06/23/1988BYRON R. MATTESON
Mayor
BARBARA PFENNIGHAUSENf
Mayor Pro Tem
Council Members
HUGH J. GRANT
DENNIS L. EVANS
SUSAN CRAWFORD
THOMAS J. SCHWAB
City Manager
June 23, 1988
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
REGULAR MEETINGS
2ND and 4TH Thursdays -- 5:30 P.M.
Council Chambers
Grand Terrace Civic Center
22795 Barton Road
Grand Terrace, CA 92324-5295
CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
Byron R. Matteson, Mayor
Barbara Pfennighausen, Mayor Pro Tem
Hugh J. Grant, Councilmember
Dennis L. Evans, Councilmember
Susan Shirley, Councilmember
Thomas J. Schwab, City Manager
City Office: 714/824-6621
22795 BARTON ROAD • GRAND TERRACE, CA 92324-5295 * CIVIC CENTER - (714) 824-6621
- —i
REVISED
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
GRAND TERRACE CIVIC CENTER
22795 Barton Road
* Call to Order
* Invocation -
* Pledge of Allegiance
* Roll Call
CONVENE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
1. Approval of Minutes 6/09/88
2. Approval of Check Register No. CRA 062388
3. A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIF.,
ADOPTING A BUDGET OF ESTIMATED REVENUES AND
EXPEDITURES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1988-89.
ADJOURN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
CONVENE CITY COUNCIL
1. Items to Delete
2. CONSENT CALENDAR
The following Consent Calendar items are
expected to be routine & non -controversial.
They will be acted upon by the Council at
one time without discussion. Any Council
Member, Staff Member or Citizen may request
removal of an item from the Consent Calendar
for discussion.
A. Approve Check Register No. 062388
B. Ratify 6/23/88 CRA Action
C. Waive Full Reading of Ordinances on Agenda
D. Approve 6/09/88 Minutes
STAFF
RECOMMENDATIONS
Approve
Approve
Adopt
Approve
Approve
June 23, 1988
COUNCIL ACTION
r
n
COUNCIL AGENDA
06/23/88 - Page 2 of 3
STAFF
RECOMMENDATIONS COUNCIL ACTION
E. A RESOLUTON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE Adopt
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIF., ADOPTING
A BUDGET OF ESTIMATED REVENUES AND EXPEND-
ITURES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1988-89.
F. Accept Agreements, Bonds, Cash Deposit & Accept
Final Tract Maps 13205-1 and 13205 for
T.J. Austyn.
G. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE Adopt
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIF., CALLING
THE ELECTION OF NOVEMBER 8, 1988.
H. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE Adopt
CITY OF GRAND TERRRACE, CALIF., TO
CONSOLIDATE WITH THE COUNTY OF SAN
BERNARDINO FOR THE ELECTION OF NOVEMBER
8, 1988.
3. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
4. ORAL REPORTS
A. Committee Reports
1. Historical & Cultural Committee
A. Accept resignation of Kathryn
Harmon.
B. Minutes of 6/6/88 Meeting.
2. Crime Prevention Committee
A. Minutes of 5/9/88.
3. Parks & Recreation Committee
A. Minutes of 5/2/88.
B. COUNCIL REPORTS
15. PUBLIC HEARINGS - 6:30 P.M.
A. An Overall Revision of the City's General
Plan.
Accept
6. NEW BUSINESS
A. Request from Fieldcrest Homes for Morator- Approve
ium Exemption.
COUNCIL AGENDA STAFF
06/23/88 - Page 3 of 3 RECOMMENDATIONS
B. Request by Mr. Ron Garrett for Waiver of Reduce fee
Site & Architectural Review Fee.
C. Award Contract for Traffic Signal at Mt. Award
Vernon & Barton Road.
D. Award of Annual Landscape Maintenance Award
Agreement.
E. Amend Schedule B to Schedule C of City Amend
Engineer's Fee Schedule.
F. Appropriation for Parkland Appraisal Fee. Appropriate
ADJOURN
THE NEXT REGULAR CRA/CITY COUNCIL MEETING WILL
BE HELD ON JULY 14 1988 AT 5:30 P.M.
------------------
AGENDA ITEM REQUESTS FOR THE 7/14/88 MEETING MUST
BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING TO THE CITY MANAGER'S
OFFICE BY NOON ON 7/06/88.
COUNCIL ACTION
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - JUNE 09, 1988
A regular meeting of the Community Redevelopment Agency, City of Grand Terrace,
was held in the Council Chambers, Grand Terrace Civic Center, 22795 Barton
Road, Grand Terrace, California, on June 09, 1988, at 5:30 p.m.
PRESENT: Byron Matteson, Chairman
Barbara Pfennighausen, Vice Chairman
Hugh J. Grant, Agency Member
Susan Shirley, Agency Member
Thomas J. Schwab, Executive Director
Randy Anstine, Assistant City Manager
Juanita Brown, Secretary
David Sawyer, Planning Director
Ivan Hopkins, City Attorney
Joe Kicak, City Engineer
ABSENT: Dennis L. Evans, Agency Member
APPROVAL OF MAY 26, 1988 CRA MINUTES
CRA-88-19 MOTION BY VICE AGENCY MEMBER GRANT, SECOND BY VICE CHAIRMAN
PFENNIGHAUSEN, CARRIED 4-0 (AGENCY MEMBER EVANS ABSENT ON VOTE), to
approve May 26, 1988 CRA Minutes.
APPROVAL OF CHECK REGISTER NO. CRA060988
CRA-88-20 MOTION BY VICE CHAIRMAN PFENNIGHAUSEN, SECOND BY AGENCY MEMBER
GRANT, CARRIED 4-0 (AGENCY MEMBER EVANS ABSENT ON VOTE), to approve
Check Register No. CRA060988.
Chairman Matteson adjourned the CRA Meeting at 5:32 p.m. until the
$AV adjourned joint regular City Council/CRA meeting which will be held
Monday, June 13, 1988 at 6:30 p.m.
CHAIRMAN of the City of Grand Terrace
SECRETARY of the City of Grand Terrace
CRA AGENDA ITEM NO. -I-
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY '
CITY
OF GRAND TERRACE
DATE:
JUNE 23, 1988
CHECK
REGISTER NO: CRA062388
CHECK OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF: JUNE 23, 1988
NUMBER VENDOR DESCRIPTION AmnilNT
18600
18603
18606
18618
18626
18640
I
SUSAN SHIRLEY
STIPENDS FOR
JUNE,
1988
$ 150.00
DENNIS EVANS
STIPENDS FOR
JUNE,
1988
150.00
HUGH GRANT
STIPENDS FOR
JUNE,
1988
150.00
BYRON MATTESON
STIPENDS FOR
JUNE,
1988
150.00
BARBARA PFENNIGHAUSEN
STIPENDS FOR
JUNE,
1988
150.00
M. L. STERN, INC.
LEASE -PURCHASE AGREEMENT FOR AIR CONDITIONING AT JUNIOR
HIGH SCHOOL
55,838.99
TOTAL: $ 56,588.99
I CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THE AFORELISTED CHECKS FOR THE PAYMENT OF CRA LIABILITIES
HAVE BEEN AUDITED BY ME AND ARE NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE EXPENDITURES FOR THE OPERATION OF CRA.
THOMAS SCHWAB
TREASURER
m
DATE: June 17, 1988
S T A F F R E P O R T
CRA ITEM (xx) COUNCIL ITEM ( ) MEETING DATE: June 23, 1988
SUBJECT: ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 88- APPROVING THE COMMUNITY
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF ✓5
GRAND TERRACE FOR FISCAL YEAR 1988-89
FUNDING REQUIRED
NO FUNDING REQUIRED
The Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) Board, during the CRA
budget hearing held on June 14, 1988, approved the CRA annual 1988-
89 budget with revenue of $675,500 and expenditures of $729,048.
STAFF RECOMMENDS
THE AGENCY APPROVE RESOLUTION #88-_ FORMALLY ADOPTING THE 1988-
89 CRA ANNUAL BUDGET.
TS:bt
N
CRA A--;-„D,A 11 a NU.
. Vv
A
' OF
A
F0
RESOLUTION NO. CRA 88-01
R
RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING
BUDGET OF ESTIMATED REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
FISCAL YEAR 1988-89
WHEREAS, the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City
of Grand Terrace is required to adopt a budget for the subsequent
fiscal year for estimated revenues and expenditures; and
WHEREAS, the members of said Community Redevelopment
Agency and Staff members have thoroughly reviewed and analyzed
the proposed budget in order to determine the needs of the City
of Grand Terrace;
NOW, THEREFORE, the Community Redevelopment Agency of
the City of Grand Terrace DOES HEREBY RESOLVE that a budget for
Fiscal Year 1988-89, a copy of which is on file in the City
Clerk's office, is hereby adopted with total estimated revenues
of $67S.,500.00 and total estimated expenditures of $729,048.00
ADOPTED this 23rd day of June, 1988.
ATTEST:
Secretary of the Grand Terrace Chairman of the Grand Terrace
Community Redevelopment Agency Community Redevelopment Agency
I, Juanita Brown, Secretary of the City of Grand
Terrace Community Redevelopment Agency, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular
meeting of the Grand Terrace Community Redevelopment Agency of
the City of Grand Terrace held on the 23rd day of June, 1988, by
the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ecretary
Approved as to form:
ity Attorney
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
f:ilJ� �CIL i .,.)'.SAL DATE: JUNE 23, 1988 CHECK REGISTER NO
CHECK OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF: JUNE 23, 1988
NUMBER VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
P5685
SOUTHERN
CA
EDISON COMPANY
P5686
SOUTHERN
CA
GAS COMPANY
P5687
WEST END
UNIFORMS
P5688
:TRAVEL TIME
TOURS
P5689
PETTY CASH
P5690
SOUTHERN
CA
EDISON COMPANY
P5691
SOUTHERN
CA
GAS COMPANY
P5692
SOUTHERN
CA
JOINT POWERS
INSURANCE
P5693
SOUTHERN
CA
GAS COMPANY
P5694
ALL PRO
CONSTRUCTION
P5695
SOUTHERN CA CITY CLERKS ASSOC.
?5697
PADDEN COMPANY
5698
SHERIFF FLOYD TIDWELL
5699
SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY
P5700
SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY
P5701
KICAK AND ASSOCIATES
P5702
MAIN LINE EMBOSSING
P5703
POSTMASTER-COLTON
P5704
STATE COMPENSATIONS INSURANCE
P5705
Z
SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY
P5706
I>
z
SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY
P5707
SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY
P5708
=
SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY
18584
AYALA AND SONS
CASH PAYMENTS FOR 6/2/88
CASH PAYMENTS FOR 6/2/88
UNIFORMS FOR CITIZENS PATROL
CARIBBEAN CRUISE DEPOSIT
FOR DAY CARE
CASH PAYMENTS FOR 6/6/88
CASH PAYMENTS FOR 6/6/88
GENERAL LIABILITY, 1988 ADJUSTMENT
t
CASH PAYMENTS FOR 6/7/88
EMERGENCY REPAIRS AS RESULT OF SEWER LINE TRENCH
FAILURE
GENERAL MEETING
LEASE ON OLYMPIA OLY TEXT AND MAILING MACHINE, 6/88
LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CRIME PREVENTION OFFICER FOR 6/88
CASH PAYMENTS FOR 6/10/88
CASH PAYMENTS FOR 6/10/88
ENGINEERING SERVICES OF 5/2-5/29/88
BUSINESS CARDS FOR RECREATION
BULK MAIL FOR RECREATION PROGRAMS
WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE FOR 5/88
CASH PAYMENTS FOR 6/14/88
CASH PAYMENTS FOR 6/14/88
CASH PAYMENTS FOR 6/15/88
CASH PAYMENTS FOR 6/15/88
CLEAR AND REMOVE DEBRIS AT PICO PARK
R
247.94
64.24
57.24
400.00
210.58
247.66
40.94
17,282.00
37.89
7,111.36
25.00
179.17
55,021.00
83.60
17.82
11,683.10
23.32
49.10
1,284.47
20.92
50.81
.35.25
59.30
4,950.00
CITY
OF GRAND TERRACE
r
DATE:
JUNE 23, 1988
CHECK REGISTER NO: 062388
CHECK
NUMBER
VENDOR
OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF: JUNE 23, 1988
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
18585
WEST END UNIFORMS
UNIFORMS FOR CITIZENS PATROL
$ 73.14
18586
DOUGH GRAHAM
REFUND, POLITICAL SIGNS
6.00
18587
GOSNEY CONSTRUCTION
ARCHITECTURAL BARRIER REMOVAL (LESS 10% RETENTION)
29,153.83
18588
TOWN & COUNTRY PROPERTIES
REFUND, WASTE WATER DISPOSAL
10.67
18589
ALL OCCASIONS AWARDS
AWARD RIBBONS
36.04
18590
ALL PRO CONSTRUCTION
REPAIR SEWER TRENCH LINE FAILURE, MICHIGAN, FINE GRADING
AT PICO PARK, TRENCHING WATER LINE AND PLACING IRRIGATION
WATER LINE.
13,290.00
18591
A & M TROPHY SERVICE
PLAQUES FOR PLANNING COMMISSION
61.63
18592
BARR COMMERCIAL DOOR
RESTOCKING CHARGE FOR DOOR
61.00
18593
BASTANCHURY BOTTLED WATER
BOTTLED WATER AND COOLER RENTAL FOR CIVIC CENTER AND
DAY CARE 6/88
68.75
18594
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
LIGHTS AT BARTON AND 215, 4/88
117.58
_.595
NORMAN T. CAOUETTE
ATTENDING MEETINGS FOR 5/2, 5/16, & 6/6/88
75.00
18596
CONSTANCE CHAPMAN
CLEANING REST ROOMS AT PARK (4 DAYS)
80.00
18597
GERALD COLE
ATTENDING MEETINGS FOR 5/2 & 5/16/88
50.00
18598
COMPLETE BUSINESS SYSTEMS
EXTRA COPIES FOR LARGE COPIER
407.28
18599
LAVON COTTRELL
MILEAGE
18.89
18600
SUSAN SHIRLEY
STIPENDS FOR JUNE, 1988
150.00
18601
DICKSON COMPANY OF THE INLAND
EMPIRE
STREET SWEEPING FOR 5/88
3,211.07
18602_
ELIZABETH DUARTE
MILEAGE
13.39
18603
DENNIS EVANS
STIPENDS FOR JUNE, 1988
150.00
18604
EWING IRRIGATION SUPPLIES
IRRIGATION SUPPLIES FOR PARK
154.65
18605
G.T. MAILERS
PICK-UP MAIL FOR CIVIC CENTER FOR 4/88 & 5/88, BURST
WASTE WATER DISPOSAL BILLS FOR 5/88
64.14 -
CITY
OF GRAND TERRACE
DATE:
JUNE 23, 1988
CHECK REGISTER NO: 062388
CHECK OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF: JUNE 23, 1988 _
NUMBER VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
18606
HUGH GRANT
18607
STANLEY HARGRAVE
18608
JOHN HARPER
18609
JERRY HAWKINSON
18610
HEALTH NET
18611
HYDREX PEST CONTROL
18612
KLEEN-LINE CORPORATION
18613
K-MART
18614
LITTLE RED SCHOOL HOUSE
18615
LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY PRINT
18616
MARANATHA DISKING
18617
MCKENZIE COMPANY
18618
BYRON MATTESON
18619
MIRACLE RECREATION EQUIPMENT
18620
RAY MUNSON
18621
MORGAN & FRANZ
18622
JEAN MYERS
18623
PACIFIC BELL
18624
PETRA ENTERPRISES
18625
PERRY'S STATIONARY
18626
BARBARA PFENNIGHAUSEN
18627
PETTY CASH
18628
CATHY PIERSON
18629
PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPANY
18630
QWIK-CODE
STIPENDS FOR JUNE, 1988
ATTEND MEETING FOR 5/2, 5/16, & 6/6/88
LEGAL SERVICES FOR FEBRUARY, MARCH AND MAY, 1988
ATTEND MEETING FOR 5/2 & 6/6/88
MEDICAL INSURANCE FOR JULY, 1988
PEST CONTROL FOR CIVIC CENTER, 6/88
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
FILM, CODE ENFORCEMENT
PARTICIPATION AWARDS, RECREATION
FORMS FOR CITY CLERK
DISK PARCELL ON PICO
RIBBONS
STIPENDS FOR JUNE, 1988
BACKSTOP FOR BASEBALL
ATTENDING MEETINGS, 5/2, 5/16, & 6/6/88
LIFE INSURANCE OFR JULY, 1988
CROSSING GUARD , 5/23-6/6/88 & 6/6-6/16/88
PHONE, DAY CARE, COMPUTER, & CIVIC CENTER PAY PHONES
PRINTING FOR PLANNING
OFFICE SUPPLIES
STIPENDS FOR JUNE, 1988
FOR DAY CARE
INSTRUCTOR FOR GYMNASTICS
AD FOR LIFEGUARD
SUPPLIES FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT
150.00
75.00
2,849.75
50.00
1,498.96
48.00
241.79
125.68
41.87
243.93
400.00
64.33
64.65
1,647.43
75.00
96.50
228.96
106.03
77.17
115.22
64.65
125.03
326.40
24.24
43.90
3
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
DATE: JUNE 23, 1988
CHECK REGISTER NO: 062388
CHECK OUTSTANDING DEMANDS AS OF: JUNE 23, 1988
NUMBER VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
18631
RADIO SHACK
18632
RALPH'S PLUMBING
18633
ADRIAN REYNOSA
18634
THOMAS SCHWAB
18635
SEARS -CATALOG
18636
SIGNAL MAINTENANCE CORP.
