHER FUNDS 3,133,984 3,356,290 32 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND 1,059 435027 i (482,659): i� (461,134) (482,659) (469,911) 32 491 6,478480 6,478 6,478,071 33 33 DEBT SERVICE FUND 4,810, 071 6,293286 6,293,286 2,700 33 DEBT SERVICE FUND 2,700,000 000 2,700000 2,700:000 2,700,000 2,700,000 1,579,840 981 750 34 LOW& MODERATE HOUSING 998,454 982:158 1,579,840 995,650 34 .... .... TOTAL CRA FUNDS 8,510,004 10,595,665 9,698,687 10,090,467 10,090,467 9,703,810 14,553,448 16,651,206 TOTAL-ALLFUNDS 15,480,544 18,070,169 [:::..... 16,870,161 14,553,449 CITY AND CRA OF GRAND TERRACE REVISED BUDGET FY 2009-10 ANALYSIS OF REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES PROJECTED THROUGH 6130110 REVENUE& EXPENDITURES TRANSFERS IN &TRANSFERS OUT Mid Year FY 200940 Mid Year FY 200940 FY 200940 N Adjustments REVISED FY 2009-10 Appry C-hgs Adjustments REVISED Adopted (Deletions) BUDGET ADOPTED Qeletions Deletions BUDGET FY 200940 Fund BUDGET Additions PROJECTED BUDGET {Additions} (Additions) PROJECTED REVENUES over(under) ORIGINAL 2/23/2010 TO 6130110 ORIGINAL TO 1/26/10 2/23/2010 TO 6130110 EXPENDITURES 10 GENERAL FUND-Undeslgnated 5,280,674 0 (483,741) 4,796,933 (5,222,845) (259,7,9,1,) 259,663 (5,222,973) 10 GENERAL FUND-Desig&Other 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 TOTAL GENERAL FUND ( 5,280,674 10111MO (483,741) 4,796,933 (5,222,845) (259,7c9,T, 259,663 (5,222,973) (426,040) 11 Street Fund 1,003,082 0 0 1,003,082 (247,500) 0 0 (247,500) 755,582 12 Storm Drain Fund 31,800 0 0 31,800 (12,276) 0 0 (12,276) 19,524 13 Park Fund 13,965 Q 0 13,965 (92,821)BE (42,173). 0 (134,994) (121,029) 14 AB 3229 COPS Fund 298,418 0 0 298,418 (298,418) 0 0 (298,418) 0 15 Air Quality Improvement Fund 15,730 0 0 15,730 (41,100) 0 0 (41,100) (25,370) 16 Gas Tax Fund 356,765 0 0 356,765 (335,315) 0 0 (335,316) 21,450 17 Traffic Safety Fund 66,400 IIIIIIIIIIIII0 0 66,400 (53,750) 0 0 (53,750) 12,650 19 Facilities Development Fund 23,000 0 0 23,000 (63,814) 0 0 (63,814) (40,814) 20 Measure I Fund 380,500 100,000 0 480,600 (394,955) 0 (494,956) (14,455) 21 Waste Water Disposal Fund 1,552,800 Q 0 1,552,800 (1,918,917) (1,086 0 (1,919,983) (367,183) 26 LSCPG1 LGHTG Assmnt Dist 14,335 0 0 14,335 (14,065) 0 0 (14,066) 270 44 Bike Lane Capital Fund 200,000 1 0 200,000 (200,000) 0 0 (200,000) 0 46 Street Improvement Projects 327,500 300,000 0 627,500 (327,500) (300,OQ0); 0 (627,500) 0 47 Barton Rd.Bridge Project 580,000 0 0 580,000 (580,000) 0 0 (580,000) 0 TOTAL OTHER FUNDS 4,864,295 111 400,000 1 0 5,264,295 (4,580,431) {?I43;239); 0 (5,023,670) 240,625 32 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND 946,000 0 0 946,000 (653,271) (886,161), (8,777) (1,568,209) (612,209) 33 DEBT SERVICE FUND 6,547,487 0` 0 6,547,487 (5,658,364) 4A9),, 0 (5,658,773) 888,714 34 LOW&MODERATE HOUSING 1,579,599 0 0 1,579,599 (2,003,166) (408}, 13,900 (1,989,674) (410,075) 0 TOTAL CRA FUNDS 9,073,086 flINEM0 1 0 9,073,086 (8,314,801) (896,9718), 5,123 (9,206,656) (133,570) 0 TOTAL-ALL FUNDS 19,218,055 J 400,000 1 (483,741) 19,134,314 (18,118,077) (1,600,0®8) 264,786 (19,453,299) (318,985) ANALYSIS OF BUDGET REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES REVISED THRU MIDYEAR . , � , ,_ - - - ' .. � - � ., F • .. � t .� � t � �l..' � .� AGENDA REPORT MEETING DATE: March 9, 2010Council Item ( X ) CRA Item ( ) TITLE: Fiscal Year 09-10 Grand Terrace CERT Grant Funds PRESENTED BY: Matt Wirz, Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: Authorize use of grant funds for trailer supplies BACKGROUND: The City of Grand (Terrace Community Emergency Response Team (CERT) is made up of' volunteers who are trained to assist first responders in the event of an emergency and to assist in the neighborhood in emergency preparedness. The CERT team has acquired a mobile trailer equipped with a generator and minimal supplies through fundraising efforts and City allocated lunds. A fully supplied trailer increases the value and effectiveness of the CERT. The San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors set aside allocations for each super-'isorial district to finance unbudgeted local needs throughout the fiscal year. A total of S 8.000 was Granted to the City of Grand Terrace CERT for supplying their trailer with the necessary equipment. A fully stocked trailer will enable the City of Grand Terrace CERT to better assist First Responders in the event of an emergency. DISCUSSION: Staff recommends the use of the CERT Grant funds for the purchase of items to stock the trailer. Items for the trailer will include, but are not limited to: Medical supplies. shelving. a generator, triage and training equipment, rescue supplies, extraction supplies, and -various disaster response equipment. Expenditures for the following list of supplies are not to exceed the $8.000 dollars -ranted. F ISC-1L. IMPACT: COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. 