Loading...
06/23/1988BYRON R. MATTESON Mayor BARBARA PFENNIGHAUSENf Mayor Pro Tem Council Members HUGH J. GRANT DENNIS L. EVANS SUSAN CRAWFORD THOMAS J. SCHWAB City Manager June 23, 1988 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE REGULAR MEETINGS 2ND and 4TH Thursdays -- 5:30 P.M. Council Chambers Grand Terrace Civic Center 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92324-5295 CITY COUNCILMEMBERS Byron R. Matteson, Mayor Barbara Pfennighausen, Mayor Pro Tem Hugh J. Grant, Councilmember Dennis L. Evans, Councilmember Susan Shirley, Councilmember Thomas J. Schwab, City Manager City Office: 714/824-6621 22795 BARTON ROAD • GRAND TERRACE, CA 92324-5295 * CIVIC CENTER - (714) 824-6621 - —i REVISED CITY OF GRAND TERRACE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS GRAND TERRACE CIVIC CENTER 22795 Barton Road * Call to Order * Invocation - * Pledge of Allegiance * Roll Call CONVENE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 1. Approval of Minutes 6/09/88 2. Approval of Check Register No. CRA 062388 3. A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIF., ADOPTING A BUDGET OF ESTIMATED REVENUES AND EXPEDITURES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1988-89. ADJOURN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CONVENE CITY COUNCIL 1. Items to Delete 2. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine & non -controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any Council Member, Staff Member or Citizen may request removal of an item from the Consent Calendar for discussion. A. Approve Check Register No. 062388 B. Ratify 6/23/88 CRA Action C. Waive Full Reading of Ordinances on Agenda D. Approve 6/09/88 Minutes STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Approve Approve Adopt Approve Approve June 23, 1988 COUNCIL ACTION r n COUNCIL AGENDA 06/23/88 - Page 2 of 3 STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS COUNCIL ACTION E. A RESOLUTON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE Adopt CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIF., ADOPTING A BUDGET OF ESTIMATED REVENUES AND EXPEND- ITURES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1988-89. F. Accept Agreements, Bonds, Cash Deposit & Accept Final Tract Maps 13205-1 and 13205 for T.J. Austyn. G. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE Adopt CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIF., CALLING THE ELECTION OF NOVEMBER 8, 1988. H. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE Adopt CITY OF GRAND TERRRACE, CALIF., TO CONSOLIDATE WITH THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO FOR THE ELECTION OF NOVEMBER 8, 1988. 3. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION 4. ORAL REPORTS A. Committee Reports 1. Historical & Cultural Committee A. Accept resignation of Kathryn Harmon. B. Minutes of 6/6/88 Meeting. 2. Crime Prevention Committee A. Minutes of 5/9/88. 3. Parks & Recreation Committee A. Minutes of 5/2/88. B. COUNCIL REPORTS 15. PUBLIC HEARINGS - 6:30 P.M. A. An Overall Revision of the City's General Plan. Accept 6. NEW BUSINESS A. Request from Fieldcrest Homes for Morator- Approve ium Exemption. COUNCIL AGENDA STAFF 06/23/88 - Page 3 of 3 RECOMMENDATIONS B. Request by Mr. Ron Garrett for Waiver of Reduce fee Site & Architectural Review Fee. C. Award Contract for Traffic Signal at Mt. Award Vernon & Barton Road. D. Award of Annual Landscape Maintenance Award Agreement. E. Amend Schedule B to Schedule C of City Amend Engineer's Fee Schedule. F. Appropriation for Parkland Appraisal Fee. Appropriate ADJOURN THE NEXT REGULAR CRA/CITY COUNCIL MEETING WILL BE HELD ON JULY 14 1988 AT 5:30 P.M. ------------------ AGENDA ITEM REQUESTS FOR THE 7/14/88 MEETING MUST BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING TO THE CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE BY NOON ON 7/06/88. COUNCIL ACTION CITY OF GRAND TERRACE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - JUNE 09, 1988 A regular meeting of the Community Redevelopment Agency, City of Grand Terrace, was held in the Council Chambers, Grand Terrace Civic Center, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California, on June 09, 1988, at 5:30 p.m. PRESENT: Byron Matteson, Chairman Barbara Pfennighausen, Vice Chairman Hugh J. Grant, Agency Member Susan Shirley, Agency Member Thomas J. Schwab, Executive Director Randy Anstine, Assistant City Manager Juanita Brown, Secretary David Sawyer, Planning Director Ivan Hopkins, City Attorney Joe Kicak, City Engineer ABSENT: Dennis L. Evans, Agency Member APPROVAL OF MAY 26, 1988 CRA MINUTES CRA-88-19 MOTION BY VICE AGENCY MEMBER GRANT, SECOND BY VICE CHAIRMAN PFENNIGHAUSEN, CARRIED 4-0 (AGENCY MEMBER EVANS ABSENT ON VOTE), to approve May 26, 1988 CRA Minutes. APPROVAL OF CHECK REGISTER NO. CRA060988 CRA-88-20 MOTION BY VICE CHAIRMAN PFENNIGHAUSEN, SECOND BY AGENCY MEMBER GRANT, CARRIED 4-0 (AGENCY MEMBER EVANS ABSENT ON VOTE), to approve Check Register No. CRA060988. Chairman Matteson adjourned the CRA Meeting at 5:32 p.m. until the $AV adjourned joint regular City Council/CRA meeting which will be held Monday, June 13, 1988 at 6:30 p.m. CHAIRMAN of the City of Grand Terrace SECRETARY of the City of Grand Terrace CRA AGENDA ITEM NO. -I- COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ' CITY OF GRAND TERRACE DATE: JUNE 23, 1988 CHECK REGISTER NO: CRA062388 CHECK OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF: JUNE 23, 1988 NUMBER VENDOR DESCRIPTION AmnilNT 18600 18603 18606 18618 18626 18640 I SUSAN SHIRLEY STIPENDS FOR JUNE, 1988 $ 150.00 DENNIS EVANS STIPENDS FOR JUNE, 1988 150.00 HUGH GRANT STIPENDS FOR JUNE, 1988 150.00 BYRON MATTESON STIPENDS FOR JUNE, 1988 150.00 BARBARA PFENNIGHAUSEN STIPENDS FOR JUNE, 1988 150.00 M. L. STERN, INC. LEASE -PURCHASE AGREEMENT FOR AIR CONDITIONING AT JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 55,838.99 TOTAL: $ 56,588.99 I CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THE AFORELISTED CHECKS FOR THE PAYMENT OF CRA LIABILITIES HAVE BEEN AUDITED BY ME AND ARE NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE EXPENDITURES FOR THE OPERATION OF CRA. THOMAS SCHWAB TREASURER m DATE: June 17, 1988 S T A F F R E P O R T CRA ITEM (xx) COUNCIL ITEM ( ) MEETING DATE: June 23, 1988 SUBJECT: ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 88- APPROVING THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF ✓5 GRAND TERRACE FOR FISCAL YEAR 1988-89 FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED The Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) Board, during the CRA budget hearing held on June 14, 1988, approved the CRA annual 1988- 89 budget with revenue of $675,500 and expenditures of $729,048. STAFF RECOMMENDS THE AGENCY APPROVE RESOLUTION #88-_ FORMALLY ADOPTING THE 1988- 89 CRA ANNUAL BUDGET. TS:bt N CRA A--;-„D,A 11 a NU. . Vv A ' OF A F0 RESOLUTION NO. CRA 88-01 R RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING BUDGET OF ESTIMATED REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES FISCAL YEAR 1988-89 WHEREAS, the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Grand Terrace is required to adopt a budget for the subsequent fiscal year for estimated revenues and expenditures; and WHEREAS, the members of said Community Redevelopment Agency and Staff members have thoroughly reviewed and analyzed the proposed budget in order to determine the needs of the City of Grand Terrace; NOW, THEREFORE, the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Grand Terrace DOES HEREBY RESOLVE that a budget for Fiscal Year 1988-89, a copy of which is on file in the City Clerk's office, is hereby adopted with total estimated revenues of $67S.,500.00 and total estimated expenditures of $729,048.00 ADOPTED this 23rd day of June, 1988. ATTEST: Secretary of the Grand Terrace Chairman of the Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Agency Community Redevelopment Agency I, Juanita Brown, Secretary of the City of Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Agency, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Grand Terrace held on the 23rd day of June, 1988, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ecretary Approved as to form: ity Attorney CITY OF GRAND TERRACE f:ilJ� �CIL i .,.)'.SAL DATE: JUNE 23, 1988 CHECK REGISTER NO CHECK OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF: JUNE 23, 1988 NUMBER VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT P5685 SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY P5686 SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY P5687 WEST END UNIFORMS P5688 :TRAVEL TIME TOURS P5689 PETTY CASH P5690 SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY P5691 SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY P5692 SOUTHERN CA JOINT POWERS INSURANCE P5693 SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY P5694 ALL PRO CONSTRUCTION P5695 SOUTHERN CA CITY CLERKS ASSOC. ?5697 PADDEN COMPANY 5698 SHERIFF FLOYD TIDWELL 5699 SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY P5700 SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY P5701 KICAK AND ASSOCIATES P5702 MAIN LINE EMBOSSING P5703 POSTMASTER-COLTON P5704 STATE COMPENSATIONS INSURANCE P5705 Z SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY P5706 I> z SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY P5707 SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY P5708 = SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY 18584 AYALA AND SONS CASH PAYMENTS FOR 6/2/88 CASH PAYMENTS FOR 6/2/88 UNIFORMS FOR CITIZENS PATROL CARIBBEAN CRUISE DEPOSIT FOR DAY CARE CASH PAYMENTS FOR 6/6/88 CASH PAYMENTS FOR 6/6/88 GENERAL LIABILITY, 1988 ADJUSTMENT t CASH PAYMENTS FOR 6/7/88 EMERGENCY REPAIRS AS RESULT OF SEWER LINE TRENCH FAILURE GENERAL MEETING LEASE ON OLYMPIA OLY TEXT AND MAILING MACHINE, 6/88 LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CRIME PREVENTION OFFICER FOR 6/88 CASH PAYMENTS FOR 6/10/88 CASH PAYMENTS FOR 6/10/88 ENGINEERING SERVICES OF 5/2-5/29/88 BUSINESS CARDS FOR RECREATION BULK MAIL FOR RECREATION PROGRAMS WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE FOR 5/88 CASH PAYMENTS FOR 6/14/88 CASH PAYMENTS FOR 6/14/88 CASH PAYMENTS FOR 6/15/88 CASH PAYMENTS FOR 6/15/88 CLEAR AND REMOVE DEBRIS AT PICO PARK R 247.94 64.24 57.24 400.00 210.58 247.66 40.94 17,282.00 37.89 7,111.36 25.00 179.17 55,021.00 83.60 17.82 11,683.10 23.32 49.10 1,284.47 20.92 50.81 .35.25 59.30 4,950.00 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE r DATE: JUNE 23, 1988 CHECK REGISTER NO: 062388 CHECK NUMBER VENDOR OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF: JUNE 23, 1988 DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 18585 WEST END UNIFORMS UNIFORMS FOR CITIZENS PATROL $ 73.14 18586 DOUGH GRAHAM REFUND, POLITICAL SIGNS 6.00 18587 GOSNEY CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECTURAL BARRIER REMOVAL (LESS 10% RETENTION) 29,153.83 18588 TOWN & COUNTRY PROPERTIES REFUND, WASTE WATER DISPOSAL 10.67 18589 ALL OCCASIONS AWARDS AWARD RIBBONS 36.04 18590 ALL PRO CONSTRUCTION REPAIR SEWER TRENCH LINE FAILURE, MICHIGAN, FINE GRADING AT PICO PARK, TRENCHING WATER LINE AND PLACING IRRIGATION WATER LINE. 13,290.00 18591 A & M TROPHY SERVICE PLAQUES FOR PLANNING COMMISSION 61.63 18592 BARR COMMERCIAL DOOR RESTOCKING CHARGE FOR DOOR 61.00 18593 BASTANCHURY BOTTLED WATER BOTTLED WATER AND COOLER RENTAL FOR CIVIC CENTER AND DAY CARE 6/88 68.75 18594 STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION LIGHTS AT BARTON AND 215, 4/88 117.58 _.595 NORMAN T. CAOUETTE ATTENDING MEETINGS FOR 5/2, 5/16, & 6/6/88 75.00 18596 CONSTANCE CHAPMAN CLEANING REST ROOMS AT PARK (4 DAYS) 80.00 18597 GERALD COLE ATTENDING MEETINGS FOR 5/2 & 5/16/88 50.00 18598 COMPLETE BUSINESS SYSTEMS EXTRA COPIES FOR LARGE COPIER 407.28 18599 LAVON COTTRELL MILEAGE 18.89 18600 SUSAN SHIRLEY STIPENDS FOR JUNE, 1988 150.00 18601 DICKSON COMPANY OF THE INLAND EMPIRE STREET SWEEPING FOR 5/88 3,211.07 18602_ ELIZABETH DUARTE MILEAGE 13.39 18603 DENNIS EVANS STIPENDS FOR JUNE, 1988 150.00 18604 EWING IRRIGATION SUPPLIES IRRIGATION SUPPLIES FOR PARK 154.65 18605 G.T. MAILERS PICK-UP MAIL FOR CIVIC CENTER FOR 4/88 & 5/88, BURST WASTE WATER DISPOSAL BILLS FOR 5/88 64.14 - CITY OF GRAND TERRACE DATE: JUNE 23, 1988 CHECK REGISTER NO: 062388 CHECK OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF: JUNE 23, 1988 _ NUMBER VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 18606 HUGH GRANT 18607 STANLEY HARGRAVE 18608 JOHN HARPER 18609 JERRY HAWKINSON 18610 HEALTH NET 18611 HYDREX PEST CONTROL 18612 KLEEN-LINE CORPORATION 18613 K-MART 18614 LITTLE RED SCHOOL HOUSE 18615 LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY PRINT 18616 MARANATHA DISKING 18617 MCKENZIE COMPANY 18618 BYRON MATTESON 18619 MIRACLE RECREATION EQUIPMENT 18620 RAY MUNSON 18621 MORGAN & FRANZ 18622 JEAN MYERS 18623 PACIFIC BELL 18624 PETRA ENTERPRISES 18625 PERRY'S STATIONARY 18626 BARBARA PFENNIGHAUSEN 18627 PETTY CASH 18628 CATHY PIERSON 18629 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPANY 18630 QWIK-CODE STIPENDS FOR JUNE, 1988 ATTEND MEETING FOR 5/2, 5/16, & 6/6/88 LEGAL SERVICES FOR FEBRUARY, MARCH AND MAY, 1988 ATTEND MEETING FOR 5/2 & 6/6/88 MEDICAL INSURANCE FOR JULY, 1988 PEST CONTROL FOR CIVIC CENTER, 6/88 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES FILM, CODE ENFORCEMENT PARTICIPATION AWARDS, RECREATION FORMS FOR CITY CLERK DISK PARCELL ON PICO RIBBONS STIPENDS FOR JUNE, 1988 BACKSTOP FOR BASEBALL ATTENDING MEETINGS, 5/2, 5/16, & 6/6/88 LIFE INSURANCE OFR JULY, 1988 CROSSING GUARD , 5/23-6/6/88 & 6/6-6/16/88 PHONE, DAY CARE, COMPUTER, & CIVIC CENTER PAY PHONES PRINTING FOR PLANNING OFFICE SUPPLIES STIPENDS FOR JUNE, 1988 FOR DAY CARE INSTRUCTOR FOR GYMNASTICS AD FOR LIFEGUARD SUPPLIES FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT 150.00 75.00 2,849.75 50.00 1,498.96 48.00 241.79 125.68 41.87 243.93 400.00 64.33 64.65 1,647.43 75.00 96.50 228.96 106.03 77.17 115.22 64.65 125.03 326.40 24.24 43.90 3 CITY OF GRAND TERRACE DATE: JUNE 23, 1988 CHECK REGISTER NO: 062388 CHECK OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF: JUNE 23, 1988 NUMBER VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 18631 RADIO SHACK 18632 RALPH'S PLUMBING 18633 ADRIAN REYNOSA 18634 THOMAS SCHWAB 18635 SEARS -CATALOG 18636 SIGNAL MAINTENANCE CORP. 18637 JIM SIMS 18638 SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY 18639 SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY 18641 STULTS ELECTRIC -COMPANY 18642 UNION OIL COMPANY 18643 UNIVERSITY PROMPT CARE 18644 FRAN VAN GELDER 18645 WEST-COMPUTIL CORP. 18646 WEST PUBLISHING COMPANY CASSETTE TAPES REPAIR WATER LEAK AT FIRE STATION SCOREKEEPER FOR SLO-PITCH MILEAGE WATER STORAGE TANK AND TOOLS FOR EMERGENCY OPERATION CENTER SIGNAL MAINTENANCE OF 5/88 ATTENDING MEETING FOR 5/2, 5/16, & 6/6/88 ELECTRIC FOR CITY BLDGS, CIVIC CENTER, TWO LIGHTS AT PARK BARTON AND PALM, STREET LIGHTS, AND SIGNALS GAS FOR CIVIC CENTER AND CITY BLDGS. ' REPAIR WALK LIGHTS AT CIVIC CENTER FUEL FOR CITY TRUCK AND PARK EQUIPMENT PRE EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS FOR RECREATION ATTEND MEETINGS, 5/2, 5/16, & 6/6/88 PROCESS PARKING CITATIONS FOR 3/88 CA CODE UPDATES TOTAL: $ 148.40 52.00 165.00 136.49 626.75 219.48 75.00 5,961.52 314.12 150.00 82.91 96.00 75.00 2.10 22.70 $163,309.84 I CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THE AFORELISTED CHECKS FOR PAYMENT OF CITY LIABILITIES HAVE BEEN AUDITED BY ME AND ARE NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE EXPENDITURES FOR THE OPERATION OF THE CITY. THOMAS SCHWAB FINANCE DIRECTOR 4 - CITY OF GRAND TERRACE CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - JUNE 09, 1988 PENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace was called to order in the Council Chambers, Grand Terrace Civic Center, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California, on June 09, 1988, at 5:30 p.m. PRESENT: Byron Matteson, Mayor Barbara Pfennighausen, Mayor Pro Tem Hugh J. Grant, Councilmember Susan Shirley, Councilmember Thomas J. Schwab, City Manager/Finance Director Randy Anstine, Assistant City Manager David Sawyer, Planning Director Juanita Brown, Deputy City Clerk Ivan Hopkins, City Attorney Joe Kicak, City Engineer (arrived at 6:25 p.m.) ABSENT: Dennis L. Evans, Councilmember The meeting was opened with invocation by Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance led by Councilmember Grant. ITEMS TO DELETE NONE SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS 1. Mayor Matteson presented a proclamation to Dr. Cynthia Williams proclaiming June 11-17, 1988, "Chiropractic Wellness Week." 2. Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen read a proclamation proclaiming June 13-19, 1988, as "National Scleroderma Awareness Week." 3. Mayor Matteson presented plaques to Norman Caouette and Gerald Cole for their service on the Planning Commission and thanked them for their good work. CONSENT CALENDAR CC-88-68 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER GRANT, SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM PFENNIGHAUSEN, CARRIED 4-0 (COUNCILMEMBER EVANS WAS ABSENT), to approve the Consent Calendar with the removal of Item A -- Approve Check Register No. 060988; Item E -- Waive Planning Fees for Marge Hosch; Item G -- Budget Appropriation for Architectural Barrier Removal. B. RATIFY JUNE 095 1988 CRA ACTION C. WAIVE FULL READING OF ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS ON AGENDA D. APPROVE MINUTES OF MAY 26, 1988 F. REQUEST FOR "NO PARKING" AREA IN FRONT OF TERRACE PINES MOBILEHOME PARK. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR DISCUSSION H. Approve Check Register No. 060988 Councilmember Grant questioned Item 18416 - Staff Seminar. City Manager Schwab explained that it was a seminar put on by the League of California Cities entitled, "Treating your Constituents as Customers." Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen questioned Item 18422 - State of California, balance due on ball field lights, stating that she thought we owned those lights. City Manager Schwab explained that back in 1983 when the lights were installed, a State architect from the School Board was involved and we are just now getting the bill from 1983 for the balance. E. Waive Planning Fees for Marge Hosch Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen stated that Mrs. Hosch did not ask that their fees be waived, if, in fact, they owe fees. She stated that the Hosches are grieved by the excessive requirements and procedures that they are being required to go through for a 63 sq. ft. washroom. Planning Director Sawyer stated that the reason they have to go through the process is because of the setback. The code states that the setback on that side of the house is 10 feet; their garage which they are going to come off of is 5 ft. into the setback, Council Minutes - 06/09/88 Page 2 indicating a variance has to meet certain State requirements to break those setback rules, therefore, they would need to go through the process. Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen voiced concern that there are developers who are not following original plans and they are getting away with it, and the Hosches are trying to build a 63 sq. ft. washroom and can't. She asked for Council's concensus that staff should be directed to use common sense discretion in these kinds of matters on a one by one issue, and to make a motion to waive the fees. Mayor Matteson disagreed, stating that the first time they make a mistake, they'll be here defending themselves; laws are made to be upheld and he has a obligation to uphold them. Councilmember Grant seconded the motion to waive the fees, and agreed that the system is what causes the problems. He felt that in the cases where injustice occurs, it should be brought to Council. Councilmember Shirley concurred with Councilmember Grant in supporting staff, and that if some leniency can be given that it be put on the Consent Calendar. CC-88-69 MOTION BY MAYOR MATTESON, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER GRANT, CARRIED 4-0 (COUNCILMEMBER EVANS WAS ABSENT), to waive the Planning fees for Marge Hosch. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Tony Petta, 11875 Eton Drive, made an observation that if oppression exists in government onto citizens, it is because of the policy Council has created and it is up to Council to change the policy. far Council directed staff to investigate the Britton Project regarding them not following approved plans and find out what recourse can be taken. G. Budget Appropriation Barrier Removal City Manager Schwab explained that the Staff Report indicated that the allocation would be from the General Fund and it should be from the Street Improvement Fund. CC-88-70 MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM PFENNIGHAUSEN, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER GRANT, CARRIED 4-0 (COUNCILMEMBER EVANS WAS ABSENT), to appropriate $2,394.00 from the Street Improvement Fund for the Architectural Barrier Removal Project. Council Minutes - 06/09/88 Page 3 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION n n ORAL REPORTS Dick Yost, President, Chamber of Commerce, reported on the activities of the Chamber. A. Committee Reports 1. Historical & Cultural Activities Committee Vi Gratson, Chairman, requested that Council re -appoint Ann Petta, Pauline Grant and Linda Lee Laufer to the Historical and Cultural Activities Committee. CC-88-71 MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM PFENNIGHAUSEN, SECOND BY MAYOR MATTESON, CARRIED 4-0 (COUNCILMEMBER EVANS WAS ABSENT), to re -appoint Ann Petta, Pauline Grant and Linda Lee Laufer and that the two consecutive terms be waived. NEW BUSINESS B. Council Reports Councilmember Grant, reported that he attended the Omnitrans Board Meeting as alternate for Councilmember Shirley on June 1, 1988, and as the principal member for the SANBAG Meeting on the same date. Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen, reported that she represented the City at Fontana's 75th celebration of its founding and the dedication of a monument built by Eagle Scout Adam Weitzel. Mayor Matteson, asked staff to look into the possibility of two left-hand lanes on Michican coming into Barton Road. A. Discussion Regarding the Sign Ordinance Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen voiced concern about signs that are put up, generally on the weekends, especially garage signs and development signs. The people who are putting them up are not taking them down. She suggested that once or twice a month a member of staff be directed on the weekend to take the signs down and cite the appropriate parties, with compensatory time off during the week. Councilmember Grant concurred to include political signs. Council Minutes - 06/09/88 Page 4 Dick Rollins, 22700 DeBerry, asked for permission from Council to do this on a volunteer basis. B. Modification to the Rules & Regulations Manual for the City of Grand Terrace and adopt a Resolution amendin the Rules & Re u ations or the ministration o Personnel matters Pursuant to Grand- Terrace Munic�pa Code Section 2.24.090. CC-88-72 MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM PFENNIGHAUSEN, SECOND BY MAYOR MATTESON, CARRIED 4-0 (COUNCILMEMBER EVANS WAS ABSENT), to adopt the changes in the Rules & Regulations Manual and adopt Resolution 88-05. C. Reappointment of Planning Commissioners Jerry Hawkins and Raymond Munson CC-88-73 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER SHIRLEY, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER GRANT, CARRIED 3-1-0 (MAYOR PRO TEM PFENNIGHAUSEN VOTED NOE AND COUNCILMEMBER EVANS WAS ABSENT), to adopt Alternate No. 1 to include authorization to exceed the two terms. CLOSED SESSION Council and the Parkland Ad Hoc committee convened to closed session for parkland acquisition negotiations. Mayor Matteson explained that City Council and the Ad Hoc Committee met in closed session and no decision was met. ORDER OF ADJOURNMENT Mayor Matteson adjourned the City Council meeting at 6:45 p.m. to an adjourned joint regular City Council/CRA meeting, June 13, 1988 at 6:30 p.m. DEPUTY CITY CLERK of the City o Grand Terrace MAYOR of the City of Grand Terrace Council Minutes - 06/09/88 Page 5 DATE: June 17, 1988 S T A F F R E P O R T CRA ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (xx) MEETING DATE: June 23, 1988 SUBJECT: ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 88- APPROVING THE CITY OF GRAND ,fjt TERRACE BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1988-89 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED The budget hearings for the 1988-89 Grand Terrace City Budget were held on June 13, 14 and 15. During these sessions detailed line -by-line analyses and approvals were conducted. The total revenue anticipated is $3,06 7,755 wi th expendi tures of $ 3, 4 96, 941. The expenditures exceed revenues in the overall budget because of the nature of our road expenditures which require the City to save several years' allocations to do a major project. The additional expenses will come from accumulated fund balances in those street and capital improvement funds. In the City Manager's budget message I provided a general fund source summary, and the recap below is to provide all modifications taken into consideration during the budget sessions. GENERAL FUND SOURCE SUMMARY Source Expense Balance Current Rev. $2,219,520 Program Expenses $2,182,589 $ 36,931 Carry Over F/B 690,213 Nonrecurring Capt. 27,150 663,063 Outlay Gen. Fund Reserve 500,000 CDF Rescue Unit 144,000 356,000 J�QUWI� AGORA ITEM 11 p G STAFF REPORT -- ADOPT 1988-89 BUDGET PAGE TWO The current general fund revenue exceeds program expenses by $36,931. The nonrecurring outlay includes the additional appropriation for the replacement of the City Clerk's word processor and is $27,150 which will be funded by the prior year's fund balance. The number has gone down due to the fact that our initial projections included funds for a commercial lawn mower which had been purchased in the current fiscal year and we failed to remove its total from the proposed budget. STAFF RECOMMENDS COUNCIL APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. 88-_ FORMALLY ADOPTING THE 1988-89 FISCAL YEAR CITY BUDGET. n n F'r'ND (; n ! , rVG CITY RESOLUTION NO. 88-08 (j A+�,�, , A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A BUDGET OF ESTIMATED REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1988-89 WHEREAS, a local agency is required to adopt a budget for the subsequent fiscal year for estimated revenues and ex- penditures; and WHEREAS, every local governmental agency shall file with the county auditor of the county in which the agency con- ducts its principal operations, a budget for the fiscal year then in progress; and 4 WHEREAS, the City Council and Staff members have thoroughly reviewed and analyzed the proposed budget in order to determine the needs of the City of Grand Terrace; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That a budget for Fiscal Year 1988-89, a copy of which is on file in the City Clerk's office, is hereby adopted for the City of Grand Terrace with total estimated revenues of $3,067,755.00 and total estimated expenditures of $3,499,541.00 and a transfer of $50,000.00 to the General Fund Reserve. Section 2. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to forward a copy of this Resolution and the adopted Fiscal Year 1988-89 Budget to the Auditor -Controller of the County of San Bernardino. ADOPTED this 23rd day of June, 1988. ATTEST: Deputy City C er of the City of Grand Terrace and of the City Council thereof. Mayor of the City of Gran Terrace and of the City Council thereof. LOURCIL AGENDA ITFIA W. 0�e RESOLUTION NO. 88-08 PAGE 2 I, Juanita Brown, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace held on the 23rd day of June, 1988, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Approved as to form: City Attorney 01 Deputy City Clerk DATE: June 9, 1 12-1.1117 STAFF REPORT C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM ( )) MEETING DATE: M 2 3 198a AGENDA ITEM NO. S SUBJECT TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 13205 FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED X The Tentative Tract Map 13205 was approved by the City Council, subject tar to certain conditions. The Tract is being developed in two Phases, Tract 13205-1 and Tract 13205. All of the conditions imposed on the Tentative Tract Map 13205 have been satisfied. Attached, you will find a list of agreements, bonds and cash deposits for each of the Phases of the Tract. Staff Recommends that City Council: 1. ACCEPT THE CASH DEPOSIT AND THE BONDS. 2. APPROVED THE AGREEMENT AND AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO SIGN THEM. 3. APPROVE FINAL TRACT MAPS 13205-1 AND 13205. 