18637
JIM SIMS
18638
SOUTHERN CA EDISON COMPANY
18639
SOUTHERN CA GAS COMPANY
18641
STULTS ELECTRIC -COMPANY
18642
UNION OIL COMPANY
18643
UNIVERSITY PROMPT CARE
18644
FRAN VAN GELDER
18645
WEST-COMPUTIL CORP.
18646
WEST PUBLISHING COMPANY
CASSETTE TAPES
REPAIR WATER LEAK AT FIRE STATION
SCOREKEEPER FOR SLO-PITCH
MILEAGE
WATER STORAGE TANK AND TOOLS FOR EMERGENCY OPERATION CENTER
SIGNAL MAINTENANCE OF 5/88
ATTENDING MEETING FOR 5/2, 5/16, & 6/6/88
ELECTRIC FOR CITY BLDGS, CIVIC CENTER, TWO LIGHTS AT PARK
BARTON AND PALM, STREET LIGHTS, AND SIGNALS
GAS FOR CIVIC CENTER AND CITY BLDGS. '
REPAIR WALK LIGHTS AT CIVIC CENTER
FUEL FOR CITY TRUCK AND PARK EQUIPMENT
PRE EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS FOR RECREATION
ATTEND MEETINGS, 5/2, 5/16, & 6/6/88
PROCESS PARKING CITATIONS FOR 3/88
CA CODE UPDATES
TOTAL:
$ 148.40
52.00
165.00
136.49
626.75
219.48
75.00
5,961.52
314.12
150.00
82.91
96.00
75.00
2.10
22.70
$163,309.84
I CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THE AFORELISTED CHECKS FOR PAYMENT OF CITY LIABILITIES HAVE
BEEN AUDITED BY ME AND ARE NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE EXPENDITURES FOR THE OPERATION OF THE CITY.
THOMAS SCHWAB
FINANCE DIRECTOR
4 -
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - JUNE 09, 1988
PENDING CITY
COUNCIL APPROVAL
A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace was called
to order in the Council Chambers, Grand Terrace Civic Center, 22795 Barton
Road, Grand Terrace, California, on June 09, 1988, at 5:30 p.m.
PRESENT: Byron Matteson, Mayor
Barbara Pfennighausen, Mayor Pro Tem
Hugh J. Grant, Councilmember
Susan Shirley, Councilmember
Thomas J. Schwab, City Manager/Finance Director
Randy Anstine, Assistant City Manager
David Sawyer, Planning Director
Juanita Brown, Deputy City Clerk
Ivan Hopkins, City Attorney
Joe Kicak, City Engineer (arrived at 6:25 p.m.)
ABSENT: Dennis L. Evans, Councilmember
The meeting was opened with invocation by Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen, followed
by the Pledge of Allegiance led by Councilmember Grant.
ITEMS TO DELETE
NONE
SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
1. Mayor Matteson presented a proclamation to Dr. Cynthia
Williams proclaiming June 11-17, 1988, "Chiropractic
Wellness Week."
2. Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen read a proclamation proclaiming
June 13-19, 1988, as "National Scleroderma Awareness Week."
3. Mayor Matteson presented plaques to Norman Caouette and
Gerald Cole for their service on the Planning Commission
and thanked them for their good work.
CONSENT CALENDAR
CC-88-68 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER GRANT, SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM
PFENNIGHAUSEN, CARRIED 4-0 (COUNCILMEMBER EVANS WAS ABSENT), to
approve the Consent Calendar with the removal of Item A --
Approve Check Register No. 060988; Item E -- Waive Planning Fees
for Marge Hosch; Item G -- Budget Appropriation for Architectural
Barrier Removal.
B. RATIFY JUNE 095 1988 CRA ACTION
C. WAIVE FULL READING OF ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS ON
AGENDA
D. APPROVE MINUTES OF MAY 26, 1988
F. REQUEST FOR "NO PARKING" AREA IN FRONT OF TERRACE PINES
MOBILEHOME PARK.
ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR DISCUSSION
H. Approve Check Register No. 060988
Councilmember Grant questioned Item 18416 - Staff
Seminar.
City Manager Schwab explained that it was a seminar put
on by the League of California Cities entitled,
"Treating your Constituents as Customers."
Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen questioned Item 18422 -
State of California, balance due on ball field lights,
stating that she thought we owned those lights.
City Manager Schwab explained that back in 1983 when
the lights were installed, a State architect from the
School Board was involved and we are just now getting
the bill from 1983 for the balance.
E. Waive Planning Fees for Marge Hosch
Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen stated that Mrs. Hosch did
not ask that their fees be waived, if, in fact, they
owe fees. She stated that the Hosches are grieved by
the excessive requirements and procedures that they are
being required to go through for a 63 sq. ft. washroom.
Planning Director Sawyer stated that the reason they
have to go through the process is because of the
setback. The code states that the setback on that side
of the house is 10 feet; their garage which they are
going to come off of is 5 ft. into the setback,
Council Minutes - 06/09/88
Page 2
indicating a variance has to meet certain State
requirements to break those setback rules, therefore,
they would need to go through the process.
Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen voiced concern that there
are developers who are not following original plans and
they are getting away with it, and the Hosches are
trying to build a 63 sq. ft. washroom and can't. She
asked for Council's concensus that staff should be
directed to use common sense discretion in these kinds
of matters on a one by one issue, and to make a motion
to waive the fees.
Mayor Matteson disagreed, stating that the first time
they make a mistake, they'll be here defending
themselves; laws are made to be upheld and he has a
obligation to uphold them.
Councilmember Grant seconded the motion to waive the
fees, and agreed that the system is what causes the
problems. He felt that in the cases where injustice
occurs, it should be brought to Council.
Councilmember Shirley concurred with Councilmember
Grant in supporting staff, and that if some leniency
can be given that it be put on the Consent Calendar.
CC-88-69 MOTION BY MAYOR MATTESON, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER GRANT, CARRIED
4-0 (COUNCILMEMBER EVANS WAS ABSENT), to waive the Planning fees
for Marge Hosch.
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
Tony Petta, 11875 Eton Drive, made an observation that
if oppression exists in government onto citizens, it is
because of the policy Council has created and it is up
to Council to change the policy.
far Council directed staff to investigate the Britton
Project regarding them not following approved plans and
find out what recourse can be taken.
G. Budget Appropriation Barrier Removal
City Manager Schwab explained that the Staff Report
indicated that the allocation would be from the General
Fund and it should be from the Street Improvement Fund.
CC-88-70 MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM PFENNIGHAUSEN, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER
GRANT, CARRIED 4-0 (COUNCILMEMBER EVANS WAS ABSENT), to appropriate
$2,394.00 from the Street Improvement Fund for the Architectural
Barrier Removal Project.
Council Minutes - 06/09/88
Page 3
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
n
n
ORAL REPORTS
Dick Yost, President, Chamber of Commerce, reported on
the activities of the Chamber.
A. Committee Reports
1. Historical & Cultural Activities Committee
Vi Gratson, Chairman, requested that Council
re -appoint Ann Petta, Pauline Grant and Linda Lee
Laufer to the Historical and Cultural Activities
Committee.
CC-88-71 MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM PFENNIGHAUSEN, SECOND BY MAYOR MATTESON,
CARRIED 4-0 (COUNCILMEMBER EVANS WAS ABSENT), to re -appoint Ann
Petta, Pauline Grant and Linda Lee Laufer and that the two
consecutive terms be waived.
NEW BUSINESS
B. Council Reports
Councilmember Grant, reported that he attended the
Omnitrans Board Meeting as alternate for Councilmember
Shirley on June 1, 1988, and as the principal member
for the SANBAG Meeting on the same date.
Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen, reported that she
represented the City at Fontana's 75th celebration of
its founding and the dedication of a monument built by
Eagle Scout Adam Weitzel.
Mayor Matteson, asked staff to look into the
possibility of two left-hand lanes on Michican coming
into Barton Road.
A. Discussion Regarding the Sign Ordinance
Mayor Pro Tem Pfennighausen voiced concern about signs
that are put up, generally on the weekends, especially
garage signs and development signs. The people who are
putting them up are not taking them down. She
suggested that once or twice a month a member of staff
be directed on the weekend to take the signs down and
cite the appropriate parties, with compensatory time
off during the week.
Councilmember Grant concurred to include political
signs.
Council Minutes - 06/09/88
Page 4
Dick Rollins, 22700 DeBerry, asked for permission from
Council to do this on a volunteer basis.
B. Modification to the Rules & Regulations Manual for the
City of Grand Terrace and adopt a Resolution amendin
the Rules & Re u ations or the ministration o
Personnel matters Pursuant to Grand- Terrace Munic�pa
Code Section 2.24.090.
CC-88-72 MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM PFENNIGHAUSEN, SECOND BY MAYOR MATTESON,
CARRIED 4-0 (COUNCILMEMBER EVANS WAS ABSENT), to adopt the changes
in the Rules & Regulations Manual and adopt Resolution 88-05.
C. Reappointment of Planning Commissioners Jerry Hawkins
and Raymond Munson
CC-88-73 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER SHIRLEY, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER GRANT,
CARRIED 3-1-0 (MAYOR PRO TEM PFENNIGHAUSEN VOTED NOE AND
COUNCILMEMBER EVANS WAS ABSENT), to adopt Alternate No. 1 to
include authorization to exceed the two terms.
CLOSED SESSION
Council and the Parkland Ad Hoc committee convened to
closed session for parkland acquisition negotiations.
Mayor Matteson explained that City Council and the Ad Hoc
Committee met in closed session and no decision was met.
ORDER OF ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Matteson adjourned the City Council meeting at 6:45 p.m.
to an adjourned joint regular City Council/CRA meeting,
June 13, 1988 at 6:30 p.m.
DEPUTY CITY CLERK of the City o
Grand Terrace
MAYOR of the City of Grand Terrace
Council Minutes - 06/09/88
Page 5
DATE: June 17, 1988
S T A F F R E P O R T
CRA ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (xx) MEETING DATE: June 23, 1988
SUBJECT: ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 88- APPROVING THE CITY OF GRAND ,fjt
TERRACE BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1988-89
----------------------------------------------------------------------
FUNDING REQUIRED
NO FUNDING REQUIRED
The budget hearings for the 1988-89 Grand Terrace City Budget were held on
June 13, 14 and 15. During these sessions detailed line -by-line analyses
and approvals were conducted. The total revenue anticipated is $3,06 7,755
wi th expendi tures of $ 3, 4 96, 941.
The expenditures exceed revenues in the overall budget because of the
nature of our road expenditures which require the City to save several
years' allocations to do a major project. The additional expenses will
come from accumulated fund balances in those street and capital improvement
funds.
In the City Manager's budget
message I provided a
general fund source
summary, and the recap below
is to provide all modifications taken
into
consideration during the budget sessions.
GENERAL FUND SOURCE SUMMARY
Source
Expense
Balance
Current Rev. $2,219,520
Program Expenses
$2,182,589
$ 36,931
Carry Over F/B 690,213
Nonrecurring Capt.
27,150
663,063
Outlay
Gen. Fund Reserve 500,000
CDF Rescue Unit
144,000
356,000
J�QUWI� AGORA ITEM 11 p G
STAFF REPORT -- ADOPT 1988-89 BUDGET
PAGE TWO
The current general fund revenue exceeds program expenses by $36,931. The
nonrecurring outlay includes the additional appropriation for the
replacement of the City Clerk's word processor and is $27,150 which will be
funded by the prior year's fund balance. The number has gone down due to
the fact that our initial projections included funds for a commercial lawn
mower which had been purchased in the current fiscal year and we failed to
remove its total from the proposed budget.
STAFF RECOMMENDS
COUNCIL APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. 88-_ FORMALLY ADOPTING THE 1988-89 FISCAL
YEAR CITY BUDGET.
n
n
F'r'ND
(; n ! , rVG CITY
RESOLUTION NO. 88-08 (j A+�,�, ,
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A BUDGET OF
ESTIMATED REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES FOR FISCAL
YEAR 1988-89
WHEREAS, a local agency is required to adopt a budget
for the subsequent fiscal year for estimated revenues and ex-
penditures; and
WHEREAS, every local governmental agency shall file
with the county auditor of the county in which the agency con-
ducts its principal operations, a budget for the fiscal year then
in progress; and
4 WHEREAS, the City Council and Staff members have
thoroughly reviewed and analyzed the proposed budget in order to
determine the needs of the City of Grand Terrace;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND
TERRACE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That a budget for Fiscal Year 1988-89, a
copy of which is on file in the City Clerk's office, is hereby
adopted for the City of Grand Terrace with total estimated
revenues of $3,067,755.00 and total estimated expenditures of
$3,499,541.00 and a transfer of $50,000.00 to the General Fund
Reserve.
Section 2. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to
forward a copy of this Resolution and the adopted Fiscal Year
1988-89 Budget to the Auditor -Controller of the County of San
Bernardino.
ADOPTED this 23rd day of June, 1988.
ATTEST:
Deputy City C er of the City
of Grand Terrace and of the
City Council thereof.
Mayor of the City of Gran
Terrace and of the City
Council thereof.