1 i i The City of Grand Terrace has received the grant funds in the total amount of`68,000. A special account will be set up for these funds once they are accepted by council. i i I Respectfully submitted, I t Management Ana t Manager Approval: „cam f Betsy Adams City Manager ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A: Contract "FAS Standard Contract" Project Name: City of Grand Terrace CERT Attachment B: List of Items for Purchase I i f i I i i i `•i I f i 1I I Attachment B List of Items for Purchase: • Electric Generator Supply • Sterile Water • Triangular Bandages • P.A.W.S. Antimicrobial Wipes • 3" Roll Gauze • Waterless hand Wash • 4" Roll Gauze • Nylon Duffle Bag 24" x IT' • Bandage Adhesive Plastic (Sheer) Ix3" • Mega Mover Stretchers C'S/10 • 1 inch Medical Tape • Soft Plastic Backboards • Tape, Adhesive, 1" x 10 YD • Disposable Back Board Straps • Tape, Adhesive, 2" x 10 YD • Rescue Randy • Tape, Duct. PVC, 2" x 50 YD • Rescue Randy Bag • 2 inch Medical Tape • EZ Up w/Kelly Green Fop • Roll, Krymptex 4.5" x 4 YD • Cribbing 2"v 4"x 18" Boards • 4"x4" Sterile Dressing • Pry Bars • Pad. Gauze, 4" x 4" • Sharpe Black Markers • Small White Board • Pad, Gauze, ABD, 5" x 9" • Shelving • Splint . Arm folded. CB 18" • Splint, Leg, folded, CB 24" • Fire Extinguishers and Mounts (5lb/ea) • Master locks/ kev boxes • Trauma Shears • Hitch • Tags, Triage, Water Proof • Spare 'Fire • Triage Tarps With Bag • Tire Covers • Wool Blankets • Chock Blocks 3 I I REPO RTIRECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AND RECORD OF ACTION i July 21, 2009 i r FROM: NEIL DERRY, Third District Supervisor I Board of Supervisors SUBJECT: ALLOCATION FROM THE 2009-10 BOARD ELECTIVE PROJECTS BUDGET RECOMMENDATION(S) 1. Approve an $8,000 allocation from the County's 2009-10 Board Elective Pra:ects budget to San Bernardino County Fire Protection District (County Fire) to contract (Agreement No. 09- 711) with the City of Grand Terrace Community Emergency Response Team ;CERT) for tie provision of emergency equipment, medical and safety supplies for their mobile traiier 2. Authorze the AuditorJControiler-Recorder to increase appropriation and tra^sfers in the 2009- 13 County Fare Administrative Operations budget (SKX 106), as detailed in :^e Flranc ai Imaact Section. (Four votes recurred) (Affected Districts: Third) (Presenter: Supervisor Neil Derry, Third District, 387-4843) BACKGROUND INFORMATION .As part of tl,e 20i;9-10 budget orocess, the B^ard of Supervisors es*ab,'srind 3 !, �'ce: :o tlr:ln;e ..,noudgeted local reeds as identifier by tt,,e Bcard throughout t ;e fiscal year. In establ-sthing this budget, the Board requ red specific approva: of projects identified for this funding Cl,e such oroiect identified )y the Third District involves an dilocatic^ to County Fire for fie ourpose of contracting with the City of Grand Terrace Community Emergency Resoor,se Tears tC=RTi for the provision or emergency equipment, medical and safety supplies `or "-,eir l�lob:le trailer CERT !earns utilize wobile trailers to impiement thetr tmir`lna, and t^ the, case of u disI-stc—, tc oerform their safety and emergency rPsoonse functions CERT marl hers -ire rralnnrd JCCI;t IFirgt Pac`I_:n�i,?r� :.?d ?=S'St .n t?�i"l'l",,r1C ��I r-c.r l�'dr„ - , ' _ -� "� •, ,y• 4/'�.N_ ��JJ V�i1T .��'J.:V.} i,i 1ST-.It ,I�'7 li i�tlh: 'when there is a lade of resources for training or in case of an Cn1CrCencv Using IhC Inlr Q iearned in the c'assroor-n and during exercises, CERT members can assist otheis in their neighborhood or work-lace flIJ IIvn vin, an event when prof 5;iCr� , ia, rec�p Jerc are nct cJl•i. G .r71R 3t iJ 'I available to help CERT members are also encouraged to support emergency resnn^sA ariencies by taking a more active role in emergency preparedness projects in their comrlt:nity CERT te::rns utilize the mobile trailers as a home hase of operations in t�-e -vert _,f a d's:.ister i V:rithln the 'valley region, one trailer exists to service 5 teanis i ne Cry Of Lorna Llr!r;ci current' y rya,., 1 of i �,(1 ;lf 1,.t' �'Bcl.. Tree :\r,COr:1 7:ISC•i \ �,;i2 �c.: s �.�„)hoc ,i•;r 1 )rr•r APPROVED (CONSENT CALENDAR) .-;K ';1_)r* COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO Board of Supervisors Mu I ItIN MU fir,:.-;I•- I,;k rrl-jr,l 1 2 i L.;V DENA M. SMITH, CLERK OF THE BOARD 'A -7hies BY I FOR COUNTY USE ONLY Nev. Corglt?: scL... ... Cma,tv Dooarimpni, Deol. Or-In N'.., S;in Bernardino County Fire Protection District SKX 106 t:,,)jnty of San Bernardino j Carol Montag 387-5944 001 00 FAS Revel't p En,jrftered STANDARD CONTRACT If no'cr.curr b e,ed-or IlYpe.pr,.;v Ar.reason_ comm,,�:ity Code Con,,ar.t 5%w DaTe Co -vvict':r� Da,,a `-)fvjx.a Arn-.i.r-1 -i-f......::nI A,to- -I- I: C-1-IT—_7—Je�,t Ore3anvallon Appr ObpKev Soxce ;PCJIPO],,.J(JB N,: S KX 106 100 200 2'35 --00 'Oo Fxic Dept rganizat,cri App, I ')bj.'Pev GRC�,;fRG R,A)H-No rr.o J,)t kept.