Loading...
01/28/1988BYRON R. MATTESON Mayor BARBARA PFENNIGHAUSEN Maya Pro Tam Counc# Members HUGH J. GRANT DENNIS L. EVANS SUSAN CRAWFORD THOMAS J. SCHWAB City Manager January 28, 1988 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE REGULAR MEETINGS 2ND and 4TH Thursdays -- 5:30 P.M. Council Chambers Grand Terrace Civic Center 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92324-5295 CITY COUNCILMEMBERS Byron R. Matteson, Mayor Barbara Pfennighausen, Mayor Pro Tem Hugh J. Grant, Councilmember Dennis L. Evans, Councilmember Susan Shirley, Councilmember ter* t Thomas J. Schwab, City Manager City Office: 714/824-6621 22795 BARTON ROAD • GRAND TERRACE, CA 92324-5295 • CIVIC CENTER - (714) 824-6621 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS GRAND TERRACE CIVIC CENTER 22795 Barton Road * Call to Order *w Invocation - * Pledge of Allegiance * Roll Call January 28, 1988 5:30 P.M. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS COUNCIL ACTION CONVENE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 1. Approval of Minutes 1/14/88 Approve 2. Approval of Check Register No. CRA012888 Approve ADJOURN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY NVENE CITY COUNCIL 1. Items to Delete 2. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS 3. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine & non -controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any Council Member, Staff Member or Citizen may request removal of an item from the Consent Calendar for discussion. Approve I A. Approve Check Register No. 011488 B. Ratify 1/28/88 CRA Action Approve C. Waive Full Reading of Ordinances and Resolutions on Agenda. COUNCIL AGENDA { STAFF 01/28/88 - Page 2 of 3 I RECOMMENDATIONS D. Approve 1/14/88 Minutes Approve E. Reduction of Filing Fee for Approve AB2020/Recycling Project. F. Authorize Staff Attendance at the School Approve Age Child Care Conference to be held on February 19 & 20, 1988, in Hayward, CA. 4. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION 5. ORAL REPORTS A. Committee Reports 1. Crime Prevention Committee (a) Minutes of 1/11/88 2. Emergency Operations Committee (a) Minutes of 11/16/87 3. Historical & Cultural Committee (a) Minutes of 1/4/88 (b) Bids for Permanent Banner. 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS - 6:30 P.M. A. Adopt Eminent Domain Resolution of Adopt Necessity. B. Extension of Tentative Parcel Map Approve No. 13050 (T.J. Austyn). Alternative Five. 7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS A. Snack Bar Recommendations B. Award Contract for Architectural Barrier Award Removal. COUNCIL ACTION COUNCIL AGENDA STAFF O1/28/88 - Page 3 of 3 RECOMMENDATIONS I COUNCIL ACTION 8. NEW BUSINESS A. SA-87-14 Keeney - A Request to Construct a Recreational Vehicle Park and Commercial Center. B. Discussion Regarding Senior Citizens' Issues. C. Riverside Highland Water Company's Request For Exemption Under Current Residential Construction Moratorium. 9. CLOSED SESSION - PERSONNEL MATTERS ADJOURN CITY COUNCIL TO ADJOURNED SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO BE HELD ON FEBRUARY 5, 1988 AT 6:30 P.M. FOR A WORKSHOP REGARDING THE GENERAL PLAN. ADJOURN THE NEXT REGULAR CRA/CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS WILL BE HELD THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 11, 1988 at 5:30 p.m. ----------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------- AGENDA ITEM REQUESTS FOR THE 2/11/88 MEETING MUST BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING TO THE CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE BY 12:00 NOON ON 2/3/87. Approve CITY OF GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REGULAR MEETING - JANUARY 14, 1988 DRAFT A regular meeting of the Community Redevelopment Agency, City of Grand Terrace, was held in the Council Chambers, Grand Terrace Civic Center, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California, on January 14, 1988, at 5:32 p.m. PRESENT: Byron Matteson, Chairman Barbara Pfennighausen, Vice Chairman LHugh J. Grant, Agency Member Dennis L. Evans, Agency Member Susan Shirley, Agency Member Thomas J. Schwab, Executive Director Randy Anstine, Assistant City Manager Juanita Brown, Secretary David Sawyer, Planning Director Joe Kicak, City Engineer ABSENT: Ivan Hopkins, City Attorney APPROVAL OF DECEMBER 17, 1987 MINUTES CRA-88-01 Motion by Agency Member Grant, second by Agency Member Shirley, ALL AYES, to approve December 17, 1987 minutes. APPROVAL OF CHECK REGISTER NO. CRA011488 CRA-88-02 Motion by Vice -Chairman Pfennighausen, second by Agencymember Shirley, ALL AYES, to approve Check Register No. CRAO11488. CRA Meeting adjourned at 5:36 p.m. until the next regular meeting which will be held Thursday, January 28, 1988 at 5:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted Secretary APPROVED: hairman CRA r.'.� �i. iDA 11T EIA N0. 1 COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CITY OF G r) TERRACE DATE: JAN AY 28, 1988 CHECK If",,,*STER NO.CRA012888 CHECK OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF: JANUARY 28, 1988 NUMBER VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 17875 SUSAN SHIRLEY 17879 DENNIS EVANS 17881 HUGH GRANT 17892 BYRON MATTESON 17899 BARBARA PFENNIGHAUSEN STIPENDS FOR JANUARY, 1988 $150.00 STIPENDS FOR JANUARY, 1988 150.00 STIPENDS FOR JANUARY, 1988 150.00 STIPENDS FOR JANUARY, 1988 150.00 STIPENDS FOR JANUARY, 1988 150.00 $750.00 I CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THE AFORELISTED CHECKS FOR PAYMENT OF CRA LIABILITIES HAVE BEEN AUDITED BY ME AND ARE NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE EXPENDITURES FOR THE OPERATION OF CRA. THOMAS SCHWAB TREASURER IE CITY OF G D TERRACE DATE: JA �2Y 2 8, 19 8 8 CHECK rSTER NO. 012888 CHECK OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF:JANUARY 28, 1988 NUMBER VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT P5463 SOUTHERN CA EDISON CO. P5464 SOUTHERN CA GAS CO. P5465 CA PARKS & RECREATION SOCIETY P5466 SOUTHERN CA EDISON CO. P5467 SOUTHERN CA GAS CO. P5468 SOUTHERN CA EDISON CO. P5469 SOUTHERN CA EDISON CO. P5470 CA MUNICIPAL TREASURERS ASSOCIATION P5471 SOUTHERN CA EDISON CO. P5472 SECRETARY OF STATE, CA P5473 DANA WHARF SPORTFISHING P5474 SOUTHERN CA EDISON CO. P5475 SOUTHERN CA EDISON CO. P5476 SOUTHERN CA GAS CO. P5477 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT P5478 SOUTHERN CA EDISON CO. P5479 SOUTHERN CA GAS CO. P5480 LEAGUE OF CA CITIES P5481 SOUTHERN CA EDISON CO. n P5482 SOUTHERN CA GAS CO. P5483 INLAND EMPIRE DIVISION m LEAGUE OF CA CITIES > P5484 SOUTHERN CA EDISON CO. ri CASH PAYMENTS, 1/7/88 CASH PAYMENTS, 1/7/88 CONFERENCE, 2/25-28, 1988 CASH PAYMENTS, 1/8/88 CASH PAYMENTS, 1/8/88 CASH PAYMENTS, 1/11/88 CASH PAYMENTS, 1/12/88 MEETING, 1/12/88 CASH PAYMENTS, 1/13/88 NOTARY PUBLIC EXAMINATION APPLICATION WHALE WATCHING EXCURSION, RECREATION CASH PAYMENTS, 1/14/88 CASH PAYMENTS, 1/15/88 CASH PAYMENTS, 1/15/88 SUI/EMPLOYEE TRAINING, 4TH QUARTER, 1988 (ONE EMPLOYEE OMITTED ON PAYROLL CHECK) CASH PAYMENTS, 1/18/88 CASH PAYMENTS, 1/18/88 EMPLOYEE RELATION INSTITUTE SEMINAR FEBRUARY 24-25, 1988 CASH PAYMENTS, 1/19/88 CASH PAYMENTS, 1/19/88 GENERAL ASSEMBLY, 1/21/88 CASH PAYMENTS, 1/20/88 $ 13.46 215.69 475.00 110.91 189.12 121.87 39.02 30.00 20.10 31.50 300.00 59.20 30.05 177.93 50.31 12.88 123.01 240.00 131.52 375.46 110.00 61.94 CITY OF---- TERRACE DATE:JAN Y 281 1988 CHECK STER NO. 012888 CHECK OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF:JANUARY 28, 1988 NUMBER VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT P5485 SOUTHERN CA GAS CO. CASH PAYMENTS, 1/20/88 228.94 17856 BONNIE RUCKER REFUND, RECREATION CLASS 12.50 17857 LINDA MANGUS REFUND, RECREATION CLASS 70.00 17858 BONNIE HENRY REFUND, RECREATION CLASS 35.00 17859 DAVID THEXTON REFUND, BALL PARK LIGHTS 17.50 17860 CA CONTINUING EDUCATION THE STATE BOARD OF CA SUBDIVISION MAP ACT PRACTICE BOOK 80.20 17861 JON VARELA ENTERPRISES COMPARTMENT SHELVES FOR DAY CARE 200.00 17862 JANET KORFF REFUND, RECREATION CLASS 15.00 17863 ALL SYSTEMS COMPANY TRAINING ON WORD PROCESSOR 400.00 17864 FRANK COTTON WASTEWATER DISPOSAL REFUND 3.73 17865 JOE GUAYANTE WASTEWATER DISPOSAL REFUND 6.40 17866 LARRY MALMBERG WASTEWATER DISPOSAL REFUND 4.00 17867 ALL PRO CONSTRUCTIONS SPEED BUMPS, PARK/ DE BERRY, REPAIRS,VARIOUS STREETS, CLEAN/RESURFACE GAGE CANAL 7,670.00 17868 AMERICAN BUSINESS FORMS W-2'S & 1099 FORMS 104.94 17869 ANY HOUR LOCK & SAFE KEYS/LOCKS FOR CIVIC CENTER 50.09 17870 BASTANCHURY BOTTLED WATER BOTTLED WATER/COOLER RENTAL FOR CIVIC CENTER & DAY CARE 1/20/88 100.95 17871 DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION MAINTENANCE/ENERGY, LIGHT AT BARTON/215 STATE OF CALIFORNIA DECEMBER, 1987 493.19 17872 CONSTANCE CHAPMAN CLEAN REST ROOMS AT PARK (4 DAYS) 80.00 17873 COMMUNTTY i2EDEVELOPMENT INFORMATION ON LOW AND MODERATE INCOME AGENCY ASSOCIATION HOUSING FROM SEMINAR 28.16 17874 COMPLETE BUSINESS SYSTEMS EXTRA COPIES ON LARGE COPIER, 1/4/88 124.83 17875 SUSAN SHIRLEY STIPENDS FOR JANUARY, 1988 150.00 7 CITY OF GRYA ,e TERRACE DATE:JANArx 28, 1988 CHECK RAPM�STER NO. 012888 CHECK NUMBER VENDOR OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF:JANUARY 28. 1988 DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 17876 DAY TIMERS, INC. CITY CLERK, REFERENCE BOOK 53.07 17877 DIAMOND SECURITY SYSTEMS SECURITY/CIVIC CENTER, 2-4, 1988 75.00 17878 DUNN EDWARD CORP. PAINT FOR STREETS AND EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER 65.66 17879 DENNIS EVANS STIPENDS FOR JANUARY, 1988 150.00 17880 FOOTHILL JOURNAL CITY NEWS AD FOR 1/7 & 1/14/88, HOLIDAY AD FOR COUNCIL, PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE 595.02 17881 HUGH GRANT STIPENDS FOR JANUARY, 1988 150.00 17882 HEALTH NET HEALTH INSURANCE FOR FEBRUARY, 1988 1,442.06 17883 HERTZ EQUIP. RENTAL RENT LIFT BUCKET, HOLIDAY DECORATION REMOVAL 286.59 17884 IVAN HOPKINS LEGAL SERVICES FOR NOVEMBER, 1987 2,083.54 17885 HYDREX PEST CONTROL FOR CIVIC CENTER 1/6/88 48.00 17886 HOLLY JAMESON AEROBICS INSTRUCTOR, RECREATION 142.80 17887 SUSAN KAUFFMAN TODDLER EXPRESS INSTRUCTOR, RECREATION 166.50 17888 KICAK AND ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR 12/14/87-1/10/88 11,534.85 17889 KELLIE G. LEMON CREATIVE DANCE INSTRUCTOR, RECREATION 93.75 17890 LITTLE RED SCHOOL HOUSE SUPPLIES FOR RECREATION PROGRAMS 67.47 17891 MASTER LEASE CORP. LEASE LARGE COPIER, 2/88 556.15 17892 BYRON MATTESON STIPENDS FOR JANUARY, 1988 67.89 17893 MINUTE MAN PRESS REPRODUCE COMPUTER MANUAL 27.81 17894 MORGAN AND FRANZ LIFE INSURANCE FOR 2/88 97.75 17895 JEAN MYERS CROSSING GUARD, 1/4-1/15/88 127.20 17896 PACIFIC 1111.1, TELEPHONE FOR JANUARY, 1988 (COMPUTER,DAY CARE, PAY PHONES AT CIVIC CENTER) 111..91 17897 PAGING PLUS RENT PAGERS, JANUARY, 1988 58.00 17898 PE`1'RA ENTERPRISES FORMS FOR PERSONNEL AND RECREATION PROGRAMS 600.13 1' 891) HAPHAIIA I)-'I;NNI(;IIAUSEN STIPENDS FOR JANUARY, .1988 67.89 3 CHECK NUMBER VENDOR 17900 CATHY PIERSON 17901 RAELENE SEARLE 17902 SIGNAL MAINTENANCE CORP. 17903 SOUTHERN CA EDISON CO. 17904 SOUTHERN CA GAS CO. 17905 SOCI, INC. 17906 THE SUN 17907 UNIVERSITY PROMPT CARE 17908 VERATEX MEDICAL SUPPLIES 17909 VISA P5488 SOUTHERN CA EDISON CO. P5489 MARYGOLD FARMS CITY :O:F G TERRACE DATE:AN Y 28, 1988 CHECK TER NO. 012888 OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF:JANUARY 28, 1988 DESCRIPTION AMOUNT GYMNASTICS INSTRUCTOR, RECREATION TOLE PAINT INSTRUCTOR, RECREATION MAINTENANCE ON SIGNALS FOR 12/87 SIGNALS, CIVIC CENTER, CITY BLDGS,PARK, AND STREET LIGHTS 12/87 CIVIC CENTER AND CITY BLDGS., 12/87 CLEAN SEWER LINE, CARDINAL SUBSCRIPTION, NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING, NOTICE OF FILING, AND AD FOR SANTA PRE -EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL FOR EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER CITY CLERK SEMINAR, MONTEREY, FINANCE SEMINAR MONTEREY, AND STRESS SEMINAR, SAN BERNARDINO PICO PARK LEASE, 1988 REIMBURSEMENT FOR CROP LOSS DUE TO ACQUISITION OF PICO PARK TOTAL: 288.00 210.00 219.48 4,778.58 1,040.17 300.00 217.17 48.00 311.35 849.89 927.00 2,500.00 $ 42,303.19 I CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THE AFORELISTED CHECKS FOR PAYMENT OF CITY LIABILITIES HAVE BEEN AUDITED BY ME AND ARE NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE EXPENDITURES FOR THE OPERATION OF THE CITY. Y THOMAS SCHWAB FINANCE DIRECTOR w CITY OF GRAND TERRACE DRAFT COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - JANUARY 14, 1988 A regular meeting of ,the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace was called to order in the Council Chambers, Grand Terrace Civic Center, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California, on January 14, 1988, at 5:30 p.m. PRESENT: Byron Matteson, Mayor Barbara Pfennighausen, Mayor Pro Tem Hugh J. Grant, Councilmember Dennis L. Evans, Councilmember Susan Shirley, Councilmember Thomas J. Schwab, City Manager/Finance Director Randy Anstine, Assistant City Manager Juanita Brown, Deputy City Clerk Ivan Hopkins, City Attorney (6:30 p.m.) David Sawyer, Planning Director Joe Kicak, City Engineer ABSENT: NONE The meeting was opened with invocation by Pastor Larry Wilson, Praise Fellowship Foursquare Church, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance led by Councilman Grant. CONSENT CALENDAR Convened City Council at 5:32 p.m. Reconvened City Council at 5:36 p.m. Mayor Matteson asked Council if there were any items to be deleted? The City Manager replied there were no items to delete. Mayor Matteson asked Council if there were any items on the Consent Calendar to be removed for discussion. Mayor Matteson requested Item (A) -- Approve Check Register No. 011488. CC-88-01 Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen, second by Councilmember Grant, ALL AYES, to approve the remainder of the Consent Calendar. Item B - Ratify January 14, 1988 CRA Action Item C - Waive Full Reading of Ordinances and Resolutions on Agenda COUNCIL AG'4N9, QD--�)1 Item D - Approve 12/17/87 Minutes Item E - Consent to Assignment and Modifications Agreement for Processing Parking Citations. Mayor Matteson asked what WWD stood for. The City Manager replied, waste water disposal. CC-88-02 Motion by Mayor Matteson, second by Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen, ALL AYES, to approve Check Register No. 011488. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Gene McMeans Mr. McMeans, Manager of Riverside/Highland Water Company, due 04W 12004 Glenwood to a request by a Grand Terrace resident, gave a report on the Colton condition and quality of our water and what the improvements are for the future. Mayor Matteson asked who takes and analyzes the tests. Mr. McMeans replied, the tests are taken by an independent lab, Edward S. Babcock & Sons, Inc. He then gave a report on how the tests are done. Councilmember Evans asked Mr. McMeans if they are required to test for about 117 different chemicals? Mr. McMeans replied, "no," approximately 31, but in 1990 it will be about 117. Councilmember Evans referenced the test for chemicals and asked, are they chemicals that are seeping into the water table because it is generated from above ground pollutions? Mr. McMeans responded that is basically the case. Councilmember Evans asked if the primary water for Grand Terrace came from the Lytle Creek well. Mr. McMeans responded that the primary source does come from the Lytle Creek well, as well as from the Colton/Rialto Basin; the Riverside North Basin; irrigation water from the Bunker Basin, northeast of the I-10/I-215 freeway. Councilmember Evans asked what could we do above ground to mitigate the underground water problems as far as pollution. Mr. McMeans replied, he believed the EPA is struggling with that in many of their reports. He stated, hopefully, we can control such things as the oil dumpings and any toxic waste dumpings, stating Proposition 65 is being worked on right now as far as industry is concerned. Council Minutes - 01/14/88 Page 2 Ed O'Neal Mr. O'Neal stated Measure "A" - Special Sales Tax Revenue 22608 Minona Dr. failed when it came up to election, and unfortunately, the Special Field transportation problem did not decrease. He stated input Representative from Council and other various interested parties around the to Barbara county, as to how they feel certain local monies should be Riordan distributed, would be very helpful and maybe they could come up with something on the ballot that the public would accept. He stated the energy to waste conversion was defeated at the supervisory level. He stated July 1, Colton Land -fill will close and we will move up to San Timeteo. He stated Riverside is closing a land -fill and the closure looks like seven million dollars because of the leeching of water into the ground water. He stated if the community could come back to the supervisory level, maybe a more acceptable decision could be made. Dick Yost Mr. Yost stated that prior to the meeting, he placed a flyer President of the on each of Council's positions that would be distributed Chamber of throughout the Grand Terrace area in reference to a new Commerce Business to Business Coffee Clatch. He stated the businesses have a problem attending the afternoon luncheons so they will be having morning coffee clatches the first Monday of every month from 7:00 to 8:00 a.m., hopefully to turn it into a once a week coffee clatch to get businesses supporting businesses and to pass on other community activities. He stated he and the Executive Director of the Chamber of Commerce attended a luncheon of the gas company, specifically to form an east valley coalition of Chambers of Commerce. Mayor Matteson mentioned that on May 18 - 20, 1988, the International Council of Shopping Centers are having a from convention in Las Vegas. He stated developers all over the country meet there and he would like to see members of the Chamber of Commerce and the City Council attend. He stated it is suppose to be one of the most popular conventions held throughout the country and anyone that is interested in going should get their reservations in early, indicating interested parties could contact him and he will give them the needed information on who to contact. COMMITTEE REPORTS Crime Prevention No one reported. Committee Councilmember Grant stated he wanted to comment on the December 15, 1987 Minutes in reference to a decision by the committee to request that in the future "a member made a recommendation that any further use of the Crime Prevention Officer by the Sheriff's Department for duties outside the City of Grand Terrace or in the interest of the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department be requested by an Council Minutes - 01/14/88 Page 3 interoffice memo and directed to the central patrol. These will be the Chief of Police in Grand Terrace and to the City Manager." He asked if this position, which is being paid for by the taxpayers of the City of Grand Terrace, has been used for purposes other than for Grand Terrace? The City Manager replied, he believed the person is a County employee and there may be a certain amount of sharing of that employee. However, there are times when we utilize many members of their staff to do functions for our city. He indicated they had their first Citizen's Patrol meeting this afternoon and we not only had our Crime Prevention Officer, but we had two or three other individuals from the Sheriff's Department. The person does not necessarily dedicate 100 percent of their time here, but there is some overlap of some of their staff. Councilmember Grant stated he did not mind the overlap or sharing as long as it's at a proration of the money that is expended to support that position. He stated money for that position should be spent for services to this City. Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen stated she has discussed this with the Crime Prevention Officer and we have to realize that everybody has particular talents, strengths, and programs they are particular affective with and some that they may not be as affective with. She stated the people that the Crime Prevention Officer works with exchange those talents and those programs throughout the valley. Therefore, she may do a program for somebody else where she has a particular strength and if she has a program that is needed in Grand Terrace that she feels somebody could give more strength to, that person comes in return and helps her. She felt the city could get the best of everything by sharing. Councilmember Grant stated the definition of other responsibilities outside the City can vary, indicating it is one thing to compliment and supplement what we are doing here in sharing of information and knowledge, but he did not want that position used for something totally unrelated to the position as it's defined in Grand Terrace. Mayor Matteson stated the City Manager is keeping an eye on the situation and felt he could handle it if it is warranted. He stated it has been requested to reopen public participation. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Tony Petta Mr. Petta stated in reference to Councilmember Grant's 11875 Eton Dr. concern, the position of the Crime Prevention Officer costs Council Minutes - 01/14/88 Page 4 x-number of dollars and if other cities benefit from it, then it would be fair for them to contribute. He stated the Crime Prevention Office has started a program that the citizens should be aware of and that is, the Citizen's Patrol. He stated the first meeting was held today and was represented by a number of people. He stated the Sheriff's representative may want to give a little information as to the purpose of this program. Lt. Peppler Lt. Peppler explained what the Citizen's Patrol was all about. He gave an outline of what is expected and not expected from the Citizen's Patrol. Mr. Petta stated there is still a need for more volunteers. Councilmember Evans stated what is new for the Grand Terrace area is the fact that they are not only involving the senior citizens, but are also requesting participation from the entire community. Larry Michaels Mr. Michaels addressed a zoning problem, referencing the Lee & Associates property at 12210 Michigan Avenue, south of Barton, which is Santa Ana an industrial building of approximately 57,500 sq. ft. and comprises two buildings facing each other that was built approximately in 1981. The zoning at that time was C-21- (industrial uses). He stated in 1984, the City eliminated that zone designation. The "T" eliminated them from putting further industrial uses in that park. He explaind the percentage and uses of the buildings and then handed out to Council a brochure and pictures showing their project, explaining the pros and cons of their present situation, and asked Council if there was anything they could do to eliminate this problem. Mayor Matteson replied Council will be reviewing the zoning and will take his request into consideration at that time. Mr. Michaels ask when will zoning will be considered? Planning Director Sawyer replied not until the General Plan had been heard sometime in February and the Public Hearing in March. Parks and Mayor Matteson asked Ms. Barbara Conley what was the Recreation significance of her questioning whether or not Tammie Barr Committee could serve on the Parks and Recreation Committee because she had a business license? It was observed that Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen left the meeting at 6:26 p.m. and returned at 6:29 p.m. Barbara Conley Ms. Barbara Conley replied, that's referencing the Policy 22285 Dove St. Manual that was put out by the City of Grand Terrace relating Chairman to committee members. She stated she talked with the City Parks and Rec Manager and was informed that it was an old clause and is now Committee being rewritten for the new manual. Council Minutes - 01/14/88 Page 5 City Manager Schwab stated for clarification, the manual indicates that a person who is a business owner that does not reside in the community could become a non -voting member of a committee, but if you looked at it literally, it sounds like if you are a business owner in Grand Terrace and live here, that you can only be an associate member. That's not the literal interpretation. If a person lives here and has a business, they can be a member. Ms. Conley read a letter recommending the law enforcement and gave a report on 1986 and 1987/88 Tour de Terrace for scholarship profits. She asked Council to approve the Parks and Recreation Committee request to follow through with this project so that sometime before June 1988, two High School seniors will receive a scholarship by Council. City Manager Schwab stated the appropriation has been made by Council and further action is not needed in order to award the two scholarships, indicating he has no problem with the justification of using profits from both years in order to give the scholarships. He felt Ms. Conley only wanted it to be made clear that there is sufficient justification to award the two scholarships, even though this fiscal year did not make the entire amount. Councilmember Shirley stated she felt the Tour de Terrace in both years has been a fantastic public relations event for the City, as well as a lot of fun for the people who participated in it. Councilmember Evans concurred with Councilmember Shirley, indicating we are trying to get some name recognition throughout the area for our community and felt the Tour de Terrace is probably the biggest event that brings that recognition. He stated next year instead of expecting the Tour de Terrace to pay for itself and hopefully generate a profit for scholarships, felt Council should consider, as a form of good will, that the City actually participate in the funding. Mayor Matteson stated he felt they are doing great the way they are. He asked for consensus of Council to proceed for scholarships. Council concurred. Snack Bar Ms. Conley stated she wanted to take this opportunity to set the record straight about comments made about the snack bar at the last Council meeting, stating for the record, the total year-to-date cost of the snack bar is $10,058.25, indicating this figure comes from a financial report requested and supplied by the City Manager. Council Minutes - 01/14/88 Page 6 She stated she and the Parks and Recreation Committee are not requesting a motion or any additional funds at this time. They feel it is important that the City Council and residents of Grand Terrace understand what has actually been spent on the snack bar. Mayor Matteson stated he would like to see an itemized list of what has been spent and where the monies came from and what is needed to complete the project. Ms. Conley replied the itemized list of what was needed to complete the project was a part of the appropriation that was given to Council at the last meeting. r Councilmember Grant asked the City Manager if he was happy with the way this item was financed. City Manager Schwab stated basically, everything Ms. Conley has said is correct. Since it is a project that went through more than one fiscal year, Ms. Conley is correct in saying that if you add up all the appropriations, you get a different number than if you add up just the expenditures. He stated at the last meeting, Council's main concern was some assurance that if they appropriated this additional $9,100.00 that the unit would be completed. They also asked staff to look at options of completing the unit or demolishing the unit and to give Council a recommendation. He stated staff is currently looking at options and have this on the Agenda for the 28th of January; a recommendation of what staff recommends for the structure. Ms. Conley stated what City Manager Schwab was trying to explain is that the $9,100.00 appropriation included approximately $4,100.00 that has already been spent and the big debate is covering that $4,100.00 that has already been spent and adding $5,000.00. Mayor Matteson stated the staff report will show a clearer picture of everything. Councilmember Grant stated whether it's $10,000.00 or $10.00, we now have a snack bar that in no way can probably ever be used as a snack bar. He stated it is now probably best suited to be used as a storage shed which is a viable option. He believes the City should have gotten involved in this project and tried to guide the well-meaning people, because the committee members themselves admitted that it is basically a lost cause. Council Minutes - 01/14/88 Page 7 Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen stated it distresses her talking about this facility as though it can never be made usable and that is not a fact. She stated we need to make it a commitment to make this building usable, indicating it was a good idea and is structurally sound and all we have to do is finish it and make it so it can be used. She also suggested that the use of that facility should not be free. Councilmember Grant asked how much more is it going to cost us to get it in shape to be used as a snack bar? Mayor Matteson replied, Council should have that information at the next Council meeting. 4 PUBLIC HEARING Item 6(A) Planning Director Sawyer gave a scenario of the request of the applicant for approval of his project, indicating the Planning Department recommends that Council approve TPM 87-6 by adopting the attached resolution which includes all before -mentioned conditions of approval in his report. Mayor Matteson asked the Planning Director on Item 10, did he say dedicate? Planning Director Sawyer replied, that is not in the wording on that, but it would require that. They are improving it and it would be a dedication of right-of-way. Mayor Matteson asked shouldn't the word dedication be issued in there then? r Planning Director Sawyer replied, he believes Number 9 takes care of that, it actually says dedication. Mayor Matteson opened this subject up to the public for pros or cons. Dick Aragon Mr. Aragon concurred with the Planning Director, indicating City of Riverside they would like to see in the offer, the dedication of the Real Property 44 ft. along the easterly portion of Parcel 1; that if the Services Office master plan, when accepted, does not show the need for Commerce Way, that this offer of dedication be relinquished. Planning Director Sawyer stated that if the City does not require or designate Commerce Way to go through there then there would be no acceptance of the dedication. City Engineer Kicak stated the dedication would be offered on a map prior to the General Plan Amendment being final. He felt what the City of Riverside was asking is that after the map is recorded, and should the alignment of Commerce Way be other than through that parcel, that the City take immediate action to vacate that portion, otherwise it remains as an Council Minutes - 01/14/88 Page 8 offer of dedication. Therefore, the City will be required to take an action on that to vacate that portion which is shown on the map as offered for dedication for public use and he would have no problem with that. CC-88-03 Motion by Mayor Matteson, second by Councilmember Shirley, to approve TPM No. 13050. Councilmember Grant asked if approval of this would have any adverse or positive affect in terms of potential commercial development in that area? City Engineer Kicak stated it has been reviewed through the Planning Commission and he felt it was found it would have no impact on any potential development in that area. Planning Director Sawyer replied, "that's correct," one of the things we have discussed with the City of Riverside is the Site and Architectural Review of the structures will be in a manner that they will not be obtrusive to whatever surrounding development. He stated that portion of the parcels that are not enclosed in the perimeter wall will be landscaped and maintained in a manner that would be incohesive with the rest of it. Motion CC-88-03 carried ALL AYES, to approve the Planning Department's recommendation for TPM 87-6. Item 6(B) Councilmember Shirley abstained from delibration of TPM 13050, due to potential conflict of interest. City Manager Schwab stated the City Attorney was supposed to have drafted an agreement with T.J. Austyn. He stated the City Attorney called him earlier this afternoon from a hearing in Los Angeles. He stated he believed the applicant was present and indicated we should hear his discussion that he had with the City Attorney. He stated we will not be able to take any action because the actual agreement has not been drawn. We should take the input tonight and continue the Public Hearing until January 28, 1988. Mayor Matteson asked the applicant if he wanted to give their input tonight or hold off until January 28, 1988? Bill Storm Mr. Storm replied they have spent several years trying to go T.J. Austyn through with this project and have been continued several times just to get to this point. He stated they understood that the City Attorney would be present at the Council meeting tonight with an agreement, indicating they have not seen the agreement either. He believes it was supposed to have been read by his secretary to us, but they still have Council Minutes - 01/14/88 Page 9 not heard the agreement. He indicated they have been very patient, working very hard with the City to come up with a compromise plan that everyone feels comfortable with and would like to get an action on this project as soon as possible. Mayor Matteson replied there are things that have been worked out with the City Attorney and T.J. Austyn's Attorney, indicating it is hard for Mr. Storm to accept it and hard for the Council to approve without that document. Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen stated the impression has been given that Council has continually continued this item, but understood that T.J. Austyn periodically has requested that this item be continued also, is that correct. Mr. Storm replied, the last continuance was their request because the agreement needed to be drafted up. Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen stated it concerns her that we have no legal counsel present, whether Ivan or whomever we have when we have an issue like this before Council. She apologized to the applicant and felt the City Manager needed to address this problem with our legal counsel as soon as possible. City Manager Schwab replied, he has taken a look at this issue and when the City Attorney was part of a firm, he did have several partners that covered him in the event that he was not available. He stated at the next meeting, he will ask Council to designate Ivan as the City Attorney and John Harper, one of his former partners, as the Deputy City Attorney, to ensure that we do have coverage. Councilmember Grant stated he and the City Manager had talked about this and he agreed with what had been stated, that this is not a good situation. City Attorney Hopkins arrived at 6:30 p.m. Mayor Matteson asked the City Attorney if he had the agreement with T.J. Austyn? City Attorney Hopkins stated we have all the fundamentals of it, but was unable to get it typed due to not being in the office all day. He stated he talked to T.J. Austyn's Attorney today and he indicated he was in agreement with the fundamentals of it. He asked for forgiveness for being late, indicating he did not know if the Planning Director had gone over the three fundamentals. Council Minutes - 01/14/88 Page 10 Mr. Storm replied, he supposed he would be comfortrable with going over the fundamentals of the agreement and if we were in agreement with that, he supposed execution of the formal agreement could occur. City Attorney Hopkins stated that is what he catered to T.J. Austyn's Attorney because of the shortness of time. He stated the first condition of the agreement is that the street, indicating perhaps the Planning Director should go over the three fundamentals rather than he since he reached the agreement. Planning Director Sawyer stated staff has been in negotiation with T.J. Austyn trying to revise the tentative map for the properties that are adjacent to the properties to the south, which they hope to be looking at in the General Plan and the zoning issue hearings as possible larger lot requirements in that area. He outlined on the board map two of the fundamentals worked out with T.J. Austyn, and asked the City Attorney what the third one was. City Attorney Hopkins replied the lower lot's density on the south side of "G" Street. Mr. Storm stated Parcel 7, 4 lots were eliminated from that parcel reducing the total number of lots by 4 and increasing the size of all the lots probably to an average of about 11,000 sq. ft. Planning Director Sawyer stated the lots that will be running east/west on that street are going to be approximately 8,000 sq. ft., and the lots that would be located in Phase 7, would be 10,800 sq. ft. size lots enabling them to move up in lot sizes as we go up the hillside. Mayor Matteson asked the Planning Director to repeat the three conditions. Planning Director Sawyer stated: (1) lots on the street which runs east and west will increase to 8,000 sq. ft. lots; (2) street, not named on the map yet, Kingfisher, will be culdesaced and terminate at the northerly portion of that street and will access off of Pico Street with all of the lots along there increased in size to 10,800 sq. ft.; (3) In doing that they are losing some lots on that section, thereby decreasing the density of the lots in that particular section of the map. City Attorney Hopkins stated T.J. Austyn's Attorney has indicated his client has agreed to those conditions and he understands that Riverside/Highland was interested in acquiring a site there but was unable to reach an agreement. Council Minutes - 01/14/88 Page 11 Mayor Matteson asked if Council could pass this extension on the basis that that is approved. City Attorney Hopkins replied, "yes sir," after the hearing. Planning Director Sawyer stated he had a question for the City Attorney and that is in talking with T.J. Austyn's agent this afternoon, they indicated you had said they did not need to go back to the Planning Commission. City Attorney Hopkins replied, these items were already considered at the Planning Commission and anything that was not considered by the Planning Commission will need to go back. He asked the Planning Director, if he remembers, they discussed the hearing in the various minutes that he (Planning Director) was going to review and the large lots were discussed throughout this hearing. Planning Director Sawyer stated the minutes indicated that they discussed larger home sizes, not lots and that was his question, indicating his understanding from their discussion (City Attorney & Planning Director) was that we were going to have to go back to the Planning Commission. City Attorney Hopkins replied if they did not discuss larger lots, they will have to go back. Planning Director Sawyer stated that is how the report is written in his recommendation is that they do have to go back Ow to the Planning Commission. PUBLIC HEARING Ed St. Germain Mr. St. Germain stated it would be crazy to vote on an 12600 Warbler agreement that doesn't yet exist and suggested putting this over until January 28, 1988, indicating he would like to get a copy of this agreement once it is in final form and see what it has to say. Councilmember Councilmember Evans stated Council should take Evans Mr. St. Germain's advice. If T.J. Austyn expects Council to make decisions now, it could have some very serious impact on this community, and until he has had the opportunity to see the agreement in written form, he wasn't prepared to act on it tonight. Mayor Pro Tem Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen concurred with Councilmember Pfennighausen Evans. Mayor Matteson stated Council will postpone this until the next meeting when Council has a copy of the agreement and asked staff to make sure that the Mr. St. Germain gets a copy of the agreement. Council Minutes - 01/14/88 Page 12 City Manager Schwab asked if Council was going to continue the Public Hearing until January 28, 1988? Mayor Matteson replied, "right." Dr. Terry McDuffee Dr. McDuffee stated he needs more help from the City Council 11830 S. Mt. because of the swampers at the Barton off ramp and LaCrosse Vernon Avenue Avenue. Councilmember Grant stated maybe the City Attorney could give a brief synopsis of what has been done and what can be done, indicating the Stater Bros. Company is not concerned because it has been brought to their attention and nothing has been done. 4 City Attorney Hopkins stated he has not seen it or heard of it being a problem for quite awhile and did not know it was still a problem. He stated we had never adopted an Ordinance in regard to it, indicating he thinks the City Manager and Assistant City Manager had met with some people in regard to this. City Manager Schwab