LOURCIL AGENDA ITFIA W. 0�e
RESOLUTION NO. 88-08
PAGE 2
I, Juanita Brown, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Grand
Terrace, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was
introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council
of the City of Grand Terrace held on the 23rd day of June, 1988,
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Approved as to form:
City Attorney
01
Deputy City Clerk
DATE: June 9, 1
12-1.1117
STAFF REPORT
C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM ( )) MEETING DATE: M 2 3 198a
AGENDA ITEM NO. S
SUBJECT TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 13205
FUNDING REQUIRED
NO FUNDING REQUIRED X
The Tentative Tract Map 13205 was approved by the City Council, subject
tar to certain conditions.
The Tract is being developed in two Phases, Tract 13205-1 and Tract
13205. All of the conditions imposed on the Tentative Tract Map 13205
have been satisfied.
Attached, you will find a list of agreements, bonds and cash deposits
for each of the Phases of the Tract.
Staff Recommends that City Council:
1. ACCEPT THE CASH DEPOSIT AND THE BONDS.
2. APPROVED THE AGREEMENT AND AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO SIGN THEM.
3. APPROVE FINAL TRACT MAPS 13205-1 AND 13205.
4W
r
TRACTS
BOND #
13205-1
BOND #
13205
1.
Cash Deposit - Monumentation
$ 3,600.00
$ 3,500.00
2.
Streets & Storm Drain
a. Agreement to construct facilities
(280,000.00)
(280,000.00)
b. Improvement Performance
Bond
962358
S
(280,000.00)
962353
S
280,000.00
C. Material & Labor Bond
962358
S
(140,000.00)
962353
S
140,000.00
3.
Grading Bond
962360
S
(45,000.00)
962355
S
60,000.00
4.
Water System
a. Agreement
(76,000.00)
(76,000.00)
b. Improvement Performance
Bond
962362
S
(76,000.00)
962357
S
76,000.00
C. Labor & Material Bond
962362
S
(38,000.00)
962357
S
38,000.00
5.
Sanitary Sewer
a. Agreement
(100,000.00)
(100,000.00)
b. Improvement Performance
Bond
962359
S
(100,000.00)
962354
S
100,000.00
C. Labor & Material Bond
962359
S
(50,000.00)
962354
S
50,000.00
6.
Landscaping
a. Agreement
(30,000.00)
(42,000.00)
b. Performance Bond
962361
S
30,000.00
962356
S
41,000.00
RESOLUTION NO. 88-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, CALLING AND GIVING
NOTICE OF THE HOLDING OF A GENERAL MUNICIPAL
ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY NOVEMBER 8, 1988
FOR THE ELECTION OF CERTAIN OFFICERS AS REQUIR-
ED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THE LAWS OF THE STATE
OF CALIFORNIA RELATING TO GENERAL LAW CITIES
WHEREAS, under the provision of the laws relating to
general law cities in the State of California a General Municipal
Election shall be held on November 8, 1988, for the election of
Municipal Officers; and
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND
TERRACE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That pursuant to the requirements of the
laws of the State of California relating to General Law Cities,
there is called and ordered to be held in the City of Grand
Terrace, California, on Tuesday, November 8, 1988, a General
Municipal Election for the purpose of electing three (3) members
of the City Council for the full term of four years.
Section 2. That the ballots to be used at the election
shall be in form and content as required by law.
Section 3. That the Deputy City Clerk is authorized,
instructed and directed to procure and furnish any and all
official ballots, notices, printed matter and all supplies,
equipment and paraphernalia that may be necessary in order to
4Wproperly and lawfully conduct the election.
Section 4. That the polls for the election shall be
open at seven o'clock a.m. of the day of the election and shall
remain open continuously from that time until eight o'clock p.m.
of the same day when the polls shall be closed, except as pro-
vided in Section 14301 of the Elections Code of the State of
California.
Section S. That in all particulars not recited in this
Resolution, the election shall be held and conducted as provided
by law for holding municipal elections.
Section 6. That notice of the time and place of holding
the election is given and the Deputy City Clerk is authorized,
instructed and directed to give further or additional notice of
the election, in time, form and manner as required by law.
11
RESOLUTION NO. 88-
PAGE 2
Section 7. That the Deputy City Clerk shall certify to
the passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the
book of original Resolutions.
ADOPTED this 23rd day of June, 1988.
ATTEST:
Deputy City Clerk of the City
of Grand Terrace and of the
City Council thereof.
Mayor of the City of Grand
Terrace and of the City
Council thereof.
I, JUANITA BROWN, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Grand
Terrace, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was
introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council
of the City of Grand Terrace held on the 23rd day of June, 1988,
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Approved as to form:
City Attorney
Deputy City Cler
RESOLUTION NO. 88-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE BOARD
OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
TO CONSOLIDATE A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO
BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 8, 1988, WITH THE STATEWIDE
GENERAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON THE DATE PURSU-
ANT TO SECTION 23302 OF THE ELECTIONS CODE.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace
called a General Municipal Election to be held on November 8,
1988, for the purpose of the election of three (3) Members of the
City Council of said City for full terms of four (4) years; and
WHEREAS, it is desirable that the General Municipal
Election be consolidated with the Statewide Election to be held
on the same date and that within the City the precincts, polling
places and election officers of the two elections be the same,
and that the Registrar of Voters of the County of San Bernardino
canvass the returns of the General Municipal Election and that
the election be held in all respects as if there were only one
election;
Section 1. That pursuant to the requirements of Section
23302 of the Elections Code, the Board of Supervisors of the
County of San Bernardino is hereby requested to consent and agree
to the consolidation of a General Municipal Election with the
Statewide General Election on Tuesday, November 8, 1988, for the
purpose of the election of three (3) Members of the City Council
for full terms of four (4) years.
Section 2. That the Registrar of Voters is authorized
to canvass the returns of the General Municipal Election. The
election shall be held in all respects as if there were only one
election, and only one form of ballot shall be used.
Section 3. That the Board of Supervisors is requested
to issue instructions to the Registrar of Voters to take any and
all steps necessary for the holding of the consolidated election.
Section 4. That the City of Grand Terrace recognizes
that additional costs will be incurred by the County by reason
of this consolidation and agrees to reimburse the County for any
costs.
Section S. That the Deputy City Clerk is hereby direct-
ed to file a certified copy of this Resolution with the Board of
Supervisors and the Registrar of Voters of the County of San
Bernardino.
;OlP.WAL AGF;.NU) ITEM U a H
RESOLUTION NO. 88-
PAGE 2
Section 6. That the Deputy City Clerk shall certify to
the passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the
book of original resolutions.
ADOPTED this 23rd day of June, 1988.
ATTEST:
Deputy City Clerk of the City of
Grand Terrace and of the City
Council thereof.
Mayor of the City of Grand
Terrace and of the City
Council thereof.
I, JUANITA BROWN, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Grand
Terrace, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was
introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council
of the City of Grand Terrace held on the 23rd day of June, 1988,
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
4
Approved as to form:
City Attorney Deputy City Clerk
COMMISSION AND COMMITTEE REPORT
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: June 23, 1988 DATE: June 15, 1988
COMMISSION/COMMITTEE: Historical and Cultural Activities
SUBJECT: RESIGNATION OF KATHY HARMON
The Historical and Cultural Activities Committee has received the
resignation of Kathy Harmon, to become effective immediately.
STAFF RECOMMENDS:
4 Council accept the resignation of Kathy Harmon and direct the
Deputy City Clerk to post the vacancy and advertise for appli-
cations to fill the vacancy.
W.
V_Wl� AGENDA ITEM W VA1(0 )
Mrs. Kathryn Harmon
11834 Kingston St.
Grand Terrace, Ca. 92324
May 21, 1988
City of Grand Terrace
22795 Barton Rd.
Grand Terrace, Ca 92324
Att: Committee Membership Division
4W Dear Sirs:
I would like to resign from the Historical and Cultural Activities
Committee because other commitments are a priority at this time.
Being a member has been a benefit to me for the past year and I
am grateful to have been able to contribute to the community
through the Historical Committee. Thank you for giving me this
opportunity.
Yours truly,
t4?�64
Kathr Harmon
cc/ Mrs. Viola Gratson, Chairperson
a
HISTORICAL & CULTURAL ACTIVITIES COb1MITTEE
Minutes of the June G, 1988 Meeting
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Viola Gratson at 7:05 PM.
Those present were Ann Petta, Irene Mason, Hannah Laister, Viola Gratson,
Pauline Grant and Linda Lee Laufer.
The minutes of the May 2nd meeting were read and approved. Ann made the motion,
Seconded by Pauline, all approved. Treasurer's report remains the same.
Viola read a note from Kathy Harmon saying that she had resigned from the Committee.
She has adivsed the City of Grand Terrace oa same stating that she has other com-
mittments. The members of this committee will all miss her as she was a valuable
addition. The Committee sent her a Thank you card.
4th Annual Art Show: The Committee termed the show a success. We will ask Randy
Anstine to have the screen repaired before the next annual Art Show.
Next Affair: The Country Fiar in November. We will get entry forms ready for
mailing in August next month. Hannah will contact Kim Hathaway of the Women's
Club informing her of the date. Viola will contact Betty Duarte of the Finance
office about getting flyers out with the sewer billings.
Commission & Committee report was made to reappointed Linda Lee Laufer, Ann Petta,
and Pauline Grant to the Committee. Their terms expire June 30, 1988.
Hannah brought pictures of the Birthday Party, the Art Show, and and preparing
the land on Mt. Vernon Avenue for the new apartments. Dates and places were
marked on the pictures for our scrapbook.
The next meeting will be July llth.
made by Vi, seconded by Linda Lee.
6 Respectfully,
41�
HANNAH LAISTER
Secretary
The meeting was adjourned at 8 PM. Motion
COUNCIL AGENDA !IJ,44. 0 4A 1(b)
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CA.
CRIME PREVENTION COMMITTEE
MEETING, MAY 9, 1988
The regular meeting of the Grand Terrace Crime Prevention
Committee was held at 1800 hours in the Conference Room of
the Civic Center, Grand Terrace, California.
MEMBERS PRESENTS Ralph Buchwalter, Chairman, Jim Singley,
Treasurer, Bea Gigandtt, Ron Wright, Debra
Mueller and Dick Rollins.
MEMBERS ABSENTS
C.S.O.
CITY STAFFS
GUESTS PRESENT s
Ures Aeberli
Sharon Korgan
None
Hugh Grant, Councilman, Sharon Wheatley,
Ralph Nichols, Ilse Bent, Citizen's Patrol.
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Buchwalter at 1805
hours.
The Minutes of the meeting of April 11, 1988 were distributed to
the members present. Jim Singley made the motion to accept the
Minutes as written. Bea Gigandte made the second, the motion was
carried with all ayes.
M #1 Jim Singley reported that all monies budgeted for the Crime
Prevention Committee for the fiscal year 86/87 had been expended
6 and adding that all bills had been paid.
,TM #2 Chairman Buchwalter outlined and explained the proposed budget
request for the upcoming fiscal year , detailing the proposed
expenditures with each item being requested and the reasons for
the requests. Recognizing that the new budget requests indicated
an increase over the prior year he felt that the activities and
effectiveness of the Committee had been enlarged upon sufficiently
to warrant the increased amounts. After considerable discussion
Jim Singley made the motion to accept the new budget proposal in
it's entirerity and that it be submitted to the City Council for
their consideration. Bea Gigandte made the second with all members
Present voting the affirmative.
?M #3 Debra Mueller reported that the Crime Buster membership now stood
at 56 members and declared that the program was proceeding very well.
Neighborhood Watch programs were being activated in several locations
within the City. She also reported that Mayor Buron Matteson had
donated the amount of $32.00 from monies collected during the Safety
Fair on the sales of Chili from his Chili -Booth, the Mayor, once
again,winning the first prize. She also reported that Sergant
Gonzales of the Sheriffs office was to speak on gang activities
Within the County at a special presentation in the Council Chambers
at the Civic Center at 1830 hours, May 25, 1988. The public has
been invited and she urged all
ITEM #4 Sharon Korgan, the Community Services Officer of the Sheriff's
Department reported on the training program for certain members
scheduled for appearances on Channel #36, public television,
COMCAST, for the actions of the newly formed Citizens Patrol
and their importance to the community in an effort to acquaint
the public of crime prevention in the City and encourage more
citizens to become involved in their community. Programs for
airing were to be announced at a later date.
After hearing reports and discussions from the Patrol members
present it was determined that there was no further business
to be discussed and Chairman Buchwalter adjourned the meeting
at 1855 hours.
Respectfully submitted,
ck Rollins
Recording Secretary
Page #2 of 2
rhr/rhr.
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
PARKS & RECREATION COMMITTEE MEETING
MONDAY, MAY 2, 1988
M I N U T E S
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Barbara Conley, Lennie Frost, Sylvia
Robles, Dick Rollins, Dick Weeks, Dave Widor
MEMBERS ABSENT: Mike Breckenridge
CITY STAFF PRESENT: Randall Anstine, Renee McCarthy
GUEST: Councilman Dennis Evans, Councilman Hugh Grant, Tony Petta
CALL TO ORDER: 7:05 p.m.
ITEMS
1. Minutes of the March 7, 1988 and April 4, 1988 were reviewed and
upon a motion by Dick Weeks and seconded by Lennie Frost approved by
unanimous vote.
2. HERSHEYS YOUTH TRACK MEET --Renee McCarthy reported to the
Committee that the "Grand Terrace Hershey's Youth Track Meet" is
scheduled for Saturday, June 10. Minimum expense to include ribbons
and staff salaries.
Chairman Conley reported contact with the Chamber about donating the
"I heart Grand Terrace" t-shirts to the 3 winners in each category
when the winners progress to the State meet in San Bernardino in
June.
Committee members will be kept abreast of Volunteer needs on the day
of the event.
Currently, no funds were allocated for this event. Tony Petta
mentioned that an "Accent on Youth" fund was established sometime
ago and possible monies from that fund could be utilized. Randall
Anstine stated this fund was not a City controlled fund. Tony Petta
questioned the existence of the fund and its status. Chairman
Conley will check with Ken Rinderhagen over this and report back to
the Committee the status of this fund.
3. PARKLAND ACQUISITION STATUS --Per Council meeting on April 28th,
4 properties were identified as possible parks. Cost were discussed
in closed executive meeting at that time.
Commissioner Dave Widor questioned the Council decision to disregard
parcel #4 (corner Michigan/Pico) when it was discovered that the
building was no longer available. Widor suggested that instead of
eliminating the potential parksite, further investigation be
completed about alternatives and future possibilities pertaining to
the land. Tony Petta agreed no alternatives were discussed.
Commissioner Dick Weeks mentioned why the normal process -public
hearing over property with concerned residents/neighbors-did not
take place prior to any final decisions by Council to enter into
negotiations.
Commissioner Lennie Frost stated we should be encouraging Council to
purchase as much land as possible for future use.
Lennie Frost made the motion that the Parks & Recreation Committee
support acquisition of Parcel #1. Seconded by Dick Weeks. All ayes
ACTION ITEM SUBMITTED TO CITY COUNCIL.
Lennie Frost also moved that City Council do not limit themselves to
Parcel #1 and look at Parcel #3 and look at the alternatives of
pursuing joint usage of facility along with purchase of the adjacent
land to include appropriate input from immediate neighborhood.
Seconded by Dick Weeks. All ayes.
ACTION ITEM SUBMITTED TO CITY COUNCIL.
4. BUDGET REVIEW --Committee questioned the increase in most
maintenance items for 1988/89 FY. Randall Anstine explained that
cost is the result of the additional maintenance of Pico Park.
Committee asked staff if the Tiny Tot, Softball and Day Care
programs were self-supporting. Randall Anstine responded yes they
are.