- rjanvanon j Aror Qt:• ?pv 5cLfce—...G.P C,rll P O.I,%I r�,B.14 ;`m!ed Name Esl:,Ylated zlay,i,crit T xal-V -.al C;!y o'lGrand Terrace ry Ani'mrit VD Fy ,',mount IVI CERT 20G9-10 `d8 000 -30 THIS CON!RACT s entered ito in the State of California by and ",etweer tie County if Sa,i 9en,arlinc cared :rlc- CO,JN'f Y and City of Grano Terrace hereinafter called "CONTRAc roR' 2�795 Barton Rd T Grandlerrac;--- CA-"---- 1 IL)No or Soj:jaj S�cujjy rju '109-430.2-26 95-13316135 IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: -his Contract is mace and ertered nto by and between "le COUNTY and the C of Grar.-I Terrace CNTRACTOR WITNESSETH vNIPEREAS, COUNTY reccqrize-s the cerefit :-i crovidit-g trainea voluntee-s and ew-eirgeno,; icstpcw.se -.,erscirei to aici ir, ,he even* of a disaster to !hose who reside in ,he City of Grand 'errace and sur()Lj,)dirg con,7u.nrtr, %1110 n ;he COUNTY's T'iird Distr:ct and as pa't of tie 2009-10 budget p-ocess the Board cf SLJCC'fVic;G-S Set 3S.de jif.�ta!10()S fc.- oistrict, to finance ur,b,ic.a.eteo !.,)cal reeds tnrowgriout the fiscal year and 'W-U_-A-S, the Citv of Grand Terrace ['as a C017-nviity EE--rer-;ericy Response -ea:-r r-,.ac i i,t.?ers s: -s* Respori.-ers in the evert of an ewergenry and to assist jr) rim -L.1_2 f',ERT tear-) i,as 3cq-ired a wob, e traile,eCLI oped MG gere'ato's v,h t,jr J1 Ta,Pr t ie .,a ,e and C'3 CP-:7cT Tear-i any lu-ch,lor Controller-Recorder Use Only -xio Contract Database G FAS runt Dale Keyed 13v 5 i '.'JHERFAS, providing emergency -espouse personnel supplies, and eq.aioment to assist rs; =:espcnce_,s _ e c-,errt of a ursas:er or disaster prepare::hess promotes're safety, we' being, and q.aality of life of County fes derts ,yard '4HEREAS the CCUNTY res derts of Grano Terrace and the surrounding comnauni:ies will ce served by ,the City of , ar—d T,;rrace Comirun vy Emergercy Res,,orse Team (CLR'T) NOI,'J• THEREFORE, in cons dera'ion of:he mutual covenants he,eir set forth and :he mutual cenefits to be derived I iheref,on- the parties agree as fol;ows. II 1 PURPOSE OF CONTRACT Th s Contrac: is made for the purpose of prov ding funding :o support the City of Grand Terrace ;h provioing tr : meraercy response personnel suppl es and egUIpmert to 'heel the needs o" the residen-s of Grand T�,,r a,e +; ;urroundirg comrnu:rities. �I' ? SCOPE OF SERVICES F,ar:drat; arising out of tTS Contract will be used to purchase emergency preparedness sjpu;!i s and eau::rnkent for the Cite of Grand Terrace Community Emergency Response Team ;CERTf mooile trailer nclu::ing hanopg�s gauze, { rieciical tape sterile dressings splints, latex gloves 'b'anke-s stretchers backboards, strips, tr aye tarps etc I3 TIME OF PERFORMANCE he services to be prov deci by CONTRACTOR shall commence upor. app,oval of this Contiact and sha" be ccn,leted by June 3'.' 2010 ;r C:OMPF NSA i_ION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT j§ For performance of such services, COUNTY s`iall provide funding n an amourt•not to exceed ei;?ht t•ious.i'id doilars ,$8 001" 00) This payrrert sha` :;onstitute full and ccmp.ete compensat.on to.CONTRACTOR ur-dei this Con: Ary costs in excess of :he amount available it th s sect,on shall be the sole respo isibili-y of CONTRACTOR cone tion however, does not prec ude COUN FY from providing additional funding at its sole discret can Fo, the Purpose of this Cortr act. COUNTY shall disburse rompehsatior and mcnito, the CONTRA'TOR's pertorrr-�ance n sat•styirg the scope of work obligations under'he :erns of this Contract. I Disb-irsei rent of funds to CONTRACTOR shall be made in one lump sum CONTRACTOR s'ta:l si,bhi,t ra fw al rz-xoendrtu,e repo':documentee with 'audit ready supportive evidence of each expenciture and proof,f -jayrne;nt uric w; fir-ds have beer. istified S COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS CONTRAC I-OR hereby agrees :hat it wid cornply with all appi;cable federal, state and local laws CONTRACTOR i ;agrees that acceptance of funds pursuant to :his Contract may equire the pay ien: of prevailir q wages for ;..unstruc:ion projects if such funds are used in connection w th construction oro;ects CONTRACTOR aq des t.at ,t .,rill .,ei errnine whether the payrrert of prevailing 'cages is required and will require he payment of prevailing wages n any ^ ilract :f necessary CONTRACTOR, pursuant to Paragraph '9, Indemnification, agrees to inriFv ufy :jefeno .aid hold harmless COUNTY in the evert any claims act!cns losses, :aarn. ages andfor liab;l:ty %?''Ises :•ut o`'he fa u,e tray p,evaili^:a'wages in 'he event such wages are applicab e PRE`,AII.ING'VVAGES By its execution of this Agreement. CONTRACTOR certifies that it is aware of the bra a;rGmena ;;f ': alifo�!i a Labor L(k ti SeC'.IOnS J(J et sea and 1770 et seq its •.veil as Californ-a Ccde of Regul tons, r:-c: a fir• ki (' F?d?'rrl `ffagF. La'::s i which Yequire the pavment of p,c`.•'aii;r1g .,age 'ates =r' j j�f, .