stated the Assistant City Manager obtained a copy of a loitering Ordinance which is currently being reviewed. Once it is reviewed, staff will bring it to Council for possible adoption, giving the Sheriff's Department a little more leverage to enforce loitering. Mayor Matteson stated maybe we should contact Colton and find out what they did because they use to be down in Colton's city limits and Colton ran them up here. City Manager Schwab stated it was a problem with Stater Bros. and since they are their employer, they have indicated that if any of those swampers were in front of their property, they would not permit them to come onto their property to unload any of those trucks and indicated they would go else where which is what pushed them up to our area. Councilmember Evans stated he would like for the City Attorney to do some research and come up with all the applicable sections that a Deputy could utilize to enforce the problem and then of course the proposed Ordinance. He stated if the problem still exists, it is generally very early in the morning, is that not correct? He stated he has seen them out there in the morning after 8:00 a.m. He asked Dr. McDuffee if that is when most of the trucks were coming into the warehouse? Dr. McDuffee stated that he works all night and usually around 3:00 a.m. to 4:00 a.m., there is a tremendous amount of traffic passing in front of the Animal Emergency Clinic and that is when those guys start to congregate. Currently, the problem we are experiencing now is in the mornings. Council Minutes - 01/14/88 Page 13 He gave a brief scenario about what he and his neighbors are doing to try to deter this problem. He indicated he believes Colton put "NO PARKING" signs up around the warehouse. Lt. Peppler Lt. Peppler stated in regard to enforcement, one problem they are faced with is that the offense is a misdemeanor, which requires a citation and the jails will not accept misdemeanors because of being overcrowded, that's court mandated. He stated once the swampers are issued a citation, they return again. He stated they have put out a memorandum to the deputies that are working in Grand Terrace to attack that problem by issuing citations. Another thing they are attempting to do is go after the truck drivers that are stopping on the thoroughfare picking up the workers, by giving them citations, hopefully discouraging the drivers from stopping. He stated they will continue to patrol the area and give citations if there are any violators out there. Councilmember Shirley stated she believes that once that area is developed, there will be less viable places for them to stand. Councilmember Evans stated currently we have only one deputy for the City of Grand Terrace during the hours where he believes the biggest offenses occur. He stated what we will have to look at is that Mr. Anstine, our Code Enforcement Officer, has taken some classes in basic arrest procedures. He asked if our Ordinance empowered him to issue citations. The response was, "yes." Councilmember Evans then stated he believes we need to explore those sections that the Code thr Enforcement Officer would be empowered to cite for, and if it means getting up at 3:00 a.m. on a selective basis, you might have to do that. City Attorney Hopkins indicated that could create a problem, a non -uniformed individual going out there with those swampers could put Mr. Anstine in danger and did not feel we wanted to expose a City employee to that. He stated we expose our police officers to that, but felt that made a difference because of their uniform. Councilmember Evans asked why was Mr. Anstine a Code Enforcement Officer? City Attorney Hopkins replied, we have a lot of Code Enforcement Officers. Councilmember Evans stated he was suggesting that there are sections that are not Penal Code Sections, that he would be empowered to enforce. Council Minutes - 01/14/88 Page 14 City Attorney Hopkins replied, he believes Mr. Anstine could enforce them, but wondered whether it would be safe at that time of the day to send him out there. Mayor Matteson felt we have the police to do that and should let them do it. Councilmember Evans stated the deputies have been trying to do their best, but they are not always available to address the issue, indicating they are shorthanded like we are shorthanded. Mayor Matteson stated he believes the best solution is to explore that Ordinance and bring it back to Council and then see what Council can do with that. Councilmember Grant stated he believes citing those truck drivers will help too. COUNCIL REPORTS Mayor Pro Tem Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen shared her concerns about water Pfennighausen pollution and air pollution, indicating some of the things the community could do to help correct this problem. She indicated her next concern was having legal counsel at every Council and Planning Commission meeting from beginning to end, indicating she has seen problems occur and Council couldn't work with them simply because of not having anyone present to legally advise them. She stated she understands the City Manager is currently r preparing suggestions on how to correct this problem. Item 87-4 She stated Item 87-4 -- Adapt the HVAC System in City Hall Adapt HVAC for smoke removal from the building in the event of a fire, System indicating she thought that is what we had and questioned why it is not functioning. City Manager Schwab replied it is functioning, he believes what they were saying is that they would like us to install an alarm system and hook that up to our smoke injection system. He believes when they do a property survey, the property surveyor takes the most conservative judgment and makes recommendations. They also recommended that we install a full sprinkling system in the entire building. He stated that was considered at the time of construction and deemed unnecessary and therefore, we didn't put one in. Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen stated she was going to read the sentence because what the City Manager was telling her is not consistent with what this sentence says. She read the following: Adapt the HVAC System in City Hall for smoke Council Minutes - 01/14/88 Page 15 removal from the building in the event of a fire, indicating that has nothing to do with an alarm system, that is covered in the next sentence, but she didn't understand why when we already have that, they are recommending it, asking is our system not working? City Manager Schwab replied, the system is working, he was out here for probably an hour touring the building and when Randy explained to him the smoke injection system, he might not have understood. He stated if the smoke injection system doesn't do anything in the event of a fire, it makes no sense in having it, indicating the system is already in place in the event of a fire; that it will activate and remove the smoke from the building. Councilmember Councilmember Grant stated for the record he attended, with Grant Councilmember Shirley, as her alternate, the regular meeting of the Omnitrans Board on January 6, 1988. He stated he attended as a principal member, the SANBAG meeting. He also commended the Citizen Patrol and Mr. Petta's comments. Councilmember Grant stated he talked to the City Manager about the flooding on Arliss Drive, north of Barton Road, behind the GTI Building, indicating there are three or four homes that are down -sloped having very narrow curves from the gutter, due to accumulation of asphalt and other materials over the years. He stated the City Manager provided him with a memorandum he received from the City Engineer in July, 1987, indicating two alternatives and cost to remedy this very serious problem. He asked if that reconstruction of Arliss Drive meant only from Barton Road, one block to the north, or does it mean the entire length of Arliss Drive? He questioned the figures of Alternative 1 ($182,000.00), and Alternative 2 ($489,000.00), indicating he could not believe that either one of those figures would only be for that one block area. He stated he did not know that that problem existed in the next block of Arliss. City Manager Schwab stated the City Engineer is going to prepare an estimate just to do the one small portion Councilmember Grant is referring to, indicating they reengineered the street. The curb and gutter included more than just the area that you considered critical. Staff will look at that one area and bring it back to Council. City Engineer Kicak stated he believes it included more than Arliss Drive, he will have to review the sketches and everything else. Councilmember Grant stated he was glad to hear staff was doing this because those people consistently suffer and the problem is getting a little old for them. He stated the Council Minutes - 01/14/88 Page 16 initial plan is to eliminate the northbound on -ramp at the bottom of Mt. Vernon onto that freeway. He stated this means that to go in a northerly direction, you are going to go all the way down past Bluffs, and that road will be expanded in terms of its width. You are going to have a real nice problem making a U-turn somewhere around there to get back onto the freeway. He believes Colton and Caltrans will realize what a grave error that would be to the people in Grand Terrace. Councilmember Councilmember Evans indicated for a number of months there Evans has been some concern about a potential commercial center going in down the hill at the base of Mt. Vernon, behind the AM/PM Arco Gas Station and Bakers. He indicated a request has been made to the City of Colton to look at their alternative plans for that commercial development, as well as the entrances and exits into the facility. He indicated, understanding staff is currently looking into the matter and hopefully within the next few weeks will give Council more pertinent information on it. He stated traffic going down Mt. Vernon will not be able to make a left turn onto the freeway on the south side and would necessitate anyone utilizing the down -hill to have to go out onto Washington, then over to the northbound entrance by the Fiesta Village. He stated this has created some real concerns because there are a number of people in our City that utilize that entrance. Councilmember Councilmember Shirley reported she attended the Omnitrans Shirley Board meeting as principal member and alternate for Councilmember Grant at the SANBAG meeting. Mayor Matteson asked the City Engineer to give an update on the Barton Road curb and gutter. City Engineer Kicak stated the plans for the Edison Company undergrounding is close to completion. He stated the telephone company is running a little behind schedule, but felt they would do their work. He stated they had planned on beginning their portion of the work sometime early this year, but since Pacific Telephone Company hasn't even started their planning process or detail plans, he estimated they are running about two months behind. He stated he hopes to be under construction with the City's portion of the work probably in May, that is his tentative schedule, but will have to confirm this with the other utilities. Mayor Matteson stated we will probably be done sometime in June or July. City Engineer Kicak replied, he believes it will take longer than that, probably around the middle of August or September. Council Minutes - 01/14/88 Page 17 Recessed at 7:36 p.m. Reconvened at 7:49 p.m. Item 8(A) City Manager Schwab made reference to the part of the map he will be talking about, indicating at the October 22, 1987 Council Meeting, Councilmember Evans made a six -part motion pertaining to potential parkland acquisition. He directed staff to specifically identify ten or more acres of either vacant or undeveloped land within the City. Staff has prepared a map that shows Edison parcels, DiNardo parcels, and Forest City Dillon parcels. He stated staff did identify some sites that were less than ten acres for staff purposes only. Staff has only contacted the owners that had the required ten or more acres, which are Forest City Dillon property, located next to the apartment complex on Mt. Vernon, as well as the properties on both the north and south side of Van Buren at the westerly portion. The south portion of that is owned by Edison adjacent to their power plant; the parcel to the north is owned by Mr. and Mrs. DiNardo. He stated staff has contacted all involved and have received responses back from all except the DiNardos. Forest City Dillon indicated they are still interested in creating a multi -family development that would fit the standards set by the City. Southern California Edison has indicated they are keeping that property as possible plant expansion for the future, and was not interested at this time in selling any or all of that site for a potential park site. He stated the only sites that are left are T.J. Austyn, who has expressed a negative sentiment towards parks, and the DiNardo's parcel. He stated Forest City Dillon indicated they were not interested in selling, but realize that everything is for sale, it's just the matter of what price, indicating to him that if the City would reimburse them for all their site costs, as well as all of the costs involved with developing the plans they have submitted to Council, they just might be interested. He believes the amount Forest City Dillon is talking about is probably more than the City is willing to spend, something over $3,000,000.00 for the parcel, in order to get back all of their costs and did not feel that is realistic for the City. City Manager Schwab stated staff was asked to develop a financing plan or someway to make the acquisition feasible. He stated Council did make a commitment to designate $100,000.00 per year to parkland acquisition. He indicated looking at a possible ten -acre site at an estimated cost of $3.20 sq. ft., we are looking at $1.4 million dollars acquisition cost and over a ten-year period we could possibly get enough money to buy such a parcel. However, in ten years the price probably would not be $3.20 sq. ft. He stated the other option is to be able to use a lease financing or Council Minutes - 01/14/88 Page 18 possibly a bond to purchase that land. He stated the approximate cost to service the debt on an issue sufficient to provide principle for $1.4 million dollars would be approximately $160,000.00 per year for 30 years. He stated staff would like for Council to indicate if there is a site more desirable than another. He stated if Council is interested in staff pursuing it further, staff would like the authority to obtain a commercial real-estate broker to go out and test the water, get an idea of what we are looking at as far as site cost and then to develop a financing plan. He indicated if staff had a principle amount and had an idea as to what the market was like as far as the bond or leasing market, staff could come back to Council with a proposal purchased by financing a parcel. If at that point, staff said they would commit to negotiating for the site, then staff may or may not be able to come up with the exact dollar figure because the broker will not be empowered to make them an offer, but only to get a feel for what range they are looking at for a possible site. He stated Council would want to keep in mind that the purchase would be for the raw land only, some of the parcels we are looking at are commercial in nature, indicating if the City Council did buy a site that, if for some reason there was a desire in the future not to make a park because of financial reasons or otherwise, that land is still commercially viable and he did not believe it would be an investment that would ever go backwards. He desired Council to understand that it is strictly raw land at this point and was asking Council to identify the desired site, authorize the contacting of a broker to look at a the cost and come back with a firmer estimate as to what is felt that service will require in order for us to obtain a site. Mayor Matteson stated for a school site you need a ten -acre site, but for a park you are also open to lesser parcels and he did not think we should just go for ten acres, indicating we might find lesser acres. Councilmember Grant stated the reference made on the map was the original rendition before we narrowed it down to the ten -acre potential park site and concurred with Mayor Matteson that we have other land for a potential park. He stated Grand Terrace has a park and indicated there is nothing embedded in concrete that says it has to be ten or up in acres and felt there were lots of options in Grand Terrace. Councilmember Evans stated in June 1987, the Parks and Recreation Committee submitted a report where they said that Grand Terrace is underutilized for parks and stated that if land was not targeted and purchased soon, large acres of land will not be available for future parks. He read off the reasons the Committee felt this way. Council Minutes - 01/14/88 Page 19 He stated in October 1987, the City received a letter from Ross Geller, the principal planner doing our General Plan Update and read the pros and cons submitted by Mr. Geller pertaining to his feelings about park/complex land. Councilmember Evans stated that when he made his motion, it was with information that came from the Parks and Recreation Committee. He stated the land that has been earmarked here this evening (DiNardo's property), if ever developed into a park site, is always going to be available for future development. CC-88-04 Motion by Councilmember Evans, second by Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen, that Council direct staff as outlined in 060 staff's recommendation to evaluate the potential cost and the availability, estimate the financing cost and return to Council for possible further action. Mayor Matteson stated according to his recommendation, staff recommends that Council identify the desired site and authorize staff to obtain a broker to evaluate potential cost, availability, estimate the financing cost and return to Council for possible action. Councilmember Evans stated he would identify the site as the DiNardo's site in his motion. Mayor Matteson stated he will not support that motion, indicating he would rather have the City Manager contact a local broker, have him come out and see what properties are #60 available and present the offers to the City Council on what properties are available. He felt the brokers are the professionals in this and he would like to see them go out and do the work before Council makes a decision on this. Councilmember Evans asked Mayor Matteson what parcel he wanted to look at. Mayor Matteson stated he would rather see a broker come before Council and give a presentation. Councilmember Shirley stated she would prefer to have some other zoned property looked at rather than a commercial piece of property, indicating one of the problems in this City is our sales tax base. She stated we do have other R-3 properties that are vacant, some property up by Terrace View Elementary School, some manufacturing -zoned property, and agreed that we could probably find a combination of parcels, perhaps create two or three parks in different areas throughout the City. She stated for these reasons, she will not support the motion. Council Minutes - 01/14/88 Pace 20 Councilmember Evans stated if we are going to sit here and talk about the need for parks, then he would like to see the other members of this Council identify what parcels they want for the park. He stated the Parks and Rec and the General Plan Consultant laid it out, staff came up with this and we are ignoring all three elements now. Councilmember Grant stated that Mayor Matteson and Councilmember Shirley made it quite clear that there are other areas in this town. He stated Councilmember Evans had also made it clear we need someone who is an expert in this area in terms of looking for this kind of thing, indicating we do not have this talent yet. He stated we need someone to do it and felt this is a legitimate sensible way to proceed. Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen stated she would like to call to the attention of Council that if we were to acquire two, three or four smaller sites, that it costs a great deal more to develop sites spread over a large area than it does to develop a large site into a centralized usable area. If you bring in a broker and we pay him for his services, he will come back with the same kind of report because the same process is going to be gone through. He is going to take a map and say what is it you need, what do you want to put on it and you come up with a certain amount of acre and then he says, okay, these are the places that are available. Motion CC-88-04 failed with Councilmember Evans and Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen voting AYE. CC-88-05 Motion by Mayor Matteson, second by Councilmember Grant, that the City Manager contact a broker within the City to have him check out and see what property is available and see what they can offer the City. City Manager Schwab stated staff has been working with a broker that worked with Westar and he has already done some groundwork. He stated he was not sure we would want to switch horses. Councilmember Grant asked if the broker was doing what this motion calls for? City Manager Schwab replied, the broker is looking at some parcels, and wanted to know if Council was going to limit staff to a local broker. Mayor Matteson stated he would prefer a local broker. Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen asked if he had anybody in mind. Mayor Matteson brokers in the then asked the Council Minutes - 01/14/88 Page 21 replied, his feeling is to take all of the City, put them in a hat and pull one out and City Manager how he was going to pick one. City Manager Schwab replied, taking commercial real estate brokers with expertise in the area of commercial real estate. Councilmember Grant asked if there were any commercial brokers in town. City Manager Schwab replied, he would assume there was. Mayor Matteson stated if you can't find a local broker to do the job, then go elsewhere, but felt we had brokers here. City Manager Schwab asked if we were going to set any minimum size on lots, indicating the map staff prepared picks up most of the parcels of significant size. Mayor Matteson replied, the City Manager will have to do some research and find out what is adequate for a park. Councilmember Grant asked, procedurally, can you have input after the motion has been made and seconded? City Attorney Hopkins replied, as long as it's agreeable to Council. Councilmember Grant stated he would request Council to permit a member of the audience to speak because he felt he has something to say. City Attorney Hopkins stated it takes three Councilmembers to open it up to the public. Majority concurred. taw Tony Petta Mr. Petta stated the City need not pay a broker to bring in 11875 Eton Dr. information. He stated a broker will supply information and the compensation of the broker will be through the eventual sale of the property. Mr. Petta stated he is Chairman of the Commercial Industrial Committee of the San Bernardino Valley Board of Realtors which meets every month in San Bernardino and if the City needs additional information on any commercial/industrial brokers in the general area, the San Bernardino Valley Board of Realtors are available for information. He stated there once was a country club in the community with approximately 20 acres of land. He stated an individual pointed out that there is no reason why this City cannot have a country club once again and felt perhaps that could answer the need of having a good recreational facility in the community. He stated the same individual also pointed out a specific parcel, about 20 to 25 acres, that would be ideal. He stated the owners would probably welcome this type of development and the City would not need to spend any money because all of Council Minutes - 01/14/88 Page 22 the development would be done by the developer and the City would end up with a beautiful recreational facility. He stated it is an item he would be glad to discuss with the City Manager and explain the parcel that was pointed out. Mayor Matteson asked if he would like to let Council know where that parcel is located. City Manager replied, it's Forest City Dillon Phase II. Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen stated she could remember when the old country club membership was rather costly, indicating the problems they had in the past and felt everybody in this City cannot avail themselves to a country club. She stated she would resent it highly if the only recreational facility was available to only those of country club status and felt that is not what Grand Terrace is about and hopes it never gets that way. Mr. Petta stated they haven't explored the possibilities of what it would involve. It needs to be studied and we couldn't at this point just say yes or no it's viable, but to get a study and arrive at a logical conclusion. Ms. Conley stated the motion that was put before Council, Mayor Matteson had a viable suggestion when he said, are we pin -pointing exactly to 10 acres plus or is there leeway either way. She then gave her feeling about what should be done to get this complex that was recommended by the Parks taw and Recreation Committee. Mayor Matteson stated the only difference between this motion and the motion that was just denied was the fact that the first motion pin -pointed one particular piece of parcel and this motion opens it up to any parcel within the City. Motion CC-88-05 carried with Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen and Councilmember Evans voting NOE, that the City Manager contact a broker within the City and to have him check out and see what property is available and see what they can offer the City. Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen asked Mayor Matteson if this broker comes back in and pin -points this site that was in the first motion, will this Council finally accept that site for a park? Council Minutes - 01/14/88 Page 23 Mayor Matteson replied, depends on how much they want for it. M Ln Adjourned City Council meeting at 8:30 p.m. until the next regular City Council meeting which will be held Thursday, January 28, 1988 at 5:30 p.m. Council Minutes - 01/14/88 Page 24 Respectfully submitted: Deputy City Clerk APPROVED: Mayor S T A F F R E P O R T DATE 1/19/88 C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (X) MEETING DATE- 1/28/88___ AGENDA ITEM NO. SUBJECTREDUCTION OF FILING FEE FOR AB2020/RECYCLING PROJECT FUNDING REQUIRED_ _ NO FUNDING REQUIRED TO: City Council FROM: David Sawyer., Planning Director SUBJECT: Reduction of Filing Fee for AB2020 Recycling Project DATE: January 28, 1988 BACKGROUND Staff has received a request from Ms. Pat Quinlan of 2020 Recycle Centers asking that the City's filing fee of $702.00 for Site and Architectural Review be reduced to $50.00 for this particular application. Ms. Quinlan's application is for the placement of three pre-rndnufactured receptacles of recyclable materials. These containers are of a standard design and are to be used throughout the State in accordance with Assembly Bill 2020. The applicant feels that the Cityy's fee of $702.00 for Site and Architectural Review is inappropriate for this type of proposed project. WE' COMMENllATIUN In concurrence with the applicant, staff feels a fee of $50.00 would be more appropriate and recommends the City Council reduce the fee accordingly for this application. Resp ct.tu 1v submitted, David R. Sawyer, Manning Director MMCII: AGE-NirA ITEM A DATE 1120188 S T A F F R E P O R T CRA ITEM C ) COUNCIL ITEM (X) MEETING DATE:1/2q/88 4 SUBJECT: STAFF ATTENDANCE TO THE SCHOOL AGE CHILD CARE CONFERENCE FUNDING REQUIRED X NO FUNDING REQUIRED On February 19 and 20, 1986, the California School Age Consortium will be holding its 6th Annual School Age Child Care and Recreation Conference, in Hayward. The Assistant City Manager and the Recreation Supervisor have reviewed the proposed conference agenda, and feel that this conference would be of great value to the City, by having the Day Care Instructors to attend. The total cost for this conference is approximated at $B70.00. The fiscal breakdown is as follows: Registration @ '15.00 x 3 $lg5.00 Air Fare @ 1g0.00 x 3 $g20.00 Hotel g5.00 Call in the same room) $ qS .00 Food $270.00 Staff Recommends that the Council: AUTHORIZE THREE DAY CARE 0 ATTEND THE ANNUAL CONFERENCE IN HAYWARD. APPROPRIATE $870.00 FROM THE UNAPPROPRIATED FUND BALANCE TO COVER ATTENDANCE. COUNCIL. AGENDA ITrM I '� F DATE: Jan. 20, 1988 S T A F F R E P O R T CRA ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (xx) MEETING DATE: Jan. 28, 1988 SUBJECT: APPOINTMENT OF CITY ATTORNEY AND DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY -f5 FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED The attorney of record for the City of Grand Terrace as designated in Resolution 80-52 is the law firm of Nazarek, Harper, Hopkins and McFarlin. Due to the subsequent breakup of the partnership, the City needs to designate our legal counsel. Staff is requesting Council designate Ivan L. Hopkins as City Attorney and John R. Harper as the Deputy City Attorney. The address and phone number of Ivan Hopkins is 22737 Barton Road, Suite 1, Grand Terrace, CA 92324, 714/783-4004. fhe address and phone number of John R. Harper is 2302 Martin Street, Suite 225, Irvine, CA 92715, 714/752-8494. Mr. Harper's car phone number is 714/747-2747. The designation of Ivan L. Hopkins, City Attorney and John R. Harper, Deputy City Attorney will allow the City to have multiple coverage as we have had in the past with the previous law firm. STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT: COUNCIL ADOPT IHL ATTACHED RESOLUTION APPOINTING IVAN L. HOPKINS AS CITY ATTORNEY AND JOHN R. HARPER AS DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY. T S : b t COUN I A SNDA €rEM # J c- z RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 80-52 AND APPOINTING IVAN L. HOPKINS AS CITY ATTORNEY AND JOHN R. HARPER AS DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY WHEREAS, Section 36505 of the Government Code provides for the appointment of a City Attorney; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Grand %w Terrace does hereby RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER that effective February 1, 1988, Resolution No. 80-52 is rescinded and Ivan L. Hopkins is appointed City Attorney and John R. Harper is appointed Deputy City Attorney for the City of Grand Terrace. ADOPTED this 28th day of January, 1988. Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace and of the City Council thereof. ATTEST: Deputy City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace and of the City Council thereof. Approved as to form: City Attorney CITY OF GRAND TERRACE CRIME PREVENTION COMMITTEE MINUTES OF MEETING HELD JANUARY 11, 1988 Buchwalter, Committee Chairman, called the meeting to order at 6:07 p.m. Present at the meeting were Buchwalter, Butler, Gigandit, ingley, Wright, and Korgan. Absent unexcused were Payce and Bailes. There was a motion made by Singley to accept the minutes of the December 15th meeting as submitted. and carried with all I's. The motion was second by Gigandit The Treasurer, Singley submitted the attached report. There was a motion made by Butler to accept the treasurers report as submitted. The motion was second by Gigandit and carried with all I's. Butler, the Crime Busters Chairman, reported that the January meeting �opic would be "Basic First Aid" with the American Red Cross putting 4bw on the program. She also reported the new flyer has been designed and is ready for printing on the Advisor group. They will have a separate meeting and consist of the junior high school level children. Their goal is to help coordinate monthly Crime Buster meetings. Their first meeting will be January 27th at 6:00 p.m. at the City Hall. Their official title will be The Crime Busters Jr. Deputy Club Advisors - The Advisors for short. The Crime Prevention Officer, Korgan reported that twelve (12) people have signed up as volunteers for the Citizens Patrol. The training program described in the previous months minutes will start as proposed on January 27th. Grand Terrace will take possession of the car later this week. The legal owner of the car will remain LJ Snow Ford and the registered owner will be the County of San Bernardino. After two (2) years the car will be returned to LJ Snow Ford and we will be issued a new car. The uniforms will come from West End Uniforms they will consist of jackets, shirts, pants, hats and name tags (a full dress uniform). Citizens Patrol volunteer Tony Petta will ask the Grand Terrace Lions Club to donate the uniforms for the first twelve persons. The uniforms ost approximately $100.00 per person. Grand Terrace has had news coverage for the Citizens Patrol through 14 different newspapers. There was a motion made by Singley to accept the resignation from Robert Bailes and the resignation from Lori Payce, when it arrives and for the secretary to issue thank -you letters to both for their participation. The motion was second by Butler and carried with all I's. Buchwalter will issue an official letter advising the City Council f the two openings and asking for permission to solicite for new members. Korgan reported that she is meeting with CDF to seek permission to use the property in Grand Terrace for the Safety Fair April 17. The Fair hours will be 10:00 a.m, to 4:00 p.m. There was a motion made by Wright if the committee receives no response from the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department regarding the memo of October 5th, 1987 within 10 days Buchwalter will send an additional memo this time sending carbon copies to Sheriff Tidwell and Sgt. Renoso the Captain of Central Patrol. The motion was second by Singley and carried with all I's. The meeting was adjourned at 7:35 p.m. # # # CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, 7 %1E,)1GFNCY OPf'ItATIONS CO'W.OITTFF A11-'1;TING MINUTES Nov. 167 1987 7:00 P.?,l. The meeting was called to order by the chairman, Jim dodder. The minutes of Sept. 217 1987 were read and approved. W,A BEIRS PRESENT: Hike Ilarris Vic Pfennighausen Eileen Hodder Jim Hodder Cindy Williams LIAISON REPORT Council liaison was not present. SUBCOWITTFE REPORTS V. Pfennighausen reported that the Hi Frequency antenna has been put ba ck up and is functioning properly. Everything ordered from last years budget is now here. The earthquake response drill planned by the state was cancelled. The state is planning to rerun the drill in January 1988. The generator was tested in October and is running effectively. EOC PLAN - No renort. OLD BUSINESS - Jim llodder reported on the town meeting in October on Earthquake Prepardness. Approximately 50 neople were in attendence and was well received. NF.Y BUSINESS - None The next regular meeting will be held December 21, 1987 in building 3 at 7:00 P.M. The meeting was adjourned at 7:36 P.M. Submitted by: J Eileen Hodder' `,'ecretary Approved by: J4mes A. Hodder, Chairman RECEIVED 0 ^ Iv 1 2 1988 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE RECEIVED Historical & Cultural Activities Committee JA N 19 W8 Minutes of the January 4th, 1988 Meeting CITY OF GRAND TERRACE The meeting was called to order by Chairman Viola Gratson at 7:05 PM. Those present were Irene Mason, Viola Gratson, Kathy Harmon, Pauline Grant, Linda Lee Laufer and Ann Petta. Hannah Laister was absent. The November 2, 1987 minutes were corrected as follows: The City Birthday Party will continue on a yearly basis rather than once every five years. Viola Gratson appeared before the Council on November 12 and, on behalf of our Committee, asked that they consider their decision. Another vote was taken and this time the majority of the ncil agreed to allow the City to celebrate its birthday yearly. The Historical & Cultural Committee appreciates the Council's support on this issue. With this change, Kathy made the motion to accept the minutes and Irene seconded. Treasurer's Report: $1,735.78 remains in the budget. Viola reported that Pacific Bell Telephone Co. is requesting information from various cities, including Grand Terrace, regarding historical background and dates of up coming public events. This information will be included in the Riverside telephone book and must be turned in by January 15th. Ann will write a brief history of Grand Terrace which Viola will forward along with the dates of our 1988 Art Show and Country Fair. The Committee selected the following dates for our two major events: Art Show - May 15, 1988 Country Fair - November 5, 1988 The Committee is also thinking ahead for the 1988 City Birthday party and feels that December 8th would be a good date. Viola will check with Tom Schwab to see if this date meets with the approval of the Council. It would be helpful to schedule this event this far in advance so we can reserve the whole room for the entire evening. Special Events Banner: Kathy discussed the 3 bids she has received for the banner which will be 2�' x 4', of nylon material, with a gold background, blue letters and blue border. The 3 bids are as follows; 1. Flags Int'1 Riverside $100 plus tax 2. Jon's Flag Shop Riverside $220 plus tax (this price reflects a lot of hand work) 3. A & M Trophy Service $136.50 plus tax The Committee recommends that the $100 plus tax bid be accepted. Kathy will determine if the price includes a pole pocket. Viola will give the bids to Tom Schwab. The City Birthday party of December 17th was discussed. Two students from our Sister City, Fabian Cudin and Elisa Driol, were guests at the potluck dinner. At the Council meeting which followed, Mayor Matteson presented them with a book on America, purchased by our Committee at a cost of $42.35. The students will present the book to their city Council when they return to Italy. Irene will write an article on the City birthday celebration for the next Chamber Newsletter. The meeting was adjourned at 8:10 PM. A motion to adjourn was made by Kathey, seconded by Pauline. The next meeting will be February 1, 1988. Re/ pectf�l submitted, �.y� z) �,_.��J�..i „a-„ F u- „-,- 1, T cl-nr Cr�rrnf-ar--,, ir41 i�1f�G��. t���{(iF �r 1�%S ii J' 1 22795 BARTON ROAD • GRAND TERRACE, CA 92324-5295 • CIVIC CENTER - (714) 824-6621 \ COMMISSION AND COMMITTEE REPORTS COUNCIL MEETING DATE: COMMISSION/COMMITTEE: Historical & Cultural Activities Committee SUBJECT: Permanent Banner for the Historical & Cultural Committee DATE: 11/2/87 PROBLEM: Facts: The Committee has obtained three bids to have a banner made with our committee name for use at the Art Show, the Country Fair and whatever other events that may take place. 