Chairman Conley asked the Committee to consider requesting Council
to appropriate monies for the Grand Terrace's possible loth Birthday
Celebration, which in its tentative stage may include a good old
fashion picnic, etc. Committee agreed this was feasible.
Renee McCarthy reminded Committee to also consider including
requesting additional funds for the 1989 Hershey's Track Meet.
Dick Weeks made the motion to suggest $1500 be added to budget under
Special Departmental Expense to support Community Activity relating
to the loth Birthday and the 1989 Hershey's Trace Meet. Dick
Rollins seconded. All ages.
ACTION ITEM SUBMITTED TO CITY COUNCIL.
Lennie Frost recommended adoption of the entire Park budget with
the Committee agreed changes and support the request of an
additional maintenance person. Sylvia Robles seconded. All ayes.
ACTION ITEM SUBMITTED TO CITY COUNCIL.
5. PICO PARK --Randall Anstine explained that in addition to
maintenance cost, $20,000 is budgeted to complete an additional ball
diamond (backstop) and hopefully enough left over to seed area.
Committee agrees with phase in.
6. TOUP, DE TERRACE --Membership in BRDAA was recommended by Chairman
Conley which would allow an additional 1 million of liability
coverage for the 1989 tour. Basically, nothing will be changed for
the 1989 tour. Same format as the past 2 years.
7. Dick Weeks asked Dave Widor whatever became of the spring
soccer. Dave stated that their was enough interest, but not enough
volunteers to warrant the undertaking this year.
8. Lennie Frost asked what is the status of the snackbar. Chairman
Conley explained that the City Manager has decided that the best way
to finish within this fiscal year is to sub -contract the individual
items for completion out. Dave Widor asked what it will be done
when they are complete. Conley responded a snackbar. Chairman
Conley will ask City Manager the status of Snackbar.
9. Dick Rollins asked Randall Anstine whatever happened to the
Roberti Zberg fund. Randall Anstine stated that approximately
$32,000 remains appropriated for Grand Terrace and the Committee
needs to decide what to do with the funds. He suggested that the
monies be used to refurbish, with state of the art equipment, the
Terrace Hills park restrooms. Any funds remaining could be used for
Park land acquisition.
Dick Rollins made the motion that the money be allocated 1st
priority for restroom maintenance and remainder for parkland
acquisition. Sylvia seconded. All ayes.
ACTION ITEM SUBMITTED TO CITY COUNCIL.
10. Barbara Conley asked Randall Anstine whatever happened to the
proposed bike rack at the park. Randall Anstine stated that the
people who have put in the bus covered waiting areas have
volunteered to put in an illuminated bike rack at the park.
Unfortunately], this item has been put on the back burner for the
moment by the company.
11. Renee McCarthy stated many individuals are requesting the
scholarship applications. All applied applicants will be reviewed
at the next P & R meeting and a decision made.
40
Meeting adjourned at 9:01 pm.
NEXT MEETING: JUNE d, 1988 AT 7:00 PM.
Respe tfully submitt ,
Barbara M. Conle __
Chairman, Recording ecretary
DATE:
4/11/88
N STAFF'REPORT
CONTINUED PROM` _
C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (X� MEETING DATE: April 14, 1988
AGENDA ITEM NO.
SUBJECT An overall revision of the City's General Plan including landuse designations,
circulation and housing density issues GP-87-4, and Master Environmental
Analysis/Environmental Impact Report on proposed General Plan Amendment for
General Plan 87-4 (E-87-1)
FUNDING REQUIRED
NO FUNDING REQUIRED
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
AVPLICANT:
LOCATION:
City Council
David Sawyer, Planning Director
April 14, 1988
Staff Reports, GP-87-4 and E-rs7-1
City of Grand Terrace
Entire City
RFOUEST: An overall revision of -010 City's r-;eneral Plan
including land use designations, circulation and
housing density issues (G15-87-4), and Master
Environmental Analysis/Erivi.ronmental Impact Report
on proposed General Plan Amendment for G1�-r�7-ir , ();-
87-.1) .
BACKGROUND :
In Iv] arr:h 1.987, the City t:oullci 1 retained the planning and
engineering firm of wildan and Associates to update the City's
General Plan., At the time the contract was executed, the City
Council requested that the analysis and recornrnenda-tion for the
Western portion of the City (area west of the 215 Freeway) be
completed first. As a result, i.n September 1987, the City
Council adopted Ordinance No. 1.10 making certain changes oil the:
landuse map for the west side of the freeway and changing
residential density categories in the text of the General Plan.
In January, the consultant completed the revision of the General
Plan for the remainder of. the City including; ch.anlres to the
landuse map, the infrastructure, recr.eati.onnal res6urces and the
community development elements.
On February 2, 1988 the 30-day public review period for the
Geiierra 1 Plan and i is EIP started and subsequently concluded on
March 3, 1988. [Wring this period ccr.tai.n commei-)ts were received
regarding the EIR and as required by t;EQA t hr-:sr: c ommeni-c, ,\
been responded to and are to he included ill t la, hr'cl f t H if 1 qf•(•
Attachment A).
On March 21, 1988, the Planning Comini;�,l,.n wA1 i,i c`tit,nl (,c: - `t(,
consultant's proposed General Plan and di nt t ni is. On npi , 14 ,
1988, the Planning Commission recommended the (, i t v t ciugn i i
approve the proposed General Plan and EIR with certain chongc:s To
t ie landuse map.
Unlike the previous hearings for the west side, we are not
amending the Zoning Ordinance or the zoning reap at this time, wr.
are only considering changes to the General Plan. titre a i ;-,e
General Plan is completed staff will then recommend oppr opr ate
changes to the Zoning Ordinance. It should however i-,e-, n"i p o _to—,
all of the changes to the General Plan which were mhoe=' r u r -
west side are included in the proposer) hinnera i ice; an ar i rt i `;
DISCUSSION:
Alternatives:
As a result
of the
changes the Planning Comminsi on made in : ne
landuse map,
staff
is presenting
,,your Council with two (2 )
alternative
landuse
maps for the
General Plan Khch or the
alternatives
is adequately
covered by
thH riH.
ALTERNATIVE #1
Alternative One is the consultant's proposed landuse map (See_
11 Attachment B). This alternative calls for. the widening of. Barton
Road from a 100' right of way to a 120' right of way and tnr ti:e
reduction of Michigan Street from an 88' right of way to a 64'
right of way. Proposed landuse changes are as presented to your
Council in your previous workshop on this issue.
ALTERNATIVE #2
Alternative Two is the Planning Commission's recommended
map (see Attachment Q . '.Phis alternative also calls for tho
widening of Barton Road from a 100' right or wa\ to a i 2o, right
of way and for the reduction of Michigan Street from in Mi' r gilt
of way to a 64' right of way. The differences hel"eQn t lie , wc,
alternatives is that Alternative Two specifies that the a t i gnivitvl1-
of Commerce Way south of Van Buren shoo i d he dw r I NH(I ;,I
specific plan at a later date and 1 hot r c•;•t .1 i li
properties remain residential. A i t e rrrn 1 1. ! n
the proper.'t.i es owned by ,chit kern Ca i i 1 c,l I -A 1 •.,,!1
for Light lnciusi ri a l llse and t h'iI , r1c�w i u(!
looking at the feasthr tlty of a tYeewav of I r"ro"p t a w ,1l A
De Berry Street and further study of t hl! l.,, Idf,rn; rig ri,,l t can !;, 1, .
An action summary Outlining the \101-1 U114 lnQ I (Inq A; t (ni
regarding this ell I e?rnati ve i s a t ac awl .1q o 1 I ie.!lt;it`I ! .lire. 1 1 ,
t
A>�ti i�aiied. ,. dr,af copy of t"(le Pi,ln,IIII�s l o;W;,iti
1nl] e O) h7 S 1. e(rl w7 l J be Flvel ] --l'D i e f-ol- \'(fil l' ev 1': ;)l t
your meeting.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Department is in support of i-Jl!? r.onc(Jp1 C. )I'C5 II e(-;
in the Consultant's Alternative One. llottii:vc--'r, after
consideration of the Planning Corr,missi.on's Pill) Jic: Y!eiir7ng' all<j
deliberation both the P 1. anning Department and the !_' ! ;hlln 1 n(s
Consultant feel the PI anning Commi ssi on' s re cornmend 1t i on i
workable and does not detract from t.he basic corlc-el:)ts or
Alternative One. It should be noted however, that i; :Inv other
areas of land are removed from the Business Park desi,llht.iorl it
ultimate success of such a concept c01.11 d 1le i77;-)d ,re,-i dnr! t ni!
need to be reevaluated..
Therefore, the Planning Department is in suppnrr nr n"-Ii-�l
Alternative One and Alternative Two. However, l:eepi_ng- in mini,
that the purpose of the General Plan is the Jong terra, pl nni n„ o
the community, the Planning Department recommences r lie C. i r •.-
Council approve the MEA/EIR and the proposed Genera) "Jan a5
presented in Alternative One with the exception iha. the eir il_
residential properties on the west side of ``iichi_gan ,ol -.;I 01 1,�:1:
Buren remain designated as low density resi-d-1!, l a i i See
Attachment E).
RespectfulJy Suhmi.tre
4
-73a. id -11. Sew e � r,
Planning Director
DRS/mcm
PRELIMINARY
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
(EIR)
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE PROGRAM
MARCH 21, 1988
ATTACHMENT A
TABLE OF CONTENTS
List of Commenting Agencies
11 Comments Received
III Responses to Comments
N
PREFACE
The purpose of this Preliminary Final Environmental Impact Report. Is to
respond to comment;, received on the Draft Environmental Impact Report
prepared for the 1988 Grand Terrace General Plan Update Program and Master
Environmental Assessment, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality
Act. The Updated General Plan and accompanying Master Environmental
Assessment and Draft Environmental Impact Report were circulated for public
review and comments during the month of Fehruary 1988. Comments which
were received during this period have been noted and responses have been
prepared within this document, Additional significant comments received
during the public hearing ano adoption stage of the program will subsequent-
ly he included within the Final Environmental Impact Report,
1!
In
- COMMENTING AGENCIES
The following agencies have submitted written comments regarding the General
Plan Update Program and Environmental Impact Report.
A, Southern California Edison Company
B. Colton Unified school District
C. department. o` Conservation
D. Department of Water Rescurres
lior E. Department of Transportation
n
COMMENTS RECEIVED
:I
A,
Snl1THERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
m
Rk CE�VV L__L.
t C. i4c7 N
Southern California Edison Company
I, O 1301. -1913
RIALTO CALIFORI41A •4::77„
March 2, 1988
David Sawyer, Planning Director
City of Grand Terrace
40 22795 Barton. Road
Grand Terrace, California 92324
wl1 U ,j 1J�)q
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
t P.l EP1�U^r?
li Ia3 87.0 'i ^.bc
Subject: General Plan Update
Dear Dave:
Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments to the City's
General Plan, especially that part which encompasses Edison's
ownership.
Edison's property was originally purchased for the installation.
of future Company utility service facilities. The property
is valuable to our operations because it is located near trans-
mission line rights of way, railroad facilities and freeway
4r arteries.
Edison does not have any near term plans to install utility
facilities on the property, however, as the community grows,
the need for electric facilities will certainly become a
necessity.
We are of the opinion that a zone designation of light indus-
trial would be more appropriate for our properties. When
Edison purchased the property, utility facilities were
permitted and we feel that such designation should remain
applicable so that Edison can construct necessary facilities
in order co fulfill our commitment to the City and surrounding
areas, We are requesting that the General Plan be changed to
reflect utility users as permitted.
Further, figure VIT-4 (Muster Plan of Streets and Highways)
indicates that Commerce Way, as it is today, is located north
of our. ownership, The General Plan Llpdate indicates plans for
an extension of Commerce Way to be realigned south to Pico
Avenue, hi_seccing the Edison -owned property, thereby placing
Mr. . D vid Sawyer
�Il�lR U :? 19�)8
i'LAitrNiNG DzrANWLNI
-7- March 2., 1988
the burden of Commerce Way entirely on Edison ownership as it
crosses our property. Edison i.s not in favor of that realignment,
however, we would favor a realignment further west paralleling
the boundaries of the generating station and merging into
Taylor Street,
Thank you for your kind consideration in this matter.
11
NSN:ts
0
Very truly yours,
Sue Noreen.
B.
COLTON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
11
BOARD OF EDUCATION
MR. ARLIE R. HUBBARD
President
MRS DORTHA E. COOLEY
Vice President
MR. RAY ABRIL, JR.
Clerti
MRS WENDY S. CURRAJN
MRS. RUTH O HARRIS
fir MRS PATRICIA;. NIX
1!RS;PHYLLIS V. ZliWERktAN
MR. RUSSELL t. DICKINSON
Superintendent
MR. CHARLES H. JORDAN
Assistant Superintendent, Personnel
MR. ROBERT W. MURPHY
Assistant Superintendent, Bus;ress
MISSJIANCY 4.14ORTON
Assistant Superintendent,
Curriculum and Instruction
MR. DANNY CAR.RASCO
ctor Admin.s:rat,ve Sorvices
MRS BONNIE RUSSELL•HUNT
Direclor, Pupil Personnel Services
COLTON JOINT UNIFIF_D SCHOOL. DISTRICT
1212 Valoncia Drive, Coilon, Calilornia 92324-17938 (714)676-4227
J{ '
February 28, 1988
Pi1��G';G l}LPARI u:'IT
Plat;rting Department
City of Grand Terrace
22795 Barton Road
Grand Terrace, CA 92324
Re: General Plan MEA/EIR
The Galton Joint 'Unified School District has co-mpleted a re-
view of the proposed update of the City General Plan and would
like to offer the following comments and clarifications:
(1) Student Generation Factor (Page 11-112), The stud;: has used
r--4--- stu ents -per sins ie family
the is �rtctiaide average o t.
residence and .53 for multiple family units. In rand Terrr,c:c
the. student generation factor is currently .51, `or single
family homes with a .12 factor for apartments. This is
based on current enrollment digided by number of units.
If the city adopts a plan to add 1,060 new home's to Grand
Terrace and 460 multiple family units, the number of students
generated would total 627. The br.eakdowm is as follows:
K-6 339
7-8 , 94
9-12 194
At Lice present time, Grand Terrace Elementary School has
an en-ollment of 587 and Terrace View has 523 students.
Terrace Hills Junior High School includes 608 students and
Colton High School's enrollment is 1,967.
The Board of Edl-tCation has directed st.af f ro "cap" all
elementary school enrollments at 700, j���ior high school
enrollments at. 800 and high school enrc' "ments zt 2,500.
Using this criteria, there are plans to accorrodate an
additional 1.13 students at Grand Terrace, 177 at "terrace
View; 192 at Terrace ,ills; and 533 students at col ton H.
The addil:io;.1 of 339 elementary students exceeds the combine(
C ap,-)rj.t:.; of C;r.tand '''`r.r.a..ce and Terrace Vic,,) schc^,s by 49
S tkid C,lr!d , Hc,wwer, =here is a tc; ta1 0; 2 cnz.d ren from
OutssidB tllese atLendance are,:as who have peen =ndfcatherea'
j.nto thr, school etar,�llment. As these S4'JCents :1r`1L;r1te1 ci:r
wiJ.l make. room to „ccortmodate Ole difference in projected
e1*11'0l1.ment.
f'!.F.�IIItt'� U(Paiat�cYT
Based on current demographic patterns, there. appears to he adequate
space to accommodate Grand Terrace stu(lent.) at ma.ximam city build-r.0
by adding rel.ocatab.le classrooms to existing schools. Thais assumes that:
(A) There is no major change in the student_ generation factor for
apartments oz single family homes in- Grand Terrace.