4W r TRACTS BOND # 13205-1 BOND # 13205 1. Cash Deposit - Monumentation $ 3,600.00 $ 3,500.00 2. Streets & Storm Drain a. Agreement to construct facilities (280,000.00) (280,000.00) b. Improvement Performance Bond 962358 S (280,000.00) 962353 S 280,000.00 C. Material & Labor Bond 962358 S (140,000.00) 962353 S 140,000.00 3. Grading Bond 962360 S (45,000.00) 962355 S 60,000.00 4. Water System a. Agreement (76,000.00) (76,000.00) b. Improvement Performance Bond 962362 S (76,000.00) 962357 S 76,000.00 C. Labor & Material Bond 962362 S (38,000.00) 962357 S 38,000.00 5. Sanitary Sewer a. Agreement (100,000.00) (100,000.00) b. Improvement Performance Bond 962359 S (100,000.00) 962354 S 100,000.00 C. Labor & Material Bond 962359 S (50,000.00) 962354 S 50,000.00 6. Landscaping a. Agreement (30,000.00) (42,000.00) b. Performance Bond 962361 S 30,000.00 962356 S 41,000.00 RESOLUTION NO. 88- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE HOLDING OF A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY NOVEMBER 8, 1988 FOR THE ELECTION OF CERTAIN OFFICERS AS REQUIR- ED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA RELATING TO GENERAL LAW CITIES WHEREAS, under the provision of the laws relating to general law cities in the State of California a General Municipal Election shall be held on November 8, 1988, for the election of Municipal Officers; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That pursuant to the requirements of the laws of the State of California relating to General Law Cities, there is called and ordered to be held in the City of Grand Terrace, California, on Tuesday, November 8, 1988, a General Municipal Election for the purpose of electing three (3) members of the City Council for the full term of four years. Section 2. That the ballots to be used at the election shall be in form and content as required by law. Section 3. That the Deputy City Clerk is authorized, instructed and directed to procure and furnish any and all official ballots, notices, printed matter and all supplies, equipment and paraphernalia that may be necessary in order to 4Wproperly and lawfully conduct the election. Section 4. That the polls for the election shall be open at seven o'clock a.m. of the day of the election and shall remain open continuously from that time until eight o'clock p.m. of the same day when the polls shall be closed, except as pro- vided in Section 14301 of the Elections Code of the State of California. Section S. That in all particulars not recited in this Resolution, the election shall be held and conducted as provided by law for holding municipal elections. Section 6. That notice of the time and place of holding the election is given and the Deputy City Clerk is authorized, instructed and directed to give further or additional notice of the election, in time, form and manner as required by law. 11 RESOLUTION NO. 88- PAGE 2 Section 7. That the Deputy City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original Resolutions. ADOPTED this 23rd day of June, 1988. ATTEST: Deputy City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace and of the City Council thereof. Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace and of the City Council thereof. I, JUANITA BROWN, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace held on the 23rd day of June, 1988, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Approved as to form: City Attorney Deputy City Cler RESOLUTION NO. 88- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO TO CONSOLIDATE A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 8, 1988, WITH THE STATEWIDE GENERAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON THE DATE PURSU- ANT TO SECTION 23302 OF THE ELECTIONS CODE. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace called a General Municipal Election to be held on November 8, 1988, for the purpose of the election of three (3) Members of the City Council of said City for full terms of four (4) years; and WHEREAS, it is desirable that the General Municipal Election be consolidated with the Statewide Election to be held on the same date and that within the City the precincts, polling places and election officers of the two elections be the same, and that the Registrar of Voters of the County of San Bernardino canvass the returns of the General Municipal Election and that the election be held in all respects as if there were only one election; Section 1. That pursuant to the requirements of Section 23302 of the Elections Code, the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino is hereby requested to consent and agree to the consolidation of a General Municipal Election with the Statewide General Election on Tuesday, November 8, 1988, for the purpose of the election of three (3) Members of the City Council for full terms of four (4) years. Section 2. That the Registrar of Voters is authorized to canvass the returns of the General Municipal Election. The election shall be held in all respects as if there were only one election, and only one form of ballot shall be used. Section 3. That the Board of Supervisors is requested to issue instructions to the Registrar of Voters to take any and all steps necessary for the holding of the consolidated election. Section 4. That the City of Grand Terrace recognizes that additional costs will be incurred by the County by reason of this consolidation and agrees to reimburse the County for any costs. Section S. That the Deputy City Clerk is hereby direct- ed to file a certified copy of this Resolution with the Board of Supervisors and the Registrar of Voters of the County of San Bernardino. ;OlP.WAL AGF;.NU) ITEM U a H RESOLUTION NO. 88- PAGE 2 Section 6. That the Deputy City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions. ADOPTED this 23rd day of June, 1988. ATTEST: Deputy City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace and of the City Council thereof. Mayor of the City of Grand Terrace and of the City Council thereof. I, JUANITA BROWN, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Grand Terrace, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace held on the 23rd day of June, 1988, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: 4 Approved as to form: City Attorney Deputy City Clerk COMMISSION AND COMMITTEE REPORT COUNCIL MEETING DATE: June 23, 1988 DATE: June 15, 1988 COMMISSION/COMMITTEE: Historical and Cultural Activities SUBJECT: RESIGNATION OF KATHY HARMON The Historical and Cultural Activities Committee has received the resignation of Kathy Harmon, to become effective immediately. STAFF RECOMMENDS: 4 Council accept the resignation of Kathy Harmon and direct the Deputy City Clerk to post the vacancy and advertise for appli- cations to fill the vacancy. W. V_Wl� AGENDA ITEM W VA1(0 ) Mrs. Kathryn Harmon 11834 Kingston St. Grand Terrace, Ca. 92324 May 21, 1988 City of Grand Terrace 22795 Barton Rd. Grand Terrace, Ca 92324 Att: Committee Membership Division 4W Dear Sirs: I would like to resign from the Historical and Cultural Activities Committee because other commitments are a priority at this time. Being a member has been a benefit to me for the past year and I am grateful to have been able to contribute to the community through the Historical Committee. Thank you for giving me this opportunity. Yours truly, t4?�64 Kathr Harmon cc/ Mrs. Viola Gratson, Chairperson a HISTORICAL & CULTURAL ACTIVITIES COb1MITTEE Minutes of the June G, 1988 Meeting The meeting was called to order by Chairman Viola Gratson at 7:05 PM. Those present were Ann Petta, Irene Mason, Hannah Laister, Viola Gratson, Pauline Grant and Linda Lee Laufer. The minutes of the May 2nd meeting were read and approved. Ann made the motion, Seconded by Pauline, all approved. Treasurer's report remains the same. Viola read a note from Kathy Harmon saying that she had resigned from the Committee. She has adivsed the City of Grand Terrace oa same stating that she has other com- mittments. The members of this committee will all miss her as she was a valuable addition. The Committee sent her a Thank you card. 4th Annual Art Show: The Committee termed the show a success. We will ask Randy Anstine to have the screen repaired before the next annual Art Show. Next Affair: The Country Fiar in November. We will get entry forms ready for mailing in August next month. Hannah will contact Kim Hathaway of the Women's Club informing her of the date. Viola will contact Betty Duarte of the Finance office about getting flyers out with the sewer billings. Commission & Committee report was made to reappointed Linda Lee Laufer, Ann Petta, and Pauline Grant to the Committee. Their terms expire June 30, 1988. Hannah brought pictures of the Birthday Party, the Art Show, and and preparing the land on Mt. Vernon Avenue for the new apartments. Dates and places were marked on the pictures for our scrapbook. The next meeting will be July llth. made by Vi, seconded by Linda Lee. 6 Respectfully, 41� HANNAH LAISTER Secretary The meeting was adjourned at 8 PM. Motion COUNCIL AGENDA !IJ,44. 0 4A 1(b) CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CA. CRIME PREVENTION COMMITTEE MEETING, MAY 9, 1988 The regular meeting of the Grand Terrace Crime Prevention Committee was held at 1800 hours in the Conference Room of the Civic Center, Grand Terrace, California. MEMBERS PRESENTS Ralph Buchwalter, Chairman, Jim Singley, Treasurer, Bea Gigandtt, Ron Wright, Debra Mueller and Dick Rollins. MEMBERS ABSENTS C.S.O. CITY STAFFS GUESTS PRESENT s Ures Aeberli Sharon Korgan None Hugh Grant, Councilman, Sharon Wheatley, Ralph Nichols, Ilse Bent, Citizen's Patrol. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Buchwalter at 1805 hours. The Minutes of the meeting of April 11, 1988 were distributed to the members present. Jim Singley made the motion to accept the Minutes as written. Bea Gigandte made the second, the motion was carried with all ayes. M #1 Jim Singley reported that all monies budgeted for the Crime Prevention Committee for the fiscal year 86/87 had been expended 6 and adding that all bills had been paid. ,TM #2 Chairman Buchwalter outlined and explained the proposed budget request for the upcoming fiscal year , detailing the proposed expenditures with each item being requested and the reasons for the requests. Recognizing that the new budget requests indicated an increase over the prior year he felt that the activities and effectiveness of the Committee had been enlarged upon sufficiently to warrant the increased amounts. After considerable discussion Jim Singley made the motion to accept the new budget proposal in it's entirerity and that it be submitted to the City Council for their consideration. Bea Gigandte made the second with all members Present voting the affirmative. ?M #3 Debra Mueller reported that the Crime Buster membership now stood at 56 members and declared that the program was proceeding very well. Neighborhood Watch programs were being activated in several locations within the City. She also reported that Mayor Buron Matteson had donated the amount of $32.00 from monies collected during the Safety Fair on the sales of Chili from his Chili -Booth, the Mayor, once again,winning the first prize. She also reported that Sergant Gonzales of the Sheriffs office was to speak on gang activities Within the County at a special presentation in the Council Chambers at the Civic Center at 1830 hours, May 25, 1988. The public has been invited and she urged all ITEM #4 Sharon Korgan, the Community Services Officer of the Sheriff's Department reported on the training program for certain members scheduled for appearances on Channel #36, public television, COMCAST, for the actions of the newly formed Citizens Patrol and their importance to the community in an effort to acquaint the public of crime prevention in the City and encourage more citizens to become involved in their community. Programs for airing were to be announced at a later date. After hearing reports and discussions from the Patrol members present it was determined that there was no further business to be discussed and Chairman Buchwalter adjourned the meeting at 1855 hours. Respectfully submitted, ck Rollins Recording Secretary Page #2 of 2 rhr/rhr. CITY OF GRAND TERRACE PARKS & RECREATION COMMITTEE MEETING MONDAY, MAY 2, 1988 M I N U T E S MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Barbara Conley, Lennie Frost, Sylvia Robles, Dick Rollins, Dick Weeks, Dave Widor MEMBERS ABSENT: Mike Breckenridge CITY STAFF PRESENT: Randall Anstine, Renee McCarthy GUEST: Councilman Dennis Evans, Councilman Hugh Grant, Tony Petta CALL TO ORDER: 7:05 p.m. ITEMS 1. Minutes of the March 7, 1988 and April 4, 1988 were reviewed and upon a motion by Dick Weeks and seconded by Lennie Frost approved by unanimous vote. 2. HERSHEYS YOUTH TRACK MEET --Renee McCarthy reported to the Committee that the "Grand Terrace Hershey's Youth Track Meet" is scheduled for Saturday, June 10. Minimum expense to include ribbons and staff salaries. Chairman Conley reported contact with the Chamber about donating the "I heart Grand Terrace" t-shirts to the 3 winners in each category when the winners progress to the State meet in San Bernardino in June. Committee members will be kept abreast of Volunteer needs on the day of the event. Currently, no funds were allocated for this event. Tony Petta mentioned that an "Accent on Youth" fund was established sometime ago and possible monies from that fund could be utilized. Randall Anstine stated this fund was not a City controlled fund. Tony Petta questioned the existence of the fund and its status. Chairman Conley will check with Ken Rinderhagen over this and report back to the Committee the status of this fund. 3. PARKLAND ACQUISITION STATUS --Per Council meeting on April 28th, 4 properties were identified as possible parks. Cost were discussed in closed executive meeting at that time. Commissioner Dave Widor questioned the Council decision to disregard parcel #4 (corner Michigan/Pico) when it was discovered that the building was no longer available. Widor suggested that instead of eliminating the potential parksite, further investigation be completed about alternatives and future possibilities pertaining to the land. Tony Petta agreed no alternatives were discussed. Commissioner Dick Weeks mentioned why the normal process -public hearing over property with concerned residents/neighbors-did not take place prior to any final decisions by Council to enter into negotiations. Commissioner Lennie Frost stated we should be encouraging Council to purchase as much land as possible for future use. Lennie Frost made the motion that the Parks & Recreation Committee support acquisition of Parcel #1. Seconded by Dick Weeks. All ayes ACTION ITEM SUBMITTED TO CITY COUNCIL. Lennie Frost also moved that City Council do not limit themselves to Parcel #1 and look at Parcel #3 and look at the alternatives of pursuing joint usage of facility along with purchase of the adjacent land to include appropriate input from immediate neighborhood. Seconded by Dick Weeks. All ayes. ACTION ITEM SUBMITTED TO CITY COUNCIL. 