4W ALTERNATIVES: SOLUTION: Flags Ilaternational 6033 Brockton Avenue Riverside, Ca, 92506 Banner and Pole $100.00 * Tax We are submitting three bids for the Council's consideration so that we can have this banner made as soon as possible. REQUESTED ACTION TO BE TAKEN BY COUNCIL AND/OR STAFF: Same as above DATE: Jan. 25, 1988 S T A F F R E P O R T CRA ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (xx) MEETING DATE: Jan. 28, 1988 SUBJECT: EMINENT DOMAIN PUBLIC HEARING ------------------------------------------------------------------ FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED As Council is aware, staff is requiring additional right-of-way at the northwest corner of Barton and Mt. Vernon for the purpose of installing an upgraded traffic signal which includes a dedicated left -turning movement. Council is required to adopt a resolution of necessity. k STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT COUNCIL CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND ADOPT THE ATTACHED RESOLUTION. T S : b t RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBING A CERTAIN PROJECT; MAKING STATEMENT OF THE PUBLIC USE FOR THE TAKING OF CERTAIN PROPERTY BY EMINENT DOMAIN: DESCRIBING GENERAL LOCATION AND EXTENT OF SAID PROPERTY TO BE TAKEN; DECLARING FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS ON PUBLIC INTEREST AND NECESSITY FOR SAID PROPERTY; AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING EMINENT DOMAIN PROCEEDINGS TO BE COMMENCED IN SUPERIOR COURT TO ACQUIRE SAID PROPERTY INCLUDING APPLICATION FOR POSSESSION OF SAID PROPERTY PRIOR TO JUDGMENT; AND MAKING OTHER DETERMINATIONS WHEREAS, the City of Grand Terrace, hereinafter called "City", is a public entity organized and existing uner and pursuant to the laws of the State of California; and WHEREAS, this Council intends to undertake a certain Project for public purposes; and WHEREAS, in order to accomplish said Project, this 4 Council believes that it is necessary to acquire by eminent domain certain property, including the right of temporary occupancy of adjacent lands for construction purposes, hereinafter collectively called "Subject Property"; and WHEREAS, this Council has previously adopted a resolution describing the Subject Property as Exhibits attached thereto; and WHEREAS, said Council has fixed a time and place for public hearing on the matters referred to in Section1240.030 of the Code of Civil Procedure; and WHEREAS, this Council has given each person who owns or claims a right in said Subject Property proposed to be acquired by eminent domain and whose name and address appears on the last equalized county assessment roll notice and reasonable opportunity to be heard in the time, form and manner s required by Section 1245.235 of the Code of Civil Procedure; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, this Council did hear and consider all testimony, written and oral, to the matters referred to in Section 1240.030 of the Code of Civil Procedure: NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace does hereby RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER as follows: faw Section 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct. Section 2. That said Subject Property to be taken by eminent domain is for a public use, to wit: The construction, installation, improvement and acquisition of road, roadway, curb, gutter, streetlight, and traffic signalization, and including appurtenant work thereto. Section 3. That the City is authorized and empowered to commence eminent domain proceedings to acquire said Subject Property, pursuant to the statutes as contained in the Eminent Domain Law, being Title 7, Part III of the Code of Civil Procedure. Section 4. That a description of the general location and extent of said Subject Property to be taken by eminent domain is set forth on Exhibit "A" and "B" attached hereto. Section 5. That this Council does find, determine an declare as follows: (a) That, to the extent acquisition of said Subject Property results in a remnant, said remnant shall be acquired by eminent domain herein, pursuant to Section 1240.410 of the Code of Civil Procedure; and (b) That, to the extent said Subject property or interest therein is already appropriated to public use, the use proposed -2- herein is a more necessary public use than the one to which said Subject Property is presently appropriated, pursuant to Section 1240.610 of the Code of Civil Procedure, or, in the alternative, the use proposed herein is a compatible public use which will not unreasonably interfere with the continuance of the existing public use, pursuant to 1240.630 (a) of the 6 Code of Civil Procedure. Section 6. That this Council does hereby further find, determine and declare as follows: (a) That the public interest and necessity require said project; and (b) That said Project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; and 4 (c) That said Subject Property sought to be acquired is necessary for said Project;and (d) That a written offer of just compensation has been made to the owner of record of said Subject Property in the time, form and manner required by Section 7267.2 of the Government Code. Section 7. That the City Attorney is hereby authorized and directed to commence an action in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of San Bernardino in the name and on behalf of the City, against those persons who appear on record or who are known to have a claim or interest in said Subject Property described in Eshibits "A" and "B", for the purpose of acquiring said Subject Property by eminent -3- domain for the public use described herein and to make application for possession of said Subject Property prior to judgment. Section 8. That the officers of the City are hereby authorized and directed to withdraw necessary sums to deposit with the Superior Court as the probable amount of compensation �Aw that will be awarded in the eminent domain proceedings to acquire said Subject Property described in Exhibits "A" and B" . u Section 9. That the officers of the City are hereby authorized and directed to take any appropriate action consistent with the pruposes of this Resolution. ADOPTED this day of , 1988. ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney Mayor That portion of Lot 1, Block "E", of Grand Terrace, being a Subdivision of Section 32, Township 1 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, as per map recorded in Book 11, Page 4, of Maps, records of the Recorder of San Bernardino County, State of California, being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Lot 1; THENCE South 890 50' 33" West, along said South line, a distance of 28.00 feet to a point thereon, being also the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE continuing South 891 50' 33" West, along said South line, a distance of 2.77 feet to a point on said South line; THENCE leaving said South line North 00' 11' 44" East, a distance of 17.00 feet, to the beginning of a curve, concave Northwesterly, the tangent to said curve bears North 89' 50' 33" East; THENCE Northeasterly along said curve to the left, having a radius of 20.00 feet, through a central angle of 89' 38' 49", for an arc distance of 31.29 feet; THENCE North 000 11' 44" East, along a line tangent to the last described curve, being also a line parallel with and distant 11.00 feet Westerly of, measured at right angles to, the Easterly line of said Lot 1, a distance of 15.00 feet; THENCE North 890 501 33" East, a distance of 11.00 feet, to a point in said Easterly line; THENCE South 00' 11' 44" West, along the East line of said Lot 1, a distance of 23.88 feet, to a point thereon, said point bears North 000 11' 44" East, measured along said East line, a distance of 28.00 feet, from said Southeast corner of said Lot 1; THENCE leaving said East line South 45' 01' 08" West, a distance of 39.71 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Contains 0.014 Acres (600.3 square feet). :KN1t3)'r HA TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT That portion of Lot 1, Block "E", of Grand Terrace, being a Subdivision of Section 32, Township 1 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, as per map recorded in Book 11, Page 4, of Maps, records of the Recorder of San Bernardino County, State of California, being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Lot 1; THENCE South 890 50' 33" West, along the South line of said Lot 1, a distance of 28.00 feet to a point thereon, being also the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE continuing South 89' 50' 33" West, along said South line, a distance of 97.00 feet to the Southwest corner of the Grantor's parcel of land; THENCE North 000 11' 44" East, along the West line of said Grantor's parcel, a distance of 17.00 feet to a point thereon; THENCE North 890 50' 33" East, along a line parallel with and distant 17.00 feet Northerly of, measured at right angles to, the Southerly line of said Lot 1, a distance of 94.12 feet; THENCE Northeasterly along a curve to the left, having a radius of 20.00 feet, tangent to the last described course, concave Northwesterly, through a central angle of 89' 38' 491r, for an arc distance of 31.29 feet; 4W THENCE North 000 11' 44" East, along a line tangent to the last described curve, being also a line parallel with and distant 11.00 feet Westerly of, measured at right angles to, the Easterly line of said Lot 1, a distance of 183.12 feet, to the intersection of said parallel line with the North line of said Grantor's parcel; THENCE North 890 50' 33" East, along said North line, a distance of 11.00 feet, to the Northeast corner of said Grantor's parcel; THENCE South 000 11' 44" West, along the East line of Grantor's parcel, being also along the East line of said Lot 1, a distance of 192.00 feet, to a point thereon, said point bears North 001 11' 44" East, measured along said East line, a distance of 28.00 feet, from said Southeast corner of said Lot 1; THENCE leaving said East line South 451 01' 08" West, a distance of 39.71 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Contains 0.093 Acres (4050.5 square feet). Ex H l F IT "B " CITY OF GRAND TERRACE NOTICE OF HEARING ON THE MATTER OF THE ADOPTION OF A PROPOSED RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY TO ACQUIRE PROPERTY BY EMINENT DOMAIN FOR A PUBLIC PURPOSE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace intends to undertake a certain Project generally described as follows: The construction, installation, improvement and acquisition of road, roadway, curb, gutter, streetlight, and traffic signalization, and including appurtenant work thereto. NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN that in order to accomplish said Project, it appears necessary to acquire certain real property by eminent domain, said property is also described on Exhibit "A" hereinafter called "Subject Property". NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that said City Council has received and considered a proposed Resolution of Necessity to acquire said "Subject Property" and that said City Council intends to adopt said Resolution of Necessity. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that said City Council adopted a resolution calling a public hearing on the matter of the adoption of said Resolution of Necessity to acquire said Subject Property, pursuant to Section 1245.235 of the Code of Civil Procedure. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that said public hearing will be held at the time and place specified as follows: TIME 'PLACE 6:30 p.m. City Council Chambers Thursday 22795 Barton Road January 28, 1988 Grand Terrace, California NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that, at said public hearing, each person owning or having an interest in said Subject Property which is proposed to be acquired by eminent domain shall have the right to appear and be heard on the matters specified as follows: 1. That the public interest and necessity require said Project; 2. That said Project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; and 3. That said Subject Property sought to be acquired is necessary for said Project. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that the failure to file a written request to appear and be heard at said public hearing will result in a waiver of the right to appear and be heard. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that, for further particulars, reference is made to the proposed Resolution of Necessity on file with the City Clerk and Section 1245.235 of the Code of Civil Procedure and sections related thereto. DATED: January 13, 1988 City Attorney -2- S T A F F R E P O R T DATE 1/20/88 C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM �X) MEETING DATE AGENDA ITEM NO. S UB JL;C,r EXTENSION OF TENTATIVE MAP 13050 (T.J. AUSTYN) FUNDING REQUIRED_ NO FUNDING REQUIREll X_ ATTACHED TO THIS MEMO IS A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT DATED 12/17/87 REGARDING THIS ITEM. THE AGREEMENT REFERRED TO IN THE REPORT HAS NOW BEEN PREPARED AND IS INCLUDED AS ATTACHMENT B. STAFF RECOMMENDATION REMAINS AS STATED IN THE REPORT. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, DAVID R. SAWYER, PLANNING DIRECTO -f -� UXCIL AGENDA �,T F_,1,4 4 �n Sti AFF REPURT 1L/ 11/U! C R A ITEM ( ) AGENDA ITEM NO. SUBJECT COUNCIL ITEM (Xk MEETING DATE: EXTENSION OF TENTATIVE MAP 13050 (T.J. AUSTYN) FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED X 12/17/87 On August 5, 1985, the Planning Commission recommended approval of Tentative Tract Map 13050 (see Attachment A) and 6pecific Plan 85-10 to the City Council and on September 12, 1985 the City Council approved both items. In accordance with California State Law the Tentative Map was set to expire on September 12, 1987, however prior to that date staff received a request from the applicant to extend the map for a period of one year. The receipt of that request by staff automatically extended the map until November 12, 1987. On August 17, 1987, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the one year extension. On September 24, 1987, the City Council denied the request. In the staff report for September 24, 1987, staff addressed the issue of the upcoming General Plan and Zoning Ordinance revision and the possibility of recommending larger minimum lot size requirements in this area. With this in consideration staff presented the City Council with the following alternatives and the City Council subsequently chose Alternative One. ALTERNATIVE _ ONE - deny the request for an extension of TM "13050 phases 5,6,and 7 thereby forcing a new tentative map to be filed which if filed after the Zoning Revision will need to meet the requirements of the revised Zoning Ordinance.. ALTERNATIVE TWO - approve an extension of TM 13050 phases �,6 and 7 until after the Zoning Ordinance is revised (4 month extension). After which, if the zoning remains the same, a jlonger extension may be granted. This alternative does allow the subdivider time to submit a final map and obtain building permits prior to the time the zoning issue is decided. ALTERNATIVE THREE - approve a 4 month extension of TM 1T050 pleases___and 6 and deny the extension of phase 7. This alternative will ensure that phase 7, which extends southward into the area of larger parcels and undivided acreage, will not be developed at the smaller lot sizes before the zoning issue is decided. It also allows the subdivider a window of time to prepare a final map for phases 5 and 6 prior to the zoning ordinance hearing's which will dictate whether or not phases 5 and 6 should be extended or denied at the end of the 4 month extension period. ALTERNATIVE FOUR - approve a one-year extension of TM 13050 phases 5, 6 and 7 as requested. However, it was learned after the meeting that the applicant had not received proper notice of the meeting and the hearing was to be rescheduled. On November 12, 1987, the City Council extended the 60 day period for a hearing on this item until December 17, 1987. Subsequent to that time, Staff has been working with the applicant on a fifth alternative which may be acceptable to all parties. As a result, such an alternative has been worked out between the applicant and City Staff including the planning staff, the City Engineer and the City Attorney. DISC_ USSIO__N: 4 The request and recommendation before you tonight is not to consider a revised map but rather to approve an agreement prepared by the City Attorney (see Attachment B) which extends Tentative Map 13050 until such time the applicant submits a revised tentative map and amended specific plan to the Planning Commission and then to the City Council for approval. The revised map shall be in the form agreed to in the said agreement and the agreement shall not allow the filing of Map 13050 for final map consideration in its original version. The proposed Alternative Five allows the applicant to go rorward with the project with a modified version of the map which provides larger lots in the area where larger lot Size requirements are to be considered in the General Plan and Zoning hearings. RECOMMENDATIONS: The Planning Department recommends the City Council approve tl►e following Alternative Five: Approve the attached agreement (Attachment B) extending Tentative Map 13050 for the sole purpose of submitting a revised tentative map and amended Specific Plan in the form included in the agreement for consideration by the Planning Commission and City Council in accordance with State and local planning laws. n ORS/mcm 09 Respect -�y submitted, David R. �awyer -- Planning Director f=� jig -- y 11 1 Im ATTACHMENT B WILL BE PROVIDED TO YOU PRIOR TO YOUR MEETING. A(_RT.`VMVWM THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this day of 1988, by and between the CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, hereinafter called "City", and called "Developer". . hereinafter WHEREAS, City has previously approved a tentative tract map for Tract Number 13050, Phases 5, 6 and 7, which has expired dueto the lapse of time; and WHEREAS, Developer desires to extend the time of approval as is provided for in the California Subdivision Map Act; and WHEREAS, it is the intent of both parties hereto that the tentative tract map for said subdivision, Phases 5, 6 and 7 will be extended as requested by Developer subject to the conditions hereinafter set forth: far NOW, THEREFORE, both parties hereto in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein do hereby agree as follows: 1. That Developer will redesign the proposed Tract Map to include Street "H" as shown on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein as a cul de sac street subject to City's existipg requirements and subject to reasonable approval by both City's Planning Director and Engineer. 2. That Developer will redesign the lots to be located on "H" Street so that each lot located thereon shall be a minimum lot size of 10,800 square feet and meet all other requirements and standards of the City, including approval by the Planning Director. 3. That Developer will redesign the lots to be located -1- ATT7-) CH MEOT " 6' on the South side of "G" Street as shown on Exhibit "A" so that each lot so located shall be a minimum size of 8,000 square feet and meet all other requirements and standards of the City, including reasonable approval of both City's Planning Director and City Engineer. tar 4. That all other conditions and requirements imposed by the Planning Commission of City and not in conflict herewith are included herein as though they were set forth in their entirety, a copy of said approval and conditions being attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B". 5. That Developer's request and application for extension of time of approval of Tentative Map for Tract Number 13050, Phases 5, 6 and 7 is included herein as though set forth in its en�ireby and is attached hereto and incorporated herein as exhibit "C". This Agreement is approved on the day and year first above written. ATTEST: DEVELOPER CITY City Clerk Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney -2- c r TYrfCAL MCT10 -eZ171-h, i I I I I 1v-,I— ryIKK mcrio, Aol lx,s� .7. o er. -ty 71 a. I CIT" 27 .............. A .7 IVE TRACT NO. 13050 TENTATIVE FUSCOCE -z-f' m T­1 ..I. 12-8.6006 12-8.5033 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TERRACE HILLS TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 13050/SPECIFIC PLAN 85-10 1. If the above referenced project is approved, applicant and/or property owners shall comply with all applicable City Ordinances and Resolutions. 2. Approval of this permit Tentative Tract Map No. 13050/Specific Plan 85-10 shall expire, if not used, one year from date of approval unless appli- cation is made prior to expiration for an extension not exceeding one year. 3. Approval of this application constitutes Specific Plan and Tentative Tract approval only, and does not constitute approval of any sign permit, gradinq permit, building permit, or any other permit required by the City. 4. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the necessary additional dedication shall be provided along all right of ways in accordance with the General Plan. 5. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a "Will Serve" letter from the Riverside Highland Water Company shall be submitted to the Department of Building and Safety. 6. The applicant shall conform to all requirements of the San Bernardino County Fire Department. 7. All utilities shall be underground. 4r 8. Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, a landscaping and lighting plan conforming to the requirements of Title 18 shall be approved by the Planning Commission. 9. The applicant shall comply with the requirements listed in the Planning Commission Staff Report dated July 15, 1985 and the attached Tentative Tract Map requirements. 10. There shall be twenty-five foot building setback from all dedicated street right of ways. 11. All private streets shall be constructed to provide for traffic index = 5 structural section. 12. The applicant shall comply with the attached conditions or concerns per the particular agency requirements. 