(B) That adequate revenue sources are available to finance' the addition
of relocatable classrooms to district schools, (Fees, RDA agreements, et(*.)
(C) The district is able to build additional schools in a timely manner,
as the communities of Colton, Grand Terrace, Bloomington, and parts of
Fontana, Rialto, San Bernardino, Loma Linda, and unincorporated areas
of Sari Bernardino and Riverside Counties continue_ to grow. The addition
of new schools'is the long -terra solution to school impaction, as it
provides an opportunity to lower enrollments by redrawing attendance
boundaries.
(2) Table 11-11. The data used includes a large rr mber of students who do
not live in the City of Grand Terrace. A staff report presented to the
City Council on Feb. 2, 1988 listed the Grand Terrace enrollment as follow,:
Grand Terrace Elementary 377
Terrace View 479
Terrace Hills Jr. High 239
Colton High School 373
Slover Continuation Z.
Zntra Dist. Transf. 20
Total: 1,508 Maximum Build -Out Total Enrollment: 2,135
(3) Banton Road Intercharj&.!�,. Under consideration is a proposal to widen Bartc•n
Roar: by 10 ft, on both sides of the street to establish a left turn median
and to improve traffic flow. As you are aware, Grand Terrace Elementary
School would be affected by this project. With. only 8.75 acres, this schc": ;.
is one of the smallest campuses in the district, and is impacted by .10ise
generated by Barton Road and freeway traffic.. The district woulc like
to review a cost analysis of this project vs the cost of developing a sec.cnd
freeway entrance/exit t:o the city which could improve traffic flowVwi.thouc
reyctiring the r.ondemnar_ion of public property. Tt is the districc's under-
standing that the Banton F.J. bridge. would also need to be ,cidened
add significant cost: to the project. Once t:he si.dewallcs arc> added; th.ce
be li.r.t.1e frontage :.eft ,)n the school site and 1.11crceased ::oise. PC- t1)C,S
reasons, the lniti.al pos'it).on o£ Lhc district would be (`c:,r tnc city to
exhaust all alternati.veq before rldOP'Z I-Ig this pInn
Sincerely,
t .
C.
DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION
V9
n
',ic of California
THE RESOURCES AGENCY OF CALIFORNfA
Memorandum
Dr. Gordon F, Snow
Assist�+nt: Secretary for Resources
Mr. David Sawyer
City of Grand Terrace
22795 Barton Road
Grand Terrace, CA 92324
,r„ Department of Conservation —Office of the Director
Dote : FEB 2 5 1988
subject: Grand 'Terrace
General Plan
SCH# 880201.03
The Department of Conservation's Division of Mines and Geology
(D14G) has reviewed the Draft Environmental Impact Report for the
'proposed Grand Terrace General Plan. The primary geologic
concerns for the City of Grand Terrace appear to be hazards
related to earthquakes, landsliding, and flooding and
sedimentation from the Santa Ana River. We offer the following
corrument-s .
A Safety Element is a necessary part of the General Plan, as
required under State Government Code Section 65302 (g).
Procedures for the compilation of the Safety Element are given in
General Plan Guidelines, published by the Office of Planning and
Research, State of California. Copies of the Guidelines may be
ordered through General Services, Publications Section, P.O. Box
1015, worth Highlands, CA, 95660((916) 973-3700).
The Draft General Plan does not contain enough information about
geologic hazards to constitute a Safety Element. The plan notes
that the City could be "considerably damaged" by earthqu k.es
originating on the San Jacinto and San Andreas faults. l�he Plan
furtAer states that "the City's disaster preparedness pi. nt•,shal).
include emergency procedures for earthquake situations",and•
seismically unsafe existing structures "shall be identifi4d"and
programmed for mitigation or removal where necessary".
The Safety Element should contain sufficient information to guide
future land use decisions, through the development and
implernentation of planning policies, by providing pertinent data
regarding geologic, soil, seismic, flood, and other hazards. The
Safety Element should include maps showing the extent of known
seismic and geologic hazards as precisely as possible. with
regard to the City, it should address the effects of
:seismically -induced surface rupture, ground shaking, ground
failure, darn failure, and seiches; the effects of slope
instability (where appropriate); the effects of flooding; and
evacuation routes. A suggested source of: i.nformatio.n for seismic
safety planning is the U.S. Geological Survey's Professional
Caper 1360, "Evaluating Earthquake, Hazards in the Los Angeles
Region". This reference incl.udos specific data and sources of
a,?di.tional information which would be, useful in preparing the:
�atety Element.
Dr . Gordon F . Snow
Mr.. David Sawyer
Page 2
The Draft Master Environmental Assessmenc, attached to the
General Plan, does riot contain sufficient data to adequately
prepare a Safety Element according to State General flan
Guidelines, when completed, the Safety Element, and any
technical studies used for developing the Safety Element, should
be submitted to the Division of Mines and Geology,
If you have any questions regarding these comments, please
contact Zoe McCrea, Division of Mines and Geology Environmental
Review Officer, at (916) 322-2562.
0, ".' � C) 1';t' lr�
Dennis J, O'Bryant
Environmental Program Coordinator
DJO:it
0589H
cc: Zoe McCrea, Division of Mines and Geology
Jeff Howard, Division of Mines and Geology
n
a
DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES
N
11
.yin of California
Th• Resources Agency
Aemorandum
FEES 1 9 1988
1. Gordon F. Sno�', Ph,D.
Assistant SeCreUar.'y COr I`esources
2. City of Grand 'Terrace
22795 Barton Road
Grand Terrace, CA 923211
Attention: David Sawyer
Dopartmonl of VVator R•sourc*t
Los Angeles, CA 90055
�bjed : DEIR for Grand Terrace Generfil Pltu't, SCHN 88020103.
0
Your subject document has been reviewed by our Deportment of. Water Resources
0*0 staff. Recommendations, as they relate to water conservation and flood dainage
prevention, are attached,
After reviewing your report, we also would like to recommend that, you further•
consider implementing a comprehensive program to use reclaimed water for,
irrigation purposes in order to free fresh water supplies for beneficial uses
that require -high quality water.
For further information, you may wish to contact John Pariewski at
(213) 620-3951.
Thank you for the opporr..unit,Y to review and comment on this report.
Charles R. White, Chief'
Planning Branch
Southern District,
Attachwents
DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES RECOMMENDATIONS
FOR WATER CONSERVATION AND WATER RECLAMATION
To reduce water demand, ir,,pl.ement the ►.;aces conservation o!ensuves described
here.
Required
The following State laws rEquive water- efficient plumbing f'ixLures in
structures: `
o Health and Safety Code Section 1' 21.E requires low -flush toilets and
urTl—,, is in virtually all buildings as follows:
�r "After January 1, 1983, all new buildings constructed in this state
shall use water closets and associated flushometer valves, if any, which
are water -conservation water closets &s defined by American National
Standards Institute Standard A112,19.2, and urinals and associated
flushometer valves, if any, that use less than an average of 1-IJ2
gallons per flush. Blowout water closets and assccip.Led flushomeLer
valves are exempt from the requirerients of this section."
o Title 20, California Administrative Code Section 1604_f A ol.i,(nce
Efficiency Standards) establishes efficiency standards that give the
maximum flow rate of all new showerheads, lavatory faucets, and sink
faucets, as specified in the standard. approved by the Fcrnerican National
Standards Institute on November 16, 1979, and known as ANSI
A112.18.lM-1979•
o Title 20, California administrative Code Section 1606(b) (Appliance
Efficiency Standards- prohibits the sale of fixtures that do not comply
with regulations. No new appliance may be sold or offered for sale in
California that is not certified by its manufacturer to be in compliance
'with the provisions of the regulations establishing applicable
efficijency standards.
o Title 24 of the California Administrative Code Section 2._530b
(California Energy Conservation StWndPrds_for New Bui ld,n �sL prohibits
the installation of fixtures unless the manufacturer has certified to
the CEC compliance with the flow rate standards.
o Title 214, California Adminis_t:rrt t.i.ve Code Sections
address pipe, insulation requiremenLs, w)'tich (--tin redUcr' waLo. :Isla tr:f )rh
hot water reaches equiLpmr.nt ov fixtures. These 'li,,'' Y ,r,
steam find Steam -condensate r etuvn Pjp> ng and ; ec.irc�.rlu tag hot. WOO—'!
piping in attics, garages, crawl spf;cl_s, or unhettte'_i spece:; ot.l,r•r tJinn
between floors or in i.r.te.,i.or walls lnsuint.ion of wftt�;r-hen r�i�;
systems is also re(ju).ved,
Health and Safety Code_Se(tion_IIOh1 prohibl.ts )nscallatlon of
residential water softening or conrll tionxnf; appliances unless certain
conditions are satisfied, Included `.s the requirement that:, in most
instances, the installation of the appliance must be accompanied by
water conservation devices on fixtures using softened or conditioned
water,
o Government Code Section 7800 specifies t.hat lavatories in all public
facilities constructed after January 1, 1985, be equipped with
self' -closing faucets that limit flow of hot water, j
To be imp(em.ented where applicable
Interior:
WF
1. Supply line pressure: Water pressure greater than 50 pounds per square
inch (psi) be reduced to 50 psi or less by means of a pressure -reducing
valve.
2, Drinking fountains: Drinking fountains be equipped with self' -closing
valves.
3. Hotel rooms: Conservation reminders be posted in rooms and restrooms."
Thermostatically controlled mixing valve be installed for bath/shower.
Laundry facilities: Water -conserving models of washers be used.
5. Restaurants: Water -conserving models of dishwashers be used or spray
emitters that have been retrofitted for reduced flow. Drinking water be
served upon request only."
6. Ultra -low -flush toilets: 1-1/2-gallon per flush toilets be installed in
'all new construction.
Exterior:" I
1. Landscape with low water -using plants wherever feasible,
2 Minimize use of lawn by limiting it to lawn -dependent uses, Such Is
playing fields. When lawn is used, require warm season grasses.
3. Group plants of similar water use to reduce overirrig�rt:on of
low -water -using plants.
r� Provide information to occupants r(',UrIL-d"I)g f] CS of, 1C)'rJ'l+'ilt.el'`l1Slf;}
landscaping and souf•ces of additional essi ;taf1CG'.
'The -Department of WaLef ReSOM-U'$ or ]octil-watC;--di ,t.rict rnaY aid -Ln'-
-
dcve:loping these mater.i.als or prov.idinf; 0011 infoi,m ition.
5, Use mulch extensively in tall landscaped areas, Mulch applied on top of
soil will improve the water -holding capacity of the soil. by reducing
evepora tion and soil Compnc CiOrl ,
6. Preserve and protect existing trees and shrubs. Established plants are
often adapted to low -water -using conditions and their use saves water
needed to establish replacement vegetat).on.
j, Install efficient irrigation systems that minimize runoff and
evaporation and maximize the water that will reach the plant roots.
Drip irrigation, soil moisture sensors, and automatic irrigation systems
are a few methods or increasing irrigation efficiency.
3. Use pervious paving material whenever, feasible to reduce surface water
runoff and to aid in ground water recharge.
q. Grade slopes so that runoff of surface water is minimized.
10. Investigate the feasibility of using reclaimed waste water, stored
rainwater, or grey water for irrigation.
U . Encourage cluster development, which can reduce the amount of land being
converted to urban use. This will reduce the amount of impervious
paving created arid thereby aid in ground water recharge.
12. Preserve existing natural drainage areas and encourage the incorporation
of natural drainage systems in new developments. This aids ground water
recharge.
13. To aid in ground water recharge, preserve flood plains and aquifer
recharge areas as open space.
FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION
In flood -prone areas, flood damtAgc previ?nLi.on iecasures required to protect a
proposed development should be basc;d on th,e following guidelines:
1. It is r.he State's polio to conserve water; any potential loss to ground
water should be mitigated.
2. All building structures should be protected against a 100-year flood.
3. In those areas not covered by a Flood Insurance Rate Map or Flood
Boundary and Floodway Map, issued by the Federal Emergency Management
Agency, the 100-yaar flood elevation and boundary should be shown in the
Environmental Impact Report,
ow 4. At least one route of ingress and egress to the development should be
available during a 100-year flood.
5. The slope and foundation designs for all structures should be oased on
deteiled soils and engineering studies, especially for hillside
developments.
6. Revegetation of disturbed or newly constructed slopes should be done as
soon as possible (utilizing native or low -water -using plant material).
-7. The potential damage to the proposed development by mudflow shoulCJi be
assessed and mitigated as required.
8. Grading should be limited to dry months to minimize problems associated
with sediment transport during construction.
E.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,
C9
;, of California
E3v�inc��, Trun.potlafion and Houting Age—Y
�emorandurn
;;tat? Cleor inghouSP
Off ice of Plant) in,3 & ReSe[A 'rh
1400 loth Street
Sacrbmento, CA 9581.4
Attention John Keene
rn DEPARTMENT Of TRANSPORTATION
District 8
Gra.nd Terrace General Plan
D°'t' Feb ruaIy 25, 1�)fiEi
file NO. 08-Riv--2].5-0. 0/1.. B
scki 188020103
13
4
eecbuse of the +_omexof the Plan anri t-he necessity fcsr
extensive evaluation in the short ti(r,e remaining, we would like to
discuss our concerns with the City of Grand Terrace before t: z
drafting of the final PI an is approved, The following are comments
that need to be conside reel ;
Page VII-6 mentions Fable VII-I for traffic lane corifigurations.
This Table is not included in the report.
Th4 Traffic Study noedw to AddrQ!wv tha improvemont- on the m8i.nli r„=
flow of the freeway traffic and the funding source for the
improvements on the interchange and the mainline,
we would 1 ike a copy of the final document as soon as it is
4W available.
We Dirge early and continuous liaison with Caltrans on proposed plans
as they affect State highways,
if you have any questions, please ca hard Dennis at ATSS
670-4165.
c, i-- l
GUY G. 1) ORAL t :^
Chief, Tr;,nspurtabon Plarnrlinq tran\f���
cc: GSmzl_h, Plan Coord Unit, DOTP ___-
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS
11
Im
III - RE=Sf'ONSES TO COMMENTS
A. Southern California -Edison Con
Comment
of linht industrial would be
We are of the opinion that a zone deslgnat!on
for
ftpn e
nthat csuclecldesig a
more appropriate our
rproeelnitted
and wfeel ion
erty, utility facilities we
p
that Edison
can
construct
,� n facilities
should remain applicable
so
IGeneraltment o
cneces'
in order to fulfill that
con
Plan
be changed to reflect utility
We are requesting
users as permitted.
Response
The intent of the General Plan is to project desired land use patterns
for the City into the next century. As such ,
the most desirous and
homogenous land use for Southern California Edison vacant properties
are proposed to be high quality business uses. As the planning process
evolves, it will become necessary to develop specific permitted uses and
development standards for uses that are desinnated as Business Park.
At that time, a caveat could be built into the reclulations to permit
venerating station expansion. If expansion is not necessary, tent o the
development would have to be designed consistent with the intent of the
Business Park designation.
Comment
OAW
Eic,ure ll-4 (Master Planof Streets and Highways) indicates that Com-
merce Way, as it is today, is located north of our ownership. The
General Plan Update indicates plans for an extension of Commerce �-'+'aY to
be realigned south to Pico Avenue, bisecting the Edison -owned property,
thereby placing the burden of Commerce vVay entirely on Edison ov,ner-
ship as it crosses our property. Edison is not in favor of that realign-
ment, however, we would favor a realignment further west naraHelinq
the boundarie, of the generating st.atinn and merging into Taylor Street.