•.talfRr''Yr,tS on certa n pub;ic NUiks gal,d m,.irttenan.. prolecis ;1 tf'": SE:rV'CE".. oaf F: t c, L:� t'•I' r=`•'_; d� ii� lit it 4aditor.Controller-Recorder Use Onl C•�ntract Database C FAS_ --- iapr.ttt�r+ra �KeyedBy appl;cable pul lic worKS" or !naintenance protect, as defined t;y the Prevailinc Wage Laws ar.J r( lt;e :c�tar ..omGensahon is S1 000 or more CONTRACTOR agrees to fully comply m1h such Pro,•,•.arl-nq L iw:, CCNTRACTOR shall make copies of the prevailing rates of per d,em .rages for Each craft or tyt:e.; c.;t .orker needed to execute the Services available to interested parties upon request. and,shall oosi cc;)-es it 'he CON TRACTOR's principal place of business and at the project site CONTRACTOR shall defcrid rr,r.err.rify and i;od the COUNTY, its elected officials, officers. employees and agents free and harmless from anv clauri�, liabilities• r-.osts penalties or interest arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with Preva!hr.g VVage La xs ON-SI i E INSPECTION COUNTY its officers, agert and employees will have the orivilege and right to or-s•te rnspec:,or of tic-. fy `-3c :y] for the creation of this Contract. CONTRACTOR will ersure that its employees or, agents furnish any nformation 'hat n the judgment of COUNTY may be re evart to a duestior of ccmpkarce ;nth contractual ;cndi'roi,s or the effectiveness, epality, and ach-everrents of the ^rogram. 8 ACCOUNTING AND RECORDS CONTRACTCR must establish and manta n on a current basis an adequate account!rg systerr in accoreance ,,with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. CONTRACTOR agrees to maintain all records reiatir•g to this Contract for a period c`three years after the termination or exoirat•en of'his Contract. County or any apooir•tee therec'sha'l have acsoiu:e right to review and audit all records books, papers, documents, corporate minutes ar:d other pertirent iterrs as requested VIOLATION OF CONTRACT in the event that CONTRACTOR violates any of the terms and cend tors of this Contract, COUNTY snall rive:written notice of v olat:cn and demand fcr correction If, w!thin thirty (30) days `rom rece of o`win:ten notice CON TRACTOR has rot corrected the v clatior or showr acceptable cause, COUNTY nas the igl-t to terminate tars Cort'act County r!ii provide a written Notice of Termination It is agreed tFat in the evert of a terrr.rnatcn due to a v olat!on cf tnis C:;)tract by CONTRAC,OR !t shall pay :o COUNTY with,n ten (10) days of receipt of a Nobce of Tertirra-ion any and inexoenclecl funds Said sum is agreed to represent a reasonacle endeavor by both parties -sere:o, to be a `air compensation for the foreseeable losses that might result `rom sich a breach or cefau,t. 1* CONTRACTOR violates any terms ana- condit ons regard,ng the proper expenc!ture of funds CONTRACTOR w:: be required to -eirrburse COUNTY for anv improper exoendi:ures 0 ASSIGNMENT this Contract is not assignable by CONTRAC iOR, wrthotit the express written consent of COUNTY Any attempt by CON T RACTOR to assign any performance of the terms of this Contract shall be null and void and shah constitute A material breach of this Contract. 1 TERMINATION AND TERMINATION COSTS fh c Contract may be terminated in whole or in pa-t at any :rme by e!tre, -arty ,wai, c!virg ,=J; days ro:ce ,) wr;:ng to the otner party Trie San Bernardino County Fire Protection District Director is hereby ._u.lhor .•ed to g ve said notice of termination COUNTY may immed ate!y ter•nrnate this Contract .ipon :he ternnr:a;urn ;+,s:;ePSIOI :1 scot:nuz+:u3n or suo star Ua. reduction it COUNTY fording for the Contract nctiv,ty or if for <)fly teas,-,'l Me t nlely ctron of t ie sere ces under to s Contract s endered irrprebac e i°eas b e or •mposs ble If CONTRACTOR s to comply ::ith any mater•al tear of tnis Con'rac: COUNTY -nay to{e cne or more of t•ie nq actions r,irowirg rot- o npiiant costs wholly or pa�tly s.ispanc:uig o� te�minatiny the aware. tfil c d ng tirrtner awarca, mid ether remedies :hnt are lega�,y availaole RE+at-N SION OF \SSF rS :critra—t terrrlr'.aw.,ri CON i RACTOR sha 4 ? s� r ' - -r'i r ' � �- e J.r. n e :o C�;J JTY ._ _. N r F��i i O'i �,:rri �t I-ir„ •ir• _ ,n:ar,n ar-i an.. ac;ou.i*s receivarm- �iltribr.table :o me use c CGUN I Y I .I ices Aucfiror,Conrroller-Recorder Use Only 11 Contract Database ❑F AS Irrprd Date -- - Keyed 7 i I f:'E Or ::)�-RFC;RMANC;f_ 1`010DIFICATIONS Tne San Bernard no County ire Protection District Director tray grant urge e` cerfcrrrarc: rlayrf:ca'iors to this Cort-act when sucn modifications. a. In aggregate do rot exceed twelve ; i?j ca endar months o Are sped easy •eauested by CONTRACTOR, c '-,V not charge the project goals or scope of srury ces d Are i•i the best interests of COJNTY and CONTRACTOR In perform ng the scope c` vir eF, unr;er this Contract and e Co no:alter the amount of cornpersatior ,order this Co•i'-ract " 1 !tVOFPf NQENT CONTRACTOR All part!es hereto in the performance cf this