13. Obtain a letter of non-interference from any utility company that may have rights of easement within the property boundaries. The letter must be obtained prior to issuance of building permits. EXHIBIT B CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TERRACE HILLS TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 13050/ SPECIFIC PLAN 85-10 12-8.5033 12-8.6006 Page 2 Subject property shall not be occupied and/or used for purposes applied for until the following conditions have been met: 14. The water system and fire hydrants shall be installed in accordance with the requirements of the State Health and Safety Code, the California Administrative Code, and plans approved by the governing fire protection far authority. 15. The planting and permanent irrigation system (s) shall be installed per approved landscape plan. 16. Screening shall be provided around the perimeter of the project, consisting of a six (6) foot high decorative masonry wall. 17. A faithfull performance bond in an amount equal to the estimated cost of uncompleted required improvements, plus the cost of administration, shall be posted with the City Building and Engineering Department, if the required improvements have not been completed at the time the occupancy permit is requested. 18. Prior to any occupancy, a Certificate of Final Completion shall be issued by the City Building Department, after which, an application shall be submitted to the Department of Environmental Health Services for a tAW Certificate of Occupancy. 19. Any phasing shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review and approval. 20. Prior to a Public Hearing for approval before the City Council, all inaccuracies in the text of the Specific Plan shall be corrected. ACCEPTANCE OF CONDITIONS I am the owner of the property described above. I am aware of and accept all of the conditions set forth herein. It is further understood that all of the aforementioned conditions which require installation of improvements shall be completed in a manner satisfactory to the Planning Department of the City of Grand Terrace and shall not be deemed complete until approved and accepted as completed by said Department. SIGNATURE Of' APPLICANT OR AGENT DATE TRACT 13050 GENERAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. Due to the lack of, or inaccuracy of information shown on Tract 13050; conditions pertaining to changes required for final maps and improvement plans shall be complied to. 2. No lot shall have less than 40' of frontage; and less than 60' at the building set back line. 4 3. No lot shall have less than 7200 square feet. 4. Observation Drive shall be constructed 1/2 section plus 10 feet throughout the limits of the Tract. Pico Street shall be improved within the Tract boundary. 33 feet of right-of-way, curb at 22 feet north of centerline. 5. Observation Drive shall intersect Van Buren Street perpendicularly. The construction of Observation and Van Buren Streets shall be a portion of Phase I. Minimum half width sections shall be one half of the total curb separation plus 10 feet. 6. Provisions shall be made for the extension of utilities, acceptance of drainage, and extensions of local streets into and through the site. 7. Local Streets shall direct drainage and traffic to collector streets. ("X" Street). Both westerly, north south streets shall be run to Van Buren Street. Lots 159 through 176 shall be sewered to Pico Street. Approximately 300 feet of sewer in Pico will be subject to reimbursement agreement. 8. The easterly extension of Cardinal Street Shall be redesigned to eliminate the conflict in grades at Observation Drive. 9. Asphalt street surfaces shall be placed in two lifts. The second lift shall not be placed prior to completion of on -site building and off -site utilities. 10. Any irrigation water lines shall be properly destroyed, removed or relocated, as required by the Riverside Highland Water Company. Engineered plans shall be prepared for relocating all water lines within subject tract. The relocation of these facilities shall be in accordance with the Riverside Highland Water Company and approved by City. 11. Submit plans for review and approval of sewer extensions crossing the Californa Aqueduct. 12. A bond will be required, prior to final tract approval for all work in the public right-of-way, and easements. A grading bond will be required prior to the commencement of grading operations. 13. Construct retaining walls as required. GC-1 14. All sewer bond Assessments and other fees shall be paid prior to final approval of map. 15. Install standard street name and traffic control signs as approved by City engineer. 16. The developer or his Engineer shall furnish the fire department with two copies of water system improvement plans. The fire Department shall also sign all water plans prior to recordation. 17. A program of slope and erosion control shall be undertaken by the developer to preclude damage to the site and downstream property during heavy storm runoff, especially during the construction stage. Any damage encountered will be the responsibility of the developer. 18. There are existing utilities, such as irrigation systems and power lines on the site that are not shown on the tentative map. These will have to be relocated in accordance with the requirements of the owner. 19. The existing 60 ft. Edison easement located 100th south of Lark Street may cause a problem for the City in the future. The Edison Company is not fee owner of the property but it cannot be used for a building site. In all probability the parcels will be sold every five years for deliquent taxes. Recommendation: Include the Edison easement property as part of the adjacent lot. 20. Developer shall have fee ownership of all property within Tract boundary prior to recording of final map. GC-2 TRACT 13050 PUBLIC WORKS REQUIREMENTS STREET 1. Cardinal a. Construct curb, gutters and sidewalk on both sides of street with standard cul-de-sac at East end. b. Construct 36' asphalt street section in accordance with construction plans to be approved later. 2. Van Buren a. Construct curb, gutters, and sidewalk on both sides of street. b. Construct 44' asphalt street section in accordance with construction plans to be approved later. c. Construct standard intersection with Observation Drive. 3. Pico Street a. Construct concrete curb 22' north of street centerline. b. Construct standard sidewalk on north side of street. c. Install asphalt street section from North curb to match existing pavement. D. Pico Street is to remain open to thru traffic at all times. 4. Oriole a. Construct curb and gutter 18' from Street centerline. b. Construct standard sidewalk along East side of street. c. Install standard asphalt from new curb to match existing pavement. 5. All other interior streets a. Construct curb, gutters, and sidewalks on both sides of streets. b. Construct 36' standard asphalt street between curbs. 6. All street names shall be coordinated with the Historical and Cultural Committee. PW-1 7. Trees, irrigation systems and landscaping shall be as specified in the City of Grand Terrace Standards for tree planting. The developer shall maintain all landscaping until it is occupied by the new owner. WATER 1. Construct water system in accordance with plans approved by Riverside Highland Water Company with fire hydrant size type and location approved by Fire Department. SEWER 1. Construct sewer system in accordance with plans to be approved by the City of Grand Terrace. DRAINAGE 1. Adequate provisions shall be made to intercept and conduct the off -site tributary drainage flow around or through the site in a manner which will not adversely affect adjacent or downstream properties. The engineer shall submit a hydrologic report for the development. 2. The drainage report shall contain detailed plans for intercepting the drainage from the East side of the Tract and conveying it to existing drainage facilities with consideration of the fav potential drainage problems at the West ends of Cardinal and Lark Street. PW-2 TRACT 13050 PLANNING REQUIRMENTS 1. STREET LIGHTS a. Marbelite street lights shall be installed in accordance with the recommendation of the Southern California Edison Company. b. All conduit for street lights and other electrical service 06 shall be underground. c. Prior to recordation of final map, deposit with the City, sufficient funds to pay street light energy cost in accordance with existing City policy. 2. TELEPHONE a. Developer shall provide for underground telephone service for all lots. b. Developer shall provide for underground T.V. cable service to all lots. c. Developer shall provide for gas service to all lots. 3. All utilities in the public Right-of-way shall be completed 16 prior to final street paving. 4. All lots shall have a minimum area of 7200 square feet a minimum depth of 100 feet and a minimum width of 60 feet (70 feet on corner lots). Each lot on a cul-de-sac or on a curved street where the side lot lines are diverging from the front to the rear of the lot, shall have a width of not less than 60 feet measured at the building set back line, and a minimum frontage of 40 feet. 5. LANDSCAPING a. A minimum number of 1 inch caliper/ 15 gallon multi branch trees shall be planted on the lot adjacent to the street right-of-way for each of the following types of lots: 1. Cul-de-sac lots - 1 tree 2. Interior lots - 2 trees 3. Corner lots - 3 trees The variety of tree to be provided is subject to City approval and is to be maintained by the property owner. b. Three (3) copies of a Landscaping Plan shall be submitted PL-1 for Office of Planning review and approval. Said Landscape Plan shall include the following; 1. The required slope planting. Slope planting shall be required for the surface of all cut slopes more than five (5) feet in height and fill slopes more than three (3) feet in height. Said slopes shall be protected against damage by erosion by planting with grass or ground cover plants. Slopes exceeding fifteen (15) feet in vertical height shall also be planted with shrubs, spaced at not to exceed ten (10) feet on centers; or trees, spaced at not to exceed twenty (20) feet on centers; or a combination of shrubs and trees as cover plants. The plants selected and planting methods used shall be suitable for the soil and climatic Trees 10% 15 gal.; 40% 5 gal.; 50% 1 gal. Shrubs 20% 5 gal.; 80% 1 gal. Groundcover 100% coverage. 2. The required street trees. 3. All required walls. All decorative walls shall be designed and constructed to incorporate design features such as tree planter wells, variable setback, split block face, columns, or other such features to provide visual and physical relief along the wall face. c. Three (3) copies of an irrigation plan shall be submitted for Office of Planning review and approval when slope planting is required. Slopes required to be planted shall be provided with an approved system of irrigation, designed to cover all portions of the slope. A functional test of the system may be required. The maintenance of graded slopes and landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer until the transfer to individual ownership. All irrigation systems, where required, shall be designed on an individual lot basis. d. All landscaping and irrigation shown on the approved landscape and irrigation plans and all required walls shall be completed or suitable bonds posted for their completion. PL_2 TRACT 13050 BUILDING AND SAFETY REQUIREMENTS 1. A preliminary soil report, shall be filed with and approved by the Building Official prior to recordation of the final map. 2. Grading plans to be submitted to and approved by the Office of Building and Safety as required by Uniform Building Code Chapter 70. r 3. Obtain a demolition permit for underground structures that must be broken, back filled and inspected before covering. 11 4. Submit plans and obtain building permits for walls required by other departments. 5. An erosion and sediment control plan shall be submitted to and approved by the building Official prior to any land disturbance. Bs-1 REFERRAL MEMO DATE : May 28, 1985 FROM: City of Grand Terrace Planning Department Attn: Joseph Kicak 22365 Barton Road, Suite 110 Grand Terrace, CA 92324 825-7503 TO: SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. P.O. Box 788, Rialto, CA 92376 FILE NO. 12-8.6006 12-8.5033 12345 i n3 �► sad ti S" UN 1985 SUBJECT: Application for Conditional Use Permit b Site 6 Architectural Review Approval Tentative Tract Map No. 13050, Terrace Hills Tract. 44.3 gross acres 176 detached Single Family Residences, Specific Plan 85-10 The above referenced application has been filed with the City Planning Director. Any planning comment you may have should be received in this office no later than JUNE 5, 1985 for Planning Review. Should you have any conditions or concerns, or know of any reason why this project should not go forward, or wish to know what decision is made, please contact the department by calling the above telephone number or write referring to above file number. NOTE TO UTILITY COMPANIES: This is for your INFORMATION ONLY. No reply is necessary unless you have existing R/W or ease- ments across the property proposed for development. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Our opinions and/or recommendations are as follows regarding the proposed: An existing powerline easement encumbers a portion of this development. Prior to approval of this project by Southern California Edison Company, it will be necessary for the developer to obtain from Edison's Right -of -Way Department, a non-interference letter. A copy of this tentative map should forwarded to Southern California Edison Company, Right -of -Way and Land Department, Post Office Box 410, Long Beach, California 90801 : Attention: C. J. Lowerison , ".anager. S'-4-0)3 Department (Please Identify ncy) Phone SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COL P. 0. Box 788 Rialto, Califomla 92376 REFERRAL MEMO FILE NO. 12-8.6006 DATE ; May 28, 1985 12-8.5033 FROM: City of Grand Terrace Planning Department Attn: Joseph Kicak RECEIVED AT 22365 Barton Road, Suite 110 41985 Grand Terrace, CA 92324 JUN 1 8 2 5- 7 5 0 3 KICAK b AMCIATES T�' COUNTY FIRE WARDEN 3800 Sierra Way, San Bernardino, CA 92410 SUBJECT: Application for Conditional Use Permit 6 Site E Architectural Review Approval Tentative Tract Map No. 13050, Terrace Hills Tract. 44.3 gross acres 176 detached Single Family Residences, Specific Plan 85-10 The above referenced application has been filed with the City Planning Director. Any planning comment you may have should be received in this office no later than JUNE 5, 1985 for Planning Review. Should you have any conditions or concerns, or know of any reason why this project should not go forward, or wish to know what decision is made, please contact the department by calling the above telephone number or write referring to above file number. NOTE TO UTILITY COMPANIES: This is for your INFORMATION ONLY. No reply is necessary unless you have existing R/W or ease- ments across the property proposed for development. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Our opinions and/or recommendations are as follows regarding the proposed: "MAEV24f e r.0 e- tip4P67i 383-76;U Department (Please Identify Agency) Phone -oRESTRY AND FIRE V, .'RDEN DEPARTMENT COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO OFFICE OF PUBLIC SAFETY •800 Sierra Way • San Bernardino, CA 92405 • (714) 882-1226 FLOYD TIDWELL, Director Q `�:~*►FIRE WARDEN ,IN C. BANGHART, Chief LAM KRNl1RDIMO {{��[N'(yymm {{����yymmy Q Q 1 LL M1�W17J L.L.1VlY U J1���Q��a/ q, 7 - / DATE June 13, 1985 12-8.6006 TO CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, Planning Department Reference # 12-8.5033 Attn: Joseoh Kicak TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 13050 FROM DON C. BANGHART, TERRACE HILLS TRACT County Fire Warden SPECIFIC PLAN - 85-10 UBJECT: FIRE PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS The above -referenced project is protected by the Forestry & Fire Warden Dept. 6-) Prior to construction occurring on any parcel, the owner shall contact the fire department for verification of current fire protection development requirements. F2. All new construction shall canply with applicable sections of the Uniform Fire Code. F3. The street address shall be posted with a ninim n of three (3) inch numbers, visible from the street, in accordance with San Bernardino County Ordinance 2108, prior to occupancy. F4. Each chimney used in conjunction with any fireplace or any heating appliance in which solid or liquid fuel is used shall be maintained with an approved spark arrester. An approved spark arrester shall mean a device constructed of stainless steel, aluminum, copper or brass, woven galvanized wire mesh, nineteen (19) gauge minimum with three -eights (3/8) inch minimum to one-half (1/2) inch maximum openings, mounted in or over all outside flue openings in a vertical or near vertical position, adequately supported to prevent movement and visible from the ground. (F5) All flammable vegetation shall be ranoved fran each building site a minimum distance of thirty (30) feet. F6. Development shall provide for safe and ready access for fire and other emergency equipment, and for routes of escape which will safely handle evacuations. Two points of access through entire project required. GF7 Private roadways which exceed one hundred fifty (150) feet in length shall be approved by the fire department, and shall be extended to within one hundred fifty (150) feet of, and shall give reasonable access to all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of any building. An access road shall be provided within fifty (50) feet of all buildings if the natural grade between the access road and building is in excess of thirty percent (30%). Where the access roadway cannot be provided, approved fire protection system or systems shall be provided as required and approved by the fire department. Roadways shall have a minimun vertical clearance of thirteen feet six �8)- inches (13' 6"). Minimum 24' width; turns based upon 47' radius. CF9 A turnaround shall be provided at the end of each roadway, and shall be approved by the fire department. Based upon 47' radius. F10 Road maintenance, including but not limited to grading and snow removal, shall be provided for. F11. All fire -protection water systems that fall within the jurisdiction of this fire department shall be approved by this office prior to the installation of said systems. The following are minimum standards for your proposed development. Hydrant locations to be determined with water system approval. A. System Standards Fire flow 1250 G.P.M. Duration 2 hour(s) Hydrant spacing 660 feet B. Distribution System Mains Laterals Riser C. Fire Hydrants 6 inch minimum 6 inch minim n 6 inch minim n Hydrants 6 inch with 1 - 2-1/2 inch outlet (s) with National Standard threads and with 1 - 4 inch pumper connection. Street valve 6 inch gate F 22. All fire flow requirements are over and above the average daily consumption of water, and the minimum residual pressure shall be twnety (20) psi. F 33. The required fire flow shall be determined by appropriate calculations, using the 1974 edition of the Insurance Services Office (ISO), "Guide for the Determination of Required Fire Flow". F14. In areas without water -serving utilities, the fire protection water system shall be based on NFPA Pamphlet Not 1231, "Water Supplies for Suburban and Rural Fire Fighting". A storage reservoir must be provided for each parcel; the minimum capacity to be maintained shall be determined by the fire department. S15 The developer or his engineer shall furnish the fire department with two copies of water system improvement plans where fire protection water systems are required. F16. Mountain Fire Zone building regulations specified in San Bernardino County Ordinance 2475 shall be strictly enforced. 1 1 F17. Buildings shall be spaced at least thirty (30) feet apart in order to minimize the exposure and risk fran an adjacent structural fire and the conflagration potential of the spread of fire from structure to structure. F18. All flammable vegetation shall be removed for a distance of one hundred (100) feet around each building site prior to construction to minimize property loss during the construction phase and to provide a cleared area for the construction of a greenbelt. Large fuels such as native oaks can be retained if dead limbs are pruned and no limbs allowed to cane within ten (10) feet of any chimney. F19. The rear building setback line on perimeter lots shall be feet to accommodate the construction of a greenbelt to protect dements, and shall be shown on the tentative map. Reference to this condition, the following definitions will apply: GREENBELT - Greenbelt is defined as a landscaped, irrigated zone between structures and the brush -covered wildlands that is designed to halt or slow the spread of fire and to control erosion and water runoff. The two basic requirements in developing such a greenbelt area are: 1. Removal of highly flammable native bruch fran around the structure for a specified distance. 