4. BUDGET REVIEW --Committee questioned the increase in most maintenance items for 1988/89 FY. Randall Anstine explained that cost is the result of the additional maintenance of Pico Park. Committee asked staff if the Tiny Tot, Softball and Day Care programs were self-supporting. Randall Anstine responded yes they are. Chairman Conley asked the Committee to consider requesting Council to appropriate monies for the Grand Terrace's possible loth Birthday Celebration, which in its tentative stage may include a good old fashion picnic, etc. Committee agreed this was feasible. Renee McCarthy reminded Committee to also consider including requesting additional funds for the 1989 Hershey's Track Meet. Dick Weeks made the motion to suggest $1500 be added to budget under Special Departmental Expense to support Community Activity relating to the loth Birthday and the 1989 Hershey's Trace Meet. Dick Rollins seconded. All ages. ACTION ITEM SUBMITTED TO CITY COUNCIL. Lennie Frost recommended adoption of the entire Park budget with the Committee agreed changes and support the request of an additional maintenance person. Sylvia Robles seconded. All ayes. ACTION ITEM SUBMITTED TO CITY COUNCIL. 5. PICO PARK --Randall Anstine explained that in addition to maintenance cost, $20,000 is budgeted to complete an additional ball diamond (backstop) and hopefully enough left over to seed area. Committee agrees with phase in. 6. TOUP, DE TERRACE --Membership in BRDAA was recommended by Chairman Conley which would allow an additional 1 million of liability coverage for the 1989 tour. Basically, nothing will be changed for the 1989 tour. Same format as the past 2 years. 7. Dick Weeks asked Dave Widor whatever became of the spring soccer. Dave stated that their was enough interest, but not enough volunteers to warrant the undertaking this year. 8. Lennie Frost asked what is the status of the snackbar. Chairman Conley explained that the City Manager has decided that the best way to finish within this fiscal year is to sub -contract the individual items for completion out. Dave Widor asked what it will be done when they are complete. Conley responded a snackbar. Chairman Conley will ask City Manager the status of Snackbar. 9. Dick Rollins asked Randall Anstine whatever happened to the Roberti Zberg fund. Randall Anstine stated that approximately $32,000 remains appropriated for Grand Terrace and the Committee needs to decide what to do with the funds. He suggested that the monies be used to refurbish, with state of the art equipment, the Terrace Hills park restrooms. Any funds remaining could be used for Park land acquisition. Dick Rollins made the motion that the money be allocated 1st priority for restroom maintenance and remainder for parkland acquisition. Sylvia seconded. All ayes. ACTION ITEM SUBMITTED TO CITY COUNCIL. 10. Barbara Conley asked Randall Anstine whatever happened to the proposed bike rack at the park. Randall Anstine stated that the people who have put in the bus covered waiting areas have volunteered to put in an illuminated bike rack at the park. Unfortunately], this item has been put on the back burner for the moment by the company. 11. Renee McCarthy stated many individuals are requesting the scholarship applications. All applied applicants will be reviewed at the next P & R meeting and a decision made. 40 Meeting adjourned at 9:01 pm. NEXT MEETING: JUNE d, 1988 AT 7:00 PM. Respe tfully submitt , Barbara M. Conle __ Chairman, Recording ecretary DATE: 4/11/88 N STAFF'REPORT CONTINUED PROM` _ C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (X� MEETING DATE: April 14, 1988 AGENDA ITEM NO. SUBJECT An overall revision of the City's General Plan including landuse designations, circulation and housing density issues GP-87-4, and Master Environmental Analysis/Environmental Impact Report on proposed General Plan Amendment for General Plan 87-4 (E-87-1) FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: AVPLICANT: LOCATION: City Council David Sawyer, Planning Director April 14, 1988 Staff Reports, GP-87-4 and E-rs7-1 City of Grand Terrace Entire City RFOUEST: An overall revision of -010 City's r-;eneral Plan including land use designations, circulation and housing density issues (G15-87-4), and Master Environmental Analysis/Erivi.ronmental Impact Report on proposed General Plan Amendment for G1�-r�7-ir , ();- 87-.1) . BACKGROUND : In Iv] arr:h 1.987, the City t:oullci 1 retained the planning and engineering firm of wildan and Associates to update the City's General Plan., At the time the contract was executed, the City Council requested that the analysis and recornrnenda-tion for the Western portion of the City (area west of the 215 Freeway) be completed first. As a result, i.n September 1987, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1.10 making certain changes oil the: landuse map for the west side of the freeway and changing residential density categories in the text of the General Plan. In January, the consultant completed the revision of the General Plan for the remainder of. the City including; ch.anlres to the landuse map, the infrastructure, recr.eati.onnal res6urces and the community development elements. On February 2, 1988 the 30-day public review period for the Geiierra 1 Plan and i is EIP started and subsequently concluded on March 3, 1988. [Wring this period ccr.tai.n commei-)ts were received regarding the EIR and as required by t;EQA t hr-:sr: c ommeni-c, ,\ been responded to and are to he included ill t la, hr'cl f t H if 1 qf•(• Attachment A). On March 21, 1988, the Planning Comini;�,l,.n wA1 i,i c`tit,nl (,c: - `t(, consultant's proposed General Plan and di nt t ni is. On npi , 14 , 1988, the Planning Commission recommended the (, i t v t ciugn i i approve the proposed General Plan and EIR with certain chongc:s To t ie landuse map. Unlike the previous hearings for the west side, we are not amending the Zoning Ordinance or the zoning reap at this time, wr. are only considering changes to the General Plan. titre a i ;-,e General Plan is completed staff will then recommend oppr opr ate changes to the Zoning Ordinance. It should however i-,e-, n"i p o _to—, all of the changes to the General Plan which were mhoe=' r u r - west side are included in the proposer) hinnera i ice; an ar i rt i `; DISCUSSION: Alternatives: As a result of the changes the Planning Comminsi on made in : ne landuse map, staff is presenting ,,your Council with two (2 ) alternative landuse maps for the General Plan Khch or the alternatives is adequately covered by thH riH. ALTERNATIVE #1 Alternative One is the consultant's proposed landuse map (See_ 11 Attachment B). This alternative calls for. the widening of. Barton Road from a 100' right of way to a 120' right of way and tnr ti:e reduction of Michigan Street from an 88' right of way to a 64' right of way. Proposed landuse changes are as presented to your Council in your previous workshop on this issue. ALTERNATIVE #2 Alternative Two is the Planning Commission's recommended map (see Attachment Q . '.Phis alternative also calls for tho widening of Barton Road from a 100' right or wa\ to a i 2o, right of way and for the reduction of Michigan Street from in Mi' r gilt of way to a 64' right of way. The differences hel"eQn t lie , wc, alternatives is that Alternative Two specifies that the a t i gnivitvl1- of Commerce Way south of Van Buren shoo i d he dw r I NH(I ;,I specific plan at a later date and 1 hot r c•;•t .1 i li properties remain residential. A i t e rrrn 1 1. ! n the proper.'t.i es owned by ,chit kern Ca i i 1 c,l I -A 1 •.,,!1 for Light lnciusi ri a l llse and t h'iI , r1c�w i u(! looking at the feasthr tlty of a tYeewav of I r"ro"p t a w ,1l A De Berry Street and further study of t hl! l.,, Idf,rn; rig ri,,l t can !;, 1, . An action summary Outlining the \101-1 U114 lnQ I (Inq A; t (ni regarding this ell I e?rnati ve i s a t ac awl .1q o 1 I ie.!lt;it`I ! .lire. 1 1 , t A>�ti i�aiied. ,. dr,af copy of t"(le Pi,ln,IIII�s l o;W;,iti 1nl] e O) h7 S 1. e(rl w7 l J be Flvel ] --l'D i e f-ol- \'(fil l' ev 1': ;)l t your meeting. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Department is in support of i-Jl!? r.onc(Jp1 C. )I'C5 II e(-; in the Consultant's Alternative One. llottii:vc--'r, after consideration of the Planning Corr,missi.on's Pill) Jic: Y!eiir7ng' all<j deliberation both the P 1. anning Department and the !_' ! ;hlln 1 n(s Consultant feel the PI anning Commi ssi on' s re cornmend 1t i on i workable and does not detract from t.he basic corlc-el:)ts or Alternative One. It should be noted however, that i; :Inv other areas of land are removed from the Business Park desi,llht.iorl it ultimate success of such a concept c01.11 d 1le i77;-)d ,re,-i dnr! t ni! need to be reevaluated.. Therefore, the Planning Department is in suppnrr nr n"-Ii-�l Alternative One and Alternative Two. However, l:eepi_ng- in mini, that the purpose of the General Plan is the Jong terra, pl nni n„ o the community, the Planning Department recommences r lie C. i r •.- Council approve the MEA/EIR and the proposed Genera) "Jan a5 presented in Alternative One with the exception iha. the eir il_ residential properties on the west side of ``iichi_gan ,ol -.;I 01 1,�:1: Buren remain designated as low density resi-d-1!, l a i i See Attachment E). RespectfulJy Suhmi.tre 4 -73a. id -11. Sew e � r, Planning Director DRS/mcm PRELIMINARY FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) CITY OF GRAND TERRACE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE PROGRAM MARCH 21, 1988 ATTACHMENT A TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Commenting Agencies 11 Comments Received III Responses to Comments N PREFACE The purpose of this Preliminary Final Environmental Impact Report. Is to respond to comment;, received on the Draft Environmental Impact Report prepared for the 1988 Grand Terrace General Plan Update Program and Master Environmental Assessment, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. The Updated General Plan and accompanying Master Environmental Assessment and Draft Environmental Impact Report were circulated for public review and comments during the month of Fehruary 1988. Comments which were received during this period have been noted and responses have been prepared within this document, Additional significant comments received during the public hearing ano adoption stage of the program will subsequent- ly he included within the Final Environmental Impact Report, 1! In - COMMENTING AGENCIES The following agencies have submitted written comments regarding the General Plan Update Program and Environmental Impact Report. A, Southern California Edison Company B. Colton Unified school District C. department. o` Conservation D. Department of Water Rescurres lior E. Department of Transportation n COMMENTS RECEIVED :I A, Snl1THERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY m Rk CE�VV L__L. t C. i4c7 N Southern California Edison Company I, O 1301. -1913 RIALTO CALIFORI41A •4::77„ March 2, 1988 David Sawyer, Planning Director City of Grand Terrace 40 22795 Barton. Road Grand Terrace, California 92324 wl1 U ,j 1J�)q PLANNING DEPARTMENT t P.l EP1�U^r? li Ia3 87.0 'i ^.bc Subject: General Plan Update Dear Dave: Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments to the City's General Plan, especially that part which encompasses Edison's ownership. Edison's property was originally purchased for the installation. of future Company utility service facilities. The property is valuable to our operations because it is located near trans- mission line rights of way, railroad facilities and freeway 4r arteries. Edison does not have any near term plans to install utility facilities on the property, however, as the community grows, the need for electric facilities will certainly become a necessity. We are of the opinion that a zone designation of light indus- trial would be more appropriate for our properties. When Edison purchased the property, utility facilities were permitted and we feel that such designation should remain applicable so that Edison can construct necessary facilities in order co fulfill our commitment to the City and surrounding areas, We are requesting that the General Plan be changed to reflect utility users as permitted. Further, figure VIT-4 (Muster Plan of Streets and Highways) indicates that Commerce Way, as it is today, is located north of our. ownership, The General Plan Llpdate indicates plans for an extension of Commerce Way to be realigned south to Pico Avenue, hi_seccing the Edison -owned property, thereby placing Mr. . D vid Sawyer �Il�lR U :? 19�)8 i'LAitrNiNG DzrANWLNI -7- March 2., 1988 the burden of Commerce Way entirely on Edison ownership as it crosses our property. Edison i.s not in favor of that realignment, however, we would favor a realignment further west paralleling the boundaries of the generating station and merging into Taylor Street, Thank you for your kind consideration in this matter. 11 NSN:ts 0 Very truly yours, Sue Noreen. B. COLTON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 11 BOARD OF EDUCATION MR. ARLIE R. HUBBARD President MRS DORTHA E. COOLEY Vice President MR. RAY ABRIL, JR. Clerti MRS WENDY S. CURRAJN MRS. RUTH O HARRIS fir MRS PATRICIA;. NIX 1!RS;PHYLLIS V. ZliWERktAN MR. RUSSELL t. DICKINSON Superintendent MR. CHARLES H. JORDAN Assistant Superintendent, Personnel MR. ROBERT W. MURPHY Assistant Superintendent, Bus;ress MISSJIANCY 4.14ORTON Assistant Superintendent, Curriculum and Instruction MR. DANNY CAR.RASCO ctor Admin.s:rat,ve Sorvices MRS BONNIE RUSSELL•HUNT Direclor, Pupil Personnel Services COLTON JOINT UNIFIF_D SCHOOL. DISTRICT 1212 Valoncia Drive, Coilon, Calilornia 92324-17938 (714)676-4227 J{ ' February 28, 1988 Pi1��G';G l}LPARI u:'IT Plat;rting Department City of Grand Terrace 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92324 Re: General Plan MEA/EIR The Galton Joint 'Unified School District has co-mpleted a re- view of the proposed update of the City General Plan and would like to offer the following comments and clarifications: (1) Student Generation Factor (Page 11-112), The stud;: has used r--4--- stu ents -per sins ie family the is �rtctiaide average o t. residence and .53 for multiple family units. In rand Terrr,c:c the. student generation factor is currently .51, `or single family homes with a .12 factor for apartments. This is based on current enrollment digided by number of units. If the city adopts a plan to add 1,060 new home's to Grand Terrace and 460 multiple family units, the number of students generated would total 627. The br.eakdowm is as follows: K-6 339 7-8 , 94 9-12 194 At Lice present time, Grand Terrace Elementary School has an en-ollment of 587 and Terrace View has 523 students. Terrace Hills Junior High School includes 608 students and Colton High School's enrollment is 1,967. The Board of Edl-tCation has directed st.af f ro "cap" all elementary school enrollments at 700, j���ior high school enrollments at. 800 and high school enrc' "ments zt 2,500. Using this criteria, there are plans to accorrodate an additional 1.13 students at Grand Terrace, 177 at "terrace View; 192 at Terrace ,ills; and 533 students at col ton H. The addil:io;.1 of 339 elementary students exceeds the combine( C ap,-)rj.t:.; of C;r.tand '''`r.r.a..ce and Terrace Vic,,) schc^,s by 49 S tkid C,lr!d , Hc,wwer, =here is a tc; ta1 0; 2 cnz.d ren from OutssidB tllese atLendance are,:as who have peen =ndfcatherea' j.nto thr, school etar,�llment. As these S4'JCents :1r`1L;r1te1 ci:r wiJ.l make. room to „ccortmodate Ole difference in projected e1*11'0l1.ment. f'!.F.