Res ponce
(user on the. level of develownent proposed (or- this area of the commu-
nity, the most efficient alignment of Commerce as de'ermined to be
�)s shown on thr' Master Plan of strr'et s and'' !-iighways. I he r)I �cice
allgnIII (Ir)T of C.:nrnrnercc S'; )) in tc rrn of sne'ci (iC imPr,c.is on ��r.'jarF'nt
properties will be determinec� ti�roucl;! the riei<7n l�rnccss,
R (_olion^Unified St1_Ic,t
i,ornment
Pic -a,;' incorpor-atr'- clr:ri(irahol)s into 11)i, sc:honl� ,rcilon of tilt c�c�r;ln ent.
Res ronse
The comments are so noted, the finirl document t.ext will b . revised to
incorporate this data.
Comment
Barton Road Interchange_. Under consideration is a proposal to widen
arton oa�Ey 10 c'et or) both sicies of the street to establish a left
turn meclian and to improve traffic flow. As you are aware, Grand
Terrace Elementary School would be affected by this project. With only
8.75 acres, thls school is one of the smallest campuses in, the district
and is impar_ter.± by noise generated by Barton Road and freeway traffic.
The district would like to review a cost analysis of this project vs. the
cost of developing a second freeway entrance/exit to the City which
could improve traffic flow without requiring the condemnation of public
property. It is the district's understanding that the Barton Road bridge
would also need to be widened which will add significant cost to the
proiect. Once the sidewalks are addeci, there will be little frontage left
on the school site and increased noise. For these reasons, the initial
position of the district would be for the, City to exhaust all alternatives
before adopting this plan.
Response
The analvsis of costs and precise location of roadways are usually deter-
mined during the design study for a project. It appears that the most
econornical way to widen Barton Road is to widen the State Route 215
overcrossing on the north side and continue the widening to the east.
The south side curb and sidewalk could remain in the existing planned
location with the widening mainly on the north side. If this is the final
configuration, mitigation of the impacts to the various properties along
Barton Road, including the school, will have to be mitigated.
Providing a second freeway access to the community was included in the
last general plat) and reviewed by this study. Factors which make
providing; an additional freeway interchange undesirable are-
1 , The Federal Highway Administration policy on spacing between
freeway interchanges.
7, Limited benefits to the community with the land use policies pro-
posed by this plan.
3. Estim�rted project costs rangincl frori 10 to 20 million dollars.
Even with another freeway inte.rchanne, the Barton Road in+erchange and
corridor vrr>;rlri have to he irn;.�rovcd to handle projected tr,jffic volurr;es.
Department of Conservation
C_omrner)t
The Draft Cjenerai Flan does not contain enough information about qeo-
ionic hazards to constitute a Safety Element, The plan notes that the
City could be "consWernbly damaged" by earthquakes prig- inating on the
C;an. .Jacinto and San Andreas faults. The Plan further states that "the
City's disaster preparedness plan shall include emergency procedures for
earthquake situations", and seksrriically unsafe existing structures "shall
rye identified and programmed for mitigation or removal where neces-
sary"
Response
The Gener fl* Plan Update Program is intended to reexamine the numerous
rr land use decisions that were adopted as part of the comprehensive
planning program in 1483. At that; time, the Safety Element was deemed
satisfactory in terms of meeting the requirements of the General Plan
Guidelines. The issues within related to hydrologic and seismic condi-
tions within the City have not and will not chanae. No unique creologic
conditions are known to exist within Grand Terrace. None of the back-
rtround information regarding these issues was deleted within the update,
program. in fact, the [_and Use Element of General Plan requires spe
cific mitigation for areas considered potentially impacted by these condi-
tions through the use of Moth a Flood Hazards Overlap and Hillside
Overlay (areas in excess of 15 percent slopes). Therefore, these Cen-
eral Plan policies, as ,vell as existing building code requirements, appear
-�o adequately address any safety related hazards.
D. Department of Water Resorarces
4 CommPn t
After reviewing your report, we also like to recommend that you further
consider implementing a comprehensive program to use reclaimed water
for irrigation purpose5 in order to free fresh water supplies for benefi-
cial uses that require high quality water.
P.esponse
Your <.'omments and recommendations are i-roted. They will be forwarded
through the "preliminary" Final FIR process, to the Planning Ccim;nission
anti to thr is it�t Council for potential inrlu:.ion in the General Plar)WEA..
E. C<flifornia De.par(Mont of Transportation.
Comment
Tt;c Traffic Str�cly
rqlc�cis
to address tfir. irrprovirr- nts on
the in,,inline
flo,;r of tho freeway
traffic
and the funding source for the
improvemen ,;
on tl)e interchange
�,ncf the
mainIine.
i�eSDoris e
Tl- is Man will re-,ult in reduced freeway volumes due to the less inten-
sive land use policies. Freeway level of service of "D" in year 2010 is
anticipated. No special consrC et-ation was glven because a 'In" level of'
service for urban areas is usually considered acceptable. Major projects
on State Route 215 will require coordination with all the communities,
both counties, th(a two realonal planning agencies and Caltrans.
Fun;.ing alternatives are included in the report. One funding possibility
not lister) is the sales tax designation for transportation improvements.
This issue was defeated by the voters of San Bernardino .County in the
last election, however, renewed support for this concept` is gaining.
This method along with traffic Impact mitigation fees may be the best
way to fund major roadway improvements.
U9
IM
ALTERNATIVE TWO
1 LEGEND 1
L.D. RESIDENTIAL
GEN. COMMERCIAL
+++
BUSINESS PARK
®
LT. INDUSTRIAL
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + +
I■■■■■■■OMEN■
I■■■■■■■■M■N■
I■■■■■■■■O■■■
I■■■■■OEEN■■■
I■■■E■■■NM■■■
I■■■M■■N■OMO■
I■■■■■■■M■■■■
IMENEEMENSMs�
I■■■■■■■■O■■■
I■■■■■■■■■M■
I■■■■■■■M■■MIS
sommommomm
ATTACHMENT C
PLANNING COMMISSION MI-:I'TlN(7 Gl-"NERAI, PLAN AND H I R DISCIJ9s1ON
D[f AFT - ACTION SUMMATION
APRI 1, 14, 1988 PI.ANN I NG COMMISSION Ml-' l-' ' 1 ,N(;
The r. eVil I ar meeting of -the Granci 'terrace Planning Cornmi.ssi.on wF,s
called to order i,t 1-he Grand Terra(-e Civic Centel ,. 11795 Barton
Road, Grand 'Terrace, Cali for_ ni.a on April 14, 1,988, gat 7 : 00 p.m.
by Chairman Norman Caouette.
PRESENT NORMAN CAOUETTE, CHAIRMAN
FRANC VAN GELDER, VICE-CHAIRWONA.
GERALD COL.E, CO`'IMISSIONER
STANLEY HARGRAVE, COMMISSIONER
fir JERRY HAWKINSON, COMMISSIONER
RAY MUNSON, COMMISSIONER
JIM SIMS, COMMISSIONER
IVAN HOPKINS, CITY ATTORNEY
JOE KICAK, CITY ENGINEER
DAVIT) SAWYER, PLANNING DIRECTOR
STAFF'
ABSENT:
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: : V ICE-CHAIRWO`IAN VAN c;E LDER
1.iI:NuTr5
WORKSHOP CONVENED AT 6:30 P.M.
4 Infor.ination/Comments frorn Staff
Information/Comments from Commissioners
Information/Comments from Wildan and Associates
WORKSHOP ADJOURNED AT 7:00 P.111.
PLANNING COMMISSION CONVENED AT 7 : 00
PLANNING COMMISSION DISUSSI-ON ON THE PROPOSED AND ALTERNATIVES OF
THE GENERAL PLAN.
ADJOURNED FOR A TWENTY `11 NUTE BREAK - 8 : 4 5 TO 9 : 0 `i P . ti) .
CONVENED PLANNING COMMISSION AT 9:05 P.,`I.
ATTACHMENT D
Commissioner Sims introduced motion with Commissioner
Hargrave secondary, that the General Plan be revised to show
the a 1 i gnment of. Commerce Way ending at Van Buren with a
specific plan to be prepared in the future for a precise
alignment south of Van Buren to `lain Street.
Commissioner Sims amended motion to reflect- the specific
plan to go down to Main Street without impacting any
existing construction (a5 suggested by Commissioner
Hawkinson) with second concurring.
CLARIFICATION OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION: NOT TO SPLIT THE
INLAND LUMBER PROPERTY DOWN THE MIDDLE.
MOTION CARRIED ALL, AYES, 7-0.
2. Commissioner Hawkinson introduced motion to accept plan as
proposed with the exception of previous motion (tire
designation that the street alignment he changed) and with
a study looking into the feasibility or a freewav offramp
at De Berry Avenue. Vice -Chairwoman Van Gelder seconded.
VICE -CHAIRWOMAN VAN GELDE;R WITHDREW SECoJND. C0'I'NIZ-)S1oN.FR
COLE SECONDED FOR THE, PURPOSE OF DISCOSSfON. H.AWhINSON
WITHDREW NOTION.
3. Commissioner Hawkinson recommended that the plan he
accepted as submitted ,Nest of Michigan Avenue, north of
Main Street, south of Barton Road and the freeway- noundary
with a feasibility study for an offramp at De Berry,
which may have to include an update on the EIR, and to
include the previous motion regarding the alignment of
Commerce Way. Commissioner Cole seconded for the purpose
of discussion.
Commissioner. Munson made the proposal to amend the motion to
have the property to the east, currently owned by Inland
Lumber retain the current designation of light industrial.
MOTION TO AMEND DEED FOR LACK OF A SECOND.
MOTION FAILED (hI;FER TO COMMI S S I ONER HAWK1 N'SON ' :7 �,ioTIO?� 1 ,
COMMISSIONERS CAOUETTE, VAN GE:LDE:R, HARGRAVE, ST`1S, %NSON
VOTING NOE AND COMMISSIONERS COLE: AND HAWKI NSON VO T I NK AVE,
5-2-0-0.
4. Commissioner Munson made the motion that the current
property of Inland Lumber, which is zoned IighT industrial?
be so designated in the original plan i nsi tlad "I tile ],)w
dera..;i1-v resiiir,ntia1 'as propo�,(-,d r)v i110 Con"11It'Jill c
0, 1 hi) FOk 1,ACK OF A SFI'COND.
5. Commissioner Haargrave made tl)e mo-tior, to t,i(� l;)nc, use
change to make the I rc I I I I d 1,11mh(,r 1)roper t v (westeI-II
port- i on/Lunaher Yard) i r o m prop -;ed r e s i delai- I a l t () a _111-
indust.r- is I and inake the othc-r ha 1 T which -tl-iev own Crcister
por. ti_on/vacant I and) a land use des i gnat: ion ch<iuge d I-rnIn 1 nw
density residential to,rercFrai. commercial. Co►nrni.csioner
Sims seconded. There was a cluestjnn c,> s1)(), zorcaelnd
the City Attorney stated t I -rev s hou i. d ac-e on" ,t ]-cis nioi ion ,
and if there was a legal question then they coctld inrorm
City Council.
MOTI ON FA I LED . COMMISSIONERS MUNSON, S INNS ANI) HAR(RAVE
VOTING AYE. COMMISSIONERS VAIN GELDER, CAOUETTE, COLE AND
40 HAWKINSON VOTING NOE, 3-4-0-0.
6. Commissioner Sims made the motion to revise the proposed
landuse for the areas north of De Berrv, west •oj: `'ii ch:, �'an,
low density residential retaining what is there now. the
area south of De Berry, west of Michi-gan, ail the wav to
Van Buren where the existing Tanduse will remain residential
revising the commercial. to low density residenti-a1.
maintaining the low density parcels south of Van Buren in
thi-s area, not including the rectangular section. Second by
Commissioner Hargrave.
MOTION FAILED. COM`I I SS IONERS HARGRAVE AND S 1MS VOTING AYE,
COMMISSIONERS VAN GELDER, CAOUETTE COLS , PIUNSO�- , HAWIF : `,SW,\
VOTING NOE, 2-5-0-0.
7. Commissioner Caouette made the motion that the areas west of
Michigan, south of Rene Lane and north of I)e Fierrv, wBich
is currently proposed for general commercial i-)e cha?aged
to low densi-t:v residential- (with exclus:i.on of ructaraguiar
portion) down to I)e Berry and east to Aj- chig<an StrFet.
Second by Commi.ssi.oners Hargrave and Sims.
MOTION PASSED. COMMISSIONERS HAWS-.INS()N AN1) Co1,F; lOi 1;�(;
COMMISSIONERS HARGRAVE, SIMS, CA01�E.T" I- MUNSON; VAN (,Fj.t)I-,k
VOTING AYE, 5-2-0-0.
8. Commissioner Hargrave
made the
motion to go along witi-, the
consultant's plan
( Busi-mess
Park
areas; Fri -,sr of
Michigan, north of Van Buren
and south
oa: De horrv) , ;1-01)
at Van Buren (do(-s
not a,•ant
to
i rcc I iccicr the Ec c sore
property), segregating
out the
a11_ 1 to
th(-: Sc uth ;>> t'ir,n
Buren for I ricer d c scussi.oil.
\%icr. —CI
rc i rwoma:a Van (,r i (Irtr
seconded.
MOTION PASSED. ALL AYES, 7-0-0-0.
Chairman Caouette stated due to the late hour l-Jiat the
applicants sti I 1 on the agenda be continued to Apr•i i '-8,
l_988.
9. Commissioner. Hawkinson made the motion to Ci1dn;(, the
property located south of Van Buren Street, north of Pico
Street and west of Commerce Way extension to Light
Industrial and to accept the consultant's proposal for The
remainder of the area south of De Berry Street and west or
Michigan Street. Commissioner- Hargrave seconded F1110 tiierI
00 withdrew motion.
Commissioner Hawkinson then changed tt1e inoti or, 1 o (J�r ; .
the homes fronting on ilii-chi gan, south of -Van Hirer i1m)
of Wi.ldan Pump only. Seconded icy i,oinnii ssi on t ,
MOTION CARRIED. COMMI SS.IONEkS 11;NS0\ , HAj?GP-\1 i- f�V r
VOTING NOE, 4-3-0-0.
10. Commissioner Hargrave made the mot i o1; to (-}i�,r;ge the !, —(J
use to its current conforming use which is res:i-de i; is i.
usage, for the houses borderi ng _`1i.chi gau, s()urh o.= i pit,
Buren and east of WiIdan Pump only. Commissioner
second.
MOTION CARRIED. ALL AYES, 7-0-0-0.
11. Commissioner Van Gelder made the motion that the width of
Michigan Avenue, a secondary hi-ghway, ire retained t.o the
current existing General Plan code, the whole length of
Michigan from Barton Road south. Commissioner Hargrave
second.
MOTION FAILED. COMMISSIONERS VAN GELDER, HARGR-- 1k"E ANI) 5I •15
VOTING AYE,. 3-4-0-0.
-
12. Commissioner Hawkinson made the motion that the contiuitani-s
or staff recommend to Council a study of a feasibility of a
freeway offramp at De Berry Avenue as part or iris
proposed General Plan. Commissioner Munson second.
MOTION CARRIED. COMM! SSION1:RS SI`1S, HnR(;Io\Vl. \'\;i)
VOTING NOE, 4-3-0-0.