2. Landscaping cleared, i.e. low growing/low fuel volume plants that have a potentially high moisture content. Many plants of this kind have been observed and tested and are considered to be fire resistive. In order to assure irrigation at regular intervals, especially during the dry fire season, a permanent (manual or automati:cl method ow or irrigation is required. A landscape plan shall be approved by the fire department along with proposed provisions for perpetual maintenance. F20. There shall be a locked gate (twenty feet in widthl installed on the end of Street to provide immediate fire access to the exterior of the subdivision. The gate should be posted with a sign to read "FIRE LANE - KEEP CLEAR" in six-inch high letters, on a contrasting background. If you have any further questions or comments, please direct them to the Fire Protection Planning Section at this office. Thank you for your cooperation. DqN C. BANGHART, County Fire warden BY: i*1 FK:dp FRANK KAWASAKI cc: T. J. Austfn, Inc. Assistant Fire Griffin Homes Fuscoe, Williams, Lundqren and Short Riverside -Highland Water Company 6517 P. DeClerck, Sta. 23 File Protection Planninq Officer n T"J. AUSTYN, INC. 500 N. Newport Boulevard Suite 201 Newport Beach, California 92663 (714) 642-6659 Judy 15, 1987 Mr. David Sawyer City of Grand Terrace 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92324-5295 Re: Tract Maps 13050-5, 13050-6 and 13050-Final Dear Mr. Sawyer: T.J. Asutyn, Inc. is currently getting ready to record Tract Maps 13050, 13050-5 and 13050-6. Our tentative maps expire September 12, 1987. In the event our construction loan does not fund promptly it will be necessary to extend our tentative maps for 1 year. Please consider this letter a request for extension for all three maps. MAE/ejs Sincerely, U Mary Anne Eliot Project Manager kICE IVED EXHIBIT C DATE: Jan. 21, 1988 S T A F F R E P O R T CRA ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (xx) MEETING DATE: Jan. 28, 1988 SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATIONS FOR COMPLETION OF THE SNACK BAR fir------------------------------------------------------------------ FUNDING REQUIRED X_ NO FUNDING REQUIRED At the meeting of December 17, 1987 Council directed staff to research the background of the snack bar and make a recommendation to the Council on how to further proceed in the matter. Staff has determined that at this time the snack bar consists of a fully secured structure with two steel doors in place. The exterior of the structure will soon have a complete coat of stucco and the exterior will be complete. The interior of the snack bar consists basically of just a wooden floor with plumbing and sewer service stubbed to the interior with no further improvements. A previous request had been made for an appropriation of $9,100 to pay for existing improvements, as well as additioal ones, to complete the snack bar with the exception of commercial appliances. This additional work was to have included drywall, cabinetry, interior electrical and interior plumbing and flooring. At such time these improvements were made we would still have a snack bar structure that had no appliances or any clear commitment on anyone's behalf to provide appliances or the cost of the utilities to the building. As it stands, once completed, the City would be responsible for utilities unless an arrangment could be made with various organizations to pay for the use of the structure to recoup our utilities. Staff feels at this point Council has basically four alternatives: 1. Demolish the structure and regrade the site to the original condition. 2. Complete the snack bar and determine if interest exists to equip, maintain and provide utilities. D01J14CIL AGI^.NDA A - fF-a,A A �% f� STAFF REPORT -- SNACK BAR RECOMMENDATIONS January 28, 1988 Page 2 3. Find an organization willing to lease, manage and pay costs for the site. 4. Donate.it to the Colton Unified School District. Staff feels the most viable option would be that of option 3. The Soccer Club has expressed an interest in taking over the MW snack bar and with their own volunteers finish the interior improvements and lease it from the City in a similar arrangment that the Lions' Club leases the Community Center. The Soccer Club would be responsible for maintaining the unit as well as the ongoing utility costs. Should the Soccer Ciub not be interested in the stuucture, staff would recommend option #4. The School District has informally indicated that there is interest in the structure for a storage facility of School District emergency supplies. In order to pay for all of the existing improvements as well as the funds necessary to stucco the exterior and finish the roof (both projects which are currently under construction), staff would require an appropriation of $5,750. With the final expenditure, total costs to the City for all improvements to date would be $9,950 for the current year and $1,758 expended in the 4„ '86-87 fiscal year for a total expenditure of $11,708 on the structure. This would complete the exterior and the basic framework of the building itself and would only leave interior improvements, potentially, to be done by the Soccer Club or the School District, depending on determination of how the structure is to be utilized. STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT: COUNCIL ANPROPRiA[E $5,750 FOR CUMPLET10N OF THE SNACK BAR AND AUTHORIZE STAFF TO -FORMALLY OFFER TO LEASE THE STRUCTURE TO THE SOCCER CLUB. SHOULD THE SOCCER CLUB HAVE A DESIRE TO ACCEPT A LEASE, CITY STAFF WILL NEGOTIATE A LEASE WITH THE SOCCER CLUB TO BE BROUGHT 10 THE COUNCIL FOR A FORMAL APPROVAL. SHOULD THE SOCCER CLUB NOT BE INTERESTED IN A LEASE ARRANGEMENT WITH THE CITY, COUNCIL AUTHORIZE STAFF TO FORMALLY OFFER TO DONATE THE STRUCTURE TO THE SCHOOL DISTRICT. T S : b t CRA ITEM C ) S T A F F R E P O R T COUNCIL ITEM (X) DATE 1/20/88 MEETING DATE: 1/2B/88 SUBJECT: CONTRACT AWARD ARCHITECTURAL BARRIER REMOVAL PROJECT FUNDING REQUIRED X NO FUNDING REQUIRED The City received a total of three sealed bids, for the Architectural Barrier Removal Project. On January 18, 1988, the City Clerk opened all bids received. The bid summary is as follows: IFS Service, Redlands, CA. $32,660.25 Bruce Pavingg, Gardena, CA. $31717.10 Gosney Const., Bloomington, CA. $29,,05q.60 As you can see, Gosney Construction is the apparent low bidder. All contractors submitted all the required documentation. At present, the Council has onlyy approved a total of $15,900 For this project. Thus far, $275.00 has been expended from this line item, leaving a project balance of $lq,725.00. Hence, if Council awards this project contract, Council will need to appropriate an additional $1q,329.00 in order to complete the pro ect. Attached to this report, staff has attached a copy of he Contractors Bidding Schedule. Staff Recommends that Council: APPROVE AWARDING THE ARCHITECTURAL BARRIER REMOVAL PROJECT TO GOSNEY CONSTRUCTION. APPROPRIATE AN ADDITIONAL $1'f,725 FROM THE UNAPPROPRIATED FUND BALANCE, TO COVER THE COST OF PROJECT COMPLETION. RLA \y CoO"ICMAroIn^, �-rM # 1,76 unTE : _ CONTRACTOR C'.d W- 5. NO. 12.39( BID NO. 11OhvnABLa mAYOR nND %- t i'Y tuuNC I i. NAME OF PECT ARCHITECTURAL ABRRIE.EMOVAL BdDDING SCHEDULE ;;IIPI. t 1 vF 3 ITEM DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED UNITS UNIT PRICE IN WORDS UNIT PRICE ITEM PRICE 40. QUAN ITY % LLARS AND_! :, CENTS 1 Clearing & Grubbing L.S. _ 2 Earthwork L.S. DOLLARS AND C!� CENTS 3 Removal of Concrete DOLLARS AND '� ,CENTS Sidewalk 3,348 S.F. 4a Removal of 8 x 18 Curb and Gutter 273 L.F. DOLLARS AND rL' CENTS 4B Removal of 8 x 24 Curb and Gutter 155 L.F. DOLLARS AND GyC� CENTS 4c Removal of 12 x 24 DOLLARS AND 67c7 CENTS Curb and Gutter 35 L.F. 5a Construct 8 x 18 Curb and Gutter 173 L.F. DOLLARS AND CC,, CENTS C-1 DATE: t - tP•d-av CONTRACTOR K.O. N0. 12.390 BID NO. 110ROAABLEAWYOR AND CITY COUNCIL NAME OF PROJECT ARCHITECTURAL BARRIE REMOVAL BMDDING SCHEDULE Sf irFT 2 OF 3 ITEM 140. DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED WAN ITY UNITS UNIT PRICE IN WORDS UNIT PRICE ITEM PRICE 5b Construct 8 x 24 Curb and Gutter 155 L.F. 7r, % DOLLARS AND J> -,, CENTS 5c Construct 12 x 24 35 L.F. DOLLARS AMDC�-/_CENTS 6 Construct Concrete Sidewalk 3,348 S.F. x DOLLARS AND c50 CENTS 7 Furnish and Place .5 Feet Thick A.C. Pavement 155 S.F. DOLLARS AND CENTS 8 Traffic Control L.S. DOLLARS AND CENTS 9 Removal of Unsuitable Subgrade _ DOLLARS AND "-' CENTS 10 Construct P.C.C. Wheelchair Ramps 1 EA. DOLLARS AND CENTS C-2 DATE: CONTRACTOR o� W.O. NO. 12.390 BID NO. HONORABLER�� YOR AND CITY COUNCIL NAME OF PROJECT ARCHITECTURAL BARRIERC REMOVAL BMDDING SCHEDULE sii ET 3 OF -J ITEM 140. DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED QUAN I TY UNITS UNIT PRICE IN WORDS UNIT PRICE ITEM PRICE 11 Tree Removal 6 EA. DOLLARS AND CENTS DOLLARS AND CENTS DOLLARS AND CENTS DOLLARS AND CENTS DOLLARS AND CENTS DOLLARS AND CENTS DOLLARS AND CENTS TOTAL C-3 S. T A F F R E Y 0 R T DATE1/20/88 C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (X) MEETING DATE_ 1_28�88_ AGENDA ITEM NO. SUBJECT SA-87-14 Keeney A Request to Construct a Recreational Vehicle Park and Commercial Center____ FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED- _ __ TO: City Council FROM: David R. Sawyer, Planning Director DATE: January 28, 1988 SUBJECT: SA-87-14 - A Request to Construct a Recreational Vehicle Park and Commercial Center APPLICANT: Bob Keeney LOCATION: Northwest Corner of Barton Road and LaCrosse Avenue BACKGROUND On December 21, 1987 the Site and Architectural Review Board considered SA-87-14, Mr. Bob Keeney's application for Site and Architectural approval of a combined recreational vehicle park and retail shops facility (see Attachment A, the Planning Commission staff report dated December 21, 1987). At that meeting the architectural elements of the proposal was approved but the site plan portion of the proposal dealing with ingress and egress onto Barton Road was referred to the City Council for final consideration. DISCOSSION The applicant's proposal has two driveways onto Barton Road. The easterly driveway is limited to ingress only and is riot to be � ?IP_ �:1- �VI i r< 1 T E%4 ;FP-f used by recreational vehicles. The westerly dr.i.vewav will be for ingress and egress and will. be identified as the R.V. entrance. In reviewing the project Cal Trans has indicated they are opposed to the easterly driveway because of its proximity to the Barton Road of.f ramp facility. The City Engineer has also reviewed this project and has indicated concern regarding the location of the driveways. The applicant has indicated the removal of the easterly driveway AW will severely hinder the design and success of the commercial portion of his project. From a project design standpoint, the Planning Staff feels that the two driveway configuration provides a better design for the overall project due to interior circulation patterns. However, the impact that the easterly driveway will have on Barton Road traffic is an important issue. After reviewing the project, its associated traffic study and comments received from Cal Trans, the City Engineer recommended against the proposed ingress and egress configuration and as a result the Planning Department also recommended against approval. The Planning Commission as a body was concerned with the issue of liability if an accident should occur as a result of the easterly driveway and they had approved the project as presented against staff recommendations. However, they did feel the remainder of the proposal merited approval. After discussion with the applicant, the City Engineer and the Planning Director the Planning Commission approved the following motion: "The Planning Commission approves SA-87-14 subject to the following conditions, 1. The architectural elements of the proposal are approved as presented. 2. The si.teplan elements of the proposal are approved with the following exceptions; a) The entire area of_ open space required by Condition No. 14 of CUP-87-7 shall be unpaved and landscaped. b) The exact location and design of the RV spaces shall be approved by the Planning Director. c) This approval does not include approval of the proposed ingress and egress configuration on Barton Road. This element of the site plan is referred to Ift the City Council for consideration and approval. 3. This approval does not include approval of the signage elements. All signs shall be approved through the City's sign permit process. 4. This approval is contingent upon final approval by the City Council on the issue of ingress and egress onto Barton Road. The Planning Commission also recommends that the City Council remove Condition No. 38 of CUP-87-7." RECOMMENDATIONS In consideration of the City Engineer's concern regarding traffic safety as it relates to the easterly driveway and his recommendation against the proposed ingress and egress configuration, the Planning Department recommends the City Council deny the proposed site plan's ingress and egress configuration and recommends an alternative design be considered. Respectfully Submitted, David R. Sawyer, Planning Directo /'7 BYRON R MATTESON BARBARA PFENNIGHAUSEN Mayor Pno Tem Council Members HUGH J GRAN r DENNIS L. EVANS SUSAN CRAWFORD THOMAS J SCHWAB Cily v_=,iager 6 TO: F'lanninq Commission, FROM: David Sawyer,, Planninq Director SUBJECT: StafF Report, SA-8?-14 i DATE: December 21, 1987 i .. APPLICANT- Robert )�eenev LOCATION: I\lorthwest corner of Dayton Road and La. Cro==e REQUEST: Site and architectural approval of a. r_,,mbine,o ( recreational vehicle park. and re,,a, 1. sh.op= facility ZONING AND LANDUSE Property 13P Zoning La.nduse Subject Property GC C- Vacant To the North LDR Vacant To the South GC C-_ `Jehicle Storaa_ a.nd office bl_ti 1d;nq T O r=t t rle =c ��f - - I_-� CO(n r-I)el c- I BACKGROUND: 1 hF? sl-rli , ec t p rod ! ✓ wh ,. I, c n s ; s ( vac,?n t on the nor'thweS-t t_r,r-rlet- p+ bc? I� t: On = 1 �� •_ Li, C r•ns,sr.? mind -_r�llr>rj I'-.' (rlt i;achrnen t, r� l 1, ark 1. ; _ --t - i l-ppo=,n1 p ,ar'1 nd e(:o_;:.:.,r�,- i r C-/, pp c-A f,,n {o 3 _ond) tIDr _>e p;R rm L - _ - i I 1'Jl=: :{)rpI'C)veri f,\' (.I i- nIIf l_) ( - (Dn .:Ppt�='O;b1 11�. 1'7�] , `:Lit?ltr= �. C C ATTACHMENT conditions of appl-oval, (Attachment. E) on appeal of a Planning Commission denial. T'he applicant is required b�• his condi tional use permit to submit a revised site plan meeting all of the conditions of approval as part of the required site and ar'rhlteCtUr11 review. A11 of the applicable conditions have been met with the exception of those outlined below. DISCUSSION AND PLANNING ISSUES: Access to Project Condition 3-18 of the Conditional Use Permit requires that the applicant redesign his project to delete the easterly driveway. The applicant has chosen to not incorporate this change into his plans. The applicant feels that the elimination of the easterl: driveway will adversely effect the design of the project and its overall success. The applicant has indicated that he will have an alternative entry design for yOLH- consideration a.t the time •��our meeting. Traffic Studv AW As a condition o+ approval the applicant was required to commission a traffic study and submit it to City Engineer and Caltrans for review. As a. result of this study comments were received from Caltrans that indicate a. problem with the easterl driveway and its safety. The City Engineer rel-la.in_ concerned about the ingress and caress configurat1on (Attachment C%. Conversations were held with Joe I-icaE, City Engineer, about thi_ problem and the planning department concurs with his counsel. S3ignage Signage is indicated in two locati.0115 on the development. It i= recommended that t1jis site and architectural re•. iew process nc•t be an :-Rp(.,ro,,al of signage. The planning staff recommends that slgnarie be decided at a later- date by =tai F t ii'nI_t,C�tt fn�' =1ai+ Peril -lit process. Commercial Center �lr._fll 1,eCi_L_.i rind (JeS_. t-'tctfl5 for thr' Ct�InillE•r�_1a1 C�ct�i1,el ;.Ili=11_lde �.I-: 1'-_ deI]Cct.Le :.f-ft, launrlr'v and t-e;a11. space tSr2C_ ,,t,; ,_ct'_'.r es are desly_neci with arched walS ar.a tTtl SS1Gfr t 1 _ Jrte s t r t_rc c i. r r.• ert_. F't-ar 1 wi-li to si, t. :.cci with E•IIuw t.]c)0t� f-I-Anies at ;Ulossorr� capl.t�+1S of n'ie;;1C.a.r'� _�tr-_�1-� r � vii r'rdom! d Itc1 rid I., 1'- o+ ^`-t Li, a. jt - _ 7n:-1 Wolf-I>Cr--I�=- fit i:A•/ t mau.ie ilt:i-)er �r_cr=ni coi.ol's that wi 11 br _rri 1 i red =.1 e fie t taffy and salfnon. A fnaterlaI board will be available at the meeti.rtq. The architectl_ll-e of the b u i Id1ngs incorporate arched walE-way- with lat,ge windows. The lines of the buildings are staggered by (nultiple roof lines. Lange windows are proposed, some with multiple panes. The applicant has provided sufficient pat -king for, the commercial convenience center square tootaRP. The pat-Linq requirements pursuant to Section 1.6. bit designates 1 space per square feet of buildinq area plus one space for each employee. the applicant is providinq 74 spaces plus S for efnployees for a total of 82 spaces. The required number of par[ ing spaces for- the commercial structures is 82'. No loadinq spaces have been provided for any of the buildings in the commercial center- a.r-•ea. Landsca in The percentage of landscaping to parking is 6.5 percent. This is 1.5 percent more than is required by the grand Terrace Municipal Code. The applicant is proposing to plant several different .varieties of trees including Jacarandas, palms, pines, carrotwoods, sycamores, ash and chinese flame trees. Some of the shrubs include Agapanthu'-, daylilies and india hawthorns (Attachment E). Recreational Vehicle Park The R.V. parE. provides space for a total of yS recreational vehicles. These spaces are divided into five categories of s, i, L-%, [., !l, and 1 These spaces r-a.nge from lt_! :T �'? t0 Te app11ca.nt. has pra. o, ided ter, toot ate A of open spac at between ea'=;l of the (-.' spa. - es. In addl'.i'�n. quest f.;ar � irtq Fla.= _ r b_t=•n pt -j /icied .t cam. I'a t 10 C:'r `= 1i. �1. -p �.ce= :c r i LiU2=t �I-`c+C2. i h t egv)retnents on aisle widtl-i tt-oim the LOndit,01-is D+ aPPt,o. .l ha a 1 -.o IL, GerI �r,r_- t . d l = . i l i i_ i s r� l_ S `c l l •=- I-� . illd'a n-_r5i The --�_ Deft _(I-ifi.eniy I'OrOill,rl!_1'ld 11h�+fi•._1e--A.1 t w; t:t -"i •=�f"� � :+ r i I Fie al'f i 1c_nt p 1 ans to cont inue t1-tc 5a1111e ty pe o f land=_cDP i n, L 1 .--4 h o Lk4" the R.V. pal ! as is lridl'-=ted; In the CO((,((i-t—Ci cc.n,,eriiencca area, abu\,e. FIa.ns 1.'clC) C atc 17. lot, (-�o'_.!. ireE4.. two playgrounds and a dog run. A winding paved patt-hwa5 weaves through a part -We area in the center of the development. Condition No. 1 of the Conditional Use Permit requires that "too more than oar% of the R.V. Part:: portion of the project shal 1. be paved, and all unpaved areas shall be landscaped with live plant materials and shall be permanently ma.i.ntained". The submitted siteplan indicates that 75% of the ten foot wide open spaces required between the R.V. spaces are to be paved. 