�IIItt'� U(Paiat�cYT Based on current demographic patterns, there. appears to he adequate space to accommodate Grand Terrace stu(lent.) at ma.ximam city build-r.0 by adding rel.ocatab.le classrooms to existing schools. Thais assumes that: (A) There is no major change in the student_ generation factor for apartments oz single family homes in- Grand Terrace. (B) That adequate revenue sources are available to finance' the addition of relocatable classrooms to district schools, (Fees, RDA agreements, et(*.) (C) The district is able to build additional schools in a timely manner, as the communities of Colton, Grand Terrace, Bloomington, and parts of Fontana, Rialto, San Bernardino, Loma Linda, and unincorporated areas of Sari Bernardino and Riverside Counties continue_ to grow. The addition of new schools'is the long -terra solution to school impaction, as it provides an opportunity to lower enrollments by redrawing attendance boundaries. (2) Table 11-11. The data used includes a large rr mber of students who do not live in the City of Grand Terrace. A staff report presented to the City Council on Feb. 2, 1988 listed the Grand Terrace enrollment as follow,: Grand Terrace Elementary 377 Terrace View 479 Terrace Hills Jr. High 239 Colton High School 373 Slover Continuation Z. Zntra Dist. Transf. 20 Total: 1,508 Maximum Build -Out Total Enrollment: 2,135 (3) Banton Road Intercharj&.!�,. Under consideration is a proposal to widen Bartc•n Roar: by 10 ft, on both sides of the street to establish a left turn median and to improve traffic flow. As you are aware, Grand Terrace Elementary School would be affected by this project. With. only 8.75 acres, this schc": ;. is one of the smallest campuses in the district, and is impacted by .10ise generated by Barton Road and freeway traffic.. The district woulc like to review a cost analysis of this project vs the cost of developing a sec.cnd freeway entrance/exit t:o the city which could improve traffic flowVwi.thouc reyctiring the r.ondemnar_ion of public property. Tt is the districc's under- standing that the Banton F.J. bridge. would also need to be ,cidened add significant cost: to the project. Once t:he si.dewallcs arc> added; th.ce be li.r.t.1e frontage :.eft ,)n the school site and 1.11crceased ::oise. PC- t1)C,S reasons, the lniti.al pos'it).on o£ Lhc district would be (`c:,r tnc city to exhaust all alternati.veq before rldOP'Z I-Ig this pInn Sincerely, t . C. DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION V9 n ',ic of California THE RESOURCES AGENCY OF CALIFORNfA Memorandum Dr. Gordon F, Snow Assist�+nt: Secretary for Resources Mr. David Sawyer City of Grand Terrace 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92324 ,r„ Department of Conservation —Office of the Director Dote : FEB 2 5 1988 subject: Grand 'Terrace General Plan SCH# 880201.03 The Department of Conservation's Division of Mines and Geology (D14G) has reviewed the Draft Environmental Impact Report for the 'proposed Grand Terrace General Plan. The primary geologic concerns for the City of Grand Terrace appear to be hazards related to earthquakes, landsliding, and flooding and sedimentation from the Santa Ana River. We offer the following corrument-s . A Safety Element is a necessary part of the General Plan, as required under State Government Code Section 65302 (g). Procedures for the compilation of the Safety Element are given in General Plan Guidelines, published by the Office of Planning and Research, State of California. Copies of the Guidelines may be ordered through General Services, Publications Section, P.O. Box 1015, worth Highlands, CA, 95660((916) 973-3700). The Draft General Plan does not contain enough information about geologic hazards to constitute a Safety Element. The plan notes that the City could be "considerably damaged" by earthqu k.es originating on the San Jacinto and San Andreas faults. l�he Plan furtAer states that "the City's disaster preparedness pi. nt•,shal). include emergency procedures for earthquake situations",and• seismically unsafe existing structures "shall be identifi4d"and programmed for mitigation or removal where necessary". The Safety Element should contain sufficient information to guide future land use decisions, through the development and implernentation of planning policies, by providing pertinent data regarding geologic, soil, seismic, flood, and other hazards. The Safety Element should include maps showing the extent of known seismic and geologic hazards as precisely as possible. with regard to the City, it should address the effects of :seismically -induced surface rupture, ground shaking, ground failure, darn failure, and seiches; the effects of slope instability (where appropriate); the effects of flooding; and evacuation routes. A suggested source of: i.nformatio.n for seismic safety planning is the U.S. Geological Survey's Professional Caper 1360, "Evaluating Earthquake, Hazards in the Los Angeles Region". This reference incl.udos specific data and sources of a,?di.tional information which would be, useful in preparing the: �atety Element. Dr . Gordon F . Snow Mr.. David Sawyer Page 2 The Draft Master Environmental Assessmenc, attached to the General Plan, does riot contain sufficient data to adequately prepare a Safety Element according to State General flan Guidelines, when completed, the Safety Element, and any technical studies used for developing the Safety Element, should be submitted to the Division of Mines and Geology, If you have any questions regarding these comments, please contact Zoe McCrea, Division of Mines and Geology Environmental Review Officer, at (916) 322-2562. 0, ".' � C) 1';t' lr� Dennis J, O'Bryant Environmental Program Coordinator DJO:it 0589H cc: Zoe McCrea, Division of Mines and Geology Jeff Howard, Division of Mines and Geology n a DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES N 11 .yin of California Th• Resources Agency Aemorandum FEES 1 9 1988 1. Gordon F. Sno�', Ph,D. Assistant SeCreUar.'y COr I`esources 2. City of Grand 'Terrace 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 923211 Attention: David Sawyer Dopartmonl of VVator R•sourc*t Los Angeles, CA 90055 �bjed : DEIR for Grand Terrace Generfil Pltu't, SCHN 88020103. 0 Your subject document has been reviewed by our Deportment of. Water Resources 0*0 staff. Recommendations, as they relate to water conservation and flood dainage prevention, are attached, After reviewing your report, we also would like to recommend that, you further• consider implementing a comprehensive program to use reclaimed water for, irrigation purposes in order to free fresh water supplies for beneficial uses that require -high quality water. For further information, you may wish to contact John Pariewski at (213) 620-3951. Thank you for the opporr..unit,Y to review and comment on this report. Charles R. White, Chief' Planning Branch Southern District, Attachwents DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES RECOMMENDATIONS FOR WATER CONSERVATION AND WATER RECLAMATION To reduce water demand, ir,,pl.ement the ►.;aces conservation o!ensuves described here. Required The following State laws rEquive water- efficient plumbing f'ixLures in structures: ` o Health and Safety Code Section 1' 21.E requires low -flush toilets and urTl—,, is in virtually all buildings as follows: �r "After January 1, 1983, all new buildings constructed in this state shall use water closets and associated flushometer valves, if any, which are water -conservation water closets &s defined by American National Standards Institute Standard A112,19.2, and urinals and associated flushometer valves, if any, that use less than an average of 1-IJ2 gallons per flush. Blowout water closets and assccip.Led flushomeLer valves are exempt from the requirerients of this section." o Title 20, California Administrative Code Section 1604_f A ol.i,(nce Efficiency Standards) establishes efficiency standards that give the maximum flow rate of all new showerheads, lavatory faucets, and sink faucets, as specified in the standard. approved by the Fcrnerican National Standards Institute on November 16, 1979, and known as ANSI A112.18.lM-1979• o Title 20, California administrative Code Section 1606(b) (Appliance Efficiency Standards- prohibits the sale of fixtures that do not comply with regulations. No new appliance may be sold or offered for sale in California that is not certified by its manufacturer to be in compliance 'with the provisions of the regulations establishing applicable efficijency standards. o Title 24 of the California Administrative Code Section 2._530b (California Energy Conservation StWndPrds_for New Bui ld,n �sL prohibits the installation of fixtures unless the manufacturer has certified to the CEC compliance with the flow rate standards. o Title 214, California Adminis_t:rrt t.i.ve Code Sections address pipe, insulation requiremenLs, w)'tich (--tin redUcr' waLo. :Isla tr:f )rh hot water reaches equiLpmr.nt ov fixtures. These 'li,,'' Y ,r, steam find Steam -condensate r etuvn Pjp> ng and ; ec.irc�.rlu tag hot. WOO—'! piping in attics, garages, crawl spf;cl_s, or unhettte'_i spece:; ot.l,r•r tJinn between floors or in i.r.te.,i.or walls lnsuint.ion of wftt�;r-hen r�i�; systems is also re(ju).ved, Health and Safety Code_Se(tion_IIOh1 prohibl.ts )nscallatlon of residential water softening or conrll tionxnf; appliances unless certain conditions are satisfied, Included `.s the requirement that:, in most instances, the installation of the appliance must be accompanied by water conservation devices on fixtures using softened or conditioned water, o Government Code Section 7800 specifies t.hat lavatories in all public facilities constructed after January 1, 1985, be equipped with self' -closing faucets that limit flow of hot water, j To be imp(em.ented where applicable Interior: WF 1. Supply line pressure: Water pressure greater than 50 pounds per square inch (psi) be reduced to 50 psi or less by means of a pressure -reducing valve. 2, Drinking fountains: Drinking fountains be equipped with self' -closing valves. 3. Hotel rooms: Conservation reminders be posted in rooms and restrooms." Thermostatically controlled mixing valve be installed for bath/shower. Laundry facilities: Water -conserving models of washers be used. 5. Restaurants: Water -conserving models of dishwashers be used or spray emitters that have been retrofitted for reduced flow. Drinking water be served upon request only." 6. Ultra -low -flush toilets: 1-1/2-gallon per flush toilets be installed in 'all new construction. Exterior:" I 1. Landscape with low water -using plants wherever feasible, 2 Minimize use of lawn by limiting it to lawn -dependent uses, Such Is playing fields. When lawn is used, require warm season grasses. 3. Group plants of similar water use to reduce overirrig�rt:on of low -water -using plants. r� Provide information to occupants r(',UrIL-d"I)g f] CS of, 1C)'rJ'l+'ilt.el'`l1Slf;} landscaping and souf•ces of additional essi ;taf1CG'. 'The -Department of WaLef ReSOM-U'$ or ]octil-watC;--di ,t.rict rnaY aid -Ln'- - dcve:loping these mater.i.als or prov.idinf; 0011 infoi,m ition. 5, Use mulch extensively in tall landscaped areas, Mulch applied on top of soil will improve the water -holding capacity of the soil. by reducing evepora tion and soil Compnc CiOrl , 6. Preserve and protect existing trees and shrubs. Established plants are often adapted to low -water -using conditions and their use saves water needed to establish replacement vegetat).on. j, Install efficient irrigation systems that minimize runoff and evaporation and maximize the water that will reach the plant roots. Drip irrigation, soil moisture sensors, and automatic irrigation systems are a few methods or increasing irrigation efficiency. 3. Use pervious paving material whenever, feasible to reduce surface water runoff and to aid in ground water recharge. q. Grade slopes so that runoff of surface water is minimized. 10. Investigate the feasibility of using reclaimed waste water, stored rainwater, or grey water for irrigation. U . Encourage cluster development, which can reduce the amount of land being converted to urban use. This will reduce the amount of impervious paving created arid thereby aid in ground water recharge. 12. Preserve existing natural drainage areas and encourage the incorporation of natural drainage systems in new developments. This aids ground water recharge. 13. To aid in ground water recharge, preserve flood plains and aquifer recharge areas as open space. FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION In flood -prone areas, flood damtAgc previ?nLi.on iecasures required to protect a proposed development should be basc;d on th,e following guidelines: 1. It is r.he State's polio to conserve water; any potential loss to ground water should be mitigated. 2. All building structures should be protected against a 100-year flood. 3. In those areas not covered by a Flood Insurance Rate Map or Flood Boundary and Floodway Map, issued by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the 100-yaar flood elevation and boundary should be shown in the Environmental Impact Report, ow 4. At least one route of ingress and egress to the development should be available during a 100-year flood. 5. The slope and foundation designs for all structures should be oased on deteiled soils and engineering studies, especially for hillside developments. 6. Revegetation of disturbed or newly constructed slopes should be done as soon as possible (utilizing native or low -water -using plant material). -7. The potential damage to the proposed development by mudflow shoulCJi be assessed and mitigated as required. 