Contract will he acting in independent capacities and not IF; agents employees partners joint 'venturers or associates of one another l.he employees or agents of one a,Irty small not i ne oeemed or construed to be the.agents or employees of the other party for any purpose whatsoever 15 DISCRIMINATION No person shall. on the ,rounds of race, sex creed coier religion. or national origin t;e exclueed fron- cartic oatirg !r, be rc`usco the benefits of r;r otherwise be subjected to discrimira'ion h any activities pregraris, cr emp cymert suppo•ted by :his C in'ract. 16 CONTRACT COMPLIANCE CONTRACTOR shall comply w°ti Execut vc Orders 11245, as ariended by Executive Orders ' 13 r'5 1 1,475 12+3.',•3 ar,d "2107, (Fclual Empioyrrent Opportunity) Executve Orders 11625 121313 12,1132 12250 and Executive Ordr.r , '32.79 Ecual Protection of the Laws For Faith-Based and Ccrnmun ty Orgarizatcns; f itle VII of tie C R g its •` + c' 1-sb4 and the Califorma Fair Hous ng and E•np oyment Act, and other applicabie teceral sta-e and COU'v TY h -e.lulal cns and pci!c:es relating to equal emcloyment and cor-tractng oppertunites nc,udirg laws and regi ia:c rs nereafter enacter. i7 IMPROPER. CONSIDERATION CONTRACTOR shall not offer ;either cirectly or through an irite•media•yl any improper ccrsrc:erat ci St,ch as but rot lin-ood to cusp viscounts services or the provision of trave or entertainment. or any terns of'valt.e to any c'icer, np oyee cr agent of COUN TY in an attempt to secure favorable treatrnent regaro-nq this Contract or any contract :1warjeo try COUNTY COUN'f Y, by notice may im•nediately te.rn,�riate this Contract or any COUNT Y contract ,f it :ete•rn nes that any •nproper conside•atien as descrit-ed n the crecedirg sentence was offered 'o any oFficer r-np oyee or agent of CO!JN(Y w th respect to any :;rcposal or aware process Irvo'ving :his Contract or any erne COUNTY contract. This proh bi:ion shall apply to any an-endment. exters on or eva!uat,ori proc<as once this Contract or any COUNTY contract has been awarded Attorreys snall immediately epert ,iny .-Itternpt by any COUNTY off cer employee or agent to solic,t (either directly or through an irterrrediaryl Irnpropi;r car-sraeratinn from CONTRACTOR The re..^.ort shall be mare to the sucerv!sor cr manacer charge with sucery s cn )f rnp c:yee or io the County Art nir•ist-ative Cffice In the event of a teririration under th s prcvisi(.r COUN TY ;s entitled to pursue any ava able lega. remecies. VISREPRESENTATION the course of the a:-niristration c` tl-!s Ccrtract, COUNTY _ieter-nir's that CON i:a. I 'I: I _,s r•i_de a ^lateral n-" s*'ate:Tienl, or misrepre-sertanor or that mater,ally I' ao,-•ljrn!e infor-naticn i",as aeon p :741('_U tc CO \IT"r, .IS itract n•,7v be immediately terminated this Corm:ict s -etrn,nated Pcccm ig iQ tn,s .:r,, 1 �'t•t�' `. - rt t'ea tc purcuc di1•y av,aII a e. Ieca' 'en-eo es lud_ito_uContruiler-Recorde_r_Use Onl ❑Contract Database C FAS iput Date Keyed By I INCEMNIFiCATION CONTRACTOR agrees to indemnify defend (with counsel reasonably approved by COUNTY) and liold harmless COUNTY and its authorized officers, employees, agents and volunteers from any and all claims nc goes losses dair•ages and'or liability arising out of this Contract from any cause whatsoever, including the .acts errors or omissions of any person and for any costs or expenses incurred by COUNTY on account of any claim ehcept wrierc such indemnification is prohibited by law this indemnification provision shall apply regard!ess of the existence or degree of fault indemnitees CONTRACTOR's indemnification obligation applies to COUNTY s active" as vvell as passive" negligence but does not apply to COUN 1Y's "sole negligence" or-willful misconduct" within the meaning of Cmi Code Section 2782 INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS CONTRACTOR agrees to prov de insL.rarce set `o,th it accordance w th :he requirements nerein 1` CON TRACTOR uses existing coverage to comply wits these regLXemen:s and trial :overage does not ir.eet the sceciflec 'equiremer,ts, CONTRACTOR agrees to amend, supplement, or erdorse the existing coverage to cfo so Fne type;s) c`insurance required is aetermined by the scope of the contract services. , '1M1/.thcut n any way affectirg the incemrity herein p'ovidec and rn add,ror thereto CONTRACTOR sha sel`-ir'sure to 'he levels identified herein or sha., secure and mair,tair throughout *he Contract the fe!:owrng `ypes of irsurance vine limits as shover Workers' Compensation/Employer's Liability - A program of Workers' Compensation insurance or a state- approved Self-insurance Program in an amount and form to meet all applicable requirements of the Labor Code of ihe State, of California, including Employers' Liability with $250,000 limits covering all persons including volunteers providing services on behalf of CONTRACTOR and all risks to s;)ch persons under this Contract. if CONTRACTOR has