1f this is allowed, the unpaved percentage falls far short of the required 40%. Therefore, staff recommends that the entire area of open space required by Condition No. 14, of the CUP be unpaved am landscaped. Conformance with this recommendation and condition along with an interpretation that the pool area meets the definition of openspace will increase the project's percentage to 42% unpaved /openspace within the R.V. portion of the project_ PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION: Due to the nonconformance of the proposed accessways onto Barton' Road with the requirements of the CUP and the recommenda ion of the City Engineer against the proposed accessway design, the Planning Department recommends the Site and Architectural Review Board deny SA-E7-14 as submitted. Respectfully Submitted, David R. Saw, er, Planning Director VICINITY MAP THE SITE � 1 TOM 7 '=a' VS C. ATTACHMENT A lt),S'01,(J1'l ON No. 137- A RES01.,U`1'ION OF TH 17 CITY COUNCIL OF 'fill; CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CUP-87-7 , AN APPLICA'}'ION 7'O CONS'l'RUCT A COMDINrl) RECREATIONAL V1 HI.CIA' PARK AND RETAIL SHOPS FACILITY 1N THE' C-2 Z,ON1:; AND ITS ASSOCIATED NI.;GATIVE DECLARA7I0N WHEREAS, the applicant, Robert Keeney applied for a onditionaI Use Permit to construct and operate a combined eereational vehicle park and retail shops facility to be located t the Northwest corner. of Barton Road ar•d LaCrosse; and WHEREAS, a properly noticed public hearing was held by the lanni.n_ C:ommi.ssion on August 17, 1987 , regarding this pp) icati.on; and WHEREAS, th.e Planning Commission motion 87- approving the JP-87-7 failed by a 2-4 vote; and WHEREAS, the applicant, ;lr. . Robert ICeenev h.as f) led a letter fI appeal with the City Clerk's office and paid the appropri81- :e; and WHEREAS , the r_,.ty Counci 1 lie Id a properly not ).ced pub) is .,ari:,g regarding this )-t.(m on Sel)ternber 1.0th, 1987; and ,•IH17REAS , a N e g a 1_ ) ve 1)e( ) ara i i on 1-,as liven pr epa red f: or 1 1-, _ nlee t pur,;uant. to ('hFi1)t or .l , Al i c I e <, cif t Ile (;iI 1 , of r,. a tvi roiIinen i" c1 0tji j 1 ) I v AC I ; ,:lid 1'(III I Z I \.`. , I )I(• (, I I ( u1ll; t I II ( t r;w(•(I I )I(• ; (i \• r 1,t1 <II tt�lt �it1(! W11; 1") A'), III(, 1 1); () p(•I ( \' I,, ( (1) I ('II( I \ \1 i I ( it III , •III(I 1iIII I r\`, `A 'M A -r -r n^ tJ It A C K I T Q ldlll ltl \S, 1IIo r(..CY, Q,r)1 -1 o1.)a l vell) c.1 1.)ay. k ) s not S1)ec:) I-) e d as a fill 1' Il cr)I)d 1 1 1 oIli1 I (..r-ITl) Ll-c'cl 0 S C 1 n ilnv /orlr` ofthe , V i)II('1 1•.I1(`)-I' I oI (. Illy) )/ rll)1) I y ) of it com.11 I 1 olli'l l I)ti(' pl;) I! l 7 _ ally 'r' 1 I' ) i' ") 1 ( , "Ind WIIERFAS, t11P praposc(I use is .n cor)i:orrnance witli the C'i.l:>>'s Ie1.701 Plan; and 1Y1-1EI1lAS, conditions have been placed on tl-l)s conditional use mi.t so as I.o insure 1lle proposed use w).'I l nc)t be detrimental to general health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare of: persons residing or. worlci.ng ).n the neighborhood; NOW, THEREFORE, )3) 7'r R1�'SOLVED 'by the City Counci ) of: the y of Grand Terrace , California, that sa i.d C) t.v Council finds It: ).. the Citv Council. haL_ reviewed the Negative Declaration for tlh'..s project attached as "I?xhibi.t A" and finds that as conditioned by i:he mitigation measures, included with the Negati ve Dec) aration, the project w).1 l not Have a significant effect on the erivir.onrnent; and 2. As conditioned, the proposed use w)_11 not be detrimental to the genera.' health, safety; morals, comfort or• general welfare of: the persons residing or working wl_t11).n the ne) gbborllood of I be proposed use or wit)-ill-1 the c).tv; or- w I I 1 h(. ).r1_jurious to I- lie property oi- 1 nlp)-overflents i n I_I)e Ile I gbborhood o) wl I b) Il i 11r. c. i 1 �! .� 1 I l d I ,, 1 I•` I ,Irltll, t I•�I (,I'II!' 1 ,, I I' I r111 illicl 1 11 1 ,I!,I,I tl� �, l �IIItI ,11 !' Ilt'( t`.`•`„11 �' 1 !I .. III '' I I11 1,111 I1�, •� ,> I :,I'I I 11111 I f1 (,(, Oill) I'1 1 �I' I I'11111 I I 1 1),1 1 Cod(- , I) No ntcit ,:, III to (,09", �I the R V Parlc 1)o1, i � on of i.i)e 1)1.•o 11-'('t til1il I 1 1)(, pi)v d , aI-I(I r) I I )I1,11)Oved al-e�,� sltr)) 1 1)(, I �)1-1dSCa1)ed ))`ttI) J ) .v(-� 1)1 �)II I Inn I eI'� I I anct SI)z)11 he 1)(,rIII el11(,ntIN, I I I t. a -1 ne d. 'l) ]'h�� R.Vport Iof) oi` t)-Ie hrolect accomodat.e rc creatj.011 I. veh).c 1 es �.rnd accompany) no i boil. try)) Jers, dame bI)gg).esl etc. only'. Occ-t,ll)ancy of: the R.V. spaces silal 1 be limited to one r'ecr.eat)ona) vehicle only. �) The maximum l.engtl) of stay f_or. any recr.eatzonai vehicle shall be fourteen days. 4) A11 recreational veh).cIes shall. be located in a designated R.V. space. 5) A twenty foot wide landscaped buffer area which shall include a three foot ltigTz berm, shall be required adjacent to the ultimate right of way of Barton lZoad and La Crosse Avenue. 6) A solid six foot split face block wal i shall be required along the peri.ml:!ter of the project, except along the right of way of Barton Road and La Crosse Avenue. 7) The minimum distance between a recr.eati.onai vchcle and any other recreational vehicle or. )u3.)dina shall be ten feet. 8 No 1ilter.n.a1. street shall he less than 25 feet )n wj.dt)-I. 9) No internal street shal ] 1)e less than 33 feet in widi.l-1 ).f p8ri)1.1e1 IJa-k3.Izg is 1)erm).tted on one s)d(; 1O) No Inlel'l1r)I ,1)'ee l)r)l l be less then '10 fe )1: w i (I { l l I f, 11 I III (' I Ilrf I 1 1 l'r• ()III rl lI I ()IfIIII) I I f• I)I) I- y I I vI. 1),11 I' I II(1 I I'rl(I 1 I r�lnc'lll `- c)t l It(• ('--) Y.C)Itc� I c 1) c I shot I I bc, il( I -, 1) c c e (f 1) a of 1-1 (' 1) k I 1— 1) o c) s rvc.cl o p c. I -I S n a c (' . I ) 1.) e o t. I (' t1 t:)ne one 11 v n h I c 1) 1 a) - a C, c e S s wc�NJ 0 1 1 to 13 (1 r (. o I'l R ci a d I) d -,a td i) c 0 c s q w a, V S 11 H J I I)rtvc il m 1.) 1 111 o III a 1- .1 g, -1 and d ], t. - () I. - Ny F, N, Ny I (11. of 50 Je e curb r F1 (I 1. 1) '9 of t w e n t. )/ - f I, v e teel. 16) 'There S ha I 1 be prow) d e d at I east one emergencN, v e r a c c e ,; s w a NJ dllhroved by t h e F 1 r e Department. 1.7 The app I icant S11a ) I of f e).- 1-o ded).cate to the City, the proposed 30 by 255 foot emergency 8ccessNvay at such time 3. n the future , the City Engineer may request )-t. 1.8) A I I trash collection and storage areas shall be screened and enclosed. 1.9) A 1 1. utilities shall be underground. Individual rooftop or outdoor television antennas shall not be permitted in the I)clrl,,, except that one single television antenna for community service may be situated in the park. 20) ').ovided for use as a clog run-. An area s h a 1. 1 be r 1 )10).d -)(�ts shall. not. be Dogs and other house allowed tc) rijil at large in -tile park. 21 AI 1 p 1 ij mb i. n g pr o v i d P d shall be d P s :L gn e d so that t h e p a r k wi 1. 1 accomoda Le a I l recreatiol-la I vehicles. 22 The pro)ecl: shall receive Site and Arch)-tectural Rev ).eNy Board cipprova I S a 3. d approva I S h a I I j. n c I u d e o cleta). led landscape and i_r7.i,gat ion plan 23 Coillp I v W) Lh I-- h C-) I - (! q e I I t-s of C.a 1-Trans a I ally n-n:) I - ov e iri 11 S t El C) f Avenun o v -I d I t lit deCi].c I OII 1 n l I (., (II tv for l.hes(, faci J ties 3O) A I I t,rouncl. :I I 1 0 b L a l II et)Id p3"ov) d0 t.o l.lte Ci tv a "wl .l 1 s-arve leper" l ronl R1.ver-s 1 d e H1 gY) l and Water Cornpanv 4P :32) lrls to I I wa T uI- syst('rn i:o provide adequate f ire prol.c!l:-il o)) 1 11 ar,col-dance wh pJ ails to he approved by the Else MartihaI 1. 33) Comply wlt11 al ) Ci.ty of Grand Terrace ordinances. 34) Coordinate with the adjacent property owners the vehicular access rights and drainage to Grand Terrace Road from parcels to the North, Northeast and East 35) Any improvements fronting on State of California (Cal Trans) ri.gllt-of-way shal 1 he reviewed, approved and permits issued by Cal -Trans. 36) A 1 1 improvements shall be deslgn.ed by -)wner's civil engineer to the standards required by the City and State. 37) If. an roadwork, l i.ghti.ng, etc. , takes place in close proximity to the signalized intersection, then a 20-sca`'.e (reproducible) plan showing both the exlst.ing and the proposed facilities shall be subrnit:ted to Ca l tr. ans for revlevr, .33) AS recommendPd by i:}Ze DepartmenI- of TranSportatloll , the r:asterly dr,vewav as nrr)p(JiF'd ) shrl l 1 llot he Consl- rUCted I is c101; proxanil l v to Ule In1 el Se(:1_ o)I r)i La ( rose .ilrl 13�)I l_c,)1 koc )(1 w) ) I rrr,r,Iq i) ,f I Ir. ,�11:�,: 'pro1)1r-'� 1)I vr-1r,i,r,l �,Il11 I (,o1151rur.! dl I\1e l;' a I^;'',n 10 -r-Ir> wr•ti I ('I I \' p) ( pel ( \ I )IIr- p '5`>) ICI r: )�) ) h i (.I I - I II I )1 1,() 1, (' ( r;lJr) 'f ll `. Idd I '�IIr1 I 1('l11 I1; .!I )•v1 I I ,II'1 ! I 1>I` ;)f r1 1 �1, ) UI1 .fI I �i o'1r •I I I c>�;' I i I I 1111 II', 1 111 Ir � II' ll) � vtVl'I /I O ) 1)I I,v t dr•r: t r•1 I, •. I `, I 1 111; d 1 :1 111,1 J," pil t (• t 11 `• IIn I I I„ 1>(• I It. ')I1,' nIr �I .tII r•�, I I) In1 I I rr',1 c• rll - � 11�))J(;;hll),11' � ,II' I . I II I u/I�.i w 1 111 I III IIr• rr I r)I)n)t'�I t h l) A l l c:oitd 1 1 0111; III dry l.c d I`'la v 1 2 1 9,137 t c'c.i'� yr-d I rout l Its (;nunl v I't rr I�itrd("n at l�Whcd as L,xh) b) l A s hi, 1 I i:>c 1 c cl+i 1 red . 4a) An o n s e pro1)erty IT] anaffer steal 1 1) ecltil.red. 44) An ).nclependenk Ti:af'f is Analysis of the project shall be comp) e t e d and submi t-ted to the Depar. t.ment of Transportation and the Ci.t_v Engineer for review and comment and an), subsequent recommendat).ons made by the City Engineer as a result of the Traffic study shall be recrutred. 45) A r.ev).sed site plan meeting all of the conditions of this condi-tionai use permit shall be submitted as part of the required Site and Architectural. Review. 11 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that C.U.P.-87-7, is hereby approved conditioned. ADOPTED this 10th day of September, 1987. 11 CI r•r-is nf- 1.11e C,i tv of N:�lvc->t uI- l-Iic' Ut t v of ('1 ,=in,i ,,,I '1'r'rrr)ce r,nd ref- 1 Itr I'rtt'rr, -r• r,nrl c,1 I he c.;l t v 11 r c,t,i,c• i I I herr!nl I licit '•i, I CI (,I -k of ( 11 (..' C I t' y rat ("rillid 1'erl J)( (jo obv cort I f-\ l hll t.1Ic I of ('Jfo) lig ke"o I ut 1.ol) v. I" 1 1) 1 1.- o d I I c e d C) 11 C] [:d �l r Ineet I llf' of 11c C' I V y Cokincl I of llIe C' t c) I id 0 1) 1 he fill I i (-I ei v c) I S e I-) t c, ni 1) e r , I h c-, %v ) I I g v c) i. e /4wS No I-I'S ABSEN't A B S'l.'A I N City Clerk )ro 46 as to -orm: :v Attornev 11 BYRON R. MATTESON Mayor PLANNING DEPARTMENT BARBARA PFENNIGHAUSEN Mayor Pro Tom Council Members HUGHJ GRANT DENNIS L. EVANS SUSAN CRAWFORD THOMAS J SCHWAB City Manager W.O. 12-8.5078 MEMORANDUM To- Dave Sawyer. Planning Director From: Bill Noble, Kicak&Assoc. Date: December 7, 1987 Subject: R.V. Park, 21900 Barton Rd., Grand Terrace Dear Dave, ea Enclosed is a letter from C G Engineeringdregarding the r`1 driveway to this project and their proposed solution to it's inherent safety hazard. At this writing, the office of Kicak & Associates is still opposed to the presently proposed ingress/egress configuration. We feel that the proposed remedy is not a viable solution and subsequently not acceptable. Could you please send a copy of the letter from C G Engineering along with a copy of the traffic analysis to the City Attorney, Ivan Hopkins, for his recommendation regarding this issue, specifically, what position would the City be in if the proposed driveway were constructed and the City were on record opposing this issue P lease contact me if you have any questions or comments. Sincerely, Bill Noble Enclosure, (2) copies PG ATTACHMENT C to C G ENGINEERING Plann.i'ng and Engineen:n.g December 4, 1987 Mr. Joe Kicak City Engineer City of Grand Terrace 22365 Barton Road Suite 110 Grand Terrace, California 92324 Reference: Proposed Recreational Vehicle Park and Commercial Development at Barton Road and I-4215 Dear Joe: I have recently reviewed a letter from Bola Pote at Caltrans, dated November 20, 1987, wherein they hav-r stated. they are still opposed to the proposed easterly driveway at the referenced development. Prior to preparing my traffic analysis for this proposed development, I spoke with Mr. Will Brisley of Caltrans who indicated that their initial opposition to this driveway was due to the possible traffic safety problems due to turning movements out of the proposed driveway and possible conflicts with ramp traffic. We feel we have addressed these possible conflicts by changing the driveway to an ingress only situation and thereby eliminating any right or left turns which could possibly obstruct turning traffic from the I-215 off ramps or LaCrosse Avenue. Please reference Figure 4 of our traffic study wherein our peak hour count at the intersection of the on and off ramps with Barton Road showed only ten vehicles making the right turn from the southbound offramp onto westbound Barton Road. As referenced on page 4 of my report, this low volume of traffic making the turn onto Barton Road will not, in my opinion, create an adverse impact for t:he "entrance only" driveway at this location. i r ' Mr. Joe Kicak -2- December 4, 1987 I urge your reconsideration of the driveway denial due to the relatively low volume of turning traffic from the off ramp as concluded in the traffic report. If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, '911- al�-� David J. Barakian Project Manager DJBab 096001.00 120401(57,12) Copy to Bob Keeney c CAUFORNIA --- BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION! AND HOUSING AGENCY ',RTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1 d, P O BOX 231 NARDINO, CA 92402 November 20, 1987 11 Mr. Joe Kicak City Engineer City of Grand Terrace 22365 Barton Road, Suite 110 Grand Terrace, CA 92324 Dear Mr. Kicak: fe�GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN, Governor t; 0 jkak and Assoc, 08-SBd-215-1.31 CUP-87-7/ROBT.KEENEY We appreciate the opportunity to review the "Conceptual Striping Plan" submitted to Caltrans by a November 3, 1987 transmittal letter from Mr. David R. Sawyer, Planning Director for the proposed recreational vehicle park and commercial development j �cated at the nort-hwcst corner of Barton Road and La Crosse enue. This location, as you are aware, consists of a signalized intersection with the southbound freeway on -ramp, two-way La Crosse Avenue (northside) and Barton Road, within close proximity of a westerly unsignalized intersection at right -turn La Crosse Avenue (northside) , two-way La Crosse Avenue (south side) and Barton Road. Caltrans cannot support the proposed easterly driveway, however, this proposed project is beyond our jurisdiction. We believe that the easterly driveway will only add to driver confusion already present at this location. Caltrans is planning signal coordination for Barton Road between Michigan Avenue and the freeway ramps and LaCrosse Avenue. Therefore, in addition to the recommended easterly driveway elimination, we recommend that a separate westbound turn -lane )nto Lhe westerly driveway be provided to allow recreational and other: vehicle: to enter the facility without obstructing traffic flow on Barton Road. If adds-tJonal information is required, please contact- Mr:. Will 13r>sl.ey, Development Review Engineer, at (714) 383-4671 Very truly yours, BYRON R. MATTESON Mayor BARBARA PFENNIGHAUSEN Meyer• Pro Tom Counci: {fambors HUGH J GRANT DENNIS L. EVANS SUSAN CRAWFORD THOMAS J. SCHWAB City .Manager November 3, 1987 State of California 'Department of Transportation Attention: Will Brisley Dist 8 P.O. Box 231 San Bernardino, CA. 92403 Re: CUP-87-7 Dear Mr. Brisley: The attached street improvement and striping plan has been submitted as part of the proposed recreational vehicle park and commercial development located at the corner of Barton Road and La Crosse Avenue which your agency has previously reviewed. This improvement and striping plan is a result of the traffic study conducted for this project, which you also reviewed. Since a )rtio►; of this plan effects Cal Trans right—of—way, our City iginer.r has requested your agency to review these plaris and submit comments you- may have regarding the proposal, with particular attention paid to the intersection of Barton Road and the 1-215 off ramp (La Crosse Avenue). Please make your comments in writing and forward them to Mr. Joe Kicak, City Engineer, 22365 Barton Road, Suite 110, Grand Terrace, California, 92324, (714) 825-3825. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Sincere avid R. awyer, Planning Director. 1)1lS /Incur _��PT OF i 1;A"`ISPCDr;TATIoN 11 t5p&r of P�jvEt AE�1 r �bCa� of Pb�'EMEt�Yr ,JAL C4I°JT VTR rPrNy ue loy (r-A veto " . N •-�r,� ��Scz.�c� n r li GRAM AVE. BARTON VUAGE — A DEVELOPMENT BY K.KA / GRAND TERRACE — MD(ED USE CONCEPT SITE PLAN Irvf (uf.Tr� L> � /MfITTlT >K/! tr rw Mee xrti rc nnw SSIS `t_i1"- i`Pu7vr I' file Oaieki Ku� F�rtr�erat� li BARTON VILLAGE A DEVELOPMENT BY K.K.A. / GRAND TERRACE g r4 The 1)cn .-tAp, w ve •� o-F&7wSPOZE BARTON VILLAGE A DEVELOPMENT BY K.KA. / GRAND TERRACE BLDG. E - FLOOR PLAN BARTON VILLAGE A DEVELOPMENT BY KKA. / GRAND TERRACE li ,, P. D..d DATE: Jan. 20, 1987 S T A F F R E P O R T CRA ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (xx) MEETING DATE: Jan. 28, 198/ SUBJECT: DISCUSSION REGARDING SENIOR CITIZEN ISSUES ,or-( FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED Councilmember Hugh Grant has requested the above item be placed on the agenda (issues that pertain to the senior citizens of Grand Terrace) for discussion and potential action. TS:bt 21 DATE: Jan. 21, 1988 S T A F F R E P O R T CRA ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (xx) MEETING DATE: Jan. 28, 1988 tar SUBJECT: RIVERSIDE HIGHLAND WATER COMPANY'S REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED In the attached letter from Eugene P. McMeans, Manager of the Riverside Highland Water Company, he is requesting that the Council provide him assistance in being able to site a reservoir north of Pico Avenue on an approximately 9.2 acre parcel owned by Barney Karger north of Pico Avenue. The current residential moratorium in affect is making the siting of the reservoir difficult. There is consideration being made in our current General Plan update process that is going to address the minimum lot size in the general area where this parcel exists. The general indication in the area is that as the lots proceed south along the base of the mountain that they would increase in size as they approach Blue Mountain Court. Should Council authorize a blanket exemption to the current development moratorium on residentially zoned property, a tentative tract map could be submitted with substantially smaller lots than what might ultimately be decided in the General Plan process. Since the tentative tract map would fall under the current General Plan, we could not turn down that project merely on lot size, since it would conform to the existing plan. Staff, as a compromise, feels that, should the developer wish to proceed, Council would entertain a proposed tentative tract map that would outline the proposed layout with particular attention to lot size. Council could determine whether the project would be consistent with adjacent developers and at that time could authorize that the proposed tentative tract map, if acceptable, be exempt from the moratorium and be allowed to be submitted to the MUNCOC AGENDA ITEM # (9 C' STAFF REPORT January 28, Page 2 -- RIVERSIDE HIGHLAND WATER COMPANY 1988 Planning Commission for its review. The exemption would specifically indicate that the proposed tentative tract map could not substantially change when presented to the Planning Commission and, in particular, the lot sizes could not be reduced. STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT: TO ASSIST RIVERSIDE HIGHLAND WATER COMPANY IN THE SITING OF A RESERVOIR ON THE AFOREMENTIONED PARCEL, COUNCIL PERMIT THE DEVELOPER TO SUBMIT A PROPOSED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TO THE COUNCIL WITH A REQUEST FOR A MORATORIUM WAIVER. T S : b t /`7 11 Riverside Highland Water Company 23009 Washington Street • Colton, California 92324 (714) 825 4128 January 20, 1988 Mr. Tom Schwab, Manager CITY OF GRAND TERRACE 22795 Barton rd Grand Terrace, CA 92324 Re: Agenda Item for the January 28, 1988 Meeting of the Grand Terrace City Council Dear Mr. Schwab: Confirming our phone conversation this date and my presentation at the Grand Terrace Planning Commission meeting on January 18, 1988, could you arrange to put Riverside Highland Water Company on the agenda of the January 28, 1988 Council meeting? We would request that the Council consider relaxing the Development Moritorium on prop— erty owner by J. B. Karger north of Pico Avenue between Tentative Tract 13050-6, Tract 13050 Future, and the California State Water Resources Project water line, to enable Riverside High— land Water Company to work with the developer to determine the exact location of a three „e million gallon storage reservoir, to support current and future development in our Zone I, and to allow sufficient capacity to take advantage of favorable energy rates. Thank you for your assistance. epm/r Sincerely-=-- / EUGENf P. McMEANS, Manager