8. Grading should be limited to dry months to minimize problems associated with sediment transport during construction. E. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, C9 ;, of California E3v�inc��, Trun.potlafion and Houting Age—Y �emorandurn ;;tat? Cleor inghouSP Off ice of Plant) in,3 & ReSe[A 'rh 1400 loth Street Sacrbmento, CA 9581.4 Attention John Keene rn DEPARTMENT Of TRANSPORTATION District 8 Gra.nd Terrace General Plan D°'t' Feb ruaIy 25, 1�)fiEi file NO. 08-Riv--2].5-0. 0/1.. B scki 188020103 13 4 eecbuse of the +_omexof the Plan anri t-he necessity fcsr extensive evaluation in the short ti(r,e remaining, we would like to discuss our concerns with the City of Grand Terrace before t: z drafting of the final PI an is approved, The following are comments that need to be conside reel ; Page VII-6 mentions Fable VII-I for traffic lane corifigurations. This Table is not included in the report. Th4 Traffic Study noedw to AddrQ!wv tha improvemont- on the m8i.nli r„= flow of the freeway traffic and the funding source for the improvements on the interchange and the mainline, we would 1 ike a copy of the final document as soon as it is 4W available. We Dirge early and continuous liaison with Caltrans on proposed plans as they affect State highways, if you have any questions, please ca hard Dennis at ATSS 670-4165. c, i-- l GUY G. 1) ORAL t :^ Chief, Tr;,nspurtabon Plarnrlinq tran\f��� cc: GSmzl_h, Plan Coord Unit, DOTP ___- RESPONSES TO COMMENTS 11 Im III - RE=Sf'ONSES TO COMMENTS A. Southern California -Edison Con Comment of linht industrial would be We are of the opinion that a zone deslgnat!on for ftpn e nthat csuclecldesig a more appropriate our rproeelnitted and wfeel ion erty, utility facilities we p that Edison can construct ,� n facilities should remain applicable so IGeneraltment o cneces' in order to fulfill that con Plan be changed to reflect utility We are requesting users as permitted. Response The intent of the General Plan is to project desired land use patterns for the City into the next century. As such , the most desirous and homogenous land use for Southern California Edison vacant properties are proposed to be high quality business uses. As the planning process evolves, it will become necessary to develop specific permitted uses and development standards for uses that are desinnated as Business Park. At that time, a caveat could be built into the reclulations to permit venerating station expansion. If expansion is not necessary, tent o the development would have to be designed consistent with the intent of the Business Park designation. Comment OAW Eic,ure ll-4 (Master Planof Streets and Highways) indicates that Com- merce Way, as it is today, is located north of our ownership. The General Plan Update indicates plans for an extension of Commerce �-'+'aY to be realigned south to Pico Avenue, bisecting the Edison -owned property, thereby placing the burden of Commerce vVay entirely on Edison ov,ner- ship as it crosses our property. Edison is not in favor of that realign- ment, however, we would favor a realignment further west naraHelinq the boundarie, of the generating st.atinn and merging into Taylor Street. Res ponce (user on the. level of develownent proposed (or- this area of the commu- nity, the most efficient alignment of Commerce as de'ermined to be �)s shown on thr' Master Plan of strr'et s and'' !-iighways. I he r)I �cice allgnIII (Ir)T of C.:nrnrnercc S'; )) in tc rrn of sne'ci (iC imPr,c.is on ��r.'jarF'nt properties will be determinec� ti�roucl;! the riei<7n l�rnccss, R (_olion^Unified St1_Ic,t i,ornment Pic -a,;' incorpor-atr'- clr:ri(irahol)s into 11)i, sc:honl� ,rcilon of tilt c�c�r;ln ent. Res ronse The comments are so noted, the finirl document t.ext will b . revised to incorporate this data. Comment Barton Road Interchange_. Under consideration is a proposal to widen arton oa�Ey 10 c'et or) both sicies of the street to establish a left turn meclian and to improve traffic flow. As you are aware, Grand Terrace Elementary School would be affected by this project. With only 8.75 acres, thls school is one of the smallest campuses in, the district and is impar_ter.± by noise generated by Barton Road and freeway traffic. The district would like to review a cost analysis of this project vs. the cost of developing a second freeway entrance/exit to the City which could improve traffic flow without requiring the condemnation of public property. It is the district's understanding that the Barton Road bridge would also need to be widened which will add significant cost to the proiect. Once the sidewalks are addeci, there will be little frontage left on the school site and increased noise. For these reasons, the initial position of the district would be for the, City to exhaust all alternatives before adopting this plan. Response The analvsis of costs and precise location of roadways are usually deter- mined during the design study for a project. It appears that the most econornical way to widen Barton Road is to widen the State Route 215 overcrossing on the north side and continue the widening to the east. The south side curb and sidewalk could remain in the existing planned location with the widening mainly on the north side. If this is the final configuration, mitigation of the impacts to the various properties along Barton Road, including the school, will have to be mitigated. Providing a second freeway access to the community was included in the last general plat) and reviewed by this study. Factors which make providing; an additional freeway interchange undesirable are- 1 , The Federal Highway Administration policy on spacing between freeway interchanges. 7, Limited benefits to the community with the land use policies pro- posed by this plan. 3. Estim�rted project costs rangincl frori 10 to 20 million dollars. Even with another freeway inte.rchanne, the Barton Road in+erchange and corridor vrr>;rlri have to he irn;.�rovcd to handle projected tr,jffic volurr;es. Department of Conservation C_omrner)t The Draft Cjenerai Flan does not contain enough information about qeo- ionic hazards to constitute a Safety Element, The plan notes that the City could be "consWernbly damaged" by earthquakes prig- inating on the C;an. .Jacinto and San Andreas faults. The Plan further states that "the City's disaster preparedness plan shall include emergency procedures for earthquake situations", and seksrriically unsafe existing structures "shall rye identified and programmed for mitigation or removal where neces- sary" Response The Gener fl* Plan Update Program is intended to reexamine the numerous rr land use decisions that were adopted as part of the comprehensive planning program in 1483. At that; time, the Safety Element was deemed satisfactory in terms of meeting the requirements of the General Plan Guidelines. The issues within related to hydrologic and seismic condi- tions within the City have not and will not chanae. No unique creologic conditions are known to exist within Grand Terrace. None of the back- rtround information regarding these issues was deleted within the update, program. in fact, the [_and Use Element of General Plan requires spe cific mitigation for areas considered potentially impacted by these condi- tions through the use of Moth a Flood Hazards Overlap and Hillside Overlay (areas in excess of 15 percent slopes). Therefore, these Cen- eral Plan policies, as ,vell as existing building code requirements, appear -�o adequately address any safety related hazards. D. Department of Water Resorarces 4 CommPn t After reviewing your report, we also like to recommend that you further consider implementing a comprehensive program to use reclaimed water for irrigation purpose5 in order to free fresh water supplies for benefi- cial uses that require high quality water. P.esponse Your <.'omments and recommendations are i-roted. They will be forwarded through the "preliminary" Final FIR process, to the Planning Ccim;nission anti to thr is it�t Council for potential inrlu:.ion in the General Plar)WEA.. E. C<flifornia De.par(Mont of Transportation. Comment Tt;c Traffic Str�cly rqlc�cis to address tfir. irrprovirr- nts on the in,,inline flo,;r of tho freeway traffic and the funding source for the improvemen ,; on tl)e interchange �,ncf the mainIine. i�eSDoris e Tl- is Man will re-,ult in reduced freeway volumes due to the less inten- sive land use policies. Freeway level of service of "D" in year 2010 is anticipated. No special consrC et-ation was glven because a 'In" level of' service for urban areas is usually considered acceptable. Major projects on State Route 215 will require coordination with all the communities, both counties, th(a two realonal planning agencies and Caltrans. Fun;.ing alternatives are included in the report. One funding possibility not lister) is the sales tax designation for transportation improvements. This issue was defeated by the voters of San Bernardino .County in the last election, however, renewed support for this concept` is gaining. This method along with traffic Impact mitigation fees may be the best way to fund major roadway improvements. U9 IM ALTERNATIVE TWO 1 LEGEND 1 L.D. RESIDENTIAL GEN. COMMERCIAL +++ BUSINESS PARK ® LT. INDUSTRIAL + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + I■■■■■■■OMEN■ I■■■■■■■■M■N■ I■■■■■■■■O■■■ I■■■■■OEEN■■■ I■■■E■■■NM■■■ I■■■M■■N■OMO■ I■■■■■■■M■■■■ IMENEEMENSMs� I■■■■■■■■O■■■ I■■■■■■■■■M■ I■■■■■■■M■■MIS sommommomm ATTACHMENT C PLANNING COMMISSION MI-:I'TlN(7 Gl-"NERAI, PLAN AND H I R DISCIJ9s1ON D[f AFT - ACTION SUMMATION APRI 1, 14, 1988 PI.ANN I NG COMMISSION Ml-' l-' ' 1 ,N(; The r. eVil I ar meeting of -the Granci 'terrace Planning Cornmi.ssi.on wF,s called to order i,t 1-he Grand Terra(-e Civic Centel ,. 11795 Barton Road, Grand 'Terrace, Cali for_ ni.a on April 14, 1,988, gat 7 : 00 p.m. by Chairman Norman Caouette. PRESENT NORMAN CAOUETTE, CHAIRMAN FRANC VAN GELDER, VICE-CHAIRWONA. GERALD COL.E, CO`'IMISSIONER STANLEY HARGRAVE, COMMISSIONER fir JERRY HAWKINSON, COMMISSIONER RAY MUNSON, COMMISSIONER JIM SIMS, COMMISSIONER IVAN HOPKINS, CITY ATTORNEY JOE KICAK, CITY ENGINEER DAVIT) SAWYER, PLANNING DIRECTOR STAFF' ABSENT: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: : V ICE-CHAIRWO`IAN VAN c;E LDER 1.iI:NuTr5 WORKSHOP CONVENED AT 6:30 P.M. 4 Infor.ination/Comments frorn Staff Information/Comments from Commissioners Information/Comments from Wildan and Associates WORKSHOP ADJOURNED AT 7:00 P.111. PLANNING COMMISSION CONVENED AT 7 : 00 PLANNING COMMISSION DISUSSI-ON ON THE PROPOSED AND ALTERNATIVES OF THE GENERAL PLAN. ADJOURNED FOR A TWENTY `11 NUTE BREAK - 8 : 4 5 TO 9 : 0 `i P . ti) . CONVENED PLANNING COMMISSION AT 9:05 P.,`I. ATTACHMENT D Commissioner Sims introduced motion with Commissioner Hargrave secondary, that the General Plan be revised to show the a 1 i gnment of. Commerce Way ending at Van Buren with a specific plan to be prepared in the future for a precise alignment south of Van Buren to `lain Street. Commissioner Sims amended motion to reflect- the specific plan to go down to Main Street without impacting any existing construction (a5 suggested by Commissioner Hawkinson) with second concurring. CLARIFICATION OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION: NOT TO SPLIT THE INLAND LUMBER PROPERTY DOWN THE MIDDLE. MOTION CARRIED ALL, AYES, 7-0. 2. Commissioner Hawkinson introduced motion to accept plan as proposed with the exception of previous motion (tire designation that the street alignment he changed) and with a study looking into the feasibility or a freewav offramp at De Berry Avenue. Vice -Chairwoman Van Gelder seconded. VICE -CHAIRWOMAN VAN GELDE;R WITHDREW SECoJND. C0'I'NIZ-)S1oN.FR COLE SECONDED FOR THE, PURPOSE OF DISCOSSfON. H.AWhINSON WITHDREW NOTION. 3. Commissioner Hawkinson recommended that the plan he accepted as submitted ,Nest of Michigan Avenue, north of Main Street, south of Barton Road and the freeway- noundary with a feasibility study for an offramp at De Berry, which may have to include an update on the EIR, and to include the previous motion regarding the alignment of Commerce Way. Commissioner Cole seconded for the purpose of discussion. Commissioner. Munson made the proposal to amend the motion to have the property to the east, currently owned by Inland Lumber retain the current designation of light industrial. MOTION TO AMEND DEED FOR LACK OF A SECOND. MOTION FAILED (hI;FER TO COMMI S S I ONER HAWK1 N'SON ' :7 �,ioTIO?� 1 , COMMISSIONERS CAOUETTE, VAN GE:LDE:R, HARGRAVE, ST`1S, %NSON VOTING NOE AND COMMISSIONERS COLE: AND HAWKI NSON VO T I NK AVE, 5-2-0-0. 4. Commissioner Munson made the motion that the current property of Inland Lumber, which is zoned IighT industrial? be so designated in the original plan i nsi tlad "I tile ],)w dera..;i1-v resiiir,ntia1 'as propo�,(-,d r)v i110 Con"11It'Jill c 0, 1 hi) FOk 1,ACK OF A SFI'COND. 5. Commissioner Haargrave made tl)e mo-tior, to t,i(� l;)nc, use change to make the I rc I I I I d 1,11mh(,r 1)roper t v (westeI-II port- i on/Lunaher Yard) i r o m prop -;ed r e s i delai- I a l t () a _111- indust.r- is I and inake the othc-r ha 1 T which -tl-iev own Crcister por. ti_on/vacant I and) a land use des i gnat: ion ch<iuge d I-rnIn 1 nw density residential to,rercFrai. commercial. Co►nrni.csioner Sims seconded. There was a cluestjnn c,> s1)(), zorcaelnd the City Attorney stated t I -rev s hou i. d ac-e on" ,t ]-cis nioi ion , and if there was a legal question then they coctld inrorm City Council. MOTI ON FA I LED . COMMISSIONERS MUNSON, S INNS ANI) HAR(RAVE VOTING AYE. COMMISSIONERS VAIN GELDER, CAOUETTE, COLE AND 40 HAWKINSON VOTING NOE, 3-4-0-0. 6. Commissioner Sims made the motion to revise the proposed landuse for the areas north of De Berrv, west •oj: `'ii ch:, �'an, low density residential retaining what is there now. the area south of De Berry, west of Michi-gan, ail the wav to Van Buren where the existing Tanduse will remain residential revising the commercial. to low density residenti-a1. maintaining the low density parcels south of Van Buren in thi-s area, not including the rectangular section. Second by Commissioner Hargrave. MOTION FAILED. COM`I I SS IONERS HARGRAVE AND S 1MS VOTING AYE, COMMISSIONERS VAN GELDER, CAOUETTE COLS , PIUNSO�- , HAWIF : `,SW,\ VOTING NOE, 2-5-0-0. 7. Commissioner Caouette made the motion that the areas west of Michigan, south of Rene Lane and north of I)e Fierrv, wBich is currently proposed for general commercial i-)e cha?aged to low densi-t:v residential- (with exclus:i.on of ructaraguiar portion) down to I)e Berry and east to Aj- chig<an StrFet. Second by Commi.ssi.oners Hargrave and Sims. MOTION PASSED. COMMISSIONERS HAWS-.INS()N AN1) Co1,F; lOi 1;�(; COMMISSIONERS HARGRAVE, SIMS, CA01�E.T" I- MUNSON; VAN (,Fj.t)I-,k VOTING AYE, 5-2-0-0. 