no em.oloyees it may certify or warrar.t to COUNTY that it aces rot currert'y Pave any employees or ndivic,L.als who are defined as employees" under 'he Labor Code and the requjre,rent for VVcr�ers Ccmpensaton coverage will be waived by the COUNTY s R sK Manager '✓°Jit`a respect to contractors that are non-profit corporations organized under Ca .fcrn•a or =edera law. volunteers for such entities are requ red to be covered by Workers' Compensation ,nSdrance if :re• COUNTY's R!sk Manager determines that there its no reasoraoly priced coverage for volunteers, eviderce of part c pation in a volunteer irsurance program may be substitu:ee Comrne•cial/General Liabi ty Insurance — CONTRACTOR shall carry Genera Jab-iity rs.irance coveagg all operas?ors oerforrr.ed by or on belha f of CONTRACTOR, providing coverage for both bodi,y wlir-y and property damage with a combined singe limit of no' less than one rt- ion do iars ,$1 a-00 0Q0i per occL,,rence The policy coverage shall inc'ude a) Premises operations and mobile equipment bi P,oajc:s and completed operations c) Broad form property damage Iinclud ng completed operat+or.$) d) Exp'osion col apse ana underground nazards e) Pe'sora. -.tjury f` Contracwal liability g) $2 000 000 general aggregate lire t Automobile Liar., ',tv Insurance —_Primary 'nsurarce coverage sha be %witten on iSO Business Auto coverage 'c-m `o- a owned nired, and non-owned, automobiles or symbol 1 ;any auto; he pc, cv sna hav a ;:i-rb ned s•ngle .mint of not less tnan one miliior co'a•s ;$1 'DOC OOC) for bccily m ury anc pjcr)er:y ..areage, per cccurrence Auditor Controller-Recorder Use UnI� ; 171 Contract Database CI FAS r. ut Date " Keyed By 9 i If CONTRACTOR is transporting one or more non-employee passengers n performance of contract Services the automobie liability policy shall have a combined s ig'e hnnit of two million dollars .S2,000 OOC'i for boJ,iy l ir!ury and property damage per occurrerce if CONTRACTOR owns no autos a non-owned auto endorsement to the General Liahii,iy policy described above is acceptable Umbrella Liability Insurance- An Limbrella (over primary) or excess policy niay be us•eo to comply 'wail limits or other primary coverage requirements When used, the umbrella policy shall apply to bodily .njuryicropeity damage, personal injury/advertising injury and shall include a "dropdown'• provision providing primary (.overage for any liability not covered by the primary r;ohcy -i he coverage shall also apply to autorr,obile ':ability Additional lrsured - All policies, except for the VVcr,<ers Compensatcri, Errors jnr l C-iusslons Professiona' Liao ity, poiicir:s steal contain endorsements rani,ig COUN i Y arc] its officers eirployees. agents and volumee-s as adcitional insureds wit') respect to i3oi,,:,es ar s•ig out of t-ie perfem-ance of services hereunoer, T•ie .add t ona, insured enccrsernerits shall not lirnit the scope of -,overage 'or COUNTY to vicar ous liability but snall allow coverau;_a for COUNTY to the fu;' extent provided by the colicy Such additional inst.rec coverage snall be a: east as bread as Additional Insured (Form B; e'tccrsemem form !SO GG 2010 11 35 avier of S�,brogation Rigtrs - CONTRACTOR shall require the carriers of equired cove ages to r✓_,ve 31i n , �'f err , i s !' r r r igh,s of subrogation a�anst COUNTY. Its c icons, np.cyc,E.�, i�.1er•ts, volunteers r_on::a.,tcrs arr.1 subcontractors All general or auto 'ability -isu•arce coverage orov der shall re' prop b:1 CONTRACTOR i and •ts employees or agents f,om waiving -he ight of subrogation prior to a oss cr cla m CONITRACTOR ierebv waives al! -rgt-ts of subrogation against COUNTY l Policies Pnrr.ary and Nor Contr,ibutory - All policies requirec herein are to be pr,,rrdry .irir; r;:: i c:�n'rlbutory .vith ar•y ')surance o, self-nsurance programs carried or adminis:eyed by COUNTY Se, c rab'l ty of In'erests - CONTRACTOR a.1rees to ensure that cevcrage prov de:j to r)ret tl' j equirements is applicab'e separately to eaclF insured and there w.l be no cross liacil ty excld,,-ons oreclude coverage for su is between CONTRACTOR and COON iY or between COUNT/ an, any ether nsured or additional rnsured under the po.cy Acceptability cf Insurance Carrier - On ess otherwise approved by Risk Managemen', nsurance st-a" be •written by insurers authorized to do :,usiness n the Stale of Ca fornia and with a minimum Des: !nsurance ._,,iice rating of 'A-VT' Deductibles and Self-Insured Retention - Any and all deductibles or self-insured retentu)r:s n ext, of $10,000 shall be declared to and approved by Risk Management Failure to Procure Coverage - In the event that any policy of insurance required under (his cc:itr in does not comply with the requirements is not procured, or is canceled and not replaced. COUNTY has [tie right but not the obligation or duty to cancel the contract or obtain insurance if it deems necessary anu. any piert;,urris pmd by COUNTY will be promptly reimbursed by CONTRACTOR or COUNTY payments to CONTRACTOR :viii tie reduced to pay for COUNTY purchased insurance PROOF OF COVERAGE r:()N-f RAC I OR shall furrish cerificates of insurance to the COJNTY ev'der.cirg the irsurance co,re,agc lu ::rya i Inci ,cements a_ recui•ed, o•ior to the comme-Cement of perfcrnian-,.e of services lhereance- :.