!{
13 . Commissioner Munson made 1.1-1e mot i on t hi, t a i I 01 h,
property north o1- ()I
Barton Road, plus property er,st „I: °lt vc-r-nc,n W10 I,}-oi,f•r t
north of 'Barton 1�0a(1 except i�,roa i e ri -) r i-,v 'lt t (•) n,,,i
triangle, he F1ppr0\7ed s1) g steel b: ri(- co},tiu mil .
Commissioner. Cole second. "'JO 'IO;V
1-4. Commissioner Hargrave made tl-,r mot ic)}, r!-Iot
which was left nut for c,iisru�Slc)}, h, l ti „irlr•,i° ,
stands as mu I t: i —fami I y res I dellt i a I I�II<,u i 1,1 at t>r,tiE of
what the courts do or don't do and i=rased u:)ou t hI s i)
being able to he amended at leah,t a minimum of our times }
year. MOTION DIE; I) FOR LACK OF A SECOND.
15. Commissioner Munson made the motl.on that the narceic,
previously discussed (undeveloped Forest CiI-v i)Iiior,
property) be approved as presented by the rontiultant.
Commissioner Van Gelder second.
MOTION CARRIED. COMMISSIONER HARG'PAVE VOT_["'G NO .
16. Commissioner Hawkinson made the motion that the -
to the Council the approvai of the balance o` tihe tr-,'a11' •
quadrant as recommended by the consultar.i_s, olr:n}iss_ ,,ate;
Cole second.
MOTION CARRIED. CO"IMISSIONER HARGRAVI t-()Ti\c;
17.
Commissioner Hargrave made the motion
-to have Barton Road a"
four lanes with a left turn lane,
median and 00' radi,ls.
MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND.
4W
18.
Chairman Caouette amended the mot i ol-,
to accept For
Barton Road as recommended by the Consultant,;
in the `taster
Plan of Streets and Highways.
Comrr,i ssio11er Ilru �ra\7Q
second.
MOTION FAILED. CW MISSI()NrI,'; CW,t';,
VOTED AYE,` 3-4-0-0.
19.
Commissioner Sims made the mot:i ol-r to
recornmerld + o,
before the 120' is accepted that
a st-udv 1-)e dnfle
Barton Road to see 1-he f- easibI I i t v
of a sa K ii,ne
and the impact it wou I r1 have ()If
proof-ri i o.� Ci,rr I rr!.;ti
Caouette second. Comm issi oner S i,n;
wi t i il-r•i,' ;,, , -,,, ,;
discussion.
20. Commissioner. Sims m a de t f'je I-ilot Jolt that Ci f- f!
information to on v
120' on Barton Road. I ook at-. file ex -,L d I c) �Tvith the Traffic Engineer CM11; Cole second.
MOTION CARRIED. COMMISSION VAN GF'I'Di"I1 VO-1,10", \0j.'
0.
21. Vice-Chairworria)-i Van Gelder moved that %v I d t ]I C) r
Vernon north of Barton Road he retained to Its (.urrerit
width, as noted in the current General Plan. Commissioner
Munson second for discussion. lice -Chairwoman Van Gelder
withdrew motion.
22. Chairman Caouette moved that the PjannJ ng comrTlis-i 01 jj; Dro\,tl
the balance of the recommenda t ions of the Gen(-ra I Pia for
the Master. Plan for Street-, a 11 d Hi gilways orrim)
Hawkinson second.
MOTION CARRIED. ALL A_iYS,
23. Chairman Caouette made the motion t I; a t 7-lie
Commission recommend to the Citv Cotinc' I
General Plan 87-4 and aPPI-O-WiIll OT prez;pnTec: r)v
staff, including previous action as a-pprovp"I r(-)r
tiles
west of the freeway, wit-11 the arciendment", recomriiended
Planning Commissi
on. on. Corlirflissinner sjjfj_;
MOTION CARRIED. COMMISSIONER HARGRAVE VOI I\G \01-_
4W PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AWOUIRNET) AT 11 :55 P. -,I,
DRS/mcm
0
Respect f it i I .y Submitted,
fja%i_d R. saw, �er,
P 1 all 1-1). n r
(3 r t c) r
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
RECOMMENDATION
LEGEND
L.D:. RESIDENTIAL
GEN. COMMERCIA
+++ BUSINESS PARK
® LT. INDUSTRIAL
.ii
.■■■t■t� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■�
■■■■■■■� ■t■■■■■■■■■■■■■�
�■■■■■ttt�� ■■■t■■■//■■■■■ti
�■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■I
�i■■t■■■■■■■i ■■■■■■■tt■■■■■■i
i��■■■■■■■■■■I ■t■■■■■■t//■■■■t
u,1■■■■■■■■■■ t■■■/■■�
i!e■■■■■■■■■■i ■■■■/■■■■■■■■■■■■t■■t■■i
ire■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■/■■■■■■■i
I14tt■■■■■■t■
�.m■■■■■■■■■■
rM■■■■■■■tt■
rAt■■■■■■■t■ Q!
■ii■■■■■■tt■■`
I■IA■■■■■■tt■■�
t■■■t■■■■tt■�
.■t■■■■■■t■t■��„
■■■■■■
.■■■t■■■tt■■■■t■■■■
■■�MENEM
/■t■/U■t■■■■t
I■■■■■■■■■■■■■tl Ems ENE ■■■■■■■■■■■■■
Ittt■■■t■■■■t■■■� tttt■■t■t■■■■■t/ttt
.//■■!t■■■t■■■t■1 t■ttt■t■■■■■■■■tttt
■■■■■■■��■■■■■■■■■t1 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■t
It00 wommo�MlMEME1 MMEMOMMEMagm�■��
I■t■■■■■■■■i�■■■■■■■/tC1 ■■■MEMO■■■■■.■■�■■
,■■■/■ ME ■■■■■■■■//■■■■■■■■
■■/■■ttMMMMMMMMMMHMMMMMMMMMMI
Mn■■ /■ !-M■MEM■E■M!t■■■■■■■■tM■■■OMMOMMOMMOMMOMi■
mm
ATTACHMENT E
3 _T A F F R E_P 0 R T
DATE June 16, 1988
C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM F) MEETING DATE_ June 23, 1988
AGENDA ITEM
Request By Fieldcrest Development for Moratorium Exemption
SUBJECT
FUNDING REQUIRED_ -,_-__._-
NO FUNDING REQUIRED.--.- _
TO: City Council
FROM: David R. Sawyer,
Planning Director
BACKGROUND:
On .Lune 7, 1988, staff received a letter from `1r. Gary Mecklin, a
general partner with Fieldcrest Homes (see Attachment A). This
letter is a request that the City Council exempt Tract 13050-
1,2,3 and 4 from the City's Residential Permit Moratorium.
Fieldcrest Homes have completed 30 homes and are now requesting
4W permits for their next construction phase.
These homes have already been approved through the Tentative and
Final Map process. However, they are subject to the moratorium
because the applicant had not applied for building permits for
the next phase prior to the moratorium.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Department recommends the City Council exempt
Fieldcrest Homes from the residential permit moratorium for the
remainder of Tract 13050 - 1,2,3 and 4.
Respectfully Submitted,
1 -
Da i 'R: yer;
:0 Planning Director
90UNCJ ; AGUiDA 11 Ef t
�1
1!
yj r t!
HOMES
June 6, 1988
Mayor Byron Matteson
City of Grand Terrace
22795 Barton Road
Grand Terrace, CA 92324
Dear Mayor Matteson:
C VC
JU N 0 7 1988
Pli"fvj" , ucrM1N)kN1
Re: Building Permit Moritorium
Terrace Hills
Tract 13050-1, 2, 3 & 4
87 Lots
Terrace Hills Residential Partners respectfully requests to be exempted
from the City's building permit moritorium. We have a recorded final
map on our subdivision as well as having paid all required fees and
posting subdivision bonds.
To date, we have constructed 30 single family homes as well as installing
all of the subdivision improvements. We have eight houses occupied and
expect to be moving in an additional ten homeowners this month.
A good many of our homeowners are local residents buying for the second
time a larger home to accommodate growing families rather than moving
away from Grand Terrace.
In light of the above, Terrace Hills Residential Partners would request
the City to allow an exemption. Your consideration in this matter is
greatly appreciated.
q
TERRACE RLLLS
BY: FIELD RES'
GENERAL P.
/BR
COPY - David Sawyer
File
ATTACHMENTA
2801 West Coast Highway, Suite 360 Newport Beach, CA 92663 (714) 548-8845
S T A F F R E P O R T
DATE June 17, 1988
C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM 4XA MEETING DATEJune 23, 1988
_
AGENDA ITEM N0.___
SUBJECT Request for Fee Waiver -of Site and Architectural Review
By Mr. Ron Garrett
FUNDING REQUIRED______._._
NO FUNDING REQUIRED.__XX_
TO: City Council
FROM: David R. Sawyer,
Planning Director
BACKGROUND:
On June 3, 1988, staff received a letter From Mr. Ron Garrett
requesting a waiver of the $702.00 fee required for a Site and
Architectural Review Application (see Attachment A). The property
involved with this request is located at the intersection of Palm
Avenue and Barton Road. This property was recently involved with
a Conditional Use Permit application for a dry cleaning business
which was conditionally approved by the Planning Commission.
Subsequent to that approval the dry cleaning business is no longer
being considered for this property and as a result the CUP and it's
conditions are no longer applicable.
While it is true that this property was recently involved in a CUP
review and' -much of the staff work required for the Site and
Architectural Review will be repetitive a certain amount of staff
time will be necessary to prepare the Site and Architectural
Review Application report. As a result of this staff Feels a
reduction in the amount of the Fee is justified but not an entire
waiving of the Fee.
With respect to Mr. Garrett's,agreement to complete clertain work
on his property, these items should be considered by the Site and
Architectural Review Board as conditions of approval and not be
addressed at this time.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Department recommends
For Site and Architectural Review
application only, and the various
addressed at this time.
Respectfully Submitted,
David R.-Sawyer,
Planning Director
4 DRS/mcm
LJ
the City Council reduce the fee
from $702.00 to $100.00 for this
Improvement requirements not be
(� u
c j,
JUNE 3, 1988
RON GARRETT
P.O. BOX 971
LOMA LINDA, CA. 92324
JUNITA BROWN
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
22795 BARTON ROAD
GRAND TERRACE, CA. 92324
RE: OCCUPANCY OF 22675 BARTON ROAD (A.M.A. 22565 BARTON ROAD)
GRAND TERRACE
DEAR JUNITA,
ENCLOSED PLEASE FIND A COPY OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
*88-2. IN WHICH I WAS ALLOWED TO OPEN UP A DRY CLEANING
FACILITIES. SUBSEQUENTLY MR. GANESH SWAMY MY PROSPECTIVE
TENANT DECIDED AGAINST OPENING UP THE DRY CLEANERS.
.IN THE MEANTIME I HAVE COME TO AN AGREEMENT WITH MR.
PASCAL D'SILVA TO MOVE INTO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY TO OPEN UP A
PROPERTY MANAGEMENT AND INVESTMENT CO.
MR. D'SILVA APPROACHED MR. SAWYER FOR MOVING INTO THE
ACILITY AND MR. SAWYER WANTS MR. D'SILVA TO PAY A $700.00
FEE TO GO THROUGH THE SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW.
I FEEL VERY STRONGLY THAT THIS ADDITIONAL FEE IS
UNJUSTIFIED IN LIGHT OF THE FACT THAT JUST 2 MONTHS AGO I
SPENT IN EXCESS OF 01100.00 FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ALONG
WITH SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW. PLEASE BEAR IN MIND WHEN
IN MARCH OF 88, I HAD APPLIED FOR THE ABOVE THE BUILDING
DEPARTMENT PEOPLE DID INSPECT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND THEY
DID STIPULATE AS TO THEIR REQUIREMENTS.
PLEASE BEAR IN MIND THAT I AM MAKING ALL ATTEMPTS TO
CLEAN UP THIS PROPERTY AND TO GET RESPONSIBLE PEOPLE MOVED IN
TO MAINTAIN AND UPKEEP THE PROPERTY, AND WITH THIS IN MIND I
NEED THE CO-OPERATION OF THE CITY.
ATTACHMENT A
I AM HEREBY REQUESTING THAT THE 0700.00 FEE BE WAIVED
AND FOLLOWING WORK TO BE DONE ON THE PROPERTY.
1. CLEAN ALL WEEDS UP ON ASPHALT AND SEAL COAT THE
COMPLETE PARKING LOT AND STRIPE FOR PARKING.
2. REPLANT AND MAINTAIN THE PLANTER BOX AT THE ENTRANCE
OF THE BUILDING.
3. SIGNS TO BE PLACED AS PER SECTION 18.72 OF THE GRAND
TERRACE MUNICIPAL CODE.
4' PLEASE BEAR IN MIND THAT THIS BUILDING HAS BEEN OCCUPIED
BY ME FOR MY CONSTRUCTION OFFICE AS EARLY AS 7 MONTHS AGO AND
RIGHTFULLY SPEAKING I SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO HAVE AN OFFICE IN
THIS LOCATION WITH NO REQUIREMENTS ATTACHED, HOWEVER MR.
D'SILVA LIKES TO HAVE A CLEAN OFFICE LOCATION AND HAS AGREED
TO DO THE ABOVE MENTIONED 3 ITEMS.
WE ARE'REQUESTING YOUR CO-OPERATION IN THIS MATTER SO WE
CAN MOVE AHEAD AND IMPROVE THIS CORNER LOCATION.
IF YOU HAVE ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE
TO CALL ME AT (714) 798-1247 OR (714) 825-5143.
YOURS TRULY,
RO % TT
RCskl
Enlcs
cc: City Manager
cc: each of the councilmen
BYRON R. MATTESON
Meyor
BARBARA PFENNIGHAUSE�
Mayor Pro Tom
Count# Members
HUGH J. GRANT
DENNIS L. EVANS
SUSAN CRAWFORD
THOMAS J. SCHWAB
City Manger
April 26, 1988
Mr. Ganesh Swamy
10962 Rincon Street
Loma Linda, CA. 92354
Re: Conditional Use Permit 88-2
Dear Mr. Swamy:
This letter is to inform
at its of you that the Planning Commi ssioii,
applicationforliaarCondi.tionalrlUse 1Per.mit88for.
aPProvPd your
agency at 22675 Barton Road subject to the following conditions:
1• The landscaping areas around to
building shall be replanted and maintaithe parkinned by tand
he
thwapplicant per landscape plans to be approvers by the
Planning Department;
2• The parking area shall be restripp
the plans, with handicapped area clearlypeaindiccats in ed; on
3• A loading space will be provided
pursuantSection
18.60.180 of the Grand Terrace MunicipaltCode, its
location to be approved by the Planning Department
Staff;, and
4• All :applications permitted for signs shall be approved
pursuant to Section 18.72 Ofthe Grand
Terrace Municipal Code,
5• Compliance with all of the ordinances of the City of
Grand Terrace with respect to Public Works and Building
and Safety Department (Building Codes).
The Planning Department will
improvements pursuant to Condition Nos, 1 and red 2, abovethe:
to i ] o%%,i ng
P.:
1 • The Parking area s)'al 1 be resurfaced with a5)�l�a I t sc
Swamy/CUP-88-2-
Pa ge 2
that the entire parking area is fully blacktopped. In
other words, the concrete area extending into the
parking area shall be removed and replaced with
asphalt.
2. Following the resurfacing of the parking area, it shall
be clearly striped, pursuant to Section 18.60.170 of
the Grand Terrace Municipal Code.