8. Commissioner Hargrave made the motion to go along witi-, the consultant's plan ( Busi-mess Park areas; Fri -,sr of Michigan, north of Van Buren and south oa: De horrv) , ;1-01) at Van Buren (do(-s not a,•ant to i rcc I iccicr the Ec c sore property), segregating out the a11_ 1 to th(-: Sc uth ;>> t'ir,n Buren for I ricer d c scussi.oil. \%icr. —CI rc i rwoma:a Van (,r i (Irtr seconded. MOTION PASSED. ALL AYES, 7-0-0-0. Chairman Caouette stated due to the late hour l-Jiat the applicants sti I 1 on the agenda be continued to Apr•i i '-8, l_988. 9. Commissioner. Hawkinson made the motion to Ci1dn;(, the property located south of Van Buren Street, north of Pico Street and west of Commerce Way extension to Light Industrial and to accept the consultant's proposal for The remainder of the area south of De Berry Street and west or Michigan Street. Commissioner- Hargrave seconded F1110 tiierI 00 withdrew motion. Commissioner Hawkinson then changed tt1e inoti or, 1 o (J�r ; . the homes fronting on ilii-chi gan, south of -Van Hirer i1m) of Wi.ldan Pump only. Seconded icy i,oinnii ssi on t , MOTION CARRIED. COMMI SS.IONEkS 11;NS0\ , HAj?GP-\1 i- f�V r VOTING NOE, 4-3-0-0. 10. Commissioner Hargrave made the mot i o1; to (-}i�,r;ge the !, —(J use to its current conforming use which is res:i-de i; is i. usage, for the houses borderi ng _`1i.chi gau, s()urh o.= i pit, Buren and east of WiIdan Pump only. Commissioner second. MOTION CARRIED. ALL AYES, 7-0-0-0. 11. Commissioner Van Gelder made the motion that the width of Michigan Avenue, a secondary hi-ghway, ire retained t.o the current existing General Plan code, the whole length of Michigan from Barton Road south. Commissioner Hargrave second. MOTION FAILED. COMMISSIONERS VAN GELDER, HARGR-- 1k"E ANI) 5I •15 VOTING AYE,. 3-4-0-0. - 12. Commissioner Hawkinson made the motion that the contiuitani-s or staff recommend to Council a study of a feasibility of a freeway offramp at De Berry Avenue as part or iris proposed General Plan. Commissioner Munson second. MOTION CARRIED. COMM! SSION1:RS SI`1S, HnR(;Io\Vl. \'\;i) VOTING NOE, 4-3-0-0. !{ 13 . Commissioner Munson made 1.1-1e mot i on t hi, t a i I 01 h, property north o1- ()I Barton Road, plus property er,st „I: °lt vc-r-nc,n W10 I,}-oi,f•r t north of 'Barton 1�0a(1 except i�,roa i e ri -) r i-,v 'lt t (•) n,,,i triangle, he F1ppr0\7ed s1) g steel b: ri(- co},tiu mil . Commissioner. Cole second. "'JO 'IO;V 1-4. Commissioner Hargrave made tl-,r mot ic)}, r!-Iot which was left nut for c,iisru�Slc)}, h, l ti „irlr•,i° , stands as mu I t: i —fami I y res I dellt i a I I�II<,u i 1,1 at t>r,tiE of what the courts do or don't do and i=rased u:)ou t hI s i) being able to he amended at leah,t a minimum of our times } year. MOTION DIE; I) FOR LACK OF A SECOND. 15. Commissioner Munson made the motl.on that the narceic, previously discussed (undeveloped Forest CiI-v i)Iiior, property) be approved as presented by the rontiultant. Commissioner Van Gelder second. MOTION CARRIED. COMMISSIONER HARG'PAVE VOT_["'G NO . 16. Commissioner Hawkinson made the motion that the - to the Council the approvai of the balance o` tihe tr-,'a11' • quadrant as recommended by the consultar.i_s, olr:n}iss_ ,,ate; Cole second. MOTION CARRIED. CO"IMISSIONER HARGRAVI t-(­)Ti\c; 17. Commissioner Hargrave made the motion -to have Barton Road a" four lanes with a left turn lane, median and 00' radi,ls. MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND. 4W 18. Chairman Caouette amended the mot i ol-, to accept For Barton Road as recommended by the Consultant,; in the `taster Plan of Streets and Highways. Comrr,i ssio11er Ilru �ra\7Q second. MOTION FAILED. CW MISSI()NrI,'; CW,t';, VOTED AYE,` 3-4-0-0. 19. Commissioner Sims made the mot:i ol-r to recornmerld + o, before the 120' is accepted that a st-udv 1-)e dnfle Barton Road to see 1-he f- easibI I i t v of a sa K ii,ne and the impact it wou I r1 have ()If proof-ri i o.� Ci,rr I rr!.;ti Caouette second. Comm issi oner S i,n; wi t i il-r•i,' ;,, , -,,, ,; discussion. 20. Commissioner. Sims m a de t f'je I-ilot Jolt that Ci f- f! information to on v 120' on Barton Road. I ook at-. file ex -,L d I c) �Tvith the Traffic Engineer CM11; Cole second. MOTION CARRIED. COMMISSION VAN GF'I'Di"I1 VO-1,10", \0j.' 0. 21. Vice-Chairworria)-i Van Gelder moved that %v I d t ]I C) r Vernon north of Barton Road he retained to Its (.urrerit width, as noted in the current General Plan. Commissioner Munson second for discussion. lice -Chairwoman Van Gelder withdrew motion. 22. Chairman Caouette moved that the PjannJ ng comrTlis-i 01 jj; Dro\,tl the balance of the recommenda t ions of the Gen(-ra I Pia for the Master. Plan for Street-, a 11 d Hi gilways orrim) Hawkinson second. MOTION CARRIED. ALL A_iYS, 23. Chairman Caouette made the motion t I; a t 7-lie Commission recommend to the Citv Cotinc' I General Plan 87-4 and aPPI-O-WiIll OT prez;pnTec: r)v staff, including previous action as a-pprovp"I r(-)r tiles west of the freeway, wit-11 the arciendment", recomriiended Planning Commissi on. on. Corlirflissinner sjjfj_; MOTION CARRIED. COMMISSIONER HARGRAVE VOI I\G \01-_ 4W PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AWOUIRNET) AT 11 :55 P. -,I, DRS/mcm 0 Respect f it i I .y Submitted, fja%i_d R. saw, �er, P 1 all 1-1). n r (3 r t c) r PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION LEGEND L.D:. RESIDENTIAL GEN. COMMERCIA +++ BUSINESS PARK ® LT. INDUSTRIAL .ii .■■■t■t� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■� ■■■■■■■� ■t■■■■■■■■■■■■■� �■■■■■ttt�� ■■■t■■■//■■■■■ti �■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■I �i■■t■■■■■■■i ■■■■■■■tt■■■■■■i i��■■■■■■■■■■I ■t■■■■■■t//■■■■t u,1■■■■■■■■■■ t■■■/■■� i!e■■■■■■■■■■i ■■■■/■■■■■■■■■■■■t■■t■■i ire■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■/■■■■■■■i I14tt■■■■■■t■ �.m■■■■■■■■■■ rM■■■■■■■tt■ rAt■■■■■■■t■ Q! ■ii■■■■■■tt■■` I■IA■■■■■■tt■■� t■■■t■■■■tt■� .■t■■■■■■t■t■��„ ■■■■■■ .■■■t■■■tt■■■■t■■■■ ■■�MENEM /■t■/U■t■■■■t I■■■■■■■■■■■■■tl Ems ENE ■■■■■■■■■■■■■ Ittt■■■t■■■■t■■■� tttt■■t■t■■■■■t/ttt .//■■!t■■■t■■■t■1 t■ttt■t■■■■■■■■tttt ■■■■■■■��■■■■■■■■■t1 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■t It00 wommo�MlMEME1 MMEMOMMEMagm�■�� I■t■■■■■■■■i�■■■■■■■/tC1 ■■■MEMO■■■■■.■■�■■ ,■■■/■ ME ■■■■■■■■//■■■■■■■■ ■■/■■ttMMMMMMMMMMHMMMMMMMMMMI Mn■■ /■ !-M■MEM■E■M!t■■■■■■■■tM■■■OMMOMMOMMOMMOMi■ mm ATTACHMENT E 3 _T A F F R E_P 0 R T DATE June 16, 1988 C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM F) MEETING DATE_ June 23, 1988 AGENDA ITEM Request By Fieldcrest Development for Moratorium Exemption SUBJECT FUNDING REQUIRED_ -,_-__._- NO FUNDING REQUIRED.--.- _ TO: City Council FROM: David R. Sawyer, Planning Director BACKGROUND: On .Lune 7, 1988, staff received a letter from `1r. Gary Mecklin, a general partner with Fieldcrest Homes (see Attachment A). This letter is a request that the City Council exempt Tract 13050- 1,2,3 and 4 from the City's Residential Permit Moratorium. Fieldcrest Homes have completed 30 homes and are now requesting 4W permits for their next construction phase. These homes have already been approved through the Tentative and Final Map process. However, they are subject to the moratorium because the applicant had not applied for building permits for the next phase prior to the moratorium. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Department recommends the City Council exempt Fieldcrest Homes from the residential permit moratorium for the remainder of Tract 13050 - 1,2,3 and 4. Respectfully Submitted, 1 - Da i 'R: yer; :0 Planning Director 90UNCJ ; AGUiDA 11 Ef t �1 1! yj r t! HOMES June 6, 1988 Mayor Byron Matteson City of Grand Terrace 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92324 Dear Mayor Matteson: C VC JU N 0 7 1988 Pli"fvj" , ucrM1N)kN1 Re: Building Permit Moritorium Terrace Hills Tract 13050-1, 2, 3 & 4 87 Lots Terrace Hills Residential Partners respectfully requests to be exempted from the City's building permit moritorium. We have a recorded final map on our subdivision as well as having paid all required fees and posting subdivision bonds. To date, we have constructed 30 single family homes as well as installing all of the subdivision improvements. We have eight houses occupied and expect to be moving in an additional ten homeowners this month. A good many of our homeowners are local residents buying for the second time a larger home to accommodate growing families rather than moving away from Grand Terrace. In light of the above, Terrace Hills Residential Partners would request the City to allow an exemption. Your consideration in this matter is greatly appreciated. q TERRACE RLLLS BY: FIELD RES' GENERAL P. /BR COPY - David Sawyer File ATTACHMENTA 2801 West Coast Highway, Suite 360 Newport Beach, CA 92663 (714) 548-8845 S T A F F R E P O R T DATE June 17, 1988 C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM 4XA MEETING DATEJune 23, 1988 _ AGENDA ITEM N0.___ SUBJECT Request for Fee Waiver -of Site and Architectural Review By Mr. Ron Garrett FUNDING REQUIRED______._._ NO FUNDING REQUIRED.__XX_ TO: City Council FROM: David R. Sawyer, Planning Director BACKGROUND: On June 3, 1988, staff received a letter From Mr. Ron Garrett requesting a waiver of the $702.00 fee required for a Site and Architectural Review Application (see Attachment A). The property involved with this request is located at the intersection of Palm Avenue and Barton Road. This property was recently involved with a Conditional Use Permit application for a dry cleaning business which was conditionally approved by the Planning Commission. Subsequent to that approval the dry cleaning business is no longer being considered for this property and as a result the CUP and it's conditions are no longer applicable. While it is true that this property was recently involved in a CUP review and' -much of the staff work required for the Site and Architectural Review will be repetitive a certain amount of staff time will be necessary to prepare the Site and Architectural Review Application report. As a result of this staff Feels a reduction in the amount of the Fee is justified but not an entire waiving of the Fee. With respect to Mr. Garrett's,agreement to complete clertain work on his property, these items should be considered by the Site and Architectural Review Board as conditions of approval and not be addressed at this time. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Department recommends For Site and Architectural Review application only, and the various addressed at this time. Respectfully Submitted, David R.-Sawyer, Planning Director 4 DRS/mcm LJ the City Council reduce the fee from $702.00 to $100.00 for this Improvement requirements not be (� u c j, JUNE 3, 1988 RON GARRETT P.O. BOX 971 LOMA LINDA, CA. 92324 JUNITA BROWN DEPUTY CITY CLERK 22795 BARTON ROAD GRAND TERRACE, CA. 92324 RE: OCCUPANCY OF 22675 BARTON ROAD (A.M.A. 22565 BARTON ROAD) GRAND TERRACE DEAR JUNITA, ENCLOSED PLEASE FIND A COPY OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT *88-2. IN WHICH I WAS ALLOWED TO OPEN UP A DRY CLEANING FACILITIES. SUBSEQUENTLY MR. GANESH SWAMY MY PROSPECTIVE TENANT DECIDED AGAINST OPENING UP THE DRY CLEANERS. .IN THE MEANTIME I HAVE COME TO AN AGREEMENT WITH MR. PASCAL D'SILVA TO MOVE INTO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY TO OPEN UP A PROPERTY MANAGEMENT AND INVESTMENT CO. MR. D'SILVA APPROACHED MR. SAWYER FOR MOVING INTO THE ACILITY AND MR. SAWYER WANTS MR. D'SILVA TO PAY A $700.00 FEE TO GO THROUGH THE SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW. I FEEL VERY STRONGLY THAT THIS ADDITIONAL FEE IS UNJUSTIFIED IN LIGHT OF THE FACT THAT JUST 2 MONTHS AGO I SPENT IN EXCESS OF 01100.00 FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ALONG WITH SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW. PLEASE BEAR IN MIND WHEN IN MARCH OF 88, I HAD APPLIED FOR THE ABOVE THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT PEOPLE DID INSPECT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND THEY DID STIPULATE AS TO THEIR REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE BEAR IN MIND THAT I AM MAKING ALL ATTEMPTS TO CLEAN UP THIS PROPERTY AND TO GET RESPONSIBLE PEOPLE MOVED IN TO MAINTAIN AND UPKEEP THE PROPERTY, AND WITH THIS IN MIND I NEED THE CO-OPERATION OF THE CITY. ATTACHMENT A I AM HEREBY REQUESTING THAT THE 0700.00 FEE BE WAIVED AND FOLLOWING WORK TO BE DONE ON THE PROPERTY. 1. CLEAN ALL WEEDS UP ON ASPHALT AND SEAL COAT THE COMPLETE PARKING LOT AND STRIPE FOR PARKING. 2. REPLANT AND MAINTAIN THE PLANTER BOX AT THE ENTRANCE OF THE BUILDING. 3. SIGNS TO BE PLACED AS PER SECTION 18.72 OF THE GRAND TERRACE MUNICIPAL CODE. 4' PLEASE BEAR IN MIND THAT THIS BUILDING HAS BEEN OCCUPIED BY ME FOR MY CONSTRUCTION OFFICE AS EARLY AS 7 MONTHS AGO AND RIGHTFULLY SPEAKING I SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO HAVE AN OFFICE IN THIS LOCATION WITH NO REQUIREMENTS ATTACHED, HOWEVER MR. D'SILVA LIKES TO HAVE A CLEAN OFFICE LOCATION AND HAS AGREED TO DO THE ABOVE MENTIONED 3 ITEMS. WE ARE'REQUESTING YOUR CO-OPERATION IN THIS MATTER SO WE CAN MOVE AHEAD AND IMPROVE THIS CORNER LOCATION. IF YOU HAVE ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO CALL ME AT (714) 798-1247 OR (714) 825-5143. YOURS TRULY, RO % TT RCskl Enlcs cc: City Manager cc: each of the councilmen BYRON R. MATTESON Meyor BARBARA PFENNIGHAUSE� Mayor Pro Tom Count# Members HUGH J. GRANT DENNIS L. EVANS SUSAN CRAWFORD THOMAS J. SCHWAB City Manger April 26, 1988 Mr. Ganesh Swamy 10962 Rincon Street Loma Linda, CA. 92354 Re: Conditional Use Permit 88-2 Dear Mr. Swamy: This letter is to inform at its of you that the Planning Commi ssioii, applicationforliaarCondi.tionalrlUse 1Per.mit88for. aPProvPd your agency at 22675 Barton Road subject to the following conditions: 1• The landscaping areas around to building shall be replanted and maintaithe parkinned by tand he thwapplicant per landscape plans to be approvers by the Planning Department; 2• The parking area shall be restripp the plans, with handicapped area clearlypeaindiccats in ed; on 3• A loading space will be provided pursuantSection 18.60.180 of the Grand Terrace MunicipaltCode, its location to be approved by the Planning Department Staff;, and 4• All :applications permitted for signs shall be approved pursuant to Section 18.72 Ofthe Grand Terrace Municipal Code, 5• Compliance with all of the ordinances of the City of Grand Terrace with respect to Public Works and Building and Safety Department (Building Codes). The Planning Department will improvements pursuant to Condition Nos, 1 and red 2, abovethe: to i ] o%%,i ng P.: 1 • The Parking area s)'al 1 be resurfaced with a5)�l�a I t sc Swamy/CUP-88-2- Pa ge 2 that the entire parking area is fully blacktopped. In other words, the concrete area extending into the parking area shall be removed and replaced with asphalt. 