%I-lch ::i,rt fic•c,t_; =,n>ill prr), ide 'nat such insu,arcc sha:l not e terminated or excire ,,.ithcut :[arty r 0) days wri-ten rc.'icn to COUN-Y ,i •.i r)N" �M':C-1O�t ..-,ail warn'ain suc') inst.'arce `rom the time it cur'rri etr_es t"ertcrn-an_e :it I` .. 'npetior 0' SLCh Derv.(-es .'r'llr fMaer t i ca o C r: tt ur � t ;s ram;, • c-_, � —RA_' -'ys f :I i•^r. u•er- nt :1f ) r-• . t : �?N `O=R I A'1u_drror,Controller-Recorder Use Only- ----- .r;? �-. ,_r 8 t.i Contract oatab_a_s_e _ ❑FA_5 input Date Keyed By I' i ' 1( ,ray, furnish a copy of the Declaration page for ail applicable policies and will provide complete certified codes of'he :::)nc;es and endorsements immediately ucon request. INSURANCE REVIEW Insurance requirements are subject to periodic review by COUNTY The COUNTY's Risk Manager or designee is authorized, but not required to reduce, waive, or suspend any insurance requirements whenever Risk Management d�°termines that any of the required insurance is not available is unreasonably priced or is not needed to protect the interests of COUNTY In addition if Risk Management determines that heretofore unreasonably pricer, or unavailable types of insurance coverage or coverage limits become reasonably priced or available the Risk Mai alter, or, des,gnee �s authorized, but not required, to change the above insurance requirements, to require additional type, of nsurance coverage or nigher coverage limits provided that any such change is reasonable in light of past claims ac;alnst COUNTY inflation, or any other stern reasonably related to the COUNTY's risk. Any change requiring additional types of insurance coverage or !-ligher coverage limits must be made by arendment to this contract. CONTRACTOR agrees to execute any such amendment within thirty (30) days of receipt Any failure, actual or aileyed, on the part of COON T Y to monitor or enforce compliance with any cf the ;n%irance and indemnification requirements will not be deemed as a waiver of any rights on part of COUNTY �3 -ELECTRONIC FUNDS CON T-RACT'OR shall accept all payments from COUNTY v.a electron-c funds transfer i,EFT; cirectly cecosited irto •he CONTRAC I OR s des gnated checkirg or other bar'K aceourt. CONTRACTOR shall prcrnp:Iy comply with directions and accurately complete forms•p•ovided ny COUNTY requ.-ed to process EFT paymews 24 LEGAL FEES ,;CIN I RAC I OR urderstancs and agrees that any ano all legal fees or costs ass�-ec;ated Yrith lawsu is concerninc :his '.'crtract against the COUNTY shalt be the CONTRACTOR's so e expense and shall not be charged as a cost urder t'us Contract In 'he event of any Contract dispute hereunder, each party to :his Cort,a ct shall oea- is own a:`.orney_ s fees and costs regardless of who prevails :n tt•e outcome of the c,sc.ite :', .AMENDMENTS VARIATIONS This writing vvitn attachments, embodies the wnole of the Contract of t•ie paites reretro There ae nc oral ayreerren,.s contained herein Except as herein prov ded, addition cr variat.en of the terms of taus Contract snail no: be valid un!ess rrade in the fora of a writ:en amend'nerit to this Contract fcrmai;y a proved and ekecLJ:ec by bot-i Pdr t es 13 INVALID CONDITIONS If ary one or more of`he terms, provisions sections p,omises coveiants or conditions c` this Cowract st•a :o any e,dert be .Jcged ivalid urenlorceac.e, vc!d or vo dacie for any reasen wnatsoever, by ? CJUrt of ;en-;;etent ;r.rrsdi::ton each ana all of the remain ng terns previsions sect ons. ;)rcmise;s, rr;over)ants a;ic, condition; of tf e Contract shall rr_t he a`fected thereby, and shall be valid and enforceab;e to the fu est extent perm:•ed by la v 27 BINDING INTEREST 1 h s Con:rac: sha' oe b iding crl the pa-ties, succ.essors in !n'erest 'leirs and asciai's NOTICES mall he seared in%,vr t nc The ra-ces shall be se'1' to try; `;lowing arlrlre;>=- Auditor t onfroller•Recorder Use Only _._.ear, : if i contract Database u FAS :nput Date Keyed By 1 • 11 r II I County :))f Sar Bernardino Crty of Grand Terrace s85 Nor,h Arrowhead Ave 227g5 Rarton r-td San Bemaidino. CA 92415 Grand Terrace, CA 52312 ` Attn Kelly Welty Attn Steve Rerry co N r ERPART.EXECUTION I I his Contract may be executed in counterparts When executed each counterpart shall tie Oeefned an original ! -respective of date of execution. Said counter parts shall together constitute one and the sarne Contract IN VVITNESS VVHFRFOF the parties have caused this Contract to be executed as of the day and year written below COUN 1 SAN 13ER'gARD'iNO% ? �� CONTRACTOR r •�� t By Y I r, t ! Gary C &itt. Orman, Board of Sup rvisors AIIthC,7Cc'!s4],7ntum t Date Name _- 14� �'•.