3. Landscaping improvements shall be made pursuant to
Sections 1.8.60.190 and 18.60.200 of the Grand Terrace
Municipal Code as follows:
"18.60.190 Landscagin R—
spcosnis�'ing of trees,buirem
us,vines,ground coverorany
combination thereof shall be installed and maintained
in commercial and industrial districts according to the
following standards and those of Section 18.60.200:
A. Boundary landscaping shall be provided in the
parking area abutting all public streets except
for the area required for street openings five
feet in width;
B. Internal landscaping in addition to that required
above shall be provided equal to at least five
percent of the parking area, including driveways,
shall also be provided in the parking area;
C. Any landscaped area shall be separated from any
adjacent vehicular area by a wall or curb at least
six inches higher than the adjacent vehicular
area;
D. The height of boundary and interior landscaping
shall be limited to a eight not to exceed three ` feet or, in the case of trees, no branch shall be
below six feet, when within fifteen feet of the
point of intersection of:
2.
A vehicular
street;
A vehicular
sidewalk;
trafficway or driveway and a
trafficway or driveway and a
3. Two or more vehicular trafficways, or
driveways, or streets.
W
Swamy/CUP-88-2
Page 3
E. Landscaping shall be equally distributed
throughout the parking area;
F. Irrigation systems shall be kept in working
condition. Adjustments, replacements, repair and
cleaning shall be a park of regular maintenance.
G. All landscaping shall be protected with concrete
curbs or other acceptable barriers.
18.60.200 Landscaping --Maintenance. The following
18.60.90: apply --to- randscapiri�; required by Section
18.60.90:
A.
Permanent watering facilities all be provided for
all landscaped area.
B.
Required landscaping shall be maintained in a
neat, clean and healthy condition. This includes
pruning, mowing of lawns, weeding, removal of
litter, fertilizing, replacement of plants where
necessary, and the regular watering of all plant
material.
C.
Lawn and ground covers are to be trimmed or mowed
regularly. All planting areas are to be kept free
from weeds and debris.
D.
All plantings are to be kept in a healthy and
growing condition. Fertilization, cultivation and
tree pruning shall be a part of regular
maintenance."
As you can see, these landscaping requirements are taken
directly out of the Municipal Code. They will be applied to any
business seeking to locate at 22675 Barton Road or any of r area
ri -fhe City where aU_6n_ffifi no aT_-1 s —Permit or Site and
Architectural Review is required.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact .
the Planning Department.
Very tr yours,
David Sawyer
Planning Direct0
DATE: June 9, 1988
STAFF REPORT 12.354
C R A ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM ( -�
MEETING DATE: June 23, 1988
AGENDA ITEM NO. -� 5
SUBJECT TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT THE INTERSECTION OF MT. VERNON AND BARTON ROAD
FUNDING REQUIRED
NO FUNDING REQUIRED
OWe bids for this particular project will be received in the office of
the City Clerk at 2:00 P.M. on June 22, 1988.
The Staff will make the presentation and the recommendation to the City
Council at the regular meeting of June 23, 1988 regarding the award of
the contract for the installation of the signal.
Staff Recommends that:
CITY COUNCIL CONSIDER ACTION ON THIS ITEM AT THE REGULAR MEETING ON
JUNE 23rd BASED ON THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION AT THAT TIME.
DATE 6,14 =o
u
CRA ITEM ( )
S T A F F R E P O R T
COUNCIL ITEM (X)
MEETING DATE : 6, 23, 88
SUBJECT: CONTRACT AWARD FOR THE ANNUAL CIVIC CENTER AND
PARK WAY LANDSCAPING 15
Effective July 1, 1988, the existing contract between the City of
Grand Terrace and Los Amigos Landscaping will expire. During the
past year, staff has been quite pleased and impressed with the
dedication and workmanship that has been displayed by Los Amigos
personnel, toward the Civic Center and park way landscaping.
Inasmuch as Los Amigos was by far, the lowest estimate received
last year, and in addition to the excellent service the City has
received, staff does not hesitate in recommending to Council that
the contract again be awarded to the local Grand Terrace business
known as Los Amigos. Further, the contractor is only requesting
an increase of $100.00 per month, over the current contrast price
of $600.00.
Staff Recommends:
COUNCIL AWARD THE ANNUAL CIVIC
MAINTENANCE CONTRACT TO LOS AMIGOS.
RLA
CEIdTE1;; PARKW"-. LANDSCAFE
DATE: June 17, 1988
Ll
S T A F F R E P O R T
CRA ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (xx) MEETING DATE: June 23, 1988
SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO THE HOURLY RATE SCHEDULE
FOR KICAK & ASSOCIATES �5
FUNDING REQUIRED
NO FUNDING REQUIRED
The City staff is submitting proposed Schedule C to amend
contract GTC #79-11 with Kicak and Associates for the delivery
of engineering services to the City of Grand Terrace. The last
amendment to the hourly fee schedule was made two years ago
effective July 1, 1986. The proposed hourly rate schedule is
included as attachment #1.
Staff has obtained for the purposes of comparison the hourly rate
schedules of four engineering companies. These companies have
submitted proposals to the City of Highland for the provision of
engineering services. These schedules are also attached to the
staff report.
In reviewing the rates proposed to the City of Highland, it is
clear that the rates being proposed by Kicak and Associates are
tar not only competitive, but in many cases are fifty percent less
than the rates proposed to Highland.
STAFF RECOMMENDS:
COUNCIL ADOPT PROPOSED SCHEDULE C to KICK AND ASSOCIATES CONTRACT
GT #79-11 EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 1988.
TS:bt
Attachments
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM W (_OF_
ATTACHMENT #1
KICAK AND ASSOCIATES INC.
PROPOSED HOURLY RATE SCHEDULE
TO
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
SCHEDULE A SCHEDULE B SCHEDULE C
Aug., 1983 July 1, 1986 Proposed
July 1, 1988
I. Attendance at City Council
& Planning Commission Meetings:
Principal Engineer
25.00/hr.
28.00/hr.
32.00/hr.
II. All other Engineering Services:
Prinicipal Engineer
36.00lhr.
40.00/hr.
45.00/hr.
Project Engineer
32.00/hr.
35.00/hr.
40.00/hr.
Designer
29.00/hr.
32.00/hr.
36.00/hr.
Draftsman
26.001hr.
29.00/hr.
32.00/hr
Clerical
14.00/hr.
18.00/hr.
20.00/hr.
III.Field Surveys
3-Man Party
90.00/hr.
100.00/hr.
105.00/hr.
2-Man Party
72.00/hr.
80.00/hr.
90.00/hr.
Mileage
.30/mile
.30lmile
.30/mile
IV. Inspections
Building Inspector
26.00/hr.
29.00/hr.
34.00/hr.
Public Works Inspector
26.00/hr.
29.00/hr.
34.00/hr.
V. Miscellaneous
6
Xerox
0.10/copy
0.10/copy
0.10/copy
Blue Line Reproduction
0.25/s.f.
0.25/s.f.
0.50/s.f.
Mylar Reproduction
3.00/s.f.
3.00/s.f.
'3.00/s.f.
Mileage other than surveys
0.25/mile
0.25/mile
0.25/mile
Expert Witness and Court Appearance - to be Arranged.
Sierra Eninear®nc
CIVIL ENGINEERS • LAND SURVEYORS • LAND PLANNER5
FF: -c COS'
FE,-:S :,i: COS''; S _-DEfdr. _.:FIED IIE3EI:: FOP E �GINEERIIN;G
SL_..T C'7S, PL _I,N CHECKS �:',D !; ii':R REL'T7D AREAS OF
RLS TS C .U7LL BE S j �i [0 r J_\IHEIR REV" Eb, R_IOR
L
,T,rTl1r1_41;,'" '7 j_T 5� �, i B�, I.vmA,N•DATOR`�
-�D T^lS OF ALL ENGI`:iEERITdG FEES AND SE1tVICES
F:'C :1- E 1'I:.,E TO ENS_�TRE Ai? EQUITABLE RELATIONSHIP
�� _ . �.. CCS T OF S RV I C LS I:D ttiORi, PERFORMED .
hLL FE.� SCI.EDJLES, ENGIi1EERING COSTS,
URIC =_ '1IL':'� C=.LOUT LS, PRCCESSIIIG PROCEDURES, AS WELL
OL THEE ENGJI-_.rERING DEl YCTMENT , SHALL
D I THE 'JAYOR A:D CITY COUNCIL
RATES
_. _: T RIi•G:
PRI:-PAL
$ 80.00/1-IOUR
SEI�:. 7'NGI1]EER, RCF.
c;5.00/ HOUR
60.00/::CUR
n' 0 . 0 0 ::OUP
SE ._ _. DR:�7`TSTJAI;
45.00/HOUR
D _'• .::G '..FD
35.00/HOUR
r --___ _
_ ._ L.:"i iJ
35.00/HOUR
r. ',l i
Aw
PA: _ : C _ I Il F
6 5 . 0 0 / HOUR
2 CRE�,l
115.00/HOUR
2 — :: CREl ;„/E111D
125.00/HOUR
J ..__.., CRE;?
135.00/HOUR
iti�/}. �11D
/�/�
145 .00/ IIOUR
(714) 888-0772
336 SCL iti `/i/-'ERMIAN. SUITE E • SAN BE NARDI,:O, CALIFORNIA 92408
BSI CONSULTANTS, INC.
SCHEDULE OF HOURLY RATES
April, 1988
C'.ASSIFTCATION
HOURLY RATE
Principal Engineer
$ 95.00
Senior Project Manager
90.00
Prefect Manager
82.00
Senior Civil Engineer
82.00
Civil Engineer
76.00
Civil Engineering Fssociate
72.00
Design Engineer
62.00
Senior Traffic Engineer
80.00
Registered Traffic Engineer
76.00
Traffic Engineering Associate
72.00
Traffic Engineering Assistant
52.00
Senior Right -of -Way Agency
76.00
Right -of -Way Agent
58.00
Senior Plan Checker
67.00
Plan Checker
58.00
Senior Designer
67.00
Designer
58.00
Staff Engineer
55.00
Senior Draftsperson
50.00
Draftsperson
46.00
Technical Aide
34.00
Senior Construction: Inspector
58.00
Construction Inspector
49.00
Registered Landscape Architect
76.00
Associate Landscape Architect
65.00
Assistant Landscape Architect
58.00
Senior Landscape Inspector
58.00
Senior Landscape Plan Checker
65.00
Landscape Plan. Checker
58.00
Landscape Advisor
65.00
Landscape Construction Inspector
49.00
Licensed Land Surveyor
76.00
Partv Chief - 2-Person Survey Crew
142.00
Party Chief - 3-Person Survey Crew
170.00
Supervising Land Su=veyor
72.00
Senior Survey Analyst
67.00
Survey Analyst
58.00
Survey Technician
52.00
CADD Ooerator
75.00
Senior Programmer
65.00
Programr-ner
50.00
Word Processor
34.00
Clerical ;
30.00
Out-of-pocket expenses (blueprinting, reproduction, printing)
will be invoiced at cost plus 151. A 15t fee for
administration, coordination, and handling will be added to
s ulDcontracted services. Mileage will be invoiced at $0.35 per
'fie Schedule of Hourly Rates is effective through March 31, 1989.
Pates may be adjusted after this date to compensate for labor
cast ad3ustments and other increases due to inflationary trends.
i
' �
WILLDAN ASSOCIATES
SCHEDULE OF HOURLY RATES
August 1987
Fee Rate
Classification Per Hour
Engineering
Sr. Consultant
$110.00
Principal Engineer
100.00
Division Manager
88.00
Project Director
82.00
Sr. Engineer
75.00
Sr. Project Manager
73.00
Project Manager
66.00
Associate Engineer
64.00
Sr. Designer (CARD)
64.00
Designer(CADD)
60.00
Supervising Engineer
82.00
Engineering Associate
64.00
Sr. Designer
60.00
Sr. Design Engineer
52.00
Design Engineer
48.00
Sr. Drafter
50.00
Designer
42.00
Sr. Drafter (CAD)
50.00
Drafter (CAD)
46.00
Drafter
40.00
Technical Aide
34.00
Spvsr.-Public Works Observation
66.00
Sr. Public Works Observer
55.00
Public Works Observer
46.00
Sr. Real Property Agent
75.00
Real Property Agent
66.00
Assistant Real Property Agent
55.00
Surveying
Spvsr. Mapping Services
80.00
Sr. Survey Analyst
60.00
Sr. Calculator
60.00
Calculator I=I
50.00
Survey Analyst
50.00
Calculator I
40.00
Spvsr.-Survey
72.00
Survey Party Chief
67.00
Two -Man Field Party
132.00
Three -Man Field Party
170.00
7/27/87 Effective 8/1/87
IM
21
J._Z. DAVIDSON ASSOCIATES, INC.
SCHEDULE OF HOURLY BILLING RATES
EFFECTIVE 'THROUGH JULY 31, 1988
12ev;.sed 11/9/87
RATES
_ _ncipal . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$90.00
Principal Engineer
$76.00
Senior Engineer/Senior Project Manager . . . . . . .
$70.00
Assistant Planning Director/Associate Engineer/
Computer Project Manager/Principal Landscape Architect/
Project Manager . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$64. 00
.._"._sect/Assistant Engineer/ Civil Designer/
..csca3e Arch itect;'Senior Planner . . . . . . . . . . .
$56.00
A: ch:.tectural Planner/Design Drafter/Planner . . . . . . .
$52.00
Computer Project Coordinator . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$46.00
Junior Engineer/Senior Drafter . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$44.00
Associate Planner/Landscape Architectural Designer . . . .
$40.00
Drafter/Senior Computer Technician . . . . . . . . . . . .
$38.00
Assistant Planner/Junior Drafter . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$34.00
Computer Technician . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$28.00
CVtiS:RUCTION MANAGEMENT
Inspector . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $54.00
SURVEYING
Principal Surveyor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $70.00
Sensor Survey Technician . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $64.00
S,:r•:ey Technician . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $52.00
an Survey Party $56.00
2-11an Survey Party . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $108.00
3-Man Survey Party . . •.. . . $154.00
-ravel Time (When in excess of 8hourswork per day)
2-Man Survey Party . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $50.00
3-Man Survey Party . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $73.00
SER`:CES AND EXPENSES:
Secretary/Clerk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $28.00
In-house Reproduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cost
Travel (per Mile) . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Su::,srster. . • • • • 0.33
ce . . . . Cost
Otter Expenses - Including Special Consultants and
P.:rc rased Services through Subcontracts Cost +
20%
Ex_, rt �,itness or Litigation (4-hour minimum,
_nclading preparation time) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $131.00
DATE: June 22, 1988
S T A F F R E P O R T
CRA ITEM ( ) COUNCIL ITEM (xx) MEETING DATE: May 23, 1988
SUBJECT: APPROPRIATION FOR PARKLAND APPROPRIATION •'f S
------------------------------------------------------------------
FUNDING REQUIRED X
NO FUNDING REQUIRED
At the meeting of May 26 in closed session Council directed staff
to obtain an appraisal of the Roberts' parcel for use in
negotiation for acquisition.
Staff came back to Council with an estimate of $2000 to $2500 for
an appropriation. Council directed staff to solicit additional
bids due to the high cost of the original estimates. Staff has
contacted additional appraisers and it appears that an appraisal
will cost approximately $1500.
STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT
COUNCIL APPROPRIATE AN ADDITIONAL $1000 TO THE $500 CURRENTLY
APPROPRIATED FOR THE PURPOSES OF OBTAINING AN ACQUISITION
APPRAISAL OF THE POTENTIAL PARK SITE.
TS:bt