2. Following the resurfacing of the parking area, it shall be clearly striped, pursuant to Section 18.60.170 of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code. 3. Landscaping improvements shall be made pursuant to Sections 1.8.60.190 and 18.60.200 of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code as follows: "18.60.190 Landscagin R— spcosnis�'ing of trees,buirem us,vines,ground coverorany combination thereof shall be installed and maintained in commercial and industrial districts according to the following standards and those of Section 18.60.200: A. Boundary landscaping shall be provided in the parking area abutting all public streets except for the area required for street openings five feet in width; B. Internal landscaping in addition to that required above shall be provided equal to at least five percent of the parking area, including driveways, shall also be provided in the parking area; C. Any landscaped area shall be separated from any adjacent vehicular area by a wall or curb at least six inches higher than the adjacent vehicular area; D. The height of boundary and interior landscaping shall be limited to a eight not to exceed three ` feet or, in the case of trees, no branch shall be below six feet, when within fifteen feet of the point of intersection of: 2. A vehicular street; A vehicular sidewalk; trafficway or driveway and a trafficway or driveway and a 3. Two or more vehicular trafficways, or driveways, or streets. W Swamy/CUP-88-2 Page 3 E. Landscaping shall be equally distributed throughout the parking area; F. Irrigation systems shall be kept in working condition. Adjustments, replacements, repair and cleaning shall be a park of regular maintenance. G. All landscaping shall be protected with concrete curbs or other acceptable barriers. 18.60.200 Landscaping --Maintenance. The following 18.60.90: apply --to- randscapiri�; required by Section 18.60.90: A. Permanent watering facilities all be provided for all landscaped area. B. Required landscaping shall be maintained in a neat, clean and healthy condition. This includes pruning, mowing of lawns, weeding, removal of litter, fertilizing, replacement of plants where necessary, and the regular watering of all plant material. C. Lawn and ground covers are to be trimmed or mowed regularly. All planting areas are to be kept free from weeds and debris. D. All plantings are to be kept in a healthy and growing condition. Fertilization, cultivation and tree pruning shall be a part of regular maintenance." As you can see, these landscaping requirements are taken directly out of the Municipal Code. They will be applied to any business seeking to locate at 22675 Barton Road or any of r area ri -fhe City where aU_6n_ffifi no aT_-1 s —Permit or Site and Architectural Review is required. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact . the Planning Department. Very tr yours, David Sawyer Planning Direct0 DATE: June 9, 1988 STAFF REPORT 12.354 C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM ( -� MEETING DATE: June 23, 1988 AGENDA ITEM NO. -� 5 SUBJECT TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT THE INTERSECTION OF MT. VERNON AND BARTON ROAD FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED OWe bids for this particular project will be received in the office of the City Clerk at 2:00 P.M. on June 22, 1988. The Staff will make the presentation and the recommendation to the City Council at the regular meeting of June 23, 1988 regarding the award of the contract for the installation of the signal. Staff Recommends that: CITY COUNCIL CONSIDER ACTION ON THIS ITEM AT THE REGULAR MEETING ON JUNE 23rd BASED ON THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION AT THAT TIME. DATE 6,14 =o u CRA ITEM ( ) S T A F F R E P O R T COUNCIL ITEM (X) MEETING DATE : 6, 23, 88 SUBJECT: CONTRACT AWARD FOR THE ANNUAL CIVIC CENTER AND PARK WAY LANDSCAPING 15 Effective July 1, 1988, the existing contract between the City of Grand Terrace and Los Amigos Landscaping will expire. During the past year, staff has been quite pleased and impressed with the dedication and workmanship that has been displayed by Los Amigos personnel, toward the Civic Center and park way landscaping. Inasmuch as Los Amigos was by far, the lowest estimate received last year, and in addition to the excellent service the City has received, staff does not hesitate in recommending to Council that the contract again be awarded to the local Grand Terrace business known as Los Amigos. Further, the contractor is only requesting an increase of $100.00 per month, over the current contrast price of $600.00. Staff Recommends: COUNCIL AWARD THE ANNUAL CIVIC MAINTENANCE CONTRACT TO LOS AMIGOS. RLA CEIdTE1;; PARKW"-. LANDSCAFE DATE: June 17, 1988 Ll S T A F F R E P O R T CRA ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (xx) MEETING DATE: June 23, 1988 SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO THE HOURLY RATE SCHEDULE FOR KICAK & ASSOCIATES �5 FUNDING REQUIRED NO FUNDING REQUIRED The City staff is submitting proposed Schedule C to amend contract GTC #79-11 with Kicak and Associates for the delivery of engineering services to the City of Grand Terrace. The last amendment to the hourly fee schedule was made two years ago effective July 1, 1986. The proposed hourly rate schedule is included as attachment #1. Staff has obtained for the purposes of comparison the hourly rate schedules of four engineering companies. These companies have submitted proposals to the City of Highland for the provision of engineering services. These schedules are also attached to the staff report. In reviewing the rates proposed to the City of Highland, it is clear that the rates being proposed by Kicak and Associates are tar not only competitive, but in many cases are fifty percent less than the rates proposed to Highland. STAFF RECOMMENDS: COUNCIL ADOPT PROPOSED SCHEDULE C to KICK AND ASSOCIATES CONTRACT GT #79-11 EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 1988. TS:bt Attachments COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM W (_OF_ ATTACHMENT #1 KICAK AND ASSOCIATES INC. PROPOSED HOURLY RATE SCHEDULE TO CITY OF GRAND TERRACE SCHEDULE A SCHEDULE B SCHEDULE C Aug., 1983 July 1, 1986 Proposed July 1, 1988 I. Attendance at City Council & Planning Commission Meetings: Principal Engineer 25.00/hr. 28.00/hr. 32.00/hr. II. All other Engineering Services: Prinicipal Engineer 36.00lhr. 40.00/hr. 45.00/hr. Project Engineer 32.00/hr. 35.00/hr. 40.00/hr. Designer 29.00/hr. 32.00/hr. 36.00/hr. Draftsman 26.001hr. 29.00/hr. 32.00/hr Clerical 14.00/hr. 18.00/hr. 20.00/hr. III.Field Surveys 3-Man Party 90.00/hr. 100.00/hr. 105.00/hr. 2-Man Party 72.00/hr. 80.00/hr. 90.00/hr. Mileage .30/mile .30lmile .30/mile IV. Inspections Building Inspector 26.00/hr. 29.00/hr. 34.00/hr. Public Works Inspector 26.00/hr. 29.00/hr. 34.00/hr. V. Miscellaneous 6 Xerox 0.10/copy 0.10/copy 0.10/copy Blue Line Reproduction 0.25/s.f. 0.25/s.f. 0.50/s.f. Mylar Reproduction 3.00/s.f. 3.00/s.f. '3.00/s.f. Mileage other than surveys 0.25/mile 0.25/mile 0.25/mile Expert Witness and Court Appearance - to be Arranged. Sierra Eninear®nc CIVIL ENGINEERS • LAND SURVEYORS • LAND PLANNER5 FF: -c COS' FE,-:S :,i: COS''; S _-DEfdr. _.:FIED IIE3EI:: FOP E �GINEERIIN;G SL_..T C'7S, PL _I,N CHECKS �:',D !; ii':R REL'T7D AREAS OF RLS TS C .U7LL BE S j �i [0 r J_\IHEIR REV" Eb, R_IOR L ,T,rTl1r1_41;,'" '7 j_T 5� �, i B�, I.vmA,N•DATOR`� -�D T^lS OF ALL ENGI`:iEERITdG FEES AND SE1tVICES F:'C :1- E 1'I:.,E TO ENS_�TRE Ai? EQUITABLE RELATIONSHIP �� _ . �.. CCS T OF S RV I C LS I:D ttiORi, PERFORMED . hLL FE.� SCI.EDJLES, ENGIi1EERING COSTS, URIC =_ '1IL':'� C=.LOUT LS, PRCCESSIIIG PROCEDURES, AS WELL OL THEE ENGJI-_.rERING DEl YCTMENT , SHALL D I THE 'JAYOR A:D CITY COUNCIL RATES _. _: T RIi•G: PRI:-PAL $ 80.00/1-IOUR SEI�:. 7'NGI1]EER, RCF. c;5.00/ HOUR 60.00/::CUR n' 0 . 0 0 ::OUP SE ._ _. DR:�7`TSTJAI; 45.00/HOUR D _'• .::G '..FD 35.00/HOUR r --___ _ _ ._ L.:"i iJ 35.00/HOUR r. ',l i Aw PA: _ : C _ I Il F 6 5 . 0 0 / HOUR 2 CRE�,l 115.00/HOUR 2 — :: CREl ;„/E111D 125.00/HOUR J ..__.., CRE;? 135.00/HOUR iti�/}. �11D /�/� 145 .00/ IIOUR (714) 888-0772 336 SCL iti `/i/-'ERMIAN. SUITE E • SAN BE NARDI,:O, CALIFORNIA 92408 BSI CONSULTANTS, INC. SCHEDULE OF HOURLY RATES April, 1988 C'.ASSIFTCATION HOURLY RATE Principal Engineer $ 95.00 Senior Project Manager 90.00 Prefect Manager 82.00 Senior Civil Engineer 82.00 Civil Engineer 76.00 Civil Engineering Fssociate 72.00 Design Engineer 62.00 Senior Traffic Engineer 80.00 Registered Traffic Engineer 76.00 Traffic Engineering Associate 72.00 Traffic Engineering Assistant 52.00 Senior Right -of -Way Agency 76.00 Right -of -Way Agent 58.00 Senior Plan Checker 67.00 Plan Checker 58.00 Senior Designer 67.00 Designer 58.00 Staff Engineer 55.00 Senior Draftsperson 50.00 Draftsperson 46.00 Technical Aide 34.00 Senior Construction: Inspector 58.00 Construction Inspector 49.00 Registered Landscape Architect 76.00 Associate Landscape Architect 65.00 Assistant Landscape Architect 58.00 Senior Landscape Inspector 58.00 Senior Landscape Plan Checker 65.00 Landscape Plan. Checker 58.00 Landscape Advisor 65.00 Landscape Construction Inspector 49.00 Licensed Land Surveyor 76.00 Partv Chief - 2-Person Survey Crew 142.00 Party Chief - 3-Person Survey Crew 170.00 Supervising Land Su=veyor 72.00 Senior Survey Analyst 67.00 Survey Analyst 58.00 Survey Technician 52.00 CADD Ooerator 75.00 Senior Programmer 65.00 Programr-ner 50.00 Word Processor 34.00 Clerical ; 30.00 Out-of-pocket expenses (blueprinting, reproduction, printing) will be invoiced at cost plus 151. A 15t fee for administration, coordination, and handling will be added to s ulDcontracted services. Mileage will be invoiced at $0.35 per 'fie Schedule of Hourly Rates is effective through March 31, 1989. Pates may be adjusted after this date to compensate for labor cast ad3ustments and other increases due to inflationary trends. i ' � WILLDAN ASSOCIATES SCHEDULE OF HOURLY RATES August 1987 Fee Rate Classification Per Hour Engineering Sr. Consultant $110.00 Principal Engineer 100.00 Division Manager 88.00 Project Director 82.00 Sr. Engineer 75.00 Sr. Project Manager 73.00 Project Manager 66.00 Associate Engineer 64.00 Sr. Designer (CARD) 64.00 Designer(CADD) 60.00 Supervising Engineer 82.00 Engineering Associate 64.00 Sr. Designer 60.00 Sr. Design Engineer 52.00 Design Engineer 48.00 Sr. Drafter 50.00 Designer 42.00 Sr. Drafter (CAD) 50.00 Drafter (CAD) 46.00 Drafter 40.00 Technical Aide 34.00 Spvsr.-Public Works Observation 66.00 Sr. Public Works Observer 55.00 Public Works Observer 46.00 Sr. Real Property Agent 75.00 Real Property Agent 66.00 Assistant Real Property Agent 55.00 Surveying Spvsr. Mapping Services 80.00 Sr. Survey Analyst 60.00 Sr. Calculator 60.00 Calculator I=I 50.00 Survey Analyst 50.00 Calculator I 40.00 Spvsr.-Survey 72.00 Survey Party Chief 67.00 Two -Man Field Party 132.00 Three -Man Field Party 170.00 7/27/87 Effective 8/1/87 IM 21 J._Z. DAVIDSON ASSOCIATES, INC. SCHEDULE OF HOURLY BILLING RATES EFFECTIVE 'THROUGH JULY 31, 1988 12ev;.sed 11/9/87 RATES _ _ncipal . . . . . . . . . . . . . $90.00 Principal Engineer $76.00 Senior Engineer/Senior Project Manager . . . . . . . $70.00 Assistant Planning Director/Associate Engineer/ Computer Project Manager/Principal Landscape Architect/ Project Manager . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $64. 00 .._"._sect/Assistant Engineer/ Civil Designer/ ..csca3e Arch itect;'Senior Planner . . . . . . . . . . . $56.00 A: ch:.tectural Planner/Design Drafter/Planner . . . . . . . $52.00 Computer Project Coordinator . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $46.00 Junior Engineer/Senior Drafter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $44.00 Associate Planner/Landscape Architectural Designer . . . . $40.00 Drafter/Senior Computer Technician . . . . . . . . . . . . $38.00 Assistant Planner/Junior Drafter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $34.00 Computer Technician . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $28.00 CVtiS:RUCTION MANAGEMENT Inspector . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $54.00 SURVEYING Principal Surveyor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $70.00 Sensor Survey Technician . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $64.00 S,:r•:ey Technician . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $52.00 an Survey Party $56.00 2-11an Survey Party . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $108.00 3-Man Survey Party . . •.. . . $154.00 -ravel Time (When in excess of 8hourswork per day) 2-Man Survey Party . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $50.00 3-Man Survey Party . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $73.00 SER`:CES AND EXPENSES: Secretary/Clerk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $28.00 In-house Reproduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cost Travel (per Mile) . . . . . . . . . . . . . Su::,srster. . • • • • 0.33 ce . . . . Cost Otter Expenses - Including Special Consultants and P.:rc rased Services through Subcontracts Cost + 20% Ex_, rt �,itness or Litigation (4-hour minimum, _nclading preparation time) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $131.00 DATE: June 22, 1988 S T A F F R E P O R T CRA ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (xx) MEETING DATE: May 23, 1988 SUBJECT: APPROPRIATION FOR PARKLAND APPROPRIATION •'f S ------------------------------------------------------------------ FUNDING REQUIRED X NO FUNDING REQUIRED At the meeting of May 26 in closed session Council directed staff to obtain an appraisal of the Roberts' parcel for use in negotiation for acquisition. Staff came back to Council with an estimate of $2000 to $2500 for an appropriation. Council directed staff to solicit additional bids due to the high cost of the original estimates. Staff has contacted additional appraisers and it appears that an appraisal will cost approximately $1500. STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT COUNCIL APPROPRIATE AN ADDITIONAL $1000 TO THE $500 CURRENTLY APPROPRIATED FOR THE PURPOSES OF OBTAINING AN ACQUISITION APPRAISAL OF THE POTENTIAL PARK SITE. TS:bt