►,,_ Poot or;ypn•7 ig7R r f oetr gr;•; !�l!L'1 Cunrar77 ::IGNFD AND CER-TMED tHAtT A d;OPY OF THIS UC)CJMENYHAS'�EEN DELIVh-REIKTO THE T,'I(-, CHAIRMAttOJ 714E-BOARD__ r •; Prntc, r-If-) Pena M. Smith j^ Cleric of the 8ardf Supervisors Date F _ of he County�f-8a Bernardino 1 j By APPROVED AS TO LIEGAL•F64,1 RUIH L SI RING LK ' i.,OJFIIv t.UUilSB! � 1' � '� ! 1 �tr��/ :f/Y✓�,i eat._.��` „/��1 '•1V Andrew Hartzell trrir,c;pal assistant Cc my C un SP I Date i ------------ ! I i I j' Aud,tur>Controller-Recorder Use Only i' '• i ❑Contract Database r.l FAS — nput Date Keyed By ' I i' 1. . s"'os fi• AML am �AIJ'FORNIA AGENDA REPORT MEETING DATE: March 9, 2010 Council Item ( X ) C RA Item ( ) TITLE: FY 2008 Homeland Security Grant Program Funds PRESENTED BY: Matt Wirz, Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: Authorize expenditure of Homeland Security Grant Program funds for the purchase of equipment for the Emergency Operations Committee. BACKGROUND: The Homeland Security Grant Program (FISGP) suite consists of five sub-programs, namely the State Homeland Security Program (SHSP), Urban Areas Security Initiative (UASI), Operation Stonegarden (OPSG), Metropolitan Medical Response System (MMRS), and Citizen Corps Program (CCP). Funds are used to obtain equipment, building capabilities at the state and local levels and used to implement the goals and objectives included in state homeland security strategies and initiatives. Due to an Environmental Planning and Historical Preservation (EHP) requirement, grant funds were put on hold. Grand Terrace Staff has submitted the requested documentation and requested tends for the purchase of equipment for the Grand Terrace Emergency Operations Committee (EOC). The Granted funds, totaling $9,602, will enable the EOC to operate more efficiently and modernize its resources. r DISCUSSION: Staff recommends the use of the HSGP funds for the purchase equipment including: computers, software. hardware, a projector, radios, and radio equipment. This equipment will update the equipment in the EOC building and aid their purpose. Expenditures for the list of supplies will not exceed the $9,602 dollars granted. FISCAL IMPACT: COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM N®. :)(5 fhe City of Grand `terrace has received the grant funds in the total amount of$9.602. A special account will be set up for these funds once they are accepted by council. I I i . Respectrully submitted. I _ 4iW Management Analyst Manager Approval: Betsy A. Ada is City Manager ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A: Equipment Detail Grand Terrace 08-HSGP i f ' I I f I I Equiptment Detail Grand Terrace 08-HSGP Item Description AEL Title AEL# Quantity Estimated Cost Estimated Total Cost Location Notes: Desktop Computer and Monitor Hardware,Computer,Integrated 04HW-01-INHW 2 $1,500.00 $3,000.00 22795 Barton Rd 03- Linked to the WEBEOC City of Grand Terrace EOC Office AYC-Unimer tery Backup Power Supply- System, n Op Technology 14CI-00-COOP 3 22795 Barton Rd 03- Uninterupptible Power Supply Batten•Backu Contingency O Operations $333.33 ea $I,000.00 Citv of Grand Terrace EOC Office for the Computer stations One Laptop Computer Hardware,Computer,Integrated 04HW-01-INHW 1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 22795 Barton Rd 93- Linked to the WEBEOC City of Graud Terrace EOC Office NIMS and SIMS reporting Standard Printer Hardware,Computer,Integrated 04HW-OI-INHW 1 $500.00 $500.00 22795 Barton Rd#3- printers for the Workstations Citv of Grand Terrace EOC Office Wireless Router Hardware.Computer,Integrated 04HW-01-INHW 1 $125.00 $125.06 22795 Barton Rd#3- For Use in the Disaster Citv of Grand Terrace EOC Office Preparedness Plannine Exercises Ptulector Projector,Video 04MD-02-PROJ 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 22795 Barton Rd#3- For Use in the Disaster City of Grand Terrace EOC Office Preparedness Planning Exercises Usb Pon Hub Hardware,Computer,Integrated 04HW-01-INHW 1 $50.00 $50.00 22795 Barton Rd#3- For use with the Computers City of Grand Terrace EOC Office Y Network Swichar Hardware,Computer,Integrated 04HW-01-INHW 2 $250.00 $250.00 22795 Barton Rd#3- City of Grand Terrace EOC Office To network the Computer lenninals ;i- S fwo Dual Baud HT-"IC-T7H Spun" with battery(BP 180), t l 3 IAM HT Radio) Barton Rd 113- l Radio,Portable 06CP-01-PORT 2 $325.00 $650.00 Charger(BCI I OA).Cable z City of Grand Terrace EOC Office I (WINSFTiCBL) 3, For use with the Emergency AM Radio Stalion to record N1PJ-Dignal Message Players Hardware,Computer,Integrated 04HW-01-INHW 3 22795 Barton Rd#3- Audio files from Computer May be:06CP-01-BASE $509.00 $1,527.00 City of Grand Terrace EOC Office and Play on the Radio for Emergency/Public Total $9,602.00 Infronnation update. W Please refer to Item 2 under CRA for Report.. COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. C��